Next Article in Journal
Reply to Bracke et al. Comment on “Prayag et al. Light Modulation of Human Clocks, Wake, and Sleep. Clocks&Sleep 2019, 1, 193–208”
Previous Article in Journal
No Effect of Chronotype on Sleepiness, Alertness, and Sustained Attention during a Single Night Shift
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Clocks & Sleep
Volume 3
Issue 3
10.3390/clockssleep3030025
clockssleep-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Habitual Sleep Duration and the Colonic Mucosa-Associated Gut Microbiota in Humans—A Pilot Study

by
Ritwick Agrawal
1,
Nadim J. Ajami
2,
Sonal Malhotra
3,
Liang Chen
4,5,
Donna L. White
4,5,6,7,8,
Amir Sharafkhaneh
1,
Kristi L. Hoffman
2,
David Y. Graham
4,6,9,
Hashem B. El-Serag
4,5,6,7,9,
Joseph F. Petrosino
2,6,7 and
Li Jiao
4,5,6,7,8,9,*,†
1
Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
2
The Alkek Center for Metagenomics and Microbiome Research, Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
3
Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
4
Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
5
Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
6
Texas Medical Center Digestive Disease Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
7
Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
8
Center for Translational Research on Inflammatory Diseases, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
9
Section of Gastroenterology, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Current affiliation: Harris County Public Health, Houston, TX 77027, USA.
Clocks & Sleep 2021, 3(3), 387-397; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/clockssleep3030025
Submission received: 29 May 2021 / Revised: 21 June 2021 / Accepted: 25 June 2021 / Published: 1 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Human Basic Research & Neuroimaging)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We examined the association between the colonic adherent microbiota and nocturnal sleep duration in humans. In a cross-sectional study, 63 polyp-free adults underwent a colonoscopy and donated 206 mucosal biopsies. The gut microbiota was profiled using the 16S rRNA gene sequencing targeting the V4 region. The sequence reads were processed using UPARSE and DADA2, respectively. Lifestyle factors, including sleep habits, were obtained using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. We categorized the participants into short sleepers (<6 h per night; n = 16) and normal sleepers (6–8 h per night; n = 47) based on self-reported data. Differences in bacterial biodiversity and the taxonomic relative abundance were compared between short vs. normal sleepers, followed by multivariable analysis. A false discovery rate-adjusted p value (q value) < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. The bacterial community composition differed in short and normal sleepers. The relative abundance of Sutterella was significantly lower (0.38% vs. 1.25%) and that of Pseudomonas was significantly higher (0.14% vs. 0.08%) in short sleepers than in normal sleepers (q values < 0.01). The difference was confirmed in the multivariable analysis. Nocturnal sleep duration was associated with the bacterial community composition and structure in the colonic gut microbiota in adults.

1. Introduction

In modern society, nearly one-third of adults sleep for less than six hours daily [1]. Chronic sleep deprivation has been associated with adverse health outcomes, including cardiovascular morbidity, immunosuppression, obesity, type 2 diabetes, cancer, and increased all-cause mortality [2]. Alteration in fecal gut microbiota, i.e., dysbiosis, has also been associated with these diseases [3]. Specifically, our previous study showed that short or long sleep duration was associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer [4]. Diet and dysbiosis are consistently shown to be associated with the risk of colorectal cancer [5]. Therefore, the link between sleep phenotype and gut microbiota is biologically plausible.
Because sleep deprivation and gut microbiota have been associated with neuropsychological conditions, including depression [6], dementia [7], Parkinsonism [8,9], and autism spectrum disorder [10,11], the role of bi-directional signaling between the gut microbiota and the brain has been suggested [12]. Several mechanisms have been proposed in this bi-directional relation, including the vagus nerve and the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, regulation of homeostasis and inflammation, and modulation of brain function and behavior [13]. Furthermore, neurotransmitters and metabolites produced by microbes, including tryptophan, melatonin, serotonin, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and short-chain fatty acids, can also impact this bi-directional relation [14]. In addition, both sleep and gut microbiota show circadian rhythms [15]. Therefore, it is plausible that sleep is intrinsically associated with gut microbiota.
Experimental studies have investigated the effects of sleep deprivation on fecal microbiota. A study in mice reported a decrease in the Lactobacillaceae family after fragmented sleep for four weeks [16]. In humans, Benedict et al. observed an increased Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio following two nights of partially deprived sleep [17]. However, a cross-species study of rats and humans found that acute sleep deprivation (four hours sleep for five nights) did not significantly alter fecal microbial populations in humans. Nevertheless, a single operational taxonomic unit (OTU), TM7-3a, was increased in sleep-deprived rats [18].
A few observational studies have examined the association between fecal gut microbiota and sleep duration [19,20,21]. With no more than 40 study participants for each, these studies found differences in Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Lachnospiraceae, or Blautia between short and normal sleepers. So far, the association between colonic adherent gut microbiota and sleep phenotype has not been well-examined. However, it is well known that fecal microbiota and colonic microbiota are different [22].
Therefore, we investigated the association between sleep duration and colonic microbiota in adults with an endoscopically normal colon in this pilot study. We hypothesized that the community composition and structure of gut microbiota differed in short sleepers vs. normal sleepers.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Participants

We conducted a cross-sectional study of 69 polyp-free veterans found to have a normal colon after a colonoscopy. The detailed procedure and the exclusion criteria have been described previously [23]. For example, those patients who had antibiotic use in the past three months or had a history of cancer or inflammatory bowel disease were excluded. In addition, all participants stopped non-essential medications one week before and stopped anti-diabetic medications one day before the procedure. The Institutional Review Boards of Baylor College of Medicine and Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center approved the research protocol.

2.2. Data Collection

Approximately two weeks before the colonoscopy, informed consent form was obtained from participants when they attended the pre-screening section. We used an interviewer-administered structured questionnaire to collect demographics, lifestyle factors, medical history, and sleep habits. A total of 69 participants answered the question, “How many hours do you typically sleep at night in a 24-h period during a weekday and weekend in the last 12 months?”. The weighted average sleep hour (5/7 × weekday hour + 2/7 × weekend hour) was calculated. Six participants who reported 9 or more h of sleep daily were excluded from the analysis. Participants were then categorized into 47 normal sleepers (6–8 h) vs. 16 short sleepers (<6 h). A total of 39 participants also completed the self-administered Block food frequency questionnaire (FFQ, 2005 version) [24]. The healthy eating index (HEI) 2005 was calculated [25].

2.3. Tissue Collection and DNA Extraction

The complete colonoscopy was performed under conscious sedation. We collected 206 mucosal biopsies (cecum, ascending, transverse, descending, and sigmoid colon or rectum) from 63 participants when feasible. All biopsies were collected between 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. daily and then immediately placed in a sterile tube (RNase- and DNase-free) on dry ice. The samples were transferred to a −80 °C freezer within 15 min until use. Microbial genomic DNA was extracted using the MO BIO PowerLyzer UltraClean Tissue & Cell (MO BIO Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA). All DNA samples were stored at −80 °C until further analysis.

2.4. Library Construction, 16S rRNA Sequencing, and Bioinformatics

The 16S rRNA gene hypervariable region 4 (V4) was amplified and sequenced on the MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) using the 2 × 250 bp paired-end protocol [26]. Sequences were assigned into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at a similarity of 97% using the SILVA v128 reference database and the UPARSE algorithm [27]. In addition, the sequence reads were processed, aligned, and categorized using the Divisive Amplicon Denoising Algorithm 2 (DADA2) v1.10.1 package in R v3.3.3 [28]. The DADA2 described the microbial communities using the unique amplicon taxonomic variants (ASVs). Filtered reads were de-replicated and de-noised using the DADA2 default parameters. After building the ASV table and removing chimeras, taxonomy was assigned using the SILVA 132 SSU NR99 database.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The differences in characteristics between short vs. normal sleepers were evaluated using Student’s test or Fisher’s exact test when appropriate. The Agile Toolkit for Incisive Microbial Analyses (ATIMA) was used for analyzing the microbiota data. The alpha-diversity of the OTUs or ASVs and the relative abundance of the taxa between short vs. normal sleepers were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. We used the PERMANOVA to test the beta-diversity (the bacterial community composition) of the OTUs/ASVs and used the principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plots to visualize the dissimilarity of the community composition using the weighted Bray–Curtis as the distance matrix.
For those bacterial genera (relative abundance > 1%) that differed by sleep duration, we used a multivariable negative binomial regression model to obtain the incidence rate ratio (IRR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) of having a non-zero bacterial count in short vs. normal sleepers. The covariates included age, ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, African Americans, and Hispanics), body mass index (BMI), cigarette smoking (yes vs. no), alcohol use (never, former, and current), hypertension, and type 2 diabetes (yes vs. no). To account for multiple colon biopsies taken from 38 of 63 participants, we used the panel data regression function (random effect) in STATA, treating each participant as a panel. We further included HEI scores in the model using data of 39 participants who completed the FFQ. In the sensitivity analyses, we used the biopsies from a single segment to examine the association. Lastly, we examined the association between gut microbiota using either weekday sleep hours or weekend sleep hours.
All statistical analyses were performed using the R statistical software (version 3.4.4, R foundation) or STATA 16.0 (Stata cooperation, College Station, TX, USA). All tests were two-sided. A p value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. The false discovery rate (FDR)-adjusted p value (q value) was used to address multiple testing in microbiota analysis.

3. Results

3.1. General Characteristics of Study Participants

Table 1 shows that there were no statistically significant differences in the demographics between normal and short sleepers. Normal sleepers had a higher proportion of diabetes than short sleepers. There was no significant difference in the composition of gut microbiota by colon segment (Supplementary Figure S1). Nevertheless, a similar proportion of biopsies was obtained from each segment in normal and short sleepers. A similar proportion of biopsies was collected in the same season in normal and short sleepers.

3.2. Biodiversity

Illumina pair-end sequencing returned a total of 2,832,046 raw sequences for 206 samples from 63 individuals. We obtained 2201 to 43,217 sequences per sample (median: 11,366). To limit the effect of uneven sampling, we rarefied the dataset to 1648 sequences per sample for the OTU-based data, and we rarefied the dataset to 4153 sequences per sample for the ASV-based data. The rarefaction analysis showed plateauing curves for all samples, indicating that most microbial diversity of the mucosal microbiota was sufficiently captured by sequencing. In the ASV-based analysis, there was no significant difference in bacterial community richness or evenness (alpha diversity) between short sleepers vs. normal sleepers (Shannon index p value = 0.06) (Figure 1A). The PCoA showed that the bacterial community composition (beta diversity) differed between the two groups (p value = 0.006) (Figure 1B).

3.3. Taxonomic Frequency

In the ASV-based analysis, the relative abundance of Firmicutes was significantly lower in short sleepers than in normal sleepers (34% vs. 40%, q value = 0.01), and the relative abundance of Bacteroidota was non-significantly higher in short sleepers than in normal sleepers (39% vs. 36%, q value = 0.11). At the family level, short sleepers had a significantly lower relative abundance of Acidaminococcaceae (0.22% vs. 0.67%), Rikenellaceae (0.47% vs. 1.31%), Sutterellaceae (0.89% vs. 1.91%), Rhodospirillales (ASV0190) (0 vs. 0.09%), and Desulfovibrionaceae (1.02% vs. 1.22%) than normal sleepers (q values < 0.05). However, short sleepers had significantly higher levels of Pseudomonadaceae (0.07% vs. 0.06%) and Pasteurellaceae (1.89% vs. 1.11%) than normal sleepers (q values < 0.05). At the genus level, among 73 genera with relative abundance > 0.05%, the relative abundance of seven bacteria was lower, and that of two bacteria was higher in shorter sleepers than in normal sleepers (Table 2).
In the OTU-based analysis, compared to normal sleepers, the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes was higher in short sleepers (37.8% vs. 44.0%, q value = 0.01); the relative abundance of Pseudomonadaceae was higher, and that of Acidaminococcaceae, Rikenellaceae, and Alcaligenaceae family was lower in short sleepers (q values < 0.05). At the genus level, the relative abundance of Lachnoclostridium, Sutterella, Bilophila, Phascolarctobacterium, and Alistipes was significantly lower, while that of Pseudomonas was significantly higher in short sleepers than in normal sleepers (q values < 0.05) (Supplementary Table S1).

3.4. Multivariable Analysis

Because the ASV and OTU-based analyses provided similar results, the IRRs (95% CI) of having non-zero bacterial count in short sleepers compared to normal sleepers were shown in Table 3 using the OTU classification. Compared to normal sleepers, the incidence rate of having Sutterella and Phascolarctobacterium was significantly lower in short sleepers. The incidence rate of having Pseudomonas was significantly higher in short sleepers. In the models adjusted for diet using 102 mucosal samples of 39 participants, the significant associations between Sutterella and Pseudomonas and sleep duration were observed. The models for bacteria with zero median count in both categories were not concaved.

3.5. Sensitivity Analysis

In the sensitivity analysis using each colon segment in the ASV-based analysis, we consistently observed a lower relative abundance of Sutterella in short sleepers than in normal sleepers (0.55% vs. 1.28% in the cecum, 0 vs. 2.42% in the ascending colon, 0.20% vs. 1.47% in the transverse colon, 0 vs. 1.27% in the sigmoid, and 0 vs. 1.99% in the rectum (p values < 0.20)). Multiple members of the Lachnospiraceae family differed by sleep duration (data not shown). Furthermore, a total of 58 participants reported both weekday and weekend sleep hours, and 53 of 58 (91.3%) of participants had the same categorization of normal vs. short sleepers. We consistently observed the lower relative abundance of Sutterella in short sleepers than in normal sleepers when using weekend sleep hours (0.76% vs. 1.79%, p value = 0.06) and weekday sleep hours (0.61% vs. 1.72%, p value = 0.02) in data analysis.

4. Discussion

In this cross-sectional study, self-reported habitual nocturnal sleep duration was associated with bacterial community composition and structure in adults. The bacteria of the Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes phyla, Lachnospiraceae, Rikenellaceae, Sutterellaceae, Prevotellaceae, and Pseudomonadaceae families differed mostly between short vs. normal sleepers. The relative abundance of Sutterella was significantly lower, and that of Pseudomonas was significantly higher in short sleepers than in normal sleepers. The differences in the relative abundance of other bacterial genera were not statistically significant in the multivariable models.
The finding of the lower Sutterella in short sleepers was consistent in the OTU- and the ASV-based analysis and in the sensitivity analysis using the single colon segment. Sutterella is lower in the colonic mucosa of children with functional abdominal pain associated with autism spectrum disorder and in the feces of patients with chronic schizophrenia and multiple sclerosis [29,30,31]. Sutterella was also one of the bacteria with lower relative abundance in patients with depression [32]. However, the other study found that the relative abundance of Sutterella spp. in feces was higher in children with autism than in controls [33]. The fact that Sutterella has been associated with multiple psychiatric conditions indicates that this bacterium plays a role in the microbial–brain–gut axis. In addition, the members of Sutterella may have immunomodulatory functions. Sutterella spp., except for S. wadsworthensis, may elicit Th-17 differentiation by adhering to intestinal epithelial cells [34]. Lastly, Sutterella is one of the tryptophan-metabolizing bacteria [35]. The role of tryptophan in the microbiome–brain axis has been increasingly recognized [36]. However, in previous feces-based studies, Sutterella was not associated with sleep phenotype in humans [19,20].
We found that Pseudomonas was significantly more abundant in short sleepers than in normal sleepers. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Psae) has the pathogenic potential of disrupting mucosa and causing respiratory infections [37]. Psae infection has been associated with pro-inflammatory immune response in the colon in IL-10(–/–) mice with chronic colitis [14]. It has been suggested that intestinal and respiratory microbiota develop simultaneously after birth. There is a constant cross-talk between these two compartments [38,39]. However, the relative abundance of Pseudomonas was very low in the study samples. Our findings should be confirmed by large studies. In addition, the specific species related to sleep duration could not be defined using the 16S rRNA sequencing in our study.
Phascolarctobacterium was less abundant in short sleepers in the univariate model but not in the multivariable model. Phascolarctobacterium belongs to Negativicutes of Firmicutes phylum. The levels of Phascolarctobacterium were lower in 26 patients with postpartum depressive disorder (PPD) compared to 16 health controls [40]. P. faecium uses succinate as substrate [41]. Succinate takes part in GABA synthesis and recycle [42]. The functions of gut bacteria and their associated substrates and metabolites in the colon remained to be fully investigated.
In both ASV- and OTU-based analysis, we found that many bacteria in the Lachnospiraceae family differed in short vs. normal sleepers. Leone et al. demonstrated that a high-fat diet dampened the circadian oscillation of Lachnospiraceae bacteria in mice [43]. In another study of four-week sleep fragmentation in mice, the preferential growth of highly fermentative members of Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae was observed. When gut microbiota from sleep-fragmented mice was transplanted to germ-free mice, inflammatory responses and metabolic alterations were recapitulated [16]. In previous feces-based studies, one study found a greater relative abundance of Blautia (a member of Lachnospiraceae) and members of Ruminococaceae in individuals who had a better sleep quality [19]. However, the other feces-based study found an inverse association between Lachnospiraceae and sleep measures [20]. Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae (phylum Firmicutes, class Clostridia) are two major anaerobes that are found in the human gastrointestinal tract and they play roles in food fermentation. The link between diet, sleep duration, and metabolism deserves further research.
Sleep deprivation can be acute/short-term or chronic/long-term. A few existing studies had a short intervention (<20 days) in animals or humans [18,44]. These studies suggested that human gut microbiota is resistant to short-term sleep deprivation. There may be a quick adaption of the gut microbiota to short-term sleep deprivation. In our study, we asked participants to report their sleep duration over the last 12 months. The difference in gut microbiota between short vs. normal sleepers was likely reflective of chronic sleep deprivation.
Our study may be the first study investigating the association between sleep duration and the mucosa-associated gut microbiota in humans. Our pilot study had several limitations. First, we could not infer causality in this cross-sectional observational study. The causes of sleep deprivation, such as behavior, insomnia, or mental health, were unknown. Second, as a side pilot project of a larger study, we only collected self-reported sleep duration data over the last 12 months. Objective sleep phenotype data should be used to reduce the likelihood of misclassification of short vs. normal sleepers in future studies. The ascertainment of chronotype, sleep phase, or meal time would improve the characterization of the biological rhythm in humans. Third, given the relatively small sample size and the lower relative abundance of the bacteria, the findings should be considered preliminary. Fouth, we excluded participants who used antibiotics in the past three months. Some studies showed that the restoration of gut microbiota varies by individuals [45,46]. Therefore, we could not exclude the possibility that the perturbed gut microbiota due to remote use of antibiotics may have affected our findings. Finally, the study participants were mostly adult men who had an endoscopically normal colon after bowel cleansing. The generalizability of the study findings to other populations may be limited.

5. Conclusions

In this pilot study, we showed that the community composition and structure of the mucosa-associated gut bacteria were associated with habitual sleep duration in adults. The lower relative abundance of Sutterella in short sleepers was consistently observed. Further whole-genome shotgun metagenomics sequencing study should determine Sutterella and Lachnospiraceae species that may contribute to sleep phenotype. The causal relation between diet, gut microbiota, microbial metabolites, and sleep phenotype deserves further investigation and may open a new door to managing sleep and its related health conditions.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/clockssleep3030025/s1, Figure S1: The community composition of colonic mucosa-associated microbiota did not differ by colon segments, Table S1: Relative abundance (%) of the bacterial genera in short sleepers and normal sleepers in the OTU-based analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.J. and J.F.P.; methodology, N.J.A.; K.L.H. and J.F.P.; software, N.J.A., K.L.H. and J.F.P.; validation, N.J.A. and J.F.P.; formal analysis, L.J., L.C. and N.J.A.; investigation, R.A., N.J.A., D.L.W., D.Y.G., H.B.E.-S. and J.F.P.; resources, D.Y.G. and H.B.E.-S.; data curation, L.J. and N.J.A.; writing—original draft preparation, R.A. and L.J.; writing—review and editing, N.J.A., S.M., D.L.W., A.S., D.Y.G., H.B.E.-S. and J.F.P.; visualization, L.J.; supervision, L.J. and H.B.E.-S.; project administration, L.C.; funding acquisition, L.J. and J.F.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Gillson Longenbaugh Foundation and Golfers Against Cancer organization (to L.J.), the Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) (grant number RP # 140767), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease P30 (grant number DK56338), the Cancer Center Support Grant NIH:NCI (grant number: P30CA022453), and Houston VA HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety (grant number CIN13-413), and Alkek research fund. Jiao received partial salary support from NIH R01 (grant number 5R01CA172880). White receives partial salary support from the Department of Veterans Affairs (grant number I01CX001430). The opinions expressed reflect those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department of Veterans Affairs, the U.S. government, or Baylor College of Medicine.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Institutional Review Boards of Baylor College of Medicine and Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center approved the research protocol on human subjects.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from each participant involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request due to local policy on privacy.

Acknowledgments

We thank David Ramsey, Diana Hutchinson, and Zhensheng Wang at Baylor College of Medicine for data management and data analysis. We also thank Jocelyn Uriostegui, Sarah Plew, Ava Smith, Preksha Shah, Kathryn Royse, and Mahmoud Al-Saadi for collecting and processing samples. We thank the veterans who participated in this study and the doctors and nurses in the GI endoscopy clinic at the Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center for their assistance with study execution.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ford, E.S.; Cunningham, T.J.; Croft, J.B. Trends in self-reported sleep duration among US Adults from 1985 to 2012. Sleep 2015, 38, 829–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Akerstedt, T.; Ghilotti, F.; Grotta, A.; Bellavia, A.; Lagerros, Y.T.; Bellocco, R. Sleep duration, mortality and the influence of age. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2017, 32, 881–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Lynch, S.V.; Pedersen, O. The human intestinal microbiome in health and disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 2369–2379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Jiao, L.; Duan, Z.; Sangihaghpeykar, H.; Hale, L.; White, D.L.; Elserag, H.B. Sleep duration and incidence of colorectal cancer in postmenopausal women. Br. J. Cancer 2013, 108, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Loke, Y.L.; Chew, M.T.; Ngeow, Y.F.; Lim, W.W.D.; Peh, S.C. Colon carcinogenesis: The interplay between diet and gut microbiota. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 603086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ma, W.; Song, J.; Wang, H.; Shi, F.; Zhou, N.; Jiang, J.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yang, L.; Zhou, M. Chronic paradoxical sleep deprivation-induced depression like behavior, energy metabolism and microbial changes in rats. Life Sci. 2019, 225, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sabia, S.; Fayosse, A.; Dumurgier, J.; van Hees, V.T.; Paquet, C.; Sommerlad, A.; Kivimäki, M.; Dugravot, A.; Singh-Manoux, A. Association of sleep duration in middle and old age with incidence of dementia. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kay, D.B.; Tanner, J.J.; Bowers, D. Sleep disturbances and depression severity in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Brain Behav. 2018, 8, e00967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Heinzel, S.; Aho, V.T.E.; Suenkel, U.; von Thaler, A.K.; Schulte, C.; Deuschle, C.; Paulin, L.; Hantunen, S.; Brockmann, K.; Eschweiler, G.W.; et al. Gut microbiome signatures of risk and prodromal markers of Parkinson disease. Ann. Neurol. 2020, 88, 320–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hua, X.; Zhu, J.; Yang, T.; Guo, M.; Li, Q.; Chen, J.; Li, T. The gut microbiota and associated metabolites are altered in sleep disorder of children with autism spectrum disorders. Front. Psychiatry 2020, 11, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Fung, T.C.; Olson, C.A.; Hsiao, E.Y. Interactions between the microbiota, immune and nervous systems in health and disease. Nat. Neurosci. 2017, 20, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Spichak, S.; Bastiaanssen, T.F.; Berding, K.; Vlckova, K.; Clarke, G.; Dinan, T.G.; Cryan, J.F. Mining microbes for mental health: Determining the role of microbial metabolic pathways in human brain health and disease. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2021, 125, 698–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Osadchiy, V.; Martin, C.R.; Mayer, E.A. The gut-brain axis and the microbiome: Mechanisms and clinical implications. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 17, 322–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, Y.; Hao, Y.; Fan, F.; Zhang, B. The role of microbiome in insomnia, circadian disturbance and depression. Front. Psychiatry 2018, 9, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Thaiss, C.A.; Levy, M.; Korem, T.; Dohnalová, L.; Shapiro, H.; Jaitin, D.A.; David, E.; Winter, D.R.; Gury-BenAri, M.; Tatirovsky, E.; et al. Microbiota diurnal rhythmicity programs host transcriptome oscillations. Cell 2016, 167, 1495–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Poroyko, V.A.; Carreras, A.; Khalyfa, A.; Khalyfa, A.A.; Leone, V.; Peris, E.; Almendros, I.; Gileles-Hillel, A.; Qiao, Z.; Hubert, N.; et al. Chronic sleep disruption alters gut microbiota, induces systemic and adipose tissue inflammation and insulin resistance in mice. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Benedict, C.; Vogel, H.; Jonas, W.; Woting, A.; Blaut, M.; Schurmann, A.; Cedernaes, J. Gut microbiota and glucometabolic alterations in response to recurrent partial sleep deprivation in normal-weight young individuals. Mol. Metab. 2016, 5, 1175–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhang, S.; Bai, L.; Goel, N.; Bailey, A.; Jang, C.J.; Bushman, F.D.; Meerlo, P.; Dinges, D.F.; Sehgal, A. Human and rat gut microbiome composition is maintained following sleep restriction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E1564–E1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Grosicki, G.J.; Riemann, B.L.; Flatt, A.A.; Valentino, T.; Lustgarten, M.S. Self-reported sleep quality is associated with gut microbiome composition in young, healthy individuals: A pilot study. Sleep Med. 2020, 73, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Smith, R.P.; Easson, C.; Lyle, S.M.; Kapoor, R.; Donnelly, C.P.; Davidson, E.J.; Parikh, E.; Lopez, J.V.; Tartar, J.L. Gut microbiome diversity is associated with sleep physiology in humans. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0222394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Anderson, J.R.; Carroll, I.; Azcarate-Peril, M.A.; Rochette, A.D.; Heinberg, L.J.; Peat, C.; Steffen, K.; Manderino, L.M.; Mitchell, J.; Gunstad, J. A preliminary examination of gut microbiota, sleep, and cognitive flexibility in healthy older adults. Sleep Med. 2017, 38, 104–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Rangel, I.; Sundin, J.; Fuentes, S.; Repsilber, D.; De Vos, W.M.; Brummer, R.J. The relationship between faecal-associated and mucosal-associated microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome patients and healthy subjects. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2015, 42, 1211–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liu, Y.; Ajami, N.J.; El-Serag, H.B.; Hair, C.; Graham, D.Y.; White, D.L.; Chen, L.; Wang, Z.; Plew, S.; Kramer, J.; et al. Dietary quality and the colonic mucosa–associated gut microbiome in humans. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2019, 110, 701–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Subar, A.F.; Thompson, F.E.; Kipnis, V.; Midthune, D.; Hurwitz, P.; McNutt, S.; McIntosh, A.; Rosenfeld, S. Comparative validation of the Block, Willett, and National Cancer Institute food frequency questionnaires: The eating at America’s table study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2001, 154, 1089–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Guenther, P.M.; Reedy, J.; Krebs-Smith, S.M. Development of the Healthy Eating Index-2005. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2008, 108, 1896–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Caporaso, J.G.; Lauber, C.L.; Walters, W.A.; Berg-Lyons, D.; Huntley, J.; Fierer, N.; Owens, S.M.; Betley, J.; Fraser, L.; Bauer, M.; et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J. 2012, 6, 1621–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Edgar, R.C. UPARSE: Highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 996–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Callahan, B.J.; Mcmurdie, P.J.; Rosen, M.J.; Han, A.W.; Johnson, A.J.A.; Holmes, S.P. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 581–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Luna, R.A.; Oezguen, N.; Balderas, M.; Venkatachalam, A.; Runge, J.K.; Versalovic, J.; Veenstra-VanderWeele, J.; Anderson, G.M.; Savidge, T.; Williams, K.C. Distinct microbiome-neuroimmune signatures correlate with functional abdominal pain in children with autism spectrum disorder. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 3, 218–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Jangi, S.; Gandhi, R.; Cox, L.M.; Li, N.; von Glehn, F.; Yan, R.; Patel, B.; Mazzola, M.A.; Liu, S.; Glanz, B.L.; et al. Alterations of the human gut microbiome in multiple sclerosis. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nguyen, T.T.; Kosciolek, T.; Maldonado, Y.; Daly, R.E.; Martin, A.S.; McDonald, D.; Knight, R.; Jeste, D.V. Differences in gut microbiome composition between persons with chronic schizophrenia and healthy comparison subjects. Schizophr. Res. 2019, 204, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Barandouzi, Z.A.; Starkweather, A.R.; Henderson, W.; Gyamfi, A.; Cong, X.S. Altered composition of gut microbiota in depression: A systematic review. Front. Psychiatry 2020, 11, 541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wang, L.; Christophersen, C.T.; Sorich, M.J.; Gerber, J.P.; Angley, M.T.; A Conlon, M. Increased abundance of Sutterella spp. and Ruminococcus torques in feces of children with autism spectrum disorder. Mol. Autism 2013, 4, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Hiippala, K.; Kainulainen, V.; Kalliomäki, M.; Arkkila, P.; Satokari, R. Mucosal prevalence and interactions with the epithelium indicate commensalism of Sutterella spp. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Zhang, C.; Shao, H.; Li, D.; Xiao, N.; Tan, Z. Role of tryptophan-metabolizing microbiota in mice diarrhea caused by Folium sennae extracts. BMC Microbiol. 2020, 20, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bosi, A.; Banfi, D.; Bistoletti, M.; Giaroni, C.; Baj, A. Tryptophan metabolites along the microbiota-gut-brain axis: An interkingdom communication system influencing the gut in health and disease. Int. J. Tryptophan Res. 2020, 13, 1178646920928984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yao, Z.-W.; Zhao, B.-C.; Yang, X.; Lei, S.-H.; Jiang, Y.-M.; Liu, K.-X. Relationships of sleep disturbance, intestinal microbiota, and postoperative pain in breast cancer patients: A prospective observational study. Sleep Breath. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Madan, J.C.; Koestler, D.C.; Stanton, B.A.; Davidson, L.; Moulton, L.A.; Housman, M.L.; Moore, J.H.; Guill, M.F.; Morrison, H.G.; Sogin, M.L.; et al. Serial analysis of the gut and respiratory microbiome in cystic fibrosis in infancy: Interaction between intestinal and respiratory tracts and impact of nutritional exposures. mBio 2012, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Marsland, B.J.; Trompette, A.; Gollwitzer, E.S. The gut-lung axis in respiratory disease. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2015, 12, S150–S156. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Zhou, Y.; Chen, C.; Yu, H.; Yang, Z. Fecal microbiota changes in patients with postpartum depressive disorder. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 567268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ikeyama, N.; Murakami, T.; Toyoda, A.; Mori, H.; Iino, T.; Ohkuma, M.; Sakamoto, M. Microbial interaction between the succinate-utilizing bacterium Phascolarctobacterium faecium and the gut commensal Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron. MicrobiologyOpen 2020, 9, 1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ravasz, D.; Kacso, G.; Fodor, V.; Horvath, K.; Adam-Vizi, V.; Chinopoulos, C. Catabolism of GABA, succinic semialdehyde or gamma-hydroxybutyrate through the GABA shunt impair mitochondrial substrate-level phosphorylation. Neurochem. Int. 2017, 109, 41–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Leone, V.; Gibbons, S.M.; Martinez, K.; Hutchison, A.L.; Huang, E.Y.; Cham, C.M.; Pierre, J.; Heneghan, A.F.; Nadimpalli, A.; Hubert, N.; et al. Effects of diurnal variation of gut microbes and high-fat feeding on host circadian clock function and metabolism. Cell Host Microbe 2015, 17, 681–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Davies, S.K.; Ang, J.E.; Revell, V.L.; Holmes, B.; Mann, A.; Robertson, F.P.; Cui, N.; Middleton, B.; Ackermann, K.; Kayser, M.; et al. Effect of sleep deprivation on the human metabolome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 10761–10766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Lozupone, C.A.; Stombaugh, J.I.; Gordon, J.I.; Jansson, J.K.; Knight, R. Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota. Nature 2012, 489, 220–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Palleja, A.; Mikkelsen, K.H.; Forslund, S.K.; Kashani, A.; Allin, K.H.; Nielsen, T.; Hansen, T.H.; Liang, S.; Feng, Q.; Zhang, C.; et al. Recovery of gut microbiota of healthy adults following antibiotic exposure. Nat. Microbiol. 2018, 3, 1255–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Clockssleep 03 00025 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) Boxplot of the Shannon index (bacterial alpha diversity) by sleep hours (<6, short sleepers vs. 6–8, normal sleepers). There was no significant difference in bacterial richness and evenness (the Shannon index) (q value = 0.061, Kruskal–Wallis test) between the two groups. (B) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) with weighted Bray–Curtis dissimilarity shows the bacterial beta diversity differed significantly between the two groups (p value = 0.0001, PERMANOVA test). The centroids of the two groups did not overlap. The fraction of diversity captured by the coordinate was shown as a percentage in the corresponding axis. PC1 and PC2 represent the top two principal coordinates that capture most of the diversity.
Figure 1. (A) Boxplot of the Shannon index (bacterial alpha diversity) by sleep hours (<6, short sleepers vs. 6–8, normal sleepers). There was no significant difference in bacterial richness and evenness (the Shannon index) (q value = 0.061, Kruskal–Wallis test) between the two groups. (B) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) with weighted Bray–Curtis dissimilarity shows the bacterial beta diversity differed significantly between the two groups (p value = 0.0001, PERMANOVA test). The centroids of the two groups did not overlap. The fraction of diversity captured by the coordinate was shown as a percentage in the corresponding axis. PC1 and PC2 represent the top two principal coordinates that capture most of the diversity.
Clockssleep 03 00025 g001
Table
Table 1. Basic characteristics of the participants based on sleep hours per night.
Table 1. Basic characteristics of the participants based on sleep hours per night.
Characteristics (n (%) or Mean ± Standard Deviation)<6 h of Sleep
(Short Sleepers)
N = 16
55 Mucosa		6–8 h of Sleep
(Normal Sleepers)
N = 47
151 Mucosa		p Value
Average sleep hour4.52 ± 0.876.89 ± 0.63<0.0001
Age (years)59.4 ± 7.562.7 ± 5.80.07
Men (%)93.795.70.73
Race/ethnicity group
Non-Hispanic white6 (37.5)28 (59.6)0.19–0.09
African American8 (50.0)11 (23.4)
Hispanic2 (12.5)8 (17.0)
BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, n (%)
No8 (50.0)15 (31.9)0.20–0.20
Yes (obese)8 (50.0)32 (68.1)
Smoking Status, n (%)
Never9 (56.3)13 (27.7)0.11
Former5 (31.2)26 (55.3)
Current2 (12.5)8 (17.0)
Alcohol Status, n (%)
Never5 (31.2)14 (29.8)1.00
Former4 (25.0)13 (27.7)
Current7 (43.8)20 (42.5)
Comorbidities, (yes, n (%))
Hypertension10 (66.7)31 (66.0)0.96
Type 2 diabetes2 (13.3)22 (47.9)0.02
Total HEI Score62.9 ± 5.6061.0 ± 10.00.61
Colon segment, n (%)
Cecum11 (20.0)26 (17.2)0.95
Ascending11 (20.0)27 (17.9)
Transverse8 (14.5)21 (13.9)
Descending8 (14.5)19 (12.6)
Sigmoid8 (14.6)30 (20.0)
Rectum9 (16.4)28 (18.4)
Season of biopsying
Spring13 (27.7)3 (18.8)0–0.68
Summer11 (23.4)5 (31.2)
Fall7 (14.9)4 (25.0)
Winter16 (34.0)4 (25.0)
BMI, body mass index; HEI, healthy eating index.
Table
Table 2. Relative abundance (%) of the bacterial genera in short sleepers and normal sleepers.
Table 2. Relative abundance (%) of the bacterial genera in short sleepers and normal sleepers.
Genus (Phylum-Family)Short SleepersNormal Sleepersq Values
Lower in short sleepersRelative abundance (%)
 Lachnoclostridium (Firmicutes-Lachnospiraceae)0.401.50<0.0001
 Sutterella (Proteobacteria-Sutterellaceae)0.381.25<0.0001
 Alistipes (Bacteroidetes-Rikenellaceae)0.481.300.006
 Bilophila (Proteobacteria-Desulfovibrionaceae)0.250.610.002
 Phascolarctobacterium (Firmicutes-Acidaminococcaceae)0.200.500.002
 UBA1819 (Firmicutes-Ruminococcaceae)0.030.130.006
 Paraprevotella (Bacteroidetes-Prevotellaceae)0.110.290.03
Higher in short sleepers
 Pseudomonas (Proteobacteria-Pseudomonadaceae)0.080.060.01
 Eubacterium_siraeum (Firmicutes-Ruminococcaceae)0.130.060.018
Table
Table 3. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) of having non-zero bacterial count in short versus normal sleepers.
Table 3. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) of having non-zero bacterial count in short versus normal sleepers.
GeneraShort SleepersNormal Sleepers aIRR (95% CI) bIIRR (95% CI) cIRR (95% CI) d
Median count
Sutterella012.90.30 (0.16–0.56)0.20 (0.06–0.60)0.08 (0.06–0.60)
Pseudomonas0.4603.31 (1.42–7.76)3.51 (1.52–8.14)6.48 (1.77–24.0)
Phascolarctobacterium1.224.160.44 (0.28–0.71)0.32 (0.13–0.79)0.47 (0.16–1.35)
Lachnoclostridium8.3922.50.52 (0.36–0.74)0.67 (0.34–1.33)0.38 (0.14–1.00)
Alistipes1.357.750.41 (0.23–0.71)0.83 (0.32–2.19)0.94 (0.34–2.59)
Bilophila05.640.42 (0.26–0.70)0.74 (0.25–2.16)
CI: confidence interval; IRR: incidence rate ratio. a Normal sleepers were the reference group in the negative binomial regression model for panel data. b The model was adjusted for age. c The model was adjusted for age, ethnicity, BMI, alcohol, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, and segment. Compared to normal sleepers, the incidence rate of having the non-zero Sutterella count in short sleepers decreased by 80%, and the incidence rate of having the non-zero Pseudomonas count increased by 2.51 times. The findings of this model were reported. d The model was also adjusted for HEI scores based on 102 mucosal samples for which diet data were collected.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Agrawal, R.; Ajami, N.J.; Malhotra, S.; Chen, L.; White, D.L.; Sharafkhaneh, A.; Hoffman, K.L.; Graham, D.Y.; El-Serag, H.B.; Petrosino, J.F.; et al. Habitual Sleep Duration and the Colonic Mucosa-Associated Gut Microbiota in Humans—A Pilot Study. Clocks & Sleep 2021, 3, 387-397. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/clockssleep3030025

AMA Style

Agrawal R, Ajami NJ, Malhotra S, Chen L, White DL, Sharafkhaneh A, Hoffman KL, Graham DY, El-Serag HB, Petrosino JF, et al. Habitual Sleep Duration and the Colonic Mucosa-Associated Gut Microbiota in Humans—A Pilot Study. Clocks & Sleep. 2021; 3(3):387-397. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/clockssleep3030025

Chicago/Turabian Style

Agrawal, Ritwick, Nadim J. Ajami, Sonal Malhotra, Liang Chen, Donna L. White, Amir Sharafkhaneh, Kristi L. Hoffman, David Y. Graham, Hashem B. El-Serag, Joseph F. Petrosino, and et al. 2021. "Habitual Sleep Duration and the Colonic Mucosa-Associated Gut Microbiota in Humans—A Pilot Study" Clocks & Sleep 3, no. 3: 387-397. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/clockssleep3030025

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop