Next Article in Journal
Correction: Hong et al. Applying SEM, Exploratory SEM, and Bayesian SEM to Personality Assessments. Psych 2024, 6, 111–134
Previous Article in Journal
Evidence of Validity, Invariance, and Reliability of the Body Image Dimension in the Body Investment Scale: A Study in Spanish University Students
 
 
Please note that, as of 22 March 2024, Psych has been renamed to Psychology International and is now published here.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Work-Related Flow in Contrast to Either Happiness or PERMA Factors for Human Resources Management Development of Career Sustainability

by
Carol Nash
History of Medicine Program, Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
Submission received: 22 January 2024 / Revised: 21 February 2024 / Accepted: 29 February 2024 / Published: 5 March 2024

Abstract

:
In promoting career sustainability, psychological theories historically have informed human resource management (HRM) development—three assessment directions are among them: work-related flow, happiness promotion, and appraising PERMA (Positive Emotions, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishment) factors. Csikszentmihalyi’s work-related flow represents an optimally challenging work-related process. Happiness promotion strives to maintain a pleased satisfaction with the current experience. PERMA represents measurable positive psychological factors constituting well-being. Reliable and validated, the experience of flow has been found to determine career sustainability in contrast to the more often investigated happiness ascertainment or identifying PERMA factors. Career sustainability research to inform HRM development is in its infancy. Therefore, publishers’ commitment to sustainability provides integrity. Given MDPI’s uniquely founding sustainability concern, its journal articles were searched with the keywords “flow, Csikszentmihalyi, work”, excluding those pertaining to education, health, leisure, marketing, non-workers, and spirituality, to determine the utilization of work-related flow to achieve career sustainability. Of the 628 returns, 28 reports were included for potential assessment. Current studies on Csikszentmihalyi’s work-related flow ultimately represented three results. These provide insight into successful, positive methods to develop career sustainability. Consequently, HRM is advised to investigate practices for assessing and encouraging employees’ engagement with work-related flow with the aim of ensuring career sustainability.

1. Introduction

Psychological theories historically have informed the methodology of human resource management (HRM) development regarding career sustainability [1] with psychological assessment being key [2]. Three directions of psychological assessment are notable: work-related flow, happiness promotion, and assessing PERMA (Positive Emotions, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishment) factors. Csikszentmihalyi’s work-related flow is a process of being optimally challenged [3]. Happiness promotion strives to maintain a state of pleased satisfaction with current experience, yet is sometimes associated with system justification, resistance to change, and insensitivity to inequality and social injustice [4]. PERMA represents five measurable factors of positive psychology that may be difficult to differentiate between an overall sense of well-being and day-to-day experiences of living a high-quality life [5]. Reliable and validated, the work-related process of flow has been found to determine career sustainability [6] compared with happiness ascertainment or identifying PERMA factors, neither of which relate to the process and are instead time-specific [7,8]. In this regard, a preference to reduce macrolevel HRM outcomes explanation to individual-level psychological behavioral factors and individual differences has been recognized as a persistent failing in HRM development [9]. In aiming at career sustainability supportive of satisfying work-related experiences across the working lifespan [10], HRM has been considered to lag in this aim [11] by its focus on assessing factors and differences. Therefore, it is surprising that little research has been conducted into HRM development practices regarding work-related flow, as it is a valuable process enhancing the psychological health that leads to career sustainability [12], in contrast to research on time-dependent happiness or PERMA factors. What research on Csikszentmihalyi’s work-related flow is available that might inform HRM development practices to support career sustainability is the focus of undertaking this limited review.
Work-related flow is a theory pioneered by psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (1934–2021 [13]) of (1) clear goals every step of the way; (2) immediate feedback to one’s actions; (3) a balance between challenges and skills; (4) action and awareness being merged; (5) distractions being excluded from consciousness; (6) no worry of failure; (7) the disappearance of self-consciousness; (8) a distorted sense of time; and (9) the activity becoming autotelic [14]. As a goal-directed process guided by meeting personally developed challenges, flow is identified as the optimal work-related experience [15]. Yet, flow is not equivalent to the experiences of fun, joy, or happiness [16]. This is because aspects of the flow process may be found frustrating by the employee during a particularly challenging task during the process of pursuing the goal [17]. Recognized as one of the most significant in contemporary psychology [18], the importance of this theory—particularly with the 1990 publication of Csikszentmihalyi’s book Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience [19]—was lauded by the then president of the American Psychological Association (1998–2000), Martin Seligman, in describing Csikszentmihalyi as “the world leader in positive psychology research” [18]. With his book translated into twenty-three languages by his death in 2021, Flow’s author is among the most cited psychologists in a variety of fields [18], with the theory of flow validated [20] and, apart from refinement [21], remaining virtually unaltered since its development [22].
Happiness in comparison is a judgment-dependent state in which a person, upon considering their situation, determines that they have pleased-satisfaction with their current experience [23] and would like it to continue [24]. Unlike happiness, flow is not a judgment. Instead, it is an engaged process in which the person in flow feels indistinct from their ongoing activity [25]. If a person is asked to evaluate their situation while experiencing flow, rather than describing themselves as happy, the likely response would be that they feel optimally challenged [26], although once the flow experience is over, they could be expected to say that they found the process in its totality enjoyable [27]. It is because happiness is time-limited [28] that development programs by HRM focused on happiness in principle cannot produce career sustainability. In this respect, career sustainability is dependent on developing and maintaining a process, like flow, rather than encouraging the judgment of happiness, which represents one particular point in time.
In 1998, flow theory became the center of psychology that concentrated on “the good life—what it is to be healthy and sane, and what humans choose to pursue when they are not suffering or oppressed” [29] (p. 3), initiated by Seligman and Csikszentmihalyi [29]. From its initial focus on flow, positive psychology was then redirected in 2011 based on Seligman’s suggestion that PERMA (Positive Emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishment) factors constitute well-being [30]. Although the originality of this measure of the good life has been called into question as differing little from the 1984 three-factor model of subjective well-being [31], PERMA factors have become a contemporary priority of research in positive psychology [32,33,34], including HRM research [35]. Yet, studies supporting this model have been called into question by a systematic review of PERMA related to HRM [36] and by a thirty-year positive psychology researcher’s findings that these measures remain poorly constructed [37]. For these reasons, there are conceptual difficulties with basing HRM development on PERMA factors for career sustainability. Contrasted to these PERMA factors, flow has continuously demonstrated validity and reliability [38,39,40] with respect to career sustainability.
Career sustainability is a form of human sustainability in its early stages of development [41]. As such, research regarding career sustainability gains important foundational support through publications acknowledging devotion to sustainability. Comparing how flow has been referenced in contrast to happiness promotion or PERMA factors in articles published in journals publicly committed to sustainability is thus the focus of this investigation. MDPI (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute) was founded as a publisher of open access scientific journals and a member of the United Nations Global Compact in support of corporate sustainability [42]. Sustainability is stated as at the core of MDPI’s values [43], with a flagship journal devoted to sustainability as well as organized conferences and events based on sustainability [44]. Although other publishing houses have adopted this commitment [45,46,47], MDPI appears to be the only publishing house founded with sustainability as its focus. As this study concerns creating a foundation for research on career sustainability, the importance of sustainability for the publishing house regarding its publications was deemed valuable for ensuring research integrity.
Predicated on MDPI’s uniquely founding sustainability concern as an important indicator of concern for career sustainability, a search was conducted using the MDPI search engine on 22 December 2023 for all MDPI articles with the keywords “flow, Csikszentmihalyi, work”. The purpose of the search was to determine how Csikszentmihalyi’s work on flow has been interpreted by MDPI authors regarding career sustainability in light of the publisher’s commitment to sustainability in comparison with mentions made of happiness and PERMA in these same articles.
The role of HRM development is predicated on motivating employees to stay energized in order for firms to survive and thrive through adverse conditions, with HRM seeking to incorporate employees’ positive psychological resources to successfully contend with uncertainties and crises [48]. Although interest in flow remains regarding career sustainability, research focus in the MDPI publications returned in the search conducted has noted a preference for investigations regarding happiness and PERMA factors even when flow is referenced. Nevertheless, based on the research results returned regarding flow, HRM is presented with practical methods to support the development of work-related flow that have been demonstrated to produce career sustainability in contrast to a focus on either happiness promotion or measuring PERMA factors at a point in time.

2. Materials and Methods

The materials to be gathered will follow a limited review. As such, this is neither a systematic review nor a scoping review—technical terms concerning the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [49]. Systematic reviews investigate predefined research questions using clear, reproducible methods to identify, critically appraise, and assess the results of primary research studies. Key stages in the systematic review process include the clarification of aims and methods in a protocol, searching for relevant research, collecting data, assessing the quality of the studies returned, synthesizing evidence, and interpreting findings quantitatively and qualitatively [50]. Although a similar process was followed to gather the materials for this study as used in a systematic review, the search undertaken was not equivalent to a systematic review as the protocol was not registered, and no quantitative statistical analysis was performed. Furthermore, this limited review is not a scoping review because only MDPI publications were searched rather than a full range of databases, and the keywords searched were not extensive enough to make the search comprehensive [50]. Nevertheless, the PRISMA process was selected for use in this limited review as it has been identified as involving high-level procedures [51]. In making use of the PRISMA diagram for this limited review, it should not be interpreted that this review is claiming to be either a systematic or scoping review for the above-mentioned reasons. Why a limited review was chosen has been stated in the Introduction and concerns the unique founding commitment of MDPI as a publishing house devoted to sustainability.
A 22 December 2023 search of MDPI articles with the keywords “flow, Csikszentmihalyi, work” was conducted. The results returned represent the materials of this study, while the process undertaken, depicted in the flow diagram of Figure 1, demonstrates the methods. The records identified numbered 628, with 2 removed for lacking Csikszentmihalyi. The following categories are offered as those excluded for not pertaining to work—plus their number: education—171; health—96; leisure—101; marketing—56; non-worker—123; and spirituality—51. The reports of the included studies following these exclusions total 28, representing the materials for which results will be provided.

3. Results

The reports included in the search performed are the articles mentioning work-related flow while referencing at least one publication by Csikszentmihalyi. These cited articles are examined in the following manner: first, year of publication and the MDPI journal title (see Table 1). Considering that MDPI began publishing in 1996 [43], there was no restriction placed on the year of publication for the search conducted. As such, reports that were included might have returned those older than five years, yet the best practice in scientific research recommends that references be published within the last five years [52]. Therefore, although all reports of included studies will be listed, only those reports published within the last five years will be discussed—those from 2019–2023. Second, the articles cited, written by Csikszentmihalyi, will be examined for how flow is referenced by the authors of the reports included. The data for this second examination are found in Table 2. Third to be considered is whether the understanding of flow in the article is focused on flow, happiness, or some other measure, with particular attention to whether PERMA factors are the “other” mentioned. The data for this assessment are found in Table 3.
The truncated titles of the reports included represent 28 MDPI articles. They are as follows: Building Work Engagement in Organizations [53], Changing the Environment Based on Empowerment [54], Contributions to Sustainability in SMEs: Human Resources [55], Creativity and Resilience as Predictors of Career Success [56], Does Happiness Launch More Businesses? Affect, Gender [57], Effect of Attainment Value and Positive Thinking [58], Effects of Selected Positive Resources on Hospitality Service [59], Engagement, Passion and Meaning of Work [60], Explaining the Paradox: How Pro-Environmental [61], Factors Affecting Entrepreneurship and Business [62], Gratitude in Organizations: Psychometric Properties [63], Human Resource Practices, Eudaimonic Well-Being [64], Intelligence and Creativity: Mapping Constructs [65], Occupational Stress: Preventing Suffering, Enhancing Wellbeing [66], Personality Traits and Positive Resources of Workers [67], Positive Orientation and Strategies for Coping with Stress [68], Promoting Flow at Work through Proactive Personality [69], Psychological Capital, Workload, and Burnout [70], Relationships between High Ability (Gifted) and Flow [71], Revisiting the Happy-Productive Worker Thesis [72], David J. Rowe’s Career-Long Methods [73], Self-Perceived Employability and Meaningful Work [74], The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility [75], The Longitudinal Link between Organizational Citizenship [76], The Nature of Job Crafting: Positive and Negative Relations [77], The Role of Relationships at Work and Happiness [78], To Be Happy: A Case Study of Entrepreneurial [79], What Are the Common Themes of Physician Resilience? [80].

3.1. Publication Date and Journal Title

The publication dates of the reports included for assessment citing Csikszentmihalyi concerning work-related flow activities, as well as the journal titles of those publications, are listed in Table 1.
As Flow was published in 1990 [19], and the MDPI publishing house began in 1996 [43], that the first article published regarding the search for “flow, Csikszentmihalyi, work” was in 2013 is noteworthy. Although the theory of work-related flow was available for research assessment, 17 years passed before a paper was published in an MDPI journal citing Csikszentmihalyi in this regard. Furthermore, the majority of the returned articles were published in 2019 and 2020. Older than five years, the following six articles will not be considered in the Discussion to follow [54,61,62,66,67,75]. Figure 2 illustrates the publication year and number of publications per year.
Figure 3 depicts the number of publications that reference Csikszentmihalyi in each of the various journals in which articles on work-related flow were published during the history of the MDPI publishing house. It is relevant that the largest number of publications have been published in MDPI’s premiere journal specifically regarding sustainability [44], as this demonstrates that these various publications represent the aim of the publishing house as intended [43] most directly.

3.2. Reference to Csikszentmihalyi Articles

Table 2 lists the Csikszentmihalyi articles referenced by the reports returned in the 22 December 2023 keyword search of “flow, Csikszentmihalyi, work”. Some articles contain more than one reference to a Csikszentmihalyi publication, so each is listed. There are 18 different Csikszentmihalyi references that historically MDPI journal articles have cited. These include the following titles: Positive Psychology: An Introduction [81], Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: Experiencing Flow in Work and Play [27], Creatividad: El Fluir y la Psicología del Descubirmiento y la Invención [82], Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience [19], Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness [83]. If We Are So Rich, Why Aren’t We Happy? [84], The Concept of Flow [85], The Experience Sampling Method [86], All You Need Is Love: The Importance of Partner and Family Relations to Highly Creative Individuals’ Well-Being and Success [87], The Creative Vision: a Longitudinal Study of Problem Finding in Art [88], Optimal Experience in Work and Leisure [89], Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention [14], Musical Improvisation: A Systems Approach [90], Proneness for Psychological Flow [91], Cultivating Talent Throughout Life [92], Flow Theory and Research [93], Optimal Experience in Adult Learning: Conception and Validation of the Flow in Education Scale (EduFlow-2) [18], The Construction of Meaning Through Vital Engagement [94].
The particular concern of this investigation is those articles that not only reference Csikszentmihalyi but that they do so regarding his theory of flow in a work-related setting. Figure 4 demonstrates that 13 of the 28 articles that cite Csikszentmihalyi are in regard to his article, Positive Psychology: An Introduction. Although the theory of flow is mentioned in this publication, there is no explanation of the theory concerning work. As such, in the Discussion to follow, those of the 28 articles that cite only this article regarding work-related flow will be excluded from consideration. Beyond those that have been eliminated already from the Discussion to follow as a result of being published pre-2019 [54,61,62,66,67,75] these additional 11 records will not be part of the Discussion because they reference Positive Psychology: An Introduction and no other work by Csikszentmihalyi [53,59,60,63,66,67,68,75,76,78,79].
Further to be eliminated from the assessment are those returned records that reference other Csikszentmihalyi-authored publications that do not discuss the theory of work-related flow. This includes one record [64]. It references publications by Csikszentmihalyi related to daily living practices rather than to work [86,87].

3.3. Flow, Happiness, or Other (Including PERMA Factors)

Table 3 represents whether the included reports focus on flow, happiness, or another measure (with specific reference to PERMA factors if they are the other). Although the search undertaken was regarding the keywords “flow, Csikszentmihalyi, work” an important result to note is that a greater number of these reports returned focused on either happiness or at least one of the PERMA factors rather than flow. This result is an indication of the importance of referencing happiness, and PERMA factors even in works that reference Csikszentmihalyi ‘s theory of flow. In total, 18 of the 28 articles were directed towards happiness, while 12 of the 28 focused on one PERMA factor or more. There were 9 articles that referred to both happiness and at least one PERMA factor, and 2 that discussed each flow, happiness, and a PERMA factor [60,69]. In the case of the first article of the two, the PERMA factor mentioned is Positive emotions. The second article, concerns the PERMA factor Engagement. What is also interesting is that there were only 2 articles returned that concentrated on an examination of flow alone [54,71], one of which will not be considered in the Discussion because it was published in 2014 [54].
The articles that will no longer be considered have been eliminated because they are either too old [54,61,62,66,67,75] or reference works by Csikszentmihalyi that do not focus on the theory of work-related flow [53,59,60,63,66,67,68,75,76,78,79]. With these articles now eliminated from further consideration, only those articles emboldened in Table 3 will be those referred to in the Discussion to follow [55,56,57,58,69,71,72,73,74,77,80].

3.4. Final Reports Included to Be Considered for Assessment

As listed in Table 4, the final reports to be considered for assessment of those included are 11 in number [55,56,57,58,69,71,72,73,74,77,80]. Of these, 6 articles are published in Sustainability, 3 in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, and 1 each in the Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, and in Challenges. The number of Csikszentmihalyi references cited by these reports in total equals 13. They are cited here in relation to how they are cited in Table 4 [14,18,19,82,83,84,88,89,90,91,92,93,94]. Of these 11 reports, 3 mention flow, 7 consider happiness, and 9 investigate some other measure, including identifying PERMA factors in 6 cases (one report mentioned two of the PERMA factors).

4. Discussion

This work aims to determine how work-related flow has been referenced in contrast to happiness or PERMA factors in articles published since 2019 in journals publicly committed to sustainability whereas MDPI journals have been noted as those specifically created in relation to sustainability. Why flow is the focus is that PERMA factor measurement has been found unreliable regarding career sustainability [36,37] and a focus on happiness is concerning a fixed time point rather than consistent work sustainability [23,24]. Although flow has been referenced in each of the 11 final reports considered for assessment, only three of the articles were found to actually discuss flow as important to career sustainability [69,71,73]. As a result, only these three reports are further assessed. Two of these articles discuss both flow and happiness [69,73], while one concerns flow alone [71]. Of these reports, two are published in Sustainability [69,71], while one is published in Challenges [73]. One of these included reports also discusses a PERMA factor [69]; this is an article published in Sustainability. The relevance of the points made in these three papers concerning HRM of career sustainability is discussed next.

4.1. Three Reports Discussing Flow

The three reports published within the last five years regarding work-related flow are examined regarding when and where they were published, the work by Csikszentmihalyi they reference, the aim of the study, its results, how it interprets work-related flow, and any mention is made of either happiness or a PERMA factor.

4.1.1. Proactive Personality and Flow in Italian Employees

The full title of the first article regarding flow is Promoting Flow at Work through Proactive Personality: A Sequential Mediation Model with Evidence from Italian Employees [69]. It was published in 2022 in Sustainability. The Csikszentmihalyi work that the authors rely on regarding their understanding of work-related flow is his book published in 2000, Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: Experiencing Flow in Work and Play [27]. The authors seek to fill a gap in the literature regarding the relationship between proactivity and flow at work, and the role of the proactive personality, job crafting, and work engagement (a PERMA factor) in promoting flow at work. They report on an online study of 362 Italian employees to determine the relationship among these variables. The results indicate that proactive employees are able to experience flow at work through job crafting and work engagement. However, the value of these results related to Csikszentmihalyi’s meaning of flow can be questioned. The reason is that after introducing Csikszentmihalyi’s definition of flow [27], the authors turn to an alternative definition of the term [95] depending on the work of Ryan and Deci regarding self-determination theory [96]—which deals with evaluations of individual action (e.g., acting autonomously or competently)—in contrast to flow theory which focuses on the experience itself [97]. In substituting another understanding of flow than Csikszentmihalyi’s, these authors have interpreted the purpose of engaging in flow to be enjoyment. As has been noted, the focus of flow in Csikszentmihalyi’s research findings is not enjoyment (although he believed life’s activities should be enjoyable [98] (pp. xx–xxi)), rather employees engage in flow and prefer flow activities because they are optimally challenging and this is what produces the optimal work-related experience [89]. Consequently, it is unclear whether those with a proactive personality are most likely to craft work that produces the type of work engagement that is optimally challenging. Rather, their focus may be making their work as enjoyable as possible. These authors have reinterpreted flow. This matters because they consider flow a short-term peak experience. Interpreted in this way, contrary to Csikszentmihalyi’s understanding, flow is not career-sustainable. For this reason, the results of this study are not obviously relevant regarding HRM developing career sustainability. How the authors refer to happiness and PERMA factors is regarding their relationship stating, “employees with high levels of engagement tend to feel positive emotions at work (for instance, happiness, joy, and enthusiasm), subsequently achieving good performance”. There is no further discussion of either happiness or work engagement in the article.

4.1.2. Flow in High-Ability Spanish Music Performers

The second article that concerns flow is titled Relationships between High Ability (Gifted) and Flow in Music Performers: Pilot Study Results [71] and was published in 2020, also in Sustainability. The authors of this article reference nine of Csikszentmihalyi’s publications: The Creative Vision: A Longitudinal Study of Problem Finding in Art [88]; Creatividad: El Fluir y la Psicología del Descubirmiento y la Invención [82]; Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience [83]; Optimal experience in work and leisure [89]; Creativity: The Work and Lives of 91 Eminent People (note, the title has now changed for this work) [14]; Musical Improvisation: A Systems Approach [90]; Proneness for Psychological Flow in Everyday Life: Associations with Personality and Intelligence [91]; Cultivating Talent Throughout Life [92]; Flow Theory and Research [93]. Unlike the first article on Italian employees, these authors represent a deeper and more nuanced understanding of Csikszentmihalyi’s theory of flow, yet—even with this better understanding—rather than stating that work in this regard is optimally challenging, they instead summarize it as being pleasurable. On the other hand, apart from this summary by the authors, the body of the paper clarifies that their definition of flow is the one supported by Csikszentmihalyi. Their study aims to investigate the relationship between high-ability Spanish musicians, dedication to music, and flow while they engage in musical activities. The result: the best indicator of the flow state is found to a statistically significant degree to be a loss of self-consciousness when performing. What the authors also found is that their results support Csikszentmihalyi’s findings that there is no relationship between intelligence and the experience of flow measured using a fluid intelligence test, such as Raven’s SPM Plus or the Wiener Matrizen Test [91]. Their results also note that those with the greatest talent experience flow more often than others. In this regard, talent includes the courage to be different, possessing independent thought and action, and having high levels of self-confidence. Additionally, the authors suggest that the flow state during musical performance may relate to greater emotional intelligence based on a 2013 reference [99]. Generally, these authors consider investigating flow to be worthwhile regarding career sustainability, especially concerning the aspect of a loss of self-consciousness, which they consider may be tied to better learning in highly accomplished musicians. This article discusses work-related flow alone and makes no mention of either happiness or PERMA factors.

4.1.3. Promoting Flow in Canadian Physics Research

The final article of the three discussing flow in work is one by this author, published in 2022 in Challenges. Its full title is Self-Direction in Physics Graduate Education: Insights for STEM from David J. Rowe’s Career-Long Methods [73]. Although this is an essay that concerns education—and search returns regarding education were initially excluded from consideration—rather than education, this publication is focused on career sustainability in the higher education setting. For this reason, it is included in the assessment. The works by Csikszentmihalyi referenced in the paper are: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience [19]; If We Are So Rich, Why Aren’t We Happy? [84]; Optimal Experience in Work and Leisure [89]; Optimal Experience in Adult Learning: Conception and Validation of the Flow in Education Scale (EduFlow-2) [18]. This study explores the self-directed learning promoted by University of Toronto physicist David J. Rowe in response to the type of research flow he consistently experienced throughout his career as a theoretical mathematical physicist that brought him the greatest work-related satisfaction. Explored are the ways he structured his work with colleagues to encourage everyday flow in their interactions concerning what he provided to them with regard to his space, time, open-mindedness, and the particular theoretical contributions he offered. The results of his methods encouraged his collaborators to sustain their careers through consistently pioneering insightful resolutions to complex, multidimensional, mathematical physics problems. This research process permitted and encouraged Rowe to sustain his own research career until the day of his death at 84. In this regard, Rowe understood work-related flow as Csikszentmihalyi defined it—a desired activity stretching the researcher’s mind to its limits in a voluntary effort to accomplish something personally valued as both difficult and worthwhile [83]. In this work, the reference made to happiness is, “as has been reported by those who have experienced flow in their work, it is flow in conducting this research that brings the greatest happiness to researchers”. This point is supported by reference to Csikszentmihalyi’s publication [84] that, when researchers are asked to assess their flow experience overall at a particular time point, they evaluate it as producing the peak experience of happiness.

4.2. Future Research Directions

This study of searched reports of the keywords “flow, Csikszentmihalyi, work” in MDPI journals, investigated for their fundamental support of sustainability, has resulted in the finding that there are only three articles published in MDPI journals within the last five years that investigate how flow might contribute to career sustainability. This paucity of publications on the topic together with the result that work-related flow is recognized as most important for career sustainability because it aligns with employees’ values [100] present reasons why the psychological theory of work-related flow as envisioned by Csikszentmihalyi is a useful area in need of research in HRM. In undertaking such work, researchers must be cautious to consider flow as an optimally challenging work-related activity rather than erroneously focusing on it as peak enjoyment. As noted, concerning the Italian study that based its understanding of flow on later research other than that of Csikszentmihalyi, if flow is interpreted as outstanding enjoyment, it is a short-term result rather than a career-sustaining activity. In this way, what needs to be considered by HRM in investigating flow is what can be enhanced in employees and what types of resources can be provided to promote work-related flow.
The research regarding high-ability Spanish musicians recognized high emotional intelligence coupled with a lack of self-consciousness as the areas to be enhanced to encourage flow. In that these researchers presented Csikszentmihalyi’s understanding of flow rather than another interpretation, their findings have particular applicability, and the standardized tests for assessing emotional intelligence and a lack of self-consciousness in employees are particularly relevant [101,102].
Regarding how physicist David Rowe organized his work with colleagues to increase their self-direction and the regular research flow of each participant—he followed a six-step process (involving four different aspects) summarized as [73]:
  • Identify resources needed to achieve each goal—(space)
  • Identify the structure and sequence of learning activities—(time)
  • Outline how it will be known those goals have been achieved—(time)
  • Create a timeline for activities’ completion—(time)
  • Locate a mentor to provide feedback on the plan—(open-mindedness)
  • Develop goals for study—(theoretical contributions).
That this process developed by Rowe has been successful in promoting consistent work-related flow in his colleagues is witnessed by the comments made by four of the physicists he worked with throughout his career in their adopting similar techniques to those of Rowe in their own research groups. Concerning the influence of Rowe’s research program organization, Jerry Draayer, Professor of Physics and Louisiana State University Distinguished Research Master, has stated, “David Rowe was a master mentor and clever innovator—at LSU we are attempting to keep that spirit alive” [103]. George Rosensteel Professor of Physics at Tulane University was Rowe’s most illustrious graduate student (who died a few months after Rowe in 2021). That he had upheld the flow-encouraging work-group style of Rowe was highlighted in Rosensteel’s obituary: “He was kind and generous with his knowledge and his time. George brought out the best in people, challenged his students, and encouraged them to reach their potential” [104]. Hubert de Guise, Professor of Physics at Lakehead University, has stated that the qualities of Rowe in obtaining the best out of his research colleagues included that “he was unhurried by the outside world … immensely patient” and that he had a skill “identifying, developing and leveraging the interests” of his colleagues “without impeding their progress while still maintaining sufficient focus to actually solve a non-trivial problem” [105]. Canada Research Chair in Theoretical Chemistry, Associate Professor Stijn De Baerdemacker made this comment regarding the flow experience of working with David Rowe: “David … showed me his thought processes on multiple occasions during group meetings. I have taken that with me … There would be a research presentation every week by one of us (or a visitor). I contributed to that on multiple occasions. The magic ingredient was that these were topics that were tangentially related to everybody’s interests” [106].
Beyond investigating the role of emotional intelligence related to flow when considering career sustainability as advised regarding working with high-achieving musicians, it is suggested that HRMs study making appropriate changes to the space available to employees, their approach to time management, the open-mindedness of supervisors, and management’s foundational contributions to introducing and discussing work-related problems comparable to the process developed by Rowe. The details of this process have been discussed in the 2022 publication on Rowe’s methods [73]. These approaches to flow are worth studying as they have been found fruitful in achieving career sustainability in each of those physicists who participated in Rowe’s research group. Furthermore, HRM would do well to investigate the publications by Csikszentmihalyi referenced in the two articles examined here that use his understanding of flow concerning their study results [18,19,82,84,88,89,90,91,92,93]. Although two of these articles by Csikszentmihalyi are specific to careers in the arts [90,92], and one is the Spanish version [82] of another publication by Csikszentmihalyi in English [14], most would be of general interest to HRM looking to develop career sustainability through work-related flow.

4.3. Limitations

A limitation of this work is that a decision was made by the author to search only MDPI journals regarding the keywords “flow, Csikszentmihalyi, work”, rather than conducting a true scoping review (or even a systematic review) of these keywords in all journals. This represents a problem because the non-representation of comprehensive studies questions the validity of the findings The decision was made to limit the review in this way as the aim was to investigate research published by publishing houses created with a founding commitment to sustainability because research concerning career sustainability is in its infancy as a form of human sustainability. As such, this report is intended to provide a foundation for this growing discipline based on an integral commitment to sustainability by the company publishing this type of research. For this reason, it was considered important that the integrity of publishing such research be ensured in creating this foundation. Although other publishing houses currently note their commitment to sustainability [45,46,47], MDPI appears to be the only publishing house that meets the stringent criterion of being created as a publishing house in this regard. Based on this exclusion criterion, a firm foundation has been provided for subsequent research contributing to the theories in this field that may include both scoping and systematic reviews.
An additional limitation of a study comparing mentions of flow, happiness, and PERMA factors in HRM-related documents is that happiness and PERMA factors were investigated only concerning their mention in studies that investigated flow. As such, there are other studies of happiness [107,108] alone and in combination with PERMA factors [109,110,111] that do not discuss flow. Given that the focus of this work is flow in making a comparison with happiness or PERMA factors, as only flow has been found to relate to career sustainability, this omission is to be expected. Nevertheless, it represents a limitation of this study.
There were three papers identified that investigated Csikszentmihalyi’s understanding of flow and, of these, only two that did so in relation to his research findings. As a result, the work environments in which flow was considered were those of professional musicians and theoretical mathematical physicists—two exceptionally creative fields open to few employees. There is no research currently available in MDPI journals regarding flow experiences (as defined by Csikszentmihalyi) in more mundane occupations. For this reason, it is unknown if what is important regarding flow to developing sustainable careers for other employees is similar to what has been found evident within these technically difficult occupations.
The evaluation of the articles for their authors’ points of view was contingent on the reading done by this author. This is an additional limitation. Although this author undertook the present study with the aim of objectivity, it is possible that the author had an unrecognized cognitive bias [112]. Various frameworks have been developed to debias research. Nevertheless, there remains little research on the efficacy of these models and, as such, how to recognize and reduce cognitive bias is identified as an area in need of additional research [113].

5. Conclusions

The importance of work-related flow regarding career sustainability was pioneered by Csikszentmihalyi and became popular with the publication of his 1990 book, Flow. Notably, the theory he initially proposed regarding flow based on his research consistently has been found valid and reliable, remaining unchanged since then in representing the optimal work-related experience. The search of the keywords “flow, Csikszentmihalyi, work” of MDPI (representing a publishing house founded regarding sustainability) publications returned 28 reports for assessment. However, although flow is a stable predictor of career sustainability, within the last five years only three of these articles have been published in MDPI journals that may be of help to HRM in developing career sustainability regarding flow. Interest in flow has remained regarding career sustainability over the years; nevertheless, research focus on career sustainability has shifted from a study of flow to investigations regarding happiness and aspects of PERMA as the predominant concerns. This has resulted in a paucity of research devoted to flow—a concept that has proven its value for career sustainability unlike either a focus on happiness which is time-dependent or PERMA factors which have been found poorly constructed. As a result, HRM is advised to redirect their development of career sustainability to work-related flow in contrast to a focus on happiness or measuring PERMA factors. From the research presented in two of these articles, how best to do this is for HRM to (1) concentrate on recruitment of employees with the courage to be different, who possess independent thought and action, and who have high levels of self-confidence, and (2) support programs that provide employees with the appropriately designed space and time to undertake what they personally value; as well as providing supervisors who are open-minded in their approach to solving problems and able to provide foundational theoretical contributions to solving work-related problems. Studying the works by Csikszentmihalyi referenced by the researchers of these two publications would be additionally helpful in developing programs. In adopting these means, HRM may anticipate strides in developing employee career sustainability.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Han, S.J.; Stieha, V. Growth Mindset for Human Resource Development: A Scoping Review of the Literature with Recommended Interventions. Hum. Res. Devel Rev. 2020, 19, 309–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sartori, R.; Costantini, A.; Ceschi, A. Psychological Assessment in Human Resource Management: Discrepancies between Theory and Practice and Two Examples of Integration. Pers. Rev. 2022, 51, 284–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Peifer, C.; Wolters, G. Flow in the Context of Work. In Advances in Flow Research; Peifer, C., Engeser, S., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 287–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Oishi, S.; Westgate, E.C. A Psychologically Rich Life: Beyond Happiness and Meaning. Psychol. Rev. 2022, 129, 790–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Heshmati, S.; Kibrislioglu Uysal, N.; Kim, S.H.; Oravecz, Z.; Donaldson, S.I. Momentary PERMA: An Adapted Measurement Tool for Studying Well-Being in Daily Life. J. Happiness Stud. 2023, 24, 2441–2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Coun, M.J.H.; Edelbroek, R.; Peters, P.; Blomme, R.J. Leading Innovative Work-Behavior in Times of COVID-19: Relationship Between Leadership Style, Innovative Work-Behavior, Work-Related Flow, and IT-Enabled Presence Awareness During the First and Second Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 717345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. DiMaria, C.H.; Peroni, C.; Sarracino, F. Happiness Matters: Productivity Gains from Subjective Well-Being. J. Happiness Stud. 2020, 21, 139–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bakracheva, M. The Meanings Ascribed to Happiness, Life Satisfaction and Flourishing. Psychology 2020, 11, 87–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kaufman, B.E. The Real Problem: The Deadly Combination of Psychologisation, Scientism, and Normative Promotionalism Takes Strategic Human Resource Management down a 30-year Dead End. Hum. Res. Manag. J. 2020, 30, 49–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Van der Heijden, B.; De Vos, A.; Akkermans, J.; Spurk, D.; Semeijn, J.; Van der Velde, M.; Fugate, M. Sustainable Careers across the Lifespan: Moving the Field Forward. J. Vocat. Behav. 2020, 117, 103344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tordera, N.; Peiró, J.M.; Ayala, Y.; Villajos, E.; Truxillo, D. The Lagged Influence of Organizations’ Human Resources Practices on Employees’ Career Sustainability: The Moderating Role of Age. J. Vocat. Behav. 2020, 120, 103444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, X. Shaheryar Work-Related Flow: The Development of a Theoretical Framework Based on the High Involvement HRM Practices with Mediating Role of Affective Commitment and Moderating Effect of Emotional Intelligence. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 564444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zuzanek, J. Tribute to Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (1934–2021). Soc. Leis. 2022, 45, 445–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Csikszentmihalyi, M. Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention, 1st ed.; Harper Collins Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zito, M.; Cortese, C.G.; Colombo, L. The Role of Resources and Flow at Work in Well-Being. SAGE Open 2019, 9, 215824401984973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kimball, M.; Willis, R. Utility and Happiness; National Bureau of Economic Research: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2023; p. w31707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Csikszentmihalyi, M. Encyclopedia of World Biography. 2019. Available online: https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/csikszentmihalyi-mihaly (accessed on 22 December 2023).
  18. Heutte, J.; Fenouillet, F.; Martin-Krumm, C.; Gute, G.; Raes, A.; Gute, D.; Bachelet, R.; Csikszentmihalyi, M. Optimal Experience in Adult Learning: Conception and Validation of the Flow in Education Scale (EduFlow-2). Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 828027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Csikszentmihalyi, M. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience; Harper Perennial Modern Classics: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  20. Basyouni, S.S.; El Keshky, M.E.S. Job Insecurity, Work-Related Flow, and Financial Anxiety in the Midst of COVID-19 Pandemic and Economic Downturn. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 632265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Van Oortmerssen, L.A.; Caniëls, M.C.J.; Van Assen, M.F. Coping with Work Stressors and Paving the Way for Flow: Challenge and Hindrance Demands, Humor, and Cynicism. J. Happiness Stud. 2020, 21, 2257–2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Engeser, S.; Schiepe-Tiska, A.; Peifer, C. Historical Lines and an Overview of Current Research on Flow. In Advances in Flow Research; Peifer, C., Engeser, S., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Germany, 2021; pp. 1–29. [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhong, Y.; Moon, H.C. What Drives Customer Satisfaction, Loyalty, and Happiness in Fast-Food Restaurants in China? Perceived Price, Service Quality, Food Quality, Physical Environment Quality, and the Moderating Role of Gender. Foods 2020, 9, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kekes, J. Happiness. Mind 1982, 91, 358–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Aydin Kucuk, B. Work Flow Experience in the Light of Leader-Member Exchange and Person-Job Fit Theories. Psychol. Rep. 2022, 125, 464–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Schermuly, C.C.; Meyer, B. Transformational Leadership, Psychological Empowerment, and Flow at Work. Eur. J. Work. Organ. Psychol. 2020, 29, 740–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Csíkszentmihályi, M. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: Experiencing Flow in Work and Play; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gao, Y.; Edelman, S. Between Pleasure and Contentment: Evolutionary Dynamics of Some Possible Parameters of Happiness. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0153193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Seligman, M.E.P. Positive Psychology: A Personal History. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 2019, 15, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Seligman, M. PERMA and the Building Blocks of Well-Being. J. Posit. Psychol. 2018, 13, 333–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Goodman, F.R.; Disabato, D.J.; Kashdan, T.B.; Kauffman, S.B. Measuring Well-Being: A Comparison of Subjective Well-Being and PERMA. J. Posit. Psychol. 2018, 13, 321–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ryan, J.; Curtis, R.; Olds, T.; Edney, S.; Vandelanotte, C.; Plotnikoff, R.; Maher, C. Psychometric Properties of the PERMA Profiler for Measuring Wellbeing in Australian Adults. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0225932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wammerl, M.; Jaunig, J.; Mairunteregger, T.; Streit, P. The German Version of the PERMA-Profiler: Evidence for Construct and Convergent Validity of the PERMA Theory of Well-Being in German Speaking Countries. J. Well Being Assess. 2019, 3, 75–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Umucu, E.; Wu, J.-R.; Sanchez, J.; Brooks, J.M.; Chiu, C.-Y.; Tu, W.-M.; Chan, F. Psychometric Validation of the PERMA-Profiler as a Well-Being Measure for Student Veterans. J. Amer. Coll. Health 2020, 68, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Shulga, L.V.; Busser, J.A.; Yedlin, J. Employee Engagement on Wellbeing: An Analysis of PERMA Framework. In Handbook of Tourism and Quality-of-Life Research II; Uysal, M., Sirgy, M.J., Eds.; International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Germany, 2023; pp. 459–476. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ibrahim, N.F.; Mohamad Sharif, S.; Saleh, H.; Mat Hasan, N.H.; Jayiddin, N.F. PERMA Well-Being and Innovative Work Behaviour: A Systematic Literature Review. F1000Research 2023, 12, 1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ryff, C.D. Positive Psychology: Looking Back and Looking Forward. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 840062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kawabata, M.; Mallett, C.J.; Jackson, S.A. The Flow State Scale-2 and Dispositional Flow Scale-2: Examination of Factorial Validity and Reliability for Japanese Adults. Psychol. Sport. Exerc. 2008, 9, 465–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Riva, E.F.M.; Riva, G.; Talò, C.; Boffi, M.; Rainisio, N.; Pola, L.; Diana, B.; Villani, D.; Argenton, L.; Inghilleri, P. Measuring Dispositional Flow: Validity and Reliability of the Dispositional Flow State Scale 2, Italian Version. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0182201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Çağlar, E.; Sarı, I.; Aşçı, F.H.; Eklund, R.C.; Jackson, S.A. Short Versions of Turkish Flow Scales: Reliability and Validity Study. Stud. Psychol. 2020, 62, 179–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. De Vos, A.; Van Der Heijden, B.I.J.M.; Akkermans, J. Sustainable Careers: Towards a Conceptual Model. J. Voca Behav. 2020, 117, 103196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. United National Global Compact. The Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact. The Power of Principles. 2023. Available online: https://unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/principles (accessed on 27 December 2023).
  43. MDPI. Overview. MDPI/About 2023. Available online: https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/about#MDPI_is_Committed_to_the_UN_Global_Compact (accessed on 27 December 2023).
  44. Sciforum. The 6th World Sustainability Forum. WSF2017. 2017. Available online: https://wsf-6.sciforum.net/ (accessed on 27 December 2023).
  45. Johnston-Hughes, T. Emerald Publishing and ScienceOpen Work Together to Promote Sustainable Development Goals. Emerald Publishing. 2020. Available online: https://emeraldgrouppublishing.com/press-release/emerald-publishing-and-scienceopen-work-together-promote-sustainable-development (accessed on 11 January 2024).
  46. Walter de Gruyter GmbH. Our Responsibility. De Gruyter. 2024. Available online: https://0-www-degruyter-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/publishing/about-us/our-responsibility?lang=en (accessed on 11 January 2024).
  47. Hoving, S. Paving the Way to A Sustainable Company: DEI Commitment. Springer Nature. 2023. Available online: https://www.springernature.com/gp/librarians/the-link/blog/blogposts-news-initiatives/commitment-to-dei-in-research/25293674 (accessed on 11 January 2024).
  48. Zhai, X.; Zhu, C.J.; Zhang, M.M. Mapping Promoting Factors and Mechanisms of Resilience for Performance Improvement: The Role of Strategic Human Resource Management Systems and Psychological Empowerment. Appl. Psychol. 2023, 72, 915–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ 2021, 88, 105906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pollock, A.; Berge, E. How to Do a Systematic Review. Int. J. Stroke 2018, 13, 138–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Salameh, J.-P.; Bossuyt, P.M.; McGrath, T.A.; Thombs, B.D.; Hyde, C.J.; Macaskill, P.; Deeks, J.J.; Leeflang, M.; Korevaar, D.A.; Whiting, P.; et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA): Explanation, Elaboration, and Checklist. BMJ 2020, 370, m2632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Paul, J.; Lim, W.M.; O’Cass, A.; Hao, A.W.; Bresciani, S. Scientific Procedures and Rationales for Systematic Literature Reviews (SPAR-4-SLR). Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2021, 45, 12695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Simbula, S.; Margheritti, S.; Avanzi, L. Building Work Engagement in Organizations: A Longitudinal Study Combining Social Exchange and Social Identity Theories. Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Salge, C.; Glackin, C.; Polani, D. Changing the Environment Based on Empowerment as Intrinsic Motivation. Entropy 2014, 16, 2789–2819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Muñoz-Pascual, L.; Galende, J.; Curado, C. Contributions to Sustainability in SMEs: Human Resources, Sustainable Product Innovation Performance and the Mediating Role of Employee Creativity. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fernández-Díaz, J.R.; Gutiérrez-Ortega, M.; Llamas-Salguero, F.; Cantón-Mayo, I. Creativity and Resilience as Predictors of Career Success. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sweida, G.; Sherman, C.L. Does Happiness Launch More Businesses? Affect, Gender, and Entrepreneurial Intention. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Pukkeeree, P.; Na-Nan, K.; Wongsuwan, N. Effect of Attainment Value and Positive Thinking as Moderators of Employee Engagement and Innovative Work Behaviour. J. Open Innova. Techn. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, T. Effects of Selected Positive Resources on Hospitality Service Quality: The Mediating Role of Work Engagement. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gómez-Salgado, J.; Navarro-Abal, Y.; López-López, M.J.; Romero-Martín, M.; Climent-Rodríguez, J.A. Engagement, Passion and Meaning of Work as Modulating Variables in Nursing: A Theoretical Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Venhoeven, L.; Bolderdijk, J.; Steg, L. Explaining the Paradox: How Pro-Environmental Behaviour Can Both Thwart and Foster Well-Being. Sustainability 2013, 5, 1372–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tur-Porcar, A.; Roig-Tierno, N.; Llorca Mestre, A. Factors Affecting Entrepreneurship and Business Sustainability. Sustainability 2018, 10, 452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Palazzeschi, L.; Svicher, A.; Gori, A.; Di Fabio, A. Gratitude in Organizations: Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version of the Gratitude Resentment and Appreciation Test–Revised Short (GRAT–RS) in Workers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 11084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Villajos, E.; Tordera, N.; Peiró, J.M. Human Resource Practices, Eudaimonic Well-Being, and Creative Performance: The Mediating Role of Idiosyncratic Deals for Sustainable Human Resource Management. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Corazza, G.E.; Lubart, T. Intelligence and Creativity: Mapping Constructs on the Space-Time Continuum. J. Intell. 2020, 9, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Quick, J.; Henderson, D. Occupational Stress: Preventing Suffering, Enhancing Wellbeing. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Di Fabio, A.; Palazzeschi, L.; Bucci, O.; Guazzini, A.; Burgassi, C.; Pesce, E. Personality Traits and Positive Resources of Workers for Sustainable Development: Is Emotional Intelligence a Mediator for Optimism and Hope? Sustainability 2018, 10, 3422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kupcewicz, E.; Jóźwik, M. Positive Orientation and Strategies for Coping with Stress as Predictors of Professional Burnout among Polish Nurses. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Callea, A.; Caracuzzo, E.; Costanzi, M.; Urbini, F. Promoting Flow at Work through Proactive Personality: A Sequential Mediation Model with Evidence from Italian Employees. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. López-Núñez, M.I.; Rubio-Valdehita, S.; Diaz-Ramiro, E.M.; Aparicio-García, M.E. Psychological Capital, Workload, and Burnout: What’s New? The Impact of Personal Accomplishment to Promote Sustainable Working Conditions. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Moral-Bofill, L.; Llave, A.L.D.L.; Pérez-Llantada, M.C. Relationships between High Ability (Gifted) and Flow in Music Performers: Pilot Study Results. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Peiró, J.M.; Montesa, D.; Soriano, A.; Kozusznik, M.W.; Villajos, E.; Magdaleno, J.; Djourova, N.P.; Ayala, Y. Revisiting the Happy-Productive Worker Thesis from a Eudaimonic Perspective: A Systematic Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Nash, C. Self-Direction in Physics Graduate Education: Insights for STEM from David J. Rowe’s Career-Long Methods. Challenges 2022, 13, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Magnano, P.; Santisi, G.; Zammitti, A.; Zarbo, R.; Di Nuovo, S. Self-Perceived Employability and Meaningful Work: The Mediating Role of Courage on Quality of Life. Sustainability 2019, 11, 764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kim, B.-J.; Nurunnabi, M.; Kim, T.-H.; Jung, S.-Y. The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Organizational Commitment: The Sequential Mediating Effect of Meaningfulness of Work and Perceived Organizational Support. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Unanue, W.; Barros, E.; Gómez, M. The Longitudinal Link between Organizational Citizenship Behaviors and Three Different Models of Happiness. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Zito, M.; Colombo, L.; Borgogni, L.; Callea, A.; Cenciotti, R.; Ingusci, E.; Cortese, C. The Nature of Job Crafting: Positive and Negative Relations with Job Satisfaction and Work-Family Conflict. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Haar, J.; Schmitz, A.; Di Fabio, A.; Daellenbach, U. The Role of Relationships at Work and Happiness: A Moderated Moderated Mediation Study of New Zealand Managers. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Su, X.; Liu, S.; Zhang, S.; Liu, L. To Be Happy: A Case Study of Entrepreneurial Motivation and Entrepreneurial Process from the Perspective of Positive Psychology. Sustainability 2020, 12, 584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Roslan, N.S.; Yusoff, M.S.B.; Morgan, K.; Ab Razak, A.; Ahmad Shauki, N.I. What Are the Common Themes of Physician Resilience? A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Seligman, M.E.P.; Csikszentmihalyi, M. Positive Psychology: An Introduction. Am. Psychol. 2000, 55, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Csikszentmihalyi, M. Creatividad: El Fluir y la Psicología del Descubirmiento y la Invención; Paidós: Madrid, Spain, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  83. Csikszentmihalyi, M.; Csikszentmihalyi, I.S. Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  84. Csikszentmihalyi, M. If We Are So Rich, Why Aren’t We Happy? Am. Psychol. 1999, 54, 821–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Nakamura, J.; Csikszentmihalyi, M. The Concept of Flow. In Handbook of Positive Psychology; Snyder, C.R., Lopez, S.J., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2005; pp. 89–105. [Google Scholar]
  86. Larson, R.; Csikszentmihalyi, M. The Experience Sampling Method. In Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology: The Collected Works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 21–34. [Google Scholar]
  87. Lebuda, I.; Csikszentmihalyi, M. All You Need Is Love: The Importance of Partner and Family Relations to Highly Creative Individuals’ Well-Being and Success. J. Creat. Behav. 2020, 54, 100–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Getzels, J.W.; Csikszentmihalyi, M. The Creative Vision: A Longitudinal Study of Problem Finding in Art; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  89. Csikszentmihalyi, M.; LeFevre, J. Optimal Experience in Work and Leisure. J. Personal. Social. Psychol. 1989, 56, 815–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Csikszentmihalyi, M.; Rich, G. Musical Improvisation: A Systems Approach. In Creativity in Performance; Sawyer, R.K., Ed.; Publications in Creativity Research; Ablex: Greenwich, CT, USA, 1997; pp. 43–66. [Google Scholar]
  91. Ullén, F.; De Manzano, Ö.; Almeida, R.; Magnusson, P.K.E.; Pedersen, N.L.; Nakamura, J.; Csíkszentmihályi, M.; Madison, G. Proneness for Psychological Flow in Everyday Life: Associations with Personality and Intelligence. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2012, 52, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Csikszentmihalyi, M.; Whalen, S.; Rathunde, K. Cultivating Talent throughout Life. In Talented Teenagers: The Roots of Success and Failure; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1997; pp. 222–241. [Google Scholar]
  93. Nakamura, J.; Csikszentmihalyi, M. Flow Theory and Research. In The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology; Lopez, S.J., Snyder, C.R., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2009; pp. 194–206. [Google Scholar]
  94. Csikszentmihalyi, M. The Construction of Meaning through Vital Engagement. In Flourishing: Positive Psychology and the Life Well-Lived; Keyes, C.L.M., Haidt, J., Eds.; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2003; pp. 83–104. [Google Scholar]
  95. Bakker, A.B.; van Woerkom, M. Flow at Work: A Self-Determination Perspective. Occup. Health Sci. 2017, 1, 47–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 2000, 55, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ilies, R.; Wagner, D.; Wilson, K.; Ceja, L.; Johnson, M.; DeRue, S.; Ilgen, D. Flow at Work and Basic Psychological Needs: Effects on Well-Being: Flow at Work and Well-Being. Appl. Psychol. 2017, 66, 3–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Csikszentmihalyi, M. Applications of Flow in Human Development and Education: The Collected Works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, 1st ed.; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014; Available online: https://0-link-springer-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/content/pdf/10.1007/978-94-017-9094-9.pdf (accessed on 13 January 2024).
  99. Marin, M.M.; Bhattacharya, J. Getting into the Musical Zone: Trait Emotional Intelligence and Amount of Practice Predict Flow in Pianists. Front. Psychol. 2013, 4, 853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ignjatovic, C.; Kern, M.L.; Oades, L.G. The VIVA Sustainable Work Engagement Model: A Conceptual Introduction and Preliminary Test Over Three Years. Int. J. Appl. Posit. Psychol. 2022, 7, 251–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Bru-Luna, L.M.; Martí-Vilar, M.; Merino-Soto, C.; Cervera-Santiago, J.L. Emotional Intelligence Measures: A Systematic Review. Healthcare 2021, 9, 1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Rubin, D.C. Self-Concept Focus: A Tendency to Perceive Autobiographical Events as Central to Identity. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn. 2020, 9, 576–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Draayer, J.P. Mentors Matter: A Tribute to David J. Rowe. Bulg. J. Phys. 2022, 49, 5–20. Available online: https://www.bjp-bg.com/papers/bjp2022_1_005-020.pdf (accessed on 12 January 2024). [CrossRef]
  104. Legacy.com. George, T. Rosensteel. The Times-Picayune. 2022. Available online: https://obits.nola.com/us/obituaries/nola/name/george-rosensteel-obituary?id=32171153 (accessed on 12 January 2024).
  105. De Guise, H.; (Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada); Nash, C.; (University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada). Personal communication, 2022.
  106. De Baerdemacker, S.; (University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada); Nash, C.; (University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada). Personal communication, 2022.
  107. Kumari, S.; Kaur, K. Perceived Organizational Virtuousness Impact on Workplace Happiness: Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction for Sustainability in IT/ITeS Organizations. Hum. Syst. Manag. Prepr. 2023, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Qamar, F.; Soomro, S.A.; Kundi, Y.M. Linking High-Performance Work Systems and Happiness at Work: Role of Career Aspiration and Thriving. Career Dev. Int. 2023, 28, 536–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Bhagtani, N. Hotel General Managers’ Quality of Life and Its Impact on Organisational Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives. Worldw. Hosp. Tour. Themes 2022, 14, 286–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Donaldson, S.I.; Van Zyl, L.E.; Donaldson, S.I. PERMA+4: A Framework for Work-Related Wellbeing, Performance and Positive Organizational Psychology 2.0. Front. Psychol. 2022, 12, 817244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kun, A.; Gadanecz, P. Workplace Happiness, Well-Being and Their Relationship with Psychological Capital: A Study of Hungarian Teachers. Curr. Psychol. 2022, 41, 185–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Neal, T.M.S.; Lienert, P.; Denne, E.; Singh, J.P. A General Model of Cognitive Bias in Human Judgment and Systematic Review Specific to Forensic Mental Health. Law Hum. Behav. 2022, 46, 99–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. O’Sullivan, E.D.; Schofield, S.J. A Cognitive Forcing Tool to Mitigate Cognitive Bias—A Randomised Control Trial. BMC Med. Educ. 2019, 19, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Results of a 22 December 2023 MDPI search of keywords “flow, Csikszentmihalyi, work”. The flowchart template follows PRISMA recommendations [49] for systematic and scoping reviews.
Figure 1. Results of a 22 December 2023 MDPI search of keywords “flow, Csikszentmihalyi, work”. The flowchart template follows PRISMA recommendations [49] for systematic and scoping reviews.
Psych 06 00021 g001
Figure 2. Number of publications in each year of publication for all articles in MDPI journals referencing Csikszentmihalyi concerning work-related flow.
Figure 2. Number of publications in each year of publication for all articles in MDPI journals referencing Csikszentmihalyi concerning work-related flow.
Psych 06 00021 g002
Figure 3. MDPI journal names publishing articles referencing Csikszentmihalyi regarding work-related flow depicted in the order of the date of the first publication in the various journals. * International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, † Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.
Figure 3. MDPI journal names publishing articles referencing Csikszentmihalyi regarding work-related flow depicted in the order of the date of the first publication in the various journals. * International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, † Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.
Psych 06 00021 g003
Figure 4. Number and title of Csikszentmihalyi publications referenced in the various MDPI articles in order of their appearance in Table 2. * Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness, † Optimal Experience in Work and Leisure, ‡ Optimal Experience in Adult Learning: Conception and Validation of the Flow in Education Scale (EduFlow-2).
Figure 4. Number and title of Csikszentmihalyi publications referenced in the various MDPI articles in order of their appearance in Table 2. * Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness, † Optimal Experience in Work and Leisure, ‡ Optimal Experience in Adult Learning: Conception and Validation of the Flow in Education Scale (EduFlow-2).
Psych 06 00021 g004
Table 1. Included reports for a 22 December 2023 search of MDPI articles with the keywords “flow, Csikszentmihalyi, work” regarding their citation number, the truncated article title, the year of publication, and the MDPI journal in which the article is published.
Table 1. Included reports for a 22 December 2023 search of MDPI articles with the keywords “flow, Csikszentmihalyi, work” regarding their citation number, the truncated article title, the year of publication, and the MDPI journal in which the article is published.
#Article Title (Truncated)YearMDPI Journal Title
53Building Work Engagement in Organizations2023Behavioral Sciences
54Changing the Environment Based on Empowerment2014Entropy
55Contributions to Sustainability in SMEs: Human Resources2021Sustainability
56Creativity and Resilience as Predictors of Career Success2021Sustainability
57Does Happiness Launch More Businesses? Affect, Gender2020International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
58Effect of Attainment Value and Positive Thinking2020Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
59Effects of Selected Positive Resources on Hospitality Service2019Sustainability
60Engagement, Passion, and Meaning of Work 2019International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
61Explaining the Paradox: How Pro-Environmental2013Sustainability
62Factors Affecting Entrepreneurship and Business2018Sustainability
63Gratitude in Organizations: Psychometric Properties2022International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
64Human Resource Practices, Eudaimonic Well-Being2019Sustainability
65Intelligence and Creativity: Mapping Constructs2020Journal of Intelligence
66Occupational Stress: Preventing Suffering, Enhancing Wellbeing2016International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
67Personality Traits and Positive Resources of Workers2018Sustainability
68Positive Orientation and Strategies for Coping with Stress2019International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
69Promoting Flow at Work through Proactive Personality2022Sustainability
70Psychological Capital, Workload, and Burnout2020Sustainability
71Relationships between High Ability (Gifted) and Flow2020Sustainability
72Revisiting the Happy-Productive Worker Thesis2021Sustainability
73David J. Rowe’s Career-Long Methods2022Challenges
74Self-Perceived Employability and Meaningful Work2019Sustainability
751The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility2018Sustainability
76The Longitudinal Link Between Organizational Citizenship2021International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
77The Nature of Job Crafting: Positive and Negative Relations2019International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
78The Role of Relationships at Work and Happiness2019Sustainability
79To Be Happy: A Case Study of Entrepreneurial2020Sustainability
80What Are the Common Themes of Physician Resilience?2022International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Table 2. Included reports for a 22 December 2023 search of MDPI articles with the keywords “flow, Csikszentmihalyi, work” regarding their citation number in this publication, the truncated article title, the citation number in this publication of the work by Csikszentmihalyi cited in the included report, and the truncated title of the work by Csikszentmihalyi cited by the included report.
Table 2. Included reports for a 22 December 2023 search of MDPI articles with the keywords “flow, Csikszentmihalyi, work” regarding their citation number in this publication, the truncated article title, the citation number in this publication of the work by Csikszentmihalyi cited in the included report, and the truncated title of the work by Csikszentmihalyi cited by the included report.
#Article Title (Truncated)#Csikszentmihalyi Title (Truncated)
53Building Work Engagement in Organizations81Positive Psychology. An Introduction
54Changing the Environment Based on Empowerment27Beyond Boredom and Anxiety
55Contributions to Sustainability in SMEs: Human Resources82Creatividad: El Fluir Y La Psicología
56Creativity and Resilience as Predictors of Career Success82Creatividad: El Fluir y La Psicología
57Does Happiness Launch More Businesses? Affect, Gender19Flow
58Effect of Attainment Value and Positive Thinking83Optimal Experience: Psychological
59Effects of Selected Positive Resources on Hospitality Service81Positive psychology: An introduction
60Engagement, Passion, and Meaning of Work 81Positive psychology: An introduction
61Explaining the Paradox: How Pro-Environmental84If we are so rich, why aren’t we happy?
62Factors Affecting Entrepreneurship and Business85The concept of flow
63Gratitude in Organizations: Psychometric Properties81Positive psychology: An introduction
64Human Resource Practices, Eudaimonic Well-Being81Positive psychology: An introduction
65Intelligence and Creativity: Mapping Constructs86
87
The experience sampling method
All You Need Is Love
66Occupational Stress: Preventing Suffering, Enhancing Wellbeing81Positive psychology: An introduction
67Personality Traits and Positive Resources of Workers81Positive psychology: An introduction
68Positive Orientation and Strategies for Coping with Stress81Positive psychology: An introduction
69Promoting Flow at Work through Proactive Personality27Beyond boredom and anxiety
70Psychological Capital, Workload, and Burnout81Positive psychology: An introduction
71Relationships between High Ability (Gifted) and Flow88
82
19
89
14
90
91
92
93
The Creative Vision
Creatividad. El Fluir y la Psicología
Flow
Optimal experience in work and leisure
Creativity: The Work and Lives *
Musical improvisation
Proneness for Psychological Flow
Cultivating talent throughout life
Flow theory and research
72Revisiting the Happy-Productive Worker Thesis19Flow
73David J. Rowe’s Career-Long Methods19
84
89
18
Flow
If we are so rich, why aren’t we happy?
Optimal experience in work and leisure
Optimal experience in adult learning
74Self-Perceived Employability and Meaningful Work94The construction of meaning
75The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility81Positive psychology: An introduction
76The Longitudinal Link Between Organizational Citizenship81Positive psychology: An introduction
77The Nature of Job Crafting: Positive and Negative Relations19Flow
78The Role of Relationships at Work and Happiness81Positive psychology: An introduction
79To Be Happy: A Case Study of Entrepreneurial81Positive psychology: An introduction
80What Are the Common Themes of Physician Resilience?19Flow
* Creativity: The Work and Lives of 91 Eminent People is now retitled Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. It is the same book with the same ISBN.
Table 3. Reports of included studies for a 22 December 2023 search of MDPI articles with the keywords “flow, Csikszentmihalyi, work” regarding their citation number in this document, the truncated article title, and whether the article mentions, flow, happiness or some other aspect to develop career sustainability noting those that refer to one or more PERMA factors. “✕” denotes no mention; “ ✓ “ indicates mention. Items emboldened represent the reports meeting the criteria for assessment.
Table 3. Reports of included studies for a 22 December 2023 search of MDPI articles with the keywords “flow, Csikszentmihalyi, work” regarding their citation number in this document, the truncated article title, and whether the article mentions, flow, happiness or some other aspect to develop career sustainability noting those that refer to one or more PERMA factors. “✕” denotes no mention; “ ✓ “ indicates mention. Items emboldened represent the reports meeting the criteria for assessment.
#Article Title (Truncated)FlowHappinessOther
53Building Work Engagement in OrganizationsWork engagement *
54Changing the Environment Based on Empowerment
55Contributions to Sustainability in SMEs: Human ResourcesCreativity
56Creativity and Resilience as Predictors of Career SuccessCreativity
57Does Happiness Launch More Businesses? Affect, GenderPositive emotions *
58Effect of Attainment Value and Positive ThinkingEngagement *
Positive emotions *
Creativity
59Effects of Selected Positive Resources on Hospitality ServiceWork engagement *
Positive emotions *
60Engagement, Passion, and Meaning of Work Positive emotions *
Character strengths
61Explaining the Paradox: How Pro-EnvironmentalDoing good
62Factors Affecting Entrepreneurship and BusinessMotivation
63Gratitude in Organizations: Psychometric PropertiesGratitude
64Human Resource Practices, Eudaimonic Well-BeingCreativity
65Intelligence and Creativity: Mapping ConstructsCreativity
66Occupational Stress: Preventing Suffering, Enhancing WellbeingEngagement *
Positive emotions *
Satisfaction
Meaning *
67Personality Traits and Positive Resources of WorkersOptimism
Hope
68Positive Orientation and Strategies for Coping with StressPositive orientation
69Promoting Flow at Work through Proactive PersonalityEngagement *
70Psychological Capital, Workload, and Burnout:Psychological capital
71Relationships between High Ability (Gifted) and Flow
72Revisiting the Happy-Productive Worker ThesisEngagement *
73David J. Rowe’s Career-Long Methods
74Self-Perceived Employability and Meaningful WorkMeaningful work *
75The Influence of Corporate Social ResponsibilityMeaningful work *
76The Longitudinal Link Between Organizational CitizenshipFlourishing †
77The Nature of Job Crafting: Positive and Negative RelationsJob autonomy
78The Role of Relationships at Work and HappinessMeaningful work *
79To Be Happy: A Case Study of EntrepreneurialEntrepreneurship
80What Are the Common Themes of Physician Resilience?Self-determination
* A PERMA factor (Positive Emotions, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, or Accomplishment). † Article directly references PERMA.
Table 4. Final 11 reports to be considered for assessment of included studies for a 22 December 2023 search of MDPI articles with the keywords “flow, Csikszentmihalyi, work” regarding their citation number, the MDPI journal in which they are published, the work by Csikszentmihalyi that is referenced, and whether the article mentions, flow, happiness or some other aspect to develop career sustainability noting those that refer to one or more PERMA factors. “✕” denotes no mention; “ ✓ “ indicates mention.
Table 4. Final 11 reports to be considered for assessment of included studies for a 22 December 2023 search of MDPI articles with the keywords “flow, Csikszentmihalyi, work” regarding their citation number, the MDPI journal in which they are published, the work by Csikszentmihalyi that is referenced, and whether the article mentions, flow, happiness or some other aspect to develop career sustainability noting those that refer to one or more PERMA factors. “✕” denotes no mention; “ ✓ “ indicates mention.
#MDPI Journal Title#Csikszentmihalyi Title (Truncated)FlowHappinessOther
55Sustainability82Creatividad: El Fluir Y La Psicología Creativity
56Sustainability82Creatividad: El Fluir Y La Psicología Creativity
57International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public Health
19FlowPositive emotions *
58Journal of Open
Innovation: Technology,
Market, and Complexity
83Optimal Experience: PsychologicalEngagement *
Positive emotions *
Creativity
69Sustainability27Beyond boredom and anxietyEngagement *
71Sustainability88
82
19
89

14
90
91
92
93
The Creative Vision
Creatividad. El Fluir y la Psicología
Flow
Optimal experience in work and
leisure
Creativity: The Work and Lives
Musical improvisation
Proneness for Psychological Flow
Cultivating talent throughout life
Flow theory and research
72Sustainability19FlowEngagement *
73Challenges19
84
89

18
Flow
If we are so rich, why aren’t we happy?
Optimal experience in work and
leisure
Optimal experience in adult learning
74Sustainability94The construction of meaningMeaningful work *
77International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public Health
19FlowJob autonomy
80International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public Health
19FlowSelf-determination
* A PERMA factor (Positive Emotions, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, or Accomplishment).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nash, C. Work-Related Flow in Contrast to Either Happiness or PERMA Factors for Human Resources Management Development of Career Sustainability. Psych 2024, 6, 356-375. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/psych6010021

AMA Style

Nash C. Work-Related Flow in Contrast to Either Happiness or PERMA Factors for Human Resources Management Development of Career Sustainability. Psych. 2024; 6(1):356-375. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/psych6010021

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nash, Carol. 2024. "Work-Related Flow in Contrast to Either Happiness or PERMA Factors for Human Resources Management Development of Career Sustainability" Psych 6, no. 1: 356-375. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/psych6010021

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop