Next Article in Journal
Current Insights into Combination Therapies with MAPK Inhibitors and Immune Checkpoint Blockade
Next Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of Drought Stress Responsive microRNAs in Tibetan Wild Barley
Previous Article in Journal
CDK6 Inhibition: A Novel Approach in AML Management
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 7
10.3390/ijms21072529
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Maize ZmFNSI Homologs Interact with an NLR Protein to Modulate Hypersensitive Response

by
Yu-Xiu Zhu
,
Chunxia Ge
,
Shijun Ma
,
Xiao-Ying Liu
,
Mengjie Liu
,
Yang Sun
and
Guan-Feng Wang
*
The Key Laboratory of Plant Development and Environmental Adaptation Biology, Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(7), 2529; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21072529
Submission received: 11 March 2020 / Revised: 31 March 2020 / Accepted: 2 April 2020 / Published: 5 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Health and Food Security)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Nucleotide binding, leucine-rich-repeat (NLR) proteins are the major class of resistance (R) proteins used by plants to defend against pathogen infection. The recognition between NLRs and their cognate pathogen effectors usually triggers a rapid localized cell death, termed the hypersensitive response (HR). Flavone synthase I (FNSI) is one of the key enzymes in the flavone biosynthesis pathway. It also displays salicylic acid (SA) 5-hydroxylase (S5H) activity. A close homolog of FNSI/S5H displays SA 3-hydroxylase (S3H) activity. Both FNSI/S5H and S3H play important roles in plant innate immunity. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms and the relationship between S5H and S3H with the NLR-mediated HR are not known in any plant species. In this study, we identified three genes encoding ZmFNSI-1, ZmFNSI-2 and ZmS3H that are significantly upregulated in a maize line carrying an autoactive NLR Rp1-D21 mutant. Functional analysis showed that ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2, but not ZmS3H, suppressed HR conferred by Rp1-D21 and its signaling domain CCD21 when transiently expressed in N. benthamiana. ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 physically interacted with CCD21. Furthermore, ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 interacted with HCT, a key enzyme in lignin biosynthesis pathway, which can also suppress Rp1-D21-mediated HR. These results lay the foundation for the further functional analysis of the roles of FNSI in plant innate immunity.

1. Introduction

To protect against the invasion of different pathogens, plants have evolved multiple sophisticated strategies including pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI) [1,2]. ETI is activated when plant disease resistance (R) genes recognize the presence of specific pathogen-secreted molecules (effectors), triggering a series of defense responses which often include a localized programmed cell death at the point of pathogen challenge known as the hypersensitive response (HR) [3,4,5]. The HR can restrict the further expansion of pathogenic microorganisms and therefore is usually regarded as a hallmark for plant disease resistance [4,6,7].
Most R-genes encode so-called NLR proteins, which contain a central nucleotide-binding (NB) domain and a C-terminal leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domain [8,9]. The NLR proteins can be further divided into two major classes according to their N-terminal domains; CC-NLRs (CNLs) contain a predicted coiled-coil (CC) domain and TIR-NLRs (TNLs) carry an N-terminal homology to the intracellular Toll-IL1 receptors (TIRs) domain [9,10]. TNLs are restricted to dicots while CNLs have been found in both monocots and dicots.
The Rp1 locus on maize chromosome 10 carries multiple tandemly repeated CNL paralogs, one of which, Rp1-D, confers resistance to maize common rust caused by specific races of the fungus Puccini sorghi [11]. A high frequency of unequal crossovers has been observed between different paralogs at this locus [12]. The chimeric gene Rp1-D21 mutant was formed by intragenic recombination between two paralogs, Rp1-D and Rp1-dp2 [13,14]. Rp1-D21 confers a dominant spontaneous HR lesion phenotype on leaves and stalks in the absence of pathogen infection [13,14]. The severity of this HR phenotype is affected by light, temperature, developmental stage and genetic background [15,16].
Rp1-D21 has been used as a tool to identify loci, genes and pathways associated with modulation of the severity of HR [16,17,18,19]. Two genes encoding homologs of enzymes in lignin biosynthesis pathway, hydroxycinnamoyltransferase (HCT1806) and caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase (CCoAOMT2), were shown to physically interact with and suppress the HR caused by Rp1-D21 [20,21]. Both lignin content and transcript abundance of the genes in the lignin biosynthesis pathway were increased in Rp1-D21 compared to a near-isogenic wild type sibling [21], suggesting that the lignin biosynthesis pathway plays important roles in the Rp1-D21-mediated defense response.
The flavonoid biosynthesis pathway also plays important roles in plant disease resistance [22,23,24]. Flavonoids can be divided into several classes: flavanones, flavanols, flavonols, anthocyanins, isoflavones and flavones [25]. Flavones act as signal molecules in the establishment of symbiotic relationships between root nodulation bacteria and their leguminous plant hosts [26]. It showed that many genes in lignin, flavonoid and terpenoid biosynthesis pathways are upregulated in maize lines inoculated by Fusarium verticillioides, a fungus causing ear rot and stalk rot in maize [27]. Flavone synthase I (FNSI) catalyzes the conversion of the flavanones into the corresponding flavones [28]. It belongs to the 2-oxoglutarate Fe (II) dependent dioxygenase (2OGD) superfamily [29,30], which in turn can be divided into three subfamilies according to phylogenetic analysis: DOXA, DOXB and DOXC [30,31,32]. Genes in the DOXC subfamily, the largest subfamily, are involved in the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, and include FNSI, flavanone 3-hydroxylase (F3H), anthocyanidin synthase (ANS), and 1-aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid oxidase (ACO) [31].
Maize ZmFNSI-1 was demonstrated to be capable of converting the flavanones naringenin and eriodictyol into their corresponding flavones, apigenin and luteolin, respectively in plants [28]. Two rice OsFNSI homologs were also reported to have FNSI activity by converting naringenin into apigenin [33,34]. Transgenic over-expression of ZmFNSI-1 in Arabidopsis causes increased levels of apigenin [28]. The Arabidopsis ZmFNSI homolog, DOWNY MILDEW RESISTANT 6 (AtDMR6, also named AtS5H) displays both FNSI activity and salicylic acid (SA) 5-hydroxylase (S5H) activity, catalyzing the formation of 2,5-DHBA by hydroxylating salicylic acid (SA) [28,29,35,36]. The Atdmr6 mutant confers resistance to multiple pathogens, including Hyaloperonospora parasitica, H. arabidopsidis, Phytophthora capsici and Pseudomonas syringae. Expressing ZmFNSI in Atdmr6 restores the susceptibility to these pathogens [28,29,36]. The Atdmr6 mutant also accumulates higher levels of SA than wild type plants due to the S5H activity of AtDMR6 [35], which is important for mediating SA homeostasis during leaf senescence and pathogen responses. In Arabidopsis, DMR6-Like Oxygenase 1 (DLO1, also known as SA 3-hydroxylase, S3H) and DLO2, with high similarity with AtDMR6, negatively regulate the defense response to downy mildew and P. syringae pv. tomato (Pst) DC3000 [36,37]. Overexpression of DLO1/S3H and DLO2 in the Atdmr6 mutant restores the susceptibility to downy mildew, indicating their partially redundant function with AtDMR6 [36]. The molecular mechanisms by which FNS1/S5H/DMR6 and S3H/DLO1 act in plant disease resistance are poorly understood and the relationship between FNSI and S3H with the NLR-mediated defense response is still unknown.
The aim of the study was to investigate the function of ZmFNSIs and ZmS3H in NLR protein Rp1-D21-mediated HR. We identified three genes encoding ZmFNSI-1, ZmFNSI-2 and ZmS3H that were significantly upregulated in Rp1-D21 compared to the near-isogenic wild type line from RNA-seq analysis. We examined their roles in modulating Rp1-D21-mediated HR. ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2, but not ZmS3H, suppressed Rp1-D21-mediated HR when transiently co-expressed with Rp1-D21 in N. benthamiana, however, they had no obvious effect on cell death caused by other elicitors. ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 physically interacted with the Rp1 protein as determined by coimmunoprecipitation (Co-IP) and yeast two hybrid (Y2H) assays. Furthermore, we showed that ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 interacted with HCT, which can also suppress Rp1-D21-mediated HR. We discuss the importance of FNSI in modulating plant defense response and lay the foundation for the further functional analysis of the roles in plant innate immunity.

2. Results

2.1. The Genes Encoding ZmFNSI and ZmS3H Are Induced in Rp1-D21 Compared to the Corresponding Wild Type

We have previously performed RNA-seq analysis to compare a near-isogenic pair of lines with and without Rp1-D21 in two hybrid backgrounds, B73 × H95 and Mo17 × H95 [21]. We demonstrated that the genes encoding HCT1806, HCT4918 and CCoAOMT2 in the lignin biosynthesis pathway were highly induced in Rp1-D21 compared to the corresponding wild type, and all of them suppressed Rp1-D21-mediated HR when transiently expressed in N. benthamiana [20,21].
To further identify the genes modulating Rp1-D21-mediated HR or the plant defense response, we selected additional 19 genes that were upregulated in plants carrying Rp1-D21 compared to their wild type counterparts and which had been otherwise implicated in plant disease resistance based on the literature for an initial screen. These genes included ZmFNSIs, ZmS3H, peptidoglycan-related genes, wall associated kinase, auxin-responsive genes, calmodulin binding proteins, etc. (Table 1). When transiently expressed in N. benthamiana, eleven of them had no obvious effect on Rp1-D21-mediated HR, two of them enhanced Rp1-D21-mediated HR and three of them showed autoactive HR, and we therefore concentrated on three genes related to ZmFNSI/ZmS3H that gave the most promising results. FNSI displays both FNSI activity by catalyzing the conversion of flavanones into flavones and S5H activity by hydroxylating SA into 2,5-DHBA, while S3H is able to hydroxylate SA into 2,3-DHBA (Figure 1).
The Arabidopsis genome contains one AtDMR6/AtS5H/AtFNSI and two DMR6-like oxygenases, AtDLO1 (AtS3H) and AtDLO2. Using AtDMR6 and AtS3H as queries to blast the maize genome database (MaizeGDB), we identified two ZmFNSI homologs, ZmFNSI-1 (Zm00001d029744) and ZmFNSI-2 (Zm00001d027423), and one ZmS3H homolog (Zm00001d002564) in maize (Table 1). Phylogenetic analysis showed that FNSIs and S3Hs from different plant species are divided into two groups, and each group was further separated into two clades containing FNSIs or S3Hs from dicots and monocots (Figure 2).
We observed that the transcript levels of ZmFNSI-1, ZmFNS1-2 and ZmS3H were highly induced in the Rp1-D21 mutants compared to the corresponding wild type plants, with the transcript levels of ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 showing higher fold change (17.2 to 235 fold) than ZmS3H (4.2–8.6 fold) (Table 1).

2.2. ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 Suppress Rp1-D21-Mediated HR in N. benthamiana

To investigate the function of ZmFNSIs and ZmS3H in Rp1-D21-mediated HR, we employed the agrobacteria-mediated transient expression system in N. benthamiana. Rp1-D21 was fused with a 3× hemagglutinin tag at the C-terminus (Rp1-D21:HA), while ZmFNSI-1, ZmFNSI-2 and ZmS3H were fused with enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) at the C-terminus (ZmS5H:EGFP and ZmS3H:EGFP). GUS:EGFP and HCT1806:EGFP were used as controls. Consistent with our previous studies [20,21,38], when GUS:EGFP was transiently co-expressed with Rp1-D21:HA in N. benthamiana, an obvious HR phenotype was observed at three days post-infiltration (dpi). No HR was observed in leaf sectors in which HCT1806:EGFP and Rp1-D21:HA were co-expressed (Figure 3A). When ZmFNSI-1, ZmFNSI-2 and ZmS3H were separately transiently co-expressed with Rp1-D21:HA in N. benthamiana, ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2, but not ZmS3H, suppressed Rp1-D21-mediated HR (Figure 3A). Consistent with our visual observations, ZmFNSI-1, ZmFNSI-2 and HCT1806 significantly reduced ion leakage levels compared to GUS or ZmS3H when co-expressed with Rp1-D21:HA (Figure 3B). Western blot results showed that co-expression of ZmFNSI-1, ZmFNSI-2 and ZmS3H did not have obvious change of the Rp1-D21 expression, compared to co-expression of GUS:EGFP (Figure 3C).

2.3. ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 Have No Obvious Suppression Roles on Other Elicitor-Induced HR

To determine whether ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 could suppress HR mediated by other NLR proteins, we co-expressed them with barley MLA10(D502V) and Arabidopsis RPM1(D505V), two CNL proteins conferring an autoactive HR when transiently expressed in N. benthamiana [39,40]. The results showed that ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 have no obvious suppression roles on either MLA10(D502V)- or RPM1(D505V)-mediated HR (Figure S1A). Similarly, ZmS3H and HCT1806 also have no obvious effects on MLA10(D502V)- or RPM1(D505V)-mediated HR (Figure S1A).
INF1 is a cell death elicitor from Phytophthora infestans and Bax is a death-promoting protein of the Bcl-2 family from mouse, both of which can induce cell death when transiently expressed in N. benthamiana [41,42]. When co-expressed with Bax or INF1, ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 did not suppress Bax- or INF1-induced cell death, which is similar to the co-expression of ZmS3H or HCT1806 with Bax or INF1, respectively (Figure S1B).

2.4. The Enzymatic Activity of ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 Might Not Be Required for Suppressing Rp1-D21-Mediated HR

In Arabidopsis AtS5H/AtDMR6, the histidine (H) at positions 212 and 269 is the catalytic residue for binding the ferrous iron atom and is critical for its FNSI enzyme activity [36]. The substitution proteins AtDMR6(H212Q) and AtDMR6(H269D) cannot restore the susceptibility of Atdmr6 to H. arabidopsisdis, indicating that the enzyme activity is required for the function of AtDMR6 [36]. Based on the sequence alignment, we found that the corresponding histidines (H211 and H268 in ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2, respectively) are conserved among different plant FNSIs (Figure 4A). To investigate whether the enzymatic activity of ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 is important for inhibiting Rp1-D21-mediated HR, we performed the corresponding mutations in ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 to generate ZmFNSI-1(H211Q), ZmFNSI-2(H211Q), ZmFNSI-1(H268D), and ZmFNSI-2(H268D). When co-expressed with Rp1-D21, all the mutants still suppressed Rp1-D21-mediated HR (Figure 4B). All the HA- and EGFP-tagged proteins were expressed at substantial and broadly comparable levels (Figure 4B). These data suggest that the enzymatic activity of ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 is not required for its function in suppressing Rp1-D21-mediated HR.

2.5. ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 Suppress CCD21-Mediated HR and Interact with CCD21

The Rp1-D21 protein can be sub-divided into three major domains: an N-terminal coiled-coil (CC) domain termed CCD21, a middle NB-ARC (APAF1, certain R gene products and CED-4) domain and a C-terminal LRR domain [38]. We have shown previously that CCD21, but not NB or LRR, conferred autoactive HR when fused with EGFP and expressed transiently in N. benthamiana [38]. To determine whether ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 can suppress CCD21-mediated HR, we co-expressed them and CCD21 in N. benthamiana, and found that ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2, but not ZmS3H, suppressed CCD21-mediated HR (Figure 5A). Ion leakage analysis further verified the visual observations: co-expression of ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2, but not of ZmS3H, with CCD21 reduced ion leakage due to CCD21-mediated HR (Figure 5B).
We previously showed that HCT1806 interacts with CCD21 and suppresses CCD21-mediated HR [20]. To investigate whether ZmFNSIs can interact with CCD21, we used yeast two hybridization (Y2H) to show that ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 physically associated with CCD21 at 72 h after co-expression, while ZmS3H showed weak or no interaction with CCD21 (Figure 6A). We further tested the interaction via co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) and found that, like HCT1806, ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 interacted strongly with CCD21, while ZmS3H interacted weakly with CCD21 (Figure 6B), indicating that the interactions between ZmFNSI-1/ ZmFNSI-2 and CCD21 are stronger than the interaction between ZmS3H and CCD21.

2.6. ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 Interact with HCT

As well as HCT1806, we have shown that CCoAOMT2 can also suppress Rp1-D21-mediated HR and can physically interact with CCD21 [20,21]. To investigate whether ZmFNSI-1 or ZmFNSI-2 can interact with HCT or CCoAOMT2, we performed a Y2H assay. The results showed that both ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 interacted with HCT, but not with CCoAOMT2 (Figure S2). Interestingly, ZmS3H also interacted with HCT and interacted weakly with CCoAOMT2 (Figure S2).

2.7. ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 Form Stronger Homomers than ZmS3H

We further used yeast two hybridization (Y2H) to test whether ZmFNSI-1, ZmFNSI-2 and ZmS3H can form homomers. As shown in Figure S3, ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 self-associated at 52 h after co-expression, while ZmS3H showed weak self-association until 81 h after co-expression.

2.8. ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 do not Change the Subcellular Localization of CCD21

To investigate where ZmFNSI-1, ZmFNSI-2 and ZmS3H are localized, we performed subcellular localization experiments by transient expression in transgenic N. benthamiana lines harboring the nuclear marker H2B:RFP [43]. When fused with a C-terminal EGFP, ZmFNSI-1, ZmFNSI-2 and ZmS3H mainly distributed in cytoplasm and nucleus (Figure S4).
Previously we showed that Rp1-D21 and CCD21 localized to both the cytoplasm and nucleus, and that nucleo-cytoplasm trafficking was important for HR induction [44]. To determine whether the different suppression effects between ZmFNSI-1, ZmFNSI-2 and ZmS3H were due to their different effects on changing the subcellular localization of CCD21, we co-expressed ZmFNSI-1, ZmFNSI-2 and ZmS3H with CCD21:RFP in N. benthamiana. When CCD21:RFP was co-expressed with GUS:EGFP, it mainly localized in cytoplasm and nucleus, which is consistent with previous results [44]. Similarly, when co-expressed with ZmFNSI-1, ZmFNSI-2 and ZmS3H, CCD21:RFP also mainly localized in the cytoplasm and nucleus (Figure S5). The results suggest that the suppression effect of ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 on CCD21-mediated HR was not due to change the subcellular localization of CCD21.

3. Discussion

3.1. ZmFNSI Functions in Plant Defense Response

FNSI is involved in the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites [29,30]. ZmFNSI-1 was reported to have FNSI activity which can catalyze the conversion of flavanones into flavones [28]. AtDMR6, the Arabidopsis homologous enzyme to ZmFNSI, also has FNSI activity [28]. The loss-of-function mutant Atdmr6 confers resistance to multiple pathogens [29,36], and overexpression of ZmFNSI-1 in drm6-1 mutant plants results in reduced resistance to P. syringae [28], indicating that the function of FNSI/DMR6 in Arabidopsis and maize is conserved in plant defense response. CRISPR-Cas9 mediated knockout of the tomato ortholog SlDMR6-1 confers resistance against different pathogens, including P. syringae, Xanthomonas spp. and P. capsici [45]. These results indicate that FNSI/DMR6 from different plant species acts as a negative regulator in the plant defense response.
We had previously found that many genes predicted to be involved in secondary metabolism were induced by Rp1-D21, including the phenylpropanoid pathway [20,21]. The CCoAOMT2 and HCT1806 proteins were predicted to catalyze consecutive steps in the lignin biosynthesis pathway and have been implicated to play important roles in Rp1-D21-mediated HR [21]. CCoAOMT2 has also been shown to confer resistance to southern leaf blight and gray leaf spot in maize [46]. From previous transcriptional data, ZmFNSI-1 and HCT1806 were highly induced in maize lines inoculated by several fungal pathogens which cause ear rot, including Fusarium graminearum, Fusarium verticillioides and Aspergillus flavus [27,47,48,49,50]. ZmFNSI-1, ZmS3H, CCoAOMT2 and HCT1806 are also upregulated in maize lines expressing WtsE from Pnss [51], suggesting these genes are also involved in maize disease resistance. Several examples have shown that negative regulators of plant immunity are induced during the defense response to control and prevent the over-activation of the defense response, e.g., Nudix hydrolase-encoding NUDT7 [52], HCT1806 and CCoAOMT2 [20,21]. Here, we found that the transcriptional levels of the genes encoding ZmFNSI-1, ZmFNSI-2, HCT1806 and CCoAOMT2 were significantly induced in the Rp1-D21 mutant. ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 acted as negative regulators to suppress Rp1-D21-mediated HR and they interacted with the CC signaling domain of Rp1-D21, suggesting that ZmFNSI/ZmS5H regulates Rp1-D21-mediated HR, likely through physical interaction. We speculate that the increased levels of ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 can serve as a reservoir to inhibit the further activation of Rp1 protein and the spread of HR.
Tricin, a flavone constituted by modified apigenins, is a structural monomer of lignin in maize [53]. Falcone Ferreyra et al. (2015) suggested that ZmFNSI-1 might have a role in lignin biosynthesis. In this study, we performed Y2H assays and found that ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 interacted with HCT, the key enzyme in the lignin biosynthesis pathway. This interaction, together with the interaction between HCT and CCoAOMT2 [21], may reflect the formation of a metabolon, a complex formed between sequential enzymes of a metabolic pathway believed to facilitate metabolite processing [54]. Components of the phenylpropanoid pathway have been shown to associate with each other in poplar and other species [55].

3.2. FNSI Enzyme Activity Is not Required for HR and ZmFNSIs Are not General Cell Death Suppressors

FNS1 belongs to the 2OGD superfamily members. In Arabidopsis, AtDMR6 acts as a negative regulator in plant immunity. Expression of AtDMR6(H212Q) and AtDMR6(H269D), the substitution proteins in the histidine (H) residues required for the putative catalytic activity of AtDMR6, fail to restore the susceptibility of Atdmr6 to H. arabidopsidis, suggesting that the oxygenase enzymatic activity of AtDMR6 is required for its function in disease resistance [36]. For the maize ZmFNS1-1 and ZmFNS1-2, however, the corresponding mutation in ZmS5H-1(H211Q), ZmS5H-2(H211Q), ZmS5H-1(H268D), and ZmS5H-2(H268D) still suppress Rp1-D21-mediated HR (Figure 4), suggesting that the enzyme activity is not required for the suppression effect. It is also possible that the substitution mutants retained low enzymatic activity which is sufficient to suppress HR. To exclude the possibility, the enzymatic activity for these mutants will be further determined. As mentioned above, ZmFNSI is induced by multiple pathogens. ZmFNSI-1 is located in a quantitative trait loci (QTL) conferring resistance to southern leaf blight [56], and it is also located at approximately 380 kb upstream of a SNP (s-ingle nucleotide polymorphism) which is associated with multiple disease resistance [57]. These results suggest that ZmFNSI might be also involved in maize disease resistance. It is possible that the differential enzyme activity requirement of FNS1/DMR6 in disease resistance and HR might be uncoupled. AtFNS1/AtDMR6 in Arabidopsis also has S5H activity [36]; it will be interesting to investigate whether ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 have S5H activity and whether the S5H activity is involved in Rp1-D21-mediated HR.
ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 suppressed Rp1-D21- and CCD21-mediated HR, however, they did not substantially suppress the HR phenotype caused by the other two CNL autoactive mutants RPM1(D505V) and MLA10(D502V), and they have no obvious effect on Bax- and INF1-mediated cell death. These data suggested that ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 might not be general HR suppressors.

3.3. FNSI/S5H and S3H have Overlapping and Different Roles in Plant Defense Response

Plant resistance to biotrophic/hemibiotrophic pathogens is largely controlled by SA-mediated signaling pathways [58]. The compounds 2,5-DHBA and 2,3-DHBA are two major catabolic products of SA and they are catalyzed by hydroxylating SA via S5H and S3H, respectively [35,37]. In Arabidopsis, AtDMR6/AtS5H was reported to have high S5H activity and low FNSI activity [35]. Therefore, the enhanced disease resistance of Atdmr6 is most likely caused by increased total SA levels [35]. After Pst DC3000 treatment, the transcript levels of AtDMR6/AtS5H and AtS3H are induced, and the accumulation of 2,5-DHBA and 2,3-DHBA is enhanced, implying that SA hydroxylation plays a role in the detoxification of excessive SA [35]. AtDMR6/AtS5H is more sensitive to SA treatment and pathogen induction than AtS3H and the Ats5h mutant exhibited much stronger pathogen resistance than the Ats3h mutant [29,35,36]. The SA levels are higher in the Atdmr6 mutant compared to wild type, and there is no significant different between the dlo1 mutant and wild type. However, in the dmr6dlo1 double mutant, the SA levels are approximately 20 times higher than that in the Atdmr6 mutant [36]. Therefore, AtDMR6/AtS5H and AtS3H have overlapping and distinct functions as negative regulators in innate immunity. Here, we found that the fold change of the transcript levels of ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 is higher than that of ZmS3H in the Rp1-D21 mutant compared to the corresponding wild type backgrounds (Table 1), and ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2, but not ZmS3H, suppress Rp1-D21- and CCD21-mediated HR, indicating the different roles of ZmFNSI and ZmS3H in the maize defense response. We also found ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 formed stronger homomers than ZmS3H (Figure S3), however, it needs to be further investigated whether the formation of homomers is related with the different roles of ZmFNSIs and ZmS3H in Rp1-D21-mediated HR.

3.4. ZmFNSI Regulates Rp1-D21-mediated HR possibly through Forming a Protein Complex

Plant NLR genes are usually expressed at low levels in living cells. The over-accumulation of NLRs can lead to autoimmune responses, causing dwarfism and an autoactive HR phenotype [59]. To reduce the pleiotropic effects to plant growth and development, NLR proteins are usually kept in an inactive state by a delicate combination of intra-molecular and inter-molecular interactions. Several different categories of host proteins (including transcription factors, kinases, E3 ligases, etc.) physically interact with NLRs to modulate plant innate immunity and some NLRs can interact with different host proteins targeted by different pathogen effectors [60]. For instance, in Arabidopsis, the NLR protein ZAR1 (HOPZ-ACTIVATED RESISTANCE1) interacts with several kinases or pseudokinases to recognize effectors secreted from different pathogens [61,62,63]. Recent cryo-electron microscopy studies have characterized the structures of ZAR1 complexes in different states; the inactive ZAR1-RKS1, the intermediate ZAR1-RKS1-PBL2UMP and the activated ZAR1-RKS1-PBL2UMP complexes [64,65]. A wheel-like pentameric ZAR1 “resistosome” is formed in the activated state that is believed to directly induce the defense response, including HR [65].
Rp1-D confers resistance to common rust caused by P. sorghi [66]. However, the cognate effector of Rp1-D from P. sorghi is still unknown. In our previous studies, we derived models to elucidate the transition between the resting and activation states of Rp1 proteins [20,21,38]. We proposed that in the resting state, Rp1 proteins are maintained by intramolecular interactions, some of which we defined, and also by interaction with other host proteins which acted as negative regulators, including HCT and CCoAOMT2. We now propose that ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 are also involved in the negative regulation of Rp1-D. In the activated state, we speculate that unknown effectors from a pathogen can target one of the components from HCT, CCoAOMT2 or ZmFNSIs and disrupt their association with Rp1 proteins, leading to the activation of Rp1. We have also previously shown that Rp1 proteins can form homomers [38]. By analogy with the ZAR1 resistosome, we speculate that Rp1-D, ZmFNSIs, HCT or CCoAOMT2 might also form a ‘Rp1-D resistosome’ to function in the maize defense response.
In summary, we have demonstrated that ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2, two homologs of enzymes which catalyze key steps in the flavone biosynthesis and SA catabolism pathway, interact with the CC domain of Rp1-D21 to regulate Rp1-D21 -mediated HR. ZmFNSI-1 and ZmFNSI-2 also interact with HCT. To our knowledge, this is the first evidence that the homologs of enzymes in the flavonoid and lignin biosynthesis pathways may function together to regulate the NLR-mediated defense response. Though substantial data were derived from agrobacteria-mediated transient expression in N. benthamiana, we believe that it can largely reflect the situation in maize for the following reasons. Firstly, this system has been widely employed for exploring the HR phenotype mediated by NLRs from diverse plant species [39,67,68,69,70]. Secondly, we have used this system to verify the suppression roles of HCT1806, HCT4918 and CCoAOMT2 in Rp1-D21-mediated HR [20,21]. Thirdly, we have also used this system to verify the HR conferred by 12 EMS maize mutants derived from Rp1-D21 and it can recapitulate the HR phenotype in maize [38]. With the maize genetic materials available in the future, we hope to further verify the results in this study.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Condition

Maize (Zea mays) line B73 was grown at 24 °C with 12 h light/12 h dark conditions and used for isolating ZmFNSI-1, ZmFNSI-2 and ZmS3H. Wild type Nicotiana benthamiana and the transgenic N. benthamiana harboring histone 2B (H2B)-TaqRFP were grown at 23 °C with a cycle of 16 h light and 8 h dark.

4.2. Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Analysis

For phylogenetic analysis, the protein sequences from the FNSI and S3H families were aligned using Clustal X v2.1 [71]. Based on this alignment, a neighbor-joining tree was constructed using MEGA 6.0 software with 1000 bootstrap replicates [72].

4.3. Plasmid Construction

GUS:EGFP, HCT1806:EGFP, CCD21:EGFP, CCD21:Myc and Rp1-D21:HA were generated previously [20,38]. The cDNA of ZmFNSI-1, ZmFNSI-2 and ZmS3H were isolated from B73 inbred line using primers listed in Table S1 and cloned into pENTR directional TOPO cloning vector (D-TOPO, Invitrogen, CA, USA). After sequencing, they were constructed into pSITEII-N1-EGFP vector [43] by LR reactions.

4.4. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-Mediated Transient Expression

A. tumefaciens strain GV3101 (pMP90) transformed with binary vector constructs was grown at 28 °C overnight in 8 mL of L-broth medium supplemented with appropriate antibiotics. The detailed procedures were performed according to our previous study [38]. Unless otherwise indicated, all the experiments were repeated three times with similar results.

4.5. Protein Analysis

For protein expression analysis, three leaf discs (1.2 cm in diameter) infiltrated by agrobacteria were collected at 30 h post inoculation (hpi). The samples were ground in liquid nitrogen, and total protein was extracted in 150 µL extraction buffer (20 mM Tris·HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, 10 mM DTT, 40 µM MG132, and 1× plant protein protease inhibitor mixture (Sigma-Aldrich, Louis, MS, USA)). For the Co-IP assay, Myc-, EGFP-, and 3×HA-tagged constructs were transiently co-expressed into N. benthamiana. Leaf samples were collected at 30 hpi, and proteins were extracted by grinding 0.6 g of leaf samples in 1.8 mL extraction buffer (50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 50 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), 0.5% Triton 100, 4 mM DTT, 40 µM MG132, and 1× plant protein protease inhibitor mixture (Sigma-Aldrich, Louis, MS, USA). The kit containing anti-GFP microbeads (Cat# 130-091-125, Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) was used for the Co-IP assay. The detailed procedures for the Co-IP assay were performed according to our previous study [38] with some modifications. HA detection was performed using a 1:6000 dilution of primary rabbit polyclonal anti-HA (Cat# H6908, Sigma-Aldrich, Louis, MS, USA), followed by hybridization with a 1:5000 dilution of anti-rabbit-HRP second antibody (Cat# A00098, GenScript, Nanjing, China). Myc detection was performed using a 1:6000 dilution of primary mouse monoclonal anti-Myc (Cat# A00704S, GenScript, Nanjing, China), followed by hybridization with a 1:5000 dilution of anti-mouse-HRP second antibody (Cat# A00160, GenScript, Nanjing, China). GFP detection was performed using a 1:6000 dilution of primary mouse polyclonal anti-GFP (Cat# A01704S, GenScript, Nanjing, China), followed by hybridization with a 1:5000 dilution of anti-mouse-HRP second antibody. The HRP signal was detected by an ECL substrate kit (Supersignal west femto chemiluminescent substrate, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

4.6. Y2H

ZmFNSI-1, ZmFNSI-2 and ZmS3H were constructed into the pGADT7 (AD) cloning vector (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA) by LR reactions, and CCD21 were constructed into the pGBKT7 (BD) vector (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA). AD- and BD-derived constructs were co-transformed into competent cells of the yeast strain Y2HGold. The Y2H interaction assay was performed according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA).

4.7. Confocal Microscopy

Confocal microscopy observation was performed according to our previous study [44] with some modifications. After agrobacteria infiltration, the abaxial sides of N. benthaminana leaves were used for observation at 48 hpi by a confocal microscope (LSM 700, Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) with a PMT detector. The representative areas were photographed under a 20× objective. EGFP fluorescence was excited at 488 nm and observed between 495 and 550 nm. RFP was excited at 561 nm and observed between 580 and 675 nm.

4.8. Accession Number

Sequence data from this article can be found in the EMBL/GenBank data libraries under the following accession numbers. Nucleotide sequence and protein sequence of Rp1-D21 is KF951062 and AIW65617, respectively. RNA-seq data: SRP060286.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/1422-0067/21/7/2529/s1. Figure S1. Investigating the function of ZmFNSIs and ZmS3H in other elicitor-mediated HR. ZmFNSIs have no obvious suppressive roles on MLA(D502V)-, RPM1(D505V)-, INF1- or Bax-mediated HR. GUS, HCT1806, ZmFNSIs and ZmS3H were transiently co-expressed with RPM1(D505V), MLA(D502V), INF1 or Bax into N. benthamiana. The representative leaf was photographed at 3 days after inoculation. Figure S2. Investigating the interactions between HCT1806 or CCoAOMT2 and ZmFNSIs or ZmS3H. HCT1806 and CCoAOMT2 were constructed into pGBKT7 and ZmFNSIs and ZmS3H were constructed into pGADT7. T + 53 was used as the positive control. “−” indicated empty vector. Figure S3. Investigating the self-association of ZmFNSIs and ZmS3H. ZmFNSIs and ZmS3H were constructed into pGADT7 and pGBKT7 vectors. T + 53 was used as the positive control. “−” indicated empty vector. Figure S4. The subcellular localization of ZmFNSIs and ZmS3H. ZmFNSIs and ZmS3H were fused with C-terminal EGFP, and infiltrated into N. benthamiana transformed with nuclear marker H2B-TaqRFP. Confocal images were taken at 48 hpi. The position of the nucleus was labeled by arrows. The scale bar represents 50 µm. The experiment was repeated three times with the same results. Figure S5. ZmFNSIs and ZmS3H did not change the subcellular localization of CCD21. ZmFNSIs:EGFP or ZmS3H:EGFP were co-infiltrated with CCD21:TaqRFP into N. benthamiana, and confocal images were taken at 48 hpi. The positions of the nuclei were labeled by arrows. The scale bar represents 50 µm. The experiment was repeated three times with the same results. Table S1. The primers used in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.-F.W.; methodology, Y.-X.Z., C.G., X.-Y.L., M.L. and Y.S.; software, Y.-X.Z., and C.G.; validation, Y.-X.Z.; formal analysis, Y.-X.Z., S.M. and Y.S.; data curation, Y.-X.Z., C.G., and G.-F.W.; writing—original draft preparation, C.G. and G.-F.W.; writing—review and editing, S.M. and G.-F.W.; supervision, G.-F.W.; project administration, G.-F.W.; funding acquisition, G.-F.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31571263 and 31871944) and the Qilu Scholarship from Shandong University of China (11200086963061).

Acknowledgments

We thank Jeff Dangl and Qian-Hua Shen for providing the bacterial strains carrying RPM1(D505V) and MLA10(D502V), respectively. We thank Michael Goodin for providing the vectors of pSITEII-N1-TagRFP, pSITEII-N1-EGFP and the transgenic N. benthamiana seeds harboring H2B-TaqRFP. We also thank Peter Balint-Kurti for critical reading and helpful discussion of the manuscript. We thank Haiyan Yu, Xiaomin Zhao and Sen Wang from SKLMT (State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University) for the assistance in microimaging of LSCM analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jones, J.D.; Dangl, J.L. The plant immune system. Nature 2006, 444, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Wang, W.; Feng, B.; Zhou, J.M.; Tang, D. Plant immune signaling: Advancing on two frontiers. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020, 62, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Bent, A.F.; Mackey, D. Elicitors, effectors, and R genes: The new paradigm and a lifetime supply of questions. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2007, 45, 399–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Balint-Kurti, P. The plant hypersensitive response: Concepts, control and consequences. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2019, 20, 1163–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Cui, H.; Tsuda, K.; Parker, J.E. Effector-triggered immunity: From pathogen perception to robust defense. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2015, 66, 487–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mur, L.A.; Kenton, P.; Lloyd, A.J.; Ougham, H.; Prats, E. The hypersensitive response; the centenary is upon us but how much do we know? J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 501–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Kourelis, J.; van der Hoorn, R.A.L. Defended to the nines: 25 Years of resistance gene cloning identifies nine mechanisms for R protein function. Plant Cell 2018, 30, 285–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Dangl, J.L.; Jones, J.D. Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection. Nature 2001, 411, 826–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ellis, J.; Dodds, P.; Pryor, T. Structure, function and evolution of plant disease resistance genes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2000, 3, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Monteiro, F.; Nishimura, M.T. Structural, functional, and genomic diversity of plant NLR proteins: An evolved resource for rational engineering of plant immunity. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2018, 56, 243–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hulbert, S.H. Structure and evolution of the rp1 complex conferring rust resistance in maize. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1997, 35, 293–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sudupak, M.A.; Bennetzen, J.L.; Hulbert, S.H. Unequal exchange and meiotic instability of disease-resistance genes in the Rp1 region of maize. Genetics 1993, 133, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Sun, Q.; Collins, N.C.; Ayliffe, M.; Smith, S.M.; Drake, J.; Pryor, T.; Hulbert, S.H. Recombination between paralogues at the Rp1 rust resistance locus in maize. Genetics 2001, 158, 423–438. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Smith, S.M.; Steinau, M.; Trick, H.N.; Hulbert, S.H. Recombinant Rp1 genes confer necrotic or nonspecific resistance phenotypes. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2010, 283, 591–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Negeri, A.; Wang, G.F.; Benavente, L.; Kibiti, C.M.; Chaikam, V.; Johal, G.; Balint-Kurti, P. Characterization of temperature and light effects on the defense response phenotypes associated with the maize Rp1-D21 autoactive resistance gene. BMC Plant Biol. 2013, 13, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Chintamanani, S.; Hulbert, S.H.; Johal, G.S.; Balint-Kurti, P.J. Identification of a maize locus that modulates the hypersensitive defense response, using mutant-assisted gene identification and characterization. Genetics 2010, 184, 813–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Chaikam, V.; Negeri, A.; Dhawan, R.; Puchaka, B.; Ji, J.; Chintamanani, S.; Gachomo, E.W.; Zillmer, A.; Doran, T.; Weil, C.; et al. Use of Mutant-Assisted Gene Identification and Characterization (MAGIC) to identify novel genetic loci that modify the maize hypersensitive response. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2011, 123, 985–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Olukolu, B.A.; Negeri, A.; Dhawan, R.; Venkata, B.P.; Sharma, P.; Garg, A.; Gachomo, E.; Marla, S.; Chu, K.; Hasan, A.; et al. A connected set of genes associated with programmed cell death implicated in controlling the hypersensitive response in maize. Genetics 2013, 193, 609–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Olukolu, B.A.; Wang, G.F.; Vontimitta, V.; Venkata, B.P.; Marla, S.; Ji, J.; Gachomo, E.; Chu, K.; Negeri, A.; Benson, J.; et al. A genome-wide association study of the maize hypersensitive defense response identifies genes that cluster in related pathways. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Wang, G.F.; He, Y.; Strauch, R.; Olukolu, B.A.; Nielsen, D.; Li, X.; Balint-Kurti, P.J. Maize homologs of hydroxycinnamoyltransferase, a key enzyme in lignin biosynthesis, bind the nucleotide binding leucine-rich repeat Rp1 proteins to modulate the defense response. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 2230–2243. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang, G.F.; Balint-Kurti, P.J. Maize homologs of CCoAOMT and HCT, two key enzymes in lignin biosynthesis, form complexes with the NLR Rp1 protein to modulate the defense response. Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 2166–2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Padmavati, M.; Reddy, A.R. Flavonoid biosynthetic pathway and cereal defence response: An emerging trend in crop biotechnology. J. Plant Biochem. Biot. 1999, 8, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fofana, B.; Benhamou, N.; McNally, D.J.; Labbe, C.; Seguin, A.; Belanger, R.R. Suppression of induced resistance in cucumber through disruption of the flavonoid pathway. Phytopathology 2005, 95, 114–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Gill, U.S.; Uppalapati, S.R.; Gallego-Giraldo, L.; Ishiga, Y.; Dixon, R.A.; Mysore, K.S. Metabolic flux towards the (iso)flavonoid pathway in lignin modified alfalfa lines induces resistance against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp medicaginis. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 1997–2007. [Google Scholar]
  25. George, V.C.; Dellaire, G.; Rupasinghe, H.P.V. Plant flavonoids in cancer chemoprevention: Role in genome stability. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2017, 45, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Peters, N.K.; Frost, J.W.; Long, S.R. A plant flavone, luteolin, induces expression of Rhizobium meliloti nodulation genes. Science 1986, 233, 977–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lanubile, A.; Ferrarini, A.; Maschietto, V.; Delledonne, M.; Marocco, A.; Bellin, D. Functional genomic analysis of constitutive and inducible defense responses to Fusarium verticillioides infection in maize genotypes with contrasting ear rot resistance. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Falcone Ferreyra, M.L.; Emiliani, J.; Rodriguez, E.J.; Campos-Bermudez, V.A.; Grotewold, E.; Casati, P. The identification of maize and Arabidopsis type I FLAVONE SYNTHASEs links flavones with hormones and biotic interactions. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 1090–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. van Damme, M.; Huibers, R.P.; Elberse, J.; Van den Ackerveken, G. Arabidopsis DMR6 encodes a putative 2OG-Fe(II) oxygenase that is defense-associated but required for susceptibility to downy mildew. Plant J. 2008, 54, 785–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kawai, Y.; Ono, E.; Mizutani, M. Evolution and diversity of the 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase superfamily in plants. Plant J. 2014, 78, 328–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, Q.; Liu, H.; Gong, Y.; Tao, Y.; Jiang, L.; Zuo, W.; Yang, Q.; Ye, J.; Lai, J.; Wu, J.; et al. An atypical thioredoxin imparts early resistance to sugarcane mosaic virus in maize. Mol. Plant 2017, 10, 483–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Keskiaho, K.; Hieta, R.; Sormunen, R.; Myllyharju, J. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii has multiple prolyl 4-hydroxylases, one of which is essential for proper cell wall assembly. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 256–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Kim, J.H.; Cheon, Y.M.; Kim, R.G.; Ahn, J.H. Analysis of flavonoids and characterization of the OsFNS gene involved in flavone biosynthesis in rice. J. Plant Biol. 2008, 51, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lee, Y.J.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, B.G.; Lim, Y.; Ahn, J.H. Characterization of flavone synthase I from rice. BMB Rep. 2008, 41, 68–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Zhang, Y.; Zhao, L.; Zhao, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Guo, R.; Gan, S.; Liu, C.J.; Zhang, K. S5H/DMR6 encodes a salicylic acid 5-hydroxylase that fine-tunes salicylic acid homeostasis. Plant Physiol. 2017, 175, 1082–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Zeilmaker, T.; Ludwig, N.R.; Elberse, J.; Seidl, M.F.; Berke, L.; Van Doorn, A.; Schuurink, R.C.; Snel, B.; Van den Ackerveken, G. DOWNY MILDEW RESISTANT 6 and DMR6-LIKE OXYGENASE 1 are partially redundant but distinct suppressors of immunity in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2015, 81, 210–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, K.; Halitschke, R.; Yin, C.; Liu, C.J.; Gan, S.S. Salicylic acid 3-hydroxylase regulates Arabidopsis leaf longevity by mediating salicylic acid catabolism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 14807–14812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Wang, G.F.; Ji, J.; Ei-Kasmi, F.; Dangl, J.L.; Johal, G.; Balint-Kurti, P.J. Molecular and functional analyses of a maize autoactive NB-LRR protein identify precise structural requirements for activity. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1004674. [Google Scholar]
  39. Bai, S.; Liu, J.; Chang, C.; Zhang, L.; Maekawa, T.; Wang, Q.; Xiao, W.; Liu, Y.; Chai, J.; Takken, F.L.; et al. Structure-function analysis of barley NLR immune receptor MLA10 reveals its cell compartment specific activity in cell death and disease resistance. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Gao, Z.; Chung, E.H.; Eitas, T.K.; Dangl, J.L. Plant intracellular innate immune receptor Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola 1 (RPM1) is activated at, and functions on, the plasma membrane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 7619–7624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kamoun, S.; van West, P.; Vleeshouwers, V.G.; de Groot, K.E.; Govers, F. Resistance of Nicotiana benthamiana to Phytophthora infestans is mediated by the recognition of the elicitor protein INF1. Plant Cell 1998, 10, 1413–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Lacomme, C.; Santa Cruz, S. Bax-induced cell death in tobacco is similar to the hypersensitive response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 7956–7961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Martin, K.; Kopperud, K.; Chakrabarty, R.; Banerjee, R.; Brooks, R.; Goodin, M.M. Transient expression in Nicotiana benthamiana fluorescent marker lines provides enhanced definition of protein localization, movement and interactions in planta. Plant J. 2009, 59, 150–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, G.F.; Balint-Kurti, P.J. Cytoplasmic and nuclear localizations are important for the hypersensitive response conferred by maize autoactive Rp1-D21 protein. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2015, 28, 1023–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Thomazella, D.P.D.T.; Brail, Q.; Dahlbeck, D.; Staskawicz, B. CRISPR-Cas9 mediated mutagenesis of a DMR6 ortholog in tomato confers broad-spectrum disease resistance. bioRxiv 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Yang, Q.; He, Y.; Kabahuma, M.; Chaya, T.; Kelly, A.; Borrego, E.; Bian, Y.; El Kasmi, F.; Yang, L.; Teixeira, P.; et al. A gene encoding maize caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase confers quantitative resistance to multiple pathogens. Nat. Genet. 2017, 49, 1364–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, Y.; Guo, Y.; Ma, C.; Zhang, D.; Wang, C.; Yang, Q. Transcriptome analysis of maize resistance to Fusarium graminearum. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 477. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kebede, A.Z.; Johnston, A.; Schneiderman, D.; Bosnich, W.; Harris, L.J. Transcriptome profiling of two maize inbreds with distinct responses to Gibberella ear rot disease to identify candidate resistance genes. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Musungu, B.M.; Bhatnagar, D.; Brown, R.L.; Payne, G.A.; OBrian, G.; Fakhoury, A.M.; Geisler, M. A network approach of gene co-expression in the Zea mays/Aspergillus flavus pathosystem to map host/pathogen interaction pathways. Front. Genet. 2016, 7, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Shu, X.; Livingston, D.P., 3rd; Woloshuk, C.P.; Payne, G.A. Comparative histological and transcriptional analysis of maize kernels infected with Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium verticillioides. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Asselin, J.E.; Lin, J.; Perez-Quintero, A.L.; Gentzel, I.; Majerczak, D.; Opiyo, S.O.; Zhao, W.; Paek, S.M.; Kim, M.G.; Coplin, D.L.; et al. Perturbation of maize phenylpropanoid metabolism by an AvrE family type III effector from Pantoea stewartii. Plant Physiol. 2015, 167, 1117–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Ge, X.; Li, G.J.; Wang, S.B.; Zhu, H.; Zhu, T.; Wang, X.; Xia, Y. AtNUDT7, a negative regulator of basal immunity in Arabidopsis, modulates two distinct defense response pathways and is involved in maintaining redox homeostasis. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145, 204–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Lan, W.; Lu, F.; Regner, M.; Zhu, Y.; Rencoret, J.; Ralph, S.A.; Zakai, U.I.; Morreel, K.; Boerjan, W.; Ralph, J. Tricin, a flavonoid monomer in monocot lignification. Plant Physiol. 2015, 167, 1284–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Jorgensen, K.; Rasmussen, A.V.; Morant, M.; Nielsen, A.H.; Bjarnholt, N.; Zagrobelny, M.; Bak, S.; Moller, B.L. Metabolon formation and metabolic channeling in the biosynthesis of plant natural products. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005, 8, 280–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wang, J.P.; Liu, B.; Sun, Y.; Chiang, V.L.; Sederoff, R.R. Enzyme-enzyme interactions in monolignol biosynthesis. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 9, 1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Balint-Kurti, P.J.; Zwonitzer, J.C.; Wisser, R.J.; Carson, M.L.; Oropeza-Rosas, M.A.; Holland, J.B.; Szalma, S.J. Precise mapping of quantitative trait loci for resistance to southern leaf blight, caused by Cochliobolus heterostrophus race O, and flowering time using advanced intercross maize lines. Genetics 2007, 176, 645–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Lopez-Zuniga, L.O.; Wolters, P.; Davis, S.; Weldekidan, T.; Kolkman, J.M.; Nelson, R.; Hooda, K.S.; Rucker, E.; Thomason, W.; Wisser, R.; et al. Using maize chromosome segment substitution line populations for the identification of loci associated with multiple disease resistance. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2019, 9, 189–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Vlot, A.C.; Dempsey, D.A.; Klessig, D.F. Salicylic Acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2009, 47, 177–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Fang, B.; Gannon, P.; Ding, P.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y. Arabidopsis snc2-1D activates receptor-like protein-mediated immunity transduced through WRKY70. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 3153–3163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Sun, Y.; Zhu, Y.-X.; Balint-Kurti, P.J.; Guan-Feng, W. Fine-tuning immunity: Players and regulators for plant NLRs. Trends Plant Sci. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, G.; Roux, B.; Feng, F.; Guy, E.; Li, L.; Li, N.; Zhang, X.; Lautier, M.; Jardinaud, M.F.; Chabannes, M.; et al. The decoy substrate of a pathogen effector and a pseudokinase specify pathogen-induced modified-self recognition and immunity in plants. Cell Host Microbe 2015, 18, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Seto, D.; Koulena, N.; Lo, T.; Menna, A.; Guttman, D.S.; Desveaux, D. Expanded type III effector recognition by the ZAR1 NLR protein using ZED1-related kinases. Nat. Plants 2017, 3, 17027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Baudin, M.; Hassan, J.A.; Schreiber, K.J.; Lewis, J.D. Analysis of the ZAR1 immune complex reveals determinants for immunity and molecular interactions. Plant Physiol. 2017, 174, 2038–2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Hu, M.; Wu, S.; Qi, J.; Wang, G.; Han, Z.; Qi, Y.; Gao, N.; Wang, H.W.; et al. Ligand-triggered allosteric ADP release primes a plant NLR complex. Science 2019, 364, eaav5868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Wang, J.; Hu, M.; Wang, J.; Qi, J.; Han, Z.; Wang, G.; Qi, Y.; Wang, H.W.; Zhou, J.M.; Chai, J. Reconstitution and structure of a plant NLR resistosome conferring immunity. Science 2019, 364, eaav5870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hu, G.; Richter, T.E.; Hulbert, S.H.; Pryor, T. Disease lesion mimicry caused by mutations in the rust resistance gene rp1. Plant Cell 1996, 8, 1367–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bolus, S.; Akhunov, E.; Coaker, G.; Dubcovsky, J. Dissection of cell death induction by wheat stem rust resistance protein Sr35 and its matching effector AvrSr35. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. MPMI 2020, 33, 308–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Slootweg, E.J.; Spiridon, L.N.; Martin, E.C.; Tameling, W.I.L.; Townsend, P.D.; Pomp, R.; Roosien, J.; Drawska, O.; Sukarta, O.C.A.; Schots, A.; et al. Distinct roles of non-overlapping surface regions of the coiled-coil domain in the potato immune receptor Rx1. Plant Physiol. 2018, 178, 1310–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Tameling, W.I.; Nooijen, C.; Ludwig, N.; Boter, M.; Slootweg, E.; Goverse, A.; Shirasu, K.; Joosten, M.H. RanGAP2 mediates nucleocytoplasmic partitioning of the NB-LRR immune receptor Rx in the Solanaceae, thereby dictating Rx function. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 4176–4194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Li, J.; Huang, H.N.; Zhu, M.; Huang, S.; Zhang, W.H.; Dinesh-Kumar, S.P.; Tao, X.R. A plant immune receptor adopts a two-step recognition mechanism to enhance viral effector perception. Mol. Plant 2019, 12, 248–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Larkin, M.A.; Blackshields, G.; Brown, N.P.; Chenna, R.; McGettigan, P.A.; McWilliam, H.; Valentin, F.; Wallace, I.M.; Wilm, A.; Lopez, R.; et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 2947–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Peterson, D.; Filipski, A.; Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2725–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijms 21 02529 g001 550
Figure 1. The phenylpropanoid pathway, modified according to previous studies [21,28]. 4CL, 4-hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA ligase; ANS, anthocyanidin synthase; C3H, p-coumarate 3-hydroxylase; C4H, cinnamate 4-hydroxylase; CAD, cinnamyl-alcohol dehydrogenase; CCoAOMT, caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase; CCR, cinnamoyl-CoA reductase; CHI, halcone isomerase; CHS, chalcone synthase; COMT, caffeic/5-hydroxyferulic acid O-methyltransferase; DFR, dihydroflavonols reductase; F3′H, flavonol 3′-hydroxylase; F3H, flavanone 3-hydroxylase; F5H, ferulate 5-hydroxylase; FLS, flavonol synthase; FNSI, flavone synthase Ι; HCT, hydroxycinnamoyltransferase; PAL, phenylalanine ammonia lyase; S3H, SA 3-hydroxylase; S5H, SA 5-hydroxylase.
Figure 1. The phenylpropanoid pathway, modified according to previous studies [21,28]. 4CL, 4-hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA ligase; ANS, anthocyanidin synthase; C3H, p-coumarate 3-hydroxylase; C4H, cinnamate 4-hydroxylase; CAD, cinnamyl-alcohol dehydrogenase; CCoAOMT, caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase; CCR, cinnamoyl-CoA reductase; CHI, halcone isomerase; CHS, chalcone synthase; COMT, caffeic/5-hydroxyferulic acid O-methyltransferase; DFR, dihydroflavonols reductase; F3′H, flavonol 3′-hydroxylase; F3H, flavanone 3-hydroxylase; F5H, ferulate 5-hydroxylase; FLS, flavonol synthase; FNSI, flavone synthase Ι; HCT, hydroxycinnamoyltransferase; PAL, phenylalanine ammonia lyase; S3H, SA 3-hydroxylase; S5H, SA 5-hydroxylase.
Ijms 21 02529 g001
Ijms 21 02529 g002 550
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of FNSI/S5H and S3H proteins from different plant species. The protein sequences were aligned using Clustal X v2.1 and the phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 6.0 software. At: Arabidopsis thaliana; Bd: Brachypodium distachyon; Bol: Brassica oleracea capitata; Cs: Cucumis sativus; Dc: Daucus carota; Gm: Glycine max; Hv: Hordeum vulgare; Mt: Medicago truncatula; Nt: Nicotiana tabacum; Os: Oryza sativa; Sb: Sorghum bicolor; Si: Setaria italica; Sv: Setaria viridis; Ta: Triticum aestivum; Tc: Theobroma cacao; Zm: Zea mays. The boxes and the underlines indicated the proteins from maize and Arabidopsis, respectively.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of FNSI/S5H and S3H proteins from different plant species. The protein sequences were aligned using Clustal X v2.1 and the phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 6.0 software. At: Arabidopsis thaliana; Bd: Brachypodium distachyon; Bol: Brassica oleracea capitata; Cs: Cucumis sativus; Dc: Daucus carota; Gm: Glycine max; Hv: Hordeum vulgare; Mt: Medicago truncatula; Nt: Nicotiana tabacum; Os: Oryza sativa; Sb: Sorghum bicolor; Si: Setaria italica; Sv: Setaria viridis; Ta: Triticum aestivum; Tc: Theobroma cacao; Zm: Zea mays. The boxes and the underlines indicated the proteins from maize and Arabidopsis, respectively.
Ijms 21 02529 g002
Ijms 21 02529 g003 550
Figure 3. Investigating the function of ZmFNSIs and ZmS3H in Rp1-D21-induced HR. (A) ZmFNSIs and ZmS3H were transiently co-expressed with Rp1-D21 into N. benthamiana. The representative leaf was photographed at 3 days after inoculation (left), and the same leaf was cleared by ethanol (right). (B) Ion leakage conductivity (average ± standard error (SE), n > 5) was measured at 61 h after co-expression of GUS, HCT, ZmFNSIs or ZmS3H with Rp1-D21. Significant differences (p < 0.05) between samples are indicated by different letters (a–b). The protocol was measured according to our previous study [38]. (C) Total protein was extracted from agro-infiltrated leaves at 30 hpi. Anti-HA was used to detect the expression of Rp1-D21, and anti-GFP was used to detect the expression of GUS, HCT, ZmFNSIs and ZmS3H. Equal loading of protein samples was shown by Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB) staining of Rubisco.
Figure 3. Investigating the function of ZmFNSIs and ZmS3H in Rp1-D21-induced HR. (A) ZmFNSIs and ZmS3H were transiently co-expressed with Rp1-D21 into N. benthamiana. The representative leaf was photographed at 3 days after inoculation (left), and the same leaf was cleared by ethanol (right). (B) Ion leakage conductivity (average ± standard error (SE), n > 5) was measured at 61 h after co-expression of GUS, HCT, ZmFNSIs or ZmS3H with Rp1-D21. Significant differences (p < 0.05) between samples are indicated by different letters (a–b). The protocol was measured according to our previous study [38]. (C) Total protein was extracted from agro-infiltrated leaves at 30 hpi. Anti-HA was used to detect the expression of Rp1-D21, and anti-GFP was used to detect the expression of GUS, HCT, ZmFNSIs and ZmS3H. Equal loading of protein samples was shown by Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB) staining of Rubisco.
Ijms 21 02529 g003
Ijms 21 02529 g004 550
Figure 4. Mutation in the predicted catalytic active site of ZmFNSIs still suppressed Rp1-D21-mediated HR. (A) Multiple sequence alignments of FNSIs from different plant species were aligned by DNAMAN software. The conserved His (H) residues at position 211 and 268 of ZmFNSIs are boxed. (B) ZmFNSIs and their mutant derivatives were transiently co-expressed with Rp1-D21 into N. benthamiana. The representative leaf was photographed at 3 days after inoculation (left), and the same leaf was cleared by ethanol (middle). Ion leakage conductivity (average ± standard error (SE), n > 5) was measured at 61 h after co-expression of GUS and ZmFNSI-drivations with Rp1-D21. Significant differences (p < 0.05) between samples are indicated by different letters (a–b). Total protein was extracted from agro-infiltrated leaves at 48 hpi. Anti-HA was used to detect the expression of Rp1-D21, and anti-GFP was used to detect the expression of GUS, ZmFNSIs and their mutant derivatives. Equal loading of protein samples was shown by CBB staining of Rubisco.
Figure 4. Mutation in the predicted catalytic active site of ZmFNSIs still suppressed Rp1-D21-mediated HR. (A) Multiple sequence alignments of FNSIs from different plant species were aligned by DNAMAN software. The conserved His (H) residues at position 211 and 268 of ZmFNSIs are boxed. (B) ZmFNSIs and their mutant derivatives were transiently co-expressed with Rp1-D21 into N. benthamiana. The representative leaf was photographed at 3 days after inoculation (left), and the same leaf was cleared by ethanol (middle). Ion leakage conductivity (average ± standard error (SE), n > 5) was measured at 61 h after co-expression of GUS and ZmFNSI-drivations with Rp1-D21. Significant differences (p < 0.05) between samples are indicated by different letters (a–b). Total protein was extracted from agro-infiltrated leaves at 48 hpi. Anti-HA was used to detect the expression of Rp1-D21, and anti-GFP was used to detect the expression of GUS, ZmFNSIs and their mutant derivatives. Equal loading of protein samples was shown by CBB staining of Rubisco.
Ijms 21 02529 g004
Ijms 21 02529 g005 550
Figure 5. Investigating the function of ZmFNSIs and ZmS3H in CCD21 induced HR. (A) ZmFNSIs and ZmS3H were transiently co-expressed with CCD21 into N. benthamiana. The representative leaf was photographed at 3 days after inoculation (left), and the same leaf was cleared by ethanol (right). (B) Ion leakage conductivity (average ± SE, n > 5) was measured at 61 h after co-expression of GUS, HCT, ZmFNSIs or ZmS3H with CCD21. Significant differences (p < 0.05) between samples are indicated by different letters (a–b). (C) Total protein was extracted from agro-infiltrated leaves at 30 hpi. Anti-GFP was used to detect the expression of GUS, HCT, ZmFNSIs and ZmS3H. Equal loading of protein samples was shown by CBB staining of Rubisco.
Figure 5. Investigating the function of ZmFNSIs and ZmS3H in CCD21 induced HR. (A) ZmFNSIs and ZmS3H were transiently co-expressed with CCD21 into N. benthamiana. The representative leaf was photographed at 3 days after inoculation (left), and the same leaf was cleared by ethanol (right). (B) Ion leakage conductivity (average ± SE, n > 5) was measured at 61 h after co-expression of GUS, HCT, ZmFNSIs or ZmS3H with CCD21. Significant differences (p < 0.05) between samples are indicated by different letters (a–b). (C) Total protein was extracted from agro-infiltrated leaves at 30 hpi. Anti-GFP was used to detect the expression of GUS, HCT, ZmFNSIs and ZmS3H. Equal loading of protein samples was shown by CBB staining of Rubisco.
Ijms 21 02529 g005
Ijms 21 02529 g006 550
Figure 6. Investigating the interactions between CCD21 and ZmFNSIs or ZmS3H. (A) Investigating the interactions between CCD21 and ZmFNSIs or ZmS3H by yeast two hybridization (Y2H) assay. CCD21 was constructed into pGBKT7 and ZmFNSIs and ZmS3H were constructed into pGADT7. SV40 large T-antigen (T) and murine p53 (53) were used as the positive controls. “−” indicated empty vector. DDO: SD-Leu-Trp; QDO: SD-Leu-Trp-Ade-His. (B) Investigating the interactions between CCD21 and ZmFNSIs or ZmS3H by co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assay. EGFP- and 4×c-Myc-tagged constructs were transiently co-expressed in N. benthamiana and samples were collected at 30 hpi for the Co-IP assay. Protein extracts were immunoprecipitated (IP) by anti-GFP (α-GFP) microbeads and detected (immunblotted; IB) by anti-GFP and anti-Myc (α-Myc) antibodies.
Figure 6. Investigating the interactions between CCD21 and ZmFNSIs or ZmS3H. (A) Investigating the interactions between CCD21 and ZmFNSIs or ZmS3H by yeast two hybridization (Y2H) assay. CCD21 was constructed into pGBKT7 and ZmFNSIs and ZmS3H were constructed into pGADT7. SV40 large T-antigen (T) and murine p53 (53) were used as the positive controls. “−” indicated empty vector. DDO: SD-Leu-Trp; QDO: SD-Leu-Trp-Ade-His. (B) Investigating the interactions between CCD21 and ZmFNSIs or ZmS3H by co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assay. EGFP- and 4×c-Myc-tagged constructs were transiently co-expressed in N. benthamiana and samples were collected at 30 hpi for the Co-IP assay. Protein extracts were immunoprecipitated (IP) by anti-GFP (α-GFP) microbeads and detected (immunblotted; IB) by anti-GFP and anti-Myc (α-Myc) antibodies.
Ijms 21 02529 g006
Table
Table 1. The fold change (FC) of the transcript levels of maize genes in Rp1-D21 compared to the corresponding wild type and the effect of the genes on the Rp1-D21-mediated hypersensitive response (HR).
Table 1. The fold change (FC) of the transcript levels of maize genes in Rp1-D21 compared to the corresponding wild type and the effect of the genes on the Rp1-D21-mediated hypersensitive response (HR).
Gene NameAccession NumberChromosomal PositionFC in B73 × H95 Isogenic LinesFC in Mo17 × H95 Isogenic LinesRp1-D21-Mediated HR Phenotype
ZmFNSI-1Zm00001d029744Chr1: 85,068,069..85,072,05117.2355.62Suppressed
ZmFNSI-2Zm00001d027423Chr1: 4,909,652..4,914,685235.0228.01Suppressed
ZmS3HZm00001d002564Chr2: 15,538,202..15,540,4698.564.18No effect
HCT1806Zm00001d027946Chr1: 18,086,164..18,087,981292.03183.11Suppressed
HCT4918Zm00001d027948Chr1: 18,147,157..18,148,9371115568.5Suppressed
CCoAOMT2Zm00001d045206Chr9: 16,074,658..16,083,1262.071.70Suppressed
Peptidoglycan related genesZm00001d043988Chr3: 215,679,092..215,679,979250.5969.97No effect
Zm00001d027325Chr1: 2,974,258..2,976,9352.363.06No effect
Zm00001d053695Chr4: 239,190,056..239,192,28322.9212.59No effect
Wall associated kinase Zm00001d003019Chr2: 29,627,526..29,635,3385.824.84Autoactive HR
Zm00001d003021Chr2: 29,666,263..29,670,1996.084.61Autoactive HR
Auxin-responsive genesZm00001d033460Chr1: 263,312,679..263,313,00524.76177.41No effect
Zm00001d031666Chr1: 195785845-19578912018.1021.15No effect
Zm00001d028167Chr1: 25,047,706..25,050,01541.1284.14No effect
MTHFR2Zm00001d034602Chr1: 297,605,177..297,611,4074.334.76No effect
Calmodulin binding proteinsZm00001d023843Chr10: 24,286,776..24,290,769157.8585.47Autoactive HR
Zm00001d052525Chr4: 192,080,883..192,084,9674.554.41No effect
Zm00001d004916Chr2: 148,560,206..148,564,3007.692.17No effect
EF hand familyZm00001d043258Chr3: 193,663,756..193,664,03710.6645.62Partially suppressed
UDP-glycosyltransferaseZm00001d014126Chr5: 33,393,733..33,395,4605.451.91No effect
Cytochrome B5 isoformsZm00001d017425Chr5: 195,722,803..195,723,646123.41163.02Enhanced
Zm00001d011081Chr8: 138,418,132..138,420,3022.272.74Enhanced

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, Y.-X.; Ge, C.; Ma, S.; Liu, X.-Y.; Liu, M.; Sun, Y.; Wang, G.-F. Maize ZmFNSI Homologs Interact with an NLR Protein to Modulate Hypersensitive Response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2529. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21072529

AMA Style

Zhu Y-X, Ge C, Ma S, Liu X-Y, Liu M, Sun Y, Wang G-F. Maize ZmFNSI Homologs Interact with an NLR Protein to Modulate Hypersensitive Response. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(7):2529. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21072529

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Yu-Xiu, Chunxia Ge, Shijun Ma, Xiao-Ying Liu, Mengjie Liu, Yang Sun, and Guan-Feng Wang. 2020. "Maize ZmFNSI Homologs Interact with an NLR Protein to Modulate Hypersensitive Response" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 7: 2529. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21072529

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop