Next Article in Journal
Salinity-Induced Physiological Changes in Pea (Pisum sativum L.): Germination Rate, Biomass Accumulation, Relative Water Content, Seedling Vigor and Salt Tolerance Index
Next Article in Special Issue
Mutation in the Endo-β-1,4-glucanase (KORRIGAN) Is Responsible for Thick Leaf Phenotype in Sorghum
Previous Article in Journal
Grassland Degradation Has Stronger Effects on Soil Fungal Community Than Bacterial Community across the Semi-Arid Region of Northern China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Understanding the Modus Operandi of Class II KNOX Transcription Factors in Secondary Cell Wall Biosynthesis
 
 
Brief Report
Peer-Review Record

Protoplast-Based Transient Expression and Gene Editing in Shrub Willow (Salix purpurea L.)

by Brennan Hyden 1,2, Guoliang Yuan 1, Yang Liu 1, Lawrence B. Smart 2, Gerald A. Tuskan 1 and Xiaohan Yang 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 11 November 2022 / Revised: 30 November 2022 / Accepted: 10 December 2022 / Published: 13 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biotechnological Advances in Biomass and Bioenergy Production)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this article, the authors describe a methodology for transfection of protoplasts from Salix sp. with the use of vectors expressing several fluorescent proteins. Then, they demonstrate the ability of using the same transfection protocol to induce the editing, with different efficiencies, of 3 different genes.

The results were well presented and attest that both protoplast transfection and genomic editing were achieved with different degrees of efficiency.

For the framing of the article in the Bried Report class I suggest that the authors merge figure 1 and figure 2 into a single figure. Likewise, figure 5 must precede figure 3 and both compose the same new figure "2".

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for the feedback. As requested, Figures 1 and 2 have been merged to create a new “Figure 1” and Figures 3 and 5 have been merged to create a new “Figure 2”, Figure 4 has been renamed “Figure 3”.

Reviewer 2 Report

In this study, authors present an efficient method of protoplast isolation and transient transformation for Salix purpurea L, as well as the first case of CRISPR/Cas-mediated gene editing of a plant of the Salix genus. The manuscript is well written, the results are clear, and the methods are sound. Therefore, I recommend this manuscript for publication.

If I may suggest some improvements for future studies, I would recommend using FIJI image processing software to count cells semi-automatically instead of manual cell counting. And to improve editing efficiency, authors could try to use different promoters and terminators for Cas9 and gRNA expression instead of 35S (e.g., here is a good review including this topic https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.tplants.2021.06.015).

P.S. correct small typos in the text, for example:

line 154: hyromycin -> hygromycin

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for the feedback. Typos in the text have been corrected. In the discussion of future directions, we have included the testing of different promoters and terminators (lines 103-105). We attempted to use FIJI to analyze our images, but the cells were too close together to correctly partition without extensive manual input, and as a result it was much more practical to manually count cells.

Back to TopTop