Next Article in Journal
Decomposition of Organic Chemical Components in Wood by Tropical Xylaria Species
Next Article in Special Issue
A Novel Immunocompetent Mouse Model for Testing Antifungal Drugs Against Invasive Candida albicans Infection
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Designed Antimicrobial Peptides Against Trauma-Related Cutaneous Invasive Fungal Wound Infections
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 6
Issue 3
10.3390/jof6030185
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Echinocandins as Biotechnological Tools for Treating Candida auris Infections

by
Elizabete de Souza Cândido
1,2,†,
Flávia Affonseca
1,†,
Marlon Henrique Cardoso
1,2 and
Octavio Luiz Franco
1,2,*
1
S-Inova Biotech, Programa de Pós Graduação em Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica Dom Bosco, Campo Grande 79117900; Brazil
2
Centro de Análises Proteômicas e Bioquímicas, Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brasília 70790160, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors equally contributed for this work.
J. Fungi 2020, 6(3), 185; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jof6030185
Submission received: 31 July 2020 / Revised: 6 September 2020 / Accepted: 9 September 2020 / Published: 22 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antifungal Peptides 2020)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Candida auris has been reported in the past few years as an invasive fungal pathogen of high interest. Its recent emergence in healthcare-associated infections triggered the efforts of researchers worldwide, seeking additional alternatives to the use of traditional antifungals such as azoles. Lipopeptides, specially the echinocandins, have been reported as an effective approach to control pathogenic fungi. However, despite its efficiency against C. auris, some isolates presented echinocandin resistance. Thus, therapies focused on echinocandins’ synergism with other antifungal drugs were widely explored, representing a novel possibility for the treatment of C. auris infections.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Candidiasis is one of the most common causes of fungal infection on a global scale and includes both superficial and invasive infections. The major concern is associated with patients in intensive care units (ICU) with high mortality rates. There are several fungal species isolated in the clinical setting responsible for these infections. Candida albicans is the most studied and frequently isolated species from nosocomial infections, but recently a new species, named Candida auris, has raised great concern regarding disorders caused by fungi [1,2].
C. auris is a multidrug-resistant pathogen that has been identified in 39 countries and has spread across five continents, with a mortality rate of ~78% [3]. Furthermore, risk factors that aggravate C. auris infections include conditions such as diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular surgical interventions and gastrointestinal pathologies, hematological malignancies and even corticosteroid therapy [4]. In addition, this pathogen spreads easily in hospital environments, but its correct identification is usually challenging. This new species appears as a major concern for health systems, since several isolates have already been confirmed as resistant to three antifungals drugs classes [5,6]. C. auris was reported for the first time in 2009. The strains were isolated from the external auditory canal of a Japanese patient. This fungus was discovered through the sequencing of the ribosomal DNA D1/D2 domain and nuclear ITS region. It was reported that C. auris is phylogenetically close to Candida ruelliae and Candida haemulonii [7]. In the same year (2009), 15 patients with chronic otitis media presented Candida species very closely related to C. haemulonii in South Korean hospitals [8].
Over the years, numerous other countries have isolated C. auris strains (Figure 1), including Kuwait [9,10], South Africa [11], Venezuela [12], Spain [13], Oman [14], Israel [15], Colombia [16], Panama [17], Pakistan [5], the United Kingdom [18], Australia [19] and Saudi Arabia [20], among others.
Currently, it is possible to separate C. auris isolates into five different clades, according to their geographical origin (South Asian, East Asian, South African, South American and Iranian). This classification was carried out using whole genome sequence data from global clinical data. Each of these clades differs phenotypically. Moreover, in terms of virulence, these isolates follow the order: South American > South Asian > (South African = East Asian) [4,21].
The emergence and exponential increase of nosocomial infections by C. auris leads to a need to seek new treatment options and infection control approaches [22]. A promising drug family that meets these criteria is the lipopeptides. These compounds are formed by a specific lipophilic fraction linked to an anionic peptide (six to seven amino acids). Lipopeptides have been shown to have antibacterial, antifungal, anti-adhesion and anticancer activities [23]. The major concern about C. auris infections is the fact that the vast majority of isolates already identified and evaluated have resistance to the four main antifungals classes: polyenes, azoles, echinocandins and nucleoside analogues, complicating the treatment of affected patients and, consequently, increasing the mortality rates [22]. Multiresistant strains bring major limitations to antifungal treatment options for patients affected by candemia, mainly due to the reduced health status of many of these patients. To date, several resistance mechanisms presented by C. auris against known antifungals have been studied. For example, specific mutations in the cellular target of antifungals, drug target overexpression, efflux pumps and biofilm formation are well-described resistance mechanisms [24].
Bearing this in mind, this review aims to provide a comprehensive update of the worldwide picture of C. auris infections, as well as presenting new views on the potential use of lipopeptides, especially echinocandins, as biotechnological tools for treating multiresistant C. auris nosocomial infections.

2. Echinocandins as Tools for Treating Candida auris Infections

Despite the increasing resistance presented by C. auris strains, lipopeptides remain the most prominent drugs among the current antifungal therapies. Biosurfactant molecules, such as lipopeptides, are particularly interesting as antifungals due to their high activity on the cell surface and high antibiotic potential. The absorption of biosurfactant molecules on the cell surface is related to changes in its hydrophobicity, which consequently causes changes in the fungus adhesion processes. Moreover, it is known that the hydrophobicity of the cell surface is related to adhesion and to some pathological processes in fungi, including C. albicans [25]. Lipopeptides are capable of self-assembling to form peptide-functionalized supramolecular nanostructures. Additionally, these amphiphilic molecules can incorporate one or more lipid chains attached to a peptide-head group, which makes these molecules advantageous for therapies, as this property facilitates the presentation of the peptide portion on the surface of nanostructures such as fibrils, micelles and vesicles [26].
Most naturally expressed lipopeptides have a cyclic hexapeptide head attached to a single lipid chain, responsible for their antifungal activity [27]. Thus, the cyclization of the peptide unit that occurs in many lipopeptides that are expressed by bacteria increases in vivo stability compared to their linear counterparts. This higher stability is due to reduced proteolysis resulting from the protection of C- and N-terminals. It also interferes with the molecule′s flexibility, but it seems to be related to the activity as well [26].
The echinocandins are lipopeptides naturally expressed by fungi such as Glarea lozoyensis [28], Colephoma empetri [29] and Aspergillus nidulans [28] among others [27]. These molecules are capable of blocking specific enzymatic reactions in the synthesis of cell wall essential components, the insoluble polysaccharide component acting at the β-1,3-glucan synthase and chitin, as observed in Figure 2 [25,30]. In Candida species, the FKS genes have been reported as essential in the catalysis of glucan synthase subunits. Glucan synthase represents a multienzyme complex, which comprises an integral catalytic membrane protein (FKS) and a regulatory subunit RHO1 protein. The latter is considered as a possible glucan synthesis activator. Thus, mutations in such genes are important in fungal resistance to echinocandins [31,32]. Echinocandins are recognized for being the first line in treating C. auris infections, since just 5% of the isolates are resistant to this drug class [33,34,35].
Echinocandin-type molecules, such as echinocandins FR901379 and WF11899A, B and C, are well studied and widely known as potent antifungals, especially against yeasts [36]. These molecules are particularly indicated for the treatment of invasive infections caused by Candida, especially in hemodynamically unstable patients after triazoles treatment. [27].
In the mid-1970s, echinocandin B was discovered, followed by the precursors of caspofungin (1989) and micafungin (1990) [31,37]. Together, these three molecules have been widely used as prophylaxis in combating Candida species infections. Echinocandins are not easily absorbed by the organism during oral dosage, making intravenous administration the best treatment option [38]. Despite the great number of molecules (Table 1) that have been studied in vitro and in vivo, currently only three echinocandins are approved by the FDA (The Food and Drug Administration) for use in the treatment of fungal infections, anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin.
Anidulafungin is a semi-synthetic derivative of echinocandin B, which originated as a fermentation product of A. nidulans. Structurally, it is a 1-[(4R,5R)-4,5-dihydroxy-N2-[[4”-(pentyloxy) [1,1′,4′,1”-terphenyl]-4-yl] cabonyl] L-ornithine] echinocandin B. It is commonly used in the treatment of esophageal candidiasis, candidemia and deep organ infections. Although its effectiveness and safety studies remain unclear, the FDA approved this antifungal in February 2006 [37]. There is no consistency in the data related to the antifungal activity of echinocandins against C. auris, which is understandable, as new isolates appear constantly, and not all of them present mutations in the FKS genes (which until now has been shown to be a solid condition in determining resistance to echinocandins). Therefore, recent studies have shown that some isolates of C. auris are tolerant to this molecule, and its fungicidal activity against some strains is reduced with MICs ≥ 4 μg·mL−1 or even not able to reach fungicidal activity [1,5,39]. A recent work carried out by Romera and co-workers [40] also demonstrated a substantial increase in C. auris resistance to biofilm formation. Free-floating and sessile cells from C. auris were tested against amphotericin B, anidulafungin, caspofungin, fluconazole and voriconazole. Sessile biofilm cells increased the tested antifungals resistance [40].
Caspofungin is a derivative of the hexapeptide expressed by G. lozoyensis, which was modified by the addition of N-acylated fatty acid chain. Structurally, it is a 1-[(4R, 5S)-5-[(2-aminoethyl) amino] 15-N2-(10,12-dimethyl-1-oxotetradecyl)-4-hydroxy-L-ornithine]-5-[(3R)-3-hydroxy-L-ornithine] pneumocandin B0 diacetate [37]. The FDA approved caspofungin in January 2001 for use in fungal infections in adults; later in July 2008 it was also approved for use in children over 3 months old [37]. Currently, the use of caspofungin is indicated in cases of neutropenic patients who present high fever and suspected fungal infections. In addition, it can be used to treat esophageal candidiasis, peritonitis, intra-abdominal abscesses, and oral cavity infections caused by Candida [41]. As for anidulafungin, caspofungin has also presented some C. auris strains with reduced susceptibility, with MICs ≥ 2 μg·mL−1. Alarming data from Indian hospitals indicate a 37% rate of resistance to caspofungin, based on the analysis of 102 C. auris isolates [42]. Even so, experiments using animal models indicate these drugs as the most effective against C. auris infections, leading to the need for more tests [1,5,39].
Caspofungins are considered effective against yeasts that form biofilms. Echinocandins, in general, manage to destabilize the integrity of the cell wall and reduce its stiffness, consequently causing cell lysis due to low osmotic pressure. [27]. Notoriously, caspofungins are considered effective against yeasts that form biofilms. However, they are inactive against C. auris biofilms, an unexpected event, since these molecules are normally effective against Candida species biofilms [43,44]. In addition, they are not used as a treatment for urinary infections caused by C. auris, as they fail to reach the required therapeutic concentrations of these compounds in the urine [27]. The survival C. auris capability in hospital environments may be related to yeast biofilm formation. In this way, Sherry and co-workers [44] tested the C. auris ability to form biofilms and further demonstrated that the species can adhere to polymeric surfaces. In addition, their results demonstrated a significant increase in resistance, highlighting that caspofungin, usually effective against Candida biofilms, was ineffective against planktonic cells and C. auris biofilms [44].
Similar to caspofungin, micafungin originated from the cleavage and addition of an N-acylated side chain to the natural hexapeptide derived from C. empetri. Structurally, it is identified as 1-[(4R,5R)-4,5-dihydroxy-N2-[4-[5-[4-(pentyloxy) phenyl]-3-24 isoxazolyl] benzoyl]-l-ornithine]-4-[(4S)-4-hydroxy-4-[4-hydroxy-3-(sulfooxy) phenyl]-25 l-threonine] monosodium salt [27]. The FDA approved this molecule in March 2005 for use in adults and in 2013 for pediatric treatment. Its use covers the treatment of adult and child patients with esophageal candidiasis and more delicate cases such as hematopoietic cell translation during neutropenia, being considered effective in 86% of the cases [41]. Similarly to the two aforementioned echinocandins, there are already strains of C. auris resistant to micafungin with MICs ≥ 4 μg·mL−1 [1,5,35].
In addition to the echinocandins already discussed, rezafungin (also named CD101), a new drug in this class has been developed. It represents a structural anidulafungin analogue and has a hexapeptide with a lipophilic tail and choline moiety at the C5 ornithine position. Modification in this analogue were carried out in order to increase the plasma stability, aqueous solutions and at high temperatures, to avoid hepatotoxicity [45], as well as increasing its half-life (30 to 40 h) and safety profile [46]. According to studies by Berkow and Lokart [47], rezafungin presented better MIC results than did other echinocandins, ranging from 0.03 to 8 μg·mL−1, while towards the same isolates the values presented by micafungin (0.5 to >8 μg·mL−1), caspofungin (0.5 to >16 μg·mL−1) and anidulafungin (1 to >16 μg·mL−1) were lower. Lepak and co-workers [48] demonstrated the potent in vivo rezafungin activity against clinical strains of C. auris. The authors suggested that the clinical dose of 400 mg administered once a week is enough to meet or exceed the pharmacodynamics target for >90% of isolates, being a really useful drug for patients infected with C. auris [48]. Still, some isolates have already been described as rezafungin resistant [45].
Although still in small proportions, C. auris resistance to lipopeptides is of great concern to researchers. It is also important to note that the resistance of Candida species to echinocandins is uncommon, but has been growing, mainly due to its widespread prophylaxis, being detected predominantly in isolates that already show resistance to azoles, suggesting a possible cross-resistance event [49]. The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) recommends that azole susceptibility tests should be performed for all blood streams and all possibly relevant Candida isolates. As well as susceptibility test to echinocandins should be carried out mainly in cases of previous infections by Candida glabrata and Candida parapsilosis [50]. The occurrence of echinocandins resistance in Candida species was first reported in 2005, where strains with mutations in the FKS genes of resistant C. albicans (FKS1) and C. glabrata (FKS2) presented low sensitivity to caspofungin [27]. Recent reports indicate that ~2% of C. auris could be resistant to echinocandins [2,27]. C. auris tolerance to echinocandins was also in vitro reported, revealing that some isolates showed high tolerance to anidulafungin, micafungin and caspofungin [35,39].

3. Alternative Therapies and Clinical Applicability

Despite the great efforts of researchers around the world in the search for more effective therapies aiming at the treatment of candidiasis, studies specifically targeting the control of C. auris infections are still in their early stages. Thus, there is a lack of antifungal therapies that have already been tested against this species when compared to other Candida species. Still, it is possible to list interesting works focused on combining drugs for better results in the control of C. auris infections.
The application of synergistic therapies can represent success in the absence of efficient treatments. For example, the synergism between micafungin and voriconazole showed positive results against multiple C. auris strains. On the other hand, combinations of micafungin and fluconazole, as well as caspofungin and voriconazole and fluconazole showed indifferent synergistic results [51,52].
Mahmoudi and colleagues [53] analyzed the synergistic effects of caspofungin and anidulafungin in combination with geldanamycin. Geldanamycin is a benzoquinone that inhibits the chaperone Hsp90 ATPase activity. This drug is originally an anti-tumor agent produced by Streptomyces hygroscopicus var. geldanus [54]. Authors reported that indifferent results were observed for the combinations tested against C. auris strains. Similarly, combinations of azoles with geldamycin were indifferent against the same strains [53]. Furthermore, Nagy and colleagues [55] reported that combinations of farnesol and the three echinocandins approved by the F.D.A. showed positive results against biofilms of C. auris. Farnesol is a sesquiterpene alcohol quorum-sensing molecule, which works to prevent the formation of C. albicans biofilms. This drug works by inhibiting the support cascade Ras1-cAMP-PKA that acts at the hypha-to-yeast transition [55,56,57]. The synergism mechanism of these drugs is not completely understood; however, farnesol is believed to modulate the expression of genes linked to ergosterol biosynthesis [58]. Thus, deleterious effects on the cell wall caused by echinocandins added to the imbalance in the ergosterol synthesis modulated by farnesol, can act simultaneously, causing fungal cell wall and membrane damage [55]. Besides, farnesol can induce the production of reactive oxygen species and disruption of mithocondrial functions, which can lead to enhanced echinocandin activity [58]. The use of effective farnesol concentrations can present emerging toxicity [59]. However, they can be used as an adjuvant in the action of echinocandins in therapies of local action (lock therapy). For biofilm treatment, this strategy avoids the toxic effect, since farnesol acts only within a catheter [55,57,60].
Shaban and coworkers [61] showed additive effects in the synergism of caspofungin and carvacrol against C. albicans and C. auris isolates, significantly reducing both drug concentrations. Carvacrol, or cymophenol, is a phenolic monoterpene and is present in the essential oil of oregano (Origanum vulgare). The authors reported that carvacrol is capable of inhibiting fungal adherence. A possible mechanism for that is blocking or even interfering in the synthesis of adhesins, which are responsible for fixing the fungus on surfaces.
Bidaud and colleagues [33] recently demonstrated the effectiveness of combining the antimicrobial peptide colistin with caspofungin against C. auris. The authors described the synergistic activity of these two molecules, even against azole-resistant isolates. It is interesting to note that colistin alone does not have antifungal activity; however, it is suggested that echinocandins cause a change in the cell wall, facilitating the access of colistin to the fungal cell membrane. However, when tested in association with caspofungin, no synergistic effect was observed [33]. Despite the encouraging results with caspofungin, the difference observed in the behavior of these two compounds is still unclear [33,51]. It is worth noting that positive results of synergism of echinocandins and colistin were previously reported against C. albicans. Both caspofungin and aminocandin showed synergism from the concentration of 0.4 mg·L−1 of colistin and from 3.1 μg·mL−1 of the echinocandins tested [62]. These results together prove the potential of combined therapies of echinocandins and antimicrobial peptides, even in in vitro trials.
Antifungal therapies based on the use of echinocandins in general have been shown to be very effective and with few side effects for patients. Treatments with micafungin and caspofungin, intravenously administered, represent a low cost when compared to conventional drugs such as amphotericin B. Also, when dealing specifically with the control of infections caused by C. auris, the use of combined therapies proved to be more promising than the use of echinocandins alone. However, it is necessary to be attentive due to prolonged use of these molecules may trigger kidney problems (especially when combined with drugs as amphotericin B deoxycholate) and even resistance, as previously discussed. Furthermore, it is important to note that the tests regarding combination therapies were performed in in vitro assays, and that it is essential to carry out in vivo tests, considering toxicity analyzes and adequate concentrations for therapeutic application, mainly for patients in critical health conditions.

Author Contributions

E.d.S.C.; F.A.; M.H.C. and O.L.F. contributed substantially with data research, discussions of the content, wrote the article, reviewed and edited the manuscript before submission. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES): 88882.315122/2010-01, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento e Tecnológico (CNPq), Fundação de Apoio a Pesquisa do Distrito Federal (FAP-DF), and Fundação de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento do Ensino, Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul (FUNDECT), Brazil.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ABCATP-Binding Cassette
AFLPAmplified Fragment Length Polymorphism
FDAThe Food and Drug Administration
FKSβ-1,3-glucan synthase genes
ICUIntensive Care Units
ITSInternal Transcribed Spacer
MALDI-ToFMatrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight
MFSMajor Facilitator Superfamily
MICMinimal Inhibition Concentration
PCRPolymerase Chain Reaction
RHO1GTP-Binding protein precursor
STRShort Tandem Repeat Typing

References

  1. Chowdhary, A.; Anil Kumar, V.; Sharma, C.; Prakash, A.; Agarwal, K.; Babu, R.; Dinesh, K.R.; Karim, S.; Singh, S.K.; Hagen, F.; et al. Multidrug-resistant endemic clonal strain of Candida auris in India. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2014, 33, 919–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chowdhary, A.; Prakash, A.; Sharma, C.; Kordalewska, M.; Kumar, A.; Sarma, S.; Tarai, B.; Singh, A.; Upadhyaya, G.; Upadhyay, S.; et al. A multicentre study of antifungal susceptibility patterns among 350 Candida auris isolates (2009-17) in India: Role of the ERG11 and FKS1 genes in azole and echinocandin resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 891–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wickes, B.L. Analysis of a Candida auris Outbreak Provides New Insights into an Emerging Pathogen. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020, 58, e02083-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Forgacs, L.; Borman, A.M.; Prepost, E.; Toth, Z.; Kardos, G.; Kovacs, R.; Szekely, A.; Nagy, F.; Kovacs, I.; Majoros, L. Comparison of in vivo pathogenicity of four Candida auris clades in a neutropenic bloodstream infection murine model. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 1160–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lockhart, S.R.; Etienne, K.A.; Vallabhaneni, S.; Farooqi, J.; Chowdhary, A.; Govender, N.P.; Colombo, A.L.; Calvo, B.; Cuomo, C.A.; Desjardins, C.A.; et al. Simultaneous Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant Candida auris on 3 Continents Confirmed by Whole-Genome Sequencing and Epidemiological Analyses. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 64, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Chow, N.A.; Gade, L.; Tsay, S.V.; Forsberg, K.; Greenko, J.A.; Southwick, K.L.; Barrett, P.M.; Kerins, J.L.; Lockhart, S.R.; Chiller, T.M.; et al. Multiple introductions and subsequent transmission of multidrug-resistant Candida auris in the USA: A molecular epidemiological survey. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 1377–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Satoh, K.; Makimura, K.; Hasumi, Y.; Nishiyama, Y.; Uchida, K.; Yamaguchi, H. Candida auris sp. nov., a novel ascomycetous yeast isolated from the external ear canal of an inpatient in a Japanese hospital. Microbiol. Immunol. 2009, 53, 41–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kim, M.N.; Shin, J.H.; Sung, H.; Lee, K.; Kim, E.C.; Ryoo, N.; Lee, J.S.; Jung, S.I.; Park, K.H.; Kee, S.J.; et al. Candida haemulonii and closely related species at 5 university hospitals in Korea: Identification, antifungal susceptibility, and clinical features. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 48, e57–e61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Emara, M.; Ahmad, S.; Khan, Z.; Joseph, L.; Al-Obaid, I.; Purohit, P.; Bafna, R. Candida auris candidemia in Kuwait, 2014. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2015, 21, 1091–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Ahmad, S.; Khan, Z.; Al-Sweih, N.; Alfouzan, W.; Joseph, L. Candida auris in various hospitals across Kuwait and their susceptibility and molecular basis of resistance to antifungal drugs. Mycoses 2020, 63, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Magobo, R.E.; Corcoran, C.; Seetharam, S.; Govender, N.P. Candida auris-associated candidemia, South Africa. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 1250–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Calvo, B.; Melo, A.S.; Perozo-Mena, A.; Hernandez, M.; Francisco, E.C.; Hagen, F.; Meis, J.F.; Colombo, A.L. First report of Candida auris in America: Clinical and microbiological aspects of 18 episodes of candidemia. J. Infect. 2016, 73, 369–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ruiz-Gaitan, A.; Moret, A.M.; Tasias-Pitarch, M.; Aleixandre-Lopez, A.I.; Martinez-Morel, H.; Calabuig, E.; Salavert-Lleti, M.; Ramirez, P.; Lopez-Hontangas, J.L.; Hagen, F.; et al. An outbreak due to Candida auris with prolonged colonisation and candidaemia in a tertiary care European hospital. Mycoses 2018, 61, 498–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Mohsin, J.; Hagen, F.; Al-Balushi, Z.A.M.; de Hoog, G.S.; Chowdhary, A.; Meis, J.F.; Al-Hatmi, A.M.S. The first cases of Candida auris candidaemia in Oman. Mycoses 2017, 60, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ben-Ami, R.; Berman, J.; Novikov, A.; Bash, E.; Shachor-Meyouhas, Y.; Zakin, S.; Maor, Y.; Tarabia, J.; Schechner, V.; Adler, A.; et al. Multidrug-Resistant Candida haemulonii and C. auris, Tel Aviv, Israel. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2017, 23, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Morales-Lopez, S.E.; Parra-Giraldo, C.M.; Ceballos-Garzon, A.; Martinez, H.P.; Rodriguez, G.J.; Alvarez-Moreno, C.A.; Rodriguez, J.Y. Invasive Infections with Multidrug-Resistant Yeast Candida auris, Colombia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2017, 23, 162–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Arauz, A.B.; Caceres, D.H.; Santiago, E.; Armstrong, P.; Arosemena, S.; Ramos, C.; Espinosa-Bode, A.; Borace, J.; Hayer, L.; Cedeno, I.; et al. Isolation of Candida auris from 9 patients in Central America: Importance of accurate diagnosis and susceptibility testing. Mycoses 2018, 61, 44–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Borman, A.M.; Szekely, A.; Johnson, E.M. Isolates of the emerging pathogen Candida auris present in the UK have several geographic origins. Med. Mycol. 2017, 55, 563–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lane, C.R.; Seemann, T.; Worth, L.J.; Easton, M.; Pitchers, W.; Wong, J.; Cameron, D.; Azzato, F.; Bartolo, R.; Mateevici, C.; et al. Incursions of Candida auris into Australia, 2018. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020, 26, 1326–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Abdalhamid, B.; Almaghrabi, R.; Althawadi, S.; Omrani, A. First report of Candida auris infections from Saudi Arabia. J. Infect. Public Health 2018, 11, 598–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Szekely, A.; Borman, A.M.; Johnson, E.M. Candida auris Isolates of the Southern Asian and South African Lineages Exhibit Different Phenotypic and Antifungal Susceptibility Profiles in Vitro. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2019, 57, e02055-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Chaabane, F.; Graf, A.; Jequier, L.; Coste, A.T. Review on Antifungal Resistance Mechanisms in the Emerging Pathogen Candida auris. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Suchodolski, J.; Derkacz, D.; Muraszko, J.; Panek, J.J.; Jezierska, A.; Lukaszewicz, M.; Krasowska, A. Fluconazole and Lipopeptide Surfactin Interplay during Candida albicans Plasma Membrane and Cell Wall Remodeling Increases Fungal Immune System Exposure. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Chybowska, A.D.; Childers, D.S.; Farrer, R.A. Nine Things Genomics Can Tell Us about Candida auris. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Biniarz, P.; Baranowska, G.; Feder-Kubis, J.; Krasowska, A. The lipopeptides pseudofactin II and surfactin effectively decrease Candida albicans adhesion and hydrophobicity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2015, 108, 343–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Hamley, I.W. Lipopeptides: From self-assembly to bioactivity. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 8574–8583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Mroczynska, M.; Brillowska-Dabrowska, A. Review on Current Status of Echinocandins Use. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Perlin, D.S. Resistance to echinocandin-class antifungal drugs. Drug Resist. Update 2007, 10, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Joseph, J.M.; Jain, R.; Danziger, L.H. Micafungin: A new echinocandin antifungal. Pharmacotherapy 2007, 27, 53–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vardanyan, R.; Hruby, V. Antifungal Drugs. In Synthesis of Best-Seller Drugs; Press, A., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; Volume 1, p. 868. [Google Scholar]
  31. Denning, D.W. Echinocandin antifungal drugs. Lancet 2003, 362, 1142–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Qadota, H.; Python, C.P.; Inoue, S.B.; Arisawa, M.; Anraku, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Watanabe, T.; Levin, D.E.; Ohya, Y. Identification of yeast Rho1p GTPase as a regulatory subunit of 1,3-beta-glucan synthase. Science 1996, 272, 279–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bidaud, A.L.; Djenontin, E.; Botterel, F.; Chowdhary, A.; Dannaoui, E. Colistin interacts synergistically with echinocandins against Candida auris. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 55, 105901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bradley, S.F. What is known about Candida auris. JAMA 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kordalewska, M.; Lee, A.; Park, S.; Berrio, I.; Chowdhary, A.; Zhao, Y.; Perlin, D.S. Understanding Echinocandin Resistance in the Emerging Pathogen Candida auris. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e00238-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Hashizume, H.; Nishimura, Y. Cyclic Lipopeptide Antibiotics. Stud. Nat. Prod. Chem. 2008, 35, 693–751. [Google Scholar]
  37. Aguilar-Zapata, D.; Petraitiene, R.; Petraitis, V. Echinocandins: The Expanding Antifungal Armamentarium. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015, 61 (Suppl. 6), S604–S611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Sucher, A.J.; Chahine, E.B.; Balcer, H.E. Echinocandins: The newest class of antifungals. Ann. Pharmacother. 2009, 43, 1647–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dudiuk, C.; Berrio, I.; Leonardelli, F.; Morales-Lopez, S.; Theill, L.; Macedo, D.; Yesid-Rodriguez, J.; Salcedo, S.; Marin, A.; Gamarra, S.; et al. Antifungal activity and killing kinetics of anidulafungin, caspofungin and amphotericin B against Candida auris. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019, 74, 2295–2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Romera, D.; Aguilera-Correa, J.J.; Gadea, I.; Vinuela-Sandoval, L.; Garcia-Rodriguez, J.; Esteban, J. Candida auris: A comparison between planktonic and biofilm susceptibility to antifungal drugs. J. Med. Microbiol. 2019, 68, 1353–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Balkovec, J.M.; Hughes, D.L.; Masurekar, P.S.; Sable, C.A.; Schwartz, R.E.; Singh, S.B. Discovery and development of first in class antifungal caspofungin (CANCIDAS(R))—A case study. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2014, 31, 15–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kathuria, S.; Singh, P.K.; Sharma, C.; Prakash, A.; Masih, A.; Kumar, A.; Meis, J.F.; Chowdhary, A. Multidrug-Resistant Candida auris Misidentified as Candida haemulonii: Characterization by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry and DNA Sequencing and Its Antifungal Susceptibility Profile Variability by Vitek 2, CLSI Broth Microdilution, and Etest Method. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 1823–1830. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Chowdhary, A.; Voss, A.; Meis, J.F. Multidrug-resistant Candida auris: ‘new kid on the block’ in hospital-associated infections? J. Hosp. Infect. 2016, 94, 209–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Sherry, L.; Ramage, G.; Kean, R.; Borman, A.; Johnson, E.M.; Richardson, M.D.; Rautemaa-Richardson, R. Biofilm-Forming Capability of Highly Virulent, Multidrug-Resistant Candida auris. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2017, 23, 328–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Hager, C.L.; Larkin, E.L.; Long, L.A.; Ghannoum, M.A. Evaluation of the efficacy of rezafungin, a novel echinocandin, in the treatment of disseminated Candida auris infection using an immunocompromised mouse model. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 2085–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Krishnan, B.R.; James, K.D.; Polowy, K.; Bryant, B.J.; Vaidya, A.; Smith, S.; Laudeman, C.P. CD101, a novel echinocandin with exceptional stability properties and enhanced aqueous solubility. J. Antibiot. 2017, 70, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Berkow, E.L.; Lockhart, S.R. Activity of CD101, a long-acting echinocandin, against clinical isolates of Candida auris. Diagn Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2018, 90, 196–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lepak, A.J.; Zhao, M.; Andes, D.R. Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Rezafungin (CD101) against Candida auris in the Neutropenic Mouse Invasive Candidiasis Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e01572-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Perlin, D.S. Echinocandin Resistance in Candida. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015, 61 (Suppl. 6), S612–S617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Pappas, P.G.; Kauffman, C.A.; Andes, D.R.; Clancy, C.J.; Marr, K.A.; Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.; Reboli, A.C.; Schuster, M.G.; Vazquez, J.A.; Walsh, T.J.; et al. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 62, e1–e50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. de Oliveira, H.C.; Monteiro, M.C.; Rossi, S.A.; Peman, J.; Ruiz-Gaitan, A.; Mendes-Giannini, M.J.S.; Mellado, E.; Zaragoza, O. Identification of Off-Patent Compounds That Present Antifungal Activity against the Emerging Fungal Pathogen Candida auris. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Fakhim, H.; Chowdhary, A.; Prakash, A.; Vaezi, A.; Dannaoui, E.; Meis, J.F.; Badali, H. In Vitro Interactions of Echinocandins with Triazoles against Multidrug-Resistant Candida auris. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e01056-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Mahmoudi, S.; Rezaie, S.; Daie Ghazvini, R.; Hashemi, S.J.; Badali, H.; Foroumadi, A.; Diba, K.; Chowdhary, A.; Meis, J.F.; Khodavaisy, S. In Vitro Interaction of Geldanamycin with Triazoles and Echinocandins against Common and Emerging Candida Species. Mycopathologia 2019, 184, 607–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Palma, L.C.; Ferreira, L.; Petersen, A.; Dias, B.R.S.; Menezes, J.P.B.; Moreira, D.R.M.; Hernandes, M.Z.; Veras, P.S.T. A docking-based structural analysis of geldanamycin-derived inhibitor binding to human or Leishmania Hsp90. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 14756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Nagy, F.; Toth, Z.; Daroczi, L.; Szekely, A.; Borman, A.M.; Majoros, L.; Kovacs, R. Farnesol increases the activity of echinocandins against Candida auris biofilms. Med. Mycol. 2020, 58, 404–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ramage, G.; Saville, S.P.; Wickes, B.L.; Lopez-Ribot, J.L. Inhibition of Candida albicans biofilm formation by farnesol, a quorum-sensing molecule. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 5459–5463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Katragkou, A.; McCarthy, M.; Alexander, E.L.; Antachopoulos, C.; Meletiadis, J.; Jabra-Rizk, M.A.; Petraitis, V.; Roilides, E.; Walsh, T.J. In vitro interactions between farnesol and fluconazole, amphotericin B or micafungin against Candida albicans biofilms. J Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015, 70, 470–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Shirtliff, M.E.; Krom, B.P.; Meijering, R.A.; Peters, B.M.; Zhu, J.; Scheper, M.A.; Harris, M.L.; Jabra-Rizk, M.A. Farnesol-induced apoptosis in Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 2392–2401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Scheper, M.A.; Shirtliff, M.E.; Meiller, T.F.; Peters, B.M.; Jabra-Rizk, M.A. Farnesol, a fungal quorum-sensing molecule triggers apoptosis in human oral squamous carcinoma cells. Neoplasia 2008, 10, 954–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Kovacs, R.; Bozo, A.; Gesztelyi, R.; Doman, M.; Kardos, G.; Nagy, F.; Toth, Z.; Majoros, L. Effect of caspofungin and micafungin in combination with farnesol against Candida parapsilosis biofilms. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2016, 47, 304–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Shaban, S.; Patel, M.; Ahmad, A. Improved efficacy of antifungal drugs in combination with monoterpene phenols against Candida auris. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zeidler, U.; Bougnoux, M.E.; Lupan, A.; Helynck, O.; Doyen, A.; Garcia, Z.; Sertour, N.; Clavaud, C.; Munier-Lehmann, H.; Saveanu, C.; et al. Synergy of the antibiotic colistin with echinocandin antifungals in Candida species. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2013, 68, 1285–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Jof 06 00185 g001 550
Figure 1. Global distribution of Candida auris between 2009 and 2019. Single cases are represented as ( Jof 06 00185 i001), whereas multiple cases are represented as ( Jof 06 00185 i002). ( Jof 06 00185 i003) Represents outbreak reports. The timeline presents the first report in each country highlighted over the years, with 2009 being the year in which the first case was reported.
Figure 1. Global distribution of Candida auris between 2009 and 2019. Single cases are represented as ( Jof 06 00185 i001), whereas multiple cases are represented as ( Jof 06 00185 i002). ( Jof 06 00185 i003) Represents outbreak reports. The timeline presents the first report in each country highlighted over the years, with 2009 being the year in which the first case was reported.
Jof 06 00185 g001
Jof 06 00185 g002 550
Figure 2. Echinocandins’ mode of action. Fks1 is essential for the catalysis of β-1,3-glucan, an important component of the fungal cell wall. Echinocandins acts through the inhibition of β-1,3-glucan synthesis.
Figure 2. Echinocandins’ mode of action. Fks1 is essential for the catalysis of β-1,3-glucan, an important component of the fungal cell wall. Echinocandins acts through the inhibition of β-1,3-glucan synthesis.
Jof 06 00185 g002
Table
Table 1. Echinocandin entries in PubChem *.
Table 1. Echinocandin entries in PubChem *.
NamePubChem CIDMolecular FormulaMolecular Weight (g/mol)
1-((4R,5R)-4,5-dihydroy-L-ornithine) Echinocandin B134693052C34H51N7O15797.8
1029890-89-8134693051C34H52CIN7O15843.3
143131-16-2 Echinocandin B456858C53H88N8O161093.3
166663-25-815224271C58H73N7O171140.2
79404-91-471762C49H71N7O171030.099
79411-15-791632900C34H51N7O15797.8
Aminocandin160772305C56H79N9O131086.3
Anidulafungin166548C58H73N7O171140.2
Biafungin92135635C63H85N8O17 +1226.4
Caspofungin2826718C52H88N10O151093.3
CHEBI:245053297328C51H82N8O171079.2
Cilofungin and Amphotericin B (AmB)6473895C96H144N8O341954.2
CINH3EtCOO Echinocandin11984605C53H86CIN9O181172.8
CINH3MeCOO Echinocandin11984607C52H84CIN9O181158.7
DiMeNEtOCOO Echinocandin456505C55H89N9O191180.3
Echinocandin B9898144C52H81N7O161060.2
Echinocandin B Nucleus91820167C34H52N7O15 +798.8
Echinocandin B Nucleus Hydrochloride138115264C34H52CIN7O15834.3
Echinocandin C10260509C52H81N7O151044.2
Echinocandin D12773979C52H81N7O131012.2
Echinocandin Phosphate23715870C50H80N8NaO20P1167.2
HOOCEtNHCOO Echinocandin456500C54H85N9O201180.3
HOOCMeNHCOO Echinocandin456501C53H83N9O201166.3
HOOCMeNMeCOO Echinocandin456502C54H85N9O201180.3
HOOCPrCOO Echinocandin456504C55H86N8O201179.3
L 731373462493C50H82N8O161051.2
Lipopeptide Der A-2a456855C50H79N8Na2O181157.2
Micafungin477468C56H71N9O23S1270.3
Mulundocandin121225706C48H77N7O161008.2
Pneumocandin B05742645C50H80N8O171065.2
Rezafungin78318119C63H85N8O17 +1226.4
Tetrahydroechinocandin B171361C52H85N7O161064.3
YKPHLXGEPNYRPY-UHFFFAOYSA-N122233C50H81N7O161036.2
* Duplicated entries were omitted. + Oxygen atom with more protons than electrons.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cândido, E.d.S.; Affonseca, F.; Cardoso, M.H.; Franco, O.L. Echinocandins as Biotechnological Tools for Treating Candida auris Infections. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 185. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jof6030185

AMA Style

Cândido EdS, Affonseca F, Cardoso MH, Franco OL. Echinocandins as Biotechnological Tools for Treating Candida auris Infections. Journal of Fungi. 2020; 6(3):185. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jof6030185

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cândido, Elizabete de Souza, Flávia Affonseca, Marlon Henrique Cardoso, and Octavio Luiz Franco. 2020. "Echinocandins as Biotechnological Tools for Treating Candida auris Infections" Journal of Fungi 6, no. 3: 185. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jof6030185

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop