Low Light Stress Increases Chalkiness by Disturbing Starch Synthesis and Grain Filling of Rice
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Variation in Rice Grain Chalkiness under Low Light Stress
2.1.1. Variation in Chalky Grain Rate and Chalkiness Degree under Low Light Stress
2.1.2. Variation in Chalkiness Types under Low Light Stress
2.2. Enzyme Activity Related to Starch Synthesis under Low Light Stress
2.3. Rice Grain Filling Characteristics under Low Light Stress
2.3.1. Grain Weight and Grain Filling Rate under Low Light Stress
2.3.2. Grain Filling Characteristics of Rice under Low Light Stress
2.3.3. Grain Filling Characteristics at Different Stages
2.4. Relationships between Chalkiness and Grain Filling Characteristics
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Plant Material and Experimental Design
4.2. Labeling and Sampling
4.3. Determination of Enzyme Activity Related to Starch Synthesis
4.4. Measurement of Grain Filling Characteristics
4.5. Microstructure Analysis
4.6. Appearance Quality
4.7. Statistical Analysis
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Guo, L.; Chen, W.; Tao, L.; Hu, B.; Li, S. GWC1 is essential for high grain quality in rice. Plant Sci. 2020, 296, 110497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, D.S.; Li, Q.F.; Zhang, C.Q.; Zhang, C.X.; Yang, Q.Q.; Pan, L.X.; Ren, X.Y.; Lu, J.; Gu, M.H.; Liu, Q.Q. GS9 acts as a transcriptional activator to regulate rice grain shape and appearance quality. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ayaad, M.; Han, Z.; Zheng, K.; Hu, G.; Abo-Yousef, M.; Sobeih, S.E.S.; Xing, Y. Bin-based genome-wide association studies reveal superior alleles for improvement of appearance quality using a 4-way MAGIC population in rice. J. Adv. Res. 2020, 28, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wada, H.; Hatakeyama, Y.; Onda, Y.; Nonami, H.; Nakashima, T.; Erra-Balsells, R.; Morita, S.; Hiraoka, K.; Tanaka, F.; Nakano, H. Multiple strategies for heat adaptation to prevent chalkiness in the rice endosperm. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 1299–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, F.; Wang, L.; Pu, S.L.; Mei, X.F.; Li, S.X.; Li, Q.P.; Ren, W.J. Shading stress increases chalkiness by postponing caryopsis development and disturbing starch characteristics of rice grains. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2018, 263, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandusingh, P.R.; Singh, N.K.; Prabhu, K.V.; Vinod, K.K.; Singh, A.K. Molecular mapping of quantitative trait loci for grain chalkiness in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed. 2013, 73, 244–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.L.; Tang, L.; Shi, P.H.; Yang, B.H.; Sun, T.; Cao, W.X.; Yan, Z. Effects of short-term high temperature on grain quality and starch granules of rice (Oryza sativa L.) at post-anthesis stage. Protoplasma 2017, 254, 935–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, F.; Li, Q.P.; Chen, H.; Zeng, Y.L.; Li, B.; Zhong, X.Y.; Wang, L.; Ren, W.J. Relationship between chalkiness and the structural and thermal properties of rice starch after shading during grain-filling stage. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 252, 117212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.B.; Fan, C.C.; Xing, Y.Z.; Yun, P.; Luo, L.J.; Yan, B.; Peng, B.; Xie, W.B.; Wang, G.W.; Li, X.H.; et al. Chalk5 encodes a vacuolar H(+)-translocating pyrophosphatase influencing grain chalkiness in rice. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 398–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, Y.C.; Li, S.F.; Jiao, G.A.; Sheng, Z.H.; Wu, Y.W.; Shao, G.N.; Xie, L.H.; Peng, C.; Xu, J.F.; Tang, S.Q.; et al. OsPK2 encodes a plastidic pyruvate kinase involved in rice endosperm starch synthesis, compound granule formation and grain filling. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 16, 1878–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, A.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, B.; Xue, P.; Cao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Li, Z.; Liu, Q.; Cheng, S.; et al. Genetic dissection of qPCG1 for a quantitative trait locus for percentage of chalky grain in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Y.; Liu, C.L.; Li, Y.Y.; Zhang, A.P.; Dong, G.J.; Xie, L.H.; Zhang, B.; Ruan, B.P.; Hong, K.; Xue, D.W.; et al. QTL analysis for chalkiness of rice and fine mapping of a candidate gene for qACE9. Rice 2016, 9, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, X.J.; Jiao, G.A.; Lin, H.Y.; Sheng, Z.H.; Shao, G.N.; Xie, L.H.; Tang, S.Q.; Xu, Q.G.; Hu, P.S. GRAIN INCOMPLETE FILLING 2 regulates grain filling and starch synthesis during rice caryopsis development. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2017, 59, 134–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Q.; Ye, Y.; Han, Z.; Zhou, L.; Guan, X.; Pan, G.; Asad, M.A.; Cheng, F. Suppression of starch synthase I (SSI) by RNA interference alters starch biosynthesis and amylopectin chain distribution in rice plants subjected to high temperature. Crop J. 2019, 7, 573–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butardo, V.M.; Fitzgerald, M.A.; Bird, A.R.; Gidley, M.J.; Flanagan, B.M.; Larroque, O.; Resurreccion, A.P.; Laidlaw, H.K.; Jobling, S.A.; Morell, M.K. Impact of down-regulation of starch branching enzyme IIb in rice by artificial microRNA- and hairpin RNA-mediated RNA silencing. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 4927–4941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, L.J.; Liang, S.S.; Ponce, K.; Marundon, S.; Ye, G.Y.; Zhao, X.Q. Factors affecting head rice yield and chalkiness in indica rice. Field Crops Res. 2015, 172, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Misra, G.; Badoni, S.; Parween, S.; Singh, R.K.; Leung, H.; Ladejobi, O.; Mott, R.; Sreenivasulu, N. Genome-wide association coupled gene to gene interaction studies unveil novel epistatic targets among major effect loci impacting rice grain chalkiness. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 910–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tabassum, R.; Dosaka, T.; Ichida, H.; Morita, R.; Katsube-Tanaka, T. FLOURY ENDOSPERM11-2 encodes plastid HSP70-2 involved with temperature-dependent chalkiness of rice (Oryza sativa L.) grains. Plant J. 2020, 103, 604–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lima, J.M.; Nath, M.; Dokku, P.; Raman, K.V.; Kulkarni, K.P.; Vishwakarma, C.; Sahoo, S.P.; Mohapatra, U.B.; Mithra, S.V.; Chinnusamy, V.; et al. Physiological, anatomical and transcriptional alterations in a rice mutant leading to enhanced water stress tolerance. AoB Plants 2015, 7, plv023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, S.; Zhang, H.X.; Liu, W.Z.; Dou, Z.; Zhou, Q.Y.; Chen, W.Z.; Wang, S.H.; Ding, Y.F. Nitrogen fertilizer at heading stage effectively compensates for the deterioration of rice quality by affecting the starch-related properties under elevated temperatures. Food Chem. 2019, 277, 455–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakata, M.; Fukamatsu, Y.; Miyashita, T.; Hakata, M.; Kimura, R.; Nakata, Y.; Kuroda, M.; Yamaguchi, T.; Yamakawa, H. High temperature-Induced expression of rice α-Amylases in developing endosperm produces chalky grains. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.L.; Wang, B.F.; Chen, L.; Li, P.; Cao, C.G. The different influences of drought stress at the flowering stage on rice physiological traits, grain yield, and quality. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A.; Panda, D.; Mohanty, S.; Biswal, M.; Behera, L. Role of sedoheptulose-1,7 bisphosphatase in low light tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2020, 26, 2465–2485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, L.P.; Li, G.; Zhao, Q.N.; Li, Y.B.; Sun, Y.T.; Wang, W.N.; Cai, C.; Chen, W.P.; Liu, R.H.; Luo, W.H.; et al. The fertilization effect of global dimming on crop yields is not attributed to an improved light interception. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2020, 26, 1697–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, L.P.; Liu, Z.J.; Li, H.Z.; Zhang, Y.L.; Dong, M.M.; Guo, X.H.; Zhang, H.; Huang, B.W.; Ni, R.B.; Li, G.; et al. The impact of global dimming on crop yields is determined by the source–sink imbalance of carbon during grain filling. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2021, 20, 689–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Müller, B.; Wild, M.; Driesse, A.; Behrens, K. Rethinking solar resource assessments in the context of global dimming and brightening. Sol. Energy 2014, 99, 272–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Deng, F.; Ren, W.J. Shading tolerance in rice is related to better light harvesting and use efficiency and grain filling rate during grain filling period. Field Crops Res. 2015, 180, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, H.Y.; Tang, H.K.; Liu, L.A.; Shi, L.; Zhang, W.F.; Jiang, C.D. Local weak light induces the improvement of photosynthesis in adjacent illuminated leaves in maize seedlings. Physiol. Plant 2021, 171, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.P.; Deng, F.; Chen, H.; Zeng, Y.L.; Li, B.; Zhong, X.Y.; Wang, L.; Zhou, W.; Chen, Y.; Ren, W.J. Shading decreases rice yield by impeding grain-filling progress after heading. Agron. J. 2020, 112, 4018–4030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, B.; Tang, J.; Yu, Z.H.; Khare, T.; Srivastav, A.; Datir, S.; Kumar, V. Light stress responses and prospects for engineering light stress tolerance in crop plants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2019, 38, 1489–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gopal, M.; Roslen, A.; Saurabh, B.; Vito, B.; Lilia, M.; Andreas, G.; Matty, D.; Morell, M.K.; Nese, S. Dissecting the genome-wide genetic variants of milling and appearance quality traits in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 5115–5130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trang Nguyen, H.; Thi Mai To, H.; Lebrun, M.; Bellafiore, S.; Champion, A. Jasmonates-the master regulator of rice development, adaptation and defense. Plants 2019, 8, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yun, P.; Zhu, Y.; Wu, B.; Gao, G.J.; Sun, P.; Zhang, Q.L.; He, Y.Q. Genetic mapping and confirmation of quantitative trait loci for grain chalkiness in rice. Mol. Breed. 2016, 36, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nevame, A.Y.M.; Emon, R.M.; Malek, M.A.; Hasan, M.M.; Alam, M.A.; Muharam, F.M.; Aslani, F.; Rafii, M.Y.; Ismail, M.R. Relationship between high temperature and formation of chalkiness and their effects on quality of rice. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 1653721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ballaré, C.L.; Pierik, R. The shade-avoidance syndrome: Multiple signals and ecological consequences. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 2530–2543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamazaki, J.Y. Is light quality involved in the regulation of the photosynthetic apparatus in attached rice leaves? Photosynth. Res. 2010, 105, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caverzan, A.; Bonifacio, A.; Carvalho, F.E.; Andrade, C.M.; Passaia, G.; Schünemann, M.; Maraschin Fdos, S.; Martins, M.O.; Teixeira, F.K.; Rauber, R.; et al. The knockdown of chloroplastic ascorbate peroxidases reveals its regulatory role in the photosynthesis and protection under photo-oxidative stress in rice. Plant Sci. 2014, 214, 74–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shafiq, I.; Hussain, S.; Raza, M.A.; Iqbal, N.; Asghar, M.A.; Raza, A.; Fan, Y.F.; Mumtaz, M.; Shoaib, M.; Ansar, M.; et al. Crop photosynthetic response to light quality and light intensity. J. Integr. Agric. 2021, 20, 4–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.L.; Zhai, J.J.; Wei, Y.X.; Lu, L.N.; Peng, C.L. Effects of shading on the senescence and photosynthetic physiology of the early-flowering rice mutant FTL10 at noon. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 39, 776–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pignon, C.P.; Jaiswal, D.; McGrath, J.M.; Long, S.P. Loss of photosynthetic efficiency in the shade. An Achilles heel for the dense modern stands of our most productive C4 crops? J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Fei, D.; Ren, W.J.; Yang, W.Y. Effects of shading on starch pasting characteristics of Indica hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.). PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, X.B.; Liu, J.X.; Li, D.Q.; Liu, C.M. Rice caryopsis development II: Dynamic changes in the endosperm. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2016, 58, 786–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- You, C.C.; Chen, L.; He, H.B.; Wu, L.Q.; Wang, S.H.; Ding, Y.F.; Ma, C.X. iTRAQ-based proteome profile analysis of superior and inferior spikelets at early grain filling stage in japonica rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, H.Y.; Zhu, Y.; Qiu, S.; Han, C.; Hu, L.; Xu, D.; Zhou, N.B.; Xing, Z.P.; Hu, Y.J.; Cui, P.Y.; et al. Combined effect of shading time and nitrogen level on grain filling and grain quality in japonica super rice. J. Integr. Agric. 2018, 17, 2405–2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, L.J.; Jiang, L.; Zhai, H.Q.; Wan, J.M. Current status and strategies for improvement of rice grain chalkiness. Hereditas 2009, 31, 563–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.Y.; Chen, M.X.; Lin, G.Q.; Yang, Y.; Yu, X.R.; Wu, Y.F.; Xiong, F. Structural development and physicochemical properties of starch in caryopsis of super rice with different types of panicle. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mo, Z.W.; Li, W.; Pan, S.G.; Fitzgerald, T.L.; Xiao, F.; Tang, Y.J.; Wang, Y.L.; Duan, M.Y.; Tian, H.; Tang, X.R. Shading during the grain filling period increases 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline content in fragrant rice. Rice 2015, 8, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prathap, V.; Aruna, T. Correlation between expression and activity of ADP glucose pyrophosphorylase and starch synthase and their role in starch accumulation during grain filling under drought stress in rice. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 157, 239–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao-Jie, T.; Cheng, P.; Jie, Z.; Yue, C.; Xiao-Man, Y.; Fei, K.; Hai-Gang, Y.; Guo-Xiang, W.; Liang, W.; Jie, J.; et al. ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase large subunit 2 is essential for storage substance accumulation and subunit interactions in rice endosperm. Plant Sci. 2016, 249, 70–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kai, S.; Xiaotian, G.; Weiping, L.; Dalei, L. Effects of weak-light stress during grain filling on the physicochemical properties of normal maize starch. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 202, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nnaemeka Emmanuel, O.; Kelvin Dodzi, A.; Tianyue, A.; Longxin, H.; Xiangru, T. The roles of starch branching enzymes and starch synthase in the biosynthesis of amylose in rice. J. Cereal Sci. 2022, 104, 103393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miyazaki, A.; Ikeda, A.; Yonemaru, J.; Morita, S.; Yamamoto, Y. Relationships among the chalkiness, kernel size and endosperm cell morphology of rice kernels at different spikelet positions within a panicle. Plant Prod. Sci. 2018, 21, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richards, F.J. A flexible growth function for empirical use. J. Exp. Bot. 1959, 10, 290–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Panicle Part | Light Treatment | Chalky Grain Rate (%) | Chalkiness Degree (%) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | ||
Top | CK | 2.29 ± 0.020 b | 2.84 ± 0.003 b | 2.50 ± 0.011 b | — | 0.500 ± 0.006 a | 0.537 ± 0.002 b | 0.687 ± 0.002 b | — |
LL | 6.17 ± 0.011 a | 7.08 ± 0.005 a | 4.91 ± 0.001 a | — | 1.42 ± 0.005 a | 2.18 ± 0.005 a | 1.44 ± 0.001 a | — | |
Bottom | CK | 4.01 ± 0.016 b | 5.06 ± 0.013 b | 3.76 ± 0.001 b | 2.73 ± 0.005 b | 0.503 ± 0.007 b | 0.920 ± 0.004 b | 0.830 ± 0.001 b | 0.683 ± 0.002 b |
LL | 12.97 ± 0.035 a | 13.48 ± 0.006 a | 11.84 ± 0.004 a | 9.82 ± 0.004 a | 2.13 ± 0.005 a | 2.43 ± 0.004 a | 2.23 ± 0.001 a | 1.74 ± 0.003 a | |
F value | Panicle part (P) | 11.03 * | 96.70 ** | 145.41 ** | — | 1.23 ns | 2.04 ns | 48.85 ** | — |
Light treatment (L) | 24.99 ** | 208.49 ** | 239.21 ** | 339.29 ** | 15.41 ** | 50.42 ** | 261.62 ** | 29.58 ** | |
P × L | 3.92 ns | 22.71 ** | 69.83 ** | — | 1.21 ns | 0.091 ns | 23.45 ** | — |
Year | Panicle Part | Light Treatment | R2 | Stimulation Equations |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020 | Top | CK | 0.9966 | WG = 19.64(1 + 668.10e−0.4503t)−1/1.88 |
LL | 0.9992 | WG = 18.68(1 + 204.90e−0.0.3484t)−1/1.25 | ||
Bottom | CK | 0.9923 | WG = 18.45(1 + 930.00e−0.3334t)−1/2.10 | |
LL | 0.9955 | WG = 15.63(1 + 679.00e−0.2916t)−1/1.37 | ||
2021 | Bottom | CK | 0.9985 | WG = 19.11(1 + 44.00e−0.2063t)−1/1.17 |
LL | 0.9986 | WG = 16.62(1 + 97.16e−0.2061t)−1/1.04 |
Year | Panicle Part | Light Treatment | RP0 | GFRmean (mg·Grain−1·d−1) | GFRmax (mg·Grain−1·d−1) | I (%) | GWmax (mg) | tmax (Day) | GFPactive (Day) | GFPeffective (Day) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2020 | Top | CK | 0.240 ± 0.020 a | 1.14 ± 0.003 a | 1.75 ± 0.017 a | 56.93 ± 0.021 a | 11.18 ± 0.307 a | 13.05 ± 0.285 b | 17.21 ± 0.175 b | 24.64 ± 0.419 b |
LL | 0.283 ± 0.042 a | 1.00 ± 0.030 b | 1.51 ± 0.041 b | 52.22 ± 0.023 a | 9.75 ± 0.339 b | 14.63 ± 0.283 a | 18.65 ± 0.642 a | 28.43 ± 0.576 a | ||
Bottom | CK | 0.160 ± 0.000 b | 0.751 ± 0.012 a | 1.16 ± 0.022 a | 58.36 ± 0.007 a | 10.77 ± 0.141 a | 18.28 ± 0.095 b | 24.56 ± 0.358 a | 34.27 ± 0.453 b | |
LL | 0.210 ± 0.010 a | 0.677 ± 0.017 b | 1.03 ± 0.030 b | 53.30 ± 0.014 b | 8.33 ± 0.105 b | 21.29 ± 0.111 a | 23.12 ± 0.860 a | 38.12 ± 0.941 a | ||
F-value | Panicle part (P) | 31.58 ** | 1122.78 ** | 1060.94 ** | 1.62 ns | 42.14 ** | 2322.37 ** | 320.09 ** | 700.80 ** | |
Light treatment (L) | 11.70 ** | 100.28 ** | 126.49 ** | 24.63 ** | 186.85 ** | 346.53 ** | 0.000 ns | 109.67 ** | ||
P × L | 0.060 ns | 9.19 * | 9.97 * | 0.031 ns | 12.54 ** | 33.10 ** | 18.97 ** | 0.008 ns | ||
2021 | Bottom | CK | 0.193 ± 0.006 a | 0.812 ± 0.005 a | 1.24 ± 0.010 a | 0.550 ± 0.007 a | 10.48 ± 0.099 a | 21.23 ± 0.199 b | 23.48 ± 0.202 b | 37.77 ± 0.170 b |
LL | 0.197 ± 0.006 a | 0.649 ± 0.013 b | 0.982 ± 0.023 b | 0.529 ± 0.011 b | 8.73 ± 0.180 b | 23.86 ± 0.130 a | 25.45 ± 0.512 a | 42.53 ± 0.619 a | ||
F-value | Light treatment (L) | 1.20 ns | 402.96 ** | 301.21 ** | 8.44 * | 218.49 ** | 367.17 ** | 38.50 ** | 165.09 ** |
Year | Panicle Part | Light Treatment | t1 | t2 | t3 | 0–t1 | t1–t2 | t2–t3 | MGR1 | MGR2 | MGR3 | CR1 | CR2 | CR3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2020 | Top | CK | 9.63 ± 0.434 b | 16.46 ± 0.147 b | 23.25 ± 0.653 b | 9.63 ± 0.434 b | 6.83 ± 0.308 b | 6.80 ± 0.769 b | 0.606 ± 0.022 a | 1.55 ± 0.017 a | 0.450 ± 0.011 a | 29.72% ± 0.026 a | 53.76% ± 0.014 a | 15.52% ± 0.013 a |
LL | 10.66 ± 0.337 a | 18.61 ± 0.307 a | 27.85 ± 0.910 a | 10.66 ± 0.337 a | 7.95 ± 0.309 a | 9.24 ± 0.940 a | 0.416 ± 0.031 b | 1.33 ± 0.035 b | 0.377 ± 0.009 b | 23.81% ± 0.027 a | 56.58% ± 0.012 a | 18.61% ± 0.016 a | ||
Bottom | CK | 13.52 ± 0.198 b | 23.04 ± 0.104 b | 32.03 ± 0.516 b | 13.52 ± 0.198 b | 9.51 ± 0.252 a | 8.99 ± 0.440 a | 0.430 ± 0.007 a | 1.02 ± 0.020 a | 0.300 ± 0.007 a | 31.56% ± 0.009 a | 52.82% ± 0.005 b | 14.63% ± 0.004 b | |
LL | 16.43 ± 0.387 a | 26.15 ± 0.167 a | 37.06 ± 1.290 a | 16.43 ± 0.387 a | 9.72 ± 0.554 a | 10.91 ± 1.124 a | 0.239 ± 0.008 b | 0.902 ± 0.027 b | 0.257 ± 0.009 b | 25.12% ± 0.017 b | 56.02% ± 0.008 a | 17.87% ± 0.010 a | ||
F-value | Panicle part (p) | 570.41 ** | 3878.32 ** | 304.50 ** | 570.41 ** | 106.20 ** | 643.94 ** | 241.13 ** | 1019.97 ** | 1.58 ns | 1.64 ns | 1.66 ns | 15.25 ** | |
Light treatment (L) | 94.29 ** | 537.84 ** | 87.09 ** | 94.29 ** | 9.45 * | 120.41 ** | 281.02 ** | 130.20 ** | 23.62 ** | 25.30 ** | 26.74 ** | 19.43 ** | ||
P × L | 21.44 ** | 18.15 ** | 0.183 ns | 21.44 ** | 4.41 ns | 7.77 * | 0.0120 ns | 9.99 * | 0.013 | 0.047 ns | 0.110 ns | 0.283 ns | ||
2021 | Bottom | CK | 16.41 ± 0.289 b | 26.04 ± 0.109 b | 36.25 ± 0.299 b | 16.41 ± 0.289 b | 9.63 ± 0.180 b | 10.21 ± 0.408 b | 0.316 ± 0.003 a | 1.09 ± 0.010 a | 0.313 ± 0.004 a | 27.18 ± 0.008 a | 55.06 ± 0.004 b | 16.76 ± 0.004 b |
LL | 18.47 ± 0.303 a | 29.24 ± 0.109 a | 41.48 ± 0.920 a | 18.47 ± 0.303 a | 10.77 ± 0.374 a | 12.23 ± 0.841 a | 0.220 ± 0.008 b | 0.863 ± 0.021 b | 0.245 ± 0.007 b | 24.58 ± 0.013 b | 56.27 ± 0.006 a | 18.15 ± 0.007 a | ||
F-value | Light treatment (L) | 72.73 ** | 1286.97 ** | 87.44 ** | 72.73 ** | 22.49 ** | 14.09 * | 356.83 ** | 280.21 ** | 196.03 ** | 8.49 * | 8.59 * | 8.39 * |
Year | Organic Matter (g kg−1) | Total N (g kg−1) | Total P (g kg−1) | Total K (g kg−1) | Alkaline Hydrolysable N (mg kg−1) | Olsen P (mg kg−1) | Exchangeable K (mg kg−1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 28.50 | 1.50 | 0.94 | 17.50 | 137.20 | 50.82 | 143.10 |
2019 | 29.92 | 1.47 | 1.04 | 16.43 | 72.65 | 43.83 | 164.10 |
2020 | 27.90 | 1.63 | 0.99 | 18.10 | 89.76 | 54.68 | 158.40 |
2021 | 27.34 | 1.98 | 0.95 | 17.86 | 21.07 | 53.91 | 126.81 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Li, Q.; Deng, F.; Zeng, Y.; Li, B.; He, C.; Zhu, Y.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, L.; Tao, Y.; et al. Low Light Stress Increases Chalkiness by Disturbing Starch Synthesis and Grain Filling of Rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9153. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23169153
Li Q, Deng F, Zeng Y, Li B, He C, Zhu Y, Zhou X, Zhang Z, Wang L, Tao Y, et al. Low Light Stress Increases Chalkiness by Disturbing Starch Synthesis and Grain Filling of Rice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(16):9153. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23169153
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Qiuping, Fei Deng, Yuling Zeng, Bo Li, Chenyan He, Youyun Zhu, Xing Zhou, Zinuo Zhang, Li Wang, Youfeng Tao, and et al. 2022. "Low Light Stress Increases Chalkiness by Disturbing Starch Synthesis and Grain Filling of Rice" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 16: 9153. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23169153