Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Immune Checkpoint-Inhibitors Therapy in Urinary Bladder Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Targeting Abnormal Cell Cycle in Cancer: A Preface to the Special Issue
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Synthetic Inhibitors of CDK4/6 Activities and Tumor Suppression: A Preface to the Special Issue

1
Division of Oncology and Molecular Biology, Cancer Research Institute, Kanazawa University, Ishikawa 920-1192, Japan
2
Division of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Nara 630-0101, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 17 December 2020 / Revised: 25 December 2020 / Accepted: 29 December 2020 / Published: 8 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Targeting Abnormal Cell Cycle in Cancer)
The status of RB1 in cancer may help us determine the optimal therapeutic approach to patients. In cancers harboring deletions or mutations in the RB1 gene allele (RB1-negative cancers), many molecules, including CHK1, PLK, Aurora-A and B, SKP2, Ras and IL6, CCL2-CCR2 axis and associating genetic deletion of SUCLA2 gene, have been proposed to be the therapeutic targets [1,2,3,4], whereas, for cancers retaining the intact RB1 gene (RB1-positive cancers), synthetic inhibitors of CDK4/6 are theoretically applicable. Synthetic CDK4/6 inhibitors exert their anti-tumor effects by keeping RB1 in an unphosphorylated state for an extended time, causing not only cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase but also cellular senescence, apoptosis and enhanced immunogenicity [5]. Currently, palbociclib, abemaciclib and ribociclib have an indication in advanced breast cancers in combination with endocrine therapy, which was shown to double the disease-free survival of patients [6]. In addition to breast cancer, synthetic CDK4/6 inhibitors are in clinical trials for many other solid tumors. However, single administration of a synthetic CDK4/6 inhibitor often ended in sub-optimal results [7]. As in the case of breast cancer therapy, we are now in need of developing combination therapy using a CDK4/6 inhibitor together with a compound that would enhance the efficacy of this agent. To this aim, we further need to investigate the intrinsic or acquired resistant mechanisms to CDK4/6 inhibitors in various RB1-positive cancers, as has been investigated in breast cancers. The mechanism whereby breast cancer cells resist CDK4/6 inhibitors to date has been proposed to include loss of RB1, estrogen receptor (ER) or progression receptor (PR); overexpression of p16INK4A, CDKs, cyclin E, E2Fs, WEE1 or MDM2; activation of FGFR, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, interferon (IFN) or IL6-STAT3 pathway; activating mutation in PI3KCA or loss-of-function mutation in FAT1; and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) [8]. More information from basic, translational and clinical studies may promote trials of CDK4/6 inhibitors in a wider variety of cancers.
This Special Issue will provide readers with new insights on possible intrinsic and acquired mechanisms whereby cancer cells become resistant to synthetic CDK4/6 inhibitors, and also valuable information on novel mechanisms whereby synthetic CDK4/6 inhibitors may exhibit their efficacy. We welcome the submission of original research papers or review articles on various aspects of synthetic CDK4/6 inhibitors and their roles in tumor suppression.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kohno, S.; Linn, P.; Nagatani, N.; Watanabe, Y.; Kumar, S.; Soga, T.; Takahashi, C. Pharmacologically targetable vulnerability in prostate cancer carrying RB1-SUCLA2 deletion. Oncogene 2020, 39, 5690–5707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Shamma, A.; Takegami, Y.; Miki, T.; Kitajima, S.; Noda, M.; Obara, T.; Okamoto, T.; Takahashi, C. Rb Regulates DNA damage response and cellular senescence through E2F-dependent suppression of N-ras isoprenylation. Cancer Cell 2009, 15, 255–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Kitajima, S.; Yoshida, A.; Kohno, S.; Li, F.; Suzuki, S.; Nagatani, N.; Nishimoto, Y.; Sasaki, N.; Muranaka, H.; Wan, Y.; et al. The RB-IL-6 axis controls self-renewal and endocrine therapy resistance by fine-tuning mitochondrial activity. Oncogene 2017, 36, 5145–5157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, F.; Kitajima, S.; Kohno, S.; Yoshida, A.; Tange, S.; Sasaki, S.; Okada, N.; Nishimoto, Y.; Muranaka, H.; Nagatani, N.; et al. RB inactivation induces a protumoral microenvironment via enhanced CCL2 secretion. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 3903–3915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Goel, S.; DeCristo, M.J.; Watt, A.C.; BrinJones, H.; Sceneay, J.; Li, B.B.; Khan, N.; Ubellacker, J.M.; Xie, S.; Hoog, J.; et al. CDK4/6 inhibition triggers anti-tumour immunity. Nature 2017, 548, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Iorfida, M.; Mazza, M.; Munzone, E. Fulvestrant in Combination with CDK4/6 Inhibitors for HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancers: Current Perspectives. Breast Cancer Targets Ther. 2020, 12, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Schettini, F.; De Santo, I.; Rea, C.G.; De Placido, P.; Formisano, L.; Giuliano, M.; Arpino, G.; De Laurentiis, M.; Puglisi, F.; Del Mastro, L.; et al. CDK 4/6 Inhibitors as Single Agent in Advanced Solid Tumors. Front. Oncol. 2018, 8, 608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. McCartney, A.; Migliaccio, I.; Bonechi, M.; Biagioni, C.; Romagnoli, D.; De Luca, F.; Galardi, F.; Risi, E.; De Santo, I.; Malorni, L.; et al. Mechanisms of Resistance to CDK4/6 Inhibitors: Potential Implications and Biomarkers for Clinical Practice. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Takahashi, C.; Kato, J.-y. Synthetic Inhibitors of CDK4/6 Activities and Tumor Suppression: A Preface to the Special Issue. Onco 2021, 1, 1-2. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/onco1010001

AMA Style

Takahashi C, Kato J-y. Synthetic Inhibitors of CDK4/6 Activities and Tumor Suppression: A Preface to the Special Issue. Onco. 2021; 1(1):1-2. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/onco1010001

Chicago/Turabian Style

Takahashi, Chiaki, and Jun-ya Kato. 2021. "Synthetic Inhibitors of CDK4/6 Activities and Tumor Suppression: A Preface to the Special Issue" Onco 1, no. 1: 1-2. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/onco1010001

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop