Next Article in Journal
Yeast Genomics and Its Applications in Biotechnological Processes: What Is Our Present and Near Future?
Previous Article in Journal
DdaCrz1, a C2H2-Type Transcription Factor, Regulates Growth, Conidiation, and Stress Resistance in the Nematode-Trapping Fungus Drechslerella dactyloides
Previous Article in Special Issue
Clinical Aspergillus Signatures in COPD and Bronchiectasis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Macrophage Lysosomal Alkalinization Drives Invasive Aspergillosis in a Mouse Cystic Fibrosis Model of Airway Transplantation

1
Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94304, USA
2
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
3
Department of Pediatrics, Pulmonary Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94304, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 2 June 2022 / Revised: 5 July 2022 / Accepted: 8 July 2022 / Published: 20 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances Against Aspergillosis and Mucormycosis 2022)

Abstract

:
Cystic fibrosis (CF) lung transplant recipients (LTRs) exhibit a disproportionately high rate of life-threatening invasive aspergillosis (IA). Loss of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR-/-) in macrophages (mφs) has been associated with lyosomal alkalinization. We hypothesize that this alkalinization would persist in the iron-laden post-transplant microenvironment increasing the risk of IA. To investigate our hypothesis, we developed a murine CF orthotopic tracheal transplant (OTT) model. Iron levels were detected by immunofluorescence staining and colorimetric assays. Aspergillus fumigatus (Af) invasion was evaluated by Grocott methenamine silver staining. Phagocytosis and killing of Af conidia were examined by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. pH and lysosomal acidification were measured by LysoSensorTM and LysotrackerTM, respectively. Af was more invasive in the CF airway transplant recipient compared to the WT recipient (p < 0.05). CFTR-/- mφs were alkaline at baseline, a characteristic that was increased with iron-overload. These CFTR-/- mφs were unable to phagocytose and kill Af conidia (p < 0.001). Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles acidified lysosomes, restoring the CFTR-/- mφs’ ability to clear conidia. Our results suggest that CFTR-/- mφs’ alkalinization interacts with the iron-loaded transplant microenvironment, decreasing the CF-mφs’ ability to kill Af conidia, which may explain the increased risk of IA. Therapeutic pH modulation after transplantation could decrease the risk of IA.

1. Introduction

Aspergillus fumigatus (Af) is a ubiquitous mold that grows in decaying organic matter, releasing airborne spores that results in an estimated 20 million cases of respiratory and sinus diseases worldwide [1]. Aspergillus-related respiratory diseases include severe asthma, tracheobronchitis, chronic necrotizing Aspergillus pneumonia and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. These diseases occur in immune-suppressed persons and in those with underlying pulmonary comorbidities such as cystic fibrosis (CF), asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [10,11,12,13]. These infections are particularly common among lung transplant recipients (LTRs), with one-in-three persons suffering from an Af-related pulmonary disease [14,15]. In addition to IPA, CF-lung transplant recipients (CF-LTRs) are at a highest risk for Af infections of the tracheal anastomosis, resulting in serious complications including fatal hemorrhage, airway stenosis and bronchomalacia [16,17]. In invasive disease, Af spores germinate into filamentous hyphae and invade and destroy tissues and organs, with mortality rates as high as 60% [18]. There are only a limited number of antifungal treatments and there is growing Af resistance to these medications [19,20,21]. The development of successful therapeutics to fight these infections requires a more comprehensive understanding of the interplay of immune mechanisms that control Af in vivo.
In CF-LTRs, the incidence of invasive Af exceeds that seen for transplants undertaken for non-CF-related pulmonary diseases [22,23]. Putative factors such as fungal colonization prior to transplantation do not completely explain this increased risk [24]. One factor that has been suggested to increase the risk of infections in persons with CF is innate immune defects caused by the loss of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR−/−) [25,26]. CFTR is a cellular receptor that mediates Cl- entry and functions as counter-ion conductase to balance the H+ influx to maintain an acidified lysosomal environment [27]. CFTR is highly expressed by several types of lung epithelial cells, as well as neutrophils, monocytes and macrophages, underlying the potential importance of CFTR deficiency in the innate immune response [28]. Mφs are central to the host defense of Af through phagocytosis and killing of conidia as well as by directing the host pro-inflammatory response that recruits neutrophils to the site of infection [29]. Mφs can recognize Af conidia by pattern recognition receptors such as Toll-like receptor (TLR)-2, TLR-4 and dectin-1 [30,31] and engulf them. The conidia are then transferred into the phagolysosome (mature phagosome that has been acidified by lysosomes), where the conidia are broken down by enzymes that are active only in an acidic microenvironment [32]. Several studies have shown that CFTR-deficiency alters mφs’ signaling pathways, and directly controls CF-mφs’ lysosomal pH and microbicidal function [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. Other studies have failed to replicate these findings possibly due to differences in experimental procedures, including methods used to measure pH and the use of live organisms versus opsonized particles [27,42,43]. In this study, our goal was to clarify the relationship between the loss of CFTR and the mφ’s ability to clear Af conidia in the setting of transplantation, using a murine orthotopic tracheal transplant (OTT) model [17,44].
We and others have previously shown that the human transplanted lung is characterized by iron-overloaded mφs [44,45,46]. In addition to their anti-microbial role, mφs play a crucial role in iron recycling [47]. Mφ lysosomes are the first organelles to receive extracellular iron and are responsible for its reduction into the ferrous (Fe2+) form for translocation, transportation for iron recycling or storage. The activity of the iron-processing enzymes in the lysosomes depends on an acidic lysosomal pH [47,48]. Studies have suggested that CFTR plays role in lysosomal pH homeostasis and that CFTR/− leads to alkalinization [34,36,49,50,51,52,53]. This CFTR/−-related alkalinization could cause an increase in mφ intracellular iron, which could be further increased by the iron overload observed in the transplant microenvironment [44]. At present, little is known about the functional sequelae that can result from mφs overloaded with iron. We hypothesized that the CFTR/−-related mφ impairment in lysosomal acidification would interact with the iron-overloaded lung transplant microenvironment to contribute to the higher rates of invasive Af infections in CF-LTRs. To study the transplanted CF host–Af relationship, we studied Af infection in our OTT model using a CFTR/− mouse as the transplant recipient compared to wild type (WT) control transplant recipients. We examined the impact of pH alkalinization in mφ’s ability to clear Af conidia and evaluated the contributory role of iron. By elucidating the role of pH modulation in mφ’s ability to clear Af conidia this model has the potential to facilitate the development of novel therapeutic concepts for the treatment of invasive Af infections in CF-LTRs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Aspergillus Culture

Dr. David Stevens provided the Aspergillus fumigatus 10AF strain and Dr. Tobias Hohl provided the Aspergillus fumigatus Af293 dsRed fluorescent Aspergillus reporter (FLARE) strain. The FLARE strain was developed to trace conidial fate and enable functional analysis of conidiacidal activity [54]. Aspergillus fumigatus conidia were grown in potato dextrose agar plates at 37 °C. Conidia were harvested by washing the surface of the agar plate with 0.05% Tween 80 in saline (v/v). The conidial suspension was vortexed to disperse clumps of conidia and stored at 4 °C overnight (14–16 h). The suspension was then diluted to the desired number of conidia per ml. For in vitro assays, the cell to FLARE conidia ratio used was 1:5 and for in vivo experiments 108 10AF conidia/ml were used.

2.2. FLARE Conidia AF633 Tagging

To generate a fluorescent cover to the FLARE conidia, 5 × 108 Af293-dsRed conidia were rotated in 0.5 mg/mL Biotin XX, SSE (B-6352; Invitrogen) in 1 mL 50 mM carbonate buffer (pH 8.3) for 2 h at 4 °C, washed in 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8), labeled with 0.02 mg/mL AF633-streptavidin (S-21375; Invitrogen) in 1 mL PBS for 30 min at RT, and resuspended in PBS and 0.025% Tween 20 for experimental use [54].

2.3. Orthotopic Tracheal Transplantation Model

Five-week-old male C57BL/6, BALB/c and Cftrtm1Unc Tg(FABPCFTR)1Jaw (CFTR−/−) mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory. Mice were randomly assigned to groups that consisted of ≥5 transplanted mice in all experiments. The OTT model was used, as previously described [17,44]. Animals were inoculated intratracheally with 4 × 106 A. fumigatus conidia on day 7 posttransplant, after which all infected animals received a single dose of corticosteroid (1 mg of triamcinolone acetonide) subcutaneously. At day 3 post infection, all mice were euthanatized using CO2 asphyxia and cervical dislocation. The animal protocol used for this study has been approved by Stanford University Research Compliance Office (RCO) Administrative Panel on Laboratory Animal Care (APLAC), active protocol # 32936.

2.4. Tissue Preparation, Grading of Fungal Invasion

The extent of fungal invasion was semiquantitatively graded, as previously described [44]. All tracheal samples were cut longitudinally in 5 μm sections through the entire tracheal segment and stained with Grocott’s methenamine silver (Histo-Tec Laboratories). Tracheal sections were graded for depth of fungal invasion. The degree of fungal burden was determined using the following scoring system: 0, no fungal elements; 1, fungal hyphae present in the epithelial layer; 2, hyphae present in the subepithelial layer; 3, hyphae present in the tracheal ring area; and 4, hyphae growth beyond the tracheal ring.

2.5. Lung Macrophages Isolation

To isolate lung mφs we used a well-established protocol described elsewhere [55]. Briefly, mice were sacrificed, and lungs were isolated and minced with a scalpel to <1 mm pieces. Minced lung tissue was incubated with Collagenase I (300 μg/mL) and DNase I (5 U/mL) at 37 °C incubator for 25 min. The dissociated lung tissue was passed through a 100 μm cell strainer. The strainer was washed using a tissue wash buffer (PBS, 2% FBS, 2 mM EDTA). To obtain monolayers of mφs, the cell concentration is adjusted to 2–3 × 106 total nucleated cells/mL in DMEM medium. The cells were allowed to adhere to the substrate by culturing them for 1 to 2 h at 37 °C. Non-adherent cells were removed by gently washing three times with warm PBS. At this time, cells should be greater than 90% mφs [56].

2.6. Tracheal Tissue Staining

Fresh tracheal cryosections from mice infected with Af-GFP were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS pH 7.4 for 15 min at room temperature. Tissue was then permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min at room temperature. Then, tracheas were then incubated with 1% BSA, 22.52 mg/mL glycine in PBST (PBS + 0.1% Tween 20) for 30 min to block unspecific binding of the antibodies. Tissue was incubated with primary antibody ferritin (ab69090; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) in 1% BSA in PBST for 1 h at room temperature. Following the tissue was incubated with secondary antibody goat anti-Rabbit IgG Texas Red (ab6719; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) in 1% BSA for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. Tracheas were then mounted using ProLong Gold (P10144; InvitrogenTM,,Waltham, MA, USA). Images and z stacks were taken using a confocal microscope (Leica Stellaris 8). Fluorescence was quantified by ImageJ.

2.7. Conidial Ingestion and Clearance Detection Imaging

Lung mφs were seeded in sterile coverslips. Mφs were allowed to adhere by incubating at 37 °C with 5% CO2 overnight. Iron-dextran (D8517; Millipore Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA) in complete media treatments were added for 16 h. FLARE-AF633 conidia were added to each well (cell–conidia ratio 1:5) and samples were incubated for 30 min and 6 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for the ingestion and clearance assessments, respectively. Cells were then washed 4 times with PBS to remove any unbound conidia and fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 10 min at room temperature. Cells were permeabilized using 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10min at room temperature. Finally, samples were then mounted using ProLong Gold with DAPI (P36941; InvitrogenTM, Waltham, MA, USA). Images and z stacks were taken using a confocal microscope (Leica Stellaris 8, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).

2.8. Flow Cytometry Methods

Lung mφs were seeded in 6-well plates. Mφs were allowed to adhere by incubating at 37 °C with 5% CO2 overnight. Iron-dextran in complete media treatments were added for 16 h. FLARE-AF633 conidia (cell–conidia ratio 1:5) were added to each flask and samples were incubated for 6 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Cells were then detached using mφs detachment solution DXF (C-41330; PromoCell, Heidelberg, Germany). Cells were washed 3 times with PBS and analyzed immediately by flow cytometry (BD LSR II or FACSymphony, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). After the exclusion of doublets and debris, initial gating was done using the forward-scatter and side-scatter dot plot. Cells were then gated for dsRed+ AF633+ (live conidia) and AF633+ (dead conidia) (Figure A1). Analyses were performed with FlowJo v10.6.2 (FlowJo, Ashland, OR, USA).

2.9. Determination of Lysosomal Alkalinization

Lung mφs were seeded in sterile coverslips. Mφs were allowed to adhere by incubating at 37 °C with 5% CO2 overnight. To detect lysosomal acidification in live cells LysoTrackerTM Green DND-26 (L7526, Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) 75nM was added to each sample. Cells were then incubated for 30 min at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Cells were then washed and analyzed by flow cytometry (BD LSR II or FACSymphony). Analyses were per-formed with FlowJo v10.6.2 (FlowJo, Ashland, OR, USA).

2.10. Cellular pH Measurement

For cellular organelles pH measurements, we used LysoSensorTM Yellow/Blue dextran (L22460; Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) probe. To form a standard curve, murine lung mφs were treated with media with increasing pH from 4 to 8 for 1 h at 37 °C. Then, LysoSensorTM probe 5 mg/mL was added in each sample and cells were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. Cells were then washed with PBS and images were taken using a confocal microscope (Leica Stellaris 8, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) at excitation 405 nm and 450 nm and emission 505 and 530 nm, respectively, or fluorescence was detected using a plate reader (Synergy LX Multi-Mode Plate Reader, BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA). pH was calculated based on the standard curve (Figure A2).

2.11. Iron Assay

Iron levels were detected using a colorimetric assay (Iron Assay Kit ab83366; Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Tracheas were harvested and washed thoroughly with PBS. Tissue was minced and homogenized using a homogenizer. Tissue homogenate was centrifuged at 16,000× g for 10 min, and supernatant was used in this assay according to manufacturer’s instructions (Figure A3).

2.12. pH Modulation Treatments

Chloroquine diphosphate (CQ) (41-095-0, Tocris Bioscience™, Bristol, UK) powder was diluted in PBS and used to increase lysosomal pH in primary lung mφs. CFTR−/− and WT mouse lung mφs were treated with increasing concentrations of CQ (20 μM, 40 μM and 80 μM) for 2 h. To decrease lysosomal pH we used Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles (NPs) with size ~100 nm (805092, Millipore Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA). PLGA NPs were diluted in PBS. CFTR−/− and WT mouse lung mφs were treated with 0.5 mg/mL NPs for 1 h. After treatments cells were washed three timeswith Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline 1×.

2.13. Statistics

GraphPad Prism version 9.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Differences in ferritin levels and iron levels were evaluated using Student’s t test. All t tests were two-tailed. Histologic differences in the depth of fungal invasion, fungal burden and Prussian blue staining for iron content in the graft were evaluated by a nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test. Results from ingestion and phagocytosis assays were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for multi-ple comparisons. PLGA studies were evaluated by Student’s t test. Significance values were set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. In the CF-OTT Model Both Tracheas and CFTR-/- mφs Had Higher Levels of Iron Compared to WT Control

In order to investigate the risk factors that lead to Af invasion in CF-LTRs, we developed a CF-OTT model by transplanting a trachea from a Balb/c mouse into a CFTR−/− recipient mouse (Cftrtm1Unc Tg(FABPCFTR)1Jaw on a C57Bl/6 background). Balb/c mouse tracheas were also transplanted into WT (C57Bl/6) mice and studied as controls. We first evaluated the iron content indirectly by staining the tracheal tissue with an anti-ferritin antibody (Ab) (Figure 1A,B) and directly via an iron detection colorimetric assay (Figure 1C) in non-transplant and transplanted mice. CFTR−/− trachea had a significantly higher tissue iron content than WT trachea (p < 0.05). This finding was also seen in explanted trachea from CF-transplant recipients compared to WT controls (p < 0.05). To characterize the levels of iron in lung mφs we measured iron levels in CFTR−/− mφs compared to WT mφs. In these studies, we found that iron, particularly in its ferric (Fe3+) form was elevated in CFTR−/− lung mφs (Figure 1D). Together, these data suggest that CFTR−/− was associated with high iron levels and that this baseline aberrancy in iron handling persisted in the CF-OTT recipient.

3.1.1. Af Was Significantly More Invasive in CF-OTT Recipients

To study Af invasion after airway transplantation, CF-OTT and WT transplants were performed. OTT recipients were infected on day 9 post-transplantation with Af conidia, and mice were sacrificed 3 days post-infection (Figure 2A). Explanted trachea were sectioned and studied for Af invasion as previously described [17]. In these studies, Af consistently demonstrated the highest level of invasion in CF-OTT compared to infections in WT-OTT (p < 0.05, Figure 2B,C).

3.1.2. CFTR−/− mφs Have Impaired Ability to Phagocytose and Kill Af Conidia and Are Further Impaired by the Addition of Iron

Given the central role of mφs in iron handling and control of Af invasion, we were particularly interested in examining the role of the CFTR−/− iron laden mφs in invasive aspergillosis. To study CFTR−/− mφs’ ability to phagocytose and kill Af conidia and the impact of iron, we used the Af293 DsRed strain, also known as fluorescent Aspergillus reporter (FLARE) strain [54]. The FLARE strain was developed to trace conidial fate and enable functional analysis [54]. The expressed DsRed is used as a viability indicator while the attached fluorescent tracer (Alexa Fluor 633; AF633) allows the detection of conidia after conidial death (Figure 3A). We discovered that in vitro CFTR-/- lung mφs had a decreased ability to phagocytose conidia (CFTR−/−: 66.5% vs. WT: 97.5%, p < 0.0001, Figure 3B,C). Moreover, the ratio of live to dead, phagocytosed conidia at 6 h was significantly higher in CFTR−/− lung mφs (p < 0.05, Figure 3D,E). This dysfunction was impaired in a dose-dependent fashion by the addition of iron (p < 0.0001, Figure 3B–E).

3.1.3. CFTR Deficiency, Iron and Treatment with Chloroquin Increase mφ Lysosomal pH

The ability of lysosomes to achieve an acidic pH is essential for iron metabolism and Af conidia killing [57,58,59,60]. Although the data are equivocal, studies have suggested that CFTR deficiency may lead to mφ lysosomal alkalinization. To evaluate this potential mechanism, murine WT and CFTR−/− lung mφs were isolated and pH measured using LysoSensor Yellow/Blue dextran. In CFTR−/− mφs, the pH was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the WT mφs (Figure 4A). Moreover, the addition of iron in culture significantly increased the pH of CFTR−/− mφs (Figure A4). To examine the role of lysosomal alkalinization in the CFTR−/− mφs’ inability to clear Af conidia, we treated WT and CFTR−/− mφs with the lysosomal alkalinizing agent chloroquine (CQ) [58,59,60]. As expected, treatment with CQ increased both WT and CFTR−/− mφs’ pH (p < 0.05, Figure 4B). Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) nanoparticles (NPs) were used to reverse lysosomal alkalinization, as NP are phagocytosed, localize to the lysosome, degrade and release their acidic components [61,62]. Exposure of CFTR−/− mφs to the PLGA NPs reversed the alkalinization caused by CFTR deficiency (Figure 4C). PLGA NP treatments also reversed mφs’ alkalinization caused by CQ treatments (Figure A5).

3.1.4. CQ Treatment Increased Lysosomal pH in Both WT and CFT−/− mφs and Lowering Their Ability to Phagocytose Kill Af Conidia

Having identified reagents that can modulate mφ pH in vitro, we investigated the impact of mφ pH modulation on Af conidia phagocytosis and killing. We measured lysosomal acidification after the addition of CQ (20 μM, 40 μM and 80 μM) by LysotrackerTM Green staining followed by flow cytometry analysis (Figure 5A). There was significant difference in lysosomal acidification (p < 0.05) between CFTR−/− and WT mφs at baseline (Figure 5A), with no detectable acidic lysosomes in mφs treated with 80 µM of CQ (Figure 5A). We then tested CFTR−/− and WT mφs’ ability to clear Af conidia before and after CQ treatments. We show that both CFTR−/− and WT CQ alkalinized mφs have a decreased ability to both phagocytose (Figure 5B) and kill Af conidia (Figure 5C). The impact of CQ on CFTR−/− mφs’ ability to kill Af conidia was significantly higher (p < 0.05) compared to the WT mφs (Figure 5C).

3.1.5. PLGA NPs Restore CFTR−/− mφ Lysosomal Acidity and Ability to Kill Af Conidia

Next, we examined if PLGA NPs treatments can improve CFTR−/− mφ fungicidal function. Treatment of CFTR−/− mφ with PLGA NPs significantly increased (p < 0.0001) and restored the percentage of CFTR−/− mφs with acidified lysosomes (Figure 6A). Furthermore, PLGA NPs significantly increased Af conidial phagocytosis (p < 0.0001) and killing (p < 0.05) by the CFTR−/− mφs (Figure 6B,C). Furthermore, PLGA NPs treatments to WT macrophages did not impact their ability to phagocytose conidia, but significantly (p < 0.05) increased conidial killing (Figure A6). Combined, these data support our hypothesis that CFTR-related mφs’ alkalinization could be critical factor in the increased risk of invasive aspergillosis in CF-LTRs (Figure 7).

4. Discussion

We identified that graft iron overload and CFTR−/−-related mφ alkalinization drive Af invasion in the CF-OTT model. We showed that (i) iron overload has an impact on CFTR−/− mφ alkalinization and antimicrobial function and (ii) that by correcting lysosomal acidity in CFTR−/− mφs, we can restore their ability to clear Af conidia.
Aspergillus-related pulmonary disease results in significant morbidity and mortality worldwide [2,3]. Patients with CF are prone to invasive aspergillosis after lung transplantation, with particularly high rates of saprophytic fungal infections of the transplant airway anastomosis [63,64,65]. Other than the risks associated with postoperative impairment of mucociliary clearance after lung transplant and immune suppression little is known of the risk factors that promote these infections in LTRs. Using the OTT model of Af infection, we have shown that iron plays a determinant role in the switch from Af colonization to invasion in transplantation [44]. Furthermore, we and others have shown that abnormal airway iron homeostasis is a feature of CF lung disease [66,67,68]. It is known that CF patient’s sputum has elevated iron levels [66] and we have identified iron-laden mφs in the biopsies of transplanted airways in CF patients [44].
In order to investigate the impact of the transplant microenvironment on CFTR−/− mφs, we developed a CF-OTT model. In this model the CFTR−/− trachea iron levels were significantly higher (p < 0.05) compared to WT at baseline. After the allotransplantion the trachea iron content was also significantly higher (p < 0.05) in explanted transplants from CFTR−/− recipients compared to explanted tracheal grafts from the WT transplant recipient. Together, these results suggest that CF-related defects in iron metabolism exist at baseline and that these defects persist in the CF-transplant recipients. These results are consistent with results of other studies suggesting that CFTR-deficiency leads to defects in iron metabolisms and that the iron imbalance after transplantation is more severe in the CFTR−/− airways [44].
Here, we have shown for the first time that CFTR−/− mφs have a decreased ability to kill Af conidia and that iron-overload contributes to this impairment. We hypothesize that this inability to clear Af is due to CFTR−/−-related mφs’ alkalinization. While alkalinization has been described in CFTR−/− mφs and suggested to impair pathogen clearance, other studies have failed to replicate these findings [69,70,71,72]. Mφs act as the first line of defense by recognizing and engulfing pathogens in phagosomes that subsequently mature into phagolysosomes, where the microorganisms are cleared [73,74]. It has been reported that alveolar mφs from CFTR-null mice were unable to kill bacteria [71]. pH in phagolysosomes in alveolar mφs from CFTR-null mice was ∼2 pH units more alkaline than those from control mice and there was a defect in lysosomal acidification in CFTR-null alveolar mφs, with pH ∼ 6 in CF mφs vs. ∼4.5 in control mφs, which was proposed, by a delayed phagolysosomal fusion mechanism, accounting for the defect in acidification [71]. Although, there is contradicting evidence regarding the connection between CFTR deficiency and mφ lysosomal acidification, there is clear evidence that dysregulation of lysosomal acidification in mφs impairs their antimicrobial functions [70]. Our findings demonstrated that CFTR−/− mφs are more alkaline (pH ~ 7.9) than WT control mφs (pH ~ 7, Figure 4A) and that iron addition significantly increased this alkalinization. These data suggest that increased iron overload could contribute to the alkalinization of the CFTR−/− mφs.
To further investigate the role of pH modulation in mφs anti-microbial function, we treated WT and CFTR−/− macrophages with CQ a known lysosomotropic agent that increases lysosomal pH by accumulating within lysosomes as a deprotonated weak base [75]. CFTR−/− and WT mφs treated with CQ showed an inability to kill Af conidia in a dose-dependent fashion and correlated with the loss of lysosomal acidification. These data suggest that the increase in lysosomal pH could be a factor that promotes Af invasion. To confirm these findings, we used PLGA NPs to acidify the lysosomes of the CFTR−/− and the WT mφs. PLGA is a biocompatible and biodegradable polymer that degrades in the acidic environment of the lysosome and releases lactic and glycolic component carboxylic acids with pKas of 3.86 and 3.83, respectively, resulting in lysosomal acidification [61]. In our studies, PLGA NPs treatments restored CFTR−/− mφs acidity and the ability to kill Af conidia. These data strongly suggest that CFTR−/− mφ pH is a key modulator of their anti-microbial function.
One limitation of this study was an inability to quantify mφ lysosomal pH in vivo resulting from technical difficulties. In preliminary studies using flow cytometry, we were not able to delineate between auto fluorescence of the transplant tissue and the LysoSensor probes. However, we were able to isolate mφs from the CFTR−/− mouse lungs and measure their pH in vitro. Additionally, controversy currently exists regarding the exact mode of Af invasion with in vitro studies demonstrating a variety of potential pathways including: (i) damage of epithelial cells and direct hyphal invasion; (ii) induction of epithelial cell damage by fungal proteases the result in disruption of tight junctions; and (iii) internalization of fungal conidia and subsequent escape [76,77]. Such a limitation may be overcome by studying serial time points after inoculation of Af conidia using transmission electron microscopy [77]. However, as TEM is notoriously insensitive and would require a high number of transplants, such studies were considered beyond the scope of the current work. Furthermore, the effect of PLGA NPs treatment in Af invasion was not examined in vivo since a detailed investigation of their route of administration, absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) and toxicity in mice would be necessary to adequately dose this medication. Future studies will examine the possibility of PLGA NP treatment to decrease Af invasion in the CF-OTT model. In addition, we recognize the central role of neutrophils in Af clearance. As CFTR is known to be present on multiple immune cell subtypes, dendritic cells, monocytes/macrophages, neutrophils and lymphocytes [28,37,76,77], future studies should also examine the role of CFTR deficiency on neutrophil function in Af clearance.
For the first time, we show that iron-laden CFTR−/− mφs are unable to kill Af conidia as a result of CFTR−/−-related lysosomal alkalinization and suggest that the CFTR−/− mφs may be a critical effector cell in the Af graft invasion. Although limited to primary cell culture, we have shown in a dose-dependent manner that both phagocytosis and the ratio of Af conidia that remained alive in CFTR−/− mφs increased with iron or CQ treatment addition. Together, our data suggest that in the lung transplant microenvironment, the CFTR−/−-related mφs’ lysosomal alkalinization is increased and leads to an inability to clear Af conidia. These findings may be clinically significant as mφ pH modulation could represent an actionable therapeutic target against Af invasion.

Author Contributions

J.H. had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Conceptualization, E.I.M., J.H. and C.C.; methodology, E.I.M. and J.H.; software, E.I.M.; validation, E.I.M. and J.H.; formal analysis, E.I.M.; investigation, E.I.M.; resources, J.H.; data curation, E.I.M. and W.C.; writing—original draft preparation, E.I.M. and W.C.; writing—review and editing, E.I.M., J.H. and C.C.; visualization, E.I.M.; supervision, J.H.; project administration, E.I.M.; funding acquisition, E.I.M. and J.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

EIM was funded for this research by Stanford Maternal and Child Health Research Institute (MCHRI) Postdoctoral Award FY2019. JLH was funded by grants from the National Institutes of Health, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (1R01HL157414-01 and 1K08HL122528-01A1).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Administrative Panel on Laboratory Animal Care (APLAC) of Stanford University (protocol # 32936, date of approval 26 April 2018).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank David Stevens and Tobias Hohl for supplying us with the Af strains used in this manuscript. Flow cytometry analysis for this project was done on instruments in the Stanford Shared FACS Facility. We would like to thank all the stuff at the Stanford Shared FACs Facility and especially Lisa Nichols and Ricardo Zermeno for their support. Some of the data were collected on an instrument in the Shared FACS Facility obtained using NIH S10 Shared Instrument Grant, 1S10OD026831-01.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Appendix A

Figure A1. Representative image of ingested live and dead conidia gating.
Figure A1. Representative image of ingested live and dead conidia gating.
Jof 08 00751 g0a1
Figure A2. Mφ pH standard curve. Cells were treated with media with pH ranging from 4.0 to 8.0 to generate this standard curve.
Figure A2. Mφ pH standard curve. Cells were treated with media with pH ranging from 4.0 to 8.0 to generate this standard curve.
Jof 08 00751 g0a2
Figure A3. Iron standard curve. Manufacturer’s standards ranging from 0nmol to 10nmol iron were used.
Figure A3. Iron standard curve. Manufacturer’s standards ranging from 0nmol to 10nmol iron were used.
Jof 08 00751 g0a3
Figure A4. Iron treatments significantly (* p < 0.05) increased CFTR−/− mφs pH in a dose-dependent manner.
Figure A4. Iron treatments significantly (* p < 0.05) increased CFTR−/− mφs pH in a dose-dependent manner.
Jof 08 00751 g0a4
Figure A5. PLGA NPs treatments restored the alkalinization of mφ caused by both the CFTR loss and the CQ treatments.
Figure A5. PLGA NPs treatments restored the alkalinization of mφ caused by both the CFTR loss and the CQ treatments.
Jof 08 00751 g0a5
Figure A6. PLGA NPs treatments did not change WT phagocytosis rate but significantly (*** p = 0.0002) increased conidial killing.
Figure A6. PLGA NPs treatments did not change WT phagocytosis rate but significantly (*** p = 0.0002) increased conidial killing.
Jof 08 00751 g0a6

References

  1. Brown, G.D.; Denning, D.W.; Gow, N.A.R.; Levitz, S.M.; Netea, M.G.; White, T.C. Hidden Killers: Human Fungal Infections. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4, 165rv13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Chabi, M.L.; Goracci, A.; Roche, N.; Paugam, A.; Lupo, A.; Revel, M.P. Pulmonary aspergillosis. Diagn. Interv. Imaging 2015, 96, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Al-Alawi, A.; Ryan, C.F.; Flint, J.D.; Müller, N.L. Aspergillus-Related Lung Disease. Can. Respir. J. 2005, 12, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fernández-Ruiz, M.; Silva, J.T.; San-Juan, R.; de Dios, B.; García-Luján, R.; López-Medrano, F.; Lizasoain, M.; Aguado, J.M. Aspergillus Tracheobronchitis: Report of 8 Cases and Review of the Literature. Medicine 2012, 91, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Agarwal, R.; Sehgal, I.S.; Dhooria, S.; Aggarwal, A.N. Challenging cases in fungal asthma. Med. Mycol. 2019, 57, S110–S117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Knutsen, A.P. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in asthma. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2017, 13, 11–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Takazono, T.; Sheppard, D.C. Aspergillus in chronic lung disease: Modeling what goes on in the airways. Med. Mycol. 2016, 55, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Bassetti, M.; Bouza, E. Invasive mould infections in the ICU setting: Complexities and solutions. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017, 72, i39–i47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Lamoth, F.; Calandra, T. Early diagnosis of invasive mould infections and disease. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017, 72, i19–i28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Samanta, P.; Clancy, C.J.; Nguyen, M.H. Fungal infections in lung transplantation. J. Thorac. Dis. 2021, 13, 6695–6707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kosmidis, C.; Denning, D.W. The clinical spectrum of pulmonary aspergillosis. Thorax 2015, 70, 270–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Carsin, A.; Romain, T.; Ranque, S.; Reynaud-Gaubert, M.; Dubus, J.-C.; Mège, J.-L.; Vitte, J. Aspergillus fumigatus in cystic fibrosis: An update on immune interactions and molecular diagnostics in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Allergy 2017, 72, 1632–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. King, J.; Brunel, S.F.; Warris, A. Aspergillus infections in cystic fibrosis. J. Infect. 2016, 72, S50–S55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Geltner, C.; Lass-Flörl, C. Invasive pulmonary Aspergillosis in organ transplants—Focus on lung transplants. Respir. Investig. 2016, 54, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pasupneti, S.; Manouvakhova, O.; Nicolls, M.R.; Hsu, J.L. Aspergillus-related pulmonary diseases in lung transplantation. Med. Mycol. 2017, 55, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Kramer, M.R.; Denning, D.W.; Marshall, S.E.; Ross, D.J.; Berry, G.; Lewiston, N.J.; Stevens, D.A.; Theodore, J. Ulcerative Tracheobronchitis after Lung Transplantation: A New Form of Invasive Aspergillosis. Am. Rev. Respir Dis. 1991, 144, 552–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hsu, J.L.; Khan, M.A.; Sobel, R.A.; Jiang, X.; Clemons, K.V.; Nguyen, T.T.; Stevens, D.A.; Martinez, M.; Nicolls, M.R. Aspergillus fumigatus invasion increases with progressive airway ischemia. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e77136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gregson, A.L. Infectious Triggers of Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2016, 18, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Robbins, N.; Wright, G.D.; Cowen, L.E. Antifungal Drugs: The Current Armamentarium and Development of New Agents. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016, 4, 4–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Campoy, S.; Adrio, J.L. Antifungals. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2017, 133, 86–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kriegl, L.; Boyer, J.; Egger, M.; Hoenigl, M. Antifungal stewardship in solid organ transplantation. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Iversen, M.; Burton, C.M.; Vand, S.; Skovfoged, L.; Carlsen, J.; Milman, N.; Andersen, C.B.; Rasmussen, M.; Tvede, M. Aspergillus infection in lung transplant patients: Incidence and prognosis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2007, 26, 879–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Warris, A.; Bercusson, A.; Armstrong-James, D. Aspergillus colonization and antifungal immunity in cystic fibrosis patients. Med. Mycol. 2019, 57, S118–S126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Liu, M.; Worley, S.; Mallory, G.B., Jr.; Arrigain, S.; Robertson, J.; Schecter, M.G.; Elidemir, O.; Danziger-Isakov, L.A. Fungal infections in pediatric lung transplant recipients: Colonization and invasive disease. J. Heart Lung Transpl. 2009, 28, 1226–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Salehi, S.; Reed, E.F. The divergent roles of macrophages in solid organ transplantation. Curr. Opin. Organ Transpl. 2015, 20, 446–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Londino, J.D.; Matalon, S. Chloride secretion across adult alveolar epithelial cells contributes to cardiogenic edema. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 10055–10056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Bruscia, E.M.; Bonfield, T.L. Cystic Fibrosis Lung Immunity: The Role of the Macrophage. J. Innate Immun. 2016, 8, 550–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Swahn, H.; Harris, A. Cell-Selective Regulation of CFTR Gene Expression: Relevance to Gene Editing Therapeutics. Genes 2019, 10, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Dagenais, T.R.T.; Keller, N.P. Pathogenesis of Aspergillus fumigatus in Invasive Aspergillosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 22, 447–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Netea, M.G.; Warris, A.; Van der Meer, J.W.M.; Fenton, M.J.; Verver-Janssen, T.J.G.; Jacobs, L.E.H.; Andresen, T.; Verweij, P.E.; Kullberg, B.J. Aspergillus fumigatus Evades Immune Recognition during Germination through Loss of Toll-Like Receptor-4-Mediated Signal Transduction. J. Infect. Dis. 2003, 188, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Werner, J.L.; Metz, A.E.; Horn, D.; Schoeb, T.R.; Hewitt, M.M.; Schwiebert, L.M.; Faro-Trindade, I.; Brown, G.D.; Steele, C. Requisite role for the dectin-1 beta-glucan receptor in pulmonary defense against Aspergillus fumigatus. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 4938–4946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Yalçin, E.; Talim, B.; Ozçelik, U.; Doğru, D.; Cobanoğlu, N.; Pekcan, S.; Kiper, N. Does defective apoptosis play a role in cystic fibrosis lung disease? Arch. Med. Res. 2009, 40, 561–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Haggie, P.M.; Verkman, A.S. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator-independent phagosomal acidification in macrophages. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 31422–31428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Law, S.M.; Stanfield, S.J.; Hardisty, G.R.; Dransfield, I.; Campbell, C.J.; Gray, R.D. Human cystic fibrosis monocyte derived macrophages display no defect in acidification of phagolysosomes when measured by optical nanosensors. J. Cyst. Fibros. Off. J. Eur. Cyst. Fibros. Soc. 2020, 19, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hanssens, L.S.; Duchateau, J.; Casimir, G.J. CFTR Protein: Not Just a Chloride Channel? Cells 2021, 10, 2844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Grassmé, H.; Döring, G.; Gulbins, E. Alterations in ceramide concentration and pH determine the release of reactive oxygen species by Cftr-deficient macrophages on infection. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 5104–5111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Lara-Reyna, S.; Holbrook, J.; Jarosz-Griffiths, H.H.; Peckham, D.; McDermott, M.F. Dysregulated signalling pathways in innate immune cells with cystic fibrosis mutations. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2020, 77, 4485–4503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Orlando, V.; Morin, G.; Laffont, A.; Lénart, D.; Solórzano Barrera, C.; Mustafy, T.; Sankhe, S.; Villemure, I.; Mailhot, G. CFTR deletion affects mouse osteoblasts in a gender-specific manner. J. Cell. Physiol. 2020, 235, 6736–6753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hazlett, H.F.; Hampton, T.H.; Aridgides, D.S.; Armstrong, D.A.; Dessaint, J.A.; Mellinger, D.L.; Nymon, A.B.; Ashare, A. Altered iron metabolism in cystic fibrosis macrophages: The impact of CFTR modulators and implications for Pseudomonas aeruginosa survival. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 10935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Di Pietro, C.; Zhang, P.-X.; O’Rourke, T.K.; Murray, T.S.; Wang, L.; Britto, C.J.; Koff, J.L.; Krause, D.S.; Egan, M.E.; Bruscia, E.M. Ezrin links CFTR to TLR4 signaling to orchestrate anti-bacterial immune response in macrophages. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Schupp, J.C.; Khanal, S.; Gomez, J.L.; Sauler, M.; Adams, T.S.; Chupp, G.L.; Yan, X.; Poli, S.; Zhao, Y.; Montgomery, R.R.; et al. Single-Cell Transcriptional Archetypes of Airway Inflammation in Cystic Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 202, 1419–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Steinberg, B.E.; Huynh, K.K.; Brodovitch, A.; Jabs, S.; Stauber, T.; Jentsch, T.J.; Grinstein, S. A cation counterflux supports lysosomal acidification. J. Cell. Biol. 2010, 189, 1171–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Haggie, P.M.; Verkman, A.S. Unimpaired lysosomal acidification in respiratory epithelial cells in cystic fibrosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 7681–7686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Hsu, J.L.; Manouvakhova, O.V.; Clemons, K.V.; Inayathullah, M.; Tu, A.B.; Sobel, R.A.; Tian, A.; Nazik, H.; Pothineni, V.R.; Pasupneti, S.; et al. Microhemorrhage-associated tissue iron enhances the risk for Aspergillus fumigatus invasion in a mouse model of airway transplantation. Sci. Transl. Med. 2018, 10, eaag2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Baz, M.A.; Ghio, A.J.; Roggli, V.L.; Tapson, V.F.; Piantadosi, C.A. Iron accumulation in lung allografts after transplantation. Chest 1997, 112, 435–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Saha, B.K.; Chong, W.H. Lung transplant to manage end-stage lung disease due to idiopathic pulmonary hemosiderosis: A review of the literature. Respir. Investig. 2022, 60, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Meng, F.; Fleming, B.A.; Jia, X.; Rousek, A.A.; Mulvey, M.A.; Ward, D.M. Lysosomal iron recycling in mouse macrophages is dependent upon both LcytB and Steap3 reductases. Blood Adv. 2022, 6, 1692–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nairz, M.; Theurl, I.; Swirski, F.K.; Weiss, G. “Pumping iron”-how macrophages handle iron at the systemic, microenvironmental, and cellular levels. Pflug. Arch. 2017, 469, 397–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Barriere, H.; Bagdany, M.; Bossard, F.; Okiyoneda, T.; Wojewodka, G.; Gruenert, D.; Radzioch, D.; Lukacs, G.L. Revisiting the role of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator and counterion permeability in the pH regulation of endocytic organelles. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2009, 20, 3125–3141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Law, S.M.; Gray, R.D. Neutrophil extracellular traps and the dysfunctional innate immune response of cystic fibrosis lung disease: A review. J. Inflamm. 2017, 14, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Meijer, L.; Nelson, D.J.; Riazanski, V.; Gabdoulkhakova, A.G.; Hery-Arnaud, G.; Le Berre, R.; Loaëc, N.; Oumata, N.; Galons, H.; Nowak, E.; et al. Modulating Innate and Adaptive Immunity by (R)-Roscovitine: Potential Therapeutic Opportunity in Cystic Fibrosis. J. Innate Immun. 2016, 8, 330–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Massip-Copiz, M.M.; Santa-Coloma, T.A. Extracellular pH and lung infections in cystic fibrosis. Eur. J. Cell. Biol. 2018, 97, 402–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Massey, M.K.; Reiterman, M.J.; Mourad, J.; Luckie, D.B. Is CFTR an exchanger?: Regulation of HCO(3) (-)Transport and extracellular pH by CFTR. Biochem. Biophys Rep. 2021, 25, 100863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Jhingran, A.; Mar, K.B.; Kumasaka, D.K.; Knoblaugh, S.E.; Ngo, L.Y.; Segal, B.H.; Iwakura, Y.; Lowell, C.A.; Hamerman, J.A.; Lin, X.; et al. Tracing conidial fate and measuring host cell antifungal activity using a reporter of microbial viability in the lung. Cell Rep. 2012, 2, 1762–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Nayak, D.K.; Mendez, O.; Bowen, S.; Mohanakumar, T. Isolation and In Vitro Culture of Murine and Human Alveolar Macrophages. JoVE 2018, 20, 57287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, X.; Goncalves, R.; Mosser, D.M. The isolation and characterization of murine macrophages. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. 2008, 83, 14.1.1–14.1.14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ibrahim-Granet, O.; Philippe, B.; Boleti, H.; Boisvieux-Ulrich, E.; Grenet, D.; Stern, M.; Latgé, J.P. Phagocytosis and intracellular fate of Aspergillus fumigatus conidia in alveolar macrophages. Infect. Immun. 2003, 71, 891–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Thywißen, A.; Heinekamp, T.; Dahse, H.-M.; Schmaler-Ripcke, J.; Nietzsche, S.; Zipfel, P.F.; Brakhage, A.A. Conidial Dihydroxynaphthalene Melanin of the Human Pathogenic Fungus Aspergillus fumigatus Interferes with the Host Endocytosis Pathway. Front. Microbiol. 2011, 2, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Weber, R.A.; Yen, F.S.; Nicholson, S.P.V.; Alwaseem, H.; Bayraktar, E.C.; Alam, M.; Timson, R.C.; La, K.; Abu-Remaileh, M.; Molina, H.; et al. Maintaining Iron Homeostasis Is the Key Role of Lysosomal Acidity for Cell Proliferation. Mol. Cell 2020, 77, 645–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yambire, K.F.; Rostosky, C.; Watanabe, T.; Pacheu-Grau, D.; Torres-Odio, S.; Sanchez-Guerrero, A.; Senderovich, O.; Meyron-Holtz, E.G.; Milosevic, I.; Frahm, J.; et al. Impaired lysosomal acidification triggers iron deficiency and inflammation in vivo. eLife 2019, 8, e51031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zeng, J.; Shirihai, O.S.; Grinstaff, M.W. Modulating lysosomal pH: A molecular and nanoscale materials design perspective. J. Life Sci. 2020, 2, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Zeng, J.; Martin, A.; Han, X.; Shirihai, O.S.; Grinstaff, M.W. Biodegradable PLGA Nanoparticles Restore Lysosomal Acidity and Protect Neural PC-12 Cells against Mitochondrial Toxicity. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 13910–13917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Nunley, D.R.; Gal, A.A.; Vega, J.D.; Perlino, C.; Smith, P.; Lawrence, E.C. Saprophytic fungal infections and complications involving the bronchial anastomosis following human lung transplantation. Chest 2002, 122, 1185–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Nunley, D.R.; Ohori, P.; Grgurich, W.F.; Iacono, A.T.; Williams, P.A.; Keenan, R.J.; Dauber, J.H. Pulmonary aspergillosis in cystic fibrosis lung transplant recipients. Chest 1998, 114, 1321–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Helmi, M.; Love, R.B.; Welter, D.; Cornwell, R.D.; Meyer, K.C. Aspergillus infection in lung transplant recipients with cystic fibrosis: Risk factors and outcomes comparison to other types of transplant recipients. Chest 2003, 123, 800–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Stites, S.W.; Walters, B.; O’Brien-Ladner, A.R.; Bailey, K.; Wesselius, L.J. Increased iron and ferritin content of sputum from patients with cystic fibrosis or chronic bronchitis. Chest 1998, 114, 814–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Stites, S.W.; Plautz, M.W.; Bailey, K.; O’Brien-Ladner, A.R.; Wesselius, L.J. Increased concentrations of iron and isoferritins in the lower respiratory tract of patients with stable cystic fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1999, 160, 796–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Reid, D.W.; Carroll, V.; O’May, C.; Champion, A.; Kirov, S.M. Increased airway iron as a potential factor in the persistence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis. Eur. Respir J. 2007, 30, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Swanson, J. CFTR: Helping to acidify macrophage lysosomes. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8, 908–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Haggie, P.M.; Verkman, A.S. Defective organellar acidification as a cause of cystic fibrosis lung disease: Reexamination of a recurring hypothesis. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2009, 296, L859–L867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Di, A.; Brown, M.E.; Deriy, L.V.; Li, C.; Szeto, F.L.; Chen, Y.; Huang, P.; Tong, J.; Naren, A.P.; Bindokas, V.; et al. CFTR regulates phagosome acidification in macrophages and alters bactericidal activity. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8, 933–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Barasch, J.; Kiss, B.; Prince, A.; Saiman, L.; Gruenert, D.; AI-Awqati, Q. Defective acidification of intracellular organelles in cystic fibrosis. Nature 1991, 352, 70–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Vieira, O.V.; Botelho, R.J.; Grinstein, S. Phagosome maturation: Aging gracefully. Biochem. J. 2002, 366, 689–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Delves, P.J.; Roitt, I.M. The Immune System. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000, 343, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Chen, P.M.; Gombart, Z.J.; Chen, J.W. Chloroquine treatment of ARPE-19 cells leads to lysosome dilation and intracellular lipid accumulation: Possible implications of lysosomal dysfunction in macular degeneration. Cell Biosci. 2011, 1, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Wasylnka, J.A.; Moore, M.M. Aspergillus fumigatus conidia survive and germinate in acidic organelles of A549 epithelial cells. J. Cell Sci. 2003, 116, 1579–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Rammaert, B.; Jouvion, G.; de Chaumont, F.; Garcia-Hermoso, D.; Szczepaniak, C.; Renaudat, C.; Olivo-Marin, J.C.; Chrétien, F.; Dromer, F.; Bretagne, S. Absence of Fungal Spore Internalization by Bronchial Epithelium in Mouse Models Evidenced by a New Bioimaging Approach and Transmission Electronic Microscopy. Am. J. Pathol. 2015, 185, 2421–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. In the CF OTT model, both CF tracheas and macrophages had higher levels of iron compared to WT control. (A) Representative image of explanted tracheal transplant tissue from wild type (WT) transplant recipient (left) and CF-transplant recipient (right), stained for ferritin. (B) Quantification of detected fluorescence in trachea from non-transplanted WT and CF mice and allotransplants in WT and CF recipients (**** p < 0.0001) (n = 5/group). (C) Quantification of total tracheal iron in non-transplanted WT and CF mice and allotransplants in WT and CF recipients (* p = 0.03, ** p < 0.005) (n = 5/group). (D) Quantification iron in mφs isolated from mouse tracheas (n = 3/group) (* p = 0.0308).
Figure 1. In the CF OTT model, both CF tracheas and macrophages had higher levels of iron compared to WT control. (A) Representative image of explanted tracheal transplant tissue from wild type (WT) transplant recipient (left) and CF-transplant recipient (right), stained for ferritin. (B) Quantification of detected fluorescence in trachea from non-transplanted WT and CF mice and allotransplants in WT and CF recipients (**** p < 0.0001) (n = 5/group). (C) Quantification of total tracheal iron in non-transplanted WT and CF mice and allotransplants in WT and CF recipients (* p = 0.03, ** p < 0.005) (n = 5/group). (D) Quantification iron in mφs isolated from mouse tracheas (n = 3/group) (* p = 0.0308).
Jof 08 00751 g001
Figure 2. Af was significantly more invasive in the CF orthotopic tracheal transplant (OTT) compared to the WT-OTT model. (A) Representative picture of OTT surgery (right) and schematic picture (left) of WT-OTT and CF-OTT model of Af infection. (B) Explanted tracheal tissue sections from WT-OTT (top) and CF-OTT (bottom) stained with Grocott Methenamine Silver stain for fungal elements. (C) Quantification of Af invasion in the WT-OTT and CF OTT models (n = 10/group) ** p = 0.0018) (TL: tracheal lumen).
Figure 2. Af was significantly more invasive in the CF orthotopic tracheal transplant (OTT) compared to the WT-OTT model. (A) Representative picture of OTT surgery (right) and schematic picture (left) of WT-OTT and CF-OTT model of Af infection. (B) Explanted tracheal tissue sections from WT-OTT (top) and CF-OTT (bottom) stained with Grocott Methenamine Silver stain for fungal elements. (C) Quantification of Af invasion in the WT-OTT and CF OTT models (n = 10/group) ** p = 0.0018) (TL: tracheal lumen).
Jof 08 00751 g002
Figure 3. CFTR−/− mφs have an impaired ability to phagocytose and kill Af conidia. (A) Illustration of DsRed expressing conidia labeled with AF633 and confocal images of labeled conidia. (B) Quantification of WT and CFTR lung mφ ability to phagocytose conidia as measured by flow cytometry (** p = 0.002, *** p = 0.001). (C) Representative confocal microscopy image of mφ phagocytosis of FLARE conidia (D) Quantification of WT and CFTR lung mφ ability to kill conidia as measured by flow cytometry (*** p = 0.0002, **** p < 0.0001). (E) Representative confocal microscopy image of FLARE conidia killing.
Figure 3. CFTR−/− mφs have an impaired ability to phagocytose and kill Af conidia. (A) Illustration of DsRed expressing conidia labeled with AF633 and confocal images of labeled conidia. (B) Quantification of WT and CFTR lung mφ ability to phagocytose conidia as measured by flow cytometry (** p = 0.002, *** p = 0.001). (C) Representative confocal microscopy image of mφ phagocytosis of FLARE conidia (D) Quantification of WT and CFTR lung mφ ability to kill conidia as measured by flow cytometry (*** p = 0.0002, **** p < 0.0001). (E) Representative confocal microscopy image of FLARE conidia killing.
Jof 08 00751 g003
Figure 4. CFTR deficiency, iron and treatment with chloroquine (CQ) increase mφ lysosomal pH. (A) Measurement of pH in WT and CFTR lung mφ by LysoSensorTM Yellow/Blue dextran staining (** p < 0.003). (B) Measurement of pH in WT and CFTR lung mφ treated with CQ by LysoSensorTM Yellow/Blue dextran staining (* p = 0.02, ** p = 0.005). (C) Measurement of pH in WT and CFTR lung mφ by LysoSensorTM Yellow/Blue dextran staining in CFTR−/− and WT mφs after poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) treatment (** p = 0.006).
Figure 4. CFTR deficiency, iron and treatment with chloroquine (CQ) increase mφ lysosomal pH. (A) Measurement of pH in WT and CFTR lung mφ by LysoSensorTM Yellow/Blue dextran staining (** p < 0.003). (B) Measurement of pH in WT and CFTR lung mφ treated with CQ by LysoSensorTM Yellow/Blue dextran staining (* p = 0.02, ** p = 0.005). (C) Measurement of pH in WT and CFTR lung mφ by LysoSensorTM Yellow/Blue dextran staining in CFTR−/− and WT mφs after poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) treatment (** p = 0.006).
Jof 08 00751 g004
Figure 5. CQ treatments increased lysosomal mφ pH and decreased mφ ability to phagocytose and kill Af conidia. (A) Measurement of lysosomal acidity in WT and CFTR lung mφ treated with CQ, using LysotrackerTM (*** p = 0.0004). (B) Quantification of the ability of WT and CFTR lung mφs treated with CQ to phagocytose Af conidia as measured by flow cytometry (* p = 0.02). (C) Quantification of the ability of WT and CFTR lung mφs treated with CQ to kill Af conidia, as measured by flow cytometry (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.009).
Figure 5. CQ treatments increased lysosomal mφ pH and decreased mφ ability to phagocytose and kill Af conidia. (A) Measurement of lysosomal acidity in WT and CFTR lung mφ treated with CQ, using LysotrackerTM (*** p = 0.0004). (B) Quantification of the ability of WT and CFTR lung mφs treated with CQ to phagocytose Af conidia as measured by flow cytometry (* p = 0.02). (C) Quantification of the ability of WT and CFTR lung mφs treated with CQ to kill Af conidia, as measured by flow cytometry (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.009).
Jof 08 00751 g005
Figure 6. PLGA NPs restore lysosomal acidity and mφ ability to clear Af conidia. (A) Measurement of lysosomal acidity in WT and CFTR lung mφ treated with PLGA, using LysotrackerTM (*** p < 0.0005). (B) Quantification of the ability of WT and CFTR lung mφs treated with PLGA to phagocytose Af conidia as measured by flow cytometry (** p < 0.05, **** p < 0.0001). (C) Quantification of the ability of WT and CFTR lung mφs treated with PLGA to kill Af conidia, as measured by flow cytometry (** p = 0.003, *** p = 0.0002).
Figure 6. PLGA NPs restore lysosomal acidity and mφ ability to clear Af conidia. (A) Measurement of lysosomal acidity in WT and CFTR lung mφ treated with PLGA, using LysotrackerTM (*** p < 0.0005). (B) Quantification of the ability of WT and CFTR lung mφs treated with PLGA to phagocytose Af conidia as measured by flow cytometry (** p < 0.05, **** p < 0.0001). (C) Quantification of the ability of WT and CFTR lung mφs treated with PLGA to kill Af conidia, as measured by flow cytometry (** p = 0.003, *** p = 0.0002).
Jof 08 00751 g006
Figure 7. Graphical Conclusions. Loss of CFTR increased mφs’ lysosomal pH. Iron overload seems to have an additive effect to the CFTR−/− mφs’ alkalinization. PLGA NPs can restore the pH acidity and increase Af conidial killing.
Figure 7. Graphical Conclusions. Loss of CFTR increased mφs’ lysosomal pH. Iron overload seems to have an additive effect to the CFTR−/− mφs’ alkalinization. PLGA NPs can restore the pH acidity and increase Af conidial killing.
Jof 08 00751 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Matthaiou, E.I.; Chiu, W.; Conrad, C.; Hsu, J. Macrophage Lysosomal Alkalinization Drives Invasive Aspergillosis in a Mouse Cystic Fibrosis Model of Airway Transplantation. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 751. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jof8070751

AMA Style

Matthaiou EI, Chiu W, Conrad C, Hsu J. Macrophage Lysosomal Alkalinization Drives Invasive Aspergillosis in a Mouse Cystic Fibrosis Model of Airway Transplantation. Journal of Fungi. 2022; 8(7):751. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jof8070751

Chicago/Turabian Style

Matthaiou, Efthymia Iliana, Wayland Chiu, Carol Conrad, and Joe Hsu. 2022. "Macrophage Lysosomal Alkalinization Drives Invasive Aspergillosis in a Mouse Cystic Fibrosis Model of Airway Transplantation" Journal of Fungi 8, no. 7: 751. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jof8070751

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop