Next Article in Journal
Integrated Use of AHP and GIS Techniques for Generating Forest Fire Risk Map in Karacabey Flooded Forest
Previous Article in Journal
Linking Visual and Stress Wave Grading of Beech Wood from the Log to the Sawmill Product
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Bark Characteristics of Scots Pine Logs †

1
Department of Forest Utilization and Timber Markets, Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development, 16225 Eberswalde, Germany
2
Landeswaldoberförsterei Chorin, Landesbetrieb Forst Brandenburg, 16225 Eberswalde, Germany
3
Department of Forest Harvesting, Logistics and Amelioration, Technical University Zvolen, 96001 Zvolen, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Forests—Forests for a Better Future: Sustainability, Innovation, Interdisciplinarity, 15–30 November 2020; Available online: https://iecf2020.sciforum.net.
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2021, 3(1), 66; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2020-08020
Published: 12 November 2020

Abstract

:
The wood of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) shows good properties as building and construction timber but also as furniture or pulp and paper, and thus, is one of the most commercially important European tree species. Scots pine are mostly harvested and processed with a high degree of mechanization. In Northeast Germany (federal states of Brandenburg and Berlin), 36% of harvested Scots pine have a diameter at breast height (DBH) between 7 and 19.9 cm. As a typical industrial wood assortment, a large proportion of the resulting small-sized logs are used in the wood industry to produce boards. Although bark is considered a by-product or waste product of the industry, no actual study has quantified the bark thickness, bark volume, bark mass and bark damage of such Scots pine logs. Therefore, the bark characteristics from 50 logs from 10 different piles were analyzed. Bark volume was quantified using the water displacement method, bark mass by weighing, bark thickness with a precision caliper and bark damage by tape measurements. The diameters of the analyzed 150 log discs were normally distributed and the mean value was 12.9 cm. The results showed average bark damages from 12.0%, which were mostly caused during the felling and processing of logs with the harvester. No significant correlation was found between double bark thickness (mean: 3.0 mm) and the diameter; whereas fresh bark volume (mean: 5.6%) and dry bark mass (mean: 3.3%) were significantly affected by the diameter. As shown for spruce by other authors, bark characteristics may change over time and therefore, should be measured regularly. Moreover, it was shown that bark parameters are site dependent. Thus, quantifying bark characteristics for economically important tree species at both the local and national scale is of great relevance. More detailed analyzes are described by Berendt et al. (2021) [1].

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The datasets analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Reference

  1. Berendt, F.; Pegel, E.; Blasko, L.; Cremer, T. Bark proportion of Scots pine industrial wood. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. (Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff) 2021, 128, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Berendt, F.; Pegel, E.; Blasko, L.; Cremer, T. Bark Characteristics of Scots Pine Logs. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2021, 3, 66. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/IECF2020-08020

AMA Style

Berendt F, Pegel E, Blasko L, Cremer T. Bark Characteristics of Scots Pine Logs. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2021; 3(1):66. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/IECF2020-08020

Chicago/Turabian Style

Berendt, Ferréol, Erik Pegel, Lubomir Blasko, and Tobias Cremer. 2021. "Bark Characteristics of Scots Pine Logs" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 3, no. 1: 66. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/IECF2020-08020

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop