Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Spatial and Temporal Variability of the Floral Scent Emitted by Barlia robertiana (Loisel.) Greuter, a Mediterranean Food-Deceptive Orchid
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Electrophilic Iodination of Organic Compounds Using Elemental Iodine or Iodides: Recent Advances 2008–2021: Part I
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Estimation of Avocado Oil (Persea americana Mill., Greek “Zutano” Variety) Volatile Fraction over Ripening by Classical and Ultrasound Extraction Using HS-SPME–GC–MS

by
Marinos Xagoraris
1,
Eleni Galani
1,
Lydia Valasi
1,
Eleftheria H. Kaparakou
1,
Panagiota-Kyriaki Revelou
1,2,
Petros A. Tarantilis
1 and
Christos S. Pappas
1,*
1
Laboratory of Chemistry, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos, 11855 Athens, Greece
2
Department of Food Science and Technology, University of West Attica, Ag. Spyridonos Str., Egaleo, 12243 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 6 December 2021 / Revised: 28 December 2021 / Accepted: 31 December 2021 / Published: 17 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Compounds)

Abstract

:
The study of flavors and fragrances is a topic of rising interest from both marketing and scientific perspectives. Over the last few years, the cultivation of avocados has accelerated in Greece, with production levels elevated by 300%. There has been increasing attention from a number of growers and consumers on avocado oil, the volatiles of which form a key part of consumers’ purchase decisions. A previously unevaluated Zutano cultivar was chosen for this study. Extraction of the pulp oil was performed during three phases of ripening using Soxhlet and ultrasound techniques. Headspace-solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) were utilized in order to analyze the isolated volatile fraction. At least 44 compounds, including mainly terpenoids (61.7%) and non-terpenoid hydrocarbons (35.9%), presented in the Zutano variety, while (1S,6S,7S,8S)-1,3-dimethyl-8-propan-2-yltricyclo[4.4.0.02,7]dec-3-ene (a-copaene) and (1R,9S,Z)-4,11,11-trimethyl-8-methylenebicyclo[7.2.0]undec-4-ene (β-caryophyllene) were in higher abundance. The composition of the volatiles was unaffected by the extraction techniques but was influenced by the ripening stage. Thus, during maturation, the volatile fraction fluctuates, with a significantly higher abundance of terpenoids during the fourth day of the ripe stage, whilst it decreases during over-ripening. These findings demonstrate that the Zutano variety can be used to produce an aromatic oil and hence could be used, among others, as an ingredient in cosmetic products.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The avocado (Persea americana Mill.) is a subtropical/tropical tree which is traditionally cultivated in Central America [1]. The growth of the avocado fruit depends on the cultivar and/or environmental conditions, and it is harvested when the fruit is horticulturally mature [1]. The production of avocados has become more widespread worldwide in the last few decades, with seven million tons produced in 2019 [2]. In Greece, avocados are mainly produced in Crete, Peloponnese, and Rhodes, with an average of 9.3 tons produced in 2019 [2]. It is an emblematic crop for Crete, with 90% of the total Greek production concentrated in the prefecture of Chania. Furthermore, it is notable that production increased by about 300% between 2014 and 2019 [3].
Avocado oil is gaining considerable attention from business and research sectors, demonstrated by the expanding literature. It is renowned for its uses in cosmetics, the food processing industries, and edible oil [4,5]. Avocado oil is obtained from the fleshy mesocarp (pulp) of the fruit and has a high nutrition value, biological effects, and healing properties [4,6,7].
The process of avocado oil extraction is quite similar to olive oil extraction. Generally, the extra virgin oil is extracted from high-quality fruit with minimal levels of rot and physiological disorders, while some rots or physiological disorders are permitted in virgin oil. In each case, extraction is carried out using only mechanical methods at low temperatures (<50 °C). For pure avocado oil, quality is not important, with low acidity, color, and a bland flavor, and for mixed avocado oil, blends with other oils are allowed. According to Woolf, [8] avocado oil might be classified as “extra virgin”, “virgin”, “pure”, or “mixed”. However, no global standardized physicochemical measurements have been implemented for such a categorization. The composition, quality, and yield of avocado oil are dependent on several factors, including fruit variety [9,10,11], harvesting time, and ripening stage [10,12,13]. The majority of scientists have focused their endeavors on assessing the “Hass” and “Fuerte” varieties or others with commercial value, while the “Zutano” variety has been studied by few researchers [14], i.e., there is a dearth of data regarding the cultivation of this variety within the Mediterranean. A further feature of the avocado is that if the fruit were to remain on the tree, ripening would not occur. Ripening takes place over a period of time, i.e., between 3–4 and 18–21 days following harvest [8]. The time duration is impacted by storage parameters, amongst additional extrinsic factors. Over-ripening may also occur. Different extraction techniques, conditions, and solvents are factors determining the avocado oil quality and yield [4,5]. An overview of extraction methods used in the last 20 years includes mainly liquid extraction using Soxhlet apparatus [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27], homogenization [26,28], and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) [19,25,27]. Several studies have focused on supercritical fluids [15,16,19,20,21,22,29] and mechanical extraction by cold pressure [17,18,30,31]. Lesser-used methods include extraction by enzymes [32] and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) [15,16,19,30].
Volatile compounds of avocado oil have a well-established role in aroma profiles and are one of the most important characteristics of the quality of the product. The combination of different volatile compounds forms the aroma character of avocado oil [33,34]. Some studies demonstrate that volatile compounds may differ depending on the variety [35,36], oil extraction solvents, or treatments [25,37]. One possible influence on the aromatic profile of avocado oil is the ripening phase, which, to date, has been poorly investigated.
In the current work, the volatiles from Greek Zutano avocado oil were acquired during three ripening phases, i.e., breaking, ripe, and overripe. Two diverse extraction methods were employed, i.e., Soxhlet extraction (SE) and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE). Headspace-solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) techniques were utilized to characterize the respective volatile fractions obtained.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Avocado Fruit Samples

Avocado fruits (Persea americana Mill., “Zutano” variety) were provided directly from producers at commercial maturity (firm) during the 2020 harvest year. The fruits were located in the Greek island of Crete (35°28′28.1″ N, 23°56′53.3″ E). The samples were stored in the dark at ambient temperature (24 ± 1 °C) for one day (breaking), four days (ripe), and eight days (overripe) (Figure 1). Then, samples were cut and lyophilized by freeze drying on a VirTis Freezemobile 25EL (SP Industries, 935 Mearns Rd, Warminster, PA, USA) to remove the water, and the solid residue was stored for 24 h at −20 ± 1 °C until oil extraction. Moreover, the percentage (% w/w) of dry matter (>19% w/w) was calculated according to Greek legislation for avocado commercial standards [38].

2.2. Avocado Oil Extraction

Avocado oils were extracted by classical SE and UAE techniques. The AOAC Official Method 948.22 was applied for the SE with some modifications. Approximately 10 g of avocado pulp powder was mixed with 625 mL petroleum ether (purity 99.0%) in a Soxhlet apparatus for 6 h at 50 °C. UAE was performed in a Grant ultrasonic water bath (Grant Instruments Ltd., Cambridge, UK) (300 × 140 × 150 mm3 internal dimensions) at the fixed frequency of 35 kHz. Approximately 10 g of avocado pulp powder was mixed with 80 mL of petroleum ether in an Erlenmeyer flask for 30 min at 25 °C. The organic solvent of each extract was totally evaporated under reduced pressure at 35 °C using a Laborota 4000 efficient rotary evaporator (Heidolph Instruments GmbH & Co. KG, Schwabach, Germany). The previous procedure was performed in triplicate and the received oily extracts were refrigerated at −20 ± 1 °C in a totally filled storing flask until GC analysis.

2.3. Isolation and Analysis of Avocado Oil Volatile Fraction

The isolation and analysis of the volatile compounds were performed using HS-SPME–GC–MS according to Xagoraris with few modifications [39]. An amount of 4 g of avocado oil alongside 1 μL of β-ionone (Alfa Aesar, Ward Hill, MA, USA) were placed into a 15 mL screw-top glass vial with PFTE/silicone septa. The vials were equilibrated for 30 min in a water bath at 60 °C under stirring at 700 rpm. Subsequently, the HS-SPME procedure was carried out using a triple-phase divinylbenzene/carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (DVB/CAR/PDMS) fiber 50/30 μm needle (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) with a length of 1 cm. The needle was inserted into the vial and exposed to the headspace for 30 min.
The analysis of volatile compounds was performed using a Thermo GC-Trace ultra, coupled with a Thermo mass spectrometer DSQ II (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The GC inlet temperature was 260 °C in splitless mode for 3 min with a 0.8 mm injector liner (SGE International Pty Ltd., Ringwood, Australia). The column used was a Restek Rtx-5MS (30 m × 2.25 mm i.d., 0.25 μm film thickness) (Restek, Bellefonte, PA, USA). The carrier gas was helium at a 1 mL·min−1 flow rate. The column was maintained at 40 °C, held for 6 min, then heated to 120 °C at a rate of 5 °C·min−1, then heated to 160 °C at a rate of 3 °C·min−1, then heated to 250 °C at a rate of 15 °C·min−1 and held at 250 °C for 1 min [39]. The temperature conditions of the mass spectrometer were: transfer line (290 °C), source (240 °C), and quadrupole (150 °C). Electron impact was 70 eV, and mass spectra were recorded at the 35–650 mass range. Retention index (RI) values were calculated using n-alkane (C8-C20) standards (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). The peak identification was carried out with the Wiley 275 mass spectra library and masses spectral data and arithmetic index provided by Adams [40]. Quantification of volatile compounds was accomplished by dividing the peak areas of the compounds by the peak area of the internal standard (β-ionone) and multiplying this ratio by the initial concentration of the internal standard.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All chromatographic data were acquired by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) using the SPSS v.25 (IBM, SPSS, Statistics) software. The mean values were calculated in Microsoft Excel 2013.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Estimation of Avocado Oil Yield

SE and UAE are classical methods that are commonly used for avocado oil extraction [7]. These processes have total solvent penetration into the oil membranes of avocado fruit [7]. Furthermore, these have been widely used to determine the theoretical maximum oil yield of avocado [41]. However, some factors, including variety, drying method, organic solvent, and temperature, should be taken into account in oil recovery. For each instance, the current data concur with previous publications [7]. Avocado oils were weighed to measure the oily mass, and all yields were calculated from 46.76 to 66.22% (w/w) for SE and 31.97 to 54.54% (w/w) for the UAE method. Similarly to our results, in a previous study, SE produced a 64.76% (w/w) oil yield and UAE produced a 54.63% (w/w) oil yield [19].

3.2. Volatile Compounds Analysis

The volatile compounds and their semi-quantification in avocado oil are expressed as average values and are summarized in Table 1. The identified fraction was characterized by at least 44 components, including terpenoids, hydrocarbons, aldehydes, and ketones. Terpenoids were the dominant fraction of volatiles, with an average relative abundance of 61.7%, whilst hydrocarbons (non-terpenoids) were 35.9%. Thus, the avocado oil fragrance from the Zutano cultivar was characterized by many terpenoids with high abundance. The results show that the volatile fraction of this variety of oil is rich in terpenoids.
As reported previously by Tan [5], the quality and quantity of volatile compounds detected in avocado oil are affected by several factors such as variety, extraction conditions (e.g., organic solvent, temperature, time), and analytical technique (isolation or analysis parameters). Avocado oil obtained from P. americana Mill. sourced from a Mexico City regional market was studied by Moreno [25], who identified 36 volatile substances using four diverse extraction methods. It should be noted that the largest number of compounds (15 volatiles) were identified using microwaves and Soxhlet and hexane as extractors. Furthermore, in a recent study by Liu [37], 40 volatile compounds were detected using different extraction methods (squeezing, supercritical carbon dioxide, and aqueous). Nineteen volatile materials were identified by Bukykkurt [33] in cold-pressed avocado oil grown in regions of Turkey.
A typical chromatogram of avocado oil’s ultrasound technique is presented in Figure 2. However, no qualitative changes were observed among the chromatograms that emerged from different extraction techniques or ripening stages. The total ion chromatograms reveal the capture of seven peaks that characterize the dominant volatile profile of avocado oil from Zutano cultivar. These peaks include 2,6,6-trimethylbicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene (α-pinene); 1-methyl-4-(prop-1-en-2-yl)cyclohex-1-ene (D-limonene); 4,10-dimethyl-7-propan-2-yltricyclo[4.4.0.01,5]dec-3-ene (α-cubebene); (1S,6S,7S,8S)-1,3-dimethyl-8-propan-2-yltricyclo[4.4.0.02,7]dec-3-ene (a-copaene); (1R,9S,Z)-4,11,11-trimethyl-8-methylenebicyclo[7.2.0]undec-4-ene (β-caryophyllene); 2,6-dimethyl-6-(4-methylpent-3-enyl)bicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene (α-bergamotene); and (1E,4E,8E)-2,6,6,9-tetramethylcycloundeca-1,4,8-triene (humulene). Similarly, Buyukurt [33] identified D-limonene, α-cubebene, β-caryophyllene, and β-curcumene as the most abundant compounds in avocado oil, while Moreno [25] confirmed the above results.

3.3. Estimation of Volatiles over Extraction Method

Although the SE and UAE techniques provided different oil yields, the analysis of the volatile compounds by HS-SPME–GC–MS showed similar results. In both techniques, a solvent is used for extraction, which permeates the oily cells to engage with the lipid compounds [41]. The main difference between these techniques was the time and temperature of extraction. In SE, the avocado fruit is repeatedly brought into contact with an organic solvent in a relatively mid–high temperature of 50 °C for 6 h, whereas in UAE, the avocado fruit has been used for accelerated extraction [30] in a relatively controlled mid–low temperature of 25 °C for 15 min.
The extraction techniques did not have statistically significant differences between their qualification and quantification results. Only three components including octan-2-one, (6Z)-7,11-dimethyl-3-methylidenedodeca-1,6,10-triene (β-farnesene), and (1S,2S,4R)-1-ethenyl-1-methyl-2,4-bis(prop-1-en-2-yl)cyclohexane (β-elemene) could potentially vary between the SE and UAE methods. However, an analysis of the variance indicated that the p-values were higher than 0.05 for all the volatile compounds.
It is evident that the mass transfer and molecular affinity amongst petroleum ether and the targeted compounds exerted a higher influence on acquiring and retaining the volatiles. In this context, comparing the advantages and drawbacks between SE and UAE, the latter appeared more cost-effective and environmentally advantageous.

3.4. Estimation of Volatiles over Ripening

The volatile fraction resulting from avocado oil extraction with petroleum ether and isolated by the HS-SPME technique gave mainly terpenoids and hydrocarbons (non-terpenoids). In contrast to previous studies, trace amounts of aldehydes, ketones, and other compounds were detected [25,33,34,36,37], which may be attributed to the sampling method or to the differences among avocado varieties.
The ripening stages (breaking, ripe, and overripe) indicated major differences in the semi-quantification of volatile compounds. The hydrocarbon (non-terpenoids) contents were found to be 14.41, 6.57, and 17.62 mg·kg−1 for breaking, ripe, and overripe samples over SE and 14.80, 2.89, and 14.14 mg·kg−1 over UAE, respectively. The corresponding terpenoids contents were found to be 18.44, 24.68, and 14.27 mg·kg−1 for breaking, ripe, and overripe samples over SE and 18.67, 28.74, and 15.50 mg·kg−1 over UAE. The above results show that, during maturation, the volatile fraction fluctuates. On the fourth day of maturation, the abundance of hydrocarbons was significantly lower (p < 0.05) compared with the first day, while it increased on the eighth day. In contrast, the abundance of terpenoids was significantly higher (p < 0.05) on the fourth day of maturation. This change in volatility was observed in both cases of the extraction techniques (Figure 3).
The abundance of hydrocarbons and terpenoids was examined by multivariate analysis of variance in comparison with the ripening stages. The Scheffe post hoc test was used to investigate which pairs of means were significant, and detailed results are presented in Table 2. It is evident that 21 of 44 total volatiles were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Three volatiles significantly differed between the ripening stages, including 1-methyl-4-(propan-2-ylidene)cyclohex-1-ene; 1-methyl-4-(prop-1-en-2-yl)benzene (p-cymenene); and (1S,8aR)-4,7-dimethyl-1-propan-2-yl-1,2,3,5,6,8a-hexahydronaphthalene (δ-cadinene).
There is a lack of published data relating to the differences between the variations of volatile components of avocado oil and the ripening stages of avocado fruit. The majority of literature reports have focused on the aroma of avocado fruit; however, a limited number of studies have investigated the aroma of avocado oil [25,33,34,35,36,37]. Nonetheless, similar results can be drawn from the study of avocado fruit volatiles. Pereira [42] reported that the sesquiterpenes of avocado fruit decreased during ripening. Moreover, similar results have been reported in other climacteric fruits, in which series of changes in metabolic biosynthesis occur during storage ripening [43]. In particular, the monoterpenes in mango fruits (Mangifera indica L. “Kensington Pride”) have increased on the fourth day of ripening and decreased afterwards [43].
Furthermore, in the same fruit, the monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, and aromatics were determined at a higher total amount in ripened mango compared with the unripe and overripe stages [44]. In another study by Zidi on figs (Ficus carica L.) [45], β-caryoophyllene and D-limonene increased significantly from the unripe to the ripe stage and were suppressed in the fully ripe stage.
Ethylene is well-known to control the storage duration and rate of ripening of climacteric fruits. A potential hypothesis is that the rise could be linearly correlated with ethylene synthesis. Several studies reported that climacteric fruits including apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) [46], tomato (Solanum lucopersicum L.) [47], and mango [48] undergo a rapid production of terpenes which depends on the response of ethylene. Thus, ethylene plays a key role in the metabolic events of volatiles during ripening [49]. Nevertheless, numerous underlying processes are yet to be delineated and merit additional study [50]. Another possible interpretation of the suppression of terpenoids over the later ripening stages (over-ripe) could be correlated with the presence of terpenoid hydroperoxides. The mesocarp of avocado fruit contains idioblastic cells that contain oil sacs and sesquiterpene hydroperoxides [7,51,52]. During maturation or enzymatic reaction, a degradation of a primary wall of the parenchyma cells occurs, which releases the oil from the idioblastic cells, and then the released hydroperoxides act on the terpenoids.

4. Conclusions

In summary, this work shows the analysis of avocado oil extracted from the Zutano variety by two (SE and UAE) techniques. In this context, petroleum ether volatile fractions were estimated over three ripening stages (breaking, ripe, and overripe) using HS-SPME–GC–MS. The Zutano variety, which is cultivated in the Crete region, gave a fragrant oil which has not been previously studied. This cultivar is characterized from seven main volatile compounds, including 2,6,6-trimethylbicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene (α-pinene), 1-methyl-4-(prop-1-en-2-yl)cyclohex-1-ene (D-limonene), 4,10-dimethyl-7-propan-2-yltricyclo[4.4.0.01,5]dec-3-ene (α-cubebene), (1S,6S,7S,8S)-1,3-dimethyl-8-propan-2-yltricyclo[4.4.0.02,7]dec-3-ene (a-copaene), (1R,9S,Z)-4,11,11-trimethyl-8-methylenebicyclo[7.2.0]undec-4-ene (β-caryophyllene), 2,6-dimethyl-6-(4-methylpent-3-enyl)bicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene (α-bergamotene), and (1E,4E,8E)-2,6,6,9-tetramethylcycloundeca-1,4,8-triene (humulene). The analyzed fractions consisted of a high content of terpenoids with an average relative abundance of over 61.7%. ANOVA revealed that the extraction methods did not have statistically significant differences between their qualification and semi-quantification results. In contrast, the application of MANOVA between the ripening stages and some volatiles indicated that the p-values were lower than 0.05. Even though ripening is one significant factor that affects volatiles, additional research is required to approve the above results. This study could form the foundation for additional research on the impact of ethylene and the metabolism of avocado oil volatiles.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.X. and C.S.P.; methodology, M.X., L.V., E.H.K., P.-K.R. and C.S.P.; software, M.X., L.V., E.H.K. and P.-K.R.; validation, M.X. and E.G.; formal analysis, E.G.; investigation, M.X., E.G., L.V. and E.H.K.; resources, E.G.; data curation, M.X. and E.G.; writing—original draft preparation, M.X.; writing—review and editing, L.V., E.H.K., P.-K.R., C.S.P. and P.A.T.; visualization, C.S.P. and P.A.T.; supervision, C.S.P.; project administration, C.S.P. and P.A.T.; funding acquisition, E.G. and P.-K.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ioannis Lathourakis and Antonios Galanis for the sponsorship of Persea americana Mill. “Zutano” variety avocados from the Greek island of Crete, Chania.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Caballero, B.; Finglas, P.M.; Toldrá, F. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Food and Health; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; ISBN 978-0-12-384947-2. [Google Scholar]
  2. FAOSTAT. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL/visualize (accessed on 24 November 2021).
  3. Kourgialas, N.N.; Dokou, Z. Water management and salinity adaptation approaches of Avocado trees: A review for hot-summer Mediterranean climate. Agric. Water Manag. 2021, 252, 106923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Flores, M.; Saravia, C.; Vergara, C.; Avila, F.; Valdés, H.; Ortiz-Viedma, J. Avocado Oil: Characteristics, Properties, and Applications. Molecules 2019, 24, 2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Tan, C.X. Virgin avocado oil: An emerging source of functional fruit oil. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 54, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bhuyan, D.J.; Alsherbiny, M.A.; Perera, S.; Low, M.; Basu, A.; Devi, O.A.; Barooah, M.S.; Li, C.G.; Papoutsis, K. The Odyssey of Bioactive Compounds in Avocado (Persea americana) and their Health Benefits. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Cervantes-Paz, B.; Yahia, E.M. Avocado oil: Production and market demand, bioactive components, implications in health, and tendencies and potential uses. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 4120–4158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Woolf, A.; Wong, M.; Eyres, L.; McGhie, T.; Lund, C.; Olsson, S.; Wang, Y.; Bulley, C.; Wang, M.; Friel, E.; et al. Avocado oil. In Gourmet and Health-Promoting Specialty Oils; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 73–125. ISBN 978-1-893997-97-4. [Google Scholar]
  9. El-Zeftawi, B. Physical and chemical changes in fruit of seven avocado cultivars at Mildura. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1978, 29, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Vekiari, S.A.; Papadopoulou, P.P.; Lionakis, S.; Krystallis, A. Variation in the Composition of Cretan Avocado Cultivars during Ripening: Seasonal Variation in the Composition of Cretan Avocados. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2004, 84, 485–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Takenaga, F.; Matsuyama, K.; Abe, S.; Torii, Y.; Itoh, S. Lipid and fatty acid composition of mesocarp and seed of avocado fruits harvested at northern range in Japan. J. Oleo Sci. 2008, 57, 591–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ozdemir, F.; Topuz, A. Changes in dry matter, oil content and fatty acids composition of avocado during harvesting time and post-harvesting ripening period. Food Chem. 2004, 86, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mahendran, T.; Brennan, J.G.; Hariharan, G. Aroma volatiles components of ‘Fuerte’ Avocado (Persea americana Mill.) stored under different modified atmospheric conditions. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2019, 31, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ali, S.; Plotto, A.; Scully, B.T.; Wood, D.; Stover, E.; Owens, N.; Pisani, C.; Ritenour, M.; Anjum, M.A.; Nawaz, A.; et al. Fatty acid and volatile organic compound profiling of avocado germplasm grown under East-Central Florida conditions. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 261, 109008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tan, C.X.; Hean, C.G.; Hamzah, H.; Ghazali, H.M. Optimization of ultrasound-assisted aqueous extraction to produce virgin avocado oil with low free fatty acids. J. Food Process. Eng. 2018, 41, e12656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tan, C.X.; Chong, G.H.; Hamzah, H.; Ghazali, H.M. Comparison of subcritical CO2 and ultrasound-assisted aqueous methods with the conventional solvent method in the extraction of avocado oil. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2018, 135, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dos Santos, M.A.Z.; Alicieo, T.V.R.; Pereira, C.M.P.; Ramis-Ramos, G.; Mendonça, C.R.B.; Dos Santos, M.A.Z. Profile of Bioactive Compounds in Avocado Pulp Oil: Influence of the Drying Processes and Extraction Methods. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2013, 91, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Krumreich, F.D.; Borges, C.D.; Mendonça, C.R.B.; Jansen-Alves, C.; Zambiazi, R.C. Bioactive compounds and quality parameters of avocado oil obtained by different processes. Food Chem. 2018, 257, 376–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Reddy, M.; Moodley, R.; Jonnalagadda, S.B.; Jonnalagadda, S.B. Fatty acid profile and elemental content of avocado (Persea americana Mill. ) oil –effect of extraction methods. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B 2012, 47, 529–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Abaide, E.; Zabot, G.L.; Tres, M.V.; Martins, R.F.; Fagundez, J.L.; Nunes, L.F.; Druzian, S.; Soares, J.F.; Prá, V.D.; Silva, J.R.; et al. Yield, composition, and antioxidant activity of avocado pulp oil extracted by pressurized fluids. Food Bioprod. Process. 2017, 102, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mostert, M.E.; Botha, B.M.; Du Plessis, L.M.; Duodu, K.G. Effect of fruit ripeness and method of fruit drying on the extractability of avocado oil with hexane and supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2007, 87, 2880–2885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Corzzini, S.C.; Barros, H.D.; Grimaldi, R.; Cabral, F. Extraction of edible avocado oil using supercritical CO2 and a CO2/ethanol mixture as solvents. J. Food Eng. 2017, 194, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Espinosa-Alonso, L.G.; Paredes-López, O.; Valdez-Morales, M.; Oomah, B.D. Avocado Oil Characteristics of Mexican Creole Genotypes: Mexican Creole Avocado Oil Properties. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2017, 119, 1600406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yanty, N.A.M.; Marikkar, J.M.N.; Long, K. Effect of Varietal Differences on Composition and Thermal Characteristics of Avocado Oil. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2011, 88, 1997–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Moreno, A.O.; Dorantes, L.; Galíndez, J.; Guzmán, R.I. Effect of Different Extraction Methods on Fatty Acids, Volatile Compounds, and Physical and Chemical Properties of Avocado (Persea americana Mill.) Oil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 2216–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Meyer, M.D.; Terry, L.A. Development of a Rapid Method for the Sequential Extraction and Subsequent Quantification of Fatty Acids and Sugars from Avocado Mesocarp Tissue. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 7439–7445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ortiz, M.A.; Dorantes, A.L.; Gallndez, M.J.; CRdenas, S.E. Effect of a Novel Oil Extraction Method on Avocado (Persea americana Mill.) Pulp Microstructure. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2004, 59, 11–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Meyer, M.D.; Terry, L.A. Fatty Acid and Sugar Composition of Avocado, Cv. Hass, in Response to Treatment with an Ethylene Scavenger or 1-Methylcyclopropene to Extend Storage Life. Food Chem. 2010, 121, 1203–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Barros, H.D.F.Q.; Coutinho, J.P.; Grimaldi, R.; Godoy, H.T.; Cabral, F.A. Simultaneous Extraction of Edible Oil from Avocado and Capsanthin from Red Bell Pepper Using Supercritical Carbon Dioxide as Solvent. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2016, 107, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Martínez-Padilla, L.P.; Franke, L.; Xu, X.-Q.; Juliano, P. Improved Extraction of Avocado Oil by Application of Sono-Physical Processes. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2018, 40, 720–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. del Pilar Ramírez-Anaya, J.; Manzano-Hernández, A.J.; Tapia-Campos, E.; Alarcón-Domínguez, K.; Castañeda-Saucedo, M.C. Influence of Temperature and Time during Malaxation on Fatty Acid Profile and Oxidation of Centrifuged Avocado Oil. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 38, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Schwartz, M.; Olaeta, J.A.; Undurraga, P. Mejoramiento del rendimiento de extracción del aceite de palta (aguacate). In Proceedings of the VI World Avocado Congress (Actas VI Congreso Mundial del Aguacate) 2007, Viña Del Mar, Chile, 12–16 November 2007. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kilic-Buyukkurt, O. Characterization of Aroma Compounds of Cold-Pressed Avocado Oil Using Solid-Phase Microextraction Techniques with Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry. J. Raw Mater. Process. Foods 2021, 2, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  34. Haiyan, Z.; Bedgood, D.R.; Bishop, A.G.; Prenzler, P.D.; Robards, K. Endogenous Biophenol, Fatty Acid and Volatile Profiles of Selected Oils. Food Chem. 2007, 100, 1544–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pino, J.A.; Rosado, A.; Aguero, J. Volatile Components of Avocado (Persea americana Mill.) Fruits. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2000, 12, 377–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. de Sousa Galvao, M.; Nunes, M.L.; Constant, P.B.L.; Narain, N. Identification of Volatile Compounds in Cultivars Barker, Collinson, Fortuna and Geada of Avocado (Persea americana Mill.) Fruit. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 36, 439–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Liu, Y.-J.; Gong, X.; Jing, W.; Lin, L.-J.; Zhou, W.; He, J.-N.; Li, J.-H. Fast Discrimination of Avocado Oil for Different Extracted Methods Using Headspace-Gas Chromatography-Ion Mobility Spectroscopy with PCA Based on Volatile Organic Compounds. Open Chem. 2021, 19, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Commission Regulation (EC) No 387/2005 of 8 March 2005 Amending (EC) Regulation No 831/97 Laying down Marketing Standards Applicable to Avocados—Publications Office of the EU. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/dd5847ac-2cc1-431f-b945-8c2ecb500f40 (accessed on 24 November 2021).
  39. Xagoraris, M.; Revelou, P.-K.; Dedegkika, S.; Kanakis, C.D.; Papadopoulos, G.K.; Pappas, C.S.; Tarantilis, P.A. SPME-GC-MS and FTIR-ATR Spectroscopic Study as a Tool for Unifloral Common Greek Honeys’ Botanical Origin Identification. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 3159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Adams, R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, 4th ed.; Allured Publishing Corporation: Carol Stream, IL, USA, 2007; ISBN 978-1-932633-21-4. [Google Scholar]
  41. Satriana, S.; Supardan, M.D.; Arpi, N.; Wan Mustapha, W.A. Development of Methods Used in the Extraction of Avocado Oil. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2019, 121, 1800210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Pereira, M.E.C.; Tieman, D.M.; Sargent, S.A.; Klee, H.J.; Huber, D.J. Volatile Profiles of Ripening West Indian and Guatemalan-West Indian Avocado Cultivars as Affected by Aqueous 1-Methylcyclopropene. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2013, 80, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lalel, H.J.D.; Singh, Z.; Tan, S.C.; Agustí, M. Maturity Stage at Harvest Affects Fruit Ripening, Quality and Biosynthesis of Aroma Volatile Compounds in ‘Kensington Pride’ Mango. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2003, 78, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lalel, H.J.D.; Singh, Z.; Tan, S.C. Aroma Volatiles Production during Fruit Ripening of ‘Kensington Pride’ Mango. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2003, 27, 323–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zidi, K.; Kati, D.E.; Bachir-bey, M.; Genva, M.; Fauconnier, M.-L. Comparative Study of Fig Volatile Compounds Using Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction-Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry: Effects of Cultivars and Ripening Stages. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 667809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Schaffer, R.J.; Friel, E.N.; Souleyre, E.J.F.; Bolitho, K.; Thodey, K.; Ledger, S.; Bowen, J.H.; Ma, J.-H.; Nain, B.; Cohen, D.; et al. A Genomics Approach Reveals That Aroma Production in Apple Is Controlled by Ethylene Predominantly at the Final Step in Each Biosynthetic Pathway. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144, 1899–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Kovács, K.; Fray, R.G.; Tikunov, Y.; Graham, N.; Bradley, G.; Seymour, G.B.; Bovy, A.G.; Grierson, D. Effect of Tomato Pleiotropic Ripening Mutations on Flavour Volatile Biosynthesis. Phytochemistry 2009, 70, 1003–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Pandit, S.S.; Kulkarni, R.S.; Chidley, H.G.; Giri, A.P.; Pujari, K.H.; Köllner, T.G.; Degenhardt, J.; Gershenzon, J.; Gupta, V.S. Changes in Volatile Composition during Fruit Development and Ripening of ‘Alphonso’ Mango. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2009, 89, 2071–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Defilippi, B.G.; Manríquez, D.; Luengwilai, K.; González-Agüero, M. Chapter 1 Aroma Volatiles. In Advances in Botanical Research; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009; Volume 50, pp. 1–37. ISBN 978-0-12-374835-5. [Google Scholar]
  50. Gapper, N.E.; McQuinn, R.P.; Giovannoni, J.J. Molecular and Genetic Regulation of Fruit Ripening. Plant Mol. Biol. 2013, 82, 575–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Platt, K.A.; Thomson, W.W. Idioblast Oil Cells of Avocado: Distribution, Isolation, Ultrastructure, Histochemistry, and Biochemistry. Int. J. Plant Sci. 1992, 153, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Platt-Aloia, K.A.; Oross, J.W.; Thomson, W.W. Ultrastructural Study of the Development of Oil Cells in the Mesocarp of Avocado Fruit. Bot. Gaz. 1983, 144, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Ripening stages of avocado fruit (Persea americana Mill., Greek “Zutano” variety).
Figure 1. Ripening stages of avocado fruit (Persea americana Mill., Greek “Zutano” variety).
Compounds 02 00003 g001
Figure 2. A characteristic gas chromatogram of avocado oil (Persea americana Mill., Greek “Zutano” variety) from UAE. (P1) 2,6,6-trimethylbicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene (α-pinene); (P2) 1-methyl-4-(prop-1-en-2-yl)cyclohex-1-ene (D-limonene); (P3) 4,10-dimethyl-7-propan-2-yltricyclo[4.4.0.01,5]dec-3-ene (α-cubebene); (P4) (1S,6S,7S,8S)-1,3-dimethyl-8-propan-2-yltricyclo[4.4.0.02,7]dec-3-ene (a-copaene); (P5) (1R,9S,Z)-4,11,11-trimethyl-8-methylenebicyclo[7.2.0]undec-4-ene (β-caryophyllene); (P6) 2,6-dimethyl-6-(4-methylpent-3-enyl)bicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene (α-bergamotene); (P7) (1E,4E,8E)-2,6,6,9-tetramethylcycloundeca-1,4,8-triene (humulene); (I.S) Internal Standard.
Figure 2. A characteristic gas chromatogram of avocado oil (Persea americana Mill., Greek “Zutano” variety) from UAE. (P1) 2,6,6-trimethylbicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene (α-pinene); (P2) 1-methyl-4-(prop-1-en-2-yl)cyclohex-1-ene (D-limonene); (P3) 4,10-dimethyl-7-propan-2-yltricyclo[4.4.0.01,5]dec-3-ene (α-cubebene); (P4) (1S,6S,7S,8S)-1,3-dimethyl-8-propan-2-yltricyclo[4.4.0.02,7]dec-3-ene (a-copaene); (P5) (1R,9S,Z)-4,11,11-trimethyl-8-methylenebicyclo[7.2.0]undec-4-ene (β-caryophyllene); (P6) 2,6-dimethyl-6-(4-methylpent-3-enyl)bicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene (α-bergamotene); (P7) (1E,4E,8E)-2,6,6,9-tetramethylcycloundeca-1,4,8-triene (humulene); (I.S) Internal Standard.
Compounds 02 00003 g002
Figure 3. The variation of volatility during three ripening stages.
Figure 3. The variation of volatility during three ripening stages.
Compounds 02 00003 g003
Table 1. Volatile compounds isolated from headspace of avocado oil (mg·kg−1).
Table 1. Volatile compounds isolated from headspace of avocado oil (mg·kg−1).
Volatile CompoundsCAS NumberRT aRI bSoxhletUAE
BreakingRipeOverripeBreakingRipeOverripe
Hydrocarbons (Non Terpenoids)
1-ethyl-2-methylcyclohexane3728-54-99.78830.200.150.210.200.000.20
(1R,3S)-1-ethyl-3-methylcyclohexane3728-55-09.88870.330.150.190.330.010.22
nonane111-84-210.28971.340.741.621.340.041.02
propylcyclohexane1678-92-811.29220.200.060.100.200.020.30
2,6-dimethyloctane2051-30-111.69320.930.150.850.930.000.54
3-ethyl-2-methylheptane14676-29-011.89370.780.430.820.780.000.70
1,1,2,3-tetramethylcyclohexane6783-92-212.39510.190.040.240.460.000.25
4-ethyloctane15869-86-012.49530.400.160.480.400.010.36
4-methylnonane17301-94-912.79610.740.300.950.740.070.69
2-methylnonane871-83-012.89640.850.281.000.850.060.70
3-methylnonane5911-04-613.09701.190.471.621.190.041.07
1-methyl-2-propylcyclohexane4291-79-613.69860.860.321.640.860.061.32
decane124-18-5 14.210014.451.806.324.470.515.08
butylcyclohexane1678-93-915.210320.570.000.500.570.000.40
dodecane112-40-320.612000.190.060.070.190.150.10
(1S,2S,3R,4S,6R,7R,8S)-1,2-dimethyl-8-propan-2-yltetracyclo[4.4.0.02,4.03,7]decane (cyclosativene)22469-52-925.813690.640.810.540.641.010.62
(1S,2S,4R)-1-ethenyl-1-methyl-2,4-bis(prop-1-en-2-yl)cyclohexane (β-elemene)515-13-926.313870.360.440.250.440.670.35
tetradecane629-59-426.814010.100.010.100.100.080.10
10,10-dimethyl-2,6-dimethylenebicyclo[7.2.0]undecane136296-38-327.714270.100.200.100.100.170.13
Terpenoids
2,6,6-trimethylbicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene (α-pinene)7785-70-811.59291.792.570.741.801.950.36
7-methyl-3-methyleneocta-1,6-diene (β-myrcene)123-35-313.79880.960.940.330.960.640.39
1-methyl-4-propan-2-ylbenzene (p-cymene)99-87-614.910220.820.440.960.820.230.75
1-methyl-4-(prop-1-en-2-yl)cyclohex-1-ene (D-limonene)138-86-315.110280.991.500.270.991.200.31
1-isopropyl-4-methylcyclohexa-1,4-diene (γ-terpinene)99-85-416.110570.000.100.000.000.110.00
1-methyl-4-(propan-2-ylidene)cyclohex-1-ene586-62-917.010850.150.070.040.150.070.03
1-methyl-4-(prop-1-en-2-yl)benzene (p-cymenene)1195-32-017.210900.090.140.010.090.140.02
4,10-dimethyl-7-propan-2-yltricyclo[4.4.0.01,5]dec-3-ene (α-cubebene)17699-14-825.013461.481.701.191.702.281.42
(1S,6S,7S,8S)-1,3-dimethyl-8-propan-2-yltricyclo[4.4.0.02,7]dec-3-ene (a-copaene)3856-25-526.013773.805.273.663.817.154.24
(1R,9S,Z)-4,11,11-trimethyl-8-methylenebicyclo[7.2.0]undec-4-ene (β-caryophyllene)87-44-527.514225.788.074.325.789.844.73
2,6-dimethyl-6-(4-methylpent-3-enyl)bicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene (α-bergamotene)13474-59-427.814321.051.551.091.052.241.21
(6Z)-7,11-dimethyl-3-methylidenedodeca-1,6,10-triene (β-farnesene)28973-97-928.414500.050.070.030.050.130.08
(1E,4E,8E)-2,6,6,9-tetramethylcycloundeca-1,4,8-triene (humulene)6753-98-628.614540.540.760.450.540.930.52
(1aR,4aS,7R,7aS,7bS)-1,1,7-trimethyl-4-methylidene-2,3,4a,5,6,7,7a,7b-octahydro-1aH-cyclopropa[e]azulene (alloaromadendrene)25246-27-928.714580.130.160.110.130.200.14
(1S,4aS,8aR)-7-methyl-4-methylidene-1-propan-2-yl-2,3,4a,5,6,8a-hexahydro-1H-naphthalene (γ-muurolene)30021-74-029.214730.080.150.080.080.210.12
(1S,4aS,8aR)-4,7-dimethyl-1-propan-2-yl-1,2,4a,5,6,8a-hexahydronaphthalene (α-muurolene)31983-22-930.014970.080.100.050.050.140.09
(4S)-1-methyl-4-(6-methylhepta-1,5-dien-2-yl)cyclohexene (β-bisabolene)495-61-430.315060.140.230.240.140.360.30
(1R,4aS,8aS)-7-methyl-4-methylidene-1-propan-2-yl-2,3,4a,5,6,8a-hexahydro-1H-naphthalene (γ-cadinene)39029-41-930.515110.040.080.040.040.090.06
(1S,8aR)-4,7-dimethyl-1-propan-2-yl-1,2,3,5,6,8a-hexahydronaphthalene (δ-cadinene)483-76-130.715170.400.650.510.400.660.57
4-isopropyl-1,6-dimethyl-1,2,3,4,4a,7-hexahydronaphthalene16728-99-731.115300.040.070.050.040.080.06
(1S)-4,7-dimethyl-1-propan-2-yl-1,2-dihydronaphthalene (α-calacorene)21391-99-131.415380.040.080.090.050.080.09
Aldehydes
nonanal124-19-617.711040.080.110.070.080.160.02
Ketones
octan-2-one111-13-710.69070.560.280.480.270.120.19
Others
trans-decahydronaphthalene493-02-716.110570.340.100.250.270.020.27
(1S,4S)-1,6-dimethyl-4-propan-2-yl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene (calamenene)72937-55-430.815190.130.240.190.130.230.22
a RT: Retention time (min); b RI: Experimental retention index.
Table 2. The statistically significant volatile compounds between ripening stages.
Table 2. The statistically significant volatile compounds between ripening stages.
Multiple Comparisons a
No.Volatile CompoundsRipening Stages in Pairsp-Value b
12,6-dimethyloctaneBreakingRipe0.021
RipeOverripe0.049
OverripeBreaking0.373
24-methylnonaneBreakingRipe0.066
RipeOverripe0.047
OverripeBreaking0.859
32-methylnonaneBreakingRipe0.047
RipeOverripe0.047
OverripeBreaking1.000
41-methyl-2-propylcyclohexaneBreakingRipe0.064
RipeOverripe0.011
OverripeBreaking0.077
5decaneBreakingRipe0.046
RipeOverripe0.019
OverripeBreaking0.364
6butylcyclohexaneBreakingRipe0.002
RipeOverripe0.004
OverripeBreaking0.131
710,10-dimethyl-2,6-dimethylenebicyclo[7.2.0]undecaneBreakingRipe0.037
RipeOverripe0.061
OverripeBreaking0.716
82,6,6-trimethylbicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene (α-pinene)BreakingRipe0.408
RipeOverripe0.024
OverripeBreaking0.056
97-methyl-3-methyleneocta-1,6-diene (β-myrcene)BreakingRipe0.486
RipeOverripe0.091
OverripeBreaking0.039
101-methyl-4-(prop-1-en-2-yl)cyclohex-1-ene (D-limonene)BreakingRipe0.133
RipeOverripe0.008
OverripeBreaking0.025
111-isopropyl-4-methylcyclohexa-1,4-diene (γ-terpinene)BreakingRipe0.000
RipeOverripe0.000
OverripeBreaking1.000
121-methyl-4-(propan-2-ylidene)cyclohex-1-eneBreakingRipe0.001
RipeOverripe0.008
OverripeBreaking0.000
131-methyl-4-(prop-1-en-2-yl)benzene (p-cymenene)BreakingRipe0.003
RipeOverripe0.000
OverripeBreaking0.001
14(1R,9S,Z)-4,11,11-trimethyl-8-methylenebicyclo[7.2.0]undec-4-ene (β-caryophyllene)BreakingRipe0.053
RipeOverripe0.022
OverripeBreaking0.366
15(1E,4E,8E)-2,6,6,9-tetramethylcycloundeca-1,4,8-triene (humulene)BreakingRipe0.060
RipeOverripe0.039
OverripeBreaking0.781
16(1R,4aS,8aS)-7-methyl-4-methylidene-1-propan-2-yl-2,3,4a,5,6,8a-hexahydro-1H-naphthalene (γ-cadinene)BreakingRipe0.036
RipeOverripe0.070
OverripeBreaking0.604
17(1S,8aR)-4,7-dimethyl-1-propan-2-yl-1,2,3,5,6,8a-hexahydronaphthalene (δ-cadinene)BreakingRipe0.005
RipeOverripe0.043
OverripeBreaking0.025
184-isopropyl-1,6-dimethyl-1,2,3,4,4a,7-hexahydronaphthaleneBreakingRipe0.021
RipeOverripe0.089
OverripeBreaking0.171
19(1S)-4,7-dimethyl-1-propan-2-yl-1,2-dihydronaphthalene (α-calacorene)BreakingRipe0.008
RipeOverripe0.192
OverripeBreaking0.004
20trans-decahydronaphthaleneBreakingRipe0.026
RipeOverripe0.046
OverripeBreaking0.640
21(1S,4S)-1,6-dimethyl-4-propan-2-yl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene (calamenene)BreakingRipe0.009
RipeOverripe0.213
OverripeBreaking0.023
a Based on observed means. b The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xagoraris, M.; Galani, E.; Valasi, L.; Kaparakou, E.H.; Revelou, P.-K.; Tarantilis, P.A.; Pappas, C.S. Estimation of Avocado Oil (Persea americana Mill., Greek “Zutano” Variety) Volatile Fraction over Ripening by Classical and Ultrasound Extraction Using HS-SPME–GC–MS. Compounds 2022, 2, 25-36. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/compounds2010003

AMA Style

Xagoraris M, Galani E, Valasi L, Kaparakou EH, Revelou P-K, Tarantilis PA, Pappas CS. Estimation of Avocado Oil (Persea americana Mill., Greek “Zutano” Variety) Volatile Fraction over Ripening by Classical and Ultrasound Extraction Using HS-SPME–GC–MS. Compounds. 2022; 2(1):25-36. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/compounds2010003

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xagoraris, Marinos, Eleni Galani, Lydia Valasi, Eleftheria H. Kaparakou, Panagiota-Kyriaki Revelou, Petros A. Tarantilis, and Christos S. Pappas. 2022. "Estimation of Avocado Oil (Persea americana Mill., Greek “Zutano” Variety) Volatile Fraction over Ripening by Classical and Ultrasound Extraction Using HS-SPME–GC–MS" Compounds 2, no. 1: 25-36. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/compounds2010003

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop