Next Article in Journal
Identifying Free-Living Physical Activities Using Lab-Based Models with Wearable Accelerometers
Previous Article in Journal
Development and Application of an Atmospheric Pollutant Monitoring System Based on LoRa—Part I: Design and Reliability Tests
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Electrical Characteristics and pH Response of a Parylene-H Sensing Membrane in a Si-Nanonet Ion-Sensitive Field-Effect Transistor

1
Department of Electrical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 37673, Korea
2
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea
3
Division of IT Convergence Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 37673, Korea
4
IM Healthcare Co. Ltd., Yongin 26354, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Submission received: 28 October 2018 / Revised: 8 November 2018 / Accepted: 10 November 2018 / Published: 12 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Sensor Materials)

Abstract

:
We report the electrical characteristics and pH responses of a Si-nanonet ion-sensitive field-effect transistor with ultra-thin parylene-H as a gate sensing membrane. The fabricated device shows excellent DC characteristics: a low subthreshold swing of 85 mV/dec, a high current on/off ratio of ~107 and a low gate leakage current of ~10−10 A. The low interface trap density of 1.04 × 1012 cm−2 and high field-effect mobility of 510 cm2V−1s−1 were obtained. The pH responses of the devices were evaluated in various pH buffer solutions. A high pH sensitivity of 48.1 ± 0.5 mV/pH with a device-to-device variation of ~6.1% was achieved. From the low-frequency noise characterization, the signal-to-noise ratio was extracted as high as ~3400 A/A with the lowest noise equivalent pH value of ~0.002 pH. These excellent intrinsic electrical and pH sensing performances suggest that parylene-H can be promising as a sensing membrane in an ISFET-based biosensor platform.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The ion-sensitive field-effect transistor (ISFET) sensor is a potential candidate for future bioassay applications due to its low cost, fast response, high sensitivity and small sensing size. Recently, studies have been conducted on channel materials such as carbon nanotubes and graphene-based materials [1,2]; channel structures such as silicon nanowire (Si NW) arrays, Si-nanonet structure and suspended Si NW [3,4,5]. Other approaches to improve the sensing responses have been made by introducing alternative sensing materials instead of SiO2 as the gate insulator in ISFET. Several issues related to sensing membranes such as insufficient isolation between the electrolyte and ISFET channel and dangling bonds in the sensing membrane can degrade the sensing responses, reliability and lifetime [6,7].
Parylene (polymer of p-xylene), which is extensively used as a biocompatible encapsulant for implantable microdevices [8], can be utilized as an ISFET gate insulator due to its high electrical resistivity. More recently, a new parylene modified with a formyl group (parylene-H) was proposed as a sensing membrane in microplate-based immunoassay and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensor applications [9,10]. It has been demonstrated that the formyl group of parylene-H can covalently bond to the primary amine group of target molecules without any additional surface modification steps [10].
In this paper, we fabricated Si-nanonet ISFETs with parylene-H gate insulator (p-H ISFETs) and investigated their DC and reliability characteristics. We also evaluated the pH sensitivity of the p-H ISFETs in various buffer solutions and conducted low frequency noise analysis for potential development in bioassay applications.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Device Fabrication

The p-H ISFETs were fabricated on an 8-inch silicon on an insulator substrate comprising a 100-nm top Si layer (<100> oriented, boron-doped, 10 Ω·cm) and a 400-nm buried oxide layer. The active region was formed by photolithography and inductively-coupled plasma reactive etching (ICP-RIE). To form the source and drain regions, arsenic ions with a dose of 5 × 1015 cm−2 were implanted by an ion implantation process with masking the ISFET active channel region by photoresist, and post-annealing at 1000 °C for 20 s was performed to activate the dopants. Then, the nanonet structure was defined on the ISFET channel region by electron-beam lithography and ICP-RIE. A metal layer of ~200 nm was deposited and patterned by a lift-off process on the source and drain regions to provide low contact resistance. A 1.5-μm SU-8 layer was coated to provide a passivation layer while opening the FET channel and the source and drain contact pad regions.
The parylene-H layer was thermally deposited by the following polymerization steps: (1) evaporation of parylene dimers at 160 °C, (2) production of a highly reactive p-xylene radical by pyrolysis at 650 °C and (3) deposition of the wafer at room temperature [11,12]. To control the thickness of the parylene-H layer, the quartz crystal microbalance response was measured from the beginning of the evaporation step. Finally, after the deposition of the parylene-H layer so as to form the gate insulator, the contact pad regions were opened.

2.2. Apparatus

The entire parylene-H coating procedure was reproducibly conducted using a microprocessor-controlled parylene coater. The morphology of the as-fabricated ISFET channel was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the thickness of parylene-H was confirmed by atomic force microscopy (AFM). The electrical characteristics of the fabricated ISFETs were measured for current-voltage (I-V) with a Keithley 4200-SCS analyzer and capacitance-voltage (C-V) with an Agilent 4284A Precision LCR Meter at room temperature. Low frequency noise characteristics were measured with a noise analyzer Cadence BTA9812A/B and a vector signal analyzer Agilent 89441A. The gate bias was applied to the liquid gate through the external Ag/AgCl reference electrode. All the electrical characterizations of the devices were performed in 0.01× PBS solution at room temperature.
Si-nanonet ISFETs with a 100-nm branch width were fabricated, as shown in Figure 1a. The illustration of the parylene-H deposition process is shown in Figure 1b. A 7 nm-thick parylene-H layer was deposited on the nanonet channel. The thickness was measured using AFM, as shown in Figure 1c.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. DC and Reliability Characteristics of p-H ISFETs

To investigate the DC characteristics of parylene-H as a gate insulator, the output characteristic curve (ID-VD) and transfer curve (ID-VG) of the p-H ISFET with a 7 nm-thick parylene-H were measured, as shown in Figure 2. The drain bias (VD) was swept from 0–0.5 V by applying the liquid gate bias (VG) from 0.9–1.2 V in steps of 0.1 V. The drain current (ID) showed a linearly increasing behavior as explained by ID ∝ (VG-VTH)·VD at low VD, while the saturation condition was obtained at higher VD as explained by ID ∝ (VG-VTH)2, indicating typical n-type FET behaviors. In Figure 2b, VG was swept from 0.3–1.2 V at constant VD = 0.1 V. Excellent electrical characteristics were obtained with a high ID on/off ratio of >107, a low subthreshold swing (SS) of ~85 mV/dec, a low threshold voltage (VTH) of 1.05 V at a constant current level of 10−6 A and a low gate leakage current of <10−10 A in the whole swept range. These DC characteristics suggest that parylene-H shows outstanding electrical properties in electron device applications, replacing conventional silicon dioxide material.
To further evaluate the reliability of parylene-H as a gate insulator, the breakdown behavior was investigated by applying gate bias stress from 0–3 V. As shown in Figure 2c, the gate current (IG) increased with the applied gate bias. Within the range of VG = 1.5–2.5 V, the IG showed a soft breakdown where an abnormal increase of the leakage current at relatively lower gate bias was observed; over VG = 2.5 V, the IG increased greatly, leading to a hard breakdown [13]. By C-V characterization, both of the capacitances of p-H ISFET and SiO2 gate insulator ISFET (Ox ISFET) with the same channel area were measured, and Figure 2d shows the normalized C-V characteristics of the p-H ISFET. The capacitance of p-H ISFET was extracted to be 3.92 × 10−7 F/cm−2, and therefore, the dielectric constant of parylene-H was estimated to be ~3.1, comparable to the 2.6–3.2 range of the parylene series as reported in the literature [14]. Therefore, the equivalent oxide thickness (EOT) of a 7 nm-thick parylene-H in p-H ISFET was calculated as low as ~8.8 nm.
The interface trap density (Nit) at the Si/parylene-H interface was extracted by the following equation [15]:
N i t = [ ( S S ln 10 ) ( q kT ) 1 ] · C i q ,
where q is the electron charge, k is the Boltzmann constant, T is the absolute temperature and Ci is the capacitance of the gate insulator per unit area. The Nit of p-H ISFET was estimated to be as low as ~1.04 × 1012 cm−2. The field-effect mobility (μFE) in the linear region was also extracted based on the following equation [15]:
μ FE = L · g m . max W · C i · V D ,
where L is the channel length, W is the channel width and gm.max is the maximum transconductance. The extracted μFE of our p-H ISFETs reached as high as ~510 cm2V−1s−1.

3.2. Sensitivity of p-H ISFETs

To evaluate the pH sensor response of the p-H ISFETs for potential bioassay applications, the output characteristics were measured at pH = 4, 7 and 10 buffer solutions by sweeping VG from 0.3–1.2 V at constant VD = 0.1 V. Figure 3a shows the ID-VG curve shifts as a function of pH value in the buffer solution. Figure 3b shows the change of VTH of the p-H ISFETs measured in different pH solutions. The calculated pH sensitivity (SpH) was as high as 48.1 ± 0.5 mV/pH, which is ~40% higher than that of ISFETs with SiO2 gate insulator (Ox ISFET). The device-to-device variation was as low as ~6.1%. The pH sensitivity of ISFETs with a bare SiO2 membrane was reported to be 34 mV/pH and can increase up to 45 mV/pH with surface modification by functional molecules [16]. The parylene-H layer deposition process can simply control the formyl group concentration without additional surface modification. Our p-H ISFETs without any surface modification was comparable or even superior to other Si NW-based sensor platforms (see Table 1) reported in the literature [3,16,17,18]. The high sensitivity of p-H ISFETs is attributed to the formation of a high density formyl group (H–C=O) at the surface of the parylene-H/electrolyte, which can release or capture H+ [9,19]. Formyl groups can have polarity due to the difference in electro negativity, and protons can attach to carbon by electrostatic interaction. The p-H ISFETs have higher pH sensitivity than Ox ISFETs due to the higher density of hydrogen ions at the gate insulator/electrolyte interface, which contribute to inducing carrier generation in the ISFET channel.

3.3. Noise Analysis of p-H ISFETs

Noise is another important characteristic because it can fundamentally limit the sensitivity and resolution of the p-H ISFETs. The low frequency noise measurements of our p-H ISFETs were performed in pH = 7 buffer solution under various gate bias conditions. Figure 4a shows the drain current noise spectra SID vs. frequency at VG = 0.8–1.2 V in steps of 0.1 V with constant VD = 0.1 V. The SID shows a typical 1/fα behavior with the exponential slope α ~ 1 in a 3-dec frequency bandwidth of ƒ12 = 1–1000 Hz. The signal to noise ratio (SNR) of our p-H ISFET was extracted based on the following equation [20]:
S N R = Δ I / ƒ 1 ƒ 2 S ID ( ƒ ) d ƒ ,
where ΔI is the drain current change in the range of pH = 4–10. The noise equivalent pH (pHEq) of our p-H ISFETs as determined by SNR and sensitivity was evaluated using the following equation [21] with SNR = 1,
pH Eq = ƒ 2 ƒ 1 S ID ( ƒ ) d ƒ / ( g m S pH ) ,
where gm is the transconductance. The extracted SNR and pHEq are shown as a function of gate bias in Figure 4b. The highest SNR of ~3400 A/A and the lowest pHEq of ~0.002 pH were obtained at VG = 1 V for our p-H ISFETs, clearly indicating that the p-H ISFETs should be operated at near threshold voltage.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we proposed a p-H ISFET with a parylene-H sensing nanolayer. The excellent electrical properties of our p-H ISFETs such as subthreshold swing, threshold voltage, drain current on/off ratio and gate leakage current have been characterized. The low Si/parylene-H interface trap density and high field-effect mobility demonstrated the excellent electrical performance of our devices. In addition, it was demonstrated that the highly sensitive pH-dependent behaviors of p-H ISFETs exhibited pH sensitivity as high as 48.1 ± 0.5 mV/pH, which is ~40% higher than that of the conventional SiO2 gate insulator-based ISFETs. Furthermore, in accordance with the low frequency noise analysis, the SNR and noise equivalent pH of p-H ISFETs were investigated for potential development in ISFET-based biosensor applications. Future work will address p-H ISFETs for use in various biomarker sensing.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing, original draft preparation and visualization, B.J., G.-Y.L. and C.P.; resources and validation, B.J., G.-Y.L., C.P., D.K. and W.C.; writing, review and editing, B.J., G.-Y.L., C.P., J.-S.L. and J.-C.P.; supervision, J.-S.L. and J.-C.P.; project administration, J.-W.Y.; funding acquisition, J.-S.L., J.-C.P. and J.-W.Y.

Funding

This work was supported by Nano Convergence Foundation (www.nanotech2020.org) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (Korea) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE, Korea) (Commercialization of Si nano nanonet FET biosensor for influenza diagnostic), by the Nano Material Technology Development Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2009-0082580) and by Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries(IPET) through Animal Disease Management Technology Development Program, funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs(MAFRA)(grant no.116167-3).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Justino, C.I.L.; Rocha-Santos, T.A.P.; Duarte, A.C.; Rocha-Santos, T.A.P. Advances in point-of-care technologies with biosensors based on carbon nanotubes. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2013, 45, 24–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Balasubramanian, K.; Kern, K. 25th Anniversary Article: Label-Free Electrical Biodetection Using Carbon Nanostructures. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 1154–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rani, D.; Pachauri, V.; Mueller, A.; Vu, X.T.; Nguyen, T.C.; Ingebrandt, S. On the Use of Scalable NanoISFET Arrays of Silicon with Highly Reproducible Sensor Performance for Biosensor Applications. ACS Omega 2016, 1, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rim, T.; Kim, K.; Kim, S.; Baek, C.-K.; Meyyappan, M.; Jeong, Y.-H.; Lee, J.-S. Improved Electrical Characteristics of Honeycomb Nanowire ISFETs. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2013, 34, 1059–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kim, K.; Rim, T.; Park, C.; Kim, D.; Meyyappan, M.; Lee, J.-S. Suspended honeycomb nanowire ISFETs for improved stiction-free performance. Nanotechnology 2014, 25, 345501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kao, C.-H.; Chang, C.L.; Su, W.M.; Chen, Y.T.; Lu, C.C.; Lee, Y.S.; Hong, C.H.; Lin, C.-Y.; Chen, H. Magnesium Oxide (MgO) pH-sensitive Sensing Membrane in Electrolyte-Insulator-Semiconductor Structures with CF4 Plasma Treatment. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 7185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kao, C.-H.; Chang, C.-W.; Tzu Chen, Y.; Ming Su, W.; Cheng Lu, C.; Lin, C.-Y.; Chen, H. Influence of NH3 plasma and Ti doping on pH-sensitive CeO2 electrolyte-insulator-semiconductor biosensors. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Trantidou, T.; Payne, D.J.; Tsiligkiridis, V.; Chang, Y.-C.; Toumazou, C.; Prodromakis, T. The dual role of Parylene C in chemical sensing: Acting as an encapsulant and as a sensing membrane for pH monitoring applications. Sens. Actuators B 2013, 186, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ko, H.; Lee, E.-H.; Lee, G.-Y.; Kim, J.; Jeon, B.-J.; Kim, M.-H.; Pyun, J.-C. One step immobilization of peptides and proteins by using modified parylene with formyl groups. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 30, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ko, H.; Lee, G.-Y.; Jeon, B.-J.; Pyun, J.-C. Fluorescence immunoassay of anti-cyclic citrulinated peptide (CCP) autoantibodies by using parylene-H film. BioChip J. 2011, 5, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jeon, B.-J.; Kim, M.-H.; Pyun, J.-C. Application of a functionalized parylene film as a linker layer of SPR biosensor. Sens. Actuators B 2011, 154, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jeon, B.-J.; Kim, M.-H.; Pyun, J.-C. Parylene-A coated microplate for covalent immobilization of proteins and peptides. J. Immunol. Methods 2010, 353, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Alam, M.A.; Weir, B.E.; Silverman, P.J. A study of soft and hard breakdown—Part I: Analysis of statistical percolation conductance. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2002, 49, 232–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kahouli, A. Effect of film thickness on structural, morphology, dielectric and electrical properties of parylene C films. Br. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 112, 064103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Junyoung, L.; Hojoon, L.; Bo, J.; Hyeongwan, O.; Sangwon, B.; Gilsang, Y.; Yongsu, L.; Rock-Hyun, B.; Jeong-Soo, L. Impact of geometrical parameters on the electrical performance of network-channel polycrystalline silicon thin-film transistors. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2018, 57, 104001. [Google Scholar]
  16. Nguyen, T.C.; Schwartz, M.; Vu, X.T.; Blinn, J.; Ingebrandt, S. Handheld readout system for field-effect transistor biosensor arrays for label-free detection of biomolecules. Phys. Status Solidi A 2015, 212, 1313–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tran, D.P.; Wolfrum, B.; Stockmann, R.; Pai, J.-H.; Pourhassan-Moghaddam, M.; Offenhäusser, A.; Thierry, B. Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor Compatible Silicon Nanowires-on-a-Chip: Fabrication and Preclinical Validation for the Detection of a Cancer Prognostic Protein Marker in Serum. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 1662–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lue, C.-E.; Yu, T.-C.; Yang, C.-M.; Pijanowska, D.G.; Lai, C.-S. Optimization of Urea-EnFET Based on Ta2O5 Layer with Post Annealing. Sensors 2011, 11, 4562–4571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Trantidou, T.; Tariq, M.; Terracciano, C.M.; Toumazou, C.; Prodromakis, T. Parylene C-Based Flexible Electronics for pH Monitoring Applications. Sensors 2014, 14, 11629–11639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Haartman, M.V.; Ostling, M. Low-Frequency Noise in Advanced MOS Devices; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; p. 216. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim, S.; Rim, T.; Kim, K.; Lee, U.; Baek, E.; Lee, H.; Baek, C.-K.; Meyyappan, M.; Deen, M.J.; Lee, J.-S. Silicon nanowire ion sensitive field-effect transistor with integrated Ag/AgCl electrode: pH sensing and noise characteristics. Analyst 2011, 136, 5012–5016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) Schematics and top-view SEM images of the fabricated Si-nanonet ISFET with parylene-H as the gate insulator. (b) Illustration of the parylene-H deposition process. (c) AFM images of the parylene-H nanolayer with a 7-nm thickness.
Figure 1. (a) Schematics and top-view SEM images of the fabricated Si-nanonet ISFET with parylene-H as the gate insulator. (b) Illustration of the parylene-H deposition process. (c) AFM images of the parylene-H nanolayer with a 7-nm thickness.
Sensors 18 03892 g001
Figure 2. Electrical characteristics of the fabricated parylene-H (p-H) ISFET in 0.01× PBS buffer solution. (a) Typical ID-VD output characteristics in the linear scale. (b) Typical ID-VG transfer characteristics and IG-VG gate leakage current characteristics at VD = 0.1 V in log scale indicating a typical n-type behavior. (c) IG-VG characteristics in log and linear scale. (d) Normalized C-V characteristics of the p-H ISFET.
Figure 2. Electrical characteristics of the fabricated parylene-H (p-H) ISFET in 0.01× PBS buffer solution. (a) Typical ID-VD output characteristics in the linear scale. (b) Typical ID-VG transfer characteristics and IG-VG gate leakage current characteristics at VD = 0.1 V in log scale indicating a typical n-type behavior. (c) IG-VG characteristics in log and linear scale. (d) Normalized C-V characteristics of the p-H ISFET.
Sensors 18 03892 g002
Figure 3. pH-dependent filed-effect characteristics. (a) ID-VG transfer characteristics at VD = 0.1 V in pH 4, 7, 10 buffer solutions for a p-H ISFET. (b) VTH shift indicating a linear pH response: the sensitivity of 48.1 ± 0.5 mV/pH and device-to-device variation of ~6.1% for p-H ISFETs; the sensitivity of 34 ± 1.9 mV/pH for Ox ISFETs.
Figure 3. pH-dependent filed-effect characteristics. (a) ID-VG transfer characteristics at VD = 0.1 V in pH 4, 7, 10 buffer solutions for a p-H ISFET. (b) VTH shift indicating a linear pH response: the sensitivity of 48.1 ± 0.5 mV/pH and device-to-device variation of ~6.1% for p-H ISFETs; the sensitivity of 34 ± 1.9 mV/pH for Ox ISFETs.
Sensors 18 03892 g003
Figure 4. (a) Low frequency drain current noise characteristics of the p-H ISFET at various gate biases at VD = 0.1 V. (b) SNR and noise equivalent pH vs. gate bias.
Figure 4. (a) Low frequency drain current noise characteristics of the p-H ISFET at various gate biases at VD = 0.1 V. (b) SNR and noise equivalent pH vs. gate bias.
Sensors 18 03892 g004
Table 1. Comparison of the characteristics of Si nanostructure-based ISFETs.
Table 1. Comparison of the characteristics of Si nanostructure-based ISFETs.
Gate Insulator and Sensing MembraneDevice ChannelSS (mV/dec)On/Off RatioSurface TreatmentpH Sensitivity (mV/pH)Ref.
parylene-HSi Nanonet~85>107w/o 148.1 ± 0.5This work
SiO2Si Nanonet~63>107w/o35[5]
SiO2Si NW//w/o34 ± 2[16]
SiO2Si NW//w 245 ± 0.3[16]
SiO2Si NW~600>105w48 ± 1[17]
SiO2Si NW~150>105w43 ± 3[3]
Ta2O5Si NW~300>103w51.8 ± 0.1[18]
1 w/o—without; 2 w—with.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jin, B.; Lee, G.-Y.; Park, C.; Kim, D.; Choi, W.; Yoo, J.-W.; Pyun, J.-C.; Lee, J.-S. Electrical Characteristics and pH Response of a Parylene-H Sensing Membrane in a Si-Nanonet Ion-Sensitive Field-Effect Transistor. Sensors 2018, 18, 3892. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/s18113892

AMA Style

Jin B, Lee G-Y, Park C, Kim D, Choi W, Yoo J-W, Pyun J-C, Lee J-S. Electrical Characteristics and pH Response of a Parylene-H Sensing Membrane in a Si-Nanonet Ion-Sensitive Field-Effect Transistor. Sensors. 2018; 18(11):3892. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/s18113892

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jin, Bo, Ga-Yeon Lee, ChanOh Park, Donghoon Kim, Wonyeong Choi, Jae-Woo Yoo, Jae-Chul Pyun, and Jeong-Soo Lee. 2018. "Electrical Characteristics and pH Response of a Parylene-H Sensing Membrane in a Si-Nanonet Ion-Sensitive Field-Effect Transistor" Sensors 18, no. 11: 3892. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/s18113892

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop