Next Article in Journal
Dietary Soy Prevents Alcohol-Mediated Neurocognitive Dysfunction and Associated Impairments in Brain Insulin Pathway Signaling in an Adolescent Rat Model
Previous Article in Journal
Impacts of Bacteriostatic and Bactericidal Antibiotics on the Mitochondria of the Age-Related Macular Degeneration Cybrid Cell Lines
Previous Article in Special Issue
Neuroinflammation Is Associated with GFAP and sTREM2 Levels in Multiple Sclerosis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 12
Issue 5
10.3390/biom12050677
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Inter-Laboratory Concordance of Cerebrospinal Fluid and Serum Kappa Free Light Chain Measurements

by
Patrizia Natali
1,
Roberta Bedin
2,
Gaetano Bernardi
3,
Elena Corsini
3,
Eleonora Cocco
4,
Lucia Schirru
4,
Ilaria Crespi
5,
Marta Lamonaca
5,
Arianna Sala
6,
Cinzia Nicolò
7,
Massimiliano Di Filippo
8,
Alfredo Villa
9,
Viviana Nociti
10,
Teresa De Michele
11,
Paola Cavalla
12,
Paola Caropreso
13,
Francesca Vitetta
14,
Maria Rosaria Cucinelli
1,
Matteo Gastaldi
15,
Tommaso Trenti
1,
Patrizia Sola
14,
Diana Ferraro
2,14,* and
on behalf of RIREMS (Rising Researchers in MS)
†add Show full author list remove Hide full author list
1
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria and Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale, 41126 Modena, Italy
2
Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neurosciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41126 Modena, Italy
3
Laboratory Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy
4
Multiple Sclerosis Center, ATS Sardegna/University of Cagliari, 09047 Cagliari, Italy
5
Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carità of Novara, 28100 Novara, Italy
6
Neurology Unit, CReSM, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Luigi Gonzaga, 10043 Orbassano, Italy
7
Clinical Chemistry and Microbiology Laboratory, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Luigi Gonzaga, 10043 Orbassano, Italy
8
Neurology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, 06132 Perugia, Italy
9
Clinical Pathology and Haematology Laboratory, Azienda Ospedaliera of Perugia, 06132 Perugia, Italy
10
Multiple Sclerosis Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Catholic University, 00168 Rome, Italy
11
Clinical Chemistry, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
12
Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy
13
Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy
14
Neurology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Modena, 41126 Modena, Italy
15
Neuroimmunology Laboratory, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
RIREMS are listed in acknowledgments.
Biomolecules 2022, 12(5), 677; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biom12050677
Submission received: 21 March 2022 / Revised: 30 April 2022 / Accepted: 4 May 2022 / Published: 7 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Events in Neurodegenerative and Neuroinflammatory Diseases in Italy: Implications for Treatments)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The kappa index (K-Index), calculated by dividing the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)/serum kappa free light chain (KFLC) ratio by the CSF/serum albumin ratio, is gaining increasing interest as a marker of intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis. However, data on inter-laboratory agreement of these measures is lacking. The aim was to assess the concordance of CSF and serum KFLC measurements, and of K-index values, across different laboratories. KFLC and albumin of 15 paired CSF and serum samples were analyzed by eight participating laboratories. Four centers used Binding Site instruments and assays (B), three used Siemens instruments and assays (S), and one center used a Siemens instrument with a Binding Site assay (mixed). Absolute individual agreement was calculated using a two-way mixed effects intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Cohen’s kappa coefficient (k) was used to measure agreement on positive (≥5.8) K-index values. There was an excellent agreement in CSF KFLC measurements across all laboratories (ICC (95% confidence interval): 0.93 (0.87–0.97)) and of serum KFLC across B and S laboratories (ICC: 0.91 (0.73–0.97)), while ICC decreased (to 0.81 (0.53–0.93)) when including the mixed laboratory in the analysis. Concordance for a positive K-Index was substantial across all laboratories (k = 0.77) and within S laboratories (k = 0.71), and very good (k = 0.89) within B laboratories, meaning that patients rarely get discordant results on K-index positivity notwithstanding the testing in different laboratories and the use of different platforms/assays.

1. Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory and neurodegenerative disorder of the central nervous system (CNS). An early and accurate diagnosis is particularly relevant for patient management since disease-modifying therapies are most effective at the early stages of the disease [1].
Diagnostic criteria for MS require the demonstration of dissemination in time (DIT) and space (DIS) of demyelinating lesions within the CNS and the exclusion of other possible diagnoses, associated with at least one clinical episode of neurological dysfunction. According to the 2017 revisions of the McDonald diagnostic criteria for MS, the diagnosis of this disease is based on clinical symptoms, imaging by MRI and laboratory testing including CSF examination. The detection of CSF IgG oligoclonal bands (OCB) plays an important role as it permits the substitution of the DIT criterion [2].
Intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis is a hallmark of MS. Using isoelectrofocusing (IEF), OCB can be detected in up to 95% of cases with clinically definite MS andin 68–83% of patients with a first demyelinating event of the CNS, a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) [3,4,5]. On the other hand, OCB may be present also in other inflammatory CNS disorders, and therefore, this test is not specific for MS [4,6].
The current laboratory methods for the detection of intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis are either quantitative, such as the IgG-Index (CSF IgG/Serum IgG divided by CSF albumin/Serum albumin), or qualitative, through the visual detection of OCB on post-IEF, IgG-specific immunoblot. The latter is considered the gold standard [2,7]. Both methods, however, have weaknesses. IgG-Index in MS diagnostics is known to have a low sensitivity [8], while IEF is time-consuming, expensive and, due to its visual interpretation, prone to interrater variability [9,10,11].
B-lymphocytes and plasma cells synthesize a large amount of kappa (KFLC) and lambda (LFLC) free light chains during immunoglobulin assembly [12]. In a healthy state, light chains are produced in slight excess over heavy chains, and the level of unbound light chains, or FLC, in serum and CSF is low. The production of FLC might be abnormally enhanced under pathological conditions such as inflammatory diseases. If an intrathecal synthesis of any immunoglobulin class, whether polyclonal, or oligoclonal, is present, an increase of CSF FLC over serum FLC can be demonstrated [13,14,15], with regard to both KFLC and LFLC. Several studies [11,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24] have demonstrated that CSF KFLC are more sensitive and specific for MS and other inflammatory CNS diseases compared to CSF LFLC.
The kappa index (K-Index), calculated by dividing the CSF KFLC/serum KFLC divided by the CSF albumin/serum albumin, which, in turn, measures the blood-CSF barrier permeability, is gaining increasing interest as a marker of intrathecal activation of the humoral immune response [4,17,25,26,27]. This is of particular relevance in the diagnostic work-up of suspected MS.
Several studies have assessed intrathecal KFLC synthesis using the K-Index or a hyperbolic reference range (quotient diagrams), demonstrating a predictive value similar to OCB for a MS diagnosis [13,21,22,28,29,30,31], its promise lying also in the automated, low-cost, rapid and objective, quantitative nature of the laboratory method. However, data on the inter-laboratory agreement in CSF and serum KFLC measurements obtained with different instruments is lacking [32].
The aim of the present study was to assess the inter-laboratory agreement among laboratories using different platforms—immunonephelometry or immunoturbidimetry—in the determination of CSF/serum KFLC concentrations and of K-Index.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

Serum and CSF from patients undergoing venous sampling and spinal tap were collected and stored at −80 °C. At the time of the diagnostic procedure, patients consented to biobank storage and future research purposes of the biological samples (Ethics Committee approval nr. 967/2017).
Subsequently, 15 pools of serum and 15 pools of corresponding CSF were made using serum and CSF with similar K-Index values, until a volume of approximately 5 mL of serum and 5 mL of CSF was reached. Samples were selected in order to ensure both high (>10) and very low (1–2) K-index values, as well as K-index values around the cut-off value of 5.8. Samples originated from a total of 37 patients. None of them had been treated with immunomodulatory treatments or had renal function impairment [33]. Diagnoses were Multiple Sclerosis/inflammatory CNS diseases (nr = 20) or, in cases of lower or unmeasurable CSF KFLC values, normal pressure hydrocephalus (nr = 2), polyneuropathy (nr = 5), Guillain-Barré Syndrome (nr = 2), dementia (nr = 2) or meningo/encephalitis (nr = 6). The 15 pairs obtained were then divided into aliquots of about 0.5 mL and sent in dry ice to the 8 Italian centers participating in the study.
Out of the eight participating laboratories, four used turbidimeter and reagents The Binding Site (Birmingham, UK) (B), three used Siemens Healthineers (Erlangen, Germany) nephelometer and reagents (S) and one used the Siemens Healthineers instrument with The Binding Site reagents (mixed). Each laboratory used the same platform and reagent batches for all measurements.

2.2. Immunoturbidimetry

Turbidimetric assay was performed by Optilite (Binding Site). The determination of soluble antigen concentration by turbidimetric methods involves the reaction with specific antiserum to form insoluble antigen–antibody complexes. When light passes through the suspension formed, a portion of the light is transmitted and focused onto a photodiode by an optical lens system. The amount of transmitted light is directly proportional to the specific protein’s concentration in the sample. Concentration is automatically calculated by reference to a calibration curve stored within the instrument. As a kinetic reaction, 7 readings are taken at different times and coded by software that automatically obtains the sample concentration and detects excess antigen—that could produce falsely low results—based on the reaction rate.
The reagent consists of a sheep polyclonal monospecific antibody, and to enhance the reaction, the antibody is coated onto a polystyrene latex particle, allowing amplification of the signal. The Binding Site reagents for Optilite is Freelite Mx Kappa Free Kit for both CSF and serum (range 0.33–127 mg/L). Freelite reacts only with exposed free light chain epitopes, which are hidden when the light chain is bound to the heavy chain. As for albumin, the Low-Level Albumin kit for CSF (linearity range 11–333 mg/L) and Albumin kit for serum (linearity range 2000–66,500 mg/L) were used.

2.3. Immunonephelometry

Nephelometric assay was performed with BN II System (Siemens Healthineers). The antigen–antibody reaction produces an insoluble immunocomplex whose scattered light is measured at a fixed angle of 13–24 degrees and with fixed-time kinetics end-point measurement. These aggregates scatter a beam of light passed through the sample. The intensity of the scattered light is proportional to the concentration of the respective protein in the sample. The result is evaluated by comparison with a standard of known concentration. The instrument for FLC assays uses built-in pre-reaction protocols for the detection of antigen excess to avoid false-low test results.
The reagent is based upon the principles of particle-enhanced immunonephelometry. Siemens reagent is N Latex FLC kappa assay (linearity range 0.034–110 mg/L) in both CSF and serum and consists of a suspension of polystyrene particles coated with murine monoclonal antibodies against human KFLC. As for albumin measurement, the N Albumin antiserum anti-human albumin (linearity range 17.0–110,000 mg/L) in CSF and serum was used.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Values were expressed as median and interquartile ranges (IQR). Differences in CSF/serum KFLC and CSF/serum albumin measurements among different laboratories were sought using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by post hoc tests. Absolute individual agreement between laboratories was calculated using a two-way mixed effects intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient for CSF and serum KFLC measurements was applied to pairs of laboratories [34]. Cohen’s kappa coefficient was used to measure inter-laboratory agreement on positive (≥5.8) kappa index values. This cut-off was chosen on the basis of a previous study conducted in our laboratory and on literature data [17,23]. Analysis was performed using STATA16 software (StataCorp LLC, College Station TX, USA). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

Median CSF/serum KFLC concentrations, K-index values (Figure 1) and CSF/serum albumin measurements (Figure S1) were calculated for the 15 CSF and serum samples determined in each laboratory.
There were no statistically significant differences in overall CSF KFLC and albumin measurements, nor of K-index values, among laboratories. Serum KFLC and albumin levels, however, differed significantly (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively) among laboratories, with only a few pairs of laboratories accounting for the difference at post hoc analysis. In particular, serum KFLC levels differed between the mixed laboratory (7.21 mg/L IQR: 5.32–9.34) versus three S laboratories (14.9 mg/L, IQR: 10.2–17.5; 15.37 mg/L, IQR: 10.45–18.58; 17.02 mg/L, IQR: 11–19.2) and two B laboratories (18.56 mg/L, IQR: 13.02–22.72; 15.6 mg/L, IQR: 11.18.2) and serum albumin levels differed between a S laboratory (3590 mg/dL, IQR: 3380–3890) and both a B (4090 mg/dL, IQR: 3800–4470) and the mixed (4145 mg/dL, IQR: 3825–4505) laboratory. Table 1 shows the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for CSF and serum KFLC concentrations and for K-index among B laboratories, among S laboratories, and among B + S and among all laboratories, including the mixed one. Briefly, the ICC is greater for CSF KFLC and albumin as opposed to serum measurements, and ICC decreases for serum KFLC and K-index measurements when the mixed laboratory is included in the analyses.
Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient ranged from 0.769 (95%CI: 0.666–0.873) between a B and an S laboratory, to 0.997 (95%CI: 0.994–0.999)], between two S laboratories, for CSF KFLC measurements (Figure 2) and from 0.403 (95%CI: 0.213–0.593), between a B and the mixed laboratory, to 0.991 (95%CI: 0.984–0.999), between two S laboratories, for serum KFLC measurements. Cohen’s kappa coefficient for a positive K-index (≥5.8) was 0.89 across B laboratories, 0.71 across S laboratories, and 0.77 across all laboratories. In particular, of the 15 samples analyzed at the eight laboratories, in 11 samples all laboratories gave concordant positive or negative findings, in one case one laboratory gave a discordant negative result (4.6), in one case one laboratory gave a discordant positive result (9.8), and in two cases, more than one laboratory gave discordant negative results, with K-index values (between 4.8 and 5.5), however, quite near the chosen cut-off of 5.8 (Table 2). The KFLC intrathecal fraction and the local KFLC concentrations according to Reiber’s diagram for KFLC [29] are shown in Tables S1 and S2.

4. Discussion

The K-index is gaining increasing interest as a possibly more sensitive marker of intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis compared to OCB in the diagnostic work-up of MS and other CNS inflammatory diseases [25,26,27,28,35,36]. However, several issues remain unresolved: the absence of a recognized international FLC reference standard, scarce data on the CSF matrix stability, several influencing factors on KFLC concentration, e.g., blood contamination, storage conditions, used sampling tubes and, finally, the lack of external quality control [14,32,37,38].
The results obtained in this study demonstrate an excellent agreement in CSF KFLC measurements across all laboratories, notwithstanding the use of different platforms and assays. Serum KFLC measurements were slightly less concordant, especially when including the laboratory using a S instrument coupled with a B assay in the analyses. Serum albumin measurements, which in turn influence the K-index calculation, showed less concordance compared to CSF albumin measurements (ICC of 0.79 versus 0.97, respectively), even though the external interlaboratory quality control by INSTAND (Düsseldorf, Germany) [39] shows a good agreement among the serum albumin measurements on the different immunochemistry analyzers [40]. Nevertheless, K-Index values showed an excellent agreement among B and S laboratories and, in particular, among laboratories using the same instrument and assay (B or S); this may be explained by the fact that K-index is a ratio of values obtained from the same instrument and this eliminates the bias that occurs when comparing absolute values.
Currently, the only certificate platforms for CSF FLC assays are two: B and S, based on different reaction principles. B, the oldest platform, on the market since 2001, uses a turbidimeter and a polyclonal antibody-based assay; S, launched on the market ten years later, in 2011, is a nephelometer and uses a monoclonal antibody-based assay. Various authors have highlighted the critical issues related to the detection of FLC [37,38,41,42,43,44]. These methods rely on different calibrators, different analytical methods, different reference ranges and have a different sensitivity. Finally, FLC concentrations in normal CSF are often so low that they cannot be measured despite latex particle enhancement [38].
Despite the highlighted issues, and notwithstanding the low number of samples included and the possibility of greater sampling variability, the results of our study show an excellent agreement in CSF and serum KFLC measurements, in particular among laboratories using either a B analyzer coupled with a B assay or an S instrument coupled to an S assay. Several authors have evaluated serum KFLC data obtained from the two platforms B and S; they concluded that B yields higher values compared to S or, vice versa, S yields lower values compared to B: as no international standard exists an exact value cannot be established [45,46,47,48]. These discrepancies, however, are found mainly in the context of very high serum FLC values, as can be found in patients with multiple myeloma. Patients with lymphoproliferative diseases were not included in our study and all obtained serum KFLC values were within normal limits: this may explain the good agreement between the values obtained from both platforms in the present study. With regard to CSF KFLC measurements, Zeman et al. compared five methods, including nephelometry and turbidimetry, for FLC quantification. Their results are very similar to ours: they found a good correlation between nephelometry and turbidimetry, which was higher for CSF KFLC (rho = 0.979) than for serum KFLC (rho = 0.865) measurements. Furthermore, the observed differences did not impact the prediction of oligoclonal FLC which was considered the reference method [41].
The only laboratory using a combined solution, S analyzer and B assay seemed to underestimate serum KFLC measurements which, in turn, increased K-index values, but no conclusions can be drawn at this point, and Süße et al. [49], on the other hand, describe a good agreement between S and B assays used on the same S platform. In particular, the study analyzed 69 samples and showed a good agreement in Passing–Bablok regression analysis (R2 = 0.94 for CSF KFLC, R2 = 0.88 for serum KFLC).

5. Conclusions

The findings of the present study are encouraging, as they demonstrate an excellent agreement in CSF KFLC and a very good agreement in serum KFLC measurements among participating laboratories using different platforms and assays. However, the institutionalization of KFLC external quality control and the increase in the number of participating laboratories is needed in order to ensure harmonized and comparable data for the benefit of clinicians and patients.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/biom12050677/s1. Figure S1: Box-plots showing median (±IQR) CSF (mg/dL) (a) and serum (g/L) (b) albumin concentrations (mg/L) of the 15 samples across laboratories using Binding Site instruments and assays (B), Siemens instruments and assays (S) or a Siemens instrument coupled with a Binding Site assay (mixed). Upper whiskers show the largest observation ≤ (third quartile + 1.5 × IQR); lower whiskers show the smallest value ≥ (lower quartile + 1.5 × IQR); black dots show outliers. Table S1: KFLC intrathecal fraction in relation to Qmean according to Reiber’s diagram across laboratories using Binding Site instruments and assays (B), Siemens instruments and assays (S) or a Siemens instrument coupled with a Binding Site assay (mixed). Calculations were done using the free software available at www.albaum.it (accessed on 18 March 2022). Table S2: Local KFLC concentrations according to Reiber’s diagram across laboratories using Binding Site instruments and assays (B), Siemens instruments and assays (S) or a Siemens instrument coupled with a Binding Site assay (mixed). Calculations were done using the free software available at www.albaum.it (accessed on 18 March 2022).

Author Contributions

Each author provided individual contributions to the research as follows: Conceptualization, D.F., R.B., P.N. and RIREMS; methodology, M.G.; software, D.F. and P.N.; validation and formal analysis, T.T., G.B., E.C. (Elena Corsini), E.C. (Eleonora Cocco), L.S., I.C., M.L., A.S., C.N., M.D.F., A.V., V.N., T.D.M., P.C. (Paola Cavalla), P.C. (Paola Caropreso), F.V. and M.R.C.; data curation, D.F. and R.B.; writing—original draft preparation, P.N.; writing—review and editing D.F.; supervision, P.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Obtained at the time of the diagnostic procedure.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

RIREMS members are listed at http://www.rirems.it/comitato-scientifico/ (accessed on 18 March 2022).

Conflicts of Interest

Disclosure: D.F., has received travel funding and speaker honoraria from The Binding Site Group (Birmingham, UK) and support to her institution through the supply of Freelite kits for research purposes. P.N., R.B., G.B., E.C. (Elena Corsini), E.C. (Eleonora Cocco), G.C., I.C., M.L., A.S., C.N., V.N., T.D.M., P.C. (Paola Cavalla), P.C. (Paola Caropreso), M.D.F, A.V., F.V., M.G., M.R.C., T.T. and P.S. have nothing to disclose in relation to the study.

References

  1. Iaffaldano, P.; Lucisano, G.; Butzkueven, H.; Hillert, J.; Hyde, R.; Koch-Henriksen, N.; Magyari, M.; Pellegrini, F.; Spelman, T.; Sørensen, P.S.; et al. Early treatment delays long-term disability accrual in RRMS: Results from the BMSD network. Mult. Scler. 2021, 27, 1543–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Thompson, A.J.; Banwell, B.L.; Barkhof, F.; Carroll, W.M.; Coetzee, T.; Comi, G.; Correale, J.; Fazekas, F.; Filippi, M.; Freedman, M.S.; et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2018, 17, 162–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dobson, R.; Ramagopalan, S.; Davis, A.; Giovannoni, G. Cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal bands in multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndromes: A meta-analysis of prevalence, prognosis and effect of latitude. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2013, 84, 909–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Puthenparampil, M.; Altinier, S.; Stropparo, E.; Zywicki, S.; Poggiali, D.; Cazzola, C.; Toffanin, E.; Ruggero, S.; Grassivaro, F.; Zaninotto, M.; et al. Intrathecal K free light chain synthesis in multiple sclerosis at clinical onset associates with local IgG production and improves the diagnostic value of cerebrospinal fluid examination. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2018, 25, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Berek, K.; Bsteh, G.; Auer, M.; Di Pauli, F.; Zinganell, A.; Berger, T.; Deisenhammer, F.; Hegen, H. Cerebrospinal Fluid Findings in 541 Patients with Clinically Isolated Syndrome and Multiple Sclerosis: A Monocentric Study. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 675307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Petzold, A. Intrathecal oligoclonal IgG synthesis in multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2013, 262, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Freedman, M.S.; Thompson, E.J.; Deisenhammer, F.; Giovannoni, G.; Grimsley, G.; Keir, G.; Öhman, S.; Racke, M.K.; Sharief, M.; Sindic, C.J.M.; et al. Recommended Standard of Cerebrospinal Fluid Analysis in the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis. Adv. Neurol. 2006, 98, 147–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Mclean, B.N.; Luxton, R.W.; Thompson, E.J. A study of immunoglobulin g in the cerebrospinal fluid of 1007 patients with suspected neurological disease using isoelectric focusing and the log igg-index: A comparison and diagnostic applications. Brain 1990, 113, 1269–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sellebjerg, F.; Christiansen, M. Qualitative assessment of intrathecal IgG synthesis by isoelectric focusing and immunodetection: Interlaboratory reproducibility and interobserver agreement. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Investig. 1996, 56, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Franciotta, D.; Lolli, F. Interlaboratory reproducibility of isoelectric focusing in oligoclonal band detection. Clin. Chem. 2007, 53, 1557–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Christiansen, M.; Gjelstrup, M.C.; Stilund, M.; Christensen, T.; Petersen, T.; Jon Møller, H. Cerebrospinal fluid free kappa light chains and kappa index perform equal to oligoclonal bands in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2018, 57, 210–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sladkova, V.; Mares, J.; Hlustik, P.; Langova, J.; Kanovsky, P. Intrathecal synthesis in particular types of multiple sclerosis. Biomed. Pap. 2014, 158, 124–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Crespi, I.; Sulas, M.G.; Mora, R.; Naldi, P.; Vecchio, D.; Comi, C.; Cantello, R.; Bellomo, G. Combined use of kappa free light chain index and isoelectrofocusing of cerebro-spinal fluid in diagnosing multiple sclerosis: Performances and costs. Clin. Lab. 2017, 63, 551–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hannich, M.J.; Dressel, A.; Budde, K.; Petersmann, A.; Nauck, M.; Süße, M. Kappa Free Light Chains in the Context of Blood Contamination, and Other IgA- and IgM-Related Cerebrospinal Fluid Disease Pattern. Cells 2021, 10, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Duranti, F.; Pieri, M.; Centonze, D.; Buttari, F.; Bernardini, S.; Dessi, M. Determination of kFLC and K index in cerebrospinal fluid: A valid alternative to assessintrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2013, 263, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gudowska-Sawczuk, M.; Tarasiuk, J.; Kułakowska, A.; Kochanowicz, J.; Mroczko, B. Kappa free light chains and IgG combined in a novel algorithm for the detection of multiple sclerosis. Brain Sci. 2020, 10, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ferraro, D.; Trovati, A.; Bedin, R.; Natali, P.; Franciotta, D.; Santangelo, M.; Camera, V.; Vitetta, F.; Varani, M.; Trenti, T.; et al. Cerebrospinal fluid free light kappa and lambda chains in oligoclonal band-negative patients with suspected Multiple Sclerosis. Eur. J. Neurol. 2020, 27, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Crespi, I.; Vecchio, D.; Serino, R.; Saliva, E.; Virgilio, E.; Sulas, M.G.; Bellomo, G.; Dianzani, U.; Cantello, R.; Comi, C.; et al. K Index is a Reliable Marker of Intrathecal Synthesis, and an Alternative to IgG Index in Multiple Sclerosis Diagnostic Work-Up. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Altinier, S.; Puthenparampil, M.; Zaninotto, M.; Toffanin, M.; Ruggero, S.; Gallo, P.; Plebani, M. Free light chain in elebrospinal fluid of multiple sclerosis patients negative for IgG oligoclonal bands. Clin. Chim. Acta 2019, 496, 117–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fischer, C.; Arneth, B.; Koehler, J.; Lotz, J.; Lackner, K.J. Kappa Free Light Chains in Cerebrospinal Fluid as Markers of Intrathecal Immunoglobulin Synthesis. Clin. Chem. 2004, 50, 1809–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Gurtner, K.M.; Shosha, E.; Bryant, S.C.; Andreguetto, B.D.; Murray, D.L.; Pittock, S.J.; Willrich, M.A.V. CSF free light chain identification of demyelinating disease: Comparison with oligoclonal banding and other CSF indexes. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2018, 27, 1071–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kaplan, B.; Ganelin-Cohen, E.; Golderman, S.; Livneh, A. Dignostic utility of kappa free light chains in multiple sclerosis. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2019, 19, 227–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Presslauer, S.; Milosavljevic, D.; Brücke, T.; Bayer, P.; Hübl, W. Elevated levels of kappa free light chains in CSF support the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. 2008, 255, 1508–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Presslauer, S.; Milosavljevic, D.; Huebl, W.; Aboulenein-Djamshidian, F.; Krugluger, W.; Deisenhammer, F.; Senel, M.; Tumani, H.; Hegen, H. Validation of kappa free light chains as a diagnostic biomarker in multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome: A multicenter study. Mult. Scler. 2016, 22, 502–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Vecchio, D.; Crespi, I.; Virgilio, E.; Naldi, P.; Campisi, M.; Serino, R.; Dianzani, U.; Bellomo, G.; Cantello, R.; Comi, C. Kappa free light chains could predict early disease course in multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2019, 30, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Voortman, M.M.; Stojakovic, T.; Pirpamer, L.; Jehna, M.; Langkammer, C.; Scharnagl, H.; Reindl, M.; Ropele, S.; Seifert-Held, T.; Archelos, J.-J.; et al. Prognostic value of free light chains lambda and kappa in early multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 2017, 23, 1496–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Menéndez-Valladares, P.; García-Sánchez, M.I.; Adorna Martínez, M.; García De Veas Silva, J.L.; Bermudo Guitarte, C.; Izquierdo Ayuso, G. Validation and meta-analysis of kappa index biomarker in multiple sclerosis diagnosis. Autoimmun. Rev. 2019, 18, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ferraro, D.; Bedin, R.; Natali, P.; Franciotta, D.; Smolik, K.; Santangelo, M.; Immovilli, P.; Camera, V.; Vitetta, F.; Gastaldi, M.; et al. Kappa Index Versus CSF Oligoclonal Bands in Predicting Multiple Sclerosis and Infectious/Inflammatory CNS Disorders. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Reiber, H.; Zeman, D.; Kušnierová, P.; Mundwiler, E.; Bernasconi, L. Diagnostic relevance of free light chains in cerebrospinal fluid. The hyperbolic reference range for reliable data interpretation in quotient diagrams. Clin. Chim. Acta 2019, 497, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Senel, M.; Mojib-Yezdani, F.; Braisch, U.; Bachhuber, F.; Lewerenz, J.; Ludolph, A.C.; Otto, M.; Tumani, H. CSF Free Light Chains as a Marker of Intrathecal Immunoglobulin Synthesis in Multiple Sclerosis: A Blood-CSF Barrier Related Evaluation in a Large Cohort. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Schwenkenbecher, P.; Konen, F.F.; Wurster, U.; Jendretzky, K.F.; Gingele, S.; Sühs, K.W.; Pul, R.; Witte, T.; Stangel, M.; Skripuletz, T. The Persisting Significance of Oligoclonal Bands in the Dawning Era of Kappa Free Light Chains for the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Konen, F.F.; Schwenkenbecher, P.; Jendretzky, K.F.; Gingele, S.; Sühs, K.-W.; Tumani, H.; Süße, M.; Skripuletz, T. The Increasing Role of Kappa Free Light Chains in the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis. Cells 2021, 10, 3056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Konen, F.F.; Schwenkenbecher, P.; Wurster, U.; Jendretzky, K.F.; Möhn, N.; Gingele, S.; Sühs, K.-W.; Hannich, M.J.; Grothe, M.; Witte, T.; et al. The Influence of Renal Function Impairment on Kappa Free Light Chains in Cerebrospinal Fluid. J. Cent. Nerv. Syst Dis 2021, 13, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Watson, P.F.; Petrie, A. Method agreement analysis: A review of correct methodology. Theriogenology 2010, 73, 1167–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Presslauer, S.; Milosavljevic, D.; Huebl, W.; Parigger, S.; Schneider-Koch, G.; Bruecke, T. Kappa free light chains: Diagnostic and prognostic relevance in MS and CIS. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e89945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Pieri, M.; Storto, M.; Pignalosa, S.; Zenobi, R.; Buttari, F.; Bernardini, S.; Centonze, D.; Dessi, M. KFLC Index utility in multiple sclerosis diagnosis: Further confirmation. J. Neuroimmunol. 2017, 309, 31–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Graziani, M.S. Measurement of free light chains—Pros and cons of current methods. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2016, 54, 1015–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cigliana, G.; Gulli, F.; Napodano, C.; Pocino, K.; De Santis, E.; Colacicco, L.; Cordone, I.; Conti, L.; Basile, U. Serum free light chain quantitative assays: Dilemma of a biomarker. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2018, 32, e22243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. EQA INSTAND; Düsseldorf, D. Society of the Laboratory Medicine. Available online: https://www.instand-ev.de/en/instand-eqas/eqa-program/ (accessed on 12 December 2021).
  40. Reiber, H. External quality assessment in clinical neurochemistry: Survey of analysis for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteins based on CSF/serum quotients. Clin. Chem. 1995, 41, 256–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zeman, D.; Kušnierová, P.; Švagera, Z.; Všianský, F.; Byrtusova, M.; Hradílek, P.; Kurková, B.; Zapletalová, O.; Bartoš, V. Assessment of intrathecal free light chain synthesis: Comparison of different quantitative methods with the detection of oligoclonal free light chains by isoelectric focusing and affinity-mediated immunoblotting. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0166556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jacobs, J.F.M.; Tate, J.R.; Merlini, G. Is accuracy of serum free light chain measurement achievable? Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2016, 54, 1021–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Tate, J.; Bazeley, S.; Sykes, S.; Mollee, P. Quantitative serum free light chain assay—Analytical issues. Clin. Biochem. Rev. 2009, 30, 131–140. [Google Scholar]
  44. Jacobs, J.F.M.; Hoedemakers, R.M.J.; Teunissen, E.; van der Molen, R.G.; Te Velthuis, H. Effect of sample dilution on two free light chain nephelometric assays. Clin. Chim. Acta 2012, 413, 19–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fleming, C.K.A.; Swarttouw, T.; De Kat Angelino, C.M.; Jacobs, J.F.M.; Russcher, H. Method comparison of four clinically available assays for serum free light chain analysis. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2019, 58, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Daves, M.; Piccin, A.; Roccaforte, V.; Lippi, G. Comparison of Freelite and N-Latex serum free light chain assays: A critical review. Biochem. Med. 2021, 31, 030701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Lock, R.J.; Saleem, R.; Roberts, E.G.; Wallage, M.J.; Pesce, T.J.; Rowbottom, A.; Cooper, S.J.; McEvoy, E.D.; Taylor, J.L.; Basu, S. A multicenter study comparing two methods for serum free light chain analysis. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 2013, 50, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Schieferdecker, A.; Hörber, S.; Ums, M.; Besemer, B.; Bokemeyer, C.; Peter, A.; Weisel, K. Comparison of three different serum-free light-chain assays—implications on diagnostic and therapeutic monitoring of multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2020, 10, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Süße, M.; Hannich, M.; Petersmann, A.; Zylla, S.; Pietzner, M.; Nauck, M.; Dressel, A. Kappa free light chains in cerebrospinal fluid to identify patients with oligoclonal bands. Eur. J. Neurol. 2018, 25, 1134–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomolecules 12 00677 g001 550
Figure 1. Box-plots showing median (±IQR) CSF (a) and serum (b) KFLC concentrations (mg/L), and K-index (CSF KFLC/Serum KFLC)/(CSF Albumin/serum Albumin) values (c) of the 15 samples across laboratories using Binding Site instruments and assays (B), Siemens instruments and assays (S) or a Siemens instrument coupled with a Binding Site assay (mixed). Upper whiskers show the upper adjacent value (UAV) (largest observation ≤ (third quartile + 1.5 × IQR)); lower whiskers show the lower adjacent value (LAV) (smallest value ≥ (lower quartile − 1.5 × IQR)); black dots show outliers (greater than the UAV or lower than the LAV).
Figure 1. Box-plots showing median (±IQR) CSF (a) and serum (b) KFLC concentrations (mg/L), and K-index (CSF KFLC/Serum KFLC)/(CSF Albumin/serum Albumin) values (c) of the 15 samples across laboratories using Binding Site instruments and assays (B), Siemens instruments and assays (S) or a Siemens instrument coupled with a Binding Site assay (mixed). Upper whiskers show the upper adjacent value (UAV) (largest observation ≤ (third quartile + 1.5 × IQR)); lower whiskers show the lower adjacent value (LAV) (smallest value ≥ (lower quartile − 1.5 × IQR)); black dots show outliers (greater than the UAV or lower than the LAV).
Biomolecules 12 00677 g001
Biomolecules 12 00677 g002 550
Figure 2. Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient for CSF KFLC measurements in the least concordant (a) pair of laboratories (0.769 (95%CI: 0.666–0.873)) and in the best concordant pair (b) (0.997 (95%CI: 0.994–0.999)).
Figure 2. Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient for CSF KFLC measurements in the least concordant (a) pair of laboratories (0.769 (95%CI: 0.666–0.873)) and in the best concordant pair (b) (0.997 (95%CI: 0.994–0.999)).
Biomolecules 12 00677 g002
Table
Table 1. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) measured for kappa free light chain (KFLC) and albumin concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum and for K-Index = (CSF KFLC/Serum KFLC)/(CSF Albumin/serum Albumin); 95%CI: 95% confidence interval.
Table 1. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) measured for kappa free light chain (KFLC) and albumin concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum and for K-Index = (CSF KFLC/Serum KFLC)/(CSF Albumin/serum Albumin); 95%CI: 95% confidence interval.
ICCCSF KFLC (95%CI)Serum KFLC (95%CI)K-Index
(95%CI)		CSF Albumin (95%CI)Serum Albumin (95%CI)
Binding Site platform and assay (B) (nr = 4)0.96 (0.9–0.98)0.93 (0.63–0.98)0.97 (0.94–0.99)1.00 (0.99–1)0.81 (0.41–0.94)
Siemens platform and assay (S) (nr = 3)0.99 (0.97–100)0.93 (0.48–0.98)0.95 (0.89–0.98)0.99 (0.98–1)0.93 (0.8–0.98)
B + S
(nr = 7)		0.93 (0.85–0.97)0.91 (0.73–0.97)0.91 (0.82–0.96)0.98 (0.96–0.99)0.83 (0.58–0.94)
All laboratories (nr = 8)0.93 (0.87–0.97)0.81 (0.53–0.93)0.65 (0.43–0.84)0.97 (0.96–0.99)0.79 (0.55–0.92)
Table
Table 2. K-index measurements across laboratories using Binding Site instruments and assays (B), Siemens instruments and assays (S) or a Siemens instrument coupled with a Binding Site assay (mixed). Discordant results, considering a cut-off for a positive K-index of 5.8, in bold.
Table 2. K-index measurements across laboratories using Binding Site instruments and assays (B), Siemens instruments and assays (S) or a Siemens instrument coupled with a Binding Site assay (mixed). Discordant results, considering a cut-off for a positive K-index of 5.8, in bold.
SampleB1B1B3B4mixedS1S2S3
1197.0252.1108.3205.3479.5170.5197.9185.6
26.96.44.611.810.55.86.06.7
31.62.52.02.64.82.31.31.4
47.08.65.014.118.45.16.36.4
519.324.316.015.557.014.418.014.8
63.43.12.43.23.62.22.73.4
768.551.442.336.5103.836.542.842.1
818.224.621.121.342.318.817.515.4
919.217.611.510.122.712.215.611.1
101.82.93.20.49.83.22.52.3
117.710.89.611.519.310.37.810.2
1227.128.518.620.086.519.323.120.1
131.11.21.21.21.21.01.00.9
144.88.25.57.014.27.55.56.1
157.012.49.59.723.013.58.48.7
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Natali, P.; Bedin, R.; Bernardi, G.; Corsini, E.; Cocco, E.; Schirru, L.; Crespi, I.; Lamonaca, M.; Sala, A.; Nicolò, C.; et al. Inter-Laboratory Concordance of Cerebrospinal Fluid and Serum Kappa Free Light Chain Measurements. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 677. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biom12050677

AMA Style

Natali P, Bedin R, Bernardi G, Corsini E, Cocco E, Schirru L, Crespi I, Lamonaca M, Sala A, Nicolò C, et al. Inter-Laboratory Concordance of Cerebrospinal Fluid and Serum Kappa Free Light Chain Measurements. Biomolecules. 2022; 12(5):677. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biom12050677

Chicago/Turabian Style

Natali, Patrizia, Roberta Bedin, Gaetano Bernardi, Elena Corsini, Eleonora Cocco, Lucia Schirru, Ilaria Crespi, Marta Lamonaca, Arianna Sala, Cinzia Nicolò, and et al. 2022. "Inter-Laboratory Concordance of Cerebrospinal Fluid and Serum Kappa Free Light Chain Measurements" Biomolecules 12, no. 5: 677. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biom12050677

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop