Preparation and Evaluation of the Tensile Characteristics of Carbon Fiber Rod Reinforced 3D Printed Thermoplastic Composites

Abstract

The most common method to fabricate both simple and complex structures in the additive manufacturing process is fused deposition modeling (FDM). Many researchers have studied the strengthening of FDM components by adding short carbon fibers (CF) or by reinforcing solid carbon fiber rods. In the current research, we sought to enhance the mechanical properties of FDM components by adding bioinspired solid CF rods during the fabrication process. An effective bonding interface of bioinspired CF rods and polylactic acid (PLA) was achieved by triangular interlocking sutures and by employing synthetic glue as the binding agent. In particular, the tensile strength of solid CF rod reinforced PLA samples was studied. Critical parameters such as layer thickness, extruder temperature, extruder speed, and shell thickness were considered for optimization. Significant process parameters were identified through leverage plots using the response surface methodology (RSM). The optimum parameters were found to be layer thickness of 0.04 mm, extruder temperature of 215 °C, extruder speed of 60 mm/s, and shell thickness of 1.2 mm. The results revealed that the bioinspired solid CF rod reinforced PLA (CFRPLA) composite exhibited a tensile strength of 82.06 MPa, which was approximately three times higher than the pure PLA (28 MPa, 66% lower than CFRPLA), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) (28 MPa, 66% lower than CFRPLA), polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) (34 MPa, 60% lower than CFRPLA), and nylon (34 MPa, 60% lower than CFRPLA) samples.

1. Introduction

Additive manufacturing (AM) has brought the next industrial revolution in many key areas, such as aerospace, medicine, and automotive. The extensive usage of AM has widened to technologies applied in biomedical implants, architecture, and full-body organs using materials such as polymers, metals, composites, ceramics, wood, etc. [1,2]. Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is one of the simplest and most commonly used technologies in AM. Different types of polymers are used for building 3D objects as per computer-aided design (CAD) by adding one layer over another with specified process parameters. The quality of the printed polymer objects depends on various process parameters, such as the printing material and part orientation during printing. These parameters influence the mechanical characteristics, building time, and volume, which affect the final cost of the part [3,4]. FDM-based fabricated components play a key role in medical, automotive, and aerospace applications due to their simplicity and cost-effectiveness. Polylactic acid (PLA) is widely used as a processing material in FDM technology due to its desirable characteristics and biocompatibility. Most of the research work carried out with pure PLA and PLA composites have become the hotspot in 3D printing [5]. In their research, Cicala et al. selected three PLA-based commercial filaments to study the influence of the mechanical properties of FDM specimens. A comparative approach was taken to differentiate pure PLA vs. PLA with added mineral fillers in order to identify better mechanical properties and printing quality. The mineral fillers dispersed in the filament improved the tensile properties of the printed specimens compared to pure PLA [6]. However, the strength of the pure thermoplastic components fabricated by the FDM process is comparatively low, which has significant limitations and restricts the application of 3D printed parts as functional components [7]. To overcome these limitations, researchers have recently shifted their focus toward dispersing additives in neat polymers to enhance their properties. Plain polymers produced via 3D printing have limited physicochemical properties. These properties can be improved by introducing fibers or particles along with the polymer matrix. In his study, Blanco showed how these reinforced polymers possessed better properties and could be associated with many fields of application [8]. Similarly, the strength of 3D printing samples was found to increase with the addition of short fibers when compared to samples without fiber reinforcement [9,10]. The mechanical properties and strength of thermoplastics such as acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and polyamide-6 produced through FDM was improved by reinforcing different modifiers like plasticizers and short glass fiber [11,12].

Hao et al. analyzed the bending interlaminar strength and lifetime of carbon/epoxy laminated curved beams using the digital speckle correlation method (DSCM) with a four-point bending test configuration by varying the thickness and radius/thickness ratio. The bending interlaminar strength of carbon/epoxy laminated curved beams were analyzed by ultrasonic C-scan images. The failure strength and maximum interlaminar radial stresses of carbon/epoxy laminated curved beams were found when deformation occurred by applying delamination mechanisms [13,14]. Ruban et al. carried out an experiment on the effect of process parameters such as layer thickness, hatch spacing, laser power, and part bed temperature for Laserform stainless steel (ST-100) by adopting the selective laser sintering (SLS) technology. It was observed that better mechanical properties were obtained when the layer thickness was kept as 0.08 mm [15]. Zeng et al. fabricated wood–plastic composite (WPC) parts using SLS. They analyzed the relationship between laser intensity and WPC parts. When the laser intensity increased from 226 to 311 W/mm², the tensile strength improved by 191% and the bending strength improved by 17%. However, when the laser intensity exceeded 340 W/mm², both the tensile and bending strength decreased [16]. Gray studied polypropylene (PP) thermoplastic material reinforced with thermotropic liquid crystalline polymer (TLCP) fibrils produced by the dual extruder process in FDM technology. The melting point of PP was 165 °C, whereas it was 283 °C for TLCP fibrils. TLCP has long and short fibers, and both were reinforced with PP and produced separately. With respect to mechanical properties, long TLCP fibers were found to have better tensile properties than short TLCP fibers [17]. Fischer et al. designed and developed a nozzle-type 3D fiber print head to produce a polymer matrix composite layer by layer [18]. Melenka et al. fabricated 3D printed structures reinforced with continuous carbon, fiberglass, or Kevlar fibers and evaluated the elastic properties using the volume average stiffness (VAS) method. The fibers were added to the matrix in different volume fractions, and the difference between experimental and predicted elastic properties was identified. This method helped researchers design the functional components to choose the right combination of matrix and reinforcement [19]. Christ et al. analyzed the green strength of large and fragile printed structures while performing the depowdering procedure in a powder bed. By reinforcing different short fibers with the polymer matrix of cellulose-modified gypsum powder, the binding strength increased by about 180%, which added much strength and avoided collapse of the printed green structures, while the work of fracture values was 10 times higher [20]. Considering the bonding interface between carbon fiber (CF) and PLA resin produced by the FDM process, Li et al. designed a nozzle to mix uniformly continuous CF with PLA. The printed part had less bonding interface between CF and PLA, and continuous CF was preprocessed and added to the PLA resin, which improved the tensile and flexural strength of composites by 13.8% and 164%, respectively [21].

Ćwikła et al. investigated the influence of printing parameters on the mechanical properties of ABS produced through FDM technology. Infill pattern, infill density, shell thickness, printing temperature, and the type of material were selected as parameters, and the samples were tested for a honeycomb pattern. Infill density of about 40–50% and shell thickness of 2–3 layers/line were found to be better parameters considering the strength of the printed pattern [22]. In their experiment, Ning et al. evaluated the effect of process parameters such as raster angle, layer thickness, infill speed, and nozzle temperature for producing carbon fiber reinforced plastics (CFRP) using FDM technology. Raster angle and infill speed had a significant influence on the tensile characteristics of the printed parts, while a layer thickness of 0.15 mm produced good tensile properties [23,24]. Another study by Tian et al. analyzed carbon fiber reinforced PLA (CFRPLA) produced by the FDM process considering critical process parameters such as temperature and pressure. The optimized bonding strength between layers was achieved using optimized process parameters such as a layer thickness of 0.4–0.6 mm, hatch spacing of 0.6 mm, and temperature of 200–230 °C. The maximum flexural strength of 335 MPa and flexural modulus of 30 GPa was achieved when the fiber content of the composite specimens was 27% [25]. Lin et al. analyzed process parameters such as tip angle and bonded tip region presence/absence as well as geometries such as trapezoidal, rectangular, triangle, and antitrapezoidal for 3D printed polymer sutures. Triangular sutures exhibited uniform stress distribution throughout the structure, with the teeth areas especially possessing better mechanical properties. The experimental results and analytical models of 3D printed sutures showed excellent agreement [26]. Padzi et al. did a comparative study on the suitability of ABS produced by FDM for industrial applications. ABS with a dog bone shape was produced by FDM or a molding process as per the ASTM D638 standard. Fatigue tests were carried out at 40, 60, and 80% tensile strength. The results showed that ABS produced through 3D printing had lower fatigue life than through the molding process, indicating its suitability for low-strength applications [27]. Changes in process parameters and addition of composites might increase the strength of ABS prototypes produced by FDM [28,29]. Wu optimized the process parameters of FDM by designing a cylindrical model. Parameters such as slice height, printing time, consumables, and dimensional accuracy were optimized, and the results showed that a slice height of 0.14 mm reduced the printing time without sacrificing the quality of printing [30]. Srinivasan et al. examined the influence of infill density on the tensile characteristics of polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) and ABS by FDM technology. Specimens were printed by maintaining the other parameters as constant but varying the infill density levels. It was observed that the infill density had a considerable influence on the tensile strength of the PETG and ABS parts [31,32,33].

Selvam et al. discussed ways to improve the strength of 3D printed bioinspired interlock sutures made up of PLA reinforced CF by particle swarm optimization (PSO). The strength of 3D printed sutures was highly influenced by building parameters such as printing speed, layer thickness, and temperature. It was observed that a printing speed of 60 mm/s, layer thickness of 0.1 mm, and temperature of 190 °C yielded maximum strength outcomes [34]. Dey et al. studied the tensile properties of ABS and PLA material reinforced with fibers produced by FDM technology and found that they were highly influenced by layer thickness, extruder speed, raster angle, extruder temperature, and shell thickness [35].

In the aforementioned literature, researchers reinforced short fibers or continuous fibers during the fabrication process to improve the strength of 3D printed components. Instead of reinforcing fibers during the fabrication process, this research focused on inserting solid bioinspired carbon fiber rods into the sample after the fabrication process. In addition, triangular-shaped interlock suture from a stickleback fish pelvic girdle was biomimicked and applied to the CF rod and PLA sample. The maximum tensile strength was obtained with optimum process parameters of bioinspired 3D printed PLA using the response surface methodology (RSM) technique.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bioinspired Suture Selection

Various biological structures of animals and plants can be mimicked to acquire unique properties with effective energy absorption capacity. The ancient sea ammonite shells are one of the best examples of suture interfaces that show various types of geometric profile starting from the basic curve to complicated fractal-like designs. Martin et al. referred to a bioinspired reinforced architecture created with 3D magnetic printing by combining additive technologies with discontinuous fibers, which delivered enhanced mechanical performance compared to the monolithic structure [36]. The suture interface geometry of the anatomy of different creatures was investigated and selected to design a solid carbon fiber rod with interlock sutures.

The triangular interlock sutures were inspired from the pelvic girdle of marine sticklebacks (fish). The three-spine marine sticklebacks protect themselves from predators with their biological armor structured body. The armor body of sticklebacks consists of the basal plate, spines, dorsal spines, lateral plates, and pelvic girdle. Many studies have been done on the structure of stickleback armor to develop bioinspired protective shields, vehicle body, building structures, protective coating, abrasion/rock penetration resistance pipelines, safety helmets, etc. The pelvic girdle of sticklebacks is made up of two ventral pelvic plates joined together by a triangular interlocking suture. Many researchers have used different bioinspired types of sutures like antitrapezoidal, rectangular, sawtooth, jigsaw, and triangular to enhance the mechanical properties of FDM components [37]. These studies reveal that, compared to other interlock sutures, triangular geometry sutures have a simple design and are more effective as they have superior tensile strength, stiffness, flexural strength, and toughness. From the above observation, a triangular-shaped suture was made manually on a plain carbon fiber rod using a specialized triangular file, as shown in Figure 1. The triangular-shaped file tool had a three-sided design that could sharpen and make a saw teeth profile (triangular suture).

2.2. Critical Process Parameters

In the additive manufacturing process of solid CF rod reinforced FDM samples, there are various significant process parameters that influence and improve the mechanical properties. Based on the literature study, layer thickness, extruder temperature, extruder speed, and shell thickness were chosen as the parameters [33].

2.3. Material Selection and Mechanical Property Investigation

PLA was selected as a printing material for the interlocking suture due to its bio-degradable nature, availability, and diverse properties. A short carbon fiber rod was employed with pure PLA to enhance the mechanical properties. The addition of CF as a composite material is not conventional, so a new approach was applied by employing CF as a solid rod. The properties of PLA and the CF material are mentioned in

Table 1. Mechanical properties of polylactic acid (PLA) and carbon fiber rod.

Mechanical Properties of PLA	Mechanical Properties of Carbon Fiber Rod
Tensile strength: 59 MPa	Tensile strength: 3800 MPa
Flexural strength: 106 MPa	Density: 1.81 g/cm3
Elongation at break: 7.0%	Carbon content: 95%
Rockwell hardness: 88HR	Elastic modulus: 242 GPa

below.

2.4. Specimen Fabrication and Use of Solid Carbon Rod

A tensile specimen of pure PLA was designed with 3D modeling software and converted into STL format. The fabrication was initiated with reference process parameters that were chosen from various literatures. For the printing of pure PLA specimen, process parameters such as raster angle of 45° and horizontal build orientation [33] were kept constant throughout the experiments as per ASTM D638-10 tensile test specimen, as shown in Figure 2. To increase the tensile strength of the fabricated reference sample, bioinspired solid CF rods of diameter 1.8 mm was reinforced manually into the three holes provided in the specimen. The inner surface of the holes was projected with a triangular suture. The interface bonding between the PLA and the CF rods were improved by applying adhesive (cyanoacrylate) through the holes exactly above the path of the solid CF rods. The process parameters mentioned in

Table 2. Reference sample parameters [29].

Layer Thickness (mm)	Extruder Temperature(°C)	Extruder Speed (mm/s)	Shell Thickness (mm)	Tensile Strength (MPa)
0.08	205	80	0.8	71.6

were used to fabricate the pure PLA tensile specimen.

If the thickness of the tensile specimen is 3 mm, the diameter of the solid CF rod should be less than 3 mm. At the same time, it should occupy more than 50% of the thickness of a tensile specimen in order to enhance the tensile strength and triangular suture characteristics. Solid CF rods are available in different diameters, but based on the above criteria, a rod diameter of 1.8 mm, or 60% of the tensile specimen value, was selected. The plain solid CF rod was preprocessed by a triangular file with 60° angle to generate triangular interlock sutures over the surface with a regular interval of 5 mm. Next, the solid CF rod was inserted into the tensile specimen hole with the help of a plastic mallet (interference fit). The linear and angular movement of the solid carbon rod was arrested by pouring the glue into the holes on the tensile specimen surface as well as in the 1.8 mm hole. The bonding strength between the CF rod and the pure PLA tensile specimen was ensured by a bonding agent (cyanoacrylate). The flow ability of the bonding agent was higher and covered the whole inner surface of the tensile specimen. Hence, no other external force was needed to increase the bonding strength. The layer view of solid CFRPLA is presented in Figure 3. Figure 4 represents the raster angle of 45°, and Figure 5 illustrates the types of built orientation for fabricating tensile specimens.

2.5. Tensile Testing of the CFRPLA Rod

After the fabrication of pure PLA, it was employed with the CF rod using the binding agent. The tensile strength was measured to understand the mechanical behavior of PLA employed with the CF rod. The Autograph AG-Is 50 KN machine was used for the tensile test. The tensile test for the specimen was carried out gradually at a jaw speed of 0.4 mm/s until the specimen broke. An extensometer was employed to measure the strain. The tensile test was performed to measure the tensile strength of the reference sample and compare it with the pure PLA sample, as shown in Figure 6. The results showed that the tensile strength of bioinspired solid CF rod reinforced FDM samples was 2.5 times superior to 3D printed pure PLA samples. The Young’s modulus (tensile modulus) of the CFRPLA was 2.5 to 4 times higher than the plain PLA based on the stress–strain curve. Figure 7 shows the CFRPLA tensile specimen after the tensile test. To maximize the tensile strength of 3D printed components and determine the detailed relationship between each parameter and the tensile characteristics of specimens, a trial and error method was followed.

2.5.1. Tensile Strength vs. Layer Thickness

The effect of layer thickness was evaluated by fabricating five different samples of varying layer thickness ranging from 0.04 to 0.12 mm, as specified in

Table 3. Tensile strength vs. layer thickness.

Layer thickness (mm)	0.04	0.06	0.08	0.1	0.12
Tensile strength (MPa)	69	72	71.6	68	67

. In the reference sample, the layer thickness was kept as 0.08 mm referring to the literature. In addition, two upper and two lower values with intervals of 0.02 mm were used. While fabricating the samples, the other four parameters were kept constant as mentioned in the reference sample. As shown in Figure 8, the sample printed with a layer thickness of 0.06 mm had the maximum tensile strength. From the above result, it can be concluded that the optimum layer thickness 0.06 mm would give the highest tensile strength for CF rod reinforced 3D printed samples.

2.5.2. Tensile Strength vs. Extruder Temperature

The effect of extruder temperature was investigated by fabricating five different samples with extruder temperature ranging from 195 to 215 °C, as specified in

Table 4. Tensile strength vs. extruder temperature.

Extruder temperature (°C)	195	200	205	210	215
Tensile strength (MPa)	65	70	72	74.6	74.1

. In addition to the sample specimen extruder temperature 205 °C, two upper and two lower values with intervals of 5 °C were used. While printing the samples, the previously obtained optimum layer thickness of 0.06 mm was used, and the remaining three parameter values mentioned in the reference sample were kept constant. As shown in Figure 9, the sample printed with the extruder temperature of 210 °C resulted in the highest tensile strength. From the above result, it was concluded that the optimum extruder temperature of 210 °C would give the highest tensile strength compared to the other extruder temperatures.

2.5.3. Tensile Strength vs. Extruder Speed

The effect of extruder speed was investigated by fabricating five different samples with extruder speeds ranging from 60 to 100 mm/s, as specified in

Table 5. Tensile strength vs. extruder speed.

Extruder speed (mm/s)	60	70	80	90	100
Tensile strength (MPa)	76.1	75.6	74.5	72	70

. In addition to the sample specimen extruder speed of 80 mm/s, two upper and two lower values with intervals of 10 mm/s were used. While printing the samples, the previously obtained optimum layer thickness of 0.06 mm and extruder temperature of 210 °C were used, and the remaining two parameter values mentioned in the reference sample were kept constant. As shown in Figure 10, the tensile strength of the solid CF rod reinforced 3D printed sample was highest when the extruder speed was 60 mm/s. From the above result, it was concluded that the optimum extruder speed of 60 mm/s would give the highest tensile strength of solid CF rod reinforced 3D printed samples.

2.5.4. Tensile Strength vs. Shell Thickness

The effect of shell thickness was investigated by fabricating five different samples with shell thickness ranging from 0.4 to 1.2 mm, as specified in

Table 6. Tensile strength vs. shell thickness.

Shell thickness (mm)	0.4	0.6	0.8	1	1.2
Tensile strength (MPa)	71.4	72.8	74.6	76.1	78.8

. In addition to the sample specimen shell thickness of 0.8 mm. two upper and two lower values with intervals of 0.2 mm were used. While printing the samples, the previously obtained optimum parameter values, i.e., layer thickness of 0.06 mm, extruder temperature of 210 °C, and extruder speed of 60 mm/s, were used, and the remaining one parameter mentioned in the reference sample was kept constant. As shown in Figure 11, the tensile strength was enhanced when the sample was printed with a shell thickness of 1.2 mm. From the above result, it was concluded that the optimum shell thickness of 1.2 mm would give the highest tensile strength.

Based on the experimental results, the process parameters and tensile strength values of each specimen was validated analytically with RSM. The optimum parameters and their influence could be identified and evaluated based on the experimental results, as shown in

Table 7. Tensile measurement.

Experimental Runs	Layer Thickness (mm)	Extruder Temperature (°C)	Extruder Speed (mm/s)	Shell Thickness (mm)	Tensile Strength (MPa)
1	0.08	205	80	0.8	71.6
2	0.04	205	80	0.8	69
3	0.06	205	80	0.8	72
4	0.08	205	80	0.8	71.6
5	0.1	205	80	0.8	68
6	0.12	205	80	0.8	67
7	0.06	195	80	0.8	65
8	0.06	200	80	0.8	70
9	0.06	205	80	0.8	72
10	0.06	210	80	0.8	74.6
11	0.06	215	80	0.8	74.1
12	0.06	210	60	0.8	76.1
13	0.06	210	70	0.8	75.6
14	0.06	210	80	0.8	74.5
15	0.06	210	90	0.8	72
16	0.06	210	100	0.8	70
17	0.06	210	60	0.4	71.4
18	0.06	210	60	0.6	72.8
19	0.06	210	60	0.8	74.6
20	0.06	210	60	1	76.1
21	0.06	210	60	1.2	78.8

.

2.5.5. Mathematical Model

From the experimental data depicted in

Table 8. Parameter estimates.

Term	Estimate	Std Error	t Ratio	Prob > ΙtΙ
Intercept	−17.684	17.071	−1.04	0.316
Layer thickness (mm)	−44.529	19.480	−2.29	0.036
Extruder temperature (°C)	0.451	0.077	5.83	<0.0001
Extruder speed (mm/s)	−0.105	0.030	−3.53	0.003
Shell thickness (mm)	9.05	2.272	3.98	0.001

and

Table 9. Analysis of variance.

Source	DF	Sum of Squares	Mean Square	F Ratio
Model	4	191.195	47.799	23.155
Error	16	33.028	2.064	Prod > F
C. Total	20	224.223		<0.0001

, a regression model was developed using JMP (John’s Macintosh Project) software version 15, 2019. JMP was used in this research for the design of experiments (DOE) and reliability modeling of CFRPLA based on the tensile characteristics. The tensile strength of CFRPLA with respect to the significant process parameters were expressed with the general regression model, as shown in Equation (1).

^y = y − ɛ = b0 × 0 + b1 × 1 + b2 × 2 +b3 × 3 + b4 × 4

(1)

From the above table, the coefficient of each parameter was substituted in the general regression Equation (1) to develop the mathematical model to predict the optimum process parameter values to maximize the tensile strength.

−17.684 − 44.5 × 1 + 0.450 × 2 − 0.105 × 3 + 9.05 × 4 = Tensile Strength

(2)

From the above relationship between the tensile strength of predicted value vs. actual value, the R² value of tensile strength was found to be 0.85. A p-value < 0.0001 was used to indicate the significance and influence of process parameters on the tensile characteristic of CFRPLA. The plot between actual tensile strength vs. predicted value is shown in Figure 12.

3. Result and Discussion

3.1. Influence of Process Parameters on Tensile Strength

The influence of each parameter on the tensile strength of CFRPLA was evaluated by a leverage plot. The p-value of each parameter revealed how the parameter influenced the tensile strength.

3.2. Leverage Plot of Layer Thickness vs. Tensile Strength

The plot in Figure 13 shows that p = 0.036, which is greater than 0.005, indicating that layer thickness was not a highly significant process parameter.

3.3. Leverage Plot of Extruder Temperature vs. Tensile Strength

The plot in Figure 14 shows p < 0.0001, which is less than 0.005, indicating that extruder temperature was a highly significant process parameter.

3.4. Leverage Plot of Extruder Speed vs. Tensile Strength

The plot in Figure 15 shows that p = 0.003, which is less than 0.005, indicating that extruder speed was a highly significant process parameter.

3.5. Leverage Plot of Shell Thickness vs. Tensile Strength

The plot in Figure 16 shows p = 0.001, which is less than 0.005, indicating that shell thickness was a highly significant process parameter.

From the leverage plots, the p-value for each process parameters was obtained to determine their significance. The extruder temperature, extruder speed, and shell thickness highly influenced the tensile strength of the CFRPLA specimen while layer thickness had less impact on the tensile strength.

• The interrelationship between the process parameters influencing the tensile strength of the CFRPLA specimen is exhibited in the interaction plot in Figure 17.
• The layer thickness and extruder temperature were directly proportional to each other in terms of tensile strength.
• The layer thickness and extruder speed were inversely proportional to each other in terms of tensile strength.
• The layer thickness and shell thickness were directly proportional to each other in terms of tensile strength.
• The extruder temperature and extruder speed were inversely proportional to each other in terms of tensile strength.
• The extruder temperature and shell thickness were directly proportional to each other in terms of tensile strength.
• The extruder speed and shell thickness were directly proportional to each other in terms of tensile strength.

From the experimental results, the maximum tensile strength of 78.8 MPa was obtained by maintaining the optimum process parameters values, i.e., layer thickness of 0.06 mm, extruder temperature of 210 °C, extruder speed of 60 mm/s, and shell thickness of 1.2 mm. From the desirability plot shown in Figure 18, the maximum tensile strength that could be obtained was 82.03 MPa using the following process parameters values: layer thickness of 0.04 mm, extruder temperature of 215 °C, extruder temperature of 60 °C, and shell thickness of 1.2 mm. It was observed that maintaining a minimum layer thickness and increasing the number of layers increased the density and also enhanced the bonding strength between the layers of PLA. The maximum extruder temperature of 215 °C and the minimum extruder speed of 60 mm/s increased the curing time and stabilized the printed layer in order to receive further material deposition over it. The maximum shell thickness of 1.2 mm provided protection against external loads over the printed layers, which maximized the tensile strength of CFRPLA.

4. Conclusions

The ultimate aim of this work was to maximize the tensile strength of FDM-processed PLA with a solid CF rod. The following process parameters were identified to obtain the maximum tensile strength of 82.06 MPa: layer thickness of 0.04 mm, extruder temperature of 215 °C, extruder speed of 60 mm/s, and shell thickness of 1.2 mm. The results clearly showed that the tensile strength of bioinspired solid CFRPLA FDM components were high compared to pure PLA 3D printed components. The results revealed that the tensile strength of pure PLA was 28 MPa, whereas the tensile strength of 3D printed CFRPLA specimen with optimized parameters was 82.06 MPa. This was approximately three times higher compared to pure PLA, indicating a drastic improvement. Future studies will be carried out to determine other mechanical characteristics, such as flexural strength, impact strength, and wear behavior of CFRPLA.