Next Article in Journal
Transient Breakage of the Nucleocytoplasmic Barrier Controls Spore Maturation via Mobilizing the Proteasome Subunit Rpn11 in the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Next Article in Special Issue
In Vitro and In Vivo Anti-Candida Activity and Structural Analysis of Killer Peptide (KP)-Derivatives
Previous Article in Journal
Production of Bio-Based Pigments from Food Processing Industry By-Products (Apple, Pomegranate, Black Carrot, Red Beet Pulps) Using Aspergillus carbonarius
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular and Biological Properties of Snakins: The Foremost Cysteine-Rich Plant Host Defense Peptides
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 6
Issue 4
10.3390/jof6040241
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Host Defense Peptides as Templates for Antifungal Drug Development

by
Virginia Basso
1,
Dat Q. Tran
1,2,
André J. Ouellette
1,3 and
Michael E. Selsted
1,2,3,*
1
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
2
Oryn Therapeutics, Vacaville, CA 95688, USA
3
Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2020, 6(4), 241; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jof6040241
Submission received: 3 October 2020 / Revised: 20 October 2020 / Accepted: 21 October 2020 / Published: 23 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antifungal Peptides 2020)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Current treatment for invasive fungal diseases is limited to three classes of antifungal drugs: azoles, polyenes, and echinocandins. The most recently introduced antifungal class, the echinocandins, was first approved nearly 30 years ago. The limited antifungal drug portfolio is rapidly losing its clinical utility due to the inexorable rise in the incidence of invasive fungal infections and the emergence of multidrug resistant (MDR) fungal pathogens. New antifungal therapeutic agents and novel approaches are desperately needed. Here, we detail attempts to exploit the antifungal and immunoregulatory properties of host defense peptides (HDPs) in the design and evaluation of new antifungal therapeutics and discuss historical limitations and recent advances in this quest.

1. Introduction

Invasive fungal infections are a global health concern, with high rates of incidence and mortality, particularly in immunocompromised patients [1,2,3]. The paucity of antifungal drugs available for treatment of invasive mycoses represents a growing public health vulnerability, as the numbers of immunosuppressed individuals grow with increasing use of cancer chemotherapy, bone marrow and solid organ transplants, and immunosuppressive drugs for treatment of autoimmune disorders. Serious, often life-threatening, mycoses that affect humans are primarily due to only a few genera (Table 1). Candida spp. infections range from mild and superficial to invasive infections with mortality rates of 40% or greater [2]. An estimated 200,000 cases of Aspergillus spp. infections occur annually with invasive disease primarily affecting immunocompromised patients. With treatment, invasive aspergillosis causes death in up to 50% of affected patients, whereas left untreated, as often occurs in developing countries, lethality approaches 100% [1]. Immunocompromised patients are also highly susceptible to cryptococcosis caused by Cryptococcus neoformans and closely related Cryptococcus gattii. Although cryptococcosis is initially a pulmonary infection, in the immunosuppressed patient the organism commonly disseminates systemically to the central nervous system (CNS) causing meningoencephalitis with an estimated 70% mortality [1].
Currently, there are three classes of antifungals: azoles, polyenes, and echinocandins (Table 2). Azoles are the most widely used class of antifungal agents because of their bioavailability as oral and intravenous (i.v.) formulations and their excellent safety profiles. However, some Candida species, such as C. krusei, are intrinsically resistant to fluconazole, the most widely used azole. Fluconazole-resistant isolates are emerging rapidly because azoles are fungistatic which promotes resistance selection with extended use [4,5]. Polyenes have been in use since the 1950s, but their toxicities limit their use to severe infections. The toxicity of amphotericin B (AmpB) is well known, particularly its nephrotoxicity, due to its affinity for and disruption of host cell membranes [6]. Fortunately, lipid-associated and liposomal formulations of AmpB have reduced adverse events associated with its use [6]. Although initially approved nearly 30 years ago, echinocandins are the newest class of antifungals. While usually effective in treatment of candidiasis and aspergillosis [7,8], echinocandins are ineffective against Cryptococcus spp. and endemic mycoses [7].
The public health impact of systemic mycoses is amplified by the increasing incidence of multidrug resistant (MDR) pathogens. Numerous clinical isolates have emerged that are resistant to all three classes of approved antifungals [4,9,10,11,12,13], highlighted by the international spread of MDR C. auris, which is now classified by CDC as a serious threat [14,15]. In the United States alone, systemic mycoses are estimated to cause more than 1.6 million deaths annually [16] with associated treatment costs exceeding USD 7 billion [17]. Accordingly, new efforts are underway to address the growing and worldwide impact of systemic fungal infections, including the development of fungal vaccines and new therapeutic strategies [18,19,20]. Here we discuss the potential of host defense peptides (HDPs) (also long referred to as antimicrobial peptides) as bioinspired templates for new agents to treat invasive fungal infections. While antimicrobial peptides are expressed by nearly all life forms, the primary focus of this review will be on antifungal HDPs expressed as elements of the mammalian immune system.

2. Mammalian HDPs

HDPs are short polypeptides, generally fewer than 50 amino acids, that display a wide range of in vitro antimicrobial activities against bacteria, fungi, viruses, and unicellular protozoa [21]. HDPs expressed in mammals are structurally diverse, predominantly expressed in leukocytes and epithelia [22,23,24], and nearly all were identified by in vitro antimicrobial screens of fractionated tissue extracts. A number of elegant studies have disclosed a central role for HDPs in innate immunity [25,26,27,28,29], thus it was logical that these molecules be evaluated for their potential as therapeutics. In addition, enzymatic cleavage of larger proteins may generate peptides (termed cryptides) with antimicrobial properties that potentially contribute to antimicrobial host defense [30]. Collectively, studies that began in the 1960s have identified several hundred antimicrobial peptides, many of which possess antifungal activities [18,31]. As discussed below, the vast majority of mammalian antifungal HDPs are fungicidal. Moreover, many HDPs also have immunoregulatory properties that appear to be essential for antifungal responses of host cells in vitro and for antifungal efficacy in vivo. In the following sections, we detail the major classes of mammalian antifungal HDPs, the status of their development as therapeutic candidates, and discuss promising advances of HDP-inspired, antifungal peptidomimetics.

2.1. Histatins

Histatins (Hsts; Table 3) constitute a family of linear histidine-rich cationic peptides isolated from human saliva [32]. Among the 12 Hst family members characterized, Hst5 is the most potent fungicidal peptide against C. albicans in vitro [33]. Synthetic Hst5 variants, termed Dhar4 and Dhar5, also inhibit biofilm formation of MDR C. albicans in vitro [34,35]. The candidacidal activity of Hst5 results from its binding to the yeast cell surface followed by internalization into the cytosol. Intracellular Hst5 induces oxidative stress and impairs mitochondrial function that induces a lethal ionic imbalance in fungal cells [33]. PAC-113 is a dodecapeptide, corresponding to amino acids 4–15 of Hst5, in which the C-terminal His is carboxamidated. Topically applied PAC-113 has been shown to be effective in phase I and II in clinical trials for oral candidiasis in HIV patients [18], and a rinse formulation for treatment and prevention of oral candidiasis is being developed by Pacgen Biopharmaceuticals. PAC-113 is currently marketed as an over-the-counter product in Taiwan. As topical agents, Hst and derivatives thereof have shown promise as candidacidal agents with low toxicity toward mammalian cells [36]. There have been no reports of systemic delivery of Hsts or their derivatives, indicating their utility is limited to topical applications.

2.2. Cathelicidins

The cathelicidin peptide family is a heterogeneous group of peptides with sizes ranging from 12 to 80 residues with highly diverse sequences and structures [73]. They share a highly conserved, amino terminal prepro sequence termed the cathelin domain. The most extensively studied antifungal cathelicidin is LL-37 (Table 3), the only known human cathelicidin. LL-37 is a cationic α-helical peptide composed of 37 amino acids that is widely expressed in the skin, gastrointestinal, urinary, and respiratory tracts [74,75], as well as by monocytes, neutrophils, NK, B, and T cells [76,77,78]. LL-37 is fungicidal in vitro against C. albicans and Aspergillus spp. [39,79]. LL-37 disrupts the cytoplasmic membrane of C. albicans blastospores [39] and also protects mammalian host cells by inhibiting biofilm formation and host cell binding by interaction with yeast cell wall carbohydrates [80]. LL-37 inhibits A. fumigatus hyphal growth and adhesion to host cells resulting in suppression of TNF-α and IL-6 release [42,45]. The immunoregulatory effects of LL-37 include its chemoattraction of neutrophils [38] and augmentation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production by neutrophils exposed to phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate or bacteria [37]. The peptide also induces chemokine release by leukocytes and epithelial cells, in particular IL-8, to increase neutrophil recruitment [40], and it inhibits neutrophil apoptosis [43]. LL-37 selectively modulates proinflammatory cytokines by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). For example, the peptide downregulates TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8 secretion by blood monocytes stimulated with TLR2 or TLR4 agonists, but it stimulates TNFα and IL-6 production by CpG-stimulated monocytes [20,41,44].
Other cathelicidins evaluated for their antifungal potential include porcine protegrins (cationic hairpin peptides of 16–18 amino acids stabilized by two disulfides) [46] and bovine indolicidin, a cationic tryptophan-rich tridecapeptide amide [81] (Table 3). Protegrins and indolicidin are expressed at high levels in granulocytes of the respective species. Protegrins have potent fungicidal activity against C. albicans in vitro but failed to advance clinically due to their unacceptable toxicity toward mammalian cells [46]. Similarly, indolicidin was fungicidal against Candida spp. and C. neoformans in vitro [82], but was cytotoxic and poorly tolerated in naive BALB/c mice that received the peptide i.v. [47]. However, liposomal encapsulation of indolicidin markedly reduced cytotoxicity and greatly improved tolerability when administered i.v. to mice [47]. This improved formulation was tested for therapeutic efficacy in mice challenged with A. fumigatus spores. A single dose of liposomal indolicidin was therapeutically effective in this model, providing evidence that liposomal formulation technology, used to enhance tolerability and efficacy of AmpB, could be applied to an antifungal peptide [47].

2.3. α- and β-Defensins

The defensin family comprises three structural subfamilies, termed α-, β-, and θ-defensins [83], the first two of which will be discussed here. α- and β-defensins vary in length from 29 to 47 amino acids [84], and despite having different tri-disulfide motifs, have remarkably similar tertiary structures (Table 3). In vitro, neutrophil α-defensins are fungicidal against numerous species, including C. albicans [85], C. neoformans [86], Coccidioides immitis [87], Rhizopus oryzae, and A. fumigatus [88]. Additionally, numerous studies demonstrate that human α-defensins possess immunomodulatory properties that are predominantly proinflammatory. For example, α-defensins induce IL-6 secretion by T-cells [50], upregulate TNFα and IL-1β expression by monocytes [48], stimulate TNFα, IL-6, and IL-12 expression in myeloid dendritic cells [89], and induce IL-8 release by lung epithelial cells [49,51,90]. α-defensins also act as a bridge between innate and acquired immunity by promoting antigen or tumor-specific immune responses in vitro and in vivo [50,91,92], mobilizing immature dendritic cells and naïve T lymphocytes [93], and enhancing chemotaxis of macrophages, mast cells, and T lymphocytes [94].
β-defensins were first identified in cattle [95,96], and soon thereafter discovered in humans [97]. There are more than 40 human β-defensin (HBD) genes [98], but most studies on HBD peptides have focused on HBDs 1–3 which are expressed in many tissues [99]. HBD-2 and 3 expression is induced by proinflammatory signals, such as TNFα and IL-1β [100,101,102,103,104,105], whereas HBD-1 is expressed constitutively [106,107]. HBD-1 was fungistatic against Candida spp. [108,109] whereas both HBD-2 and HBD-3 were fungicidal against C. albicans [55]. In addition to their microbicidal properties, like α-defensins, β-defensins function as immunostimulants. For example, mouse β-defensin-2 is an endogenous ligand for TLR-4 on immature dendritic cells, producing a Th1 polarized immune response with production of IL-1 α/β, IL-6, and IL-12 [52]. HBDs 2–4 induced expression of several proinflammatory cytokines in keratinocytes [53,54] and HBD-2 elicited similar effects in CD3/28-stimulated peripheral T-cells [53]. Under some conditions, HBDs are reported to have immunosuppressive activities [110].
Therapeutic development of α- and β-defensins, including those expressed in humans, have not advanced to the clinic for any indication. In fact, none of the antifungal peptides described above have been translated clinically for treatment of invasive mycoses. However, Hst and indolicidin analogs, LL-37-derived peptides, and a number of other synthetic peptides are under development as topical agents to treat a number infectious diseases including mucocutaneous candidiasis [31]. As discussed by Haney et al., it is not surprising that the antimicrobial activities of HDPs determined in vitro do not predictably translate functionally in the physiologic milieu of infected host tissues [111], despite the wide use of this approach for small molecules. For HDPs, the challenge of in vitro-to-in vivo translation, especially for a systemically administered drug, is complicated by other factors including unpredictable binding of the peptide to blood elements and tissues, peptide degradation, unfavorable pharmacokinetics, and potentially adverse effects of the HDP itself. It is evident, therefore, that preclinical efficacy and toxicology studies are required to justify clinical development of HDPs.

3. Potential Role of HDPs in Antifungal Drug Development

For reasons outlined above, the track record of peptide-based drug development of anti-infectives is littered with failures. Ironically, the development of peptide drugs in general is on a steep positive trajectory, with 20 new peptide-based clinical trials every year, and more than 400 peptidic drugs in clinical development. Over the last 20 years, a total of 60 peptide drugs have been approved worldwide, with metabolic disorders and cancer as the main targeted therapeutic areas [112]. Moreover, as noted above, a number of HDPs are in development for topical antifungal applications, including the treatment of oral and vulvovaginal candidiasis [31]. Despite the challenges of antifungal drug development in general, and the inherent barriers encountered in developing peptide drugs, there is reason to be hopeful that the biological properties of HDPs may contribute to the quest for new antifungal agents. The following sections provide a few examples of recent successes, exploiting both the antifungal and immunotherapeutic properties of HDPs.

3.1. IDR-1018

Hancock and colleagues were among the first to recognize that the antimicrobial efficacy of HDPs was linked to the immunoregulatory properties of the molecule [111,113]. This informed the synthesis of innate defense regulator (IDR) peptides using bovine cathelicidin Bac2a as the template for analog design and subsequent activity screens. Freitas et al. demonstrated the utility of this approach in studies of IDR-1018, a linear dodecapeptide amide that was tested for its effect on survival in a mouse model of systemic candidiasis [56]. Candidemic mice were treated daily with 1, 5, or 10 mg/kg of IDR-1018 by the i.p. route beginning 24 h post retroorbital infection. The highest dose statistically prolonged survival and had a modest effect on fungal kidney burden after 7 days of peptide treatment. It was concluded that the therapeutic effect of IDR-1018 is mediated by its modulation of proinflammatory cytokines (TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-12) by bone marrow derived macrophages stimulated with heat killed C. albicans [56].

3.2. hLF 1-11

Human lactoferrin (hLF) is a 77 kDa iron-binding glycoprotein implicated in host defense by direct killing of C. albicans, or through the action of proteolytic fragments (cryptides). A number of studies were performed using hLF1-11, the amino terminal undecapeptide of hLF. hLF1-11 is fungicidal in vitro, having greater potency than hLF itself [59]. Direct fungal killing occurred by increasing mitochondrial potential and permeability via calcium uptake, which resulted in ROS and adenosine triphosphate production, and consequently in C. albicans cell death [58]. The efficacy of hLF1-11 in vivo was evaluated in neutropenic mice challenged i.v. with C. albicans Y01-19 and treated with a single i.v. dose of hLF1-11 24 h post infection. After an additional 18 h, mice were euthanized and renal fungal burden was quantified as a function of peptide dose. Significant reduction is fungal burden was obtained with peptide doses as low as 0.4 ng/kg [58]. Although the study design did not allow for determination of treatment impact on survival, histologic analysis indicated that peptide treatment inhibited filamentation of surviving fungi. Moreover, hLF1-11 treatment dose-dependently reduced serum TNFα and IL-6 in infected mice.

3.3. θ-Defensins

Recent studies suggest that θ-defensins, the third of the three mammalian defensin subfamilies, may represent a unique HDP template for antifungal drug development. θ-Defensins are cyclic octadecapeptides expressed exclusively in Old World monkeys and are the only known cyclic polypeptides in the Animal Kingdom [114]. The cyclic backbone is produced by head-to-tail splicing of two nonapeptides derived from α-defensin-like precursors [115], and binary combinations produce multiple θ-defensin isoforms (e.g., six in rhesus macaques [116]; 10 in olive baboons [117]) that have distinct antimicrobial activities against bacteria and fungi in vitro [9,116,117,118].
Rhesus theta defensin 1 (RTD-1), the first θ-defensin isoform described, has served as the prototype for characterizing in vitro antimicrobial activities against bacteria, fungi, and enveloped viruses [9,85,117,118,119,120,121,122]. In early in vivo studies, single dose administration of RTD-1 was effective in E. coli- and polymicrobial sepsis in BALB/c mice [62]. While RTD-1 is broadly microbicidal in vitro, numerous lines of evidence suggested that in vivo efficacy is a function of RTD-1 immunomodulation of systemic inflammation. Studies show that RTD-1 homeostatically regulates LPS- and E. coli-stimulated release of TNFα by inhibiting tumor necrosis alpha converting enzyme (TACE; ADAM17) [61], as well as other proinflammatory cytokines by regulation of nuclear factor kappa B and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways [64]. These studies suggested that RTD-1 promotes survival in mouse models of sepsis by immunomodulation of the host response.
In a recent study, the candidacidal properties and fungicidal mechanisms of natural θ-defensin isoforms were evaluated, demonstrating that the peptides are broadly, though differentially, fungicidal against numerous Candida species including MDR resistant strains of C. albicans and C. auris [9]. RTD-1 killing of C. albicans was time and concentration dependent, and temporally correlated with yeast permeabilization, ATP release, and induction of fungal ROS [9]. RTD-1 was >200-fold more active than Hst5 in these studies, and was stable to fungal proteases that rapidly degraded Hst5 [9]. These findings are consistent with previous studies demonstrating the stability of RTD-1 in biological matrices [62]. Moreover, θ-defensins are extremely poor immunogens [63], suggesting that they, or analogs thereof, might have utility as systemically administered therapeutics.
Since RTD-1 was among the most potent and broadly anti-candidal θ-defensins in vitro [9], this peptide was evaluated for therapeutic efficacy in a mouse model of systemic candidiasis. Mice were challenged i.v. with drug sensitive or MDR C. albicans, and treated i.p. with 5 mg/kg of RTD-1 once daily for 7 days beginning 24 post infection [60]. RTD-1 was highly effective in promoting long term survival of mice infected with both C. albicans strains, and this was statistically equivalent to the effects of fluconazole and caspofungin in mice infected with drug sensitive C. albicans SC5314 [60]. In mice infected with MDR C. albicans 53264, endpoint analysis showed RTD-1 to be superior to both fluconazole and caspofungin [60]. In both infections, RTD-1 was highly effective in promoting fungal clearance, as determined by quantitation of renal fungal burden, and was more effective in promoting fungal clearance than fluconazole or caspofungin [60]. Moreover, RTD-1 treatment homeostatically restored dysregulated inflammatory responses, including chronically elevated granulocyte counts and inflammatory cytokines responses (TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-17) that occurred in sham-treated infected mice [60]. Interestingly, RTD-1 treatment produced a transient 3–4-fold increase in peripheral blood neutrophils in infected animals [60]. This may be significant given the importance of neutrophils in the host response to systemic fungal infection.
Analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters in RTD-1 treated mice revealed that the maximum plasma concentrations achieved in the multiple i.p. dosing scheme employed were less than 1% of that required to kill either organism in the presence of 50% mouse serum [60]. These data demonstrate that the effect of RTD-1 in resolving systemic candidiasis is not the result of direct fungal killing, but rather peptide-mediated augmentation of the host antifungal response. While the mechanistic details underlying the observed efficacy in vivo have yet to be revealed, a common feature of RTD-1 in multiple models is the modulation of dysregulated inflammation. This effect has been obtained in RTD-1 treatment of endotoxin-mediated lung injury [123], P. aeruginosa lung infection [119,124], and pulmonary inflammation in a murine model of SARS coronavirus infection [65]. These data suggest that cyclic θ-defensins represent a novel approach for developing HDPs as host directed agents that enhance the host response to fungal infection.

3.4. Immunomodulatory Peptides

The concept of host directed immunomodulation for treatment of infection has gained attention in recent years. Two examples are immunotherapeutic peptides, Raltecimod™ and Zadaxin™, both of which regulate systemic inflammation in the host. RaltecimodTM (AB103) developed by Atox Bio, is a CD28 mimetic that antagonizes CD28 cell signaling [66,67]. It is efficacious in mouse models of toxic shock, sepsis, and Gram negative bacterial peritonitis by promoting bacterial clearance and preventing septic shock. ZadaxinTM is a synthetic version of the 28 amino acid human peptide thymosin α 1. The peptide regulates multiple immune cell subsets by stimulating the production of cytokines and has been approved in 35 countries for treatment of hepatitis B and C and also shows promise for treatment of severe sepsis [68,69,70].

3.5. Antifungal Peptide Mimics

A promising approach, circumventing limitations of HDPs per se, has been the design and evaluation of HDP mimetics [71,125,126]. These nonpeptidic molecules, based on a meta-phenylene ethynylene core [127], a peptide mimic inspired by membrane binding properties of the frog skin peptide magainin II [128]. One analog, compound C4 (Table 3) was shown to permeabilize C. albicans yeast and hyphal cell membranes, inducing ATP release and propidium iodide uptake [71]. Further, C4 was fungicidal in vitro and in vivo and was highly efficacious in promoting long term survival of immunosuppressed mice challenged with C. albicans SC5314. Importantly, initial toxicity studies showed that C4 and related compounds have low in vitro and in vivo toxicities, demonstrating selectivity of a new class of antifungals [126].

4. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Despite warnings of emerging MDR fungal pathogens, such as C. auris, only recently have there been significant national and international efforts devoted to antimicrobial resistance, only a fraction of which has been focused on systemic mycoses. Nevertheless, pockets of the scientific community are employing novel strategies to develop the next class of antifungal agents and novel therapeutic approaches. In this regard, peptide mimetics certainly hold promise. Further, there is growing evidence that HDP-inspired peptides that augment the host antifungal response and modulate dysregulated inflammation will contribute to the list of possible therapeutic solutions urgently required. Given the remarkable increase of peptides entering clinical trials in recent years (https://webs.iiitd.edu.in/raghava/thpdb/index.html), there is reason to be optimistic that peptides and peptide mimics will contribute to a much needed expansion of the clinical anti-infective armamentarium.

Author Contributions

V.B., D.Q.T., A.J.O., and M.E.S. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

V.B., D.Q.T., A.J.O., and M.E.S. were supported in by grants from National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases grants (RO1 AI22931, RO1 AI125141, R44 AI142959), the Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UL1 TR000130), and National Cancer Institute (P30 CA014089). D.Q.T. receives salary support from Oryn Therapeutics, LLC.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Vasu Punj for bioinformatics assistance in generating peptide structures in Table 3.

Conflicts of Interest

M.E.S. is a founder and equity holder in Oryn Therapeutics, LLC. A.J.O and D.Q.T. hold equity in Oryn Therapeutics.

References

  1. Brown, G.D.; Denning, D.W.; Gow, N.A.; Levitz, S.M.; Netea, M.G.; White, T.C. Hidden killers: Human fungal infections. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4, 165rv113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Pfaller, M.A.; Diekema, D.J. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: A persistent public health problem. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 20, 133–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Yapar, N. Epidemiology and risk factors for invasive candidiasis. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2014, 10, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Pianalto, K.M.; Alspaugh, J.A. New Horizons in Antifungal Therapy. J. Fungi 2016, 2, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Robbins, N.; Wright, G.D.; Cowen, L.E. Antifungal Drugs: The Current Armamentarium and Development of New Agents. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Deray, G. Amphotericin B nephrotoxicity. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2002, 49 (Suppl. 1), 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Denning, D.W. Echinocandin antifungal drugs. Lancet 2003, 362, 1142–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Eschenauer, G.; Depestel, D.D.; Carver, P.L. Comparison of echinocandin antifungals. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2007, 3, 71–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Basso, V.; Garcia, A.; Tran, D.Q.; Schaal, J.B.; Tran, P.; Ngole, D.; Aqeel, Y.; Tongaonkar, P.; Ouellette, A.J.; Selsted, M.E. Fungicidal Potency and Mechanisms of theta-Defensins against Multidrug-Resistant Candida Species. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Howard, S.J.; Cerar, D.; Anderson, M.J.; Albarrag, A.; Fisher, M.C.; Pasqualotto, A.C.; Laverdiere, M.; Arendrup, M.C.; Perlin, D.S.; Denning, D.W. Frequency and evolution of Azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus associated with treatment failure. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2009, 15, 1068–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pfaller, M.A. Antifungal drug resistance: Mechanisms, epidemiology, and consequences for treatment. Am. J. Med. 2012, 125, S3–S13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pfaller, M.A.; Messer, S.A.; Boyken, L.; Rice, C.; Tendolkar, S.; Hollis, R.J.; Doern, G.V.; Diekema, D.J. Global trends in the antifungal susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans (1990 to 2004). J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 2163–2167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Walker, L.A.; Gow, N.A.; Munro, C.A. Fungal echinocandin resistance. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2010, 47, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Navalkele, B.D.; Revankar, S.; Chandrasekar, P. Candida auris: A worrisome, globally emerging pathogen. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2017, 15, 819–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Spivak, E.S.; Hanson, K.E. Candida auris: An Emerging Fungal Pathogen. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2018, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Clark, C.; Drummond, R.A. The Hidden Cost of Modern Medical Interventions: How Medical Advances Have Shaped the Prevalence of Human Fungal Disease. Pathogens 2019, 8, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Benedict, K.; Jackson, B.R.; Chiller, T.; Beer, K.D. Estimation of Direct Healthcare Costs of Fungal Diseases in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019, 68, 1791–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ciociola, T.; Giovati, L.; Conti, S.; Magliani, W.; Santinoli, C.; Polonelli, L. Natural and synthetic peptides with antifungal activity. Future Med. Chem. 2016, 8, 1413–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. BR Da Silva, L.; Taborda, C.P.; Nosanchuk, J.D. Advances in Fungal Peptide Vaccines. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mookherjee, N.; Brown, K.L.; Bowdish, D.M.; Doria, S.; Falsafi, R.; Hokamp, K.; Roche, F.M.; Mu, R.; Doho, G.H.; Pistolic, J.; et al. Modulation of the TLR-mediated inflammatory response by the endogenous human host defense peptide LL-37. J. Immunol. 2006, 176, 2455–2464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Zasloff, M. Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. Nature 2002, 415, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Boman, H.G. Peptide antibiotics and their role in innate immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1995, 13, 61–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Selsted, M.E.; Brown, D.M.; DeLange, R.J.; Harwig, S.S.; Lehrer, R.I. Primary structures of six antimicrobial peptides of rabbit peritoneal neutrophils. J. Biol. Chem. 1985, 260, 4579–4584. [Google Scholar]
  24. Selsted, M.E.; Szklarek, D.; Lehrer, R.I. Purification and antibacterial activity of antimicrobial peptides of rabbit granulocytes. Infect. Immun. 1984, 45, 150–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Chu, H.; Pazgier, M.; Jung, G.; Nuccio, S.P.; Castillo, P.A.; de Jong, M.F.; Winter, M.G.; Winter, S.E.; Wehkamp, J.; Shen, B.; et al. Human alpha-defensin 6 promotes mucosal innate immunity through self-assembled peptide nanonets. Science 2012, 337, 477–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Lemaitre, B.; Nicolas, E.; Michaut, L.; Reichhart, J.M.; Hoffmann, J.A. The dorsoventral regulatory gene cassette spatzle/Toll/cactus controls the potent antifungal response in Drosophila adults. Cell 1996, 86, 973–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Nizet, V.; Ohtake, T.; Lauth, X.; Trowbridge, J.; Rudisill, J.; Dorschner, R.A.; Pestonjamasp, V.; Piraino, J.; Huttner, K.; Gallo, R.L. Innate antimicrobial peptide protects the skin from invasive bacterial infection. Nature 2001, 414, 454–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Salzman, N.H.; Ghosh, D.; Huttner, K.M.; Paterson, Y.; Bevins, C.L. Protection against enteric salmonellosis in transgenic mice expressing a human intestinal defensin. Nature 2003, 422, 522–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wilson, C.L.; Ouellette, A.J.; Satchell, D.P.; Ayabe, T.; Lopez-Boado, Y.S.; Stratman, J.L.; Hultgren, S.J.; Matrisian, L.M.; Parks, W.C. Regulation of intestinal alpha-defensin activation by the metalloproteinase matrilysin in innate host defense. Science 1999, 286, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Samir, P.; Link, A.J. Analyzing the cryptome: Uncovering secret sequences. AAPS J. 2011, 13, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mookherjee, N.; Anderson, M.A.; Haagsman, H.P.; Davidson, D.J. Antimicrobial host defence peptides: Functions and clinical potential. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2020, 19, 311–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kavanagh, K.; Dowd, S. Histatins: Antimicrobial peptides with therapeutic potential. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2004, 56, 285–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Puri, S.; Edgerton, M. How does it kill?: Understanding the candidacidal mechanism of salivary histatin 5. Eukaryot. Cell 2014, 13, 958–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. De Prijck, K.; De Smet, N.; Rymarczyk-Machal, M.; Van Driessche, G.; Devreese, B.; Coenye, T.; Schacht, E.; Nelis, H.J. Candida albicans biofilm formation on peptide functionalized polydimethylsiloxane. Biofouling 2010, 26, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Pusateri, C.R.; Monaco, E.A.; Edgerton, M. Sensitivity of Candida albicans biofilm cells grown on denture acrylic to antifungal proteins and chlorhexidine. Arch. Oral Biol. 2009, 54, 588–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Zhu, J.; Luther, P.W.; Leng, Q.; Mixson, A.J. Synthetic histidine-rich peptides inhibit Candida species and other fungi in vitro: Role of endocytosis and treatment implications. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 2797–2805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Alalwani, S.M.; Sierigk, J.; Herr, C.; Pinkenburg, O.; Gallo, R.; Vogelmeier, C.; Bals, R. The antimicrobial peptide LL-37 modulates the inflammatory and host defense response of human neutrophils. Eur. J. Immunol. 2010, 40, 1118–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ciornei, C.D.; Sigurdardottir, T.; Schmidtchen, A.; Bodelsson, M. Antimicrobial and chemoattractant activity, lipopolysaccharide neutralization, cytotoxicity, and inhibition by serum of analogs of human cathelicidin LL-37. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 2845–2850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. den Hertog, A.L.; van Marle, J.; van Veen, H.A.; Van’t Hof, W.; Bolscher, J.G.; Veerman, E.C.; Nieuw Amerongen, A.V. Candidacidal effects of two antimicrobial peptides: Histatin 5 causes small membrane defects, but LL-37 causes massive disruption of the cell membrane. Biochem. J. 2005, 388, 689–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Filewod, N.C.; Pistolic, J.; Hancock, R.E. Low concentrations of LL-37 alter IL-8 production by keratinocytes and bronchial epithelial cells in response to proinflammatory stimuli. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2009, 56, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kai-Larsen, Y.; Agerberth, B. The role of the multifunctional peptide LL-37 in host defense. Front. Biosci. 2008, 13, 3760–3767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Luo, X.L.; Li, J.X.; Huang, H.R.; Duan, J.L.; Dai, R.X.; Tao, R.J.; Yang, L.; Hou, J.Y.; Jia, X.M.; Xu, J.F. LL37 Inhibits Aspergillus fumigatus Infection via Directly Binding to the Fungus and Preventing Excessive Inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Nagaoka, I.; Tamura, H.; Hirata, M. An antimicrobial cathelicidin peptide, human CAP18/LL-37, suppresses neutrophil apoptosis via the activation of formyl-peptide receptor-like 1 and P2X7. J. Immunol. 2006, 176, 3044–3052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Niyonsaba, F.; Ushio, H.; Nagaoka, I.; Okumura, K.; Ogawa, H. The human beta-defensins (-1, -2, -3, -4) and cathelicidin LL-37 induce IL-18 secretion through p38 and ERK MAPK activation in primary human keratinocytes. J. Immunol. 2005, 175, 1776–1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhang, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Sun, C.; Wang, Q.; Yang, Z.; Pan, X.; Zhu, M.; Xiao, W. The human cathelicidin LL-37 enhances airway mucus production in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 443, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Paredes-Gamero, E.J.; Martins, M.N.; Cappabianco, F.A.; Ide, J.S.; Miranda, A. Characterization of dual effects induced by antimicrobial peptides: Regulated cell death or membrane disruption. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1820, 1062–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Ahmad, I.; Perkins, W.R.; Lupan, D.M.; Selsted, M.E.; Janoff, A.S. Liposomal entrapment of the neutrophil-derived peptide indolicidin endows it with in vivo antifungal activity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1995, 1237, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Chaly, Y.V.; Paleolog, E.M.; Kolesnikova, T.S.; Tikhonov, I.I.; Petratchenko, E.V.; Voitenok, N.N. Neutrophil alpha-defensin human neutrophil peptide modulates cytokine production in human monocytes and adhesion molecule expression in endothelial cells. Eur. Cytokine Netw. 2000, 11, 257–266. [Google Scholar]
  49. Khine, A.A.; Del Sorbo, L.; Vaschetto, R.; Voglis, S.; Tullis, E.; Slutsky, A.S.; Downey, G.P.; Zhang, H. Human neutrophil peptides induce interleukin-8 production through the P2Y6 signaling pathway. Blood 2006, 107, 2936–2942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lillard, J.W., Jr.; Boyaka, P.N.; Chertov, O.; Oppenheim, J.J.; McGhee, J.R. Mechanisms for induction of acquired host immunity by neutrophil peptide defensins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 651–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Syeda, F.; Liu, H.Y.; Tullis, E.; Liu, M.; Slutsky, A.S.; Zhang, H. Differential signaling mechanisms of HNP-induced IL-8 production in human lung epithelial cells and monocytes. J. Cell. Physiol. 2008, 214, 820–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Biragyn, A.; Ruffini, P.A.; Leifer, C.A.; Klyushnenkova, E.; Shakhov, A.; Chertov, O.; Shirakawa, A.K.; Farber, J.M.; Segal, D.M.; Oppenheim, J.J.; et al. Toll-like receptor 4-dependent activation of dendritic cells by beta-defensin 2. Science 2002, 298, 1025–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kanda, N.; Kamata, M.; Tada, Y.; Ishikawa, T.; Sato, S.; Watanabe, S. Human β-defensin-2 enhances IFN-γ and IL-10 production and suppresses IL-17 production in T cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2011, 89, 935–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Niyonsaba, F.; Ushio, H.; Nakano, N.; Ng, W.; Sayama, K.; Hashimoto, K.; Nagaoka, I.; Okumura, K.; Ogawa, H. Antimicrobial peptides human beta-defensins stimulate epidermal keratinocyte migration, proliferation and production of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2007, 127, 594–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Vylkova, S.; Nayyar, N.; Li, W.; Edgerton, M. Human beta-defensins kill Candida albicans in an energy-dependent and salt-sensitive manner without causing membrane disruption. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Freitas, C.G.; Lima, S.M.F.; Freire, M.S.; Cantuaria, A.P.C.; Junior, N.G.O.; Santos, T.S.; Folha, J.S.; Ribeiro, S.M.; Dias, S.C.; Rezende, T.M.B.; et al. An Immunomodulatory Peptide Confers Protection in an Experimental Candidemia Murine Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Wieczorek, M.; Jenssen, H.; Kindrachuk, J.; Scott, W.R.; Elliott, M.; Hilpert, K.; Cheng, J.T.; Hancock, R.E.; Straus, S.K. Structural studies of a peptide with immune modulating and direct antimicrobial activity. Chem. Biol. 2010, 17, 970–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Lupetti, A.; Brouwer, C.P.; Bogaards, S.J.; Welling, M.M.; de Heer, E.; Campa, M.; van Dissel, J.T.; Friesen, R.H.; Nibbering, P.H. Human lactoferrin-derived peptide’s antifungal activities against disseminated Candida albicans infection. J. Infect. Dis. 2007, 196, 1416–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Lupetti, A.; Paulusma-Annema, A.; Welling, M.M.; Senesi, S.; van Dissel, J.T.; Nibbering, P.H. Candidacidal activities of human lactoferrin peptides derived from the N terminus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 3257–3263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Basso, V.; Tran, D.Q.; Schaal, J.B.; Tran, P.; Eriguchi, Y.; Ngole, D.; Cabebe, A.E.; Park, A.Y.; Beringer, P.M.; Ouellette, A.J.; et al. Rhesus Theta Defensin 1 Promotes Long Term Survival in Systemic Candidiasis by Host Directed Mechanisms. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 16905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Schaal, J.B.; Maretzky, T.; Tran, D.Q.; Tran, P.A.; Tongaonkar, P.; Blobel, C.P.; Ouellette, A.J.; Selsted, M.E. Macrocyclic theta-defensins suppress tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) shedding by inhibition of TNF-alpha-converting enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 2725–2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Schaal, J.B.; Tran, D.; Tran, P.; Osapay, G.; Trinh, K.; Roberts, K.D.; Brasky, K.M.; Tongaonkar, P.; Ouellette, A.J.; Selsted, M.E. Rhesus macaque theta defensins suppress inflammatory cytokines and enhance survival in mouse models of bacteremic sepsis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e51337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Schaal, J.B.; Tran, D.Q.; Subramanian, A.; Patel, R.; Laragione, T.; Roberts, K.D.; Trinh, K.; Tongaonkar, P.; Tran, P.A.; Minond, D.; et al. Suppression and resolution of autoimmune arthritis by rhesus theta-defensin-1, an immunomodulatory macrocyclic peptide. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0187868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Tongaonkar, P.; Trinh, K.K.; Schaal, J.B.; Tran, D.; Gulko, P.S.; Ouellette, A.J.; Selsted, M.E. Rhesus macaque theta-defensin RTD-1 inhibits proinflammatory cytokine secretion and gene expression by inhibiting the activation of NF-kappaB and MAPK pathways. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2015, 98, 1061–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wohlford-Lenane, C.L.; Meyerholz, D.K.; Perlman, S.; Zhou, H.; Tran, D.; Selsted, M.E.; McCray, P.B., Jr. Rhesus theta-defensin prevents death in a mouse model of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus pulmonary disease. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 11385–11390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Ramachandran, G.; Kaempfer, R.; Chung, C.S.; Shirvan, A.; Chahin, A.B.; Palardy, J.E.; Parejo, N.A.; Chen, Y.; Whitford, M.; Arad, G.; et al. CD28 homodimer interface mimetic peptide acts as a preventive and therapeutic agent in models of severe bacterial sepsis and gram-negative bacterial peritonitis. J. Infect. Dis. 2015, 211, 995–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ramachandran, G.; Tulapurkar, M.E.; Harris, K.M.; Arad, G.; Shirvan, A.; Shemesh, R.; Detolla, L.J.; Benazzi, C.; Opal, S.M.; Kaempfer, R.; et al. A peptide antagonist of CD28 signaling attenuates toxic shock and necrotizing soft-tissue infection induced by Streptococcus pyogenes. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 207, 1869–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Camerini, R.; Garaci, E. Historical review of thymosin alpha 1 in infectious diseases. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2015, 15 (Suppl. 1), S117–S127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. King, R.; Tuthill, C. Immune Modulation with Thymosin Alpha 1 Treatment. Vitam. Horm. 2016, 102, 151–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Pei, F.; Guan, X.; Wu, J. Thymosin alpha 1 treatment for patients with sepsis. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2018, 18, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Menzel, L.P.; Chowdhury, H.M.; Masso-Silva, J.A.; Ruddick, W.; Falkovsky, K.; Vorona, R.; Malsbary, A.; Cherabuddi, K.; Ryan, L.K.; DiFranco, K.M.; et al. Potent in vitro and in vivo antifungal activity of a small molecule host defense peptide mimic through a membrane-active mechanism. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 4353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Ryan, L.K.; Freeman, K.B.; Masso-Silva, J.A.; Falkovsky, K.; Aloyouny, A.; Markowitz, K.; Hise, A.G.; Fatahzadeh, M.; Scott, R.W.; Diamond, G. Activity of potent and selective host defense peptide mimetics in mouse models of oral candidiasis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 3820–3827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Zanetti, M. Cathelicidins, multifunctional peptides of the innate immunity. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2004, 75, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Frohm, M.; Agerberth, B.; Ahangari, G.; Stahle-Backdahl, M.; Liden, S.; Wigzell, H.; Gudmundsson, G.H. The expression of the gene coding for the antibacterial peptide LL-37 is induced in human keratinocytes during inflammatory disorders. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 15258–15263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Bals, R. Epithelial antimicrobial peptides in host defense against infection. Respir. Res. 2000, 1, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Agerberth, B.; Charo, J.; Werr, J.; Olsson, B.; Idali, F.; Lindbom, L.; Kiessling, R.; Jornvall, H.; Wigzell, H.; Gudmundsson, G.H. The human antimicrobial and chemotactic peptides LL-37 and alpha-defensins are expressed by specific lymphocyte and monocyte populations. Blood 2000, 96, 3086–3093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gudmundsson, G.H.; Agerberth, B.; Odeberg, J.; Bergman, T.; Olsson, B.; Salcedo, R. The human gene FALL39 and processing of the cathelin precursor to the antibacterial peptide LL-37 in granulocytes. Eur. J. Biochem. 1996, 238, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kahlenberg, J.M.; Kaplan, M.J. Little peptide, big effects: The role of LL-37 in inflammation and autoimmune disease. J. Immunol. 2013, 191, 4895–4901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Mania, D.; Hilpert, K.; Ruden, S.; Fischer, R.; Takeshita, N. Screening for antifungal peptides and their modes of action in Aspergillus nidulans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 7102–7108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Tsai, P.W.; Yang, C.Y.; Chang, H.T.; Lan, C.Y. Human antimicrobial peptide LL-37 inhibits adhesion of Candida albicans by interacting with yeast cell-wall carbohydrates. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Selsted, M.E.; Novotny, M.J.; Morris, W.L.; Tang, Y.Q.; Smith, W.; Cullor, J.S. Indolicidin, a novel bactericidal tridecapeptide amide from neutrophils. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 4292–4295. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  82. van Abel, R.J.; Tang, Y.Q.; Rao, V.S.; Dobbs, C.H.; Tran, D.; Barany, G.; Selsted, M.E. Synthesis and characterization of indolicidin, a tryptophan-rich antimicrobial peptide from bovine neutrophils. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 1995, 45, 401–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Selsted, M.E. A pocket guide to explorations of the defensin field. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2007, 13, 3061–3064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Selsted, M.E.; Ouellette, A.J. Mammalian defensins in the antimicrobial immune response. Nat. Immunol. 2005, 6, 551–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lehrer, R.I.; Ganz, T.; Szklarek, D.; Selsted, M.E. Modulation of the in vitro candidacidal activity of human neutrophil defensins by target cell metabolism and divalent cations. J. Clin. Investig. 1988, 81, 1829–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Alcouloumre, M.S.; Ghannoum, M.A.; Ibrahim, A.S.; Selsted, M.E.; Edwards, J.E., Jr. Fungicidal properties of defensin NP-1 and activity against Cryptococcus neoformans in vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1993, 37, 2628–2632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Segal, G.P.; Lehrer, R.I.; Selsted, M.E. In vitro effect of phagocyte cationic peptides on Coccidioides immitis. J. Infect. Dis. 1985, 151, 890–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Levitz, S.M.; Selsted, M.E.; Ganz, T.; Lehrer, R.I.; Diamond, R.D. In vitro killing of spores and hyphae of Aspergillus fumigatus and Rhizopus oryzae by rabbit neutrophil cationic peptides and bronchoalveolar macrophages. J. Infect. Dis. 1986, 154, 483–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Presicce, P.; Giannelli, S.; Taddeo, A.; Villa, M.L.; Della Bella, S. Human defensins activate monocyte-derived dendritic cells, promote the production of proinflammatory cytokines, and up-regulate the surface expression of CD91. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2009, 86, 941–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Van Wetering, S.; Mannesse-Lazeroms, S.P.; Van Sterkenburg, M.A.; Daha, M.R.; Dijkman, J.H.; Hiemstra, P.S. Effect of defensins on interleukin-8 synthesis in airway epithelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. 1997, 272, L888–L896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Brogden, K.A.; Ackermann, M.; McCray, P.B., Jr.; Tack, B.F. Antimicrobial peptides in animals and their role in host defences. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2003, 22, 465–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Tani, K.; Murphy, W.J.; Chertov, O.; Salcedo, R.; Koh, C.Y.; Utsunomiya, I.; Funakoshi, S.; Asai, O.; Herrmann, S.H.; Wang, J.M.; et al. Defensins act as potent adjuvants that promote cellular and humoral immune responses in mice to a lymphoma idiotype and carrier antigens. Int. Immunol. 2000, 12, 691–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Yang, D.; Chen, Q.; Chertov, O.; Oppenheim, J.J. Human neutrophil defensins selectively chemoattract naive T and immature dendritic cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2000, 68, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  94. Grigat, J.; Soruri, A.; Forssmann, U.; Riggert, J.; Zwirner, J. Chemoattraction of macrophages, T lymphocytes, and mast cells is evolutionarily conserved within the human alpha-defensin family. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 3958–3965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Diamond, G.; Zasloff, M.; Eck, H.; Brasseur, M.; Maloy, W.L.; Bevins, C.L. Tracheal antimicrobial peptide, a cysteine-rich peptide from mammalian tracheal mucosa: Peptide isolation and cloning of a cDNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 3952–3956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Selsted, M.E.; Tang, Y.Q.; Morris, W.L.; McGuire, P.A.; Novotny, M.J.; Smith, W.; Henschen, A.H.; Cullor, J.S. Purification, primary structures, and antibacterial activities of beta-defensins, a new family of antimicrobial peptides from bovine neutrophils. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 6641–6648. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  97. Lehrer, R.I. Primate defensins. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 727–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Meade, K.G.; O’Farrelly, C. beta-Defensins: Farming the Microbiome for Homeostasis and Health. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 3072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Garcia, J.R.; Krause, A.; Schulz, S.; Rodriguez-Jimenez, F.J.; Kluver, E.; Adermann, K.; Forssmann, U.; Frimpong-Boateng, A.; Bals, R.; Forssmann, W.G. Human beta-defensin 4: A novel inducible peptide with a specific salt-sensitive spectrum of antimicrobial activity. FASEB J. 2001, 15, 1819–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Diamond, G.; Russell, J.P.; Bevins, C.L. Inducible expression of an antibiotic peptide gene in lipopolysaccharide-challenged tracheal epithelial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 5156–5160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Jia, H.P.; Schutte, B.C.; Schudy, A.; Linzmeier, R.; Guthmiller, J.M.; Johnson, G.K.; Tack, B.F.; Mitros, J.P.; Rosenthal, A.; Ganz, T.; et al. Discovery of new human beta-defensins using a genomics-based approach. Gene 2001, 263, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Russell, J.P.; Diamond, G.; Tarver, A.P.; Scanlin, T.F.; Bevins, C.L. Coordinate induction of two antibiotic genes in tracheal epithelial cells exposed to the inflammatory mediators lipopolysaccharide and tumor necrosis factor alpha. Infect. Immun. 1996, 64, 1565–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Schroder, J.M.; Harder, J. Human beta-defensin-2. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 1999, 31, 645–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Singh, P.K.; Jia, H.P.; Wiles, K.; Hesselberth, J.; Liu, L.; Conway, B.A.; Greenberg, E.P.; Valore, E.V.; Welsh, M.J.; Ganz, T.; et al. Production of beta-defensins by human airway epithelia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 14961–14966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Zasloff, M. Inducing endogenous antimicrobial peptides to battle infections. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 8913–8914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Shi, J.; Zhang, G.; Wu, H.; Ross, C.; Blecha, F.; Ganz, T. Porcine epithelial beta-defensin 1 is expressed in the dorsal tongue at antimicrobial concentrations. Infect. Immun. 1999, 67, 3121–3127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Valore, E.V.; Park, C.H.; Quayle, A.J.; Wiles, K.R.; McCray, P.B., Jr.; Ganz, T. Human beta-defensin-1: An antimicrobial peptide of urogenital tissues. J. Clin. Investig. 1998, 101, 1633–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Joly, S.; Maze, C.; McCray, P.B., Jr.; Guthmiller, J.M. Human beta-defensins 2 and 3 demonstrate strain-selective activity against oral microorganisms. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 1024–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Krishnakumari, V.; Rangaraj, N.; Nagaraj, R. Antifungal activities of human beta-defensins HBD-1 to HBD-3 and their C-terminal analogs Phd1 to Phd3. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 256–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Semple, F.; Webb, S.; Li, H.N.; Patel, H.B.; Perretti, M.; Jackson, I.J.; Gray, M.; Davidson, D.J.; Dorin, J.R. Human beta-defensin 3 has immunosuppressive activity in vitro and in vivo. Eur. J. Immunol. 2010, 40, 1073–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Haney, E.F.; Straus, S.K.; Hancock, R.E.W. Reassessing the Host Defense Peptide Landscape. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Lee, A.C.; Harris, J.L.; Khanna, K.K.; Hong, J.H. A Comprehensive Review on Current Advances in Peptide Drug Development and Design. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Mansour, S.C.; Pena, O.M.; Hancock, R.E. Host defense peptides: Front-line immunomodulators. Trends Immunol. 2014, 35, 443–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Lehrer, R.I.; Cole, A.M.; Selsted, M.E. theta-Defensins: Cyclic peptides with endless potential. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 27014–27019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Tang, Y.Q.; Yuan, J.; Osapay, G.; Osapay, K.; Tran, D.; Miller, C.J.; Ouellette, A.J.; Selsted, M.E. A cyclic antimicrobial peptide produced in primate leukocytes by the ligation of two truncated alpha-defensins. Science 1999, 286, 498–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Tongaonkar, P.; Tran, P.; Roberts, K.; Schaal, J.; Osapay, G.; Tran, D.; Ouellette, A.J.; Selsted, M.E. Rhesus macaque theta-defensin isoforms: Expression, antimicrobial activities, and demonstration of a prominent role in neutrophil granule microbicidal activities. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2011, 89, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Garcia, A.E.; Osapay, G.; Tran, P.A.; Yuan, J.; Selsted, M.E. Isolation, synthesis, and antimicrobial activities of naturally occurring theta-defensin isoforms from baboon leukocytes. Infect. Immun. 2008, 76, 5883–5891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Tran, D.; Tran, P.; Roberts, K.; Osapay, G.; Schaal, J.; Ouellette, A.; Selsted, M.E. Microbicidal properties and cytocidal selectivity of rhesus macaque theta defensins. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 944–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Beringer, P.M.; Bensman, T.J.; Ho, H.; Agnello, M.; Denovel, N.; Nguyen, A.; Wong-Beringer, A.; She, R.; Tran, D.Q.; Moskowitz, S.M.; et al. Rhesus theta-defensin-1 (RTD-1) exhibits in vitro and in vivo activity against cystic fibrosis strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 71, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Brandt, C.R.; Akkarawongsa, R.; Altmann, S.; Jose, G.; Kolb, A.W.; Waring, A.J.; Lehrer, R.I. Evaluation of a theta-defensin in a Murine model of herpes simplex virus type 1 keratitis. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007, 48, 5118–5124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Seidel, A.; Ye, Y.; de Armas, L.R.; Soto, M.; Yarosh, W.; Marcsisin, R.A.; Tran, D.; Selsted, M.E.; Camerini, D. Cyclic and acyclic defensins inhibit human immunodeficiency virus type-1 replication by different mechanisms. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Yasin, B.; Wang, W.; Pang, M.; Cheshenko, N.; Hong, T.; Waring, A.J.; Herold, B.C.; Wagar, E.A.; Lehrer, R.I. Theta defensins protect cells from infection by herpes simplex virus by inhibiting viral adhesion and entry. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 5147–5156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Jayne, J.G.; Bensman, T.J.; Schaal, J.B.; Park, A.Y.J.; Kimura, E.; Tran, D.; Selsted, M.E.; Beringer, P.M. Rhesus Theta (theta)-Defensin-1 Attenuates Endotoxin-Induced Acute Lung Injury by Inhibiting Proinflammatory Cytokines and Neutrophil Recruitment. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Bensman, T.J.; Jayne, J.G.; Sun, M.; Kimura, E.; Meinert, J.; Wang, J.C.; Schaal, J.B.; Tran, D.; Rao, A.P.; Akbari, O.; et al. Efficacy of Rhesus Theta-Defensin-1 in Experimental Models of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lung Infection and Inflammation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Scott, R.W.; Tew, G.N. Mimics of Host Defense Proteins; Strategies for Translation to Therapeutic Applications. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2017, 17, 576–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Chowdhury, M.H.; Ryan, L.K.; Cherabuddi, K.; Freeman, K.B.; Weaver, D.G.; Pelletier, J.C.; Scott, R.W.; Diamond, G. Antifungal Potential of Host Defense Peptide Mimetics in a Mouse Model of Disseminated Candidiasis. J. Fungi 2018, 4, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Beckloff, N.; Laube, D.; Castro, T.; Furgang, D.; Park, S.; Perlin, D.; Clements, D.; Tang, H.; Scott, R.W.; Tew, G.N.; et al. Activity of an antimicrobial peptide mimetic against planktonic and biofilm cultures of oral pathogens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 4125–4132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Zasloff, M. Magainins, a class of antimicrobial peptides from Xenopus skin: Isolation, characterization of two active forms, and partial cDNA sequence of a precursor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1987, 84, 5449–5453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Table
Table 1. Annual worldwide fungal infections.
Table 1. Annual worldwide fungal infections.
Fungal DiseaseEstimated CasesMortality RateReferences
Candidiasis400,000/year10–75%[1,2,4]
Aspergillosis200,000/year30–95%[1,4]
Cryptococcosis1,000,000/year20–70%[1,4]
Table
Table 2. Approved antifungals for clinical usage.
Table 2. Approved antifungals for clinical usage.
Antifungal ClassFungal TargetsMechanism of ActionLimitationReferences
AzolesAspergillus, Candida, CryptococcusInterference with ergosterol biosynthesis via 14α-demethylase inhibitionFungistatic[4,5]
PolyenesAspergillus, Candida, Cryptococcus, Histoplasma, BlastomycesErgosterol extraction from plasma membraneToxicity[4]
EchinocandinsAspergillus, Candidaβ-1,3-glucan synthase inhibitionPoor oral bioavailability[7]
Table
Table 3. Representative host defense peptides (HDPs) and mimics.
Table 3. Representative host defense peptides (HDPs) and mimics.
CompoundSequence/StructureStructural MotifActivityReference/Database
Hst5
(histatin)		 Jof 06 00241 i001α-helixInternalized after binding to fungal cell wall. Induces oxidative stress, affects ionic balance and mitochondrial functionChemspider: 17289075
[33]
LL-37
(human cathelicidin)		 Jof 06 00241 i002α-helixDisrupts fungal membrane and modulates host responses in vitroPDB: 2K6O
[20,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]
Protegrin
(porcine cathelicidin)		 Jof 06 00241 i003Cysteine-rich β-sheet, two disulfide bridgesFungicidal in vitro, cytotoxic and hemolytic to mammalian cells PDB: 1PG1
[46]
Indolicidin
(bovine cathelicidin)		 Jof 06 00241 i004Extended chain containing five tryptophansAntifungal activity, toxic in mammalsPDB:1G89
[47]
HNP-1
(α-defensin)		 Jof 06 00241 i005Tri-disulfide stabilized β-sheet dominated monomers that from non-covalent dimersFungicidal in vitro, modulates host responses in vivo PDBE: 3hj2
[48,49,50,51]
HBD-2
(β-defensin)		 Jof 06 00241 i006Tri-disulfide stabilized monomers that from non-covalent dimersFungicidal in vitro, modulates host responses in vivoPDB:1FD4
[52,53,54,55]
IDR-1018
(bactenecin derivative)		 Jof 06 00241 i007α-helixModulates cytokines in bone marrow-derived macrophages stimulated with heat-killed C. albicans[56,57]
hLF1-11
(human lactoferrin cryptide)		 Jof 06 00241 i008First 11 N-terminal amino acids of the human lactoferrin loop peptideFungicidal in vitro, inhibits C. albicans filamentation and reduces TNFα and IL-6 in vivo[58,59]
RTD-1
(θ-defensin)		 Jof 06 00241 i009Tri-disulfide β-stranded macrocyclePermeabilizes fungal cells and induces oxidative stress in vitro, enhances fungal clearance in vivoPDB: 2LYF
[9,60,61,62,63,64,65]
AB103;
Raltecimod
(CD-28 mimetic)		 Jof 06 00241 i010D-Ala1, D-Ala10 CD-28 mimetic Modulates host responses in vivo Chemspider: 58828035
[66,67]
Zadaxin Jof 06 00241 i011α-helix; synthetic version of human peptide thymosin α 1Modulates host responses in vivoPDB: 2L9I
[68,69,70]
C4;
Compound 4
(mPE-derived)		 Jof 06 00241 i012Peptidomimetic derived from the magainin-inspired mPEDisrupt fungal cell membrane in vitro, fungicidal in oral and systemic candidiasis in vivo[71,72]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Basso, V.; Tran, D.Q.; Ouellette, A.J.; Selsted, M.E. Host Defense Peptides as Templates for Antifungal Drug Development. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 241. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jof6040241

AMA Style

Basso V, Tran DQ, Ouellette AJ, Selsted ME. Host Defense Peptides as Templates for Antifungal Drug Development. Journal of Fungi. 2020; 6(4):241. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jof6040241

Chicago/Turabian Style

Basso, Virginia, Dat Q. Tran, André J. Ouellette, and Michael E. Selsted. 2020. "Host Defense Peptides as Templates for Antifungal Drug Development" Journal of Fungi 6, no. 4: 241. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jof6040241

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop