Next Article in Journal
In Vivo Two-Photon Imaging Analysis of Dynamic Degradation of Hepatic Lipid Droplets in MS-275-Treated Mouse Liver
Previous Article in Journal
Implication of Irisin in Different Types of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 17
10.3390/ijms23179959
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Physical, Chemical, and Biological Properties of Chitosan-Coated Alginate Microparticles Loaded with Porcine Interleukin-1β: A Potential Protein Adjuvant Delivery System

by
Wan-Xuan Ho
1,†,
Wen-Ting Chen
1,†,
Chih-Hsuan Lien
2,
Hsin-Yu Yang
2,3,
Kuan-Hung Chen
2,
Yu-Fan Wei
1,
Meng-Han Wang
1,
I-Ting Ko
1,
Fan-Gang Tseng
2,* and
Hsien-Sheng Yin
1,*
1
Institute of Bioinformatics and Structural Biology, and College of Life Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan
2
Department of Engineering and System Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan
3
Nano Science and Technology Program, Taiwan International Graduate Program, Academia Sinica and National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(17), 9959; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23179959
Submission received: 12 August 2022 / Revised: 27 August 2022 / Accepted: 30 August 2022 / Published: 1 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Materials Science)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We previously developed chicken interleukin-1β (IL-1β) mutants as single-dose adjuvants that induce protective immunity when co-administered with an avian vaccine. However, livestock such as pigs may require a vaccine adjuvant delivery system that provides long-lasting protection to reduce the need for successive booster doses. Therefore, we developed chitosan-coated alginate microparticles as a carrier for bovine serum albumin (BSA) or porcine IL-1β (pIL-1β) and assessed their physical, chemical, and biological properties. Electrospraying of the BSA-loaded alginate microparticles (BSA/ALG MPs) resulted in an encapsulation efficiency of 50%, and those MPs were then coated with chitosan (BSA/ALG/CHI MPs). Optical and scanning electron microscopy, zeta potential analysis, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy were used to characterize these MPs. The BSA encapsulation parameters were applied to ALG/CHI MPs loaded with pIL-1β, which were not cytotoxic to porcine fibroblasts but had enhanced bio-activity over unencapsulated pIL-1β. The chitosan layer of the BSA/ALG/CHI MPs prevented burst release and facilitated sustained release of pIL-1β for at least 28 days. In conclusion, BSA/ALG/CHI MPs prepared as a carrier for pIL-1β may be used as an adjuvant for the formulation of pig vaccines.

1. Introduction

Adjuvants have been used to enhance the immune response to vaccines for many decades [1]. Aluminum salts and oil emulsions are the most common adjuvants in veterinary vaccines [2]. However, aluminum salts are not effective for inducing cell-mediated immunity [3], and oil emulsions are prone to cause inflammation and ulcers at the injection site [4]. When included in an adjuvant preparation, cytokines can enhance primary and memory immune responses to certain types of infectious diseases [5]. The cytokine interleukin (IL)-1β is produced primarily by monocytes, macrophages, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells [6]. It not only activates its own gene but can also induce the cellular abundance of IL-6 and IL-8 [7]. Additionally, studies have shown that IL-1β is an effective adjuvant for humoral and cellular immune responses when co-administered with protein antigens in mice [8,9] and sheep [10,11]. We previously developed mutant chicken IL-1β as a single-dose vaccine adjuvant that accelerates and enhances mucosal immunity in combination with a vaccine targeting Newcastle disease virus. Moreover, a single dose of this IL-1β-containing vaccine induced protective immunity, with the added benefits of reduced animal stress and clinical cost [12]. The findings suggested that a mutant chicken IL-1β may be an effective adjuvant for vaccines used in the poultry industry. However, the vaccination of large livestock animals such as pigs and cattle may need booster doses to achieve maximum vaccine potency [13]. Moreover, vaccine costs should also be considered [14]. Therefore, a systematic approach is needed for development of adjuvants that may provide solutions to these issues for animals that are commonly treated at veterinary clinics.
Nanotechnology-derived vaccine delivery systems have received a substantial amount of attention during the last two decades as viable alternatives to conventional veterinary vaccines, although most are in the early stages of development [15,16]. Nevertheless, the use of microparticles (MPs) or nanoparticles as vaccine adjuvant delivery vehicles for veterinary medicine remains largely unexplored. Both MPs and nanoparticles can be manufactured from natural biodegradable polymers, which could help maintain the safety and quality of veterinary vaccine adjuvants [17,18]. For example, alginate is a natural polysaccharide that has been widely applied in the food and pharmaceutical industries because of its low toxicity, low price, and high biocompatibility [19]. Anionic alginate polysaccharides can form hydrogels in the presence of a divalent cation such as Ca2+ [20]. Alginate MPs have been successfully used for encapsulating vaccines for various animal species, including fish [21], mice [22], and cattle [23]. Nevertheless, the potential for prolonged drug release from sodium alginate particles is still limited owing to sodium alginate’s solubility, which leads to rapid particle dissolution in vivo [24]. However, a copolymer such as chitosan can be used to coat alginate MPs to reduce the initial “burst” release of an encapsulated drug or antigen [25]. Chitosan is a naturally occurring cationic polymer that is derived by deacetylating chitin in alkaline solution [26]. Because of its lack of toxicity as well as its biocompatibility and biodegradability, chitosan is highly suitable for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications [27]. It has been demonstrated that IL-1β abundance is robustly induced by priming mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages with 100 ng/mL lipopolysaccharide for 3 h, followed by 0.1 mg/mL chitosan for 6 h [28]. Additionally, high concentrations of sodium alginate (1 to 3 mg/mL) can increase IL-6 abundance in mouse macrophages [29]. Additionally, the cationic nature of chitosan can facilitate ionic interactions with the negatively charged carboxyl groups of alginate [30].
Polymers can provide substantial benefits to colloidal drug delivery systems because they help optimize drug loading and release [31,32]. Electrospraying is an efficient means of preparing nanoparticles via encapsulation for protein/drug delivery and other carrier-mediated systems [33]. This technique works by forcing a polymer solution through a syringe needle, which allows the solution to become charged via an electric field applied at the needle tip; hence, the solution is emitted as fine droplets. These charged droplets then fall towards an oppositely charged collector and generate MPs [34]. Electrospraying has a few advantages over other techniques for producing MP cargo carriers for various biomedical applications. Specifically, electrospraying produces particles with a narrow size distribution, i.e., from nanometers to microns [35], and the Coulombic repulsion inherent in this technique allows for self-dispersal of the highly charged electrosprayed droplets [36]. Although alginate and chitosan are widely used for the production of MPs and nanoparticles for drug delivery systems and have been extensively studied [37,38,39,40], alginate–chitosan MPs have yet to be fully characterized with respect to their use in veterinary vaccine adjuvants.
Toward the goal of producing MPs to carry a cytokine adjuvant, here we used alginate MPs to encapsulate a model protein (bovine serum albumin, BSA) by cross-linking alginate with Ca2+ (in CaCl2 solution) using electrospray ionization, and encapsulation efficiency was evaluated. Alginate MPs were then further encapsulated in chitosan to form chitosan-coated, BSA-loaded alginate MPs (BSA/ALG/CHI MPs). Finally, chitosan-coated alginate MPs encapsulating recombinant porcine IL-1β (pIL-1β/ALG/CHI MPs) were fabricated using parameters derived from the BSA model (Scheme 1). The cytotoxicity, bioactivity, and release properties of these MP formulations were evaluated in vitro. By performing this study, we gained a deeper understanding of the properties of chitosan-coated alginate MPs as a potential delivery carrier, which could result in the sustained and prolonged release of pIL-1β and the enhancement of downstream IL-6 production. As veterinary vaccine adjuvant formulation strategies are crucial to achieving long-lasting immunity for large animals, such as pigs, it is imperative that effective vaccine adjuvant formulation strategies be devised. Veterinary practitioners may be able to achieve maximum vaccine potency and long-term immunity through the use of a microcarrier platform for protein adjuvant delivery.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Expression and Purification of IL-1β

The gene encoding pIL-1β was expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3), and recombinant pIL-1β was purified to homogeneity through Co2+-affinity chromatography by using a His6 tag. The extracted pIL-1β was >99% pure as assessed by SDS–PAGE and Coomassie blue staining, and its molecular mass was approximately 20 kDa (Figure 1). This work presents the first report concerning the expression and purification of recombinant pIL-1β using a bacterial system. The purified pIL-1β was evaluated with regard to its potential as an MP-encapsulated bioadjuvant.

2.2. Efficiency of Encapsulating BSA in Alginate MPs

Encapsulation efficiency was used to determine how much BSA could be encapsulated within alginate MPs at different MP concentrations. An alginate concentration of 1% (w/v) yielded the highest encapsulation efficiency for BSA, i.e., 49.7 ± 4.4%. Lower encapsulation efficiencies of 45.7 ± 2.6% and 40.2 ± 5.6% were estimated at 0.5% and 1.5% concentrations of alginate, respectively (Figure 2). Previous research had demonstrated that electrospraying BSA could produce monodispersed MPs with high encapsulation efficiency [41]. Indeed, another study found that electrospraying BSA plus alginate into a CaCl2 solution yielded an encapsulation efficiency ranging from 19.1% to 49.7% depending on the initial loading of BSA [42]. The latter percentage agreed with our encapsulation efficiency of 49.7% with 1% alginate; therefore, 1% alginate was utilized in subsequent experiments to optimize the inner encapsulation of alginate in MPs.

2.3. Microscopy of MPs

To characterize the size distribution of our alginate-containing MPs, both BSA-loaded alginate MPs (BSA/ALG MPs and BSA/ALG/CHI MPs) were observed under optical and electron microscopes (Figure 3). Optical microscopy showed that the BSA/ALG MPs and BSA/ALG/CHI MPs were generally spherical with an approximate diameter of 20 μm (Figure 3a,b), suggesting that the MPs might be suitable for intramuscular delivery [43]. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that lyophilization of the BSA/ALG MPs resulted in irregularly shaped MPs (Figure 3c). However, the BSA/ALG/CHI MPs had relatively better sphericity and thus could withstand lyophilization better than the MPs that lacked the chitosan coating (Figure 3d). Indeed, research has demonstrated that sodium alginate is a colloid that swells in aqueous solution, and lyophilization destroys its spherical structure [44,45]. Previous work also demonstrated that sphericity improved by coating alginate-containing Bifidobacterium longum MPs [45]. Notably, layers of alginate were visible on the surface of our BSA/ALG/CHI MPs (Figure 3b,d), which may be a positive attribute of the chitosan coating [45,46].

2.4. Surface Charge of MPs

Zeta potential measurements revealed that BSA/ALG MPs were negatively charged (−14.6 ± 1.5 mV), but BSA/ALG/CHI MPs were positively charged (28.8 ± 2.1 mV) (Figure 4). This suggested that positively charged chitosan effectively interacted (electrostatically) with the negatively charged alginate surface. Zeta potential can be used to quantify the colloidal stability of MPs, and values greater than 30 mV or less than −30 mV indicate that the MPs are stable [47]. The BSA/ALG MPs had a zeta potential of −14.6 ± 1.5 mV, whereas the value for BSA/ALG/CHI MPs was 28.8 ± 2.1 mV (Figure 4), indicating that the MPs were colloidally stable in their final formulations. In addition, zeta potential also provides information regarding the surface charge of MPs and nanoparticles [48]. The switch of the zeta potential from −14.6 ± 1.5 mV (BSA/ALG MPs) to 28.8 ± 2.1 mV (BSA/ALG/CHI MPs) confirmed that a chitosan layer was present on the surface of the alginate MPs. The fact that this charge-switch phenomenon has previously been observed with alginate-coated chitosan MPs [49,50] confirmed that our MPs indeed had a chitosan outer shell.

2.5. FT-IR

FT-IR analysis was used to identify the functional groups present within the MPs. As shown in Figure 5, the spectrum of BSA/ALG MPs (Figure 5a) indicated that the peak observed at 3356 cm−1 corresponded to an O–H group [51], and this O–H stretching peak has also been reported for BSA encapsulated in alginate [52]. This result suggested that BSA was indeed encapsulated within alginate MPs. Peaks that we observed at 1608 cm−1 and 1429 cm−1 corresponded to –COOH asymmetric and –COOH symmetric stretching, respectively [53]. Peaks observed at 1079 cm−1 and 1019 cm−1 were characteristic of C–O and C–O–H bonds, respectively [54]. The spectrum of BSA/ALG/CHI MPs (Figure 5b) showed that the peak at 3355 cm−1 represented the stretching of N–H in chitosan [55,56]. Thus, the spectra of alginate and chitosan-coated alginate MPs showed a broad band at 3356–3355 cm−1, corresponding to O–H stretching that indicated intermolecular hydrogen bonding, and this broad band also overlapped with the N–H stretching in chitosan [56,57]. Complexation of alginate with chitosan resulted in spectral displacement of carboxylic groups, with peak shifts from 1608 and 1429 cm−1 to 1618 and 1430 cm−1, respectively. In the FT-IR spectrum of BSA/ALG/CHI MPs, the peak at 1528 cm−1 was indicative of N–H bending in amide groups in chitosan [58]. The corresponding peak in the range 1528–1534 cm−1 was attributed to C–N and C–N–H bending in chitosan [59,60]. In addition, the peak at 1078 cm−1 was assigned to C–O stretching, whereas the peak at 1020 cm−1 was attributed to C–O–C stretching, indicative of the structure of chitosan [61,62]. These results indicated that BSA was encapsulated within sodium alginate, and that the carboxyl groups of sodium alginate and amino groups of chitosan interacted electrostatically.

2.6. Cytotoxicity of MPs

The CCK-8 assay identifies viable cells by utilizing the ability of the mitochondrial dehydrogenases to oxidize the highly water soluble tetrazolium salt (WST)-8 to produce a colored formazan product [63]. CCK-8 assays were used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of pIL-1β, pIL-1β/ALG MPs, and pIL-1β/ALG/CHI MPs to ST cells (Figure 6a) and PK-15 cells (Figure 6b). Figure 6 presents data for the percentage of live cells for each treatment relative to the nontreated control cells. In comparison with the control ST cells, ST cells incubated with unencapsulated pIL-1 or with pIL-1β/ALG MPs or pIL-1β/ALG/CHI MPs had similar viabilities of 99.9 ± 4.5%, 98.2 ± 5.6%, and 99.3 ± 3.7%, respectively. Likewise, the treated PK-15 cells had similar relative viabilities of 99.1 ± 5.3%, 99.7 ± 4.1%, and 98.9 ± 5.7%, respectively. All these viability percentages were statistically indistinguishable (p > 0.05). These results indicated that neither pIL-1β nor any of the MP formulations prepared in this study were cytotoxic when examined in vitro.

2.7. Effects of MP Formulations on IL-1β Signaling In Vitro

To evaluate the effects of MP formulations on IL-1β signaling in vitro, IL-6 abundance in lysates of the porcine fibroblast line ST was measured to assess pIL-1β-induced IL-6 production (Figure 7). At 10 ng/mL, unencapsulated pIL-1β significantly increased IL-6 abundance in the lysates (p < 0.01), whereas treatment with alginate, chitosan, CaCl2, or ALG/CHI MPs at the same molar equivalent had no effect on IL-6 abundance (p > 0.05). In contrast, the increase in IL-6 abundance induced by pIL-1β/ALG/CHI MPs was significantly higher than that observed in nontreated control cells (p < 0.001). pIL-1β/ALG/CHI MPs increased IL-6 abundance significantly relative to treatment with pIL-1β (p < 0.05). Mean IL-6 abundance induced by pIL-1β/ALG/CHI MPs relative to that induced by pIL-1β was 132%, indicating that the MP formulations may substantially enhance other porcine proinflammatory immune responses, at least as measured in vitro. Several factors, including polymer concentration, cell type, and stimulant may explain why alginate, chitosan, and ALG/CHI MPs were unable to significantly increase IL-6 abundance. One possibility is that pIL-1β/ALG/CHI MPs induced higher levels of IL-6 in fibroblasts than did unencapsulated pIL-1β because they protected interleukins from enzymatic degradation and sustained the stable release of pIL-1β [64,65]. Nevertheless, the results might also be explained by the fact that pIL-1β can also act as an immunostimulant, i.e., similar to lipopolysaccharide, which may have facilitated chitosan’s ability to enhance IL-1β abundance [28]. Thus, pIL-1β/ALG/CHI MPs increased IL-6 abundance in ST cells. A recent study revealed that alginate and chitosan are effective adjuvants for the hepatitis B vaccine in mouse models, which could reduce the dose of the this vaccine and thus be economically advantageous [66]. It may be necessary to increase the concentration of biopolymers to maximize the potential adjuvant-related effects of alginate-chitosan MPs, thereby reducing the dosage of the porcine vaccine. Thus, we suggest that porcine vaccines containing a triple-adjuvant formula with pIL-1β, alginate, and chitosan MPs might generate potent immunogenic responses in swine.

2.8. In Vitro Release from pIL-1β/ALG/CHI MPs

One of the aims of this study was to slow down the release of pIL-1β by encapsulating it via two steps of microencapsulation. Therefore, we examined the rate of pIL-1β release from electrosprayed pIL-1β/ALG MPs and pIL-1β/ALG/CHI MPs. Figure 8 presents data for the cumulative release of pIL-1β from these two MP types at pH 7.4 over a period of 28 days. Notably, the initial “burst” release of pIL-1β from electrosprayed alginate MPs was not significant, totaling 13.9 ± 1.2% after 1 day, 30.3 ± 0.7% after 3 days, 71.2 ± 1.9% after 6 days, and = 91.8 ± 1.2% after 28 days. An important finding of this study was that the electrosprayed alginate MPs coated with chitosan exhibited a relatively slower, sustained release of pIL-1β, totaling 11.1 ± 1.2% after 1 day, 17.9 ± 1.4% after 3 days, and 35.4 ± 1.3% after 6 days. Moreover, the release rate was substantially slower during the subsequent 22 days, and indeed 45.8 ± 1.1% of the pIL-1β had been released at the end of the 28-day study. Therefore, the total amount of pIL-1β released after 28 days from chitosan-coated alginate MPs was significantly lower than that released from uncoated alginate particles. Owing to the fact that chitosan forms a film easily, chitosan-coated alginate particles reduce matrix swelling and prolong the drug release period in comparison with uncoated alginate particles [67]. Therefore, we propose that chitosan-coated alginate MPs could be administered to pigs intramuscularly as a long-lasting adjuvant delivery system. We therefore chose a pH of 7.4 and temperature of 37 °C, i.e., consistent with pig physiology, for evaluating the release of pIL-1β from uncoated and chitosan-coated alginate MPs. The release of pIL-1β from MPs may be influenced by factors such as formulation composition and the manufacturing process. A previous study demonstrated that electrostatic interactions between alginate and chitosan, specifically at 1% chitosan, resulted in significantly increased caffeine retention within particles [68]. The electrostatic interactions between two polymers may create a stronger network that could maintain its integrity in liquid medium. Our electrosprayed alginate MPs were also coated with 1% (w/v) chitosan, which facilitated electrostatic interactions that may meet the requirements for prolonging pIL-1β release. Additionally, a chitosan coating on alginate has been shown to facilitate more sustained release of a hydrophilic drug with a lesser initial burst release [25]. In our present study, the pIL-1β, which is hydrophilic, that had been encapsulated in chitosan-coated alginate MPs was released in a relatively slow, sustained manner, with a reduced initial burst of release. A previous study found that poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) MPs loaded with drug had the desirable size range (20–60 μm) and that in vitro release was prolonged for at least 28 days [69]. Comparatively, intrasciatic nerve injection of PLGA-coupled MPs of 3.6 μm diameter resulted in MP dispersal within 2 weeks after injection [70]. These PLGA-coupled MPs had an approximate diameter of 20 μm, which may also have contributed to the prolongation of pIL-1β release. Although PLGA is also a suitable vehicle for prolonging drug release [71], the natural biopolymer composite in our MPs and the reduced initial burst release of pIL-1β (11.1 ± 1.2% release after 1 day) suggest that MPs may prove beneficial as adjuvant carriers in veterinary vaccines.

2.9. Stability of pIL-1β Released from MPs

In order to investigate whether any structural alternations were made to the pIL-1β after release from the ALG and ALG/CHI MPs, SDS–PAGE was performed (Figure 9). As shown in Figure 9, we found that a small amount of pIL-1β was present after 1 day of release from ALG (lane 2) or ALG/CHI (lane 3) MPs. A significant amount of pIL-1β was detected after 6 days of release from ALG MPs (lane 4) in comparison with ALG/CHI MPs (lane 5). Therefore, ALG/CHI MPs containing pIL-1β may release at a slower rate than ALG MPs containing pIL-1β. Additionally, a successful protein drug delivery system must be able to maintain the conformational integrity of the protein during drug delivery [72,73]. An SDS–PAGE analysis revealed no additional bands in the gel, such as protein aggregation or fragmentation. There was no lower or higher molecular weight band in the other lanes. Thus, the pIL-1β retains its primary structure during the release from the ALG and ALG/CHI MPs.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

The sodium alginate (average molecular weight 155,000 Da, low viscosity, 15–20 cP for 1% in water at 25 °C), medium molecular weight chitosan (viscosity, 200–800 cP, 1 wt% in 1% acetic acid, molecular mass: 190,000–310,000 Da), BSA, CaCl2, and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) strain was obtained from Yeastern Biotech Company (New Taipei City, Taiwan). Isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside was purchased from Protech (Taipei, Taiwan). Ampicillin, imidazole, NaCl, and tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris) were supplied by United States Biochemical (Cleveland, OH, USA).

3.2. Preparation of pIL-1β

The full-length cDNA for pIL-1β (GenBank accession number NM_214055) was synthesized by Genomics BioSci and Tech (Taipei, Taiwan). Subsequently, the gene encoding pIL-1β was cloned into pET-28a(+) (Novagen, Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA), with an upstream T7 promoter and histidine (His6) tag and expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3). Bacteria were initially grown in Luria–Bertani medium containing 50 μg/mL ampicillin. After the OD600 had reached 0.6, isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (0.4 mM final concentration) was added into the culture medium to induce protein expression for 4 h at 37 °C. To obtain soluble expressed proteins, whole cells were lysed by sonication in 25 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl, and pH 7.4, and then centrifuged at 8000× g for 30 min at 4 °C. Recombinant His-tagged pIL-1β was purified by Co2+-affinity column chromatography (Clontech, CA, USA). After loading the E. coli extract, the column was initially washed with 100 mM imidazole, 25 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.4, and His-tagged pIL-1β was eluted in the same solution but containing 300 mM imidazole. A Microcon YM-10 centrifugal filter unit with a 10,000 MW cut-off membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) was then used to remove imidazole and to concentrate the protein. The purity of the purified pIL-1β was assessed by SDS-PAGE [74] and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (Autoflex III, Bruker Daltonics Inc., Billerica, MA, USA). Protein concentrations were determined using reagents of the Quick Start Bradford Protein Assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) with BSA as the standard. PIL-1β (15 mg/mL) in 25 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.4 was used as the stock solution.

3.3. Preparation of Alginate MPs

An alginate solution of 0.5%, 1.0%, or 1.5% w/v, and 10 mg/mL BSA [50] (or pIL-1β) was put into a 5 mL syringe with a metal needle (24 G) and connected to a high-voltage supply (CZE 1000R, Spellman High Voltage Electronics Corporation, Hauppauge, NY) set to 12 kV. The collector plate was 20 cm distant from the needle tip. A syringe pump (New Era Pump Systems Inc., NE-300, Hauppauge, NY, USA) controlled the solution feed rate at 0.1 mL/h. Droplets were dripped into a 0.3 M aqueous solution of CaCl2 for 30 min to allow the BSA/ALG or pIL-1β/ALG MPs to harden. The BSA/ALG or pIL-1β/ALG MPs were then washed with cold distilled water and pelleted down by centrifugation at 3000× g and 4 °C for 30 min. Afterward, the BSA/ALG or pIL-1β/ALG MPs suspensions were lyophilized for 48 h using a vacuum manifold freeze dryer (FDM-2, UNISS Technology Ltd., New Taipei City, Taiwan). The dried BSA/ALG or pIL-1β/ALG MPs were stored in glass vials at 4 °C.

3.4. Efficiency of Encapsulation

The Bradford method [75] was used to measure the encapsulation efficiency of MPs. The BSA-loaded ALG MPs were centrifuged at 10,000× g for 30 min at 4 °C to separate the MPs from the solution. The amount of free BSA present in the supernatant of collection solution was determined using Quick Start Bradford Protein Assay reagents with BSA as the standard. Encapsulation efficiency was calculated as (C0–C1/C0) × 100%, where C0 and C1 represent the total and free BSA concentrations, respectively. In all experiments, three replicates were performed.

3.5. Preparation of Chitosan-Coated Alginate MPs

Chitosan solution (1 wt% in 1% acetic acid) was added into the BSA/ALG or pIL-1β/ALG MPs suspensions and then sonicated (Model 3000; Misonix Inc, Farmingdale, NY, USA) for 10–30 s at 50 W [76], followed by gentle stirring with a magnetic stirrer for 2 h at 4 °C. Then the suspension was centrifuged at 1000× g for 10 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was discarded. The BSA/ALG/CHI or pIL-1β/ALG/CHI MPs suspensions were lyophilized for 48 h using the FDM-2 freeze dryer. The dried BSA/ALG/CHI or pIL-1β/ALG/CHI MPs were stored at 4 °C.

3.6. Optical Microscopy

Microparticles were measured using an optical microscope to characterize their shapes and sizes. Using a sonicator at 3 W, the BSA/ALG and BSA/ALG/CHI MPs (1 mg/mL) were dispersed in distilled water for 60 s [77]. The dispersion was examined under a microscope (ZOOMKOP EZ-20I, New Taipei, Taiwan) by placing a drop on a glass slide. ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to binarize the images [78]. The mean diameter of each type of MPs was calculated as the average of 100 individual MPs.

3.7. Scanning Electron Microscopy

The size distributions of BSA/ALG and BSA/ALG/CHI MPs were examined under a scanning electron microscope (JEOL JSM-6380, Tokyo, Japan) at the National Tsing Hua University with an operating potential of 15 kV and width distance of 8.0 mm at 2000× and 1500× magnification, respectively. Prior to observation, samples were dried overnight on air at room temperature and then coated with a thin layer of gold [79].

3.8. Surface Charge

The surface zeta potential of BSA/ALG and BSA/ALG/CHI MPs was measured with a zeta-potential and particle-size analyzer (ELSZ-2000, Otsuka Electronics Ltd., Osaka, Japan) equipped with a 660 nm semiconductor laser operating a 15-degree detector angle. The measurements were conducted at a temperature of 25 °C. Each sample’s zeta potential was determined in triplicate based on its intensity distribution, and average values were calculated.

3.9. FT-IR Analysis

The BSA/ALG and BSA/ALG/CHI MPs were characterized by FT-IR spectroscopy (Nexus 870, Thermo Nicolet, WI, USA). A total of 2% (w/w) of sample was mixed with dry potassium bromide (KBr) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA). The mixture was ground into a fine powder using an agate mortar before being compressed into KBr discs. KBr discs were scanned at 4 mm/s at a resolution of 2 cm over a wave number range of 640–4000 cm−1 [80].

3.10. Cytotoxicity Studies

A Cell-Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay (Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Kumamoto, Japan) was used to evaluate in vitro cytotoxicity of alginate MPs with or without the chitosan coating in the swine testis cell line ST (ATCC CRL-1746) or porcine kidney cell line PK-15 (ATCC CCL-33), respectively. Cells were seeded into a 96-well plate (Nalge-Nunc International, Rochester, NY, USA) at 3 × 103 cells per well and cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s medium at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 18 h to facilitate adherence of cells. The medium was removed, and cells were treated for 24 h with 1 mg/mL MPs in culture medium: pIL-1β/ALG MPs, pIL-1β/ALG/CHI MPs, or pIL-1β; control cells were incubated in the absence of MPs. The medium was removed, and 100 μL of 10% CCK-8 was added with subsequent incubation for 2 h, after which the absorbance at 450 nm was measured for each well. Cell viability was expressed as a percentage relative to the nontreated control cells. All experiments were carried out in three independent assays with different batches of cells.

3.11. In Vitro Bioactivity of MP Formulations

The ST cells were seeded into a 6-well plate (Nalge-Nunc International) at 1.5 × 106 cells per well and grown to 80–90% confluency in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s medium. Cells were then washed with PBS and treated with CaCl2, alginate, chitosan, ALG/CHI MPs, pIL-1β, or pIL-1β/ALG/CHI MPs at a concentration of 10 ng/mL in culture medium. The cells plus reagents were incubated at 37 °C for 8 h. Control cells were incubated in medium without any added reagent. IL-6 abundance in cell lysates was determined using an IL-6-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (LifeSpan BioSciences, Seattle, WA, USA). The ELISA plate was read using the iMark microplate reader (Bio-Rad). All samples were evaluated in triplicate.

3.12. In Vitro Release of pIL-1β

The in vitro release of pIL-1β from pIL-1β/ALG MPs and pIL-1β/ALG/CHI MPs was evaluated as described previously [81] with some modifications. The MP suspensions were added to individual tubes containing PBS at 37 °C and placed in a shaker bath set to 50 rpm. Samples were taken over time and filtered through a low protein-binding filter (Millex 0.22 μm; Durapore polyvinylidene difluoride membrane; Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), followed by centrifugation at 8000× g for 20 min. Protein concentration in the supernatant was measured with Quick Start Bradford Protein Assay reagents. The percentage of pIL-1β released was determined based on the change in the concentration of pIL-1β measured over time.

3.13. SDS–PAGE of the Release pIL-1β

The primary structural integrity of released pIL-1β from ALG and ALG/CHI MPs after 1 day and 6 days in PBS (pH 7.4) was determined by SDS–PAGE and compared with pure pIL-1β and molecular weight markers. pIL-1β was present at 5 ug in both unencapsulated (pure) and encapsulated ALG and ALG/CHI MP samples. Aliquots (15 µL) of these dispersions were mixed with 4× sample buffer (0.25 mol/L Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 80 g/L SDS, 200 mL/L glycerol, 100 g/L β-mercaptoethanol, and 1 g bromophenol blue) [82] denatured at 100 °C for 3 min. The gel (12% (w/v) acrylamide) was run under reducing conditions using Bio-Rad Mini-PROTEAN 3 Cell (Bio-Rad Laboratories) at a constant voltage mode of 120 V in a Tris/glycine/SDS buffer. The gel was stained with Coomassie blue staining solution and destained with 5% (v/v) acetic acid solution overnight.

3.14. Statistical Analysis

All experimental results were expressed as the mean value ± standard deviation. One-way analysis of variance was used to evaluate statistical differences among different groups using Prism software, version 7.00 (GraphPad Software, Inc. La Jolla, CA, USA). Differences between groups was evaluated statistically as p < 0.01 (**) or <0.001 (***).

4. Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first in vitro study to use a livestock cytokine encapsulated within a dual-layered chitosan-coated alginate MP, with subsequent characterization of its cytotoxicity, bioactivity, and release properties. Our findings suggest that the chitosan-coated alginate MPs could serve as a safe and effective delivery vehicle for long-lasting release of pIL-1β as well as for maintaining or improving its biological activity. MPs loaded with pIL-1β may possibly be employed as an adjuvant or immunostimulant for the formulation of vaccines for pigs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.-S.Y. and F.-G.T.; methodology, C.-H.L., W.-T.C. and H.-Y.Y.; software, W.-X.H., H.-Y.Y. and C.-H.L.; validation, W.-X.H. and W.-T.C.; investigation, Y.-F.W., M.-H.W., I.-T.K., W.-X.H., W.-T.C. and H.-S.Y.; data curation, W.-T.C. and H.-Y.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, C.-H.L., W.-T.C. and H.-Y.Y.; writing—review and editing, H.-S.Y., W.-T.C., W.-X.H., C.-H.L. and K.-H.C.; visualization, H.-S.Y., W.-T.C. and W.-X.H.; supervision, H.-S.Y. and F.-G.T.; project administration, H.-S.Y. and F.-G.T.; funding acquisition, H.-S.Y. and F.-G.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST grant numbers 111-2634-F-007-007, 110-2221-E-007-017-MY3, and 108-2313-B-007-002) and by the Frontier Research Center on Fundamental and Applied Sciences of Matters, from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education, Taiwan.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Petrovsky, N.; Aguilar, J.C. Vaccine adjuvants: Current state and future trends. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2004, 82, 488–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bowersock, T.L.; Martin, S. Vaccine delivery to animals. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1999, 38, 167–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cox, J.C.; Coulter, A.R. Adjuvants—A classification and review of their modes of action. Vaccine 1997, 15, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mohan, T.; Verma, P.; Rao, D.N. Novel adjuvants & delivery vehicles for vaccines development: A road ahead. Indian J. Med. Res. 2013, 138, 779–795. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Ahlers, J.D.; Belyakov, I.M.; Matsui, S.; Berzofsky, J.A. Mechanisms of cytokine synergy essential for vaccine protection against viral challenge. Int. Immunol. 2001, 13, 897–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, J.M.; An, J. Cytokines, inflammation, and pain. Int. Anesthesiol. Clin. 2007, 45, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dinarello, C.A. Biologic basis for interleukin-1 in disease. Blood 1996, 87, 2095–2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Staats, H.F.; Ennis, F.A., Jr. IL-1 is an effective adjuvant for mucosal and systemic immune responses when coadministered with protein immunogens. J. Immunol. 1999, 162, 6141–6147. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kayamuro, H.; Yoshioka, Y.; Abe, Y.; Arita, S.; Katayama, K.; Nomura, T.; Yoshikawa, T.; Kubota-Koketsu, R.; Ikuta, K.; Okamoto, S.; et al. Interleukin-1 family cytokines as mucosal vaccine adjuvants for induction of protective immunity against influenza virus. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 12703–12712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lofthouse, S.A.; Andrews, A.E.; Nash, A.D.; Bowles, V.M. Humoral and cellular responses induced by intradermally administered cytokine and conventional adjuvants. Vaccine 1995, 13, 1131–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Andrews, A.E.; Lofthouse, S.A.; Bowles, V.M.; Brandon, M.R.; Nash, A.D. Production and in vivo use of recombinant ovine IL-1 beta as an immunological adjuvant. Vaccine 1994, 12, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, W.T.; Chang, H.K.; Lin, C.C.; Yang, S.M.; Yin, H.S. Chicken interleukin-1beta mutants are effective single-dose vaccine adjuvants that enhance mucosal immune response. Mol. Immunol. 2017, 87, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Maina, T.W.; Grego, E.A.; Boggiatto, P.M.; Sacco, R.E.; Narasimhan, B.; McGill, J.L. Applications of Nanovaccines for Disease Prevention in Cattle. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 608050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Heegaard, P.M.; Dedieu, L.; Johnson, N.; Le Potier, M.F.; Mockey, M.; Mutinelli, F.; Vahlenkamp, T.; Vascellari, M.; Sorensen, N.S. Adjuvants and delivery systems in veterinary vaccinology: Current state and future developments. Arch. Virol. 2011, 156, 183–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dhakal, S.; Renukaradhya, G.J. Nanoparticle-based vaccine development and evaluation against viral infections in pigs. Vet. Res. 2019, 50, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fawzy, M.; Khairy, G.M.; Hesham, A.; Rabaan, A.A.; El-Shamy, A.G.; Nagy, A. Nanoparticles as a novel and promising antiviral platform in veterinary medicine. Arch. Virol. 2021, 166, 2673–2682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. George, A.; Shah, P.A.; Shrivastav, P.S. Natural biodegradable polymers based nano-formulations for drug delivery: A review. Int. J. Pharm. 2019, 561, 244–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bose, R.J.; Kim, M.; Chang, J.H.; Paulmurugan, R.; Moon, J.J.; Koh, W.G.; Lee, S.H.; Park, H. Biodegradable polymers for modern vaccine development. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019, 77, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lee, K.Y.; Mooney, D.J. Alginate: Properties and biomedical applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 106–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wee, S.; Gombotz, W.R. Protein release from alginate matrices. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1998, 31, 267–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ballesteros, N.A.; Alonso, M.; Saint-Jean, S.R.; Perez-Prieto, S.I. An oral DNA vaccine against infectious haematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV) encapsulated in alginate microspheres induces dose-dependent immune responses and significant protection in rainbow trout (Oncorrhynchus mykiss). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2015, 45, 877–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Nograles, N.; Abdullah, S.; Shamsudin, M.N.; Billa, N.; Rosli, R. Formation and characterization of pDNA-loaded alginate microspheres for oral administration in mice. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2012, 113, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bowersock, T.L.; HogenEsch, H.; Torregrosa, S.; Borie, D.; Wang, B.; Park, H.; Park, K. Induction of pulmonary immunity in cattle by oral administration of ovalbumin in alginate microspheres. Immunol. Lett 1998, 60, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pestovsky, Y.S.; Martínez-Antonio, A. The Synthesis of Alginate Microparticles and Nanoparticles. Drug Des. Intellect. Prop. Int. J. 2019, 3, 293–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ryu, S.; Park, S.; Lee, H.Y.; Lee, H.; Cho, C.W.; Baek, J.S. Biodegradable Nanoparticles-Loaded PLGA Microcapsule for the Enhanced Encapsulation Efficiency and Controlled Release of Hydrophilic Drug. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Prabaharan, M.; Mano, J.F. Chitosan-based particles as controlled drug delivery systems. Drug Deliv. 2005, 12, 41–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sinha, V.R.; Singla, A.K.; Wadhawan, S.; Kaushik, R.; Kumria, R.; Bansal, K.; Dhawan, S. Chitosan microspheres as a potential carrier for drugs. Int. J. Pharm. 2004, 274, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bueter, C.L.; Lee, C.K.; Wang, J.P.; Ostroff, G.R.; Specht, C.A.; Levitz, S.M. Spectrum and mechanisms of inflammasome activation by chitosan. J. Immunol. 2014, 192, 5943–5951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, D.; Jones, K.S. Effect of alginate on innate immune activation of macrophages. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2009, 90, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zhao, X.; Wang, X.; Lou, T. Preparation of fibrous chitosan/sodium alginate composite foams for the adsorption of cationic and anionic dyes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 403, 124054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tiwari, G.; Tiwari, R.; Sriwastawa, B.; Bhati, L.; Pandey, S.; Pandey, P.; Bannerjee, S.K. Drug delivery systems: An updated review. Int. J. Pharm. Investig. 2012, 2, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Schmaljohann, D. Thermo- and pH-responsive polymers in drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2006, 58, 1655–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xie, J.; Jiang, J.; Davoodi, P.; Srinivasan, M.P.; Wang, C.H. Electrohydrodynamic atomization: A two-decade effort to produce and process micro-/nanoparticulate materials. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2015, 125, 32–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Phuong Ta, L.; Bujna, E.; Kun, S.; Charalampopoulos, D.; Khutoryanskiy, V.V. Electrosprayed mucoadhesive alginate-chitosan microcapsules for gastrointestinal delivery of probiotics. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 597, 120342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, J.; Jansen, J.A.; Yang, F. Electrospraying: Possibilities and Challenges of Engineering Carriers for Biomedical Applications-A Mini Review. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xu, Y.; Hanna, M.A. Electrospray encapsulation of water-soluble protein with polylactide. Effects of formulations on morphology, encapsulation efficiency and release profile of particles. Int. J. Pharm. 2006, 320, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gamboa, A.; Araujo, V.; Caro, N.; Gotteland, M.; Abugoch, L.; Tapia, C. Spray Freeze-Drying as an Alternative to the Ionic Gelation Method to Produce Chitosan and Alginate Nano-Particles Targeted to the Colon. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 104, 4373–4385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, Y.; Wei, W.; Lv, P.; Wang, L.; Ma, G. Preparation and evaluation of alginate-chitosan microspheres for oral delivery of insulin. Eur J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2011, 77, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Unagolla, J.M.; Jayasuriya, A.C. Drug transport mechanisms and in vitro release kinetics of vancomycin encapsulated chitosan-alginate polyelectrolyte microparticles as a controlled drug delivery system. Eur J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 114, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ahmed, T.A.; Aljaeid, B.M. Preparation, characterization, and potential application of chitosan, chitosan derivatives, and chitosan metal nanoparticles in pharmaceutical drug delivery. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2016, 10, 483–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tanhaei, A.; Mohammadi, M.; Hamishehkar, H.; Hamblin, M.R. Electrospraying as a novel method of particle engineering for drug delivery vehicles. J. Control. Release 2021, 330, 851–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Suksamran, T.; Opanasopit, P.; Rojanarata, T.; Ngawhirunpat, T.; Ruktanonchai, U.; Supaphol, P. Biodegradable alginate microparticles developed by electrohydrodynamic spraying techniques for oral delivery of protein. J. Microencapsul. 2009, 26, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mi, F.L.; Wong, T.B.; Shyu, S.S. Sustained-release of oxytetracycline from chitosan microspheres prepared by interfacial acylation and spray hardening methods. J. Microencapsul. 1997, 14, 577–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xing, L.; Sun, J.; Tan, H.; Yuan, G.; Li, J.; Jia, Y.; Xiong, D.; Chen, G.; Lai, J.; Ling, Z.; et al. Covalently polysaccharide-based alginate/chitosan hydrogel embedded alginate microspheres for BSA encapsulation and soft tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 127, 340–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ji, R.; Wu, J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, T.; Zhang, X.; Shao, L.; Chen, D.; Wang, J. Extending Viability of Bifidobacterium longum in Chitosan-Coated Alginate Microcapsules Using Emulsification and Internal Gelation Encapsulation Technology. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yeung, T.W.; Ucok, E.F.; Tiani, K.A.; McClements, D.J.; Sela, D.A. Microencapsulation in Alginate and Chitosan Microgels to Enhance Viability of Bifidobacterium longum for Oral Delivery. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gibson, N.; Shenderova, O.; Luo, T.; Moseenkov, S.; Bondar, V.; Puzyr, A.; Purtov, K.; Fitzgerald, Z.; Brenner, D. Colloidal stability of modified nanodiamond particles. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2009, 18, 620–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Azevedo, M.A.; Bourbon, A.I.; Vicente, A.A.; Cerqueira, M.A. Alginate/chitosan nanoparticles for encapsulation and controlled release of vitamin B2. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 71, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bagre, A.P.; Jain, K.; Jain, N.K. Alginate coated chitosan core shell nanoparticles for oral delivery of enoxaparin: In vitro and in vivo assessment. Int. J. Pharm. 2013, 456, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, X.; Kong, X.; Shi, S.; Zheng, X.; Guo, G.; Wei, Y.; Qian, Z. Preparation of alginate coated chitosan microparticles for vaccine delivery. BMC Biotechnol. 2008, 8, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Devi, G.V.Y.; Prabhu, A.; Anil, S.; Venkatesan, J. Preparation and characterization of dexamethasone loaded sodium alginate-graphene oxide microspheres for bone tissue engineering. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2021, 64, 102624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, S.; Fan, H.; Yi, C.; Li, Y.; Yang, K.; Liu, S.; Cheng, Z.; Sun, J. Assembly encapsulation of BSA and CCCH-ZAP in the sodium alginate/atractylodis macrocephalae system. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 12600–12606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Jiao, G.; Pan, Y.; Wang, C.; Li, Z.; Li, Z.; Guo, R. A bridging SF/Alg composite scaffold loaded NGF for spinal cord injury repair. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2017, 76, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sharif, A.; Khorasani, M.; Shemirani, F. Nanocomposite bead (NCB) based on bio-polymer alginate caged magnetic graphene oxide synthesized for adsorption and preconcentration of lead (II) and copper (II) ions from urine, saliva and water samples. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2018, 28, 2375–2387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tang, Q.; Li, N.; Lu, Q.; Wang, X.; Zhu, Y. Study on Preparation and Separation and Adsorption Performance of Knitted Tube Composite beta-Cyclodextrin/Chitosan Porous Membrane. Polymers 2019, 11, 1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rathinam, K.; Kou, X.; Hobby, R.; Panglisch, S. Sustainable Development of Magnetic Chitosan Core-Shell Network for the Removal of Organic Dyes from Aqueous Solutions. Materials 2021, 14, 7701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Baysal, K.; Aroguz, A.Z.; Adiguzel, Z.; Baysal, B.M. Chitosan/alginate crosslinked hydrogels: Preparation, characterization and application for cell growth purposes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 59, 342–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rus, I.; Tertiș, M.; Paşcalău, V.; Pavel, C.; Melean, B.; Suciu, M.; Moldovan, C.; Topală, T.; Popa, C.; Săndulescu, R. Simple and fast analytical method for the evaluation of the encapsulation and release profile of doxorubicin from drug delivery systems. Farmacia 2021, 69, 670–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kavitha, K.; Sutha, S.; Prabhu, M.; Rajendran, V.; Jayakumar, T. In situ synthesized novel biocompatible titania-chitosan nanocomposites with high surface area and antibacterial activity. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 93, 731–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Anaya-Esparza, L.M.; Ruvalcaba-Gomez, J.M.; Maytorena-Verdugo, C.I.; Gonzalez-Silva, N.; Romero-Toledo, R.; Aguilera-Aguirre, S.; Perez-Larios, A.; Montalvo-Gonzalez, A.E. Chitosan-TiO2: A Versatile Hybrid Composite. Materials 2020, 13, 811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Huang, J.; Xie, H.; Ye, H.; Xie, T.; Lin, Y.; Gong, J.; Jiang, C.; Wu, Y.; Liu, S.; Cui, Y.; et al. Effect of carboxyethylation degree on the adsorption capacity of Cu(II) by N-(2-carboxyethyl)chitosan from squid pens. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 138, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kuczajowska-Zadrożna, M.; Filipkowska, U.; Jóźwiak, T. Adsorption of Cu (II) and Cd (II) from aqueous solutions by chitosan immobilized in alginate beads. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 103878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Jeong, S.H.; Lee, J.E.; Jin, S.H.; Ko, Y.; Park, J.B. Effects of Asiasari radix on the morphology and viability of mesenchymal stem cells derived from the gingiva. Mol. Med. Rep. 2014, 10, 3315–3319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Gupta, S.; Jain, A.; Chakraborty, M.; Sahni, J.K.; Ali, J.; Dang, S. Oral delivery of therapeutic proteins and peptides: A review on recent developments. Drug Deliv. 2013, 20, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Guo, J.; Sun, X.; Yin, H.; Wang, T.; Li, Y.; Zhou, C.; Zhou, H.; He, S.; Cong, H. Chitosan Microsphere Used as an Effective System to Deliver a Linked Antigenic Peptides Vaccine Protect Mice Against Acute and Chronic Toxoplasmosis. Front. Cell Infect. MicroBiol. 2018, 8, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. AbdelAllah, N.H.; Abdeltawab, N.F.; Boseila, A.A.; Amin, M.A. Chitosan and Sodium Alginate Combinations Are Alternative, Efficient, and Safe Natural Adjuvant Systems for Hepatitis B Vaccine in Mouse Model. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2016, 2016, 7659684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Efentakis, M.; Buckton, G. The effect of erosion and swelling on the dissolution of theophylline from low and high viscosity sodium alginate matrices. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2002, 7, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Nikoo, A.M.; Kadkhodaee, R.; Ghorani, B.; Razzaq, H.; Tucker, N. Electrospray-assisted encapsulation of caffeine in alginate microhydrogels. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 116, 208–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Han, F.Y.; Thurecht, K.J.; Lam, A.L.; Whittaker, A.K.; Smith, M.T. Novel polymeric bioerodable microparticles for prolonged-release intrathecal delivery of analgesic agents for relief of intractable cancer-related pain. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 104, 2334–2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kohane, D.S.; Lipp, M.; Kinney, R.C.; Anthony, D.C.; Louis, D.N.; Lotan, N.; Langer, R. Biocompatibility of lipid-protein-sugar particles containing bupivacaine in the epineurium. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2002, 59, 450–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Han, F.Y.; Thurecht, K.J.; Whittaker, A.K.; Smith, M.T. Bioerodable PLGA-Based Microparticles for Producing Sustained-Release Drug Formulations and Strategies for Improving Drug Loading. Front. Pharmacol. 2016, 7, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Lee, S.H.; Zhang, Z.; Feng, S.S. Nanoparticles of poly(lactide)-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol succinate (PLA-TPGS) copolymers for protein drug delivery. Biomaterials 2007, 28, 2041–2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Amin, M.K.; Boateng, J.S. Enhancing Stability and Mucoadhesive Properties of Chitosan Nanoparticles by Surface Modification with Sodium Alginate and Polyethylene Glycol for Potential Oral Mucosa Vaccine Delivery. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Laemmli, U.K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970, 227, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. BioChem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zheng, C.; Liang, W. A one-step modified method to reduce the burst initial release from PLGA microspheres. Drug Deliv. 2010, 17, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Shahani, K.; Panyam, J. Highly loaded, sustained-release microparticles of curcumin for chemoprevention. J. Pharm. Sci. 2011, 100, 2599–2609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Schneider, C.A.; Rasband, W.S.; Eliceiri, K.W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wu, R.G.; Yang, C.S.; Wang, P.C.; Tseng, F.G. Nanostructured pillars based on vertically aligned carbon nanotubes as the stationary phase in micro-CEC. Electrophoresis 2009, 30, 2025–2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zohri, M.; Nomani, A.; Gazori, T.; Haririan, I.; Mirdamadi, S.S.; Sadjadi, S.K.; Ehsani, M.R. Characterization of chitosan/alginate self-assembled nanoparticles as a protein carrier. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2011, 32, 576–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Borges, O.; Borchard, G.; Verhoef, J.C.; de Sousa, A.; Junginger, H.E. Preparation of coated nanoparticles for a new mucosal vaccine delivery system. Int. J. Pharm. 2005, 299, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Chao, J.C.; Chiang, S.W.; Wang, C.C.; Tsai, Y.H.; Wu, M.S. Hot water-extracted Lycium barbarum and Rehmannia glutinosa inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. World J. Gastroenterol. 2006, 12, 4478–4484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijms 23 09959 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Schematic representation of the electrospraying setup and preparation of the chitosan-coated alginate MPs containing pIL-1β. A solution of sodium alginate containing recombinant pIL-1β protein was electrosprayed into CaCl2 solution and then pIL-1β/ALG MPs were formed. As a next step, the chitosan solution was combined with pIL-1β/ALG MPs in order to obtain pIL-1β/ALG/CHI MPs. In this study, a voltage of 12 kV, a flow rate of 0.1 mL/h, and a needle-to-collector distance of 20 cm were used. A description of the experimental details is provided in Section 3.2, Section 3.3, and Section 3.5.
Scheme 1. Schematic representation of the electrospraying setup and preparation of the chitosan-coated alginate MPs containing pIL-1β. A solution of sodium alginate containing recombinant pIL-1β protein was electrosprayed into CaCl2 solution and then pIL-1β/ALG MPs were formed. As a next step, the chitosan solution was combined with pIL-1β/ALG MPs in order to obtain pIL-1β/ALG/CHI MPs. In this study, a voltage of 12 kV, a flow rate of 0.1 mL/h, and a needle-to-collector distance of 20 cm were used. A description of the experimental details is provided in Section 3.2, Section 3.3, and Section 3.5.
Ijms 23 09959 sch001
Ijms 23 09959 g001 550
Figure 1. Purification of recombinant porcine interleukin 1-β (pIL-1β). The SDS–PAGE gel (15% (w/v) acrylamide) was stained with Coomassie blue. Lane 1, pIL-1β (10 µg); lane M, electrophoretic molecular mass markers.
Figure 1. Purification of recombinant porcine interleukin 1-β (pIL-1β). The SDS–PAGE gel (15% (w/v) acrylamide) was stained with Coomassie blue. Lane 1, pIL-1β (10 µg); lane M, electrophoretic molecular mass markers.
Ijms 23 09959 g001
Ijms 23 09959 g002 550
Figure 2. Encapsulation efficiency of bovine serum albumin (BSA)-loaded microparticles (MPs) at different concentrations of alginate.
Figure 2. Encapsulation efficiency of bovine serum albumin (BSA)-loaded microparticles (MPs) at different concentrations of alginate.
Ijms 23 09959 g002
Ijms 23 09959 g003 550
Figure 3. Optical microscopy (a,b) and scanning electron microscopy (c,d) of MPs. (a,c) Electrosprayed alginate MPs loaded with BSA. (b,d) BSA-loaded alginate MPs coated with chitosan. Scanning electron microscopy of (c) BSA/ALG/MPs with magnification 2000×; (d) BSA/ALG/CHI MPs with magnification 1500×; white scale bar: 10 μm. The white arrows indicate visible layers on the surface of alginate MPs.
Figure 3. Optical microscopy (a,b) and scanning electron microscopy (c,d) of MPs. (a,c) Electrosprayed alginate MPs loaded with BSA. (b,d) BSA-loaded alginate MPs coated with chitosan. Scanning electron microscopy of (c) BSA/ALG/MPs with magnification 2000×; (d) BSA/ALG/CHI MPs with magnification 1500×; white scale bar: 10 μm. The white arrows indicate visible layers on the surface of alginate MPs.
Ijms 23 09959 g003
Ijms 23 09959 g004 550
Figure 4. Zeta potential measurements for BSA-loaded alginate MPs (BSA/ALG MPs, black) and chitosan-coated BSA/ALG MPs (BSA/ALG/CHI MPs, red).
Figure 4. Zeta potential measurements for BSA-loaded alginate MPs (BSA/ALG MPs, black) and chitosan-coated BSA/ALG MPs (BSA/ALG/CHI MPs, red).
Ijms 23 09959 g004
Ijms 23 09959 g005 550
Figure 5. Fourier transform infrared spectra of BSA/ALG MPs (a) and BSA/ALG/CHI MPs (b).
Figure 5. Fourier transform infrared spectra of BSA/ALG MPs (a) and BSA/ALG/CHI MPs (b).
Ijms 23 09959 g005
Ijms 23 09959 g006 550
Figure 6. Cytotoxicity of pIL-1β, pIL-1β/ALG MPs, and pIL-1β/ALG/CHI MPs upon incubation with ST cells (a) or PK-15 cells (b). Negative controls included untreated ST cells and PK-15 cells.
Figure 6. Cytotoxicity of pIL-1β, pIL-1β/ALG MPs, and pIL-1β/ALG/CHI MPs upon incubation with ST cells (a) or PK-15 cells (b). Negative controls included untreated ST cells and PK-15 cells.
Ijms 23 09959 g006
Ijms 23 09959 g007 550
Figure 7. Effects of alginate, chitosan, CaCl2, ALG/CHI MPs, pIL-1β, and pIL-1β/ALG/CHI MPs on IL-6 abundance in lysates of the porcine fibroblast line ST. ST cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s medium (Control) or 10 ng/mL of alginate, chitosan, CaCl2, ALG/CHI MPs, pIL-1β, or pIL-1β/ALG/CHI MPs for 8 h. Cells were lysed, and IL-6 abundance was measured using a porcine-specific ELISA. Data represent the mean ± standard deviation of triplicate determinations. * p < 0.05, pIL-1β vs. pIL-1β/CHI/ALG MPs; ** p < 0.01, pIL-1β vs. control; *** p < 0.001, pIL-1β/CHI/ALG MPs vs. control.
Figure 7. Effects of alginate, chitosan, CaCl2, ALG/CHI MPs, pIL-1β, and pIL-1β/ALG/CHI MPs on IL-6 abundance in lysates of the porcine fibroblast line ST. ST cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s medium (Control) or 10 ng/mL of alginate, chitosan, CaCl2, ALG/CHI MPs, pIL-1β, or pIL-1β/ALG/CHI MPs for 8 h. Cells were lysed, and IL-6 abundance was measured using a porcine-specific ELISA. Data represent the mean ± standard deviation of triplicate determinations. * p < 0.05, pIL-1β vs. pIL-1β/CHI/ALG MPs; ** p < 0.01, pIL-1β vs. control; *** p < 0.001, pIL-1β/CHI/ALG MPs vs. control.
Ijms 23 09959 g007
Ijms 23 09959 g008 550
Figure 8. Cumulative release of pIL-1β from alginate MPs (■) and chitosan-coated alginate MPs (□) in PBS at pH 7.4. Data represent the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
Figure 8. Cumulative release of pIL-1β from alginate MPs (■) and chitosan-coated alginate MPs (□) in PBS at pH 7.4. Data represent the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
Ijms 23 09959 g008
Ijms 23 09959 g009 550
Figure 9. SDS–PAGE analysis of in vitro release assays. After 1 (lanes 2 and 3) and 6 (lanes 4 and 5) days, pIL-1β was released from alginate MPs (lanes 2 and 4) and chitosan-coated alginate MPs (lanes 3 and 5) compared to 5 µg of pure pIL-1β (lane 1). Lane M, electrophoretic molecular mass markers. The arrow indicates the pIL-1β.
Figure 9. SDS–PAGE analysis of in vitro release assays. After 1 (lanes 2 and 3) and 6 (lanes 4 and 5) days, pIL-1β was released from alginate MPs (lanes 2 and 4) and chitosan-coated alginate MPs (lanes 3 and 5) compared to 5 µg of pure pIL-1β (lane 1). Lane M, electrophoretic molecular mass markers. The arrow indicates the pIL-1β.
Ijms 23 09959 g009
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ho, W.-X.; Chen, W.-T.; Lien, C.-H.; Yang, H.-Y.; Chen, K.-H.; Wei, Y.-F.; Wang, M.-H.; Ko, I.-T.; Tseng, F.-G.; Yin, H.-S. Physical, Chemical, and Biological Properties of Chitosan-Coated Alginate Microparticles Loaded with Porcine Interleukin-1β: A Potential Protein Adjuvant Delivery System. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9959. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23179959

AMA Style

Ho W-X, Chen W-T, Lien C-H, Yang H-Y, Chen K-H, Wei Y-F, Wang M-H, Ko I-T, Tseng F-G, Yin H-S. Physical, Chemical, and Biological Properties of Chitosan-Coated Alginate Microparticles Loaded with Porcine Interleukin-1β: A Potential Protein Adjuvant Delivery System. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(17):9959. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23179959

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ho, Wan-Xuan, Wen-Ting Chen, Chih-Hsuan Lien, Hsin-Yu Yang, Kuan-Hung Chen, Yu-Fan Wei, Meng-Han Wang, I-Ting Ko, Fan-Gang Tseng, and Hsien-Sheng Yin. 2022. "Physical, Chemical, and Biological Properties of Chitosan-Coated Alginate Microparticles Loaded with Porcine Interleukin-1β: A Potential Protein Adjuvant Delivery System" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 17: 9959. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23179959

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop