Next Article in Journal
Direct and Base Excision Repair-Mediated Regulation of a GC-Rich cis-Element in Response to 5-Formylcytosine and 5-Carboxycytosine
Previous Article in Journal
A Beginner’s Introduction to Skin Stem Cells and Wound Healing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Molecular Insights on the Possible Role of Annexin A2 in COVID-19 Pathogenesis and Post-Infection Complications

1
Central Research Laboratory, KS Hegde Medical Academy (KSHEMA), NITTE (Deemed to be University), Mangalore 575018, India
2
Department of Biochemistry, KS Hegde Medical Academy (KSHEMA), NITTE (Deemed to be University), Mangalore 575018, India
3
Division of Proteomics and Cancer Biology, Nitte University Center for Science Education and Research (NUCSER), NITTE (Deemed to be University), Mangalore 575018, India
4
Microbiology, Immunology & Genetics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX 76107, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(20), 11028; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms222011028
Submission received: 20 August 2021 / Revised: 23 September 2021 / Accepted: 28 September 2021 / Published: 13 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Pathology, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics)

Abstract

:
Severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has infected >235 million people and killed over 4.8 million individuals worldwide. Although vaccines have been developed for prophylactic management, there are no clinically proven antivirals to treat the viral infection. Continuous efforts are being made all over the world to develop effective drugs but these are being delayed by periodic outbreak of mutated SARS-CoV-2 and a lack of knowledge of molecular mechanisms underlying viral pathogenesis and post-infection complications. In this regard, the involvement of Annexin A2 (AnxA2), a lipid-raft related phospholipid-binding protein, in SARS-CoV-2 attachment, internalization, and replication has been discussed. In addition to the evidence from published literature, we have performed in silico docking of viral spike glycoprotein and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase with human AnxA2 to find the molecular interactions. Overall, this review provides the molecular insights into a potential role of AnxA2 in the SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis and post-infection complications, especially thrombosis, cytokine storm, and insulin resistance.

1. Introduction

Severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a single known causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has infected more than 235 million people worldwide. It has caused severe social and economic disruption with mortality rate of around 2.2%, accounting for the deaths of over 4.8 million individuals [1,2,3]. The highly recombinogenic SARS-CoV-2 is the seventh known coronavirus to infect humans since the first human coronaviruses that were described in 1960s [4,5,6]. There are currently no clinically proven antivirals; however, a few vaccines with limited clinical efficacy have been developed for the treatment of COVID-19. In addition, various repurposed drugs, such as nucleoside analogues like remdesivir, translation inhibitors, compounds like hydroxychloroquine, dexamethasone, and dietary supplements like vitamins, minerals, folate, butyrate, etc. are being used in the treatment of COVID-19 [7,8]. Ongoing efforts are being made to develop drugs and vaccines all over the world but are being hampered by the frequent outbreaks of mutant SARS-CoV-2 [9]. Moreover, there is a lack of knowledge about the molecular mechanisms involved in SARS-CoV-2 replication as well as its interaction with human host cells, except angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), a cell membrane receptor protein for the viral entry [10,11,12]. ACE2, a component of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, catalyzes the conversion of angiotensin II to angiotensin-(1–7) and angiotensin I to angiotensin-(1–9), lowering blood pressure [13,14]. ACE2 receptor expression is found in a wide range of cells, including vascular endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, nasal and oral mucosa, enterocytes, type II alveolar pneumocytes, and others, indicating the tissue susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection [15,16]. It has recently been discovered that high levels of circulating ACE2 in severe COVID-19 patients are linked to a higher risk of serious cardiovascular events such heart failure and aortic stenosis [17].
SARS-CoV-2 is an enveloped betacoronavirus with a positive-sense, single-stranded RNA genome belonging to the family coronaviridae [18,19]. SARS-CoV-2 has a genome size of 29.9 kb, sharing 79.5% and 96.2% identity with SARS-CoV and bat CoV RaTG13, respectively [20]. The viral genome encodes for 29 proteins that include 16 non-structural proteins including an error-prone RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) for viral replication, nine accessory proteins for countering host immune responses, and four structural proteins comprising the nucleocapsid (N) protein that encapsulates the RNA genome and three membrane proteins: the spike (S)-glycoprotein, the matrix (M) protein, and the envelope (E) protein [6,21,22,23]. Approximately 40% of these SARS-CoV-2 proteins were engaged in vesicle trafficking pathways connected with endomembrane compartments for coronavirus replication [24,25,26]. All coronavirus mRNAs rely on cap-dependent translation to produce their proteins [27,28]. However, the basic functional features of these viral proteins, as well as the role of their interacting host proteins in virus multiplication and survival, are yet unknown.
The S-glycoprotein is a highly glycosylated homotrimer made up of S1 and S2 subdomains. The S1 subdomain encodes the receptor binding domain and is responsible for binding to host cell receptor, whereas the S2 subdomain mediates fusion of the viral and host cell membranes by forming a six-helical bundle via the two-heptad repeat domain [13,29,30]. A transmembrane metallopeptidase, ACE2, was initially identified as a SARS-CoV-2 receptor; however, subsequent researchers found that neuropilin-1 is also a host component that aids infectivity [10,12,31,32,33,34]. However, recent studies show that SARS-CoV-2 enters cells via clathrin-mediated endocytosis, implying that this pathway is an important part of virus infectivity [35]. Furthermore, it has been observed that S-glycoprotein has a furin cleavage site at the S1/S2 boundary and mediates the cleavage through the type II transmembrane serine protease TMPRSS2 at S2 site to activate the membrane fusion [10]. This fusion is a molecular mimic of SNARE-mediated cellular membrane fusion, and it generates a channel that allows the virus’s RNA and RNA-associated nucleocapsid proteins to gain access to the cytosol, causing infection [36]. As a result, the viral and host cell membranes’ lipid bilayer composition, particularly the lipid rafts, is crucial for virus membrane fusion and entry into the host cell [37]. Therefore, the host cell membrane’s lipid rafts, which house multiple transmembrane proteins involved in receptor signaling and trafficking via the secretory and endocytic pathways, could serve as hotspots for virus entry [35,37,38].
A pleiotropic protein, Annexin A2 (AnxA2), is a calcium-dependent protein implicated in a variety of membrane-related biological activities including cell-cell adhesion, exocytosis, endocytosis, and the creation and stabilization of lipid rafts [38,39]. Moreover, AnxA2 has been reported to be involved in attachment, internalization, replication, and pathogenesis of several viruses including SARS-CoV [40,41]. Recent investigations identified the presence of anti-AnxA2 autoantibodies in hospitalized COVID-19 patients [42]. Thus, in this review, we specifically considered the evidence from the published literature and in silico docking analysis data to provide the molecular insights into the potential role of AnxA2 in the SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis and post-infection complications, especially thrombosis, cytokine storm, and hyperglycemia.

2. AnxA2 Role in SARS-CoV-2 Pathogenesis

AnxA2 is a phospholipid-binding 36-kDa protein that exists as a monomer in the cytoplasm or as a heterotetramer in the extracellular plasma membrane, generated by the non-covalent interaction of two AnxA2 molecules with two S100A10 (p11) molecules [43,44]. The AnxA2 tetramer (A2T) acts as a receptor for tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), which converts plasminogen into plasmin, which is involved in fibrinolysis [45]. In addition to its RNA binding protein activity, AnxA2 operates as an upstream signaling molecule for multiple downstream cell signaling pathways that are involved in the control of various cellular processes such as cell proliferation, metastasis, angiogenesis, and inflammation [38,46,47]. With this background, we have tried to gather evidence to support the possible role of AnxA2 in SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis including attachment, internalization, trafficking, and replication (Figure 1).

2.1. Role in Attachment and Internalization of the Virus

Cellular attachment and penetration into the targeted host, which is dependent on host cell components and processes such as cellular receptors, is a critical part of any viral life cycle. AnxA2 has been connected to a number of membrane-related host-virus interactions, including virus attachment, internalization, and trafficking (Table 1). The pseudorabies virus (PRV) infection induces the AnxA2 production in axons and exploit it for the efficient retrograde transport in the peripheral nervous system neurons. [48]. A plasma membrane-associated receptor AnxA2 also interacts with enterovirus type 71 (EV71) VP1 to promote virus attachment and infection [49,50,51]. AnxA2 binds to viral membrane anionic phospholipids of cytomegalovirus (CMV) on the cell surface of endothelial cells in a calcium-dependent manner to fuse with the host cell membrane, which varies on the cell type [52,53,54]. The L2 protein of the human papillomavirus (HPV) interacts with the p11 component of A2T to aid in HPV internalization, indicating that both the tetramer and monomeric forms of AnxA2 play a vital role in HPV infection by preventing the lysosomal breakdown [55,56]. Furthermore, the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) envelope protein’s phosphatidylserine binds to AnxA2 on the cell membrane, which serves as a cellular cofactor supporting the macrophage HIV-1 infection [57,58]. Early infection with dengue virus serotype 2 (DENV2) produces an increase in the synthesis of AnxA2, a protein involved in cytoskeletal rearrangements that could also serve as a host cell factor for viral internalization [59]. The respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) glycoproteins G and F are involved in cell attachment and fusion. RSV G protein interacts with L-selectin and AnxA2, which are expressed on the surfaces of leukocytes and epithelial cells, respectively, and RSV infection promotes AnxA2 expression on the epithelial cell surface [60].
To understand the molecular interaction between human AnxA2 (PDB entry: 6M71; resolution: 2.90 Å) with the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein (PDB entry: 6LZG; resolution: 2.50 Å), molecular docking studies were performed using the fully automated web-based platform, ClusPro v2.0 (http://cluspro.bu.edu/ (accessed on 13 September 2021)) that executes rigid body docking, when a partner protein in a complex is structurally flexible [61,62,63]. This returned with the top models based on energy and cluster size that are having interactions within the same sphere of binding site for the docking complexes. Further, the docked conformations were filtered based on surface complementarities, which were ranked according to their clustering parameters so as to sort those with highest free energy values, ΔG (kcal/mol) as obtained by smoothening their local minima [63,64]. Among the top generated docking conformations having interactions in the same region of proteins, a model interaction with the lowest docking energy of −889.3 and largest cluster size of 24 members was further analyzed using PyMol v2.4.0 program [65]. It was observed that there were 12 hydrogen bonds and 2 salt bridges between the interacting amino acid residues in the C-terminal region of SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein (Arg1107, Thr1077, Ser708, Asn616, Thr618, Glu707, Gln644, and Gly669) and human AnxA2 (Glu188, Tyr187, Lys226, Gln75, Lys79, Gln187, Glu81, and Glu148) (Figure 2A and Figure S1A). The hydrogen bond interactions determine the structural integrity of many biological molecules, and are crucial for protein folding and binding. According to Janin et al. [61], an interface with at least ten hydrogen bonds has enough enthalpy to establish binding affinities of up to 10−14 M, indicating that the human AnxA2 can form a stable complex of protein-protein interaction with viral spike glycoprotein.

2.2. Role in Replication and Release of Virus

Viruses must take over and reprogram host cells in order to successfully create their progeny in the infected host. This coordinated complex process relies on the host cell components to facilitate the viral uncoating, integrating into host genome, and protein expression to replicate and release the viral particle. During the process, AnxA2 is utilized by measles virus (MV), hepatitis C virus, (HCV), influenza A virus (IAV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) during the assembly, maturation, and replication (Table 2). In HeLa cells, the MV matrix protein helps attach the viral capsid to the viral envelope so that it fuses with the host cell membrane, and it traffics through monomeric AnxA2 rather than A2T [66]. The lipid rafts have been shown to have a role in the development of crude replication complexes, in which HCV replication is mediated by the non-structural protein NS5A, which recruits AnxA2 [67,68]. However, AnxA2’s direct contact with HCV’s NS5B lowers NS5B’s polymerase activity and RNA binding ability [69]. AnxA2 and A2T have been observed on the IAV H1N1 viral envelopes, with A2T being a plasminogen receptor involved in the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin, which is required for IAV replication [70]. Furthermore, H5N1’s non-structural protein NS1 interacts with AnxA2, promoting viral reproduction in host cells. However, silencing AnxA2 causes a decrease in the expression of viral proteins Hemagglutinin (HA) and Matrix (M), which are required for viral attachment and infection [71]. H5N1 infection, on the other hand, reduces AnxA2 expression, and lowered AnxA2 expression increases H5N1 spread [72]. AnxA2 in lipid rafts containing ganglioside M1 interacts with viral p41Gag protein and PIP2 on the plasma membrane, as well as with viral polyprotein precursor protein p55Gag on the late endosomal membrane, where HIV assembly and replication occur [73,74]. This is disputed because it is only seen in macrophages produced from monocytes [58]. HBV polymerase interacts with p11, a subunit of the A2T, which mediates HBV polymerase recruitment to nuclear bodies of promyelocytic leukemia protein in a Ca2+-dependent way [75].
In our protein–protein docking studies performed as explained above between the human AnxA2 (PDB entry: 6M71; resolution: 2.90 Å) and SARS-CoV-2 RdRp (PDB entry: 2HYW; resolution: 2.10 Å), the top model conformation with lowest docking energy of −738.1 and highest cluster size of 11 members was identified. The conformation has 10 hydrogen bonds between the interacting amino acid residues in the C-terminal region of SARS-CoV-2 RdRp (Gly337, Asn404, Val405, Ser518, Lys508, Arg365, Asp336, Tyr374, and Lue401) and human AnxA2 (Lys203, Arg308, Thr187, Lys226, Glu188, Arg195, Arg230, and Lys232) (Figure 2B and Figure S2B). These data show that the human AnxA2 can also form a more stable interaction protein complex with viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, indicating their role in viral replication, maturation, and release into the host cell.

3. AnxA2 Role in Cytokine Storm

The recent literature reviews on several studies that looked at the cytokine profiles of COVID-19 patients indicate that the ‘cytokine storm’ was connected to lung injury, multi-organ failure, and a dismal prognosis [67,68,69,70]. This cytokine storm phenomenon represents the release of a large number of pro-inflammatory cytokines as a hyperactive immunological response triggered by SARS-CoV-2 infection [76,77,78,79]. Among the pro-inflammatory molecules, Fang et al. identified an upregulated expression of Ca2+-dependent binding protein AnxA2 by SARS-CoV associated cytokines and the cross-reactivity of anti-SARS-CoV Spike domain-2 antibodies to AnxA2 [41]. AnxA2, being a pro-inflammatory receptor protein, its enhanced synthesis could trigger hyper-immunogenicity, resulting in autoantibodies against it. Additionally, it has been observed in the hospitalized COVID-19 patients that there is a massive production of pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-6, IL-1β, and TNFα, whose production is known to be stimulated by the concentrated AnxA2 at the plasma membrane in the heterotetramer form as A2T [80,81,82]. The intracellular AnxA2 binds to p50 subunit of pro-inflammatory transcription factor NF-κB, leading to increased transcriptional activity and the expression of adrenomedullin, CSF2 (GM-CSF), F3, IL-1B, IL1R2, IL-6, CD40, and GADD45B genes [83]. Activated coagulation factor X induces AnxA2 dependent cytokine production in airway smooth muscle cells and may cause fibrosis in lungs [84,85]. AnxA2 also regulates the production of inflammatory cytokines (IL-6 and IL-8) by airway smooth muscle cells in response to plasminogen stimulation by activating the ERK1/2, p38MAPK, and PI3K/Akt downstream pathways [86].
The local production of AnxA2 within the tissues promotes the complement-mediated bacterial clearance by suppressing the factor H, a circulating protein that regulates the alternative pathway of complement. [87]. In colonic epithelial cells and monocytes, AnxA2 interacts directly with ADAM17 and mediates the ectodomain shedding of TNF-α [88]. A2T activates and stimulates the production of inflammatory cytokines via a TLR 4-dependent mechanism [89]. The increased production of inflammatory cytokine IL-1β by the gram-negative bacteria Vibrio vulnificus promoted the phagocytic death via NF-κB regulation mediated by AnxA2 [90,91]. Increased expression and raft distribution of AnxA2 are stimulated by SARS-CoV-induced cytokines IL-6 and IFN-γ, as well as enhanced anti-S2 antibody binding activity, resulting in thrombotic complications and lung inflammation, leading to a severe form of SARS-CoV infection [41]. Moreover, recent reports have also shown that the elevated levels of anti-AnxA2 antibodies are observed among COVID-19 patients causing cytokine storm that may finally lead to systemic thrombosis, cell death, and non-cardiogenic pulmonary oedema [42,92,93]. This could be due to the hyper-immunogenicity of AnxA2, as it has been found to be an autoantigen in patients with anti-phospholipid syndrome and lung cancer [94,95]. In addition, according to our findings, AnxA2 acts an upstream regulator of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, IL-1β, and TNFα, and also play a reciprocal regulation with anti-inflammatory AnxA1 in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis [96]. Furthermore, a glucocorticoid dexamethasone treatment, in severe COVID-19 patients, is known to induce anti-inflammatory AnxA1 and also enhances its translocation to cell membrane, could reduce the membrane deposition of AnxA2, making it unavailable for the virus entry and replication [97].

4. AnxA2 Role in Thrombosis

According to recent clinical data, COVID-19 is linked to a high risk of thrombotic consequences such as microvascular thrombosis, venous thromboembolic illness, and stroke [98,99,100,101,102]. These thrombotic events occur in up to one-third of COVID-19 patients and are linked to more severe illness and mortality [103]. Recent evidence suggests that decreased plasma fibrinolysis is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism, and that cell surface tPA receptor, especially AnxA2 is involved in this hypofibrinolysis [104,105]. However, previous research has linked the release of anti-phospholipid antibodies, which is seen in anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS), to arterial and venous thrombosis as a possible risk factor. The majority of these antibodies recognize phospholipid-binding proteins such as β2 Glycoprotein I (β2GPI) and prothrombin, which activate endothelial cells when β2GPI binds with AnxA2 with high affinity. The profibrinolytic tPA-plasminogen receptor, AnxA2 complex on the cell surface facilitates plasmin production and triggers endothelial cell activation [94,106,107,108].
In fact, the activation of vascular endothelial cells in the inner lining of blood vessels lead to the loss of anti-coagulant and anti-thrombotic properties that are vital for blood fluidity [109]. The AnxA2 forms a multiprotein signaling complex with toll-like receptor 4, calreticulin, and nucleolin, which mediate anti-β2GPI antibodies induced endothelial cell activation, leading to thrombosis associated with APS [110,111]. Intravenous injection of recombinant AnxA2 dramatically reduces thrombus development in a rat model of embolic stroke without changing hemostatic parameters [112]. Additionally, the role of AnxA2 in maintaining the endothelial cell junctions around lung microvasculature and preventing pulmonary edema, especially in response to hypoxia, has recently been identified [113]. Given its critical protective roles, the levels of anti-AnxA2 antibodies among hospitalized COVID-19 patients highly predicted the mortality, indicating the importance of AnxA2 in the pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection [42]. In severe COVID-19 patients, an apparent hypofibrinolysis has been observed, which could be related to the ceaseless engagement of AnxA2 with viral replication, rendering it unavailable for its typical function of tPA mediated conversion of plasminogen to plasmin, a major participant in fibrinolysis [104,114]. As hypofibrinolytic and hyperthrombin production have been linked to SARS-CoV-2-related thrombosis, the tPAs or AnxA2 agonists that can induce thrombolysis may be beneficial for treating pulmonary embolism (PE) and hemodynamic instability [115]. Therefore, the use of tPA in the treatment of critically-ill COVID-19 patients with PE and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) may be advantageous [116,117,118]. Furthermore, the broad spectrum immunosuppressant drug dexamethasone treatment given to critically ill COVID-19 patients may be associated with the risk of venous thromboembolism because corticosteroids are known to induce anti-inflammatory AnxA1, recruiting to the membrane surface results in lowered translocation of AnxA2 to the cell membrane, which could precipitate into thrombosis [119].

5. AnxA2 Role in Insulin Resistance

According to recent evidence, diabetes mellitus and hyperglycemia are the predictors of poor prognosis and increased risk of death among COVID-19 patients [120,121,122,123,124]. Moreover, a new-onset of acute hyperglycemia has been observed in severe COVID-19 patients, which can exacerbate the existing diabetes, resulting in increased insulin resistance, hyper-inflammation, and a lower probability of survival [125]. In the literature, there are several reviews on the proposed concept that explains the sudden onset of hyperglycemia in individuals with severe COVID-19 infection. The most widely debated theory is that SARS-CoV-2 infects the pancreas via ACE2 interaction on pancreatic β cells, which then impairs endogenous insulin synthesis by altering insulin receptor signaling, resulting in acute hyperglycemia and devastating hyperinflammation [126,127,128].
Hyperglycemia and diabetes mellitus reduce fibrinolytic activity on the endothelial cell surface by lowering tPA and plasminogen expression and increasing plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression. Hyperglycemia also causes hyper-coagulation by increasing the levels of advanced glycation end-products modified forms of cellular and membrane AnxA2 [129,130]. In a high-fat diet induced IR mouse model study, silencing AnxA2 attenuated the obesity-induced insulin resistance and inflammation through the process of p50 nuclear translocation of the NF-κB signaling pathway [131]. Furthermore, AnxA2 interacts with galectin-3 at the cell surface, which directly induces cellular insulin resistance and associated inflammation under obese conditions by impairing insulin signaling [132,133,134]. As evidenced by recent studies, the anti-AnxA2 antibodies detected in severely infected COVID-19 patients suggest that AnxA2 expression is increased following SARS-CoV-2 infection, which could disrupt insulin signaling via the galectin-3 or NF-κB pathways, resulting in insulin resistance and hyperglycemia [42,135,136]. Furthermore, the viral infection-mediated increased production of AnxA2 interacts with galectin-3, which can bind directly to the insulin receptor and prevent it from being activated by insulin [132,137]. This suppresses the down-stream signaling of IRS1 tyrosine phosphorylation, PDK1 activation, and AKT phosphorylation, resulting in insulin-dependent glucose uptake and translocation of GLUT4 inhibition, and ultimately results in hyperglycemia [138].

6. Summary and Future Perspectives

Multiple evidences in this review, including the detection of anti-AnxA2 antibodies in COVID-19 patients, suggests that AnxA2 has an implicating role in SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis and post-infection complications (Figure 3). In addition to its wide range of functions including plasminolysis, we have established in our earlier studies that the AnxA2 has importance in EGFR downstream signaling and its interacting partner galectin-3 regulation [137,139]. Furthermore, we also elucidated that AnxA2 may function as an upstream pro-inflammatory regulator and have reciprocal regulation with AnxA1 in inflammatory conditions like rheumatoid arthritis [96]. According to our preliminary protein docking investigations, the AnxA2 might interact with S2 and RdRp proteins of SARS-CoV-2 to aid in internalization and replication. After attachment to the host cell, SARS-CoV-2 utilizes the membrane bound AnxA2 for internalization, decreasing the A2T mediated cell surface plasminolysis, and leading to the intravascular thrombosis in COVID-19 patients. The virus will then use the cytoplasmic monomeric AnxA2 for replication in the infected cell, resulting in a devastating inflammatory surge and cytokine storm. The viral mediated AnxA2 induction and its membrane translocation might recruit galectin-3 to bind insulin receptor, leading to insulin resistance.
The currently available treatment options for COVID-19 includes broad spectrum antivirals, nutritional immune boosters, immunosuppressants or corticosteroids, etc. [140,141,142]. Though there is insufficient data to support the beneficial effects of nutritional supplements such as vitamins, minerals, fatty acids, herbs, etc. are being recommended for proper immune function [143]. In addition, we recently made a detailed review and proposed a dietary supplement, sodium butyrate or butyric acid, which has an anti-inflammatory effects, could be an effective therapeutic strategy for COVID-19 prevention [144]. However, there is a general dearth of particular antiviral drugs that target the virus rather than simply providing symptomatic relief. The vaccine research, despite moving at a rapid pace and yielding more than a dozen vaccinations, has been unable to keep up with the virus’s global mutation rate [145,146]. Furthermore, the vaccines’ efficacy in offering protection against existing mutations or forthcoming variations is still unknown [147]. As a result, there is a great demand for novel drugs and strategies that can either prevent the virus entry or replication inside the host cells. Currently, drug repurposing and in silico docking studies are being pursued in order to provide therapeutic insights into mechanisms that could be effective in combating the virus [148]. Given the situation, AnxA2 could be explored as a potential therapeutic target to combat SARS-CoV-2 infection because it has been already tested as an antigenic target for T cell immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer and also known to serve as a target for developing anti-angiogenic drug to prevent cancer aggressiveness [149,150,151]. Furthermore, we believe that multidisciplinary research is needed to fully understand these mechanistic pathways and to confirm their therapeutic implications against this viral infection.

Supplementary Materials

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.P. and P.S.; methodology, P.P., N.K.K. and P.G.; software, P.P. and P.G.; validation, P.P., P.S., S.S., R.B., J.K.V. and S.D.G.; formal analysis, P.P., N.K.K. and P.G.; investigation, P.P., N.K.K. and P.G.; resources, P.S.; data curation, P.P., N.K.K. and P.G.; writing—original draft preparation, P.P., N.K.K. and P.G.; writing—review and editing, P.P., P.S., S.S., R.B., J.K.V. and S.D.G.; visualization, P.P., P.S., N.K.K., S.S., R.B. and S.D.G.; supervision, P.S.; project administration, P.S.; funding acquisition, P.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

All the authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. China CDC Weekly. The Epidemiological Characteristics of an Outbreak of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Diseases (COVID-19)—China, 2020. China CDC Weekly 2020, 2, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center Home Page. Available online: https://0-coronavirus-jhu-edu.brum.beds.ac.uk/data (accessed on 5 October 2021).
  3. Wu, Y.; Ho, W.; Huang, Y.; Jin, D.-Y.; Li, S.; Liu, S.-L.; Liu, X.; Qiu, J.; Sang, Y.; Wang, Q.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 is an appropriate name for the new coronavirus. Lancet 2020, 395, 949–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Khan, S.; Siddique, R.; Shereen, M.A.; Ali, A.; Liu, J.; Bai, Q.; Bashir, N.; Xue, M. Emergence of a Novel Coronavirus, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2: Biology and Therapeutic Options. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Ludwig, S.; Zarbock, A. Coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2: A Brief Overview. Anesth. Analg. 2020, 131, 93–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jin, Y.; Yang, H.; Ji, W.; Wu, W.; Chen, S.; Zhang, W.; Duan, G. Virology, Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Control of COVID-19. Viruses 2020, 12, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Umakanthan, S.; Chattu, V.K.; Ranade, A.V.; Das, D.; Basavarajegowda, A.; Bukelo, M. A rapid review of recent advances in diagnosis, treatment and vaccination for COVID-19. AIMS Public Health 2021, 8, 137–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ahn, D.-G.; Shin, H.-J.; Kim, M.-H.; Lee, S.; Kim, H.-S.; Myoung, J.; Kim, B.-T.; Kim, S.-J. Current Status of Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Therapeutics, and Vaccines for Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 30, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Harvey, W.T.; Carabelli, A.M.; Jackson, B.; Gupta, R.K.; Thomson, E.C.; Harrison, E.M.; Ludden, C.; Reeve, R.; Rambaut, A.; Peacock, S.J.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 variants, spike mutations and immune escape. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 19, 409–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Schroeder, S.; Krüger, N.; Herrler, T.; Erichsen, S.; Schiergens, T.S.; Herrler, G.; Wu, N.-H.; Nitsche, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell 2020, 181, 271–280.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shang, J.; Wan, Y.; Luo, C.; Ye, G.; Geng, Q.; Auerbach, A.; Li, F. Cell entry mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 11727–11734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yan, R.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Xia, L.; Guo, Y.; Zhou, Q. Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2. Science 2020, 367, 1444–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Wrapp, D.; Wang, N.; Corbett, K.S.; Goldsmith, J.A.; Hsieh, C.L.; Abiona, O.; Graham, B.S.; McLellan, J.S. Cryo-EM Structure of the 2019-NCoV Spike in the Prefusion Conformation. Science 2020, 367, 1260–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Sanchis-Gomar, F.; Lavie, C.J.; Perez-Quilis, C.; Henry, B.M.; Lippi, G. Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 and Antihyper-tensives (Angiotensin Receptor Blockers and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors) in Coronavirus Disease 2019. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2020, 95, 1222–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zou, X.; Chen, K.; Zou, J.; Han, P.; Hao, J.; Han, Z. Single-cell RNA-seq data analysis on the receptor ACE2 expression reveals the potential risk of different human organs vulnerable to 2019-nCoV infection. Front. Med. 2020, 14, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Beyerstedt, S.; Casaro, E.B.; Rangel, É.B. COVID-19: Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) expression and tissue suscep-tibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2021, 40, 905–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kragstrup, T.W.; Singh, H.S.; Grundberg, I.; Nielsen, A.L.-L.; Rivellese, F.; Mehta, A.; Goldberg, M.B.; Filbin, M.R.; Qvist, P.; Bibby, B.M. Plasma ACE2 predicts outcome of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0252799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Woo, P.C.Y.; Huang, Y.; Lau, S.K.P.; Yuen, K.-Y. Coronavirus Genomics and Bioinformatics Analysis. Viruses 2010, 2, 1804–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Peiris, J.S.M.; Lai, S.T.; Poon, L.L.M.; Guan, Y.; Yam, L.Y.C.; Lim, W.; Nicholls, J.; Yee, W.K.S.; Yan, W.W.; Cheung, M.T.; et al. Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet 2003, 361, 1319–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Lu, R.; Zhao, X.; Li, J.; Niu, P.; Yang, B.; Wu, H.; Wang, W.; Song, H.; Huang, B.; Zhu, N.; et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: Implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet 2020, 395, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Ye, D.; Liu, Q. Review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) based on current evidence. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 55, 105948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zheng, J. SARS-CoV-2: An Emerging Coronavirus that Causes a Global Threat. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 16, 1678–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Shereen, M.A.; Khan, S.; Kazmi, A.; Bashir, N.; Siddique, R. COVID-19 infection: Emergence, transmission, and characteristics of human coronaviruses. J. Adv. Res. 2020, 24, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gordon, D.E.; Jang, G.M.; Bouhaddou, M.; Xu, J.; Obernier, K.; White, K.M.; O’Meara, M.J.; Rezelj, V.V.; Guo, J.Z.; Swaney, D.L.; et al. A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing. Nature 2020, 583, 459–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bojkova, D.; Klann, K.; Koch, B.; Widera, M.; Krause, D.; Ciesek, S.; Cinatl, J.; Münch, C. Proteomics of SARS-CoV-2-infected host cells reveals therapy targets. Nat. Cell Biol. 2020, 583, 469–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, M.Y.; Zhao, R.; Gao, L.J.; Gao, X.F.; Wang, D.P.; Cao, J.M. SARS-CoV-2: Structure, Biology, and Structure-Based Ther-apeutics Development. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Romano, M.; Ruggiero, A.; Squeglia, F.; Maga, G.; Berisio, R. A Structural View of SARS-CoV-2 RNA Replication Machinery: RNA Synthesis, Proofreading and Final Capping. Cells 2020, 9, 1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Haddad, C.; Davila-Calderon, J.; Tolbert, B.S. Integrated approaches to reveal mechanisms by which RNA viruses reprogram the cellular environment. Methods 2020, 183, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, F. Structure, Function, and Evolution of Coronavirus Spike Proteins. Annu. Rev. Virol. 2016, 3, 237–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Zhai, X.; Sun, J.; Yan, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, J.; Zhao, Z.; Gao, Q.; He, W.-T.; Veit, M.; Su, S. Comparison of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Spike Protein Binding to ACE2 Receptors from Human, Pets, Farm Animals, and Putative Intermediate Hosts. J. Virol. 2020, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Lan, J.; Ge, J.; Yu, J.; Shan, S.; Zhou, H.; Fan, S.; Zhang, Q.; Shi, X.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, L.; et al. Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor. Nature 2020, 581, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Davies, J.; Randeva, H.S.; Chatha, K.; Hall, M.; Spandidos, D.A.; Karteris, E.; Kyrou, I. Neuropilin-1 as a new potential SARS-CoV-2 infection mediator implicated in the neurologic features and central nervous system involvement of COVID-19. Mol. Med. Rep. 2020, 22, 4221–4226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cantuti-Castelvetri, L.; Ojha, R.; Pedro, L.D.; Djannatian, M.; Franz, J.; Kuivanen, S.; Van Der Meer, F.; Kallio, K.; Kaya, T.; Anastasina, M.; et al. Neuropilin-1 facilitates SARS-CoV-2 cell entry and infectivity. Science 2020, eabd2985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Daly, J.L.; Simonetti, B.; Klein, K.; Chen, K.-E.; Williamson, M.K.; Antón-Plágaro, C.; Shoemark, D.K.; Simón-Gracia, L.; Bauer, M.; Hollandi, R.; et al. Neuropilin-1 is a host factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Science 2020, eabd3072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bayati, A.; Kumar, R.; Francis, V.; McPherson, P.S. SARS-CoV-2 infects cells after viral entry via clathrin-mediated endocytosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 296, 100306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Walls, A.C.; Xiong, X.; Park, Y.-J.; Tortorici, M.A.; Snijder, J.; Quispe, J.; Cameroni, E.; Gopal, R.; Dai, M.; Lanzavecchia, A.; et al. Unexpected Receptor Functional Mimicry Elucidates Activation of Coronavirus Fusion. Cell 2019, 176, 1026–1039.e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Tang, T.; Bidon, M.; Jaimes, J.A.; Whittaker, G.R.; Daniel, S. Coronavirus membrane fusion mechanism offers a potential target for antiviral development. Antivir. Res. 2020, 178, 104792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Valapala, M.; Vishwanatha, J.K. Lipid Raft Endocytosis and Exosomal Transport Facilitate Extracellular Trafficking of Annexin A2. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 30911–30925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Liu, W.; Hajjar, K.A. The annexin A2 system and angiogenesis. Biol. Chem. 2016, 397, 1005–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Taylor, J.R.; Skeate, J.; Kast, W.M. Annexin A2 in Virus Infection. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Fang, Y.-T.; Lin, C.-F.; Liao, P.-C.; Kuo, Y.-M.; Wang, S.; Yeh, T.-M.; Shieh, C.-C.K.; Su, I.-J.; Lei, H.-Y.; Lin, Y.-S. Annexin A2 on lung epithelial cell surface is recognized by severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus spike domain 2 antibodies. Mol. Immunol. 2010, 47, 1000–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zuniga, M.; Gomes, C.; Carsons, S.E.; Bender, M.T.; Cotzia, P.; Miao, Q.R.; Lee, D.C.; Rodriguez, A. Autoimmunity to Annexin A2 predicts mortality among hospitalised COVID-19 patients. Eur. Respir. J. 2021, 2100918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Filipenko, N.R.; MacLeod, T.J.; Yoon, C.-S.; Waisman, D. Annexin A2 Is a Novel RNA-binding Protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 8723–8731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Bharadwaj, A.; Bydoun, M.; Holloway, R.; Waisman, D. Annexin A2 Heterotetramer: Structure and Function. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 6259–6305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Madureira, P.A.; Surette, A.P.; Phipps, K.D.; Taboski, M.A.S.; Miller, V.A.; Waisman, D.M. The role of the annexin A2 heterotetramer in vascular fibrinolysis. Blood 2011, 118, 4789–4797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Rescher, U.; Gerke, V. Annexins—Unique membrane binding proteins with diverse functions. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117, 2631–2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Hajjar, K.A. The Biology of Annexin A2: From Vascular Fibrinolysis to Innate Immunity. Trans. Am. Clin. Clim. Assoc. 2015, 126, 144–155. [Google Scholar]
  48. Koyuncu, O.O.; Perlman, D.H.; Enquist, L.W. Efficient Retrograde Transport of Pseudorabies Virus within Neurons Requires Local Protein Synthesis in Axons. Cell Host Microbe 2013, 13, 54–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Yang, S.-L.; Chou, Y.-T.; Wu, C.N.; Ho, M.-S. Annexin II Binds to Capsid Protein VP1 of Enterovirus 71 and Enhances Viral Infectivity. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 11809–11820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Kobayashi, K.; Koike, S. Cellular receptors for enterovirus A71. J. Biomed. Sci. 2020, 27, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yen, T.-Y.; Shih, W.-L.; Huang, Y.-C.; Lee, J.-T.; Huang, L.-M.; Chang, L.-Y. Polymorphisms in enterovirus 71 receptors associated with susceptibility and clinical severity. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0206769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Wright, J.; Kurosky, A.; Wasi, S. An Endothelial Cell-Surface Form of Annexin II Binds Human Cytomegalovirus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1994, 198, 983–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Derry, M.C.; Sutherland, M.R.; Restall, C.M.; Waisman, D.; Pryzdial, E.L.G. Annexin 2-mediated enhancement of cytomegalovirus infection opposes inhibition by annexin 1 or annexin 5. J. Gen. Virol. 2007, 88, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Raynor, C.M.; Wright, J.F.; Waisman, D.; Pryzdial, E.L.G. Annexin II Enhances Cytomegalovirus Binding and Fusion to Phospholipid Membranes. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 5089–5095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Woodham, A.W.; Da Silva, D.M.; Skeate, J.; Raff, A.B.; Ambroso, M.R.; Brand, H.E.; Isas, J.M.; Langen, R.; Kast, W.M. The S100A10 Subunit of the Annexin A2 Heterotetramer Facilitates L2-Mediated Human Papillomavirus Infection. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e43519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Taylor, J.R.; Fernandez, D.J.; Thornton, S.M.; Skeate, J.; Lühen, K.P.; Da Silva, D.M.; Langen, R.; Kast, W.M. Heterotetrameric annexin A2/S100A10 (A2t) is essential for oncogenic human papillomavirus trafficking and capsid disassembly, and protects virions from lysosomal degradation. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ma, G.; Greenwell-Wild, T.; Lei, K.; Jin, W.; Swisher, J.; Hardegen, N.; Wild, C.T.; Wahl, S.M. Secretory Leukocyte Protease Inhibitor Binds to Annexin II, a Cofactor for Macrophage HIV-1 Infection. J. Exp. Med. 2004, 200, 1337–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Rai, T.; Mosoian, A.; Resh, M.D. Annexin 2 Is Not Required for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Particle Production but Plays a Cell Type-Dependent Role in Regulating Infectivity. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 9783–9792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Aliyu, I.A.; Ling, K.-H.; Hashim, N.F.M.; Lam, J.-Y.; Chee, H.-Y. Annexin II as a Dengue Virus Serotype 2 Interacting Protein Mediating Virus Interaction on Vero Cells. Viruses 2019, 11, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Malhotra, R.; Ward, M.; Bright, H.; Priest, R.; Foster, M.R.; Hurle, M.; Blair, E.; Bird, M. Isolation and characterisation of potential respiratory syncytial virus receptor(s) on epithelial cells. Microbes Infect. 2003, 5, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Janin, J.; Henrick, K.; Moult, J.; Eyck, L.T.; Sternberg, M.; Vajda, S.; Vakser, I.; Wodak, S. CAPRI: A Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 2003, 52, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Comeau, S.R.; Gatchell, D.W.; Vajda, S.; Camacho, C.J. ClusPro: A fully automated algorithm for protein-protein docking. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, W96–W99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Kozakov, D.; Hall, D.R.; Xia, B.; Porter, K.A.; Padhorny, D.; Yueh, C.; Beglov, D.; Vajda, S. The ClusPro web server for protein–protein docking. Nat. Protoc. 2017, 12, 255–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kozakov, D.; Beglov, D.; Bohnuud, T.; Mottarella, S.E.; Xia, B.; Hall, D.R.; Vajda, S. How good is automated protein docking? Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 2013, 81, 2159–2166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Schrödinger, L.; De Lano, W. PyMOL; v2.4.0; Schrodinger: New York, NY, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  66. Koga, R.; Kubota, M.; Hashiguchi, T.; Yanagi, Y.; Ohno, S. Annexin A2 Mediates the Localization of Measles Virus Matrix Protein at the Plasma Membrane. J. Virol. 2018, 92, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Backes, P.; Quinkert, D.; Reiss, S.; Binder, M.; Zayas, M.; Rescher, U.; Gerke, V.; Bartenschlager, R.; Lohmann, V. Role of Annexin A2 in the Production of Infectious Hepatitis C Virus Particles. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 5775–5789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Saxena, V.; Lai, C.-K.; Chao, T.-C.; Jeng, K.-S.; Lai, M.M.C. Annexin A2 Is Involved in the Formation of Hepatitis C Virus Replication Complex on the Lipid Raft. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 4139–4150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Solbak, S.M.Ø.; Abdurakhmanov, E.; Vedeler, A.; Danielson, U.H. Characterization of interactions between hepatitis C virus NS5B polymerase, annexin A2 and RNA—Effects on NS5B catalysis and allosteric inhibition. Virol. J. 2017, 14, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. LeBouder, F.; Morello, E.; Rimmelzwaan, G.F.; Bosse, F.; Péchoux, C.; Delmas, B.; Riteau, B. Annexin II Incorporated into Influenza Virus Particles Supports Virus Replication by Converting Plasminogen into Plasmin. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 6820–6828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Ma, Y.; Sun, J.; Gu, L.; Bao, H.; Zhao, Y.; Shi, L.; Yao, W.; Tian, G.; Wang, X.; Chen, H. Annexin A2 (ANXA2) interacts with nonstructural protein 1 and promotes the replication of highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus. BMC Microbiol. 2017, 17, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Liu, C.; Zhang, A.; Guo, J.; Yang, J.; Zhou, H.; Chen, H.; Jin, M. Identification of Human Host Proteins Contributing to H5N1 Influenza Virus Propagation by Membrane Proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11, 5396–5405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ryzhova, E.V.; Vos, R.M.; Albright, A.V.; Harrist, A.V.; Harvey, T.; González-Scarano, F. Annexin 2: A Novel Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag Binding Protein Involved in Replication in Monocyte-Derived Macrophages. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 2694–2704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Harrist, A.V.; Ryzhova, E.V.; Harvey, T.; González-Scarano, F. Anx2 Interacts with HIV-1 Gag at Phosphatidylinositol (4,5) Bisphosphate-Containing Lipid Rafts and Increases Viral Production in 293T Cells. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e5020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Choi, J.; Chang, J.-S.; Song, M.-S.; Ahn, B.-Y.; Park, Y.I.; Lim, D.-S.; Han, Y.S. Association of hepatitis B virus polymerase with promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies mediated by the S100 family protein p11. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003, 305, 1049–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Tang, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, D.; Xu, Z.; Ji, J.; Wen, C. Cytokine Storm in COVID-19: The Current Evidence and Treatment Strategies. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ragab, D.; Eldin, S.H.; Taeimah, M.; Khattab, R.; Salem, R. The COVID-19 Cytokine Storm; What We Know So Far. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Mokhtari, T.; Hassani, F.; Ghaffari, N.; Ebrahimi, B.; Yarahmadi, A.; Hassanzadeh, G. COVID-19 and multiorgan failure: A narrative review on potential mechanisms. J. Mol. Histol. 2020, 51, 613–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yang, L.; Xie, X.; Tu, Z.; Fu, J.; Xu, D.; Zhou, Y. The signal pathways and treatment of cytokine storm in COVID-19. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Darif, D.; Hammi, I.; Kihel, A.; El Idrissi Saik, I.; Guessous, F.; Akarid, K. The pro-inflammatory cytokines in COVID-19 pathogenesis: What goes wrong? Microb. Pathog. 2021, 153, 104799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Swisher, J.F.A.; Khatri, U.; Feldman, G.M. Annexin A2 is a soluble mediator of macrophage activation. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2007, 82, 1174–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Shetty, P.; Patil, V.S.; Mohan, R.; D’Souza, L.C.; Bargale, A.; Patil, B.R.; Dinesh, U.; Haridas, V.; Kulkarni, S.P. Annexin A2 and its downstream IL-6 and HB-EGF as secretory biomarkers in the differential diagnosis of Her-2 negative breast cancer. Ann. Clin. Biochem. Int. J. Lab. Med. 2016, 54, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Jung, H.; Kim, J.M.; Kim, W.K.; Oh, K.-J.; Lee, H.J.; Han, B.S.; Kim, D.S.; Seo, Y.S.; Lee, S.C.; Park, S.G.; et al. Intracellular annexin A2 regulates NF-κB signaling by binding to the p50 subunit: Implications for gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2015, 6, e1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Schuliga, M.; Langenbach, S.; Berhan, A.; Harris, T.; Keenan, C.R.; Royce, S.G.; Stewart, A.G. The Coagulant Factor Xa Induces Protease-Activated Receptor-1 and Annexin A2-Dependent Airway Smooth Muscle Cytokine Production and Cell Proliferation. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2016, 54, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Schuliga, M.; Jaffar, J.; Berhan, A.; Langenbach, S.; Harris, T.; Waters, D.; Lee, P.V.S.; Grainge, C.; Westall, G.; Knight, D.; et al. Annexin A2 contributes to lung injury and fibrosis by augmenting factor Xa fibrogenic activity. Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2017, 312, L772–L782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Schuliga, M.; Langenbach, S.; Xia, Y.C.; Qin, C.; Mok, J.S.; Harris, T.; Mackay, G.A.; Medcalf, R.L.; Stewart, A.G. Plasminogen-Stimulated Inflammatory Cytokine Production by Airway Smooth Muscle Cells Is Regulated by Annexin A2. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2013, 49, 751–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Renner, B.; Tong, H.H.; Laskowski, J.; Jonscher, K.; Goetz, L.; Woolaver, R.; Hannan, J.; Li, Y.X.; Hourcade, D.; Pickering, M.C.; et al. Annexin A2 Enhances Complement Activation by Inhibiting Factor H. J. Immunol. 2016, 196, 1355–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Tsukamoto, H.; Tanida, S.; Ozeki, K.; Ebi, M.; Mizoshita, T.; Shimura, T.; Mori, Y.; Kataoka, H.; Kamiya, T.; Fukuda, S.; et al. Annexin A2 Regulates A Disintegrin and Metalloproteinase 17–mediated Ectodomain Shedding of Pro–Tumor Necrosis Factor-α in Monocytes and Colon Epithelial Cells. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2013, 19, 1365–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Swisher, J.F.A.; Burton, N.; Bacot, S.M.; Vogel, S.N.; Feldman, G.M. Annexin A2 tetramer activates human and murine macrophages through TLR4. Blood 2010, 115, 549–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Lee, S.-J.; Jung, Y.H.; Song, E.J.; Jang, K.K.; Choi, S.H.; Han, H.J. Vibrio vulnificusVvpE Stimulates IL-1β Production by the Hypomethylation of the IL-1β Promoter and NF-κB Activation via Lipid Raft–Dependent ANXA2 Recruitment and Reactive Oxygen Species Signaling in Intestinal Epithelial Cells. J. Immunol. 2015, 195, 2282–2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Lee, S.-J.; Jung, Y.H.; Kim, J.S.; Lee, H.J.; Lee, S.H.; Lee, K.-H.; Jang, K.K.; Choi, S.H.; Han, H.J. A Vibrio vulnificus VvpM Induces IL-1β Production Coupled with Necrotic Macrophage Death via Distinct Spatial Targeting by ANXA2. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Khamsi, R. Rogue antibodies could be driving severe COVID-19. Nat. Cell Biol. 2021, 590, 29–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zaid, A.; Dawoodi, S.; Pirro, M.; Monti, M.; Mobaraki, P.D. key role of annexin a2 and plasmin in covid-19 pathophysiology, clinical presentation and outcomes. Ital. J. Prev. Diagnostic Ther. Med 2020, 3, 16–25. [Google Scholar]
  94. Cesarman-Maus, G.C.; Ríos-Luna, N.P.; Deora, A.B.; Huang, B.; Villa, R.; Cravioto, M.D.C.; Alarcón-Segovia, D.; Sánchez-Guerrero, J.; Hajjar, K.A. Autoantibodies against the fibrinolytic receptor, annexin 2, in antiphospholipid syndrome. Blood 2006, 107, 4375–4382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Brichory, F.M.; Misek, D.E.; Yim, A.-M.; Krause, M.C.; Giordano, T.; Beer, D.G.; Hanash, S.M. An immune response manifested by the common occurrence of annexins I and II autoantibodies and high circulating levels of IL-6 in lung cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 9824–9829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Haridas, V.; Shetty, P.; Sarathkumar, E.; Bargale, A.; Vishwanatha, J.; Patil, V.; Dinesh, U.S. Reciprocal regulation of pro-inflammatory Annexin A2 and anti-inflammatory Annexin A1 in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2019, 46, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Tsai, W.-H.; Lai, S.-L.; Li, I.-T.; Chien, H.-Y.; Shih, C.-H.; Kou, Y.R.; Hsu, H.-C. Annexin A1 mediates the anti-adhesive effects of dexamethasone during the cell-cell interaction between the all-trans retinoic acid-treated acute promyelocytic leukemic cells and endothelial cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2013, 114, 551–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. McFadyen, J.D.; Stevens, H.; Peter, K. The Emerging Threat of (Micro)Thrombosis in COVID-19 and Its Therapeutic Implications. Circ. Res. 2020, 127, 571–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Klok, F.A.; Kruip, M.J.H.A.; van der Meer, N.J.M.; Arbous, M.S.; Gommers, D.; Kant, K.M.; Kaptein, F.H.J.; van Paassen, J.; Stals, M.A.M.; Huisman, M.V.; et al. Confirmation of the high cumulative incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19: An updated analysis. Thromb. Res. 2020, 191, 148–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Suh, Y.J.; Hong, H.; Ohana, M.; Bompard, F.; Revel, M.-P.; Valle, C.; Gervaise, A.; Poissy, J.; Susen, S.; Hékimian, G.; et al. Pulmonary Embolism and Deep Vein Thrombosis in COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Radiology 2021, 298, E70–E80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Middeldorp, S.; Coppens, M.; Van Haaps, T.F.; Foppen, M.; Vlaar, A.P.; Müller, M.C.A.; Bouman, C.C.S.; Beenen, L.F.M.; Kootte, R.S.; Heijmans, J.; et al. Incidence of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 18, 1995–2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Mohamed, M.F.H.; Al-Shokri, S.D.; Shunnar, K.M.; Mohamed, S.F.; Najim, M.S.; Ibrahim, S.I.; Elewa, H.; Abdalla, L.O.; El-Bardissy, A.; Elshafei, M.N.; et al. Prevalence of Venous Thromboembolism in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021, 7, 598846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Loo, J.; Spittle, D.A.; Newnham, M. COVID-19, immunothrombosis and venous thromboembolism: Biological mechanisms. Thorax 2021, 76, 412–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Fassel, H.; Chen, H.; Ruisi, M.; De Sancho, M.T.; Hajjar, K.A. Markedly Reduced Expression of Annexin A2 Is Associated with Hypofibrinolysis and Provoked and Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism. Blood 2019, 134, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Fassel, H.; Chen, H.; Ruisi, M.; Kumar, N.; DeSancho, M.T.; Hajjar, K.A. Reduced expression of annexin A2 is associated with impaired cell surface fibrinolysis and venous thromboembolism. Blood 2021, 137, 2221–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ma, K.; Simantov, R.; Zhang, J.-C.; Silverstein, R.; Hajjar, K.A.; McCrae, K.R. High Affinity Binding of β2-Glycoprotein I to Human Endothelial Cells Is Mediated by Annexin II. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 15541–15548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Zhang, J.; McCrae, K.R. Annexin A2 mediates endothelial cell activation by antiphospholipid/anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies. Blood 2005, 105, 1964–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Cesarman-Maus, G.; Cantú-Brito, C.; Barinagarrementeria, F.; Villa, R.; Reyes, E.; Sanchez-Guerrero, J.; Hajjar, K.A.; Latorre, E.G. Autoantibodies Against the Fibrinolytic Receptor, Annexin A2, in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis. Stroke 2011, 42, 501–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Rajendran, P.; Rengarajan, T.; Thangavel, J.; Nishigaki, Y.; Sakthisekaran, D.; Sethi, G.; Nishigaki, I. The Vascular Endothelium and Human Diseases. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2013, 9, 1057–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Romay-Penabad, Z.; Montiel-Manzano, M.G.; Shilagard, T.; Papalardo, E.; Vargas, G.; Deora, A.B.; Wang, M.; Jacovina, A.T.; Garcia-Latorre, E.; Reyes-Maldonado, E.; et al. Annexin A2 is involved in antiphospholipid antibody-mediated pathogenic effects in vitro and in vivo. Blood 2009, 114, 3074–3083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Allen, K.L.; Fonseca, F.V.; Betapudi, V.; Willard, B.; Zhang, J.; McCrae, K.R. A novel pathway for human endothelial cell activation by antiphospholipid/anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies. Blood 2012, 119, 884–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Ishii, H.; Yoshida, M.; Hiraoka, M.; Hajjar, K.A.; Tanaka, A.; Yasukochi, Y.; Numano, F. Recombinant annexin II modulates impaired fibrinolytic activity in vitro and in rat carotid artery. Circ. Res. 2001, 89, 1240–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Luo, M.; Flood, E.C.; Almeida, D.; Yan, L.; Berlin, D.A.; Heerdt, P.M.; Hajjar, K.A. Annexin A2 supports pulmonary microvascular integrity by linking vascular endothelial cadherin and protein tyrosine phosphatases. J. Exp. Med. 2017, 214, 2535–2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Bachler, M.; Bösch, J.; Stürzel, D.P.; Hell, T.; Giebl, A.; Ströhle, M.; Klein, S.J.; Schäfer, V.; Lehner, G.F.; Joannidis, M.; et al. Impaired fibrinolysis in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Br. J. Anaesth. 2021, 126, 590–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Nougier, C.; Benoit, R.; Simon, M.; Desmurs-Clavel, H.; Marcotte, G.; Argaud, L.; David, J.S.; Bonnet, A.; Negrier, C.; Dargaud, Y. Hypofibrinolytic state and high thrombin generation may play a major role in SARS-COV2 associated thrombosis. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 18, 2215–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Arachchillage, D.J.; Stacey, A.; Akor, F.; Scotz, M.; Laffan, M. Thrombolysis restores perfusion in COVID-19 hypoxia. Br. J. Haematol. 2020, 190, e270–e274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Wang, J.; Hajizadeh, N.; Moore, E.E.; McIntyre, R.C.; Moore, P.; Veress, L.A.; Yaffe, M.B.; Moore, H.B.; Barrett, C.D. Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) treatment for COVID-19 associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): A case series. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 18, 1752–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Goyal, A.; Saigal, S.; Niwariya, Y.; Sharma, J.; Singh, P. Successful use of tPA for thrombolysis in COVID related ARDS: A case series. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 2021, 51, 293–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Sarfraz, A.; Sarfraz, Z.; Razzack, A.A.; Patel, G.; Sarfraz, M. Venous Thromboembolism, Corticosteroids and COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin. Appl. Thromb. 2021, 27, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Li, X.; Xu, S.; Yu, M.; Wang, K.; Tao, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Shi, J.; Zhou, M.; Wu, B.; Yang, Z.; et al. Risk factors for severity and mortality in adult COVID-19 inpatients in Wuhan. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020, 146, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Lim, S.; Bae, J.H.; Kwon, H.-S.; Nauck, M.A. COVID-19 and diabetes mellitus: From pathophysiology to clinical management. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2021, 17, 11–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Carrasco-Sánchez, F.J.; López-Carmona, M.D.; Martínez-Marcos, F.J.; Pérez-Belmonte, L.M.; Hidalgo-Jiménez, A.; Buonaiuto, V.; Fernández, C.S.; Castro, S.J.F.; Luordo, D.; Fontan, P.M.P.; et al. Admission hyperglycaemia as a predictor of mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 regardless of diabetes status: Data from the Spanish SEMI-COVID-19 Registry. Ann. Med. 2021, 53, 103–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Zhu, L.; She, Z.-G.; Cheng, X.; Qin, J.-J.; Zhang, X.-J.; Cai, J.; Lei, F.; Wang, H.; Xie, J.; Wang, W.; et al. Association of Blood Glucose Control and Outcomes in Patients with COVID-19 and Pre-existing Type 2 Diabetes. Cell Metab. 2020, 31, 1068–1077.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Zhang, J.; Kong, W.; Xia, P.; Xu, Y.; Li, L.; Li, Q.; Yang, L.; Wei, Q.; Wang, H.; Li, H.; et al. Impaired Fasting Glucose and Diabetes Are Related to Higher Risks of Complications and Mortality Among Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Zhang, W.; Li, C.; Xu, Y.; He, B.; Hu, M.; Cao, G.; Li, L.; Wu, S.; Wang, X.; Zhang, C.; et al. Hyperglycemia and Correlated High Levels of Inflammation Have a Positive Relationship with the Severity of Coronavirus Disease 2019. Mediat. Inflamm. 2021, 2021, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Wu, C.-T.; Lidsky, P.V.; Xiao, Y.; Lee, I.T.; Cheng, R.; Nakayama, T.; Jiang, S.; Demeter, J.; Bevacqua, R.J.; Chang, C.A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 infects human pancreatic β cells and elicits β cell impairment. Cell Metab. 2021, 33, 1565–1576.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Ilias, I.; Diamantopoulos, A.; Pratikaki, M.; Botoula, E.; Jahaj, E.; Athanasiou, N.; Tsipilis, S.; Zacharis, A.; Vassiliou, A.; Vassiliadi, D.; et al. Glycemia, Beta-Cell Function and Sensitivity to Insulin in Mildly to Critically Ill Covid-19 Patients. Medicina 2021, 57, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Steenblock, C.; Richter, S.; Berger, I.; Barovic, M.; Schmid, J.; Schubert, U.; Jarzebska, N.; von Mässenhausen, A.; Linkermann, A.; Schürmann, A.; et al. Viral infiltration of pancreatic islets in patients with COVID-19. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Dai, H.; Yu, Z.; Fan, X.; Liu, N.; Yan, M.; Chen, Z.; Lo, E.H.; Hajjar, K.A.; Dai, H.; Wang, X. Dysfunction of annexin A2 contributes to hyperglycaemia-induced loss of human endothelial cell surface fibrinolytic activity. Thromb. Haemost. 2013, 109, 1070–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Ishii, H.; Yoshida, M.; Hajjar, K.A.; Tanaka, A.; Yasukochi, Y.; Shimokado, K.; Numano, F. Potential role of recombinant annexin II in diabetic vascular injury. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 947, 308–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Wang, Y.; Cheng, Y.-S.; Yin, X.-Q.; Yu, G.; Jia, B.-L. Anxa2 gene silencing attenuates obesity-induced insulin resistance by suppressing the NF-κB signaling pathway. Am. J. Physiol. Physiol. 2019, 316, C223–C234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Li, P.; Liu, S.; Lu, M.; Bandyopadhyay, G.; Oh, D.; Imamura, T.; Johnson, A.M.F.; Sears, D.; Shen, Z.; Cui, B.; et al. Hematopoietic-Derived Galectin-3 Causes Cellular and Systemic Insulin Resistance. Cell 2016, 167, 973–984.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Alves, M.T.; De Souza, I.D.P.; Ferreira, C.N.; Cândido, A.L.; Bizzi, M.F.; Oliveira, F.R.; Reis, F.M.; Gomes, K.B. Galectin-3 is a potential biomarker to insulin resistance and obesity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2020, 36, 760–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Kingwell, K. Turning down galectin 3 to combat insulin resistance. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2017, 16, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Al-Kuraishy, H.M.; Al-Gareeb, A.I.; Alblihed, M.; Guerreiro, S.G.; Cruz-Martins, N.; Batiha, G.E.-S. COVID-19 in Relation to Hyperglycemia and Diabetes Mellitus. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021, 8, 644095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Santos, A.; Magro, D.O.; Evangelista-Poderoso, R.; Saad, M.J.A. Diabetes, obesity, and insulin resistance in COVID-19: Mo-lecular interrelationship and therapeutic implications. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2021, 13, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Shetty, P.; Bargale, A.; Patil, B.R.; Mohan, R.; Dinesh, U.S.; Vishwanatha, J.; Gai, P.B.; Patil, V.S.; Amsavardani, T.S. Cell surface interaction of annexin A2 and galectin-3 modulates epidermal growth factor receptor signaling in Her-2 negative breast cancer cells. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2015, 411, 221–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Storgaard, H.; Song, X.M.; Jensen, C.B.; Madsbad, S.; Björnholm, M.; Vaag, A.A.; Zierath, J. Insulin Signal Transduction in Skeletal Muscle From Glucose-Intolerant Relatives With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes 2001, 50, 2770–2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Shetty, P.K.; Thamake, S.I.; Biswas, S.; Johansson, S.L.; Vishwanatha, J.K. Reciprocal Regulation of Annexin A2 and EGFR with Her-2 in Her-2 Negative and Herceptin-Resistant Breast Cancer. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e44299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Yuan, S.; Chan, C.C.-Y.; Chik, K.K.-H.; Tsang, J.O.-L.; Liang, R.; Cao, J.; Tang, K.; Cai, J.-P.; Ye, Z.-W.; Yin, F.; et al. Broad-Spectrum Host-Based Antivirals Targeting the Interferon and Lipogenesis Pathways as Potential Treatment Options for the Pandemic Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Viruses 2020, 12, 628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Waterer, G.W.; Rello, J. Steroids and COVID-19: We Need a Precision Approach, Not One Size Fits All. Infect. Dis. Ther. 2020, 9, 701–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Akhtar, S.; Das, J.K.; Ismail, T.; Wahid, M.; Saeed, W.; Bhutta, Z.A. Nutritional perspectives for the prevention and mitigation of COVID-19. Nutr. Rev. 2020, 79, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. National Institute for Health (NIH) Dietary Supplements in the Time of COVID-19: Fact Sheet for Health Professionals. Available online: https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/COVID19-HealthProfessional/ (accessed on 23 September 2021).
  144. Nithin, K.K.; Patil, P.; Bhandary, S.K.; Haridas, V.; Suchetha, K.N.; Sarathkumar, E.; Shetty, P. Is butyrate a natural alternative to dexamethasone in the management of CoVID-19? F1000Research 2021, 10, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Funk, C.D.; Laferrière, C.; Ardakani, A. A Snapshot of the Global Race for Vaccines Targeting SARS-CoV-2 and the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Peiffer-Smadja, N.; Rozencwajg, S.; Kherabi, Y.; Yazdanpanah, Y.; Montravers, P. COVID-19 vaccines: A race against time. Anaesth. Crit. Care Pain Med. 2021, 40, 100848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Forni, G.; Mantovani, A.; Forni, G.; Mantovani, A.; Moretta, L.; Rappuoli, R.; Rezza, G.; Bagnasco, A.; Barsacchi, G.; Bussolati, G.; et al. COVID-19 vaccines: Where we stand and challenges ahead. Cell Death Differ. 2021, 28, 626–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Shah, B.; Modi, P.; Sagar, S.R. In silico studies on therapeutic agents for COVID-19: Drug repurposing approach. Life Sci. 2020, 252, 117652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Zheng, L.; Jaffee, E.M. Annexin A2 is a new antigenic target for pancreatic cancer immunotherapy. OncoImmunology 2012, 1, 112–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Li, Z.; Yu, L.; Hu, B.; Chen, L.; Jv, M.; Wang, L.; Zhou, C.; Wei, M.; Zhao, L. Advances in cancer treatment: A new therapeutic target, Annexin A2. J. Cancer 2021, 12, 3587–3596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Raddum, A.M.; Hollås, H.; Shumilin, I.A.; Henklein, P.; Kretsinger, R.; Fossen, T.; Vedeler, A. The native structure of annexin A2 peptides in hydrophilic environment determines their anti-angiogenic effects. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2015, 95, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. A schematic illustration of the possible functional role of human AnxA2 in internalization and replication of SARS-CoV-2. The process starts by the recognition of host cell ACE2 receptor by viral spike glycoprotein S1, which is followed by the spike glycoprotein S2 interaction with A2T at the membrane surface. After the furin cleavage at S1/S2 boundary, the virus gets endocytosed via clathrin/SNARE-mediated pathway. Furthermore, AnxA2 interacts with viral non-structural proteins like RNA-dependent RNA polymerase for replication and helps in trafficking, maturation, and viral release. AnxA2, being a proinflammatory upstream regulator, results in inflammatory surge and cytokine storm. ACE2, Angiotensin converting enzyme 2; AnxA2, Annexin A2; A2T, Annexin A2 Tetramer; IL-6, Interleukin 6; p11, Protein S100A10; RP, Replication protein; S1, Spike glycoprotein 1; S2, Spike glycoprotein 2, and TNF-α, Tumor necrosis factor alpha.
Figure 1. A schematic illustration of the possible functional role of human AnxA2 in internalization and replication of SARS-CoV-2. The process starts by the recognition of host cell ACE2 receptor by viral spike glycoprotein S1, which is followed by the spike glycoprotein S2 interaction with A2T at the membrane surface. After the furin cleavage at S1/S2 boundary, the virus gets endocytosed via clathrin/SNARE-mediated pathway. Furthermore, AnxA2 interacts with viral non-structural proteins like RNA-dependent RNA polymerase for replication and helps in trafficking, maturation, and viral release. AnxA2, being a proinflammatory upstream regulator, results in inflammatory surge and cytokine storm. ACE2, Angiotensin converting enzyme 2; AnxA2, Annexin A2; A2T, Annexin A2 Tetramer; IL-6, Interleukin 6; p11, Protein S100A10; RP, Replication protein; S1, Spike glycoprotein 1; S2, Spike glycoprotein 2, and TNF-α, Tumor necrosis factor alpha.
Ijms 22 11028 g001
Figure 2. The low-energy binding conformations generated by molecular docking of human AnxA2 with spike glycoprotein (A) and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (B) of SARS-CoV-2. The close-up image shows the detailed view of the interacting residues in the region where human AnxA2 bound to spike glycoprotein and RdRp of SARS-CoV-2.
Figure 2. The low-energy binding conformations generated by molecular docking of human AnxA2 with spike glycoprotein (A) and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (B) of SARS-CoV-2. The close-up image shows the detailed view of the interacting residues in the region where human AnxA2 bound to spike glycoprotein and RdRp of SARS-CoV-2.
Ijms 22 11028 g002
Figure 3. The proposed model for the pathophysiological involvement of human AnxA2 interaction with SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein S2 at the membrane surface. Upon host cell infection, virus induces the production of AnxA2 and utilizes it for internalization and replication, triggering an aggressive immune response that results in the release of a large amount of pro-inflammatory cytokines including autocrine AnxA2, and IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α, resulting in a cytokine storm. In severe COVID-19 patients, an apparent hypofibrinolysis has been observed, which could be related to the ceaseless engagement of AnxA2 with viral replication, rendering it unavailable for its typical function of tPA mediated conversion of plasminogen to plasmin, a major participant in fibrinolysis. In addition, a methylprednisolone or dexamethasone, an anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressant drug given to hospitalized COVID-19 patients with pneumonia, induces anti-inflammatory AnxA1 and recruits it to the cell membrane, resulting in decreased membrane deposition of AnxA2 that could further impede the plasminolysis. Furthermore, the glycosylated AnxA2 at the membrane surface interacts with galectin-3 that can bind directly to the insulin receptor and blocks its activation and inhibits down-stream signaling such as IRS1 tyrosine phosphorylation, PDK1 activation, and AKT phosphorylation. Subsequently, it leads to the inhibition of insulin-dependent glucose uptake and translocation of GLUT4, resulting in hyperglycemia. ACE2, Angiotensin converting enzyme 2; AKT, Protein kinase B; AnxA2, Annexin A2; A2T, Annexin A2 Tetramer; GAL3, Galectin-3; GLUT4, Glucose transporter type 4; IL-6, Interleukin 6; IR, Insulin receptor; IRS1, Insulin receptor substrate 1; NF-κB, Nuclear factor kappa B; p11, Protein S100A10; PDK1, Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1; TNFα, Tumor necrosis factor alpha; and tPA, Tissue plasminogen activator.
Figure 3. The proposed model for the pathophysiological involvement of human AnxA2 interaction with SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein S2 at the membrane surface. Upon host cell infection, virus induces the production of AnxA2 and utilizes it for internalization and replication, triggering an aggressive immune response that results in the release of a large amount of pro-inflammatory cytokines including autocrine AnxA2, and IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α, resulting in a cytokine storm. In severe COVID-19 patients, an apparent hypofibrinolysis has been observed, which could be related to the ceaseless engagement of AnxA2 with viral replication, rendering it unavailable for its typical function of tPA mediated conversion of plasminogen to plasmin, a major participant in fibrinolysis. In addition, a methylprednisolone or dexamethasone, an anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressant drug given to hospitalized COVID-19 patients with pneumonia, induces anti-inflammatory AnxA1 and recruits it to the cell membrane, resulting in decreased membrane deposition of AnxA2 that could further impede the plasminolysis. Furthermore, the glycosylated AnxA2 at the membrane surface interacts with galectin-3 that can bind directly to the insulin receptor and blocks its activation and inhibits down-stream signaling such as IRS1 tyrosine phosphorylation, PDK1 activation, and AKT phosphorylation. Subsequently, it leads to the inhibition of insulin-dependent glucose uptake and translocation of GLUT4, resulting in hyperglycemia. ACE2, Angiotensin converting enzyme 2; AKT, Protein kinase B; AnxA2, Annexin A2; A2T, Annexin A2 Tetramer; GAL3, Galectin-3; GLUT4, Glucose transporter type 4; IL-6, Interleukin 6; IR, Insulin receptor; IRS1, Insulin receptor substrate 1; NF-κB, Nuclear factor kappa B; p11, Protein S100A10; PDK1, Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1; TNFα, Tumor necrosis factor alpha; and tPA, Tissue plasminogen activator.
Ijms 22 11028 g003
Table 1. The viruses interacting with AnxA2 for cell attachment, entry and internalization.
Table 1. The viruses interacting with AnxA2 for cell attachment, entry and internalization.
VirusFamily & GenusGenomeAnxA2 FunctionRef.
StrandTypeSize
PRV
Pseudorabies virus
Herpesviridae
Varicellovirus
Double,
Linear positive
DNA,
envelope
143 KbInvolved in retrograde trafficking of PRV in axons[48]
CMV
Cytomegalovirus
Herpesviridae
Cytomegalovirus
Double, CircularDNA,
envelope
200 KbBridge virus to host cell membrane and enhances infection[52,53,54]
HPV
Human Papillomavirus
Papillomaviridae
Alphapapillomavirus
Double, CircularDNA,
non-envelope
7.9 KbInteract with viral L2 capsid protein for internalization and infection[55,56]
EV71
Enterovirus type 71
Picornaviridae EnterovirusSingle,
Linear positive
RNA,
non-envelope
7.5 KbInteract with viral VP1 for host cell entry[49,50,51]
DENV
Dengue virus
Flaviviridae
Flavivirus
Single,
Linear positive
RNA,
envelope
10.7 KbRequires active filopodia formation for a successful DENV infection[59]
RSV
Respiratory syncytial virus
Pneumoviridae
Orthopneumovirus
Single,
Linear negative
RNA,
envelope
15 KbPotential epithelial cell receptor for RSV infection[60]
HIV
Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Retroviridae
Lentivirus
Single,
Linear positive
RNA,
envelope
9.2 KbRegulates HIV1 infectivity in cell dependent manner[57,58]
SARS-CoV
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus
Coronaviridae
Betacoronavirus
Single,
Linear positive
RNA,
envelope
30 KbColocalised with S2 protein of SARS-CoV, role in internalization[41]
Table 2. The viruses interacting with AnxA2 for their replication, trafficking and release out of cell.
Table 2. The viruses interacting with AnxA2 for their replication, trafficking and release out of cell.
VirusFamily & GenusGenomeAnxA2 FunctionRef
StrandTypeSize
MV
Measles Virus
Paramyxoviridae
Morbillivirus
Single,
Linear negative
RNA,
envelope
16KbInteracts with M protein of the virus to mediates the cellular localization[66]
HCV
Hepatitis C virus
Flaviviridae
Hepacivirus
Single,
Linear positive
RNA,
envelope
9.6KbInteract with NS5A/B protein of virus involved in assembly and replication[67,68,69]
IAV
Influenza A viruses
Orthomyxoviridae
Alphainfluenzavirus
Single,
Linear negative
RNA,
envelope
13.6KbActivation of plasminogen helps the virus to replicate[70,71,72]
HBV
Hepatitis B Virus
Hepadnaviridae
Hepadnavirus
Double,
Linear negative
DNA,
envelope
3.2KbIn modulating HBV Pol function for intracellular viral replication[75]
HIV
Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Retroviridae
Lentivirus
Single,
Linear positive
RNA,
envelope
9.2KbInteract with HIV-1 Gag binding protein for replication in monocyte-derived macrophages[73,74]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Patil, P.; Shetty, P.; Kuriakose, N.; Gollapalli, P.; Shetty, S.; Bhandary, R.; Vishwanatha, J.K.; Ghate, S.D. Molecular Insights on the Possible Role of Annexin A2 in COVID-19 Pathogenesis and Post-Infection Complications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11028. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms222011028

AMA Style

Patil P, Shetty P, Kuriakose N, Gollapalli P, Shetty S, Bhandary R, Vishwanatha JK, Ghate SD. Molecular Insights on the Possible Role of Annexin A2 in COVID-19 Pathogenesis and Post-Infection Complications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(20):11028. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms222011028

Chicago/Turabian Style

Patil, Prakash, Praveenkumar Shetty, Nithin Kuriakose, Pavan Gollapalli, Sukanya Shetty, Roopa Bhandary, Jamboor K. Vishwanatha, and Sudeep D. Ghate. 2021. "Molecular Insights on the Possible Role of Annexin A2 in COVID-19 Pathogenesis and Post-Infection Complications" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 20: 11028. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms222011028

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop