Next Article in Journal
Evolutionary Origins of Metabolic Reprogramming in Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Jatrorrhizine Improves Endothelial Function in Diabetes and Obesity through Suppression of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Metabolomics-Driven Mining of Metabolite Resources: Applications and Prospects for Improving Vegetable Crops

1
ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Jakhini, Shahanshahpur, Varanasi 221305, India
2
Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), Krishi Bhawan, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi 110001, India
3
ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, Centre for Agricultural Bioinformatics, Library Avenue, Pusa, New Delhi 110012, India
4
Biorefining and Advanced Materials Research Centre, Scotland’s Rural College, Kings Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
5
Department of Mycology and Plant Pathology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(20), 12062; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms232012062
Submission received: 2 August 2022 / Revised: 13 September 2022 / Accepted: 23 September 2022 / Published: 11 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)

Abstract

:
Vegetable crops possess a prominent nutri-metabolite pool that not only contributes to the crop performance in the fields, but also offers nutritional security for humans. In the pursuit of identifying, quantifying and functionally characterizing the cellular metabolome pool, biomolecule separation technologies, data acquisition platforms, chemical libraries, bioinformatics tools, databases and visualization techniques have come to play significant role. High-throughput metabolomics unravels structurally diverse nutrition-rich metabolites and their entangled interactions in vegetable plants. It has helped to link identified phytometabolites with unique phenotypic traits, nutri-functional characters, defense mechanisms and crop productivity. In this study, we explore mining diverse metabolites, localizing cellular metabolic pathways, classifying functional biomolecules and establishing linkages between metabolic fluxes and genomic regulations, using comprehensive metabolomics deciphers of the plant’s performance in the environment. We discuss exemplary reports covering the implications of metabolomics, addressing metabolic changes in vegetable plants during crop domestication, stage-dependent growth, fruit development, nutri-metabolic capabilities, climatic impacts, plant-microbe-pest interactions and anthropogenic activities. Efforts leading to identify biomarker metabolites, candidate proteins and the genes responsible for plant health, defense mechanisms and nutri-rich crop produce are documented. With the insights on metabolite-QTL (mQTL) driven genetic architecture, molecular breeding in vegetable crops can be revolutionized for developing better nutritional capabilities, improved tolerance against diseases/pests and enhanced climate resilience in plants.

1. Introduction

Metabolites, especially the small molecules, are functional readouts of cellular reactions and are essential for biological processes in all life forms on the earth. They reflect visible traits, characters, and marked changes correlated with the phenotypic parameters of the organisms and maintain them under diverse environmental and pathophysiological conditions. The emergence of organism specific highly transitory and diverse chemical inventories of >200,000 primary and secondary compounds are linked with particular biological activities under adverse environmental conditions [1]. Their importance is reflected in plant-based foods that are reported to contain almost 25,000 different metabolites, of which nearly 7000 are volatile compounds [2]. Whether it may be plant and human cells, or those of unseen tiny microorganisms, it all represents vast cell factories that produce a huge array of metabolites to perform their biological functions [3]. Even a single cell is a biological factory in which thousands of chemical reactions are going on at a given point of time, leading to the biosynthesis of numerous intermediates and the end products. Many of these small molecules have a very short life but help in producing the majority of stable molecules that are the key players for biological functionalities meant for growth and development, reproduction, bioenergetics, defense against stresses and the sustenance of life. The products of biological reactions in the cells, as represented by various metabolic networks, shape the phenotypic characteristics of the organisms [4] and changes in the content or composition of metabolites are reflected by the characteristic traits [5].
In the present time, when malnutrition in the human population is continuously increasing worldwide, vegetable crops have emerged as a prominent source of nutritional power with a high content of mineral nutrients, vitamins, proteins, amino acids, carbohydrates, fibers, phenolics, flavonoids and other secondary metabolites [6]. Growing vegetables has not only provided nutritional security [7] but also livelihood options to the masses of people in rural areas [8]. These all-season crops have remained worth-proven for sustaining food systems and enhancing economic self-reliance in the rural population, especially in village women and youth in the tough times of the COVID-19 pandemic, and have supported families of farming communities worldwide [9]. As crop plants, vegetables have a tremendous diversity of secondary chemical molecules [10], which confer valued functions to these commercial agricultural commodities [11]. Functional phytometabolites derived from vegetable sources have been considered a nutritional powerhouse for human health [12]. Therefore, exploring a vast majority of vegetable plants, among as many as 10,000 plant species defined as vegetables [13] for their metabolite profile, is a profound task with multiple benefits. The cutting-edge technologically advanced metabolomics platforms for metabolite identification, functional characterization, library generation, comparative analysis and data resources have made the exploration of vegetable bioactive metabolites an easy and less time-consuming operation.

2. Vegetable Plants as Prominent Metabolite Resources

In the human diet, vegetables are integral constituents to enrich defense-activating, immunity-boosting and health promoting biomolecules [14]. Carotenoids, polyphenolics, flavonoids, sterols, phenolic acids, glucosinolates, glycosides and dietary fibers from vegetables are the risk-reducing factors against diseases and stresses [15]. Phytometabolites, having bioactive antimutagenic, antimicrobial, antiviral, antidiuretic, antidiabetic, cytotoxic and antioxidant mechanisms, have been isolated and identified from lettuce, asparagus, broccoli, spinach, tomato, chili, mustard, turnip, Brussel sprouts and cauliflower [16]. The content and bioactivity level of active molecules in the tissues of vegetable plants depends on crop species, cultivars, agronomic practices, agro-climatic impacts, and post-harvest management [17]. Since the consumption of health foods with high nutraceutical values are majorly linked with prevention and avoidance of major degenerative and deadly diseases, vegetables and fruits with functionally diverse bioactive metabolites are the obvious choice in the diet of the society. High throughput methods have made the comprehensive identification and functional characterization of metabolites from vegetable plants more efficient, easy, integrative and cost-effective [18].
The complex evolutionary diversification pattern of crop plants is reflected in their metabolic diversity [19]. Diversified bioactive functions associated with the chemical diversity in vegetables provide commercial edge to these crop commodities [11]. Tomatoes with rich antioxidant potential are among the most nutritious crops having multi-minerals, proteins, essential amino acids, carbohydrates, vitamins, fatty acids, phytosterols, carotenoids, polyphenolics and flavonoids as reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavengers and reducers of oxidative damage [20]. Growth stage-dependent differential metabolic regulation of free, bound and conjugated polyphenolic metabolite signatures was observed in different tissue-types of tomato, eggplant and pepper [21]. Caffeic, ferulic, chlorogenic and p-coumaric acids and flavonoids naringenin, catechin, kaempeferol, quercetin and rutin in tomato varieties and their commercial by-products confer antioxidant properties [22]. Other phenolics like benzoic, 4-hydroxybenzoic and syringic acids impart varied defense roles to tomato against biotic interactions [23]. Marked changes happened in polyphenolics content of ripening tomato fruits cultivated under organic and conventional agronomic practices [24].
Eggplants (Solanum melongena) hold high nutritive values due to vitamins, polyphenolics, flavonoids and anthocyanins as free-radical and superoxide scavenging antioxidant biomolecules [25]. Although excessive domestication caused a reduction in phenolic constituents in eggplant [26], metabolic constituents like carbohydrates, vitamins, ascorbic acid, organic acids etc., are largely cultivation dependent [27]. From the fruits of eggplant, malonated caffeoylquinic acid and 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid derivatives [28] and from the peels, antioxidant nasunin, a derivative of delphinidin anthocyanin [29], delphinidin-3-rutinoside and delphinidin-3-rutinoside-5-glucoside [30], delphinidin-3-(caffeoylrutinoside)-5-glucoside and petunidin-3-(p-coumaroylrutinoside)-5-glucoside [31] were isolated and identified. These bioactive compounds contribute to the antioxidant properties, color, morpho-physiological traits and the phenotypic characters of eggplant. Fruits of the Capsicum species (pepper) are a good source of secondary metabolites quercetin 3,7-di-O-α-l-rhamnopyranoside and narigenin-7-O-β-d-(3-p-coumaroyl)-glucopyranoside [32]. The high content of carbohydrates, organic acids (ascorbic, citric, malic, quinic, succinic, fumaric and oxalic acids), capsaicinoids (capsaicin, dihydrocapsaicin, nordihydrocapsaicin, homocapsaicin, homodihydrocapsaicin), carotenoids, flavonoids, luteolin and vitamins (E, C and A) that add to the antimicrobial, antiseptic, anticancer, counterirritant, appetite stimulator, immunomodulator and antioxidant properties [33] were reported from the fruits of Capsicum annuum L., C. chinense Jacq. and C. baccatum L. [34]. The world’s hottest chili from the northeast region of India, called Naga King (Capsicum chinense Jacq), possesses unique pungent capsaicinoid in red fruits, along with amino acids, palmitic, stearic and α-linolenic acid and a high content of linoleic acid in the seeds [35]. Phenotypic functions of mature chili fruits were influenced by the content of ascorbic acid, capsaicinoids and flavone aglycone [36] and color intensity traits are impacted by carotenoid biosynthesis and sequestration [37]. Among the most important causal conditions for secondary chemical diversification in chili are the ecological succession and adaptive crop domestication that benefit plants against stresses.
Brassica plants are rich in flavonol-O-glycosides quercetin, kaempeferol and isorhamnetin, anthocyanins pelargonidin, cyanidin, delphinidin, peonidin, ptunidin and malvidin and phenolic acids hydroxycinnamic, sinapic, p-coumaric and ferulic acids [38]. Brassicaceae vegetables (cabbage, cauliflower, broccoli, radish, cherry radish, watercress and Brussel sprouts) biosynthesize volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from various metabolic pathways like fatty acid metabolism, methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway and glucosinolate (GLS) [39]. From Brassica rapa, 38 bioactive metabolites including tocopherols, sterols, carotenoids, glucosinolates and policosanols [40], and from nine other Brassicaceae plants 28 metabolites have been identified [41]. In Cucurbitaceae plants (cucumbers, gourds and melons) cucurbitacins A, B, C, D and E [42], along with the phytoalexin C-glycosyl flavonoid [43] and other antioxidant and free radical scavenging compounds, have been identified. Additionally, a significant shift in metabolite content was observed during the developmental stages of stylar, intermediate and peduncular segments in cucumber plants [44]. Overall, vegetable plants, especially the fruits, are a rich pool of secondary metabolites having diversified metabolic origin and multipronged functional properties, which not only benefit the host plants but become beneficial for the human beings too.

3. Defining Metabolites, Metabolome and Metabolomics

Plant metabolites are the ultimate bio-molecular products of multiple pharmaco-physiological and biochemical functions that characteristically represent phenological traits of the organisms. These diverse groups of phytometabolites are regularly being produced within cells in response to the climatic perturbations, to represent strategic tolerance and survival in organisms. The plant-specialized primary and secondary compounds help organisms to regulate their energy metabolism, photosynthesis and respiration, signal recognition, totipotency and defense mechanisms to improve their fitness under biotic challenges and adverse environments. Therefore, the real time identification of the cellular metabolites and characterization of their metabolic networks and biosynthetic routes becomes essential. It is also pertinent to link metabolites and their functional attributes with the proteins and genes responsible for their biosynthesis in metabolic biosynthetic pathways.
Metabolome represents a qualitative and quantitative collection of an entire set of small molecule low-molecular weight metabolites essential for cell growth, maintenance and normal biological functions [44]. Boththe composition of biogenic VOCs, the volatilome [45] and non-volatile metabolites constitute global metabolome of the organisms [46]. Catalyzed by the enzymes regulated by the proteomes, the metabolites are synthesized in the cells in continuum, but are subject to change in a time dependent manner to determine the metabolic functions of the organisms [47]. Active cell metabolome affects cellular physiology, which further modulates various omics-level changes that affect genomic, epi-genomic, transcripomic and proteomic levels [48]. The dynamics of chemical complexity in cellularly processes is reflected in the biological functions and [49] the genetic makeup of the organisms [48].
Metabolome composition can be induced by the environmental stressors (light, humidity, temperature, salt, drought or water-excess), biotic factors (pathogens/pests/beneficial microorganisms), the exogenous application of chemicals and the contamination of soil, water and fertilizers [50]. A global unbiased extraction, separation, identification and functional characterization of a whole set of metabolites from cells is crucial [51,52]. Modern methods of ultrasonic extraction [53], membrane separation and molecular distillation [54] have facilitated the extraction of metabolite pools of plant cells. Bioassay (bioactivity)-guided chromatographic separation techniques involving thin layer chromatography (TLC), high performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) have widely been employed in the process standardization, method development, detection and the characterization of bioactive metabolites [55].
The technique of studying structural identity, quantity and the characters of metabolites within the whole metabolome is ‘metabolomics’ [44]. The metabolomic interventions offer opportunities to fingerprint key chemical footprints of the cells with high sensitivity, accuracy and preciseness [56,57,58] either in a targeted way [44] or in nontargeted (unbiased) manner [59] (Figure 1). Being viewed as complementary to transcriptomics and proteomics [60], plant metabolomics has versatile implications in metabolome profiling, metabolic pathway dissection, population genetic interpretation, species discrimination and comprehensive analysis [61]. To unravel plant single cell metabolism by exploring single-cell-metabolome, state-of-the-art spatially resolved metabolomics technologies are extremely helpful [62]. The direct relevance and application of the discipline connects with the experiments in biology, nutrition, stress physiology, analytical chemistry, biochemistry, medical sciences, genetics, plant breeding, plant and animal pathology, biotechnology, diagnostics, microbiology and food science [63,64] in a comprehensive workflow (Figure 2).
Comparative metabolomics has become a widely applied and robust tool in cross-boundary applications [65] to discover active drivers of the biological processes under stress conditions. Qualitative and quantitative metabolomics is helpful to understand fundamental behavior of plant phenotypic responses in tripartite interactions in relation to the development, physiology, tissue identity, resistance and tolerance against biotic and abiotic factors [66]. With stringent unsupervised statistical methods, principal component analysis (PCA) approaches [67] and bioinformatics tools, the study discloses complex, intricate and interactive nature of metabolic networks associated with the inherent metabolic changes in biological systems [68] (Figure 3). Tripartite interactions in plants display the most natural ping-pong mechanisms guided by intrinsic chemical factories through which the cellular machinery overcomes the impact of environmental stressors [50].
Gene expression and proteomic analyses do not reflect a cumulative status of biochemical happenings within a cell [69]. Additionally, the studies on individual enzymes of the metabolic pathways, the means by which enzyme networks control metabolite concentrations and fluxes within the cells in an integrated manner remains less understood [70]. Likewise, because of the limitations, proteome at a given point of time may not be completely predicted from the transcriptome due to specific differences in regulatory mechanisms [71]. The study of global metabolome is therefore down the line from the gene and protein functions, and reflects more closely the ever-changing activities and functional mechanisms within the cells at a given point of time [44,72].

4. Application of Metabolomics in Vegetable Crops

The comprehensive metabolomic profiling of vegetable crops has yielded large datasets of metabolites, complex biological pathways and hidden regulatory networks linked with distinguished phenotypic traits [73]. The mapping of different classes of metabolites in vegetable plants, localizing distinct cellular metabolic pathways, classifying the functional performance of metabolite molecules and establishing linkages between metabolic fluxes and genomic and proteomic regulations, can yield targeted results through comprehensive metabolomic experiments that address the plant’s performance in the environment [74]. The majority of work excerpts are presented in Table 1. As key drivers of phenotypic expressions in the organisms, metabolites are essential biomarkers for selective metabolic-quantitative trait loci (mQTL), which links metabolomes with the genomes [57]. Information on metabolite identity and metabolic fluxes in the cells was used to reveal connections between physiological conditions under stresses and proteins/genes to advance metabolomics-driven breeding programs by utilizing mQTLs and metabolome wide genome association studies (mGWAS) [75,76]. These insights can revolutionize molecular breeding in vegetable plants for better nutritional capabilities, improved adoption against diseases/pests and enhanced climate resilience in crops [77].

4.1. Vegetable Crop Domestication Studies

Crop domestication processes meant for selecting plants artificially to improve their suitability for human food have profound impacts on plant interactions with their natural inhabitant pests and predators [78]. Since the inception of the domestication processes, the majority of vegetable crops have undergone alterations in their metabolome profile because of the selection pressure [79]. The shaping of the crop metabolism during the domestication processes can be marked at the metabolome level to identify new targets for varietal development through designer metabolic engineering [80]. Tomato has undergone worldwide domestication from wild species through intensive breeding and revealed the evolutionary consequences of improvement to yield high value crop for human consumption and commercial implication [81]. Metabolomic studies clubbed with genomic and transcriptomic analysis indicated that the intensive breeding has changed the global metabolome of tomato fruits [82]. An analysis of natural variation in domesticated tomato (S. lycopersicum) and wild species (S. pimpinellifolium, S. peruvianum, S. habrochaites, S. pennellii, S. cheesmaniae, S. chmielewskii and S. neorickii) using GC-MS and LC-MS revealed pathway structure and metabolic regulation of polyphenolics in fruits and leaves [83]. The selection of the genes associated with the larger fruit size for breeding purposes has changed the associated metabolome profile of the fruits. Making tomatoes phenotypically pink modifies hundreds of metabolites in fruits [82]. The introgression of resistance genes from the wild species has made unexpected alterations in the metabolic profile and was found linked to the fruit-mass altered metabolites [84]. Thus, metabolomics can trace out the manipulated targets of metabolic variations linked to phenotypic and genotypic characters in tomato and other vegetable plants undergoing domestication processes.

4.2. Monitoring Development-Dependent Metabolic Changes

Metabolomic studies on the developmental stages (vegetative, flowering or fruiting) of plants, organs (tissue-dependent growth) or fruits (unripened or have registered marked metabolic shifts linked with varieties, agronomic factors and growth conditions [85,86] (Table 1). The primary metabolite profiling of tomato fruits by combined GC- and LC-MS platforms identified 70 compounds including organic acids, sugars, sugar alcohols, phosphorylated and lipophilic compounds and amino acids [87]. Dry and imbibed tomato seeds analyzed under different development stages showed increased metabolic flux as analyzed by GC-TOF/MS [88]. Quality variables in tomato varieties were analyzed using NMR to enhance economic value to the crop [89]. Light intensity can modulate biochemical pathways and metabolic changes in tomato to impact fruit ripening. LC-MS and GC-MS based metabolomics recorded 554 compounds and revealed that the compounds of health benefits like carotenoids, flavonoids, tocopherols and phenolic acids in the fruits accumulated faster under white light as compared to darkness [90]. A blue light exposure of fruits can effectively alter fruit metabolome during the ripening process and shape the levels of key metabolites imparting fruit quality characters. Early post-anthesis chili fruits accumulated luteolin, apigenin, quercetin, shikimic acid, aminobutyric acid and putrescine as dominant molecules, while chemical dominance at later stages was replaced by leucine, isoleucine, phenylalanine, proline, capsaicin, dihydrocapsaicin and kaempferol [91]. Metabolite profiling by UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS based nontargeted metabolomics assessed distinctly marked varietal variation in chili [92]. The exploration of ethylene-related pathways and carbon metabolism in Capsicum, using GC-MS and LC-MS elucidated stage-dependent potential ripening markers and unique ripening-responsible metabolic mechanisms [93]. Metabolomic analyses emphasized that the profile of starch, sugars and sugar-derivatives not only changed following ripening stages but further influenced glycolysis intermediates, tricarboxylic acid cycle, amino acids, pungency precursors and color to also observe significant metabolic shift during non-climacteric ripening of Capsicum.
The skin color of cucumber fruits as determined by chlorophyll and anthocyanin content holds important commercial value for the crop. Comparative metabolomics of dark green vs. light green skinned cucumber deciphered 162 metabolites comprising 40 flavones, nine flavonoids, eight flavanones, eight flavanols, six anthocyanins and other compounds linked with the metabolic pathways imparting skin color [94]. Like cucumber, the sponge gourd Luffa aegyptiaca is also a fruit of choice for nutritional purposes among a large population. Metabolic differentiation between the soft young and fibrous mature ripened fruits suggested a complex biochemical process driving different stages of fruit maturation. SPME-GC-MS metabolomic analysis revealed 53 volatile metabolites comprising aldehydes, ketones, acids and aromatic compounds in various proportion while characteristically predominantly present semi-polar compounds oleanane triperpene glycosides and dihydroxy-oxo-oleanonic acid glycosides were determined by UPLC-MS profiling [95]. Floral specialized secondary metabolites, usually pigments and volatiles comprising hydroxycinnamates, phenolamides and flavonoids, are widely produced by the plants to perform a number of physiological functions, including protection against light and ultra-violet radiation, insect invasion, disease-causing organisms and herbivory and pollinator attraction [96]. Metabolomic analysis of 20 different Brassicaceae genotypes using LC-MS revealed 228 detected metabolites and deciphered chemical signatures indicating evolutionary role in floral metabolism in self-compatible and self-incompatible genotypes of Brassicaceae species [97]. Overall, metabolomic studies on vegetable crops comprising different stage-dependent changes in phenotype-guiding chemical constituents like pigments, photosynthates and volatile organic molecules, have led to decipher physiology-driven metabolic patterns in vegetable crops.

4.3. Nutritional Metabolomics of Vegetable Plants

Plant nutrition aspects are essential issues not only for offering quality and economic value to crops but also for providing nutritional security to the people. An accumulation of various minerals and metabolites makes plants nutritionally enriched and secure. Cellular environment drives plant growth, yield and stress resistance/tolerance and offers nutritional value to the crop plants [98]. Metabolic composition, in which small molecule metabolites play a vital role, is crucial for the compositional determinants of the crops for human beings [99]. Nutri-metabolite constituents that add to the nutritional value to the crops are qualitatively and quantitatively determined, analyzed and interpreted to assess vegetables and fruits. Nutri-metabolomics has emerged as a potential analytical approach to investigate the role of vegetables, fruits and plant-derived bioactive compounds, extracts and functional foods on health [100]. The approach involves separation technologies, analytical bioorganic chemistry, precision instrumental analysis, high-throughput instrumentation, chemometrics, biostatistics, databases, complex compound libraries and bioinformatics [97]. At the process level, the sample preparation of biological fluids, the classification of diverse biological stages, the origin and quality of sample, analytical procedures, data acquisition, collection and retrieval, system integration, interfacing, statistical analysis, documentation and the interpretation of the data are the key methodological components in metabolomics [101,102] (Figure 2). The technique leads to the qualitative and quantitative cataloguing of small molecule metabolites of nutritional significance in the plants under environmental pressure, toxicogenic exposure and dietary changes. It could generate a snapshot of metabolome-driven novel gene and protein elucidation in plant species [103] and clubbed with the transcriptomics, can have applications in genome editing studies as well [104].
Nutritional metabolomics offers investigations on the application of plant-derived small molecule metabolite profiling to address the complexity of the diet, nutrition, metabolome and health issues [105]. Both the targeted and non-targeted metabolomics of vegetables like tomato [106] and bitter melon (Momordica charantia) [107] has implications of advancing nutritional crops [108] by identifying and quantifying nutri-chemicals directly linked with the human diet and nutrition [109]. Comprehensive metabolomic profiling of ripened fruit collection of 32 chilli accessions using nontargeted LC-MS and GC-MS platforms identified 88 semi-polar metabolites. The high accumulation of acyclic diterpenoid phytatetraene and other volatiles were linked with differences in the pungency level of the accessions. Abundant acyclic diterpenoid glycoside capsianosides showed antioxidant and pharmaceutical properties in C. annuum [110]. The linking of specific metabolites or metabolic pathways directly to a trait of nutritive value that can potentiate human health is being achieved through interspecies comparative metabolomics, mQTL and mGWAS [64]. This could yield identification of candidate genes for the important traits in tomato [111]. Breeding crops with high content of mineral nutrients, health promoting metabolites and high-value nutraceuticals is now becoming easier due to advancements in comprehensive crop metabolomics [82,112]. Although chemical composition traits are yet to become established markers of the crop quality, research on protein, oil, provitamin A content in maize, starch content in potato and rice and carotenoids in tomato [113] has advanced our understanding of these traits.
Worldwide, the work on metabolomics-inspired data generation registering metabolic changes on the impacts of environmental and genetic perturbations in plants has gained interest due to their influence on nutrition in human diet and commercial value of plant-derived products [114]. NMR helped to screen spoilage of tomato fruits during storage [115] to decipher impact low- and high-lycopene content in tomato sauces on human beings [116] and to differentiate 361 samples of tomato plants grown under organic and conventional cultivation practices [117]. A metabolomics approach using QTOF-MS revealed that tomato grown under an organic agronomic environment differentially expressed antioxidant activities and the commercial ketchup product made from the fruits accumulated significantly high antioxidant micronutrients [118]. Non-targeted metabolomics helped metabolic fingerprinting of organically and conventionally grown tomato and pepper crops for differential food markers [119,120]. A comprehensive metabolomics approach clubbed with genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic work can address crop nutritional quality parameters for engaging the same in vegetable improvement programs [121]. Comparative metabolomics addressing food and nutritional values in vegetables varieties being grown under different agroecological conditions or cultural practices (organic vs. non-organic) could identify specific small molecule signatures for improving nutrition-specific agricultural production [122].

4.4. Decephering Plant’s Adaptive Strategies under Abiotic Stresses

In fields, vegetable crops are directly exposed to abiotic stresses including drought, salinity, heat, cold, radiation and edaphic factors. All these factors negatively modulate plant performance in terms of physiological, biochemical and molecular changes at the cellular levels [123]. Intrinsically, a plant’s adaptive mechanisms and mitigation strategies are linked with modifications in biological metabolic processes like photosynthesis, energy metabolism, hormone synthesis, secondary metabolite biosynthesis and the quantitative accumulation of metabolites following stresses [124]. Metabolome analysis can address a plant’s adaptive changes at metabolic level. Cold-susceptible tomato fruits revealed seven amino acids, 16 sugars, 27 organic acids and various other metabolites due to chilling shock [125]. Besides the intrinsic capability of crop genotypes to fight against stresses, other factors also influence plant responses against abiotic stresses. Seed priming agents influence the metabolic profile of the crop plants to make them more stringent and tough. Tomato seed priming with β-aminobutyric acid (BABA) triggered induced tolerance against environmental stress in plants [126] and identified 6887 metabolite features of interest in MS-generated metabolomics analysis [127]. Various transcription factors including TDR4 gene played a crucial regulatory role in the ripening of tomato fruits. Metabolomics analysis together with RNA-seq has led to the revelation that TDR4 silenced tomatine accumulation, while tyrosine, phenylalanine and organic acids were reduced in tomato [128]. Phenomics investigations coupled with MS-based metabolomics of bio stimulant 4-VITA treated tomato plants showed the effective elicitation of secondary metabolic pathways including the biosynthesis of phytohormones, thylakoid lipids, xanthins and chlorophyll [129]. A coordinated reprogramming of biosynthetic pathways enhances tomato plant resilience against drought stress. LC-MS based untargeted metabolomic experiment unraveled modulations in the biochemical framework of tomato plants following non-microbial silicon (Si)-based bio stimulant application under saline conditions [130]. The primary metabolic pathways of tricarboxylic acid cycle, fatty acid and amino acid biosynthesis along with the secondary metabolic phenylpropanoid and flavonoid biosynthetic pathways, including flavone and flavanol synthesis were reprogrammed in tomato leaves due to Si-based bio stimulant exposure to support plants in alleviating salinity stress. The exogenous application of ascorbic acid improved spinach plant tolerance against freezing conditions. Leaf metabolomic analysis revealed greater abundance of antioxidants (glutathione, tocopherols), compatible solutes (proline, galactinol and myo-inositol) and activated enzyme activity [131]. Abiotic stress mitigation strategies in vegetable plants essentially comprise elicitation of metabolite-based crop responses followed by changes in proteomic and transcriptomic levels. Metabolomics can detect and identify new metabolite of interest, the abundance of which relates to stress minimization or investigates multi-fold changes in the level of diverse metabolites involved in tolerance.

4.5. Assessing Metabolome under Plant-Microbe Interactions

Metabolomics clubbed with other omics studies integrates multi-layered information to decipher the complexity of dynamic molecular and metabolic changes in plants due to microbial and environmental interactions [50]. The metabolomic analysis of microbial interactions with plants identified biomarkers with immense applications in biosensor development, phytopathogen monitoring, disease diagnostics and overall plant protection [132]. Vegetable plants continuously interact with microorganisms that majorly influence their cellular metabolic composition and affect their yield performance in field conditions [133]. Beneficial microbial interactions not only promote growth and development of plants but also improve intrinsic tolerance/resistance leading to plant immunity [134]. Non-targeted UHPLC-MS and targeted UHPLC-triple quadrupole-MS metabolomics analysis of tomato primed with Pseudomonas fluorescens N04 and Paenibacillus alvei T22 documented crucial metabolic changes in response to the infection of Phytophthora capsici. Tomato root treatment with two PGPR strains, followed by the inoculation of the phytopathogen P. capsici at the stem, caused differential reprogramming of aromatic amino acids, glycoalkaloids, benzoates, phenylpropanoids, flavonoids, organic acids, oxygenated fatty acids and abscisic and methyl salicylic acid as major signal molecules in plant tissues [135].
Non-targeted metabolomics of bacterial pathogen-challenged tomato identified activation of phenylpropanoid pathway with the increased accumulation of quinic acid and flavonoid derivatives as antimicrobial agents and hexoses as osmotic regulators [136]. Bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum created the blockage of tomato xylem vessels due to the accumulation of putrescine, as revealed by LC-MS analysis [137]. The response of two near-isogenic lines of tomato showing different levels of resistance against white-fly mediated begomovirus tomato curly stunt virus (ToCSV) was documented using UPLC-MS based metabolomic analysis. The reprogramming of structurally diverse metabolites in susceptible plants has led to identify biomarkers such as hydroxycinnamic acid conjugated to quinic acid, galactaric acid and glucose [138]. Molecular and biochemical mechanisms underlying quantitative resistance in two advanced diploid potato genotypes were investigated using metabolome profiling [139]. Metabolites belonging to phenylpropanoids, flavonoid and alkaloid chemical groups were highly induced in resistant genotypes than in susceptible plants. From expression studies it was concluded that the resistance to late blight in resistant genotypes was mainly associated with cell wall thickening due to the deposition of hydroxycinnamic acid amides and the accumulation of flavonoids and alkaloids.
GC-MS and LC-MS metabolomics directly linked primary and secondary metabolic status of resistance and susceptible plants with specialized defense responses against bacterial, fungal or viral pathogens [140]. NMR has been universally accepted to identify plant metabolome under the integrated pest management (IPM) framework and to address candidate secondary compounds involved in host-pest interactions and resistance [141]. Investigations on cultivated and wild tomato genotypes having resistance against wilt and blight diseases [142], Fusarium oxysporum [143], pest (Frankliniella occidentalis, western flower thrips) [141,144] and root-knot nematode [145] using the NMR metabolomic platform, reflected the chemotaxonomic perturbations of resistance and/or susceptibility. Distinct metabolic profile using 1H NMR was observed in chili under beet mild curly top virus (BMCTV) infection. Infected plants showed high abundance of marker molecules fructose, isoleucine, histidine, tryptophan and phenylalanine linked to the energy metabolism for viral acquisition, replication and capsid assembly [146]. Plant interactions with pathogenic microorganisms result in programmed modulation in cellular machinery that initiates damaging impacts on crop quality and yield [147]. Under pathogenic conditions, plants utilize pathogen-triggered defense mechanisms to modulate composite cellular metabolome in response to patho-physiological conditions [148]. Mapping structurally complex metabolite cascade in plant cells after pathogenic attack and determining interactive metabolic outcomes allows for the identification of those signature molecules, which directly or indirectly influence progression or suppression of pathogens [149] and paves the way to identify signature molecules.

4.6. Metabolomic Studies in Plant-Insect (Herbivore) Interactions

Under insect interactions, a plant’s metabolome undergoes metabolic changes due to induced cellular mechanisms involved in the interplay of herbivorous relationships and their implications at the biological interface [150]. Pest infestation on crops usually favors activation of defense metabolites to check pest invasion, develop resistance against insect attack and facilitate physiological growth [151]. Characteristic cellular metabolomic signatures confined to these processes can be deciphered in local or systemic parts through targeted or nontargeted analysis. The specific impacts of various trophic levels on the primary and secondary metabolic profile of tomato plants revealed a unique pattern of non-volatile and volatile metabolites [152]. Metabolome and volatilome analysis of tomato and eggplant challenged with pinworm (Tutta absoluta) using ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) and headspace solid-phase microextraction with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (HS-SPME/GC-MS), revealed 797 primary and secondary metabolites and 141 VOCs representing aldehydes, alcohols, sugars, aromatics, amines, terpenoids, ketones, phenolics and olefins [153]. The results indicated that because of the characteristic metabolic contents (both volatile and non-volatile), tomato becomes a more suitable host for the pest T. absoluta than eggplants. Such compounds could be considered as signature metabolites to be targeted and validated for improving crop breeding [154].
GC-MS based nontargeted metabolomics of pepper (C. chinense and C. annuum) has shown marked changes in metabolite profile related to pest resistance and susceptibility at different developmental stages [155]. The abundance of monomer and dimer acyclic diterpene glycosides (capsianosides) was shown to link with insect resistance, while sucrose and malonylated flavone glycosides with host susceptibility. Enhanced defense in tomato against aphids after Trichoderma priming was linked to metabolome and transcriptome reprogramming [156]. The metabolomic study of two pepper (C. annuum) genotypes differentially susceptible to spider mite herbivory revealed infestation induced jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA) signaling and terpenoid and flavonoid synthesis [157]. Stronger defense in pepper plants was observed due to the increased production of volatile and non-volatile metabolites induced after metabolic modulations under mite infestation. Transcriptomic rearrangements in plants due to pest attack often leads to altered phenotypic and metabolic responses. In two cucumber (C. sativus) genotypes having spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) infestation, terpenoid level increased but cucurbitacin C decreased during herbivore interaction. It indicated regulation of directly or indirectly induced defense responses against herbivory [158]. Cucumber plants showed up- and down regulated accumulation of amino acids, organic acids, sugars, glycosides and lipids along with secondary S-containing metabolites as their stress responses against sulfur-fumigation [159]. Qualitative and quantitative screening of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) metabolome using 1H high resolution NMR revealed isoleucine, γ-aminobutyrate, glutamine, asparagine, choline, phosphocholine and cinnamic acid following postharvest senescence [160]. Knowing the differential interactive performance of plants against insect pests is crucial to deciphering bioactivity-guided chemical reactions at the host-insect interface. Untargeted metabolomics could be helpful to identify candidate metabolites linked with the host specificity against insect pests.

4.7. Understanding on Rhizosphere Metabolome

In the systems biology approach, rhizosphere is considered as a living biological entity to be studied for rhizodeposition of diverse metabolites, rhizomicrobiome dynamics and plant growth promoting mechanisms. Due to belowground beneficial microbial interactions, rhizosphere continues to influence crop performance under diverse plant growth conditions [161]. Environmental metabolomics can efficiently address complex, dynamic and edaphic factor-influenced rhizosphere metabolomes of vegetable crops. Inoculation of plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) in tomato rhizosphere under saline stress caused the accumulation of proline and other osmoprotectants in the root exudate. It has modulated plant responses due to shikimate and phenylpropanoid pathways and differential carbon substrate utilization by the microbial communities [162]. Resistant cultivars of cucumber offer control against Fusarium wilt disease in the field. Nontargeted metabolome profiling of root exudates of susceptible cucumber cultivar and investigations on rhizosphere microflora showed excessive release of organic acids (citric, pyruvate, succinic and fumaric acid) under higher abundance by Foc-susceptible cultivar. Resistant cultivar allowed the recruitment of specific beneficial bacterial communities from Comamonadaceae [163]. Pathogen infection has been shown to change the microbiome and metabolome composition of the plant rhizosphere. The invasion of the phytopathogen Ralstonia solanacearum causing global bacterial wilt disease in tomato influenced the abundance of rhizosphere microbial communities. High pathogenic abundance reduced alpha-bacterial diversity, especially those of Bacillus and Chitinophaga in tomato rhizosphere. Metabolome analysis using GC-MS revealed that low abundance of pathogen harbored more sugar metabolites [164]. Accumulation of p-hydroxybenzoic acid (PHBA) in the soil becomes auto toxic for cucumber plants. However, PHBA stress mitigation in cucumber is achieved by inoculating Klebsiella in the soil, which not only decomposed the auto toxic compound but also activated soil enzyme activity, enhanced the antioxidant effect in plants and systemically accumulated secondary metabolites in leaves, as revealed by metabolome and transcriptome experiments [165]. This is despite the fact that the role of rhizosphere interactions in offering different levels of disease resistance using metabolomics is less studied.
Plant genotypes, edaphic factors, symbiotic or pathogenic interaction and pest infestation influence chemical diversity of rhizosphere metabolome and the belowground microbiome composition. GC-TOF-MS based metabolome analysis revealed cultivar, organ and developmental stage-dependent quantitative differences in phytochemical profile [166]. The exudates of tomato fruit, root and shoot as surface compounds supported the growth of Salmonella enterica. Short-term and long-term exposure to sulfur fumigation exhibited differential metabolic patterns in cucumber in protected cultivation. Metabolomic profiling of rhizosphere and bulk soils detected 11 different metabolites including organic acids and sugars and pointed out differentially expressed starch and sucrose metabolic pathways [167]. Soil metagenomics reflected differential structural and functional bacterial community composition in pepper rhizosphere, in which metabolites were more abundant than in the bulk soil. Under greenhouse cultivation conditions, a close proximity was shown between the rhizosphere bacterial communities and soil metabolome. Such studies indicated the processes of qualitative and quantitative chemical diversity of surface exudates secreted by the plant organs on bacterial population dynamics. The findings may be manipulated for developing better plant genotypes, with efficient surface secondary metabolites having role in food safety, plant defense and health.

4.8. Metabolomic Studies on Transgenic Vegetable Plants

The 1H NMR-based metabolomics of transgenic tomato fruits engineered to accumulate high content of polyamines, spermine and spermidine revealed accumulated organic acids, amino acids and sugars as compared to non-transgenic plants [168]. The accumulation of nitrogenous spermine and spermidine metabolites in transgenic tomato fruit cells enhanced stimulation of carbon sequestration and improved respiratory activity due to the up-regulation of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase. This mechanism has given transgenic plants metabolic advantage over the control non-transgenic plants. In the high temperature regime associated with global climate changes, plants suffering from heat stress may be relieved by the suppression or over-expression of heat shock proteins (HSPs) that control thermotolerance related metabolic functions. Metabolome profiling of heat stress transcription factor (HsfsB1) transgenic tomato plants and wild-type (WT) revealed a higher accumulation of biosynthetic products related to phenylpropanoids and flavonoid pathways, including the isomers of caffeoylquinic acid in transgenic plants due to overexpression of HsfsB1 [169]. A close correlation between the thermo-stress response of tomato plants and their physiological development under heat regime was observed.

4.9. Metabolomic Changes in Vegetable Plants Due to Nanoparticles Impact

Phytotoxic impact of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) due to the exposure of plant roots and crop growth modulatory property of silica-nanoparticles (SiO2-NPs) has been widely reported. Cucumber foliage when exposed to ZnO-NPs and SiO2-NPs changed plant performance as was reflected by the comparative metabolomic profiling of seedlings in which both the primary (amino acids, organic acids, sugars and glycosides) and secondary metabolites were changed [170]. The study established that instead of root exposure of the NPs, foliar application may become rather more effective in generating positive plant response and showing better crop performance. Silver ions and silver-NPs (AgNPs) induce oxidative stress in cucumber. GC-MS based metabolomics analysis has resulted in the identification and quantification of 268 metabolites in AgNPs-treated cucumber leaves [171]. Metabolic reprogramming as revealed by multivariate analysis showed activation of defense related polyphenolic compounds, pentadecanoic and arachidonic acids whereas down-regulation of linoleic and linolenic acids, glutamine, asparagine and photosynthesis-linked metabolites and has improved understanding on molecular mechanisms of cucumber while responding to AgNP exposure. Metabolomics based on GC-TOF-MS assessed metabolic changes in spinach (Spinacia oleracea) leaves exposed to Cu(OH)2 nanopesticide (NP) and Cu ion upon foliar spray. Zhao et al. [172] showed activated anti-oxidative pathways but reduced beneficial antioxidant levels of various metabolites including ascorbic acid, alpha-tocopherol, threonic acid, β-sitosterol, 4-hydroxybutyric acid, ferulic acid and phenolics in Cu(OH)2-exposed spinach leaves. Cu2+ was supposed to reduce the antioxidant levels and confer changes in ascorbate and aldarate metabolism resulting in the reduced nutritional value of Cu-NP exposed spinach plants. Foliar exposure of leaves to CeO2 NP has induced down-regulation of various amino acids and marked invisible metabolic reprogramming in spinach [173].

4.10. Metabolome Profiling and Pharmaco-Physiological Impact Assessment

Chemotype differentiation in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia, Cucurbitaceae) was performed using UPLC-HRMS based metabolomics [174]. Crop fruits with potential anti-diabetic properties accumulated high content of secondary metabolite flavonoids, phenolics, terpenoids and sterols, while terpene metabolites were linked with fruit bitterness. Metabolome diversity in edible vegetable fruits makes them potentially useful against human diseases and exploring composition of known and unknown metabolites can be performed with metabolomics. Phyto-medicinal biomolecules from fruit sub-parts like pericarp, skin and seeds were identified by NMR-based metabolic profiling of bitter gourd [175]. The clustering of metabolites in seeds and the pericarp of fruits was observed using multivariate analysis. However, the metabolome profile of fruit skin revealed accumulation of phytosterols charantin and momordicine. Differential accumulation of secondary metabolites in different fruit parts and phytosterols in the skin was shown to have links with antidiabetic properties [175]. However, looking into the pharmaco-physiological, nutritional, health-driving, crop production and commercial aspects directly linked with the global metabolite profile of vegetables crops, extensive studies are required.
Table 1. MS and NMR based metabolomics applications in vegetable crop plants.
Table 1. MS and NMR based metabolomics applications in vegetable crop plants.
Sr. No. Vegetable Plants/PartsMetabolomics PlatformsMetabolome Studies/Metabolites IdentifiedReference
Tomato
1. Transgenic and non-transgenic fruit powder600 MHz 1H-NMR in D2O buffer solution amino acids (9), gama-aminobutyric acid (GABA), organic acids, sugars, choline, polyamines spermine and spermidine[168]
2.Ripened fruits of 50 cultivars including cherry and round type tomato1H-NMR, LC-(QTOF) MSIntra-(NMR–NMR, LCMS–LCMS) and inter-(NMR–LCMS) metabolomics-correlation analysesphenylalanine, zeatin hexose, caffeic acid hexose, dehydrophaseic acid, caffoylquinic acid, esculeoside A, rutin, kaempferol-3-O-rutinose, dicaffeoylquinic acid, naringenin chalcone-hexose, lycoperoside A–C, tomatin, tomatoside, tricaffeoylquinic acid, naringenin, naringenin chalcone [176]
3.Fruit volatile compounds Headspace SPME-GC-MShexanol, phenylethanol, phenylacetaldehyde, hexanal, heptenel, β-Ionone, 6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one, 2-Methylbutanal, 2-isobutylthiazole, 1-Penten-3-one, eugenol[177]
4.Plant-bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum) interaction 1H-NMRamino acids, organic acids, and sugar groups, GABA, ethanolamine, glycine, choline, valine etc. [178]
5.Midstem and xylem sap-Ralstonia solanacearum interaction LC-MS, GC-MS amino acids, organic acids, fatty acids, various derivatives of cinnamic acid and benzoic acids, flavonoids and steroidal glycoalkaloids, flavonoids and hydroxycinnamic acids, polyamines and tyramine. 22 compounds identified by GC-MS[139,140]
6. Cutin3D HR-MAS NMR spectroscopylignin structures, plant derived fulvic acid, humic materials[179]
7.Seeds treated with Trichoderma secondary metabolites 6-pentyl-2H-pyran-2-one and harzianic acid and corresponding plants leaves at 15 daysHRMAS NMR acetylcholine, GABA[180]
8.Leaves and rootsGC-MS, LC-MSsugars, organic acids, oligosaccharides—α-ketoglutarate and raffinose [181]
9.Cherry tomato (5 types)—fruits GC-TOF-MS, UPLC-Linear Trap Quadrupole-Orbitrap-Tandem MS amino acids, lipids, organic acids, phenylpropanoids, lycopene, β-carotene, and α-carotene[110]
10.Mature fruits—25 cultivars Untargeted MS/MS7118 accurate mass values [182]
11.Fruits—Cryptococcus laurentii induced changesUPLC-MS/MS analysis in Positive and Negative ion mode59 metabolites phenolics, flavonoids and phenylpropanoids including chlorogenic, caffeic and ferulic acids [183]
12.Fruits GC-MSprimary metabolites (organic acids, sugars, sugar alcohols, amino acids, phosphorylated intermediates, lipophilic compounds)[87]
13.Fruits and leaves 1H-NMR and LC-QTOF-MS metabolomics profiling 70 metabolites in leaves, 56 in fruits, free amino acids, sugars, sucrose, rhamnose, erythritol, glycerate, alanine, β-alanine, glycine, tyramine, and trigonelline, hydroxycinnamate, flavonoid, or glycoalkaloid, α-tomatine, dehydrotomatine, and chlorogenate [184]
14.Fruits Solanum pannelliiNMR, HPLCcarotenoids and tocopherols [185]
15.Host pathogen interaction with leaf mold disease caused by Cladosporium fulvumGC-TOF-MS, LC-PDA-QTOF-MSpolar primary metabolites (PPM)-132semi-polar secondary metabolites (SPSM)enhanced accumulation of benzoic acid, salicylic acid, tyramine, dopamine, coumaroyltyramine-isoform 1, and coumaroyldopamine [186]
16.Predator Chrysoperla carnea larvae and herbivore interaction Tetranychus urticae and Myzus persicaeGC-MS, LC-ESI-MSnon-volatile metabolites—abscisic acid and amino acidsvolatile metabolites—monoterpenes (37%), sesquiterpenes (32%), aldehydes (5%), phenylpropanoids (11%) and fatty acid derivatives (5%)[152]
17.Tomato-Trichoderma harzianum-Aphids LC-ESI (+)-MSprimary and secondary semi-polar metabolitesDown-accumulation-citric acid, dihydro-caffeic acid, 2-hydroxyglutarate, phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), coumarin, syringaldehyde, tetrahydrofolate, δ-tomatine (an alkaloid), N-isovalerylglycine and threonine/homoserine (amino acids) and protoporphyrinogen IX Over-represented metabolites—salicylate β-D-glucose ester and salicyloyl-L-aspartic acid, phenylalanine, coumaric and chorismic acids [156]
18.Tomato—thrips-resistant (10 wild) and susceptible (10 cultivated) lines 1H-NMRacylsugars[187]
19.Tomato rhizosphere GC-MS, LC-MSfatty acid derivatives, oxylipin isomers, azelaic and pimelic acids, glycosides, amino acids [188]
20.Tomato leaves—Si-based biostimulant treatmentLC-MSterpenes, polyamines, phenolic compounds, caffeic-, coumaric-, sinapoyl- and ferulic acids and conjugates, quercetin and kaempferol conjugates, hexadecadienoic acid (HDDA), hydroperoxyoctadecadienoic acid (HPDA)[130]
21.Plant-PGPR mediated salt tolerance GC-MS based metabolite profilinghigh accumulation—xylose, rhamnose, D-mannose, L-galactose, allose, sedoheptulose, erythrose, and 2-deoxy-D-erythro-pentitol, lactate and oxalate, alanine, valine, isoleucine, glycine, serine, threonine, and cystathionine in inoculated plants [189]
22.Fruits at different ripening stages FT-ICR MS, NMR, HPLCamino acids and derivatives, organic acids, sugar esters of caffeic and ferulic acids, caffeoyl- and feruloyl-hexose, monosaccharides fructose, glucose and galactose, choline and adenosine, tannins, flavonoids apigeniflavan, tetrahydroxyflavanone glucoside, polyphenol derivatives like catechin-O-glucoside, catechin-O-rutinoside, dihydrokaempferol, trihydroxy-prenyldihydrochalcone glucosyl-coumarate, quercetin glucoside-glucuronide [190]
23.Fruits—chitosan treated plantsLC-ESI-MS/MSbenzenesulfonates, benzoates, desulfoglucosinolates, fatty acids, flavonoids, oligosaccharides, organosulfates, organosulfur compounds, phenylpropanoids, phospholipids and terpenoids[191]
24.Tomato product—pureesHPLC-PDA and fluorescence detector, 1H-NMR, LC-QToF-MS, LC-multiple reaction monitoring, headspace GC-MS vitamins, semi-polar and polar metabolites, oxylipins, volatile metabolites, phytonutrients [192]
Capsicum
25.Capsicum annuum L.—aqueous phase of Serrano peppers1H-NMR, 2D NMR and Chenomx databasevitamin C and 44 metabolites including sugars, organic acids, polyphenols, amino acids, alcohols[193]
26.Capsicum annuum cv. serrano 1H-NMR, 2D NMR and qNMR, PCA, PLS-DS48 metabolites including sugars (glucose, fructose, sucrose and galactose), organic acids (citric, formic, fumaric, malic), alcohols and polyphenolic acids [194]
27.Capsicum annuum L. Serrano peppers from two geographically different regions1H-NMRVeracruz region produce: rich in aspartate citrate, lactate, leucine and sucroseOaxaca region produce: rich in acetate, formate, fumarate, malonate, phosphocholine, pyruvate and succinate [195]
Cucumber
28.Cucumber-leaves and root exudates1H-NMR and GC-MSascorbic acid, citric acid, amino acids[196]
29.Cucumber fruits-extract 1H-NMR and GC-MSnano-Cu influenced metabolite profile of sugars, amino acids, fatty acids, methylnicotinamide, trigonelline, imidazole, quinolate [128]
30.Cucumber-fruit peel UPLC-QTOF-MSuniquely abundant 113 ions in resistant fruit peels[197]
31.Cucumber grafted on different root stocksGC-MSvolatile organic compounds (VOCs), Fructose-6-phosphate and trehalose), linoleic acid, and amino-acid (isoleucine, proline, and valine)[198]
32.Cucumis sativus—cucurbit chlorotic yellows virus infection UPLC, ESI-Q TRAP-MS/MS, MWDB and MRMtotal identified metabolites 612. maximum accumulation—lipids, phenolic acids and flavonoidsmetabolites detected—organic acids, alkaloids, terpenoids, lignans, coumarins, and tannins. [199]
33.Cucumber fruit-2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) exogenous treatmentNon-targeted metabolomics by UPLC-qTOF-MSdecreased levels of flavonoids and cinnamic acid derivatives but increased levels of amino acids[86]
34.Luffa aegyptiaca Mill-young and mature fruitsUHPLC-MS, GC-MSaldehydes, furans, alcohols, ketones, acids, aromatics [95]
Lettuce
35.Lettuce leaf GC-MS, LC-MS, PCA101 metabolites from 223 peaks GC-MS, 95 peaks by LC-MS, tetracosanol and hexacosanol, sesquiterpene lactones (lactucopicrin-15-oxalate and 15-deoxylactucin-8-sulfate)[200]
Eggplant
36.Eggplant and Tomato—Tuta absoluta infection UPLC-MS/MS, HS-SPME/GC-MSidentified 141 volatile organic compounds and 797 primary/secondary metabolites, dominant compounds-aldehyde, alcohols, alkanes, amine, aromatics, a heterocyclic compound, ketone, olefin, phenol, and terpenes[154]
37.Eggplant—fruit accessions LC-MS, GC-MS51 compounds (LC-MS), 207 compounds (GC-MS)Terpenes, alkaloids, fatty acids, flavonoids and terpenoids [201]
38. Eggplant-fruits-browning mechanismLC-MS946 metabolites changed dynamically, 119 common differential metabolites [202]
39.Solanaceous crops fruit tissues (peel and pericarp) of pepper, eggplant, tomato, Capsicum annum LC-ESI-MSpolyphenolics hydroxycinnamate and flavonoids quercetin-3-O-(2″-O-apiosyl-6″-O-rhamnosyl)glucoside-7-O-glucoside, kaempferol-3-O-(2″-O-apiosyl-6″-O-rhamnosyl)glucoside, quercetin-3-O-glucoside, quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside; and K3R, kaempferol-3-O-rhamnoside[203]
Momordica charantia
40. Momordica charantia fruit (Cucurbitaceae) LC-MS-QTOFbrevifolincarboxylic acid (new antioxidant molecule), 3-malonylmomordicin I and goyaglycoside G and other metabolites [204]
Cabbage
41.Chinese cabbage—root colonization by Piriformospora indicaHigh-throughput GC-MStotal compounds—1126, 549 identified in colonized and non-colonized cabbage roots and hyphae of P. indica[205]
42. Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata)—taste attributesGC-MSprimary metabolites, 4-aminobutyric acid, fructose 1-phosphate, adipic acid, 5-oxoproline, N-acetylglycine, O-phosphoethanolamine, and homovanillic acid [206]
43.Brassica rapa subsp. chinensisGC-TOF-MS and HPLC53 primary metabolites in 3 pak choi cultivars, 49 hydrophilic metabolites in others. [207]
Spinach (Spinacia oleracea)
44.Leaves GC-MSvariations in carbohydrates, organic acids, amino acids content after treatment with NO3 and Gly[208]
Common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
45.Contrasting genotypes of saline conditions GC-MSaccumulation of lysine, valine and isoleucine in roots[209]
46.Common bean Genotype (107 accessions)-heat stressNon-targeted and targeted MS measured high content of salicylic acid while low content of triterpene saponins, phenylpropanoids deciphered [210]
47.Cold-tolerant (120) and sensitive (93) common bean cultivarsUPLC-MSflavonoids, methionine and malondialdehyde as biomarkers against cold temperatures[211]
Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera)
48.Seeds LC-MSidentified flavonoids (30) and alkaloids [212]
49.SeedsLC-MSamino acids, organic acids, sugars[213]
Moringa (Moringa oleifera)
50.Leaves and stem 1H-NMR30 metabolites identified, 22 common in leaf and stem tissues. 4-aminobutyrate, adenosine, guanosine, tyrosine, p-cresol [214]
LC—liquid chromatography, MS—mass spectrometry, NMR—nuclear magnetic resonance, QTOF—quadrupole time-of-flight, HRMAS NMR—high-resolution magic-angle-spinning nuclear magnetic resonance, PCA—Principal component analysis; PLS-DS—partial least square discriminant analysis, qNMR—quantitative NMR, UPLC—Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography, MWDB—MetWare database, MRM—multiple reaction monitoring.

5. Conclusions

Metabolomics has become a versatile tool to investigate the metabolic status of vegetable plants with multi-faceted dimensions. These crops are being grown by farmers worldwide, not only for the nutritional and pharmaco-physiological prospective, but also for income generation and livelihood for resource poor rural people including youth and women. So, crop plants with high nutrition, enhanced productivity and low pest/disease resurgence could be of much demand by farmers for gaining improved economic viability from farms. However, there remain multifarious interactions of vegetable plants with their environment and biotic entities that influence quality, nutritional richness and productivity of the crops. For similar reasons, the importance of metabolic composition, i.e., the metabolome of the crop produce under specified agroclimatic regimes and its implications on human health becomes prominent. To measure metabolome is to measure the ultimate functional chemical entities of the cells that firstly and directly respond to the challenges of the environment. However, extracting and identifying all the metabolite molecules from plant cells and tissues is not realistic and one can extract only maximum possible metabolites by efficient solvent combinations and extraction conditions. Metabolomics offers limitless opportunities without analysis, application and interpretation related limitations to decipher global as well as targeted metabolites from vegetable plants. The area is ever-evolving and holds promise for the developers of the methods, techniques, protocols, algorithms and statistical tools.
Vegetable plant interactions with beneficial microorganisms, pathogens, pests, environment, edaphic conditions and anthropogenic factors invoke such metabolic changes which, if marked at global scale, could yield biomarker candidate metabolites for utilization in crop improvement through identified mQTLs. Knowing in planta candidate metabolites that act as phytohormones, signal molecules, cross-communication agents, elicitors, surface-inhibitors, antimicrobials, and stimulators/suppressors of metabolic pathways, synergizing agents of metabolism and post-harvest signatures, specific metabolic pathways could be tuned in favor of plant health. Mining of crop plant VOCs using GC-MS metabolomics platform is an effective way to identify molecules that could act as candidates for biosensor development. The rhizosphere of crops is the hotspot for diverse microbial communities and their multi-functionalities. Modulating overall beneficial microbiome functions in the rhizosphere, either through exogenous microbial inoculation or by the application of growth-stimulating organic compounds, is a strategy to provoke better crop performance that can be studied for candidate metabolic alterations using metabolomics. Growth stage-dependent crop metabolome pool in plants under conventional crop production practices (that involve synthetic chemical fertilizers and pesticides), integrated pest management (IPM), integrated nutrient management (INM), low-external input farming, natural methods and organic cultivation can be mapped effectively using metabolomics. Identifying metabolites from the plants growing in different farming practices and implying them in molecular breeding programs for improved nutrition, resistance and crop health are new and promising avenues for future agriculture. Integrated metabolomics platforms entwined with the genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic resources could help to explore key metabolites, crucial metabolic pathways and critical networks engaged by the plants to overcome stress-linked challenges in vegetable crops.

Author Contributions

D.P.S. conceptualized the idea, design and framework of the MS and written the MS. R.S. and R.P. helped in preparing the Figures. M.S.B., Y.S.R., S.M., K.K.C., M.S.F., P.M.S., N.R., T.C. and S.S. helped in article collection and reference sequencing. V.K.G. and B.K.S. supported compilation and structuring of the MS and Table. A.R. and T.K.B. reviewed the MS thoroughly. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Indian Council of Agricultural Research, India.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not Applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not Applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not Applicable.

Acknowledgments

D.P.S. is thankful to the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), India for funding grant under ICAR-IASRI-CABin Network Project on ‘Computational Biology and Agricultural Bioinformatics’.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wurtzel, E.T.; Kutchan, T.M. Plant metabolism, the diverse chemistry set of the future. Science 2016, 353, 1232–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Bernhoft, A. (Ed.) A brief review on bioactive compounds in plants. In Bioactive Compounds in Plants—Benefits and Risks for Man and Animals; The Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters: Oslo, Norway, 2010; pp. 11–17. [Google Scholar]
  3. Marchev, A.S.; Yordanova, Z.P.; Georgiev, M.I. Green (cell) factories for advanced production of plant secondary metabolites. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2020, 40, 443–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. De la Fuente, I.M. Elements of the cellular metabolic structure. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2015, 2, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Kastenmüller, G.; Schenk, M.E.; Gasteiger, J.; Mewes, H.W. Uncovering metabolic pathways relevant to phenotypic traits of microbial genomes. Genome Biol. 2009, 10, R28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Slavin, J.L.; Lloyd, B. Health benefits of fruits and vegetables. Adv. Nutr. 2012, 3, 506–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Joosten, F.; Dijkxhoorn, Y.; Sertse, Y.; Ruben, R. How Does the Fruit and Vegetable Sector Contribute to Food and Nutrition Security? LEI Wageningen UR: The Hague, The Netherlands, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  8. Schreinemachers, P.; Simmons, E.B.; Wopereis, M.C.S. Tapping the economic and nutritional power of vegetables. Glob. Food Secur. 2018, 16, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. HLPE-FAO. Impacts of COVID-19 on Food Security and Nutrition: Developing Effective Policy Responses to Address the Hunger and Malnutrition Pandemic; CFS: Rome, Italy, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Goldman, I.L. Forgotten and Future Vegetable Phytoceuticals. In Trends in New Crops and New Uses; Janick, J., Whipkey, A., Eds.; ASHS Press: Alexandria, VA, USA, 2002; pp. 484–490. [Google Scholar]
  11. Solankey, S.S.; Saha, D.P.; Shyama, K.; Shirin, A.; Jha, V.B.; Sohane, R.K.; Singh, R.R. Biodiversity in Vegetable Crops for Healthier Life and Livelihood. In Proceedings-Cum-Abstract Book of International Web Conference, 27–28 August 2020; Bihar Agricultural University: Bhagalpur, India, 2020; ISBN 978-81-937815-0-0. [Google Scholar]
  12. Septembre-Malaterre, A.; Remize, F.; Poucheret, P. Fruits and vegetables, as a source of nutritional compounds and phytochemicals: Changes in bioactive compounds during lactic fermentation. Food Res. Int. 2018, 104, 86–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ülger, T.G.; Songur, A.N.; Çırak, O.; Çakıroğlu, P.F. Role of Vegetables in Human Nutrition and Disease Prevention. In Vegetables—Importance of Quality Vegetables to Human Health; Asaduzzaman, M., Asao, T., Eds.; Intech Open: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Hounsome, N.; Hounsome, B.; Tomos, D.; Edwards-Jones, G. Plant metabolites and nutritional quality of vegetables. J. Food Sci. 2008, 73, R48–R65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vats, S.; Bansal, R.; Rana, N.; Kumawat, S.; Bhatt, V.; Jadhav, P.; Kale, V.; Sathe, A.; Sonah, H.; Jugdaohsingh, R.; et al. Unexplored nutritive potential of tomato to combat global malnutrition. Crit. Rev. Food. Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 1003–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Soto, C.; González, R.; Galmarini, C. Bioactive compounds in vegetables, Is there consistency in the published information? A systematic review. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2021, 96, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Francini, A.; Pintado, M.; Manganaris, G.A.; Ferrante, A. Editorial: Bioactive compounds biosynthesis and metabolism in fruit and vegetables. Front. Plant. Sci. 2020, 11, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Bowling, F.G.; Thomas, M. Analyzing the metabolome. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1168, 31–45. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lin, B.B. Resilience in agriculture through crop diversification: Adaptive management for environmental change. BioScience 2011, 61, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ali, M.Y.; Sina, A.A.I.; Khandker, S.S.; Neesa, L.; Tanvir, E.M.; Kabir, A.; Khalil, M.I.; Gan, S.H. Nutritional composition and bioactive compounds in tomatoes and their impact on human health and disease: A Review. Foods 2021, 10, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Perea-Domínguez, X.P.; Hernández-Gastelum, L.Z.; Olivas-Olguin, H.R.; Espinosa-Alonso, L.G.; Valdez-Morales, M.; Medina-Godoy, S. Phenolic composition of tomato varieties and an industrial tomato by-product: Free, conjugated and bound phenolics and antioxidant activity. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 3453–3461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dadáková, K.; Heinrichová, T.; Lochman, J.; Kašparovský, T. Production of defense phenolics in tomato leaves of different age. Molecules 2020, 25, 4952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Anton, D.; Bender, I.; Kaart, T.; Roasto, M.; Heinonen, M.; Luik, A.; Püssa, T. Changes in polyphenols contents and antioxidant capacities of organically and conventionally cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruits during ripening. Int. J. Anal. Chem. 2017, 2017, 2367453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Gürbüz, N.; Uluişik, S.; Frary, A.; Frary, A.; Doğanlar, S. Health benefits and bioactive compounds of eggplant. Food Chem. 2018, 268, 602–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Meyer, R.S.; Whitaker, B.D.; Little D., P.; Wu, S.-B.; Kennelly, E.J.; Long, C.-L.; Litt, A. Parallel reductions in phenolic constituents resulting from the domestication of eggplant. Phytochemistry 2015, 115, 194–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. San José, R.; Sánchez-Mata, M.C.; Cámara, M.; Prohens, J. Eggplant fruit composition as affected by the cultivation environment and genetic constitution. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 2774–2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Ma, C.; Dastmalchi, K.; Whitaker, B.D.; Kennelly, E.J. Two new antioxidant malonated caffeoylquinic acid isomers in fruits of wild eggplant relatives. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 9645–9651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Noda, Y.; Kneyuki, T.; Igarashi, K.; Mori, A.; Packer, L. Antioxidant activity of nasunin, an anthocyanin in eggplant peels. Toxicology 2000, 148, 119–0123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wu, X.; Prior, R.L. Identification and characterization of anthocyanins by high performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry in common foods in the United States: Vegetables, nuts, and grains. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 3101–3113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Azuma, K.; Ohyama, A.; Ippoushi, K.; Ichiyanagi, T.; Tekeuchi, A.; Saito, T.; Fukuoka, H. Structures and antioxidant activity of anthocyanins in many accessions of eggplant and its related species. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 10154–10159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Morales-Soto, A.; Gómez-Caravaca, A.M.; García-Salas, P.; Segura-Carretero, A.; Fernández-Gutiérrez, A. High-performance liquid chromatography coupled to diode array and electrospray time-of-flight mass spectrometry detectors for a comprehensive characterization of phenolic and other polar compounds in three pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) samples. Food Res. Int. 2013, 51, 977–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Batiha, G.E.-S.; Alqahtani, A.; Ojo, O.A.; Shaheen, H.M.; Wasef, L.; Elzeiny, M.; Ismail, M.; Shalaby, M.; Murata, T.; Zaragoza-Bastida, A.; et al. Biological properties, bioactive constituents, and pharmacokinetics of some Capsicum spp. and capsaicinoids. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zamljen, T.; Medic, A.; Veberic, R.; Hudina, M.; Jakopic, J.; Slatnar, A. Metabolic variation among fruits of different chili cultivars (Capsicum spp.) using HPLC/MS. Plants 2021, 11, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ananthan, R.; Subhash, K.; Longvah, T. Capsaicinoids, amino acid and fatty acid profiles in different fruit components of the world hottest Naga king chilli (Capsicum chinense Jacq). Food Chem. 2018, 238, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bae, H.; Jayaprakasha, G.K.; Crosby, K.; Yoo, K.S.; Leskovar, D.I.; Jifon, J.L.; Patil, B.S. Ascorbic acid, capsaicinoid, and flavonoid aglycone concentrations as a function of fruit maturity stage in greenhouse-grown peppers. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2014, 33, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Berry, H.M.; Rickett, D.V.; Baxter, C.J.; Enfissi, E.M.A.; Fraser, P.D. Carotenoid biosynthesis and sequestration in red chilli pepper fruit and its impact on colour intensity traits. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 2637–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Cartea, M.E.; Francisco, M.; Soengas, P.; Velasco, P. Phenolic compounds in Brassica vegetables. Molecules 2010, 16, 251–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Liu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Umashankar, S.; Liang, X.; Lee, H.W.; Swarup, S.; Ong, C.N. Characterization of plant volatiles reveals distinct metabolic profiles and pathways among 12 Brassicaceae vegetables. Metabolites 2018, 8, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Baek, S.A.; Jung, Y.H.; Lim, S.H.; Park, S.U.; Kim, J.K. Metabolic profiling in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. subsp. pekinensis) cultivars reveals that glucosinolate content is correlated with carotenoid content. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 4426–4434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Lee, K.B.; Kim, Y.J.; Kim, H.J.; Choi, J.; Kim, J.K. Phytochemical profiles of Brassicaceae vegetables and their multivariate characterization using chemometrics. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2018, 61, 131–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Abureidah, I.M.; Arráezromán, D.; Quirantespiné, R.; Fernándezarroyo, S.; Seguracarretero, A.; Fernándezgutiérrez, A. HPLC–ESI-Q-TOF-MS for a comprehensive characterization of bioactive phenolic compounds in cucumber whole fruit extract. Food Res. Int. 2012, 46, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mcnally, D.J.; Wurms, K.V.; Labbé, C.; Quideau, S.; Bélanger, R.R. Complex C-glycosyl flavonoid phytoalexins from Cucumis sativus. J. Nat. Prod. 2003, 66, 1280–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hu, C.; Zhao, H.; Wang, W.; Xu, M.; Shi, J.; Nie, X.; Yang, G. Identification of conserved and diverse metabolic shift of the stylar, intermediate and peduncular segments of cucumber fruit during development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Roberts, L.D.; Souza, A.L.; Gerszten, R.E.; Clish, C.B. Targeted metabolomics. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 2012, 98, 30.2.1–30.2.24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Iijima, Y. Recent advances in the application of metabolomics to studies of biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOC) produced by plant. Metabolites 2014, 4, 699–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mattoli, L.; Gianni, M.; Burico, M. Mass spectrometry-based metabolomic analysis as a tool for quality control of natural complex products. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2022, e21773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Martínez-Esteso, M.J.; Martínez-Márquez, A.; Sellés-Marchart, S.; Morante-Carriel, J.A.; Bru-Martínez, R. The role of in proteomics progressing insights into plant secondary metabolism. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Yugi, K.; Kubota, H.; Hatano, A.; Kuroda, S. Trans-omics: How to reconstruct biochemical networks across multiple ‘Omic’ layers. Trends Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 276–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Chan, E.K.; Rowe, H.C.; Hansen, B.G.; Kliebenstein, D.J. The complex genetic architecture of the metabolome. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6, e1001198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Meena, K.K.; Sorty, A.M.; Bitla, U.M.; Choudhary, K.; Gupta, P.; Pareek, A.; Singh, D.P.; Prabha, R.; Sahu, P.K.; Gupta, V.K.; et al. Abiotic stress responses and microbe-mediated mitigation in plants: The omics strategies. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Zhao, Q.; Zhang, J.-L.; Li, F. Application of metabolomics in the study of natural Products. Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 2018, 8, 321–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Salem, M.A.; De Souza, L.P.; Serag, A.; Fernie, A.R.; Farag, M.A.; Ezzat, S.M.; Alseekh, S. Metabolomics in the context of plant natural products research: From sample preparation to metabolite analysis. Metabolites 2020, 10, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Gil-Chávez, G.J.; Villa, J.A.; Ayala-Zavala, J.F.; Heredia, J.B.; Sepulveda, D.; Yahia, E.M. González-Aguilar, G.A. Technologies for extraction and production of bioactive compounds to be used as nutraceuticals and food ingredients: An overview. Comp. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2013, 12, 5–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Williams, S.R.; Oatley, D.L.; Abdrahman, A.; Butt, T.; Nash, R. Membrane technology for the improved separation of bioactive compounds. Procedia Eng. 2012, 44, 2112–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Salam, A.M.; Lyles, J.T.; Quave, C.L. Methods in the Extraction and Chemical Analysis of Medicinal Plants. In Methods and Techniques in Ethnobiology and Ethnoecology; Albuquerque, U.P., De Lucea, R.F.P., Da Cunha, L.V.F.C., Alves, R.R.N., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 257–283. [Google Scholar]
  56. Patel, M.K.; Pandey, S.; Kumar, M.; Haque, M.I.; Pal, S.; Yadav, N.S. Plants metabolome study: Emerging tools and techniques. Plants 2021, 10, 2409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sharma, V.; Gupta, P.; Priscilla, K.; Kumar, S.; Hangargi, B.; Veershetty, A.; Ramrao, D.P.; Suresh, S.; Narasanna, R.; Naik, G.R.; et al. Metabolomics intervention towards better understanding of plant traits. Cells 2021, 10, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rienzo, M.; Jackson, S.J.; Chao, L.K.; Leaf, T.; Schmidt, T.J.; Navidi, A.H.; Nadler, D.C.; Ohler, M.; Leavell, M.D. High-throughput screening for high-efficiency small-molecule biosynthesis. Metab. Eng. 2021, 63, 102–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Di Masi, S.; De Benedetto, G.E.; Malitesta, C.; Saponari, M.; Citti, C.; Cannazza, G.; Ciccarella, G. HPLC-MS/MS method applied to an untargeted metabolomics approach for the diagnosis of “olive quick decline syndrome”. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2022, 414, 465–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Silva, M.S.; Cordeiro, C.; Roessner, U.; Figueiredo, A. Editorial: Metabolomics in crop research—Current and emerging methodologies. Front. Plant. Sci. 2019, 10, 1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ma, A.; Qi, X. Mining plant metabolomes: Methods, applications, and perspectives. Plant Commun. 2021, 2, 100238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. De Souza, L.P.; Borghi, M.; Fernie, A. Plant single-cell metabolomics—Challenges and perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kumar, R.; Bohra, A.; Pandey, A.K.; Pandey, M.K.; Kumar, A. Metabolomics for plant improvement: Status and prospects. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Sun, W.; Chen, Z.; Hong, J.; Shi, J. Promoting human nutrition and health through plant metabolomics: Current status and challenges. Biology 2021, 10, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Pinu, F.R.; Goldansaz, S.A.; Jaine, J. Translational metabolomics: Current challenges and future opportunities. Metabolites 2019, 9, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Dias, D.A.; Hill, C.B.; Jayasinghe, N.S.; Atieno, J.; Sutton, T.; Roessner, U. Quantitative profiling of polar primary metabolites of two chickpea cultivars with contrasting responses to salinity. J. Chromatogr. B 2015, 1000, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kellogg, J.J.; Kvalheim, O.M.; Cech, N.B. Composite score analysis for unsupervised comparison and network visualization of metabolomics data. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1095, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Turner, M.F.; Heuberger, A.L.; Kirkwood, J.S.; Collins, C.C.; Wolfrum, E.J.; Broeckling, C.D.; Prenni, J.E.; Jahn, C.E. Non-targeted metabolomics in diverse sorghum breeding lines indicates primary and secondary metabolite profiles are associated with plant biomass accumulation and photosynthesis. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Van Dam, S.; Võsa, U.; Van der Graaf, A.; Franke, L.; De Magalhães, J.P. Gene co-expression analysis for functional classification and gene–disease predictions. Brief. Bioinform. 2018, 19, 575–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Sweetlove, L.J.; Fernie, A.R. The role of dynamic enzyme assemblies and substrate channelling in metabolic regulation. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Manzoni, C.; Kia, D.A.; Vandrovcova, J.; Hardy, J.; Wood, N.W.; Lewis, P.A.; Ferrari, R. Genome, transcriptome and proteome: The rise of omics data and their integration in biomedical sciences. Brief. Bioinform. 2018, 19, 286–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Johnson, C.H.; Ivanisevic, J.; Siuzdak, G. Metabolomics: Beyond biomarkers and towards mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2016, 17, 451–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Wei, S.; Yang, X.; Huo, G.; Ge, G.; Liu, H.; Luo, L.; Hu, J.; Huang, D.; Long, P. Distinct metabolome changes during seed germination of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) in response to thermal stress as revealed by untargeted metabolomics analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Yizhak, K.; Benyamini, T.; Liebermeister, W.; Ruppin, E.; Shlomi, T. Integrating quantitative proteomics and metabolomics with a genome-scale metabolic network model. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, i255–i260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Sharma, K.; Sarma, S.; Bohra, A.; Mitra, A.; Sharma, N.K.; Kumar, A. Plant Metabolomics: An Emerging Technology for Crop Improvement; Intech Open: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Raza, A. Metabolomics: A systems biology approach for enhancing heat stress tolerance in plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2022, 41, 741–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Razzaq, A.; Sadia, B.; Raza, A.; Khalid, H.M.; Saleem, F. Metabolomics: A way forward for crop improvement. Metabolites 2019, 9, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Chen, Y.H.; Gols, R.; Benrey, B. Crop domestication and its impact on naturally selected trophic interactions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2015, 60, 35–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Alseekh, S.; Scossa, F.; Wen, W.; Luo, J.; Yan, J.; Beleggia, R.; Klee, H.J.; Huang, S.; Papa, R.; Fernie, A.R. Domestication of crop metabolomes: Desired and unintended consequences. Trends. Plant. Sci. 2021, 26, 650–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Alseekh, S.; Bermudez, L.; De Haro, L.A.; Fernie, A.R.; Carrari, F. Crop metabolomics: From diagnostics to assisted breeding. Metabolomics 2018, 14, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Giovannoni, J. Tomato multiomics reveals consequences of crop domestication and improvement. Cell 2018, 172, 6–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhu, G.; Wang, S.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, S.; Liao, Q.; Zhang, C.; Lin, T.; Qin, M.; Peng, M.; Yang, C.; et al. Rewiring of the fruit metabolome in tomato breeding. Cell 2018, 172, 249–261.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Tohge, T.; Scossa, F.; Wendenburg, R.; Frasse, P.; Balbo, I.; Watanabe, M.; Alseekh, S.; Jadhav, S.S.; Delfin, J.C.; Lohse, M.; et al. Exploiting natural variation in tomato to define pathway structure and metabolic regulation of fruit polyphenolics in the Lycopersicum complex. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 127–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Carrari, F.; Baxter, C.; Usadel, B.; Urbanczyk-Wochniak, E.; Zanor, M.I.; Nunes-Nesi, A.; Nikiforova, V.; Centero, D.; Ratzka, A.; Pauly, M.; et al. Integrated analysis of metabolite and transcript levels reveals the metabolic shifts that underlie tomato fruit development and highlight regulatory aspects of metabolic network behaviour. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142, 1380–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Rohrmann, J.; Tohge, T.; Alba, R.; Osorio, S.; Caldana, C.; McQuinn, R.; Arvidsson, S.; Van der Merwe, M.J.; Riaño-Pachón, D.M.; Mueller-Roeber, B.; et al. Combined transcription factor profiling, microarray analysis and metabolite profiling reveals the transcriptional control of metabolic shifts occurring during tomato fruit development. Plant J. 2011, 68, 999–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ibarra-Estrada, E.; Palma-Tenango RM, S. Metabolomics as a Tool in Agriculture. In Metabolomics—Fundamentals and Applications; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Roessner-Tunali, U.; Hegemann, B.; Lytovchenko, A.; Carrari, F.; Bruedigam, C.; Granot, D.; Fernie, A.R. Metabolic profiling of transgenic tomato plants overexpressing hexokinase reveals that the influence of hexose phosphorylation diminishes during fruit development. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133, 84–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Kazmi, R.H.; Willems, L.A.J.; Joosen, R.V.L.; Khan, N.; Ligterink, W.; Hilhorst, H.W.M. Metabolomic analysis of tomato seed germination. Metabolomics 2017, 13, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Abreu, A.C.; Fernández, I. NMR Metabolomics applied on the discrimination of variables influencing tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Molecules 2020, 25, 3738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ntagkas, N.; De Vos, R.C.H.; Woltering, E.J.; Nicole, C.C.S.; Labrie, C.; Marcelis, L.F.M. Modulation of the tomato fruit metabolome by LED light. Metabolites 2020, 10, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Jang, Y.K.; Jung, E.; Lee, H.-A.; Choi, D. Metabolomic characterization of Hot pepper (Capsicum annuum ‘CM334’) during fruit development. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 9452–9460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Mi, S.; Wenlong, Y.; Jian, L.; Minxuan, L.; Yaxin, S.; Xianghong, W. Characterization and discrimination of chilli peppers based on multi-element and non-targeted metabolomics analysis. LWT 2020, 131, 109742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Aizat, W.M.; Dias, D.A.; Stangoulis, J.C.R.; Able, J.A.; Roessner, U.; Able, A.J. Metabolomics of capsicum ripening reveals modification of the ethylene related-pathway and carbon metabolism. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2014, 89, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wang, M.; Chen, L.; Liang, Z.; Liu, W.; Jiang, B.; Yan, J.; Sun, P.; Cao, Z.; Peng, Q.; Lin, Y. Metabolome and transcriptome analyses reveal chlorophyll and anthocyanin metabolism pathway associated with cucumber fruit skin color. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Maamoun, A.A.; El-Akkad, R.H.; Farag, M.A. Mapping metabolome changes in Luffa aegyptiaca mill fruits at different maturation stages via MS-based metabolomics and chemometrics. J. Adv. Res. 2021, 29, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Brock, M.T.; Lucas, L.K.; Anderson, N.A.; Rubin, M.J.; Markelz, R.J.; Covington, M.F.; Devisetty, U.K.; Chapple, C.; Maloof, J.N.; Weinig, C. Genetic architecture, biochemical underpinnings and ecological impact of floral UV patterning. Mol. Ecol. 2016, 25, 1122–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Liu, R.; Bao, Z.X.; Zhao, P.J.; Li, G.H. Advances in the study of metabolomics and metabolites in some species interactions. Molecules 2021, 26, 3311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zhang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, J.-K. Thriving under stress: How plants balance growth and the stress response. Dev. Cell 2020, 55, 529–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Nahar, K.; Alam, M.M.; Roychowdhury, R.; Fujita, M. Physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms of heat stress tolerance in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 643–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Rangel-Huerta, O.D.; Gil, A. Nutrimetabolomics: An update on analytical approaches to investigate the role of plant-based foods and their bioactive compounds in non-communicable chronic diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Baidoo, E.E.K. Microbial metabolomics: A general overview. Methods Protoc. 2019, 1859, 18. [Google Scholar]
  102. Carrera, F.P.; Noceda, C.; Maridueña-Zavala, M.G.; Cevallos-Cevallos, J.M. Metabolomics, a powerful tool for understanding plant abiotic stress. Agronomy 2021, 11, 824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Tohge, T.; De Souza, L.P.; Fernie, A.R. Genome-enabled plant metabolomics. J. Chromatogr. B 2014, 966, 7–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Xu, J.; Chen, Z.; Wang, F.; Jia, W.; Xu, Z. Combined transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses uncover rearranged gene expression and metabolite metabolism in tobacco during cold acclimation. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Jones, D.P.; Park, Y.; Ziegler, T.R. Nutritional metabolomics: Progress in addressing complexity in diet and health. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2012, 32, 183–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Mun, H.; Kwon, M.C.; Lee, N.-R.; Son, S.Y.; Song, D.H.; Lee, C.H. Comparing metabolites and functional properties of various tomatoes using mass spectrometry-based metabolomics approach. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 659646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Reed, D.; Kumar, D.; Kumar, S.; Raina, K.; Punia, R.; Kant, R.; Saba, L.; Cruickshank-Quinn, C.; Tabakoff, B.; Reisdorph, N.; et al. Transcriptome and metabolome changes induced by bitter melon(Momordica charantia)-intake in a high-fat diet induced obesity model. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2021, 12, 287–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Emwas, A.H.M.; Al-Rifai, N.; Szczepski, K.; Alsuhaymi, S.; Rayyan, S.; Almahasheer, H.; Jaremko, M.; Brennan, L.; Lachowicz, J.I. You are what you eat: Application of metabolomics approaches to advance nutrition research. Foods 2021, 10, 1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Marchev, A.S.; Vasileva, L.V.; Amirova, K.M.; Savva, M.S.; Balcheva-Sivenova, Z.P.; Georgiev, M.I. Metabolomics and health: From nutritional crops and plant-based pharmaceuticals to profiling of human biofluids. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2021, 78, 6487–6503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Wahyuni, Y.; Ballester, A.-R.; Tikunov, Y.; De Vos, R.C.H.; Pelgrom, K.T.B.; Maharijaya, A.; Sudarmonowati, E.; Bino, R.J.; Bovy, A.G. Metabolomics and molecular marker analysis to explore pepper (Capsicum sp.) biodiversity. Metabolomics 2013, 9, 130–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Ye, J.; Wang, X.; Hu, T.; Zhang, F.; Wang, B.; Li, C.; Yang, T.; Li, H.; Lu, Y.; Giovannoni, J.J.; et al. An InDel in the promoter of Al-Activated malate transporter selected during tomato domestication determines fruit malate contents and Aluminum tolerance. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 2249–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Saxena, A.; Cramer, C.S. Metabolomics: A potential tool for breeding nutraceutical vegetables. Adv. Crop Sci. Tech. 2013, 1, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Liu, L.; Shao, Z.; Zhang, M.; Wang, Q. Regulation of carotenoid metabolism in tomato. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 28–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Tohge, T.; Fernie, A.R. Metabolomics-inspired insight into developmental, environmental and genetic aspects of tomato fruit chemical composition and quality. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015, 56, 1681–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Pinter, M.D.; Harter, T.; McCarthy, M.J.; Augustine, M.P. Towards using NMR to screen for spoiled tomatoes stored in 1000 L, aseptically sealed, metal-lined totes. Sensors 2014, 14, 4167–4176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Bondia-Pons, I.; Cañellas, N.; Abete, I.; Rodríguez, M.A.; Perez-Cornago, A.; Navas-Carretero, S.; Ángeles Zulet, M.; Correig, X.; Martínez, J.A. Nutri-Metabolomics: Subtle serum metabolic differences in healthy subjects by NMR-based metabolomics after a short-term nutritional intervention with two tomato sauces. OMICS J. Int. Biol. 2013, 17, 611–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Hohmann, M.; Christoph, N.; Wachter, H.; Holzgrabe, U. 1H NMR profiling as an approach to differentiate conventionally and organically grown Tomatoes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 33, 8530–8540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Vallverdú-Queralt, A.; Medina-Remón, A.; Casals-Ribes, I.; Amat, M.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M. A metabolomic approach differentiates between conventional and organic ketchups. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 11703–11710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Novotná, H.; Kmiecik, O.; Gałązka, M.; Krtková, V.; Hurajová, A.; Schulzová, V.; Hallmann, E.; Rembiałkowska, E.; Hajšlová, J. Metabolomic fingerprinting employing DART-TOFMS for authentication of tomatoes and peppers from organic and conventional farming. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess. 2012, 29, 1335–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Rocchetti, G.; Senizza, B.; Zengin, G.; Bonini, P.; Bontempo, L.; Camin, F.; Trevisan, M.; Lucini, L. The hierarchical contribution of organic vs. conventional farming, cultivar, and terroir on untargeted metabolomics phytochemical profile and functional traits of tomato fruits. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 856513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Pott, D.M.; Durán-Soria, S.; Osorio, S.; Vallarino, J.G. Combining metabolomic and transcriptomic approaches to assess and improve crop quality traits. CABI Agric. Biosci. 2021, 2, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Tebani, A.; Bekri, S. Paving the way to precision nutrition through metabolomics. Front. Nutr. 2019, 6, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Yadav, B.; Jogawat, A.; Rahman, S.; Narayan, O.P. Secondary metabolites in the drought stress tolerance of crop plants: A review. Gene Rep. 2021, 23, 101040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Nephali, L.; Piater, L.A.; Dubery, I.A.; Patterson, V.; Huyser, J.; Burgess, K.; Tugizimana, F. Biostimulants for plant growth and mitigation of abiotic stresses: A metabolomics perspective. Metabolites 2020, 10, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Zhang, W.-F.; Gong, Z.-H.; Wu, M.-B.; Chan, H.; Yuan, Y.-J.; Tang, N.; Zhang, Q.; Miao, M.-J.; Chang, W.; Li, Z.; et al. Integrative comparative analyses of metabolite and transcript profiles uncovers complex regulatory network in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit undergoing chilling injury. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Luna-Ruiz, J.D.J.; Nabhan, G.P.; Aguilar-Meléndez, A. Shifts in plant chemical defenses of chile pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) due to domestication in mesoamerica. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2018, 6, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Luna, E.; Flandin, A.; Cassan, C.; Prigent, S.; Chevanne, C.; Kadiri, F.; Gibon, Y.; Pétriacq, P. Metabolomics to exploit the primed immune system of tomato fruit. Metabolites 2020, 10, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Zhao, X.; Yuan, X.; Chen, S.; Fu, D.-Q.; Jiang, C.-Z. Metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses reveal that a MADS-box transcription factor TDR4 regulates tomato fruit quality. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Sudiro, C.; Guglielmi, F.; Hochart, M.; Senizza, B.; Zhang, L.; Lucini, L.; Altissimo, A. A phenomics and metabolomics investigation on the modulation of drought stress by a biostimulant plant extract in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Agronomy 2022, 12, 764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Chele, K.H.; Steenkamp, P.; Piater, L.A.; Dubery, I.A.; Huyser, J.; Tugizimana, F. A global metabolic map defines the effects of a Si-based biostimulant on tomato plants under normal and saline conditions. Metabolites 2021, 11, 820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Min, K.; Chen, K.; Arora, R. A metabolomics study of ascorbic acid-induced in situ freezing tolerance in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). Plant Direct 2020, 4, e00202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Adeniji, A.A.; Babalola, O.O.; Loots, D.T. Metabolomic applications for understanding complex tripartite plant-microbe interactions: Strategies and perspectives. Biotechnol. Rep. 2020, 25, e00425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Velásquez, A.C.; Castroverde, C.; He, S.Y. Plant-pathogen warfare under changing climate conditions. Curr. Biol. 2018, 28, R619–R634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Harman, G.; Khadka, R.; Doni, F.; Uphoff, N. Benefits to plant health and productivity from enhancing plant microbial symbionts. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 610065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Mhlongo, M.I.; Piater, L.A.; Steenkamp, P.A.; Labuschagne, N.; Dubery, I.A. Metabolomic evaluation of tissue-specific defense responses in tomato plants modulated by PGPR-priming against Phytophthora capsici infection. Plants 2021, 10, 1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Zeiss, D.R.; Mhlongo, M.I.; Tugizimana, F.; Steenkamp, P.A.; Dubery, I.A. Metabolomic profiling of the host response of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) following infection by Ralstonia solanacearum. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Lowe-Power, T.M.; Hendrich, C.G.; Von Roepenack-Lahaye, E.; Li, B.; Wu, D.; Mitra, R.; Dalsing, B.L.; Ricca, P.; Naidoo, J.; Cook, D.; et al. Metabolomics of tomato xylem sap during bacterial wilt reveals Ralstonia solanacearum produces abundant putrescine, a metabolite that accelerates wilt disease. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 20, 1330–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Rossouw, L.T.; Madala, N.E.; Tugizimana, F.; Steenkamp, P.A.; Esterhuizen, L.L.; Dubery, I.A. Deciphering the resistance mechanism of tomato plants against whitefly-mediated tomato curly stunt virus infection through ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS)-based metabolomics approaches. Metabolites 2019, 9, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Yogendra, K.N.; Kushalappa, A.C.; Sarmiento, F.; Rodriguez, E.; Mosquera, T. Metabolomics deciphers quantitative resistance mechanisms in diploid potato clones against late blight. Funct. Plant Biol. 2014, 42, 284–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Castro-Moretti, F.R.; Gentzel, I.N.; Mackey, D.; Alonso, A.P. Metabolomics as an emerging tool for the study of plant-pathogen interactions. Metabolites 2020, 10, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Leiss, K.A.; Choi, Y.H.; Verpoorte, R.; Klinkhamer, P.G.A. An overview of NMR-based metabolomics to identify secondary plant compounds involved in host plant resistance. Phytochem. Rev. 2011, 10, 205–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Garcia, G.P.; Dos Santos, F.N.; Zanotta, S.; Eberlin, M.N.; Carazzone, C. Metabolomics of Solanum lycopersicum infected with Phytophthora infestans leads to early detection of late blight in asymptomatic plants. Molecules 2018, 23, 3330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Hernández-Aparicio, F.; Lisón, P.; Rodrigo, I.; Bellés, J.M.; López-Gresa, M.P. Signaling in the tomato immunity against Fusarium oxysporum. Molecules 2021, 26, 1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Bisht, H.; Bhagat, D.; Bhatnagar, M.K. Metabolic profiling of tomatoes with pest infestation using GC-MS and NMR spectroscopy. Int. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. Res. 2014, 6, 550–556. [Google Scholar]
  145. Afifah, E.N.; Murti, R.H.; Nuringtyas, T.R. Metabolomics approach for the analysis of resistance of four tomato genotypes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) to root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita). Open Life Sci. 2019, 14, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Villa-Ruano, N.; Velásquez-Valle, R.; Zepeda-Vallejo, L.G.; Pérez-Hernández, N.; Velázquez-Ponce, M.; Arcos-Adame, V.M.; Becerra-Martínez, E. 1H NMR-based metabolomic profiling for identification of metabolites in Capsicum annuum cv. mirasol infected by beet mild curly top virus (BMCTV). Food Res. Int. 2018, 106, 870–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Moënne-Loccoz, Y.; Mavingui, P.; Combes, C.; Normand, P.; Steinberg, C. Microorganisms and Biotic Interactions. In Environmental Microbiology: Fundamentals and Applications; Bertrand, J.C., Caumette, P., Lebaron, P., Matheron, R., Normand, P., Sime-Ngando, T., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. López-Gresa, M.P.; Maltese, F.; Bellés, J.M.; Conejero, V.; Kim, H.K.; Choi, Y.H.; Verpoorte, R. Metabolic response of tomato leaves upon different plant-pathogen interactions. Phytochem. Anal. 2010, 21, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Allwood, J.W.; Ellis, D.I.; Goodacre, R. Metabolomic technologies and their application to the study of plants and plant-host interactions. Physiol. Plant. 2008, 132, 117–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Maag, D.; Erb, M.; Glauser, G. Metabolomics in plant–herbivore interactions: Challenges and applications. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2015, 157, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Jiang, Y.; Zhang, C.-X.; Chen, R.; He, S.Y. Challenging battles of plants with phloem-feeding insects and prokaryotic pathogens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 23390–23397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Errard, A.; Ulrichs, C.; Kühne, S.; Mewis, I.; Mishig, N.; Maul, R.; Drungowski, M.; Parolin, P.; Schreiner, M.; Baldermann, S. Metabolite profiling reveals a specific response in tomato to predaceous Chrysoperla carnea larvae and herbivore(s)-predator interactions with the generalist pests Tetranychus urticae and Myzus persicae. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Chen, L.; Li, X.; Zhang, J.; He, T.; Huang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Hafeez, M.; Zhou, S.; Ren, X.; et al. Comprehensive metabolome and volatilome analyses in eggplant and tomato reveal their differential responses to Tuta absoluta infestation. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 757230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Chen, L.M.; Li, X.W.; He, T.J.; Li, P.J.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, S.X.; Wu, Q.C.; Chen, T.T.; Lu, Y.B.; Hou, Y.M. Comparative biochemical and transcriptome analyses in tomato and eggplant reveal their differential responses to Tuta absoluta infestation. Genomics 2021, 113, 2108–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Macel, M.; Visschers, I.G.S.; Peters, J.L.; Kappers, I.F.; De Vos, R.C.H.; Van Dam, N.M. Metabolomics of thrips resistance in pepper (Capsicum spp.) reveals monomer and dimer acyclic diterpene glycosides as potential chemical defenses. J. Chem. Ecol. 2019, 45, 490–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Coppola, M.; Diretto, G.; Digilio, M.C.; Woo, S.L.; Giuliano, G.; Molisso, D.; Pennacchio, F.; Lorito, M.; Rao, R. Transcriptome and metabolome reprogramming in tomato plants by Trichoderma harzianum strain T22 primes and enhances defense responses against aphids. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Zhang, Y.; Bouwmeester, H.J.; Kappers, I.F. Combined transcriptome and metabolome analysis identifies defence responses in spider mite-infested pepper (Capsicum annuum). J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 330–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. He, J.; Bouwmeester, H.J.; Dicke, M.; Kappers, I. Transcriptional and metabolite analysis reveal a shift in direct and indirect defences in response to spider-mite infestation in cucumber (Cucumis sativus). Plant Mol. Biol. 2020, 103, 489–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Liu, J.; Gao, Y.; Gong, F.; Hou, F.; Zhang, Z.; Cheng, X.; Du, W.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J.; Xu, J.; et al. The transcriptome and metabolome reveal stress responses in sulfur-fumigated Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 778956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Liu, J.; Yuan, Y.; Wu, Q.; Yupeng, Z.; Jiang, Y.; John, A.; Wen, L.; Li, T.; Jian, Q.; Yang, B. Analyses of quality and metabolites levels of okra during postharvest senescence by 1 H-high resolution NMR. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2017, 132, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Mashabela, M.D.; Piater, L.A.; Dubery, I.A.; Tugizimana, F.; Mhlongo, M.I. Rhizosphere tripartite interactions and PGPR-mediated metabolic reprogramming towards ISR and plant priming: A metabolomics review. Biology 2022, 11, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Zuluaga, M.Y.A.; Milani, K.M.L.; Miras-Moreno, M.B.; Lucini, L.; Valentinuzzi, F.; Mimmo, T.; Pii, Y.; Cesco, S.; Rodrigues, E.P.; De Oliveira, A.L.M. The adaptive metabolomic profile and functional activity of tomato rhizosphere are revealed upon PGPB inoculation under saline stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2021, 189, 104552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Wen, T.; Zhao, M.; Liu, T.; Huang, Q.; Yuan, J.; Shen, Q. High abundance of Ralstonia solanacearum changed tomato rhizosphere microbiome and metabolome. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. Wen, T.; Yuan, J.; He, X.; Lin, Y. Enrichment of beneficial cucumber rhizosphere microbes mediated by organic acid secretion. Hortic. Res. 2020, 7, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Wu, F.; Ding, Y.; Nie, Y.; Wang, X.-J.; An, Y.-Q.; Roessner, U.; Walker, R.; Du, B.; Bai, J.-G. Plant metabolomics integrated with transcriptomics and rhizospheric bacterial community indicates the mitigation effects of Klebsiella oxytoca P620 on p-hydroxybenzoic acid stress in cucumber. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 415, 125756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Han, S.; Micallef, S.A. Environmental metabolomics of the Tomato plant surface provides insights on Salmonella enterica colonization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 3131–3142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  167. Song, Y.; Li, X.; Yao, S.; Yang, X.; Jiang, X. Correlations between soil metabolomics and bacterial community structures in the pepper rhizosphere under plastic greenhouse cultivation. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 728, 138439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Mattoo, A.K.; Sobolev, A.P.; Neelam, A.; Goyal, R.K.; Handa, A.K.; Segre, A.L. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy-based metabolite profiling of transgenic tomato fruit engineered to accumulate spermidine and spermine reveals enhanced anabolic and nitrogen-carbon interactions. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142, 1759–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Paupière, M.J.; Tikunov, Y.; Schleiff, E.; Bovy, A.; Fragkostefanakis, S. Reprogramming of tomato leaf metabolome by the activity of heat stress transcription factor HsfB1. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 610599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Li, S.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, J.; Xing, G. Comparative physiological and metabolomic analyses revealed that foliar spraying with zinc oxide and silica nanoparticles modulates metabolite profiles in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Food Energy Secur. 2021, 10, e269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Zhang, H.; Du, W.; Peralta-Videa, J.R.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L.; White, J.C.; Keller, A.; Guo, H.; Ji, R.; Zhao, L. Metabolomics reveals how cucumber (Cucumis sativus) reprograms metabolites to cope with silver ions and silver nanoparticle-induced oxidative stress. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 8016–8026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Zhao, L.; Huang, Y.; Adeleye, A.S.; Keller, A.A. Metabolomics reveals Cu(OH)2 nanopesticide-activated anti-oxidative pathways and decreased beneficial antioxidants in spinach leaves. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 10184–10194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  173. Zhang, H.; Lu, L.; Zhao, X.; Zhao, S.; Gu, X.; Du, W.; Wei, H.; Ji, R.; Zhao, L. Metabolomics reveals the “invisible” responses of spinach plants exposed to CeO2 nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 6007–6017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Zhou, S.; Allard, P.M.; Wolfrum, C.; Ke, C.; Tang, C.; Ye, Y.M.; Wolfender, J.-L. Identification of chemotypes in bitter melon by metabolomics: A plant with potential benefit for management of diabetes in traditional Chinese medicine. Metabolomics 2019, 15, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Mishra, S.; Ankit; Sharma, R.; Gogna, N.; Dorai, K. NMR-based metabolomic profiling of the differential concentration of phytomedicinal compounds in pericarp, skin and seeds of Momordica charantia (bitter melon). Nat. Prod. Res. 2022, 36, 390–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Moco, S.; Forshed, J.; De Vos, R.C.H.; Bino, R.J.; Vervoort, J. Intra- and inter-metabolite correlation spectroscopy of tomato metabolomics data obtained by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance. Metabolomics 2008, 4, 202–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  177. Tikunov, Y.; Lommen, A.; De Vos, C.H.R.; Verhoeven, H.A.; Bino, R.J.; Hall, R.D.; Arnaud, G.; Bovy, A. Novel approach for nontargeted data analysis for metabolomics. Large-scale profiling of tomato fruit volatiles. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139, 1125–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Murti, R.H.; Afifah, E.N.; Nuringtyas, T.R. Metabolomic response of tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) against bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum) Using 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Plants 2021, 10, 1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Simpson, A.J.; Kingery, W.L.; Hatcher, P.G. The identification of plant derived structures in humic materials using three-dimensional NMR spectroscopy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Mazzei, P.; Vinale, F.; Woo, S.L.; Pascale, A.; Lorito, M.; Piccolo, A. Metabolomics by proton high-resolution magic-angle-spinning nuclear magnetic resonance of tomato plants treated with two secondary metabolites isolated from Trichoderma. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 3538–3545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  181. Sung, J.; Lee, S.; Lee, Y.; Ha, S.; Song, B.; Kim, T.; Waters, B.M.; Krishnan, H.B. Metabolomic profiling from leaves and roots of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants grown under nitrogen, phosphorus or potassium-deficient condition. Plant Sci. 2015, 241, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Ara, T.; Sakurai, N.; Takahashi, S.; Waki, N.; Suganuma, H.; Aizawa, K.; Matsumura, Y.; Kawada, T.; Shibata, D. TOMATOMET: A metabolome database consists of 7118 accurate mass values detected in mature fruits of 25 tomato cultivars. Plant Direct 2021, 5, e00318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Tang, Q.; Zheng, X.; Chen, W.; Ye, X.; Tu, P. Metabolomics reveals key resistant responses in tomato fruit induced by Cryptococcus laurentii. Food Chem. Mol. Sci. 2022, 4, 100066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Bénard, C.; Bernillon, S.; Biais, B.; Osorio, S.; Maucourt, M.; Ballias, P.; Deborde, C.; Colombié, S.; Cabasson, C.; Jacob, D.; et al. Metabolomic profiling in tomato reveals diel compositional changes in fruit affected by source–sink relationships. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 3391–3404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  185. Perez-Fons, L.; Wells, T.; Corol, D.; Ward, J.L.; Gerrish, C.; Beale, M.H.; Seymour, G.B.; Bramley, P.M.; Fraser, P.D. A genome-wide metabolomic resource for tomato fruit from Solanum pennellii. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 3859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  186. Etalo, D.W. An Integrated Approach Involving Metabolomics and Transcriptomics for a System-Wide Understanding of the Interaction between Tomato and Cladosporium fulvum. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2014. Available online: https://www.wur.nl (accessed on 22 September 2022).
  187. Mirnezhad, M.; Romero-González, R.R.; Leiss, K.A.; Choi, Y.H. Metabolomic analysis of host plant cultivated tomatoes. Phytochem. Anal. 2009, 21, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Korenblum, E.; Dong, Y.; Szymanski, J.; Panda, S.; Jozwiak, J.; Massalha, H.; Meir, S.; Rogachev, I.; Aharoni, A. Rhizosphere microbiome mediates systemic root metabolite exudation by root-to-root signalling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 3874–3883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Mellidou, I.; Ainalidou, A.; Papadopoulou, A.; Leontidou, K.; Genitsaris, S.; Karagiannis, E.; Van de Poel, B.; Karamanoli, K. Comparative transcriptomics and metabolomics reveal an intricate priming mechanism involved in PGPR-mediated salt tolerance in tomato. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 713984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Ingallina, C.; Maccelli, A.; Spano, M.; Di Matteo, G.; Di Sotto, A.; Giusti, A.M.; Vinci, G.; Di Giacomo, S.; Rapa, M.; Ciano, S.; et al. Chemico-Biological characterization of Torpedino Di Fondi® tomato fruits: A comparison with San Marzano cultivar at two ripeness stages. Antioxidant 2020, 9, 1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Fatima, E.A.; Moha, T.; Said, W.; Abdelilah, M.; Mohammed, R. Use of metabolomics data analysis to identify fruit quality markers enhanced by the application of an aminopolysaccharide. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 35514–35524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Lopez-Sanchez, P.; De Vos, R.C.H.; Jonker, H.H.; Mumm, R.; Hall, R.D.; Bialek, L.; Leenman, R.; Strassburg, K.; Vreeken, R.; Hankemeier, T.; et al. Comprehensive metabolomics to evaluate the impact of industrial processing on the phytochemical composition of vegetable purees. Food Chem. 2015, 168, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Florentino-Ramos, E.; Villa-Ruano, N.; Hidalgo-Martínez, D.; Ramírez-Meraz, M.; Méndez-Aguilar, R.; Velásquez-Valle, R.; Zepeda-Vallejo, L.G.; Pérez-Hernández, N.; Becerra-Martínez, E. 1H NMR-based fingerprinting of eleven Mexican Capsicum annuum cultivars. Food Res. Int. 2019, 121, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Villa-Ruano, N.; Ramírez-Meraz, M.; Méndez-Aguilar, R.; Zepeda-Vallejo, L.G.; Álvarez-Bravo, A.; Pérez-Hernández, N.; Becerra-Martínez, E. 1H NMR-based metabolomics profiling of ten new races from Capsicum annuum cv. serrano produced in Mexico. Food Res. Int. 2019, 119, 785–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Becerra-Martínez, E.; Florentino-Ramos, E.; Pérez-Hernández, N.; Zepeda-Vallejo, L.G.; Villa-Ruano, N.; Velázquez-Ponce, M.; García-Mendoza, F.; Bañuelos-Hernández, A.E. 1H NMR-based metabolomic fingerprinting to determine metabolite levels in serrano peppers (Capsicum annum L.) grown in two different regions. Food Res. Int. 2017, 102, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Zhao, L.; Hu, J.; Huang, Y.; Wang, H.; Adeleye, A.; Ortiz, C.; Keller, A.A. 1H NMR and GC–MS based metabolomics reveal nano-Cu altered cucumber (Cucumis sativus) fruit nutritional supply. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 110, 138–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  197. Mansfeld, B.; Colle, M.; Kang, Y.; Jones, A.D.; Grumet, R. Transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses of cucumber fruit peels reveal a developmental increase in terpenoid glycosides associated with age-related resistance to Phytophthora capsici. Hortic. Res. 2017, 4, 17022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  198. Miao, L.; Di, Q.; Sun, T.; Li, Y.; Duan, Y.; Wang, J.; Yan, Y.; He, C.; Wang, C.; Yu, X. Integrated metabolome and transcriptome analysis provide insights into the effects of grafting on fruit flavor of cucumber with different rootstocks. Int. J. Mol. Sci 2019, 20, 3592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  199. Zhang, Z.; He, H.; Yan, M.; Zhao, C.; Lei, C.; Li, J.; Yan, F. Widely targeted analysis of metabolomic changes of Cucumis sativus induced by cucurbit chlorotic yellows virus. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Tamura, Y.; Mori, T.; Nakabayashi, R.; Kobayashi, M.; Saito, K.; Okazaki, S.; Wang, N.; Kusano, M. Metabolomic evaluation of the quality of leaf lettuce grown in practical plant factory to capture metabolite signature. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Hanifah, A.; Maharijaya, A.; Putri, S.P.; Laviña, W.A.; Ridwani, S. Untargeted metabolomics analysis of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) fruit and its correlation to fruit morphologies. Metabolites 2016, 8, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  202. Liu, X.; Zhang, A.; Shang, J.; Zhu, Z.; Li, Y.; Wu, X.; Zha, D. Study on browning mechanism of fresh-cut eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) based on metabolomics, enzymatic assays and gene expression. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 6937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Calumpang, C.L.F.; Saigo, T.; Watanabe, M.; Tohge, T. Cross-species comparison of fruit-metabolomics to elucidate metabolic regulation of fruit polyphenolics among solanaceous crops. Metabolites 2020, 10, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Perumal, V.; Khatib, A.; Ahmed, Q.U.; Uzir, B.F.; Abas, F.; Murugesu, S.; Saiman, M.Z.; Primaharinastiti, R.; El-Seedi, H. Antioxidants profile of Momordica charantia fruit extract analyzed using LC-MS-QTOF-based metabolomics. Food Chem. Mol. Sci. 2021, 2, 100012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Hua, M.D.S.; Kumar, S.; Shyur, R.; Cheng, Y.B.; Tian, Z.; Oelmüller, R.; Yeh, K.W. Metabolomic compounds identified in Piriformospora indica-colonized Chinese cabbage roots delineate symbiotic functions of the interaction. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  206. Mabuchi, R.; Tanaka, M.; Nakanishi, C.; Takatani, N.; Tanimoto, S. Analysis of primary metabolites in cabbage (Brassica oleracea var capitata) varieties correlated with antioxidant activity and taste attributes by metabolic profiling. Molecules 2019, 24, 4282. [Google Scholar]
  207. Yeo, H.J.; Baek, S.A.; Sathasivam, R.; Kim, J.K.; Park, S.U. Metabolomic analysis reveals the interaction of primary and secondary metabolism in white, pale green, and green pak choi (Brassica rapa subsp chinensis). Appl. Biol. Chem. 2021, 64, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Liu, X.; Yang, X.; Wang, L.; Duan, Q.; Huang, D. Comparative analysis of metabolites profile in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) affected by different concentrations of gly and nitrate. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 204, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Niron, H.; Barlas, N.; Salih, B.; Türet, M. Comparative transcriptome, metabolome, and ionome analysis of two contrasting common bean genotypes in saline conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 599501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Mecha, E.; Erny, G.L.; Guerreiro, A.C.L.; Feliciano, R.P.; Barbosa, I.; Da Silva, A.B.; Leitão, S.T.; Veloso, M.M.; Rubiales, D.; Rodriguez-Mateos, A.; et al. Metabolomics profile responses to changing environments in a common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm collection. Food Chem. 2022, 370, 131003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Mengdi, L.; Xiaoxu, Y.; Chang, L.; Yanmei, L.; Zhishan, Y.; Guojun, F.; Dajun, L. Integrated transcriptomics and metabolomics analysis to characterize cold stress responses in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2022; preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Zhu, M.; Liu, T.; Guo, M. Current advances in the metabolomics study on Lotus seeds. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  213. Wang, L.; Fu, J.; Li, M.; Fragner, L.; Weckwerth, W.; Yang, P. Metabolomic and proteomic profiles reveal the dynamics of primary metabolism during seed development of lotus (Nelumbo nucifera). Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  214. Mahmud, I.; Chowdhury, K.; Boroujerdi, A. Tissue-specific metabolic profile study of Moringa oleifera L. using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Plant Tissue Cult. Biotechnol. 2014, 24, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of metabolomics applications in crop improvement programs: 1. A representative sampling source of vegetable crop plants (tomato) as a biological source from which cellular metabolome can be extracted from almost all the plant parts and the rhizosphere under varying experimental environmental conditions; 2. data acquisition approach in metabolomics to be applied whether unbiased non-targeted fingerprinting is required or the analysis and quantification of a few selected target molecules is the need of the experiment; 3. study outcomes which needs biological interpretation for hypothesis questions; 4. possible answers to the hypothesis questions in the cellular chemistry and its entwining relations with the environmental impacts; 5. functional targets that could be achieved through metabolomics analysis of the vegetable plants; 6. result-oriented applications of the data outcomes in crop improvement practices; and 7. the ‘end product’ of the experimental metabolomics exercise in vegetable crops.
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of metabolomics applications in crop improvement programs: 1. A representative sampling source of vegetable crop plants (tomato) as a biological source from which cellular metabolome can be extracted from almost all the plant parts and the rhizosphere under varying experimental environmental conditions; 2. data acquisition approach in metabolomics to be applied whether unbiased non-targeted fingerprinting is required or the analysis and quantification of a few selected target molecules is the need of the experiment; 3. study outcomes which needs biological interpretation for hypothesis questions; 4. possible answers to the hypothesis questions in the cellular chemistry and its entwining relations with the environmental impacts; 5. functional targets that could be achieved through metabolomics analysis of the vegetable plants; 6. result-oriented applications of the data outcomes in crop improvement practices; and 7. the ‘end product’ of the experimental metabolomics exercise in vegetable crops.
Ijms 23 12062 g001
Figure 2. Illustrative diagram of possible plant environmental interactions, which are supposed to influence the metabolic status of the crop plants. Analyzing the metabolome of plants exposed to such challenges using metabolomics approaches can yield competitive vegetables crops with better yield, high level of defense and stress mitigating capabilities.
Figure 2. Illustrative diagram of possible plant environmental interactions, which are supposed to influence the metabolic status of the crop plants. Analyzing the metabolome of plants exposed to such challenges using metabolomics approaches can yield competitive vegetables crops with better yield, high level of defense and stress mitigating capabilities.
Ijms 23 12062 g002
Figure 3. Illustrative flow diagram of metabolomics methods, techniques and step-wise bioinformatics resources for identifying metabolites and deciphering their role in the metabolic pathways.
Figure 3. Illustrative flow diagram of metabolomics methods, techniques and step-wise bioinformatics resources for identifying metabolites and deciphering their role in the metabolic pathways.
Ijms 23 12062 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Singh, D.P.; Bisen, M.S.; Shukla, R.; Prabha, R.; Maurya, S.; Reddy, Y.S.; Singh, P.M.; Rai, N.; Chaubey, T.; Chaturvedi, K.K.; et al. Metabolomics-Driven Mining of Metabolite Resources: Applications and Prospects for Improving Vegetable Crops. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12062. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms232012062

AMA Style

Singh DP, Bisen MS, Shukla R, Prabha R, Maurya S, Reddy YS, Singh PM, Rai N, Chaubey T, Chaturvedi KK, et al. Metabolomics-Driven Mining of Metabolite Resources: Applications and Prospects for Improving Vegetable Crops. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(20):12062. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms232012062

Chicago/Turabian Style

Singh, Dhananjaya Pratap, Mansi Singh Bisen, Renu Shukla, Ratna Prabha, Sudarshan Maurya, Yesaru S. Reddy, Prabhakar Mohan Singh, Nagendra Rai, Tribhuvan Chaubey, Krishna Kumar Chaturvedi, and et al. 2022. "Metabolomics-Driven Mining of Metabolite Resources: Applications and Prospects for Improving Vegetable Crops" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 20: 12062. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms232012062

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop