Next Article in Journal
Editorial “Special Issue Clinical and Post Mortem Toxicology”
Previous Article in Journal
Identification and Mechanistic Analysis of Toxic Degradation Products in the Advanced Oxidation Pathways of Fluoroquinolone Antibiotics
Previous Article in Special Issue
A 35-Year Record (1987–2022) of Hg Concentrations in Two of the Fish Species Most Consumed by People Living in the Upper Madeira River Basin, Brazilian Amazon Region
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Trends in Mercury Contamination Distribution among Human and Animal Populations in the Amazon Region

by
Irvin Martoredjo
1,
Lenize Batista Calvão Santos
2,
Jéssica Caroline Evangelista Vilhena
1,
Alex Bruno Lobato Rodrigues
3,
Andréia de Almeida
4,
Carlos José Sousa Passos
4 and
Alexandro Cezar Florentino
1,*
1
Postgraduate Program in Environmental Sciences (PPGCA/UNIFAP), Federal University of Amapá, Rod. JK, km 02, Macapá 68903-419, Brazil
2
Postgraduate Program in Ecology (PPGECO), Institute of Biological Sciences (ICB), Federal University of Pará (UFPA), Augusto Correia, Number 1, Guamá, Belém 66075-110, Brazil
3
Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences (PPGCS), Federal University of Amapá, Rod. JK, km 02, Macapá 68903-419, Brazil
4
Faculty UnB at Planaltina (FUP/UnB) Planaltina, University of Brasília, Brasília 73345-010, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 26 December 2023 / Revised: 19 February 2024 / Accepted: 27 February 2024 / Published: 7 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mercury Cycling and Health Effects)

Abstract

:
Mercury contamination in the Amazon arising from both natural sources and intensive mining activities in the region is a significant public health concern. This metal is used to separate Au from sediments. Accordingly, this study aimed to assess the impact of mining on mercury contamination in the animal and human populations of the Amazon. This overall objective was pursued through a systematic review of the existing literature to assess the impact of Hg and identify gaps in geographic coverage arising from this assessment. Herein, we employed PECO and PRISMA-ScR protocols to select articles published between 2017 and 2023 based on projected points on a map within the biogeographic boundaries of the Amazon. We found that mercury concentrations increase with trophic levels, reaching high values of 3.7 µg/g in the muscles of predatory fish and 34.9 µg/g in human hair. The mean level of mercury in human hair in the whole (Amazon) region exceeds 6 µg/g, surpassing tolerance levels. Although mining regions show high concentrations of Hg, the highest incidence was observed among populations with fish-based diets. It was concluded that continuous research and monitoring of fish in the region are required in order to accurately assess the risk associated with Hg contamination, especially since fish are the main source of protein in this region.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The vast geographical extension of the Amazon region, covering approximately 7 million km2, is characterized by remarkable biological diversity and complex ecosystems, including both aquatic and terrestrial environments [1,2,3]. However, this region has been experiencing increasing pressure owing to the intensified encroachment of human activities. The mining sector is one of the main drivers of this pressure. This increase in mining activities has led to the deterioration of vegetation cover and soil erosion, culminating in the degradation of forest areas [4,5,6]. The Scientific Panel for the Amazon identifies these human activities as the primary catalysts for forest degradation, impacting multiple aspects of the ecosystem [7].
In the Amazon, the progression of artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) is primarily driven by the discovery of new gold deposits and stimulated by the profitability of this activity. Its expansion into indigenous territories, which started during the 1980s, was facilitated by weak environmental law enforcement and intense lobbying activities, leading to various socio-environmental implications [8].
This ongoing trend continues to challenge environmental governance [9,10]. Contemporary illegal mining activities in the Brazilian Amazon have experienced exponential growth, increasing by more than 90% since 2017, leading to major forest loss in 2020 [10,11,12,13,14,15], especially during the COVID-19 pandemic [16].
Furthermore, the exploitation of forest resources contributes substantially to the environmental degradation of the Amazon, with small-scale mining playing a crucial role in countries such as Suriname, Ecuador, Peru, and Guyana [17,18,19,20,21].
Gold prospectors employ rudimentary extraction methods involving the use of mercury to capture dense gold particles through gravitational concentrations of water–ore slurry [22]. With their disregard for efficiency and safety, much of the Hg0 used by these miners is discharged in mining tailings, in turn contaminating the surrounding water resources [11,23,24,25,26]. This practice eventually leads to the formation of the most toxic and bioavailable form of Hg, methylmercury (CH3Hg+), through the conversion of aqueous Hg2+ and Hg0 by sulfate-reducing bacteria in anoxic aquatic environments. CH3Hg+ then moves further up the freshwater food chain via aquatic plant roots and reaches fish trophic levels, where it bioaccumulates and biomagnifies in higher concentrations in the tissues of top predators. This feeding habit as well as the uptake of aqueous CH3Hg+ from fish gills is expected to cause high bioaccumulation in the liver, brain, and muscle, with the latter pathway directly affecting the cardiovascular system [27]. High levels of CH3Hg+ affects cellular function, leading to irreversible neurological damage in animals and humans [28,29].
Therefore, the contaminated aquatic food chain poses a significant threat to vulnerable Amazonian populations dependent on fishing for subsistence and nutrition from fish as their primary source of animal protein, as it is also their main gateway to Hg exposure [12,15,26,30,31,32]. CH3Hg+ comprises approximately 80% of the total mercury found in human hair, and its presence in the biological matrix indicates chronic mercury exposure. Hair, as the biomarker of Hg, is generally preferred over blood, urine, or other tissues, owing to the ease of collecting samples, its non-intrusive nature, and its ability to record long-term exposure.
This situation prompted the World Health Organization (WHO) and regional Common Market of the South (MERCOSUR) to publish references on Hg threshold levels for food safety and human exposure.
On the other hand, the Amazon naturally exhibits high levels of Hg from volcanic sources in the Andes, as evidenced by its presence in forest soil, which is carried to tributaries through erosion and then to rivers where the contaminant is diluted and adheres to sediments [33,34,35,36]. However, mining can hasten the release and mobilization of natural inorganic Hg through deforestation and erosion, as well as elemental Hg introduced for the amalgamation process [37,38].
Previous reviews of scientific publications reporting on Hg in the Amazon highlighted a considerable spatial gap outside of Brazil, whereas a particular urgency arises for riverine populations whose livelihood and food source depend on fishing. Also, the few studies reporting the exposure of humans to Hg have largely failed to include Amazonian territories outside of Brazil [39]. Scientometric studies on Hg contamination have revealed a more pronounced focus on the Amazon compared to other Brazilian biomes, emphasizing gold mining, fish exposure to Hg, and contamination by Hg in water bodies and river sediments [40,41]. Additionally, a recent systematic review of the geological characteristics of the Amazon basin highlighted the uneven distribution of dangerous metal enrichment, including mercury, owing to mining activities, as well as a scarcity of data from other countries in the Amazon basin [42].
Moreover, a review of feeding guilds and dietary habits in the Amazon revealed relatively high levels of CH3Hg+ in predatory fish compared with their non-predatory counterparts [43]. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the impact of Hg on human and animal populations in the Amazon region and identify any gaps in geographic coverage arising from this assessment. The study area includes the international Amazonian ecological region, a vast tropical forest and watershed extending over nine South American countries: Brazil, Peru, Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, Suriname, Guyana, Bolivia, and French Guiana [44].

2. Material and Methods

The use of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) in cataloging articles ensures that the present systematic review has been documented in a clear and transparent manner and that this study is replicable [45,46]. This scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews). VosViewerTM version 1.6.19.0 (Leiden, The Netherlands) was employed as a preliminary tool to identify trends in the search syntax related to mercury concentrations in the Amazon region [47]. The analysis was conducted using the keywords present in the titles and abstracts of studies that were finally accepted for screening.
Population, Exposure, Comparator, Outcome (PECO) was used as a framework to delineate the research question and establish search criteria [48]. In the present study, PECO criteria were defined as follows:
  • Population: Human and animal population in the Amazon region.
  • Exposure: Exposure to mercury (Hg).
  • Comparator: Different levels of mercury exposure or comparisons between different species or regions, and the values allowed by health organizations.
  • Outcome: Hg contamination in animal tissues and humans relative to diet.
All of these criteria played a role in structuring and conducting the research. To support these PECO criteria, articles included in the review had to contain a quantification of mercury levels and make a clear distinction between human and non-human samples. Additionally, the sampling region of each study had to be within the biogeographic province of the Amazon, as defined by the Amazon Network of Georeferenced Socio-Environmental Information (RAISG). The selected studies presented original research and were not reviews or meta-analyses. This ensured that the research would be relevant and applicable to the population and the environment under study. Table 1 shows the search strategy with Boolean parameters used in full form for advanced options in the entire content of the items in the Web of Science and SCOPUS databases from 2017 to 2023.
All identified records were assessed for relevance based on their titles and abstracts. The full texts of potentially eligible studies were retrieved and assessed for eligibility based on the predefined criteria. Studies that did not measure Hg in animal tissues and/or humans or performed tissue collection outside of the Amazon region were excluded.
Data were systematically extracted from the selected studies using a standardized form. Each article was identified using a DOI link. The following information was recorded for each study:
  • Study Characteristics: DOI, title, and author(s) of the study.
  • Population Characteristics: Whether the study focuses on human or non-human species, the scientific nomenclature of the studied species, and their feeding guild.
  • Collection Details: Sample collection location (in decimal degrees) and the period during which the samples were collected.
  • Mercury Exposure Details: Type of tissue sampled and the total amount of mercury found in these tissues.
  • Additional Data: Any mention of indigenous regions, hydroelectric dams, or artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM), as well as details of mercury analysis.
This structured approach to data extraction ensured consistency across all studies included in the review.
The highest average (mean or median) total mercury (THg) level reported in each study was used to indicate accumulation in the target human or animal species. Additionally, Hg data in animals were categorized into their respective dietary guilds (feeding habits). In the present study, piscivorous fish were included in the carnivorous group. This classification distinguishes them from other piscivorous animal species that feed on fish.
The reported Hg concentrations were assessed according to United Nations (UN) and WHO guidelines for human consumption, and permitted levels of mercury accumulation in food were established. The limit for non-predatory fish is 0.5 µg/g, and the limit is 1.0 µg/g for predatory fish [49,50]. These limits were also recognized by MERCOSUR, according to resolution RDR No. 42 of 29 August 2013 [51].
Furthermore, WHO guidelines for Hg in human hair consider concentrations below 1.8 µg/g to be safe, while the range from 1.8 µg/g to 6 µg/g is considered concerning because 6 µg/g is the indicated tolerance level for cellular functions in the human body [52,53]. The WHO acknowledges that these guidelines are not absolute, and that individual susceptibility and exposure patterns may vary. This means that even mercury levels below any of these thresholds may still pose a risk to human health and lead to adverse health effects. Hair Hg concentrations above 10 µg/g are considered hazardous, and may lead to notable chronic symptoms for mercury poisoning [54].

2.1. Geoprocessing

Quantum GIS, version 3.20.3 [55], was used to record significant sampling locations projected within the boundary of the Amazonian ecoregion, which is the layer obtained from RAISG [44]. Each georeferenced record was adjusted to include only sampling locations that had (1) a distinctive average (mean or median) or combined average (mean or median) value of Hg per research article, and (2) significant spatial distance from other sampling locations. In this regard, nearby spatial samples with the same THg value, but within 1°–2° in the WGS84 Coordinate Reference System, were represented as a single point.
To examine spatial disparities in the Amazon study area, the region was categorized based on ecoregion distinctions, as defined by Dinerstein et al. [56,57]. These distinctions allow the grouping of areas into their respective bioregions, including the northern, central, western, and southern regions, as well as the Guiana Shield and Amazon Estuary. To analyze recent mining activities, mining polygons delineated by RAISG [44], which are categorized as active and aimed at gold extraction, were integrated into the global mining footprint dataset provided by Tang and Werner [58].
The distance between sampling points (animal or human surveys) and mining activity was evaluated using three classes: <20 km, 20 km to 50 km, and >50 km. Up to 20 km, mining directly influences both the sediment and the food chain in the surrounding areas [59,60], while significant Hg contamination is observed at a distance of 50 km, impacting both the local ecosystem and the human population dependent on it for sustenance [61,62]. To accurately measure the proximity of human or animal locations to these high-risk zones, mining area polygons were converted into points. This allowed us to calculate the distance to the edge of the mining areas, providing a more precise measure when compared to the use of centroids of the mining polygons.

2.2. Statistical Analysis

Tabulated mercury data are presented as their mean and median values. The General Linear Model (GLM) was utilized to find statistical relationships among specific tissue Hg concentrations, children, reproductive age, riverside communities, and mining, as well as assess the variation in metal concentration among demographic groups. Logistic regression analysis was also conducted beyond the GLM, transforming total mercury concentration (Hg) into a binomial variable. This transformation was based on an established threshold of 6 μg/g [52,53]. The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) was used to select the best-fit model. All analyses were conducted using R software version 4.3.1 [63].

3. Results

Bibliographic research conducted using the PRISMA 2020 flowchart is shown in Figure 1. Duplicate items were removed before the screening process, which involved reviewing the titles and abstracts of records for relevance to the research theme, followed by analysis of the full text for eligibility criteria. Among the 105 articles accepted after screening, 66 were studies on animals, 37 were solely on humans, and 2 articles contained both animal and human samples.

3.1. Study Characteristics

The 105 reports selected through PRISMA were processed using VosViewer to generate 1383 keywords based on the titles and abstracts of the articles. This bibliometric visualization was based on the density of eight occurrences of related keywords. Figure 2 presents a network of keyword co-occurrences in the articles included in the review.
The results indicate a predominance of studies reporting on fish muscle tissues contaminated by Hg caused by artisanal small-scale gold mining (ASGM) (the only pollution activity mentioned), presenting risk factors through fish consumption, and studies predominantly carried out in the Brazilian Amazon region. Additionally, total Hg and methylmercury are measured in human hair and fish muscle tissues as well as the reproductive population. Moreover, the color classification in Figure 2 shows the highest occurrence of relevant keywords in studies between 2020 and 2021, with the largest single volume of studies published in 2018. Figure 3 shows the distribution of the number of articles published on this topic by year and country.
Brazil is the most covered country by relevant research about mercury contamination in the Amazon, with a total of 25 published articles. Peru and Colombia recorded 13 and 6 articles, respectively; French Guiana, Guyana, and Bolivia have 2 articles each; and Suriname has 1 article. Ecuador and Venezuela were not represented. Among the studies analyzed, the pie charts in Figure 4 shows that the most commonly used biomarker was muscle in animal tissues, and in studies conducted with human data, the most commonly used biomarker was hair, apart from blood and breast milk, each of which was presented in a single article.
Among the studies that analyzed the presence of THg in animals, analyses of different fish species prevailed in addition to categorizing these feeding guilds (Figure 5).

3.2. Overview of THg Levels in Animal Research

The results of these studies demonstrated that ecotoxicological research on Hg is predominantly conducted in aquatic ecosystems, mostly comprising fish species, considering exposure to indigenous and riverside communities in major rivers and tributaries. Therefore, to facilitate a more effective statistical overview, records that used fish muscle as a THg biomarker were reviewed separately.
Accordingly, the predominance of fish muscle tissue could be plotted and categorized into predatory and non-predatory feeding guilds. The boxplots for fish indicate the distribution of THg into the following categories: all fish muscle (median 0.440 µg/g and interquartile range (IQR) 0.820 µg/g), predatory fish muscle (median 0.690 µg/g and IQR 0.900 µg/g), and non-predatory muscle (median 0.210 µg/g and IQR 0.300 µg/g). Predatory fish, classified as carnivores, exhibit THg ranges above the guidelines established by WHO, with levels being 1 µg/g and 0.5 µg/g, respectively, for predatory and non-predatory fish. In contrast, the non-predatory group, which included omnivores and other species, displayed significantly lower THg levels, suggesting a safe mean level (Figure 6).
Accordingly, the highest frequencies of studies in the main tributaries of the Amazon River were for Plagioscion squamosis Yesus, Serrasalmus rhombeus, and Cichla spp. The carnivorous guild had the highest THg values (ranging from 0.086 to 5.920 μg/g), with a mean of 1.058 μg/g, followed by the omnivores (0.029 μg/g to 0.700 μg/g), with a mean of 0.316 μg/g, and the detritivores (0.064 μg/g to 0.370 μg/g), with a mean of 0.180 μg/g (Table 2).
Additionally, studies evaluating fish in hydroelectric reservoirs and dam regions showed that Puruzinho and Catalão Lakes presented higher mercury concentrations of S. rhombeus (mean 0.789 μg/g, and range of 0.029 to 1.640 μg/g) [71,81,84]. On the other hand, the reservoirs of Belo Monte and Jirau Hydroelectric Plants showed high concentrations of mercury in S. rhombeus (0.480 μg/g) and lower concentrations in Triportheus albus (0.132 μg/g) [90,94].
Table 3 presents the remaining records, which either did not include fish muscle tissue analyzed for THg or were not sampled at Amazonian basin locations. These measured THg values include muscle tissue samples from fish along the Atlantic coast, hepatic tissue of fish, and tissues from species other than fish. These animal tissues show a mean THg value of 3.850 μg/g with a range from 0.011 to 17.900 μg/g, with the highest THg value being in the liver of Arapaima gigas.
Variation from 0.010 to 17.900 µg/g of THg across ecoregions can be observed. Most sampling points were recorded in the southern Amazon forests, with a mean mercury level of 0.890 µg/g (range 0.016 to 11.570 µg/g), followed by the western Amazon forests, with a mean mercury level of 1.700 µg/g (range 0.150 to 17.420 µg/g). The least abundant points were recorded in the Guyana ecoregion, with a mean mercury level of 1.570 µg/g (range 0.165 to 5.920 µg/g).
The Brazilian territory has the highest concentration of scientific reports, including the Amazon River and its major tributaries, with emphasis on the Madeira and Tapajós Rivers. Specifically, the Madeira River basin, which acts as a boundary between bioregions, has a mean mercury level of 0.470 µg/g in fish (range 0.014 to 4.046 µg/g). Also, Brazil Rondônia, near the region of Porto Velho, and the Tapajós River have a mean of 0.69 µg/g (range 0.0740 to 1.510 µg/g). Additionally, the Madre de Dios River basin in Peru has a mean of 0.720 µg/g of mercury (range 0.200 to 3.720 µg/g), while the mean mercury level in fish of the Amazon River was 0.673 µg/g (range 0.050 to 1.490 µg/g) (Figure 7).
The highest levels of THg reported in the Amazon were in the skin tissues of Panthera onca (17.900 µg/g) and the hepatic tissue of Arapaima gigas (17.400 µg/g). In Brazil, the highest value of mercury in predatory fish was found in the black piranha (S. rhombeus), a carnivore, at 1.640 µg/g [84]. The highest muscle mercury concentration in countries outside Brazil was found in a study carried out at Oxbow Lakes, a natural protected area in Madre de Dios Province, Peru, at 3.170 µg/g, and along the Mazaruni River in Guyana, at 5.920 µg/g, both of which are areas close to mining activities [101,107].

3.3. Overview of THg Levels in Human Research

In a comparative analysis of indigenous populations (impacted or not by mining), and non-indigenous populations, this systematic review provided evidence that THg found in the hair of indigenous populations existed at marginally higher levels (median of 10.900 µg/g and IQR 4.900 µg/g) than that found among non-indigenous populations (median of 9.150 µg/g and IQR 7.490 µg/g). Studies that examined (small-scale) mining areas had a comparatively larger sampling range (IQR 10.652 µg/g) but a lower median (8.275 µg/g) within the studied population.
All categories analyzed exceeded the WHO guidelines for Hg in hair, suggesting that indigenous populations are exposed to higher levels of Hg, which may have implications for the health of these populations (Figure 8).
The total hair THg in humans ranged from 1.030 to 27.620 µg/g. Notably, we can distinguish the following groups: children, who had a mean of 8.81 µg/g (range 1.030 to 22.380 µg/g); indigenous populations, with a mean of 13.190 µg/g (range 2.060 to 34.900 µg/g); women of reproductive age, including mothers, pregnant women, and lactating women, who had a mean of 7.710 µg/g (range 2.120 to 12.80 µg/g); riverside populations, with mean concentrations of 10.610 µg/g (range 3.070 to 22.380 µg/g); and, finally, a mean of 11.930 µg/g (range 1.740 to 34.90 µg/g) reported for individuals living in mining areas. Table 4 shows a list of human studies with significant findings related to THg concentrations in human tissues.
Only two studies do not consider total human mercury concentrations in hair. One reported data from the breast milk (mean 0.010 µg/g THg) of lactating women to estimate exposure to neurotoxic metals influenced by small-scale mining in infants in Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brazil [154]. Another reported blood levels (mean 0.021 µg/g THg) in Amazonian juvenile populations in Cuniã, Brazil [155].
It should be noted that the indigenous community is well represented, especially in the Munduruku reserve/community in the Tapajós basin and in studies in the Madre de Dios region in Peru, as part of cohort studies [136,144,147] where comparisons were made between native demographics and mining hotspots, together with respective controls around the Amarakaeri Communal Reserve. Pregnant women, women of reproductive age, and juveniles received particular attention owing to their heightened vulnerability to mercury exposure. Interestingly, one study revealed that occupational Hg exposure from mining remained lower than levels observed in riverside communities, as exemplified by the riverside population of Itaituba (20 µg/g THg) compared to the mining region of Serra Pelada (1 µg/g THg) [146].
No statistical differences (p < 0.05) in THg concentration were found between the groups analyzed (children, indigenous, maternity, riverside, and those directly affected by mining) using MLG models. According to the summary in Table 5, no parameters were strongly correlated with concentrations in human hair. Logistic regression showed better a model fit than the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), but all p values were > 0.05, i.e., no connection was demonstrated.
The spatial representation of human research is highest in the southern forest bioregion with 34 records. In this area, the highest density was recorded in the Tapajós basin, followed by western Amazon ecoregions with 28 records. The remaining studies were conducted in the other three regions.
The human data presented spatial trends nearly identical to studies concentrated in the Tapajós and Madeira River basins in Brazil and Madre de Dios in Peru. Evidence of three classes of THg gradients, along with several high-Hg points, can be visualized as deep red dots scattered across the map. This feature has also been observed in the northern and western areas of the Amazon Forest, including studies conducted in the state of Amazonas, Roraima in Brazil, and Nariño in the Colombian Amazon. These observations are illustrated in Figure 9.

3.4. Mining

Many studies have reported on Hg in regions with mining activities in floodplain areas, including all classes of Amazonian floodplains, grouped according to Dinerstein et al. [56]. It was possible to observe tributaries with intense mining activity near the sampling points, which are grouped on the map into classes according to distances, i.e., of 0–20 km, 20–50 km, and above 50 km, relative to mining polygons. The mining polygons (orange scheme) comprise a combination of datasets consisting of global mining footprints [58] with a layer of illegal mining, as adapted from RAISG [44].
Floodplain areas were specifically included in the analysis to represent zones of high water retention and the accumulation of mining tailings, which are factors that can contribute to Hg concentrations in the environment [84,156]. Notably, the extent of illegal mining is more widely recognized by initiatives such as RAISG, the data from which indicate an overlap of these activities with the studied areas. In particular, these illegal operations are prevalent in the western regions of the Napo River, an important tributary of the Amazon River basin, affecting the sample collection areas situated in the border zones that separate Peru, Colombia, and Brazil. Moreover, illegal mining activity is intense along the Madre de Dios River basin in Peru, with operations extending close to the designated sample collection areas. Certain sample points with close proximity classes (up to 20 km, and 20 km to 50 km) intersect with mining zones.
Highlights for animal studies from these points are in the Mazaruni River basin region in Guyana and the downstream Suriname River region, despite the low representation of study articles. Regions with significant research overlap and mining activity in the interior include the Tapajós basin, close to the Munduruku Reserve and Itaituba, and the Itacaiúnas River basin, situated between the Xingu and Tocantins River basins in Brazil.
Based on distance classification, mercury concentrations within a 20 km radius of the georeferenced mining sites (closest) had a mean of 0.870 µg/g (range 0.033–5.920 µg/g) for fish, wherein Serrasalmus spp. was the most frequently mentioned. The approximation category between 20 and 50 km had a mean of 0.506 µg/g (range 0.022 to 1.510 µg/g), and within this distance category, Plagioscion squamosis Yesus was the most cited fish species. Although higher, the mean muscle THg concentrations in fish closest to mining activity are still slightly below the 1 µg/g limit, indicating a permissible level for predatory fish, but it does exceed the permitted dietary reference of Hg set at 0.50 µg/g for their non-predatory counterparts. Figure 10 shows the point data for animal records, which are mapped alongside polygons that indicate small-scale mining.
Research on human tissues has also been mapped along with the geospatial information of mining and indigenous territories. The results of human studies show that the highest number of studies were conducted close to the illegal mining polygons of RAISG in the Madre de Dios and Tapajós basins. The Madeira River basin is also the subject of a high number of studies, but with less illegal mining activity. This is because illegal mining follows the river flow, likely the result of alluvial mining activities. Consequently, the cities of Itaituba and Marabá, both in the Tapajós basin, are among the most frequent sample areas near illegal mining activities, reported in high numbers.
Despite limited spatial representation in the north, some studies have highlighted the presence of mining activities. Among these, small-scale mining has been reported in the mountainous region of Marudi, which is located in Guyana [145]. Another point of interest is the Lawa River basin situated in French Guiana [8]. Additionally, the Yanomami indigenous region in Roraima, Brazil, which is in the Uraricoera River basin, is also mentioned [152]. Although limited in number, these studies hold significant value because of their proximity to mining areas in the Guiana Shield.
The human samples closest to mining areas up to 20 km had a mean THg of 4.301 µg/g (1 to 11.61 µg/g), while human samples at a distance of 20 km to 50 km had a mean of 6.782 µg/g (0.01 to 12.80 µg/g). Notably, all studies conducted within a 20 km radius of mining areas were also within a 17 km radius of indigenous territories. Figure 11 shows human studies related to mining polygons.

4. Discussion

This review provides insights into total Hg accumulated in animal and human tissues, as reported in recent surveys. The human records in this review overlap with those of the scoping review on neurotoxicity by Santos-Sacramento et al. [39] and confirm the trend of high representation of studies in Brazil.
This scoping review revealed a greater focus on the southwest region, particularly the basins of the Madre de Dios, Madeira, and Tapajós Rivers and their tributaries. The Madeira River and its floodplains serve as significant boundaries in the geographic zoning of the ecoregions considered in this study. The results related to animals were predominantly from aquatic ecosystems and were assessed within the context of the fish food web and bioconcentration of Hg, considering the differences between pelagic and demersal species and their distinct feeding groups in these tropical zones (feeding guilds) [41,77].
These studies partially cover the regions currently exploited for mining, but numerous regions are not represented or are under-represented in sampling locations for both humans and animals. The analysis of overall data in humans showed a median of alarmingly high levels of total Hg in hair (above 6 µg/g), thus exceeding the safe level for humans. This emphasizes the pressing necessity for comprehensive ecotoxicological studies in the Amazonian region. These studies form a basis for understanding the nature of mercury bioaccumulation and its spatial distribution in both animal and human tissues. High levels of Hg represent immediate environmental and public health concerns that require prompt attention.
We used a geographical dataset related to small-scale mining and its textual references in the reviewed items and created a spatial representation of the sample points. Based on this reference, it is noteworthy that certain areas, even those devoid of any mining activities, exhibit high mean tissue THg levels. This can be traced back to the cycling dynamics of Hg in the environment. Long-range deposits of Hg can be influenced by several factors. These include the transport of Hg through waterways, which leads to higher concentrations downstream owing to sedimentation, the atmospheric mercury (Hg) uptake by oxidation of Hg0 and Hg2+, and the role of larger aquatic animals. Aquatic animals contribute Hg through bioaccumulation and migratory behavior [61,157]. The migratory behavior of fish is crucial for spatial analysis, as they can be captured by fishermen far from critical mining contamination points or zones of high Hg content [65,147]. Lastly, the remobilization of Hg that persists in historic mining zones could currently impact the riverine populations that consume fish in abundance [142].
The well-studied tropical forest of the Amazon, which is an important terrestrial sink, mitigating the release of Hg into the atmosphere, could have its ability reduced by anthropogenically induced forest degradation [158].
In this review, both the volume of research conducted and the spatial distribution across the region are more extensively represented in animal studies compared to human studies. However, the high levels of Hg in human research call for equally distributed spatial representation, especially in indigenous communities where fish are a staple food. Even with diets primarily rich in fish, the total mercury levels in the indigenous populations showed lower variation [26].
Most human studies are based on hair as a non-intrusive and convenient matrix for detecting dietary Hg [54,159,160]. Interestingly, some studies note that proximity to mining is not necessarily associated with exposure risk [147]. However, despite the lower medians associated with higher levels of hair THg and greater variations in populations close to mining areas, the significant presence of Hg in these locations is undeniable. The same can be said for the observed overlap between fish habitats and floodplains, raising concerns about potential effects of nearby alluvial mining activity [161]. Notably, the presence of dredges in these areas further strengthens this suspicion [13,17,162,163].
High water levels generally present higher total Hg concentrations in fish tissues. Low water levels in blackwater tributaries, which are commonly believed to contain higher levels of inorganic Hg, do not necessarily result in higher tissue Hg, as low water factors may block the synthesis of Hg [77]. Occupational exposure from gold mining was unexpectedly lower than that in the riverside control group [146].
Hg release in the Amazon region remains ubiquitous and not clearly understood through both anthropogenic and natural pathways as a more elaborate combination of variables are required to correlate the impact to a point contamination, i.e., small-scale gold mining. The dietary habit and tissue Hg assessments derived in this review only reveal the after-effects and extent of Hg contamination within the region. The GLM and lower medians for THg in mining areas for humans suggest the possibility of elevated levels even in non-mining areas and non-rural communities (not riverine, tribal, or indigenous).
While northern regions of the Amazon have a high occurrence of small-scale mining, research is noticeably lacking on both animals and humans in these regions.
Nonetheless, to address the mercury problem in the Amazon region, some directions and recommendations should be considered for future research and policy initiatives, as discussed below.
The development and implementation of a regional Hg-monitoring network and database are essential. This would facilitate the collection, sharing, and dissemination of Hg data and information among different stakeholders and actors. It is important that this network includes all Amazonian nations with special attention given to those with fewer publications. The application and improvement of spatial analysis tools and techniques, such as the Geographic Information System (GIS), remote sensing, and spatial statistics, are essential to enhance the understanding and communication of spatial patterns and trends of mercury contamination and exposure in the region. The integration of RAISG geospatial datasets can be used as fundamental building blocks in this process.
The promotion and support of alternative and sustainable livelihoods and technologies in the artisanal and small-scale mining sectors are crucial. This would reduce the use and emission of mercury and improve the socioenvironmental conditions of miners and their communities. Establishing and enforcing regional and national standards and regulations for mercury management and control are required. This would harmonize and coordinate the efforts and actions of different countries and agencies to address the mercury problem in the region.
Based on the extent of research coverage of aquatic ecosystems, both in terms of fish muscle assessment and human consumption from fish-rich diets, a comprehensive meta-analysis could be proposed. This would statistically analyze the correlation between tissue Hg contamination and aqueous Hg concentrations in Amazonian hydrology and sediments, particularly in relation to the impact of clandestine small-scale mining. It would also consider Hg sedimentation known to be transported in aquatic environments, a phenomenon prevalent in the blackwater-flooded forests and floodplains of the Amazon region [34,164]. These environments carry suspended matter, which has been reported to contain high concentrations of Hg in these tributaries, increasing atmospheric concentrations owing to its volatility.

Limitations

Some limitations of this study should be addressed. First, this review only focuses on tissue Hg and is thus limited by the lack of consideration of nearby sediment and water analyses. The search syntax and search engines used may have limitations by failing to include relevant articles. Importantly, assessing the contamination of ASGM by fish tissue Hg is less effective, as some argue, than measuring sediment Hg in local effluents [100]. The inclusion of alluvial sediment/water analysis, the consideration of downstream/upstream water flow relative to mining activities, and fish migratory factors could all have been factors accounting for lower fish muscle Hg levels near mining sites.
Second, for georeferencing, only sampling locations geographically distinguishable on a regional scale were considered. The algorithm used for the global mining dataset was designed to detect disturbances in terrestrial or forested areas caused by mining activities. However, this approach resulted in limited data from RAISG on alluvial mining activities.
Third, sample sizes were inconsistent among the studies with respect to THg data, as the number of fish per species varied significantly. The Hg concentration is often only reported for the entire collection, which may not accurately represent individual species or regions. Not all studies distinguished each sample region, often reporting the same averages (in mean or median) of geographically distant locations. The average Hg in these studies was indicated as either the mean or median, which, since they are different units of measurement, can affect the interpretation of overall data trends. The periods of sampling and tissue collection can vary drastically within the year of publication and are sometimes not indicated, leading to possible temporal bias. Some, but not all, authors indicated if they had cross-sectional or cohort studies.
Fourth, different protocols and Hg reference materials were used to assess Hg in the tissues, such as Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (CVAAS), Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Spectroscopy (CVAFS), and versions of Dogfish Muscle Certified Reference Material (DORM). Furthermore, the range of sampling periods, use of cohort versus cross-sectional studies, and consideration of wet weight versus dry weight, especially in fish tissues, may have contributed to variations in results. Wet weight was preferred based on its overall use in the studies reviewed.
Additionally, while some studies provide spatial details of sample points within their local study area, others do not, resulting in a map that may appear obscure owing to a lack of detailed information.
Lastly, only a few studies carried out a comprehensive data analysis, necessitating the expansion of the review period and, potentially, a systematic review or meta-analysis. These limitations highlight the need for more comprehensive and standardized research in this field.

5. Conclusions

Despite the wide range of studies on the presence of mercury in the Amazon, they are mainly concentrated in Brazil, in the western Amazon in the Madre de Dios region of Peru, and along the basins of the Tapajós River near Itaituba and the Madeira River near Porto Velho, Brazil. This coverage suggests a lack of studies assessing Hg contamination in other regions or countries of the Amazon, particularly Suriname, Ecuador, Venezuela, French Guiana, and English Guyana.
By broadening the scope of our systematic literature review, the results partially confirmed our initial hypothesis, in that we showed the highest concentrations of mercury in tissue samples collected near mining areas. This observation was particularly evident in studies that specifically evaluated the impacts of mining. It was noted that indigenous populations were more susceptible to mercury exposure, raising concerns discussed in the review. Interestingly, even areas located up to 50 km from mining activities exhibited higher mean THg levels in human hair, surpassing the 6 µg/g threshold established by the WHO. This suggests that the impact of mining activities on mercury levels extends well beyond the immediate vicinity of the mines.
Our review highlights that mining activities are a significant source of downstream Hg contamination and bioaccumulation in aquatic ecosystems. Understanding both the progression of mercury contamination by mining and the distribution and dispersion of downstream mercury concentrations is critical for properly assessing its effects on animals and humans. It is also important to highlight the high concentrations of mercury in predatory fish, as well as the potential health risks to human populations that rely heavily on fish as a staple in their diet. This finding underscores the need for stringent regulations and effective mitigation strategies for mining practices. Additionally, as anticipated in some studies, the bioaccumulation of mercury in fish demands that their migratory behavior be considered since fish can reach areas not known for mining activities.
This review documents a significant impact of mercury contamination on human and animal populations in the Amazon region and identifies gaps in geographic coverage. It is anticipated that these findings will lead to more comprehensive studies, particularly in areas that have not been adequately studied in previous research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.M. and A.C.F.; methodology, I.M.; software, I.M.; validation, L.B.C.S., A.C.F. and C.J.S.P.; formal analysis, I.M.; investigation, I.M.; resources, A.C.F. and C.J.S.P.; data curation, A.d.A.; writing—original draft preparation, I.M.; writing—review and editing, A.C.F., J.C.E.V. and A.B.L.R.; visualization, I.M.; supervision, A.C.F. and C.J.S.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) (Process 88887.636729/2021-00), CAPES—PROCAD Amazônia (Process 88881.200561/2018-01), and CAPES/PDPG—Amazônia Legal (Process 88887.510191/2020-00).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Paiva, P.F.P.R.; de Lourdes Pinheiro Ruivo, M.; da Silva Júnior, O.M.; de Nazaré Martins Maciel, M.; Braga, T.G.M.; de Andrade, M.M.N.; dos Santos Junior, P.C.; da Rocha, E.S.; de Freitas, T.P.M.; da Silva Leite, T.V.; et al. Deforestation in Protect Areas in the Amazon: A Threat to Biodiversity. Biodivers. Conserv. 2020, 29, 19–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Garcia, B. The Amazon from an International Law Perspective; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2011; ISBN 1-139-49668-9. [Google Scholar]
  3. Antonelli, A.; Zizka, A.; Carvalho, F.A.; Scharn, R.; Bacon, C.D.; Silvestro, D.; Condamine, F.L. Amazonia Is the Primary Source of Neotropical Biodiversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 6034–6039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nunes, C.A.; Berenguer, E.; França, F.; Ferreira, J.; Lees, A.C.; Louzada, J.; Sayer, E.J.; Solar, R.; Smith, C.C.; Aragão, L.E.O.C.; et al. Linking Land-Use and Land-Cover Transitions to Their Ecological Impact in the Amazon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2202310119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Matricardi, E.A.T.; Skole, D.L.; Costa, O.B.; Pedlowski, M.A.; Samek, J.H.; Miguel, E.P. Long-Term Forest Degradation Surpasses Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 2020, 369, 1378–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Giljum, S.; Maus, V.; Kuschnig, N.; Luckeneder, S.; Tost, M.; Sonter, L.J.; Bebbington, A.J. A Pantropical Assessment of Deforestation Caused by Industrial Mining. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2118273119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Albert, J.S.; Carnaval, A.C.; Flantua, S.G.A.; Lohmann, L.G.; Ribas, C.C.; Riff, D.; Carrillo, J.D.; Fan, Y.; Figueiredo, J.J.P.; Guayasamin, J.M.; et al. Human Impacts Outpace Natural Processes in the Amazon. Science 2023, 379, eabo5003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Vega, C.; Orellana, J.; Oliveira, M.; Hacon, S.; Basta, P. Human Mercury Exposure in Yanomami Indigenous Villages from the Brazilian Amazon. IJERPH 2018, 15, 1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Siqueira-Gay, J.; Sánchez, L.E. The Outbreak of Illegal Gold Mining in the Brazilian Amazon Boosts Deforestation. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2021, 21, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Achatz, R.W.; De Vasconcellos, A.C.S.; Pereira, L.; Viana, P.V.D.S.; Basta, P.C. Impacts of the Goldmining and Chronic Methylmercury Exposure on the Good-Living and Mental Health of Munduruku Native Communities in the Amazon Basin. IJERPH 2021, 18, 8994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Basta, P.C.; De Sousa Viana, P.V.; De Vasconcellos, A.C.S.; Santos Périssé, A.R.; Hofer, C.B.; Paiva, N.S.; Kempton, J.W.; De Andrade, D.C.; De Oliveira, R.A.A.; Achatz, R.; et al. Mercury Exposure in Munduruku Indigenous Communities from Brazilian Amazon: Methodological Background and an Overview of the Principal Results. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 9222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hacon, S.D.S.; Oliveira-da-Costa, M.; Gama, C.D.S.; Ferreira, R.; Basta, P.C.; Schramm, A.; Yokota, D. Mercury Exposure through Fish Consumption in Traditional Communities in the Brazilian Northern Amazon. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pestana, I.A.; De Rezende, C.E.; Almeida, R.; De Lacerda, L.D.; Bastos, W.R. Let’s Talk about Mercury Contamination in the Amazon (Again): The Case of the Floating Gold Miners’ Village on the Madeira River. Extr. Ind. Soc. 2022, 11, 101122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Valdelamar-Villegas, J.; Olivero-Verbel, J. High Mercury Levels in the Indigenous Population of the Yaigojé Apaporis National Natural Park, Colombian Amazon. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2020, 194, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Vasconcellos, A.C.S.D.; Hallwass, G.; Bezerra, J.G.; Aciole, A.N.S.; Meneses, H.N.D.M.; Lima, M.D.O.; Jesus, I.M.D.; Hacon, S.D.S.; Basta, P.C. Health Risk Assessment of Mercury Exposure from Fish Consumption in Munduruku Indigenous Communities in the Brazilian Amazon. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 7940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Calvimontes, J.; Massaro, L.; Araujo, C.H.X.; Moraes, R.R.; Mello, J.; Ferreira, L.C.; De Theije, M. Small-Scale Gold Mining and the COVID-19 Pandemic: Conflict and Cooperation in the Brazilian Amazon. Extr. Ind. Soc. 2020, 7, 1347–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Velásquez Ramírez, M.G.; Barrantes, J.A.G.; Thomas, E.; Gamarra Miranda, L.A.; Pillaca, M.; Tello Peramas, L.D.; Bazán Tapia, L.R. Heavy Metals in Alluvial Gold Mine Spoils in the Peruvian Amazon. Catena 2020, 189, 104454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Adler Miserendino, R.; Guimarães, J.R.D.; Schudel, G.; Ghosh, S.; Godoy, J.M.; Silbergeld, E.K.; Lees, P.S.J.; Bergquist, B.A. Mercury Pollution in Amapá, Brazil: Mercury Amalgamation in Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining or Land-Cover and Land-Use Changes? ACS Earth Space Chem. 2018, 2, 441–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bullock, E.L.; Woodcock, C.E.; Souza, C.; Olofsson, P. Satellite-based Estimates Reveal Widespread Forest Degradation in the Amazon. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2020, 26, 2956–2969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gallay, M.; Mora, A.; Martinez, J.; Gardel, A.; Laraque, A.; Sarrazin, M.; Beaucher, E.; Doudou, J.; Lagane, C. Dynamics and Fluxes of Organic Carbon and Nitrogen in Two Guiana Shield River Basins Impacted by Deforestation and Mining Activities. Hydrol. Process. 2018, 32, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mestanza-Ramón, C.; Mora-Silva, D.; D’Orio, G.; Tapia-Segarra, E.; Gaibor, I.D.; Esparza Parra, J.F.; Chávez Velásquez, C.R.; Straface, S. Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining (ASGM): Management and Socioenvironmental Impacts in the Northern Amazon of Ecuador. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Veiga, M.M.; Gunson, A.J. Gravity Concentration in Artisanal Gold Mining. Minerals 2020, 10, 1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dethier, E.N.; Sartain, S.L.; Lutz, D.A. Heightened Levels and Seasonal Inversion of Riverine Suspended Sediment in a Tropical Biodiversity Hot Spot Due to Artisanal Gold Mining. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 23936–23941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Esdaile, L.J.; Chalker, J.M. The Mercury Problem in Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining. Chem.—Eur. J. 2018, 24, 6905–6916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Espejo, J.C.; Messinger, M.; Román-Dañobeytia, F.; Ascorra, C.; Fernandez, L.E.; Silman, M. Deforestation and Forest Degradation Due to Gold Mining in the Peruvian Amazon: A 34-Year Perspective. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alcala-Orozco, M.; Caballero-Gallardo, K.; Olivero-Verbel, J. Mercury Exposure Assessment in Indigenous Communities from Tarapaca Village, Cotuhe and Putumayo Rivers, Colombian Amazon. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 36458–36467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cosio, C. Special Issue on Bioconversion, Bioaccumulation and Toxicity of Mercury in a Changing World. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Teixeira, R.A.; Pereira, W.V.D.S.; Souza, E.S.D.; Ramos, S.J.; Dias, Y.N.; Lima, M.W.D.; De Souza Neto, H.F.; Oliveira, E.S.D.; Fernandes, A.R. Artisanal Gold Mining in the Eastern Amazon: Environmental and Human Health Risks of Mercury from Different Mining Methods. Chemosphere 2021, 284, 131220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Fujimura, M.; Usuki, F. Cellular Conditions Responsible for Methylmercury-Mediated Neurotoxicity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Crespo-Lopez, M.E.; Augusto-Oliveira, M.; Lopes-Araújo, A.; Santos-Sacramento, L.; Takeda, P.Y.; de Matos Macchi, B.; do Nascimento, J.L.M.; Maia, C.S.; Lima, R.R.; Arrifano, G.P. Mercury: What Can We Learn from the Amazon? Environ. Int. 2021, 146, 106223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Crespo-López, M.E.; Augusto-Oliveira, M.; Santos-Sacramento, L.; Lopes-Araújo, A. Mercúrio Na Amazônia Uma Breve Contextualizaçao Do Problema; Universidade do Estado do Amazonas: Manaus, Brazil, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  32. De Oliveira, D.F.; De Castro, B.S.; Do Nascimento Recktenvald, M.C.N.; Da Costa Júnior, W.A.; Da Silva, F.X.; De Menezes Alves, C.L.; Froehlich, J.D.; Bastos, W.R.; Ott, A.M.T. Mercury in Wild Animals and Fish and Health Risk for Indigenous Amazonians. Food Addit. Contam. Part B 2021, 14, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Baturin, G.; Gordeev, V. Geochemistry of Suspended Matter in the Amazon River Waters. Geochem. Int. 2019, 57, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kasper, D.; Forsberg, B.R.; do Amaral Kehrig, H.; Amaral, J.H.F.; Bastos, W.R.; Malm, O. Mercury in Black-Waters of the Amazon; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; ISBN 978-3-319-90121-3. [Google Scholar]
  35. Fisher, J.A.; Schneider, L.; Fostier, A.-H.; Guerrero, S.; Guimarães, J.R.D.; Labuschagne, C.; Leaner, J.J.; Martin, L.G.; Mason, R.P.; Somerset, V.; et al. A Synthesis of Mercury Research in the Southern Hemisphere, Part 2: Anthropogenic Perturbations. Ambio 2023, 52, 918–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Brito, B.C.; Forsberg, B.R.; Kasper, D.; Amaral, J.H.F.; De Vasconcelos, M.R.R.; De Sousa, O.P.; Cunha, F.A.G.; Bastos, W.R. The Influence of Inundation and Lake Morphometry on the Dynamics of Mercury in the Water and Plankton in an Amazon Floodplain Lake. Hydrobiologia 2017, 790, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Salazar-Camacho, C.; Salas-Moreno, M.; Marrugo-Madrid, S.; Marrugo-Negrete, J.; Díez, S. Dietary Human Exposure to Mercury in Two Artisanal Small-Scale Gold Mining Communities of Northwestern Colombia. Environ. Int. 2017, 107, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Diringer, S.E.; Berky, A.J.; Marani, M.; Ortiz, E.J.; Karatum, O.; Plata, D.L.; Pan, W.K.; Hsu-Kim, H. Deforestation Due to Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining Exacerbates Soil and Mercury Mobilization in Madre de Dios, Peru. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 286–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Santos-Sacramento, L.; Arrifano, G.P.; Lopes-Araújo, A.; Augusto-Oliveira, M.; Albuquerque-Santos, R.; Takeda, P.Y.; Souza-Monteiro, J.R.; Macchi, B.M.; do Nascimento, J.L.M.; Lima, R.R.; et al. Human Neurotoxicity of Mercury in the Amazon: A Scoping Review with Insights and Critical Considerations. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 208, 111686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Miguel, V.M.N.; Darlan, Q. Brito Mercury (Hg) Researches in Brazilian Biomes: A Scientometric Analysis between the Years 1991 and 2018. J. Veterina Sci. Res. 2021, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Basta, P.C.; de Vasconcellos, A.C.S.; Hallwass, G.; Yokota, D.; Pinto, D.D.O.D.E.R.; de Aguiar, D.S.; de Souza, C.C.; Oliveira-da-Costa, M. Risk Assessment of Mercury-Contaminated Fish Consumption in the Brazilian Amazon: An Ecological Study. Toxics 2023, 11, 800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Moulatlet, G.M.; Yacelga, N.; Rico, A.; Mora, A.; Hauser-Davis, R.A.; Cabrera, M.; Capparelli, M.V. A Systematic Review on Metal Contamination Due to Mining Activities in the Amazon Basin and Associated Environmental Hazards. Chemosphere 2023, 339, 139700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Gimenes, T.C.; Penteado, J.O.; dos Santos, M.; da Silva Júnior, F.M.R. Methylmercury in Fish from the Amazon Region—A Review Focused on Eating Habits. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2021, 232, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. RAISG Amazon in Numbers. Available online: https://www.raisg.org/en/infographic/ (accessed on 1 August 2022).
  45. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. Syst. Rev. 2021, 10, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Cochrane. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, 2nd ed.; Higgins, J., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M., Welch, V., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kirby, A. Exploratory Bibliometrics: Using VOSviewer as a Preliminary Research Tool. Publications 2023, 11, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cohen Hubal, E.A.; Frank, J.J.; Nachman, R.; Angrish, M.; Deziel, N.C.; Fry, M.; Tornero-Velez, R.; Kraft, A.; Lavoie, E. Advancing Systematic-Review Methodology in Exposure Science for Environmental Health Decision Making. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2020, 30, 906–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. FAO; WHO. General Standard For Contaminants And Toxins In Food And Feed CXS 193-1995. Codex Alimentarius. 2019, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  50. WHO. Chapter 6.9 Mercury General Description. In Air Quality Guidelines, 2nd ed.; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000; pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  51. Ministério da Saúde RESOLUÇÃO—RDC No 42, DE 29 DE AGOSTO DE 2013. 2013. Available online: https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/inspecao/produtos-animal/plano-de-nacional-de-controle-de-residuos-e-contaminantes/documentos-da-pncrc/anvisa-resolucao-rdc-no-42-de-29-de-agosto-de-2013-internaliza-a-resolucao-gmc-res-n-o-12-2011.pdf/view (accessed on 16 November 2023).
  52. Poulin, J.; Gibb, H.; Prüss-Üstün, A.; World Health Organization. Mercury: Assessing the Environmental Burden of Disease at National and Local Levels; Prüss-Üstün, A., Ed.; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
  53. Costa Junior, J.M.F.; Silva, C.I.M.D.; Lima, A.A.D.S.; Rodrigues Júnior, D.; Silveira, L.C.D.L.; Souza, G.D.S.; Pinheiro, M.D.C.N. Teores de Mercúrio Em Cabelo e Consumo de Pescado de Comunidades Ribeirinhas Na Amazônia Brasileira, Região Do Tapajós. Cienc. Saude Coletiva 2018, 23, 805–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wang, Y.; Li, L.; Yao, C.; Tian, X.; Wu, Y.; Xie, Q.; Wang, D. Mercury in Human Hair and Its Implications for Health Investigation. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health 2021, 22, 100271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. QGIS Association QGIS.Org 2023. Available online: https://qgis.org/en/site/ (accessed on 16 November 2023).
  56. Dinerstein, E.; Olson, D.; Joshi, A.; Vynne, C.; Burgess, N.D.; Wikramanayake, E.; Hahn, N.; Palminteri, S.; Hedao, P.; Noss, R.; et al. An Ecoregion-Based Approach to Protecting Half the Terrestrial Realm. BioScience 2017, 67, 534–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Southern America|Realm & Subrealms|One Earth. Available online: https://www.oneearth.org/realms/southern-america/ (accessed on 16 November 2023).
  58. Tang, L.; Werner, T.T. Author Correction: Global Mining Footprint Mapped from High-Resolution Satellite Imagery. Commun Earth Environ. 2023, 4, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yevugah, L.L.; Darko, G.; Bak, J. Does Mercury Emission from Small-Scale Gold Mining Cause Widespread Soil Pollution in Ghana? Environ. Pollut. 2021, 284, 116945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Goix, S.; Maurice, L.; Laffont, L.; Rinaldo, R.; Lagane, C.; Chmeleff, J.; Menges, J.; Heimbürger, L.-E.; Maury-Brachet, R.; Sonke, J.E. Quantifying the Impacts of Artisanal Gold Mining on a Tropical River System Using Mercury Isotopes. Chemosphere 2019, 219, 684–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gerson, J.R.; Szponar, N.; Zambrano, A.A.; Bergquist, B.; Broadbent, E.; Driscoll, C.T.; Erkenswick, G.; Evers, D.C.; Fernandez, L.E.; Hsu-Kim, H. Amazon Forests Capture High Levels of Atmospheric Mercury Pollution from Artisanal Gold Mining. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Feingold, B.J.; Berky, A.; Hsu-Kim, H.; Rojas Jurado, E.; Pan, W.K. Population-Based Dietary Exposure to Mercury through Fish Consumption in the Southern Peruvian Amazon. Environ. Res. 2020, 183, 108720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  64. Silva, S.F.D.; Oliveira, D.C.; Pereira, J.P.G.; Castro, S.P.; Costa, B.N.S.; Lima, M.D.O. Seasonal Variation of Mercury in Commercial Fishes of the Amazon Triple Frontier, Western Amazon Basin. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 106, 105549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ferreira Da Silva, S.; De Oliveira Lima, M. Mercury in Fish Marketed in the Amazon Triple Frontier and Health Risk Assessment. Chemosphere 2020, 248, 125989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Souza-Araujo, J.; Souza-Junior, O.G.; Guimarães-Costa, A.; Hussey, N.E.; Lima, M.O.; Giarrizzo, T. The Consumption of Shark Meat in the Amazon Region and Its Implications for Human Health and the Marine Ecosystem. Chemosphere 2021, 265, 129132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Albuquerque, F.E.A.; Minervino, A.H.H.; Miranda, M.; Herrero-Latorre, C.; Barrêto Júnior, R.A.; Oliveira, F.L.C.; Sucupira, M.C.A.; Ortolani, E.L.; López-Alonso, M. Toxic and Essential Trace Element Concentrations in Fish Species in the Lower Amazon, Brazil. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 732, 138983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Lino, A.S.; Kasper, D.; Guida, Y.S.; Thomaz, J.R.; Malm, O. Mercury and Selenium in Fishes from the Tapajós River in the Brazilian Amazon: An Evaluation of Human Exposure. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2018, 48, 196–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Alcala-Orozco, M.; Caballero-Gallardo, K.; Olivero-Verbel, J. Biomonitoring of Mercury, Cadmium and Selenium in Fish and the Population of Puerto Nariño, at the Southern Corner of the Colombian Amazon. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2020, 79, 354–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Da Silva, S.F.; Pereira, J.P.G.; Oliveira, D.C.; Lima, M.D.O. Methylmercury in Predatory and Non-Predatory Fish Species Marketed in the Amazon Triple Frontier. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2020, 104, 733–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. De Castro Paiva, T.; Dary, E.P.; Pestana, I.A.; Amadio, S.A.; Malm, O.; Kasper, D. Flood-Pulse and Trophic Position Modulate Mercury Concentrations in Fishes from an Amazon Floodplain Lake. Environ. Res. 2022, 215, 114307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Finoto Viana, L.; Damasceno De Souza, D.C.; Batista Da Silva, E.; Kummrow, F.; Lima Cardoso, C.A.; De Lima, N.A.; Crispim, B.D.A.; Barufatti, A.; Florentino, A.C. Bioaccumulation of Metals and Genotoxic Effects in Females of Colomesus Asellus Collected in an Amazon River Estuary, Amapá, Brazil. Limnetica 2023, 42, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Lino, A.S.; Kasper, D.; Guida, Y.S.; Thomaz, J.R.; Malm, O. Total and Methyl Mercury Distribution in Water, Sediment, Plankton and Fish along the Tapajós River Basin in the Brazilian Amazon. Chemosphere 2019, 235, 690–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Oliveira, R.B.D.; Silva, D.M.D.; Franco, T.S.B.S.; Vasconcelos, C.R.S.; Sousa, D.J.D.A.D.; Sarrazin, S.L.F.; Sakamoto, M.; Bourdineaud, J.-P. Fish Consumption Habits of Pregnant Women in Itaituba, Tapajós River Basin, Brazil: Risks of Mercury Contamination as Assessed by Measuring Total Mercury in Highly Consumed Piscivore Fish Species and in Hair of Pregnant Women. Arch. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol. 2022, 73, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. De Souza Azevedo, J.; Hortellani, M.A.; De Souza Sarkis, J.E. Organotropism of Total Mercury (THg) in Cichla Pinima, Ecological Aspects and Human Consumption in Fish from Amazon Region, Brazil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 21363–21370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Da Silva Montes, C.; Ferreira, M.A.P.; Giarrizzo, T.; Amado, L.L.; Rocha, R.M. The Legacy of Artisanal Gold Mining and Its Impact on Fish Health from Tapajós Amazonian Region: A Multi-Biomarker Approach. Chemosphere 2022, 287, 132263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Azevedo, L.S.; Pestana, I.A.; Da Costa Nery, A.F.; Bastos, W.R.; Souza, C.M.M. Variation in Hg Accumulation between Demersal and Pelagic Fish from Puruzinho Lake, Brazilian Amazon. Ecotoxicology 2019, 28, 1143–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Cavecci-Mendonça, B.; Cavalcante de Souza Vieira, J.; Monteiro de Lima, P.; Leite, A.L.; Buzalaf, M.A.R.; Zara, L.F.; de Magalhães Padilha, P. Study of Proteins with Mercury in Fish from the Amazon Region. Food Chem. 2020, 309, 125460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. de Queiroz, J.V.; Cavecci-Mendonça, B.; Vieira, J.C.S.; Martins, R.A.; de Almeida Assunção, A.S.; Cavallini, N.G.; dos Santos, F.A.; de Magalhães Padilha, P. Metalloproteomic Strategies for Identifying Proteins as Biomarkers of Mercury Exposure in Serrasalmus Rhombeus from the Amazon Region. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2021, 199, 712–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Soares, J.M.; Gomes, J.M.; Anjos, M.R.; Silveira, J.N.; Custódio, F.B.; Gloria, M.B.A. Mercury in Fish from the Madeira River and Health Risk to Amazonian and Riverine Populations. Food Res. Int. 2018, 109, 537–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Azevedo, L.S.; Pestana, I.A.; Nery, A.F.D.C.; Bastos, W.R.; Souza, C.M.M. Influence of the Flood Pulse on Mercury Accumulation in Detritivorous, Herbivorous and Omnivorous Fish in Brazilian Amazonia. Ecotoxicology 2019, 28, 478–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Vieira, J.C.S.; De Oliveira, G.; Cavallini, N.G.; Braga, C.P.; Adamec, J.; Zara, L.F.; Buzalaf, M.A.R.; De Magalhães Padilha, P. Investigation of Protein Biomarkers and Oxidative Stress in Pinirampus Pirinampu Exposed to Mercury Species from the Madeira River, Amazon-Brazil. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2022, 200, 1872–1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Da Cunha Bataglioli, I.; De Queiroz, J.V.; Vieira, J.C.S.; Cavalline, N.G.; Braga, C.P.; Buzalaf, M.A.R.; Zara, L.F.; Adamec, J.; De Magalhães Padilha, P. Mercury Metalloproteomic Profile in Muscle Tissue of Arapaima Gigas from the Brazilian Amazon. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2022, 194, 705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Azevedo, L.S.; Pestana, I.A.; Almeida, M.G.; Ferreira Da Costa Nery, A.; Bastos, W.R.; Magalhães Souza, C.M. Mercury Biomagnification in an Ichthyic Food Chain of an Amazon Floodplain Lake (Puruzinho Lake): Influence of Seasonality and Food Chain Modeling. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 207, 111249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Bittarello, A.C.; Vieira, J.C.S.; Braga, C.P.; De Paula Araújo, W.L.; Da Cunha Bataglioli, I.; Da Silva, J.M.; Buzalaf, M.A.R.; Fleuri, L.F.; De Magalhães Padilha, P. Characterization of Molecular Biomarkers of Mercury Exposure to Muscle Tissue of Plagioscion Squamosissimus and Colossoma Macropomum from the Amazon Region. Food Chem. 2019, 276, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. De Queiroz, J.V.; Vieira, J.C.S.; De Oliveira, G.; Braga, C.P.; Da Cunha Bataglioli, I.; Da Silva, J.M.; De Paula Araújo, W.L.; De Magalhães Padilha, P. Identification of Biomarkers of Mercury Contamination in Brachyplatystoma Filamentosum of the Madeira River, Brazil, Using Metalloproteomic Strategies. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2019, 187, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Mussy, M.H.; De Almeida, R.; De Carvalho, D.P.; Lauthartte, L.C.; De Holanda, I.B.B.; Almeida, M.G.D.; De Sousa-Filho, I.F.; De Rezende, C.E.; Malm, O.; Bastos, W.R. Evaluating Total Mercury and Methylmercury Biomagnification Using Stable Isotopes of Carbon and Nitrogen in Fish from the Madeira River Basin, Brazilian Amazon. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 30, 33543–33554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Reis, P.A.; Ozório, R.O.A.; Rodriguez, A.F.R.; Faria, F.S.E.D.V.; Furtado, C.M.; Ribeiro, R.A. Mercury Distribution in Two Commercial Fish Species (Pimelodus Maculatus and Calophysus Macropterus)—Case Study of River Acre (Acre State, Brazilian Amazon). Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2020, 26, 1439–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Vieira, J.C.S.; Braga, C.P.; Queiroz, J.V.D.; Cavecci-Mendonça, B.; Oliveira, G.D.; Freitas, N.G.D.; Fernandes, A.A.H.; Fernandes, M.D.S.; Buzalaf, M.A.R.; Adamec, J.; et al. The Effects of Mercury Exposure on Amazonian Fishes: An Investigation of Potential Biomarkers. Chemosphere 2023, 316, 137779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Vieira, J.C.S.; Braga, C.P.; De Oliveira, G.; Padilha, C.D.C.F.; De Moraes, P.M.; Zara, L.F.; Leite, A.D.L.; Buzalaf, M.A.R.; Padilha, P.D.M. Mercury Exposure: Protein Biomarkers of Mercury Exposure in Jaraqui Fish from the Amazon Region. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2018, 183, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. De Queiroz, J.V.; Vieira, J.C.S.; Da Cunha Bataglioli, I.; Bittarello, A.C.; Braga, C.P.; De Oliveira, G.; Do Carmo Federici Padilha, C.; De Magalhães Padilha, P. Total Mercury Determination in Muscle and Liver Tissue Samples from Brazilian Amazon Fish Using Slurry Sampling. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2018, 184, 517–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Vieira, J.C.S.; Cavecci, B.; Queiroz, J.V.; Braga, C.P.; Padilha, C.C.F.; Leite, A.L.; Figueiredo, W.S.; Buzalaf, M.A.R.; Zara, L.F.; Padilha, P.M. Determination of the Mercury Fraction Linked to Protein of Muscle and Liver Tissue of Tucunaré (Cichla Spp.) from the Amazon Region of Brazil. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2015, 69, 422–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. da Silva Montes, C.; Pantoja Ferreira, M.A.; Giarrizzo, T.; Amado, L.L.; Rocha, R.M. Evaluation of Metal Contamination Effects in Piranhas through Biomonitoring and Multi Biomarkers Approach. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Souza-Araujo, J.; Andrades, R.; Hauser-Davis, R.A.; Lima, M.O.; Giarrizzo, T. Before the Dam: A Fish-Mercury Contamination Baseline Survey at the Xingu River, Amazon Basin Before the Belo Monte Dam. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2022, 108, 861–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. De Matos, L.S.; Silva Correa, A.S.A.; Da Silva, S.A.A.; Muniz, C.C.; Alves Ignacio, A.R. Mercury Concentrations in Fish and Human Health Assessment in Preflood Phase of a Hydro Dam in Teles Pires River, Southern Brazilian Amazon. Elementa 2021, 9, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Matos, L.S.D.; Silva, J.O.S.; Kasper, D.; Carvalho, L.N. Assessment of Mercury Contamination in Brycon falcatus (Characiformes: Bryconidae) and Human Health Risk by Consumption of This Fish from the Teles Pires River, Southern Amazonia. Neotrop. Ichthyol. 2018, 16, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Viana, L.F.; Kummrow, F.; Cardoso, C.A.L.; De Lima, N.A.; Do Amaral Crispim, B.; Barufatti, A.; Florentino, A.C. Metal Bioaccumulation in Fish from the Araguari River (Amazon Biome) and Human Health Risks from Fish Consumption. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 4111–4122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Da Silva Costa, M.; Viana, L.F.; Lima Cardoso, C.A.; Gonar Silva Isacksson, E.D.; Silva, J.C.; Florentino, A.C. Landscape Composition and Inorganic Contaminants in Water and Muscle Tissue of Plagioscion Squamosissimus in the Araguari River (Amazon, Brazil). Environ. Res. 2022, 208, 112691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Costa, I.D.D.; Nascimento, E.L.D.; Faccheti, M.S.D.A.; Nunes, N.N.D.S.; Gomes, J.P.D.O.; Almeida, R.D.; Bastos, W.R. Mercury in Muscle and Liver of Plagioscion Squamosissimus (Acanthuriformes: Sciaenidae) from the Machado River, Brazilian Amazon. Acta Amaz. 2022, 52, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Martinez, G.; McCord, S.; Driscoll, C.; Todorova, S.; Wu, S.; Araújo, J.; Vega, C.; Fernandez, L. Mercury Contamination in Riverine Sediments and Fish Associated with Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Madre de Dios, Peru. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Barocas, A.; Vega, C.; Alarcon Pardo, A.; Araujo Flores, J.M.; Fernandez, L.; Groenendijk, J.; Pisconte, J.; Macdonald, D.W.; Swaisgood, R.R. Local Intensity of Artisanal Gold Mining Drives Mercury Accumulation in Neotropical Oxbow Lake Fishes. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 886, 164024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Rodriguez-Levy, I.E.; Van Damme, P.A.; Carvajal-Vallejos, F.M.; Bervoets, L. Trace Element Accumulation in Different Edible Fish Species from the Bolivian Amazon and the Risk for Human Consumption. Heliyon 2022, 8, e11649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. De Vasconcellos, A.C.S.; Ferreira, S.R.B.; De Sousa, C.C.; De Oliveira, M.W.; De Oliveira Lima, M.; Basta, P.C. Health Risk Assessment Attributed to Consumption of Fish Contaminated with Mercury in the Rio Branco Basin, Roraima, Amazon, Brazil. Toxics 2022, 10, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Borges, A.C.; Da Silva Montes, C.; Barbosa, L.A.; Ferreira, M.A.P.; Berrêdo, J.F.; Martins Rocha, R. Integrated Use of Histological and Ultrastructural Biomarkers for Assessing Mercury Pollution in Piranhas (Serrasalmus rhombeus) from the Amazon Mining Region. Chemosphere 2018, 202, 788–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Vreedzaam, A.; Ouboter, P.; Hindori-Mohangoo, A.D.; Lepak, R.; Rumschlag, S.; Janssen, S.; Landburg, G.; Shankar, A.; Zijlmans, W.; Lichtveld, M.Y.; et al. Contrasting Mercury Contamination Scenarios and Site Susceptibilities Confound Fish Mercury Burdens in Suriname, South America. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 336, 122447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Laffont, L.; Menges, J.; Goix, S.; Gentès, S.; Maury-Brachet, R.; Sonke, J.E.; Legeay, A.; Gonzalez, P.; Rinaldo, R.; Maurice, L. Hg Concentrations and Stable Isotope Variations in Tropical Fish Species of a Gold-Mining-Impacted Watershed in French Guiana. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 60609–60621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Montaña, C.G.; Liverpool, E.; Taphorn, D.C.; Schalk, C.M. The Cost of Gold: Mercury Contamination of Fishes in a Neotropical River Food Web. Neotrop. Ichthyol. 2021, 19, e200155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Cunha Bataglioli, I.D.; Souza Vieira, J.C.; Vitor De Queiroz, J.; Da Silva Fernandes, M.; Bittarello, A.C.; Braga, C.P.; Rabelo Buzalaf, M.A.; Adamec, J.; Zara, L.F.; Magalhães Padilha, P.D. Physiological and Functional Aspects of Metal-Binding Protein Associated with Mercury in the Liver Tissue of Pirarucu (Arapaima gigas) from the Brazilian Amazon. Chemosphere 2019, 236, 124320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Viana, L.F.; Cardoso, C.A.L.; Lima-Junior, S.E.; Súarez, Y.R.; Florentino, A.C. Bioaccumulation of Metal in Liver Tissue of Fish in Response to Water Toxicity of the Araguari-Amazon River, Brazil. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2020, 192, 781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Albuquerque, F.E.A.; Minervino, A.H.H.; Miranda, M.; Herrero-Latorre, C.; Barrêto Júnior, R.A.; Oliveira, F.L.C.; Dias, S.R.; Ortolani, E.L.; López-Alonso, M. Toxic and Essential Trace Element Concentrations in the Freshwater Shrimp Macrobrachium Amazonicum in the Lower Amazon, Brazil. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2020, 86, 103361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Pinheiro-Sousa, D.B.; da Costa Soares, S.H.; Torres, H.S.; de Jesus, W.B.; de Oliveira, S.R.S.; Bastos, W.R.; de Oliveira Ribeiro, C.A.; Carvalho-Neta, R.N.F. Sediment Contaminant Levels and Multibiomarker Approach to Assess the Health of Catfish Sciades Herzbergii in a Harbor from the Northern Brazilian Amazon. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 208, 111540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Lopes, M.C.B.; de CARVALHO, G.O.; Bernardo, R.R.; Macedo, J.; Lino, A.S.; Ramalho, E.E.; Kasper, D.; Meire, R.O.; Torres, J.P.M.; Malm, O. Total Mercury in Wild Felids Occurring in Protected Areas in the Central Brazilian Amazon. Acta Amaz. 2020, 50, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Barbosa, M.S.; Carvalho, D.P.; Gravena, W.; De Almeida, R.; Mussy, M.H.; Sousa, E.A.; Holanda, I.B.B.; De Sousa-Filho, I.F.; Bastos, W.R. Total Mercury and Methylmercury in River Dolphins (Cetacea: Iniidae: Inia Spp.) in the Madeira River Basin, Western Amazon. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 45121–45133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Salazar-Pammo, A.C.; Achá, D.; Miranda-Chumacero, G. Preferential Liver Accumulation of Mercury Explains Low Concentrations in Muscle of Caiman yacare (Alligatoridae) in Upper Amazon. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2021, 106, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Dos Santos, A.N.D.; Recktenvald, M.C.N.D.N.; de Carvalho, D.P.; Puerta, E.L.B.; de Sousa-Filho, I.F.; Dórea, J.G.; Bastos, W.R. Mercury in Birds (Aquatic and Scavenger) from the Western Amazon. Environ. Res. 2021, 201, 111574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Kumar, A.; Divoll, T.J.; Ganguli, P.M.; Trama, F.A.; Lamborg, C.H. Presence of Artisanal Gold Mining Predicts Mercury Bioaccumulation in Five Genera of Bats (Chiroptera). Environ. Pollut. 2018, 236, 862–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Moreno-Brush, M.; Portillo, A.; Brändel, S.D.; Storch, I.; Tschapka, M.; Biester, H. Mercury Concentrations in Bats (Chiroptera) from a Gold Mining Area in the Peruvian Amazon. Ecotoxicology 2018, 27, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Da Silva Júnior, F.J.T.M.; Ribeiro, J.D.N.; Da Silva, H.L.A.; Da Silva Carneiro, C.; De Jesus, E.F.O.; De Araújo, U.B.; Lazzarini, S.M.; Souza, A.R.; Simões, J.S.; Lopes, R.T.; et al. Study of Inorganic Elements in Different Organs and Tissues of Amazonian Manatee (Trichechus inunguis) from Brazil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 30486–30495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Mosquera-Guerra, F.; Trujillo, F.; Parks, D.; Oliveira-da-Costa, M.; Van Damme, P.A.; Echeverría, A.; Franco, N.; Carvajal-Castro, J.D.; Mantilla-Meluk, H.; Marmontel, M.; et al. Mercury in Populations of River Dolphins of the Amazon and Orinoco Basins. EcoHealth 2019, 16, 743–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Borges, Â.O.; Erickson, J.; Silva, L.A.D.; Fantin, C.; Domingos-Moreira, F.X.V. Mercury Bioaccumulation, Genotoxic and Biochemical Biomarkers Reveal the Health Status of Yellow-Spotted Amazon River Turtles (Podocnemis unifilis) in an Environmental Protection Area in the Amazon. Acta Amaz. 2022, 52, 254–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Pignati, M.; Pezzuti, J.; Souza, L.; Lima, M.; Pignati, W.; Mendes, R. Assessment of Mercury Concentration in Turtles (Podocnemis unifilis) in the Xingu River Basin, Brazil. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Targino, F.J.; Ribeiro, J.D.D.N.; Simões, J.S.; Carneiro, C.S.; Lazzarini, S.M.; Souza, A.R.; Ferreira, M.D.S.; Mano, S.B.; Mársico, E.T. Total Mercury Content in the Tissues of Freshwater Chelonium (Podocnemis expansa) and a Human Health Risk Assessment for the Amazon Population in Brazil. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 6489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Oliveira, E.; Ignácio, A.R.A.; Lázaro, W.L.; Díez, S.; Guimarães, J.R.D.; Santos-Filho, M. Green Kingfishers as Sentinel Species for Mercury Contamination in Amazon. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2023, 85, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Hurtado, T.C.; De Medeiros Costa, G.; De Carvalho, G.S.; Brum, B.R.; Ignácio, Á.R.A. Mercury and Methylmercury Concentration in the Feathers of Two Species of Kingfishers Megaceryle torquata and Chloroceryle amazona in the Upper Paraguay Basin and Amazon Basin. Ecotoxicology 2023, 32, 1084–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Galvão, R.C.F.; Holanda, I.B.B.; De Carvalho, D.P.; Almeida, R.; Souza, C.M.M.; Lacerda, L.D.; Bastos, W.R. Freshwater Shrimps (Macrobrachium depressimanum and Macrobrachium jelskii) as Biomonitors of Hg Availability in the Madeira River Basin, Western Amazon. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2018, 190, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Arrifano, G.P.F.; Martín-Doimeadios, R.C.R.; Jiménez-Moreno, M.; Ramírez-Mateos, V.; Da Silva, N.F.S.; Souza-Monteiro, J.R.; Augusto-Oliveira, M.; Paraense, R.S.O.; Macchi, B.M.; Do Nascimento, J.L.M.; et al. Large-Scale Projects in the Amazon and Human Exposure to Mercury: The Case-Study of the Tucuruí Dam. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 147, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Feitosa-Santana, C.; Souza, G.D.S.; Sirius, E.V.P.; Rodrigues, A.R.; Cortes, M.I.T.; Silveira, L.C.D.L.; Ventura, D.F. Color Vision Impairment with Low-Level Methylmercury Exposure of an Amazonian Population—Brazil. Neurotoxicology 2018, 66, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Dos Santos Freitas, J.; Da Costa Brito Lacerda, E.M.; Da Silva Martins, I.C.V.; Rodrigues, D.; Bonci, D.M.O.; Cortes, M.I.T.; Corvelo, T.C.O.; Ventura, D.F.; De Lima Silveira, L.C.; Da Conceição Nascimento Pinheiro, M.; et al. Cross-Sectional Study to Assess the Association of Color Vision with Mercury Hair Concentration in Children from Brazilian Amazonian Riverine Communities. Neurotoxicology 2018, 65, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Costa Junior, J.M.F.; Lima, A.A.D.S.; Rodrigues Junior, D.; Khoury, E.D.T.; Souza, G.D.S.; Silveira, L.C.D.L.; Pinheiro, M.D.C.N. Manifestações Emocionais e Motoras de Ribeirinhos Expostos Ao Mercúrio Na Amazônia. Rev. Bras. Epidemiol. 2017, 20, 212–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Oliveira, R.A.A.D.; Pinto, B.D.; Rebouças, B.H.; Ciampi De Andrade, D.; Vasconcellos, A.C.S.D.; Basta, P.C. Neurological Impacts of Chronic Methylmercury Exposure in Munduruku Indigenous Adults: Somatosensory, Motor, and Cognitive Abnormalities. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 10270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Perini, J.A.; Silva, M.C.; Vasconcellos, A.C.S.D.; Viana, P.V.S.; Lima, M.O.; Jesus, I.M.; Kempton, J.W.; Oliveira, R.A.A.; Hacon, S.S.; Basta, P.C. Genetic Polymorphism of Delta Aminolevulinic Acid Dehydratase (ALAD) Gene and Symptoms of Chronic Mercury Exposure in Munduruku Indigenous Children within the Brazilian Amazon. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Vianna, A.D.S.; Câmara, V.D.M.; Barbosa, M.C.D.M.; Santos, A.D.S.E.; Asmus, C.I.R.F.; Luiz, R.R.; Jesus, I.M.D. Exposição Ao Mercúrio e Anemia Em Crianças e Adolescentes de Seis Comunidades Da Amazônia Brasileira. Ciênc. Saúde Coletiva 2022, 27, 1859–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Silman, A.K.; Chhabria, R.; Hafzalla, G.W.; Giffin, L.; Kucharski, K.; Myers, K.; Culquichicón, C.; Montero, S.; Lescano, A.G.; Vega, C.M.; et al. Impairment in Working Memory and Executive Function Associated with Mercury Exposure in Indigenous Populations in Upper Amazonian Peru. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Wyatt, L.; Ortiz, E.; Feingold, B.; Berky, A.; Diringer, S.; Morales, A.; Jurado, E.; Hsu-Kim, H.; Pan, W. Spatial, Temporal, and Dietary Variables Associated with Elevated Mercury Exposure in Peruvian Riverine Communities Upstream and Downstream of Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Weinhouse, C.; Ortiz, E.J.; Berky, A.J.; Bullins, P.; Hare-Grogg, J.; Rogers, L.; Morales, A.-M.; Hsu-Kim, H.; Pan, W.K. Hair Mercury Level Is Associated with Anemia and Micronutrient Status in Children Living Near Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in the Peruvian Amazon. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2017, 97, 1886–1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Koenigsmark, F.; Weinhouse, C.; Berky, A.; Morales, A.; Ortiz, E.; Pierce, E.; Pan, W.; Hsu-Kim, H. Efficacy of Hair Total Mercury Content as a Biomarker of Methylmercury Exposure to Communities in the Area of Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Madre de Dios, Peru. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 13350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Vasconcellos, A.C.S.D.; Barrocas, P.R.G.; Ruiz, C.M.V.; Mourão, D.D.S.; Hacon, S.D.S. Burden of Mild Mental Retardation Attributed to Prenatal Methylmercury Exposure in Amazon: Local and Regional Estimates. Ciênc. Saúde Coletiva 2018, 23, 3535–3545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. De Paula Fonseca Arrifano, G.; Del Carmen Rodriguez Martin-Doimeadios, R.; Jiménez-Moreno, M.; Augusto-Oliveira, M.; Rogério Souza-Monteiro, J.; Paraense, R.; Rodrigues Machado, C.; Farina, M.; Macchi, B.; Do Nascimento, J.L.M.; et al. Assessing Mercury Intoxication in Isolated/Remote Populations: Increased S100B mRNA in Blood in Exposed Riverine Inhabitants of the Amazon. NeuroToxicology 2018, 68, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Cerbino, M.R.; Vieira, J.C.S.; Braga, C.P.; Oliveira, G.; Padilha, I.F.; Silva, T.M.; Zara, L.F.; Silva, N.J.; Padilha, P.M. Metalloproteomics Approach to Analyze Mercury in Breast Milk and Hair Samples of Lactating Women in Communities of the Amazon Basin, Brazil. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2018, 181, 216–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Arrifano, G.P.F.; Martín-Doimeadios, R.C.R.; Jiménez-Moreno, M.; Fernández-Trujillo, S.; Augusto-Oliveira, M.; Souza-Monteiro, J.R.; Macchi, B.M.; Alvarez-Leite, J.I.; Do Nascimento, J.L.M.; Amador, M.T.; et al. Genetic Susceptibility to Neurodegeneration in Amazon: Apolipoprotein E Genotyping in Vulnerable Populations Exposed to Mercury. Front. Genet. 2018, 9, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Gonzalez, D.J.X.; Arain, A.; Fernandez, L.E. Mercury Exposure, Risk Factors, and Perceptions among Women of Childbearing Age in an Artisanal Gold Mining Region of the Peruvian Amazon. Environ. Res. 2019, 179, 108786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Freitas, J.S.; Lacerda, E.M.C.B.; Rodrigues Júnior, D.; Corvelo, T.C.O.; Silveira, L.C.L.; Pinheiro, M.D.C.N.; Souza, G.S. Mercury Exposure of Children Living in Amazonian Villages: Influence of Geographical Location Where They Lived during Prenatal and Postnatal Development. An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc. 2019, 91, e20180097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Santos-Lima, C.D.; Mourão, D.D.S.; Carvalho, C.F.D.; Souza-Marques, B.; Vega, C.M.; Gonçalves, R.A.; Argollo, N.; Menezes-Filho, J.A.; Abreu, N.; Hacon, S.D.S. Neuropsychological Effects of Mercury Exposure in Children and Adolescents of the Amazon Region, Brazil. Neurotoxicology 2020, 79, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Reuben, A.; Frischtak, H.; Berky, A.; Ortiz, E.J.; Morales, A.M.; Hsu-Kim, H.; Pendergast, L.L.; Pan, W.K. Elevated Hair Mercury Levels Are Associated with Neurodevelopmental Deficits in Children Living Near Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Peru. GeoHealth 2020, 4, e2019GH000222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Watson, L.C.; Hurtado-Gonzales, J.L.; Chin, C.J.; Persaud, J. Survey of Methylmercury Exposures and Risk Factors among Indigenous Communities in Guyana, South America. J. Health Pollut. 2020, 10, 200604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Lacerda, E.M.D.C.B.; Souza, G.D.S.; Cortes, M.I.T.; Rodrigues, A.R.; Pinheiro, M.C.N.; Silveira, L.C.D.L.; Ventura, D.F. Comparison of Visual Functions of Two Amazonian Populations: Possible Consequences of Different Mercury Exposure. Front. Neurosci. 2020, 13, 1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Weinhouse, C.; Gallis, J.A.; Ortiz, E.; Berky, A.J.; Morales, A.M.; Diringer, S.E.; Harrington, J.; Bullins, P.; Rogers, L.; Hare-Grogg, J.; et al. A Population-Based Mercury Exposure Assessment near an Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining Site in the Peruvian Amazon. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2021, 31, 126–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Bello, T.C.S.; Buralli, R.J.; Cunha, M.P.L.; Dórea, J.G.; Diaz-Quijano, F.A.; Guimarães, J.R.D.; Marques, R.C. Mercury Exposure in Women of Reproductive Age in Rondônia State, Amazon Region, Brazil. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 5225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Lopes-Araújo, A.; Arrifano, G.P.; Macchi, B.M.; Augusto-Oliveira, M.; Santos-Sacramento, L.; Rodríguez Martín-Doimeadios, R.C.; Jiménez-Moreno, M.; Martins Filho, A.J.; Alvarez-Leite, J.I.; Oriá, R.B.; et al. Hair Mercury Is Associated with Dyslipidemia and Cardiovascular Risk: An Anthropometric, Biochemical and Genetic Cross-Sectional Study of Amazonian Vulnerable Populations. Environ. Res. 2023, 229, 115971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Suárez-Criado, L.; Rodríguez-González, P.; Marrugo-Negrete, J.; García Alonso, J.I.; Díez, S. Determination of Methylmercury and Inorganic Mercury in Human Hair Samples of Individuals from Colombian Gold Mining Regions by Double Spiking Isotope Dilution and GC-ICP-MS. Environ. Res. 2023, 231, 115970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Silva, M.C.D.; Oliveira, R.A.A.D.; Vasconcellos, A.C.S.D.; Rebouças, B.H.; Pinto, B.D.; Lima, M.D.O.; Jesus, I.M.D.; Machado, D.E.; Hacon, S.S.; Basta, P.C.; et al. Chronic Mercury Exposure and GSTP1 Polymorphism in Munduruku Indigenous from Brazilian Amazon. Toxics 2023, 11, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Pignoux, R.; Gourves, P.-Y.; Sow, M.; Maury-Brachet, R. Imprégnation mercurielle des femmes enceintes de Guyane (Haut Maroni): Étude et prévention. Toxicol. Anal. Clin. 2019, 31, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Cunha, M.; Marques, R.; Dórea, J. Influence of Maternal Fish Intake on the Anthropometric Indices of Children in the Western Amazon. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Bastos, W.R.; Vieira, S.M.; Manzatto, Â.G.; Dórea, J.G.; Rubira, M.C.; De Souza, V.F.P.; Da Costa Junior, W.A.; Souza Bastos, M.T. Heterogeneity of Multimedia Exposures to Neurotoxic Elements (Al, As, Cd, Pb, Mn, and Hg) in Breastfed Infants from Porto Velho, Brazil. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2018, 184, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Carvalho, L.V.B.; Hacon, S.S.; Vega, C.M.; Vieira, J.A.; Larentis, A.L.; Mattos, R.C.O.C.; Valente, D.; Costa-Amaral, I.C.; Mourão, D.S.; Silva, G.P.; et al. Oxidative Stress Levels Induced by Mercury Exposure in Amazon Juvenile Populations in Brazil. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Oliveira, A.T.D.; Rodrigues, P.A.; Ramos Filho, A.M.; Gomes, M.F.S.; Liebl, A.R.S.; de Pinho, J.V.; Aride, P.H.R.; Conte-Junior, C.A. Levels of Total Mercury and Health Risk Assessment of Consuming Freshwater Stingrays (Chondrichthyes: Potamotrygoninae) of the Brazilian Amazon. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 6990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Kumar, V.; Umesh, M.; Shanmugam, M.K.; Chakraborty, P.; Duhan, L.; Gummadi, S.N.; Pasrija, R.; Jayaraj, I.; Dasarahally Huligowda, L.K. A Retrospection on Mercury Contamination, Bioaccumulation, and Toxicity in Diverse Environments: Current Insights and Future Prospects. Sustainability 2023, 15, 13292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Casagrande, G.C.R.; Dambros, J.; de Andrade, E.A.; Martello, F.; Sobral-Souza, T.; Moreno, M.I.C.; Battirola, L.D.; de Andrade, R.L.T. Atmospheric Mercury in Forests: Accumulation Analysis in a Gold Mining Area in the Southern Amazon, Brazil. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2023, 195, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Esteban-López, M.; Arrebola, J.P.; Juliá, M.; Pärt, P.; Soto, E.; Cañas, A.; Pedraza-Díaz, S.; González-Rubio, J.; Castaño, A. Selecting the Best Non-Invasive Matrix to Measure Mercury Exposure in Human Biomonitoring Surveys. Environ. Res. 2022, 204, 112394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Santos Serrão De Castro, N.; De Oliveira Lima, M. Hair as a Biomarker of Long Term Mercury Exposure in Brazilian Amazon: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Pestana, I.A.; Almeida, M.G.; Bastos, W.R.; Souza, C.M.M. Total Hg and Methylmercury Dynamics in a River-Floodplain System in the Western Amazon: Influence of Seasonality, Organic Matter and Physical and Chemical Parameters. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 656, 388–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Torres, C.; Verschoor, G. Re-Imagining Environmental Governance: Gold Dredge Mining vs Territorial Health in the Colombian Amazon. Geoforum 2020, 117, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Queiroz, J.; Gasparinetti, P.; Bakker, L.B.; Lobo, F.; Nagel, G. Socioeconomic Cost of Dredge Boat Gold Mining in the Tapajós Basin, Eastern Amazon. Resour. Policy 2022, 79, 103102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Junk, W.J.; Wittmann, F.; Schöngart, J.; Piedade, M.T.F. A Classification of the Major Habitats of Amazonian Black-Water River Floodplains and a Comparison with Their White-Water Counterparts. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 2015, 23, 677–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flowchart of the literature search according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
Figure 1. Flowchart of the literature search according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
Toxics 12 00204 g001
Figure 2. VosViewer keyword analysis with relevance in the year of article acceptance by color coding.
Figure 2. VosViewer keyword analysis with relevance in the year of article acceptance by color coding.
Toxics 12 00204 g002
Figure 3. Article occurrences: (a) valid for each year; (b) valid for each Amazonian country (those not represented are grayed out).
Figure 3. Article occurrences: (a) valid for each year; (b) valid for each Amazonian country (those not represented are grayed out).
Toxics 12 00204 g003
Figure 4. Predominant tissue samples in datasets: (a) non-human and (b) human, after screening.
Figure 4. Predominant tissue samples in datasets: (a) non-human and (b) human, after screening.
Toxics 12 00204 g004
Figure 5. Main data sources obtained: (a) species and (b) trophic levels.
Figure 5. Main data sources obtained: (a) species and (b) trophic levels.
Toxics 12 00204 g005
Figure 6. Representations of THg ranges in fish muscle tissue from animal research compared to WHO and MERCOSUR guidelines.
Figure 6. Representations of THg ranges in fish muscle tissue from animal research compared to WHO and MERCOSUR guidelines.
Toxics 12 00204 g006
Figure 7. Spatial distribution of animal studies categorized by THg levels in fish in relation to the permissible reference concentration of 1.0 µg/g in the human diet, as established by WHO.
Figure 7. Spatial distribution of animal studies categorized by THg levels in fish in relation to the permissible reference concentration of 1.0 µg/g in the human diet, as established by WHO.
Toxics 12 00204 g007
Figure 8. Comparison of THg concentrations in human hair across different groups. The figure points out data for overall samples, indigenous populations, and mining areas.
Figure 8. Comparison of THg concentrations in human hair across different groups. The figure points out data for overall samples, indigenous populations, and mining areas.
Toxics 12 00204 g008
Figure 9. Spatial distribution of human studies according to THg levels, categorized as permissible (1.8 µg/g), dangerous (10 µg/g), and above the dangerous level (>10 µg/g).
Figure 9. Spatial distribution of human studies according to THg levels, categorized as permissible (1.8 µg/g), dangerous (10 µg/g), and above the dangerous level (>10 µg/g).
Toxics 12 00204 g009
Figure 10. Spatial distribution of animal studies relative to mining polygons. Distance classes, as indicated by the 20 km and 50 km markers, were defined by the difference in point size.
Figure 10. Spatial distribution of animal studies relative to mining polygons. Distance classes, as indicated by the 20 km and 50 km markers, were defined by the difference in point size.
Toxics 12 00204 g010
Figure 11. Spatial distribution of human studies relative to mining polygons. Distance classes, as indicated by the 20 km and 50 km markers, were defined by the difference in point size. Native/indigenous territories were included as darker overlays.
Figure 11. Spatial distribution of human studies relative to mining polygons. Distance classes, as indicated by the 20 km and 50 km markers, were defined by the difference in point size. Native/indigenous territories were included as darker overlays.
Toxics 12 00204 g011
Table 1. Search syntax (CH3Hg+ also termed as MeHg, asterisk (*) used as wildcard operator).
Table 1. Search syntax (CH3Hg+ also termed as MeHg, asterisk (*) used as wildcard operator).
ArgumentsSearch Syntax
mercury in the Amazon Amazon * AND (mercury * OR hg OR MeHg OR methyl * OR “total mercury”)
activityAND (mining OR artisanal OR asgm OR “gold mining *” OR garimp * OR alluvial OR contamination OR “inorganic contaminant *” OR “trace mineral *” OR trophic)
specimen AND (fish OR species OR population OR aquatic OR bioaccumulation OR community OR riverine OR “human hair” OR indigenous OR human OR nonhuman OR animal)
conditionsAND (exposure OR accumulation OR concentration OR content OR consumption)
biomarkerAND (tissue OR muscle OR protein OR hair OR blood)
exclude ex situNOT (farm OR agriculture)
Table 2. Highest mean or median THg values reported in the muscle records of fish grouped by basin location with indication of fish feeding habits and whether mining activities were part of the study.
Table 2. Highest mean or median THg values reported in the muscle records of fish grouped by basin location with indication of fish feeding habits and whether mining activities were part of the study.
Hydrographic Basin *Mentioned Mining?CountryStudySpecies/Feeding Guild THg (μg/g) Based on Mean/Median
ANoBrazil[64,65] **Hoplias malabaricus, carnivore 0.947
ANoBrazil[66]Carcharhinus acronotus, carnivore1.120
A, TYesBrazil[67]Arapaima sp., carnivore0.375
A, TNoBrazil[68]Plagioscion squamosisYesus, carnivore1.510
AYesBrazil[69]Pseudoplatystoma tigrinum, carnivore0.920
ANoBrazil[70]Ageneiosus inermis, carnivore0.691
ANoBrazil[71]Acestrorhyncus falcirostris, carnivore1.490
ANoBrazil[72]Colomesus asellus, omnivore0.350
TYesBrazil[73]Carnivorous group: Cichla monoculus, Plagioscion squamosis Yesus, and Serrasalmus calmoni0.668
TYesBrazil[74]Plagioscion squamosis Yesus, carnivore0.730
TYesBrazil[75]Cichla pinima, carnivore1.172
TNoBrazil[76]Serrasalmus rhombeus, carnivore0.088
MNoBrazil[77]Carnivorous group: Plasgioscion squamosis Yesus, Calophysus macropterus, Cichla pleiozona, and Hoplias malabaricus0.970
MNoBrazil[78]Prochilodus nigricans, detritivore0.064
MNoBrazil[79]Serrasalmus rhombeus, carnivore0.263
MYesBrazil[80]Triportheus angulatus, omnivore0.290
MNoBrazil[81]Triportheus albus, omnivore0.029
MNoBrazil[82]Pinirampus pirinampu, benthivore0.060
MNoBrazil[83]Arapaima gigas, carnivore0.153
MNoBrazil[84]Serrasalmus rhombeus, carnivore1.640
MNoBrazil[85]Plagioscion squamosisYesus, carnivore and Colossoma macropomum, omnivore0.086
MNoBrazil[86]Brachyplatystoma filamentosum, carnivore0.402
MNoBrazil[87]Calophysus maropterus, carnivore1.400
MNoPeru/Brazil (Border)[88]Calophysus maropterus, carnivore0.229
MNoBrazil[89]Cichla spp., carnivore0.128
MNoBrazil[90]Semaprochilodus spp. (Jaraqui), detritivore0.132
MNoBrazil[91]Serrasalmus rhombeus, carnivore0.268
MNoBrazil[92]Cichla spp. (Tucunaré), carnivore0.435
MYesBrazil[93]Serrasalmus rhombeus, carnivore0.417
XNoBrazil[94]Hemiodus unimaculatus, omnivore0.480
TpNoBrazil[95]Serrasalmus rhombeus, carnivore0.304
TpNoBrazil[96]Brycon falcatus, omnivore0.052
ArYesBrazil[12]Carnivorous group: Ageneiosus inermis, Boulengerella cuvieri, Cichla monoculus, and Hoplias aimara0.580
ArYesBrazil[97]Curimata incompta, detritivore0.370
ArYesBrazil[98]Plagioscion squamosis Yesus, carnivore0.320
JNoBrazil[99]Plagioscion squamosis Yesus, carnivore1.090
MDYesPeru[100]Serrasalmus spp., carnivore0.280
MDYesPeru[101]Serrasalmus spp., carnivore3.720
BNoBolivia[102]Brycon amazonicus, omnivore 0.700
BrYesBrazil[103]Pinirampus pirinampu, carnivore0.869
BrYesBrazil[32]Pygocentrus nattereri, carnivore1.215
MYesBrazil[104]Serrasalmus rhombeus, carnivore0.283
SuYesSuriname[105]Multiple, high THg in carnivores: Acestrorhynchus microlepsis, Hoplias malabaricus, Cichla ocellaris, Serrasalmus rhombeus, and Pristobrycon eigenmanni 2.528
CYesFrench Guiana[106]Hoplias aimara and Boulengerella cuvieri, carnivore2.900
MzYesGuyana[107]Ageneiosus ucayalensis, carnivore5.920
* Main Amazon River: A, Tapajós River: T, Madeira River: M, Xingu River: X, Teles Pirés River: Tp, Jiparaná River: J, Madre de Dios River; MD, Beni River: B, Rio Branco: Br, Suriname River: Su, Camopi River: C, Mazaruni River: Mz. ** These studies used the same fish muscle tissue collection and mean THg. † Records that only provided median THg.
Table 3. Tissue THg in fish, birds, mammals, and crustaceans according to location in the Amazon region and mining area coverage.
Table 3. Tissue THg in fish, birds, mammals, and crustaceans according to location in the Amazon region and mining area coverage.
LocationMentioned Mining?StudySpeciesTissueMean THg (μg/g)
Madeira River, Rondônia, BrazilNo[108]Arapaima gigas, fish, carnivorehepatic17.420
Araguari River, Amapá, BrazilNo[109]Anodus orinocensis, fish, omnivorehepatic0.500
Madeira River, BrazilNo[110]Macrobrachium amazonicum, shrimp, omnivore muscle 0.610
Atlantic Coast, Ilha dos Caranguejos, BrazilNo[111]Sciades herzbergii, fish, omnivoremuscle0.033
Mamirauá, Amazonas, BrazilNo[112]Panthera onca, mammal, carnivorepelage17.900
Guaporé River, BrazilNo[113]Inia boliviensis, mammal, piscivoreadipose1.323
Beni River, BolíviaNo[114]Caiman yacare, reptile, piscivoremuscle0.150
Madeira River, BrazilNo[115]Ardea cocoi, bird, carnivorefeather4.046
Biological Station Cocha Cashu, PeruNo[116]Rhynconycteris naso, mammal, carnivorepelage7.440
Madre de Dios, PeruYes[117]Phyllostomus elongatus, mammal, carnivorepelage0.660
Figueiredo, Amazonas, BrazilNo[118]Trichechus inunguis, mammal, herbivoremuscle0.059
Arauca River and Orinoco River, ColombiaYes[119]Inia sp. and Sotalia sp., mammal, piscivoremuscle0.870
Itapuru mirim Lagoon, BrazilNo[120]Podocnemis unifilis, reptile, herbivoremuscle 0.011
Xingu and Teles Pires’ Rivers, BrazilNo[121]Podocnemis unifilis, reptile, herbivoremuscle 0.134
Uatumã River, Balbina Brazil No[122]Podocnemis expansa, reptile, omnivoremuscle0.109
Teles Pires, BrazilNo[123]Chloroceryle amazona, bird, piscivore feather11.570
Teles Pires, BrazilNo[124]Chloroceryle amazona, bird, piscivorefeather4.000
Madeira River, BrazilNo[125]Macrobrachium depres Yesanum, Macrobrachium jelskii, shrimp, omnivore muscle0.022
Table 4. Total THg in human hair of Amazonian populations.
Table 4. Total THg in human hair of Amazonian populations.
Hydrographic Basin *Mining Mentioned? CountryStudyCommunity/PopulationTHg (μg/g) Based on Mean/Median
ToYesBrazil[126]Adults (18–70), fish as a staple food, near the reservoir of Tucuruí Dam.10.900
UYesBrazil[8]Age groups and comparison of various villages. Yanomami indigenous reserve, with a high diet of fish and nearby mining activity. 15.500
MYesBrazil[127]Age groups of adults ranging from 17 to 92 years.26.030
To, TaYesBrazil[128]Adult riverside dwellers only (18 to 60 years old).4.500
TaYesBrazil[129]Riverside dwellers only; adult women (13 to 53 years old).9.150
TaYesBrazil[130]Munduruku Indigenous Reserve. Comparison between villages.7.400
M, TaNoBrazil[74]Pregnant women (18 to 40 years old). Fish Diet. 6.070
MDYesPeru[62]Urban and rural demographic comparison with a focus on fish diets.1.740
AYesColombia[69]Indigenous community in Puerto Nariño. Mean age~35 years. Diet rich in fish.5.310
TaNoBrazil[11]Munduruku Indigenous Reserve. Comparison between villages and age categorization with juvenile, childbearing-age, and other adults.11.500
TaNoBrazil[131]Munduruku Indigenous Reserve. Comparison between villages and the exclusively juvenile population. 11.800
TaNoBrazil[10]Munduruku Indigenous Reserve. Comparison between villages. Ages > 12 years. 7.400
A, Cg, TaYesBrazil[132]Youth and adults in riverside communities.12.700
MDYesPeru[133]Matsigenka Indigenous community (ages 1 to 65). 11.830
MDNoPeru[134]Riverside communities. High-fish diet.4.800
MDNoPeru[135]Comparison of various dwellings in the Amarakaeri Reserve, age categorization (under 5 years old, and 5 to 11 years old).1.030
MDYesPeru[136]Comparison of various dwellings in the Amarakaeri Reserve.4.150
AYesBrazil[137]Riverside population. Prenatal exposure, women of childbearing age (15 to 49 years)6.490
To, TaNoBrazil[138]Riverside communities with ages between 19 and 70 years (high THg).15.900
M, NYesBrazil[139]Lactating women.2.120
ToNoBrazil[140]Riverine populations in the Tucuruí Dam reservoir area.8.120
CPYesColombia[26]Indigenous communities in Tarapacá village.17.800
MDYesPeru[141]Women of childbearing age.5.500
Ta, ToNoBrazil[142]Children from riverside villages; born to women aged between 25 and 40. Fish-rich diet and primary exposure to Hg.22.380
MNoBrazil[143]Children/adolescents aged 6 to 14 along the Madeira River.3.070
MDYesPeru[144]Comparison of various dwellings in the Amarakaeri Reserve. Indigenous Native children (6 to 15 years old)2.060
RKYesGuyana[145]Indigenous people from the Rupununi region (15 to 78 years old). High-fish diet. Comparison of mining area and control area.27.620
Ta, ToYesBrazil[146]Riverine men and miners and the THg among them. High-fish diet. Itaituba and Serra Pelada.20.000
MDYesPeru[147]Comparison of various dwellings in the Amarakaeri Reserve. Women of childbearing age (15 to 49 years).3.500
MYesBrazil[148]Riverine, rural, mining, and urban communities. Women of childbearing age.12.220
To NoBrazil[149]Adults (18–70 years), Riverine populations in the Tucuruí Dam reservoir area.7.900
ApYesColombia[150]Population in different locations in mining regions. High-fish diet.14.920
TaNoBrazil[151]Munduruku indigenous reserve. Comparison between villages and categorization. Diet rich in fish. Ages over 12 years old.8.500
ApYesColombia[14]Indigenous population of the Yaigojé Apaporis National Natural Park.34.900
TaNoBrazil[53]Adult riverside residents only (18 to 60 years old). High consumption of fish.10.800
CoYes French Guiana[152]Only pregnant women, ethnic groups considered (15 to 41 years old); tribal and indigenous communities of Wayana. 12.800
MNoBrazil[153]Mothers and children in childbirth and after pregnancy at 6, 24, and 59 months of age.11.610
* Madre de Dios River: MD, Tapajós River: Ta, Cotuhe and Putumayo Rivers: CP, Campina Grande River: Cg, Tocantins River: To, Apapóris River: Ap, Uiaiacás River: U, Courantyne River: Co, Rupununi and Kuyuwini Rivers (Guyana): RK. † Records that only provided median THg.
Table 5. General Linear Model (GLM) and logistic regression of the effect of THg on mining-related parameters and demographic classes in human studies.
Table 5. General Linear Model (GLM) and logistic regression of the effect of THg on mining-related parameters and demographic classes in human studies.
GLMLogistic Regression
AIC 257.2653.867
Parametersp-Valuep-Value
THgChildren0.60550.416
Indigenous 0.42010.273
Maternity0.23640.661
Riverside0.61080.287
Mining 0.24130.774
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martoredjo, I.; Calvão Santos, L.B.; Vilhena, J.C.E.; Rodrigues, A.B.L.; de Almeida, A.; Sousa Passos, C.J.; Florentino, A.C. Trends in Mercury Contamination Distribution among Human and Animal Populations in the Amazon Region. Toxics 2024, 12, 204. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxics12030204

AMA Style

Martoredjo I, Calvão Santos LB, Vilhena JCE, Rodrigues ABL, de Almeida A, Sousa Passos CJ, Florentino AC. Trends in Mercury Contamination Distribution among Human and Animal Populations in the Amazon Region. Toxics. 2024; 12(3):204. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxics12030204

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martoredjo, Irvin, Lenize Batista Calvão Santos, Jéssica Caroline Evangelista Vilhena, Alex Bruno Lobato Rodrigues, Andréia de Almeida, Carlos José Sousa Passos, and Alexandro Cezar Florentino. 2024. "Trends in Mercury Contamination Distribution among Human and Animal Populations in the Amazon Region" Toxics 12, no. 3: 204. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxics12030204

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop