Next Article in Journal
What Hides in the Heights? The Case of the Iberian Endemism Bromus picoeuropeanus
Next Article in Special Issue
Tracking Permeation of Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO) in Mentha × piperita Shoot Tips Using Coherent Raman Microscopy
Previous Article in Journal
Ecophysiological Differentiation among Two Resurrection Ferns and Their Allopolyploid Derivative
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transcriptome Profiling during Sequential Stages of Cryopreservation in Banana (Musa AAA cv Borjahaji) Shoot Meristem
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 12
Issue 7
10.3390/plants12071530
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Micropropagation of Endemic Endangered Taxa of the Italian Flora: Adenostyles alpina subsp. macrocephala (Asteraceae), as a Case Study

by
Valeria Gianguzzi
1,
Giulio Barone
1,2,
Emilio Di Gristina
1,*,
Francesco Sottile
3 and
Gianniantonio Domina
1,2
1
Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, bldg. 4, I-90128 Palermo, Italy
2
NBFC, National Biodiversity Future Center, Piazza Marina 61 (c/o palazzo Steri), I-90133 Palermo, Italy
3
Department of Architecture, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, bldg. 14, I-90128 Palermo, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(7), 1530; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants12071530
Submission received: 6 March 2023 / Revised: 28 March 2023 / Accepted: 31 March 2023 / Published: 1 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Micropropagation and Cryopreservation of Plants)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The conservation of endangered, rare, and endemic plant species is based on in situ and ex situ conservation strategies. When in situ conservation alone is not sufficient to guarantee the survival of the species, ex situ techniques are adopted in support. This study aimed to develop an efficient micropropagation protocol for Adenostyles by evaluating the effect of different plant growth regulators on leaf explants. Adenostyles alpina subsp. macrocephala (Asterace) is a perennial herbaceous plant endemic to Calabria (Southern Italy). The genus Adenostyles includes three species confined to the mountains of the Mediterranean and southern Europe. For callus induction, media supplemented with different concentrations of Benzylaminopurine (BAP) (0.5, 1, 2, and 3 mg L−1), Naphthaleneacetic Acid (NAA) (1 mg L−1), and 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid (2,4-D) (1 mg L−1) were tested. Shoot regeneration and proliferation were obtained in media supplemented with BAP (1, 2, and 3 mg L−1) and NAA (1 mg L−1). Root induction was obtained in media supplemented with IBA (0.25, 0.50, and 1 mg L−1) and NAA (0.25, 0.50, and 1 mg L−1). Statistically significant differences in callus induction and shoot regeneration were observed between the various media tested. The medium containing Murashige and Skoog (MS) supplemented with 3 mg L−1 of BAP and 1 mg L−1 of NAA showed the highest percentage of callus induction and increased shoot regeneration. The regenerated shoots showed more effective root induction in the hormone-free MS medium and in the presence of Indole-3-Butyric Acid (IBA) at concentrations of 0.25, 0.50, and 1 mg L−1. These results can be used as a basis for the preparation of a micropropagation protocol for different taxa of Adenostyles, as well as other species of Asteraceae specialized to the Mediterranean mountain habitat.

1. Introduction

The major threats affecting biodiversity in terms of plant distribution and richness include habitat loss and fragmentation, overexploitation, invasive alien species, air pollution and nitrogen deposition, and, finally, climate change [1]. These threats are mostly due to human pressure and demand for resources [2]. Endemic taxa, among all those occurring in a territory, represent one of the greatest global conservation responsibilities for any country [3]. Due to their rarity, they are considered to have low-density occurrences in a small geographic range, which is often a precursor to extinction [4].
There are several possible conservation actions that can be undertaken in situ to help mitigate this negative trend, but when this step is not possible (e.g., loss of habitat), ex situ collections (i.e., outside of the plant’s natural habitat) in botanical gardens, seed banks, in vitro techniques, and cryopreservation collections can be a valuable solution to avoid the complete disappearance of a taxon [5,6].
In situ conservation of threatened and endemic plants is the most effective tool against extinction [7]. This strategy aims to protect and maintain populations within their natural locations. Their habitats are conserved, and single taxa are protected. In situ conservation alone may not always be practical due to several constraints, including reduced area size for target-taxa preservation, low genetic diversity, personnel expenses, and vulnerability to natural uncertainties. [8]. In these cases, ex situ programs can support in situ conservation and, sometimes, are the only conservation strategies possible [9].
Ex situ conservation involves preserving threatened taxa outside of their original habitat by placing them in a human-controlled environment. One of the major limitations is the scarcity of propagating material [10]. Often, we deal with plants that flower occasionally, do not produce fertile seeds, or where traditional vegetative multiplication is difficult to apply. Compared with conventional methods, plant-tissue culture requires a small amount of initial plant material for plant propagation [11]. Among the advantages of in vitro culture techniques are their independence from seasonality, their speed, and their ability to produce pathogen-free plants [12]. On the other hand, the genetic and physiological uniformity of the material obtained can represent a limit with respect to the objective of conservation.
Taxa preserved ex situ as seeds, tissue cultures, or living collections can then be employed for reintroduction, population reinforcement, or restoration actions in situ. There is growing literature about restoration actions, but few studies have reported the outcomes of these projects [13,14]. When selecting a species deserving conservation actions, there are four steps required before any translocation is undertaken: the selection and profiling of the target species, seed collection, development of propagation protocols, and assessment of plant fitness of the populations used as a source [15]. Complementary strategies of ex situ conservation for species with few or no seeds available or those producing recalcitrant ones can be the use of in vitro conservation, which consists of maintaining the plant germplasm using tissue culture technologies [16]. Furthermore, micropropagation techniques can be used to safeguard species that have difficulty being propagated with traditional propagation techniques; for example, Capparis spinosa L. (Capparaceae) has a low seed germination rate due to seed dormancy and a high degree of seed heterozygosity. However, the main problems associated with vegetative propagation by stem cuttings seem to depend on the type of propagation material, which is influenced by the environment. For these reasons, in recent years, there has been growing interest in micropropagation with the aim of obtaining a large number of genetically homogeneous and uniform plant materials in a limited time and space [17,18,19]. In addition, micropropagation techniques can also be employed to study the ecological factors that influence plant development [20,21]. Collecting and maintaining endangered plants in tissue culture or cryopreservation to support the species’ survival and reduce its extinction risk can be a valuable alternative [22,23,24,25]. However, these solutions are only feasible if the practitioner can restore a rooted plant from tissue culture or cryopreservation that is then capable of being transplanted into the wild [26,27]; hence, the importance of developing successful protocols arises. Micropropagated plants can present in vitro generated variations, known as somaclonal variation [22,23]; these variations deserve to be monitored, as they can be an advantage for the conservation of wild plants with low genetic variability [25].
The Italian territory lies at the center of one of the main biodiversity hotspots for endemic plants, the Mediterranean basin [28,29]. However, here, as in many Mediterranean countries, very small actions have been undertaken to successfully conserve this plant richness [1]. International treaties (i.e., the Convention on Biological Diversity’s 2020 target) and conservation policies (i.e., Directive 1992/43/EEC in Europe) are in place to reduce biodiversity loss. However, the most effective way to protect biodiversity is at national and local scales [30].
Adenostyles Cass. (Asteraceae) is a genus of perennial herbaceous plants endemic to Europe, distributed in the high mountain ranges at montane to subalpine altitudes [31]. This genus includes three species: Adenostyles alliariae (Gouan) A. Kern., A. alpina (L.) Bluff and Fingerh., and A. leucophylla (Willd.) Rchb. A. alliariae is further subdivided into two subspecies, and A. alpina is subdivided into six subspecies [32,33]. This taxonomic arrangement is the result of a spatial and ecological separation between the different populations of the genus that are evolving towards increasingly isolated taxa [33]. Isolated and fragmented populations are most at risk of extinction. The southernmost populations of Adenostyles occur in Italy and are those of A. alpina subsp. macrocephala (Huter, Porta, and Rigo), Dillenb. and Kadereite, and A. alpina subsp. nebrodensis (Wagenitz and I.Müll.) Greuter. Adenostyles alpina subsp. macrocephala is endemic to Aspromonte and Sila (Calabria, S. Italy); its populations are scattered but include several hundred mature individuals growing along the rivulets that run through these mountain systems. Adenostyles alpina subsp. nebrodensis is known from a single locality at Passo della Botte on the higher Madonie mountains in Northern Sicily. The past population’s significant size is evidenced by the abundance of 19th-century specimens found in the main European herbaria. For over twenty years, only one individual has been known to have survived the indiscriminate scientific collection and alteration of its habitat [34]. The Passo della Botte area is, in fact, subject to water collection for civil use, which drains the watercourse and changes the microclimatic conditions of the site. Surely the ongoing climate change, with the decrease in snowfall and the inconstant distribution of rain, plays a role in this modification of microclimatic conditions [35]. These two subspecies have also been investigated from a conservation point of view. The IUCN category endangered (EN) was proposed for A. alpina subsp. macrocephala (Huter, Porta, and Rigo) Dillenb. and Kadereit, and critically endangered (CR) for A. alpina subsp. nebrodensis (Wagenitz and I.Müll.) Greuter on the basis of their limited extent of occurrence and area of occupancy and the threats of “Human intrusion & Disturbance” and “Natural System modifications” [36]. In fact, the areas where they grow are affected by the opening of new roads and trails and by water collection. The individual A. alpina subsp. nebrodensis has been monitored regularly for about 20 years; it flowers occasionally, but no fertile seeds have been observed. Therefore, vegetative reproduction is the only method for obtaining more individuals of this plant, and the micropropagation technique is surely a preferential solution to reduce disturbance [37]. Previous experiments were conducted directly on A. alpina subsp. nebrodensis have led to the formation of a callus starting from transverse sections of the leaf petiole, but further results have not yet been obtained [38]. The aim of this study was to develop an efficient micropropagation protocol for Adenostyles, endangered taxa, by evaluating the effects of different plant growth regulators on leaf explants. We preferred to carry out experimentation on Adenostyles alpina subsp. macrocephala, given the numerical consistency of its populations.

2. Results and Discussion

Leaf segments were cultured on MS medium supplemented with BAP (0.5, 1, 2, and 3 mg L−1) in combination with NAA and 2,4-D, respectively, at the same concentration of 1 mg L−1. After 3 weeks, there were significant differences (p < 0.05) in callus regeneration on media with different combinations and concentrations of cytokinins and auxins. Both in the explants placed directly in the light (photoperiod of 16 h light and 8 h darkness) and those placed in the dark (photoperiod of 24 h darkness) for a week, there was proliferation on all culture media, except in the hormone-free control medium, in which there was no callus production. In the data obtained, there were statistically significant differences between the growth media used, which influenced callus production. The concentration of plant regulators in the medium favored the growth of the callus, which increased when a higher concentration of BAP was present in the medium in combination with 2.4 D. In the present study, both in the case in which the explants were placed directly in the light and dark for one week, the highest percentages of callus production (85% and 66%, respectively) were obtained in the D4 medium (3 mg L−1 of BAP and 1 mg L−1 of 2,4-D) (Figure 1a,b).
In studies on callus production in Rubus idaeus L. (Rosaceae) and Orthosiphon stamineus Benth. (Lamiaceae), 2,4-D was the best growth regulator for inducing callus formation [39,40]. In Dendranthema × grandiflorum (Ramat.) Kitamura (Asteraceae) leaf explants reported no callus formation in hormone-free media, while vigorous callus growth was observed in the medium with 1.0 mg L−1 2,4-D and 1.0 mg L−1 BAP [41]. In several species, somatic embryo induction was achieved using different auxins such as 2,4-D, NAA, IAA, for example Swietenia macrophylla King (Meliaceae) with 2,4-D (4.0 mg L−1) and kinetin (1.0 mg L−1) [42]; Cymbopogon jwarancusa (Jones) Schult. (Poaceae) with 2,4-D (18.1 μM) [43]; Musa acuminata Colla (Musaceae) with 2,4-D (4.5 μM) [44]; Salicornia brachiata Roxb. with 2,4-D (2.0 mg L−1) [45], and Solanum melongena L. (Solanaceae) with 2,4-D (0.5 mg L−1) [46].
In the present study, when 2,4-D was replaced with NAA in the medium, callus production was lower. When the explants were placed in the dark for one week, 15% was recorded in the N1 medium and up to 47% in the N4 medium. In contrast, when the explants were exposed directly to light, 33% were observed in the N1 medium and 60% in the N4 medium. In Artemisia absinthium L. (Asteraceae), [47] reported the best callogenic response with BAP and NAA in the medium. A combination of BA and NAA was suitable for callus induction and shoot differentiation. This cytokinin–auxin combination has been used for callus regeneration in various protocols developed for species of Helianthus and Saussurea (Asteraceae) [48,49,50,51,52,53].
The texture and color of the callus changed according to the presence of growth regulators in the medium. When BAP was present in the medium at a concentration of 1, 2, or 3 mg L−1 in combination with 1 mg L−1 NAA and the explants were placed in the dark for a week, the callus was yellowish, green, and crumbly. Furthermore, after 5 weeks, small shoots and roots formed in the same medium. However, when the NAA was replaced with 2,4-D, the callus was light green, whitish, and crumbly, and there was shoot formation. The best results in terms of shoot regeneration were obtained in the MS medium integrated with 3 mg L−1 BAP and 1 mg L−1 NAA. Thus, shoot regeneration was achieved through indirect organogenesis.
Yellowish and whitish soft calli favored the development of shoots (Figure 2).
The mean value of shoots per explant obtained was 3.21 for medium N2, 2.98 for medium N3, and 4.38 for medium N4 (Figure 3). An increase in the vigor of the shoots obtained is therefore observed in the medium with increasing concentrations of cytokinin (BAP) in combination with 1 mg L−1 NAA. The culture medium containing 3 mg L−1 BAP and 1 mg L−1 NAA gave the best results (Figure 4).
Media containing benzyladenine (BA) (2.22–8.87 μM) and NAA (0.27–0.54 μM) were preferably used for multiple shoot induction and maintenance in Asteraceae [54,55,56,57,58,59]. The presence of auxins and cytokinins in the culture medium promotes cell division and differentiation of the shoots [60,61]. In the genus Artemisia, the effect of BA at concentrations of 0.1–2 mg L−1 on stimulating shoot formation was reported, and the best results occurred at concentrations between 0.25 and 1 mgL−1 [62,63].
Hyperhydricity (vitrification) is one of the problems encountered in micropropagation. Vitrified shoots have smaller internodes and poor rooting ability [64]. No hyperhydricity was observed during our tests. This result may be due to the correct concentration of plant growth regulators in the medium, especially cytokinins, whose high concentration has been indicated among the factors that may induce vitrification [65].
To promote root induction, the shoots obtained were transferred to a hormone-free MS medium or a medium containing IBA (0.25, 0.50, and 1 mg L−1) or NAA at the same concentrations. After 5 weeks, the shoots grew roots in the medium without hormones and in the presence of IBA in all three concentrations tested. No roots were formed when NAA replaced IBA in the medium. Longer (until 60 mm), more numerous roots (about 10), and more developed shoots (average of 8–10 leaves 30 mm long) were obtained in the hormone-free medium and the medium containing 1 mg L−1 IBA. When the concentration of IBA in the medium was 0.25–0.50 mg L−1, shorter (about 20 mm) and more numerous roots (about 10) were obtained with less developed shoots (an average of 5 leaves 20 mm long). Among the auxins, IBA is one of the most used to induce root formation by organogenesis. Its activity has been extensively tested on Arabidopsis (Brassicaceae) [66,67]. Recent studies conducted on Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) Bertoni (Asteraceae) have reported that 100% rooting was obtained in MS medium containing 1 mg L−1 IBA [68,69].
Subsequently, the microshoots that produced roots were acclimatized by transferring them in conditions of absolute sterility into Jiffy-7® pots soaked with sterile double-distilled water in Magenta® vessel GA7 and placed in the growth chamber under the same thermal (25 ± 1 °C) and light (16 h light and 8 h darkness) phase conditions of the in vitro phase until the emission of roots outside the Jiffy-7® (Figure 5).
The percentage of plants acclimatized to greenhouse conditions was 70%. The individuals produced have a number of leaves between 10 and 15, with an average height of 20 cm. The health status is overall good. Despite the non-optimal transplant period and environmental conditions, the satisfactory results obtained can be attributed to the good quality of the roots produced.
Plants moved outdoors, on hills, and entered vegetative rest after two weeks, which is in accordance with the taxon’s vegetative cycle. This outdoor parcel will be used in the next few years to monitor the acclimatization in natural conditions of these individuals obtained in vitro.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Material and Culture Media

3.1.1. Collection and Sterilization of Plant Material

We opted to use small leaf portions as propagation material due to their ease of harvesting and minimal harm to the plants when cut. The apical/nodal explants are not to be taken from rhizomes that are underground. Young leaves with an area of about 10 cm2 of Adenostyles alpina subsp. macrocephala were collected from different individuals randomly selected within the population growing along the Torrente Telese, Gambarie (South Italy, Calabria), 1420 m a.s.l., 38.175053° N, 15.856755° E (WGS84), on 16 June 2022, by G. Domina, E. Di Gristina, and G. Barone (voucher specimen housed in the SAF herbarium of the Department of Agriculture, Food, and Forest Sciences of the University of Palermo). The leaves were transported to the laboratory in plastic bags stored at about 7 °C and processed within 12 h of collection. The process of sterilizing plant material (explants) is an important activity in tissue culture which aims to eliminate microorganisms carried during explant extraction, which can cause contamination. The leaves were disinfected by standard methods using ethanol/sodium hypochloride [70]. The explants were sterilized by immersion in a 70% ethanol solution for 5 min and then in a 15% sodium hypochlorite solution for 20 min, followed by three 5 min rinses in sterile distilled water. No antibiotics were used. The concentration and exposure time to sterilants were decided based on the consistency of the explants. Subsequently, the leaves were cut in segments of about 50 mm2 with a sterile scalpel and cultured in Petri dishes containing mediums medium with different concentrations and combinations of Plant Growth Regulators (PGRs) (Table 1) for 3 weeks.

3.1.2. Callus Induction

For callus induction, the explants were used to inoculate the MS basal medium with vitamins [71], supplemented with 30 g/L−1 sucrose and 7 g/L−1 plant agar (Duchefa) as a gelling agent, and containing various concentrations and combinations of 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP), 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), and 1-naphthylacetic acid (Table 1). MS medium without any hormones (MS0) was used as a control. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 5.5 prior to the addition of the gelling agent with NaCl or with HCl 1 M. Each treatment included 40 explants, or eight replicates (Petri dishes) with five explants each. The callus was subcultured once in the same medium, 10 days after being cultured. After 3 weeks, the effect of the different PGRs on the explants placed directly in the light and those placed in the dark for a week was evaluated. The Petri dishes were maintained in a climatic growth chamber at 25 ± 1 °C in the dark and then placed under a cool, white, fluorescent lamp with a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 35 μmol m−1 s−1 and a photoperiod of 16 h light and 8 h darkness.

3.1.3. Shoot and Root Induction

For shoot induction, calli obtained from the induction phase of callus were transferred into transparent microbox vessels of 125 × 65 mm and 80 mm high, containing 80–100 mL of MS basal medium with vitamins [71], supplemented with 30 g/L−1 sucrose and 7 g/L−1 plant agar (Duchefa) as a gelling agent, and different concentrations of BAP (1, 2, and 3 mg L−1) and NAA (1 mg L−1) (Table 1). After 5 weeks, the percentage of shoots produced by the callus was evaluated with binoculars. Subsequently, the 10 mm shoots were isolated from the callus with a sterile scalpel and tweezers. On average, 6 shoots per callus were obtained and subcultured once in the same medium (N2, N3, and N4) for 12 days to promote their elongation. Microshoots, 15 mm long, were used for root induction. The shoots’ proliferation was evaluated only in the media in which there was the development of shoots (N2, N3, and N4).
Rooting of regenerated shoots was achieved on MS medium without any added phytohormones (MS0) or supplementation with different auxins (Table 2). The explants have always been kept on the same medium until the emission of roots without performing subculture. After 5 weeks, once the roots were obtained, the plants were placed in Jiffy-7-Pellet®. All cultures were incubated in a climatic growth chamber at 25 ± 1 °C with a photoperiod of 16 h light and 8 h darkness and a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 35 μmol m−1 s−1 for 4 weeks.

3.1.4. Acclimatization

Acclimatization of plantlets was performed first in plastic containers measuring 119 × 90 mm and 80 mm high and containing 150 g of a peat (75%) and perlite (25%) mix under controlled growth conditions (25 ± 1 °C and 16 h light and 8 h darkness) to promote the hardening of plantlets. The mix of peat and perlite used ensured good aeration of the root system, which is considered one of the key elements for the survival of tissue culture plantlets transferred from a lab to pots [72]. A plant rooted in Jiffy-7-Pellet® with a length of 5 cm was placed inside each individual plastic container. After 3 weeks, the plants reached about 15 cm in length and were transplanted in pots of 16 cm in diameter containing about one liter of slightly alkaline loam soil and placed in unheated, shaded greenhouse conditions (10–22 °C and 9 h light and 13 h darkness) for 4 weeks. One plant was transplanted into each pot.
After greenhouse acclimatization, in the first week of December 2022, ten plants were transferred outdoors to study the behavior of in vitro produced plants in climatic conditions more similar to those of the natural population from which the propagating material was taken. It was chosen to grow the plants along a rivulet in a private garden in Giacalone, a locality not far from Palermo (38.033398° N, 13.234257° E, 650 m a.s.l., upper Mesomediterranean bioclimate, on clay carbonate soil). This locality is more than 70 km as the crow flies from the individual of Adenostyles alpina subsp. nebrodensis, to avoid any risk of genetic pollution.

3.2. Data Analysis

Each treatment included 40 explants—eight replicates with five explants each. Statistical analysis was performed using the software SYSTAT 13. To highlight statistically significant differences and possible interactions between the culture system and PGRs, a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed (p ≤ 0.05). When the interaction between two factors was not significant, a one-way ANOVA was performed; each factor was analyzed individually, and the separation of the averages was performed via the Tukey test (p ≤ 0.05).

4. Conclusions

Micropropagation, starting from leaf portions of Adenostyles alpina subsp. macrocephala, was tested with success. The best results with growth regulators were achieved with the following supplements: 3 mg L−1 BAP and 1 mg L−1 2.4 D in the initiation stage and 3 mg L−1 BAP and 1 mg L−1 NAA in the elongation stage. The acclimatization stage was successfully performed with Jiffy-7® pellets. Using this protocol, 12 plantlets can be produced from a 1 cm2 leaf in approximately 24 weeks.
To date, no published reports on the use of micropropagation for Adenostyles exist. This is also the first report on the outdoor planting of in vitro micropropagated Adenostyles species. More years of observations will be needed to monitor the outdoor acclimatization of the plants produced with micropropagation techniques. In particular, it will be necessary to observe whether these individuals are more delicate than those obtained by seed or grown under natural and less favorable conditions.
The proposed micropropagation technique has the potential to be applied to other endangered Adenostyles spp. or, more generally, to other Asteraceae of rocky environments, and this in vitro approach may be of benefit to other plant conservation researchers. Although the leaves are not among the best organs from which to start micropropagation [16], they are certainly the easiest to collect and whose cutting causes less stress to the mother plant. Micropropagation from vegetative organs creates clones. Therefore, it is essential for conservation programs to assess, ex ante, the intra-population genetic variability of the taxa for the proper development of conservation strategies and for proper plan sampling [73,74]. Plant regeneration via callus formation often gives rise to somaclonal variations [22]. Variations in plants can be analyzed by various molecular markers or can be estimated by flow cytometry (FCM) [23,24]. Somaclonal variations, when they do not involve a change in the chromosome number, can be useful for increasing the genetic variability of the propagation material to be used for conservation interventions [25].
The first application of the micropropagation protocol presented could be the conservation of Adenostyles alpina subsp. nebrodensis. The multiplication of this plant must be carried out as soon as possible to offer greater chances of survival to the single individual that still exists.
Micropropagation has not yet been universally adopted for conservation purposes due to still limited knowledge, high production costs, and the need for specialized personnel and equipped laboratories. In addition, the significant loss of material due to microbial contamination, poor rooting, and low survival rates during the acclimatization stage should be taken into account [75,76]. The use of ex situ strategies is expected to rise in view of the increasing anthropogenic pressure and climate change. In vitro techniques for the propagation and preservation of cells, tissues, and plant organs are proving to be a valuable tool in ex situ conservation. As often reiterated, conserving endemic species that are threatened is critical in achieving global biodiversity targets. Each country has the responsibility to halt global biodiversity loss by conserving as a priority the endemic species that occur in its territory. Any loss of endemic wildlife that can no longer be recovered is a failure perpetrated against future generations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.G. and F.S.; methodology, V.G.; validation, V.G., F.S. and G.D.; formal analysis, V.G.; investigation, V.G.; resources, V.G., G.B., E.D.G., F.S. and G.D.; data curation, V.G.; writing—original draft preparation, V.G., E.D.G. and G.B.; writing—review and editing, F.S. and G.D.; funding acquisition, F.S. and G.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by NBFC to the University of Palermo, funded by the Italian Ministry of University and Research, PNRR, Missione 4 Componente 2, “Dalla ricerca all’impresa”, Investimento 1.4, Project CN00000033, and by the “Progetto di Ricerca di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale” (PRIN) “PLAN.T.S. 2.0–towards a renaissance of PLANt Taxonomy and Systematics” led by the University of Pisa, under the grant number 2017JW4HZK.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the text.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Corlett, R.T. Plant diversity in a changing world: Status, trends, and conservation needs. Plant Divers. 2016, 38, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Watson, J.E.M.; Shanahan, D.F.; Di Marco, M.; Allan, J.; Laurance, W.F.; Sanderson, E.W.; Mackey, B.; Venter, O. Catastrophic Declines in Wilderness Areas Undermine Global Environment Targets. Curr. Biol. 2016, 26, 2929–2934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Kraus, D.; Enns, A.; Hebb, A.; Murphy, S.; Drake, D.A.R.; Bennett, B. Prioritizing nationally endemic species for conservation. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 2022, 2023, e12845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Whittaker, R.J.; Araújo, M.B.; Jepson, P.; Ladle, R.J.; Watson, J.E.M.; Willis, K.J. Conservation Biogeography: Assessment and Prospect. Div. Distrib. 2005, 11, 3–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. CBD. The Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020 and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, in: unep/cbd/cop/dec/x/2. In Proceedings of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Nagoya, Japan, 18–19 October 2010. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ensslin, A.; Tschöpe, O.; Burkart, M.; Joshi, J. Fitness decline and adaptation to novel environments in ex situ plant collections: Current knowledge and future perspectives. Biol. Conserv. 2015, 192, 394–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Moura, M. Conservation of Hypericum foliosum Aiton, an Endemic Azorean Species, by Micropropagation. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 1998, 34, 244–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Salgotra, R.K.; Sharma, M.; Pandotra, P. Biotechnological Interventions for Sustainable Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources in the Scenario of Climate Change. Nat. Resour. Conserv. Res. 2019, 2, 754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ramsay, M.M.; Jacskon, A.D.; Porley, R.D. A pilot study for ex situ conservation of UK bryophytes. In BGCI, EuroGard 2000; EBGC: Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, 2000; pp. 52–57. [Google Scholar]
  10. Grigoriadou, K.; Krigas, N.; Maloupa, E. GIS-facilitated in vitro propagation and ex situ conservation of Achillea occulta. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2011, 107, 531–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Coelho, N.; Gonçalves, S.; Romano, A. Endemic plant species conservation: Biotechnological approaches. Plants 2020, 9, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Debnarh, M.; Malik, C.P.; Baisen, P.S. Micropropagation: A tool for the production of high quality plant based medicines. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2006, 7, 33–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Sarropoulou, V.; Maloupa, E. Micropropagation and ex situ conservation of three rare and endemic ornamental Dianthus taxa (Caryophyllaceae). Bot. Serbica 2022, 46, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Godefroid, S.; Piazza, C.; Rossi, G.; Buord, S.; Stevens, A.D.; Aguraiuja, R.; Cowell, C.; Weekley, C.W.; Vogg, G.; Iriondo, J.M.; et al. How successful are plant species reintroductions? Biol. Conserv. 2011, 144, 672–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Godefroid, S.; Le Pajolec, S.; Van Rossum, F. Pre-translocation considerations in rare plant reintroductions: Implications for designing protocols. Plant Ecol. 2016, 217, 169–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Reed, B.M.; Sarasan, V.; Kane, M.; Bunn, E.; Pence, V.C. Biodiversity conservation and conservation biotechnology tools. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2011, 47, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vahdati, K.; Jariteh, M.; Niknam, V.; Mirmasoumi, M.; Ebrahimzadeh, H. Somatic embryogenesis and embryo maturation in Persian Walnut. Acta Hort. 2005, 705, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gianguzzi, V.; Inglese, P.; Barone, E.; Sottile, F. In vitro regeneration of Capparis spinosa L. by using a temporary immersion system. Plants 2019, 8, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Gianguzzi, V.; Barone, E.; Sottile, F. In vitro rooting of Capparis spinosa L. as affected by genotype and by the proliferation method adopted during the multiplication phase. Plants 2020, 9, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Maleki Asayesh, Z.; Vahdati, K.; Aliniaeifard, S.; Askari, N. Enhancement of ex vitro acclimation of walnut plantlets through modification of stomatal characteristics in vitro. Sci. Hort. 2017, 220, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Maleki Asayesh, Z.; Vahdati, K.; Aliniaeifard, S. Investigation of physiological components involved in low water conservation capacity of in vitro walnut plants. Sci. Hort. 2017, 224, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pence, V.C. The possibilities and challenges of in vitro methods for plant conservation. Kew Bull. 2010, 65, 539–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Slazak, B.; Sliwinska, E.; Saługa, M.; Ronikier, M.; Bujak, J.; Słomka, A.; Göransson, U.; Kuta, E. Micropropagation of Viola uliginosa (Violaceae) for endangered species conservation and for somaclonal variation-enhanced cyclotide biosynthesis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015, 120, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Carra, A.; Catalano, C.; Badalamenti, O.; Carimi, F.; Pasta, S.; Motisi, A.; Abbate, L.; La Bella, F.; Fazan, L.; Kozlowski, G.; et al. Overcoming sexual sterility in conservation of endangered species: The prominent role of biotechnology in the multiplication of Zelkova sicula (Ulmaceae), a relict tree at the brink of extinction. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2019, 137, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Żabicki, P.; Sliwinska, E.; Mitka, J.; Sutkowska, A.; Tuleja, M.; Migdałek, G.; Żabicka, J.; Słomka, A.; Kwiatkowska, M.; Kuta, E. Does somaclonal variation play advantageous role in conservation practice of endangered species?: Comprehensive genetic studies of in vitro propagated plantlets of Viola stagnina Kit. (Violaceae). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2019, 136, 339–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Center for Plant Conservation CPC. Best Plant Conservation Practices to Support Species Survival in the Wild; Center for Plant Conservation: Escondido, CA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  27. Halmagyi, A.; Coste, A.; Jarda, L.; Butiuc keul, A. A safeguard measure of endemic and endangered plant species: Cryostorage of Dianthus taxa. Biodivers. Conserv. 2020, 29, 3445–3460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Médail, F.; Quézel, P. Biodiversity Hotspots in the Mediterranean Basin: Setting Global Conservation Priorities. Conserv. Biol. 1999, 13, 1510–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Myers, N.; Mittermeier, R.A.; Mittermeier, C.G.; da Fonseca, G.A.B.; Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 2000, 403, 853–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Pimm, S.L.; Jenkins, C.N.; Abell, R.; Brooks, T.M.; Gittleman, J.L.; Joppa, L.N.; Raven, P.H.; Roberts, C.M.; Sexton, J.O. The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science 2014, 344, 1246752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Meusel, H.; Jäger, E.J. Vergleichende Chorologie der Zentraleuropäischen. Flora. Bd. 3. Gustav Fischer: Stuttgart, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  32. Dillenberger, M.S.; Kadereit, J.W. Two new combinations in Adenostyles (Asteraceae, Senecioneae), a conspectus of the genus and key to its species and subspecies. Willdenowia 2012, 42, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dillenberger, M.S.; Kadereit, J.W. The phylogeny of the European high mountain genus Adenostyles (Asteraceae-Senecioneae) reveals that edaphic shifts coincide with dispersal events. Amer. J. Bot. 2013, 100, 1171–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Scafidi, F.; Domina, G. Indagini morfometriche sul genere Adenostyles (Asteraceae) nell’Italia meridionale. Proceeding of the Minilavori della Riunione Scientifica del Gruppo per la Floristica, Sistematica ed Evoluzione, Rome, Italy, 21–22 October 2016; Domina, G., Peruzzi, L., Eds.; Botanical Society of Italy: Rome, Italy, 2016; p. 41. [Google Scholar]
  35. Walther, G.R.; Post, E.; Convey, P.; Menzel, A.; Parmesan, C.; Beebee, T.J.C.; Fromentin, J.; Hoegh-Guldberg, O.; Bairlein, F. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 2002, 416, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Orsenigo, S.; Montagnani, C.; Fenu, G.; Gargano, D.; Peruzzi, L.; Abeli, T.; Alessandrini, A.; Bacchetta, G.; Bartolucci, F.; Bovio, M.; et al. Red listing plants under full national responsibility: Extinction risk and threats in the vascular flora endemic to Italy. Biol. Conserv. 2018, 224, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Spadaro, V.; Bazan, G.; Raimondo, F.M. Adenostyles alpina subsp. nebrodensis (Asteraceae) taxon endemico in via di estinzione. In Proceedings of the 105° Congresso Nazionale della Società Botanica Italiana, Milan, Italy, 25–28 August 2010; Riassunti, Società Botanica Italiana: Milan, Italy, 2010; p. 113. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lombardo, G.; Raimondo, F.M.; Spadaro, V. Formazione di callo in Adenostyles alpina subsp. nebrodensis (Asteraceae). In Proceedings of the 108° Congresso Società Botanica Italiana, Baselga di Pinè (Trento), Italy, 18–20 September 2013; Riassunti, Società Botanica Italiana: Trento, Italy, 2013; p. 76. [Google Scholar]
  39. Borejsza-Eysocki, W.; Hrazdin, G. Establishment of callus and cell suspension cultures of raspberry (Rubus idaues cv. Royalty). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1994, 37, 213–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lee, W.L.; Chang, L.K. Establishment of Orthosiphon stamineus cell suspension culture for cell growth. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2004, 78, 101–106. [Google Scholar]
  41. Shinoyama, H.; Nomurai, Y.; Tsuchiya, T.; Kazuma, T. A Simple and efficient Method for somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from leaves of chrysanthemum [Dendranthema × grandiflorum (Ramat.) Kitamura]. Plant Biotechnol. 2004, 1, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Collado, R.; Barbon, R.; Agramonte, D.; Jiménez-Terry, F.; Pérez, M.; Gutiérrez, O. Embriogénesis somática directa en Swietenia macrophylla King. Biotecnol. Veg. 2006, 6, 67–71. [Google Scholar]
  43. Mehandru, P.; Gehlot, H.S.; Shekhawat, N.S.; Vibha, J.B.; Dinesh, R. In vitro plant regeneration of Cymbopogon jwarancusa (Jones) Schult from meristematic base of spikelet. Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. 2014, 37, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Escobedo-GraciaMedrano, R.M.; Maldonado-Borges, J.I.; Burgos-Tan, M.J.; Valadez-González, N.; Ku-Cauich, J.R. Using flow cytometry and cytological analyses to assess the genetic stability of somatic embryo-derived plantlets from embryogenic Musa acuminata Colla (AA) ssp. malaccensis cell suspension cultures. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2014, 116, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rathore, M.S.; Paliwal, N.; Anand, K.G.V.; Agarwal, P.K. Somatic embryogenesis and in vitro plantlet regeneration in Salicornia brachiata Roxb. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015, 120, 355–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ashraful-Habib, M.; Abdul-Muktadir, M.; Rezwan-Kabir, M.; Khaleque-Mian, M.A.; Yousuf-Akhond, M.A. Optimization of somatic embryogenesis protocol for locally adapted eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) Varieties in Bangladesh. Plant Tissue Cult. Biotech. 2016, 26, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Nin, S.; Morosi, E.; Schiff, S.; Bennici, A. Callus culture of Artemisia absinthium L. initiation, growth optimization and organogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1996, 45, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Knittel, N.; Escandon, A.S.; Hahne, G. Plant regeneration at high frequency from mature sunflower cotyledons. Plant Sci. 1991, 73, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chraibi, K.M.B.; Castelle, J.C.; Latche, A.; Roustan, J.P.; Fallot, J.A. Genotype- independent system of regeneration from cotyledons of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) the role of ethylene. Plant Sci. 1992, 86, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhao, D.X.; Qiao, C.L.; Wang, Y. Cell culture and selection of high flavonoid production during cell lines of Saussurea medusa. Acta Bot Sin. 1998, 40, 515–520. [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhao, D.; Xing, J.; Li, M.; Lu, D.; Zhao, Q. Optimization of growth and jaceosidin production in callus and cell suspension cultures of Saussurea medusa. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2001, 67, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Baker, M.C.; Munoz-Fernandez, N.; Carter, C.D. Improved sheet development and rooting from mature cotyledons of sunflower. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1999, 58, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Deglene, L.; Lesignes, P.; Alibert, G.; Saraffi, A. Genetic control of organogenesis in cotyledons of sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1997, 48, 127–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Winand, C.H.; Ramaut, J.L.; Gaspar, T.H. Multiplication vegetative par culture in vitro Arnica montana L. J. Pharm. Belg. 1986, 41, 147–150. [Google Scholar]
  55. Akita, M.; Shigeoka, T.; Koizumi, Y.; Kawamura, M. Mass propagation of shoots of Stevia rebaudiana using large scale bioreactor. Plant Cell Rep. 1994, 13, 180–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Laparra, H.; Stoeva, P.; Ivanov, P.; Hahne, G. Plant regeneration from different explants in Helianthus smi-thii Heiser. Plant Cell Rep. 1997, 16, 692–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Stojakowska, A.; Kisiel, W. Production of parthenolide in organ cultures of feverfew. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1997, 47, 159–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liu, C.Z.; Wang, Y.C.; Guo, C.; Ouyang, F.; Ye, H.C.; Li, G.F. Production of artemisinin by shoot cultures of Artemisia annua L. in a modified inner-loop mist bioreactor. Plant Sci. 1998, 135, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wildi, E.; Schaffner, W.; Berger, B.K. In vitro propagation of Petasites hybridus (Asteraceae) from leaf and petiole explants and from inflorescence buds. Plant Cell Rep. 1998, 18, 336–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Kieber, J.J. Tribute to Folke Skoog. Recent advances in our understanding of Cytokinin biology. Plant Growth Regul. 2002, 21, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Razdan, M.K. Introduction to Plant Tissue, 2nd ed.; Qxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.: New Delhi, India, 2003; p. 27. [Google Scholar]
  62. Holobiuc, I.; Blindu, R. In vitro culture introduction for ex situ conservation of some rare plant species. Rom. J. Biol. Plant Biol. 2007, 51–52, 13–23. [Google Scholar]
  63. Zia, M.; Rehman, R.; Chaudhary, M.F. Hormonal regulation for callogenesis and organogenesis of Artemisia absinthium L. Afr. J. Biotech. 2007, 6, 1874–1878. [Google Scholar]
  64. Antonopoulou, C.; Dimassi, K.; Therios, I.; Chatzissavvidis, C. Does dikegulac affect in vitro shoot proliferation and hyperhydricity incidence in olive explants? Hort. Sci. 2018, 45, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Martin, G.; Geetha, S.P.; Raja, S.S.; Raghu, A.V.; Balachandran, I.; Ravindran, P.N. An efficient micropropagation system for Celastrus paniculatus Wild.: A vulnerable medicinal plant. J. For. Res. 2006, 11, 461–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ludwig-Müller, J.; Vertocnik, A.; Town, C.D. Analysis of indole-3-butyric acid-induced adventitious root formation on Arabidopsis stem segments. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 2095–2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Casson, S.A.; Lindsey, K. Genes and signalling in root development. New Phytol. 2003, 158, 11–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hwang, S.J. Rapid in vitro propagation and enhanced stevioside accumulation in Stevia rebaudiana Bert. Plant Biol. 2006, 49, 267–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tadhani, M.B.; Jadeja, R.P.; Rena, S. Micropropagation of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni using multiple shoot culture. J. Cell Tissue Res. 2006, 6, 545–548. [Google Scholar]
  70. Sudha, S.; Bhaskar, A.; Nair, S.S. Standardisation of Surface Sterilization Procedures for Micropropagation in Heliconia stricta var. iris bannochie. Biosci. Biotech. Res. Asia 2010, 7, 785–792. [Google Scholar]
  71. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F.A. Revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 1962, 15, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhou, J.; Guo, F.; Qi, C.; Fu, J.; Xiao, Y.; Wu, J. Efficient ex vitro rooting and acclimatization for tissue culture plantlets of ginger. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2022, 150, 451–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Gaudeul, M.; Taberlet, P.; Till-Bottraud, I. Genetic diversity in an endangered alpine plant, Eryngium alpinum L. (Apiaceae), inferred from amplified fragment length polymorphism markers. Molec. Ecol. 2000, 9, 1625–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Cristea, V.; Besenyei, E.; Jarda, L.; Farkas, A.; Marcu, D.; Clapa, D.; Halmagyi, A.; Butiuc-Keul, A. In situ genetic variability and micropropagation of Cerastium banaticum (rochel) heuff. (Caryophyllaceae)—A rare and endemic species from Romania. Acta Biol. Crac. Ser. Bot. 2019, 61, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kozai, T.; Kubota, C. Developing a photoautotrophic micropropagation system for woody plants. J. Plant Res. 2001, 114, 525–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Gianní, S.; Sottile, F. In vitro storage of plum germplasm by slow growth. Hortic. Sci. 2016, 42, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Plants 12 01530 g001a 550Plants 12 01530 g001b 550
Figure 1. (a) Effect of different plant growth regulator (PGR) concentrations on the percentage of callus induction (%) in Adenostyles alpina subsp. macrocephala placed in the dark for one week (n = 40). Bars represent standard error. The different letters reported above the bars indicate statistically significant differences between each culture medium tested (Tukey’s test, p ≤ 0.05). MS0 (control, hormone-free, medium with sucrose); N1 (medium with 0.5 mg L−1 BAP + 1 mg L−1 NAA); N2 (1 BAP + 1 NAA); N3 (2 BAP + 1 NAA); N4 (3 BAP + 1 NAA); D1 (medium with 0.5 mg L−1 BAP + 1 mg L−1 2,4-D); D2 (1 BAP + 1 2,4-D); D3 (2 BAP + 1 2,4-D); D4 (3 BAP + 1 2,4-D). (b) Effect of different plant growth regulator (PGR) concentrations on the percentage of callus (%) in Adenostyles alpina subsp. macrocephala placed directly in the light (n = 40). Bars represent standard error. The different letters reported above the bars indicate statistically significant differences between each culture medium tested; (Tukey’s test, p ≤ 0.05). MS0 (control, hormone-free, medium with sucrose); N1 (medium with 0.5 mg L−1 BAP + 1 mg L−1 NAA); N2 (1 BAP + 1 NAA); N3 (2 BAP + 1 NAA); N4 (3 BAP + 1 NAA); D1 (medium with 0.5 mg L−1 BAP + 1 mg L−1 2,4-D); D2 (1 BAP + 1 2,4-D); D3 (2 BAP + 1 2,4-D); D4 (3 BAP + 1 2,4-D).
Figure 1. (a) Effect of different plant growth regulator (PGR) concentrations on the percentage of callus induction (%) in Adenostyles alpina subsp. macrocephala placed in the dark for one week (n = 40). Bars represent standard error. The different letters reported above the bars indicate statistically significant differences between each culture medium tested (Tukey’s test, p ≤ 0.05). MS0 (control, hormone-free, medium with sucrose); N1 (medium with 0.5 mg L−1 BAP + 1 mg L−1 NAA); N2 (1 BAP + 1 NAA); N3 (2 BAP + 1 NAA); N4 (3 BAP + 1 NAA); D1 (medium with 0.5 mg L−1 BAP + 1 mg L−1 2,4-D); D2 (1 BAP + 1 2,4-D); D3 (2 BAP + 1 2,4-D); D4 (3 BAP + 1 2,4-D). (b) Effect of different plant growth regulator (PGR) concentrations on the percentage of callus (%) in Adenostyles alpina subsp. macrocephala placed directly in the light (n = 40). Bars represent standard error. The different letters reported above the bars indicate statistically significant differences between each culture medium tested; (Tukey’s test, p ≤ 0.05). MS0 (control, hormone-free, medium with sucrose); N1 (medium with 0.5 mg L−1 BAP + 1 mg L−1 NAA); N2 (1 BAP + 1 NAA); N3 (2 BAP + 1 NAA); N4 (3 BAP + 1 NAA); D1 (medium with 0.5 mg L−1 BAP + 1 mg L−1 2,4-D); D2 (1 BAP + 1 2,4-D); D3 (2 BAP + 1 2,4-D); D4 (3 BAP + 1 2,4-D).
Plants 12 01530 g001aPlants 12 01530 g001b
Plants 12 01530 g002 550
Figure 2. In vitro callus regeneration produced by leaves of Adenostyles alpina subsp. macrocephala. (a) The callus that developed in the medium when the NAA was replaced with 2.4 D. (b–f) Different stages of indirect organogenesis in the MS medium integrated with 3 mg L−1 BAP and 1 mg L−1 NAA. Bars (a–f) = 1 mm.
Figure 2. In vitro callus regeneration produced by leaves of Adenostyles alpina subsp. macrocephala. (a) The callus that developed in the medium when the NAA was replaced with 2.4 D. (b–f) Different stages of indirect organogenesis in the MS medium integrated with 3 mg L−1 BAP and 1 mg L−1 NAA. Bars (a–f) = 1 mm.
Plants 12 01530 g002
Plants 12 01530 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of different PGR concentrations on the number of shoots per explant. Bars represent standard error. The different letters reported above the bars indicate statistically significant differences between each culture medium tested (Tukey’s test, p ≤ 0.05). N2 (medium with 1 mg L−1 BAP + 1 mg L−1 NAA); N3 (2 BAP + 1 NAA); N4 (3 BAP + 1 NAA).
Figure 3. Effect of different PGR concentrations on the number of shoots per explant. Bars represent standard error. The different letters reported above the bars indicate statistically significant differences between each culture medium tested (Tukey’s test, p ≤ 0.05). N2 (medium with 1 mg L−1 BAP + 1 mg L−1 NAA); N3 (2 BAP + 1 NAA); N4 (3 BAP + 1 NAA).
Plants 12 01530 g003
Plants 12 01530 g004a 550Plants 12 01530 g004b 550
Figure 4. In vitro shoot development of Adenostyles alpina subsp. macrocephala in the culture medium containing 3 mg L−1 BAP and 1 mg L−1 NAA (a,b).
Figure 4. In vitro shoot development of Adenostyles alpina subsp. macrocephala in the culture medium containing 3 mg L−1 BAP and 1 mg L−1 NAA (a,b).
Plants 12 01530 g004aPlants 12 01530 g004b
Plants 12 01530 g005a 550Plants 12 01530 g005b 550
Figure 5. Adenostyles alpina subsp. macrocephala: (a) In vitro rooting of shoots. (b) Plantlet placed in Jiffy-7®. (c) Plant in greenhouse for acclimatization.
Figure 5. Adenostyles alpina subsp. macrocephala: (a) In vitro rooting of shoots. (b) Plantlet placed in Jiffy-7®. (c) Plant in greenhouse for acclimatization.
Plants 12 01530 g005aPlants 12 01530 g005b
Table
Table 1. Plant growth regulators used in the growth media to induce the formation of callus and shoots from Adenostyles alpina subsp. macrocephala leaves.
Table 1. Plant growth regulators used in the growth media to induce the formation of callus and shoots from Adenostyles alpina subsp. macrocephala leaves.
MediumPGR
BAP mg L−1NAA mg L−12,4-D mg L−1
MS0000
N10.510
N2110
N3210
N4310
D10.501
D2101
D3201
D4301
Abbreviations: MS0 (control, hormone-free, medium with sucrose); N1, (medium with 0.5 mg L−1 BAP + 1 mg L−1 NAA); N2 (1 BAP + 1 NAA); N3 (2 BAP + 1 NAA); N4 (3 BAP + 1 NAA); D1 (medium with 0.5 mg L−1 BAP + 1 mg L−1 2,4-D); D2 (1 BAP + 1 2,4-D); D3 (2 BAP + 1 2,4-D); D4 (3 BAP + 1 2,4-D).
Table
Table 2. Plant growth regulators used in the growth media to induce the formation of roots from Adenostyles alpina subsp. macrocephala leaves.
Table 2. Plant growth regulators used in the growth media to induce the formation of roots from Adenostyles alpina subsp. macrocephala leaves.
MediumPGR
IBA mg L−1NAA mg L−1
MS000
R10.250
R20.500
R310
R400.25
R500.50
R601
Abbreviations: MS0 (control, hormone-free, medium with sucrose); R1, R2, R3, (medium with different concentrations of IBA, 0.25 mg L−1, 0.50 mg L−1, 1 mg L−1, respectively); R4, R5, R6 (medium with different concentrations of NAA, 0.25 mg L−1, 0.50 mg L−1, 1 mg L−1, respectively).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gianguzzi, V.; Barone, G.; Di Gristina, E.; Sottile, F.; Domina, G. Micropropagation of Endemic Endangered Taxa of the Italian Flora: Adenostyles alpina subsp. macrocephala (Asteraceae), as a Case Study. Plants 2023, 12, 1530. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants12071530

AMA Style

Gianguzzi V, Barone G, Di Gristina E, Sottile F, Domina G. Micropropagation of Endemic Endangered Taxa of the Italian Flora: Adenostyles alpina subsp. macrocephala (Asteraceae), as a Case Study. Plants. 2023; 12(7):1530. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants12071530

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gianguzzi, Valeria, Giulio Barone, Emilio Di Gristina, Francesco Sottile, and Gianniantonio Domina. 2023. "Micropropagation of Endemic Endangered Taxa of the Italian Flora: Adenostyles alpina subsp. macrocephala (Asteraceae), as a Case Study" Plants 12, no. 7: 1530. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants12071530

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop