Next Article in Journal
Differences in the Effects of EGCG on Chromosomal Stability and Cell Growth between Normal and Colon Cancer Cells
Previous Article in Journal
ω-Methylsulfanylalkyl Glucosinolates: A General Synthetic Pathway
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 23
Issue 4
10.3390/molecules23040787
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Regulating Cdc42 and Its Signaling Pathways in Cancer: Small Molecules and MicroRNA as New Treatment Candidates

by
Xing-Hua Xiao
1,2,†,
Lin-Chen Lv
1,2,†,
Jing Duan
1,2,
Ye-Meng Wu
1,2,
Shu-Jin He
1,2,
Zhen-Zhen Hu
1,2,* and
Li-Xia Xiong
1,2,*
1
Department of Pathophysiology, Medical College, Nanchang University, 461 Bayi Road, Nanchang 330006, China
2
Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Tumor Pathogenesis and Molecular Pathology, 461 Bayi Road, Nanchang 330006, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2018, 23(4), 787; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules23040787
Submission received: 27 February 2018 / Revised: 19 March 2018 / Accepted: 24 March 2018 / Published: 29 March 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Medicinal Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Despite great improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of neoplasms, metastatic disease is still the leading cause of death in cancer patients, with mortality rates still rising. Given this background, new ways to treat cancer will be important for development of improved cancer control strategies. Cdc42 is a member of the Rho GTPase family and plays an important role in cell-to-cell adhesion, formation of cytoskeletal structures, and cell cycle regulation. It thus influences cellular proliferation, transformation, and homeostasis, as well as the cellular migration and invasion processes underlying tumor formation. Cdc42 acts as a collection point for signal transduction and regulates multiple signaling pathways. Moreover, recent studies show that in most human cancers Cdc42 is abnormally expressed and promoting neoplastic growth and metastasis. Regarding possible new treatments for cancer, miRNA and small molecules targeting Cdc42 and related pathways have been recently found to be effective on cancer. In this review, we analyze the newly recognized regulation mechanisms for Cdc42 and Cdc42-related signal pathways, and particularly new treatments using small molecules and miRNAs to inhibit the abnormal overexpression of Cdc42 that may slow down the metastasis process, improve cancer therapy and lead to novel strategies for development of antineoplastic drugs.

1. Introduction

Cell division control protein 42 homolog (Cdc42) is a member of the Rho GTPase family, which was first discovered in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells, where it was found to be a marker of the loci where new buds would appear. Earlier in vivo studies in mammals indicated that Cdc42 plays an important role in the regulation of the cardiovascular system, immune system, nervous system, and bone modeling. Cdc42 is also essential for the development of the pancreas, blood cells, eyes, and skin [1]. The Cdc42 active molecular switch is opened in the GTP-bound state and closed in the GDP-bound state, which is regulated by the guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), GTPase activating proteins (GAPs), and guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs). GEFs catalyze the exchange from GDP- to GTP-activating Cdc42 that can then activate downstream effectors, leading to altered cellular proliferation, polarity, adhesion, and migration, as well as dynamic changes of the cytoskeleton and other cell functions [2]. Conversely, GAPs play a negative regulatory role on the activity of Cdc42 via hydrolysis of GTP to GDP; GDIs lock the GDP-bound inactive state of Cdc42 and prevent its further activation [3]. This is the classic “GTPase cycle” model of Cdc42 (Figure 1). Based on this mechanism, many small molecule inhibitors have been developed that are targeted to Cdc42 and its signaling proteins [4].
Several recent studies have revealed unconventional mechanisms regulating the Rho GTPase signaling activity. For example, microRNAs regulate post-transcriptional processing of Rho GTPase-encoding mRNAs. Palmitoylation and nuclear translocation signals have an effect on intracellular distribution and post-translational phosphorylation. Some micro-RNAs can regulate the expression of Cdc42 through directly binding to 3’UTR of Cdc42 mRNA, which changes the activity of downstream effector/adaptor proteins of Cdc42 [5]. Transglutamination and AMPylation also affect Rho GTPase signaling, and the stability and turnover of the Rho GTPase protein is controlled by ubiquitination [5].
This review will address the post-transcriptional regulation of Cdc42 by microRNAs. We will describe the expression and regulators of Cdc42 and discuss their downstream effectors in cancers. Finally, we will summarize the small molecule inhibitors and micro-RNAs regulating Cdc42 activity.

2. The Expression of Cdc42 in Cancer

According to the Sanger COSMIC database (Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer), 41 mutations of Cdc42 have been reported in a variety of tumor tissues [6]. However, the frequency of Cdc42 mutations is low, ranging from 0.06 to 0.73%. Copy number variations of Cdc42 are still uncommon (<1% according to COSMIC) and found in only 11 tissues. The G12V variant of Cdc42 was identified in a melanoma biopsy as an oncogenic Ras mutation [6]. Moreover, the expression of the Cdc42 (F28L) mutant promotes cellular growth with low-serum conditions and malignant transformation of NIH 3T3 cell lines [7]. Some Cdc42 mutants can exchange GDP for GTP but still hydrolyze GTP (called ‘fast-cycling’ mutants) promote cellular transformation, whereas Cdc42 mutants that cannot hydrolyze GTP (called ‘slow-cycling’ mutations) and are irreversibly trapped in the GTP-bound state often inhibit cell growth. It has been proved that GAP can reverse the transformation caused by the ‘fast-cycling’ mutants Cdc42[F28L] [8]. In addition, some Cdc42 mutants can change the structure of Cdc42, which may leads to a strong interaction with the effector proteins such as PAKs. Although further molecular researches are needed to confirm this these possibilities and have clearer understanding of the Cdc42 mutant structures [9]. The gene expression of Cdc42 is different in several types of cancer. For instance, its expression is significantly downregulated in central nervous system (−20.09%), adrenal gland (−15.19%), kidney (−11.50%), and pancreatic cancers (−10.61%) [8]. Yet it is upregulated in cancers of the cervix (+8.79%), stomach (+5.61%), esophagus (+5.60%), prostate (+4.82%), lung (+4.13%), hematopoietic/lymphoid tissues (+4.07%), and thyroid gland (+3.31%) [10]. Cdc42 is associated with oncogenesis non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), gastric cancer, breast cancer, and squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. But Cdc42 may act as an anti-cancer gene in hepatocellular carcinoma. In conclusion, the role of Cdc42 in cancer is diverse and needs further exploration.

3. Regulators of Cdc42

3.1. Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors (GEFs)

Like other GTPases, Cdc42 switches between an inactive GDP-bound state and an active GTP-bound state; this configuration determines whether a downstream effect is produced. GEFs catalyze the exchange of GDP with GTP, which results in the activation of downstream effector proteins that produce key effects. The typical GEF contains a Dbl homology (DH) domain, which is essential for its biological activity [11]. Also, some additional domains such as DOCK180, which mediates interactions between lipids and peptides, have been found to promote the guanine nucleotide exchange of Rac (another member of the small GTPase family) with the DH domain [12]. A Pleck–Strin homology (PH) domain is adjacent to the DH domain that mediates membrane localization and has direct regulatory effects on the DH domain (Figure 2). Comparative analyses of the crystal structure of the DH–PH domains of the ‘son of sevenless’ (Sos) protein GEFs in the presence and absence of the lipid ligand state have shown that the PH domain can affect the conformation of the adjacent DH domain and regulate its activity [13]. Moreover, additional domains specific to each GEF may modulate the mechanisms of the activation and regulation of the GEFs [14].

3.2. GTPase-Activating Proteins (GAPs)

Conversely, the GAPs function to inactivate Cdc42 by hydrolyzing the GTP to GDP. There are about 20 types of human GAPs, eight of which are coded by loci on chromosome 22, according to the human genome sequencing project. Of these GAPs, Rga1, Rga2, and Bem3 are relatively well-studied. Although they share similar activity of the GAP domain, their protein sequences are not similar [11]. Rga1 contains two tandem Lin-11, Isl-11, Mec-3 (LIM) domains while Bem3 contains a PH domain. Lim domains mediate protein interactions through binding with zinc ions. The function of the PH domain is to play a role in membrane localization. The study of Smith et al. [11] demonstrated that these GAPs for Cdc42 play unique roles in haploid invasive growth and septin organization. Bem3 may play a more crucial role in mediating Cdc42 and Cla4 effects in cytokinesis, while Rga1 and Rga2 largely regulate interactions between Cdc42 and Ste20 but seem to regulate the morphologies of the cells to a lesser extent. Another important discovery is that after the comparison of the crystal structures of the ground-state complex between RhoGAP and Cdc42 guanosine 5’-(β,γ-imido) triphosphate, a 20° rotation between GTPase and GAP leads to an arginine residue of the GAP protein entering the active GTPase site to mediate and stabilize a change from the ground state to a transition state [14].

3.3. Guanosine Nucleotide Dissociation Inhibitors (GDIs)

The GDIs comprise a class of GTPase inhibitors that can block GDP-bound Cdc42 in the cytoplasm and inhibit Cdc42 activation. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) images and crystal structures of GDI show that it has an immunoglobulin-like C-terminal domain containing a hydrophobic pocket that can accommodate geranyleranyl lipids, and a flexible N-terminal domain to inhibit GDP to GTP exchange [14]. GDI competes with the Cdc42 regulator and effector proteins but also blocks G-proteins in the cytoplasm, so that GTPase activity can only be switched on in the absence of GDI. Additionally, the ERM (ezrin, radixin, and moesin) family of proteins can release Rho from RhoGDI and then mediate translocation of Rho from the cytoplasm to the membrane [12,16].

4. Downstream Effector/Adaptor Proteins of Cdc42 in Cancer

Cdc42 is able to activate more than 20 effector/adaptor proteins, including kinases, phospholipases, actin-associated proteins, and others [2]. This section will address the roles in tumors of some protein kinases, such as activated Cdc42 kinase 1 (ACK1), p21-activated kinases (PAKs), mixed-lineage kinase 3 (MLK3), isoleucine-glutamine-motif containing GTPase-activating proteins (IQGAPs), neural Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome proteins (N-WASP), and phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks) (Figure 3).

4.1. Activated Cdc42 Kinase 1 (ACK1)

Activated Cdc42 kinase 1 (ACK1), which is also called TNK2, belongs to the Ack family of nonreceptor tyrosine kinases (NRTKs). Structurally, ACK1 has four parts: an N-terminal sterile alpha motif (SAM) domain, a SH3 domain, a kinase domain, and a Cdc42/Rac-interactive domain (CRIB). Cdc42 can activate ACK1 by directly and specifically binding to it. ACK1 has been shown to be involved in a variety of cancers, and its overexpression promotes the progression of many of them. In prostate cancer, ACK1 is able to phosphorylate and activate AR function and degrade the phosphorylated tumor suppressor Wwox. Moreover, phosphorylation of Ack1 Tyr284 may serve as a marker of prostate cancer progression [17,18,19]. Activation of Ack1 also plays a crucial role in breast cancer metastasis and is related to poor prognosis [20,21]. However, the influence of Ack1 on cell proliferation has nothing to do with its clinical effects, but rather plays a possible scaffolding function [22,23]. In general, Ack1 exerts effects in cancer cells through both kinase-independent (protein–protein interactions) and kinase-dependent actions. Recent studies have shown that ACK can regulate the proliferation and apoptosis of cells through interaction with the Yorkie (Yki) cofactor. Drosophila ACK, as a Hippo pathway regulator, can promote tissue overgrowth through inhibiting ex-mediated Yki regulation [24].

4.2. P21-Activated Kinases (PAKs)

The p21-activated kinases (PAKs) are Ser/Thr kinases. The family of PAKs can be divided into two groups according to structure and function: Group I contains PAK1, PAK2, and PAK3 and Group II contains PAK4, PAK5, and PAK6. Group I is characterized by an auto-inhibition region and a kinase region activated by Cdc42/ Rac1, while Group II lacks these features and cannot be activated by the Rho GTPases. PAK1, as the best characterized member of Group I PAKs, has been shown to act as an oncogene in various tumors. Overexpression of PAK1 has been correlated with NSCLC [25], breast cancer, prostate cancer [26], pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer [27,28], colorectal carcinoma [29], and oral cancers [30]. Moreover, it has been reported that the PAK1-deficient mutant (RB689) of C. elegans has a 60% longer lifespan than the wild type, indicating that PAK1 may shorten the lifespan [31], and PAK1-deficient mutant mice appear to be healthier than the wild type [32]. PAK1 has been studied extensively, its association with tumors has been confirmed; in contrast, there have been few similar reports involving PAK2 and PAK3. The expression of PAK2 is upregulated in gastric cancer and is associated with an unfavorable prognosis [33]. Deng et al. [34] found that PAK2 is highly expressed in adenoid cystic carcinoma and promotes cellular migration and proliferation. Inhibition and knockdown of PAK2 can reduce migration of ovarian cancer cells [35]. In addition, recent research shows that PAK3 and SGK2 play key roles in the survival of HPV+ cervical cancer cells, while the lethality of PAK3 and SGK2 shRNAs for HPV+ cervical cancer cells has nothing to do with suppressing PAK3 or SGK2 expression but likely is exerted through non-specific RNAi effects [36].
The PAK signaling pathway is involved in multiple human malignancies including lung, liver, colon, and breast cancers. PAK1 overexpression occurs in 75% of hepatocellular carcinoma tissues, and it results in increased invasiveness, poorer cellular differentiation, uncontrolled neoplastic survival, and tumor growth [37]. Other molecules are also involved in the abnormal overexpression of PAKs, including cyclin D1, Ras, Rac and ERK1/2 [38]. However, drugs targeting PAKs and other molecules in the PAK signaling pathways, such as PF-3758309, FL172, IPA-3, and LCH-7749944, only theoretically inhibit PAK-overexpression-induced cancers [39,40,41,42,43]. Many obstacles such as cytotoxicity, competition for ATP, and failed in vivo tests need to be overcome to improve the efficacy of the small molecule PAK inhibitors.

4.3. Mixed-Lineage Kinase 3 (MLK3)

Mixed-lineage kinase 3 (MLK3), also named MAP3K11, is one member of the MLK family. The MLK family has some common structures: an amino N-terminal Src-homology 3 (SH3) domain, a catalytic domain, leucine/isoleucine zipper (LZ) motifs, and a CDC42-/Rac1-interactive binding (CRIB) motif. MLK3 acts as a MAP3K that phosphorylates and activates specific MAP2Ks, which activate specific MAPKs in sequence. The sequence of the three major MAPKs is c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)/stress-activated protein kinase (SAPK), extracellular-signaling regulated kinase (ERK), and P38 MAPK. The combination of GTP-bound Cdc42 with MLK3 can disrupt SH3-mediated autoinhibition through its CRIB motif, leading to conformational changes that phosphorylate and activate MLK3. Cdc42 activates MLK3 by inducing its homo-dimerization and autophosphorylation, which in turn activate its downstream signaling effectors [42]. The MLK3-JNK signaling axis plays an important role in cell migration in breast cancers. Ectopic expression of MLK3 can induce cell migration whether immortalized breast epithelial cells or poorly invasive breast cancer cells are present, while inhibition of the MLK3 or JNK pathways can block the migration of TNBC cells [44]. MLK3 is essential for FRA-1 expression in breast cancer cells and raises MMP-1 and MMP-9 by FRA-1, which is important for breast cancer cell invasion and transendothelial migration [45]. MLK3 can also promote cell invasion in other cancers, such as NSCLC [46], breast cancer, melanoma, and ovarian cancer [47,48].

4.4. Isoleucine-Glutamine-Motif Containing GTPase-Activating Proteins (IQGAPS)

The IQGAP proteins are so-named because they have two key regions: a calmodulin binding IQ-motif and a GTPase activating protein (GAP) related domain (GRD). There are three IQGAP isoforms in humans: IQGAP1, IQGAP2, and IQGAP3. They have some common structural domains: the actin-binding calmodulin homology domain (CHD), the IQ-motif, and the GRD [49]. GTP-Cdc42 and GTP-Rac1 can activate IQGAP1 and IQGAP3 by binding to their GRD, while IQGAP2 is able to interact with the GDP- and GTP-bound forms [49,50]. IQGAP1 acts as an oncogene that promotes tumorigenesis and metastasis, while IQGAP2 may have the opposite effect. However, IQGAP3’s function is not very clear and there are few relevant reports. The level expression of IQGAP1 is elevated in many types of cancers, including NSCLC [51], colorectal carcinoma [52], hepatocellular carcinoma [53], thyroid cancer [54], and pancreatic cancer [55]. IQGAP1 plays an important role in cell proliferation, transformation, migration, cell-cell adhesion, and exocytosis through binding to partners including components of the MAPK cascade, β-catenin, Rac1 and Cdc42, E-cadherin, actin, calmodulin, APC, and others [49]. The absence of IQGAP2 in SV129J mice resulted in IQGAP1-dependent development of HCC at about 12 months [56]. Both the IQGAP2 mRNA and IQGAP2 protein levels are downregulated in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [53]. In addition, the expression of IQGPA2 is decreased in hormone-refractory prostate cancer [57]. Therefore, IQGAP2 may act as a tumor suppressor. Recently, Xu et al. have found that the expression of IQGAP3 is upregulated in pancreatic cancer and IQGAP3-regulated pancreatic cancer cell proliferation, apoptosis, metastasis, and Cdc42 pathways.

4.5. Neural Wiskott–Aldrich Syndrome Protein (N-WASP)

Neural Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein (N-WASP), as one member of the WASP family, is widely expressed in all kinds of tissues. N-WASP has some common structural areas with WASP such as GTPase-binding domain/Cdc42 and Rac interactive binding (GBD/CRIB) regions, a proline-rich domain, and a VCA domain. N-WASP can remain inactive because of its auto-inhibiting, folded conformation. Rho GTPase, Cdc42, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2), and other ligands’ interaction with N-WASP can disrupt the autoinhibited conformation and lead to activation of N-WASP. Furthermore, Arp2/3 becomes activated through binding to N-WASP that regulates actin polymerization [58].
Recent studies have shown that N-WASP may have a significant impact on tumor progression and metastasis. Hou et al. [59] have found that the expression of N-WASP is up-regulated in cervical cancer biopsies and cell lines. Additionally, N-WASP overexpression can promote migration and invasion in C33a-R cells, while N-WASP knockdown can suppress migration, invasion, and malignant behaviors in HeLa cells, probably by regulating the activity of the p38 MAPK-signaling pathway. Therefore, they concluded that N-WASP may act as an oncogene in cervical cancer. The expression of N-WASP is up-regulated in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) suggesting that an N-WASP assay may be helpful for the diagnosis of ESCC [60]. It has also been reported that RTVP-1 plays an important role in the migration and invasion of glioma cells through interactions with N-WASP [61]. Interestingly, the expression of N-WASP is down-regulated in breast tumors compared to normal mammary tissues [62]. Lower expression levels of N-WASP may be associated with poor patient prognosis. The function of N-WASP in breast cancer is being further explored. In addition, some N-WASP interaction partners and activators have been reported in breast cancer, such as Cdc42 interaction protein 4 and focal adhesion kinase [63,64]. In conclusion, N-WASP may play dual and cancer-specific roles in tumor progression, and further investigation will be required to elucidate these issues.

4.6. Phosphoinositide 3-Kinases (PI3Ks)

Phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks), as members of the intracellular lipid kinase family, play significant roles in cell proliferation and growth, survival, polarity, apoptosis, and migration. PI3Ks are divided into three classes (I–III): Class I PI3Ks, Class II PI3Ks, and Class III PI3Ks. Class I PI3Ks are grouped into three homologous isoforms: PI3KCA, PI3KCB, and PI3KCD. They encode the highly homologous catalytic subunits p110α, p110β, and p110δ, respectively [65]. Over-activation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway often occurs in human cancers. On one hand, phosphatidyl inositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) is phosphorylated to phosphatidylinositol-3,4,4-trisphosphate (PIP3) by PI3K, which leads to the phosphorylation of Akt. On the other hand, phosphatidyl inositol-3,4,4-trisphosphate (PIP3) is quickly dephosphorylated to phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) under the action of PTEN. The PI3K/AKT signaling pathway has been reviewed recently [66].
PI3KCB is a Class I isoform which is activated by Cdc42 and Rac1 [67]. PI3KCB plays a key role in PTEN-deficient cancers. Recently Wee et al. [68] have found that the inactivation of PIK3CB can significantly suppress tumor growth and PI3K pathway signaling in PTEN-deficient cancers. The authors also found that p110β was the key PI3K isoform that promotes abnormal proliferation and drives the activation of the PI3K pathway in PTEN-deficient cancers. In contrast, PIK3CA depletion did not affect PI3K signaling and cell growth in PTEN-deficient cancer cell lines. PIK3CB (the gene encoding p110β) promotes cancer cell proliferation and tumorigenesis in the absence of mutations, especially in wild-type PIK3CA and PTEN-deficient cancers [69,70]. Furthermore, PIK3CB mutations also have similar effects to E633K and D1067V [71,72]. In addition, the E1051K mutations may occur in lung, breast, esophageal, gastric and renal cancer cells. The p110βE1051K mutation can enhance the catalytic activity of p110β and up-regulate downstream PI3K signaling that raises the level of phosphorylated AKT and S6 compared to wild-type p110β [73]. Pridham et al. [73] found that PIK3CB/p110β plays an important role in cell survival, growth, and activation of AKT/GSK3β in glioblastoma.

5. Small Molecule Inhibitors of Cdc42

There is ample evidence to suggest that Cdc42 is an attractive therapeutic target in cancers. In recent years, innovative drug development has led to the introduction of novel small molecule inhibitors of Cdc42. In this section, we will discuss the discovery, molecular structure, and function of Cdc42 inhibitors in cancer therapy (Table 1).

5.1. ZCL278

In a recent study of the interaction of Cdc42 with intersectin (ITSN, a specific Cdc42 GEF), modeling the 3D structure of the Cdc42–ITSN complex revealed its main binding area [4,93,94]. Additionally, investigators using high-throughput screening have discovered compounds that fit into the groove on the surface of the Cdc42 structure and can play a similar role as ITSN in the binding pocket. Friesland et al. [74] have found that ZCL278 has a broad and favorable interaction with the Cdc42 residues. Their experiments also found that ZCL278 suppressed the activity of Cdc42 by directly binding to the molecule, and inhibited the migration of cultured prostate cancer cells from lines such as PC-3 but did not disrupt cell viability. ZCL278, as a Cdc42-selective small molecule inhibitor, also can suppress cellular invasion and migration in pancreatic cancer cell lines [95].

5.2. Secramine

Natural products, such as brefeldin A, have a significant role in the study of biological processes. Therefore, a complex natural products library was assembled of small molecules resembling galanthamine that have similar functions. A fast-acting compound found in these natural products, secramine (named because of similarities to the yeast sec mutant) was screened via a cell-based phenotypic assay and was found to be able to inhibit protein trafficking from the Golgi apparatus to the plasma membrane in monkey kidney epithelial (BS-C-1) cells and to inhibit the actin polymerization in Xenopus laevis cytoplasmic egg extract [75,76]. Secramines A and B inhibited the activation of Cdc42 through reducing the membrane association of prenylated Cdc42(GDP) in Cdc42(GDP)–RhoGDI1 in a complex fashion. However, secramine C does not share this feature. Therefore, Cdc42 and its association with RhoGDI1 is the target of secramines A and B. Secramine A suppressed the binding of Cdc42 to Golgi membranes and interfered with Golgi polarization of migrating cells.

5.3. CASIN

CASIN, formerly known as Pirl1, is a small molecule that acts as an inhibitor of Cdc42. Pirl1 was discovered in screening with PIP2-induced actin polymerization through a new method based on the functional suppression of chemical inhibition in vitro [78,79,96]. Peterson et al. [77] found that Pirl1 was able to inhibit nucleotide exchange on Cdc42. Furthermore, CASIN is used to treat cells in many experiments: 7 μM CASIN can suppress cytokinesis to a great extent and 20 μM can effectively kill HeLa cells within 24 h [96]. There is evidence that CASIN treatment reverts aged LT-HSC (long-term hematopoietic stem cell) to young HSCs in terms of the polar phenotype as a selective small molecule inhibitor of Cdc42 [97].

5.4. AZA197 and AZA1

AZA197 and AZA1 were both identified through in vitro screening of small molecule inhibitors according to modifications of NSC23766 (a specific inhibitor of GEFs binding to Rac) [98]. AZA197 can specifically inhibit Cdc42 activity through disrupting the interaction between Cdc42 and GEFs. Furthermore, Zins et al. [80] documented that AZA197 suppressed proliferation, migration, and invasion in HT-29 colon cancer cell lines and induced cancer growth in mice with human SW620 colon cancer xenografts [81]. AZA1 downregulates Rac1 and Cdc42 activity in PC-3 human prostate cancer cells and inhibits the proliferation and migration of those cells as well as decreasing formation of lamellipodia and filopodia in which Cdc42 and Rac1 play a crucial role [81]. Moreover, both AZA197 and AZA1 are able to inhibit corresponding tumor growth and increase survival in mice bearing human SW620 colon cancer xenografts [80].

5.5. ML141

ML141, also named CID2950007, was found to be a novel and selective Cdc42 inhibitor through high throughput screening in the Molecular Libraries Screening Center Network (MLSCN) library [82]. ML141 is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-related compound and its analog, CID44216842, can inhibit Cdc42 activity by specifically blocking its GTP binding domain [84]. CID2950007 is a noncompetitive Cdc42 inhibitor. Furthermore, Hong et al. [83] reported that CID2950007 was able to inhibit the migration of OVCA429 ovarian cancer cells and decrease Cdc42 activity in breast cancer cell lines such as MCF-7, SKBR3, and MDA-MB-231. In addition, naproxen (a widely used NSAID), was also found to inhibit Cdc42 activity in a dose-dependent manner in Swiss 3T3 cells, achieving a maximum effect at 300 μM, a concentration equivalent to 10 μM ML141/CID2950007 [99].

5.6. PAK1-Specific Inhibitors

A series of FRAXs (486, 597, and 1036) were identified through high-throughput screening in the small molecules library using the structure-activity relationship approach. They are all small molecule inhibitors of group I PAKs (PAK1, PAK2, and PAK3) that act by directly binding to ATP. FRAX486 decreases hyperactivity and stereotypical movements and reduces audiogenic seizures in Fmr1 KO mice (knock out of fragile X mental retardation 1 gene: the mice show similar symptoms to Fragile X syndrome in humans, including seizures and hyperactivity) [85].
FRAX597 can suppress proliferation, migration, invasion, and survival in PANC-1, MiaPaCa-2, and BxPC-3 human pancreatic cancer cell lines and has a synergistic effect with gemcitabine in inhibiting the growth of pancreatic cancer in vitro and in vivo [86]. FRAX597 also inhibits SC4 cell (Schwannoma cell) proliferation in vitro through suppressing Group I PAKs and reduces tumor formation in neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) [87]. When combined with docetaxel, FRAX1036 synergistically inhibited microtubule function and induced apoptotic markers in MDA-MB-175breast cancer cells [88]. Although FRAXs are very good inhibitors of Group I PAKs and have good effects on some diseases and tumors, the disadvantages of FRAXs are also very obvious, and include poor bioavailability and cell-permeability as well as side effects caused by inhibition of PAK2 or PAK3. Thus, novel PAK1-specific inhibitors that have been developed recently (such as G-5555 [89], NOV-3 [90,91], and AZ137-05339 [92]) have advantages over FRAXs for development in clinical therapeutics.

6. The Role of MicroRNAs in Cancer by Targeting Cdc42

MicroRNAs are small short non-coding RNA molecules with 20–24 nucleotides. They were first found in 1993. MicroRNAs are involved in many different kinds of fundamental cellular processes, including cell proliferation, cell cycle regulation, cell death, differentiation, and other functions. Most microRNAs regulate mRNA expression by binding to target mRNA 3’ untranslated regions (UTRs) through base pairing, which then results in mRNA degradation or blockage of mRNA translation [100]. MicroRNAs are short, single RNA strands that can target many mRNAs; at the same time any mRNA may have several sites allowing binding to different microRNAs. In recent years, it has been reported that microRNAs are closely related to cancer. It is now recognized that microRNAs play a significant role in carcinogenesis and progression by inducing angiogenesis, activating invasion and metastasis, reprogramming energy metabolism, evading immune destruction, and other actions [101]. Many studies have reported that Cdc42 is regulated by various microRNAs in cancer. A summary of the interactions between microRNAs and Cdc42 and its downstream effectors/adaptors is given in Table 2.

6.1. The Role of MicroRNAs in Lung Cancer by Targeting Cdc42

There are two types of lung cancer: small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and NSCLC. More than 80% are NSCLC, including squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and large cell carcinomas of three histological types. Chen et al. [122] reported that overexpression of Cdc42 is widespread in patients with primary lung cancer, and that the expression level of Cdc42 can be utilized as a prognostic marker for NSCLC metastasis. Furthermore, Li et al. [102] found that miR-29a expression levels in NSCLC tissues were significantly lower than in other non-cancer lung tissues and that miR-29a inhibited cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in these tissues by targeting Cdc42. Both nucleotides 578–584 and 997–1004 of the mRNA 3’UTR of Cdc42 have a common base 5’…UGGUGCU..., while miRNA-29a has a short base 3’…ACCACGA… [102]. Then miR-29a can bind to the mRNA of Cdc42 by base complementation and affect the function of Cdc42 in patients with NSCLC. Cdc42 also can regulate cell polarity and metastasis by affecting the formation of cellular filopodia [123]. By directly targeting the seed sequence of the Cdc42 3’UTR, miR-186 can reduce the protein expression of Cdc42 moieties and reduce metastasis of NSCLC [103]. Dacic et al. [124] reported that miRNA-137 expression was down-regulated in lung adenocarcinomas more than 20-fold compared to normal lung tissue. Furthermore, miR-137 directly targeted 3’UTR of Cdc42 and Cdk6 and negatively regulates Cdc42 and Cdk6 to inhibit cell proliferation and induce cell cycle arrest in G1 in NSCLC cells [104]. In addition, down-regulation of miR-25 contributes significantly to inhibition of cell proliferation, and to enhance chemosensitivity to cisplatin, as well as to induce cell cycle (G1) arrest in A549 cells by targeting Cdc42 [105].

6.2. The Role of MicroRNAs in Breast Cancer by Targeting Cdc42

The most common types of cancer in women are breast cancers, one of the major causes of death in females throughout the world [125]. According to previous research, CdcC42 induces invasiveness and metastatic activity by breast cancer cells [126]. MiR-29a can precipitate cell cycle G0/G1 arrest and suppress breast cancer cell growth through direct targeting of Cdc42 [106]. Chou et al. [107] found that miR-1 can bind to the Cdc42 3’UTR and suppress it, and thus play an important role in inducing metastasis in breast cancer. Additionally, they discovered that MALAT1 influenced the expression of Cdc42 by binding miR-1 competitively. There were ceRNA networks that co-regulated cell migration and invasion in breast cancer patients by MALALT1, miR-1 and Cdc42 [107].

6.3. The Role of MicroRNA-195 Targeting of Cdc42 in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC)

Histologically, more than 90% of esophageal cancers are squamous cell carcinomas (ESCC) [127]. Expression of Cdc42 is increased in human ESCC tissues [127]. Mir-195 can suppress the expression of Cdc42 in ESCC cell lines by directly targeting its 3’UTR and inhibiting the Cdc42/ERK/Cyclin D1 signaling pathways [108]. Sun et al. [109] reported that the miR-195-Cdc42 axis was significantly involved in the progression of ESCC and that the expression of miR-195 and Cdc42 could be used as a prognostic biomarker for these cancers.

6.4. The Role of MicroRNAs in Gastric Cancer by Targeting Cdc42

Gastric cancer ranks as the second leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide [128]. Expression of Cdc42 is significantly increased in gastric cancer tissues and is associated with post-transcriptional regulation [112]. The expression of ectopic miR-137 can significantly suppress cell growth and influence cell apoptosis and cell cycles in gastric cancer cell lines such as AGS and MKN45 [111]. Yet the expression of miR-137 is decreased in AGS and MKN45 cell lines and negatively regulates Cdc42 by targeting its 3’UTR [111]. However, it is not clear that miR-137 functions in gastric cancer by targeting Cdc42. Cheng et al. [112] found that miR-133 inhibited the expression of Cdc42 by directly and specifically binding to its 3’UTR and then suppressing the Cdc42/PAK pathway, remarkably impeding the growth, migration and invasiveness of gastric cancer cells.

6.5. The Role of MicroRNAs in Colorectal Cancer by Targeting Cdc42

Colorectal cancer is one of the common malignant cancers and also one of the leading causes of death in the world today. Overexpression of Cdc42 was found in colorectal cells [129], and Cdc42 activation is thought to be one of the keys to the malignant progression of human colorectal cancer with increased cellular invasiveness [117,130]. Additionally, miR-18a can inhibit the expression level of Cdc42 through directly targeting its 3’UTR, thus decreasing cellular proliferation and migration and leading to G1/S phase arrest of the cell cycle, altering morphology and increasing apoptosis in CRC cells [113]. Liu et al. [114] found that miR-137 inhibits Cdc42 expression and the Cdc42/PAK signaling pathway by binding to the 3’UTR of Cdc42 in colorectal cancer cells, negatively regulating their invasiveness and proliferation. Studies have also suggested that miR-185 can downregulate the activity and function of RhoA and Cdc42 by targeting sites in the RhoA and Cdc42 3’UTR, which then can suppress the proliferation and invasiveness of the colorectal cancer cells [115]. The main cause of death from CRC is metastasis, with 70% of metastatic lesions occurring in the liver [131,132]. Recent studies have indicated that miR-384 can suppress the invasiveness and metastatic activity of CRC cells by downregulating expression of KRAS and Cdc42 by targeting their 3’UTR [116]. It has also been reported that miR-224 can decrease Cdc42 expression and inhibit filamentous actin-mediated cell migration by binding to the 3’UTR pf Cdc42, and thus regulate CRC metastasis [117].

6.6. The Role of MicroRNAs in the Downstream Signaling Pathways of Cdc42

PAK1, MLC, ERK1/2 and Cyclin D1 are the downstream effectors of Cdc42. The expression of the PAKs can be seen in all sorts of tissues and plays an essential role in promoting tumorigenesis in various human neoplasms including breast cancer [40]. PAK 1, as an oncogene in breast cancer, plays an essential role in cell proliferation, colony formation, and motility. MiR-497 can downregulate the expression of PAK1 by directly and specifically targeting its 3’UTR in breast cancer cells [118]. Other microRNAs, including miR-7, also have similar functions [119]. Ectopic expression of miR-137 decreases phosphorylation levels of PAK1, MLC and ERK1/2 and inhibits expression of Cyclin D1 in colorectal cancer cell lines [114]. Additionally, miR-195 reduces the phosphorylation levels of ERK1/2 and suppresses the expression of cyclin D1 in cell lines derived from esophageal squamous cell cancer [108].
MLK3 is another downstream effector of Cdc42. It is upregulated in several types of cancer and promotes cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and metastatic disease [133,134]. MiR-199-5p can decrease the expression of MLK3 by directly targeting its 3’UTR and it thus can suppress the MLK3/IκB/NF-κB signaling pathway in bladder urothelial carcinoma [120]. Ack1, as a downstream effector of Cdc42, has a significant role in promoting cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in a variety of human neoplasms such as hepatocellular carcinomas [135], breast cancers [21], and osteosarcomas [121]. MiR-24 suppresses Ack1 expression by directly targeting the 3’ UTR of Ack1 mRNA and significantly inhibiting the migration and invasiveness of osteosarcoma cell [121].

6.7. The Role of MicroRNA-224 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Targeting Cdc42

Hepatocyte-specific Cdc42 knockout mice showed hepatomegaly, slow growth, and chronic jaundice and frequently developed hepatocellular carcinomas at 8 months of age [136]. It has been suggested that these changes occurred because Cdc42 significantly affects the establishment of cell polarity, cell-to-cell adhesion, and spindle orientation in adherent cells. Spindle misorientation can occur with knockdown of Cdc42 without affecting cellular polarity, and these cells cannot divide and make daughter cells that will attach to the substratum [137]. Zhang et al. [110] found that overexpression of miR-224 could promote viability and migration in HCC cells, which decreased the expression of Cdc42, CDH1, and PAK2 and increased the expression of BCL-2.

7. Concluding Remarks and Perspectives

It is clear that Cdc42 and its signaling pathways play important roles in tumor invasion, metastasis, and proliferation. Therefore, Cdc42 is a therapeutic target for treatment of cancer. However, there are still problems that limit the utility of Cdc42 targeting. Some regulators (GAPs, GEFs, and GDIs) are not specific to Cdc42, and it does not exclusively activate all its downstream effector/adaptor proteins. For example, Rac1 can also activate ACK1, PAKs, MLK3, IQGAPs, and PI3Ks. These findings suggest that drugs targeting Cdc42 may have to be used in combination with other agents in order to get good therapeutic effects. Also, there are still some controversies over tissue-specific effects, as some studies have shown that Cdc42 can promote the progression of hepatic cancer. The prevailing explanation for this is that Cdc42 may play different roles in cancer formation depending on temporal and spatial factors, but this conclusion remains controversial. Moreover, some drugs targeting Cdc42 effector molecules have proven to be effective in vitro but to have poor therapeutic effects in experimental animal models, representing another challenge to drug development for targeted Cdc42 treatment of cancer.
Small molecules have many advantages in the treatment of cancer, such as their being fast acting, highly specific, and having excellent pharmacokinetic properties. For example, FRAX486 can reverse symptoms after the onset of cancer; the fast-acting small molecule can pass through the blood–brain barrier (BBB) easily and remaining in the brain for 24 h [85]. In addition, downstream effector protein PAK1 (the target of FRAX597) is only expressed in the pancreatic cancer tissues, not in normal tissue; the administration of this small molecule can specifically act on cancerous tissue and reduce the side effects of damaging normal tissue [86].
Thus far, it appears that the therapeutic potential of small molecules to inhibit Cdc42 has been relatively underestimated, mainly due to the lack of medications specifically targeted to Cdc42. However, modern drug design and development efforts have discovered some small-molecule inhibitors of Cdc42, such as ZCL278, Secramine, CASIN, ML141, AZA197, and AZA1. Yet their specificity and cell permeability are still poor, and untoward side effects have occurred. Therefore, these small-molecule inhibitors do not approach our ultimate goal of use in hospital beds or homes for their clinical applications.
MicroRNAs play important roles in the progression and metastasis of a variety of cancers including lung cancer, breast cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric cancer, and colorectal cancer. Therefore, targeting miRNAs may offer a very effective treatment for cancer. Recent research shows that dietary phytochemicals may suppress the development and progression of cancers by modulating miRNA expression [138]. For example, sulforaphane can increase miR-140 expression and decrease miR-29a and miR-21 expression in breast cancer stem-like cells, leading to the inhibition of breast cancer stem-like cells [139,140]; epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) can decrease miR-210 expression through upregulating hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1a) expression in lung cancer cells, which ultimately represses lung cancer cell growth [141]. Although it is reported that dietary phytochemicals play a critical role in the treatment of cancer by regulating miRNA expression, this pathway is still a long way from clinical application.
In recent years, post-transcriptional regulation by microRNAs has come to be regarded as an unconventional mechanism for regulating Cdc42, and application of competitive endogenous messenger RNA (ceRNA) has been proposed. It is known that long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) can bind directly to common microRNAs, affecting the transcription of other mRNAs. Obviously, this offers a very important strategy for the development of anti-cancer drugs. For example, MALAT1 as a type of lncRNA can promote breast cancer cell migration and invasion through competitively binding miR-1 with Cdc42 [107].
In summary, Cdc42 is a potentially valuable therapeutic target for anti-cancer therapy and offers a very promising avenue for research focused on specific Cdc42 inhibition and/or combination treatment strategies.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31660287).

Author Contributions

Xing-Hua Xiao contributed the Section 2: The Expression of Cdc42 in Cancer and Section 5: Small Molecule Inhibitors of Cdc42. Lin-Chen Lv contributed the Section 3: Regulators of Cdc42 and Table 1. Jing Duan contributed the Section 4: Downstream Effector/Adaptor Proteins of Cdc42 in Cancer. Ye-Meng Wu contributed the Table 2. Shu-Jin He contributed the Section 6: The Role of MicroRNAs in Cancer by Targeting Cdc42. Zhen-Zhen Hu contributed the Section 1: Introduction. Li-Xia Xiong contributed the Section 7: Concluding Remarks and Perspectives.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Melendez, J.; Grogg, M.; Zheng, Y. Signaling role of Cdc42 in regulating mammalian physiology. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 2375–2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cotteret, S.; Chernoff, J. The evolutionary history of effectors downstream of Cdc42 and Rac. Genome Biol. 2002, 3, Reviews0002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Arias-Romero, L.E.; Chernoff, J. Targeting Cdc42 in cancer. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2013, 17, 1263–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ahmad, K.F.; Lim, W.A. The minimal autoinhibited unit of the guanine nucleotide exchange factor intersectin. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, M.; Bi, F.; Zhou, X.; Zheng, Y. Rho gtpase regulation by mirnas and covalent modifications. Trends Cell Biol. 2012, 22, 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Forbes, S.A.; Beare, D.; Boutselakis, H.; Bamford, S.; Bindal, N.; Tate, J.; Cole, C.G.; Ward, S.; Dawson, E.; Ponting, L.; et al. Cosmic: Somatic cancer genetics at high-resolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D777–D783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hodis, E.; Watson, I.R.; Kryukov, G.V.; Arold, S.T.; Imielinski, M.; Theurillat, J.P.; Nickerson, E.; Auclair, D.; Li, L.; Place, C.; et al. A landscape of driver mutations in melanoma. Cell 2012, 150, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Fidyk, N.; Wang, J.B.; Cerione, R.A. Influencing cellular transformation by modulating the rates of gtp hydrolysis by Cdc42. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 7750–7762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Chandrashekar, R.; Salem, O.; Krizova, H.; Mcfeeters, R.; Adams, P.D. A switch I mutant of Cdc42 exhibits decreased conformational freedom. Biochemistry 2011, 50, 6196–6207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Aguilar, B.J.; Zhou, H.; Lu, Q. Cdc42 signaling pathway inhibition as a therapeutic target in ras- related cancers. Curr. Med. Chem. 2017, 24, 3485–3507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Smith, G.R.; Givan, S.A.; Cullen, P.; Sprague, G.F., Jr. Gtpase-activating proteins for Cdc42. Eukaryot. Cell 2002, 1, 469–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Itoh, R.E.; Kurokawa, K.; Ohba, Y.; Yoshizaki, H.; Mochizuki, N.; Matsuda, M. Activation of Rac and Cdc42 video imaged by fluorescent resonance energy transfer-based single-molecule probes in the membrane of living cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002, 22, 6582–6591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rameh, L.E.; Arvidsson, A.; Carraway, K.L., 3rd; Couvillon, A.D.; Rathbun, G.; Crompton, A.; VanRenterghem, B.; Czech, M.P.; Ravichandran, K.S.; Burakoff, S.J.; et al. A comparative analysis of the phosphoinositide binding specificity of pleckstrin homology domains. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 22059–22066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bishop, A.L.; Hall, A. Rho gtpases and their effector proteins. Biochem. J. 2000, 348, 241–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rose, A.S.; Bradley, A.R.; Valasatava, Y.; Duarte, J.M.; Prlić, A.; Rose, P.W. Web-based molecular graphics for large complexes. In Proceedings of the ACM 21st International Conference on Web3D Technology, Anaheim, CA, USA, 22–24 July 2016; pp. 185–186. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hoffman, G.R.; Nassar, N.; Cerione, R.A. Structure of the rho family gtp-binding protein Cdc42 in complex with the multifunctional regulator rhogdi. Cell 2000, 100, 345–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mahajan, K.; Challa, S.; Coppola, D.; Lawrence, H.; Luo, Y.; Gevariya, H.; Zhu, W.; Chen, Y.A.; Lawrence, N.J.; Mahajan, N.P. Effect of ACK1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor on ligand-independent androgen receptor activity. Prostate 2010, 70, 1274–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mahajan, N.P.; Liu, Y.; Majumder, S.; Warren, M.R.; Parker, C.E.; Mohler, J.L.; Earp, H.S.; Whang, Y.E. Activated Cdc42-associated kinase ACK1 promotes prostate cancer progression via androgen receptor tyrosine phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 8438–8443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mahajan, N.P.; Whang, Y.E.; Mohler, J.L.; Earp, H.S. Activated tyrosine kinase ACK1 promotes prostate tumorigenesis: Role of ACK1 in polyubiquitination of tumor suppressor WWOX. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 10514–10523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Howlin, J.; Rosenkvist, J.; Andersson, T. TNK2 preserves epidermal growth factor receptor expression on the cell surface and enhances migration and invasion of human breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res. BCR 2008, 10, R36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Van der Horst, E.H.; Degenhardt, Y.Y.; Strelow, A.; Slavin, A.; Chinn, L.; Orf, J.; Rong, M.; Li, S.; See, L.H.; Nguyen, K.Q.C.; et al. Metastatic properties and genomic amplification of the tyrosine kinase gene ACK1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 15901–15906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, J.; Rix, U.; Fang, B.; Bai, Y.; Edwards, A.; Colinge, J.; Bennett, K.L.; Gao, J.; Song, L.; Eschrich, S.; et al. A chemical and phosphoproteomic characterization of dasatinib action in lung cancer. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2010, 6, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Prieto-Echague, V.; Gucwa, A.; Craddock, B.P.; Brown, D.A.; Miller, W.T. Cancer-associated mutations activate the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase ACK1. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 10605–10615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hu, L.; Xu, J.; Yin, M.X.; Zhang, L.; Lu, Y.; Wu, W.; Xue, Z.; Ho, M.S.; Gao, G.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Ack promotes tissue growth via phosphorylation and suppression of the hippo pathway component expanded. Cell Discov. 2016, 2, 15047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yang, Z.; Wang, H.; Xia, L.; Oyang, L.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, B.; Chen, X.; Luo, X.; Liao, Q.; Liang, J. Overexpression of PAK1 correlates with aberrant expression of emt markers and poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer. J. Cancer 2017, 8, 1484–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Al-Azayzih, A.; Gao, F.; Somanath, P.R. P21 activated kinase-1 mediates transforming growth factor Beta1-induced prostate cancer cell epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1853, 1229–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wang, G.; Zhang, Q.; Song, Y.; Wang, X.; Guo, Q.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Han, Y.; Miao, Z.; Li, F. Pak1 regulates RUFY3-mediated gastric cancer cell migration and invasion. Cell Death Dis. 2015, 6, e1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wang, G.; Song, Y.; Liu, T.; Wang, C.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, F.; Cai, X.; Miao, Z.; Xu, H.; Xu, H.; et al. PAK1-mediated MORC2 phosphorylation promotes gastric tumorigenesis. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 9877–9886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Al-Maghrabi, J.; Emam, E.; Gomaa, W.; Al-Qaydy, D.; Al-Maghrabi, B.; Buhmeida, A.; Abuzenadah, A.; Al-Qahtani, M.; Al-Ahwal, M. Overexpression of PAK-1 is an independent predictor of disease recurrence in colorectal carcinoma. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 8, 15895–15902. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Parvathy, M.; Sreeja, S.; Kumar, R.; Pillai, M.R. Potential role of p21 activated kinase 1 (PAK1) in the invasion and motility of oral cancer cells. BMC Cancer 2016, 16 (Suppl. S1), 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Yanase, S.; Luo, Y.; Maruta, H. PAK1-deficiency/down-regulation reduces brood size, activates HSP16.2 gene and extends lifespan in caenorhabditis elegans. Drug Discov. Ther. 2013, 7, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Maruta, H. Herbal therapeutics that block the oncogenic kinase PAK1: A practical approach towards PAK1-dependent diseases and longevity. Phytother. Res. PTR 2014, 28, 656–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gao, C.; Ma, T.; Pang, L.; Xie, R. Activation of P21-activated protein kinase 2 is an independent prognostic predictor for patients with gastric cancer. Diagn. Pathol. 2014, 9, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Deng, W.W.; Wu, L.; Bu, L.L.; Liu, J.F.; Li, Y.C.; Ma, S.R.; Yu, G.T.; Mao, L.; Zhang, W.F.; Sun, Z.J. PAK2 promotes migration and proliferation of salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinoma. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2016, 8, 3387–3397. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Flate, E.; Stalvey, J.R. Motility of select ovarian cancer cell lines: Effect of extra-cellular matrix proteins and the involvement of PAK2. Int. J. Oncol. 2014, 45, 1401–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhou, N.; Ding, B.; Agler, M.; Cockett, M.; McPhee, F. Lethality of PAK3 and SGK2 shrnas to human papillomavirus positive cervical cancer cells is independent of PAK3 and SGK2 knockdown. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0117357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tse, E.Y.; Ching, Y.P. The role of P21-activated kinases in hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis. J. Mol. Signal. 2014, 9, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. O’Sullivan, G.C.; Tangney, M.; Casey, G.; Ambrose, M.; Houston, A.; Barry, O.P. Modulation of P21-activated kinase 1 alters the behavior of renal cell carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 2007, 121, 1930–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Deacon, S.W.; Beeser, A.; Fukui, J.A.; Rennefahrt, U.E.; Myers, C.; Chernoff, J.; Peterson, J.R. An isoform-selective, small-molecule inhibitor targets the autoregulatory mechanism of P21-activated kinase. Chem. Biol. 2008, 15, 322–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. King, H.; Nicholas, N.S.; Wells, C.M. Role of P-21-activated kinases in cancer progression. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2014, 309, 347–387. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  41. Parekh, P.; Rao, K.V. Overexpression of cyclin d1 is associated with elevated levels of map kinases, Akt and PAK1 during diethylnitrosamine-induced progressive liver carcinogenesis. Cell Biol. Int. 2007, 31, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Rattanasinchai, C.; Gallo, K.A. MLK3 signaling in cancer invasion. Cancers 2016, 8, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhang, J.; Wang, J.; Guo, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Peng, H.; Cheng, M.; Zhao, D.; Li, F. LCH-7749944, a novel and potent P21-activated kinase 4 inhibitor, suppresses proliferation and invasion in human gastric cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2012, 317, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chen, J.; Miller, E.M.; Gallo, K.A. MLK3 is critical for breast cancer cell migration and promotes a malignant phenotype in mammary epithelial cells. Oncogene 2010, 29, 4399–4411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Rattanasinchai, C.; Llewellyn, B.J.; Conrad, S.E.; Gallo, K.A. MLK3 regulates FRA-1 and mmps to drive invasion and transendothelial migration in triple-negative breast cancer cells. Oncogenesis 2017, 6, e345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Lin, C.H.; Yu, M.C.; Tung, W.H.; Chen, T.T.; Yu, C.C.; Weng, C.M.; Tsai, Y.J.; Bai, K.J.; Hong, C.Y.; Chien, M.H.; et al. Connective tissue growth factor induces collagen I expression in human lung fibroblasts through the RAC1/MLK3/JNK/AP-1 pathway. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1833, 2823–2833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Blessing, N.A.; Brockman, A.L.; Chadee, D.N. The E3 ligase chip mediates ubiquitination and degradation of mixed-lineage kinase 3. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2014, 34, 3132–3143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zhan, Y.; Abi Saab, W.F.; Modi, N.; Stewart, A.M.; Liu, J.; Chadee, D.N. Mixed lineage kinase 3 is required for matrix metalloproteinase expression and invasion in ovarian cancer cells. Exp. Cell Res. 2012, 318, 1641–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Elliott, S.F.; Allen, G.; Timson, D.J. Biochemical analysis of the interactions of IQGAP1 c-terminal domain with Cdc42. World J. Biol.Chem. 2012, 3, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. White, C.D.; Brown, M.D.; Sacks, D.B. Iqgaps in cancer: A family of scaffold proteins underlying tumorigenesis. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583, 1817–1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Zhao, H.; Xie, C.; Lin, X.; Zhao, Y.; Han, Y.; Fan, C.; Zhang, X.; Du, J.; Han, Y.; Han, Q.; et al. Coexpression of iq-domain gtpase-activating protein 1 (IQGAP1) and dishevelled (DVL) is correlated with poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e113713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Rotoli, D.; Morales, M.; Maeso, M.D.C.; Garcia, M.D.P.; Gutierrez, R.; Valladares, F.; Avila, J.; Diaz-Flores, L.; Mobasheri, A.; Martin-Vasallo, P. Alterations in IQGAP1 expression and localization in colorectal carcinoma and liver metastases following oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 14, 2621–2628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. White, C.D.; Khurana, H.; Gnatenko, D.V.; Li, Z.; Odze, R.D.; Sacks, D.B.; Schmidt, V.A. IQGAP1 and IQGAP2 are reciprocally altered in hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010, 10, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Liu, Z.; Liu, D.; Bojdani, E.; El-Naggar, A.K.; Vasko, V.; Xing, M. IQGAP1 plays an important role in the invasiveness of thyroid cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010, 16, 6009–6018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wang, X.X.; Li, X.Z.; Zhai, L.Q.; Liu, Z.R.; Chen, X.J.; Pei, Y. Overexpression of IQGAP1 in human pancreatic cancer. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Dis. Int. 2013, 12, 540–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Schmidt, V.A.; Chiariello, C.S.; Capilla, E.; Miller, F.; Bahou, W.F. Development of hepatocellular carcinoma in IQGAP2-deficient mice is iqgap1 dependent. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008, 28, 1489–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ouyang, X.; Jessen, W.J.; Al-Ahmadie, H.; Serio, A.M.; Lin, Y.; Shih, W.J.; Reuter, V.E.; Scardino, P.T.; Shen, M.M.; Aronow, B.J.; et al. Activator protein-1 transcription factors are associated with progression and recurrence of prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 2132–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Frugtniet, B.; Jiang, W.G.; Martin, T.A. Role of the wasp and wave family proteins in breast cancer invasion and metastasis. Breast Cancer (Dove Med. Press) 2015, 7, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  59. Hou, J.; Yang, H.; Huang, X.; Leng, X.; Zhou, F.; Xie, C.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, Y. N-wasp promotes invasion and migration of cervical cancer cells through regulating P38 mapks signaling pathway. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2017, 9, 403–415. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  60. Wang, W.S.; Zhong, H.J.; Xiao, D.W.; Huang, X.; Liao, L.D.; Xie, Z.F.; Xu, X.E.; Shen, Z.Y.; Xu, L.Y.; Li, E.M. The expression of CFL1 and N-WASP in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and its correlation with clinicopathological features. Dis. Esophagus 2010, 23, 512–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Ziv-Av, A.; Giladi, N.D.; Lee, H.K.; Cazacu, S.; Finniss, S.; Xiang, C.; Pauker, M.H.; Barda-Saad, M.; Poisson, L.; Brodie, C. RTVP-1 regulates glioma cell migration and invasion via interaction with N-WASP and HNRNPK. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 19826–19840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Martin, T.A.; Pereira, G.; Watkins, G.; Mansel, R.E.; Jiang, W.G. N-WASP is a putative tumour suppressor in breast cancer cells, in vitro and in vivo, and is associated with clinical outcome in patients with breast cancer. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2008, 25, 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Pichot, C.S.; Arvanitis, C.; Hartig, S.M.; Jensen, S.A.; Bechill, J.; Marzouk, S.; Yu, J.; Frost, J.A.; Corey, S.J. Cdc42-interacting protein 4 promotes breast cancer cell invasion and formation of invadopodia through activation of N-WASP. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 8347–8356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Sanchez, A.M.; Flamini, M.I.; Baldacci, C.; Goglia, L.; Genazzani, A.R.; Simoncini, T. Estrogen receptor-alpha promotes breast cancer cell motility and invasion via focal adhesion kinase and N-WASP. Mol. Endocrinol. 2010, 24, 2114–2125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Engelman, J.A.; Luo, J.; Cantley, L.C. The evolution of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases as regulators of growth and metabolism. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2006, 7, 606–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Rodgers, S.J.; Ferguson, D.T.; Mitchell, C.A.; Ooms, L.M. Regulation of PI3K effector signalling in cancer by the phosphoinositide phosphatases. Biosci. Rep. 2017, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Fritsch, R.; de Krijger, I.; Fritsch, K.; George, R.; Reason, B.; Kumar, M.S.; Diefenbacher, M.; Stamp, G.; Downward, J. RAS and RHO families of gtpases directly regulate distinct phosphoinositide 3-kinase isoforms. Cell 2013, 153, 1050–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Wee, S.; Wiederschain, D.; Maira, S.M.; Loo, A.; Miller, C.; deBeaumont, R.; Stegmeier, F.; Yao, Y.M.; Lengauer, C. Pten-deficient cancers depend on PIK3CB. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 13057–13062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Jia, S.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, S.; Liu, P.; Zhang, L.; Lee, S.H.; Zhang, J.; Signoretti, S.; Loda, M.; Roberts, T.M.; et al. Kinase-dependent and -independent functions of the p110β phosphoinositide-3-kinase in cell growth, metabolic regulation and oncogenic transformation. Nature 2008, 454, 776–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Dbouk, H.A.; Khalil, B.D.; Wu, H.; Shymanets, A.; Nurnberg, B.; Backer, J.M. Characterization of a tumor-associated activating mutation of the P110beta PI 3-kinase. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e63833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Pazarentzos, E.; Giannikopoulos, P.; Hrustanovic, G.; St John, J.; Olivas, V.R.; Gubens, M.A.; Balassanian, R.; Weissman, J.; Polkinghorn, W.; Bivona, T.G. Oncogenic activation of the PI3-kinase P110beta isoform via the tumor-derived Pik3cbeta(d1067v) kinase domain mutation. Oncogene 2016, 35, 1198–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Whale, A.D.; Colman, L.; Lensun, L.; Rogers, H.L.; Shuttleworth, S.J. Functional characterization of a novel somatic oncogenic mutation of PIK3CB. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2017, 2, 17063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Pridham, K.J.; Le, L.; Guo, S.; Varghese, R.T.; Algino, S.; Liang, Y.; Fajardin, R.; Rodgers, C.M.; Simonds, G.R.; Kelly, D.F.; et al. Pik3CB/p110beta is a selective survival factor for glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Friesland, A.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, Y.H.; Wang, L.; Zhou, H.; Lu, Q. Small molecule targeting Cdc42-intersectin interaction disrupts golgi organization and suppresses cell motility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 1261–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Pelish, H.E.; Westwood, N.J.; Feng, Y.; Kirchhausen, T.; Shair, M.D. Use of biomimetic diversity-oriented synthesis to discover galanthamine-like molecules with biological properties beyond those of the natural product. J. A. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6740–6741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Pelish, H.E.; Peterson, J.R.; Salvarezza, S.B.; Rodriguez-Boulan, E.; Chen, J.L.; Stamnes, M.; Macia, E.; Feng, Y.; Shair, M.D.; Kirchhausen, T. Secramine inhibits cdc42-dependent functions in cells and Cdc42 activation in vitro. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006, 2, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Peterson, J.R.; Lebensohn, A.M.; Pelish, H.E.; Kirschner, M.W. Biochemical suppression of small-molecule inhibitors: A strategy to identify inhibitor targets and signaling pathway components. Chem. Biol. 2006, 13, 443–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Peterson, J.R.; Bickford, L.C.; Morgan, D.; Kim, A.S.; Ouerfelli, O.; Kirschner, M.W.; Rosen, M.K. Chemical inhibition of N-WASP by stabilization of a native autoinhibited conformation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004, 11, 747–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Peterson, J.R.; Lokey, R.S.; Mitchison, T.J.; Kirschner, M.W. A chemical inhibitor of N-WASP reveals a new mechanism for targeting protein interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 10624–10629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Zins, K.; Gunawardhana, S.; Lucas, T.; Abraham, D.; Aharinejad, S. Targeting Cdc42 with the small molecule drug AZA197 suppresses primary colon cancer growth and prolongs survival in a preclinical mouse xenograft model by downregulation of pak1 activity. J. Transl. Med. 2013, 11, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Zins, K.; Lucas, T.; Reichl, P.; Abraham, D.; Aharinejad, S. A RAC1/Cdc42 gtpase-specific small molecule inhibitor suppresses growth of primary human prostate cancer xenografts and prolongs survival in mice. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e74924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Surviladze, Z.; Waller, A.; Strouse, J.J.; Bologa, C.; Ursu, O.; Salas, V.; Parkinson, J.F.; Phillips, G.K.; Romero, E.; Wandinger-Ness, A.; et al. A potent and selective inhibitor of Cdc42 GTPase. In Probe Reports from the Nih Molecular Libraries Program; National Center for Biotechnology Information (US): Bethesda, MD, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  83. Hong, L.; Kenney, S.R.; Phillips, G.K.; Simpson, D.; Schroeder, C.E.; Noth, J.; Romero, E.; Swanson, S.; Waller, A.; Strouse, J.J.; et al. Characterization of a Cdc42 protein inhibitor and its use as a molecular probe. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 8531–8543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Zhan, Y.; Liang, X.; Li, L.; Wang, B.; Ding, F.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhan, Q.; Liu, Z. MicroRNA-548j functions as a metastasis promoter in human breast cancer by targeting Tensin1. Mol. Oncol. 2016, 10, 838–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Dolan, B.M.; Duron, S.G.; Campbell, D.A.; Vollrath, B.; Shankaranarayana Rao, B.S.; Ko, H.Y.; Lin, G.G.; Govindarajan, A.; Choi, S.Y.; Tonegawa, S. Rescue of fragile X syndrome phenotypes in Fmr1 ko mice by the small-molecule PAK inhibitor FRAX486. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 5671–5676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Yeo, D.; He, H.; Patel, O.; Lowy, A.M.; Baldwin, G.S.; Nikfarjam, M. Frax597, a PAK1 inhibitor, synergistically reduces pancreatic cancer growth when combined with gemcitabine. BMC Cancer 2016, 16, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Licciulli, S.; Maksimoska, J.; Zhou, C.; Troutman, S.; Kota, S.; Liu, Q.; Duron, S.; Campbell, D.; Chernoff, J.; Field, J.; et al. Frax597, a small molecule inhibitor of the P21-activated kinases, inhibits tumorigenesis of neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2)-associated schwannomas. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 29105–29114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Ong, C.C.; Gierke, S.; Pitt, C.; Sagolla, M.; Cheng, C.K.; Zhou, W.; Jubb, A.M.; Strickland, L.; Schmidt, M.; Duron, S.G.; et al. Small molecule inhibition of group I P21-activated kinases in breast cancer induces apoptosis and potentiates the activity of microtubule stabilizing agents. Breast Cancer Res. BCR 2015, 17, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Ndubaku, C.O.; Crawford, J.J.; Drobnick, J.; Aliagas, I.; Campbell, D.; Dong, P.; Dornan, L.M.; Duron, S.; Epler, J.; Gazzard, L.; et al. Design of selective PAK1 inhibitor G-5555: Improving properties by employing an unorthodox Low-PK a polar moiety. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 1241–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Maruta, H.; Ahn, M.R. From bench (laboratory) to bed (hospital/home): How to explore effective natural and synthetic PAK1-blockers/longevity-promoters for cancer therapy. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 142, 229–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Karpov, A.S.; Amiri, P.; Bellamacina, C.; Bellance, M.H.; Breitenstein, W.; Daniel, D.; Denay, R.; Fabbro, D.; Fernandez, C.; Galuba, I.; et al. Optimization of a dibenzodiazepine hit to a potent and selective allosteric PAK1 inhibitor. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 776–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. McCoull, W.; Hennessy, E.J.; Blades, K.; Chuaqui, C.; Dowling, J.E.; Ferguson, A.D.; Goldberg, F.W.; Howe, N.; Jones, C.R.; Kemmitt, P.D.; et al. Optimization of highly kinase selective bis-anilino pyrimidine PAK1 inhibitors. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 1118–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Goreshnik, I.; Maly, D.J. A small molecule-regulated guanine nucleotide exchange factor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 938–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Snyder, J.T.; Worthylake, D.K.; Rossman, K.L.; Betts, L.; Pruitt, W.M.; Siderovski, D.P.; Der, C.J.; Sondek, J. Structural basis for the selective activation of RHO gtpases by DBL exchange factors. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2002, 9, 468–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Sorber, R.; Teper, Y.; Abisoye-Ogunniyan, A.; Waterfall, J.J.; Davis, S.; Killian, J.K.; Pineda, M.; Ray, S.; McCord, M.R.; Pflicke, H.; et al. Whole genome sequencing of newly established pancreatic cancer lines identifies novel somatic mutation (c.2587G>A) in axon guidance receptor plexin A1 as enhancer of proliferation and invasion. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0149833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Sakamori, R.; Das, S.; Yu, S.; Feng, S.; Stypulkowski, E.; Guan, Y.; Douard, V.; Tang, W.; Ferraris, R.P.; Harada, A.; et al. Cdc42 and RAB8A are critical for intestinal stem cell division, survival, and differentiation in mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 122, 1052–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Florian, M.C.; Dorr, K.; Niebel, A.; Daria, D.; Schrezenmeier, H.; Rojewski, M.; Filippi, M.D.; Hasenberg, A.; Gunzer, M.; Scharffetter-Kochanek, K.; et al. Cdc42 activity regulates hematopoietic stem cell aging and rejuvenation. Cell Stem Cell 2012, 10, 520–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Akbar, H.; Cancelas, J.; Williams, D.A.; Zheng, J.; Zheng, Y. Rational design and applications of a RAC gtpase-specific small molecule inhibitor. Methods Enzymol. 2006, 406, 554–565. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  99. Oprea, T.I.; Sklar, L.A.; Agola, J.O.; Guo, Y.; Silberberg, M.; Roxby, J.; Vestling, A.; Romero, E.; Surviladze, Z.; Murray-Krezan, C.; et al. Novel activities of select nsaid R-enantiomers against RAC1 and Cdc42 gtpases. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0142182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Subramanyam, D.; Blelloch, R. From micrornas to targets: Pathway discovery in cell fate transitions. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2011, 21, 498–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Detassis, S.; Grasso, M.; Del Vescovo, V.; Denti, M.A. MicroRNAs make the call in cancer personalized medicine. Front. Cell Dev.Biol. 2017, 5, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Li, Y.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; Jing, R. MicroRNA-29a functions as a potential tumor suppressor through directly targeting Cdc42 in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 13, 3896–3904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Dong, Y.; Jin, X.; Sun, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Song, X. Mir-186 inhibited migration of NSCLC via targeting Cdc42 and effecting emt process. Mol. Cells 2017, 40, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  104. Zhu, X.; Li, Y.; Shen, H.; Li, H.; Long, L.; Hui, L.; Xu, W. Mir-137 inhibits the proliferation of lung cancer cells by targeting Cdc42 and CDK6. FEBS Lett. 2013, 587, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Yang, T.; Chen, T.; Li, Y.; Gao, L.; Zhang, S.; Wang, T.; Chen, M. Downregulation of miR-25 modulates non-small cell lung cancer cells by targeting Cdc42. Tumour Biol. 2015, 36, 1903–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Zhang, M.; Guo, W.; Qian, J.; Wang, B. Negative regulation of Cdc42 expression and cell cycle progression by miR-29A in breast cancer. Open Med. 2016, 11, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Chou, J.; Wang, B.; Zheng, T.; Li, X.; Zheng, L.; Hu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xing, Y.; Xi, T. Malat1 induced migration and invasion of human breast cancer cells by competitively binding miR-1 with Cdc42. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 472, 262–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Fu, M.G.; Li, S.; Yu, T.T.; Qian, L.J.; Cao, R.S.; Zhu, H.; Xiao, B.; Jiao, C.H.; Tang, N.N.; Ma, J.J.; et al. Differential expression of miR-195 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and miR-195 expression inhibits tumor cell proliferation and invasion by targeting of Cdc42. FEBS Lett. 2013, 587, 3471–3479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Sun, N.; Ye, L.; Chang, T.; Li, X.; Li, X. MicroRNA-195-Cdc42 axis acts as a prognostic factor of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2014, 7, 6871–6879. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  110. Zhang, Y.; Takahashi, S.; Tasaka, A.; Yoshima, T.; Ochi, H.; Chayama, K. Involvement of microRNA-224 in cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and anti-apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013, 28, 565–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Chen, Q.; Chen, X.; Zhang, M.; Fan, Q.; Luo, S.; Cao, X. MiR-137 is frequently down-regulated in gastric cancer and is a negative regulator of Cdc42. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2011, 56, 2009–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Cheng, Z.; Liu, F.; Wang, G.; Li, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, F. MiR-133 is a key negative regulator of Cdc42-PAK pathway in gastric cancer. Cell. Signal. 2014, 26, 2667–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Humphreys, K.J.; McKinnon, R.A.; Michael, M.Z. MiR-18a inhibits Cdc42 and plays a tumour suppressor role in colorectal cancer cells. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e112288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Liu, M.; Lang, N.; Qiu, M.; Xu, F.; Li, Q.; Tang, Q.; Chen, J.; Chen, X.; Zhang, S.; Liu, Z.; et al. MiR-137 targets Cdc42 expression, induces cell cycle G1 arrest and inhibits invasion in colorectal cancer cells. Int. J. Cancer 2011, 128, 1269–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Liu, M.; Lang, N.; Chen, X.; Tang, Q.; Liu, S.; Huang, J.; Zheng, Y.; Bi, F. MiR-185 targets RHOA and Cdc42 expression and inhibits the proliferation potential of human colorectal cells. Cancer Lett. 2011, 301, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Wang, Y.X.; Chen, Y.R.; Liu, S.S.; Ye, Y.P.; Jiao, H.L.; Wang, S.Y.; Xiao, Z.Y.; Wei, W.T.; Qiu, J.F.; Liang, L.; et al. MiR-384 inhibits human colorectal cancer metastasis by targeting KRAS and Cdc42. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 84826–84838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Sakamori, R.; Yu, S.; Zhang, X.; Hoffman, A.; Sun, J.; Das, S.; Vedula, P.; Li, G.; Fu, J.; Walker, F.; et al. Cdc42 inhibition suppresses progression of incipient intestinal tumors. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 5480–5492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Zhan, M.N.; Yu, X.T.; Tang, J.; Zhou, C.X.; Wang, C.L.; Yin, Q.Q.; Gong, X.F.; He, M.; He, J.R.; Chen, G.Q.; et al. MicroRNA-494 inhibits breast cancer progression by directly targeting PAK1. Cell Death Dis. 2017, 8, e2529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Reddy, S.D.; Ohshiro, K.; Rayala, S.K.; Kumar, R. MicroRNA-7, a homeobox D10 target, inhibits P21-activated Kinase 1 and regulates its functions. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 8195–8200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Song, T.; Zhang, X.; Yang, G.; Song, Y.; Cai, W. Decrement of miR-199A-5P contributes to the tumorigenesis of bladder urothelial carcinoma by regulating MLK3/NF-kappab pathway. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2015, 7, 2786–2794. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  121. Liu, Z.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Liu, B.; Zhang, K. MiR-24 represses metastasis of human osteosarcoma cells by targeting ACK1 via AKT/MMPS pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 486, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Chen, Q.Y.; Jiao, D.M.; Yao, Q.H.; Yan, J.; Song, J.; Chen, F.Y.; Lu, G.H.; Zhou, J.Y. Expression analysis of Cdc42 in lung cancer and modulation of its expression by curcumin in lung cancer cell lines. Int. J. Oncol. 2012, 40, 1561–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Ridley, A.J. Rho gtpase signalling in cell migration. Curr. Opin. Biol. 2015, 36, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Dacic, S.; Kelly, L.; Shuai, Y.; Nikiforova, M.N. Mirna expression profiling of lung adenocarcinomas: Correlation with mutational status. Mod. Pathol. 2010, 23, 1577–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Sung, H.; Rosenberg, P.S.; Chen, W.Q.; Hartman, M.; Lim, W.Y.; Chia, K.S.; Wai-Kong Mang, O.; Chiang, C.J.; Kang, D.; Ngan, R.K.; et al. Female breast cancer incidence among asian and western populations: More similar than expected. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2015, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Lee, S.; Craig, B.T.; Romain, C.V.; Qiao, J.; Chung, D.H. Silencing of Cdc42 inhibits neuroblastoma cell proliferation and transformation. Cancer Lett. 2014, 355, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Feng, J.G.; Liu, Q.; Qin, X.; Geng, Y.H.; Zheng, S.T.; Liu, T.; Sheyhidin, I.; Lu, X.M. Clinicopathological pattern and annexin A2 and Cdc42 status in patients presenting with differentiation and lymphnode metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 39, 1267–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Torre, L.A.; Bray, F.; Siegel, R.L.; Ferlay, J.; Lortet-Tieulent, J.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2015, 65, 87–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Gomez Del Pulgar, T.; Valdes-Mora, F.; Bandres, E.; Perez-Palacios, R.; Espina, C.; Cejas, P.; Garcia-Cabezas, M.A.; Nistal, M.; Casado, E.; Gonzalez-Baron, M.; et al. Cdc42 is highly expressed in colorectal adenocarcinoma and downregulates ID4 through an epigenetic mechanism. Int. J. Oncol. 2008, 33, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Jaffe, T.; Schwartz, B. Leptin promotes motility and invasiveness in human colon cancer cells by activating multiple signal-transduction pathways. Int. J. Cancer 2008, 123, 2543–2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Alwan, A. World health organization. Disaster Med. Public Health Preparedness 2007, 1, 7–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Siegel, R.; Naishadham, D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2012, 62, 10–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Rangasamy, V.; Mishra, R.; Mehrotra, S.; Sondarva, G.; Ray, R.S.; Rao, A.; Chatterjee, M.; Rana, B.; Rana, A. Estrogen suppresses MLK3-mediated apoptosis sensitivity in ER + breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 1731–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Mishra, P.; Senthivinayagam, S.; Rangasamy, V.; Sondarva, G.; Rana, B. Mixed lineage kinase-3/JNK1 axis promotes migration of human gastric cancer cells following gastrin stimulation. Mol. Endocrinol. 2010, 24, 598–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Lei, X.; Li, Y.F.; Chen, G.D.; Ou, D.P.; Qiu, X.X.; Zuo, C.H.; Yang, L.Y. ACK1 overexpression promotes metastasis and indicates poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 40622–40641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Van Hengel, J.; D’Hooge, P.; Hooghe, B.; Wu, X.; Libbrecht, L.; De Vos, R.; Quondamatteo, F.; Klempt, M.; Brakebusch, C.; van Roy, F. Continuous cell injury promotes hepatic tumorigenesis in Cdc42-deficient mouse liver. Gastroenterology 2008, 134, 781–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Mitsushima, M.; Toyoshima, F.; Nishida, E. Dual role of Cdc42 in spindle orientation control of adherent cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2009, 29, 2816–2827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Sayeed, M.A.; Bracci, M.; Lazzarini, R.; Tomasetti, M.; Amati, M.; Lucarini, G.; Di Primio, R.; Santarelli, L. Use of potential dietary phytochemicals to target mirna: Promising option for breast cancer prevention and treatment? J. Funct. Foods 2017, 28, 177–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Li, Q.; Yao, Y.; Eades, G.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Q. Downregulation of miR-140 promotes cancer stem cell formation in basal-like early stage breast cancer. Oncogene 2014, 33, 2589–2600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Li, Q.; Eades, G.; Yao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Q. Characterization of a stem-like subpopulation in basal-like ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 1303–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Wang, H.; Bian, S.; Yang, C.S. Green tea polyphenol egcg suppresses lung cancer cell growth through upregulating miR-210 expression caused by stabilizing HIF-1alpha. Carcinogenesis 2011, 32, 1881–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 23 00787 g001 550
Figure 1. Regulation of Cdc42. Cdc42 switches between an inactive GDP-bound state and an active GTP-bound state. The GTP binding and hydrolysis cycle is highly regulated by intracellular molecules GEFs, GAPs, and GDIs. When Cdc42 is activated by various stimuli, Cdc42 can transiently interact with its downstream effector proteins, triggering cytoskeleton reorganization, alterations in the cell cycle, and transcription.
Figure 1. Regulation of Cdc42. Cdc42 switches between an inactive GDP-bound state and an active GTP-bound state. The GTP binding and hydrolysis cycle is highly regulated by intracellular molecules GEFs, GAPs, and GDIs. When Cdc42 is activated by various stimuli, Cdc42 can transiently interact with its downstream effector proteins, triggering cytoskeleton reorganization, alterations in the cell cycle, and transcription.
Molecules 23 00787 g001
Molecules 23 00787 g002 550
Figure 2. Three-dimensional structures of DH–PH domains. A ribbon diagram shown the DH domain (left dotted area) and PH domain (right dotted area) binding to Cdc42 (upper area). PDB accession number 1KZ7 [15]. GDP-bound Cdc42 (Rho GTPase) favor interactions with GEFs (as indicated by DH and PH in the figure). DH domain is essential for the biological activity of GEFs while PH domain can directly regulate the activity of the DH domain.
Figure 2. Three-dimensional structures of DH–PH domains. A ribbon diagram shown the DH domain (left dotted area) and PH domain (right dotted area) binding to Cdc42 (upper area). PDB accession number 1KZ7 [15]. GDP-bound Cdc42 (Rho GTPase) favor interactions with GEFs (as indicated by DH and PH in the figure). DH domain is essential for the biological activity of GEFs while PH domain can directly regulate the activity of the DH domain.
Molecules 23 00787 g002
Molecules 23 00787 g003 550
Figure 3. Downstream effector/adaptor proteins of Cdc42. Cdc42 can activate downstream proteins of Cdc42 including PAKs, ACK1, MLK3, IQGAPs, N-WASP, and PI3Ks. Ack1 promotes tumorigenesis by phosphorylating Wwox, Akt, and androgen receptors. PAK1, PAK2, and PAK3 can promote tumor progression and metastasis. MLK3 can phosphorylate and activate specific MAP2Ks, which activate specific MAPKs in sequence. The three major MAPKs are JNK/SAPK, ERK, and P38 MAPK. They can promote cancer cell migration and invasion. IQGAP1 promotes tumorigenesis and metastasis, while IQGAP2 may have the opposite effect. The function of IQGAP3 is not very clear at present. N-WASP can promote cancer cell migration and invasion by phosphorylating P38 MAPK. PIP2 is phosphorylated to PIP3 by PI3K, which leads to the phosphorylation of Akt. And Akt can phosphorylate and activate mTOR, which can promote tumor metastasis. Otherwise, PIP3 is quickly dephosphorylated to PIP2 under the action of PTEN.
Figure 3. Downstream effector/adaptor proteins of Cdc42. Cdc42 can activate downstream proteins of Cdc42 including PAKs, ACK1, MLK3, IQGAPs, N-WASP, and PI3Ks. Ack1 promotes tumorigenesis by phosphorylating Wwox, Akt, and androgen receptors. PAK1, PAK2, and PAK3 can promote tumor progression and metastasis. MLK3 can phosphorylate and activate specific MAP2Ks, which activate specific MAPKs in sequence. The three major MAPKs are JNK/SAPK, ERK, and P38 MAPK. They can promote cancer cell migration and invasion. IQGAP1 promotes tumorigenesis and metastasis, while IQGAP2 may have the opposite effect. The function of IQGAP3 is not very clear at present. N-WASP can promote cancer cell migration and invasion by phosphorylating P38 MAPK. PIP2 is phosphorylated to PIP3 by PI3K, which leads to the phosphorylation of Akt. And Akt can phosphorylate and activate mTOR, which can promote tumor metastasis. Otherwise, PIP3 is quickly dephosphorylated to PIP2 under the action of PTEN.
Molecules 23 00787 g003
Table
Table 1. Selective small molecule inhibitors of Cdc42 and its downstream effectors/adaptors.
Table 1. Selective small molecule inhibitors of Cdc42 and its downstream effectors/adaptors.
InhibitorMode of ActionReference
ZCL278act as intersectin (ITSN) by directly binding to Cdc42[74]
Secraminereduce membrane association of prenylated Cdc42(GDP) in a Cdc42(GDP)–RhoGDI1 complex fashion[75,76]
CASINinhibit nucleotide exchange on Cdc42[77,78,79]
AZA197disrupt the interaction between Cdc42 and GEFs[80]
AZA1disrupt the interaction between Cdc42 and GEFs[81]
ML141specifically block GTP binding to Cdc42[82,83,84]
FRAXs (486, 597, and 1036)inhibit group I PAKs (PAK1, PAK2, PAK3) by competing with ATP[85,86,87,88]
G-5555specific suppress PAK1 by competing with ATP[89]
NOV-3specific suppress PAK1 by competing with ATP[90,91]
AZ137-05339specific suppress PAK1 by competing with ATP[92]
Table
Table 2. (A) The role of microRNAs in cancer by targeting Cdc42; (B) The role of microRNAs in cancer by targeting downstream effectors/adaptors of Cdc42.
Table 2. (A) The role of microRNAs in cancer by targeting Cdc42; (B) The role of microRNAs in cancer by targeting downstream effectors/adaptors of Cdc42.
A
miRNATargetCancer TypesFunctional ContributionReference
miR-29aCDC42 3’UTR 5’…UGGUGCU…NSCLCinhibit proliferation, migration, invasion[102]
miR-186CDC42 3’UTR 5’…UUAAGAA…NSCLCinhibit migration and effect EMT[103]
miR-137CDC42 3’UTR 5’…GCAAUAA…NSCLC
CDK6 3’UTR 5’…GCAAUA…NSCLCinhibit proliferation and induce cell cycle arrest[104]
miR-25CDC42 3’UTR 5’…UGCAAU…NSCLCreduce proliferation and induce G1 cell cycle arrest[105]
miR-29aCDC42 3’UTRBreast cancerinhibit growth through cell cycle regulation[106]
miR-1CDC42 3’UTR 5’…ACAUUCC…Breast cancerinhibit migration and invasion[107]
miR-195CDC42 3’UTR 5’…UGCUGCU…ESCCinhibit proliferation and invasion; act as a prognostic biomarker[108,109]
miR-224CDC42, CDH1,PAK2,BLC-2,MAPK1Hepatocellular carcinomapromote cell proliferation, migration, invasion; anti-apoptosis[110]
miR-137CDC42 3’UTRGastric cancerinhibit cell cycle progression and induce apoptosis[111]
miR-133CDC42 3’UTR 5’…GGGGACCAG…Gastric cancersuppress cell growth, migration and invasion[112]
miR-18aCDC42 3’UTR 5’…CACCUU…Colorectal cancerreduce proliferation, migration; increase apoptosis; induce cell cycle arrest[113]
miR-137CDC42 3’UTR 5’…AAGCAAT…Colorectal cancerinhibit invasion, proliferation; induce cell cycle G1 arrest[114]
miR-185CDC42 3’UTR 5’…UGCCUUU…
RhoA 3’UTR 5’…UUCUCUCCA…Colorectal cancerinhibit proliferation, invasion; induce G0/G1 arrest[115]
miR-384CDC42 3’UTR 5’…UAGGAA…
KRAS 3’UTR 5’…UAGGAA…Colorectal cancerinhibit metastasis and invasive[116]
miR-224CDC42 3’UTR 5’…GUGACUU…
SMAD4 3’UTR 5’…GUGACUU…Colorectal cancersuppress migration and the formation of Actin Filaments[117]
B
miRNATargetCancer TypesFunctional ContributionReference
miR-497PAK1Breast cancersuppress colonogetic ability, metastasis, tumorigenesis, invasion[118]
miR-7PAK1Breast cancerinhibit motility, invasiveness, anchorage-independent growth[119]
miR-137PAK1Colorectal cancersuppress Cdc42/pak signaling pathway[114]
MLC, ERK1/2
CyclinD1
miR-195ERK1/2ESCCsuppressed Cdc42/ERK/Cyclin D1 signaling pathway[108]
CyclinD1
miR-199-5pMLK3Bladder urothelial carcinomainhibit MLK3/IkB/NF-KB signaling pathway[120]
miR-24ACK1Osteosarcomainhibit migration and invasion[121]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xiao, X.-H.; Lv, L.-C.; Duan, J.; Wu, Y.-M.; He, S.-J.; Hu, Z.-Z.; Xiong, L.-X. Regulating Cdc42 and Its Signaling Pathways in Cancer: Small Molecules and MicroRNA as New Treatment Candidates. Molecules 2018, 23, 787. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules23040787

AMA Style

Xiao X-H, Lv L-C, Duan J, Wu Y-M, He S-J, Hu Z-Z, Xiong L-X. Regulating Cdc42 and Its Signaling Pathways in Cancer: Small Molecules and MicroRNA as New Treatment Candidates. Molecules. 2018; 23(4):787. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules23040787

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xiao, Xing-Hua, Lin-Chen Lv, Jing Duan, Ye-Meng Wu, Shu-Jin He, Zhen-Zhen Hu, and Li-Xia Xiong. 2018. "Regulating Cdc42 and Its Signaling Pathways in Cancer: Small Molecules and MicroRNA as New Treatment Candidates" Molecules 23, no. 4: 787. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules23040787

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop