Next Article in Journal
Optimization of a New Antioxidant Formulation Using a Simplex Lattice Mixture Design of Apium graveolens L., Coriandrum sativum L., and Petroselinum crispum M. Grown in Northern Morocco
Next Article in Special Issue
Improvement in Essential Oil Quantity and Quality of Thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) by Integrative Application of Chitosan Nanoparticles and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi under Water Stress Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Diversity, Distribution, Systematics and Conservation Status of Podocarpaceae
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Different Precursors on Content of Polyphenols in Camellia sinensis In Vitro Callus Culture
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Propagation of Medicinal Plants for Sustainable Livelihoods, Economic Development, and Biodiversity Conservation in South Africa

by
Olufunke O. Fajinmi
1,
Olaoluwa O. Olarewaju
1 and
Johannes Van Staden
2,*
1
Department of Nature Conservation, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Mangosuthu University of Technology, Durban 4031, South Africa
2
Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 20 January 2023 / Revised: 23 February 2023 / Accepted: 28 February 2023 / Published: 3 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Propagation and Cultivation of Medicinal Plants)

Abstract

:
South Africa is blessed with vast plant resources and unique vegetation types. Indigenous South African medicinal plants have been well-harnessed to generate income in rural communities. Many of these plants have been processed into natural products to heal a variety of diseases, making them valuable export commodities. South Africa has one of the most effective bio-conservation policies in Africa, which has protected the South African indigenous medicinal vegetation. However, there is a strong link between government policies for biodiversity conservation, the propagation of medicinal plants as a source of livelihood, and the development of propagation techniques by research scientists. Tertiary institutions nationwide have played a crucial role in the development of effective propagation protocols for valuable South African medicinal plants. The government-restricted harvest policies have also helped to nudge natural product companies and medicinal plant marketers to embrace the cultivated plants for their medicinal uses, and thus have helped support the South African economy and biodiversity conservation. Propagation methods used for the cultivation of the relevant medicinal plants vary according to plant family and vegetation type, among others. Plants from the Cape areas, such as the Karoo, are often resuscitated after bushfires, and propagation protocols mimicking these events have been established through seed propagation protocols with controlled temperatures and other conditions, to establish seedlings of such plants. Thus, this review highlights the role of the propagation of highly utilized and traded medicinal plants in the South African traditional medicinal system. Some valuable medicinal plants that sustain livelihoods and are highly sought-after as export raw materials are discussed. The effect of South African bio-conservation registration on the propagation of these plants and the roles of the communities and other stakeholders in the development of propagation protocols for highly utilized and endangered medicinal plants are also covered. The role of various propagation methods on the bioactive compounds’ composition of medicinal plants and issues of quality assurance are addressed. The available literature, media online news, newspapers, and other resources, such as published books and manuals, were scrutinized for information.

1. Introduction

South Africa is blessed with abundant natural resources, as nearly 10% of all flowering plant species known to humankind exist in South Africa [1]. This is a valuable resource, and around 24,000 plant species have yet to be fully explored for the benefit of humankind [1]. Despite rapid urban and infrastructure development, increased Westernization, and access to conventional western medical facilities, the use of traditional medicine to treat diseases remains high in South Africa [2]. The value of traditional medicinal products extends from the prevention or cure of health problems to their cultural use, for purging and cleansing the body of evil spirits [3] and various other cultural purposes, thus making medicinal plants an important part of South African culture.
The functionality of the whole African traditional medicine system is solely dependent on the availability and sustainability of these endemic plants, and thus the propagation of medicinal plants is a crucial factor to ensure that such plants can be easily sourced when needed for treatment. In several African countries, sourcing medicinal plants from the wild are the norm. However, their propagation will relieve the pressure on the wild populations and conserve highly utilized, vulnerable, scarce, and endangered species. The use of medicinal plants to treat diseases and ailments is an integral part of African culture and is still being practised. Furthermore, the failing healthcare system in Africa makes the use of medicinal plants for health purposes an alternative and well-accepted practice, irrespective of financial status, class, and race. Traditional medicine trade in South Africa is a widespread growing industry, with an estimated income of about R2.9 billion per year, representing about 5.6% of the health budget for the country, with around 27 million consumers [4]. Therefore, it is necessary to put measures in place to sustain medicinal plant production to ensure their availability whenever the need arises. This will ensure that valuable medicinal plants are not lost and that knowledge about their potential is retained across generations. Hence, this review aimed to examine the status quo of highly utilized and traded South African medicinal plants and their propagation techniques. The objectives of the study were to review:
  • Plants that are highly potent and utilized, endangered, declining, incorporated into natural products, have cultural relevance, and contribute to the sustainability of livelihoods;
  • Factors involved in the propagation of plants resulting from objective 1 and issues related to quality assurance of plant materials sourced from propagation under controlled environments.

2. Results and Discussions

The propagation of several South African indigenous plants has been the result of several factors, including government policies, community development projects, food purposes, exportation, and cultural practices. Other factors include in-depth research into the extraction of active ingredients of plants and the sale of medicinal plants to sustain livelihoods (Figure 1 and Figure 2), in parts or synergistic combinations. Several medicinal plants of South African origin are featured in the literature, because of their high potency for the cure of various diseases and infections. While some of these plants are restricted to South Africa, others are endemic to southern Africa, as their distribution cuts across southern African countries. This review features some of the most popular, highly utilized, and valuable plants with medicinal value within the southern African region. These include Agathosma betulina (Berg.) Pillans (buchu), Aloe ferox Mill. (bitter aloe), Hoodia gordonii (Masson) Sweet ex Decne. (hoodia, ghaap), Hypoxis hemerocallidea Fisch.Mey. and Avé-Lall. (“Africanpotato”), Pelargonium sidoides DC (“Umckaloabo”), Siphonochilus aethiopicus (Schweinf.) B.L.Burtt (African ginger), Warburgia salutaris (Bertol.f.) Chiov (pepperbark tree), Sclerocarya birrea (A. Rich.) Hochst. subsp. caffra (Sond.), Cyclopia genistoides (honeybush tea), and Athrixia phylicoides DC.

2.1. Medicinal Plants of Interest, Their History, Distribution, and Potential

2.1.1. Hoodia Godonni

Hoodia gordonni is a cactus-like succulent of the Kalahari Desert (KD) in the southern part of Africa [5], and has an abundant distribution in southern Africa [6]. Hoodia is a genus of succulent plants widely used traditionally by the San people of southern Africa to quench thirst and suppress appetite [7], and has been consumed by the San hunters and gatherers for ages, especially during long hunting trips [8] and famine [5]. As a result of the knowledge of its indigenous use, a natural anti-obesity agent from Hoodia has been commercialized, leading to a growing demand from the international market for locally sourced Hoodia material [9]. Hence, the cultivation of the plant in South Africa and neighboring countries such as Namibia and Botswana, where Hoodia species also occur naturally, is a potential source for the generation of income for rural communities and households [9].
Hoodia is used as a traditional medicine to cure tuberculosis, indigestion, hypertension, severe abdominal cramps, hemorrhoids and diabetes [7], as well as a treatment for obesity [8]. The plant is attractive and a potential candidate for aesthetic purposes but difficult to cultivate, and is now a protected species in southern Africa [7]. This means that permits are required for certain activities [7]. In 2008, there were more than 20 international patent applications/registrations on Hoodia gordonii, with several Hoodia-containing commercial products available in the market [9]. In 2010, the plant was on the Red Data List as ‘Endangered’ and the government has since strictly controlled its export [10].

2.1.2. Hypoxis hemerocallidea

Hypoxis hemerocallidea Fisch., C.A.Mey., & Avé-Lall. (Family: Hypoxidaceae), also known as African potato, iLabatheka, iNkomfe, moli, or starflower, has shown promise for use as a medicinal plant and natural product in southern Africa [9,11]. The plant is endemic to southern Africa and can be gathered in the wild. It has the potential to be developed into natural products and treatments due to its many medical applications [12]. Most varieties of the genus Hypoxis can be found in Africa, and tinctures, tonics, and lotions made from the species are among the products that can be bought on the market [12]. H. hemerocallidea is under tremendous stress because of being used as a “cure-all” treatment, and the population of the species is rapidly declining due to unsustainable harvesting, making it a strong candidate for conservation and propagation [12]. The only species of Hypoxis represented in the 51 plants of the African Herbal Pharmacopoeia is H. hemerocallidea [13]. Its corms are the most widely utilized part, making the plant susceptible to rapid destruction [14]. Because of this, conservation activities are now necessary due to the rapid decline in its natural population [13]. Hence, it was recommended that a platform be created to connect all stakeholders to manage H. hemerocallidea in the wild [12].
The popular therapeutic plant known as African ginger, Siphonochilus aethiopicus (Family: Zingiberaceae), is endemic to South Africa and is being overharvested for trade in the unofficial "muthi" marketplaces [15,16,17]. Due to commercial trade, the plant is now largely extinct, extremely rare, and designated as a critically endangered species in South Africa [17]. African ginger is used for a variety of purposes, which increases its demand. As a result, the plant may become scarce or even extinct in the wild, which is a severe issue for many stakeholders, especially traditional healers [17]. Fresh rhizomes are chewed to cure asthma, hysteria, colds, flu, coughs, pain, dysmenorrhea, influenza, hysteria, and malaria, and women chew them during menstruation [18]. Moreover, local companies use the plants to formulate tablets, capsules, and syrups for medicines [16]. The extremely scented roots have been believed to be utilized as a lightning repellent by the Zulu people [18]. Its cultural uses include spiritual healing, defence against evil spirits, and washing to fend off bad luck or evil spirits [17]. According to research conducted by [17], African ginger guards the divine bones (ditaola) from all evil spirits when a person arrives at the hut of a traditional healer with ulterior motives. Due to its geographic location and the presence of a wild population of the herb, Mpumalanga province of South Africa sees a high inflow of commercial plant gatherers from outside the community, which contributes significantly to overharvesting [17]. African ginger rhizomes are preferred to the root because they are easier to harvest and have better chances of surviving and regenerating [17]. However, cultivation of the plant is necessary for its long-term use. Mander, [2] estimated that, in KwaZulu-Natal, about 1.9 tons of African ginger, totalling 52,000 plants, are traded yearly. For many harvesters, the plant has provided a means of subsistence. Alternative strategies are continually being researched to ensure that the rising demand for African ginger is satisfied globally [19]. Wild ginger cultivation should be a feasible business in South Africa since there is always a need for it, and the cash earned compensates for the effort [20]. This is because street vendors earn roughly R140 per kg, while stores and healers get up to R450 per kg [2]. Large-scale cultivation is often the only option for many species to maintain the wild species as alive and economically viable [21]. Established micropropagation is not yet utilized on a significant scale for the proliferation of wild ginger [22,23].

2.1.3. Pelargonium sidoides

Pelargonium sidoides DC. is another medicinal plant that is native to South Africa and mostly found along the coastline regions of the country, and in Lesotho [24]. A substance prepared from the root of the plant was used to cure tuberculosis in Europe during the first part of the 20th century [24]. One of the most popular phytomedicines in the world since the 1990s is EPs 7630 (Umckaloabo), an ethanolic extract of P. sidoides tuberous roots that is high in prodelphinidin. The extract was approved to treat respiratory tract infections, such as acute bronchitis [25,26]. The root is being harvested indiscriminately in very large quantities to meet the existing global demand, which is now unsustainable due to increasing harvests by many plant gatherers. This has now led to a downward trend in the demography of the species in their native habits [27]. Though there are no official statistics on annual harvests, it is believed that they range from 9000 to 45,000 kg per annum [24]. Germany alone generates more than € 80 million in sales annually [26]. A P. sidoides mother tincture mixture, known as Umkalor, is offered for sale in Latvia, Russia, and Ukraine [24]. Seven patents around the world are now covering the use of proprietary extracts of P. sidoides and associated preparations [24]. In South Africa, most of the plant material used to produce medicines is still collected by people from rural communities [28]. In traditional medicine, P. sidoides is used to cure a variety of illnesses, including those that cause a cough, fever, tuberculosis, sore throats, exhaustion, and general body weakness [27].
Although the South African Department of Agriculture has implemented the use of licenses to manage the wild harvests of P. sidoides, the practice is ineffective in stopping the unlawful gathering of the plant, especially from vulnerable areas [27]. The root is often damaged after harvest, compromising the possibility of vegetative regeneration. The plant naturally regenerates from seeds and perennates that grow through the underground root–tuber system [27] Therefore, it is recommended that vegetative multiplication be encouraged to preserve the plant in situ in the Eastern Cape, as well as in other natural habitats, and make available an alternative source of supplies [27].

2.1.4. Warburgia salutaris

Several medicinal usages of Warburgia salutaris have caused it to become scarce due to its uncontrolled harvesting in the wild. This has led to about a 50% reduction in the South African population of the plant, with some subpopulations becoming almost extinct [29]. Several health issues can be treated with W. salutaris, but its bark is the most common part used, which is harvested by stripping it vertically from the tree. Senkoro et al. [30] proposed many conservation strategies to support the species’ sustainable usage, including the adoption of alternate species for the same use, the replacement of bark for leaves, and the cultivation of other species. Alternative plant material sources were proposed throughout the region as a main technique for species control [31,32,33]. Furthermore, the peppery scent of W. salutaris leaves makes them an appealing condiment for a variety of cuisine dishes and drinks [34]. Pepper bark is considered to be severely endangered in southern African countries due to frequent local subsistence uses and high commercial demand in urban centers [30,31].

2.1.5. Aloe

Aloe is used for treating various diseases, such as gout, colon cancer, skin cancer, and thrombophlebitis, to stimulate immunity, and to treat diabetes, rheumatism, lung cancer, leukaemia, digestive candidiasis, and obesity [18]. Aloe ferox is also known as Cape Aloe, Bitter aloe, and Tap aloe, in Africa [35]. Red Aloe and Lily of the Desert is a species of Aloe indigenous to the south-eastern and western regions of South Africa’s Western Cape, Eastern Cape, and Free state [36]. Aloe ferox originated in South Africa and was also widely distributed throughout the tropics and subtropics, where it is grown as an ornamental and medicinal plant [35]. The popular Aloe gel is used to prepare aloe bitter powder, aloe drinks, aloe bitter crystals (for constipation), cosmetics, hair, and skin-care products [35].

2.1.6. Agathosma spp.

Agathosma crenulata and A. betulina (also known as Buchu) are significant sources of essential oils, which are mostly extracted and utilized in the production of cosmetics, soaps, and food colorants, as well as pharmaceutically for the treatment of renal problems and chest complaints [37]. The two main oil constituents in the essential oils of A. betulina are iso-menthone and diosphenol, which are mainly sought after because of their antibacterial and diuretic properties [37]. It is generally known that the Khoisan people utilized essential oil for nearly everything, including treating their skin and stomach aches [37]. Buchu is now recognized as a protected species, as it is extremely vulnerable, to the point of extinction, and it is often referred to as the “abalone of the land” because of its commercialization. Since its primary applications are in the food and pharmaceutical industries, there is a significant demand for it on a global scale [38]. The Western Cape Nature Conservation Board (WCNCB) estimates that the buchu industry generates about R150 million annually [37]. Wild populations in the Western Cape mountains were the only sources of buchu before 1995, putting the resource at risk of extinction [37].
The Khoisan and other indigenous peoples referred to a variety of fragrant plants as buchu, and employed them in dance ceremonies, as anointing oil, cosmetics, perfume, and medicine [39,40]. Traditional knowledge belongs to the Khoisan within the scope of those documented usages and should be acknowledged and valued as such [40]. Buchu was a cherished Khoisan traditional medicine from an ethnobiological perspective, and it is now one of the most widely used herbal remedies in South Africa [41]. The traditional use of buchu includes the management of fever, rheumatism, gout, stomach disorders, kidney and urinary tract infections, and colds [41]. It was used externally as an antiseptic wash on infected wounds and as a compress for bruises, swelling, and sprains [41]. A. betulina is traditionally consumed orally as an aqueous infusion, occasionally sweetened with brown sugar, or as a tincture in brandy [41]. Agathosma species and other valuable fynbos species are on the conservation list [37].

2.1.7. Cape Fynbos Endemic Tea, Cyclopia genistoides

The South African fynbos vegetation is renowned for its abundance and diversity of indigenous plant species that are adapted to acidic, nutrient-poor soils, formed from sandstone and shale, in a climate with cold, wet winters and scorching, dry summers [42]. Most fynbos plants are primarily harvested from the wild, whether they are utilized to produce natural herbal beverages, cut flowers, essential oils, or medications [43,44]. It is now obvious that sustainable cultivation is required because of the increased demand for these specialty commodities, which put a heavy strain on the natural areas where these resources occur [44,45].
There are endemic species of honeybush (Cyclopia) in South Africa’s Fynbos Biome of the Cape Floral Kingdom [46]. Nevertheless, its strength, in contrast to Aspalathus linearis, as a commercial crop lies in the variety of species that can be grown, its varied natural distribution, and the possibilities for wider habitat adaptation [47]. Cyclopia genistoides and C. intermedia are the most gathered species from the wild [46]. In the past two decades, honeybush and rooibos have gained popularity among health-conscious consumers. The herb, which does not contain caffeine, is used to make honeybush tea, a herbal infusion with a flavor reminiscent of honey [47,48]. To prepare herbal tea with a high concentration of antioxidants, honeybush leaf is traditionally chopped, fermented, and sun-dried [46]. In addition to its delightful flavor and aroma, honeybush tea has several health advantages, including antioxidant, anti-mutagenic, anti-cancer, and phytoestrogen qualities [49]. However, the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s Red List of Threatened Species lists the plant, because around 80% of them are harvested from the wild in an unsustainable manner [46]. Therefore, cultivation is necessary to ensure that enough tea is produced. However, the poor rooting responses of the species that regenerate from shoots represent a significant barrier to cultivation. The distinctive qualities of honeybush that contribute to its flavor, medicinal value, and processing have received most of the attention in research. However, much less is understood about plant breeding, pest and disease control, nutrient needs, harvesting techniques, and propagation [46].

2.1.8. Athrixia phylicoides, the Bushman’s Tea

Athrixia phylicoides (Asteraceae) is indigenous to the northeastern mountains of South Africa, where it has been utilized to make tea, brooms, and traditional medicine [50]. The consumption of a refreshing beverage derived from dried leaves and twigs of Athrixia phylicoides is common in South Africa [51] and its popularity has led to over-exploitation of the plant [50]. The plant has a long history of use among the indigenous citizens of southern Africa, making it a possible candidate for commercialization [51], which could open new paths for the development of various food products. The bush tea plant has great potential in the cosmetic, food, and beverage industries [52]. Bush tea is used extensively as traditional medicine for the treatment of boils, sores, acne, cuts, infected wounds, headaches, colds, and loss of voice, as well as being used as a gargle for throat infections [53]. It has great potential as a garden specimen with its attractive mauve flowers [54]. Globally, South African tea is very popular and well sought after because of its valuable nutrients and medicinal values, making it beneficial for consumption. Similar to South African teas and tea products, Marula and its derivative products receive international interest due to its many functions.

2.1.9. Sclerocarya birrea, the African Horticultural Tree with Immense Potential

Sclerocarya birrea (A. Rich.) Hochst. subsp. caffra (Sond.) Kokwaro, popularly referred to as Marula, is an African wild tree distributed across various African countries, where its parts such as leaves, stem bark, root, and fruits are utilized as food and traditional medicine [55,56] and are thus referred to as the “tree of life”. The fruit is high in vitamins C and K, as well as Na, Ca, Mg, Fe, Zn, and Mn, and sesquiterpene hydrocarbons, which are recognized for its antibacterial effects [57] The seed kernel, which is often consumed fresh or roasted [58], contains oleic, palmitic, myristic, and stearic acids, amino acids, glutamic acid, and arginine [55]. It is rich in oil and protein [55], with potential commercial oil production [58]. Marula is a crucial multifunctional plant in Africa [59], with its luscious fruit being an important component of southern African cuisines for centuries [60]. Because of its delicious fruit and medicinal properties, Marula has received great attention as a candidate for domestication and commercialization in southern Africa [61]. It has become a well-sought-after commercial crop, as the fruit pulp is used to make juice, alcoholic beverages [62], jams, and jellies [62,63]. Among all the products from Marula, only Amarula Cream (a popular liquor) has realized its full export potential, while an extract incorporated into cosmetic formulation has been patented by Phytotrade, in conjunction with Aldivia, a French company [24].
The Zulu people of South Africa use stem–bark decoctions of Marula to treat diabetes [64], and as enemas for diarrhea [65] and dysentery [66]. Traditional practitioners use decoctions as a wash before treating patients infected with gangrenous rectitis, which is also treated with the same decoction [67]. In different parts of Africa, chewing fresh leaves of Marula and swallowing the astringent juice is used for indigestion [68], while the stem bark is used to treat proctitis [69]. The plant also occurs across northern and western parts of Africa, with only the subspecies caffra existing in southern Africa [18]. Marula trees on communal lands are protected by the local chiefs because the plant is regarded as sacred [24]. The bark is utilized across Africa to treat various ailments/diseases, such as rheumatism, insect bites [24,66], malaria, and proctitis [70], while the aroma from the leaves relieves abscesses, burns, and spider bites. The oil is used to treat ear, nose, and throat conditions [24].

2.2. Effect of the South African Plant Red List Status on Medicinal Plant Propagation

According to the South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), the critically acclaimed International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List is used as a criterion to prepare the South African plants’ Red List, which assesses the risk of extinction of species to emphasize the urgent conservation/protection requirement for these species. The IUCN system does not focus on species with a low risk of extinction but may, however, place a high importance on conservation. Hence, the Red List of South African plants is highly regarded as a basis for the implementation of South African conservation practices [7]. In addition, the Red List of South African plants is a crucial prompt for the propagation of medicinal plants, as it reflects the population decline, information on the oveharvesting of plant parts and the government ban on the harvesting of South African indigenous plants and other naturalized plants within South Africa. Over the years, the status of potent medicinal plants on the South African Red Data list frequently changes. For example, a highly utilized medicinal plant could have a status of ‘Least Concerned’ because of its wide range of distribution, and subsequent overharvesting from the wild could then drastically reduce its population, thus impacting the plant’s status. African ginger’s, Siphonochilus aethiopicus, status changed from ‘Not Threatened’ [71] to ‘Critically Endangered’ [72] and Cyclopia genistoides’s status changed from ‘Least Concerned’ [73] to ‘Near Threatened’ [74] (Table 1). Other factors, such as the exportation of raw materials and restricted distribution, pose a threat to some other medicinal plants. This is common with medicinal plants with restricted distribution to the Cape area only, such as the Karoo and other ecologically rich areas within South Africa. The government often places a harvest ban on plants with drastically declining populations. In addition, a plant with multiple uses is often a potential candidate in government conservation policies, which prompts the promotion of its propagation, in order to provide a protocol that could be used to propagate the plant to ensure its sustainability. For example, Sclerocarya birrea remains one of the most multipurpose traditional horticultural crops, with high cultural and medicinal relevance and valuable economic potential because of both its local consumption and international demands. The drinks produced from the tree are very popular and highly sought after globally. These potentials place Sclerocarya birrea in the ABC category illustrated in Figure 1.
Table 1. Red data list the status of some South African indigenous and naturalized plants, reasons for their propagation, and propagation protocols available in the literature.
Table 1. Red data list the status of some South African indigenous and naturalized plants, reasons for their propagation, and propagation protocols available in the literature.
Medicinal PlantRed Data List Status and Reason for PropagationPropagation Protocol
Agathosma betulina (P.J.Bergius) PillansLeast Concerned
The plant is highly harvested for essential oil with increasing demands and prices, resulting from demand from overseas markets. In 2006, legislation has been established to support the cultivation of plant materials and pressure on wild populations has declined [37].
Micropropagation and secondary metabolites in Agathosma betulina (Berg.) [75]. The biosynthesis of certain compounds increased in vitro, and in vitro seed germination yielded healthy seedlings [75].
Aloe feroxLeast Concerned.
It is a medicinal plant of high commercial importance, as the leaves are extensively harvested, and a high quantity of materials has been exported since the 1980s, increasing in trade over the past 15 years [76]. Overexploitation in certain localities has led to localized extinctions [76].
[77] investigated the effects of temperatures, growth-promoting substances, and watering frequencies on seed germination and seedling growth of A. ferox. Smoke–water enhanced seed germination The cytokinins meta-Topolin (mT) and meta-Topolin riboside (mTR) at 5 mM gave significantly higher shoot multiplication rates compared with the control and benzyl adenine (BA)-treated plants, which gave a higher abnormality index.
Athrixia phylicoides DC. Least ConcernedInvestigation of the propagation and cosmeceutical application of Athrixia phylicoides [78]. Seed germination and vegetative propagation of bush tea (Athrixia phylicoides) protocol [79]
Cyclopia genistoides (L.) R.Br.Least Concerned [73] and Near Threatened [74]. Populations are declining from overharvesting for tea production, as poaching of leaves and branches for tea occurs in several areas [74]. The lowland subpopulations in the Malmesbury, Cape Peninsula, Kleinmond, Hermanus and Albertinia regions have been lost to urban growth and in some cases, crop cultivation [74].Woody rootstock regenerates after fire [74]. Honeybush can be propagated through both seeds and vegetatively [80,81], while the seed is the preferred method, as cuttings are expensive and difficult to root [82]. However, the seed germination rate in the genera could be low (≤15%) if not pretreated [80,81] with chemical scarification [81].
HoodiaNot Threatened [71]. The species has undergone a drastic decline since 2001 from harvests, for its appetite-suppressant properties. International and national demands were especially huge between 2004 and 2006. There’s been strict enforcement/legislation to prevent wild harvesting in South Africa [83]. Unilever had patents for methods for the micropropagation of Hoodia plants in 2008 [84]
Hypoxis hemerocallidea Fisch., C.A.Mey. & Avé-Lall.The Hypoxis population is declining in some subpopulations, especially in Gauteng, South Africa, because of extensive commercial exploitation, in addition to habitat loss and degradation [85]. Hypoxis is heavily traded at high prices [86]. Since it became popular in 1997 when an article in DRUM magazine referred to it as South Africa’s “miracle muthi”, being effective in strengthening the immunity of HIV sufferers [87]. The propagation of the plant is erratic because of seed dormancy and worsened by the fact that it does not propagate easily from corms [88]. [89] developed an ex vitro vegetative propagation technique for Hypoxis hemerocallidea corms. The author confirmed that the propagation method from the corms of H. hemerocallidea successfully produced cormlets and suggested that the upper corm parts could be used for propagation, while the bottom corm parts should be used for medicinal purposes [89] to achieve sustainable medicinal use of the plant.
Pelargonium sidoides DC. Least Concerned. Plant remnants from harvests resprout well but the growth of the lignotuber is very slow, thus limiting subsequent harvests, in addition to declining populations [90]. The destructive harvests of the roots, which is the major plant part utilized for medicinal purposes, are the major cause of localized population decline [91]. A propagation protocol for Pelargonium sidoides from root cuttings has been developed [91], and a clonal propagation protocol for the plant was developed [27].
Siphonochilus aethiopicus (Schweinf.) B.L.BurttCritically Endangered [72]. The harvesting is unsustainable as the species population is rapidly declining, with extinction looming. As of 2000, 60% of the known extant subpopulations have less than 100 individuals [92]. A hydroponic propagation protocol for Siphonochilus aethiopicus [93] was developed. Efficient in vitro micropropagation and acclimatization protocols were developed to aid the conservation of the species’ [94] wild populations.
Sclerocarya birrea (A.Rich.) Hochst. subsp. caffra (Sond.) Kokwaro LCLeast Concerned. According to Moyo (2009), the increasing demands for Marula products by the food, pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries locally and internationally cannot be sustained by the wild populations.[95] investigated the micropropagation and secondary metabolites of Sclerocarya birrea. The author observed a significant pharmacological activity in S. birrea renewable plant parts (leaves and young stems) and suggested plant part substitution as being a practical conservation strategy for this species.
Warburgia salutaris (G.Bertol.) Chiov.Endangered [96].
There was at least a 50% decline in the South African population from the over-harvesting of bark for traditional medicine, particularly in KwaZulu-Natal [96].
Propagation protocol was developed for in vitro and ex vitro propagation [97].

2.3. Trends Leading to Medicinal Plants as Candidates for Propagation

Several medicinal plants’ statuses have evolved since their utilization and the exposure of European settlers and tourists to their potency and use locally (A). The knowledge of the potency transferred by European tourists to the international community (B) and their increasing popularity has led to the extraction of bioactive ingredients and their incorporation into food products, drinks, and others (C), making them potential candidates for bio-conservation and propagation (ABC; Figure 1).
The South African government’s policy of protecting indigenous flora has been very effective in the conservation of medicinal indigenous plants. South Africa has one of the best conservation policies in Africa. These policies have helped to curtail the overharvesting of medicinal plants that are in high demand. Over several decades, this has helped to protect these plants from the transition from their utilization by visiting European tourists to a stage where they are now more popular and in high demand. The strategical exploitation of South African endemic medicinal plants should involve the cultivation of the candidate plants to ensure sustainability (Figure 2). The sustainability of endangered and vulnerable species is often achieved through mass propagation. Micropropagation through plant tissue culture is a crucial tool for effective mass propagation. This technique has been used to develop an effective protocol for Agathosma betulina [75], Aloe ferox [77] Hypoxis hemerocallidea [98], Pelargonium sidoides [99], Sclerocarya birrea [100], Siphonochilus aethiopicus [101], and Warburgia salutaris [102] by the academic stakeholders. Community development projects to implement the mass production of valuable medicinal plants often use available propagation protocols developed by academics (Figure 2). However, the propagation of the plants is often not impactful, as the plants produced are not maximally utilized. Before the implementation of such projects, viable markets need to be identified, and products that can be utilized locally should be formulated and promoted by the Department of Science and Technology, while similar imported products should be placed on an import ban/restriction. Similar local products utilizing synthetic materials in their product formulations should be encouraged, in order to replace the synthetic products with natural ingredients from the plants. For example, Marula fruit is rich in vitamin C content, with a greater abundance than in oranges, and has abundant citric acid content. The latter is often used as a preservative in food product formulations. Hence, in-depth research into the potential use of Marula fruit as a preservative is advisable.

2.4. Effectiveness of Propagation Method(s) of Medicinal Plants and Quality Assurance

Various propagation methods have been used for the propagation of medicinal plants in South Africa (Figure 3). Medicinal plant nurseries, household gardeners and small-scale farmers often use the traditional propagation methods, which comprise seed propagation and vegetative propagation (Figure 3). However, these methods are often hampered by factors such as loss of seed viability, seed dormancy, and rooting difficulty of stem cuttings. The seeds of S. birrea [95] and H. hemerocallidea [88] have been reported to exhibit dormancy. Methods involving cold stratification, heat treatment, and the use of hormones to enhance radicle emergence have been adopted in seed germination protocols. Cold stratification enhanced the germination of S. birrea [95] and Cyclopia spp seeds [81]. These methods are used to mimic the natural environment of the plants in relation to the weather conditions that support seed germination on the field. The Fynbos vegetation in South Africa is species-rich, with various valuable medicinal plants endemic to the geological zone. This vegetation often experiences periodic fires, which often lead to the sprouting of seedlings from the soil seed bank. Hence, the use of smoke–water and heat, and the combinations of both, have been used in the seed propagation of various Fynbos species, such as Agathosma species [103] and Aloe ferox [77], among others. The use of smoke–water and its isolated compounds have now gained much popularity and are much utilized for the seed propagation of several medicinal plants. The use of smoke–water has been adopted by some small-scale farmers, as the information describing the successful germination of various South African medicinal plants is available on websites.
According to Nwafor et al. (2021), various agronomic and agroecological challenges are a great hindrance to the successful propagation of medicinal plants by smallholder farmers [104]. These challenges include planting materials, extension support, markets, information, diseases, pests, support, agronomic, costs, and returns [104]. Progress in the propagation of medicinal plants by South African smallholder farmers and their involvement in its value chain can only be achieved when the complex socio-economic and socio-cultural challenges are well addressed. Refs [104,105] stated that the unavailability of seeds or propagation materials is among the challenges faced by small-scale farmers involved in medicinal plant propagation. The authors further stated that the cultivation of medicinal plants could contribute immensely to the financial empowerment of women in rural communities [105]. However, the propagation of plants through seeds and vegetative parts yields insufficient plant material for use as traditional medicine, especially in cases of endangered, vulnerable, or rare medicinal plants.
The functionality of the African traditional medicine system is solely dependent on the availability of adequate, quality plant material. Hence, the optimization of propagation methods of medicinal plants to ensure rapid, mass production of plant materials in vitro is a crucial tool that could fulfil high demands for valuable medicinal plants and is well embraced by plant conservationists in South Africa. Optimized propagation protocols developed by the academic stakeholders (tertiary institutions and research institutes) offer the opportunity to solve the problems associated with traditional propagation methods as previously highlighted. However, a high percentage of traditional medicine practitioners and users have, in the past, condemned the use of medicinal plants raised in vitro, because of the assumption that wild plants are natural and have better potency.
Plant biotechnology is a vital and effective instrument that provides plant production options beyond those yielding high amounts of mass with quick production and can raise the levels of key bioactive compounds that are responsible for pharmacological activities (Table 2). However, some in vitro treatments have been reported to yield a decrease in some bioactive compounds. A Polish research team investigated the in vitro accumulation of valuable phenolic compounds of C. intermedia, C. subternata and C. genistoides [106,107,108]. The phenolic content of the shoots produced in vitro was similar to those produced in the shoots from the field. However, callus cultures did not produce mangiferin and isomangiferin, which are two of the major bioactive contents of the species. Factors, such as the effect of medium supplementation, temperature, and light regime on isoflavone production from C. subternata callus cultures, were investigated [106,107]. Medium supplementation with coconut water yielded increased biomass and high isoflavone production, while casein hydrolysate and phenylalanine supplementation had no favorable effect on either biomass or isoflavone formation. Higher temperatures and cold stress gave an increased isoflavone production but lower biomass during the first stage of growth, while the second stage of growth under the same conditions yielded an improved isoflavone production without any effect on the biomass. Culturing in the darkness, with coconut water supplementation, under dark conditions, yielded a significant increase in isoflavone production. The methoxylated isoflavones produced in C. genistoides shoot cultures were at low levels [108].
In the in vitro propagation of Agathosma betulina, the callus of nodal explants on medium containing 0.5 mg·L−1 NAA yielded the highest relative concentration of limonene with the absence of pulegone, making the treatment favorable for the in vitro production of limonene [103]. The production of hydroxybenzoic and hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives in H. hemerocallidea organ cultures was significantly increased by cytokinins, particularly the meta-topolin-treated organ cultures, which produced higher levels of gallic, protocatechuic, gentisic, and p-hydroxybenzoic, m-hydroxybenzoic, salicylic, chlorogenic and trans-cinnamic acids, while the isoprenoid cytokinins (N6-(2-isopentenyl)-adenine) significantly increased the production of hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives, namely, caffeic, p-coumaric, sinapic and ferulic acids [109]. The cytokinin-treated organ cultures displayed a significant increase in antioxidant activity [109]. However, cytokinin use in callus cultures decreased the concentrations of hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives and antioxidant activity when compared to the control [109].
This raises the issue of the suitability of biotechnology propagation techniques, as regards quality assurance. The use of hydroponics for the propagation of medicinal plants is not a common practice in South Africa, but researchers are gradually accepting the idea because of its positive outcomes. For instance, Giurgiu et al. 2014 [110] highlighted the improved concentration of bioactive properties in medicinal plants that are cultivated through hydroponics. Xego et al. 2016 [111] also observed that various hydroponic cultivation methods produced more shoots than traditional soil cultivation, coupled with comparatively higher yields of bioactive contents and total activity than the wild-sourced plants. Furthermore, [112] reported that plants grow faster in hydroponic conditions because they obtain all the nutrients they need in the proper amounts and proportions. The increase in watering intervals from 3 to 5 days during S. aethiopicus hydroponics propagation enhanced the levels of phenolic compounds [93]. Water deficit is known to have a positive impact on plant tissue secondary metabolite concentrations [113]. Hence, the successful propagation of medicinal plants is highly dependent on various environmental (natural or mimicked in vitro) biotic and abiotic factors, which can act singly or synergistically to modify essential oil and secondary metabolite contents.
Table 2. Major bioactive compounds of chosen medicinal plants and their pharmacological activities.
Table 2. Major bioactive compounds of chosen medicinal plants and their pharmacological activities.
SNMedicinal Plant SpeciesMajor Bioactive Compound(s)Pharmacological Activities and/or Mode of Action of Major Bioactive Compound(s)
1.Agathosma betulina (P.J.Bergius) Pillans A. betulina essential oil’s major components are (ϕ)-diosphenol, and (iso)menthone [114]. Menthone has sedating and antipyretic activities [115]
2.Aloe feroxAloe-emodin, chrysophanol, and aloin A [36]Aloe-emodin is an anticancer agent with selective activity against neuroectodermal tumours [116]. Aloe-emodin could kill GSDME-expressed cancer cells through pyroptotic cell death [117]. Aloe-emodin inhibited the growth of Bacillus cereus, Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli, and Shigella sonnei [36].
Chrysophanol has antidiabetic, anticancer [118] and hepatoprotective activities [119]. Kim et al. (2010) [120] reported that Chrysophanol inhibited the production of TNF-α and IL-6, as well as the expression of COX-2 upon treatment with LPS. Chrysophanol inhibits B. subtilis, S. epidermidis, and E. coli while aloin A inhibits all the tested bacterial strains [36].
3.Athrixia phylicoides DC. Bush tea is rich in flavonoids and tannins, and its major antioxidant compound, (6-hydroxy luteolin-7-O-β-glucoside) was isolated [121]. Monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes, such as α-pinene, β-pinene, caryophyllene oxide, β-caryophyllene, myrcene and spathulenol, were major components of the essential oil [122]Luteolin and its glycoside have been reported to regulate NF-κB, MAPK, and JAK/STAT pathways, and to modify the effects induced by pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TLRs, TNF, IL-1TNF, IL-1, and IL-6 [123]. Luteolin controls glucose metabolism, cell growth, and the apoptosis process, which are often not regulated in malignant cells. Hence, luteolin is an anti-cancer compound [124] with potential treatment for diabetes [125]
4.Cyclopia genistoides (L.) R.Br.Xanthones and benzophenones [126].
Mangiferin.
Xanthone exhibits anti-inflammatory and anti-diabetic activities [127]. The occurrence of mangiferin with benzophenone α-glucosidase inhibitors in Cyclopia [128], and any other components that improve glucose uptake in vitro, such as iso mangiferin and scolymoside [129], makes Cyclopia extract a potential anti-diabetic nutraceutical [130].
5.HoodiaP57AS3 (an oxy pregnane glycoside) was isolated from H. gordonii and patented by CSIR South Africa [131].The mechanism of action of P57AS3 for appetite suppression is by increasing the ATP content in the hypothalamus neurons, which regulate food intake of the body [132]. It is also used as an antidiabetic [133] and for the prevention of aspirin-induced gastric impairment [134].
6.Hypoxis hemerocallidea Fisch., C.A.Mey. & Avé-Lall.Hypoxoside (found in corms) [135,136]Antitumor properties [137]
7.Pelargonium sidoides DC.Epicatechin [138]. Can inhibit mucin production in sputum and thus exhibit bronchodilator activity [139].
8.Siphonochilus aethiopicus (Schweinf.) B.L.BurttSiphonochilone (from the roots and rhizomes) [140].
1,8-cineole, cis alloocimene, (E)-β-ocimene, sabinene, terpinen-4-ol, kessane, and β-pinene [140].
Siphonochilone has potential in the treatment of asthma and allergic reactions [16]. Eucalyptol (or 1,8-cineole) has anti-inflammatory, muscle relaxant, analgesic, and antispasmodic activities [141]
9.Sclerocarya birrea (A.Rich.) Hochst. subsp. caffra (Sond.) Kokwaro LCPolyphenols, flavonoids, and condensed tanninsCan prevent chronic and degenerative disorders [142]
10.Warburgia salutaris (G.Bertol.) Chiov.drimane and colorotane sesquiterpenoids are the major constituents [143].
Warburganal [144], polygodial [145], salutarisolide [146], muzigadial [147], ugandensidial, isopolygodial [148], mukaadial [149] and mannitol [66]
Sesquiterpenoids have insect anti-feedant, anti-microbial, anti-cancer, molluscidal and anti-fungal activities [150]
As illustrated in Figure 4, the conservation and propagation of medicinal plants (A) and quality assurance (B) of plant products are interwoven, determining factors regarding the functionality of traditional medicine systems (AB) (Figure 4). Major questions to be addressed are ‘Does the conservation of medicinal plants through propagation offer quality plant materials?’ and ‘which propagation method(s) is/are most suitable for each medicinal plant family?’. A decrease in the levels of major bioactive ingredients of plants raised in vitro equates to reduced efficacy of the plant material, while an increase in the major bioactive ingredient equates to increased efficacy. However, this increase may lead to health concerns, including cases of severe side effects or overdose. Hence, it is important to put control measures in place to ensure that standardized and quality medicinal plant materials are offered for sale in local markets and to natural product companies. To achieve this, the traditional medicine system needs to be restructured to implement the following:
  • Control the supply of plant materials to medicinal plant marketers.
  • Educate sellers about the dangers involved in the sale of sister species in place of the well-known potent species.
  • Involve academic stakeholders in determining the levels of bioactive compounds in plants produced through different propagation methods and their suitability as traditional medicines.
  • Enlighten medicinal plant marketers about the role of seasons on the plant’s major bioactive compound(s) composition, and
  • Establish networks and or platforms in which all stakeholders are members.

3. Materials and Methods

A literature search was conducted using electronic databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, Google Books, and Google Scholar. Other sources scrutinized for relevant information included student theses from South African Universities, published manuals and South African online news sources.

4. Conclusions and Recommendations

South African medicinal plants with a high potency often receive considerable attention from the international community, which, among other factors, leads to the conservation and propagation of medicinal plants. In the process of conservation and propagation, different stakeholders, including the academic community, are involved. The role of the academic community in the propagation and sustainability of South African medicinal plants cannot be over-emphasized. The roles of the academic stakeholders should further involve the development of new products from propagated plants. This can be achieved by a proper restructuring of the academic curriculum of plant biology/plant sciences at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels. An effective curriculum should include food processing and product development modules and some entrepreneurship modules. These steps will help the academic community to commercialize scientific results with ease and thus prevent valuable innovations from being lost to international companies or foreign countries.
The economic growth of Africa can be achieved by a well-planned and efficient use of Africa’s natural resources, which includes the use of highly potent medicinal plants. This will go a long way to sustain rural households involved in the sale of medicinal plants. Hence, the economic development of the individuals in the lower economic pyramid could be achieved by prompting the use of natural resources within their environment. Insight into the way a community utilizes its natural resources, and factors influencing the degree of their use is essential for the development and implementation of policies for its sustainability and availability. This is crucial for the functionality of the African traditional medicinal system.

Author Contributions

With the submission of this manuscript, we would like to state that this work is original and compiled by the authors. No part thereof has been submitted nor published elsewhere. O.O.F. and O.O.O. conceived the idea and O.O.F. designed the article. O.O.F. and O.O.O. wrote the article while J.V.S. gave guidance and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing does not apply to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

References

  1. Horak, M. The green gold of South Africa-our unique plant diversity. Plus 50 2015, 10, 54–55. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mander, M. Marketing of Indigenous Medicinal Plants in South Africa: A Case Study in Kwazulu-Natal; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 1998; pp. 1–158. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cocks, M. Wild Plant Resources and Cultural Practices in Rural and Urban Households in South Africa: Implications for Bio-Cultural Diversity Conservation. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen Universitty, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mander, M.; Ntuli, L.; Diederichs, N.; Mavundla, K. Economics of the traditional medicine trade in South Africa. S. Afr. Health Rev. 2007, 1, 189–196. [Google Scholar]
  5. Stowell, J.D. Novel Ingredients for Weight Loss: New Developments. In Novel Food Ingredients for Weight Control, 1st ed.; Henry, C.J.K., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2007; pp. 1–376. [Google Scholar]
  6. Vermaak, I.; Viljoen, A. Indigenous South African medicinal plants: Part 9: Hoodia gordonii. S. Afr. Pharm. J. 2008, 75, 37. [Google Scholar]
  7. SANBI Information Document on Trade in Hoodia gordonii and other Hoodia species. Available online: https://pza.sanbi.org/iinformation-document-trade-hoodia-gordonii-and-other-hoodia-species (accessed on 6 January 2023).
  8. Amusan, L. Politics of biopiracy: An adventure into Hoodia/Xhoba patenting in Southern Africa. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 14, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. van Heerden, F.R. Hoodia gordonii: A natural appetite suppressant. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 119, 434–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Witkamp, R.F. Biologically active compounds in food products and their effects on obesity and diabetes. In Comprehensive Natural Products II: Chemistry and Biology, 3rd ed.; Elsevier Ltd: Oxford, UK, 2010; pp. 509–545. [Google Scholar]
  11. Williams, V.L.; Balkwill, K.; Witkowski, E.T.F. Size-class prevalence of bulbous and perennial herbs sold in the Johannesburg medicinal plant markets between 1995 and 2001. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2007, 73, 144–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Mofokeng, M.M.; Araya, H.T.; Amoo, S.O.; Sehlola, D.; du Plooy, C.P.; Bairu, M.W.; Venter, S.; Mashela, P.W. Diversity and conservation through the cultivation of Hypoxis in Africa—A case study of Hypoxis hemerocallidea. Diversity 2020, 12, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Sathekge, N.R.; Kritzinger, Q.; Prinsloo, G. Comparison of secondary metabolite content and antimicrobial activity of four Hypoxis species used in traditional medicine. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2010, 76, 403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Malangu, N. Self-reported use of traditional, complementary, and over-the-counter medicines by HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy in Pretoria, South Africa. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2007, 4, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Moyo, M.; Aremu, A.O.; Van Staden, J. Medicinal plants: An invaluable, dwindling resource in sub-saharan Africa. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 174, 595–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Adebayo, S.A.; Amoo, S.O.; Mokgehle, S.N.; Aremu, A.O. Ethnomedicinal uses, biological activities, phytochemistry and conservation of African ginger (Siphonochilus aethiopicus): A commercially important and endangered medicinal plant. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 266, 113459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Seile, B.P.; Bareetseng, S.; Koitsiwe, M.T.; Aremu, A.O. Indigenous knowledge on the uses, sustainability, and conservation of African Ginger (Siphonochilus aethiopicus) among Two Communities in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. Diversity 2022, 14, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. van Wyk, B.E.; Oudtshoorn, B.V.; Gericke, N. Medicinal Plants of South Africa; Briza Publications: Pretoria, South Africa, 1997; pp. 1–304. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gatabazi, A.; Marais, D.; Steyn, M.J.; Araya, H.T.; Mofokeng, M.M.; Mokgehle, S.N. Evaluating growth, yield, and water use efficiency of African and commercial ginger species in South Africa. Water 2019, 11, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Street, R.A.; Prinsloo, G. Commercially important medicinal plants of South Africa: A Review. J. Chem. 2013, 2013, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Cunningham, A.B. African medicinal plants: Setting priorities at the interface between conservation and primary health care. In People and Plants; UNESCO Press: Paris, France, 1993; pp. 1–53. [Google Scholar]
  22. van Wyk, B.; Gericke, N. People’s Plants: A Guide to Useful Plants of Southern Africa; Briza Publications: Pretoria, South Africa, 2000; pp. 1–352. [Google Scholar]
  23. Crouch, N.; Symmonds, R.; Spring, W.; Diederichs, N. Fact sheets for growing popular medicinal plant species. In Commercializing Medicinal Plants: A Southern African Guide; Sun Press: Stellenbosch, South Africa, 2006; pp. 100–102. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gurib-Fakim, A.; Brendler, T.; Philips, L.D.; Eloff, J.N. Green Gold: Success Stories Using Southern African Medicinal Plant Species; Association for African Medicinal Plants Standards Publishing: Mauritius, Africa, 2010; pp. 1–107. [Google Scholar]
  25. Theisen, L.L.; Muller, C.P. EPs® 7630 (Umckaloabo®), an extract from Pelargonium sidoides roots, exerts anti-influenza virus activity in-vitro and in-vivo. Antivir. Res. 2012, 94, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. van Wyk, B.-E. The potential of South African plants in the development of new medicinal products. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2011, 77, 812–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Lewu, F.B.; Grierson, D.S.; Afolayan, A.J. Clonal Propagation of Pelargonium sidoides: A threatened medicinal plant of South Africa. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 5, 123–125. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lewu, F.B.; Adebola, P.O.; Afolayan, A.J. Commercial harvesting of Pelargonium sidoides in the Eastern Cape, South Africa: Striking a balance between resource conservation and rural livelihoods. J. Arid Environ. 2007, 70, 380–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mbambezeli, G. Warburgia salutaris, PlantZAfrica. Available online: https://pza.sanbi.org/warburgia-salutaris (accessed on 2 January 2023).
  30. Senkoro, A.M.; Shackleton, C.M.; Voeks, R.A.; Ribeiro, A.I. Uses, knowledge, and management of the threatened pepper-bark tree (Warburgia salutaris) in southern Mozambique. Econ. Bot. 2019, 73, 304–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Botha, J.; Witkowski, E.T.F.; Shackleton, C.M. The impact of commercial harvesting on Warburgia salutaris (‘pepper-bark Tree’) in Mpumalanga, South Africa. Biodivers. Conserv. 2004, 13, 1675–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Maroyi, A. Community attitudes towards the reintroduction programme for the endangered pepper-bark tree Warburgia salutaris: Implications for plant conservation in South-East Zimbabwe. Oryx 2012, 46, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Veeman, T.; Cunningham, A.; Kozanayi, W.; Maingi, D. The economics of production of a rare medicinal species reintroduced in southeastern Zimbabwe: Warburgia salutaris. Adv. Econ. Bot. 2014, 17, 179–188. [Google Scholar]
  34. Venter, F.; Venter, J. Making the Most of Indigenous Trees, 1st ed.; Briza Publications: Pretoria, South Africa, 1996; pp. 1–304. [Google Scholar]
  35. Sekhar Sin, C.; Rao Bethap, R.; Chari Muru, A.; Pullagummi, C.; Latha, T.; Venkatesh, K.; Jyothi Bhe, A.; Pudutha, A.; Roja Rani, A. Cultivation, phytochemical studies, biological activities, and medicinal uses of Aloe ferox, grandfather of aloes an important amazing medicinal plant. Int. J. Pharmacol. 2013, 9, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kambizi, L.; Sultana, N.; Afolayan, A.J. Bioactive compounds isolated from Aloe ferox: A plant traditionally used for the treatment of sexually transmitted infections in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Pharm. Biol. 2005, 42, 636–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Trinder-Smith, T.; Raimondo, D. Agathosma betulina (P.J.Bergius) Pillans: National Assessment: Red list of South African Plants Version 2020.1; South African National Biodiversity Institute: Pretoria, South Africa, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  38. Coetzee, C.; Jefthas, E.; Reinten, E. Indigenous plant genetic resources of South Africa. In Perspectives on New Crops and New Uses; Janick, J., Ed.; ASHS Press: Alexandria, VA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  39. Smith, C.A.; Phillips, E.P.; van Hoepen, E. Common names of South African Plants. Taxon 1967, 16, 55. [Google Scholar]
  40. Low, C.H. Different histories of buchu: Euro-American appropriation of San and Khoekhoe knowledge of buchu plants. Environ. Hist. 2007, 13, 333–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Brendler, T.; Abdel-Tawab, M. Buchu (Agathosma betulina and A. crenulata): Rightfully Forgotten or Underutilized? Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 813142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Manning, J.; Goldblatt, P. Plants of the Greater Cape Floristic Region 1: The Core Cape Flora; Strelitzia, South African National Biodiversity Institute: Pretoria, South Africa, 2012; Volume 29. [Google Scholar]
  43. Brits, G.J.; Jacobs, G.; Vogts, M.M. Domestication of fynbos Proteaceae as a floricultural crop. Bothalia 1983, 14, 641–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Privett, S.D.J.; Krug, R.M.; Forbes, G.; Gaertner, M. Wild-flower harvesting on the Agulhas plam, South Africa: Impact of harvesting intensity under a simulated commercial harvesting regime for two re-seeding and two re-sprouting fynbos species. S. Afr. Bot. 2014, 94, 270–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Potts, A.J. Genetic risk, and the transition to cultivation in cape endemic crops—The example of honeybush (Cyclopia)? S. Afr. J. Bot. 2017, 110, 52–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Karsen, P.A.; Lötze, E.; Valentine, A.J.; Hoffman, E.W. Propagation, and cultivation practices of honeybush (Cyclopia spp.) for the Sustainable production of an export quality indigenous South African tea. Crop Sci. 2022, 62, 1702–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Joubert, E.; de Beer, D.; Malherbe, C.J.; Muller, M.; Louw, A.; Gelderblom, W.C.A. Formal honeybush tea industry reaches 20-year milestone—Progress of product research targeting phenolic composition, quality, and bioactivity. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2019, 127, 58–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. du Toit, J.; Joubert, E.; Britz, T.J. Honeybush tea–A rediscovered indigenous South African herbal tea. J. Sustain. Agric. 1998, 12, 67–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Joubert, E.; Joubert, M.E.; Bester, C.; de Beer, D.; de Lange, J.H. Honeybush (Cyclopia spp.): From Local Cottage Industry to Global Markets—The catalytic and supporting role of research. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2011, 77, 887–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rampedi, I.; Olivier, J.; Rampedi, I.T.; Olivier, J. The use and potential commercial development of Athrixia phylicoides. Acta Acad. 2005, 37, 165–183. [Google Scholar]
  51. Lerotholi, L.; Chaudhary, S.K.; Combrinck, S.; Viljoen, A. Bush tea (Athrixia phylicoides): A review of the traditional uses, bioactivity and phytochemistry. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2017, 110, 4–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Vuwani, M.K.; Nkomo, M.; Ngezimana, W.; Makunga, N.P.; Mudau, F.N. Response of phytochemicals in Bush tea (Athrixia phylicoides DC.) as influenced by selected micronutrients. HortScience 2017, 52, 965–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mabogo, D.E.N. The Ethnobotany of the Vhavenda; University of Pretoria: Pretoria, South Africa, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  54. Foden, W.; Potter, L. Athrixia phylicoides DC. National Assessment: Red List of South African Plants Version 2020.1; South African National Biodiversity Institute: Pretoria, South Africa, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  55. Mariod, A.A.; Abdelwahab, S.I. Sclerocarya birrea (Marula), An African tree of nutritional and medicinal uses: A Review. Food Rev. Int. 2012, 28, 375–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gouwakinnou, G.N.; Lykke, A.M.; Assogbadjo, A.E.; Sinsin, B. Local Knowledge, Pattern and Diversity of Use of Sclerocarya birrea. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2011, 7, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Borochov-Neori, H.; Judeinstein, S.; Greenberg, A.; Fuhrman, B.; Attias, J.; Volkova, N.; Hayek, T.; Aviram, M. Phenolic, Antioxidants and Antiatherogenic Effects of Marula (Sclerocarrya birrea Subsp. caffra) fruit juice in healthy humans. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 9884–9891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Moganedi, K.L.M.; Colpaert, N.; Breyne, P.; Sibara, M.M.; Goyvaerts, E.M.A. Determination of genetic stability of grafted Marula trees using AFLP markers. Sci. Hortic. 2007, 111, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ojewole, J.A.O.; Mawoza, T.; Chiwororo, W.D.H.; Owira, P.M.O. Sclerocarya birrea (a. Rich) Hochst. [‘Marula’] (Anacardiaceae): A review of its phytochemistry, pharmacology and toxicology and its ethnomedicinal uses. Phytother. Res. 2010, 24, 633–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Fox, F.; Young, M. Food from the Veld. Edible Wild Plants of Southern Africa; Delta Books: Johannesburg, South Africa, 1982; pp. 1–399. [Google Scholar]
  61. Viljoen, A.M.; Kamatou, G.P.P.; Başer, K.H.C. Head-space volatiles of Marula (Sclerocarya birrea Subsp. caffra). S. Afr. J. Bot. 2008, 74, 325–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Hillman, Z.; Mizrahi, Y.; Beit-Yannai, E. Evaluation of valuable nutrients in selected genotypes of Marula (Sclerocarya birrea ssp. caffra). Sci. Hortic. 2008, 117, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Leakey, R.R.B. Potential for novel food products from agroforestry trees: A review. Food Chem. 1999, 66, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. van de Venter, M.; Roux, S.; Bungu, L.C.; Louw, J.; Crouch, N.R.; Grace, O.M.; Maharaj, V.; Pillay, P.; Sewnarian, P.; Bhagwandin, N.; et al. Antidiabetic screening and scoring of 11 plants traditionally used in South Africa. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 119, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Mathabe, M.C.; Nikolova, R.V.; Lall, N.; Nyazema, N.Z. Antibacterial activities of medicinal plants used for the treatment of diarrhoea in Limpopo province, South Africa. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 105, 286–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Watt, J.M.; Breyer Brandwijk, M.G. The Medicinal and Poisonous Plants of Southern and Eastern Africa: Being an Account of Their Medicinal and Other Uses, Chemical Composition, Pharmacological Effects and Toxicology in Man and Animal, 2nd ed.; E. & S. Livingstone Ltd.: London, UK, 1962; p. 1457. [Google Scholar]
  67. Bryant, A.T. Zulu medicine and medicine-men. S. Afr. Humanit. 2021, 2, 1–103. [Google Scholar]
  68. van Wyk, B.-E.; van Oudtshoorn, B.; Gericke, N. Medicinal Plants of South Africa; Briza Publications: Pretoria, South Africa, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  69. Eloff, J.N. Antibacterial activity of Marula (Sclerocarya birrea (A. Rich.) Hochst. Subsp. caffra (Sond.) Kokwaro) (Anacardiaceae) bark and leaves. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2001, 76, 305–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hutchings, A. Zulu Medicinal Plants: An Inventory; University of Natal Press: Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, 1996; ISBN 0869808. [Google Scholar]
  71. Hilton-Taylor, C. Hoodia gordonii. Red Data List of Southern African Plants; South African National Botanical Institute: Pretoria, South Africa, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  72. Lötter, M.; Burrows, J.E.; von Staden, L. Siphonochilus aethiopicus (Schweinf) B.L Burtt. National Assessment: Red List of South African Pants; South African National Biodiversity Institute: Pretoria, South Africa, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  73. Raimondo, D.; von Staden, L.; Foden, W.; Victor, J.E.; Helme, N.A.; Turner, R.C.; Kamundi, D.A.; Manyama, P.A. Red List of South African Plants. Strelitzia 25; South African National Biodiversity Institute: Pretoria, South Africa, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  74. Schutte-Vlok, A.L.; Raimondo, D. Cyclopia genistoides (L.) R.Br. National Assessment: Red List of South African Plants; South African National Biodiversity Institute: Pretoria, South Africa, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  75. Witbooi, H.; Okem, A.; Makunga, N.P.; Kambizi, L. Micropropagation and secondary metabolites in Agathosma betulina (Berg.). S. Afr. J. Bot. 2017, 111, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Raimondo, D.; Vlok, J.H.; van Wyk, B.E.; van Jaarsveld, E.J.; Mtshali, H. Aloe ferox Mill. National Assessment: Red List of South African Plants Version 2020.1; South African National Biodiversity Institute: Pretoria, South Africa, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  77. Bairu, M.W.; Kulkarni, M.G.; Street, R.A.; Mulaudzi, R.B.; van Staden, J. Studies on Seed Germination, Seedling Growth, and In Vitro Shoot Induction of Aloe ferox Mill., a Commercially Important Species. HortScience 2009, 44, 751–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Kleynhans, R.; Singh, S.; Kishore, N.; Lall, N. Investigation towards Propagation and Cosmeceutical Application of Athrixia phylicoides DC; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  79. Araya, H. Seed Germination and Vegetative Propagation of Bush Tea (Athrixia phylicoides). Master’s Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  80. Mbangcolo, M.M. Aspects of Honeybush Tea (Cyclopia species) Propagation. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Agronomy, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  81. Koen, J.; Slabbert, M.M.; Bester, C.; Bierman, F. Germination Characteristics of Dimorphic Honeybush (Cyclopia spp.) Seed. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2017, 110, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. van Der Walt, L. Cyclopia genistoides (L.) R. Br. Sanbi Plants of The Week; South African National Biodiversity Institute: Pretoria, South Africa, 2020; Available online: https://www.arc.agric.za/arc-infruitec-nietvoorbij/honeybush/Documents/Cyclopia_genistoides_PlantZAfrica%20%281%29.pdf (accessed on 1 February 2023).
  83. Raimondo, D.; Wynberg, R.; Newton, D.; Victor, J.E. Hoodia gordonii (Masson) Sweet Ex Decne. National Assessment: Red List of South African Plants Version 2020; South African National Biodiversity Institute: Pretoria, South Africa, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  84. Okole, B.N.; Moodley, N. Conopco Inc In Vitro Multiplication of Hoodia Plants. U.S. Patent WO2008128847A1, 30 October 2008. [Google Scholar]
  85. Williams, V.L.; Raimondo, D.; Crouch, N.R.; Victor, J.E.; Cunningham, A.B.; Scott-Shaw, C.R.; Lötter, M.; Ngwenya, A.M.; Singh, Y. Hypoxis hemerocallidea Fisch., C.A.Mey. & Avé-Lall. National Assessment: Red List of South African Plants Version 2020.1; South African National Biodiversity Institute: Pretoria, South Africa, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  86. Dold, A.P.; Cocks, M.L. The Trade in Medicinal Plants in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci. 2002, 98, 589–597. [Google Scholar]
  87. Hawker, L.C.; Lumley, M.; Swartz, P.; Buckas, E.; Nichols, G.; Crouch, N.; Prentice, C.; Singh, Y. Growing a Hot Potato. Notes on the Cultivation and Propagation of Hypoxis hemerocallidea. Plant Life 1999, 21, 34–36. [Google Scholar]
  88. Mofokeng, M.M.; Kleynhans, R.; Sediane, L.M.; Morey, L.; Araya, H.T. Propagation of Hypoxis hemerocallidea by Inducing Corm Buds. S. Afr. J. Plant Soil 2018, 35, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Mofokeng, M.M.; Araya, H.T.; Amoo, S.O.; du Plooy, C.P.; Mashela, P.W. Ex-Vitro Vegetative Propagation Technique for Sustainable Utilization of Hypoxis hemerocallidea Corms. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 139, 294–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. de Castro, A.; Vlok, J.H.; Newton, D.; Motjotji, L.; Raimondo, D. Pelargonium sidoides DC. National Assessment: Red List of South African Plants Version 2020.1; South African National Biodiversity Institute: Pretoria, South Africa, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  91. Kleynhans, R.; Khoza, S.B. Propagation of Pelargonium sidoides from Root Cuttings. Acta Hortic. 2020, 1287, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Crouch, N.R.; Lötter, M.C.; Krynauw, S.; Pottas-Bircher, C. Siphonochilus aethiopicus (Zingiberaceae), the Prized Indungulu of the Zulu—An Overview. Herbertia 2000, 55, 115–129. [Google Scholar]
  93. Xego, S. Hydroponic Propagation of Siphonochilus aethiopicus: An Endangered Medicinal Plant; Cape Peninsula University of Technology: Cape Town, South Africa, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  94. Hannweg, K.; Visser, G.; Sippel, A.; Bertling, I. Micropropagation and in Vitro Polyploidisation of Siphonochilus aethiopicus (Wild Ginger) and Its Effect on Selected Horticultural Characteristics. In Acta Horticulturae, Proceedings of XIX International Horticultural Congress on Horticulture: Sustaining Lives, Livelihoods and Landscapes (IHC2014): International Symposium on Micropropagation and In Vitro Techniques, Brisbane, Australia, 17 August 2014; International Society for Horticultural Science: Leuven, Belgium, 2016; Volume 1113, p. 1113. [Google Scholar]
  95. Moyo, M. Micropropagation and Secondary Metabolites of Sclerocarya birrea. Ph.D. Thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  96. Williams, V.L.; Geldenhuys, C.J.; Scott-Shaw, C.R.; Victor, J.E. Warburgia salutaris (G.Bertol.) Chiov. National Assessment: Red List of South African Plants Version 2020.1; South African National Biodiversity Institute: Pretoria, South Africa, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  97. Hannweg, K.; Sippel, A.; Hofmeyr, M.; Swemmer, L.; Froneman, W. Strategies for the Conservation of Warburgia salutaris (Family: Canewaceaé), a Red Data List Species—Development of Propagation Methods. Acta Hortic. 2016, 1125, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Appleton, M.R.; van Staden, J. Micropropagation of Some South African Hypoxis species with Medicinal and Horticultural Potential. Acta Hortic. 1995, 420, 75–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Moyo, M.; Finnie, J.F.; van Staden, J. Topolins in Pelargonium sidoides micropropagation: Do the new brooms really sweep cleaner? Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2012, 110, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Moyo, M.; Finnie, J.F.; van Staden, J. In Vitro Morphogenesis of Organogenic Nodules Derived from Sclerocarya sirrea subsp. caffra Leaf Explants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2009, 98, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ngwenya, G.L.; Moodley, N.; Nemutanzhela, M.E.; Crampton, B.G. A micropropagation protocol for Siphonochilus aethiopicus, an endangered South African medicinal plant. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2010, 76, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Kowalski, B.; van Staden, J. In Vitro Culture of Two Threatened South African Medicinal Trees—Ocotea bullata and Warburgia salutaris. Plant Growth Regul. 2001, 34, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Witbooi, H. In Vitro Propagation of Agathosma betulina an Indigenous Plant of Economic Importance. Ph.D. Thesis, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  104. Nwafor, I.; Nwafor, C.; Manduna, I. Constraints to Cultivation of Medicinal Plants by Smallholder Farmers in South Africa. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Keirungi, J.; Fabricius, C. Selecting Medicinal Plants for Cultivation at Nqabara on the Eastern Cape Wild Coast, South Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci. 2005, 101, 497–501. [Google Scholar]
  106. Kokotkiewicz, A.; Luczkiewicz, M.; Kowalski, W.; Badura, A.; Piekus, N.; Bucinski, A. Isoflavone Production in Cyclopia subternata Vogel (Honeybush) Suspension Cultures Grown in Shake Flasks and Stirred-Tank Bioreactor. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 8467–8477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Kokotkiewicz, A.; Bucinski, A.; Luczkiewicz, M. Light and Temperature Conditions Affect Bioflavonoid Accumulation in Callus Cultures of Cyclopia subternata Vogel (Honeybush). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2014, 118, 589–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Kokotkiewicz, A.; Bucinski, A.; Luczkiewicz, M. Xanthone, Benzophenone and Bioflavonoid Accumulation in Cyclopia genistoides (L.) Vent. (Honeybush) Shoot Cultures Grown on Membrane Rafts and in a Temporary Immersion System. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015, 120, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Moyo, M.; Amoo, S.O.; Aremu, A.O.; Gruz, J.; Šubrtová, M.; Doležal, K.; van Staden, J. Plant Regeneration and Biochemical Accumulation of Hydroxybenzoic and Hydroxycinnamic Acid Derivatives in Hypoxis hemerocallidea Organ and Callus Cultures. Plant Sci. 2014, 227, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Giurgiu, R.M.; Morar, G.A.; Dumitras, A.; Boanca, P.; Duda, B.M.; Moldovan, C. Study regarding the suitability of cultivating medicinal plants in hydroponic systems in controlled environment. Res. J. Agric. Sci. 2014, 46, 84–92. [Google Scholar]
  111. Xego, S.; Kambizi, L.; Nchu, F. Threatened Medicinal Plants of South Africa: Case of the Family Hyacinthaceae. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2016, 13, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Wahome, P.K.; Oseni, T.O.; Masarirambi, M.T.; Shongwe, V.D. Effects of different hydroponics systems and growing media on the vegetative growth, yield and cut flower quality of gypsophila (Gypsophila paniculata L.). World J. Agric. Sci. 2011, 7, 692–698. [Google Scholar]
  113. Ade-Ademilua, O.E.; Mbah, G.C. Effect of different water regimes on the growth and phytochemical constituents of Acalypha wilkesiana harvested at 3am and 3pm. Int. J. Sci. Nat. 2013, 4, 619–623. [Google Scholar]
  114. Posthumus, M.A.; van Beek, T.A.; Collins, N.F.; Graven, E.H. Chemical composition of the essential oils of Agathosma betulina, A. crenulata and an A. betulina x crenulata hybrid (buchu). J. Essent. Oil Res. 1996, 8, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. de Urbina, A.V.O.; Martín, M.L.; Montero, M.J.; Morán, A.; Román, L.S. Sedating and Antipyretic Activity of the Essential Oil of Calamintha sylvatica subsp. ascendens..J. Ethnopharmacol. 1989, 25, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Pecere, T.; Gazzola, M.V.; Mucignat, C.; Parolin, C.; Vecchia, F.D.; Cavaggioni, A.; Basso, G.; Diaspro, A.; Salvato, B.; Carli, M.; et al. Aloe-emodin is a new type of anticancer agent with selective activity against neuroectodermal tumors. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 2800–2804. [Google Scholar]
  117. Li, T.; Shi, L.; Liu, W.; Hu, X.; Hui, Y.; Di, M.; Xue, S.; Zheng, Y.; Yao, M.; Li, C.; et al. Aloe-emodin induces mitochondrial dysfunction and pyroptosis by activation of the caspase-9/3/gasdermin e axis in HeLa cells. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 854528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Lu, C.C.; Yang, J.S.; Huang, A.C.; Hsia, T.C.; Chou, S.T.; Kuo, C.L.; Lu, H.F.; Lee, T.H.; Wood, W.G.; Chung, J.G. Chrysophanol induces necrosis through the production of ros and alteration of ATP levels in j5 human liver cancer cells. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2010, 54, 967–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Qian, Z.J.; Zhang, C.; Li, Y.X.; Je, J.Y.; Kim, S.K.; Jung, W.K. Protective effects of emodin and chrysophanol isolated from marine fungus Aspergillus sp. on ethanol-induced toxicity in HepG2/CYP2E1 cells. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2011, 2011, 452621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Kim, S.J.; Kim, M.C.; Lee, B.J.; Park, D.H.; Hong, S.H.; Um, J.Y. Anti-inflammatory activity of chrysophanol through the suppression of NF-ΚB/Caspase-1 activation in vitro and in vivo. Molecules 2010, 15, 6436–6451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  121. de Beer, D.; Joubert, E.; Malherbe, C.J.; Jacobus Brand, D. Use of countercurrent chromatography during isolation of 6-Hydroxyluteolin-7-o-β-Glucoside, a major antioxidant of Athrixia phylicoides. J Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218, 6179–6186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Padayachee, K. The Phytochemistry and Biological Activities of Athrixia phylicoides. Master’s Thesis, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  123. Caporali, S.; de Stefano, A.; Calabrese, C.; Giovannelli, A.; Pieri, M.; Savini, I.; Tesauro, M.; Bernardini, S.; Minieri, M.; Terrinoni, A. Anti-inflammatory and active biological properties of the plant-derived bioactive compounds luteolin and luteolin 7-glucoside. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Samec, M.; Liskova, A.; Koklesova, L.; Samuel, S.M.; Zhai, K.; Buhrmann, C.; Varghese, E.; Abotaleb, M.; Qaradakhi, T.; Zulli, A.; et al. Flavonoids against the Warburg phenotype—Concepts of predictive, preventive and personalised medicine to cut the gordian knot of cancer cell metabolism. EPMA J. 2020, 11, 377–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Sangeetha, R. Luteolin in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr. Res. Nutr. Food Sci. J. 2019, 7, 393–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Beelders, T.; de Beer, D.; Stander, M.; Joubert, E. Comprehensive phenolic profiling of Cyclopia genistoides (L.) Vent. by LC-DAD-MS and -MS/MS reveals novel xanthone and benzophenone constituents. Molecules 2014, 19, 11760–11790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Vyas, A.; Syeda, K.; Ahmad, A.; Padhye, S.; Sarkar, F.H. Perspectives on medicinal properties of mangiferin. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2012, 12, 412–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Beelders, T.; Brand, D.J.; de Beer, D.; Malherbe, C.J.; Mazibuko, S.E.; Muller, C.J.F.; Joubert, E. Benzophenone C- and O-Glucosides from Cyclopia genistoides (Honeybush) inhibit mammalian α-Glucosidase. J. Nat. Prod. 2014, 77, 2694–2699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Schulze, A.E.; de Beer, D.; Mazibuko, S.E.; Muller, C.J.F.; Roux, C.; Willenburg, E.L.; Nyunaï, N.; Louw, J.; Manley, M.; Joubert, E. Assessing similarity analysis of chromatographic fingerprints of Cyclopia subternata extracts as potential screening tool for in vitro glucose utilisation. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2016, 408, 639–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. van der Merwe, J.D.; de Beer, D.; Swanevelder, S.; Joubert, E.; Gelderblom, W.C.A. Dietary exposure to honeybush (Cyclopia) polyphenol-enriched extracts altered redox status and expression of oxidative stress and antioxidant defense-related genes in rat liver. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2017, 110, 230–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. van Heerden, F.R.; Vleggaar, R.; Horak, R.M.; Learmonth, R.A.; Maharaj, V.; Whittal, R.D. Steroidal Glycosides, Methods for Their Production and Preparation, Pharmaceutical Compositions Containing Them, and Their Use as Appetite Suppressants. International Patent GB2360519A, 28 November 2001. [Google Scholar]
  132. MacLean, D.B.; Luo, L.G. Increased ATP content/production in the hypothalamus may be a signal for energy-sensing of satiety: Studies of the anorectic mechanism of a plant steroidal glycoside. Brain Res. 2004, 1020, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Rubin, I.D.; Bindra, J.S.; Cawthorne, M.A. Extracts, Compounds and Pharmaceutical Compositions Having Anti-Diabetic Activity and Their Use. U.S. Patent US 2002/0146468 A1, 10 October, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  134. Horak, R.M.; Maharaj, V.; Hakkinen, J. Steroidal Glycosides or Plant Extracts for Treatment of Gastric Acid Secretion Damage. European Patent EP1099444A1, 16 May 2000. [Google Scholar]
  135. Bayley, A.D.; van Staden, J. Is the Corm the Site of Hypoxoside biosynthesis in Hypoxis hemerocallidea? Plant Physiol. Biochem. 1990, 28, 691–695. [Google Scholar]
  136. Bettolo, G.B.M.; Patamia, M.; Nicoletti, M.; Galeffi, C.; Messana, I. Research on African medicinal Plants-II. Hypoxoside, a new glycoside of uncommon structure from Hypoxis obtusa Busch. Tetrahedron 1982, 38, 1683–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Albrecht, C.F.; Kruger, P.B.; Smit, B.J.; Freestone, M.; Gouws, L.; Miller, R.; van Jaarsveld, P.P. The pharmacokinetic behaviour of hypoxoside taken orally by patients with lung cancer in a phase I trial. S. Afr. Med. J. 1995, 85, 861–865. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  138. Janecki, A.; Conrad, A.; Engels, I.; Frank, U.; Kolodziej, H. Evaluation of an aqueous-ethanolic extract from Pelargonium sidoides (eps® 7630) for its activity against group a-streptococci adhesion to human HEp-2 epithelial cells. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 133, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Park, Y.; Jung, W.; Yang, E.; Nam, K.-Y.; Bong, W.-R.; Kim, J.; Kim, K.Y.; Lee, S.; Cho, J.-Y.; Hong, J.-H.; et al. Evaluation of food effects on the pharmacokinetics of Pelargonium sidoides and Coptis with each bioactive compound berberine and epicatechin after a single oral dose of an expectorant and antitussive agent UI026 in healthy subjects. Transl. Clin. Pharmacol. 2022, 30, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Viljoen, A.M.; Demirci, B.; Başer, K.H.C.; van Wyk, B.E. The essential oil composition of the roots and rhizomes of Siphonochilus aethiopicus. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2002, 68, 115–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Jalilzadeh-Amin, G.; Maham, M. The application of 1,8-cineole, a terpenoid oxide present in medicinal plants, inhibits castor oil-induced diarrhea in rats. Pharm. Biol. 2015, 53, 594–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Mashau, M.E.; Kgatla, T.E.; Makhado, M.V.; Mikasi, M.S.; Ramashia, S.E. Nutritional composition, polyphenolic compounds and biological activities of marula fruit (Sclerocarya birrea) with its potential food applications: A Review. Int. J. Food. Prop. 2022, 25, 1549–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Maroyi, A. Warburgia salutaris (Bertol. f.) Chiov.: A multi-use ethnomedicinal plant species. J Med. Plants Res 2013, 7, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
  144. Appleton, C.C.; Drewes, S.E.; Mashimbye, M.J.; Cunningham, A.B. Observations on the molluscicidal properties of (−)-Warburganal on the South African Bulinus africanus (Planorbidae). J. Med. Appl. Malacol. 1992, 4, 37–40. [Google Scholar]
  145. Mashimbye, M.J. Chemical Constituents of Plants Native to Venda. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  146. Frum, Y.; Viljoen, A.M. In vitro 5-lipoxygenase and anti-oxidant activities of South African medicinal plants commonly used topically for skin diseases. Skin Pharmacol. Physiol. 2006, 19, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  147. Rabe, T.; van Staden, J. Isolation of an antibacterial sesquiterpenoid from Warburgia salutaris. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2000, 73, 171–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Mashimbye, M. A Drimane Sesquiterpenoid Lactone from Warburgia salutaris. Phytochemistry 1999, 51, 435–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Mashimbye, M.J.; Maumela, M.C.; Drewes, S.E. Novel and bioactive metabolites of Warburgia salutaris indigenous to the northern province, South Africa. Niger. J. Nat. Prod. Med. 1999, 3, 28–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Olila, D.; Olwa-Odyek; Opuda-Asibo, J. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of extracts of Zanthoxylum chalybeum and Warburgia ugandensis, Ugandan medicinal plants. Afr. Health Sci. 2001, 1, 66–72. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Factors responsible for the propagation of South African indigenous and naturalized medicinal plants.
Figure 1. Factors responsible for the propagation of South African indigenous and naturalized medicinal plants.
Plants 12 01174 g001
Figure 2. The path leading to the propagation of South African indigenous and naturalized medicinal plants.
Figure 2. The path leading to the propagation of South African indigenous and naturalized medicinal plants.
Plants 12 01174 g002
Figure 3. Propagation of medicinal plants in South Africa.
Figure 3. Propagation of medicinal plants in South Africa.
Plants 12 01174 g003
Figure 4. Conservation, propagation, and quality assurance as determining factors of the functionality of the traditional medicine system.
Figure 4. Conservation, propagation, and quality assurance as determining factors of the functionality of the traditional medicine system.
Plants 12 01174 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fajinmi, O.O.; Olarewaju, O.O.; Van Staden, J. Propagation of Medicinal Plants for Sustainable Livelihoods, Economic Development, and Biodiversity Conservation in South Africa. Plants 2023, 12, 1174. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants12051174

AMA Style

Fajinmi OO, Olarewaju OO, Van Staden J. Propagation of Medicinal Plants for Sustainable Livelihoods, Economic Development, and Biodiversity Conservation in South Africa. Plants. 2023; 12(5):1174. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants12051174

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fajinmi, Olufunke O., Olaoluwa O. Olarewaju, and Johannes Van Staden. 2023. "Propagation of Medicinal Plants for Sustainable Livelihoods, Economic Development, and Biodiversity Conservation in South Africa" Plants 12, no. 5: 1174. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants12051174

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop