Next Article in Journal
Identification of the Wheat (Triticum aestivum) IQD Gene Family and an Expression Analysis of Candidate Genes Associated with Seed Dormancy and Germination
Previous Article in Journal
Resveratrol Inhibition of the WNT/β-Catenin Pathway following Discogenic Low Back Pain
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integrative Transcriptomic and Proteomic Analysis Reveals an Alternative Molecular Network of Glutamine Synthetase 2 Corresponding to Nitrogen Deficiency in Rice (Oryza sativa L.)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Plant Nutrition: Physiological and Metabolic Responses, Molecular Mechanisms and Chromatin Modifications

by
Fatema Binte Hafiz
1,
Sabine von Tucher
2 and
Wilfried Rozhon
1,*
1
Department of Agriculture, Ecotrophology and Landscape Development, Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, 06406 Bernburg, Germany
2
TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(8), 4084; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23084084
Submission received: 29 March 2022 / Accepted: 2 April 2022 / Published: 7 April 2022
Plant growth and crop yield highly depend on the availability of all required nutrients, ideally in well-balanced ratios. However, plants often face shortages of one or several nutrients. Plant hormones play an important role in the adaptation of plant growth during nutrient-deficiency stresses. Therefore, the aim of this Special Issue is to elucidate the impact of nutrients on plant productivity, root and shoot morphology, as well as to determine the underlying mechanisms involved in nutrient deficiency responses. The manuscripts submitted for this Special Issue contribute to unravelling the molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of phenotypic and metabolic responses to nutrient limitations, particularly in the case of nitrogen (N), phosphate (Pi) and iron (Fe) deficiency. Systemic nutrient deficiency responses were extensively studied by transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic analyses in the economically important crop plants rice and maize and in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana.
Phosphorus is an important macronutrient for plant development. It is a constituent of numerus biomolecules including nucleic acids, phospholipids, co-substrates and co-factors, for instance, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) and pyridoxal phosphate. Phosphate plays a vital role in plant metabolic functions, including photosynthesis, respiration [1] as well as in signal transduction [2,3,4]. Depending on the pH, plants take up inorganic phosphorus from soil in the form of dihydrogen phosphate, H2PO4, and hydrogen phosphate, HPO42−. Pi deficiency responses, transduced by root Pi transporters and phytohormones, can cause diverse phenotypic, transcriptional and metabolic alterations in different plant species. For example, in Arabidopsis, Pi deficiency markedly reduces primary root elongation by inhibiting meristematic cell elongation and proliferation and increases the root-to-shoot ratio due to a stronger decrease in shoot compared to root growth [5,6]. Auxin can modulate the root morphology in response to Pi supply. In Pi deficiency, auxin levels increase in plants and enhance lateral root formation but reduce primary root growth.
Sun et al., 2019 [7] elucidated that the auxin-efflux carrier protein PIN2 regulates basipetal auxin transport in roots and plays a key role in root growth and development under Pi deficiency in OsPIN2-overexpressing rice. The OsPIN2 overexpression line also showed increased auxin distribution in roots, which increased root hair development in rice.
Chutia et al., 2021 [8] showed the relationship between Pi and Fe deficiency signals at the phenotypic and metabolic levels. Fe deficiency causes chlorosis, characterized by chlorophyll loss and subsequent yellowing of leaves [9], while Pi shortage leads to stunted shoots and dark green leaves [10]. The authors extensively analyzed the metabolic responses of A. thaliana shoots and roots under single and combined Pi and Fe deficiencies. Reduced root, shoot and seedling growth was recorded in response to Pi scarcity while Fe deficiency enhanced primary metabolite formation such as asparagine, leucine and tyrosine. Both Pi and Fe deficiency-responsive transcription factors and metabolic regulators controlled the metabolic changes. Notably, organic acid (malate and citrate) formation increased in roots in response to combined Pi and Fe deficiencies. Malate and citrate can solubilize iron and thereby enhance its uptake [11], a function similar to that of hydroxycoumarines, which were recently reported to act as chelators to mediate iron-uptake by plants [12,13,14,15].
Similar to Pi, N is also an important macronutrient required for plant growth and development. N deficiency can adversely affect photosynthesis, inhibit leaf area growth and eventually reduce the longevity of leaves [16]. Inorganic N is taken up by plant roots in the form of nitrate (NO3) and ammonium (NH4+) [17] and transported to the upper plant bodies by several NO3 transporters (NRTs) [18,19]. In this context, Ma et al., 2020 [20] elucidated that the high-affinity transporter NRT3.1 forms a complex with NRT2.5 on the plasma membrane of root hairs, which, in turn, increased NO3 and NH4+ uptake and enhanced the growth of A. thaliana seedlings under N starvation.
In a very interesting manuscript, Wang et al., 2020 [21] investigated the impact of gibberellins (GAs) in nitrogen uptake. Low N supply suppressed the production of bioactive GAs, particularly GA1. Experiments with 15N-labelled nitrate revealed significantly reduced nitrate uptake by the zmga3ox mutant, a maize line with reduced GA biosynthesis, both under low and high N supply. Treatment with the gibberellin GA3 could rescue the mutant to some extent, while the application of uniconazole, a potent triazole-type GA biosynthesis inhibitor, reduced 15N-nitrate uptake in the wildtype line. RNA sequencing and qPCR analysis showed that GAs modulate the transcript abundance of nitrate uptake-related genes, including the high affinity nitrate transporters ZmNRT2.1 and ZmNTR2.2, as well as the nitrate transporter 1/peptide transporters ZmNPF6.3a and ZmNPF6.3b. In addition, a number of transcription factors known to be involved in expression regulation of nitrate transporters also showed different mRNA abundances in wild-type and zmga3ox plants cultivated under low and high nitrate conditions. These experiments provide convincing evidence that GAs are crucial for efficient upregulation of nitrate transporter abundance and therefore for high nitrogen use efficiency (NUE). With respect to that, it is important to mention that a number of high-yield varieties of cereal crops that enabled the “green revolution” are weak GA biosynthesis or signaling mutants [22]. While weak GA deficiency causes semi-dwarfism and therefore increases the yield, the same mechanism reduces NUE. Under conditions with high fertilization, this is of minor importance. However, under low fertilization, as it is required for limiting emission of the strong greenhouse gas N2O, the performance of such lines might be strongly affected. Clearly, more research is needed to investigate the impact of these findings under field conditions.
Liang et al., 2021 [23] performed phenotypic, transcriptomic and proteomic analyses on roots of a rice variety with high nitrogen use efficiency grown hydroponically in the presence of different levels of ammonium nitrate. The authors observed that root length was highest at low levels of ammonium nitrate, while it was significantly lower in the presence of no as well as high levels of ammonium nitrate. Proteomic analysis revealed that glutamine synthetase (OsGS2) was upregulated 48-fold at low ammonium nitrate levels. In addition, the GS activity in roots increased at low N supply, although only less than twofold and thus to a much lower level than the OsGS2 protein abundance. In addition, the abundance of glycolytic enzymes was affected in a way that 2-phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) synthesis may be activated under low N supply conditions. The entrance of PEP into the citrate cycle may stimulate the production of 2-oxoglutarate (2-OG), which serves as a precursor for the synthesis of glutamate and glutamine. Recently, glutamine was shown to act, in addition to its role in metabolism, as a signaling molecule to induce the expression of key transcription factor genes involved in nitrogen and stress responses in rice roots [24]. Based on these results, the authors proposed an alternative pathway of N assimilation in response to N deficiency. However, although the proteomic results speak for this hypothesis, it will be important to substantiate this idea by analysis of metabolite levels and fluxes (particularly of 2-OG) and quantification of enzymatic activities. As expected, the authors also found significant increases in the abundances of nitrate transporters (NRTs), nitrate reductase (NR2) and ammonium transporters (AMTs). Furthermore, the data provide evidence for modulation of the phenylpropanoid pathway in response to N-deficiency stress.
Taken together, the data presented in this Special Issue elucidate that plants undergo complex molecular processes and metabolic changes to adjust their growth under Pi-, Fe- and N-deficient stresses (Figure 1).

Funding

This research was supported by the International Graduate Schools in Agricultural and Polymer Sciences (AGRIPOLY), European Commission—European Social Fund (EU-ESF), Funding-ID: ZS/2016/08/80644.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Stigter, K.A.; Plaxton, W.C. Molecular Mechanisms of Phosphorus Metabolism and Transport during Leaf Senescence. Plants 2015, 4, 773–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Park, C.J.; Caddell, D.F.; Ronald, P.C. Protein Phosphorylation in Plant Immunity: Insights into the Regulation of Pattern Recognition Receptor-Mediated Signaling. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Morris, P.C. MAP Kinase Signal Transduction Pathways in Plants. New Phytol. 2001, 151, 67–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Stone, J.M.; Walker, J.C. Plant Protein Kinase Families and Signal Transduction. Plant Physiol. 1995, 108, 451–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Peret, B.; Desnos, T.; Jost, R.; Kanno, S.; Berkowitz, O.; Nussaume, L. Root architecture responses: In search of phosphate. Plant Physiol. 2014, 166, 1713–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Thibaud, M.C.; Arrighi, J.F.; Bayle, V.; Chiarenza, S.; Creff, A.; Bustos, R.; Paz-Ares, J.; Poirier, Y.; Nussaume, L. Dissection of Local and Systemic Transcriptional Responses to Phosphate Starvation in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2010, 64, 775–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sun, H.; Guo, X.; Xu, F.; Wu, D.; Zhang, X.; Lou, M.; Luo, F.; Xu, G.; Zhang, Y. Overexpression of OsPIN2 Regulates Root Growth and Formation in Response to Phosphate Deficiency in Rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Chutia, R.; Scharfenberg, S.; Neumann, S.; Abel, S.; Ziegler, J. Modulation of Phosphate Deficiency-Induced Metabolic Changes by Iron Availability in Arabidopsis thaliana. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ivanov, R.; Brumbarova, T.; Bauer, P. Fitting into the Harsh Reality: Regulation of Iron-Deficiency Responses in Dicotyledonous Plants. Mol. Plant 2012, 5, 27–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Li, J.; Xie, Y.; Dai, A.; Liu, L.; Li, Z. Root and Shoot Traits Responses to Phosphorus Deficiency and QTL Analysis at Seedling Stage Using Introgression Lines of Rice. J. Genet. Genom. 2009, 36, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abadía, J.; López-Millán, A.F.; Rombolà, A.; Abadía, A. Organic Acids and Fe Deficiency: A Review. Plant Soil 2002, 241, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Siwinska, J.; Siatkowska, K.; Olry, A.; Grosjean, J.; Hehn, A.; Bourgaud, F.; Meharg, A.A.; Carey, M.; Lojkowska, E.; Ihnatowicz, A. Scopoletin 8-hydroxylase: A Novel Enzyme Involved in Coumarin Biosynthesis and Iron-Deficiency Responses in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 1735–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Rajniak, J.; Giehl, R.; Chang, E.; Murgia, I.; von Wirén, N.; Sattely, E.S. Biosynthesis of Redox-Active Metabolites in Response to Iron Deficiency in Plants. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2018, 14, 442–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tsai, H.H.; Rodríguez-Celma, J.; Lan, P.; Wu, Y.C.; Vélez-Bermúdez, I.C.; Schmidt, W. Scopoletin 8-Hydroxylase-Mediated Fraxetin Production Is Crucial for Iron Mobilization. Plant Physiol. 2018, 177, 194–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Chutia, R.; Abel, S.; Ziegler, J. Iron and Phosphate Deficiency Regulators Concertedly Control Coumarin Profiles in Arabidopsis thaliana Roots During Iron, Phosphate, and Combined Deficiencies. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Xiaohuan, M.; Yanling, C. The physiological Response of Photosynthesis to Nitrogen Deficiency. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 158, 76–82. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hachiya, T.; Sakakibara, H. Interactions between Nitrate and Ammonium in Their Uptake, Allocation, Assimilation, and Signaling in Plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 2501–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fan, X.; Naz, M.; Fan, X.; Xuan, W.; Miller, A.J.; Xu, G. Plant Nitrate Transporters: From Gene Function to Application. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 2463–2475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. O’Brien, J.A.; Vega, A.; Bouguyon, E.; Krouk, G.; Gojon, A.; Coruzzi, G.; Gutierrez, R.A. Nitrate Transport, Sensing, and Responses in Plants. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 837–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ma, H.; Zhao, J.; Feng, S.; Qiao, K.; Gong, S.; Wang, J.; Zhou, A. Heterologous Expression of Nitrate Assimilation Related-Protein DsNAR2.1/NRT3.1 Affects Uptake of Nitrate and Ammonium in Nitrogen-Starved Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, Y.; Yao, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xing, J.; Yang, B.; Mi, G.; Li, Z.; Zhang, M. The Role of Gibberellins in Regulation of Nitrogen Uptake and Physiological Traits in Maize Responding to Nitrogen Availability. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Peng, J.; Richards, D.E.; Hartley, N.M.; Murphy, G.P.; Devos, K.M.; Flintham, J.E.; Beales, J.; Fish, L.J.; Worland, A.J.; Pelica, F.; et al. ‘Green Revolution’ Genes Encode Mutant Gibberellin Response Modulators. Nature 1999, 400, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liang, T.; Yuan, Z.; Fu, L.; Zhu, M.; Luo, X.; Xu, W.; Yuan, H.; Zhu, R.; Hu, Z.; Wu, X. Integrative Transcriptomic and Proteomic Analysis Reveals an Alternative Molecular Network of Glutamine Synthetase 2 Corresponding to Nitrogen Deficiency in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kan, C.C.; Chung, T.Y.; Juo, Y.A.; Hsieh, M.H. Glutamine Rapidly Induces the Expression of Key Transcription Factor Genes Involved in Nitrogen and Stress Responses in Rice Roots. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of molecular mechanisms involved in response to Pi, Fe and N deficiencies. PIN2, pin-formed 2, a component of the auxin efflux carrier; bHLH, basic helix–loop–helix transcription factors; NRT2, nitrate transporter 2; NRT3.1, nitrate transporter 3.1; NPF6, nitrate transporters of the nitrate transporter 1/peptide transporter class.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of molecular mechanisms involved in response to Pi, Fe and N deficiencies. PIN2, pin-formed 2, a component of the auxin efflux carrier; bHLH, basic helix–loop–helix transcription factors; NRT2, nitrate transporter 2; NRT3.1, nitrate transporter 3.1; NPF6, nitrate transporters of the nitrate transporter 1/peptide transporter class.
Ijms 23 04084 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hafiz, F.B.; von Tucher, S.; Rozhon, W. Plant Nutrition: Physiological and Metabolic Responses, Molecular Mechanisms and Chromatin Modifications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4084. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23084084

AMA Style

Hafiz FB, von Tucher S, Rozhon W. Plant Nutrition: Physiological and Metabolic Responses, Molecular Mechanisms and Chromatin Modifications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(8):4084. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23084084

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hafiz, Fatema Binte, Sabine von Tucher, and Wilfried Rozhon. 2022. "Plant Nutrition: Physiological and Metabolic Responses, Molecular Mechanisms and Chromatin Modifications" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 8: 4084. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23084084

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop