Next Article in Journal
EUCAST Ibrexafungerp MICs and Wild-Type Upper Limits for Contemporary Danish Yeast Isolates
Next Article in Special Issue
Testing the Biocontrol Ability of a Trichoderma-Streptomycetes Consortium against Pyrrhoderma noxium (Corner) L.W. Zhou and Y.C. Dai in Soil
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Preharvest Natural Infection and Toxin Contamination in Food and Feed Safety in Maize, South-East Hungary, 2014–2021
Previous Article in Special Issue
Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Profiles of Different Trichoderma Species and Their Potential Application
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessing the Various Antagonistic Mechanisms of Trichoderma Strains against the Brown Root Rot Pathogen Pyrrhoderma noxium Infecting Heritage Fig Trees

1
School of Science, Technology and Engineering, The University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Dr, Sippy Downs, QLD 4556, Australia
2
Brisbane City Council, Program, Planning and Integration, Brisbane Square, Level 10, 266 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
3
Forest Industries Research Centre, The University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Dr, Sippy Downs, QLD 4556, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 24 July 2022 / Revised: 9 October 2022 / Accepted: 9 October 2022 / Published: 19 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Trichoderma-Plant Beneficial Interactions)

Abstract

:
A wide range of phytopathogenic fungi exist causing various plant diseases, which can lead to devastating economic, environmental, and social impacts on a global scale. One such fungus is Pyrrhoderma noxium, causing brown root rot disease in over 200 plant species of a variety of life forms mostly in the tropical and subtropical regions of the globe. The aim of this study was to discover the antagonistic abilities of two Trichoderma strains (#5001 and #5029) found to be closely related to Trichoderma reesei against P. noxium. The mycoparasitic mechanism of these Trichoderma strains against P. noxium involved coiling around the hyphae of the pathogen and producing appressorium like structures. Furthermore, a gene expression study identified an induced expression of the biological control activity associated genes in Trichoderma strains during the interaction with the pathogen. In addition, volatile and diffusible antifungal compounds produced by the Trichoderma strains were also effective in inhibiting the growth of the pathogen. The ability to produce Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), siderophores and the volatile compounds related to plant growth promotion were also identified as added benefits to the performance of these Trichoderma strains as biological control agents. Overall, these results show promise for the possibility of using the Trichoderma strains as potential biological control agents to protect P. noxium infected trees as well as preventing new infections.

1. Introduction

Fungi are the most dominant group of plant pathogens, causing some of the world’s most serious plant diseases on a wide range of crops and pose a continuous threat to global food security [1,2,3,4]. One such fungus is Pyrrhoderma noxium which causes the destructive plant disease known as brown root rot in tropical and sub-tropical regions, such as Africa, Asia, Central America, the Caribbean, Australia and Oceania. In the case of Australia, sub-tropical conditions in the state of Queensland (QLD) have been reported to facilitate the establishment of this disease [5]. Its highly invasive nature has already killed many significant trees including several heritage fig trees found in the public spaces of Brisbane city, the capital of QLD [5]. Infected trees in urban parks, along the roads and power lines are imposing a great risk to surrounding people and properties. This necessitated the need to identify suitable disease control measures to manage its spread.
One widely used strategy to manage fungal plant diseases is the utilisation of chemical fungicides. However, chemical-based control measures (fungicides and fumigants) are not environmentally friendly and the chemical residues can build-up in the food chain and cause negative effects on human health [5,6,7]. In recent years, the role of biological control agents (BCAs) has been getting more attention as alternative control measures over hazardous chemicals. Various Trichoderma species have been found to play important roles in managing many phytopathogenic fungi [8,9,10,11,12,13].
The antagonism by Trichoderma is proposed as a combination of direct and indirect mechanisms [14]. Some of these include the recognition of host signals by Trichoderma which appears to be an essential step for successful continuation of the mycoparasitism against pathogenic fungi [15]. Additionally, during the initial stages of direct mycoparasitism, Trichoderma coil around the pathogenic fungal hyphae or produces hook-shaped and appressorium-like structures [16,17]. Previous research has suggested that the coiling is mediated by the signals generated from the host, its surface structure, or the by-products of its initial degradation by Trichoderma [18,19].
Mechanical and enzymatic penetration of the pathogen by the Trichoderma are the next step of interaction. The enzymes, mainly chitinase (chit), β-glucanase (bgn) and protease (pra and prb) produced through the expression of biological control associated genes are involved in this step [20,21,22,23,24,25]. The expression of chit, bgn, pra and prb genes in Trichoderma were reported to be induced after physical contact between Trichoderma and the pathogen [26,27]. The cell wall degrading enzymes produced by the Trichoderma act synergistically and digest the host cell wall at the interaction site before penetration [28]. Trichoderma with the genes encoding chitinase, endo chitinase, β-1,3-glucanase and proteases were reported to have much stronger antifungal activity against a wide range of phytopathogens [24,26,27,29,30,31,32]. While the qid gene in Trichoderma is reported to be associated with the synthesis of cysteine-rich cell wall protein, cellular protection, adherence to hydrophobic surfaces and formation of specialised structures such as appressoria [23,33]. This gene was reported to be induced both before and after physical contact with the pathogen [26,27].
In addition, volatile and non-volatile compounds produced by Trichoderma are also capable of inhibiting the growth of pathogens [34]. A wide range of bioactive secondary metabolites produced by Trichoderma species are reported to show inhibitory effect on various phytopathogenic fungi including Alternaria alternata, Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium species, Pythium species, Rhizoctonia solani, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, and Ustilago maydis [35,36,37]. Mainly, pyrones, koninginins, viridins, nitrogen heterocyclic compounds, azaphilones, butenolides, hydroxy-lactones, diketopiperazines, isocyano metabolites and peptaibols compounds produced by Trichoderma species were reported to exhibit bioactivity against many phytopathogenic fungi [38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. The VOCs of Trichoderma species associated with antifungal ability, induce a defence response in plant and promote plant growth [49,50,51,52,53,54]. Volatile compounds (VOCs) released by the Trichoderma species were reported to directly inhibit the growth of pathogens or cause abnormal changes of pathogens [49,55]. The Trichoderma VOCs belong to various structural classes including mono-and sesquiterpenes, lactones, esters, alcohols, ketones or C8 compounds [56]. The alcohol compounds, mainly 3-methyl-1-butanol, 2-methyl-1-propanol and ethanol have been previously reported to be produced by different Trichoderma species [34,55,57,58].
Indirect mechanisms include competition for nutrients and space, plant growth promotion and induced systemic resistance to the plant [34,59]. The production of plant regulators by Trichoderma is an important mechanism often associated with stimulation of plant growth [60]. Previously conducted studies confirmed the IAA production ability of Trichoderma species including in T. asperellum, T. harzianum, T. pinnatum, T. longibrachiatum, T. asperelloides, T. virens, T. atrobrunneum, T. guizhouense, T. paratroviride, and T. simmonsii [61,62,63,64]. On the other hand, IAA produced by Trichoderma may cause physiological changes in the plant, such as cell wall-loosening and the release of nutrients. Subsequently assist the colonization of beneficial microorganisms [65,66]. These beneficial microorganisms can also compete with pathogens and limit their growth.
Iron is an essential component of various proteins and pigments for pathogenic fungi [67]. Trichoderma species produce a variety of siderophores, mainly related to the class hydroxamate to chelate the insoluble iron and make them unavailable to the pathogen [37,68]. Certain antagonistic strains of T. asperellum, T. atrobrunneum, T. atroviride, T. gamsii, T. hamatum, T. harzianum, T. polysporum, T. reesei, T. virens, T. paratroviride, T. pyramidale, T. rufobrunneum, T. thermophilum, T. viridulum, T. guizhouense and T. simmonsii were reported for siderophore production [37,63,69,70].
Thus, studying the antagonistic mechanisms of Trichoderma species against the pathogen in vitro gives insight into its effectivity as a biological control agent for environmental applications. Accordingly, two indigenous Trichoderma strains (#5001 and #5029) were tested to: (1) evaluate the antagonistic mechanisms of the strains against P. noxium strains; (2) study the expression of the biological control associated genes during their confrontation with P. noxium; (3) characterise the antifungal activity of volatile compounds emitted from these Trichoderma strains; (4) study the plant growth promoting traits of these Trichoderma strains which may be associated with plant growth promotion. Identification of effective biological control agent would protect the economically and culturally significant plants from P. noxium infection and also minimise the application of hazardous chemical control measures against this pathogen.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Genome Sequencing for the Molecular Identification of Trichoderma Strains

For the molecular identification, the Trichoderma strains (#5001 and #5029) were cultured on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA, Oxoid, Hampshire, UK) and incubated at 28 °C for 5 days prior to the DNA extraction. DNA extraction was performed using DNeasy Plant mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and following the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA samples were then sent to the Australian Genome Research Facility (AGRF) in Brisbane, QLD, for whole genome sequencing on NovaSeq 6000 platform. The data generated with the Illumina bcl2fastq pipeline version 2.20.0.422 were used in the downstream analysis.

2.1.1. Draft Genome Assembly

Sequencing was checked for quality using FastQC v0.11.9 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/; accessed on 15 January 2022). Trimmomatic 0.39, multithreaded command line tool was used for removing adapter sequences and the low quality reads were filtered out [71]. SPAdes 3.15.3, assembler was used for creating the genome assemblies with K-mer sizes of 21, 25, 33, 55, 77, 91 and 101 [72]. Completeness of the Trichoderma draft genome assembly was evaluated using BUSCO v. 5.1.3 against the asomycota database [73]. K-mer depth was calculated using Jellyfish version 2 [74] and K-mer-based estimates of genome size was generated using GenomeScope [75].

2.1.2. Assembly Preparation for Downstream Application

De novo genome annotation of both Trichoderma genomes were performed using GeneMark-ES [76] and AUGUSTUS [77] in Funannotate (v1.7.4) gene prediction pipeline (https://funannotate.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ accessed on 15 January 2022). Then, validated by mapping the RNAseq data of the reference strain T. reesei (PRJNA15571) to the genes to support the predictions. The newly annotated gene models were evaluated for completeness using BUSCO v5 in protein mode against the ascomycota_odb10 database.

2.1.3. Phylogenetic Tree

For the identification of the closest match of the Trichoderma strains # 5001 and 5029, protein sequences of 12 Trichoderma strains were analysed together with predicted protein sequences of Trichoderma strains # 5001 and #5029. The protein sequences of T. reesei (GCF 000167675.1), T. cornu-damae (GCA 020631695.1), T. arundinaceum (GCA 003012105.1), T. asperellum (GCF 003025105.1), T. atroviride (GCF 000171015.1), T. gamsii (GCF 001481775.2), T. virens (GCF 000170995.1), T. harzianum (GCF 003025095.1), T. lentiforme (GCA 011066345.1), T. simmonsii (GCA 019565615.1), T. guizhouense (GCA 002022785.1), T. semiorbis (GCA 020045945.2) and protein sequence of A. niger (GCF 000002855.3) as out group were downloaded from the GenBank database (as of December 2021). Protein sequences were analysed with OrthoFinder v. 2.3.8, which grouped them into orthogroups [78,79]. Gene families that contained only one gene for each species (single copy orthologs) were selected to construct a phylogenetic tree using FastTree program integrated in OrthoFinder [80]. The phylogenetic trees of the Trichoderma isolates were constructed by maximum likelihood method [81]. Finally, the tree was visualized using iTOL [82].

2.2. Microscopic Investigation of the Mycelial Interaction between P. noxium and Trichoderma Strains

The mycelial interaction between Trichoderma strains and P. noxium was observed under an automated upright microscope system (LEICA DM5500 B) [83]. The P. noxium plug was inoculated at 0.5 cm distance from a coverslip embedded into the PDA at a 45° angle. After two days of incubation, a plug of the strains #5001 and #5029 (separately) was placed 1 cm away from P. noxium on the plate and incubated for 2 days at 28 °C. Once both fungi were grown onto the coverslip, fungal mycelia were stained with lactophenol cotton blue and observed for the mycoparasitism-related structures produced by Trichoderma strains, e.g., coiling and appressorium-like structures.

2.3. Detection of the Antagonistic Activities of Trichoderma Strains against P. noxium Using a Dual Culture Assay

The antagonistic activity of Trichoderma strains (#5001 and #5029) was tested against five different P. noxium strains: A, B, D, E and F using a dual culture assay [84]. Trichoderma and P. noxium plugs were inoculated on a PDA plate away from each other [84]. Due to the slow growth rate, P. noxium was inoculated two days before the inoculation of Trichoderma strains. After two days, a Trichoderma plug was placed 2 cm from the edge of the P. noxium colony. As a control, the pathogen and the biological control agents (BCAs) were placed in a similar manner on a fresh PDA plate without reciprocal fungal inoculations and incubated at 28 °C for 5 days. All pairings were carried out in quadruplicate. Growth inhibition percentage for tested phytopathogenic fungi was determined [84].
Inhibition% = Colony   diameter   of   P .   n o x i u m   control   Colony   diameter   of   P . n o x i u m   treatment Colony   diameter   of   P .   n o x i u m   control 100

2.4. Assessing the Inhibitory Effect of Volatile Compounds Produced by Trichoderma on P. noxium Growth

To study the effect of volatile compounds of Trichoderma strains on P. noxium (A, B, D, E and F), the sandwich plate method described by Dennis and Webster, 1971b [85], was used. A Trichoderma plug (3 days old) was cultured on PDA medium and incubated for 4 days at 28 °C. After that, the lids of the Trichoderma culture plates were replaced by the PDA plates (bottom part) freshly inoculated with a P. noxium plug, sealed with three layers of parafilm, and incubated at 28 °C for 3 days. Controls of P. noxium were prepared by sandwiching with an un-inoculated PDA plate. All pairings were carried out in quadruplicate. Effect of volatile compounds produced by BCAs on the pathogen was evaluated by comparing the growth area of P. noxium in the treatment plates with the control plates [85].

2.5. Changes in the Volatile Compounds Produced by Trichoderma Strains before and after the Confrontation with P. noxium

To identify the volatile compounds produced by the pure cultures of Trichoderma strains (#5001 and #5029), each strain was prepared by placing 2 mm agar plugs in the center of a headspace vial (20 mL) containing PDA medium. To study the changes in the volatile compounds produced by Trichoderma strains during the interaction with pathogen, co-cultures were prepared by placing two 2 mm agar plugs of the strains #5001 and 5029 (separately) and P. noxium (strain B was used as representative of P. noxium) at the center of the headspace vial and incubating for 7 days at 28 °C [86]. Due to the slow growth rate, P. noxium was inoculated one day before the inoculation of Trichoderma. Pure cultures of P. noxium were also prepared in headspace vials and used for identifying the volatile compounds produced by P. noxium in the co-culture setup.
Uninoculated PDA medium was used as blank [86]. All the inoculated vials and controls were incubated for 7 days at 28 °C. Volatiles in the headspace of the above cultures were analyzed using Solid Phase Microextraction (SPME). Fibers (75 µm Carboxen/PDMS, Merck) were inserted in the headspace vial, and exposed for 15 min. Volatiles were desorbed from the fiber when it was injected into the inlet port and analyzed with a gas chromatograph (GC) (Agilent 6890 Series) coupled to a mass spectrometer (MS) (Agilent 5975) and fitted with a silica capillary column (Agilent, model HP5-MS, 30 m × 250 µm ID × 0.25 µm film thickness). Gas chromatograph conditions for acquiring data were—inlet temperature: 250 °C, carrier gas: helium at 51 cm/s, split ratio 13:1, transfer-line temperature: 280 °C, initial temperature: 40 °C, initial time: 2 min, rate: 10 °C/min, final temperature: 260 °C, final time: 6 min. The MS was held at 280 °C in the ion source and the scan rate was 4.45 scans/s. Tentative identities were assigned to peaks with respect to the National Institute of Standards and Technology mass spectral library. Mass spectra of peaks from different samples with the same retention time were compared to ensure that the compounds were indeed the same. Negative control results were compared with volatiles from blank PDA control and common substances were removed during interpretation of results.

2.6. Effect of Diffusible Compounds Produced by Trichoderma Strains on P. noxium

To examine the effects of diffusible (non-volatile) compounds produced by the strains # 5001 and #5029 on P. noxium growth, biological control agents and pathogen (P. noxium strain B) were co-cultured on PDA and incubated at 28 °C for 7 days. After the incubation period, culture medium was cut into small pieces and the diffusible compounds were extracted using ethyl acetate [87]. Three extractions were performed at 24-h intervals on a shaker at 120 rpm at 20 °C. All the extracts were filtered through a Whatman No. #1 filter paper [87]. The ethyl acetate extracts were concentrated on a rotary evaporator at room temperature and further evaporated using Genevac. The dried crude extracts were measured and dissolved in appropriate volume of ethyl acetate to get the concentrations of 500, 1000, 1500, 2500, 5000 and 10,000 ppm and used for fungicidal assay using paper disc diffusion technique [88].
To determine the fungicidal activity of the crude extract against P. noxium, an agar plug from a 3-day-old mycelial culture of P. noxium strain B was inoculated at the center of a fresh PDA plate. Two sterile disks were kept both sides of the inoculated plug at 2.5 cm distance. One of the disks was saturated with 100 µL of the crude extract and 10 µL of Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and the other disk was saturated with solvents (100 µL ethyl acetate and 10 µL DMSO) and used as the control. The plates were incubated at 28 °C for 5 days. The fungicidal activity of crude extract at different concentrations was assessed in terms of the area of fungal inhibition and expressed as the percentage of the inhibition of fungal growth as mentioned above. The fungicidal assay was performed with three replicates.

2.7. The Biocontrol-Associated Genes Expression in Trichoderma Strains during the Interaction with P. noxium

In order to study changes in the expression level of biological control related genes in Trichoderma strains (#5001 and #5029), a confrontation assay was conducted using P. noxium [22]. The strain B was used as the P. noxium representative in this study. Six biological control associated genes (chitinase 33 (chit), endochitinase 42 (endo), β-1,3-endoglucanase (bgn), trypsin-like protease pra1 (pra), subtilisin-like protease prb1 (prb) and QID74 protein (qid)) previously reported in Trichoderma spp. [27] for the expression upon pathogen confrontation were studied during the interaction between Trichoderma strains (#5001 and #5029) and P. noxium strain B. PDA plates were overlaid with cellophane and were inoculated with agar plaques of the P. noxium strain B and the strains # 5001 or #5029 (separately) as explained above and incubated for 3 days at 28 °C. The membrane was used to facilitate the removal of the Trichoderma mycelia at the contact point from the plate for RNA extraction [22,24]. For the controls, Trichoderma strains (#5001 and 5029) were grown alone on PDA plates at the same growth conditions, while the peripheral hyphae were used for RNA extraction.
For RNA extraction, mycelia (90 mg) of the Trichoderma strains #5001 and #5029 from the treatment and control plates were immediately placed in Eppendorf tubes with Zirconia silica beads (few of the 23 mm beads and a small quantity of 0.1 mm diameter beads) and frozen in liquid nitrogen for 30 s and then placed into a Qiagen TissueLyser adapter for efficient grinding for 40 s at 23,000 rpm. The liquid nitrogen freezing and grinding steps were repeated twice and the adapter positions were reversed in the TissueLyser each time. The ground mycelia were used for total RNA extraction using RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) as per manufacturer’s instructions. NanoDrop was used for RNA quantification.
Genomic DNA elimination step followed by cDNA synthesis was carried out using the reaction components provided in the QuantiTect® Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and following manufacturer’s instructions. The cDNA concentration was quantified using a NanoDrop. The changes in the expression level of biological control associated genes of Trichoderma during the confrontation with P. noxium was analysed using qPCR techniques. This method is widely used for the quantification of gene expression [22,24]. Biological control associated genes in strains #5001 and #5029 were identified via homology sequence search against the biological control genes of T. harzianum CBS 226.95 (V1.0) previously reported [24]. The mRNA of T. harzianum CBS 226.95 (V1.0) were obtained from Genbank (https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/genbank/ as of 15 December 2021) and the gene transcripts (chit, endo, bgn, pra, prb and qid) were identified via locating the specific primer sequences reported [24]. The identified transcripts of T. harzianum were individually BLAST against the blast library of mRNA sequences from the strains #5001 and #5029 created in Qiagen CLC Genomics Workbench version 20.0. The homology sequences (with lowest E-value and highest percentage of identity) in the transcript of Trichoderma strains #5001 and #5029 were selected for primer designing. The specific primers were designed using Primer 3 (http://primer3.ut.ee/ accessed on 15 January 2022) (Table S1) and manufactured by Merk (Australia). Quantitative real-time PCR was used for amplifying the transcripts from individual genes using QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Each reaction consisted of 10 μL QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR master mix, 1 μL each of forward and reverse primers (final concentration of 0.5 μM), 2 μL cDNA, and 6 μL Rnase-free water. qPCR conditions were: one cycle of initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 15 min to activate the HotStarTaq DNA Polymerase, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, annealing at 59 °C for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 30 s. High resolution melting (HRM) was carried out over the ranging from 65 °C to 95 °C with temperature increasing steps of 0.5 °C every 4 s. RNase-free water was used in non-template control [24].
Genes encoding elongation factor 1-α and β-actin were used as internal references for normalization of gene expression in Trichoderma [24,89]. Relative expression levels of individual genes were calculated from the threshold cycle using the Pfaffl method for efficiency correction [90]. A standard curve was generated to calculate the gene-specific PCR amplification efficiency and correlation coefficient for each gene [24].

2.8. Effect of Volatiles Produced by Trichoderma Strains on the Growth Parameters of Arabidopsis thaliana

The effect of VOCs of Trichoderma on plant growth parameters was studied using modified double plate-within-a-plate method described by Lee et al. 2016 [54]. Arabidopsis thaliana was used as model plant [54]. Two small Petri dishes (50 mm) with PDA were placed in a larger plate (140 mm) and 50 mL of Murashige and Skoog salt (MS) medium (pH 5.7) containing 3% sucrose and 0.7% agar was poured into the larger plate (Figure S3). A. thaliana seeds were surface sterilised for 5 min in 70% ethanol, soaked for 7 min in 10% sodium hypochlorite solution, and rinsed four times with distilled water. Finally, seeds were kept in distilled water and vernalized for 2 days at 4 °C in dark. Sterilised seeds were inoculated on MS media and incubated for 3 days. Ten germinated seeds selected from contamination free plates were reinoculated on the MS media portion established in the double plate-within-a-plate setup (Figure S3). In the meantime, small plates in the double plate-within-a-plate units were inoculated with 5 μL of a Trichoderma spore suspension (containing 1 × 106 spores). For controls, plants were exposed to the PDA alone. The VOCs mediated plant growth promotion is often associated with exposure period [54]. Therefore, this study was conducted for a period of 12 days to provide enough volatile exposure to the plants. All the plates were sealed and incubated at 25 °C. The experiment was performed in a complete randomized block design with 2 treatments (Trichoderma strains #5001 and #5029) and 1 negative control with 5 replicates (corresponding to 10 plants/plate).
The effect of VOCs on the growth parameters of A. thaliana was evaluated by comparing the fresh mass, shoot length, root length and total chlorophyll content of plants exposed to Trichoderma strains with unexposed plants. Ten plates were pooled and biomass was measured (n = 5, corresponding to 50 plants). Total chlorophyll content of A. thaliana was determined spectrophotometrically [54]. Fifty milligrams of shoots collected from each treatment were ground and submerged overnight in 100 μL of 80 % acetone in the dark at 4 °C. The following day, absorbance readings were measured at 645 nm (A645) and 663 nm (A663) using an EnSpire™ multimode plate reader [52,54]. The total chlorophyll content was calculated from the following equation [(8.02)(A663) + (20.2)(A645)]V/1000 × W, where V is volume and W is plant fresh mass [52,54].

2.9. Indole 3-Acetic Acid Production by Trichoderma Strains

The IAA producing ability of Trichoderma strains was studied in potato dextrose broth (PDB, Oxoid, Hampshire, UK) supplemented with l-tryptophan [91]. Filter (0.2 μm membrane filter, Whatman) sterilised tryptophan (0.2 % w/v) was incorporated after sterilising the media at 15 psi at 121 °C for 15 min. During the preparation of 0.2% l-tryptophan aqueous solution, a few drops of NaOH (1 M) was used for increasing solubility of tryptophan. After adding the l-tryptophan, culture medium pH was adjusted to 5.6 with filter sterilized HCl (1 M).
Culture flasks containing 50 mL of PDB broth with l-tryptophan were inoculated with two agar plugs removed from a 3-day old Trichoderma culture plate and the flasks were incubated at 28 °C at 120 rpm [92,93]. Cell-free culture filtrates collected on day 7 were used for testing the indole 3-acetic acid production. IAA was measured by mixing 1 mL of the cell-free culture filtrate with 2 mL of Salkowski reagent (2% 0.5 M FeCl3 in 35% HClO4) [94]. The reaction mixture was incubated at room temperature for 20 min and the absorbance was recorded at 530 nm in a UV-Vis spectrophotometer [95]. IAA produced by the Trichoderma was determined from the standard curve. The experiment was performed in triplicate, IAA produced by the Trichoderma strains are presented as mean values with a standard deviation of three replicates.

2.10. Siderophore Production by Trichoderma Strains

The siderophore production by Trichoderma strains was studied on universal siderophore assay medium using chrome azurol S (CAS). The medium was prepared according to the procedure described by Schwyn and Neilands, 1987 [96] and Louden et al. 2011 [97]. A culture plug removed from 3-day old Trichoderma plate was placed at the centre of CAS agar medium and incubated at 28 °C for 7 days. After the incubation period, plates were observed for evidence (orange halo) of siderophore production.

2.11. Statistics

The effect of total volatiles produced by Trichoderma strains on the growth of different P. noxium strains (A, B, D, E and F) were analysed via one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. The differences in inhibitory effect caused by the Trichoderma strains # 5001 and #5029 were compared using the paired t-test. Similarly, the inhibitory effect displayed by the Trichoderma strains on the growth of different P. noxium strains during the confrontation was studied using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. The differences in mycoparasitism caused by the Trichoderma strain # 5001 and #5029 were compared using the paired t-test. The effect of crude extract of Trichoderma strains on the growth of P. noxium strains B at different concentrations was analysed via one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. The differences in inhibitory effect caused by the crude extract of Trichoderma strains # 5001 and #5029 were compared using the paired t-test. The results from gene expression study were analysed using a Student’s t-test to compare the changes in expression levels between control and treatments. The effect of VOCs of Trichoderma strains on A. thaliana was compared between the strains and also with control via one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. The IAA and siderophore producing ability of the strains # 5001 and #5029 were compared using the paired t-test. All the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistics 26 [41].

3. Results

3.1. Molecular Identification of Trichoderma Strains via Whole Genome Sequencing

The Illumina sequencing generated 222 million, 150-bp paired-end reads for Trichoderma strain #5001 and 202 million, 150-bp paired-end reads for Trichoderma strain #5029. The genome of Trichoderma strain #5001 assembled in to 116 scaffolds with a total assembly length 32.126 Mb (N50 = 493.501 KB and N90 = 196.64 KB), a GC content of 53.33%, and a largest scaffold size of 1.473 Mb (Table 1). Based on Kmer-based genome size estimation size of the Trichoderma strain #5001 genome was 31,444,261 bp. In total, 8812 protein coding genes were predicted in the Trichoderma strain #5001 genome. The analysis showed the presence of 99% BUSCO completeness. Trichoderma strain #5029 genome consists of 85 scaffolds sequence with a total assembly length 32.132 Mb (N50 = 599.273 KB and N90 = 264.963 KB), a GC content of 53.33%, and a largest scaffold size of 1.76 Mb (Table 1). Genome size of Trichoderma strain #5029 was estimated as 31,502,229 bp. In total, 8969 protein coding genes were predicted in the Trichoderma strain #5029 genome. The analysis showed the presence of 99.06% BUSCO completeness. These assembly quality metrics indicate that we have achieved a high level of contiguity and completeness for both these genomes in comparison with other published assemblies.
The program OrthoFinder identified 158,696 gene clusters, from which 4653 orthologous genes were shared across all 15 Trichoderma species. From these shared gene clusters, 3059 orthologous genes present as single copies were used for the phylogenetic analysis. Trichoderma strain #5001 and #5029 form a distinct cluster with T. reesei (GCF 000167675.1) (Figure 1) indicating they are most closely related to T. reesei.

3.2. Microscopic Investigation of the Mycelial Interaction between P. noxium and Trichoderma Strains

During the interaction between Trichoderma strain #5001 (T) and P. noxium (P), Trichoderma coiled around the pathogen (Figure 2a) and formed appressoria like structures (Figure 2b). As observed with the strains #5001, the strain 5029 also used the similar mycoparasitic structures against P. noxium. Moreover, surface colonisation by Trichoderma on the host mycelia was also observed under the microscope (Figure 2c).

3.3. Detection of the Antagonistic Activities of Trichoderma Strains against P. noxium in Dual Culture Assay

The results show that the Trichoderma strains used in this study were effective in inhibiting P. noxium growth (Figure S1). The growth inhibition caused by Trichoderma strains was significantly different between P. noxium strains (F = 7.493, p < 0.001) (Figure 3a). The growth inhibition caused by the strains #5001 on P. noxium was significantly (p = 0.04) higher than the inhibition caused by the strain #5029. The growth inhibition caused by the strain #5001 on P. noxium strain B was significantly higher (F = 15.391, p < 0.001) than P. noxium A (62%), D (60%), E (60%) and F (60%). Whereas the inhibition caused by the strain #5029 on P. noxium strains B and A was significantly higher (F = 17.7, p < 0.001) than the strains E (67%), F (65%) and minimum in D (61%) (Figure 3a).

3.4. Inhibitory Effect of Volatile Compounds of Trichoderma Strains on P. noxium Growth

The results show that P. noxium growth was inhibited by the volatile compounds emitted by the Trichoderma strains. The growth inhibition caused by the volatile compounds of Trichoderma strains was significantly different between P. noxium strains (F = 3.104, p = 0.033) (Figure 3b). The inhibition caused by the strain #5001 was not significantly different (p = 0.924) from the inhibition caused by the strain #5029. The growth inhibition caused by the VOCs of the strain #5001 on P. noxium strains B and E was significantly higher (F = 4.886, p = 0.019) than the inhibition on P. noxium strains A (58%), D (53%) and minimum in F (49%). Whereas the inhibition caused by the VOCs of the strain #5029 on P. noxium strain B was significantly higher (F = 5.99, p = 0.010) than strain F (56.9%), D (56.12%), A (55.2%) and minimum in E (52.9%) (Figure 3b).

3.5. Changes in the Volatile Compounds Produced by Trichoderma Strains before and after the Confrontation with P. noxium

The volatile compounds produced by strain #5001 before and after confrontation with P. noxium strain B are shown in Table 2 and Figure 4, whereas volatile compounds produced by strain #5029 before and after confrontation with P. noxium strain B are shown in Table 2 and Figure 5. The compounds identified in pure cultures of Trichoderma strains and in co-culture treatments were members of the compound classes; alcohol, aldehyde, ester, diterpenoid alcohol and sesquiterpene (Table 2). A total of 21 compounds were tentatively identified using the NIST library for the pure culture of strain #5001 (Table 2), whereas 19 compounds were identified in co-culture set up of strain #5001–P. noxium. On the other hand, a total of 19 compounds were identified for the pure culture of strain # 5029, while 18 compounds were identified in co-culture set up of strain #5029-P. noxium. The volatile profiles of the strain #5001 and co-culture of the strain #5001–P. noxium were, nearly the same: 16 of 21 compounds were in common. Similarly, 15 of 19 compounds from the strain #5029 were detected in the emission profile of co-culture of strain #5029–P. noxium. On the other hand 13 out of 16 compounds seen in a pure P. noxium culture, furan, β- necoclovene, aristolene, thujopsene, 2-isopropenyl-4a,8,dimethyl-1,2,3,4a,5,6,7-octahydronaphthalene, δ-gurjunene, β-elemene, β-caryophyllene, 8-isopropenyl-1,5-dimethyl-cyclodeca-1,5-diene, cadiene, elixene and a unidentified sesquiterpene (Figure S2 and Table S2) were not detected in the co-cultures of P. noxium- strain #5001 or in the co-cultures of P. noxium—strain #5029. Overall, co-culture profiles showed high similarity with the profile of the Trichoderma strains rather than of P. noxium (Table 2 and Figure 4 and Figure 5). This confirmed the inhibitory effect of Trichoderma strains on P. noxium growth in the co-culture set up.
The most dominant volatile compound produced by the pure cultures of strain # 5001 and #5029 was ethanol, at a retention time of 1.02 min with relative percent area of 22.72% and 31.18%, respectively, (Table 2, Figure 4 and Figure 5), While, the relative percentage area of ethanol was increased to 33.98% and 36.3%, respectively in the co-culture setup of the strain #5001–P. noxium and strain #5029–P. noxium. The second most dominant compound produced by the strain #5001 and #5029 was β-cedrene, at 11.72 min with relative percent area of 19.95% and 18.31%, respectively. The emission of β-cedrene was slightly reduced to 19.28% and 16.5% in the co-culture of strain #5001–P. noxium and in the co-culture of strain #5029–P. noxium, respectively. In addition, isobutanol produced by pure cultures of strains #5001 and #5029, at retention time of 1.33 min with relative percent area of 7.90% and 6.60%, respectively, was also reduced to 4.24% in the co-culture of strain #5001–P. noxium and 4.53% in the co-culture of strain #5029–P. noxium. There were three new sesquiterpene compounds (α-copaene, β-himachalene, α-longipinene) detected in the co-culture set up of the strain #5001-P. noxium and in the cultures of the strain #5029-P. noxium were not detected when the strains were grown alone (Table 2, Figure 4 and Figure 5). α-cubebene and acoradiene were unique in the co-culture set up of strain #5001–P. noxium, whereas 2-methylbutyl acetate was unique in the co-culture assay of strain #5029–P. noxium.

3.6. Effect of Diffusible Compounds of Trichoderma Strains on P. noxium Growth

The diffusible compounds emitted by the Trichoderma strains showed growth inhibition on P. noxium strain B (Figure 3c). The growth inhibition caused by the crude extract was significantly different (F = 815.24, p < 0.001) among the tested concentration. The inhibition caused by the crude extracts of the strain #5001 was not significantly different from the inhibition by the extracts of strain #5029 (p = 0.58). The inhibition caused by the crude extract of the strain #5001 (F = 536.84, p < 0.001) and #5029 (F = 499.85, p < 0.001) were significantly high at 10,000 ppm compared to other tested concentrations. Whereas the lowest inhibition by the extracts from both the strains was observed at 500 ppm (Figure 3c).

3.7. The Biocontrol-Associated Genes Expression in Trichoderma Strains during the Interaction with P. noxium Strain B

The gene expression levels measured between the strains were significantly different (p < 0.04). Expression of chit was higher than other biological control related genes expression levels measured in both Trichoderma strains (Figure 6). Particularly, relative expression of chit gene was increased by 11.6 times in Trichoderma strain 5029 and by 8.4 times in Trichoderma strain #5001 (Figure 6), While relative expression of endo, bgn, pra, prb and qud genes were increased by 3.3, 2.5, 3.1 and 2.9 times, respectively in Trichoderma strain 5001 and by 1.5, 4.4, 2.4 and 2 times, respectively in Trichoderma strain #5029 (Figure 6). The chit, qid and bgn genes of Trichoderma strain #5029 were expressed at 1.38, 3.13 and 1.74 times higher, respectively, than expressions detected in Trichoderma strain #5001 (Figure 6). Whereas endo, pra and prb genes of the strain #5001 expressed 2.2, 1.3 and 1.4 times higher, respectively, than expression measured in Trichoderma strain #5029 (Figure 6).

3.8. Effect of Volatiles Produced by Trichoderma Strains on the Growth Parameters of Arabidopsis thaliana

The plants from the shared atmosphere with the Trichoderma strains showed improved growth than control plants (Figure S3). The root length of the plants, which shared the space with the strains #5001 and #5029 were significantly (F = 1986.4, p < 0.001) higher than control plants (Figure 7). Similarly, shoot length (F = 3362.7, p < 0.001), chlorophyll content (F = 41.7, p < 0.001) and fresh mass (F = 565, p < 0.001) were also significantly improved in the plants which shared the space with the strains #5001 and #5029 (Figure 7). The root length and chlorophyll content measured different from control (F = 1986.4, p < 0.001) but were not significantly different between the treatments of the strain #5001 and #5029 (Figure 7). However, shoot length and fresh mass measured in the treatment of Trichoderma strain #5001 was significantly (F = 1986.4, p < 0.001) higher than the strain # 5029 (Figure 7).

3.9. Indole 3-Acetic Acid Production by Trichoderma Strains

Both of the strains used in this study produced IAA in the l-tryptophan supplemented media. The IAA produced by the strain #5029 (6.13 ± 0.31 µg/mL) was significantly higher (p = 0.03) than the IAA produced by the strain #5001 (4.49 ± 0.19 µg/mL).

3.10. Siderophore Production by Trichoderma Strains

Visible orange halo formation surrounding the Trichoderma growth on CAS agar media indicate that both the strains produced siderophores on CAS agar media. Halo zone developed by the strain #5029 (18.33 ± 0.5 cm2) was significantly larger (p = 0.017) than the strain #5001 (14.2 ± 0.45 cm2), indicating that the siderophores production by the strain #5029 was most efficient than the strain #5001 (Figure 8).

4. Discussion

Overall results indicate that Trichoderma strains used possessed different mechanisms that provided effective antagonism against Pyrrhoderma noxium. The Trichoderma strains used in this study produced coil around P. noxium, while the flattened, enlarged hyphal tips produced by the strains might involve in the direct penetration and ultimately, lead to leakage of cytoplasm and death. Findings also confirm that the strains #5001 and #5029 can grow faster and easily compete for space and nutrients with the slower growing P. noxium, which can thus lead to the elimination of the pathogen as previously reported by other researchers [98,99,100,101].
The induced expression of qid genes in the strains #5001 and #5029 indicate that Trichoderma strains were able to sense the presence of P. noxium and prepared for defense by protecting their cell wall from the lytic enzymes of P. noxium. Similar observations were also made for T. harzianum against F. solani and T. virens against F. oxysporum [23,24]. While induced expression of chit and endo genes in Trichoderma strains #5001 and #5029 indicate that chitinolytic enzymes produced by the strains possibly played a significant role in inhibiting the growth of P. noxium (Figure 6). The induced expression of chitinase encoding gene in recombinant T. harzianum strain was previously reported to increase its antagonizing activity against R. solani [21]. Similarly, expression of chitinase gene (chi46) of Trichoderma reesei PC-3-7 in E. coli showed lytic activity against the cell wall of Fusarium oxysporum [102]. In a different study, induced expression of endo and chit genes were detected in T. harzianum, when it was cultured in the medium supplement with inactivated F. solani cell wall [26]. Therefore, the induced expression of the genes encoding the chitinase and endochitinases in the strains #5001 and #5029 may be associated with degradation of chitin in the cell wall of P. noxium.
Over expression of prb and pra in the strains #5001 and #5029 indicate that proteinases may play an important role in biological control by the Trichoderma strains used in the study (Figure 6). Induced expression of subtilisin-like protease prb1 gene was previously detected in T. harzianum transformants during the confrontation with Rhizoctonia solani and also in the presences of cell walls of R. solani [29]. Moreover, in a greenhouse study, these transformants significantly reduced the disease caused by R. solani in cotton plants [29]. Similarly, the expression of trypsin-like protease pra1 gene was previously reported in T. atroviride during physical contact with R. solani [103]. Therefore, induced expression of the gene encoding the proteases in the strains #5001 and #5029 may degrade the protein components in the cell wall of P. noxium and cause cell lysis.
The crude extracts of Trichoderma strains #5001 and #5029 were effective in inhibiting the growth of P. noxium (Figure 3c). However, further studies are underway to identify the antifungal metabolites present in the crude extracts of the strains #5001 and #5029. In this study, the VOCs of the strains #5001 and #5029 were also efficient in inhibiting the growth of P. noxium (Figure 3b), therefore these strains may be able to be used as a biofumigation source to manage P. noxium over the application of toxic fungicides. Similarly, an inhibitory effect by the VOCs of T. atroviride, T. harzianum and T. virens on P. noxium was reported by Schwarze et al. 2012 [5] and Burcham et al., 2017 [104]. Inhibitory effects of VOCs of T. reesei on Colletotrichum capsici, Aspergillus flavus, A. niger, Cladosporium cucumerium, Fusarium solani, F. udum, Rhizoctonia solani, Rhizoctonia bataticola, Rhizopus stolonifera and Pythium species have also been observed by several researchers [105,106].
The VOC profiles of the strains #5001 and #5029 were dominated by sesquiterpenes. These results were also aligned with Guo, (2020) study [107], where 52.69% of the volatile profile of T. reesei QM6a was dominated by sesquiterpenes. Sesquiterpenes compounds are lipophilic compounds, therefore can cause osmotic control failure in cell membranes of competitors [108]. On the other hand, they can also act as a solvent to facilitate the transportation of toxic compounds through the membrane into the cell [108]. It remains to be determined if any of these sesquiterpenes inhibit P. noxium. However, sesquiterpenes from a number of Trichoderma species have been reported to have antibacterial and antifungal activities [109,110,111]. The second most dominant VOC detected in this study was β–cedrene and this compound produced by T. longibrachiatum was reported for antifungal activity against C. lagrnarium and B. cinerea [112,113]. Cedrene production by T. harzianum, T. hamatum, T. reesei and T. velutinum was also documented by researchers [107,108,114]. The β–cedrene produced by the strains # 5001 and # 5029 may have antifungal properties, and this finding is worthy of further studies. The 3-methyl-1-butanol, 2-methyl-1-propanol, ethanol and ester compound detected in this this study were also produced by various Trichoderma species and reported to have antimicrobial activity [54,55,58,115,116,117,118].
The lipophilic VOCs such as 3-methyl-1-butanol and 2-methyl-1-propanol have high affinity for plasma membrane, therefore they are more toxic to the microorganisms than ethanol [119]. The 3-methyl-1-butanol and 2-methyl-1-propanol from T. atroviride were reported to have antifungal activity against P. infestans [55]. Ethanol detected in the volatile profile of T. asperellum, T. aggressivum, T. longibrachiatum, T. pseudokoningiihave, T. stromaticum, T. virens, T. atroviride and T. pseudokoningiihave was reported for antifungal activity at high concentrations [54,55,58,117,118].
Compared to monocultures, co-cultivation settings were found to induce specific changes in the fungal VOC emissions, indicating that there is an interaction between P. noxium and Trichoderma strains. Similar results were observed during the interaction between T. hamatum and Laccaria bicolor [114]. Altered VOC profiles were also observed during the interaction between A. alternata with F. oxysporum and L. bicolor with T. harzianum, T. hamatum and T. velutinum [114,120]. Production of new VOCs and concentration changes in co-culture settings may be required for the inhibition of a competitor. 13 out of 16 compounds seen in a pure P. noxium culture (Figure S2 and Table S2) were not detected in the co-cultures of strain #5001–P. noxium or in the co-cultures of strain #5029–P. noxium. Overall, co-culture profiles showed high similarity with the profile of the Trichoderma strains rather than of P. noxium (Table 2 and Figure 4 and Figure 5). This confirmed the inhibitory effect of Trichoderma strains on the growth of P. noxium growth in the co-culture set up and also the inhibitory effect on the production of P. noxium’s volatile compounds. Therefore, the new compounds detected in the co-culture set were high, likely produced by Trichoderma strains.
In addition to the antifungal property, VOCs of Trichoderma species were also reported to be associated with plant growth promotion [50,51,52,53,54]. This study clearly shows that VOCs from the strains #5001 and #5029 were effective in increasing the plant biomass, chlorophyll content, shoot and root length (Figure 7). Similar results were reported for the VOCs of T. atroviride, T. virens and T. asperellum on growth parameters of A. thaliana [60] and T. viride on tomato seedlings [54]. The results obtained in this study contrast the results reported by Nieto-Jacobo et al. 2017 [60], where VOCs of T. reesei did not show any effects on plants. This contrasting result may be due to the shorter volatile exposure period, the media used for growing Trichoderma (MS media) and strain specificity.
Microbial VOCs including sesquiterpenes, 6-pentyl-α-pyrone (6-PP), 3-methyl-1-butanol and 2-methyl-1-butanol were previously reported to be associated with plant growth promotion [50,51,52,53]. Cedrene from T. guizhouense was associated with lateral root formation and primary root elongation in A. thaliana [121]. Similarly, 6-PP from T. atroviride was reported to induce the lateral root formation in A. thaliana [122]. The production of 3-methyl-1-butanol and 2-methyl-1-butanol were also reported to improve plant size and chlorophyll concentration [50,52]. During this study, 6-PP was not detected, therefore, possibly 3-methyl-1-butanol, 2-methyl-1-butanol and sesquiterpenes mainly α–cedrene produced by Trichoderma strains #5001 and #5029 were involved in the plant promotion observed in A. thaliana.
The Trichoderma strains used in this study also produced siderophores. Therefore, if these strains were used in the environmental applications they might possibly compete and suppress the growth of P. noxium via rapidly acquired available iron before the pathogen. Furthermore, siderophores producing Trichoderma species were also reported to help the transformation of insoluble Fe3+ to plant absorbable Fe2+ and boosts the plant uptake [37,63,64], while, the IAA produced by the Trichoderma strains #5001 and #5029 may asset the recovery of P. noxium infected trees via modifying the root architecture, resulting in development of new roots which aid the efficient nutrient and water uptake by the plant

5. Conclusions

Mycoparasitic ability of Trichoderma strains #5001 and #5029 against P. noxium was confirmed and the results showed that during the initial stage of interaction Trichoderma hyphae often coil around the P. noxium and attach to the host via appressorium like structure. After these mycelial interactions, the genes related to the production of cell wall degrading enzymes are expressed and facilitate the penetration of Trichoderma hyphae through the P. noxium cell wall. Similarly, the volatile and diffusible compounds produced by Trichoderma strains also played significant roles in inhibiting the growth of P. noxium. It is conceivable that, during the interaction between Trichoderma and P. noxium, all these mechanisms may be operative simultaneously in order to inhibit the growth of the pathogen. The ability of Trichoderma strains to produce IAA and siderophores indicate the possibility of these biological control agents to promote plant growth in environmental applications. The overall study confirmed that Trichoderma strains can be used as potential biological control agents against P. noxium in environmental applications especially for protection of heritage fig trees.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/jof8101105/s1, Figure S1: Growth inhibitory effect of the (b) Trichoderma strain #5001, (c) strain #5029 on P. noxium strain B after 5 days of inoculation in dual culture (T: Trichoderma and P: P. noxium), (a) P. noxium strain B grown alone; Figure S2: Chromatogram of volatile compounds produced by strain B (above zero level); chromatogram of volatile compounds detected in the PDA media control (below zero level). Numbers refer to compounds listed in Table S2; Figure S3: Effect of volatile compounds on the growth of Arabidopsis thaliana in a shared atmosphere with Trichoderma strains #5001 and #5029 for 12 days. (a) Control plants exposed to PDA medium, (b) plants exposed to Trichoderma strain #5001 and (c) plants exposed to the strain #5029; Table S1: Primer pairs used for gene expression analysis by qPCR technique; Table S2: Volatile compounds produced by strain B tentatively identified through SPEM GC/MS analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.P., D.İ.K., A.S. and K.F.; methodology, H.P., D.P., B.L.Q., S.N., R.A.H. and C.A.; software, H.P.; validation, H.P.; formal analysis, H.P.; investigation, H.P.; resources, H.P., K.F., R.T., D.İ.K. and A.S.; data curation, H.P.; writing—original draft preparation, H.P. and D.İ.K.; writing—review and editing, all authors; visualization, H.P.; supervision, D.İ.K., A.S. and K.F.; project administration, D.İ.K. and A.S.; funding acquisition, K.F. and R.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We acknowledge Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship (USC-001) and Brisbane City Council (R22_0098) for their financial assistances for this research.

Data Availability Statement

Data are provided in the Supplementary Materials. Genome data of Trichoderma strain #5001 (SAMN30380231) and #5029 (SAMN30380232) were deposited in NCBI BioProject under reference number: PRJNA870600. ITS sequences of P. noxium strain A, B, D, E and F were deposited under GenBank accession numbers: OP430849, OP430850, OP430851, OP430852 and OP430853, respectively.

Acknowledgments

Authors thank Louisa Parkinson and Elizabeth Dann, QAAFI, UQ for providing P. noxium and Trichoderma strains used in the study as part of their collaboration with the Brisbane City Council.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Strange, R.; Scott, P. Plant Disease: A Threat to Global Food Security. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2005, 43, 83–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chandrasekaran, M.; Thangavelu, B.; Chun, S.C.; Sathiyabama, M. Proteases from phytopathogenic fungi and their importance in phytopathogenicity. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2016, 82, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Almeida, F.; Rodrigues, M.L.; Coelho, C. The Still Underestimated Problem of Fungal Diseases Worldwide. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Dietzel, K.; Valle, D.; Fierer, N.; U’Ren, J.M.; Barberán, A. Geographical Distribution of Fungal Plant Pathogens in Dust Across the United States. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 7, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Schwarze, F.W.M.R.; Jauss, F.; Spencer, C.; Hallam, C.; Schubert, M. Evaluation of an antagonistic Trichoderma strain for reducing the rate of wood decomposition by the white rot fungus Phellinus noxius. Biol. Control 2012, 61, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Schubert, M.; Fink, S.; Schwarze, F.W.M.R. Evaluation of Trichoderma spp. as a biocontrol agent against wood decay fungi in urban trees. Biol. Control 2008, 45, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rather, I.A.; Koh, W.Y.; Paek, W.K.; Lim, J. The Sources of Chemical Contaminants in Food and Their Health Implications. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Benítez, T.; Rincón, A.M.; Limón, M.C.; Codón, A.C. Biocontrol mechanisms of Trichoderma strains. Int. Microbiol. 2004, 7, 249–260. [Google Scholar]
  9. Verma, M.; Brar, S.K.; Tyagi, R.D.; Surampalli, R.Y.; Valéro, J.R. Antagonistic fungi, Trichoderma spp.: Panoply of biological control. Biochem. Eng. J. 2007, 37, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wijesinghe, C.J.; Wijeratnam, R.S.W.; Samarasekara, J.K.R.R.; Wijesundera, R.L.C. Development of a formulation of Trichoderma asperellum to control black rot disease on pineapple caused by (Thielaviopsis paradoxa). J. Crop Prot. 2011, 30, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Waghunde, R.; Shelake, R.; Sabalpara, A. Trichoderma: A significant fungus for agriculture and environment. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2016, 11, 1952–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kumar, M.; Ashraf, S. Role of Trichoderma spp. as a Biocontrol Agent of Fungal Plant Pathogens. In Probiotics and Plant Health; Kumar, V., Kumar, M., Sharma, S., Prasad, R., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2017; pp. 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Adnan, M.; Islam, W.; Shabbir, A.; Khan, K.A.; Ghramh, H.A.; Huang, Z.; Chen, H.Y.H.; Lu, G.D. Plant defense against fungal pathogens by antagonistic fungi with Trichoderma in focus. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 129, 7–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Williams, J.; Clarkson, J.M.; Mills, P.R.; Cooper, R.M. Saprotrophic and mycoparasitic components of aggressiveness of Trichoderma harzianum groups toward the commercial mushroom Agaricus bisporus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 4192–4199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Thambugala, K.M.; Daranagama, D.A.; Phillips, A.J.L.; Kannangara, S.D.; Promputtha, I. Fungi vs. Fungi in Biocontrol: An Overview of Fungal Antagonists Applied Against Fungal Plant Pathogens. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 604923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tong-Kwee, L.; Keng, T.B. Antagonism in vitro of Trichoderma species against several basidiomycetous soil-borne pathogens and Sclerotium rolfsii. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 1990, 97, 33–41. [Google Scholar]
  17. Yobo, K.S.; Laing, M.D.; Hunter, C.H.; Morris, M.J. Biological control of Rhizoctonia solani by two Trichoderma species isolated from South African composted soil. S. Afr. J. Plant Soil 2004, 21, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kullnig, C.; Mach, R.L.; Lorito, M.; Kubicek, C.P. Enzyme diffusion from Trichoderma atroviride (= T. harzianum P1) to Rhizoctonia solani is a prerequisite for triggering of Trichoderma ech42 gene expression before mycoparasitic contact. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 2232–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Rocha-Ramirez, V.; Omero, C.; Chet, I.; Horwitz, B.A.; Herrera-Estrella, A. Trichoderma atroviride G-protein alpha-subunit gene tga1 is involved in mycoparasitic coiling and conidiation. Eukaryot. Cell 2002, 1, 594–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Carsolio, C.; Gutiérrez, A.; Jiménez, B.; Van Montagu, M.; Herrera-Estrella, A. Characterization of ech-42, a Trichoderma harzianum endochitinase gene expressed during mycoparasitism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 10903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kubicek, C.P.; Mach, R.L.; Peterbauer, C.K.; Lorito, M. Trichoderma: From genes to biocontrol. Plant Pathol. 2001, 83, 11–23. [Google Scholar]
  22. Marcello, C.M.; Steindorff, A.S.; da Silva, S.P.; Silva, R.D.N.; Mendes Bataus, L.A.; Ulhoa, C.J. Expression analysis of the exo-β-1,3-glucanase from the mycoparasitic fungus Trichoderma asperellum. Microbiol. Res. 2010, 165, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Steindorff, A.; Silva, R.; Coelho, A.; Nagata, T.; Noronha, E.; Ulhoa, C. Trichoderma harzianum expressed sequence tags for identification of genes with putative roles in mycoparasitism against Fusarium solani. Biol. Control 2012, 61, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, N.; Alfiky, A.; Wang, W.; Islam, M.; Nourollahi, K.; Liu, X.; Kang, S. Volatile compound-mediated recognition and inhibition between Trichoderma Biocontrol agents and Fusarium oxysporum. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Maruyama, C.R.; Bilesky-José, N.; de Lima, R.; Fraceto, L.F. Encapsulation of Trichoderma harzianum preserves enzymatic activity and enhances the potential for biological control. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Vieira, P.M.; Coelho, A.S.G.; Steindorff, A.S.; de Siqueira, S.J.L.; Silva, R.D.N.; Ulhoa, C.J. Identification of differentially expressed genes from Trichoderma harzianum during growth on cell wall of Fusarium solanias a tool for biotechnological application. BMC Genet. 2013, 14, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Li, N. Fungal Volatile Compounds: Small Molecules with Big Roles in Plant-Fungal and Fungal-Fungal Interactions. Ph.D. Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  28. Viterbo, A.; Montero, M.; Ramot, O.; Friesem, D.; Monte, E.; Llobell, A.; Chet, I. Expression regulation of the endochitinase chit36 from Trichoderma asperellum (T. harzianum T-203). Curr. Genet. 2002, 42, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Flores, A.; Chet, I.; Herrera-Estrella, A. Improved biocontrol activity of Trichoderma harzianum by over-expression of the proteinase-encoding gene prb1. Curr. Genet. 1997, 31, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. El-Katatny, M.; Gudelj, M.; Robra, K.H.; Elnaghy, M.; Gübitz, G. Characterization of a chitinase and an endo-β-1,3-glucanase from Trichoderma harzianum Rifai T24 involved in control of the phytopathogen Sclerotium rolfsii. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 56, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Martin, K.; McDougall, B.M.; McIlroy, S.; Chen, J.; Seviour, R.J. Biochemistry and molecular biology of exocellular fungal β-(1,3)- and β-(1,6)-glucanases. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 31, 168–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Suarez, B.; Rey, M.; Castillo, P.; Monte, E.; Llobell, A. Isolation and characterization of PRA1, a trypsin-like protease from the biocontrol agent Trichoderma harzianum CECT 2413 displaying nematicidal activity. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 65, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Samolski, I.; Rincón, A.M.; Pinzón, L.M.; Viterbo, A.; Monte, E. The qid74 gene from Trichoderma harzianum has a role in root architecture and plant biofertilization. Microbiology 2012, 158, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Stracquadanio, C.; Quiles, J.M.; Meca, G.; Cacciola, S.O. Antifungal activity of bioactive metabolites produced by Trichoderma asperellum and Trichoderma atroviride in liquid medium. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hyder, S.; Inam-ul-Haq, M.; Bibi, S.; Humayun, A.; Ghuffar, S.; Iqbal, S. Novel potential of Trichoderma spp. as biocontrol agent. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 2017, 5, 214–222. [Google Scholar]
  36. Damodaran, T.; Rajan, S.; Muthukumar, M.; Ram, G.; Yadav, K.; Kumar, S.; Ahmad, I.; Kumari, N.; Mishra, V.K.; Jha, S.K. Biological Management of Banana Fusarium Wilt Caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense Tropical Race 4 Using Antagonistic Fungal Isolate CSR-T-3 (Trichoderma reesei). Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 595845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sood, M.; Kapoor, D.; Kumar, V.; Sheteiwy, M.S.; Ramakrishnan, M.; Landi, M.; Araniti, F.; Sharma, A. Trichoderma: The “Secrets” of a Multitalented Biocontrol Agent. Plants 2020, 9, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Brian, P.W.; McGowan, J.G. Viridin: A highly fungistatic substance produced by Trichoderma viride. Nature 1945, 156, 144–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Golder, W.S.; Watson, T.R. Lanosterol derivatives as precursors in the biosynthesis of viridin. Part 1. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1980, 1, 422–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Schirmböck, M.; Lorito, M.; Wang, Y.L.; Hayes, C.K.; Arisan-Atac, I.; Scala, F.; Harman, G.E.; Kubicek, C.P. Parallel formation and synergism of hydrolytic enzymes and peptaibol antibiotics, molecular mechanisms involved in the antagonistic action of Trichoderma harzianum against phytopathogenic fungi. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994, 60, 4364–4370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Scarselletti, R.; Faull, J.L. In vitro activity of 6-pentyl-α-pyrone, a metabolite of Trichoderma harzianum, in the inhibition of Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Mycol. Res. 1994, 98, 1207–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Howell, C.R. Selective isolation from soil and separation in Vitro of P and Q strains of Trichoderma virens with differential media. Mycologia 1999, 91, 930–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Dunlop, R.; Simon, A.; Sivasithamparam, K.; Ghisalberti, E. An antibiotic from Trichoderma Koningii active against soilborne plant pathogens. J. Nat. Prod. 2004, 52, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Singh, S.; Dureja, P.; Tanwar, R.S.; Singh, A.K. Production and antifungal activity of secondary metabolites of Trichoderma virens. J. Pestic. Sci. 2005, 17, 26–29. [Google Scholar]
  45. Vinale, F.; Marra, R.; Scala, F.; Ghisalberti, E.L.; Lorito, M.; Sivasithamparam, K. Major secondary metabolites produced by two commercial Trichoderma strains active against different phytopathogens. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 43, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Reino, J.L.; Guerrero, R.F.; Hernández-Galán, R.; Collado, I.G. Secondary metabolites from species of the biocontrol agent Trichoderma. Phytochem. Rev. 2008, 7, 89–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vinale, F.; Sivasithamparam, K.; Ghisalberti, E.; Woo, S.; Nigro, M.; Marra, R.; Lombardi, N.; Lorito, M. Trichoderma secondary metabolites active on plants and fungal pathogens. Open Mycol. J. 2014, 8, 127–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Tamandegani, P.R.; Marik, T.; Zafari, D.; Balázs, D.; Vágvölgyi, C.; Szekeres, A.; Kredics, L. Changes in peptaibol production of Trichoderma Species during In Vitro antagonistic interactions with fungal plant pathogens. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Intana, W.; Kheawleng, S.; Sunpapao, A. Trichoderma asperellum T76-14 Released Volatile Organic Compounds against Postharvest Fruit Rot in Muskmelons (Cucumis melo) Caused by Fusarium incarnatum. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ryu, C.M.; Farag, M.A.; Hu, C.H.; Reddy, M.S.; Wei, H.X.; Paré, P.W.; Kloepper, J.W. Bacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis. Bacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 4927–4932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Blom, D.; Fabbri, C.; Connor, E.; Schiestl, F.; Klauser, D.; Boller, T.; Eberl, L.; Weisskopf, L. Production of plant growth modulating volatiles is widespread among rhizosphere bacteria and strongly depends on culture conditions. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 13, 3047–3058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hung, R.; Lee, S.; Bennett, J.W. Arabidopsis thaliana as a model system for testing the effect of Trichoderma volatile organic compounds. Fungal Ecol. 2013, 6, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ditengou, F.A.; Müller, A.; Rosenkranz, M.; Felten, J.; Lasok, H.; Van Doorn, M.M.; Legué, V.; Palme, K.; Schnitzler, J.P.; Polle, A. Volatile signalling by sesquiterpenes from ectomycorrhizal fungi reprogrammes root architecture. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Lee, S.; Yap, M.; Behringer, G.; Hung, R.; Bennett, J.W. Volatile organic compounds emitted by Trichoderma species mediate plant growth. Fungal Biol. Biotechnol. 2016, 3, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Elsherbiny, E.A.; Amin, B.H.; Aleem, B.; Kingsley, K.L.; Bennett, J.W. Trichoderma Volatile Organic Compounds as a Biofumigation Tool against Late Blight Pathogen Phytophthora infestans in Postharvest Potato Tubers. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 8163–8171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Siddiquee, S. Recent Advancements on the Role and Analysis of Volatile Compounds (VOCs) from Trichoderma. In Biotechnology and Biology of Trichoderma; Gupta, V.K., Schmoll, M., Herrera-Estrella, A., Upadhyay, R.S., Druzhinina, I., Tuohy, M.G., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 139–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Huang, R.; Che, H.; Zhang, J.; Yang, L.; Jiang, D.; Li, G. Evaluation of Sporidiobolus pararoseus strain YCXT3 as biocontrol agent of Botrytis cinerea on post-harvest strawberry fruits. J. Biol. Control 2012, 62, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kamaruzzaman, M.; Samiul, M.A.; Ahmed, S.P.; Sultana, R. Effect of volatile organic compounds mediated fungal growth inhibition by Trichoderma asperellum HbGT6-07. Res. Sq. 2021, 1, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Nawrocka, J.; Małolepsza, U. Diversity in plant systemic resistance induced by Trichoderma. Biol. Control 2013, 67, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Nieto-Jacobo, M.F.; Steyaert, J.M.; Salazar-Badillo, F.B.; Nguyen, D.V.; Rostás, M.; Braithwaite, M.; De Souza, J.T.; Jimenez-Bremont, J.F.; Ohkura, M.; Stewart, A.; et al. Environmental Growth Conditions of Trichoderma spp. Affects Indole Acetic Acid Derivatives, Volatile Organic Compounds, and Plant Growth Promotion. Front Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Hoyos-Carvajal, L.; Orduz, S.; Bissett, J. Growth stimulation in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) by Trichoderma. J. Biol. Control 2009, 51, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chagas, L.F.B.; De Castro, H.G.; Colonia, B.S.O.; De Carvalho Filho, M.R.; Miller, L.D.O.; Chagas, A.F.J. Efficiency of Trichoderma spp. as a growth promoter of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and analysis of phosphate solubilization and indole acetic acid synthesis. Braz. J. Bot. 2016, 39, 437–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chen, L.; Bóka, B.; Kedves, O.; Nagy, V.D.; Szűcs, A.; Champramary, S.; Roszik, R.; Patocskai, Z.; Münsterkötter, M.; Huynh, T.; et al. Towards the Biological Control of Devastating Forest Pathogens from the Genus Armillaria. Forests 2019, 10, 1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Go, W.Z.; H’ng, P.S.; Wong, M.Y.; Chin, K.L.; Ujang, S.; Noran, A.S. Evaluation of Trichoderma asperellum as a potential biocontrol agent against Rigidoporus microporus Hevea brasiliensis. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 2019, 52, 639–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Vanderhoef, L.N.; Dute, R.R. Auxin-regulated Wall Loosening and Sustained Growth in Elongation. Plant Physiol. 1981, 67, 146–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Legein, M.; Smets, W.; Vandenheuvel, D.; Eilers, T.; Muyshondt, B.; Prinsen, E.; Samson, R.; Lebeer, S. Modes of Action of Microbial Biocontrol in the Phyllosphere. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Greenshields, D.L.; Liu, G.; Wei, Y. Roles of iron in plant defence and fungal virulence. Plant Signal. Behav. 2007, 2, 300–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Angel, L.P.; Yusof, M.T.; Ismail, I.S.; Ping, B.T.; Mohamed Azni, I.N.; Kamarudin, N.H.; Sundram, S. An in vitro study of the antifungal activity of Trichoderma virens 7b and a profile of its non-polar antifungal components released against Ganoderma boninense. J. Microbiol. 2016, 54, 732–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Altomare, C.; Norvell, W.A.; Björkman, T.; Harman, G.E. Solubilization of Phosphates and Micronutrients by the Plant-Growth-Promoting and Biocontrol Fungus Trichoderma harzianum Rifai 1295-22. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 2926–2933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Harman, G.E.; Howell, C.R.; Viterbo, A.; Chet, I.; Lorito, M. Trichoderma species—Opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. J. Bioinform. 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Pevzner, P.A. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Simão, F.A.; Waterhouse, R.M.; Ioannidis, P.; Kriventseva, E.V.; Zdobnov, E.M. BUSCO: Assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 3210–3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Marçais, G.; Kingsford, C. A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k-mers. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 764–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Vurture, G.W.; Sedlazeck, F.J.; Nattestad, M.; Underwood, C.J.; Fang, H.; Gurtowski, J.; Schatz, M. GenomeScope: Fast reference-free genome profiling from short reads. Bioinformatics 2017, 33, 2202–2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Borodovsky, M.; Lomsadze, A. Eukaryotic gene prediction using GeneMark.hmm-E and GeneMark-ES. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2011, 4, 4.6.1–4.6.10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Stanke, M.; Schöffmann, O.; Morgenstern, B.; Waack, S. Gene prediction in eukaryotes with a generalized hidden Markov model that uses hints from external sources. BMC Bioinform. 2006, 7, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Emms, D.M.; Kelly, S. Ortho Finder: Solving fundamental biases in whole genome comparisons dramatically improves orthogroup inference accuracy. Genome Biol. 2015, 16, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Emms, D.M.; Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: Phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 2019, 20, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Price, M.N.; Dehal, P.S.; Arkin, A.P. FastTree 2—Approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Guindon, S.; Gascuel, O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 2003, 52, 696–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL): An online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 127–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Cross, T. Growth and examination of actinomycetes-some guidelines. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology; Williams, S.T., Sharpe, M.E., Holt, J.G., Eds.; Williams and Wilkins: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1989; Volume 4, pp. 2340–2343. [Google Scholar]
  84. Dennis, C.; Webster, J. Antagonistic properties of species-groups of Trichoderma: III. Hyphal interaction. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1971, 57, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Liu, Z.; Yang, X.; Sun, D.; Song, J.; Chen, G.; Juba, O.; Yang, Q. Expressed sequence tags-based identification of genes in a biocontrol strain Trichoderma asperellum. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2010, 37, 3673–3681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Pfaffl, M.W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT–PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29, e45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Dennis, C.; Webster, J. Antagonistic properties of species-groups of Trichoderma: II. Production of volatile antibiotics. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1971, 57, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Azzollini, A.; Boggia, L.; Boccard, J.; Sgorbini, B.; Lecoultre, N.; Allard, P.M.; Rubiolo, P.; Rudaz, S.; Gindro, K.; Bicchi, C.; et al. Dynamics of metabolite induction in fungal co-cultures by metabolomics at both volatile and non-volatile levels. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Zhang, S.; Xu, B.; Zhang, J.; Gan, Y. Identification of the antifungal activity of Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 and assessment of bioactive substances in controlling phytopathgens. Pestic. Biochem. Phys. 2018, 147, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Nweze, E.I.; Mukherjee, P.K.; Ghannoum, M.A. Agar-Based Disk Diffusion Assay for Susceptibility Testing of Dermatophytes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 3750–3752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Gueye, N.; Kumar, K.; Dangue, A.; Arama, M.; Ndiaye, F.; Diop, T.; Ram, M. Bioproduction of indole 3-acetic acid by Trichoderma strains isolated from agriculture field soils in Senegal. World J. Pharm. Res. 2018, 7, 817–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Chuen, N.; Ngadin, A.; Zahari, N.A. Potential of Trichoderma spp. as biological control agents against Bakanae Pathogen (Fusarium fujikuroi) in Rice. Asian J. Plant Pathol. 2015, 9, 46–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Chowdhary, K.; Sharma, S. Plant Growth Promotion and Biocontrol Potential of Fungal Endophytes in the Inflorescence of Aloe vera L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. B Biol. Sci. 2020, 90, 1045–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Rahman, A.; Sitepu, I.R.; Tang, S.Y.; Hashidoko, Y. Salkowski’s Reagent Test as a Primary Screening Index for Functionalities of Rhizobacteria Isolated from Wild Dipterocarp Saplings Growing Naturally on Medium-Strongly Acidic Tropical Peat Soil. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2010, 74, 2202–2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Khamna, S.; Yokota, A.; Lumyong, S. Actinomycetes isolated from medicinal plant rhizosphere soils: Diversity and screening of antifungal compounds, indole-3-acetic acid and siderophore production. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 25, 649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Schwyn, B.; Neilands, J.B. Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal. Biochem. 1987, 160, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Louden, B.C.; Haarmann, D.; Lynne, A.M. Use of Blue Agar CAS Assay for Siderophore Detection. J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. 2011, 12, 51–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Halifu, S.; Deng, X.; Song, X.; Ruiqing, S. Effects of Two Trichoderma Strains on Plant Growth, Rhizosphere Soil Nutrients, and Fungal Community of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica Annual Seedlings. Forests 2019, 10, 758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Mukhopadhyay, R.; Kumar, D. Trichoderma: A beneficial antifungal agent and insights into its mechanism of biocontrol potential. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 2020, 30, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Oszust, K.; Cybulska, J.; Frąc, M. How do Trichoderma genus fungi win a nutritional competition battle against soft fruit pathogens? A report on niche overlap nutritional potentiates. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kumar, N.; Khurana, S.M.P. 3—Trichoderma-plant-pathogen interactions for benefit of agriculture and environment. In Biocontrol Agents and Secondary Metabolites; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2021; pp. 41–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ike, M.; Nagamatsu, K.; Shioya, A.; Nogawa, M.; Ogasawara, W.; Okada, H.; Morikawa, Y. Purification, characterization, and gene cloning of 46 kDa chitinase (Chi46) from Trichoderma reesei PC-3-7 and its expression in Escherichia coli. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 71, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Grinyer, J.; Hunt, S.; McKay, M.; Herbert, B.R.; Nevalainen, H. Proteomic response of the biological control fungus Trichoderma atroviride to growth on the cell walls of Rhizoctonia solani. Curr. Genet. 2005, 47, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Burcham, D.C.; Wong, J.Y.; Abarrientos, N.V.; Ali, M.I.M.; Fong, Y.K.; Schwarze, F.W.M.R. In vitro evaluation of antagonism by Trichoderma spp. towards Phellinus noxius associated with rain tree (Samanea saman) and Senegal mahogany (Khaya senegalensis) in Singapore. BioRxiv 2017, 2017, 151753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Watts, R.; Dahiya, J.; Chaudhary, K.; Tauro, P. Isolation and characterization of a new antifungal metabolite of Trichoderma reesei. Plant Soil 1988, 107, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ajith, P.S.; Lakshmidevi, N. Effect of Volatile and Non-volatile compounds from Trichoderma spp. against Colletotrichum capsici incitant of Anthracnose on Bell peppers. Nat. Sci. 2010, 8, 265–269. [Google Scholar]
  107. Guo, Y.; Jud, W.; Ghirardo, A.; Antritter, F.; Benz, J.P.; Schnitzler, J.P.; Rosenkranz, M. Sniffing fungi-phenotyping of volatile chemical diversity in Trichoderma species. New Phytol. 2020, 227, 244–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Moya, P.A.; Girotti, J.R.; Toledo, A.V.; Sisterna, M.N. Antifungal activity of Trichoderma VOCs against Pyrenophora teres, the causal agent of barley net blotch. J. Plant Prot. Res. 2018, 58, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Bennett, J.W.; Klich, M. Mycotoxins. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 16, 497–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Hermosa, R.; Cardoza, R.E.; Rubio, M.B.; Gutiérrez, S.; Monte, E. Secondary Metabolism and Antimicrobial Metabolites of Trichoderma. In Biotechnology and Biology of Trichoderma; Vijai, G.P., Schmoll, M., Herrera-Estrella, A., Upadhyay, R.S., Druzhinina, I., Tuohy, M.G., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 125–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Du, F.Y.; Ju, G.L.; Xiao, L.; Zhou, Y.M.; Wu, X. Sesquiterpenes and Cyclodepsipeptides from Marine-Derived Fungus Trichoderma longibrachiatum and Their Antagonistic Activities against Soil-borne Pathogens. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Mostafa, A.A.; Al-Rahmah, A.N.; Adel-Megeed, A. Evaluation of some plant extracts for their antifungal and antiaflatoxigenic activities. J. Med. Plant Res. 2011, 5, 4231–4238. [Google Scholar]
  113. Sridharan, A.P.; Thankappan, S.; Karthikeyan, G.; Uthandi, S. Comprehensive profiling of the VOCs of Trichoderma longibrachiatum EF5 while interacting with Sclerotium rolfsii and Macrophomina phaseolina. Microbiol. Res. 2020, 236, 126436. [Google Scholar]
  114. Guo, Y.; Ghirardo, A.; Weber, B.; Schnitzler, J.P.; Benz, J.P.; Rosenkranz, M. Trichoderma Species Differ in Their Volatile Profiles and in Antagonism Toward Ectomycorrhiza Laccaria bicolor. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Ando, H.; Kurata, A.; Kishimoto, N. Antimicrobial properties and mechanism of volatile isoamyl acetate, a main flavour component of Japanese sake (Ginjo-shu). J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 118, 873–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Medina-Romero, Y.M.; Roque-Flores, G.; Macías-Rubalcava, M.L. Volatile organic compounds from endophytic fungi as innovative postharvest control of Fusarium oxysporum in cherry tomato fruits. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 8209–8222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Baiyee, B.; Pornsuriya, C.; Ito, S.; Sunpapao, A. Trichoderma spirale T76-1 displays biocontrol activity against leaf spot on lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) caused by Corynespora cassiicola or Curvularia aeria. J. Biol. Control 2019, 129, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Wonglom, P.; Ito, S.; Sunpapao, A. Volatile organic compounds emitted from endophytic fungus Trichoderma asperellum T1 mediate antifungal activity, defense response and promote plant growth in lettuce (Lactuca sativa). Fungal Ecol. 2020, 43, 100867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Weber, F.J.; de Bont, J.A.M. Adaptation mechanisms of microorganisms to the toxic effects of organic solvents on membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1996, 1286, 225–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Weikl, F.; Ghirardo, A.; Schnitzler, J.P.; Pritsch, K. Sesquiterpene emissions from Alternaria alternata and Fusarium oxysporum: Effects of age, nutrient availability and co-cultivation. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Yucong, l.; Shao, J.; Fu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, H.; Xu, Z.; Feng, H.; Xun, W.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, N.; et al. The volatile cedrene from plant beneficial Trichoderma guizhouense modulates Arabidopsis root development through auxin transport and signaling. Plant Cell Environ. 2021, 45, 969–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Garnica-Vergara, A.; Barrera-Ortiz, S.; Muñoz-Parra, E.; Raya-González, J.; Méndez-Bravo, A.; Macías-Rodríguez, L.; Ruiz-Herrera, L.F.; López-Bucio, J.J. The volatile 6-pentyl-2H-pyran-2-one from Trichoderma atroviride regulates Arabidopsis thaliana root morphogenesis via auxin signaling and ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE 2 functioning. New Phytol. 2016, 209, 1496–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of 15 Trichoderma strains constructed using 3059 single-copy genes present in all the analysed genomes, using the maximum-likelihood method and with A. niger as the outgroup.
Figure 1. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of 15 Trichoderma strains constructed using 3059 single-copy genes present in all the analysed genomes, using the maximum-likelihood method and with A. niger as the outgroup.
Jof 08 01105 g001
Figure 2. Mycoparasitism by the Trichoderma strain #5001 (T) on P. noxium strain B (P). (a) Trichoderma coiled around hyphae of P. noxium strain B (X 400), (b) appressorium-like structure (X 400) and (c) Trichoderma growth over P. noxium strain B hyphae (X 400). The red and black arrows indicate the Trichoderma and P. noxium, respectively. Circles indicate the coiling, appressorium-like structures and Trichoderma overgrowth on P. noxium.
Figure 2. Mycoparasitism by the Trichoderma strain #5001 (T) on P. noxium strain B (P). (a) Trichoderma coiled around hyphae of P. noxium strain B (X 400), (b) appressorium-like structure (X 400) and (c) Trichoderma growth over P. noxium strain B hyphae (X 400). The red and black arrows indicate the Trichoderma and P. noxium, respectively. Circles indicate the coiling, appressorium-like structures and Trichoderma overgrowth on P. noxium.
Jof 08 01105 g002
Figure 3. Growth inhibition % of P. noxium (strains: A, B, C, D, E and F) (a) during the confrontation with Trichoderma strains #5001 and #5029 in dual culture set up; (b) by the volatile compounds of Trichoderma strains #5001 and #5029; (c) growth inhibition % of P. noxium strain B by the crude extracts of the Trichoderma strains #5029 and #5001 at different concentrations. Different letters with the same color on the top of SE bars indicate significant differences in growth inhibition observed between P. noxium strains caused by the particular Trichoderma strain based on Tukey’s test, p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Growth inhibition % of P. noxium (strains: A, B, C, D, E and F) (a) during the confrontation with Trichoderma strains #5001 and #5029 in dual culture set up; (b) by the volatile compounds of Trichoderma strains #5001 and #5029; (c) growth inhibition % of P. noxium strain B by the crude extracts of the Trichoderma strains #5029 and #5001 at different concentrations. Different letters with the same color on the top of SE bars indicate significant differences in growth inhibition observed between P. noxium strains caused by the particular Trichoderma strain based on Tukey’s test, p < 0.05.
Jof 08 01105 g003
Figure 4. Overlay plot of (a) pure culture of strain #5001 on top and media control at bottom; (b) co−culture of strain #5001 with P. noxium on top and pure culture of P. noxium strain at bottom. Numbers refer to compounds listed in Table 2.
Figure 4. Overlay plot of (a) pure culture of strain #5001 on top and media control at bottom; (b) co−culture of strain #5001 with P. noxium on top and pure culture of P. noxium strain at bottom. Numbers refer to compounds listed in Table 2.
Jof 08 01105 g004
Figure 5. Overlay plot of (a) pure culture of strain #5029 on top and media control at bottom; (b) co−culture of strain #5029 with P. noxium on top and pure culture of P. noxium strain at bottom. Numbers refer to compounds listed in Table 2.
Figure 5. Overlay plot of (a) pure culture of strain #5029 on top and media control at bottom; (b) co−culture of strain #5029 with P. noxium on top and pure culture of P. noxium strain at bottom. Numbers refer to compounds listed in Table 2.
Jof 08 01105 g005
Figure 6. Expression patterns of biocontrol-associated genes after confrontation with P. noxium strain B in (a,c) Trichoderma strain #5001 and (b,d) Trichoderma strain #5029. Elongation factor 1−α and β−actin genes (tef and act, respectively) were used as references to normalize biological control associated genes expression in Trichoderma strain #5001 and #5029. Asterisks indicate significant differences by Student’s t-test (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Expression patterns of biocontrol-associated genes after confrontation with P. noxium strain B in (a,c) Trichoderma strain #5001 and (b,d) Trichoderma strain #5029. Elongation factor 1−α and β−actin genes (tef and act, respectively) were used as references to normalize biological control associated genes expression in Trichoderma strain #5001 and #5029. Asterisks indicate significant differences by Student’s t-test (p < 0.05).
Jof 08 01105 g006aJof 08 01105 g006b
Figure 7. Effect of volatiles produced by the Trichoderma strains on plant growth parameters: (a) shoot length (cm), (b) root length, (c) total chlorophyll content (mg/g) and (d) fresh weight. Different letters on the top of SE bars indicate significant differences between the treatments based on Tukey’s test, p < 0.05.
Figure 7. Effect of volatiles produced by the Trichoderma strains on plant growth parameters: (a) shoot length (cm), (b) root length, (c) total chlorophyll content (mg/g) and (d) fresh weight. Different letters on the top of SE bars indicate significant differences between the treatments based on Tukey’s test, p < 0.05.
Jof 08 01105 g007
Figure 8. Production of siderophores screened on CAS agar medium (front view) (a) uninoculated CAS agar medium, (b) CAS medium inoculated with the strain #5001, (c) CAS medium inoculated with the strain #5029.
Figure 8. Production of siderophores screened on CAS agar medium (front view) (a) uninoculated CAS agar medium, (b) CAS medium inoculated with the strain #5001, (c) CAS medium inoculated with the strain #5029.
Jof 08 01105 g008
Table 1. Comparison of genome assembly statistics of Trichoderma strain #5001 and #5029 with the reference strain Trichoderma reesei.
Table 1. Comparison of genome assembly statistics of Trichoderma strain #5001 and #5029 with the reference strain Trichoderma reesei.
Genome FeaturesTrichoderma Strain #5001Trichoderma Strain #5029Trichoderma reesei (PRJNA15571)
Total scaffold length, Mb32.12632.13233.396
Total contig length, Mb32.12432.1333.348
Number of contigs (Total)162147128
Number of scaffold (Total)1168577
Largest contig, Kb964.461981.42199
Largest scaffold, Mb1.4731.763.757
Scaffold N90, KB196.64264.963407.093
Scaffold N50, KB493.501599.2731220
GC (%)53.3353.3352.82
Busco completeness (%)9999.0698.3
Total protein coding genes881289699111
Table 2. Changes in the volatile compounds produced by Trichoderma strains before and after the confrontation with P. noxium tentatively identified through SPEM GC/MS analysis.
Table 2. Changes in the volatile compounds produced by Trichoderma strains before and after the confrontation with P. noxium tentatively identified through SPEM GC/MS analysis.
Trichoderma Strain #5001Co-Culture of Trichoderma Strain #5001–P. noxium Strain BTrichoderma Strain #5029Co-Culture of Trichoderma Strain #5029–P. noxium Strain B
CompoundClassRetention TimeArea %PeakRetention TimeArea %PeakRetention TimeArea %PeakRetention TimeArea %Peak
Ethanolalcohol1.0222.7211.0233.9811.0231.211.0136.31
Ethyl acetateester1.286.1521.286.1331.275.0131.266.473
Isobutanolalcohol1.337.931.334.2441.326.641.314.534
Isopentanolalcohol1.961.7641.954.9851.942.4251.935.855
Un known sesquiterpenesesquiterpene11.222.19811.22.48711.22.04911.22.028
α-cedrenesesquiterpene11.480.94911.51.08811.50.671011.50.839
τ-muurolenesesquiterpene11.637.431011.67.63911.66.51111.66.4310
β-cedrenesesquiterpene11.7219.951111.719.281011.7218.311211.716.511
Eremophilenesesquiterpene12.054.141312.13.81212.14.121412.12.5612
Di-epi- α -cedrenesesquiterpene12.43.171512.42.851412.42.771612.42.3113
Cuparenesesquiterpene12.791.81612.81.391712.81.291712.81.1516
δ-elemenesesquiterpene12.872.161712.91.681812.91.711812.91.3717
Verticiolditerpenoid alcohol17.835.912017.83.011917.84.921917.81.7418
α-cubebenesesquiterpene11.781.391211.80.771111.81.2213---
Acoradienesesquiterpene12.31.441412.30.931312.30.8515---
Isobutyl acetateester2.341.225---2.332.215---
Isopentyl acetateester3.780.896---3.770.957---
2-methylbutyl acetateester3.813.277---3.84.7283.822.236
Isobutanalaldehyde---1.16121.150.8521.140.782
α-copaenesesquiterpene---11.20.756---11.10.637
β-himachalenesesquiterpene---12.60.715---12.62.6814
α-longipinenesesquiterpene---12.70.516---12.71.2115
Un known diterpenediterpene18.190.7121---------
δ-cadinenesesquiterpene13.010.8918---------
α-cubebenesesquiterpenes15.620.6819---------
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Panchalingam, H.; Powell, D.; Adra, C.; Foster, K.; Tomlin, R.; Quigley, B.L.; Nyari, S.; Hayes, R.A.; Shapcott, A.; Kurtböke, D.İ. Assessing the Various Antagonistic Mechanisms of Trichoderma Strains against the Brown Root Rot Pathogen Pyrrhoderma noxium Infecting Heritage Fig Trees. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 1105. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jof8101105

AMA Style

Panchalingam H, Powell D, Adra C, Foster K, Tomlin R, Quigley BL, Nyari S, Hayes RA, Shapcott A, Kurtböke Dİ. Assessing the Various Antagonistic Mechanisms of Trichoderma Strains against the Brown Root Rot Pathogen Pyrrhoderma noxium Infecting Heritage Fig Trees. Journal of Fungi. 2022; 8(10):1105. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jof8101105

Chicago/Turabian Style

Panchalingam, Harrchun, Daniel Powell, Cherrihan Adra, Keith Foster, Russell Tomlin, Bonnie L. Quigley, Sharon Nyari, R. Andrew Hayes, Alison Shapcott, and D. İpek Kurtböke. 2022. "Assessing the Various Antagonistic Mechanisms of Trichoderma Strains against the Brown Root Rot Pathogen Pyrrhoderma noxium Infecting Heritage Fig Trees" Journal of Fungi 8, no. 10: 1105. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jof8101105

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop