Next Article in Journal
Combining Sea Level Rise Inundation Impacts, Tidal Flooding and Extreme Wind Events along the Abu Dhabi Coastline
Previous Article in Journal
Does Flash Flood Model Performance Increase with Complexity? Signature and Sensitivity-Based Comparison of Conceptual and Process-Oriented Models on French Mediterranean Cases
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Deep Convective Systems in the Colombian Andean Region
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advances in Modelling of Rainfall Fields

by
Davide Luciano De Luca
1,* and
Andrea Petroselli
2,*
1
Department of Informatics, Modelling, Electronics and System Engineering, University of Calabria, Arcavacata, 87036 Rende, Italy
2
Department of Economics, Engineering, Society and Business Organization (DEIM), Tuscia University, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 25 July 2022 / Revised: 5 August 2022 / Accepted: 8 August 2022 / Published: 10 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Modelling of Rainfall Fields)
Rainfall is the main input for all hydrological models, such as rainfall–runoff models and the forecasting of landslides triggered by precipitation, with its comprehension being clearly essential for effective water resource management as well. The need to improve the modelling of rainfall fields constitutes a key aspect both for efficiently realizing early warning systems and for carrying out analyses of future scenarios related to occurrences and magnitudes for all induced phenomena.
The aim of this Special Issue was to provide a collection of innovative contributions for rainfall modelling, focusing on hydrological scales and a context of climate changes. The first group of papers regarded the study of global precipitation products and their downscaled versions [1], the estimation of peak discharges in rainfall–runoff modeling under different rainfall depth–duration–frequency formulations [2], stormwater infiltration practices in rapidly urbanizing cities with the aim of designing resilient urban environments [3], and a novel temporal stochastic rainfall simulator [4] aiming to generate long and high-resolution rainfall time series, with the advantage of being strongly user friendly and parsimonious in terms of employed input parameters. Moreover, other works focused on determining the quantities of runoff by knowing the amount of rainfall in order to calculate the required quantities of water storage in reservoirs and to determine the likelihood of flooding [5], some analyzed intrastorm pattern recognition through fuzzy clustering [6], and others investigated the use and combination of pluviograph and daily records to assess rain behavior in urban areas, selecting a suitable method that would provide the best results of IDF relationships [7]. Finally, a sensitivity analysis of the rainfall–runoff modeling parameters in data-scarce urban catchment areas was performed aiming to improve the rainfall–runoff model calibration process [8], satellite-based rainfall estimations were compared with ground data [9], machine learning and process-based models for rainfall–runoff simulations were applied [10], and deep convective systems associated with extreme rainfall storms were examined in tropical regions [11].
We believe that the contribution from the latest research outcomes presented in this Special Issue can shed novel insights on the comprehension of the hydrological cycle and all the phenomena that are a direct consequence of rainfall.
Moreover, all these proposed papers can clearly constitute a valid base of knowledge for improving specific key aspects of rainfall modelling, mainly concerning climate change and how it induces modifications in properties such as magnitude, frequency, duration, and the spatial extension of different types of rainfall fields. The goal should also consider providing useful tools to practitioners for quantifying important design metrics in transient hydrological contexts (quantiles of assigned frequency, hazard functions, intensity–duration–frequency curves, etc.).

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, D.L.D.L. and A.P.; writing—review and editing, D.L.D.L. and A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tadesse, K.E.; Melesse, A.M.; Abebe, A.; Lakew, H.B.; Paron, P. Evaluation of Global Precipitation Products over Wabi Shebelle River Basin, Ethiopia. Hydrology 2022, 9, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gioia, A.; Lioi, B.; Totaro, V.; Molfetta, M.G.; Apollonio, C.; Bisantino, T.; Iacobellis, V. Estimation of Peak Discharges under Different Rainfall Depth–Duration–Frequency Formulations. Hydrology 2021, 8, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bastia, J.; Mishra, B.K.; Kumar, P. Integrative Assessment of Stormwater Infiltration Practices in Rapidly Urbanizing Cities: A Case of Lucknow City, India. Hydrology 2021, 8, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. De Luca, D.L.; Petroselli, A. STORAGE (STOchastic RAinfall GEnerator): A User-Friendly Software for Generating Long and High-Resolution Rainfall Time Series. Hydrology 2021, 8, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hamdan, A.N.A.; Almuktar, S.; Scholz, M. Rainfall-Runoff Modeling Using the HEC-HMS Model for the Al-Adhaim River Catchment, Northern Iraq. Hydrology 2021, 8, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Vantas, K.; Sidiropoulos, E. Intra-Storm Pattern Recognition through Fuzzy Clustering. Hydrology 2021, 8, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gámez-Balmaceda, E.; López-Ramos, A.; Martínez-Acosta, L.; Medrano-Barboza, J.P.; Remolina López, J.F.; Seingier, G.; Daesslé, L.W.; López-Lambraño, A.A. Rainfall Intensity-Duration-Frequency Relationship. Case Study: Depth-Duration Ratio in a Semi-Arid Zone in Mexico. Hydrology 2020, 7, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ballinas-González, H.A.; Alcocer-Yamanaka, V.H.; Canto-Rios, J.J.; Simuta-Champo, R. Sensitivity Analysis of the Rainfall–Runoff Modeling Parameters in Data-Scarce Urban Catchment. Hydrology 2020, 7, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hamal, K.; Sharma, S.; Khadka, N.; Baniya, B.; Ali, M.; Shrestha, M.S.; Xu, T.; Shrestha, D.; Dawadi, B. Evaluation of MERRA-2 Precipitation Products Using Gauge Observation in Nepal. Hydrology 2020, 7, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bhusal, A.; Parajuli, U.; Regmi, S.; Kalra, A. Application of Machine Learning and Process-Based Models for Rainfall-Runoff Simulation in DuPage River Basin, Illinois. Hydrology 2022, 9, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Velásquez, N. Assessment of Deep Convective Systems in the Colombian Andean Region. Hydrology 2022, 9, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luca, D.L.D.; Petroselli, A. Advances in Modelling of Rainfall Fields. Hydrology 2022, 9, 142. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/hydrology9080142

AMA Style

Luca DLD, Petroselli A. Advances in Modelling of Rainfall Fields. Hydrology. 2022; 9(8):142. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/hydrology9080142

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luca, Davide Luciano De, and Andrea Petroselli. 2022. "Advances in Modelling of Rainfall Fields" Hydrology 9, no. 8: 142. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/hydrology9080142

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop