Next Article in Journal
Development of Microencapsulation Method of Gamma-Decalactone
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring Inflammatory Status in Febrile Seizures Associated with Urinary Tract Infections: A Two-Step Cluster Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Development of Soft Pneumatic Actuators Using High-Strain Elastic Materials with Stress Anisotropy of Short Fibers †

1
Chuo University Institute of Science and Engineering, Tokyo 112-8551, Japan
2
Chuo University Faculty of Science and Engineering Precision Mechanics, Tokyo 112-8551, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the First International Electronic Conference on Actuator Technology: Materials, Devices and Applications, 23–27 November 2020; Available online: https://iecat2020.sciforum.net/.
Published: 22 November 2020

Abstract

:
In recent years, soft robots, such as those with high human affinity and those that excellently imitate the movements of natural creatures, have gained considerable attention. In soft robots, structurally flexible soft actuators need to be used, not conventional motors or hydraulic/pneumatic cylinders. Various types of soft actuators have been developed depending on the driving principle. A pneumatic rubber artificial muscle is a kind of soft actuator that acquires power through injection of a working fluid, such as air, into an elastic structure, such as rubber. In this study, the authors developed an actuator, namely, the straight-fiber-type artificial muscle, which exhibits excellent contraction characteristics. This artificial muscle consists of a rubber tube that contains reinforcing fibers arranged in the axial direction. When air pressure is applied to the rubber tube, the artificial muscle expands only in the radial direction and contracts in the axial direction due to the restraining effect of the reinforcing fiber. While this artificial muscle exhibits excellent contraction properties, it has some drawbacks. One is the difficulty in enclosing the reinforced fibers that have accumulated in the rubber tube, making this artificial muscle difficult to manufacture. In this study, we investigated short-fiber-reinforced artificial muscles that can be easily manufactured. First, a short-fiber-reinforced rubber was prepared, and anisotropy was evaluated via a tensile test. Then, the short-fiber-reinforced artificial muscles were prepared, and their contractions rates were evaluated. The results confirmed that a short-fiber-reinforced rubber can be useful for the manufacture of artificial muscles.

1. Introduction

A pneumatic artificial muscle is a rubber actuator that is activated by air pressure. It is lightweight and exhibits higher power density than the other actuators, such as conventional motors and hydraulic cylinders. Moreover, it is highly compatible with humans owing to its flexibility [1]. Currently, the McKibben-type artificial muscle (hereinafter referred to as the McKibben type) has been widely used. It consists of a rubber tube covered with a fiber cord [2]. When this fiber cord expands in the radial direction, the McKibben type artificial muscle contracts in the axial direction. The restraining effect of the fiber cord converts the expansion force into the axial contraction force. The McKibben type has a maximum contraction rate of approximately 28%, which is smaller than that of the human muscles, which is about 30%. Such an amount of contraction is insufficient when manufacturing a human imitation system. To solve this problem, the authors have developed the straight-fiber-type pneumatic rubber artificial muscle (hereinafter referred to as SF-ARM) [3]. The SF-ARM consists of reinforcing fibers aligned only in the axial direction and are enclosed in a rubber tube. When air pressure is applied, the SF-ARM expands only in the radial direction and contracts in the axial direction due to the restraining effect of the reinforcing fibers. The SF-ARM has a contraction rate of up to 38% or more at low pressure. It is capable of generating the same contraction ratio as the living muscles. Moreover, it has been confirmed by both experiments and theory that its output is more than three times that of the McKibben type as the total air pressure applied to the inner cylinder contributes to the contraction force [4]. Furthermore, since the reinforcing fibers accumulate in the rubber tube, no rubbing between the rubber tube and reinforcing fibers occurs; thus, a longer life can be expected.
With regard to the short-fiber-reinforced rubber, the types of rubber and fibers, fiber lengths, etc., have been investigated [5]. However, the short-fiber-reinforced rubber as a material for the manufacture of the SF-ARM has not been studied. If this material can be used for the manufacture of artificial muscles, a continuous, easy, and efficient production by extrusion will be possible. Therefore, in this study, we fabricated an SF-ARM using a rubber material whose short fibers are oriented in one direction. Moreover, we investigated the potential of the short-fiber-reinforced rubber as a material that can used to manufacture axial fiber-reinforced artificial muscles. First, anisotropy was evaluated by conducting a tensile test on the short-fiber-reinforced rubber fabricated using three methods. Next, artificial muscles were prepared using three types of short-fiber-reinforced rubber, and their contraction rates were evaluated.

2. Methods

2.1. Pneumatic Rubber Artificial Muscle

2.1.1. Straight-Fiber-Type Artificial Muscle

As presented in Figure 1, the SF-ARM consists of reinforced fibers aligned only in the axial direction and are enclosed in a rubber tube. When air pressure is applied, it expands only in the radial direction and contracts in the axial direction due to the restraining effect of the reinforcing fibers.

2.1.2. Short-Fiber-Reinforced Artificial Muscle

Figure 2 presents the outline of the short-fiber-reinforced artificial muscle. By enclosing the short fibers oriented in the axial direction in the rubber tube, the rubber develops anisotropy and expands in the radial direction and contracts in the axial direction, similar to a normal SF-ARM. Since the short-fiber-reinforced artificial muscle can be manufactured through extrusion of the short-fiber-reinforced rubber, a continuous manufacturing process can be achieved.

2.2. Fabrication of Short-Fiber-Reinforced Rubber and Short-Fiber-Reinforced Artificial Muscle

In this study, three methods for producing short-fiber-reinforced rubber and short-fiber-reinforced artificial muscle were investigated. In Table 1, the manufacturing methods are presented.

3. Experiment

3.1. Anisotropy Evaluation for Short-Fiber-Reinforced Rubber Sheet

To evaluate the anisotropy of the three types of short-fiber-reinforced rubber sheets prepared in Section 2.2, we conducted tensile tests in the directions perpendicular and parallel to the aligned reinforcing fibers (Figure 3). In the tensile test, Autograph AG-1 (SHIMADZU Corp., Kyoto, Japan), with a test speed of 50 mm/min (JIS K6253-compliant) was used, and the test piece was of strip shape with a width, thickness, and length of 10, 2, and 30 mm, respectively.

3.2. Evaluation of Contraction Ratio of Short-Fiber-Reinforced Artificial Muscle

The end of the artificial muscle prepared in Section 2.2 was sealed with a terminal, and air pressure was applied in 0.01 MPa increments. Moreover, the contraction rate ((natural length - length when air pressure was applied)/natural length) was measured (Figure 4).

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Anisotropy Evaluation Result of Short-Fiber-Reinforced Rubber Sheet

The results of the tensile test conducted on the rubber sheet using each of the three manufacturing methods are presented in Figure 5a–c. Table 2 presents the calculation results of elastic modulus. From Figure 5, it can be seen that all the rubber sheets exhibited anisotropy with different stress–strain characteristics in the directions perpendicular and parallel to the fiber orientation direction. In Figure 5a,c, the stress in the parallel direction is about 1.5 times that in the vertical direction, and the strain at break is approximately 0.2 times. This is possibly due to the increase in stress caused by the reinforcing effect of the fiber and decrease in the strain at break caused by the decrease in the rubber content in the stretching direction. This finding is supported by the comparison presented in Table 2. Furthermore, from Figure 5b, it can be inferred that such a result was obtained because the amount of mixed fibers was small, and their physical properties were not hindered by the fibers in the vertical direction.

4.2. Evaluation Result of the Contraction Rate of Short-Fiber-Reinforced Artificial Muscle

Figure 6 presents the measurement results of the contraction rate of the artificial muscle using each of the three manufacturing methods. From Figure 6, it can be seen that the contraction ratio is about 5% for latex mixed with short fibers, about 6% for solid rubber mixed with short fibers, and about 17% for solid rubber mixed with MB. This is possibly due to the influence of the amount of mixed fibers, degree of fiber orientation, and ratio of fiber diameter to length. In this sample, it is considered that the mixture of latex and solid rubber with short fibers has resulted in inadequate reinforcement and inferior shrinkage due to the small amount of mixed fibers.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we investigated the possibility of manufacturing an artificial muscle using a rubber sheet mixed with short fibers to achieve an easy and efficient production of an axial fiber-reinforced artificial muscle, which exhibits excellent contraction characteristics but is generally difficult to fabricate. From the results, the following conclusions were obtained:
  • A short-fiber-reinforced rubber can be used as a material for the manufacture of axial fiber-reinforced artificial muscle.
  • By orienting the short fibers on the rubber sheet, anisotropy can be expressed in the stress–strain characteristics.
  • By fabricating an artificial muscle using short-fiber-reinforced rubber, it is possible to obtain contraction in the same way as the SF-ARM.
  • The characteristics of the short-fiber-reinforced rubber sheet and artificial muscle depend on the mixing amount of short fibers, degree of orientation, and ratio of fiber diameter to length.

Author Contributions

T.N. conceived the experiments; A.K. and M.O. designed the experiments; A.K. performed the experiments; A.K. and M.O. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research JP19K21948.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
NRNatural rubber
SF-ARMStraight-fiber-type artificial muscle
MBMaster batch

References

  1. Okui, M.; Iikawa, S.; Yamada, Y.; Nakamura, T. Fundamental characteristic of novel actuation system with variable viscoelastic joints and MR clutches for human assistance. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2017, 29, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chou, C.P.; Hannaford, B. Measurement and modeling of McKibben pneumatic artificial muscles. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 1996, 12, 90–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tomori, H.; Nakamura, T. Theoretical Comparison of McKibben-Type Artificial Muscle and Novel Straight-Fiber-Type Artificial Muscle. Int. J. Autom. Technol. (IJAT) 2011, 5, 544–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Suzuki, R.; Okui, M.; Iikawa, S.; Yamada, Y.; Nakamura, T. Novel Feedforward Controller for Straight-Fiber-Type Artificial Muscle Based on an Experimental Identification Model. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft), Livorno, Italy, 24–28 April 2018. [Google Scholar]
  5. Tian, M.; Cheng, L.; Liang, W.; Zhang, L. The Anisotropy of Fibrillar Silicate/Rubber Nanocomposites. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2005, 290, 681–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Straight-fiber-type artificial muscle.
Figure 1. Straight-fiber-type artificial muscle.
Proceedings 64 00041 g001
Figure 2. Short-fiber-reinforced artificial muscle.
Figure 2. Short-fiber-reinforced artificial muscle.
Proceedings 64 00041 g002
Figure 3. Outline of the tensile test.
Figure 3. Outline of the tensile test.
Proceedings 64 00041 g003
Figure 4. Outline of the contraction test.
Figure 4. Outline of the contraction test.
Proceedings 64 00041 g004
Figure 5. Stress–strain curve of the rubber sheet.
Figure 5. Stress–strain curve of the rubber sheet.
Proceedings 64 00041 g005
Figure 6. Contraction ratio of short-fiber-reinforced artificial muscle.
Figure 6. Contraction ratio of short-fiber-reinforced artificial muscle.
Proceedings 64 00041 g006
Table 1. Short-fiber-reinforced rubber manufacturing methods.
Table 1. Short-fiber-reinforced rubber manufacturing methods.
SampleABC
RubberNatural rubber (NR) latexNR solidNR solid
FiberAramidCarbon Aramid
Fiber length [mm]3031–2
Fiber content [phr]5212
Rubber sheet manufacturing method1. Arrange the fibers in latex
2. Dry to make a sheet
1. Dissolve NR in toluene
2. Mix CB fibers
3. Align by shaking
4. Dry to make a sheet
5. Heat (140 °C × 30 min)
1. Mix master batch (MB) with NR
2. Sheet using open roll
3. Heat (150 °C × 20 min)
Appearance of short-fiber-reinforced rubber sheet Proceedings 64 00041 i001 Proceedings 64 00041 i002 Proceedings 64 00041 i003
Artificial muscle manufacture-
-ng method
1. Apply latex to a core with an inner diameter of 10 mm and dry to make an inner rubber tube
2. Arrange the aramid fibers in the inner rubber tube
3. Apply latex to the outer layer of the fiber layer and dry to make an outer-layer rubber tube
1. Wrap a rubber sheet around the core and vulcanize
2. Wrap a fiber-reinforced-rubber sheet and vulcanize
3. Wrap a rubber sheet and vulcanize
1. Wrap a fiber-reinforced rubber sheet around the core
2. Vulcanize
Appearance of short-fiber-reinforced artificial muscle Proceedings 64 00041 i004 Proceedings 64 00041 i005 Proceedings 64 00041 i006
Table 2. Elastic modulus calculation result.
Table 2. Elastic modulus calculation result.
SampleABCWithout Fiber
Vertical [MPa]0.20.21.10.75
Parallel [MPa]3.11.3140.75
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kojima, A.; Okui, M.; Nakamura, T. Development of Soft Pneumatic Actuators Using High-Strain Elastic Materials with Stress Anisotropy of Short Fibers. Proceedings 2020, 64, 41. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/IeCAT2020-08526

AMA Style

Kojima A, Okui M, Nakamura T. Development of Soft Pneumatic Actuators Using High-Strain Elastic Materials with Stress Anisotropy of Short Fibers. Proceedings. 2020; 64(1):41. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/IeCAT2020-08526

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kojima, Akihiro, Manabu Okui, and Taro Nakamura. 2020. "Development of Soft Pneumatic Actuators Using High-Strain Elastic Materials with Stress Anisotropy of Short Fibers" Proceedings 64, no. 1: 41. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/IeCAT2020-08526

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop