Next Article in Journal
Genetic Markers for Later Remission in Response to Early Improvement of Antidepressants
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in Expression Level of OsHKT1;5 Alters Activity of Membrane Transporters Involved in K+ and Ca2+ Acquisition and Homeostasis in Salinized Rice Roots
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 14
10.3390/ijms21144883
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Advances in Understanding the Initial Steps of Pruritoceptive Itch: How the Itch Hits the Switch

by
Shirin Kahremany
1,2,*,†,
Lukas Hofmann
1,†,
Arie Gruzman
1 and
Guy Cohen
2,3
1
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Exact Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 5290002, Israel
2
The Skin Research Institute, The Dead Sea and Arava Science Center, Masada 86910, Israel
3
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Eilat Campus, Eilat 8855630, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(14), 4883; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21144883
Submission received: 16 June 2020 / Revised: 7 July 2020 / Accepted: 8 July 2020 / Published: 10 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Biology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Pruritoceptive (dermal) itch was long considered an accompanying symptom of diseases, a side effect of drug applications, or a temporary sensation induced by invading pruritogens, as produced by the stinging nettle. Due to extensive research in recent years, it was possible to provide detailed insights into the mechanism of itch mediation and modulation. Hence, it became apparent that pruritus is a complex symptom or disease in itself, which requires particular attention to improve patients’ health. Here, we summarize recent findings in pruritoceptive itch, including how this sensation is triggered and modulated by diverse endogenous and exogenous pruritogens and their receptors. A differentiation between mediating pruritogen and modulating pruritogen seems to be of great advantage to understand and decipher the molecular mechanism of itch perception. Only a comprehensive view on itch sensation will provide a solid basis for targeting this long-neglected adverse sensation accompanying numerous diseases and many drug side effects. Finally, we identify critical aspects of itch perception that require future investigation.

1. Introduction

Itch is an unpleasant sensation that evokes a desire to scratch, in response to chemical, mechanical, or thermal stimuli [1]. This sensation is a frequent symptom originating from numerous diseases such as dermatological or systemic diseases and neurologic or autoimmune disorders. Eventually, almost one-third of the global population will suffer from itch through the course of their lives [2]. Recent studies revealed that this frequently ignored symptom can have major consequences on physical and emotional health [3,4,5]. Itch is a unique sensory modality in that it is restricted to the skin, mucous membranes, and cornea, as no other tissue or organ is capable of experiencing itch [6]. So far, itch has been the least understood and researched somatosensory modality in the scientific community. Itch has attracted surprisingly little attention until recently despite the advent of the molecular era of biomedical research in the 20th century [7]. Reasons for such low interest and slow progress related to itch are as manifold as the causes for the symptom.
The molecular mechanisms involved in itch sensation are highly complex and remain elusive in most of these diseases. However, from studies in patients and animal models, a large number of controversial mediators, modulators, and receptors responsible for scratching behavior have been identified [8]. The most well-supported distinction between types of itch is that of histaminergic and non-histaminergic itch [9]. These observations have paralleled a much-needed increase of investigation into the mechanisms underlying itch and will eventually lead to new and effective therapeutics [7,10]. The scope of this review is to summarize the current knowledge and recent advances pertaining to the molecular mechanisms of itch, and classify the receptors by mediators and modulators.

2. Types of Itch

Itch is classified into four different clinical categories [11,12]. These are neuropathic, systemic, psychogenic, and pruritoceptive [11]. These categories are based on advances in understanding of the peripheral and central origins of itch. In many patients, more than one of these categories can coexist [13]. This review emphasis is placed on pruritoceptive (dermal-generated) itch following molecular mechanisms of pruritus. Neuropathic itch is a result of damage to the central or peripheral nervous system and could occur along the afferent itch pathway that results in a sensation to scratch [14,15]. Systemic itch refers to itch generated from the central nervous system in response to circulating pruritogens, as in cholestasis, or in response to intraspinal morphine [12]. Psychogenic pruritus is defined as itch not related to dermatologic or systemic causes. It can be categorized as a pruritic disease with psychiatric sequelae, a pruritic disease aggravated by psychosocial factors, or a psychiatric disease-causing pruritus [16]. Pruritoceptive itch starts in the skin, usually by an inflammatory or other visible pathological process (e.g., scabies, urticaria) [17]. This type of itch accounts for many cases of clinical pruritus because nearly everything from endogenous mediators to exogenous allergens that invade the skin can induce pruritoceptive itch [18]. As mentioned before, transmission of pruritus can be divided into histaminergic and non-histaminergic [9,19]. Acute pruritus is mediated via both pathways [20,21,22]. In contrast, chronic pruritus is mainly mediated by the non-histaminergic pathway [7]. Further, chronic pruritus can be a seriously debilitating symptom accompanying various cutaneous and systemic disorders [23]. The classification of these two systems originates in the periphery, where the primary afferent nerves express their dedicated receptors [24,25]. Until recently, it was thought that histamine was the final mediator of itch, but clinical observations showed that itch could be initiated without flare by cutaneous electrical or mechanical stimuli, suggesting a histamine independent pathway [26].
On a molecular level, pruritoceptive itch is initiated when endogenous or exogenous pruritogens interact with itch receptors or pruriceptors (pruritus + receptor). Pruriceptors reside in the membrane of the free nerve endings of peripheral afferent nerve fibers (Figure 1) [27]. These itch-sensory (pruriceptive) nerve fibers are primary sensory neurons, comprised of C fibers (peptidergic and nonpeptidergic) and Aδ fibers [25,28,29,30]. Peptidergic or nonpeptidergic C fibers are unmyelinated and range into the epidermis, responding to itch stimuli, whereas Aδ fibers are lightly myelinated and distributed throughout the dermis, responding to pain and itch stimuli [31,32]. Further, large-scale single-cell RNA sequencing grouped these pruriceptive neurons into three different classes based on the expression of itch receptor types [25,33]. Once these receptors are activated, the signal is transmitted via spinal dorsal horn to the brain [31]. It was revealed, that the transmission of itch sensation by pruriceptive sensory neurons is dependent on the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) within the spinal cord [34], indicating a modulating effect of itch sensation within the central nervous system [1]. For example, it was demonstrated that the μ- and κ-opioid receptors interact with GRPR modifying itch perception in the spinal cord of mice [35,36,37]. More information about itch circuits and its central modulation can be found in the following reviews [1,38,39]. The succeeding paragraphs discuss peripheral receptors followed by their mediators and modulators which are reported to contribute to pruritoceptive itch sensation.

3. Itch Mediators, Modulators and their Receptors

Pruriceptors localize in the peripheral nervous system and are capable of detecting environmental changes and then transducing this signal to the central nervous system [7]. The majority of itch receptors are members of the class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) (Figure 2). GPCRs are the largest and most diverse group of membrane receptors found in eukaryotes. To date, about 35% of all approved drugs target different classes of GPCRs, suggesting that GPCRs are predestined to be targets to develop drugs relieving or modulating itch sensation in patients suffering from pruritus [40]. Figure 3 represents 13 receptors, their mediators, and modulators involved in itch sensation.
Itch sensation starts with the invasion of pruritogens on the skin. Endogenous or exogenous pruritogens activate receptors which ultimately trigger an itch response (Figure 1). GPCRs, Interleukins, and Toll-like receptors promote the opening of ion channels, namely transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 or 4 (TRPV1/4), transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1), or both to generate action potentials [7,24]. These channels are expressed on all cell types involved in itch signaling, such as keratinocytes, immune, endothelial, and mast cells [43]. Thus, these channels contribute to acute and chronic itch sensation. There are two pathways describing itch stimulation. First, the histaminergic pathway, which activates the TRPV1 channel and second, the nonhistaminergic pathway that activates TRPV1 or TRPA1 (Table 1) [7]. In both pathways, histaminergic and nonhistaminergic, TRPV1/TRPA1 activates NaV1.7, and subsequently, NaV1.7 controls action potentials in neurons [7,24,44].
Here, itch signaling was divided into two classes of stimulants. The first class is endogenous or exogenous mediators, which cause itch by direct activation of pruriceptors, termed itch mediators. While the second class of pruritogens has an indirect effect on itch signaling, these are termed modulators (Table 1 and Figure 3). Receptors activated by such modulators can enhance or reduce itch sensation but do not, or only to a reduced extent, induce itch sensation. It is noteworthy that mediators are capable of potentiating or influencing each other’s effect on itch sensation. Taken together, a mediator can modulate but a modulator cannot mediate itch sensation on its own.

3.1. Histamine 1 Receptor

The four histamine receptors (H1-4R) belong to the class A GPCRs and bind to endogenous histamine [45]. H1R is expressed in smooth muscles, and endothelial cells throughout the CNS and cardiovascular system [46,47]. Thus, H1R signaling has an impact on inflammatory processes and circadian rhythm in humans [48,49]. Once activated by histamine, H1R signals through Gi/Go and Gq/G11 with subsequent activation of TRPV1 (Table 2) [50]. H1R shows the lowest potency of all four histamine receptors H3R = H4R > H2R > H1R [46,51]. Albeit it has the lowest potency, the H1R plays a major role in eliciting itch sensation in humans demonstrated by treatment with highly selective H1R antagonists and agonists [52,53,54]. Moreover, recent findings suggest that also H4R and to a lesser degree H3R might have modulatory (additive) effects on pruritus in mice and humans [47,55,56,57]. In conclusion, there is convincing evidence that H1R is responsible for inducing itch sensation in humans. However, more data are required to shed light on the precise role of the other histaminergic receptors in pruritus. Thus far, it seems that H2R does not play a role in pruritus, whereas H3R and H4R solely have a modulatory function in itch sensation.
Histamine has various functions as anaphylaxis mediator, neurotransmitter, and in gastric acid secretion. Histamine is synthesized from histidine by removing the carboxyl group through histidine decarboxylase [58]. Early on it has been shown that administration of histamine produces a triple response of redness, flare and swelling in addition to itch [59]. Moreover, the release of endogenous histamine upon insect bites explained the itching sensation thereafter [60]. The vast amount of literature and research articles on histamine and itch sensation provides a thorough understanding about histaminergic itch sensation and can therefore be considered as the prototypical pruritogen in humans [61].

3.2. Serotonin Receptor

Serotonin receptors (5-HTR) belong to the class A GPCRs and can be divided into seven main groups (e.g., 5-HTR1-7) [62]. In total, fourteen 5-HTRs are further subdivided based on sequence, splice variants, specific agonists or antagonists and signal transduction [63]. Given the large group and variety in signal transduction, it seems obvious that 5-HTRs are involved in many biological and neurological processes through the regulation of hormones and neurotransmitters [64,65,66]. Current research in mice demonstrated that 5-HTR1/2/3 and 5-HTR7 are involved in itch mediation, generally application of serotonin induced elevated scratching [67,68,69] (Table 2). In contrast, treatment with 5-HTR2 and 5-HTR3 antagonists did not attenuate scratching behavior in rats, thus contradicting the role of 5-HTR2/3 in pruritus [70]. Interestingly, different strains of rats reacted differently to 5-HT receptor agonists or antagonists as shown by Tian Bin et al. [71]. Aside from the controversies, the role of 5-HTR7 in acute itch seems to be well established. It was demonstrated that activation of 5-HTR7 leads to the opening of TRPA1 and subsequent acute itch sensation [69] (Table 1). Indeed, recent data confirmed that 5-HTR7 signals in an TRPA1-dependent manner, whereas 5-HTR2 acts via an unusual TRPV4 dependent pathway [72] (Table 1). It remains elusive how results obtained in rodents can be applied to humans and thereby answer the role of 5-HT receptors in pruritus. Nevertheless, it was shown that the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor was capable of reducing pruritus in patients suffering from AD [73,74]. Moreover, it was discovered that 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A were overexpressed in lesional skin compared to healthy patients, indicating a neuromodulator role of serotonin and 5-HT receptors in itch mediation [75]. In addition, recent research provided insight into the role of 5-HT1A receptor, which potentiates itch sensation through gastrin-releasing peptide dependent scratching behavior [76]. To date, it remains controversial if the pruritic influence of 5-HT receptors is fulfilled by their immunomodulatory effect or as a direct itch mediator [74]. Taken together, itch mediated by 5-HT receptors is a complex topic by itself and might be best answered by a dynamic interplay of several 5-HT receptors and their neuroimmunological roles interacting in concert to create the sensation of itch.
Serotonin was discovered in the 1940′s and identified as “tonic” substance from the “serum”, hence serotonin [77]. Serotonin has the rare ability to act as hormone (periphery) and neurotransmitter (CNS) depending on the site of action. In the initial step of its synthesis, L-tryptophan is converted to L-5OH-tryptophan by tryptophan hydroxylase, which is subsequently converted to serotonin by L-amino acid decarboxylase [78]. Humoral Serotonin is responsible for a wide variety of functions in the human body, starting from cardiovascular function, bowel motility, ejaculatory latency, bladder control, platelet aggregation, circadian rhythm, mood, anxiety, appetite, temperature just to name a few [65]. It was also demonstrated that the application of serotonin potentiates and induces itch sensation in mice [69,79]. Thereby, serotonin contributes to vasodilation, inflammation, immunomodulation and pruritogenic effects by interacting with their receptor in the skin [74]. Thus, explaining pruritogenic effects elicited by serotonin without considering the synergistic effects of inflammation, vasodilation, and immunomodulation would be insufficient. It remains a tremendous and complex task to decipher the individual contribution of each 5-HT receptor and serotonin to acute itch sensation in human patients.

3.3. Protease-Activated Receptors

Protease-activated receptors (PAR) belong to the class A GPCRs and are unique from most other GPCRs in their mechanism of activation. They are activated by proteolytic cleavage of their own extracellular N terminus [80,81,82]. Once activated, PARs signal through Gi/Go and G12/G13, whereas PAR1 is also capable of signaling through Gq/G11 heterotrimeric G proteins [51] (Table 2). This family is comprised of four members, PAR1, PAR2, PAR3, and PAR4, which are involved in a variety of physiological functions ranging from hemostasis, inflammation to cell differentiation and proliferation [83,84]. Studies demonstrated that activation of PAR1, PAR2, and PAR4 can induce non-histaminergic itch. [38,85]
There are various endogenous and exogenous mediators that have been shown to induce itch sensations. These mediators belong to the protease family, examples are cathepsin S, mucunain, and tryptase [86,87,88]. Cathepsin S is an endogenous lysosome protease that was shown to evoke itch and activate PAR2 and PAR4. [89] Mucunain is an exogenous cysteine protease that was shown to also activate PAR2 and PAR4. Mucunain is the active component of cowhage (Mucuna pruriens), a plant found in tropical areas. It was reported that this compound elicits pruritus without the urticarial response associated with histamine suggesting that mucunain could identify a non-histaminergic pathway of pruritus [80,90]. Other plant-derived cysteine proteases such as bromelain, ficain, and papain activated PAR2 and PAR4 in HeLa cells [91]. Given that these proteases act via the same activation mechanism as mucunain, would suggest a histamine independent mechanism of action. Aside from plants there are many other exogenous proteases originating from bacteria, amoebae, insects, fungi, and reptiles activating members of the PAR family [83,92,93]. Nonetheless, the detailed mechanism of how and if these exogenous proteases elicit an itch sensation exclusively through PARs remains to be answered.
PARs are known to form homo- or heterodimer with other members of the PAR family [42,94,95,96]. How this dimerization impacts and modulates itch sensation is still under investigation. Obviously, the dimerization interface of PARs provides an additional target site to reduce or modulate itch sensation triggered by protease mediators. Additionally, activation of PAR1 and PAR2 recruit trimeric G proteins (Gi, Gq, or G12/G13) whereas PAR4 signals, through Gq or G12/G13. Gq activation, stimulate further downstream processes including TRPV1 and TRPV3 [42,88,97,98] (Table 1 and Table 2). If all members of PAR cause itch sensation involving TRPV1 activation or if other G proteins, biased signaling, and additional receptors are engaged remains elusive.

3.4. Neurokinin Receptors

There are three types of neurokinin receptors: NK1R, NK2R, and NK3R. All belong to the class A GPCRs. Moreover, all three members bind to peptide ligands and signal via Gq/G11, whereas NK1R and NK2R are also capable of Gs signaling [51] (Table 2). Among NK receptors, NK1R is mainly involved in itch because of its preferred ligand substance P (SP) [99,100]. Interaction with SP leads to activation of phospholipase CB (PLCB), and results in a transient increase in intracellular inositol 1,4,5 triphosphate (IP3) diacyl-glycerol and increased cytosolic calcium concentration [101]. NK1R is expressed by sensory nerve endings, mast cells, keratinocytes, and fibroblasts and is highly abundant in the central nervous system [100,102]. Moreover, it was reported that NK1R is overexpressed across multiple chronic itch-induced conditions [103]. Thus, treatment of patients suffering from chronic pruritus reported reduced itch sensation after various NK1R antagonist regimens [99,104,105]. Recent research suggested an interplay between opioid receptors and NK1R because of their co-localization. There is growing evidence that opioid receptors might modulate SP release and that NK1R is involved in side effects of opioids [106]. Therefore, it is possible that the interplay between opioid receptors and NK1R might also modulate the signaling of itch sensation through SP.
SP is a neuropeptide and consists of eleven amino acid residues [107,108]. This undecapeptide belongs to the largest known peptide group, the tachykinin peptide hormone family (locus on the TAC1 gene) [109]. It was shown that overexpressing SP nerve fibers are augmented in human skin suffering from chronic itch [110]. Thus, SP remains an interesting neuropeptide with regard to the mechanisms of itch sensation. Even though SP binds to NK1R and MRGPRX2 only NK1R is involved in itch sensation since the effect was reduced by administering NK1R specific antagonist which exclusively binds NK1R but not MRGPRX2 [111]. Furthermore, SP is known to induce expression of leukotriene B4 which in turn causes itch sensation through leukotriene receptors [112]. Thus, SP induced itch sensation might be evoked by induced expression of leukotriene B4. Moreover, histamine and SP induced itch was almost completely suppressed by antihistamines, whereas bradykinin- and serotonin-induced itch was not. Suggesting that SP is a histamine-dependent pruritogen [113]. The complex interplay between endogenous pruritogens demonstrates that further research is urgently required to fully understand the role of each receptor and mediator in the orchestra of itch sensation.

3.5. Bradykinin Receptors

As the majority of pruritogenic receptors, also bradykinin receptors BDKRB1 and BDKRB2 belong to the class A GPCRs. BDKRB1 and BDKRB2 signal through trimeric G proteins Gi/Go, Gq/G11 and Gs, Gi/Go, Gq/G11, respectively [114] (Table 2). Another major difference between BDKRB1 and BDKRB2 are the expression levels. While BDKRB2 is constitutively expressed, BDKRB1 is solely expressed in traumatic or inflammatory conditions [115]. Even though bradykinin (BDK) is known to activate both receptors the role of the two receptors in BDK induced itch remains enigmatic. Whether both receptors BDKRB1 and BDKRB2 induce itch sensation to a similar extend, if they interact via a complex interplay or via identical pathways is part of current research [116]. Previous studies demonstrated that a BDKRB2 antagonist induces itch sensation and this sensation is increased in combination with BDK [116]. Given that BDKRB1 causes itch sensation upon BDK application, an obvious explanation would be that BDKRB1 is activated and BDKRB2 inactivated, causing the synergistic effect of BDK and BDKRB2 antagonist. Conversely, another study concluded that itch induced by sodium deoxycholic acid is reduced upon administration of BDKRB2 antagonists [117]. Activation of BDKRB1 mediates the alloknesis response in complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA)-inflamed mice [116]. Investigations showed that activation of BDKRB1 receptor with BDK caused histaminergic independent itch sensation in inflamed tissue [113,116]. In addition, it was demonstrated that itch related behavior was modulated but not entirely depleted upon prior application of histamine [118,119]. Thus, demonstrating histaminergic independent itch sensation induced by BDK [113]. Further, it was also shown that the administration of BDK causes elevated concentrations of CGRP, substance P, and prostaglandin E2, all of them are known to induce itch sensation [120]. Taken together, these findings illustrate the controversial understanding of itch mediated by the two BDK receptors. The common denominator of these studies is related to the fact that both receptors are involved in itch sensation but through different pathways. Both of these pathways triggered by BDKRB1 and BDKRB2 require further investigation to fully understand the interplay between the BDK receptors BDKRB1, BDKRB2, and histaminergic or non-histaminergic pruritus.
Aside from the controversies about the receptor signaling, it is well established that BDKRB1 and BDKRB2 have the shared ligand bradykinin. BDK is a nonapeptide hormone (sequence RPPGFSPFR) originating from the kinin-kallikrein system [121]. Thereby, the precursor kininogen is enzymatically cleaved to produce BDK by kallikrein which itself is originating from the precursor prekallikrein [122]. Kinins, which are produced by the action of kallikrein enzymes, are blood-derived local-acting peptides that were shown to have broad effects. The nonapeptide is generated mainly during pathophysiologic conditions such as inflammation, trauma, burns, shock, and allergy, thus causing skin disorders in humans and mice under chronic inflammation conditions [123]. In addition, it was shown that an injection of highly diluted BDK (1: 100 Mio) is sufficient to elicit a physiological itch response, which renders BDK a highly potent pruritogen [124].

3.6. Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Type 1 Receptor

The calcitonin gene-related peptide type 1 receptor (CALCRL) is an atypical member of the class B1 GPCRs required to carry a modification in order to be functional. This modification is called receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP1), which results in a heterodimeric receptor entity required for trafficking and receptor activity [125,126,127]. This heterodimeric receptor is called calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) receptor and is capable of signaling via Gs heterotrimeric G proteins [128] (Table 2). CGRP receptors are translated throughout the body and are involved in a variety of physiological processes of which mediation of migraine is of particular interest [129]. Nevertheless, it was shown that ablation of CGRP resulted in attenuated itch, suggesting a modulating effect of CGRP receptors [130]. Moreover, it was demonstrated that neurons lacking expression of CGRP resulted in reduced capsaicin/heat associated itch response in mice [131]. Taken together, CGRP receptors are receptive to a variety of physical stressors ranging from heat, cold, mechanical stress to itch. Therefore, it is topic of current research to elucidate the complex interplay of CGRP signals with other neurotransmitters to elicit the above-mentioned sensation influenced by CGRP and its receptor.
CGRP a member of the calcitonin peptide family, consisting of two members αCGRP and βCGRP which both are 37 amino acids long and share 94% identity [132,133]. CGRP is the product of transcription, translation, and post-translational modification of the calcitonin gene. Thereby, the two mature CGRP result from splicing, post-translational modification, and protease cleavage [134]. These mature isoforms of the neurotransmitters are then stored in vesicles at the sensory nerve terminals which are frequently released together with substance P [135]. Given the interplay between substance P and CGRP, the simplistic view of CGRP induced itch fails to explain the synergistic outcome of the two endogenous modulators. Thus, only a comprehensive view on itch mediators as published by Rogoz et al. provides a profound understanding of CGRP modulated itch sensation [130]. In addition, recent studies have reported that prurigo nodularis, a disorder accompanied by intensive pruritus, is closely associated with increased dermal levels of CGRP and SP [136]. Altogether, itch sensation modulated or induced by CGRP is a complex subject involving various transmitters leading to synergistic effects. Thus, only a combinatorial treatment against pruritus will be effective.

3.7. Mas-related GPR Family Member X1 (MRGPRX1)

MRGPRX1 belongs to the class A orphan GPCRs, albeit lacking the conventional Cys-Cys disulfide bridge and ionic-lock, which are found in prototypical class A GPCRs [137]. Also, MRGPRX1 is a member of the MRGPR family, which comprises receptor genes found in mice, rats, and humans [138,139]. The MRGPR family consists of eleven subfamilies with about 50 GPCRs in total, seven subfamilies and ten GPCRs thereof were detected in humans [140]. It was found that MRGPR is exclusively expressed in dorsal root ganglion neurons and these sensory neurons are responsible for detection of painful stimuli [140,141]. Interestingly, these neurons containing MRGPRs lack the expression of TRPV1, substance P, and partly CGRP in mice but not in humans [141,142]. The substantial difference in expression patterns of itch modulators and mediators such as substance P, CGRP and TRPV1 between mice and humans obscures a direct transfer of results about MRGPR mediated pruritus [141]. In humans, MRGPRX1 receptor is activated by bovine adrenal medulla peptide (8–22) (BAM8-22), compound 16, and chloroquine. Activated MRGPRX1 signals through the Gq/G11 pathway resulting in stimulation of phospholipase C [21,143,144,145] (Table 2). It was shown in mice that activation of MRGPRA3 and MRGPRC11 (MRGPRX1 mouse homolog) with BAM8-22 or chloroquine ultimately leads to activation of TRPA1 channel which elicits itch sensation [146] (Table 1). Chloroquine is commonly used as an anti-malaria therapeutic and found recent popularity during the COVID-19 outbreak. In addition, pruritus is one of the most common side effects in chloroquine treatment, which also shows poor response to systemic antihistamine pre-treatment [147,148,149]. The case studies mentioned here together with the human patient trial of BAM8-22 provide strong evidence for the role of MRGPRX1 in pruritus [150]. However, effective concentrations of endogenous agonists for MRGPRX1 are rarely reached, thus the question of the role of MRGPRX1 remains open. One hypothesis for the role of MRGPRX1 is related to the fact that this receptor is predominantly activated by warning of toxic or harmful substances invading the organism [140]. Despite strong evidence for the itch inducing role of MRGPRX1 in humans, it might not be the target of choice for treating pruritus or itch related diseases, except if induced by chloroquine or any other known exogenous agonists mentioned above.
Bovine adrenal medulla (BAM) peptides are peptides secreted from the adrenal gland derived from cleavage products of the pro-encephalin A gene [144,151]. It was shown that the first seven amino acids of BAM22 do not contribute to the binding to MRGPRX1, whereas these initial amino acids are crucial in binding to opioid receptors [152]. It was shown that application of BAM8-22 induced itch sensation without wheal or flare in a histamine independent manner, but this was not induced by BAM8-18 [153]. In addition, it was shown that MRGPR can be activated by the peptide SLIGRL, which is released upon activation of PAR2 in mice [154]. Moreover, the truncated version SLIGR lacking the leucine amino acid residue is capable of activating PAR2 but the mouse MRGPR lacks an itch response [154]. This controversy indicates that itch mediated by SLIGRL might be evoked by the activation of MRGPRX1 and not PAR2. Thorough research is required to precisely describe the role of the two receptors and their impact in itch mediation.

3.8. Leukotriene Receptors

Leukotriene receptors are class A GPCRs that bind and are activated by leukotrienes (LT). They include cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1 and 2 that are activated by LTC4, LTD4, and LTE4 [155]. Additionally, leukotriene B4 receptor 1 (BLT1) and leukotriene B4 receptor 2 (BLT2) are activated by leukotriene B4 (LTB4). BLT1 is signaling through Gi/Go and Gq/G11, whereas BLT2 mainly signals through Gi/Go [51] (Table 2). Andoh et al. found that scratching behavior of mice could be induced after the injection of LTB4 into mice skin. It was found that the levels of LTB4 were significantly elevated in AD and psoriatic lesions which were usually accompanied with pruritus [156]. These studies in mice showed a connection between LTB4 and itch sensation [157,158]. Furthermore, the application of BLT antagonist ONO-4057 suppressed the itch sensation, indicating involvement of BLT receptors in pruritus in mice [159]. However, LTB4 induced itch could not be recapitulated in healthy humans, and only wheal and flare response was observed upon LTB4 application [160,161]. Thus, it is highly controversial if leukotrienes are directly involved in itch sensation. Nevertheless, it is of common understanding that leukotrienes play a crucial role in inflammation but in contrast play at most a modulatory role in itch sensation [155].
The origin of LTs is found in the universal precursor arachidonic acid [162]. This subfamily of molecules belongs to eicosanoids signaling pathways which are responsible for diverse physiological and pathological functions [163]. LTB4 is known to bind both receptors; BLT1 with high affinity and BLT2 with low affinity [155,164]. To date, extensive research showed a major contribution of LTB4 in inflammatory diseases but clear evidence for an explicit role in itch sensation is still lacking.

3.9. Platelet-Activating Factor Receptor (PAFR)

PAFR belongs also to the class A GPCR family as the majority of receptors involved in itch sensation. PAFR is mainly localized in the plasma and nucleus membrane of inflammatory cells, immune cells and cells of the hemostatic system [165]. Thereby, phospholipid ligands bind to PAFR and induce conformational changes, which in turn recruit various heterotrimeric G proteins, such as Gs, Gi/Go and Gq/G11 [114] (Table 2). This intracellular signal cascade leads to an amplification of inflammatory and thrombotic events such as synthesis of interleukins and activation of target cells [165]. Research administering a combination of platelet-activating factor (PAF) and the H1R antihistamine mepyramin resulted in reduction of pruritic effects. Similar results were observed in histamine-depleted skin [166]. Additionally, it was shown that intradermal administration of PAF caused itch sensation through histamine, released from mast cells via neurogenic activation [167,168]. Yet, a detailed mechanism of how PAF activates these peptidergic neurons is still under investigation.
Platelet-activating factor (PAF) is produced through two different enzymatic pathways [169]. The first pathway comprises a remodeling pathway substituting an acetyl residue for the fatty acyl residue of membrane derived phospholipids. The second pathway describes a de novo synthesis which involves the two enzymes phospholipase A2 and lyso-PAF acetyltransferase thereby synthesizing PAF from phosphocholine and an alkyl acetyl glycerol rest [170]. Additional information regarding the synthesis and homeostasis of PAF and other lipid mediators can be found in the excellent review by Prescott et al. [169]. PAF has a variety of physiological and pathophysiological effects. It acts as an important mediator and activator in anaphylaxis, inflammation, platelet aggregation and degranulation, and leukocyte chemotaxis. Normally, PAF is produced in low quantities by various cells (e.g., platelets, neutrophils, macrophages, endothelial cells, and monocytes), but it emerges in larger quantities from inflammatory cells in response to specific stimulators. Through specific receptors and a series of signal transduction systems, PAF works to induce diverse biochemical responses. It has been demonstrated that PAF initially evokes an inflammatory response in allergic reactions in the skin of mammals and humans. Further, prolonged exposure of PAF antagonist resulted in a desensitization of the said antagonist [171]. This mechanism indicates an upregulation of PAFR expression or increased receptor activity after acquired pharmacodynamical tolerance to compensate for lost sensitivity. Whether receptor sensitivity or receptor density was increased or if a third mechanism is responsible for the acquired tolerance remains the subject of future studies.

3.10. Opioid Receptors

Opioid receptors belong to class A GPCRs as the majority of itch mediating receptors. It was previously shown that out of the four different opioid receptors only μ- receptor (OPRM) as heterodimer with gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) and κ- receptor (OPRK) mediate itch sensation [37,172,173,174,175]. Thereby, OPRM and OPRK both signal through Gi/Go heterotrimeric G proteins [176] (Table 2). In addition, recent research showed that GRPR in the CNS is required for morphine induced itch sensation [35]. Also, it was shown that up to ten percent of patients treated systemically with opioids (morphine) developed pruritus [177]. It is a topic of current research whether expression levels of OPRM in the skin are altered in patients with pruritus. It was recently demonstrated that OPRK expression levels were indeed downregulated, whereas OPRM levels remain unchanged in patients suffering from psoriatic itch [178,179]. Thus, it can be concluded that patients suffering from itch might show an imbalance of epidermal opioid receptors being the cause or result of said sensation [180]. Various OPRM antagonists were able to decrease morphine induced itch sensation in human trials [181,182]. Similar effects were reported when OPRK agonists were applied to patients suffering from pruritus [183]. Taken together, there is significant evidence that both OPRM and OPRK receptors or imbalanced expression levels of these receptors are involved in pruritus and itch sensation. Of note, it was shown that both OPRM antagonists and OPRK agonists are able to relieve symptoms of opioid induced itch sensation.
Dynorphin is the endogenous OPRK agonist and an opioid peptide derived from cleavage of prodynorphin by proprotein convertase 2 in the nervous system [184]. In agreement with the OPRK agonist treatment mentioned above, it was shown that the expression and presence of dynorphin inhibited itch sensation in mice [185]. Endorphins are a group of OPRM agonists and are comprised of three endogenous opioid peptides, which are produced and stored in the pituitary gland [186]. It was shown that the plasma levels of β-endorphins are elevated in patients suffering from prurigo [187]. Thus, it can be hypothesized that imbalanced endorphin levels may contribute to pruritus. How endorphins and dynorphins act in patients suffering from pruritus is under investigation. However, there is clear evidence showing the role of these opioid peptides in itch sensation but the effect of imbalanced expression and distribution in pruritus remains to be answered.

3.11. Cannabinoid Receptors

Cannabinoid receptors are comprised of cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) and cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2), both belong to the class A GPCRs [188]. The two receptors share 44% identity and signal through Gi/Go heterotrimeric G proteins [189] (Table 2). CB1 is mainly distributed in the central nervous system, while CB2 is distributed in the peripheral tissues mainly in immune and to a lesser degree in neuronal cells [189]. Several studies showed that the topical application of cannabinoid derivatives relieve itch sensation in patients suffering from pruritus [190,191,192]. Moreover, histamine-induced itch was attenuated by CB agonist [193]. These findings clearly demonstrate the involvement of CB receptors in itch sensation. In addition, it was shown that CB1 and TRPV1 receptors are co-localized in primary afferent C-fibers [194]. This co-localization is of particular interest, since TRPV1 channels are involved in histaminergic itch sensation, thus representing the bottleneck of histaminergic evoked itch [195,196,197]. The close interplay between TRPV1 and CB receptors render cannabinoids a preferred substance to counteract histaminergic involved itch sensation. In conclusion, CB receptors might not induce itch sensation but are potent modulators of pruritus.
Endocannabinoids (eCB) belong to derivatives of arachidonic acid and are comprised of N-arachidonoylethanolamide (AEA) and 2-Arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG). These two arachidonate-based lipids are synthesized from arachidonic acid by fatty acid amide hydrolase and monoacylglycerol lipase [198,199]. Together with the two receptors CB1 and CB2 they comprise the so-called endocannabinoid system [200]. Thereby, AEA binds with higher affinity to CB1 and to a lesser degree to CB2, whereas 2-AG binds to both receptors with equal preference [201]. It is well established that the endocannabinoid system is involved in a variety of processes including mood, memory, sleep, appetite, and fertility [202]. In animal studies, it was found that cannabinoid (CB) could induce release of 13- endorphins by binding to their receptor relieving pain and alleviate histamine-induced itching. Furthermore, the endocannabinoid AEA is known to activate TRPV1 and thus release of CGRP [203] (Table 1 and Figure 3). In addition, recent research showed that various cannabinoids are capable of acting on a variety of TRP channels [204]. Thus, it might be possible that AEA- and CB- induced itch sensation is caused by the release of CGRP and SP through activation of TRPV but not by directly interacting with CB receptors (Table 1). These results indicate that eCB, including CB1 and CB2, may be involved in the regulation of pain and pruritus as modulators but not as pruritogens.

3.12. Interleukin-1 Receptor/Toll-like Receptor Superfamily

3.12.1. Interleukin Receptors

Interleukin receptors belonging to the cytokine family are playing an important role in the underlying mechanism of itch [205]. Interleukin receptors are activated by cytokines which are released from leukocytes. Herein, we focus on itch related cytokine receptors IL2R, IL4R, IL13R, IL31R, Oncostatin M receptor, and cytokine receptor like factor 2 heterodimerized with IL7Rα.
IL2R exists as combinations of three different proteins, namely IL2Rα, IL2Rβ, and IL2Rγ, and these three proteins together form the high affinity receptor of IL-2 [206]. Once IL2R is activated by IL-2 it propagates the signal via two tyrosine kinases JAK1 and JAK3 associated with IL2Rβ and IL2Rγ respectively (Table 2). Activation of these two kinases triggers the MAPK and PI-3K kinase pathways [207,208,209]. A study carried out on 30 patients suffering from pruritus showed increased IL-2 levels compared to healthy individuals [210]. Furthermore, application of IL-2 showed a low but immediate pruritogenic effect upon subcutaneous administration [211]. These results demonstrate the ability of IL-2 to induce itch sensation albeit to a moderate extent.
IL-2, the endogenous ligand of IL2R, is a 153 amino acid long protein belonging to the hematopoietin family and is produced by CD4 T lymphocytes upon induced cell differentiation [212,213,214]. A study carried out on thirty patients suffering from uremic pruritus and healthy control showed increased levels of IL-2 between patients and control but no correlation among patients suffering from pruritus and without [210]. Further, 10–29% of patients treated with Aldesleukin (IL-2) reported itching as a side effect of the treatment [215]. Altogether, more research is required to decipher the precise role of IL-2 in pruritus or mediation of itch sensation. Thus far, it seems plausible that IL-2 plays a modulatory role in itch sensation but does not necessarily act as pruritogen in humans.
Unlike IL2R, IL4R can consist of two different heterodimers IL4Rα combined with either γc or IL13Rα1, propagating the signal of both IL-4 and IL13R or only IL13R, respectively [216,217,218,219]. Binding of either IL-4 or IL13R results in activation of STAT6 through the JAK1, JAK3 or Tyk2, JAK2 pathways, depending on cell type and receptor heterodimer [220,221] (Table 2). A recent study revealed the pruritogenic effect of IL-4 and IL13R administered to mice. They were able to show an additive effect while administering IL-4 and IL13R in combination [222]. IL-4 and IL13R alone did not evoke itch response in humans, thus these findings in mice could not be recapitulated [223]. Albeit, administration of histamine in combination with IL-4 resulted in increased scratching behavior, indicating a modulatory role of IL-4 in itch responses [223]. These findings indicate that IL-4 might be an endogenous modulator of pruritus but how and if IL-4 evokes an itching sensation in humans remains to be answered.
IL-4 is a pleiotropic cytokine of 153 amino acid residues and is predominantly expressed in mast cells and T cells [224]. AD patients treated with dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody blocking IL4Rα, showed amelioration of their conditions [225,226,227]. Furthermore, a study in mice showed that deletion of IL4Rα sensitizes neurons to other pruritogens and that IL4Rα is required to elicit a chronic itch sensation in AD-like skin inflammation. The same study also showed that JAK1 inhibition in patients with CIP reduces pruritus [223]. Thus, there is supporting evidence showing that IL-4 does not act as acute pruritogen but merely modulates itch sensation by increasing sensitivity to other pruritogens.
IL13R consists of a heterodimer similar to IL4R. The subunits IL13Rα (which also forms one heterodimer receptor of IL4R) and IL13Rα1 compose the functional receptor IL13R [218]. It was shown that IL13R binds to IL13R with high affinity of 10–15 M, allowing for exclusive signaling through IL13R and not IL-4, despite their shared receptor moiety [228]. Once activated, IL13R signals through JAK1 and Tyk2 and STAT6 activation [229] (Table 2). As mentioned above (see IL4R), the research on IL-4 and IL13R showed that IL13R caused scratching behavior in mice [222]. In addition, research carried out on mice suffering on IL13R induced topic dermatitis showed that additional IL13R administration stimulated TRPA1 expression, which is known for its role in pruritus [230]. Thus, it is debatable if IL13R is a pruritogen or if IL13R modulates itch sensation by enhancing the allergic responses of sensory neurons.
IL13R is as IL-4 a pleiotropic cytokine of 146 amino acids, and shares about 30% sequence homology with IL-4 [231,232]. IL13R is expressed by TH2 helper cells, mast cells, basophils, and eosinophiles [233,234]. Aside from the close homology to IL-4, IL13R also activates similar responses as IL-4, partially due to the shared receptor subunit IL13Rα1 [218]. IL13R induces proliferation and immunoglobulin E synthesis in human B cells, this might suggest that IL13R impacts allergic reactions and anti-inflammatory processes [235]. It was shown that mice suffering from AD induced by IL13R, had elevated expression levels of TRPA1, which is one cause of chronic itch in AD [230]. In agreement with this finding, it was published that IL-4 and IL13R elicit scratching behavior in mice [222]. Similar experiments in humans are still lacking. Thus, it is still under investigation whether IL13R is an immediate pruritogen or if the described sensation in mice is due to the allergic or anti-inflammatory role of IL13R.
IL-31 receptor (IL31R) is a heterodimeric receptor consisting of IL-31 receptor A (IL31RA) and oncostatin M receptor (OSMR) [236]. OSMR increases the affinity of IL31R towards IL-31 and activates PI3K/AKT and MAPK signaling pathways. In addition, IL31RA signals through JAK1/2 which subsequently activate STAT1/3/5 upon binding to IL-31 [236,237,238] (Table 2). IL31R are expressed among others in keratinocytes, epithelial cells, and by DRG pruriceptors [238,239]. Immunohistochemical analyses revealed that IL31R protein levels seem to be increased in patients with AD [239,240]. In addition, it was shown that the IL31R is co-expressed with TRPV1 and TRPA1 in sensory nerves which mediate T cell induced itch [241]. Aside of AD, IL31R overexpression and elevated IL-31 levels are involved in various diseases such as allergic contact dermatitis, psoriasis, bullous pemphigoid, chronic spontaneous urticarial, dermatomyositis, bowel disease and airway hypersensitivity [236,242]. Given the significant evidence of the connection between pruritus and prevalence of IL31R, it is beyond doubt that IL31R is the cytokine receptor responsible for transmitting itch sensation in humans suffering from pruritus, thus providing an excellent target for the treatment of pruritus and IL31R related diseases.
IL-31 is 164 amino acid long and belongs to the interleukin 6 family of cytokines [237]. IL-31 is preferably expressed in activated helper T cells, in particular TH2 helper cells, mast cells, macrophages, dendritic cells and eosinophils comparable to IL13R [238,242]. Also, IL-31 plays an important role in the homeostasis of the skin, airway, and intestinal epithelia, in general IL-31 is crucial for an intact innate or adaptive immunity in tissues with direct contact to the environment [236,237]. It was shown that levels of IL-31 were significantly elevated in pruritic lesional skin of patients with AD compared to nonpruritic lesional skin of patients with psoriasis [243]. Similar findings were confirmed in mice, where elevated IL-31 levels lead to pruritus, alopecia, and skin lesions [238,242,244,245]. Moreover, it was shown that IL-31 is overexpressed in patients suffering from asthma [246]. Altogether, there is strong evidence that IL-31 induces pruritus and plays a crucial role in autoimmune skin diseases. Future research is required to answer the details of how IL-31 induces pruritus and causes atopic dermatitis.
Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) receptor (TSLPR) is a heterodimeric receptor consisting of IL7Rα and cytokine receptor-like factor 2 [247]. TSLPR is mainly found in immune cell types such as monocytes, T cells, B cells, mast cells NKT cells, dendritic cells, and tissues from heart, skeletal, muscle, kidney, and liver [248,249,250]. TSLPR is activated upon binding of TSLP, thus signaling as other interleukin receptors through activation of JAK1/2 and subsequent activation of STAT1/3/4/5/6 [251,252,253] (Table 2). Remarkably, it was shown that TSLP is able to induce itch sensation by directly activating TRPA1-positive neurons. Still, the study demonstrated that both receptors TSLPR and TRPA1 are required to induce itch sensation upon TLSP administration [254,255]. Taking together, TSLPR plays a crucial role in itch mediation while the sensation may be modulated by direct activation of TRPA1. Future research will provide more insights into the orchestration of itch sensation by TLSPR and additional receptors activated by TLSP.
TSLP exists in two isoforms as a steadily expressed short form and as a long alternative splice variant which is expressed upon inflammation [256,257]. The short isform counts 63 amino acids, whereas the long isoform consists of 159 amino acid residues [258]. TSLP, a pleiotropic cytokine, belongs to the IL-2 cytokine family and is a paralog of IL-7 [248]. Moreover, TSLP is mainly expressed in lung and intestinal epithelial cells, skin keratinocytes, and fibroblasts [259,260,261]. Thereby, exposure of TSLP stimulates CD4+ T helper type 2 differentiation [262,263]. Patients suffering from AD showed elevated expression levels of TSLP in keratinocyte, whereas healthy individuals were lacking TSLP [260,264]. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that TSLP evokes itch via TRPA1 channel activation in mice and human cell lines, thus rendering TSLP induced itch signaling histamine independent [255] (Table 1). Studies in human tissue confirmed the role of TSLP as a “missing link” between itch and AD. Hence, elevated ΔNp73 levels increased releasing of TSLP via NF-κβ activation [265]. Taken together, there is strong evidence that TSLP acts as a primary pruritogen and not as a modulator of pruritus unlike the majority of interleukins.
Altogether, there is convincing evidence for cytokines IL-31 and TSLP to play a primary role in eliciting itch sensation in humans. Moreover, other cytokines mentioned in this review and elsewhere might have a limited effect on pruritus and thus acting predominantly as modulators of itch sensation but not as primary pruritogens. In addition, a tremendous amount of experiments and research is carried out on rodent models which provides a first and strong basis for determination of the pathophysiology of itch, but ultimately the proof of concept in patients is still required. As stated by Storan and O’Gorman et al., there is convincing evidence for the important role of several interleukins in pruritus, while for cytokines such as oncostatin M, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, and IL13R, direct evidence is still lacking [266]. This clearly demonstrates that major effort has to be invested to determine the relevance of interleukins in itch sensation in humans.

3.12.2. Toll-Like Receptors

In humans, the toll-like receptor (TLRs) family is comprised of ten receptors TLR1 to TLR10, which are close homologs of the interleukin-1 receptor family [267]. Thereby, all TLR members are required to form hetero- or homo- dimers to create a functional receptor entity. This dimeric entity consists of two bitopic membrane proteins allowing for signal transduction across the membrane. TLRs regulate the host immune response against pathogens by recognizing molecular components derived from microorganisms [268]. Due to their function, TLRs are predominantly found in macrophages or dendritic cells and are activated by an enormous variety of ligands. These ligands range from lipopeptides, glycolipids, proteolipds, lipopolysaccharide, DNA, to single and double stranded RNA [269]. All TLRs, except TLR3 signal via myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MyD88)-dependent pathways which subsequently activate transcription factor NF-κβ and Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) [268] (Table 2). Nevertheless, TLR3 signals through a TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β (TRIF)-dependent pathway leading to production of interferon type I. Ultimately, activation of NF-κβ leads to a similar outcome as the activation pathway of MyD88 [270] (Table 2). Additionally, TLR4 is able to signal through both TIRF- and MyD88- dependent pathways, which renders TLR4 a favored target for therapeutics [271,272] (Table 2). Recent research revealed that TLR3, TLR4, and TLR7 are expressed in small-sized pruriceptive/nociceptive neurons. Thus, there is strong evidence that these three TLRs play a potential role in mediating and modulating pruritus [273].
TLR3 interacts with exogenous double stranded RNA. This interaction leads to the production of Type I interferons, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and subsequent activation of NF-κβ [270,274,275]. It was shown that activation of TLR3 elicits an action potential in DRG neurons expressing TRPV1 and gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP). In addition, knockout and knockdown of TLR3 resulted in modulation of itch-evoked scratching behavior in mice [276]. Moreover, a study carried out on human keratinocytes and mouse DRG demonstrated that the expression of TSLP and endothelin-1 (ET-1) is increased upon exposure of polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (PIC) [277]. PIC is a synthetic RNA homolog and acts as TLR3 agonist. In conclusion, increased levels of TLR3, TSLP and ET-1 in dry skin support the previous findings, where activation of TLR3 by PIC showed elevated itch sensation in mice. Conversely, elevated TSLP expression by TLR3 could indicate that itch sensation is evoked by direct interaction between TSLP and TRPA1 as mentioned above (Table 1 and Figure 3). Thus, rendering TLR3 an itch modulator.
TLR4 resides in the cell membrane of DRG neurons unlike TLR3 and TLR7 which are localized in the membrane of endosomes and the endoplasmic reticulum [278]. Bacterial lipopolysaccharides are the exogenous ligands of TLR4 [279]. An extensive review about synthetic and natural ligands of TLR4 from Peri et al. provides an intriguing insight into the versatility of the exogenous and endogenous ligands of TLR4 [280]. DRG sensory neurons which express TLR4 also express TRPV1 and activation of TLR4 sensitizes TRPV1 [281]. Thus, activation of these TLR4 does not elicit an acute itch sensation in mice but modulates the histaminergic itch response [282]. This research in mice supports that TLR4 enhances the histaminergic itch response by potentiating TRPV1 signaling [281,282] (Table 2). Further, studies in mice revealed that acute itch induced by acetone and diethylether followed by water was reduced upon inhibition or knockout of TLR4 [283]. In conclusion, TLR4 unlike TLR3 and TLR7, fails to evoke acute itch sensation upon activation and therefore belongs to the histamine dependent itch modulators. We have to bear in mind that the here mentioned studies about TLR4 were carried out in mice. Moreover, there is 103 order difference in LPS sensitivity between human and mice [279]. Thus, itch related insights derived from rodent experiment have to be carefully assessed before applied to humans.
Similar to TLR3, TLR7 is activated by the interaction with single stranded RNA, obviously recognizing infections by viral genomes [274,284]. Again, similar to TLR3, small-size DRG neurons which express TLR7 also express gastrin-releasing peptide, MRGPRA3 and TRPV1 in mice [285,286]. Thereby, TLR7 knockout mice did not show any impairment in pain and thermal sensitivity, or histaminergic induced itch, suggesting that TLR7 mediates histamine independent pruritus [286]. In addition, imiquimod is used to reduce growth of warts, keratosis, and basal cell carcinoma. A major side effect of the topical administered drug is itching, supporting the experimental results derived from mice [287]. Research with the TLR7 agonist imiquimod confirmed a TRPV1 dependent pathway evoking itch but proposed an TLR7 independent pathway [288] (Table 2). Altogether, there is yet little and contradicting evidence for the role of TRL7 in pruritus. Thus, major effort is required to understand the exact role of TLR3, TLR4, and TLR7 in pruritus. Moreover, results obtained in rodents have to be complemented with data derived from human cells or patients to provide a detailed and profound understanding of the role of TLRs in pruritus.

4. Conclusions

Besides classic chemical receptors and pathways described in this review, there are reports of a new class of pruriceptors emerging on the horizon. Mechanosensitive pruriceptors are involved in a mechanical induced itch sensation. This touch induced itch sensation involves fading of mechanosensitive Merkel cells with advancing age (alloknesis) [380,381]. Recently, it was shown that the lack of Piezo2 channel signaling (modulator) in Merkel cells is responsible for the conversion of touch into itch sensation [382]. Similarly, TLR5 positive mechanoreceptors might mediate mechanical itch conditions, because of lacking inhibition (modulation) by interneurons expressing neuropeptide Y [383,384,385]. In addition, a recent study revealed that mechanical itch was developed in streptozotocin induced diabetic mice by activation of TRPA1 [386], thus providing an explanation for itch and hypoalgesia in type 1 diabetes [386]. Altogether, mechanosensitive cells, their receptors, and signaling pathways are a potential source for itch sensation, which urgently requires future research to understand their contribution to pruritus. Thus, revealing the detailed interaction between chemical and mechanical itch pathway is of paramount interest.
Considering chemical receptors, pruritoceptive (dermal) itch is mediated through various individual receptors which interact with different mediators and modulators. Moreover, it was demonstrated that expression levels and clustering of different receptors within a cell influence itch perception. Therefore, this sensation ought to be considered as a complex interplay of different players as found in a well-rehearsed orchestra. Here, we differentiated by itch mediator and modulator. It was found that many of the presented ligands are itch modulators and do not act as primary pruritogens (Table 1 and Figure 3). As in other research fields, the majority of experiments concerning pruritus are carried out in rodents. However, the translation of results obtained from rodents cannot be applied directly to humans. Therefore, results related to itch sensation obtained in rodents have to be considered with great caution if used to decipher human pruritus. Further, the reports should be carefully consulted, and experiments have to be wisely selected to draw valid conclusions regarding the contribution of a specific receptors and their ligands to itch sensation. In addition, itch sensation is frequently accompanied by inflammation and sensations like pain or local heat [19]. These circumstances render the topic of pruritus especially challenging because of the lack of delineated boundaries between these states and sometimes even shared receptors and mediators. As is often the case, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts, and this sentence holds especially true when trying to understand the molecular mechanism of pruritoceptive itch. Nevertheless, remarkable effort and advances in the field of pruritoceptive itch have provided a multitude of new potential targets. Future research has to delineate the interaction between these targets and find ways to inhibit and modulate this sensation by targeting a combination of receptors, mediators, and modulators within the orchestra of itch.

Author Contributions

S.K. and L.H. wrote and illustrated the manuscript, G.C. and A.G. wrote, revised, and consulted on the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

S.K. is supported by Israel Ministry of Science and Technology, Regional R&D Centers, Scholarship number 8.

Acknowledgments

We thank Nathan S. Alexander and Tivadar Orban for their valuable comments on the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AEAarachidonoylethanolamide
BAMbovine adrenal medulla
BAM8-22bovine adrenal medulla peptide (8-22)
BLT1, 2leukotriene B4 receptor 1 or 2
BDKbradykinin
BDKRB1bradykinin receptors 1 or 2
CALCRLcalcitonin gene-related peptide type 1 receptor
CBCannabinoid
CB1Cannabinoid receptor 1 or 2
CFAComplete Freund’s adjuvant
CNSCentral nervous system
CGPRCalcitonin gene-related peptide
eCBEndocannabinoids
ET-1Endothelin-1
GRPGastrin-releasing peptide
GRPRGastrin-releasing peptide receptor
GPCRG protein coupled receptor
H1-4RHistamine receptors 1-4
IL1-14Interleukins 1-14
IL1 – 14RInterleukin 1-14 receptor
IP3Inositol 1,4,5 triphosphate
OPRKκ- opioid receptor
LTLeukotriene
LTB4Leukotriene B4
MAPKMitogen-activated protein kinase
MEmediator
MRGPRX1Mas-related GPR family member X1
MOModulator
MyD88Myeloid differentiation primary response 88
OPRMμ- opioid receptor
OSMROncostatin M receptor
PARProtease-activated receptors
PAFRPlatelet-activating factor receptor
PICPolyinosinic:polycytidylic acid
PLCBPhospholipase CB
RAMP1Receptor activity-modifying protein
SPSubstance P
TLRToll-like receptor
TRIFTIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β
TRPA1Transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily A, member 1
TRPV1, 3Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 1 or 3
TSLPThymic stromal lymphopoietin
TSLPRThymic stromal lymphopoietin receptor
2-AG2-Arachidonoylglycerol
5-HTR5-Hydroxytryptamine receptor (serotonin receptor)

References

  1. Chen, X.-J.; Sun, Y.-G. Central circuit mechanisms of itch. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dalgard, F.J.; Lien, L.; Dalen, I. Itch in the community: Associations with psychosocial factors among adults. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2007, 21, 1215–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Halvorsen, J.A.; Dalgard, F.; Thoresen, M.; Lien, E. Itch and Mental Distress: A Cross-Sectional Study among Late Adolescents. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2009, 89, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Dalgard, F.; Svensson, Å.; Holm, J.O.; Sundby, J. Self-Reported Skin Morbidity among Adults: Associations with Quality of Life and General Health in a Norwegian Survey. J. Investig. Dermatol. Symp. Proc. 2004, 9, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Zachariae, R.; Lei, U.; Hædersdal, M.; Zachariae, C. Itch Severity and Quality of Life in Patients with Pruritus: Preliminary Validity of a Danish Adaptation of the Itch Severity Scale. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2012, 92, 508–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Yosipovitch, G.; Papoiu, A.D.P. What causes itch in atopic dermatitis? Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2008, 8, 306–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yosipovitch, G.; Rosen, J.D.; Hashimoto, T. Itch: From mechanism to (novel) therapeutic approaches. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2018, 142, 1375–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Song, J.; Xian, D.; Yang, L.; Xiong, X.; Lai, R.; Zhong, J. Pruritus: Progress toward Pathogenesis and Treatment. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Andersen, H.; Elberling, J.; Arendt-Nielsen, L. Human Surrogate Models of Histaminergic and Non-histaminergic Itch. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2014, 95, 771–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Patel, T.; Yosipovitch, G. Therapy of pruritus. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2010, 11, 1673–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Twycross, R.; Greaves, M.W.; Handwerker, H.; Jones, E.A.; Libretto, S.E.; Szepietowski, J.C.; Zylicz, Z. Itch: Sratching more than the surface. QJM: Int. J. Med. 2003, 96, 7–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yosipovitch, G.; Greaves, M.W.; Schmelz, M. Itch. Lancet 2003, 361, 690–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Garibyan, L.; Rheingold, C.G.; Lerner, E.A. Understanding the pathophysiology of itch. Dermatol. Ther. 2013, 26, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Oaklander, A.L. Neuropathic itch. Semin. Cutan. Med. Surg. 2011, 30, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Misery, L.; Brenaut, E.; Le Garrec, R.; Abasq, C.; Genestet, S.; Marcorelles, P.; Zagnoli, F. Neuropathic pruritus. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2014, 10, 408–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yosipovitch, G.; Samuel, L.S. Neuropathic and psychogenic itch. Dermatol. Ther. 2008, 21, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tivoli, Y.A.; Rubenstein, R.M. Pruritus: An updated look at an old problem. J. Clin. Aesthet. Dermatol. 2009, 2, 30–36. [Google Scholar]
  18. Yosipovitch, G. Assessment of itch: More to be learned and improvements to be made. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2003, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Koma, A.; Steinhoff, M.; Ständer, S.; Yosipovitch, G.; Schmelz, M. The neurobiology of itch. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2006, 7, 535–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rinaldi, G. The Itch-Scratch Cycle: A Review of the Mechanisms. Dermatol. Pr. Concept. 2019, 9, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Liu, Q.; Tang, Z.; Surdenikova, L.; Kim, S.; Patel, K.N.; Kim, A.; Ru, F.; Guan, Y.; Weng, H.-J.; Geng, Y.; et al. Sensory Neuron-Specific GPCR Mrgprs Are Itch Receptors Mediating Chloroquine-Induced Pruritus. Cell 2009, 139, 1353–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Bulca, S.; Bayramgürler, D.; Demirsoy, E.O.; Yavuz, M.; Şikar Aktürk, A.; Bilen, N.; Kıran, R. Comparison of effects of 5 and 10 mg oral desloratadine and levocetirizine on histamine-induced wheal and flare response in healthy volunteers. J. Dermatol. Treat. 2013, 24, 473–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yosipovitch, G.; Bernhard, J.D. Clinical practice. Chronic pruritus. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 1625–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Fowler, E.; Yosipovitch, G. Chronic itch management: Therapies beyond those targeting the immune system. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019, 123, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Wang, F.; Kim, B.S. Itch: A Paradigm of Neuroimmune Crosstalk. Immunity 2020, 52, 753–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ikoma, A.; Handwerker, H.; Miyachi, Y.; Schmelz, M. Electrically evoked itch in humans. Pain 2005, 113, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Dong, X.; Dong, X. Peripheral and Central Mechanisms of Itch. Neuron 2018, 98, 482–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Harrison, I.P.; Spada, F. Breaking the Itch-Scratch Cycle: Topical Options for the Management of Chronic Cutaneous Itch in Atopic Dermatitis. Medicine 2019, 6, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Schmelz, M. Itch and pain. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2010, 34, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Schmelz, M.; Schmidt, R.; Bickel, A.; Handwerker, H.O.; Torebjork, H.E. Specific C-Receptors for Itch in Human Skin. J. Neurosci. 1997, 17, 8003–8008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sun, S.; Dong, X. Trp channels and itch. Semin. Immunopathol. 2015, 38, 293–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Ringkamp, M.; Schepers, R.J.; Shimada, S.G.; Johanek, L.M.; Hartke, T.V.; Borzan, J.; Shim, B.; LaMotte, R.H.; Meyer, R.A. A role for nociceptive, myelinated nerve fibers in itch sensation. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 14841–14849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Usoskin, D.; Furlan, A.; Islam, S.; Abdo, H.; Lönnerberg, P.; Lou, D.; Hjerling-Leffler, J.; Haeggström, J.; Kharchenko, O.; Kharchenko, P.V.; et al. Unbiased classification of sensory neuron types by large-scale single-cell RNA sequencing. Nat. Neurosci. 2014, 18, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sun, Y.-G.; Chen, Z.-F. A gastrin-releasing peptide receptor mediates the itch sensation in the spinal cord. Nature 2007, 448, 700–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, X.Y.; Ginosar, Y.; Yazdi, J.; Hincker, A.; Chen, Z.F. Cross-talk between Human Spinal Cord mu-opioid Receptor 1Y Isoform and Gastrin-releasing Peptide Receptor Mediates Opioid-induced Scratching Behavior. Anesthesiology 2019, 131, 381–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Munanairi, A.; Liu, X.-Y.; Barry, D.M.; Yang, Q.; Yin, J.-B.; Jin, H.; Li, H.; Meng, Q.-T.; Peng, J.-H.; Wu, Z.-Y.; et al. Non-canonical Opioid Signaling Inhibits Itch Transmission in the Spinal Cord of Mice. Cell Rep. 2018, 23, 866–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Liu, X.-Y.; Liu, Z.-C.; Sun, Y.-G.; Ross, M.; Kim, S.; Tsai, F.-F.; Li, Q.-F.; Jeffry, J.; Kim, J.-Y.; Loh, H.H.; et al. Unidirectional Cross-Activation of GRPR by MOR1D Uncouples Itch and Analgesia Induced by Opioids. Cell 2011, 147, 447–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Han, L.; Dong, X. Itch Mechanisms and Circuits. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2014, 43, 331–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Davidson, S.; Giesler, G.J. The multiple pathways for itch and their interactions with pain. Trends Neurosci. 2010, 33, 550–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Hauser, A.S.; Attwood, M.M.; Rask-Andersen, M.; Schiöth, H.B.; Gloriam, D.E. Trends in GPCR drug discovery: New agents, targets and indications. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2017, 16, 829–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. De La Fuente, M.; Noble, D.N.; Verma, S.; Nieman, M.T. Mapping Human Protease-activated Receptor 4 (PAR4) Homodimer Interface to Transmembrane Helix 4. J. Boil. Chem. 2012, 287, 10414–10423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Arachiche, A.; Mumaw, M.M.; De La Fuente, M.; Nieman, M.T. Protease-activated Receptor 1 (PAR1) and PAR4 Heterodimers Are Required for PAR1-enhanced Cleavage of PAR4 by α-Thrombin. J. Boil. Chem. 2013, 288, 32553–32562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Xie, Z.; Hu, H. TRP Channels as Drug Targets to Relieve Itch. Pharmaceutics 2018, 11, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Lee, J.-H.; Park, C.-K.; Chen, G.; Han, Q.; Xie, R.-G.; Liu, T.; Ji, R.-R.; Lee, S.-Y. RETRACTED: A Monoclonal Antibody that Targets a NaV1.7 Channel Voltage Sensor for Pain and Itch Relief. Cell 2014, 157, 1393–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Parsons, M.; Ganellin, C.R. Histamine and its receptors. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2006, 147, S127–S135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Panula, P.; Chazot, P.L.; Cowart, M.; Gutzmer, R.; Leurs, R.; Liu, W.L.S.; Stark, H.; Thurmond, R.L.; Haas, H.L. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. XCVIII. Histamine Receptors. Pharmacol. Rev. 2015, 67, 601–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Timmerman, H.; Leurs, R.; Van Der Goot, H. Histamine Receptors and Their Ligands: Mechanisms and Applications. In Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology; Elsevier BV: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  48. Canonica, G.; Blaiss, M. Antihistaminic, Anti-Inflammatory, and Antiallergic Properties of the Nonsedating Second-Generation Antihistamine Desloratadine: A Review of the Evidence. World Allergy Organ. J. 2011, 4, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Passani, B.; Lin, J.-S.; Hancock, A.; Crochet, S.; Blandina, P. The histamine H3 receptor as a novel therapeutic target for cognitive and sleep disorders. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2004, 25, 618–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Imamachi, N.; Park, G.H.; Lee, H.; Anderson, D.J.; Simon, M.I.; Basbaum, A.I.; Han, S.-K. TRPV1-expressing primary afferents generate behavioral responses to pruritogens via multiple mechanisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 11330–11335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Pándy-Szekeres, G.; Munk, C.; Tsonkov, T.; Mordalski, S.; Harpsoe, K.; Hauser, A.S.; Bojarski, A.J.; Gloriam, D.E. GPCRdb in 2018: Adding GPCR structure models and ligands. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, D440–D446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Denham, K.J.; Boutsiouki, P.; Clough, G.F.; Church, M.K. Comparison of the effects of desloratadine and levocetirizine on histamine-induced wheal, flare and itch in human skin. Inflamm. Res. 2003, 52, 424–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Tanizaki, H.; Ikoma, A.; Fukuoka, M.; Miyachi, Y.; Kabashima, K. Effects of Bepotastine and Fexofenadine on Histamine-Induced Flare, Wheal and Itch. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2012, 158, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Davies, M.G.; Greaves, M.W. Sensory responses of human skin to synthetic histamine analogues and histamine. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1980, 9, 461–465. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Ohsawa, Y.; Hirasawa, N. The Role of Histamine H1 and H4 Receptors in Atopic Dermatitis: From Basic Research to Clinical Study. Allergol. Int. 2014, 63, 533–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Bell, J.K.; McQueen, D.S.; Rees, J.L. Involvement of histamine H4and H1receptors in scratching induced by histamine receptor agonists in BalbC mice. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2004, 142, 374–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Roßbach, K.; Nassenstein, C.; Gschwandtner, M.; Schnell, D.; Sander, K.; Seifert, R.; Stark, H.; Kietzmann, M.; Bäumer, W.; Vlad, G.; et al. Histamine H1, H3 and H4 receptors are involved in pruritus. Neurosciences. 2011, 190, 89–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. 5Huang, H.; Li, Y.; Liang, J.; Finkelman, F.D. Molecular Regulation of Histamine Synthesis. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Simone, N.A.; Ngeow, J.Y.F.; Whitehouse, J.; Becerra-Cabal, L.; Putterman, G.J.; LaMotte, R.H. The Magnitude and Duration of Itch Produced by Intracutaneous Injections of Histamine. Somatosens. Res. 1987, 5, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Horsmanheimo, L.; Harvima, I.T.; Harvima, R.J.; Brummer-Korvenkontio, H.; Francois, G.; Reunala, T. Histamine and leukotriene C4 release in cutaneous mosquito-bite reactions. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1996, 98, 408–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Thurmond, R.L.; Kazerouni, K.; Chaplan, S.; Greenspan, A.; Carstens, E.; Akiyama, T. Peripheral Neuronal Mechanism of Itch. Advances in Vagal Afferent Neurobiology 2014, 20143036, 143–192. [Google Scholar]
  62. Hoyer, D.; Clarke, D.E.; Fozard, J.R.; Hartig, P.R.; Martin, G.R.; Mylecharane, E.J.; Saxena, P.R.; Humphrey, P.P. International Union of Pharmacology classification of receptors for 5-hydroxytryptamine (Serotonin). Pharmacol. Rev. 1994, 46, 157–203. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  63. Hoyer, D. Serotonin receptors nomenclature. In The Serotonin System; Tricklebank, M.D., Daly, E., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; Chapter Four; pp. 63–93. [Google Scholar]
  64. Nichols, D.E.; Nichols, C.D. Serotonin Receptors. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 1614–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Berger, M.; Gray, J.; Roth, B.L. The Expanded Biology of Serotonin. Annu. Rev. Med. 2009, 60, 355–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Masson, J.; Emerit, M.B.; Hamon, M.; Darmon, M. Serotonergic signaling: Multiple effectors and pleiotropic effects. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Membr. Transp. Signal. 2012, 1, 685–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yamaguchi, T.; Nagasawa, T.; Satoh, M.; Kuraishi, Y. Itch-associated response induced by intradermal serotonin through 5-HT2 receptors in mice. Neurosci. Res. 1999, 35, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kim, D.K.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, H.; Koh, J.Y.; Kim, K.M.; Noh, M.; Kim, J.J.; Lee, C.H. Involvement of serotonin receptors 5-HT1 and 5-HT2 in 12(S)-HPETE-induced scratching in mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2008, 579, 390–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Morita, T.; McClain, S.P.; Batia, L.M.; Pellegrino, M.; Wilson, S.R.; Kienzler, M.A.; Lyman, K.; Olsen, A.S.B.; Wong, J.F.; Stucky, C.L.; et al. HTR7 Mediates Serotonergic Acute and Chronic Itch. Neuron 2015, 87, 124–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Nojima, H.; Carstens, E. 5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)2 Receptor Involvement in Acute 5-HT-Evoked Scratching but Not in Allergic Pruritus Induced by Dinitrofluorobenzene in Rats. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2003, 306, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Tian, B.; Wang, X.-L.; Huang, Y.; Chen, L.-H.; Cheng, R.-X.; Zhou, F.-M.; Guo, R.; Li, J.-C.; Liu, T. Peripheral and spinal 5-HT receptors participate in cholestatic itch and antinociception induced by bile duct ligation in rats. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 36286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Akiyama, T.; Ivanov, M.; Nagamine, M.; Davoodi, A.; Carstens, M.I.; Ikoma, A.; Cevikbas, F.; Kempkes, C.; Buddenkotte, J.; Steinhoff, M.; et al. Involvement of TRPV4 in Serotonin-Evoked Scratching. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2016, 136, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Ständer, S.; Böckenholt, B.; Schürmeyer-Horst, F.; Weishaupt, C.; Heuft, G.; Schneider, T. Treatment of Chronic Pruritus with the Selective Serotonin Re-uptake Inhibitors Paroxetine and Fluvoxamine: Results of an Open-labelled, Two-arm Proof-of-concept Study. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2009, 89, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Kim, K. Neuroimmunological Mechanism of Pruritus in Atopic Dermatitis Focused on the Role of Serotonin. Biomol. Ther. 2012, 20, 506–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Lonne-Rahm, S.; Rickberg, H.; Elnour, H.; Marin, P.; Azmitia, E.C.; Nordlind, K. Neuroimmune mechanisms in patients with atopic dermatitis during chronic stress. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2007, 22, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Zhao, Z.-Q.; Liu, X.-Y.; Jeffry, J.; Karunarathne, A.; Li, J.-L.; Munanairi, A.; Zhou, X.-Y.; Li, H.; Sun, Y.-G.; Wan, L.; et al. Descending control of itch transmission by the serotonergic system via 5-HT1A-facilitated GRP-GRPR signaling. Neurology 2014, 84, 821–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Rapport, M.M.; Green, A.A.; Page, I.H. Serum vasoconstrictor, serotonin; isolation and characterization. J. Boil. Chem. 1948, 176, 1243–1251. [Google Scholar]
  78. Walther, D.J.; Peter, J.-U.; Bashammakh, S.; Hörtnagl, H.; Voits, M.; Fink, H.; Bader, M. Synthesis of Serotonin by a Second Tryptophan Hydroxylase Isoform. Science 2003, 299, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Bardoni, R. Serotonergic Modulation of Nociceptive Circuits in Spinal Cord Dorsal Horn. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2019, 17, 1133–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Reddy, V.B.; Iuga, A.O.; Shimada, S.G.; LaMotte, R.H.; Lerner, E.A. Cowhage-evoked itch is mediated by a novel cysteine protease: A ligand of protease-activated receptors. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28, 4331–4335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Nieman, M.T.; Schmaier, A.H. Interaction of Thrombin with PAR1 and PAR4 at the Thrombin Cleavage Site. Biochemicals 2007, 46, 8603–8610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Zhang, P.; Covic, L.; Kuliopulos, A. Protease-Activated Receptors. In Platelets; Elsevier BV: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 249–259. [Google Scholar]
  83. Heuberger, D.M.; Schuepbach, R.A. Protease-activated receptors (PARs): Mechanisms of action and potential therapeutic modulators in PAR-driven inflammatory diseases. Thromb. J. 2019, 17, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Nieman, M.T. Protease-activated receptors in hemostasis. Blood 2016, 128, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Akiyama, T.; Lerner, E.A.; Carstens, E. Protease-activated receptors and itch. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2015, 226, 219–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Adams, M.N.; Ramachandran, R.; Yau, M.-K.; Suen, J.; Fairlie, D.P.; Hollenberg, M.D.; Hooper, J.D. Structure, function and pathophysiology of protease activated receptors. Pharmacol. Ther. 2011, 130, 248–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Reddy, V.B.; Shimada, S.G.; Sikand, P.; LaMotte, R.H.; Lerner, E.A. Cathepsin S Elicits Itch and Signals via Protease-Activated Receptors. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2010, 130, 1468–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Soh, U.J.; Dores, M.; Chen, B.; Trejo, J. Signal transduction by protease-activated receptors. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2010, 160, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Kim, N.; Bae, K.B.; Kim, M.O.; Yu, D.H.; Kim, H.J.; Yuh, H.S.; Ji, Y.R.; Park, S.J.; Kim, S.; Son, K.-H.; et al. Overexpression of Cathepsin S Induces Chronic Atopic Dermatitis in Mice. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2012, 132, 1169–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Davidson, S.; Zhang, X.; Yoon, C.H.; Khasabov, S.G.; Simone, N.A.; Giesler, G.J. The itch-producing agents histamine and cowhage activate separate populations of primate spinothalamic tract neurons. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27, 10007–10014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Reddy, V.; Lerner, E.A. Plant cysteine proteases that evoke itch activate protease-activated receptors. Br. J. Dermatol. 2010, 163, 532–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Barry, G.D.; Le, G.T.; Fairlie, D.P. Agonists and antagonists of protease activated receptors (PARs). Curr. Med. Chem. 2006, 13, 243–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Fostini, A.; Golpanian, R.; Rosen, J.; Xue, R.-D.; Yosipovitch, G. Beat the bite: Pathophysiology and management of itch in mosquito bites. Itch 2019, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lin, H.; Liu, A.P.; Smith, T.; Trejo, J. Cofactoring and dimerization of proteinase-activated receptors. Pharmacol. Rev. 2013, 65, 1198–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. De La Fuente, M.; Arachiche, A.; Nieman, M.T. Thrombin Modulates PAR1-PAR4 Heterodimers. Blood 2011, 118, 2203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Han, X.; Hofmann, L.; De La Fuente, M.; Alexander, N.; Palczewski, K.; INVENT INVENT Consortium; Nieman, M.T. PAR4 activation involves extracellular loop-3 and transmembrane residue Thr153. Blood 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zhao, P.; Metcalf, M.; Bunnett, N.W. Biased Signaling of Protease-Activated Receptors. Front. Endocrinol. 2014, 5, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Zhao, J.; Munanairi, A.; Liu, X.-Y.; Zhang, J.; Hu, L.; Hu, M.; Bu, D.; Liu, L.; Xie, Z.; Kim, B.S.; et al. PAR2 Mediates Itch via TRPV3 Signaling in Keratinocytes. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Ständer, S.; Luger, T.A. NK-1 Antagonists and Itch. Drug Delivery 2015, 226, 237–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Majkowska-Pilip, A.; Halik, P.; Gniazdowska, E. The Significance of NK1 Receptor Ligands and Their Application in Targeted Radionuclide Tumour Therapy. Pharm. 2019, 11, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Ma, H.-T.; Venkatachalam, K.; Li, H.-S.; Montell, C.; Kurosaki, T.; Patterson, R.L.; Gill, D.L. Assessment of the Role of the Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptor in the Activation of Transient Receptor Potential Channels and Store-operated Ca2+ Entry Channels. J. Boil. Chem. 2001, 276, 18888–18896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Douglas, S.D.; Leeman, S.E. Neurokinin-1 receptor: Functional significance in the immune system in reference to selected infections and inflammation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2010, 1217, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Amatya, B.; Elnour, H.; Holst, M.; Theodorsson, E.; Nordlind, K. Expression of tachykinins and their receptors in plaque psoriasis with pruritus. Br. J. Dermatol. 2011, 164, 1023–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ständer, S.; Siepmann, D.; Herrgott, I.; Sunderkötter, C.; Luger, T.A. Targeting the Neurokinin Receptor 1 with Aprepitant: A Novel Antipruritic Strategy. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e10968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Ständer, S.; Yosipovitch, G. Substance P and neurokinin 1 receptor are new targets for the treatment of chronic pruritus. Br. J. Dermatol. 2019, 181, 932–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Xiao, J.; Zeng, S.; Wang, X.; Babazada, H.; Li, Z.; Liu, R.; Yu, W. Neurokinin 1 and opioid receptors: Relationships and interactions in nervous system. Transl. Perioper. Pain Med. 2016, 3, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Euler, U.S.V.; Gaddum, J.H. An unidentified depressor substance in certain tissue extracts. J. Physiol. 1931, 72, 74–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Studer, R.O.; Trzeciak, A.; Lergier, W. Isolierung und Aminosäuresequenz von Substanz P aus Pferdedarm. Helv. Chim. Acta 1973, 56, 860–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Severini, C. The Tachykinin Peptide Family. Pharmacol. Rev. 2002, 54, 285–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Haas, S.; Capellino, S.; Phan, N.Q.; Böhm, M.; Luger, T.A.; Straub, R.H.; Ständer, S. Low density of sympathetic nerve fibers relative to substance P-positive nerve fibers in lesional skin of chronic pruritus and prurigo nodularis. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2010, 58, 193–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Azimi, E.; Reddy, V.B.; Shade, K.-T.C.; Anthony, R.M.; Talbot, S.; Pereira, P.J.S.; Lerner, E.A. Dual action of neurokinin-1 antagonists on Mas-related GPCRs. JCI Insight 2016, 1, e89362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Katsube, N.; Maruyama, M.; Andoh, T.; Kuraishi, Y. Involvement of Leukotriene B4 in Substance P-Induced Itch-Associated Response in Mice. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2001, 117, 1621–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Hosogi, M.; Schmelz, M.; Miyachi, Y.; Ikoma, A. Bradykinin is a potent pruritogen in atopic dermatitis: A switch from pain to itch. Pain 2006, 126, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Inoue, A.; Raimondi, F.; Kadji, F.M.N.; Singh, G.; Kishi, T.; Uwamizu, A.; Ono, Y.; Shinjo, Y.; Ishida, S.; Arang, N.; et al. Illuminating G-Protein-Coupling Selectivity of GPCRs. Cell 2019, 177, 1933–1947.e25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Calixto, J.B.; Cabrini, D.A.; Ferreira, J.; Campos, M.M. Kinins in pain and inflammation. Pain 2000, 87, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Liang, J.; He, Y.; Ji, W. Bradykinin-evoked scratching responses in complete Freund’s adjuvant-inflamed skin through activation of B1 receptor. Exp. Biol. Med. 2012, 237, 318–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Hayashi, I.; Majima, M. Reduction of sodium deoxycholic acid-induced scratching behaviour by bradykinin B2receptor antagonists. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1999, 126, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Lang, E.; Novák, A.; Reeh, P.W.; Handwerker, H.O. Chemosensitivity of fine afferents from rat skin in vitro. J. Neurophysiol. 1990, 63, 887–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Koppert, W.; Martus, P.; Reeh, P.W. Interactions of histamine and bradykinin on polymodal C-fibres in isolated rat skin. Eur. J. Pain 2001, 5, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Averbeck, B.; Reeh, P.W. Interactions of inflammatory mediators stimulating release of calcitonin gene-related peptide, substance P and prostaglandin E2 from isolated rat skin. Neuropharmacol. 2001, 40, 416–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Golias, C.; Charalabopoulos, A.; Stagikas, D.; Charalabopoulos, K.; Batistatou, A. The kinin system—Bradykinin: Biological effects and clinical implications. Multiple role of the kinin system—Bradykinin. Hippokratia 2007, 11, 124–128. [Google Scholar]
  122. Tetta, C.; Maffei, S.; Cisterna, B.; Fonsato, V.; Triolo, G.; Paolo, G.; Camussi, G.; Chiara, M.; Gatti, E. The Evolution of Biocompatibility: From Microinflammation to Microvesiscles. In Progress in Hemodialysis—From Emergent Biotechnology to Clinical Practice; Intech Open: London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  123. Liu, Y.; Liu, J.; Li, M.; Dai, S.; Liang, J.; Ji, W. The effect of kinin B1 receptor on chronic itching sensitization. Mol. Pain 2015, 11, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Cormia, F.E.; Dougherty, J.W. Proteolytic activity in development of pain and itching. Cutaneous reactions to bradykinin and kallikrein. J. Investig. Dermatol. 1960, 35, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Poyner, D.R.; Sexton, P.M.; Marshall, I.; Smith, D.M.; Quirion, R.; Born, W.; Muff, R.; Fischer, J.A.; Foord, S.M. International Union of Pharmacology. XXXII. The mammalian calcitonin gene-related peptides, adrenomedullin, amylin, and calcitonin receptors. Pharmacol. Rev. 2002, 54, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Booe, J.M.; Warner, M.L.; Roehrkasse, A.M.; Hay, D.L.; Pioszak, A.A. Probing the Mechanism of Receptor Activity–Modifying Protein Modulation of GPCR Ligand Selectivity through Rational Design of Potent Adrenomedullin and Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Antagonists. Mol. Pharmacol. 2018, 93, 355–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Kuwasako, K.; Cao, Y.-N.; Chu, C.-P.; Iwatsubo, S.; Eto, T.; Kitamura, K. Functions of the Cytoplasmic Tails of the Human Receptor Activity-modifying Protein Components of Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide and Adrenomedullin Receptors. J. Boil. Chem. 2006, 281, 7205–7213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  128. Southan, C.; Sharman, J.L.; Benson, H.E.; Faccenda, E.; Pawson, A.J.; Alexander, S.P.; Buneman, O.P.; Davenport, A.P.; McGrath, J.C.; Peters, J.A.; et al. The IUPHAR/BPS Guide to PHARMACOLOGY in 2016: Towards curated quantitative interactions between 1300 protein targets and 6000 ligands. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 44, D1054–D1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  129. Cottrell, G.S. CGRP Receptor Signalling Pathways. Drug Delivery 2018, 255, 37–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Rogoz, K.; Andersen, H.H.; Lagerström, M.C.; Kullander, K. Multimodal Use of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide and Substance P in Itch and Acute Pain Uncovered by the Elimination of Vesicular Glutamate Transporter 2 from Transient Receptor Potential Cation Channel Subfamily V Member 1 Neurons. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34, 14055–14068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. McCoy, E.S.; Taylor-Blake, B.; Street, S.E.; Pribisko, A.L.; Zheng, J.; Zylka, M.J. Peptidergic CGRPα primary sensory neurons encode heat and itch and tonically suppress sensitivity to cold. Neuron 2013, 78, 138–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Russell, F.A.; King, R.; Smillie, S.J.; Kodji, X.; Brain, S.D. Calcitonin gene-related peptide: Physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol. Rev. 2014, 94, 1099–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Kee, Z.; Kodji, X.; Brain, S.D. The Role of Calcitonin Gene Related Peptide (CGRP) in Neurogenic Vasodilation and Its Cardioprotective Effects. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Amara, S.; Jonas, V.; Rosenfeld, M.G.; Ong, E.S.; Evans, R.M. Alternative RNA processing in calcitonin gene expression generates mRNAs encoding different polypeptide products. Nature 1982, 298, 240–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Schlereth, T.; Schukraft, J.; Krämer-Best, H.H.; Geber, C.; Ackermann, T.; Birklein, F. Interaction of calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) and substance P (SP) in human skin. Neuropeptides 2016, 59, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Vaalasti, A.; Suomalainen, H.; Rechardt, L. Calcitonin gene-related peptide immunoreactivity in prurigo nodularis: A comparative study with neurodermatitis circumscripta. Br. J. Dermatol. 1989, 120, 619–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Rosenbaum, D.M.; Rasmussen, S.G.F.; Kobilka, B.K. The structure and function of G-protein-coupled receptors. Nature 2009, 459, 356–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Jackson, T.R.; Blair, L.A.C.; Marshall, J.; Goedert, M.; Hanley, M.R. The mas oncogene encodes an angiotensin receptor. Nature 1988, 335, 437–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Dong, X.; Han, S.-K.; Zylka, M.J.; Simon, M.I.; Anderson, D.J. A Diverse Family of GPCRs Expressed in Specific Subsets of Nociceptive Sensory Neurons. Cell 2001, 106, 619–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Bader, M.; Alenina, N.; Andrade-Navarro, M.A.; Santos, R.A. Mas and Its Related G protein-coupled Receptors, Mrgprs. Pharmacol. Rev. 2014, 66, 1080–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Zhang, L.; Taylor, N.; Xie, Y.; Ford, R.; Johnson, J.; Paulsen, J.E.; Bates, B. Cloning and expression of MRG receptors in macaque, mouse, and human. Mol. Brain Res. 2005, 133, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Han, L.; Ma, C.; Liu, Q.; Weng, H.-J.; Cui, Y.; Tang, Z.; Kim, Y.; Nie, H.; Qu, L.; Patel, K.N.; et al. A subpopulation of nociceptors specifically linked to itch. Nat. Neurosci. 2012, 16, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Han, S.-K.; Dong, X.; Hwang, J.-I.; Zylka, M.J.; Anderson, D.J.; Simon, M.I. Orphan G protein-coupled receptors MrgA1 and MrgC11 are distinctively activated by RF-amide-related peptides through the G q/11 pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA 2002, 99, 14740–14745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Mc Lembo, P.; Grazzini, E.; Groblewski, T.; O’Donnell, D.; Roy, M.-O.; Zhang, J.; Hoffert, C.; Cao, J.; Schmidt, R.; Pelletier, M.; et al. Proenkephalin A gene products activate a new family of sensory neuron–specific GPCRs. Nat. Neurosci. 2002, 5, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Prchalová, E.; Hin, N.; Thomas, A.G.; Veeravalli, V.; Ng, J.; Alt, J.; Rais, R.; Rojas, C.; Li, Z.; Hihara, H.; et al. Discovery of Benzamidine- and 1-Aminoisoquinoline-Based Human MAS-Related G-Protein-Coupled Receptor X1 (MRGPRX1) Agonists. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 8631–8641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Wilson, S.R.; Gerhold, K.A.; Bifolck-Fisher, A.; Liu, Q.; Patel, K.N.; Dong, X.; Bautista, D.M. TRPA1 is required for histamine-independent, Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor-mediated itch. Nat. Neurosci. 2011, 14, 595–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  147. Aghahowa, S.E.; Obianwu, H.O.; Isah, A.O.; Arhewoh, I.M. Chloroquine-induced Pruritus. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2010, 72, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  148. Osifo, N.G. The antipruritic effects of chlorpheniramine, cyproheptadine and sulphapyridine monitored with limb activity meters on chloroquine induced pruritus among patients with malaria. Afr. J. Med. Med. Sci. 1995, 24, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  149. Abila, B.; Ezeamuzie, I.C.; Igbigbi, P.S.; Ambakederemo, A.W.; Asomugha, L. Effects of two antihistamines on chloroquine and histamine induced weal and flare in healthy African volunteers. Afr. J. Med. Med. Sci. 1994, 23, 139–142. [Google Scholar]
  150. Sanjel, B.; Maeng, H.J.; Shim, W.-S. BAM8-22 and its receptor MRGPRX1 may attribute to cholestatic pruritus. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 10888–10913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Swain, M.G.; MacArthur, L.; Vergalla, J.; Jones, E.A. Adrenal secretion of BAM-22P, a potent opioid peptide, is enhanced in rats with acute cholestasis. Am. J. Physiol. Liver Physiol. 1994, 266, G201–G205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Chen, H.; Ikeda, S.R. Modulation of Ion Channels and Synaptic Transmission by a Human Sensory Neuron-Specific G-Protein-Coupled Receptor, SNSR4/mrgX1, Heterologously Expressed in Cultured Rat Neurons. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24, 5044–5053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Sikand, P.; Dong, X.; LaMotte, R.H. BAM8–22 Peptide Produces Itch and Nociceptive Sensations in Humans Independent of Histamine Release. J. Neurosc. 2011, 31, 7563–7567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Liu, Q.; Weng, H.-J.; Patel, K.N.; Tang, Z.; Bai, H.; Steinhoff, M.; Dong, X. The Distinct Roles of Two GPCRs, MrgprC11 and PAR2, in Itch and Hyperalgesia. Sci. Signal. 2011, 4, ra45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Toda, A.; Yokomizo, T.; Shimizu, T. Leukotriene B4 receptors. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2002, 68, 575–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Andoh, T.; Saito, A.; Kuraishi, Y. Leukotriene B4 Mediates Sphingosylphosphorylcholine-Induced Itch-Associated Responses in Mouse Skin. J. Investig. Derma. 2009, 129, 2854–2860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  157. Andoh, T.; Haza, S.; Saito, A.; Kuraishi, Y. Involvement of leukotriene B4 in spontaneous itch-related behaviour in NC mice with atopic dermatitis-like skin lesions. Exp. Dermatol. 2011, 20, 894–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Andoh, T.; Kuraishi, Y. Intradermal leukotriene B4, but not prostaglandin E2, induces itch-associated responses in mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1998, 353, 93–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Tsukumo, Y.; Harada, D.; Manabe, H. Pharmacological characterization of itch-associated response induced by repeated application of oxazolone in mice. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2010, 113, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  160. Camp, R.; Jones, R.R.; Brain, S.D.; Woollard, P.; Greaves, M. Production of Intraepidermal Microabscesses by Topical Application of Leukotriene B4. J. Investig. Dermatol. 1984, 82, 202–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Soter, N.; Lewis, R.A.; Corey, E.J.; Austen, K.F. Local Effects of Synthetic Leukotrienes (LTC4, LTD4, and LTB4) in Human Skin. J. Investig. Dermatol. 1983, 80, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Gijón, M.A.; Zarini, S.; Murphy, R.C. Biosynthesis of eicosanoids and transcellular metabolism of leukotrienes in murine bone marrow cells. J. Lipid Res. 2006, 48, 716–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  163. Harizi, H.; Corcuff, J.-B.; Gualde, N. Arachidonic-acid-derived eicosanoids: Roles in biology and immunopathology. Trends Mol. Med. 2008, 14, 461–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Yokomizo, T.; Izumi, T.; Shimizu, T. Leukotriene B4: Metabolism and Signal Transduction. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2001, 385, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Yost, C.C.; Weyrich, A.S.; Zimmerman, G.A. The platelet activating factor (PAF) signaling cascade in systemic inflammatory responses. Biochimicals 2010, 92, 692–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  166. Fjellner, B.; Hägermark, O. Experimental pruritus evoked by platelet activating factor (PAF-acether) in human skin. Acta Derm. Venereol. 1985, 65, 409–412. [Google Scholar]
  167. Shigenobu, K.; Mori, T.; Kamata, K.; Kasuya, Y. Platelet-activating factor: Lack of direct action on guinea pig myocardium and possible transmitter release from cardiac sympathetic nerve endings at high concentrations. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1989, 67, 669–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Petersen, L.J.; Church, M.K.; Skov, P.S. Platelet-activating factor induces histamine release from human skin mast cells in vivo, which is reduced by local nerve blockade. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1997, 99, 640–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Prescott, S.M.; Zimmerman, G.A.; Stafforini, D.M.; McIntyre, T.M. Platelet-Activating Factor and Related Lipid Mediators. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2000, 69, 419–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Inflammation: Basic Principles and Clinical Correlates. Ann. Int. Med. 1988, 109, 519. [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Abeck, D.; Andersson, T.; Grosshans, E.; Jablonska, S.; Kragballe, K.; Vahlquist, A.; Schmidt, T.; Dupuy, P.; Ring, J. Topical application of a platelet-activating factor (PAF) antagonist in atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm. Venereol. 1997, 77, 449–451. [Google Scholar]
  172. Greisenegger, E.K.; Zimprich, A.; Stingl, G.; Kopp, T.; Zimprich, F. Analysis of the prodynorphin promoter polymorphism in atopic dermatitis and disease-related pruritus. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2009, 34, 728–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Melo, H.; Basso, L.; Iftinca, M.; Macnaughton, W.K.; Hollenberg, M.D.; McKay, D.M.; Altier, C. Itch induced by peripheral mu opioid receptors is dependent on TRPV1-expressing neurons and alleviated by channel activation. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 15551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Goodman, A.J.; Le Bourdonnec, B.; Dolle, R.E. Mu Opioid Receptor Antagonists: Recent Developments. ChemMedChem 2007, 2, 1552–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Yuan, C.-S.; Foss, J.; O’Connor, M.; Osinski, J.; Roizen, M.F.; Moss, J. Efficacy of orally administered methylnaltrexone in decreasing subjective effects after intravenous morphine. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1998, 52, 161–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Avidor-Reiss, T.; Nevo, I.; Saya, D.; Bayewitch, M.; Vogel, Z. Opiate-induced adenylyl cyclase superactivation is isozyme-specific. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 5040–5047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  177. Reich, A.; Szepietowski, J.C. Opioid-induced pruritus: An update. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2010, 35, 2–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Taneda, K.; Tominaga, M.; Negi, O.; Tengara, S.; Kamo, A.; Ogawa, H.; Takamori, K. Evaluation of epidermal nerve density and opioid receptor levels in psoriatic itch. Br. J. Dermatol. 2011, 165, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Tominaga, M.; Ogawa, H.; Takamori, K. Possible Roles of Epidermal Opioid Systems in Pruritus of Atopic Dermatitis. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2007, 127, 2228–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  180. Kupczyk, P.; Reich, A.; Holysz, M.; Gajda, M.; Wysokińska, E.; Kobuszewska, A.; Nevozhay, D.; Nowakowska, B.; Strzadała, L.; Jagodziński, P.P.; et al. Opioid Receptors in Psoriatic Skin: Relationship with Itch. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2017, 97, 564–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  181. Holzer, P. Non-analgesic effects of opioids: Management of opioid-induced constipation by peripheral opioid receptor antagonists: Prevention or withdrawal? Curr. Pharm. Des. 2012, 18, 6010–6020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Phan, N.Q.; Siepmann, D.; Gralow, I.; Ständer, S. Adjuvant topical therapy with a cannabinoid receptor agonist in facial postherpetic neuralgia. J. der Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 2009, 8, 88–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Phan, N.; Lotts, T.; Antal, A.; Bernhard, J.; Ständer, S. Systemic Kappa Opioid Receptor Agonists in the Treatment of Chronic Pruritus: A Literature Review. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2012, 92, 555–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Day, R.; Lazure, C.; Basak, A.; Boudreault, A.; Limperis, P.; Dong, W.; Lindberg, I. Prodynorphin processing by proprotein convertase 2. Cleavage at single basic residues and enhanced processing in the presence of carboxypeptidase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 829–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  185. Kardon, A.P.; Polgár, E.; Hachisuka, J.; Snyder, L.M.; Cameron, D.; Savage, S.; Cai, X.; Karnup, S.; Fan, C.R.; Hemenway, G.M.; et al. Dynorphin acts as a neuromodulator to inhibit itch in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. Neuron 2014, 82, 573–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  186. Goldstein, A. Opioid peptides endorphins in pituitary and brain. Science 1976, 193, 1081–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Ishikawa, T.; Hashimoto, T.; Munetsugu, T.; Yokozeki, H.; Satoh, T. Increased β-endorphin and autotaxin in patients with prurigo. J. Cutan. Immunol. Allergy 2019, 2, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Mackie, K. Cannabinoid Receptors: Where They are and What They do. J. Neuroendocr. 2008, 20, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Howlett, A.C.; Barth, F.; Bonner, T.I.; Cabral, G.; Casellas, P.; Devane, W.A.; Felder, C.C.; Herkenham, M.; Mackie, K.; Martin, B.R.; et al. International Union of Pharmacology. XXVII. Classification of cannabinoid receptors. Pharmacol. Rev. 2002, 54, 161–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Stander, S.; Reinhardt, H.W.; Luger, T.A. Topical cannabinoid agonists. An effective new possibility for treating chronic pruritus. Hautarzt 2006, 57, 801–807. [Google Scholar]
  191. Avila, C.; Massick, S.; Kaffenberger, B.H.; Kwatra, S.G.; Bechtel, M. Cannabinoids for the treatment of chronic pruritus: A review. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2020, 82, 1205–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Pogatzki-Zahn, E.; Marziniak, M.; Schneider, G.; Luger, T.A.; Ständer, S. Chronic pruritus: Targets, mechanisms and future therapies. Drug News Perspect. 2008, 21, 541–551. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  193. Dvorak, M.; Watkinson, A.; McGlone, F.; Rukwied, R. Histamine induced responses are attenuated by a cannabinoid receptor agonist in human skin. Inflamm. Res. 2003, 52, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Binzen, U.; Greffrath, W.; Hennessy, S.; Bausen, M.; Saaler-Reinhardt, S.; Treede, R.-D. Co-expression of the voltage-gated potassium channel Kv1.4 with transient receptor potential channels (TRPV1 and TRPV2) and the cannabinoid receptor CB1 in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. Neurosciences 2006, 142, 527–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Duo, L.; Hu, L.; Tian, N.; Cheng, G.; Wang, H.; Lin, Z.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Y. TRPV1 gain-of-function mutation impairs pain and itch sensations in mice. Mol. Pain 2018, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Moiseenkova-Bell, V.Y.; Stanciu, L.A.; Serysheva, I.I.; Tobe, B.J.; Wensel, T.G. Structure of TRPV1 channel revealed by electron cryomicroscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 7451–7455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  197. Nakagawa, H.; Hiura, A. Four Possible Itching Pathways Related to the TRPV1 Channel, Histamine, PAR-2 and Serotonin. Malays. J. Med. Sci. 2013, 20, 5–12. [Google Scholar]
  198. Wang, J.; Ueda, N. Biology of endocannabinoid synthesis system. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2009, 89, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Di Marzo, V. Endocannabinoids: Synthesis and degradation. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2006, 160, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Lu, H.-C.; Mackie, K. An Introduction to the Endogenous Cannabinoid System. Boil. Psychiatry 2015, 79, 516–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  201. Grotenhermen, F. Cannabinoids. Curr. Drug. Targets CNS Neurol. Disord. 2005, 4, 507–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Pacher, P.; Bátkai, S.; Kunos, G. The Endocannabinoid System as an Emerging Target of Pharmacotherapy. Pharmacol. Rev. 2006, 58, 389–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  203. Zygmunt, P.; Petersson, J.; Andersson, D.A.; Chuang, H.-H.; Sørgård, M.; Di Marzo, V.; Julius, D.; Högestätt, E.D. Vanilloid receptors on sensory nerves mediate the vasodilator action of anandamide. Nature 1999, 400, 452–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Muller, C.; Morales, P.; Reggio, P.H. Cannabinoid Ligands Targeting TRP Channels. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2019, 11, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Carstens, E.; Akiyama, T. Itch: Mechanisms and Treatment; CRC Press/Taylor & Francis: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  206. Asao, H. Interleukin-2. In Reference Module in Biomedical Sciences; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  207. Malek, T.R.; Castro, I. Interleukin-2 Receptor Signaling: At the Interface between Tolerance and Immunity. Immunity 2010, 33, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  208. Nelson, B.H.; Willerford, D.M. Biology of the Interleukin-2 Receptor. In Advances in Immunology; Elsevier BV: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1998; Volume 70, pp. 1–81. [Google Scholar]
  209. Gaffen, S.L. Signaling Domains of the Interleukin 2 Receptor. Cytokine 2001, 14, 63–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Azim, A.A.A.; Farag, A.S.; Hassan, D.A.E.-M.; Abdu, S.M.I.; Lashin, S.M.A.-E.; Abdelaziz, N.M. Role of Interleukin-2 in Uremic Pruritus Among Attendants of AL-Zahraa Hospital Dialysis Unit. Indian J. Dermatol. 2015, 60, 211. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  211. Darsow, U.; Scharein, E.; Bromm, B.; Ring, J. Skin testing of the pruritogenic activity of histamine and cytokines (interleukin-2 and tumour necrosis factor-α) at the dermal-epidermal junction. Br. J. Dermatol. 1997, 137, 415–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Boulay, J.-L.; Paul, W.E. Hematopoietin sub-family classification based on size, gene organization and sequence homology. Curr. Boil. 1993, 3, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Théze, J. Interleukin 2. In Encyclopedia of Immunology; Elsevier BV: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1998; pp. 1436–1438. [Google Scholar]
  214. Luckheeram, R.V.; Zhou, R.; Verma, A.D.; Xia, B. CD4+T Cells: Differentiation and Functions. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2012, 2012, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  215. IL-2. Available online: http://chemocare.com/chemotherapy/drug-info/il-2.aspx (accessed on 9 July 2020).
  216. Mueller, T.D.; Zhang, J.-L.; Sebald, W.; Duschl, A. Structure, binding, and antagonists in the IL-4/IL-13 receptor system. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Mol. Cell. Res. 2002, 1592, 237–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  217. Heeb, L.E.M.; Egholm, C.; Boyman, O. Evolution and function of interleukin-4 receptor signaling in adaptive immunity and neutrophils. Genes Immun. 2020, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  218. LaPorte, S.L.; Juo, Z.S.; Vaclavikova, J.; Colf, L.A.; Qi, X.; Heller, N.M.; Keegan, A.D.; Garcia, K.C. Molecular and structural basis of cytokine receptor pleiotropy in the interleukin-4/13 system. Cell 2008, 132, 259–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  219. Weidemann, T.; Höfinger, S.; Auer, M. Signaling of IL-4R, a Typical Class I Cytokine Receptor. In Handbook of Cell Signaling; Elsevier BV: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. 323–328. [Google Scholar]
  220. Suzuki, A.; Leland, P.; Joshi, B.H.; Puri, R. Targeting of IL-4 and IL-13 receptors for cancer therapy. Cytokine 2015, 75, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Junttila, I.S. Tuning the Cytokine Responses: An Update on Interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 Receptor Complexes. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Campion, M.; Smith, L.; Gatault, S.; Metais, C.; Buddenkotte, J.; Steinhoff, M. Interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 evoke scratching behaviour in mice. Exp. Dermatol. 2019, 28, 1501–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  223. Oetjen, L.K.; Mack, M.R.; Feng, J.; Whelan, T.M.; Niu, H.; Guo, C.J.; Chen, S.; Trier, A.M.; Xu, A.Z.; Tripathi, S.V.; et al. Sensory Neurons Co-opt Classical Immune Signaling Pathways to Mediate Chronic Itch. Cell 2017, 171, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  224. Ying, S.; Humbert, M.; Barkans, J.; Corrigan, C.J.; Pfister, R.; Menz, G.; Larché, M.; Robinson, D.S.; Durham, S.R.; Kay, A.B. Expression of IL-4 and IL-5 mRNA and protein product by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, eosinophils, and mast cells in bronchial biopsies obtained from atopic and nonatopic (intrinsic) asthmatics. J. Immunol. 1997, 158, 3539–3544. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  225. Beck, L.A.; Thaci, D.; Hamilton, J.D.; Graham, N.M.; Bieber, T.; Rocklin, R.; Ming, J.E.; Ren, H.; Kao, R.; Simpson, E.; et al. Dupilumab Treatment in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 371, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  226. Simpson, E.L.; Bieber, T.; Guttman-Yassky, E.; Beck, L.A.; Blauvelt, A.; Cork, M.J.; Silverberg, J.I.; Deleuran, M.; Kataoka, Y.; Lacour, J.P.; et al. Two Phase 3 Trials of Dupilumab versus Placebo in Atopic Dermatitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 2335–2348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Thaçi, D.; Simpson, E.; Beck, L.; Bieber, T.; Blauvelt, A.; Papp, K.; Soong, W.; Worm, M.; Szepietowski, J.C.; Sofen, H.; et al. Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis inadequately controlled by topical treatments: A randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging phase 2b trial. Lancet 2016, 387, 40–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Lupardus, P.J.; Birnbaum, M.E.; Garcia, K.C. Molecular basis for shared cytokine recognition revealed in the structure of an unusually high affinity complex between IL-13 and IL-13Ralpha2. Structure 2010, 18, 332–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  229. Hershey, G.K.K. IL-13 receptors and signaling pathways: An evolving web. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2003, 111, 677–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Oh, M.-H.; Oh, S.Y.; Lu, J.; Lou, H.; Myers, A.C.; Zhu, Z.; Zheng, T. TRPA1-dependent pruritus in IL-13-induced chronic atopic dermatitis. J. Immunol. 2013, 191, 5371–5382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  231. Chandramohan, V.; Sampson, J.H.; Pastan, I.H.; Bigner, D.D. Chapter 10-Immunotoxin Therapy for Brain Tumors. In Translational Immunotherapy of Brain Tumors; Sampson, J.H., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2017; pp. 227–260. [Google Scholar]
  232. Minty, A.; Chalon, P.; Derocq, J.-M.; Dumont, X.; Guillemot, J.-C.; Kaghad, M.; Labit, C.; Leplatois, P.; Liauzun, P.; Miloux, B.; et al. lnterleukin-13 is a new human lymphokine regulating inflammatory and immune responses. Nature 1993, 362, 248–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Bao, K.; Reinhardt, R.L. The differential expression of IL-4 and IL-13 and its impact on type-2 immunity. Cytokine 2015, 75, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Kelly-Welch, A.; Hanson, E.M.; Keegan, A.D. Interleukin-13 (IL-13) Pathway. Science’s STKE 2005, 2005, cm8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Punnonen, J.; Carballido, J.M.; Aversa, G.; De Vries, J.E. Interleukin 13 and its Receptor. In Encyclopedia of Immunology; Elsevier BV: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1998; pp. 1489–1492. [Google Scholar]
  236. Zhang, Q.; Putheti, P.; Zhou, Q.; Liu, Q.; Gao, W. Structures and biological functions of IL-31 and IL-31 receptors. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2008, 19, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  237. Cornelissen, C.; Lüscher-Firzlaff, J.; Baron, J.M.; Lüscher, B. Signaling by IL-31 and functional consequences. Eur. J. Cell Boil. 2012, 91, 552–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Dillon, S.R.; Sprecher, C.; Hammond, A.; Bilsborough, J.; Rosenfeld-Franklin, M.; Presnell, S.R.; Haugen, H.S.; Maurer, M.; Harder, B.; Johnston, J.; et al. Interleukin 31, a cytokine produced by activated T cells, induces dermatitis in mice. Nat. Immunol. 2004, 5, 752–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  239. Cornelissen, C.; Marquardt, Y.; Czaja, K.; Wenzel, J.; Frank, J.; Lüscher-Firzlaff, J.; Lüscher, B.; Baron, J.M.; Wenzel, J. IL-31 regulates differentiation and filaggrin expression in human organotypic skin models. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2012, 129, 426–433.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Neis, M.; Peters, B.; Dreuw, A.; Wenzel, J.; Bieber, T.; Mauch, C.; Krieg, T.; Stanzel, S.; Heinrich, P.C.; Merk, H.F. Enhanced expression levels of IL-31 correlate with IL-4 and IL-13 in atopic and allergic contact dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2006, 118, 930–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Cevikbas, F.; Wang, X.; Akiyama, T.; Kempkes, C.; Savinko, T.; Antal, A.; Kukova, G.; Buhl, T.; Ikoma, A.; Buddenkotte, J.; et al. A sensory neuron-expressed IL-31 receptor mediates T helper cell-dependent itch: Involvement of TRPV1 and TRPA1. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 133, 448–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  242. Gibbs, B.F.; Patsinakidis, N.; Raap, U. Role of the Pruritic Cytokine IL-31 in Autoimmune Skin Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Sonkoly, E.; Müller, A.; Lauerma, A.I.; Pivarcsi, A.; Soto, H.; Kemény, L.; Alenius, H.; Dieu-Nosjean, M.-C.; Meller, S.; Rieker, J.; et al. IL-31: A new link between T cells and pruritus in atopic skin inflammation. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2006, 117, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Takaoka, A.; Arai, I.; Sugimoto, M.; Honma, Y.; Futaki, N.; Nakamura, A.; Nakaike, S. Involvement of IL-31 on scratching behavior in NC/Nga mice with atopic-like dermatitis. Exp. Dermatol. 2006, 15, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Furue, M.; Yamamura, K.; Kido-Nakahara, M.; Nakahara, T.; Fukui, Y. Emerging role of interleukin-31 and interleukin-31 receptor in pruritus in atopic dermatitis. Allergy 2017, 73, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  246. Lai, T.; Wu, N.; Li, W.; Chen, M.; Yi, Z.; Huang, D.; Jing, Z.; Lu, Y.; Lv, Q.; Li, N.; et al. Interleukin-31 expression and relation to disease severity in human asthma. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  247. Pandey, A.; Ozaki, K.; Baumann, H.; Levin, S.D.; Puel, A.; Farr, A.G.; Ziegler, S.F.; Leonard, W.J.; Lodish, H.F. Cloning of a receptor subunit required for signaling by thymic stromal lymphopoietin. Nat. Immunol. 2000, 1, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  248. Ziegler, S.F.; Roan, F.; Bell, B.D.; Stoklasek, T.A.; Kitajima, M.; Han, H. Chapter 4—The Biology of Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin (TSLP). In Advances in Pharmacology; Webb, D.R., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013; Volume 66, pp. 129–155. [Google Scholar]
  249. Ziegler, S.F. The role of thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) in allergic disorders. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2010, 22, 795–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  250. He, R.; Geha, R.S. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2010, 1183, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  251. Wohlmann, A.; Sebastian, K.; Borowski, A.; Krause, S.; Friedrich, K. Signal transduction by the atopy-associated human thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) receptor depends on Janus kinase function. Boil. Chem. 2010, 391, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Rochman, Y.; Kashyap, M.; Robinson, G.W.; Sakamoto, K.; Gomez-Rodriguez, J.; Wagner, K.-U.; Leonard, W.J. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin-mediated STAT5 phosphorylation via kinases JAK1 and JAK2 reveals a key difference from IL-7-induced signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 19455–19460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  253. Arima, K.; Watanabe, N.; Hanabuchi, S.; Chang, M.; Sun, S.-C.; Liu, Y.-J. Distinct Signal Codes Generate Dendritic Cell Functional Plasticity. Sci. Signal. 2010, 3, ra4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  254. Han, H.; Roan, F.; Ziegler, S.F. The atopic march: Current insights into skin barrier dysfunction and epithelial cell-derived cytokines. Immunol. Rev. 2017, 278, 116–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Wilson, S.R.; The, L.; Batia, L.M.; Beattie, K.; Katibah, G.E.; McClain, S.P.; Pellegrino, M.; Estandian, D.M.; Bautista, D.M. The epithelial cell-derived atopic dermatitis cytokine TSLP activates neurons to induce itch. Cell 2013, 155, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  256. Varricchi, G.; Pecoraro, A.; Marone, G.; Criscuolo, G.; Spadaro, G.; Genovese, A.; Marone, G. Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin Isoforms, Inflammatory Disorders, and Cancer. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  257. Fornasa, G.; Tsilingiri, K.; Caprioli, F.; Botti, F.; Mapelli, M.; Meller, S.; Kislat, A.; Homey, B.; Di Sabatino, A.; Sonzogni, A.M.; et al. Dichotomy of short and long thymic stromal lymphopoietin isoforms in inflammatory disorders of the bowel and skin. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015, 136, 413–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  258. Quentmeier, H.; Drexler, H.G.; Fleckenstein, D.; Zaborski, M.; Armstrong, A.; Sims, J.; Lyman, S.D. Cloning of human thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) and signaling mechanisms leading to proliferation. Leuk. 2001, 15, 1286–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  259. Bjerkan, L.; Schreurs, O.; Engen, S.A.; Jahnsen, F.L.; Baekkevold, E.S.; Blix, I.J.; Schenck, K. The short form of TSLP is constitutively translated in human keratinocytes and has characteristics of an antimicrobial peptide. Mucosal Immunol. 2014, 8, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Soumelis, V.; Reche, P.A.; Kanzler, H.; Yuan, W.; Edward, G.; Homey, B.; Gilliet, M.; Ho, S.; Antonenko, S.; Lauerma, A.; et al. Human epithelial cells trigger dendritic cell-mediated allergic inflammation by producing TSLP. Nat. Immunol. 2002, 3, 673–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Kashyap, M.; Rochman, Y.; Spolski, R.; Samsel, L.; Leonard, W.J. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin is produced by dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 2011, 187, 1207–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  262. Watanabe, N.; Hanabuchi, S.; Soumelis, V.; Yuan, W.; Ho, S.; Malefyt, R.D.W.; Liu, Y.-J. Human thymic stromal lymphopoietin promotes dendritic cell-mediated CD4+ T cell homeostatic expansion. Nat. Immunol. 2004, 5, 426–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Muñoz-Carrillo, J.L.; Contreras-Cordero, J.F.; Gutiérrez-Coronado, O.; Villalobos-Gutiérrez, P.T.; Ramos-Gracia, L.G.; Hernández-Reyes, V.E. Cytokine Profiling Plays a Crucial Role in Activating Immune System to Clear Infectious Pathogens. In Immune Response Activation and Immunomodulation; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  264. Misery, L. TSLP, the key of pruritus in atopic dermatitis. Med. Sci. 2014, 30, 142–144. [Google Scholar]
  265. Kumagai, A.; Kubo, T.; Kawata, K.; Kamekura, R.; Yamashita, K.; Jitsukawa, S.; Nagaya, T.; Sumikawa, Y.; Himi, T.; Yamashita, T.; et al. Keratinocytes in atopic dermatitis express abundant DeltaNp73 regulating thymic stromal lymphopoietin production via NF-kappaB. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2017, 88, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  266. Storan, E.R.; O’Gorman, S.M.; McDonald, I.D.; Steinhoff, M. Role of Cytokines and Chemokines in Itch. Drug Delivery 2015, 226, 163–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Bryant, C.E.; Orr, S.J.; Ferguson, B.; Symmons, M.F.; Boyle, J.P.; Monie, T.P. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. XCVI. Pattern Recognition Receptors in Health and Disease. Pharmacol. Rev. 2015, 67, 462–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  268. Fitzgerald, K.A.; Kagan, J.C. Toll-like Receptors and the Control of Immunity. Cell 2020, 180, 1044–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  269. Bryant, A.H.; Menzies, G.E.; Scott, L.M.; Spencer-Harty, S.; Davies, L.B.; Smith, R.A.; Jones, R.; Thornton, C.A. Human gestation-associated tissues express functional cytosolic nucleic acid sensing pattern recognition receptors. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2017, 189, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  270. Alexopoulou, L.; Holt, A.C.; Medzhitov, R.; Flavell, R.A. Recognition of double-stranded RNA and activation of NF-kappaB by Toll-like receptor 3. Nature 2001, 413, 732–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  271. Park, B.S.; Song, D.H.; Kim, H.M.; Choi, B.-S.; Lee, H.; Lee, J.-O. The structural basis of lipopolysaccharide recognition by the TLR4–MD-2 complex. Nature 2009, 458, 1191–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  272. Shimazu, R.; Akashi, S.; Ogata, H.; Nagai, Y.; Fukudome, K.; Miyake, K.; Kimoto, M. MD-2, a Molecule that Confers Lipopolysaccharide Responsiveness on Toll-like Receptor 4. J. Exp. Med. 1999, 189, 1777–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  273. Taves, S.; Ji, R.-R. Itch Control by Toll-Like Receptors. Drug Delivery 2015, 226, 135–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Uematsu, S.; Akira, S. Toll-Like Receptors (TLRs) and Their Ligands. Drug Delivery 2008, 183, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. De Bouteiller, O.; Merck, E.; Hasan, U.; Hubac, S.; Benguigui, B.; Trinchieri, G.; Bates, E.E.M.; Caux, C. Recognition of Double-stranded RNA by Human Toll-like Receptor 3 and Downstream Receptor Signaling Requires Multimerization and an Acidic pH. J. Boil. Chem. 2005, 280, 38133–38145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  276. Liu, T.; Berta, T.; Xu, Z.-Z.; Park, C.-K.; Zhang, L.; Lu, N.; Liu, Q.; Liu, Y.; Gao, Y.-J.; Liu, Y.-C.; et al. TLR3 deficiency impairs spinal cord synaptic transmission, central sensitization, and pruritus in mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 122, 2195–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Szöllősi, A.G.; McDonald, I.; Szabó, I.L.; Meng, J.; Bogaard, E.V.D.; Steinhoff, M. TLR3 in Chronic Human Itch: A Keratinocyte-Associated Mechanism of Peripheral Itch Sensitization. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2019, 139, 2393–2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  278. Hu, Y.H.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, L.Q.; Wang, S.; Lei, C.Q.; Sun, M.S.; Shu, H.B.; Liu, Y. WDFY1 mediates TLR3/4 signaling by recruiting TRIF. EMBO Rep. 2015, 16, 447–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  279. Vaure, C.; Liu, Y.; Vaure, C. A Comparative Review of Toll-Like Receptor 4 Expression and Functionality in Different Animal Species. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  280. Peri, F.; Calabrese, V. Toll-like Receptor 4 (TLR4) Modulation by Synthetic and Natural Compounds: An Update. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 57, 3612–3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Diogenes, A.; Ferraz, C.; Akopian, A.; Henry, M.; Hargreaves, K. LPS Sensitizes TRPV1 via Activation of TLR4 in Trigeminal Sensory Neurons. J. Dent. Res. 2011, 90, 759–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  282. Min, H.; Lee, H.; Lim, H.; Jang, Y.H.; Chung, S.J.; Lee, C.J.; Lee, S.J. TLR4 enhances histamine-mediated pruritus by potentiating TRPV1 activity. Mol. Brain 2014, 7, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  283. Liu, T.; Han, Q.; Chen, G.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, L.-X.; Berta, T.; Gao, Y.-J.; Ji, R.-R. Toll-like receptor 4 contributes to chronic itch, alloknesis, and spinal astrocyte activation in male mice. Pain 2016, 157, 806–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  284. Heil, F.; Hemmi, H.; Hochrein, H.; Ampenberger, F.; Kirschning, C.; Akira, S.; Lipford, G.; Wagner, H.; Bauer, S. Species-Specific Recognition of Single-Stranded RNA via Toll-like Receptor 7 and 8. Science 2004, 303, 1526–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  285. Roßbach, K.; Bäumer, W. PCR detects bands consistent with the expression of receptors associated with pruritus in canine dorsal root ganglia. Veter—Dermatol. 2013, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Liu, T.; Xu, Z.-Z.; Park, C.-K.; Berta, T.; Ji, R.-R. Toll-like receptor 7 mediates pruritus. Nat. Neurosci. 2010, 13, 1460–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  287. Larson, P.; Kucaba, T.A.; Xiong, Z.; Olin, M.; Griffith, T.S.; Ferguson, D.M. Design and Synthesis of N1-Modified Imidazoquinoline Agonists for Selective Activation of Toll-like Receptors 7 and 8. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 1148–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  288. Kim, S.-J.; Park, G.H.; Kim, N.; Lee, J.; Min, H.; Wall, E.; Lee, C.J.; Simon, M.I.; Lee, S.J.; Han, S.-K. Analysis of cellular and behavioral responses to imiquimod reveals a unique itch pathway in transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1)-expressing neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 3371–3376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  289. Flock, T.; Hauser, A.S.; Lund, N.; Gloriam, D.E.; Balaji, S.; Babu, M.M. Selectivity determinants of GPCR–G-protein binding. Nature 2017, 545, 317–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  290. Gschwandtner, M.; Purwar, R.; Wittmann, M.; Bäumer, W.; Kietzmann, M.; Werfel, T.; Gutzmer, R. Histamine Upregulates Keratinocyte MMP-9 Production via the Histamine H1 Receptor. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2008, 128, 2783–2791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  291. Lin, L.; Yamagata, K.; Nakayamada, S.; Sawamukai, N.; Yamaoka, K.; Sakata, K.; Nakano, K.; Tanaka, Y. Histamine inhibits differentiation of skin fibroblasts into myofibroblasts. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 463, 434–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Migalovich-Sheikhet, H.; Friedman, S.; Mankuta, D.; Levi-Schaffer, F. Novel Identified Receptors on Mast Cells. Front. Immunol. 2012, 3, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  293. Gangwar, R.S.; Landolina, N.; Arpinati, L.; Levi-Schaffer, F. Mast cell and eosinophil surface receptors as targets for anti-allergic therapy. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017, 170, 37–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Zschiebsch, K.; Fischer, C.; Wilken-Schmitz, A.; Geisslinger, G.; Channon, K.M.; Watschinger, K.; Tegeder, I. Mast cell tetrahydrobiopterin contributes to itch in mice. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2018, 23, 985–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Matsuda, N.; Jesmin, S.; Takahashi, Y.; Hatta, E.; Kobayashi, M.; Matsuyama, K.; Kawakami, N.; Sakuma, I.; Gando, S.; Fukui, H.; et al. Histamine H1 and H2 Receptor Gene and Protein Levels Are Differentially Expressed in the Hearts of Rodents and Humans. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2004, 309, 786–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Booth, R.G.; Moniri, N.H.; Bakker, R.A.; Choksi, N.Y.; Nix, W.B.; Timmerman, H.; Leurs, R. A novel phenylaminotetralin radioligand reveals a subpopulation of histamine H(1) receptors. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2002, 302, 328–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Heinrich, T.; Böttcher, H.; Gericke, R.; Bartoszyk, G.D.; Anzali, S.; Seyfried, C.A.; Greiner, H.E.; Van Amsterdam, C. Synthesis and Structure—Activity Relationship in a Class of Indolebutylpiperazines as Dual 5-HT1AReceptor Agonists and Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 4684–4692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  298. Slominski, A.T.; Wortsman, J.; Tobin, D.J. The cutaneous serotoninergic/melatoninergic system: Securing a place under the sun. FASEB J. 2005, 19, 176–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  299. Nordlind, K.; Azmitia, E.C.; Slominski, A.T. The skin as a mirror of the soul: Exploring the possible roles of serotonin. Exp. Dermatol. 2008, 17, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  300. Ahern, G.P. 5-HT and the immune system. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2011, 11, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  301. Shajib, M.S.; Khan, W.I. The role of serotonin and its receptors in activation of immune responses and inflammation. Acta Physiol. 2014, 213, 561–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  302. Sleight, A.J.; Stam, N.J.; Mutel, V.; Vanderheyden, P.M. Radiolabelling of the human 5-HT2A receptor with an agonist, a partial agonist and an antagonist: Effects on apparent agonist affinities. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1996, 51, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. Bard, J.A.; Zgombick, J.; Adham, N.; Vaysse, P.; Branchek, T.A.; Weinshank, R.L. Cloning of a novel human serotonin receptor (5-HT7) positively linked to adenylate cyclase. J. Boil. Chem. 1993, 268, 23422–23426. [Google Scholar]
  304. McKelvey, K.; Jackson, C.J.; Xue, M. Activated protein C: A regulator of human skin epidermal keratinocyte function. World J. Boil. Chem. 2014, 5, 169–179. [Google Scholar]
  305. Duitman, J.; Ruela-De-Sousa, R.R.; Shi, K.; De Boer, O.J.; Borensztajn, K.S.; Florquin, S.; Peppelenbosch, M.P.; Spek, C.A. Protease Activated Receptor-1 Deficiency Diminishes Bleomycin-Induced Skin Fibrosis. Mol. Med. 2014, 20, 410–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  306. Regard, J.B.; Sato, I.T.; Coughlin, S.R. Anatomical Profiling of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Expression. Cell 2008, 135, 561–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  307. Rattenholl, A.; Steinhoff, M. Proteinase-activated receptor-2 in the skin: Receptor expression, activation and function during health and disease. Drug News Perspect. 2008, 21, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  308. Kuckleburg, C.J.; Newman, P.J. Neutrophil proteinase 3 acts on protease-activated receptor-2 to enhance vascular endothelial cell barrier function. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Boil. 2012, 33, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  309. Mumaw, M.M. A Novel Approach To Antiplatelet Therapy: Targeting Protease Activated Receptor 4. Ph.D. Thesis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  310. Liu, J.Y.; Hu, J.H.; Zhu, Q.G.; Li, F.Q.; Sun, H.-J. Substance P receptor expression in human skin keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Br. J. Dermatol. 2006, 155, 657–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  311. Staniek, V.; Misery, L.; Péguet-Navarro, J.; Abello, J.; Doutremepuich, J.-D.; Claudy, A.; Schmitt, D. Binding and in vitro modulation of human epidermal Langerhans cell functions by substance P. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 1997, 289, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  312. Cunin, P.; Caillon, A.; Corvaisier, M.; Garo, E.; Scotet, M.; Blanchard, S.; Delneste, Y.; Jeannin, P. The tachykinins substance P and hemokinin-1 favor the generation of human memory Th17 cells by inducing IL-1beta, IL-23, and TNF-like 1A expression by monocytes. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 4175–4182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  313. Ho, W.-Z.; Lai, J.P.; Zhu, X.H.; Uvaydova, M.; Douglas, S.D. Human monocytes and macrophages express substance P and neurokinin-1 receptor. J. Immunol. 1997, 159, 5654–5660. [Google Scholar]
  314. Bellucci, F.; Carini, F.; Catalani, C.; Cucchi, P.; Lecci, A.; Meini, S.; Patacchini, R.; Quartara, L.; Ricci, R.; Tramontana, M.; et al. Pharmacological profile of the novel mammalian tachykinin, hemokinin 1. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2002, 135, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  315. Tian, Y.; Wu, L.H.; Oxender, D.L.; Chung, F.Z. The unpredicted high affinities of a large number of naturally occurring tachykinins for chimeric NK1/NK3 receptors suggest a role for an inhibitory domain in determining receptor specificity. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 20250–20257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  316. Sarau, H.M.; Griswold, D.E.; Potts, W.; Foley, J.J.; Schmidt, D.B.; Webb, E.F.; Martin, L.D.; Brawner, M.E.; Elshourbagy, N.A.; Medhurst, A.D.; et al. Nonpeptide tachykinin receptor antagonists: I. Pharmacological and pharmacokinetic characterization of SB 223412, a novel, potent and selective neurokinin-3 receptor antagonist. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1997, 281, 1303–1311. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  317. Matus, C.E.; Ehrenfeld, P.; Pavicic, F.; González, C.B.; Concha, M.; Bhoola, K.D.; Burgos, R.A.; Figueroa, C. Activation of the human keratinocyte B1 bradykinin receptor induces expression and secretion of metalloproteases 2 and 9 by transactivation of epidermal growth factor receptor. Exp. Dermatol. 2016, 25, 694–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  318. Khan, T.K. Chapter 7—Cell-Based Alzheimer’s Disease Biomarkers. In Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease; Khan, T.K., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 221–256. [Google Scholar]
  319. Prat, A.; Weinrib, L.; Becher, B.; Poirier, J.; Duquette, P.; Couture, R.; Antel, J.P. Bradykinin B1 receptor expression and function on T lymphocytes in active multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1999, 53, 2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  320. Hess, J.F.; Derrick, A.W.; MacNeil, T.; Borkowski, J.A. The agonist selectivity of a mouse B1 bradykinin receptor differs from human and rabbit B1 receptors. Immunopharmacology 1996, 33, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  321. Hess, J.F.; Borkowski, J.A.; MacNeil, T.; Stonesifer, G.Y.; Fraher, J.; Strader, C.D.; Ransom, R.W. Differential pharmacology of cloned human and mouse B2 bradykinin receptors. Mol. Pharmacol. 1994, 45, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  322. Jones, C.; Phillips, E.; Davis, C.; Arbuckle, J.; Yaqoob, M.; Burgess, G.M.; Docherty, R.J.; Webb, M.; Bevan, S.; McIntyre, P. Molecular characterisation of cloned bradykinin B1 receptors from rat and human. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1999, 374, 423–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  323. Hou, Q.; Barr, T.; Gee, L.; Vickers, J.; Wymer, J.; Borsani, E.; Rodella, L.F.; Getsios, S.; Burdo, T.; Eisenberg, E.; et al. Keratinocyte expression of calcitonin gene-related peptide β: Implications for neuropathic and inflammatory pain mechanisms. Pain 2011, 152, 2036–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  324. Roggenkamp, D.; Köpnick, S.; Stäb, F.; Wenck, H.; Schmelz, M.; Neufang, G. Epidermal Nerve Fibers Modulate Keratinocyte Growth via Neuropeptide Signaling in an Innervated Skin Model. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2013, 133, 1620–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  325. Bernardo, H.; Vanina, T.-V.; Paola, M.; Jerônimo, F.; Silvana, G.; Lydia, F. The action of CGRP and SP on cultured skin fibroblasts. Op. L. Sci. 2014, 9, 717–726. [Google Scholar]
  326. Upton, P.D.; Austin, C.; Taylor, G.M.; Nandha, K.A.; Clark, A.J.; Ghatei, M.A.; Bloom, S.R.; Smith, D.M. Expression of adrenomedullin (ADM) and its binding sites in the rat uterus: Increased number of binding sites and ADM messenger ribonucleic acid in 20-day pregnant rats compared with nonpregnant rats. Endocrinology 1997, 138, 2508–2514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  327. Aiyar, N.; Disa, J.; Pullen, M.; Nambi, P. Receptor activity modifying proteins interaction with human and porcine calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR) in HEK-293 cells. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2001, 224, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  328. McLatchie, L.M.; Fraser, N.J.; Main, M.J.; Wise, A.; Brown, J.; Thompson, N.; Solari, R.; Lee, M.G.; Foord, S.M. RAMPs regulate the transport and ligand specificity of the calcitonin-receptor-like receptor. Nature 1998, 393, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  329. Hong, Y.; Hay, D.L.; Quirion, R.; Poyner, D.R. The pharmacology of adrenomedullin 2/intermedin. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 166, 110–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  330. Nodin, C.; Vauquelin, G.; Von Mentzer, B. Cys2, 7EtalphaCGRP is a potent agonist for CGRP1 receptors in SK-N-MC cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2005, 69, 1235–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  331. Southern, C.; Cook, J.M.; Neetoo-Isseljee, Z.; Taylor, D.L.; Kettleborough, C.A.; Merritt, A.; Bassoni, D.L.; Raab, W.J.; Quinn, E.; Wehrman, T.S.; et al. Screening β-arrestin recruitment for the identification of natural ligands for orphan G-protein-coupled receptors. J Biomol Screen. 2013, 18, 599–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  332. Yokomizo, T. Two distinct leukotriene B4 receptors, BLT1 and BLT2. J. Biochem. 2014, 157, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  333. Bäck, M.; Bu, D.-X.; Bränström, R.; Sheikine, Y.; Yan, Z.-Q.; Hansson, G.K. Leukotriene B4 signaling through NF- B-dependent BLT1 receptors on vascular smooth muscle cells in atherosclerosis and intimal hyperplasia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 17501–17506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  334. Toda, A.; Terawaki, K.; Yamazaki, S.; Saeki, K.; Shimizu, T.; Yokomizo, T. Attenuated Th1 induction by dendritic cells from mice deficient in the leukotriene B4 receptor 1. Biochemical 2010, 92, 682–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  335. Huang, W.-W.; Garcia-Zepeda, E.A.; Sauty, A.; Oettgen, H.C.; Rothenberg, M.E.; Luster, A.D. Molecular and Biological Characterization of the Murine Leukotriene B4 Receptor Expressed on Eosinophils. J. Exp. Med. 1998, 188, 1063–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  336. Runarsson, G.; Liu, A.; Mahshid, Y.; Feltenmark, S.; Pettersson, A.; Klein, E.; Björkholm, M.; Claesson, H.-E. Leukotriene B4 plays a pivotal role in CD40-dependent activation of chronic B lymphocytic leukemia cells. Blood 2005, 105, 1274–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  337. Yokomizo, T.; Izumi, T.; Chang, K.; Takuwa, Y.; Shimizu, T. A G-protein-coupled receptor for leukotriene B4 that mediates chemotaxis. Nature 1997, 387, 620–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  338. Yokomizo, T.; Kato, K.; Terawaki, K.; Izumi, T.; Shimizu, T. A second leukotriene B(4) receptor, BLT2. A new therapeutic target in inflammation and immunological disorders. J. Exp. Med. 2000, 192, 421–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  339. Man, M.Q.; Hatano, Y.; Lee, S.H.; Man, M.; Chang, S.; Feingold, K.R.; Leung, D.Y.; Holleran, W.; Uchida, Y.; Elias, P.M. Characterization of a hapten-induced, murine model with multiple features of atopic dermatitis: Structural, immunologic, and biochemical changes following single versus multiple oxazolone challenges. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2008, 128, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  340. Saeki, K.; Yokomizo, T. Identification, signaling, and functions of LTB 4 receptors. Semin. Immunol. 2017, 33, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  341. Ishii, Y.; Saeki, K.; Liu, M.; Sasaki, F.; Koga, T.; Kitajima, K.; Meno, C.; Okuno, T.; Yokomizo, T. Leukotriene B 4 receptor type 2 (BLT2) enhances skin barrier function by regulating tight junction proteins. FASEB J. 2015, 30, 933–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  342. Michel, L.; Denizot, Y.; Thomas, Y.; Jean-Louis, F.; Heslan, M.; Benveniste, J.; Dubertret, L. Production of Paf-Acether by Human Epidermal Cells. J. Investig. Dermatol. 1990, 95, 576–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  343. Ye, R.D.; Prossnitz, E.R.; Zou, A.; Cochrane, C.G. Characterization of a human cDNA that encodes a functional receptor for platelet activating factor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1991, 180, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  344. Nakamura, M.; Honda, Z.; Izumi, T.; Sakanaka, C.; Mutoh, H.; Minami, M.; Bito, H.; Seyama, Y.; Matsumoto, T.; Noma, M. Molecular cloning and expression of platelet-activating factor receptor from human leukocytes. J. Boil. Chem. 1991, 266, 20400–20405. [Google Scholar]
  345. Aoki, Y.; Nakamura, M.; Kodama, H.; Matsumoto, T.; Shimizu, T.; Noma, M. A radioreceptor binding assay for platelet-activating factor (PAF) using membranes from CHO cells expressing human PAF receptor. J. Immunol. Methods 1995, 186, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  346. Bigliardi, P.L.; Bigliardi-Qi, M.; Buechner, S.; Rufli, T. Expression of mu-opiate receptor in human epidermis and keratinocytes. J. Inv. Dermatol. 1998, 111, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  347. Ständer, S.; Gunzer, M.; Metze, D.; Luger, T. Steinhoff M. Localization of mu-opioid receptor 1A on sensory nerve fibers in human skin. Regul. Pept. 2002, 110, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  348. Chuang, T.; Killam, K.; Chuang, L.; Kung, H.; Sheng, W.; Chao, C.; Yu, L.; Chuang, R. Mu Opioid Receptor Gene Expression in Immune Cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1995, 216, 922–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  349. Toll, L.; Berzetei-Gurske, I.P.; Polgar, W.E.; Brandt, S.R.; Adapa, I.D.; Rodriguez, L.; Schwartz, R.W.; Haggart, D.; O’Brien, A.; White, A.; et al. Standard binding and functional assays related to medications development division testing for potential cocaine and opiate narcotic treatment medications. NIDA Res. Monogr. 1998, 178, 440–466. [Google Scholar]
  350. Raynor, K.; Kong, H.; Chen, Y.; Yasuda, K.; Yu, L.; Bell, G.I.; Reisine, T. Pharmacological characterization of the cloned kappa-, delta-, and mu-opioid receptors. Mol. Pharmacol. 1994, 45, 330–334. [Google Scholar]
  351. Ganesh, A.; Maxwell, L.G. Pathophysiology and management of opioid-induced pruritus. Drugs 2007, 67, 2323–2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  352. Cheng, B.; Liu, H.-W.; Fu, X.-B.; Sheng, Z.-Y.; Li, J.-F. Coexistence and upregulation of three types of opioid receptors, mu, delta and kappa, in human hypertrophic scars. Br. J. Dermatol. 2008, 158, 713–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  353. Salemi, S.; Aeschlimann, A.; Reisch, N.; Jüngel, A.; Gay, R.E.; Heppner, F.L.; Michel, B.A.; Gay, S.; Sprott, H. Detection of kappa and delta opioid receptors in skin—Outside the nervous system. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 338, 1012–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  354. Gavériaux, C.; Peluso, J.; Simonin, F.; Laforet, J.; Kieffer, B. Identification of kappa- and delta-opioid receptor transcripts in immune cells. FEBS Lett. 1995, 369, 272–276. [Google Scholar]
  355. Zhu, J.; Chen, C.; Xue, J.C.; Kunapuli, S.; Deriel, J.K.; Liu-Chen, L.Y. Cloning of a human kappa opioid receptor from the brain. Life Sci. 1995, 56, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  356. Yasuda, K.; Raynor, K.; Kong, H.; Breder, C.D.; Takeda, J.; Reisine, T.; Bell, G.I. Cloning and functional comparison of kappa and delta opioid receptors from mouse brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 6736–6740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  357. Wikström, B.; Gellert, R.; Ladefoged, S.D.; Danda, Y.; Akai, M.; Ide, K.; Ogasawara, M.; Kawashima, Y.; Ueno, K.; Mori, A.; et al. κ-Opioid System in Uremic Pruritus: Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Studies. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2005, 16, 3742–3747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  358. Bort, A.; Alvarado-Vazquez, P.A.; Moracho-Vilrriales, C.; Virga, K.G.; Gumina, G.; Romero-Sandoval, E.A.; Asbill, S. Effects of JWH015 in cytokine secretion in primary human keratinocytes and fibroblasts and its suitability for topical/transdermal delivery. Mol. Pain 2017, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  359. Herkenham, M.; Lynn, A.B.; Little, M.D.; Johnson, M.R.; Melvin, L.S.; De Costa, B.R.; Rice, K.C. Cannabinoid receptor localization in brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 1932–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  360. Mechoulam, R.; Ben-Shabat, S.; Hanuš, L.; Ligumsky, M.; Kaminski, N.E.; Schatz, A.R.; Gopher, A.; Almog, S.; Martin, B.R.; Compton, D.R.; et al. Identification of an endogenous 2-monoglyceride, present in canine gut, that binds to cannabinoid receptors. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1995, 50, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  361. Showalter, V.M.; Compton, D.R.; Martin, B.R.; Abood, M.E. Evaluation of binding in a transfected cell line expressing a peripheral cannabinoid receptor (CB2): Identification of cannabinoid receptor subtype selective ligands. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1996, 278, 989–999. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  362. Schlosburg, J.E.; O’Neal, S.T.; Conrad, D.H.; Lichtman, A.H. CB1 receptors mediate rimonabant-induced pruritic responses in mice: Investigation of locus of action. Psychopharmacology 2011, 216, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  363. Arenas-Ramirez, N.; Woytschak, J.; Boyman, O. Interleukin-2: Biology, Design and Application. Trends Immunol. 2015, 36, 763–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  364. Junghans, V.; Jung, T.; Neumann, C. Human keratinocytes constitutively express IL-4 receptor molecules and respond to IL-4 with an increase in B7/BB1 expression. Ex. Dermato. 1996, 5, 316–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  365. McCormick, S.; Heller, N. Commentary: IL-4 and IL-13 receptors and signaling. Cytokine 2015, 75, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  366. Graber, P.; Gretener, D.; Herren, S.; Aubry, J.P.; Elson, G.; Poudrier, J.; Lecoanet-Henchoz, S.; Alouani, S.; Losberger, C.; Bonnefoy, J.Y.; et al. The distribution of IL-13 receptor alpha1 expression on B cells, T cells and monocytes and its regulation by IL-13 and IL-4. Eur. J. Immunol. 1998, 28, 4286–4298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  367. Kasraie, S.; Niebuhr, M.; Baumert, K.; Werfel, T. Functional effects of interleukin 31 in human primary keratinocytes. Allergy 2011, 66, 845–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  368. Jawa, R.S.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Tracy, E.; Wang, Y.; Huntoon, K.; Dayton, M.T.; Baumann, H. Regulated Expression of the IL-31 Receptor in Bronchial and Alveolar Epithelial Cells, Pulmonary Fibroblasts, and Pulmonary Macrophages. J. Interf. Cytokine Res. 2008, 28, 207–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  369. Ghilardi, N.; Li, J.; Hongo, J.-A.; Yi, S.; Gurney, A.; De Sauvage, F.J. A Novel Type I Cytokine Receptor Is Expressed on Monocytes, Signals Proliferation, and Activates STAT-3 and STAT-5. J. Boil. Chem. 2002, 277, 16831–16836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  370. Mosley, B.; De Imus, C.; Friend, D.; Boiani, N.; Thoma, B.; Park, L.S.; Cosman, D. Dual oncostatin M (OSM) receptors. Cloning and characterization of an alternative signaling subunit conferring OSM-specific receptor activation. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 32635–32643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  371. Leyva-Castillo, J.M.; Hener, P.; Jiang, H.; Li, M. TSLP Produced by Keratinocytes Promotes Allergen Sensitization through Skin and Thereby Triggers Atopic March in Mice. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2013, 133, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  372. Fitzgerald, K.A.; O’Neill, L.A.; Gearing, A.J.; Callard, R.E. TSLP. In The Cytokine FactsBook and Webfacts; Elsevier BV: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2001; pp. 490–492. [Google Scholar]
  373. Lebre, M.C.; Van Der Aar, A.M.; Van Baarsen, L.; Van Capel, T.M.; Schuitemaker, J.H.; Kapsenberg, M.L.; De Jong, E.C. Human Keratinocytes Express Functional Toll-Like Receptor 3, 4, 5, and 9. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2007, 127, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  374. Miller, L.S. Toll-like receptors in skin. Adv. Dermatol. 2008, 24, 71–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  375. Lafon, M.; Mégret, F.; Lafage, M.; Prehaud, C. The Innate Immune Facet of Brain: Human Neurons Express TLR-3 and Sense Viral dsRNA. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2006, 29, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  376. Medzhitov, R.; Preston-Hurlburt, P.; Janeway, C.A. A human homologue of the Drosophila Toll protein signals activation of adaptive immunity. Nature 1997, 388, 394–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  377. Tatematsu, M.; Yoshida, R.; Morioka, Y.; Ishii, N.; Funami, K.; Watanabe, A.; Saeki, K.; Seya, T.; Matsumoto, M. Raftlin Controls Lipopolysaccharide-Induced TLR4 Internalization and TICAM-1 Signaling in a Cell Type-Specific Manner. J. Immunol. 2016, 196, 3865–3876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  378. Sibaud, V.; Lebœuf, N.R.; Roche, H.; Belum, V.R.; Gladieff, L.; Deslandres, M.; Montastruc, M.; Eche, A.; Vigarios, E.; Dalenc, F.; et al. Dermatological adverse events with taxane chemotherapy. Eur. J. Dermatol. EJD 2016, 26, 427–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  379. Pendergraft, W.F.; Means, T.K. Chapter 18—Toll-Like Receptors, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. In Systemic Lupus Erythematosus; Tsokos, G.C., Ed.; Academic Press: Boston, MA, USA; Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 143–151. [Google Scholar]
  380. Feng, J.; Hu, H. A novel player in the field: Merkel disc in touch, itch and pain. Exp. Dermatol. 2019, 28, 1412–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  381. Sakai, K.; Akiyama, T. Disinhibition of Touch-Evoked Itch in a Mouse Model of Psoriasis. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2019, 139, 1407–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  382. Feng, J.; Luo, J.; Yang, P.; Du, J.; Kim, B.S.; Hu, H. Piezo2 channel—Merkel cell signaling modulates the conversion of touch to itch. Science 2018, 360, 530–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  383. Acton, D.; Ren, X.; Di Costanzo, S.; Dalet, A.; Bourane, S.; Bertocchi, I.; Eva, C.; Goulding, M. Spinal Neuropeptide Y1 Receptor-Expressing Neurons Form an Essential Excitatory Pathway for Mechanical Itch. Cell Rep. 2019, 28, 625–639.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  384. Pan, H.; Fatima, M.; Li, A.; Lee, H.; Cai, W.; Horwitz, L.; Hor, C.C.; Zaher, N.; Cin, M.; Slade, H.; et al. Identification of a Spinal Circuit for Mechanical and Persistent Spontaneous Itch. Neuron 2019, 103, 1135–1149. e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  385. Xu, Z.-Z.; Kim, Y.H.; Bang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Berta, T.; Wang, F.; Oh, S.B.; Ji, R.-R. Inhibition of mechanical allodynia in neuropathic pain by TLR5-mediated A-fiber blockade. Nat. Med. 2015, 21, 1326–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  386. Cheng, R.-X.; Feng, Y.; Liu, D.; Wang, Z.-H.; Zhang, J.-T.; Chen, L.-H.; Su, C.-J.; Wang, B.; Huang, Y.; Ji, R.-R.; et al. The role of Nav1.7 and methylglyoxal-mediated activation of TRPA1 in itch and hypoalgesia in a murine model of type 1 diabetes. Theranostics 2019, 9, 4287–4307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 21 04883 g001 550
Figure 1. Pathway of itch. Itch sensation is caused by exogenous (green) and endogenous (cyan) pruritogens, that bind to itch receptors in free nerve endings of C fibers within the epidermis (yellow) and Aδ fibers within the dermis (grey). In addition, endogenous pruritogens (cyan) can be produced by epidermal keratinocytes and dermal immune cells (purple). The triggered signal is transmitted through peripheral afferent nerve fibers (yellow and grey) of the peripheral nervous system to the central nervous system (CNS), eventually resulting in itch sensation. (Figure adapted from [28]).
Figure 1. Pathway of itch. Itch sensation is caused by exogenous (green) and endogenous (cyan) pruritogens, that bind to itch receptors in free nerve endings of C fibers within the epidermis (yellow) and Aδ fibers within the dermis (grey). In addition, endogenous pruritogens (cyan) can be produced by epidermal keratinocytes and dermal immune cells (purple). The triggered signal is transmitted through peripheral afferent nerve fibers (yellow and grey) of the peripheral nervous system to the central nervous system (CNS), eventually resulting in itch sensation. (Figure adapted from [28]).
Ijms 21 04883 g001
Ijms 21 04883 g002 550
Figure 2. Two main types of itch receptors. Itch receptors can be grouped in two main types, interleukins and G protein-coupled receptor (GPCRs). Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and interleukin receptors (ILRs) are part of the Interleukin-1 Receptor/Toll-like Receptor Superfamily. GPCRs are divided into three sub-types, classic GPCRs, protease activated receptors that dimerize [41,42], and GPCRs which require a receptor activity modifying protein (CGRP).
Figure 2. Two main types of itch receptors. Itch receptors can be grouped in two main types, interleukins and G protein-coupled receptor (GPCRs). Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and interleukin receptors (ILRs) are part of the Interleukin-1 Receptor/Toll-like Receptor Superfamily. GPCRs are divided into three sub-types, classic GPCRs, protease activated receptors that dimerize [41,42], and GPCRs which require a receptor activity modifying protein (CGRP).
Ijms 21 04883 g002
Ijms 21 04883 g003 550
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the 13 major receptor groups involved in itch and their endogenous pruritogens. Each receptor is colored based on two parameters: First, GPCR signaling (blue button) or non-GPCR signaling (white button) and second, ion channel signaling pathway. TRPA1/TRPV1 signaling is represented by a blue sector, TRPV1 signaling is represented by a yellow sector and TRPA1 signaling is represented by an orange sector. The arrows indicate the type of contribution of the receptor and its endogenous pruritogens to itch sensation. White arrows represent itch modulators and grey arrows represent itch mediators.
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the 13 major receptor groups involved in itch and their endogenous pruritogens. Each receptor is colored based on two parameters: First, GPCR signaling (blue button) or non-GPCR signaling (white button) and second, ion channel signaling pathway. TRPA1/TRPV1 signaling is represented by a blue sector, TRPV1 signaling is represented by a yellow sector and TRPA1 signaling is represented by an orange sector. The arrows indicate the type of contribution of the receptor and its endogenous pruritogens to itch sensation. White arrows represent itch modulators and grey arrows represent itch mediators.
Ijms 21 04883 g003
Table
Table 1. Endogenous pruritogens and their signaling pathway. The receptors are grouped by ion channel signaling, G- protein signaling, and kinase signaling. In addition, each receptor and its endogenous pruritogen is categorized as mediator (ME) or modulator (MO). Color coded according to Figure 3.
Table 1. Endogenous pruritogens and their signaling pathway. The receptors are grouped by ion channel signaling, G- protein signaling, and kinase signaling. In addition, each receptor and its endogenous pruritogen is categorized as mediator (ME) or modulator (MO). Color coded according to Figure 3.
MEMEMEMEMOMOMOMOMOMEMEMEMEMOMO
endogenous pruritogensThrombinTrypsinThrombinBradykinin, kallidin Leukotriene B4Leukotriene B4Bradykinin, kallidin IL-4 IL-13IL-31IL-2 SerotoninBAM8-22Calcitonin gene-related peptideTSLP
receptorPAR1PAR2PAR4BDKRB1BLT1 BLT2BDKRB2IL4RIL13RIL31RIL2R 5-HTR7MRGPRX1CGRPTSLPR
receptor signalingGi/Go, Gq/G11, G12/G13Gi/Go, G12/G13Gi/Go, Gq/G11Gi/GoGs, Gi/Go, Gq/G11JAK1/2/3JAK1JAK1/2JAK1/3Gs, Gq/G11, G12/G13GsJAK1/2
ion channelTRPA1, TRPV1-TRPA1
MEMOMOMOMOMEMEMOMOMOMOMO
endogenous pruritogensendorphinsdynorphins and endorphinesendocanna-binoidsendocanna-binoidsplatelet-activating factorsubstance PHistamineOncostatin Mds RNALPSss RNASerotonin
receptorOPRMOPRKCB1CB2PAFRNK1RH1ROSMRTLR3TLR4TLR75-HTR2
receptor signalingGi/GoGi/Go, G12/G13Gs, Gi/Go, Gq/G11Gs, Gq/G11Gi/Go, Gq/G11JAK1/2TRIFMyD88/TRIFMyD88Gi/Go, Gq/G11
ion channelTRPV1TRPV4
Table
Table 2. Exogenous and endogenous pruritogens, their receptors, expression levels and signaling.
Table 2. Exogenous and endogenous pruritogens, their receptors, expression levels and signaling.
ReceptorsExpressionG-Protein Binding [289]Endogenous PruritogensExogenous Puritogens
GsGi/GoGq/G11G12/G13
5|1814|1810|186|18
Histamine receptorGPCR Monoamine
H1RKeratinocytes [290], dermal fibroblasts [291], Granulocytes, mast cells [292,293,294] smooth muscles, endothelial cells, CNS, and cardiovascular system [295] Histamine [296]vilazodone [297]
Serotonin receptorGPCRs Monoamine
5-HTR2Keratinocytes [298], dermal fibroblasts [299], dermal langerhans cells [74] T cells, B cells, granulocytes, dendritic cells, macrophages, and monocytes [300,301] 5-hydroxytryptamine [302]alpha-methylserotonin [67]
5-HTR7Keratinocytes [298], dermal fibroblasts [299], dermal Langerhans cells [74], T cells, B cells, granulocytes, macrophages, monocytes, and dendritic cells [301] 5-hydroxytryptamine [303]LP44 [69]
Protease-activated receptorsGPCRs Proteases
PAR1Keratinocytes [304], dermal fibroblast [305], platelets, and vascular endothelial cells [306] Thrombin [83]Hexapeptide derived from thedered peptide sequence e.g., TFLLR [85] bromelain, ficin, papain, mucunain, and trypsin from animals [91]
PAR2Keratinocytes [98], dermal fibroblast [307], endothelial cells in pancreas, liver, kidney, GI tract, and colon but not in the brain or skeletal muscle [306,308] Trypsin [83]Hexapeptide derived from thedered peptide sequence e.g., SLIGRL [85] bromelain, ficin, papain, mucunain, and trypsin from animals [91]
PAR4Platelets, lung, thyroid, testis, small intestin, and pancreas [306,309] Thrombin [83]Hexapeptide derived from thedered peptide sequence e.g., AYPGKF [85] bromelain, ficin, papain, mucunain, and trypsin from animals [91]
Neurokinin receptorsGPCR Peptides
NK1RKeratinocytes, dermal fibroblast [310], dermal Langerhans cells [311], T cells, macrophages, and monocytes [312,313] substance P, neurokinin A, neurokinin B, neuropeptide-γ, neuropeptide K [314,315,316]N/A
Bradykinin receptorsGPCRs Peptides
BDKRB1Keratinocytes [317], dermal fibroblasts [318], Granulocytes, and T lymphocytes [319] bradykinin, kallidin, T-kinin, [des-Arg10] kallidin [320,321,322]diphenylcyclopropenone [123]
BDKRB2N/A bradykinin, kallidin, T-kinin, [des-Arg10] kallidin [320,321,322]sodium deoxycholic acid [117]
Calcitonin receptor-like receptorGPCR receptors Peptides
CGRPKeratinocytes [323,324], dermal fibroblasts [325], Lung, uterus, and placenta [326] adrenomedullin, adrenomedullin 2/intermedin, α-CGRP, β-CGRP [327,328,329][Cys(Et)2,7]α-CGRP [330]
Mas-related GPR familyGPCR Peptide
MRGPRX1Small dorsal root, and trigeminal sensory neurons [144] BAM8-22 [331]chloroquine [21]
Leukotriene receptorsGPCRs Leukotrienes
BLT1Keratinocytes [332], Granulocytes, B-lymphocytes, leukocytes, endothelial cells, and dendritic cells [333,334,335,336] 20-hydroxy-LTB4, 12R-HETE, Leukotriene B4 [337,338]oxazolone [339]
BLT2Keratinocytes [340,341], spleen, liver, ovary, leukocytes, and atherosclerotic lesions [333,338] 20-hydroxy-LTB4, 12R-HETE, Leukotriene B4 [337,338]oxazolone [339]
Phospholipid receptorGPCR Phospholipid
PAFRKeratinocytes [342], leukocytes, and granulocytes [343,344] platelet-activating factor, methylcarbamyl PAF [345]N/A
Opoid receptorsGPCRs Opioids
OPRMKeratinocytes [346], dermal fibroblasts [347], CNS, T/B lymphocytes, CD4+, monocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils [348] β-endorphin, enkephalin, dynorphin [349,350]morphine [351]
OPRKKeratinocytes [352], dermal fibroblasts [353], CNS, and immune cells [353,354,355] dynorphin, β-endorphin, enkephalin, neoendorphin [349,356]nor-binaltorphimine [357]
Cannabinoid receptorsGPCRs Cannabinoids
CB1Keratinocytes [358], CNS, and peripheral neurons [359] anandamide, 2-arachidonoylglycerol [360,361]Rimonabant [362]
CB2Keratinocytes [358], spleen, tonsils, bone marrow, and peripheral blood leukocytes [189] anandamide, 2-arachidonoylglycerol [360,361]N/A
Interleukin receptorsnon-GPCRs Interleukins
IL2R CD8 + T cells, and natural killer cells [363] JAK1/3 IL-2Aldesleukin [215]
IL4RKeratinocytes [364], activated T-cells, and hematopoietic immune cells [365] JAK1/2/3 IL-4N/A
IL13RB-cells, T-cells, basophils, eosinophils, mast cells and endothelial cells of heart, liver, skeletal muscle and ovary [366] JAK1 IL-13N/A
IL31R CD14-, CD56- positive blood cells, macrophages, keratinocytes, dorsal root ganglia neurons, lung epithelial cells [241,367,368,369] JAK1/2 IL-31N/A
OSMRkeratinocytes, neural cells, fibroblast, and epithelial cells [367,370] JAK1/2 Oncostatin MN/A
TSLPRkeratinocytes [371], B-cells, T-cells, and macrophage cell lines [372] JAK1/2 Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP)N/A
Toll-like receptorsnon-GPCRs various
TLR3keratinocytes [373], dermal langerhans cells [374], dendritic cells, astrocytes, glia and neurons; especially in placenta and pancreas [375] TRIF ds RNAPolyinosinic:polycytidylic acid [105]
TLR4Keratinocytes [373], monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, and T-cells [376,377] MyD88/TRIF LPSpaclitaxel [378]
TLR7Plasmacytoid dendritic cells, and B cells [379] MyD88 ss RNAImiquimod [288]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kahremany, S.; Hofmann, L.; Gruzman, A.; Cohen, G. Advances in Understanding the Initial Steps of Pruritoceptive Itch: How the Itch Hits the Switch. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4883. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21144883

AMA Style

Kahremany S, Hofmann L, Gruzman A, Cohen G. Advances in Understanding the Initial Steps of Pruritoceptive Itch: How the Itch Hits the Switch. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(14):4883. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21144883

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kahremany, Shirin, Lukas Hofmann, Arie Gruzman, and Guy Cohen. 2020. "Advances in Understanding the Initial Steps of Pruritoceptive Itch: How the Itch Hits the Switch" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 14: 4883. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21144883

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop