Next Article in Journal
Simple and Sensitive Analysis of Clenbuterol in Urine Matrices by UHPLC-MS/MS Method with Online-SPE Sample Preparation
Next Article in Special Issue
Essential Oils from Six Aromatic Plants of Langtang National Park: Insights on Their Chemical Constituents via GC-MS Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Target Discovery of Flavonoids from Elymus nutans Griseb Using Medium- and High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography Combined with Online High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl Detection
Previous Article in Special Issue
RP-HPLC-DAD Analysis of Mitragynine Content in Mitragyna speciosa Korth. (Ketum) Leaf Extracts Prepared Using Ultrasound Assisted Extraction Technique and Their Cytotoxicity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Essential Oils of Taxodium distichum Winter Leaves Obtained by Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction Method and Hydrodistillation

Technical Faculty “Mihajlo Pupin”, University of Novi Sad, Djure Djakovica bb, 23000 Zrenjanin, Serbia
Submission received: 3 November 2022 / Revised: 22 November 2022 / Accepted: 7 December 2022 / Published: 13 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Approach for Natural Product Separation from Plants)

Abstract

:
The extraction of Taxodium distichum needles was done using supercritical carbon dioxide extraction and hydrodistillation. SC CO2 extraction of T. distichum winter leaves was conducted at different pressures and temperatures using a central composite rotatable design. The optimal extraction conditions concerning the yield and α-tocopherol relative amount were determined by response surface methodology. The optimal conditions for the highest extraction yield of 3.97% were at 17.79 MPa and 62.70 °C and the highest α-tocopherol relative amount of 85.99 mg per 100 g of the plant material was at 22.07 MPa and 35.86 °C. The essential oil obtained by hydrodistillation contained 62 compounds and (-)-caryophyllene oxide was dominant (55.55%). The T. distichum essential oil obtained by SC CO2 extraction and hydrodistillation had a different composition. The desirable compounds influence the choice of the extraction method.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Taxodium distichum L. Rich., Cupressaceae, or bald cypress, is an allochthonous coniferous species [1,2,3,4]. Taxodium is a winter deciduous conifer [4,5]. It is a conifer well-adapted to hydric habitats [6,7]. Bald cypress grows on lowlands, especially on flooded sites, where it grows in groups or individually [6,7]. Green, needle-like leaves turn orange-yellow in autumn to coppery red in winter [8,9]. Bald cypress distribution, prevalence and commonness are well described by forest scientists [1,2,10]. In urban landscapes it grows successfully [11,12].
The essential oil of needle-like bald cypress leaves during all seasons was investigated, and it compromised monoterpene hydrocarbons, mainly α-pinene, myrcene, β-pinene, limonene, camphene and α-terpineol [13]. In its essential oils, from different seasons, α-pinene was present in the amount of 81.9% up to 94.3% [13]. The essential oil, from a different geographical region, contained bornyl acetate, β-caryophyllene, α-humulene and germacene D [14]. Major constituents of the needles, of three varieties being recognized under one polymorphic species Taxodium distichum (L.) Rich., were found to contain α-pinene, limonene and β-phellandrene [15]. When other conifer needles are concerned, various methods were used for the extraction of monoterpenes from conifer needles Abies grandis and Picea pungens [16]. After steam distillation, solvent extraction and liquid CO2 extraction extracts consisting of a great number of monoterpenes were obtained [16]. It was found that the most effective technique for collecting monoterpenes is steam distillation compared to solvent and liquid CO2 extraction [16].
Carbon dioxide (CO2), at pressures and temperatures beyond its critical point, is a solvent enabling efficient extraction of lipophilic compounds [17]. Supercritical carbon dioxide (SC CO2) extraction is a green technology and a method that can replace extractions using solvents. SC CO2 extracts can be obtained at low temperatures compared to extractions at elevated temperatures. SC CO2 extraction was a method of choice for the removal of extractives from the green needles, branches, cones and bark of Scots pine trees [18]. SC CO2 extraction of Scots pine needles and stumps yielded resin acids, terpenes and steroids [18]. SC CO2 extraction can separate the fatty acids from wood material [19]. SC CO2 has been applied for the extraction of volatiles from conifer needles, Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies [20]. The most abundant compounds in needles were bornyl acetate and camphene [20]. SC CO2 has been utilized for the extraction of polyprenol from Picea sitchensis, Cedrus atlantica “Glauca”, Pinus sylvestris and Taxus baccata conifer species [21]. Data on the lipophilic phytochemicals present in T. distichum needles SC CO2 and hydrodistillation extracts is not known.
The aims of the research were: to evaluate the effect of pressure and temperature on SC CO2 extraction of T. distichum needles, to optimize the total extraction yield and the α-tocopherol relative amount by response surface methodology (RSM) and to identify the phytochemicals present in essential oil obtained by hydrodistillation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

The CO2 used for the extraction was 99.97% pure (w/w) (Messer, Tehnogas AD, Serbia). The α-tocopherol (98.2%) was purchased from Dr Ehrenstorfer GmbH (Augsburg, Germany). All solvents were of analytical reagent grade (J. T. Baker, Phillipsburg, NJ, USA). The anhydrous sodium sulfate was purchased from Centrohem, Stara Pazova, Serbia.

2.2. Plant Material

T. distichum coppery red needles were collected in February 2022 in Futoski park, Novi Sad, Serbia (45°14′60″ N, 19°49′42″ E). The needles were air dried at room temperature for three days. Prior to extractions, the needles were grounded using a laboratory mill. The percent of moisture in the needles was determined in accordance with the AOAC Official Method 925.40 and was 2.28 ± 0.11% [22]. The pulverized plant material was sieved through 0.5 mm, 0.4 mm, 0.315 mm and 0.2 mm mesh sieves. The pulver remaining on each sieve was used to compute the fragments’ distribution and were normalized to the total mass. The sieve analysis results were determined using Rosin–Rammler distribution [23]. The average particle size was computed to be 0.371 mm ± 0.12.

2.3. Extractions

The SC CO2 experiments were performed on the laboratory-made system described previously [24,25]. The grounded plant material (50 g) was placed in the extraction cell. The SC CO2 continuous flow passed through the sample. After each extraction obtained extracts were weighted. The obtained extracts’ yield was weighted on the balance with the precision of ±0.0001 g. The extraction yield was calculated in percentages (grams of extract per 100 g of the dry pulverized plant material). The extractions were performed at different extraction conditions determined by the RSM and obtained by the central composite rotational design (CCRD) [26]. The 90 min extraction time and the CO2 flow rate of 1.94 kg·h−1 were kept constant during all experiments. In CCRD, the extraction pressure (X1) and temperature (X2) were independent variables in coded values investigated to evaluate their effect on the extraction yield and α-tocopherol relative amount (Y). The statistical analysis of experimental data and three-dimensional response surface plots were generated using Minitab LLC®, State College, PA, USA, 2021. The goodness of fit was based on the R2 determination coefficient. There are no previous data describing the influence of moisture on the SC CO2 extraction of T. distichum needles. Moisturizing of pulverized plant material with water induces the extraction of alkaloids from leaves that contain them. For leaves containing alkaloids, moisture of up to 20% is acceptable. Higher moisture induces the increase of extractor pressure to insecure levels inducing the obstruction of flow in the metering valve and blockage of the in-line filter placed after the extractor. Due to the obstacles mentioned, the pulverized plant material moisture was kept at 2.28 ± 0.11%.
Hydrodistillation was performed according to the standard procedure described in Ph. Iug. IV [27]. Pulverized plant material (50 g) was used for hydrodistillation. Bright brown essential oil was dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate. After drying, the obtained oil was dissolved in n-hexane and subjected to GC-MS analysis.

2.4. GC-MS Analysis

The GC-MS analyses were performed using an Agilent 7890A GC equipped with Agilent 5975 MSD (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The GC-MS was equipped with a HP-5MS (Agilent J&W 19091S-433) column (30 m × 0.25 mm ID, film thickness 0.25 μm). The carrier gas was He, adjusted to a flow of 1.0 mL·min−1. The injection port temperature was 250 °C. The HP-5MS column temperature was linearly programmed from 40 °C at the rate of 3 °C·min−1. The split ratio was 1:50. The ionization energy was 70 eV with a scan time of 1 s and mass scan range of 30–450 mass units. The component percentage was calculated from the GC peak areas. Components were identified by matching mass spectral data and retention times with those in a mass spectra library (Wiley 275.1) and using literature [28,29]. The quantitative analyses have been provided based on calibration curves. The standard solutions of α-tocopherol were prepared in n-hexane. Six different standard solutions were prepared. The R2 for the calibration curve was 0.999. All analyses were performed in duplicate.

3. Results

The CCRD was used to optimize two coded operating variables, the pressure and temperature of the SC CO2 extraction, to achieve the highest extraction yield and α-tocopherol relative amount. The pressure range was chosen due to the plant material with low oil content. For plant material with low oil content, it was not appropriate to apply pressure values higher than 22.07 MPa. The temperature range was from 36 °C up to 64 °C due to the phytochemicals present in the plant material. The higher temperatures would reduce the relative amount of some phytochemicals present in the plant material. The operating conditions were defined in five levels and the design was done with thirteen experiments with five replicates for the central point (Table 1). The extraction yield was from 1.93% to 4.08% depending on the applied process parameters (Table 1). The lowest yield was at 7.93 MPa and 50 °C and the highest in the experiments performed at 15 MPa and 64 °C.
The response surface regression coefficients of the polynomial function for the T. distichum needles extraction yield obtained by SC CO2 are depicted in Table 2.
The surface response plot of the proposed model visualizing the effect of independent variables on dependent ones is depicted in Figure 1.
The composition of SC CO2 extracts obtained was determined by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. The compounds determined and their relative amount in mg α-tocopherol equivalents per 100 g of the plant material are depicted in Table 3.
The response surface regression coefficients of the polynomial function for the α-tocopherol relative amount of T. distichum needles obtained by SC CO2 is depicted in Table 4.
The response surface plot showing the influence of independent variables in coded values on α-tocopherol relative amount is depicted in Figure 2.
The chemical composition of the T. distichum needles obtained by hydrodistillation is depicted in Table 5.

4. Discussion

The RSM-CCRD approach with two variables, pressure and temperature, was used to optimize SC CO2 extraction to achieve the highest extraction yield and α-tocopherol relative amount. The CCRD provided information on experimental variable effects and experimental error in the least possible number of necessary runs. The extraction yield varied from 1.93% to 4.08% depending on the applied process parameters (Table 1). The p-value showed that the linear term of pressure and temperature had a statistically significant influence on the extraction yield (Table 2). The regression analysis was significant for the extraction yield (p < 0.05) with the coefficient of determination, R2 = 0.9754. The extraction yield in terms of pressure and temperature is depicted in Figure 1. The linear behavior of temperature on the extraction yield can be noticed. The extraction yield increases to the pressure of 17.79 MPa, and with further increase of pressure it decreased. The maximum extraction yield was at a pressure of 17.79 MPa and temperature of 62.70 °C. Under these operating variables the extraction yield was 3.97%. The relative amount of α-tocopherol varied from 19.07 to 77.36 mg per 100 g of plant material (Table 3). The p-value showed that the linear term of pressure and temperature and quadratic term of temperature had a significant influence on the α-tocopherol relative amount (Table 4). The optimal conditions for obtaining the highest α-tocopherol relative amount were at the pressure of 22.07 MPa and temperature of 35.86 °C. Under these conditions the α-tocopherol relative amount was 85.99 mg per 100 g of the plant material.
There are no previous SC CO2 extractions of T. distichum winter needles. The α-tocopherol relative amount in olive leaves was 10.10 mg per 100 g of the plant material at process parameters of 25 MPa, 40 °C, CO2 flow rate of 1 SL·min−1, particle diameter of 1.5 mm and extraction time of 120 min [30]. At the same process parameters, with an extraction time of 60 min, the α-tocopherol relative amount was 6.94 mg per 100 g of leaves [30]. Comparing the temperatures, the optimal extraction temperature for olive leaves was at 40 °C and for T. distichum needles at 35.86 °C, and it can be noticed that a higher relative amount of α-tocopherol is obtained at lower temperatures. The α-tocopherol relative amount in Eugenia involucrata leaves was the highest, 68.27 mg per 100 g of leaves, at the pressure of 20 MPa, at 60 °C and under a CO2 flow rate of 4 mL·min−1 [31]. Up to now, general process parameters and extraction conditions for the highest α-tocopherol relative amount cannot be drawn. The present study indicates that the α-tocopherol relative amount is higher at lower temperatures.
The phytochemical content present in essential oils varies according to geographic location, season, year and harvesting method and has a diversity that is not infinite. The content can be attributed to temperature, humidity, light intensity, soil moisture and nutrient availability, and the most vital for leaf production is photosynthesis, influencing the total biomass production. Many abiotic and biotic factors reduce the leaf area, influence leaf productivity and can reduce the contribution of the leaf area to biomass production and accumulation. The recovery of SC CO2 extracts revealed the presence of a limited number of phytochemicals. The SC CO2 extracts consisted of: caryophyllene oxide, hexahydrofarnesyl acetone, neophytadiene, eicosane, stearyl aldehyde, 1-octadecanol, phytol, sandaracopimaradiene, geranylgeraniol, ferruginol, m-pentadecylphenol, α-tocopherol and β-sitosterol. Different extraction parameters influenced their presence in the extracts (Table 3). Chlorophyll biodegradation induces the formation of phytol and is essential in α-tocopherol biosynthesis [32]. The α-tocopherol biosynthesis uses phytol formed after the phytyl ester hydrolysis of the chlorophyll propionate side chain, and the other pathway involves de novo biosynthesis from geranylgeranyl diphosphate [33]. It can only be observed, from the results obtained, that the α-tocopherol biosynthesis proceeds in coppery red T. disctichum needles.
Differences were found among the SC CO2 extracts and essential oil (Table 5). The predominant compounds in the essential oil analyzed were: caryophyllene oxide (55.55%), bornyl acetate (11.36%), humulene epoxide II (5.71%) and 4-hydroxy-9-epi-(E)-caryophyllene (3.65%). Caryophylla-4(12),8(13)-dien-5-α-ol (2.28%) and 14-hydroxy-(Z)-caryophyllene (2.41%) were present in more than 2%. The most abundant oxygenated monoterpene was borneol (1.57%). Three sesquiterpenes were present in a higher amount than 0.20%: ar-curcumene (0.29%), γ-cadinene (0.25%) and trans-calamenene (0.23%). Oxygenated sesquiterpenes were the most abundant essential oil constituents: caryophyllene oxide (55.56%), humulene epoxide II (5.71%), 4-hydroxy-9-epi-(E)-caryophyllene (3.65%), 14-hydroxy-(Z)-caryophyllene (2.41%), caryophylla-4(12), 8(13)-dien-5-α-ol (2.28%), italicene epoxide (1.46%); other oxygenated sesquiterpenes were detected in less than 1%. Diterpenes detected in the essential oil were: pimaradiene (0.07%), ethyl hexadecanoate (0.10%), abietatriene (0.02%), phytol (0.07%), ethyl linoleate (0.04%), ethyl oleate (0.11%) and ethyl octadecanoate (0.03%). Phytol was detected in the quantity of 0.07%, and α-tocopherol was not detected due to its degradation at elevated temperatures.
In SC CO2 extracts the α-tocopherol relative amount depends on the extraction temperature, with a higher relative amount at lower temperatures. α-Tocopherol is not present in essential oil obtained by hydrodistillation, indicating that its isolation is influenced by the extraction temperature. The methods where the experiments are done at lower temperatures can be used for the recovery of α-tocopherol. Hydrodistillation is a technique of choice for obtaining oxygenated sesquiterpenes. The results suggested that SC CO2 can be used for obtaining extracts containing α-tocopherol when operating at low extraction temperatures and hydrodistillation is a method of choice for obtaining oxygenated sesquiterpenes.

5. Conclusions

In SC CO2 extraction, the influence of pressure and temperature on the total extraction yield and α-tocopherol relative amount was analyzed. Experimentally the total extraction yield and α-tocopherol were significantly influenced by pressure and temperature. The optimized process variables for the total extraction yield were at 17.79 MPa and 62.70 °C. The optimal extraction conditions, considering the highest α-tocopherol relative amount, were at 22.07 MPa and 35.86 °C. In the essential oil obtained after hydrodistillation, 62 compounds were determined with the caryophyllene oxide, which represented 55.55% of the total essential oil. The winter T. distichum needles essential oil obtained by hydrodistillation can be used for the isolation of caryophyllene oxide.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Farjon, A. The Kew Review: Conifers of the World. Kew Bull. 2018, 73, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Debreczy, Z.; Racz, I. Conifers Around the World; DendroPress Ltd.: Budapest, Hungary, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  3. Christenhusz, M.J.M.; Reveal, J.L.; Fajron, A.; Gardner, M.F.; Mill, R.R.; Chase, M.W. A new classification and linear sequence of extant gymnosperms. Phytotaxa 2011, 19, 55–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Biffin, E.; Brodribb, T.J.; Hill, R.S.; Thomas, P.; Lowe, A.J. Leaf evolution in Southern Hemisphere conifers tracks the angiosperm ecological radiation. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2012, 279, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kunzmann, L.; Kvacek, Z.; Hans Mai, D.; Walther, H. The genus Taxodium (Cupresseaceae) in the Palaeogene and Neogene of Central Europe. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 2009, 153, 153–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, C.X.; Zhong, Z.C.; Geng, Y.H.; Schneider, R. Comparative studies on physiological and biochemical adaptation of Taxodium distichum and Taxodium ascendens seedlings to different soil water regimes. Plant Soil 2010, 329, 481–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Burton, T.M. Swamps–Wooded Wetlands. In Encyclopedia of Inland Waters; Likens, G.E., Ed.; Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 549–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Howard, A.L. Deciduous Cypress (Taxodium distichum). Nature 1944, 154, 775–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Pezeshki, S.R.; Santos, M.I. Relationships among rhizosphere oxygen deficiency, root restriction, photosynthesis, and growth in bald cypress (Taxodium distichum L.) seedlings. Photosynthetica 1998, 35, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sijacic-Nikolic, M.; Vilotic, D.; Veselinovic, M.; Mitrovic, S.; Jokanovic, D. Bald cypress (Taxodium distichum (L.) Rich.) in the protected ares „Veliko ratno ostrvo”. Bull. Fac. For. 2010, 103, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ninić-Todorović, J.; Ocokoljić, M. Ekofiziološke karakteristike taksodijuma (Taxodium distichum L. Rich.) u parkovima Novog Sada. In Proceedings of the Environmental Protection of Urban and Suburban Settlement, Eko-Konferencija, Novi Sad, Serbia, 26–29 September 2001. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ninic-Todorovic, J.; Ocokoljic, M. Varijabilnost populacija taksodijuma (Taxodium distichum (L.) Rich.) u parkovima Novog Sada. In Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Flora of Southeastern Serbia and Neighbouring Regions, Dimitrovgrad, Yugoslavia, 6–9 June 2002. [Google Scholar]
  13. Padalia, R.C.; Verma, R.S.; Chauhan, A.; Goswami, P.; Chanotiya, C.S. Compositional and enantiomeric analysis of the essential oil of Taxodium distichum from India. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2016, 11, 419–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Flamini, G.; Cioni, P.L.; Morelli, I. Investigation of the essential oil of feminine cones, leaves and branches of Taxodium distichum from Italy. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2000, 12, 310–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Adams, R.P.; Arnold, M.A.; King, A.R.; Denny, G.C. Seasonal variation in the leaf essential oil of Taxodium distichum (Cupressaceae). Phytologia 2012, 94, 91–102. [Google Scholar]
  16. Muzika, R.-M.; Campbell, C.L.; Hanover, J.W.; Smith, A.L. Comparison of techniques for extracting volatile compounds from conifer needles. J. Chem. Ecol. 1990, 16, 2713–2722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Reverchon, E. Supercritical fluid extraction and fractionation of essential oils and related products. J. Supercrit Fluids 1997, 10, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Trubetskaya, A.; Budarin, V.; Arshadi, M.; Magajhaes, D.; Kazanc, F.; Hunt, A.J. Supercritical extraction of biomass as an effective pretreatment step for the char yield control in pyrolysis. Renew. Energy 2021, 170, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Trubetskaya, A.; Hunt, A.J.; Budarin, V.L.; Umeki, K. Supercritical extraction and microwave activation of wood wastes for enhanced syngas production and generation of fullerene-like soot particles. Fuel Process Technol. 2020, 212, 106633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Orav, A.; Kailas, T.; Koel, M. Simultaneous distillation, extraction and supercritical fluid extraction for isolating volatiles and other materials from conifer needles. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1998, 10, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alaydi, H.; Downey, P.; McKeon-Bennett, M.; Beletskaya, T. Supercritical-CO2 extraction, identification and quantification of polyprenol as a bioactive ingredient from Irish trees species. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 7461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, 17th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Washington, DC, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  23. Vesilind, P.A. The Rosin-Rammler particle size distribution. Resour. Recov. Conserv. 1980, 5, 275–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Djapic, N. Parrotia persica Yellow and Amber Leaves’ Lipophilic Phytochemicals Obtained by Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extracton. Molecules 2022, 27, 5237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Martinez, J.L.; Vance, S.W. Supercritical extraction plants. In Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Nutraceuticals and Bioactive Compounds, 1st ed.; Martinez, J.L., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2007; pp. 25–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bas, D.; Boyaci, I.H. Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology. J. Food Eng. 2007, 78, 836–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pharmacopoea Iugoslavica, Editio Quarta (Ph. Iug. IV); Federal Institute of Public Health: Belgrade, Yougoslavia, 1984; Volume 2.
  28. Adams, R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, 4th ed.; Allured Publishing Corp.: Carol Stream, IL, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  29. Adams, R. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry; Allured Publishing: Carol Stream, IL, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  30. de Lucas, A.; Martinez de la Ossa, E.J.; Rincon, J.; Blanco, M.A.; Gracia, I. Supercritical fluid extraction of tocopherol concentrates from olive tree leaves. J. Super Fluids 2002, 22, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Barzotto, I.L.M.; Santos, K.A.; da Silva, E.A.; Sene, A.C.; da Silva, N.S.; Vieira, L. Supercritical extraction of Eugenia involucrate leaves: Influence of operating conditions on yield and α-tocopherol content. J. Super Fluids 2019, 143, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. vom Dorp, K.; Hoelzl, G.; Plohmann, C.; Eisenhut, M.; Abraham, M.; Weber, A.P.; Hanson, A.D.; Doermann, P. Remobilization of phytol from chlorophyll degradation is essential for tocopherol synthesis and growth of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 2846–2859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Mach, J. Phytol from degradation of chlorophyll feeds biosynthesis of tocopherols. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 2676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Surface response plot for the extraction yield in a function of extraction pressure and temperature.
Figure 1. Surface response plot for the extraction yield in a function of extraction pressure and temperature.
Separations 09 00436 g001
Figure 2. Surface response plot for the α-tocopherol relative amount in a function of independent variables.
Figure 2. Surface response plot for the α-tocopherol relative amount in a function of independent variables.
Separations 09 00436 g002
Table 1. The CCRD experimental design and results for the T. distichum needles total extraction yield [%].
Table 1. The CCRD experimental design and results for the T. distichum needles total extraction yield [%].
RunPressure [MPa], X1Temperature [°C], X2Extraction Yield [%]
1.22.07503.86
2.15644.08
3.7.93501.93
4.10402.84
5.15503.97
6.15503.91
7.20603.92
8.10602.98
9.15363.64
10.15504.02
11.20403.80
12.15503.86
13.15503.98
Table 2. The response surface regression coefficients of the polynomial function for the T. distichum needles total extraction yield [%].
Table 2. The response surface regression coefficients of the polynomial function for the T. distichum needles total extraction yield [%].
TermCoefficientStandard Error CoefficientT-Valuep-Value
Intercept3.9480.05867.880.000
X10.5780.04612.590.000
X20.1100.0462.400.048
X1·X1−0.5250.049−10.640.000
X2·X2−0.0420.049−0.850.421
X1·X2−0.0050.065−0.080.941
R2 = 0.9754
Table 3. The compounds determined in the SC CO2 extracts of T. distichum needles and their relative amount in mg α-tocopherol equivalents per 100 g of leaves.
Table 3. The compounds determined in the SC CO2 extracts of T. distichum needles and their relative amount in mg α-tocopherol equivalents per 100 g of leaves.
No.CompoundRun 1Run 2Run 3Run 4Run 5Run 6Run 7Run 8Run 9Run 10Run 11Run 12Run 13
1.Caryophyllene oxide-0.92----1.00--0.94-1.011.05
2.Hexahydrofarnesyl acetone0.910.860.31-1.320.420.880.86-0.82-0.900.92
3.Neophytadiene39.6475.9384.7117.6428.7220.5875.8223.5035.8076.3867.3477.0376.27
4.Eicosane7.8113.084.3614.271.68-13.71--12.91-13.5614.02
5.Stearyl aldehyde18.9318.3921.065.7815.419.6218.6222.368.6417.8311.5318.5418.67
6.1-Octadecanol3.372.564.181.83--2.711.620.842.77-2.922.68
7.Phytol45.0626.7827.3011.1941.1248.7224.9836.3411.1725.0638.1625.9326.11
8.Sandaracopimaradiene3.262.936.135.324.873.962.764.822.683.142.932.853.05
9.Geranylgeraniol2.364.963.5426.922.77-4.853.923.395.1810.765.025.34
10.Ferruginol4.911.044.39-4.60-0.91--1.095.860.991.19
11.m-Pentadecylphenol10.767.4621.866.918.075.807.026.6116.397.237.367.687.63
12.α-Tocopherol32.8539.8320.9668.0322.9850.0840.5477.3619.0739.9445.8740.6840.03
13.β-Sitosterol-2.213.60---1.834.12-1.966.582.072.71
Table 4. The response surface regression coefficients of the polynomial function for the α-tocopherol relative amount of T. distichum needle leaves (mg α-tocopherol equivalents per 100 g of plant material).
Table 4. The response surface regression coefficients of the polynomial function for the α-tocopherol relative amount of T. distichum needle leaves (mg α-tocopherol equivalents per 100 g of plant material).
TermCoefficientStandard Error CoefficientT-Valuep-Value
Constant40.201.7822.530.000
X19.381.416.650.000
X2−17.271.41−12.240.000
X1·X1−2.031.51−1.340.221
X2·X23.981.512.630.034
X1·X2−4.351.99−2.180.065
R2 = 0.9676
Table 5. The chemical composition of T. distichum needles obtained by hydrodistillation.
Table 5. The chemical composition of T. distichum needles obtained by hydrodistillation.
No.CompoundRI%
1.n-nonanal11000.36
2.α-Campholenal11220.19
3.trans-Pinocarveol11350.22
4.Borneol11651.57
5.p-Mentha-1,5-dien-8-ol11660.09
6.Terpinen-4-ol11740.05
7.α-Terpineol11860.31
8.Myrtenol11940.73
9.Verbenone12040.88
10.trans-Carveol12150.14
11.Bornyl acetate128711.36
12.trans-Pinocarvyl acetate12980.44
13.Myrtenyl acetate13240.31
14.trans-Carvyl acetate13390.28
15.α-Terpinyl acetate13460.34
16.Silphiperfol-4,7(14)-diene13580.03
17.Ethyl decanoate13950.11
18.trans-β-Caryophyllene14170.20
19.trans-α-Ionone14280.19
20.α-Humulene14520.11
21.Geranyl acetone14530.41
22.2-Isopropenyl-4,8-dimethyl octahydronaphthalene14730.10
23.ar-Curcumene14790.29
24.trans-β-Ionone14870.09
25.α-Selinene14980.08
26.α-Muurolene15000.09
27.β -Bisabolene15050.16
28.γ-Cadinene15130.25
29.trans-Calamenene15210.23
30.α -Cadinene15370.11
31.α -Calacorene15440.06
32.Italicene epoxide15491.46
33.Salviadienol15490.55
34.trans-Nerolidol15610.23
35.Caryophyllene oxide158255.56
36.4(14)-Salvialene-1-one15920.57
37.Humulene epoxide I15930.84
38.Humulene epoxide II16085.71
39.Isoaromadendrene epoxide16120.33
40.Humulene epoxide III16260.22
41.allo-Aromadendrene epoxide16390.60
42.Caryophylla-4(12),8(13)-dien-5-α-ol16392.28
43.α-Muurolol (=Torreyol)16440.32
44.β-Eudesmol16490.12
45.α-Cadinol16520.38
46.14-Hydroxy-(Z)-caryophyllene16662.41
47.4-Hydroxy-9-epi-(E)-caryophyllene16683.65
48.Germacra-4(15),5,10(14)-trien-1-α-ol16800.48
49.α-Costol17650.27
50.14-Hydroxy-α-muurolene17790.06
51.8-Cedren-13-ol acetate17880.49
52.2-α-Acetoxy-amorpha-4,7(11)-diene18050.09
53.Khusinol acetate18230.11
54.Hexahydrofarnesyl acetone18380.14
55.(5E,9E)-Farnesyl acetone19130.08
56.Pimaradiene19480.07
57.Ethyl hexadecanoate19920.10
58.Abietatriene20550.02
59.Phytol21110.07
60.Ethyl linoleate21510.04
61.Ethyl oleate21710.11
62.Ethyl octadecanoate21960.03
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Djapic, N. Essential Oils of Taxodium distichum Winter Leaves Obtained by Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction Method and Hydrodistillation. Separations 2022, 9, 436. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/separations9120436

AMA Style

Djapic N. Essential Oils of Taxodium distichum Winter Leaves Obtained by Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction Method and Hydrodistillation. Separations. 2022; 9(12):436. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/separations9120436

Chicago/Turabian Style

Djapic, Nina. 2022. "Essential Oils of Taxodium distichum Winter Leaves Obtained by Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction Method and Hydrodistillation" Separations 9, no. 12: 436. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/separations9120436

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop