Next Article in Journal
Benzo[a]pyrene—Environmental Occurrence, Human Exposure, and Mechanisms of Toxicity
Previous Article in Journal
Antifungal Activity of the Frog Skin Peptide Temporin G and Its Effect on Candida albicans Virulence Factors
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Insights to the Structural Basis for the Stereospecificity of the Escherichia coli Phytase, AppA

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(11), 6346; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23116346
by Isabella M. Acquistapace 1, Emma J. Thompson 1, Imke Kühn 2, Mike R. Bedford 3, Charles A. Brearley 1 and Andrew M. Hemmings 1,4,5,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(11), 6346; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23116346
Submission received: 11 May 2022 / Revised: 30 May 2022 / Accepted: 2 June 2022 / Published: 6 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Advances in Enzymes and Protein Engineering)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

 

The authors have investigated the influence of the proton donor residue on the stereospecificity of AppA, and introduced the characteristic MINPP HAE proton donor motif into the E. coli enzyme. The four mutants were generated: AppA-HAT, AppA-HET, AppA-HDE, and AppA-HAE. The phytase activities and stereospecificities were examined in solution and the X-ray structures were determined.

The experiments are well-performed, and the manuscript is well written. The HAT mutant showed that the reversal of the stereospecificity shown in the Table 2 and Figure 4, but the crystal structures of the wild type and HAT mutant showed the same binding of the InsS6. If there is any plausible explanation, the authors should clearly mention the origin of the reversal stereospecificity of the HAT mutant based on the X-ray crystallographic structure.

There are many typographical errors. The authors should check all the text.

line 31, “targetting” should be “targeting”.

line 124, “of of ” should be “of”.

line 147, “afffinity” should be “affinity”.

line 152 and 264, “identication” should be “identification”.

line 391, “stereospecificty” should be “stereospecificity”.

line 433, “snaphots” should be “snapshots”.

line 592, “stong” should be “strong”.

line 762-769 “crystallisation” should be “crystallization”.

 

 

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for their careful and critical reading of the manuscript. We have corrected the typographical errors and added the sentence copied below to address the unexpected binding of the pseudosubstrate inhibitor to the AppA-HAT variant (lines 396-399):

Why for this variant the inhibitor binds with the 1D-6-sulfate in the A specificity pocket rather than the 1D-1- or 1D-3-sulfate as suggested by the results of HPLC analysis is unclear, however, we note that a previous crystallographic study of a variant AppA resulted in a similar phenomenon [11].

Reviewer 2 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Following the suggestion of the reviewer, the resolution ranges shown in Table S1 of the Supplementary Information have been modified to show two decimal places for high resolution limits and only one for low resolution. 

Back to TopTop