A Review of Safety Risk Theories and Models and the Development of a Digital Highway Construction Safety Risk Model
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Research Methodology
3. Bibliometric Search Technique
4. Classification Technique
5. Research Results
6. Co-Occurrence of Keywords
7. Existing Safety Risk Theories and Models
8. The Trend and Future Direction of Theory and Model Building
9. Categorisation of Significant Keywords
10. Information Theory, Digital Technology and Safety Models
11. The Relationship between the Human Element, Key Safety Indicators and Domain Application
12. Predictive Safety Models and Big Data
13. Classification of Models
14. Resilient Predictive Models
15. Discussion
16. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Carter, G.; Smith, S.D. Safety hazard identification on construction projects. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2006, 132, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Health and Safety Executive. Managing Risks and Risk Assessment at Work—Overview, London: HSE. 2020. Available online: https://www.hse.gov.uk/simple-health-safety/risk/index.htm?msclkid=b03c1234af8211ec869cb7ad218415b0 (accessed on 8 May 2022).
- Hinze, J.W.; Teizer, J. Visibility-related fatalities related to construction equipment. Saf. Sci. 2011, 49, 709–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azmy, N.; Mohd Zain, A.Z. The application of technology in enhancing safety and health aspects on Malaysian construction projects. ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2016, 11, 7209–7213. [Google Scholar]
- Edwards, D.J.; Martek, I.; Hossseini, R.M.; Ejohwomu, O.; Aigbavboa, C. Hand-arm vibration management: An operational health and safety strategy framework. Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adapt. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bortey, L.; Edwards, D.J.; Shelbourn, M.; Rillie, I. Development of a proof-of-concept risk model for accident prevention on highways construction. In Proceedings of the Quantity Surveying Research Conference, Port Elizabeth, South Africa, 10 November 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Hillson, D. Managing Overall Project Risk. In Proceedings of the PMI Global Congress 2014—EMEA, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 26–28 October 2014; Project Management Institute: Newtown Square, PA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Manu, P.; Ankrah, N.; Proverbs, D.; Suresh, S. The health and Safety-Impact of construction project features. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2014, 21, 65–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thompson, P.A.; Perry, J.G. Engineering Construction Risks—A Guide to Project Risk Analysis and Risk Management. In Institution of Civil Engineers (Ed.); Thomas Telford Ltd.: London, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nieto-Morote, A.; Ruz-Vila, F. A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2011, 29, 220–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rasmussen, J. Human errors. A taxonomy for describing human malfunction in industrial installations. J. Occup. Accid. 1982, 4, 311–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mohammadfam, I.; Ghasemi, F.; Kalatpour, O.; Moghimbeigi, A. Constructing a Bayesian network model for improving safety behavior of employees at workplaces. Appl. Ergon. 2017, 58, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, S.; Ming-Zhong, G.; Li, Y. Theory and Construction of Emergency Refuge System in Underground Coal Mine. Procedia Eng. 2011, 26, 2351–2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Heinrich, H.W. Industrial Accident Prevention—A Scientific Approach; McGraw-Hill Book Company: New York, NY, USA, 1931. [Google Scholar]
- Leveson, N. A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Saf. Sci. 2004, 42, 237–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Edwards, D.J.; Holt, G.D.; Harris, F.C. Predictive maintenance techniques and their relevance to construction plant. J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 1998, 4, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edwards, D.J.; Pärn, E.A.; Love, P.E.D.; El-Gohary, H. Machinery, manumission and economic machinations. J. Bus. Res. 2017, 70, 391–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roberts, C.; Edwards, D.J.; Sing, M.C.P.; Aigbavboa, C. Post-occupancy evaluation: Process delineation and implementation trends in the UK higher education sector. Archit. Eng. Des. Manag. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roberts, C.J.; Pärn, E.A.; Edwards, D.J.; Aigbavboa, C. Digitalising asset management: Concomitant benefits and persistent challenges. Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adapt. 2018, 36, 152–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Saeed, Y.; Edwards, D.; Scaysbrook, S. Automating construction manufacturing procedures using BIM digital objects (BDOs): Case study of knowledge transfer partnership project in UK. Constr. Innov. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lenzholzer, S.; Brown, R.D. Post-positivist microclimatic urban design research: A review. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2016, 153, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Annells, M. Grounded theory method, part I: Within the five moments of qualitative research. Nurs. Inq. 1997, 4, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pluye, P.; Gagnon, M.-P.; Griffiths, F.; Johnson-Lafleur, J. A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2009, 46, 529–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bayramova, A.; Edwards, D.J.; Roberts, C. The role of blockchain technology in augmenting supply chain resilience to cybercrime. Buildings 2021, 11, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oshodi, O.; Edwards, D.J.; Lam, K.C.; Olanipekun, A.; Aigbavboa, C. Construction output modelling: A systematic review. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2020, 27, 2959–2991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nelson, G.; Stefancic, A.; Rae, J.; Townley, G.; Tsemberis, S.; Macnaughton, E.; Aubry, T.; Distasio, J.; Hurtubise, R.; Patterson, M.; et al. Early implementation evaluation of a multi-site housing first intervention for homeless people with mental illness: A mixed methods approach. Eval. Program Plan. 2014, 43, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Edwards, D.J.; Pärn, E.A.; Sing, C.P.; Thwala, W.D. Risk of excavators overturning: Determining horizontal centrifugal force when slewing freely suspended loads. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2019, 26, 479–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Grant, M.J.; Booth, A. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Inf. Libr. J. 2009, 26, 91–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Posillico, J.; Edwards, D.J.; Roberts, C.; Shelbourn, M. Curriculum development in the higher education literature: A synthesis focusing on construction management programmes. Ind. High. Educ. 2021, 09504222211044894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aghaei Chadegani, A.; Salehi, H.; Yunus, M.; Farhadi, H.; Fooladi, M.; Farhadi, M.; Ale Ebrahim, N. A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2257540). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. 2013. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2257540 (accessed on 20 January 2022).
- Chamberlain, D.; Edwards, D.J.; Lai, J.; Thwala, W.D. Mega event management of formula one grand prix: An analysis of literature. Facilities 2019, 37, 1166–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martín-Martín, A.; Orduna-Malea, E.; Thelwall, E.; López-Cózar, E.D. Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. J. Informetr. 2018, 12, 1160–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tomiyama, T. A Classification of Design Theories and Methodologies. In Proceedings of the ASME 2006 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 10–13 September 2008; pp. 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niknazar, P.; Bourgault, M. Theories for classification vs. classification as theory: Implications of classification and typology for the development of project management theories. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2017, 35, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010, 84, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lees, F.P. Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2nd ed.; Butterworth Publications: London, UK, 1996; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
- Embrey, D.E. Incorporating management and organisational factors into probabilistic safety assessment. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 1992, 38, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Booth, W.L. Police Management of Traffic Accident Prevention Programs. Office of Justice Programs [WWW Document]. 1980. Available online: https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/police-management-traffic-accident-prevention-programs-0 (accessed on 22 March 2021).
- Rasmussen, J. The Human as a Systems Component. In Human Interaction with Computers; Smith, H.T., Green, T.R.G., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1980; pp. 67–96. [Google Scholar]
- Gordon, J.E. The epidemiology of accidents. Am. J. Public Health 1949, 39, 504–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bird, F.E.; Cecchi, F.; Tilche, A.; Mata-Alvarez, J. Management Guide to Loss Control; Institute Press: Vienna, Austria, 1974; pp. 167–199. [Google Scholar]
- Whittington, C.; Livingston, A.; Lucas, D. Research into Management, Organisational and Human Factors in the Construction Industry; Health and Safety Executive Contract Research; Report No. 45/1992; HSE Books: Sudbury, Suffolk, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Hinze, J. The distractions theory of accident causation, in implementation of safety and health on construction sites. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference CIB Working Commission W099—Safety and Health on Construction Sites CIB Report, Singapore, 11–12 September 1996; pp. 112–121. [Google Scholar]
- Abdelhamid, T.S.; Everett, J.G. Identifying root causes of construction accidents. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2000, 126, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gibb, A.; Haslam, R.; Hide, S.; Gyi, D. The role of design in accident causality. In Designing for Safety and Health in Construction; Hecker, S., Gambatese, J., Weinstein, M., Eds.; University of Oregon Press: Eugene, Oregon, 2004; pp. 11–21. [Google Scholar]
- Suraji, A.; Duff, A.R.; Peckitt, S.J. Development of Causal Model of Construction Accident Causation. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2001, 127, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reason, J. Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents; Routledge: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glendon, A.I.; Litherland, D.K. Safety climate factors, group differences and safety behaviour in road construction. Saf. Sci. 2001, 39, 157–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burgoyne, J.H. Accident investigation. J. Occup. Accid. 1982, 3, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kletz, T. Accident investigation—Missed opportunities. In Components of System Safety; Springer: London, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- White, D.; Fortune, J. Current practice in project management—An empirical study. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2002, 20, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demirkesen, S.; Ozorhon, B. Impact of integration management on construction project management performance. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2017, 35, 1639–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schieg, M. Risk management in construction project management. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 2006, 7, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Badri, A.; Gbodossou, A.; Nadeau, S. Occupational health and safety risks: Towards the integration into project management. Saf. Sci. 2012, 50, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmieri-Smith, R.M.; Thomas, A.C.; McLean, S.G. Quadriceps and Hamstrings Fatigue Alters Hip and Knee Mechanics. J. Appl. Biomech. 2010, 26, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Akaike, H. Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Second International Symposium on Information Theory; Perov, B.N., Csaki, F., Eds.; Akademiai Kiado: Budapest, Hungary, 1973; pp. 267–281. [Google Scholar]
- Bauk, S.; Calvo, J.A.L.; Mathar, R.; Schmeink, A. V2P/I communication for increasing occupational safety at a seaport. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Symposium ELMAR, Zadar, Croatia, 18–20 September 2017; pp. 79–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rivas, T.; Paz, M.; Martín, J.E.; Matías, J.M.; García, J.F.; Taboada, J. Explaining and predicting workplace accidents using data-mining techniques. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2011, 96, 739–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grant, B.A.; Smiley, A. Driver response to antilock brakes: A demonstration of behavioural adaptation. In Proceedings of the Canadian Multidisicplinary Road Safety Conference VIII, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, 14–16 June 1993; University of Saskatoon: Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- LaPorte, T.R.; Consolini, P.M. Working in Practice but Not in Theory: Theoretical Challenges of High-Reliability Organizations. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 1991, 1, 19–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Roberts, K.H. Some Characteristics of One Type of High Reliability Organization. Organ. Sci. 1990, 1, 160–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kjellén, U. Integrating analyses of the risk of occupational accidents into the design process—Part II: Method for prediction of the LTI-rate. Saf. Sci. 1995, 19, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munteanu, I.; Aldemir, T. A Methodology for Probabilistic Accident Management. Nucl. Technol. 2003, 144, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alizadeh, S.S.; Mortazavi, S.B.; Mehdi Sepehri, M. Assessment of accident severity in the construction industry using the Bayesian theorem. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 2015, 21, 551–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Amiri, M.; Ardeshir, A.; Fazel Zarandi, M.H.; Soltanaghaei, E. Pattern extraction for high-risk accidents in the construction industry: A data-mining approach. Int. J. Inj. Control. Saf. Promot. 2016, 23, 264–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eleye-Datubo, A.G.; Wall, A.; Saajedi, A.; Wang, J. Enabling a Powerful Marine and Offshore Decision-Support Solution Through Bayesian Network Technique. Risk Anal. 2006, 26, 695–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerassis, S.; Martín, J.E.; García, J.T.; Saavedra, A.; Taboada, J. Bayesian Decision Tool for the Analysis of Occupational Accidents in the Construction of Embankments. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2017, 143, 04016093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ardeshir, A.; Mohajeri, M. Assessment of safety culture among job positions in high-rise construction: A hybrid fuzzy multi criteria decision-making (FMCDM) approach. Int. J. Inj. Control. Saf. Promot. 2018, 25, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomas, J.M.; Melia, J.L.; Oliver, A. A cross-validation of a structural equation model of accidents: Organizational and psychological variables as predictors of work safety. Work. Stress 1999, 13, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ehrenberg, A.S.C.; Barnard, N.R.; Sharp, B. Decision models or descriptive models? Int. J. Res. Mark. 2000, 17, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perneger, T.V. The Swiss cheese model of Safety-Incidents: Are there holes in the metaphor? BMC Health Serv. Res. 2005, 5, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hallowell, M.R.; Gambatese, J.A. Construction Safety Risk Mitigation. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2009, 135, 1316–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choudhry, R.M.; Fang, D.; Mohamed, S. Developing a Model of Construction Safety Culture. J. Manag. Eng. 2007, 23, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fosser, S.; Sagberg, F.; Sotermo, I.A.F. Behavioural Adaptation to Antilock Brakes: Drivers Keep A Shorter Distance. Nord. Road Transp. Res. 1996, 8, 21–22. [Google Scholar]
- Donoghue, A.M. Occupational health hazards in mining: An overview. Occup. Med. 2004, 54, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Choudhry, R.M.; Fang, D. Why operatives engage in unsafe work behavior: Investigating factors on construction sites. Saf. Sci. 2008, 46, 566–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Newnam, S.; Watson, B. Work-related driving safety in light vehicle fleets: A review of past research and the development of an intervention framework. Saf. Sci. 2011, 49, 369–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Teo, E.A.-L.; Feng, Y. The Role of Safety Climate in Predicting Safety Culture on Construction Sites. Archit. Sci. Rev. 2009, 52, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; McCabe, B.; Hyatt, D. A resilience safety climate model predicting construction safety performance. Saf. Sci. 2018, 109, 434–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riaz, Z.; Edwards, D.J.; Holt, G.D.; Thorpe, A. Data flow analysis of plant and equipment health and safety management. J. Eng. Des. Technol. 2011, 9, 178–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhuang, R.L.; Hung, S.; Shiau, Y.C.; Liu, K.T.; Liu, C.C. Investigating Safety Passage Planning for System Shoring Supports with BIM. In ISARC. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction; IAARC Publications: Waterloo, ON, Canada, 2016; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Burnham, K.P.; Anderson, D.R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2002; ISBN 0-387-95364-7. [Google Scholar]
- Howard, W.R. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Kubernetes 2007, 36, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tixier, A.J.-P.; Hallowell, M.R.; Rajagopalan, B.; Bowman, D. Automated content analysis for construction safety: A natural language processing system to extract precursors and outcomes from unstructured injury reports. Autom. Constr. 2016, 62, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Guo, B.H.W.; Goh, Y.M. Ontology for design of active fall protection systems. Autom. Constr. 2017, 82, 138–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y.; Li, Q.; Zhou, Z.; Deng, Y. Ontology-based knowledge modeling for automated construction safety checking. Saf. Sci. 2015, 79, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salas, R.; Hallowell, M. Predictive Validity of Safety Leading Indicators: Empirical Assessment in the Oil and Gas Sector. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2016, 142, 04016052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edwards, D.J.; Holt, G.D. Antecedents of health and safety issues relating to plant trailer wheels. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2014, 140, 04014027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edwards, D.J.; Holt, G.D. Health and safety issues relating to construction excavators and their attachments. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2008, 15, 321–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyu, S.; Hon, C.K.H.; Chan, A.P.C.; Wong, F.K.W.; Javed, A.A. Relationships among Safety Climate, Safety Behavior, and Safety Outcomes for Ethnic Minority Construction Workers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Guldenmund, F.W. The nature of safety culture: A review of theory and research. Saf. Sci. 2000, 34, 215–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marquardt, N.; Gades, R.; Robelski, S. Implicit social cognition and safety culture. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind. 2012, 22, 213–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brezonik, P.L.; Stadelmann, T.H. Analysis and predictive models of stormwater runoff volumes, loads, and pollutant concentrations from watersheds in the Twin Cities metropolitan area, Minnesota, USA. Water Res. 2002, 36, 1743–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, L.; Wu, C.; Wang, B.; Ouyang, Q. Big-data-driven safety decision-making: A conceptual framework and its influencing factors. Saf. Sci. 2018, 109, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burns, T.R.; Machado, N. Technology, Complexity, and Risk: Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas; Centro de Investigacao e Estudos de Sociologica: Online, 2009; Volume 61, pp. 11–39. ISSN 2182-7907. [Google Scholar]
- McGraw, C.; Drennan, V.; Humphrey, C. Understanding risk and safety in home health care: The limits of generic frameworks. Qual. Prim. Care 2008, 16, 239–248. [Google Scholar]
- Gibson, J.J. The contribution of experimental psychology to the formulation of the problem of safety—A brief for basic research. Behav. Approaches Accid. Res. 1961, 1, 77–89. [Google Scholar]
- Wilde, G.J.S. The use of incentives for the promotion of accident-free driving. J. Stud. Alcohol 1985, 10, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kjellén, U.; Sklet, S. Integrating analyses of the risk of occupational accidents into the design process Part I: A review of types of acceptance criteria and risk analysis methods. Saf. Sci. 1995, 18, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bellamy, L.J.; Geyer, T.A.W.; Wilkinson, J. Development of a functional model which integrates human factors, safety management systems and wider organisational issues. Saf. Sci. 2008, 46, 461–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ekanem, N.J.; Mosleh, A.; Shen, S.-H. Phoenix—A model-based Human Reliability Analysis methodology: Qualitative Analysis Procedure. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2016, 145, 301–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hollnagel, E.; Woods, D.D.; Leveson, N. Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts; Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.: London, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Hollnagel, E. Safety-I and Safety-II, the past and future of safety management. Cognition. Technol. Work. 2015, 17, 461–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hollnagel, E.; Wears, R.L.; Braithwaite, J. From Safety-I to Safety-II: A White Paper; University of Southern Denmark: Odense, Denmark; University of Florida: Gainesville, FL, USA; Macquarie University: Sydney, Australia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Woods, D.D.; Wreathall, J. Managing Risk Proactively: The Emergence of Resilience Engineering. The Ohio State University. 2003. Available online: https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/41821391/Managing_Risk_Proactively_The_Emergence_20160131-4305-1cm78kv-with-cover-page-v2.pdf? (accessed on 28 March 2022).
- Azadeh, A.; Salehi, V.; Arvan, M.; Dolatkhah, M. Assessment of resilience engineering factors in high-risk environments by fuzzy cognitive maps: A petrochemical plant. Saf. Sci. 2014, 68, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Imani, M.; Hasan, M.M.; Bittencourt, L.F.; McClymont, K.; Kapelan, Z. A novel machine learning application: Water quality resilience prediction Model. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 768, 144459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ferreira, P. Resilience in the Planning of Rail Engineering Work. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK, December 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blismas, N.G.; Pendlebury, M.; Gibb, A.; Pasquire, C. Constraints to the use of off-site production on construction projects. Archit. Eng. Des. Manag. 2005, 1, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, J.; Cameron, I.; Hassall, M. Improving process safety: What roles for Digitalization and Industry 4.0? Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2019, 132, 325–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hüllermeier, E. Fuzzy sets in machine learning and data mining. Appl. Soft Comput. 2011, 11, 1493–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Newman, C.; Edwards, D.J.; Martek, I.; Lai, J.; Thwala, W.D. Industry 4.0 deployment in the construction industry: A bibliometric literature review and UK-based case study. Smart Sustain. Built Environ. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, J.; Edwards, D.J.; Martek, I.; Chileshe, N.; Roberts, C.; Hayhow, S. The antecedents of construction project change: An analysis of design and build procurement application. J. Eng. Des. Technol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Category | Keywords | Frequency (f) | Percentages (%) | Citations |
---|---|---|---|---|
Prominent Theories/models | Information theory | 13 | 8.8 | [56,57] |
System theory | 25 | 17.0 | [37,58] | |
Theory of planned behaviour | 11 | 7.5 | [14,59] | |
Reliability theory | 14 | 9.5 | [60,61] | |
Mathematical models | 16 | 10.9 | [62] | |
Statistical models | 5 | 3.4 | [63] | |
Bayes theory | 5 | 3.4 | [64,65] | |
Bayesian network model | 9 | 6.1 | [66,67] | |
Fuzzy set theory | 9 | 6.1 | [10,68] | |
Structural equation model | 11 | 7.5 | [69] | |
Regression analysis | 8 | 5.4 | [58] | |
Decision theory | 13 | 8.8 | [70] | |
Laws and legislations | 8 | 5.4 | [39,71] | |
Domain | Construction industry | 43 | 36.4 | [4,72] |
Building information modelling | 14 | 11.9 | [20] | |
Tunnel construction | 11 | 9.3 | [73] | |
Coal mines | 7 | 5.9 | [13] | |
Traffic accidents | 6 | 5.0 | [38] | |
Transportation | 5 | 4.2 | [74] | |
Building industry | 10 | 8.4 | [18,20] | |
Mining | 7 | 5.9 | [75] | |
Agriculture | 6 | 5.0 | ||
Definition words for human factor | Operatives | 8 | 24.2 | [76] |
Worker | 7 | 21.2 | [77] | |
Construction worker | 13 | 39.4 | [1] | |
Employee | 5 | 15.2 | [12] | |
Key Safety-Indicators (factor) | Safety climate | 12 | 12.6 | [78] |
Safety culture | 11 | 11.5 | [68,73] | |
High-risk behaviour | 7 | 7.4 | [76] | |
Risk perception | 25 | 26.3 | [79] | |
Safety behaviour | 10 | 10.5 | [12] | |
Task performance | 5 | 5.3 | [37,48] | |
Industrial hygiene | 20 | 21.1 | ||
Construction equipment | 5 | 5.3 |
Model/Theories | Features | Benefits | Limitations | Authors |
---|---|---|---|---|
Element Theories/Models | Characterizes the unique participating elements and components that make the model |
|
| [11,37,38,39,40,95,96,97] |
Incentive Theories/Models | Characterizes the actions and initiatives that enhance safety with feedback elements |
|
| [39,77,98] |
Quantitative or Statistical | Identifies the connection between events and incidents by quantifying data and finding patterns |
|
| [62,63,99] |
Sequential | Identifies a chain of events that leads to an accident |
|
| [14] |
Behavioural | Identifies the unsafe behaviour and attitude of workers as leading causes of accidents |
|
| [69] |
Barricade | Safety is measured based on the effectiveness of barriers erected |
|
| [100,101] |
Resilience Models | Focuses on the ability of a system to handle varying conditions and how long it takes to restore to normal conditions after a disturbance occurs |
|
| [102,103,104,105] |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Bortey, L.; Edwards, D.J.; Roberts, C.; Rillie, I. A Review of Safety Risk Theories and Models and the Development of a Digital Highway Construction Safety Risk Model. Digital 2022, 2, 206-223. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/digital2020013
Bortey L, Edwards DJ, Roberts C, Rillie I. A Review of Safety Risk Theories and Models and the Development of a Digital Highway Construction Safety Risk Model. Digital. 2022; 2(2):206-223. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/digital2020013
Chicago/Turabian StyleBortey, Loretta, David J. Edwards, Chris Roberts, and Iain Rillie. 2022. "A Review of Safety Risk Theories and Models and the Development of a Digital Highway Construction Safety Risk Model" Digital 2, no. 2: 206-223. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/digital2020013