A Comprehensive Review Uncovering the Challenges and Advancements in the In Vitro Propagation of Eucalyptus Plantations
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Article “A comprehensive review unleashing the challenges and advancements in in-vitro propagated Eucalypt plantations” is written well but some major information is still missing.
1. What’s the importance of this article and it should be described in abstract and in the last Para of introduction and reasons for tissue culture
2. Add History of eucalypt tissue culture
3. 2.2.1 Organogenesis: add different compounds and regulators
4. The key role of plant growth regulators should be added
5. Can we propagate eucalyptus by seeds and cuttings
6. Tree Improvement And genotype conservation should be discussed
7. Limitation, challenges and future direction should be added in separate headings.
8. There are 101 references out of which only 20 references are from 2020- 2023. Most of the references are too old that’s acceptable. At least 50% should be in between 2020- 2023.
9. Ref no. 50 is incomplete.
10. References are not uniform. There font and size varies greatly.
11. Provide some illustration for propagation scheme.
minor improvement needed.
Author Response
Thank you Sir/ Ma’am for your suggestions, considering your valuable feedback report, we have updated the manuscript as follows and highlighted in yellow.
Reviewer 1
Comments and Suggestions for Authors
Article “A comprehensive review unleashing the challenges and advancements in in-vitro propagated Eucalypt plantations” is written well but some major information is still missing.
- What’s the importance of this article and it should be described in abstract and in the last Para of introduction and reasons for tissue culture. Corrected
- Add History of eucalypt tissue culture. Corrected
- 2.2.1 Organogenesis: add different compounds and regulators. Added in the table 1.
- The key role of plant growth regulatorsshould be added. Corrected
- Can we propagate eucalyptus by seeds and cuttings. Added in table 1, 2
- Tree Improvement And genotype conservation should be discussed. Corrected.
- Limitation, challenges and future direction should be added in separate headings. corrected
- There are 101 references out of which only 20 references are from 2020- 2023. Most of the references are too old that’s acceptable. At least 50% should be in between 2020- 2023. We have tried to add all the possible references that could fit in the requirements and directions of this review.
- Ref no. 50 is incomplete. Corrected
- References are not uniform. There font and size varies greatly. Corrected
- Provide some illustration for propagation scheme. Corrected
Reviewer 2 Report
Authors did a review on A comprehensive review unleashing the challenges and advancements in in-vitro propagated Eucalypt plantations. Overall manuscript is well prepared. Some of the minor changes are
1. Abstract should be more discriptive.
2. Some more figures should be added.
3. Check for the uniform formating of headings and subheadings.
4. what is the novelty of this review.
Minor editing of English language required
Author Response
Thank you Sir/ Ma’am for your suggestions, considering your valuable feedback report, we have updated the manuscript as follows. We have highlighted the corrections in yellow.
Reviewer 2
Comments and Suggestions for Authors
Authors did a review on A comprehensive review unleashing the challenges and advancements in in-vitro propagated Eucalypt plantations. Overall manuscript is well prepared. Some of the minor changes are
1. Abstract should be more descriptive. Corrected
- Some more figures should be added. Corrected (Figure 1, 3 added)
- Check for the uniform formating of headings and subheadings. Corrected
- what is the novelty of this review. Corrected (in last para of introduction)
Reviewer 3 Report
This manuscript reviewed the progress in in-vitro propagation of Eucalyptus spp. and its uses in Eucalyptus germplasm preservation. Generally, It is appropriately organized, but it encounters some problems as followings.
Major concerns:
(1) In ‘2.2.1 Organogenesis’, the authors indicated organogenesis refers to the process of shoot regeneration. Actually, organogenesis should include the regeneration of roots, and this part should be described in the manuscript.
(2) In ‘2.2.2 Somatic embryogenesis’, the authors indicated it is a pathway for shoot regeneration. Somatic embryogenesis is also the pathway for root or plantlet regeneration.
(3) Line 253, the authors proposed that somatic embryos may directly develop from pre-embryonic cells. Considering the cultured explants are usually leaves, stems and roots, the sources of pre-embryonic cells should be described.
(4) Figure 2 provided little information, and the items are repeated, for example, ‘Carbohydrates’ is also ‘Organic and inorganic supplements’ and ‘Culture media’, while the above contents have been described in the text. This figure could be deleted.
(5) As to ‘4. in-vitro germplasm preservation’, there is only one sub-title (4.1 cryopreservation and cold storage) in this part, and this sub-title could be deleted. On the other hand, the authors should pay more attention to the writing format of all of the topic titles in the manuscript.
(6) Table 1 and Table 2 should be in the form of three-line table, and the table title should be put above the table. The abbreviations could be put under the table.
Minor concerns:
Line 25, High-quality: high-quality
Line 3, 28, 30, Eucalypt: Eucalyptus
Line 46, 68, 81, Eucalyptus: Eucalyptus (italicized)
Line 67, Traditional and Modern: traditional and modern (not capitalized word)
Line 86, 87, Tropical and Subtropical: tropical and subtropical (not capitalized word)
Line 90, and: and (not italicized)
Line 130, Table 2, Line 156, Line 169, Eucalypt: Eucalyptus
Line 155, Additives: additives (not capitalized word)
Line 161, Five: five
Line 164, 165, stage: Stage
Line 185, Dormant Axillary: dormant axillary
Line 193-207, it is not suitable to capitalize the name of chemical reagents.
Line 204, the full genus name for C. citridora should be provided.
Line 213, Nodal: nodal
Line 242, 244, 264, 267, Eucalypt: Eucalyptus
Line 273, Semisolid: semisolid
Line 284, Red: red
Line 320, Eucalypt: Eucalyptus
Line 329, Tissues of Eucalyptus: tissues of Eucalyptus plants
Line 341, Auxin: auxin
Line 346, Comparing: comparing
Line 362, Gelling: gelling
Line 367: Eucalypt: Eucalyptus
Line 379, eucalyptus: Eucalyptus
Line 382, Eucalypts: Eucalyptus
Line 384, Eucalypt: Eucalyptus
Line 390-419, 440, 442, it is not suitable to capitalize the name of elements and chemical reagents.
Line 420, Eucalypt: Eucalyptus
Line 433, to promote. The: to promote the
Line 434, Eucalyptus: Eucalyptus (italicized)
Line 454, 455, Use of Red/ Blue LEDs and Florescent: use of red/ blue LEDs and florescent
Line 456, Eucalypt: Eucalyptus
Line 460, White: white
Line 466, Carbondioxide: carbon dioxide
Line 493, Eucalypt spp. Have: Eucalyptus spp. have
Line 501, Eucalypt spp. Have: Eucalyptus spp. have
Line 500-510, a very long sentence, it should be reorganized.
Line 506-507, Plant Vitrification Solution (PVS) and Preservation of Axillary buds: plant vitrification solution (PVS) and preservation of axillary buds
Line 512, Half: half
Line 515, the full genus name for C. toleriana should be provided.
Line 515, and: and (not italicized)
Line516, Full: full
Line 521, Eucalypt spp. : Eucalyptus spp.
Line 524, 529, Eucalypts: Eucalyptus
Line 528, 538, Eucalypt: Eucalyptus
Line 530, Eucalypt spp: Eucalyptus spp.
Line 532, ttype: type
Line 536, All: all
References (line 551-884): The format of all of the references needs to be revised. Please pay more attentions to the format of author names, paper titles, plant scientific names, journal titles (full name or abbreviation). There is only one word in [50]. [11] is a copy of [10], and [56] is a copy of [55].
There are a lot of minor errors in English language writing, and it is necessary to revise these errors.
Author Response
Thank you Sir/ Ma’am for your suggestions, considering your valuable feedback report, we have updated the manuscript as follows. We have corrected the manuscript and highlighted in yellow.
Reviewer 3
(1) In ‘2.2.1 Organogenesis’, the authors indicated organogenesis refers to the process of shoot regeneration. Actually, organogenesis should include the regeneration of roots, and this part should be described in the manuscript. Corrected
(2) In ‘2.2.2 Somatic embryogenesis’, the authors indicated it is a pathway for shoot regeneration. Somatic embryogenesis is also the pathway for root or plantlet regeneration. Corrected
(3) Line 253, the authors proposed that somatic embryos may directly develop from pre-embryonic cells. Considering the cultured explants are usually leaves, stems and roots, the sources of pre-embryonic cells should be described. Corrected
(4) Figure 2 provided little information, and the items are repeated, for example, ‘Carbohydrates’ is also ‘Organic and inorganic supplements’ and ‘Culture media’, while the above contents have been described in the text. This figure could be deleted. Corrected
(5) As to ‘4. in-vitro germplasm preservation’, there is only one sub-title (4.1 cryopreservation and cold storage) in this part, and this sub-title could be deleted. On the other hand, the authors should pay more attention to the writing format of all of the topic titles in the manuscript. Corrected
(6) Table 1 and Table 2 should be in the form of three-line table, and the table title should be put above the table. The abbreviations could be put under the table. Corrected
Minor concerns:
Line 25, High-quality: high-quality. Corrected
Line 3, 28, 30, Eucalypt: Eucalyptus. Corrected
Line 46, 68, 81, Eucalyptus: Eucalyptus (italicized). Corrected
Line 67, Traditional and Modern: traditional and modern (not capitalized word). Corrected
Line 86, 87, Tropical and Subtropical: tropical and subtropical (not capitalized word). Corrected
Line 90, and: and (not italicized). Corrected
Line 130, Table 2, Line 156, Line 169, Eucalypt: Eucalyptus. Corrected
Line 155, Additives: additives (not capitalized word). Corrected
Line 161, Five: five. Corrected
Line 164, 165, stage: Stage. Corrected
Line 185, Dormant Axillary: dormant axillary. Corrected
Line 193-207, it is not suitable to capitalize the name of chemical reagents. Corrected
Line 204, the full genus name for C. citridora should be provided. Corrected
Line 213, Nodal: nodal. Corrected
Line 242, 244, 264, 267, Eucalypt: Eucalyptus. Corrected
Line 273, Semisolid: semisolid. Corrected
Line 284, Red: red. Corrected
Line 320, Eucalypt: Eucalyptus. Corrected
Line 329, Tissues of Eucalyptus: tissues of Eucalyptus plants. Corrected
Line 341, Auxin: auxin. Corrected
Line 346, Comparing: comparing. Corrected
Line 362, Gelling: gelling. Corrected
Line 367: Eucalypt: Eucalyptus. Corrected
Line 379, eucalyptus: Eucalyptus. Corrected
Line 382, Eucalypts: Eucalyptus. Corrected
Line 384, Eucalypt: Eucalyptus. Corrected
Line 390-419, 440, 442, it is not suitable to capitalize the name of elements and chemical reagents. Corrected
Line 420, Eucalypt: Eucalyptus. Corrected
Line 433, to promote. The: to promote the. Corrected
Line 434, Eucalyptus: Eucalyptus (italicized). Corrected
Line 454, 455, Use of Red/ Blue LEDs and Florescent: use of red/ blue LEDs and florescent. Corrected
Line 456, Eucalypt: Eucalyptus. Corrected
Line 460, White: white. Corrected
Line 466, Carbondioxide: carbon dioxide. Corrected
Line 493, Eucalypt spp. Have: Eucalyptus spp. have. Corrected
Line 501, Eucalypt spp. Have: Eucalyptus spp. have. Corrected
Line 500-510, a very long sentence, it should be reorganized. Corrected
Line 506-507, Plant Vitrification Solution (PVS) and Preservation of Axillary buds: plant vitrification solution (PVS) and preservation of axillary buds. Corrected
Line 512, Half: half.Corrected
Line 515, the full genus name for C. toleriana should be provided. Corrected
Line 515, and: and (not italicized).Corrected
Line516, Full: full.Corrected
Line 521, Eucalypt spp. : Eucalyptus spp. Corrected
Line 524, 529, Eucalypts: Eucalyptus. Corrected
Line 528, 538, Eucalypt: Eucalyptus. Corrected
Line 530, Eucalypt spp: Eucalyptus spp. Corrected
Line 532, ttype: type. Corrected
Line 536, All: all. Corrected
References (line 551-884): The format of all of the references needs to be revised. Please pay more attentions to the format of author names, paper titles, plant scientific names, journal titles (full name or abbreviation). There is only one word in [50]. [11] is a copy of [10], and [56] is a copy of [55]. Corrected
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Author should add Limitation, challenges and future direction should be added in separate headings before conclusion
minor error need to be corrected
Author Response
Comment: Author should add Limitation, challenges and future direction should be added in separate headings before conclusion.
Response: Dear Sir many thanks for your comment. We have modified the manuscript as suggested.
Reviewer 3 Report
i. Table 1 and Table 2 should be in the form of three-line tables.
ii. One more 'Figure 3' was showed in line 188.
iii. The 'spp.' in line 515, 521 should not be italic.
iv. References (line 574-900): The format of the references needs to be revised. Please pay more attentions to the format of author names, paper titles, journal titles (full name or abbreviation). The editors' name and publisher should be indicated in [51].
The quality of English language writing needs to be improved further.
Author Response
Reviewer2
i. Table 1 and Table 2 should be in the form of three-line tables.
Response: Corrected.
ii. One more 'Figure 3' was showed in line 188.
Response: Corrected.
iii. The 'spp.' in line 515, 521 should not be italic.
Response: Corrected.
iv. References (line 574-900): The format of the references needs to be revised. Please pay more attentions to the format of author names, paper titles, journal titles (full name or abbreviation). The editors' name and publisher should be indicated in [51].
Response: Revised and corrected using zotero.