Next Article in Journal
Selenium Combined with Methyl Jasmonate to Control Tomato Gray Mold by Optimizing Microbial Community Structure in Plants
Next Article in Special Issue
Plant Growth-Promoting Fungi as Biocontrol Tool against Fusarium Wilt Disease of Tomato Plant
Previous Article in Journal
Hidden Species Diversity was Explored in Two Genera of Catapyrenioid Lichens (Verrucariaceae, Ascomycota) from the Deserts of China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Inhibition of Aspergillus flavus Growth and Aflatoxin Production in Zea mays L. Using Endophytic Aspergillus fumigatus
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 8
Issue 7
10.3390/jof8070730
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Improved Tolerance of Artemisia ordosica to Drought Stress via Dark Septate Endophyte (DSE) Symbiosis

by
Xia Li
1,2,*,
Xue Zhang
1,
Minghui Xu
1,
Qiannan Ye
1,
Huili Gao
1 and
Xueli He
1,2,*
1
School of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China
2
Key Laboratory of Microbial Diversity Research and Application of Hebei Province, School of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2022, 8(7), 730; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jof8070730
Submission received: 16 June 2022 / Revised: 8 July 2022 / Accepted: 11 July 2022 / Published: 13 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Beneficial Plant–Fungal Interactions)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Dark septate endophytes (DSEs) usually colonize plant roots, especially in stress environments. However, their relationship with plants ranges from beneficial to harmful and has remained largely uncharacterized. In the present study, 14 DSE species grouped into 11 genera were isolated from the roots of a desert plant, Artemisia ordosica, which is widely distributed in northwest China. Three dominant DSE species—Paraphoma chrysanthemicola (Pc), Alternaria chartarum (Ac), and Acrocalymma vagum (Av)—were selected and tested for their resistance to drought in vitro. Furthermore, we characterized the responses of A. ordosica under drought conditions in relation to the presence of these DSEs following inoculation. The results showed that all three strains grew well under in vitro drought stress, and the biomass of Ac and Av was significantly higher than that of the unstressed control. The effects of DSE inoculation on the growth of A. ordosica under drought stress varied according to the different DSE species but were generally beneficial. Under drought stress, Av and Pc promoted plant growth, antioxidant enzyme activity, and root development of the hosts. The Ac strain conferred obvious positive effects on the antioxidant enzyme activity of the hosts. In general, Av and Pc demonstrated better application potential for improving the drought resistance of A. ordosica.

1. Introduction

As one of the major ecological problems facing the world, desertification has great impact on the structure and function of soil [1]. This phenomenon results in a loss of soil nutrients and a decrease in vegetation productivity, which seriously reduces the living space of organisms and restricts the sustainable development of the local environment and social economy [2,3,4,5]. In addition, desert ecosystems may be more vulnerable to climate change compared to other ecosystems [6,7,8]. In China, deserts cover approximately one-fifth of the country’s surface, and the conditions are particularly harsh in the arid regions of northwest China due to their sparse rainfall, arid climate, and strong wind and sand activity [9,10]. For a long time, land desertification has not only affected vegetation growth and biodiversity in this region but also seriously threatened the healthy development of agriculture, husbandry production, and food security [10,11]. Therefore, the restoration of vegetation and soil function in this area is essential for the sustainable development of the desert ecosystem.
During the long process of their evolution, desert plants have not only developed the ability to regulate their growth characteristics but also to respond to climate change and environmental stress by establishing symbioses with fungi [12,13]. Among them, root–symbiotic fungi interactions can promote nutrient absorption and stress resistance in hosts and regulate the relationship between plants and other soil microorganisms [14]. Based on these effects, mycorrhizal symbionts can influence plant root growth and regulate plant–soil interactions, thus affecting the processes and nutrient cycling of the ecosystem in which they are located [15]. Dark septate endophytes (DSEs), as a kind of endophyte in plant roots, act as a bridge connecting material transport between aboveground and underground ecosystems. Studies have shown that these fungi can enhance host adaptability by improving plant tolerance to multiple biological and abiotic stresses, resulting in increased biomass accumulation and reduced water consumption, and thus have a profound impact on plant growth and community construction [16,17,18].
DSEs form an ambiguous group and may be represented by several orders within ascomycetous fungi that colonize cells or intercellular spaces of healthy plant root tissues [16]. It has been reported that DSEs have a wide range of host and ecological distributions, showing an especially high colonization rate in the roots of plants under extreme climatic conditions (drought, cold, salt, etc.) or in contaminated environments [16,17,18,19]. DSEs cannot be identified based on colonization morphology alone; therefore, investigations using laboratory and molecular techniques are needed. In recent years, the species diversity and ecological functions of DSEs in arid or desert habitats have been studied [17,20,21,22,23]. Rayment et al. [24] studied nine plants distributed along the east coast of Australia and found that DSEs were widely distributed in their roots and preferred to grow in arid environments. Barrow [25] investigated Bouteloua sp., a plant in the semiarid grasslands of the United States, and found that the roots of these plants all showed DSE colonization. It was speculated that the DSE mycelia extending from the roots of the plants could help symbiotic plants maintain water and nutrient transport in arid environments and improve their drought resistance. Moreover, the symbiotic association between licorice plants and DSE fungi was shown to help licorice plants recover from drought stress [26]. These reports show that DSEs are widely distributed in areas of water stress, and colonization host plant roots by DSEs can help to increase tolerance of host plants to drought stress under in vitro culture conditions.
Despite the harsh conditions, desert ecosystems often comprise multizonal vegetation, and species that have typical characteristic of adaptation to drought, which is the main property determining desert productivity [9,27]. Among these species, Artemisia ordosica is one of the most dominant subshrubs and is distributed widely in the sandy areas of northwest China, such as Inner Mongolia, Ningxia, Shaanxi, Gansu, and other provinces [28,29,30]. Artemisia ordosica can adapt well to water stress conditions and has developed the typical morphological and physiological characteristics of adaptation to drought and sand burial [29,31]. For example, it has a taproot system, consisting of one large vertical root that produces many small lateral roots in a well-developed system. In addition, A. ordosica can not only reproduce by seed but can also produce a large number of adventitious roots from its branches and grow rapidly. Therefore, it has become the winner of the competition for plant survival in sandy environments and plays an important role in preventing wind erosion and fixing sand in northwest China [28,32,33]. Previous studies on these plants have mostly focused on their physiological characteristics, drought resistance, and ecological processes, while relatively few studies have focused on their symbiotic DSE fungi.
Microorganisms also play important roles in determining soil structure and aggregate formation as well as in functions related to plant health and growth [15,34,35]. Thus, the interaction between plants and microorganisms is an important part of desert ecosystems. Revealing the interaction between plants, microorganisms, and the environment can profoundly increase our understanding of the evolutionary process of desert ecosystems, which is of great significance for the restoration of desert vegetation [32]. The survival strategies and maintenance mechanisms of these organisms have become a hot topic in research. In addition, although DSEs may improve the growth and nutrition of the host plant, the nature of DSE symbiosis, namely whether it is beneficial or harmful for the host plant, has remained largely unclear [36]. Therefore, studies on the distribution and ecological function of DSEs in extreme environments would improve our understanding of the biology of DSE symbiosis. We assume that in a highly heterogeneous desert environment, the growth of A. ordosica not only strongly affects plant species diversity but also has a profound impact on the distribution and activities of DSE fungi that form a symbiotic relationship with the plant roots.
The deserts of northwest China are typically habitats of extreme stress and thus constitute an ideal area to study the effects of drought stress on plant–fungi symbiosis [23,37,38,39]. In this study, the DSE colonization status and species composition of A. ordosica in arid deserts were investigated in a field investigation, in which DSE strains were isolated. Subsequently, the influence of the isolated DSE strains on the growth and drought resistance of the host plant were assessed in a greenhouse assay. We hypothesized that DSE strains isolated from deserts would be drought-tolerant and have beneficial effects on host growth under drought stress conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Sites

The root samples of A. ordosica were collected from three sites in northwest China: Shapotou (37.46° N, 105° E) in Ningxia, Alxa (38.98° N, 105.85° E), and Dengkou (40.40° N, 107.01° E) in Inner Mongolia. These areas have a typical temperate continental climate. The altitude ranges from 1000 to 1700 m, the average annual temperature is 7–10 °C, and the average annual rainfall is 186.6, 206.2, and 144.5 mm, respectively.

2.2. Soil and Root Sampling

Three small-scale plots were selected for each site in July 2018, in which five healthy A. ordosica plants were randomly selected. For each plant, four 7 cm soil column were collected in different directions at a depth of 30 cm. The soil samples were mixed and sieved (<2 mm mesh) to extract fine roots. The fine roots and soil samples were then placed into self-sealing bags and transported to the laboratory in an insulated container. All root samples were stored in refrigerator at 4 °C, and about 30 root segments/plant were used for DSE isolation.

2.3. Isolation and Identification of DSE Strains

Fresh root samples were washed with sterilized water, sterilized with 75% ethanol for 5 min, and then with 5% sodium hypochlorite for 2 min before being rinsed three times in sterilized water. The root samples were dried on sterilized filter paper and cut into 1 cm long segments, which were placed into potato dextrose agar (PDA) culture medium with antibiotics (containing 50 mg/L of ampicillin and streptomycin sulfate) in Petri dishes. Approximately five root segments were placed in each dish. These dishes were then incubated at 27 °C in the dark and observed daily. Colonies with dark mycelia were transferred to a new PDA plate [38].
The DSE strains were identified by morphological and molecular methods [40]. First, the morphological and microscopic characteristics of these isolates were determined for preliminary identification. Then, we conducted the molecular identification process. Approximately 50 mg of the mycelium from each colony was scraped and then placed into a 1.5 mL centrifuge tube and thoroughly ground. DNA was then extracted using a fungal genomic DNA extraction kit (Solarbio, Beijing, China). The PCR reaction system was 20 μL, containing 2× Taq PCR Master Mix (10 μL), template (3.5 μL), primers (0.5 μL each; 10 μmol/L stocks of ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) and ITS5 (5′-GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG-3′)), and ddH2O (5.5 μL). The PCR process was performed in a Life ECO™ thermocycler (BIOER, China) (initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, then 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, primer annealing at 55 °C for 1 min, extension at 72 °C for 1 min, and then a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min). Finally, the PCR products were purified and sequenced. The obtained DNA sequence was submitted to and used in BLAST searching of the GenBank database, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 6 software based on the ML algorithm [41]. The DNA sequences were stored in GenBank according to the following accession numbers: MK753038–MK753043, MK753045, MK753047, MK753049, MK753052–MK753056, MN592645, MN592646, MN592650, MN592652, MN592653, and MN592658. The DSE isolation frequency (IF) calculation refers to the isolate number of each fungus divided by the total number of fungal isolates.

2.4. DSE Colonization and Diversity Analysis

The DSE colonization of A. ordosica was detected according to the method of Phillips and Hayman [42]. Thirty fresh root segments (cut into 1 cm pieces) from each sample were randomly selected, incubated with 10% KOH at 100 °C for 1 h, and stained with 0.5% acid fuchsin at 90 °C for 5 min before being decolorized with lactic acid–glycerin for more than 12 h. The colonization structure and infection status of the DSEs were observed under an optical microscope, and the colonization rate and colonization intensity of the DSEs were calculated according to the following formula [22]:
Colonization rate (%) = number of infected root segments/total number of evaluated root segments × 100%
The DSE diversity was assessed using indices of Shannon–Weaver index (H). Dominance was calculated with Simpson’s dominance (D) measures. Evenness index (J) was used to determine of uniformity of the isolated DSE fungi. The formulae were as follows [43,44,45]:
H = − ∑(Pi)(InPi)
D = 1 − ∑(Pi)2
where the ratio ‘Pi’ is the frequency of colonization of the taxon in the sample.
J = H/In(S)
where ‘S’ is the total number of DSE isolated.

2.5. Soil Physicochemical Properties

Soil organic matter was estimated by the combustion method, with samples being heated in a muffle furnace (TMF-4-10T, Shanghai Gemtop Scientific Instrument Corporation, Shanghai, China) at 550 °C for 4 h [46]. The soil available phosphorus (AP) was measured using the sodium bicarbonate molybdenum antimony anti-colorimetric method [47]. The soil available nitrogen (AN) was determined using the alkaline hydrolysis–diffusion method [48]. The soil pH was measured using a portable high-precision in situ pH meter (STEP pH 3000). The soil moisture was determined with a soil humidity recorder (L99-TWS-2, China). The soil acid phosphatase (ACP) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activities were determined using the Tarafdar and Marschner methods [49]. The soil urease (U) activity was measured according to the method described by Hoffmann and Teicher [50].

2.6. Drought Stress of the DSE Strains in Vitro

Three dominant DSE strains isolated from A. ordosica with the highest IFs were selected for this test (A. chartarum, P. chrysanthemicola, and A. vagum). These fungi were stored in the Laboratory of Plant Ecology, Hebei University, China. The capacity of the DSE isolates to grow under drought stress was tested in a liquid culture. Prior to the stress procedure, the three fungal strains were individually grown in potato dextrose agar (PDA) culture medium at 27 °C for two weeks. The experiment was conducted under sterile conditions using a modified Melin Norkrans (MMN) medium (glucose, 15.0 g; MgSO4·7H2O, 0.15 g; citric acid, 0.2 g; (NH4)2HPO4, 0.25 g; KH2PO4, 0.5 g; CaCl2, 0.05 g; NaCl, 0.025 g; VB1, 100 μg; FeCl3 (1%), 1.2 mL; distilled water, 1000 mL; pH 5.5). Polyethylene glycol 6000 (PEG-6000) was added to simulate drought stress, and the permeability gradient of PEG was 0 and 1.34 MPa [38,51]. For each strain, one fungal disk (5 mm in diameter) was cut from the edge of the colony and transferred to a sterilized 250 mL conical glass flask containing 150 mL of sterilized MMN medium. The cultures were incubated at 27 °C under constant shaking at 120 rpm for 15 days. Each treatment was repeated three times.
The mycelia were collected by filtering the fungal solution. The fresh mycelia were then randomly divided into two parts. One part was used to determine the superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, malondialdehyde (MDA) content, soluble protein, and melanin content. The SOD activity was analyzed by the NBT photoreduction method [52]. MDA content was determined according to the thiobarbituric acid (TBA) method [53]. Soluble protein content was measured via Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 colorimetry [54]. Melanin was extracted from mycelia following the method described by Zhan et al. [55,56]. The other part was dried to a constant weight at 75 °C to measure the water content of the mycelia. The sum of the dry weights of these two parts was then taken as the total biomass of the fungi.

2.7. Inoculation Assay

2.7.1. DSE Inoculation and Plant Growth Conditions

The seeds of A. ordosica were collected from the Desert Forestry Experimental Center, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Dengkou, and stored at 4 °C. Healthy seeds of the same size were selected, sterilized with 75% ethanol for 1 min, washed with sterile water several times, and then germinated in a sterilized culture dish with double-layer filter paper for three days. Following germination, the seedlings were planted in culture pots (bottom diameter, 5.5 cm; top diameter, 9.5 cm; height, 11.5 cm), filled with 400 g of 2 mm sieved autoclaved soil. The experimental soil contained 4.82 mg/g of organic carbon, 60.67 μg/g of alkali nitrogen, and 9.7 μg/g of available phosphorus (pH 6.73). Two seedlings were planted in each pot.
Two factors were examined in this experiment, namely, DSE inoculation and drought treatment, with four variables for each condition. The DSE inoculation treatments comprised a non-DSE inoculated control (CK) and A. chartarum (Ac), P. chrysanthemicola (Pc), and A. vagum (Av) inoculation. For the inoculation treatments, 5 mm fungal mycelia discs excised from the edge of the colonies actively growing DSE in potato dextrose agar (PDA) culture medium were placed 1 cm below the roots of the plants (two discs for each plant) in the culture pots. For the CK treatment, discs of the PDA culture medium without fungi were added into the culture pots. All of the inoculation processes were performed in a sterile environment. The culture pots were placed in an illumination incubator with a light cycle of 14 h light/10 h dark, a temperature of 27 °C light/22 °C dark, and 50% mean relative humidity. One month after sowing, the seedlings were treated with drought stress. The drought stress treatments included drought (W−) or well-watered (W+) treatment, corresponding to 30% and 70% of the field water capacity, respectively. Water loss was supplemented daily with sterile distilled water to maintain the desired field capacity by regular weighing. The plant growth and physiological parameters, as well as root colonization, were measured 90 days after sowing.

2.7.2. Plant Growth Parameters

At the end of drought stress treatment, the height and branch number of the A. ordosica plants were measured. The shoots and roots from each pot were separately harvested, and the roots were gently washed with tap water to remove the residual soil on their surface. Individual root samples were first suspended at an approximately 1 cm depth in deionized water in a plexiglass tray and then scanned using a scanner (EPSON V800, Seiko Epson Inc., NKS, Tokyo, Japan). The root morphological indexes were analyzed by the WinRHIZO image analysis system [57]. The roots were collected after scanning and a few root samples were randomly selected to analyze the DSE colonization (see below). After the physiological indicators were determined, the remaining root and shoot samples were dried in an oven at 70 °C for more than 48 h to measure the plant biomass.

2.7.3. Plant Physiological Parameters

After the stress treatment, a spAD-502 chlorophyll content analyzer (Konica Minolta Sensing, Osaka, Japan) was used to determine the chlorophyll content of the Artemisia ordosica seedlings. The SPAD values were measured in random order from 9:00 to 11:00 a.m., and the chlorophyll content of each pot was calculated from the average value of the two plants [58].
The chemical composition and antioxidant enzyme activity of the shoots of the plant were determined, including the auxin content, SOD activity, and glutathione (GSH), MDA, soluble protein, and proline contents. The GSH content was determined using the DTNB method [59]. An acid ninhydrin colorimetry approach was applied to measure the proline content according to Bates et al. [60]. The root auxin (IAA) content was determined using the ELISA method [61].

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed with SPSS version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All data were tested for homogeneity of variances and normality using Levene’s test and the Shapiro–Wilk test. Data that did not fulfil the above assumptions were log-transformed. Then, t-test analysis was conducted for detecting the drought tolerance of each examined DSE strain compared with normal treatment, such as the biomass, SOD activity, and melanin content. Two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the effects of DSE inoculation, drought, and their interaction on the growth and physiological parameters of the A. ordosica plants. The differences between the means among the different treatments were compared using Tukey’s test at p < 0.05. The effects of the soil variables on the IFs of the DSE strains were examined by Pearson’s correlation analysis, and heatmaps were processed and formulated using R with the pheatmap package.

3. Results

3.1. DSE Colonization in Artemisia ordosica

Melanized and septate hyphae and diverse microsclerotia were observed in the roots of A. ordosica growing naturally in an arid desert (Figure 1). For different sites, the IF of DSE in DK (55.0%) was significantly lower than that in ALS (66.7%) and SPT (73.3%) (p = 0.004). After 15 days of culture, morphological observation showed different types of DSE colonies that were 2.0–8.5 cm in diameter, round or oval, and mainly gray-black or brown in color (Figure 2). The surface of the colonies was mostly blank or felt-like and relatively flat, with a few surface ridges or concentric circles. Observation under a light microscope showed that the mycelia all had obvious septa that were mainly brown in color. Most of the DSE strains did not produce spores, while some produced inverted rod-shaped brown conidia and spherical conidia.
According to the morphological identification and ITS sequence analysis, a total of 11 genera and 14 species of DSE fungi were isolated and identified from the roots of A. oraceae (Figure 3). These 11 genera were Acrocalymma, Alternaria, Chaetomium, Cladosporium, Fusarium, Herpotrichia, Paraphoma, Periconia, Poaceascoma, Preussia, and Trematosphaeria. The maximum values of the DSE species appeared in Dengkou, followed by Shapotou, while Alxa had the least species (Figure 4). The DSE diversity in SPT and DK was considerably higher than that of ASL (Figure 5). The highest values of the Simpson index and evenness indices were recorded at SPT site, while the Shannon–Weiner index was the highest at DK.
The species Paraphoma chrysanthemicola was common to these three sites and was the dominant species in Alxa and Dengkou. Alternaria alstroemeriae was a species common to Shapotou and Dengkou (Figure 6). Trematosphaeria sp. and Alternaria tellustris were common to Alxa and Dengkou. Among all of the isolated fungi, P. chrysanthemicola, Alternaria chartarum, and Acrocalymma vagum were the dominant species, with isolation frequencies of 60.00%, 10.77%, and 10.77%, respectively. The correlation analysis results show that the IFs of A. alstroemeriae and Preussia terricola were significant negatively correlated to pH, while Fusarium citricola showed a positive relationship (Figure 6). The occurrences of A. chartarum were affected by AN. Acrocalymma vagum and Periconia epilithographicola were negatively affected by ACP. The Ifs of P. chrysanthemicola and F. citricola were closely corelated to ACP, ALP, and U. Moreover, F. citricola, Trematosphaeria sp., and Chaetomium globosum were positively affected by Hum.

3.2. In Vitro Drought Stress Tolerance of the DSE Stains

The three studied DSE strains all grew well under stress conditions and showed a high drought tolerance capacity in vitro. Under drought stress, the biomass of the tested fungi showed an increasing trend, and the biomass of Ac and Av were significantly higher than that of the control (Figure 7a). The analysis of fungal melanin showed that the melanin content of Pc was significantly higher than that of the control under drought treatment, while those of Ac and Av were not significantly different from the unstressed treatment (Figure 7b). Under drought treatment, the activity of SOD and the soluble protein content of all DSE fungi were significantly higher than those of the control (Figure 7c,d). Compared to the control treatment, the MDA content of DSEs was significantly increased by drought stress, and the difference in Pc and Av was significant (Figure 7e).

3.3. Effect of DSEs on the Performance of Artemisia ordosica

After harvest, no DSE colonization was found in the roots of the uninoculated plants, while dark septa or microsclerotia structures were observed in the roots of the inoculated A. ordosica plants (Figure 8). DSE fungal colonization was measured under different treatments. The colonization rate of the mycelia was 25–50%, while that of the microsclerotia was 2–40%, and the total colonization rate was 10–60% (Figure 9). Following inoculation, A. vagum showed stronger colonization than P. chrysanthemicola and A. chartarum.

3.3.1. Vegetative Growth of Artemisia ordosica

The seedlings of A. ordosica grew healthily during the experiment. Two-factor variance analysis showed that DSE inoculation, drought stress, and their interaction significantly affected the plant height, branch number, and root growth of A. ordosica (Table 1). The plant height and branch number were negatively affected by drought stress, but inoculation with DSE played a positive role in alleviating the adverse effects of drought stress on the growth of A. ordosica (Figure 10a,b). Although drought treatment reduced the plant height, the decrease in A. ordosica seedlings inoculated with Av and Ac was lower compared to that with the other treatments. Moreover, DSEs did not adversely affect the host height even under drought conditions. Under W− conditions, inoculation with DSEs increased the number of host branches, and Av exhibited a significant effect. Under the conditions of W+, Pc showed a significant positive effect on the host branching number, while Av and Ac had a significant negative effect. DSEs promoted the root growth of A. ordosica, especially under drought conditions (Figure 10c–f). The root length, root surface area, and root volume of A. ordosica inoculated with Av and Pc were significantly higher than those of the control plants. However, the root length and root surface area of A. ordosica inoculated with Pc and Ac were significantly reduced compared to the control under the W+ conditions, while the root of A. ordosica inoculated with Av was not significantly affected. DSE inoculation had no significant effect on the root diameter of A. ordosica

3.3.2. Biomass Production of Artemisia ordosica

DSE inoculation, drought, and their interaction significantly affected the biomass production and root–shoot ratio of A. ordosica (Table 1). Under drought conditions, the shoot, root, and total biomass of A. ordosica inoculated with Av were significantly higher than those of the control plants, showing an obvious growth promotion effect (Figure 11a,b). However, Av had no significant effect on the biomass accumulation of the host with a sufficient water supply. Nevertheless, the root–shoot ratio of the Av inoculated plants was significantly higher than that of the uninoculated plants due to their higher root biomass under W+ conditions (Figure 11c). Pc and Ac had beneficial effects on A. ordosica under drought treatment but detrimental effects under a sufficient water supply. Under W− conditions, the shoot, root, and total biomass of those plants inoculated with Pc were significantly higher than those of the control (Figure 11a,b). However, under W+ conditions, DSE inoculation showed a negative effect. Under W+ conditions, the biomass of the Ac plants was significantly lower than that of the control plants, but under drought conditions, this adverse effect disappeared, and the root–shoot ratio of the inoculated plants was significantly higher than that of the control plants (Figure 11c).

3.3.3. Physiological Response Index of Artemisia ordosica

In general, DSEs increased the activity of antioxidant enzymes in A. ordosica under drought conditions (Table 2). Under W− treatment, the SOD and GSH activities of A. ordosica inoculated with DSEs were all significantly higher than those of the control plants, while no significant effect was observed under W+ conditions (Figure 12a,b). Meanwhile, DSE fungi played an active role in reducing the MDA content of the host plant under drought stress (Figure 12c). The auxin content of A. ordosica decreased under drought stress. Although DSEs showed no significant effect on the auxin content of A. ordosica under drought conditions, the auxin content decreased to a lesser degree in the inoculated plants than the control plants, while the auxin content of Pc-inoculated A. ordosica exhibited an increasing trend (Figure 12d). Under W+ conditions, the proline content of A. ordosica inoculated with Ac was significantly lower than that of the control, but there was no significant difference between them under drought conditions. The results show that Ac inoculation had a stronger promoting effect on the proline content of the host plant under drought conditions (Figure 12e). Pc significantly promoted the chlorophyll content in A. ordosica under all treatments (Figure 12f).

4. Discussion

4.1. Colonization and Species Diversity of DSEs in Artemisia ordosica

In this study, 14 DSE strains belonging to 11 genera were isolated from the roots of A. ordosica by morphological and molecular identification. All isolated strains produced a dark septate mycelium and other structures in the culture or root system, suggesting that they could be considered DSEs. All of these strains belong to Ascomycota, and most of them belong to Pleosporales. This is consistent with previous reports on desert DSEs in that Pleosporales are frequently isolated in arid environments [40,62,63]. The species composition of the DSEs was significantly different among the sampling sites, with obvious spatial heterogeneity. Paraphoma chrysanthemicola was a common species in these three sites and had the highest isolation rate. Meanwhile, the DSE fungi isolated in this study are widely distributed in various ecosystems. Among them, P. chrysanthemicola, H. striatispora, A. vagum, and A. alstroemeriae have been isolated from several desert plants, such as Hedysarum scoparium, Reaumuria soongorica, Sympegma regelii, Ephedra przewalskii, Nitraria sphaerocarpa, Salsola passerine, Ammopiptanthus mongolicus, and Glycyrrhiza uralensis [63,64,65]. The plants are greatly affected by the soil environment, where most of their symbiotic fungi come from [66,67]. Therefore, the relatively consistent environmental conditions in desert habitats may explain the similarity of plant symbiotic DSE fungi to a certain extent. In addition, P. chrysanthemicola and A. vagum have also been found in Nicotiana tabacum, Pinus tabulaeformis, Oryza sativa, and other plant root tissues [68,69]. This indicates that DSE fungi show no significant host specificity and strong ecological adaptability.
The soil microenvironment can affect the plant growth and microorganism distribution and then alter the stability of a desert ecosystem [70,71,72]. Among them, the soil pH value is an important factor affecting the distribution and diversity of symbiotic fungi, as it plays a key role in the soil nutrient availability [73,74]. In this study, the IFs of most of the DSE fungi showed a negative correlation with the pH value, indicating that these fungi have a preference for acidic soil. This has also been reported in other studies on desert plants [66]. Meanwhile, a large number of studies have shown that soil nutrients may significantly impact the soil fungal community [75,76]. In this study, the IF levels of A. chartarum and H. striatispora were negatively correlated with the soil total nitrogen content, consistent with previous studies [77,78]. This might be related to the utilization of nitrogen source nutrients by DSEs. When plant roots are deficient in inorganic nitrogen, the increase in DSE colonization of plant roots can mineralize rhizosphere peptides, amino acids, and proteins, thus improving the acquisition of soil inorganic nitrogen by plants [17]. Soil enzymes, the main exudates of soil microorganisms and plant roots, are important indicators that reflect the intensity of soil biochemical processes and are used to evaluate soil fertility [79,80]. For instance, soil urease is an important catalyst for the decomposition and transformation of soil urea, and its activity reflects the nitrogen utilization rate of plants and microorganisms to a certain extent [81,82]. In this study, P. chrysanthemicola and F. citricola were positively affected by urease activity, suggesting that these two DSE fungi may participate in the transformation of soil nitrogen and thus prevent or attenuate its accumulation. In addition, the IFs of DSE fungi are closely related to soil moisture, and most showed a negative response. This may indicate that the high drought tolerance capacity of DSE strains and the water supply of the natural habitat is still unfavorable for DSE growth [38].

4.2. DSE Growth under Drought Stress

Previous studies have shown that DSE fungi are widely distributed in arid and semiarid environments and can improve the tolerance of host plants to drought stress [18,26,27,63,83,84,85]. In this study, all three of the DSE strains isolated from A. ordosica grew well under drought stress, and the biomass accumulation of Ac and Av was significantly higher than that of the control. We also found similar phenomena in a study of other desert fungi [27,63,83], suggesting that endophytic fungi in water-stressed habitats generally confer certain advantages to hosts in terms of drought resistance.
The antioxidant system comprises an important strategy for plants and microorganisms to cope with oxidative damage [86,87,88]. SOD is considered to be an important antioxidant enzyme to eliminate the reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced under oxidative damage [87,89]. In this study, the SOD activity of the three DSE fungi significantly increased under drought stress, suggesting that DSE fungi may accumulate SOD to remove ROS, thereby greatly reducing oxidative damage to DSE fungi. Li et al. [90] also found that DSE inoculation can increase the SOD activity of Isatis indigotica under drought stress conditions. Under drought stress, mycelium cells may lose water, result in decreased cell turgor, which affects substance metabolism and even inhibits mycelium growth [91]. As an osmotic regulator, soluble protein can directly promote osmotic regulation and improve the drought tolerance of cells [54]. In this study, the soluble protein content of these three fungi was significantly higher than that of the control, indicating that soluble protein is directly involved in osmotic regulation and enhances the tolerance to dehydration under water deficit. In addition, melanin, as the main component of DSE fungal cell walls, is believed to improve the structural rigidity of the cell wall and reduce the oxidative damage associated with stress environments, thus enhancing fungal stress tolerance [56,64,92]. In our study, the melanin content of Av and Ac did not increase under drought treatment, indicating that this treatment does not induce melanin biosynthesis in them. However, the content of melanin in Pc was significantly higher than that in the control, suggesting that fungal melanin may play a role in specific fungi. It is possible that melanin plays a role in the tolerance to other types of abiotic stress depending on the fungi. Gaber et al. [93] also found that melanin was not necessary for salt stress resistance of DSE strains. In conclusion, Av and Ac showed higher resistance to drought stress in vitro, which may be related to the regulation of the antioxidant enzyme system. The growth of Pc was not adversely affected under drought stress, which may be related to having a higher melanin content or a result of other mechanisms.

4.3. Effect of DSEs on the Performance of Artemisia ordosica

Endophytic fungi can form complex symbiotic relationships with plants and are widely distributed in many ecosystems [94,95]. Studies have shown that endophytic fungi can colonize the roots of various plants under drought stress and improve the tolerance of host plants to drought through the involvement of complex biological pathways [17,18,20,21,22]. In this study, DSE fungi were found to have colonized A. ordosica root tissues under all inoculated treatments, indicating that these desert fungi are still effective root colonizers of A. ordosica under water deficit conditions. Our results also showed that the mycelium was the main colonization structure of DSEs in A. ordosica roots under all the treatments. The mycelia crossing the plant cell walls and penetrating into plant cells and intercellular spaces could facilitate water transport and nutrient exchange between plants and fungi. This is an important ecological strategy for fungi in resisting stress environments [17,96]. In addition, the roots of A. ordosica were colonized by microsclerotia under stress. In previous reports, microsclerotia were considered to be a propagule or hypopus. Growth of these microsclerotia, with their spore-like structure, may be another important strategy employed by DSE fungi in resisting drought stress [18,32,96].
The effects of DSE inoculation on A. ordosica growth under drought stress varied but were generally beneficial. Additionally, the responses resulting from interactions between the DSEs and plants were dependent on the DSE species involved. Av and Pc had obvious effects on the growth and drought resistance of A. ordosica. Under drought treatment, the biomass accumulation and vegetative growth of A. ordosica inoculated with DSEs were significantly higher than those of the control. This growth-promoting effect may be related to the enhanced root growth of the host. In this study, DSE inoculation increased the root length and root surface area of A. ordosica and reduced the adverse effects of drought. In related studies on other plants, Wu et al. [97] found that DSE stimulated the root development of an endangered medicinal plant. Liu et al. [98] found that DSE could help Ormosia hosiei seedlings adapt to a drought stress environment by altering the root morphology and reducing ultrastructural damage. A well-developed root system and a higher branch number are extremely important for the growth of desert plants, so they may have resulted from the long-term coevolution of DSEs and desert plants. Deep and extensive root development of host plants can promote the absorption of water and nutrients and ultimately affect plant biomass production by improving subsurface and aboveground morphological indicators to improve the adaptability of host plants to drought stress [22]. Positive effects of Av and Pc on A. ordosica were also found to be related to the regulation of the antioxidant enzyme system. Under drought stress, SOD activity and GSH contents were significantly increased in A. ordosica seedlings inoculated with DSE. The presence of these two substances is essential for reactive oxygen species removal in plants [38,57,99]. Moreover, MDA is an important biomarker for assessing the degree of oxidative damage in plants [100,101]. In this study, the MDA content of A. ordosica was significantly reduced after inoculation with Av and Pc under drought stress, suggesting that DSEs alleviate the adverse effects of drought stress on plants. In general, Av and Pc mainly enhance the adaption of host plants to adverse conditions by promoting plant growth as well as the antioxidant enzyme activity and root development of hosts under drought stress.
Although Ac exhibited a high separation rate in A. ordosica roots, it did not show an obvious growth-promoting effect in the inoculation test that was expected. After harvest, the biomass of A. ordosica inoculated with Ac under drought treatment was not significantly different to that of the control, but the root–shoot ratio of the host significantly increased. The analysis of physiological indexes shows that Ac increased the SOD activity and GSH content in A. ordosica under drought conditions. At the same time, the increase in the proline content of Ac-inoculated A. ordosica was significantly higher than that of the control under drought conditions. Previous studies have also found that inoculation of fungi can increase the accumulation of osmotic adjustment substances and reduce the osmotic potential of host cells, so as to resist dehydration injury caused by stress [102,103,104]. This is in accordance with a recent study by He et al. [65], who found that A. vagum can enhance the drought tolerance of the host plant Astragalus mongholicus. In natural habitats, the higher isolation rate of Ac may be related to the enhancement of stress resistance and the guarantee of normal growth of A. ordosica under drought conditions. It may also be that the effect of Ac on the host was not enough to affect the accumulation of biomass, but if the assessment is carried out after a longer period, the DSEs will eventually promote plant growth.
Plant growth is usually inseparable from the participation and regulation of plant hormones. The ability of endophytic fungi to produce hormones by themselves or by promoting plant production is beneficial for host resistance to adverse effects under stress conditions [12,61,105,106]. As the main endogenous hormone in plants, IAA plays an important role in regulating plant responses to external stress. Qiang et al. [12] found that inoculation with A. alternata could increase the auxin content, improve the growth, and enhance the drought stress tolerance of wheat. In addition, studies on other microorganisms also found that AM fungi could increase the auxin content of L. barbarum, promote plant osmotic regulation, and increase plant tolerance to salt stress [107]. Based on its growth-promoting effect, we expected DSEs to promote auxin accumulation in A. ordosica plants. In this study, although inoculation with DSEs had no significantly beneficial effect in increasing the host auxin content, the extent of decrease in auxin content was lower in inoculated plants than of control plants under drought conditions. Moreover, under drought, the auxin content of Pc-inoculated A. ordosica showed an increasing trend. These results indicate that DSEs have a certain effect on the auxin regulation of A. ordosica under drought stress. In addition, the chlorophyll content was significantly higher in Pc-inoculated A. ordosica plants than the control under all treatments. Chlorophyll is an important pigment for photosynthesis and plays an important role in the process of light absorption [108]. Under drought stress, DSEs may affect plant growth by increasing the host’s chlorophyll content and thereby increasing the photosynthetic rate. Other studies have also found that endophytic fungal infection can increase the photosynthetic pigment content of host plants to improve plant growth under stress [109,110].
Afforestation is still the fundamental method for vegetation restoration in arid regions in China. To ensure this is effective, it is important to improve the growth and survival ability of A. ordosica seedlings under drought stress. In this study, we found that three dominant DSE fungi isolated from deserts could exert beneficial effects by promoting host growth or enhancing their drought tolerance, which might be one of the reasons for their high isolation rate in natural habitats. Based on the results of this study, we speculate that DSE–A. ordosica symbionts could play an important role in promoting vegetation growth and ecological restoration in arid regions.

5. Conclusions

This study investigated the species diversity and promoting potential of DSEs associated with a dominant subshrub growing naturally in the desert of northwest China. We found that DSEs are universally observed in A. ordosica roots, and a total of 14 DSE species grouped into 11 genera were identified. Three dominant DSE species cultured in vitro showed good drought resistance, and they also promoted the growth of A. ordosica under drought conditions. In general, A. vagum and P. chrysanthemicola had better promotion effects on the biomass accumulation, root development, and antioxidant enzyme activity of A. ordosica, leading to better growth and drought resistance. Considering that A. ordosica plays vital roles in preventing wind erosion and fixing sand in deserts, our findings are crucial for understanding how plants combat drought and to provide evidence for the application of DSEs in vegetation restoration in arid ecosystems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.L. and X.H.; Data curation, X.L. and X.Z.; Formal analysis, M.X., Q.Y. and H.G.; Funding acquisition, X.L. and X.H.; Investigation, X.Z.; Methodology, X.L. and X.H.; Project administration, X.H.; Software, M.X.; Writing—original draft, X.L. and X.Z.; Writing—review and editing, X.L. and X.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 31800345, 31770561; and the National Science Foundation of Hebei Province, China, grant number C2020201043.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data collected and analyzed throughout the present research are available upon request. Fungal sequences were deposited in NCBI GenBank and the accession numbers were given in the text.

Acknowledgments

We greatly appreciate the support of Anxi Extreme Arid Desert of the National Nature Reserve for their invaluable assistance on this experiment. We also thank MDPI for language editing services.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Huang, J.; Yu, H.; Dai, A.; Wei, Y.; Kang, L. Drylands face potential threat under 2 °C global warming target. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2017, 7, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sheffield, J.; Andreadis, K.M.; Wood, E.F.; Lettenmaier, D.P. Global and continental drought in the second half of the twentieth century, severity-area-duration analysis and temporal variability of large-scale events. J. Clim. 2009, 22, 1962–1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Peters, D.P.C.; Yao, J.; Sala, O.E.; Anderson, J.P. Directional climate change and potential reversal of desertification in arid and semiarid ecosystems. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2012, 18, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Tang, Z.; An, H.; Deng, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, G.; Shangguan, Z. Effect of desertification on productivity in a desert steppe. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chen, D.; Saleem, M.; Cheng, J.; Mi, J.; Chu, P.; Tuvshintogtokh, I.; Hu, S.; Bai, Y. Effects of aridity on soil microbial communities and functions across soil depths on the Mongolian Plateau. Funct. Ecol. 2019, 33, 1561–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Na, X.; Yu, H.; Wang, P.; Zhu, W.; Niu, Y.; Huang, J. Vegetation biomass and soil moisture coregulate bacterial community succession under altered precipitation regimes in a desert steppe in northwestern China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2019, 136, 107520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Omer, A.; Zhu, G.; Zheng, Z.; Saleem, F. Natural and anthropogenic influences on the recent droughts in Yellow River Basin, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 704, 135428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Barker, J.D.; Kaspari, S.; Gabrielli, P.; Wegner, A.; Beaudon, E.; Sierra–Hernandez, M.R.; Thompson, L. Drought–induced biomass burning as a source of black carbon to the Central Himalaya since 1781 CE as reconstructed from the Dasuopu Ice Core. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2021, 21, 5615–5633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Meng, H.H.; Gao, X.Y.; Huang, J.F.; Zhang, M.L. Plant phylogeography in arid Northwest China: Retrospectives and perspectives. J. Syst. Evol. 2015, 53, 33–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wei, W.; Guo, Z.; Shi, P.; Zhou, L.; Xie, B. Spatiotemporal changes of land desertification sensitivity in Northwest China from 2000 to 2017. J. Geogr. Sci. 2021, 31, 46–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cui, Z.; Kang, H.; Wang, W.; Guo, W.; Guo, M.; Chen, Z. Vegetation restoration restricts rill development on dump slopes in coalfields. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 820, 153203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Qiang, X.J.; Ding, J.J.; Lin, W.; Li, Q.; Xu, C.; Zheng, Q.; Li, Y. Alleviation of the detrimental effect of water deficit on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth by an indole acetic acid–producing endophytic fungus. Plant Soil 2019, 439, 373–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gehring, C.; Sevanto, S.; Patterson, A.; Ulrich, D.; Kuske, C.R. Ectomycorrhizal and dark septate fungal associations of pinyon pine are differentially affected by experimental drought and warming. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 582574. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sebastiana, M.; Duarte, B.; Monteiro, F.; Malhóa, R.; Caçadorb, I.; Matosa, A.R. The leaf lipid composition of ectomycorrhizal oak plants shows a drought-tolerance signature. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2019, 144, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Smith, S.E.; Read, D.J. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  16. Jumpponen, A.; Trappe, J.M. Dark septate endophytes, a review of facultative biotrophic root-colonizing fungi. New Phytol. 1998, 140, 295–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Newsham, K.K. A meta-analysis of plant responses to dark septate root endophytes. New Phytol. 2011, 190, 783–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Santos, M.; Ignacio, C.; Fernando, D.; Brenda, S.; Alejandro, M. Advances in the role of dark septate endophytes in the plant resistance to abiotic and biotic stresses. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yuan, Z.; Druzhinina, I.S.; Gibbons, J.G.; Zhong, Z.; Van de Peer, Y.; Rodriguez, R.J.; Liu, Z.; Wang, X.; Wei, H.; Wu, Q.; et al. Divergence of a genomic island leads to the evolution of melanization in a halophyte root fungus. ISME J. 2021, 15, 3468–3479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Knapp, D.G.; Imrefi, I.; Boldpurev, E.; Csíkos, S.; Akhmetova, G.; Berek-Nagy, P.J.; Otgonsuren, B.; Kovács, G.M. Root-colonizing endophytic fungi of the dominant grass Stipa krylovii from a Mongolian steppe grassland. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lugo, M.A.; Menoyo, E.; Allione, L.R.; Negritto, M.A.; Henning, J.A.; Anton, A.M. Arbuscular mycorrhizas and dark septate endophytes associated with grasses from the Argentine Puna. Mycologia 2018, 110, 654–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, X.; He, X.L.; Hou, L.F.; Ren, Y.; Wang, S.J.; Su, F. Dark septate endophytes isolated from a xerophyte plant promote the growth of Ammopiptanthus mongolicus under drought condition. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 7896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Zuo, Y.; Xia, L.; Yang, J.; Liu, J.; Zhao, L.; He, X. Fungal endophytic community and diversity associated with desert shrubs driven by plant identity and organ differentiation in extremely arid desert ecosystem. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rayment, J.T.; Jones, S.; French, K. Seasonal patterns of fungal colonisation in Australian native plants of different ages. Symbiosis 2020, 80, 169–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Barrow, J.R. Atypical morphology of dark septate fungal root endophytes of Bouteloua in arid southwestern USA rangelands. Mycorrhiza 2003, 13, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. He, C.; Zeng, Q.; Chen, Y.; Chen, C.; Wang, W.; Hou, J.; Li, X. Colonization by dark septate endophytes improves the growth and rhizosphere soil microbiome of licorice plants under different water treatments. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2021, 166, 103993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, Z.; Pan, J. Spatiotemporal changes in vegetation net primary productivity in the arid region of Northwest China, 2001 to 2012. Front. Earth Sci. 2018, 12, 108–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gui, Z.; Li, L.; Qin, S.; Zhang, Y. Foliar water uptake of four shrub species in a semi–arid desert. J. Arid Environ. 2021, 195, 104629. [Google Scholar]
  29. Jiang, Y.; Tian, Y.; Zha, T.; Jia, X.; Bourque, C.P.A.; Liu, P.; Jin, C.; Jiang, X.; Li, X.; Wei, N.; et al. Dynamic changes in plant resource use efficiencies and their primary influence mechanisms in a typical desert shrub community. Forests 2021, 12, 1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Qin, J.; Si, J.; Jia, B.; Zhao, C.; Zhou, D.; He, X.; Wang, C.; Zhu, X. Water use characteristics of two dominant species in the mega–dunes of the Badain Jaran Desert. Water 2022, 14, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zha, T.; Qian, D.; Jia, X.; Bai, Y.; Tian, Y.; Bourque, C.P.A.; Ma, J.; Feng, W.; Wu, B.; Peltola, H. Soil moisture control of sap–flow response to biophysical factors in a desert–shrub species Artemisia Ordosica. Biogeosciences 2017, 14, 4533–4544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Hou, L.; He, X.; Li, X.; Wang, S.; Zhao, L. Species composition and colonization of dark septate endophytes are affected by host plant species and soil depth in the Mu Us sandland, northwest China. Fungal Ecol. 2019, 39, 276–284. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ma, X.; Zhu, J.; Wang, Y.; Yan, W.; Zhao, C. Variations in water use strategies of sand-binding vegetation along a precipitation gradient in sandy regions, Northern China. J. Hydrol. 2021, 600, 126539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Patterson, A.; Flores-Rentería, L.; Whipple, A.; Whitham, T.; Gehring, C. Common Garden experiments disentangle plant genetic and environmental contributions to ectomycorrhizal fungal community structure. New Phytol. 2019, 221, 493–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Terhonen, E.; Blumenstein, K.; Kovalchuk, A.; Asiegbu, F.O. Forest tree microbiomes and associated fungal endophytes, functional roles and impact on forest health. Forests 2019, 10, 42. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ruotsalainen, A.L.; Kauppinen, M.; Wli, P.R.; Saikkonen, K.; Helander, M.; Tuomi, J. Dark septate endophytes, mutualism from by–products? Trends Plant Sci. 2022, 27, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xie, L.L.; He, X.L.; Wang, K.; Hou, L.F.; Sun, Q. Spatial dynamics of dark septate endophytes in the roots and rhizospheres of Hedysarum scoparium in northwest China and the influence of edaphic variables. Fungal Ecol. 2017, 26, 135–143. [Google Scholar]
  38. Li, X.; He, C.; He, X.; Su, F.; Hou, L.; Ren, Y.; Hou, Y. Dark septate endophytes improve the growth of host and non-host plants under drought stress through altered root development. Plant Soil 2019, 439, 259–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Han, L.; Shi, J.; He, C.; He, X. Temporal and spatial dynamics of dark septate endophytes in the roots of Lycium ruthenicum in the desert region of Northwest China. Agronomy 2021, 11, 648. [Google Scholar]
  40. Knapp, D.; Kovacs, G.M.; Zajta, E.; Groenewald, J.; Crous, P. Dark septate endophytic pleosporalean genera from semiarid areas. Persoonia 2015, 35, 87–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Peterson, D.; Filipski, A.; Kumar, S. MEGA6, molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2725–2729. [Google Scholar]
  42. Phillips, J.M.; Hayman, D.S. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1970, 55, 158–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shannon, C.E.; Weaver, W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication; University of Illinois Press: Urbana, IL, USA, 1949. [Google Scholar]
  44. Pielou, E.C. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J. Theor. Biol. 1966, 13, 131–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Samaga, P.V.; Rai, V.R. Diversity and bioactive potential of endophytic fungi from Nothapodytes foetida, Hypericum mysorense and Hypericum japonicum collected from Western Ghats of India. Ann. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 229–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Heiri, O.; Lotter, A.F.; Lemcke, G. Loss on ignition as a method for estimating organic and carbonate content in sediments: Reproducibility and comparability of results. J. Paleolimnol. 2001, 25, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Olsen, S.R.; Cole, C.V.; Watanabe, F.S. Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate; Circular/United States Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 1954.
  48. Bao, S.D. Agrochemical Analysis of Soil; Chinese Agricultural Press: Beijing, China, 2000; pp. 44–49. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  49. Tarafdar, J.; Marschner, H. Phosphatase activity in the rhizosphere and hyphosphere of VA mycorrhizal wheat supplied with inorganic and organic phosphorus. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1994, 26, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hoffmann, G.; Teicher, K. A colorimetric technique for determining urease activity in soil. Dung Boden. 1961, 95, 55–63. (In German) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, D.M.; Khalili, K.; Cairney, J.W.G. Influence of water stress on biomass production by isolates of an ericoid mycorrhizal endophyte of Woollsia pungens and Epacris microphylla (Ericaceae). Mycorrhiza 2003, 13, 173–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Elavarthi, S.; Martin, B. Spectrophotometric assays for antioxidant enzymes in plants. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010, 639, 273–280. [Google Scholar]
  53. Peever, T.L.; Higgins, V.J. Electrolyte leakage, lipoxygenase, and lipid peroxidation induced in tomato leaf tissue by specific and nonspecific elicitors from Cladosporium fulvum. Plant Physiol. 1989, 90, 867–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Christos, D.G.; Konstantinos, G.; George, Z. Mechanism of Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 binding to proteins: A hydrophobic assay for nanogram quantities of proteins. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2008, 3912, 391–403. [Google Scholar]
  55. Ellis, D.H.; Griffiths, D.A. The location and analysis of melanins in the cell walls of some soil fungi. Can. J. Microbiol. 1974, 20, 1379–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhan, F.; He, Y.; Zu, Y.; Li, T.; Zhao, Z. Characterization of melanin isolated from a dark septate endophyte (DSE), Exophiala pisciphila. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 27, 2483–2489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chen, J.H.; Jiang, H.W.; Hsieh, E.J.; Chen, H.; Chien, C.; Hsieh, H.; Lin, T. Drought and salt stress tolerance of an Arabidopsis glutathione S–transferase U17 knockout mutant are attributed to the combined effect of glutathione and abscisic acid. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158, 340–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. He, C.; Wang, W.; Hou, J. Plant growth and soil microbial impacts of enhancing licorice with inoculating dark septate endophytes under drought stress. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Anderson, M.E. Determination of glutathione and glutathione disulfide in biological samples. Method Enzymol. 1985, 113, 548–555. [Google Scholar]
  60. Bates, L.S.; Waldren, R.P.; Teare, I.D. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil. 1973, 39, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hou, L.; Li, X.; He, X.; Zuo, Y.; Zhang, D.; Zhao, L. Effect of dark septate endophytes on plant performance of Artemisia ordosica and associated soil microbial functional group abundance under salt stress. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2021, 165, 103998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Steven, B.; Hesse, C.; Gallegos-Graves, L.V.; Belnap, J.; Kuske, C.R. Fungal diversity in biological soil crusts of the Colorado plateau. In Proceedings of the 12th Biennial Conference of Research on the Colorado Plateau; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  63. Zuo, Y.; Hu, Q.; Liu, J.; He, X.L. Relationship of root dark septate endophytes and soil factors to plant species and seasonal variation in extremely arid desert in Northwest China. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2022, 175, 104454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hou, L.; Yu, J.; Zhao, L.; He, X. Dark septate endophytes improve the growth and the tolerance of Medicago sativa and Ammopiptanthus mongolicus under cadmium stress. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 3061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. He, C.; Liu, C.; Liu, H.; Wang, W.; Hou, J.; Li, X. Dual inoculation of dark septate endophytes and Trichoderma viride drives plant performance and rhizosphere microbiome adaptations of Astragalus mongholicus to drought. Environ. Microbiol. 2022, 24, 324–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Collins, S.L.; Sinsabaugh, R.L.; Crenshaw, C.; Green, L.; Porras–Alfaro, A.; Stursova, M.; Zeglin, L.H. Pulse dynamics and microbial processes in aridland ecosystems. J. Ecol. 2008, 96, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lagueux, D.; Jumpponen, A.; Porras-Alfaro, A.; Herrera, J.; Chung, Y.A.; Baur, L.E.; Smith, M.D.; Knapp, A.K.; Collins, S.L.; Rudgers, J.A. Experimental drought re-ordered assemblages of root-associated fungi across North American grasslands. J. Ecol. 2020, 2, 776–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chu, H.; Wang, C.; Li, Z.; Wang, H.; Xiao, Y.; Chen, J.; Tang, M. The dark septate endophytes and ectomycorrhizal fungi effect on Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. seedling growth and their potential effects to pine wilt disease resistance. Forests 2019, 10, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Han, L.; Zuo, Y.; He, X.; Hou, Y.; Li, M.; Li, B. Plant identity and soil variables shift the colonisation and species composition of dark septate endophytes associated with medicinal plants in a northern farmland in China. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2021, 167, 104042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Upson, R.; Read, D.J.; Newsham, K.K. Nitrogen form influences the response of Deschampsia antarctica to dark septate root endophytes. Mycorrhiza 2009, 20, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sinsabaugh, R.L.; Belnap, J.; Rudgers, J.; Kuske, C.R.; Martinez, N.; Sandquist, D. Soil microbial responses to nitrogen addition in arid ecosystems. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Zhou, Z.H.; Wang, C.K.; Luo, Y.Q. Meta-analysis of the impacts of global change factors on soil microbial diversity and functionality. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Carrino-Kyker, S.R.; Kluber, L.A.; Petersen, S.M.; Coyle, K.P.; Hewins, C.R.; DeForest, J.L.; Smemo, K.A.; Burke, D.J. Mycorrhizal fungal communities respond to experimental elevation of soil pH and P availability in temperate hardwood forests. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016, 92, fiw024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Fonseca, A.A.; Santos, D.A.; Passos, R.R.; Andrade, F.V.; Rangel, O.J.P. Phosphorus availability and grass growth in biochar–modified acid soil, a study excluding the effects of soil pH. Soil Use Manag. 2020, 36, 714–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Leff, J.W.; Jones, S.E.; Prober, S.M.; Barberan, A.; Borer, E.T.; Firn, J.L.; Harpole, W.S.; Hobbie, S.E.; Hofmockel, K.S.; Knops, J.M.; et al. Consistent responses of soil microbial communities to elevated nutrient inputs in grasslands across the globe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 10967–10972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Chen, X.; Hao, B.; Jing, X.; He, J.; Ma, W.; Zhu, B. Minor responses of soil microbial biomass, community structure and enzyme activities to nitrogen and phosphorus addition in three grassland ecosystems. Plant Soil 2019, 444, 21–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hobbie, E.A.; Colpaert, J.V.; White, M.W.; Ouimette, A.P.; Macko, S.A. Nitrogen form, availability, and mycorrhizal colonization affect biomass and nitrogen isotope patterns in Pinus sylvestris. Plant Soil 2008, 310, 121–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Monica, I.F.D.; Saparrat, M.C.N.; Godeas, A.M.; Scervino, J.M. The co-existence between DSE and AMF symbionts affects plant P pools through P mineralization and solubilization processes. Fungal Ecol. 2015, 17, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Renella, G.; Egamberdiyeva, D.; Landi, L.; Mench, M.; Nannipieri, P. Microbial activity and hydrolase activities during decomposition of root exudates released by an artificial root surface in Cd–contaminated soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2006, 38, 702–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Xiao, W.; Chen, X.; Jing, X.; Zhu, B. A meta–analysis of soil extracellular enzyme activities in response to global change. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2018, 123, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Acosta-Martinez, V.; Tabatabai, M.A. Enzyme activities in a limed agricultural soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2000, 31, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Glassman, S.I.; Wang, I.J.; Bruns, T.D. Environmental filtering by pH and soil nutrients drives community assembly in fungi at fine spatial scales. Mol. Ecol. 2017, 26, 6960–6973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Li, X.; He, X.L.; Zhou, Y.; Hou, Y.T.; Zuo, Y.L. Effects of dark septate endophytes on the performance of Hedysarum scoparium under water deficit stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Landolt, M.; Stroheker, S.; Queloz, V.; Gall, A.; Sieber, T.N. Does water availability influence the abundance of species of the Phialocephala fortinii s.l.—Acephala applanata complex (PAC) in roots of pubescent oak (Quercus pubescens) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris)? Fungal Ecol. 2020, 44, 100904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. He, C.; Wang, W.; Hou, J.; Li, X. Dark septate endophytes isolated from wild licorice roots grown in the desert regions of Northwest China enhance the growth of host plants under water deficit stress. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 522449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Baltruschat, H.; Fodor, J.; Harrach, B.D.; Niemczyk, E.; Barna, B.; Gullner, G.; Janeczko, A.; Kogel, K.H.; Schafer, P.; Schwarczinger, I.; et al. Salt tolerance of barley induced by the root endophyte Piriformospora indica is associated with a strong increase in antioxidants. New Phytol. 2008, 180, 501–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Li, J.; Meng, B.; Chai, H.; Yang, X.; Song, W.; Li, S.; Lu, A.; Zhang, T.; Sun, W. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate drought stress in C3 (Leymus chinensis) and C4 (Hemarthria altissima) grasses via altering antioxidant enzyme activities and photosynthesis. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Salducci, M.D.; Folzera, H.; Issartela, J.; Rabiera, J.; Masottia, V.; Prudentb, P.; Affrea, L.; Hardionc, L.; Tatonia, T.; Laffont-Schwobad, I. How can a rare protected plant cope with the metal and metalloid soil pollution resulting from past industrial activities? Phytometabolites, antioxidant activities and root symbiosis involved in the metal tolerance of Astragalus tragacantha. Chemosphere 2019, 217, 887–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Collin–Hansen, C.; Andersen, R.A.; Steinnes, E. Molecular defense systems are expressed in the king bolete (Boletus edulis) growing near metal smelters. Mycologia 2005, 97, 973–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Li, M.; Hou, L.F.; Liu, J.Q.; Yang, J.Y.; Zou, Y.L.; Zhao, L.L.; He, X.L. Growth-promoting effects of dark septate endophytes on the non-mycorrhizal plant Isatis indigotica under diferent water conditions. Symbiosis 2021, 85, 291–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Petelenz-Kurdziel, E.; Eriksson, E.; Smedh, M.; Beck, C.; Hohmann, S.; Goksör, M. Quantification of cell volume changes upon hyperosmotic stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Integr. Biol. 2011, 3, 1120–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Berthelot, C.; Perrin, Y.; Leyval, C.; Blaudez, D. Melanization and ageing are not drawbacks for successful agrotransformation of dark septate endophytes. Fungal Biol. 2017, 121, 652–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Gaber, D.A.; Berthelot, C.; Camehl, I.; Kovács, G.M.; Blaudez, D.; Franken, P. Salt stress tolerance of dark septate endophytes is independent of melanin accumulation. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 562931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Addy, H.D.; Piercey, M.M.; Currah, R.S. Microfungal endophytes in roots. Can. J. Bot. 2005, 83, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Mandyam, K.; Jumpponen, A. Seeking the elusive function of the root-colonising dark septate endophytic fungi. Stud. Mycol. 2005, 53, 173–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Peterson, R.L.; Wagg, C.; Pautler, M. Associations between microfungal endophytes and roots, do structural features indicate function. Botany 2008, 86, 445–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wu, L.Q.; Lv, Y.L.; Meng, Z.X.; Chen, J.; Guo, S.X. The promoting role of an isolate of dark–septate fungus on its host plant Saussurea involucrate Kar. et Kir. Mycorrhiza 2010, 20, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Liu, Y.; Wei, X.L. Dark septate endophyte improves drought tolerance of Ormosia hosiei Hemsley & E. H. Wilson by modulating root morphology, ultrastructure, and the ratio of root hormones. Forests 2019, 10, 830. [Google Scholar]
  99. Hosseini, F.; Mosaddeghi, M.R.; Dexter, A.R.; Sepehri, M. Maize water status and physiological traits as affected by root endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica under combined drought and mechanical stresses. Planta 2018, 247, 1229–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Khan, A.L.; Hamayun, M.; Khan, S.A.; Kang, S.M.; Shinwari, Z.K.; Kamran, M.; Rehman, S.; Kim, J.G.; Lee, I.J. Pure culture of Metarhizium anisopliae LHL07 reprograms soybean to higher growth and mitigates salt stress. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 28, 1483–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Xu, L.; Wang, A.A.; Wang, J.; Wei, Q.; Zhang, W.Y. Piriformospora indica confers drought tolerance on Zea mays L. through enhancement of antioxidantactivity and expression of drought–related genes. Crop J. 2017, 5, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Pan, X.; Qin, Y.; Yuan, Z.L. Potential of a halophyte–associated endophytic fungus for sustaining Chinese white poplar growth under salinity. Symbiosis 2018, 76, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Deng, X.; Song, X.; Halifu, S.; Yu, W.; Song, R. Effects of dark septate endophytes strain A024 on damping–off biocontrol, plant growth, and the rhizosphere soil environment of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica annual seedlings. Plants 2020, 9, 913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Bouzouina, M.; Kouadria, R.; Lotmani, B. Fungal endophytes alleviate salt stress in wheat in terms of growth, ion homeostasis and osmoregulation. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 130, 913–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Khan, A.L.; Hamayun, M.; Kang, S.M.; Kim, Y.H.; Jung, H.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, I.J. Endophytic fungal association via gibberellins and indole acetic acid can improve plant growth under abiotic stress, an example of Paecilomyces formosus LHL10. BMC Microbiol. 2012, 12, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Priyadharsini, P.; Muthukumar, T. The root endophytic fungus Curvularia geniculata from Parthenium hysterophorus roots improves plant growth through phosphate solubilization and phytohormone production. Fungal Ecol. 2017, 27, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Liu, H.G.; Wang, Y.J.; Hart, M.; Chen, H.; Tang, M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis regulates hormone and osmotic equilibrium of Lycium barbarum L. under salt stress. Mycosphere 2016, 7, 828–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Lage–Pinto, F.; Oliveira, J.G.; Cunha, D.M.; Souza, C.M.M.; Rezende, C.E.; Azevedo, R.A.; Vitoria, A.P. Chlorophyll a fluorescence and ultrastructural changes in chloroplast of water hyacinth as indicators of environmental stress. Environ. Expl. Bot. 2008, 64, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Gupta, S.; Schillaci, M.; Walker, R.; Smith, P.M.C.; Watt, M.; Roessner, U. Alleviation of salinity stress in plants by endophytic plant–fungal symbiosis, current knowledge, perspectives and future directions. Plant Soil 2020, 461, 219–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Liu, Y.; Wei, X. Dark septate endophyte improves the drought–stress resistance of Ormosia hosiei seedlings by altering leaf morphology and photosynthetic characteristics. Plant Ecol. 2021, 222, 761–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jof 08 00730 g001 550
Figure 1. Dark septate endophytes associated with the roots of Artemisia ordosica growing in natural habitats. bars = 50 µm. Arrows indicate the following: Hy, DSE hyphae; M, DSE microsclerotia.
Figure 1. Dark septate endophytes associated with the roots of Artemisia ordosica growing in natural habitats. bars = 50 µm. Arrows indicate the following: Hy, DSE hyphae; M, DSE microsclerotia.
Jof 08 00730 g001
Jof 08 00730 g002 550
Figure 2. Colonies of dark septate endophytes isolated from the roots of Artemisia ordosica grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium (A–N). (a–n), microscopic morphology of endophytic fungi (bars = 50 μm).
Figure 2. Colonies of dark septate endophytes isolated from the roots of Artemisia ordosica grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium (A–N). (a–n), microscopic morphology of endophytic fungi (bars = 50 μm).
Jof 08 00730 g002
Jof 08 00730 g003 550
Figure 3. Maximum likelihood tree based on the ITS4-5.8S-ITS5 rDNA sequence analysis of DSEs isolated from roots of Artemisia ordosica. Sequences that were determined in the course of this study appear in bold.
Figure 3. Maximum likelihood tree based on the ITS4-5.8S-ITS5 rDNA sequence analysis of DSEs isolated from roots of Artemisia ordosica. Sequences that were determined in the course of this study appear in bold.
Jof 08 00730 g003
Jof 08 00730 g004 550
Figure 4. Column chart of the proportion of DSE species at three sample sites. Note: SPT, Shapotou. ALS, Alxa. DK, Dengkou.
Figure 4. Column chart of the proportion of DSE species at three sample sites. Note: SPT, Shapotou. ALS, Alxa. DK, Dengkou.
Jof 08 00730 g004
Jof 08 00730 g005 550
Figure 5. Assessment of the species diversity indices and colonization rate of DSE fungi at three sample sites. Note: SPT, Shapotou. ALS, Alxa. DK, Dengkou. Different letters above the error bars indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Assessment of the species diversity indices and colonization rate of DSE fungi at three sample sites. Note: SPT, Shapotou. ALS, Alxa. DK, Dengkou. Different letters above the error bars indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05.
Jof 08 00730 g005
Jof 08 00730 g006 550
Figure 6. Heat maps of the correlation analysis between soil factors and the roots relative abundance of isolated endophytes. Note: ACP, soil acid phosphatase. Hum, soil moisture. ALP, soil alkaline phosphatase activities. U, soil urease. SOC, soil organic matter. AP, soil available phosphorus. AN, soil available nitrogen. The asterisks indicate significant correlations at p < 0.05.
Figure 6. Heat maps of the correlation analysis between soil factors and the roots relative abundance of isolated endophytes. Note: ACP, soil acid phosphatase. Hum, soil moisture. ALP, soil alkaline phosphatase activities. U, soil urease. SOC, soil organic matter. AP, soil available phosphorus. AN, soil available nitrogen. The asterisks indicate significant correlations at p < 0.05.
Jof 08 00730 g006
Jof 08 00730 g007 550
Figure 7. Biomass (a), melanin content (b), superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity (c), soluble protein (d), and malondialdehyde (e) content of three dark septate endophytes (DSEs) exposed to drought stress induced with polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000. The asterisk above the error bars indicates significant difference between the normal and drought treatment of each DSE stain at p < 0.05. Note: Ac, Alternaria chartarum. Pc, Paraphoma chrysanthemicola. Av, Acrocalymma vagum.
Figure 7. Biomass (a), melanin content (b), superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity (c), soluble protein (d), and malondialdehyde (e) content of three dark septate endophytes (DSEs) exposed to drought stress induced with polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000. The asterisk above the error bars indicates significant difference between the normal and drought treatment of each DSE stain at p < 0.05. Note: Ac, Alternaria chartarum. Pc, Paraphoma chrysanthemicola. Av, Acrocalymma vagum.
Jof 08 00730 g007
Jof 08 00730 g008 550
Figure 8. Colonization of DSE strains in the roots of inoculated Artemisia ordosica seedlings after harvest. Note: bars = 50 µm.
Figure 8. Colonization of DSE strains in the roots of inoculated Artemisia ordosica seedlings after harvest. Note: bars = 50 µm.
Jof 08 00730 g008
Jof 08 00730 g009 550
Figure 9. Dark septate endophyte (DSE) colonization rate in the roots of Artemisia ordosica inoculated with DSEs under drought stress. Note: W−, drought treatment. W+, well-watered treatment. Ac, Alternaria chartarum. Pc, Paraphoma chrysanthemicola. Av, Acrocalymma vagum. Different letters above the error bars indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 9. Dark septate endophyte (DSE) colonization rate in the roots of Artemisia ordosica inoculated with DSEs under drought stress. Note: W−, drought treatment. W+, well-watered treatment. Ac, Alternaria chartarum. Pc, Paraphoma chrysanthemicola. Av, Acrocalymma vagum. Different letters above the error bars indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05.
Jof 08 00730 g009
Jof 08 00730 g010 550
Figure 10. Effects of dark septate endophyte (DSE) on the shoot and root morphological traits of Artemisia ordosica seedlings under drought stress. Different letters above the error bars indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05. Note: (a), plant height, (b), branching number, (c) total root length, (d), root surface area, (e), root volume, (f), root diameter. W−, drought treatment. W+, well-watered treatment. CK, non-DSE inoculated control. Ac, Pc, and Av, plants inoculated with Alternaria chartarum, Paraphoma chrysanthemicola, and Acrocalymma vagum.
Figure 10. Effects of dark septate endophyte (DSE) on the shoot and root morphological traits of Artemisia ordosica seedlings under drought stress. Different letters above the error bars indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05. Note: (a), plant height, (b), branching number, (c) total root length, (d), root surface area, (e), root volume, (f), root diameter. W−, drought treatment. W+, well-watered treatment. CK, non-DSE inoculated control. Ac, Pc, and Av, plants inoculated with Alternaria chartarum, Paraphoma chrysanthemicola, and Acrocalymma vagum.
Jof 08 00730 g010
Jof 08 00730 g011 550
Figure 11. Effects of dark septate endophyte (DSE) on the biomass production and root–shoot ratio of Artemisia ordosica seedlings under drought stress. Different letters above the error bars indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05. Note: (a), shoot and root biomass, (b), total biomass, (c), root:shoot ratio. W−, drought treatment. W+, well-watered treatment. CK, non-DSE inoculated control. Ac, Pc, and Av, plants inoculated with Alternaria chartarum, Paraphoma chrysanthemicola, and Acrocalymma vagum.
Figure 11. Effects of dark septate endophyte (DSE) on the biomass production and root–shoot ratio of Artemisia ordosica seedlings under drought stress. Different letters above the error bars indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05. Note: (a), shoot and root biomass, (b), total biomass, (c), root:shoot ratio. W−, drought treatment. W+, well-watered treatment. CK, non-DSE inoculated control. Ac, Pc, and Av, plants inoculated with Alternaria chartarum, Paraphoma chrysanthemicola, and Acrocalymma vagum.
Jof 08 00730 g011
Jof 08 00730 g012 550
Figure 12. Effects of dark septate endophyte (DSE) on the shoot and root physiological traits of Artemisia ordosica seedlings under drought stress. Different letters above the error bars indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05. Note: (a), SOD, (b), GSH, (c), MDA, (d), auxin, (e) proline, (f), chlorophyll. W−, drought treatment. W+, well-watered treatment. CK, non-DSE inoculated control. Ac, Pc, and Av, plants inoculated with Alternaria chartarum, Paraphoma chrysanthemicola, and Acrocalymma vagum.
Figure 12. Effects of dark septate endophyte (DSE) on the shoot and root physiological traits of Artemisia ordosica seedlings under drought stress. Different letters above the error bars indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05. Note: (a), SOD, (b), GSH, (c), MDA, (d), auxin, (e) proline, (f), chlorophyll. W−, drought treatment. W+, well-watered treatment. CK, non-DSE inoculated control. Ac, Pc, and Av, plants inoculated with Alternaria chartarum, Paraphoma chrysanthemicola, and Acrocalymma vagum.
Jof 08 00730 g012
Table
Table 1. Analysis of variance for the effects of drought stress and dark septate endophyte (DSE) inoculation on the shoot and root morphological traits and biomass production of Artemisia ordosica seedlings.
Table 1. Analysis of variance for the effects of drought stress and dark septate endophyte (DSE) inoculation on the shoot and root morphological traits and biomass production of Artemisia ordosica seedlings.
Plant HeightBranching NumberTotal Root LengthRoot Surface AreaRoot VolumeRoot DiameterShoot BiomassRoot BiomassTotal BiomassRoot:Shoot Ratio
FpFpFpFpFpFpFpFpFpFp
drought17.570.001365.16< 0.0010.010.9660.530.4790.320.5811.990.1770.220.64618.280.0011.530.2347.850.013
DSE4.340.02056.34< 0.00111.79< 0.00138.39< 0.0018.150.0021.760.19565.80<0.001127.37< 0.001111.41< 0.00111.08< 0.001
drought ×
DSE		3.510.04065.86<0.00115.74<0.00134.11<0.0014.960.0131.070.39182.25< 0.00167.72< 0.001119.85< 0.00123.19< 0.001
Note: Significant p-values are in bold.
Table
Table 2. Analysis of variance for the effects of drought stress and dark septate endophyte (DSE) inoculation on the physiological traits of Artemisia ordosica seedlings.
Table 2. Analysis of variance for the effects of drought stress and dark septate endophyte (DSE) inoculation on the physiological traits of Artemisia ordosica seedlings.
SODGSHMDAAuxinProlineChlorophyll
FpFpFpFpFpFp
drought3.080.098193.48<0.0010.010.99727.19<0.00132.16<0.0011.180.293
DSE7.500.00230.96<0.00110.99<0.0016.640.00415.35<0.00149.69<0.001
drought × DSE3.480.04131.55<0.00110.51<0.0013.390.0444.420.01916.12<0.001
Note: SOD, superoxide dismutase activity. GSH, glutathione content. MDA, malondialdehyde content. Significant p-values are in bold.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Xu, M.; Ye, Q.; Gao, H.; He, X. Improved Tolerance of Artemisia ordosica to Drought Stress via Dark Septate Endophyte (DSE) Symbiosis. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 730. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jof8070730

AMA Style

Li X, Zhang X, Xu M, Ye Q, Gao H, He X. Improved Tolerance of Artemisia ordosica to Drought Stress via Dark Septate Endophyte (DSE) Symbiosis. Journal of Fungi. 2022; 8(7):730. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jof8070730

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Xia, Xue Zhang, Minghui Xu, Qiannan Ye, Huili Gao, and Xueli He. 2022. "Improved Tolerance of Artemisia ordosica to Drought Stress via Dark Septate Endophyte (DSE) Symbiosis" Journal of Fungi 8, no. 7: 730. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jof8070730

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop