Next Article in Journal
3D Object Detection Based on Attention and Multi-Scale Feature Fusion
Next Article in Special Issue
I Can Step Clearly Now, the TENS Is On: Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation Decreases Sensorimotor Uncertainty during Stepping Movements
Previous Article in Journal
Detecting Cyberattacks on Electrical Storage Systems through Neural Network Based Anomaly Detection Algorithm
Previous Article in Special Issue
“Listen to Your Immune System When It’s Calling for You”: Monitoring Autoimmune Diseases Using the iShU App
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Flexible Pressure Sensor Array with Multi-Channel Wireless Readout Chip

In Situ Devices Center, School of Communication and Electronic Engineering, East China Normal University, 500 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200241, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 17 April 2022 / Revised: 12 May 2022 / Accepted: 20 May 2022 / Published: 23 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Wearables 2022)

Abstract

:
Flexible sensor arrays are widely used for wearable physiological signal recording applications. A high density sensor array requires the signal readout to be compatible with multiple channels. This paper presents a highly-integrated remote health monitoring system integrating a flexible pressure sensor array with a multi-channel wireless readout chip. The custom-designed chip features 64 voltage readout channels, a power management unit, and a wireless transceiver. The whole chip fabricated in a 65 nm complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) process occupies 3.7 × 3.7 mm2, and the core blocks consume 2.3 mW from a 1 V supply in the wireless recording mode. The proposed multi-channel system is validated by measuring the ballistocardiogram (BCG) and pulse wave, which paves the way for future portable remote human physiological signals monitoring devices.

1. Introduction

Flexible electronic devices are widely used in detecting human physiological signals for their advantages of being attachable and wearable [1,2,3,4,5]. As a part of advanced devices, flexible sensors with complex sensing functions are significant in wearable devices [6,7].
Among the sensors, the flexible pressure sensors, which imitate the human sensory system, are widely applicated in wearable devices [8,9,10]. Flexible pressure sensors could convert subtle mechanical signals to electronic signals, mainly divided into piezoelectric, capacitive, and piezoresistive types. Compared with the other two kinds of flexible pressure sensors, piezoresistive pressure sensors have a simpler structure and more comprehensive measurement range [11]. Recently, piezoresistive pressure sensors have great application potential in health monitoring, artificial intelligence, and human posture detection [12,13,14,15].
The combination of sensors and near-sensor chips reduces communication power consumption [16]. The specifically designed sensor signal readout chip has the advantages of small size and low power, which are required for wearable devices. It is necessary to further study the integration of the flexible sensor array with a multi-channel signal processing chip. Gao et al. reported a sensor array integrated with flexible circuit for in situ perspiration analysis [17]. Recently, this method was applied to piezoresistive pressure sensors [18]. Researchers reported the development of a piezoresistive sensor array integrated with an ultrahigh-efficiency chip, which is the first to use a low-power artificial intelligence (AI) chip to realize human gait monitoring.
This paper proposes a remote health monitoring system to acquire ballistocardiogram (BCG) and pulse waves, which integrates a flexible piezoresistive pressure sensor array and a wireless multi-channel voltage readout chip. We also proposed a nonlinear resistance readout circuit to calibrate the inversely proportional resistive response of the pressure sensor.

2. Materials and Methods

Figure 1 shows the diagram of the proposed remote health monitoring system, which includes a flexible pressure sensor array (RP-C7.6LT-LF2, Legact Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China) and a custom-designed wireless multi-channel voltage readout chip. Carbon-based film is used as the pressure-sensitive layer. It is a porous structure. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) image (shot by Zeiss Gemini 450, Oberkochen, Germany) in Figure 1 shows the carbon particles and porous structure of the sensor. As the sensor is extruded, more current conductive paths are created leading a lower resistance. The multi-channel readout chip acquires the resistance values and transmits them wirelessly [19]. Such sensor array data could be used for BCG signals detecting.
The pressure sensor performance is studied. Figure 2a shows the characteristic testing system of the flexible pressure sensor, which is composed of a high precision tensile machine (UH6502, Youhong, Shanghai, China), an electrochemical workstation (CHI660D, CH Instruments, Shanghai, China). The tensile machine applies a time-varying force to the sensor and the electrochemical workstation measures its resistance change over time. The measured performance without post-processing shows the intrinsic characteristics of the sensor, which are shown in Figure 2b–d. Figure 2b illustrates the resistance change of the flexible pressure sensor with pressure increasing from 50 to 600 kPa. For all samples, resistance is inversely proportional to pressure, which can be described as
1 R = 6.8 × 10 6 × P 0.0002
where R is the sensor resistance in kΩ, P is the applied pressure in kPa, and the goodness of fit is R2 = 0.99. Figure 2c depicts the change rate and sensitivity of the sensor by averaging five groups of samples with pressure increasing from 50 to 600 kPa. Sensitivity S P is defined as
S P = | Δ R R 0 | × 1 P
where | Δ R / R 0 | is the change rate of resistance. As the fitting curve shows, S P decreases with pressure, which is consistent with the inversely proportional resistance response. Figure 2d depicts the sensor output current change as the pressure increases stepwise from 200 to 700 kPa in units of 100 kPa. The current responses immediately to the pressure change almost with no delay, which reveals good repeatability at a wide range of pressure. The lower delay time leads to faster response, which can be used to track pressure changes induced by physiological signals.
The electronic signal from the pressure sensors is collected and processed. In our sensor system, the relationship between resistance and voltage is nonlinear. A specific chip is needed to process such signal. Figure 3a shows that the sensor resistance is converted into voltage change by connecting a fixed-value resistor in serial to form a resistor divider. Each node in the sensor array is independently connected to a switch and a divider resistor to avoid crosstalk between different channels. Only the sensor node being measured is turned on to generate a pressure-depended output voltage signal, while the others are disconnected from the bias voltage. The output voltage V out can be described as:
V out = R ref R sen + R ref × V in
where V in is the input voltage to bias the divider, R ref is the resistance of the reference resistor, and R sen is the resistance of the resistive pressure sensor. When R ref is smaller than R sen , V out can be approximated as
V out R ref R sen × V in
The inversely proportional resistance-to-voltage converter could be used for nonlinearity correction. Figure 3b shows that the sensor resistance is also approximately inversely proportional to the pressure. The proposed resistor divider makes a linear relationship between the output voltage and the pressure.
The sensitivity of the whole signal path, including the sensor and readout circuit, is obtained by taking Equation (1) into Equation (4). Assuming that the pressure measurement range is from 50 kPa to 1000 kPa, the sensitivity curves of the signal path of the linear and inversely proportional readout are shown in Figure 3b. As the pressure generated by the self-weight of the human body can generate a wide range of pressures, the nonlinear signal readout circuit can obtain higher sensitivity than the conventional linear circuits with a proportional voltage-resistance response.
The minimum identifiable input change Δ V in in the sensor readout analog front-end can be expressed as:
Δ V in = V ref 2 N × S
where S is the sensitivity of the signal path, V ref is the reference voltage of the ADC, and N is the resolution of the ADC. Higher sensitivity S reduces the accuracy requirements of ADC to obtain the exact signal resolution, thus lowering system cost and power consumption. The linear relationship between the output voltage and pressure using the nonlinearity correction method also simplifies the post-reconstruction process from voltage to pressure, which reduces the power consumption of digital signal processing [20,21].
To further reduce the size and power of the proposed system, we utilize a self-designed 64-channel signal readout system on chip (SoC) to process the voltage-to-digital conversion and data transmission. As shown in Figure 4a, this SoC is composed of 64 analog front-end (AFE) channels, a data processing unit (DPU), a power management unit (PMU), and a wireless transceiver supporting radio frequency (RF) power harvesting. Each channel of the AFE includes a low noise amplifier (LNA) and a programmable gain amplifier (PGA), which are used to amplify the voltage signals from the sensor array shown in Figure 3a. A 10-bit SAR ADC digitizes every 16 channels at a sample rate of 40 kSps through time-division multiplexing. The DPU controls each block through on-chip registers and packages the output of ADCs into data frames. The frame packet is then sent through an on-off keying (OOK) transmitter operating at 3.2 GHz. The PMU includes a 13.56 MHz RF power harvester and a switched-capacitor DC-DC converter for wireless and battery-powered scenarios. On-chip low drop-out regulators (LDOs) and bias generators provide suitable operation voltage for each block [22,23]. Figure 4b shows the micrograph of the chip fabricated in a 65 nm complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) process with a total area of 3.7 × 3.7 mm2. Figure 4c summarizes the key specifications of the chip.
This chip supports dual-mode communication. In the wireless mode, the chip core consumes 2.28 mW from a 1 V supply, and the power distribution is shown in Figure 5a. The wireless data transmitter consumes most power, including the RF phase-locked loop (PLL) and the power amplifier (PA). Figure 5b shows the measured power distribution of the chip core in the wired-transmission mode. The total power consumption decreases to 0.48 mW. Figure 5c depicts the gain and input-referred noise (IRN) of the AFE. The measured mid-band gain of the AFE is 55 dB, and the −3 dB bandwidth is from sub-Hz to 10 kHz. The measured IRN is less than 8 μVrms integrating over the whole signal bandwidth. The chip can operate from a single supply ranging from 1.3 to 4.2 V. This chip also exhibits a higher power supply rejection ratio (PSRR) than the other work [24,25,26,27]. The replica-biasing scheme in the LNA guarantees a stable bias current despite high power supply interference without consuming much extra power and area [23]. The performance comparison with other works is shown in Figure 5d. The specifications of this chip are suitable for multi-mode physiological signal recording. The customized design has the advantage of low power and high channel count compared to commercially available chips.

3. Results

3.1. Subtle BCG Detection

We set up a high-density sensor array which is compatible with multi-channel signal readout. Here we show a case study to collect and process human physiological signals. BCG is an indicator of human heart activity. As shown in Figure 6a, the weight of a person sitting still naturally exerts a certain pressure on the sole, which is mainly distributed on the heel and forefoot. The sparse distribution of the artery at the heel makes it difficult to detect week BCG signal. The plantar artery near the big toe is densely distributed. Therefore, the forefoot is the best position to place the pressure sensor for BCG recording.
The sensor signal is amplified and recorded by the signal processing circuit described in Section 2. The recorded BCG signal is filtered by a second-order Butterworth low-pass infinite impulse response (IIR) filter with a cut-off frequency of 30 Hz. Figure 6b shows the obtained BCG signal. The weak BCG signal is vulnerable to foot shaking when measuring the signal. It is worth noting that the BCG signal is the micro-motion signal generated by the heart. The subject should keep the foot stationary to obtain a stable BCG signal. There are mainly three peaks in the BCG signal. The I-wave in the BCG signal is the minimum before the global maximum in the corresponding period, J-wave is the global maximum in the period, and K-wave is the global minimum after J-wave. Although the plantar pressure variations of the sensor lead to different detected BCG signals, the periodicity and characteristics of the BCG signal are still maintained after normalization. The representative peak of the I, J, and K wave could be distinguished clearly in Figure 6b.

3.2. Multi-Channel Pulse Wave Detection

The pressure sensor array can also be used to monitor the pulse wave during sleep. As shown in Figure 6c, the wrist squeezed between the bed and other objects provides a natural pressure, which could be used to detect the pulse wave at the radial artery. Considering the small area available for detection at the radial artery, a four-channel sensor array is attached to the wrist with a distribution shown in Figure 6c. Maintaining posture during sleep is challenging, an inflatable cuff is added to apply pressure to the wrist. The radial pulse waves measured at four different positions with the proposed wireless readout system simultaneously are shown in Figure 6d. According to the shape and amplitude of the pulse wave of each channel, the pressure distribution and pulse intensity at each point of the wrist can be judged. The amplitude of the pulse wave in each channel can be interpreted as a measure of distance between the sensor and the artery. The sensor closer to the artery would generate a pulse wave with a larger amplitude. In this work, the most significant pulse waveform amplitude appears at channel 2. Sensor arrays can also be used to measure the pulse wave transit time (PTT) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) [28]. In this work, the maximum distance between sensors in the array is 2 cm. As shown in Figure 6c, the pulse wave transmits from the proximal end (channel 2 and channel 4) to the distal end (channel 1 and channel 3). The sensor of channel 4 first senses the pulse signal, and the PTT can be calculated based on the foot-to-foot method [29]. The average PTT from channel 4 to channel 3 is 0.0865 s, and the average PTT from channel 2 to channel 1 is 0.0635 s. These could be further used for continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring.

4. Discussion

The flexible pressure sensor array, together with the custom-designed multi-channel signal readout chip provides a low-power solution to wearable health monitoring devices. The nonlinear resistance readout circuit calibrates the inversely proportional characteristic of the pressure sensor. The high linearity between output voltage and pressure simplifies the reconstruction process compared to traditional designs. This method is suitable for applications that need to directly record the pressure change. The nonlinear resistance-to-voltage conversion is easy to implement by simply decreasing the reference resistance in the resistor divider. The readout circuit becomes more sensitive at high-pressure conditions, common in BCG applications using bodyweight to provide pressure.
The robustness of physiological signal recording in a moving human body is important in wearable devices. As the size of each sensor used in this paper is small compared to the curvature radius of the wrist and heel, the bending of the foot and the wrist causes little sensor deformation. Meanwhile, the good bending reliability of the flexible sensor leads to little signal distortion. The proposed non-linear readout scheme is not limited to the specific material used in the paper, but can also be applied to other resistive sensors with similar inversely proportional responses.
Recent studies exhibit the feasibility of the cardiovascular (CV) parameters monitoring based on BCG. The amplitude between the second major wave and the third major wave is called J-K amplitude, which is an indicator of diastolic and systolic pressure [30]. Multivariate linear regression analysis of amplitudes and time intervals shows a relevance between BCG and CV parameters [31].

5. Conclusions

This paper reports a remote health monitoring system based on a pressure sensor array with a wireless multiple channels sensor signal processing chip. The system includes a flexible resistive pressure sensor array, a data transmission module, and a display module. The system can detect BCG signals and multi-channel pulse waves in sitting, sleeping, and other life scenes and exhibits great potential in human health monitoring and medical diagnostics. The proposed system has the potential to record from much more sensor sites, leading to a more precise measurement.

Author Contributions

Methodology, L.L. and X.W.; validation, H.W.; investigation, H.W.; writing—original draft preparation, H.W.; writing—review and editing, L.L., H.B. and X.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by NSFC under Grant Nos. 62074057, Projects of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality Grant Nos. (19ZR1473800).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dong, Z.; Liu, H.; Yang, X.; Fan, J.; Bi, H.; Wang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, C.; Chen, X.; Wu, X. Facile fabrication of paper-based flexible thermoelectric generator. Npj Flex. Electron. 2021, 5, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fu, Y.; Zhao, S.; Zhu, R. A wearable multifunctional pulse monitor using thermosensation-based flexible sensors. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2018, 66, 1412–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kai, D.; Wu, Z.; Deng, J.; Wang, A.C.; Zou, H.; Chen, C.; Hu, D.; Gu, B.; Sun, B.; Lin, W.Z. A stretchable yarn embedded triboelectric nanogenerator as electronic skin for biomechanical energy harvesting and multifunctional pressure sensing. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1804944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, Y.; Pharr, M.; Salvatore, G.A. A lab-on-skin: A review of flexible and stretchable electronics for wearable health monitoring. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 9614–9635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Peng, J.Y.; Lu, S.C. A flexible capacitive tactile sensor array with cmos readout circuits for pulse diagnosis. IEEE Sens. J. 2014, 15, 1170–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cui, Z.; Poblete, F.; Zhu, Y. Tailoring temperature coefficient of resistance of silver nanowire nanocomposite and application as stretchable temperature sensor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 17836–17842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gao, Q.; Sahin, H.; Kang, J. Strain tunable band structure of a new 2d carbon allotrope c568. J. Semicond. 2020, 41, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kang, S.; Lee, J.; Lee, S.; Kim, S.G.; Kim, J.K.; Algadi, H.; Al-Sayari, S.; Kim, D.E.; Kim, D.E.; Lee, T. Highly sensitive pressure sensor based on bioinspired porous structure for real-time tactile sensing. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2016, 2, 1600356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lin, Z.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, B.; Wang, Y.C.; Guo, H.; Liu, G.; Chen, C.; Chen, Y.; Yang, J.; Wang, Z.L. A triboelectric nanogenerator-based smart insole for multifunctional gait monitoring. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2019, 4, 1800360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mannsfeld, S.; Tee, C.K.; Stoltenberg, R.M.; Chen, H.H.; Barman, S.; Muir, B.; Sokolov, A.N.; Reese, C.; Bao, Z. Highly sensitive flexible pressure sensors with microstructured rubber dielectric layers. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 859–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, M.Y.; Hang, C.Z.; Zhao, X.F.; Zhu, L.Y.; Zhang, D.W. Advance on flexible pressure sensors based on metal and carbonaceous nanomaterial. Nano Energy 2021, 87, 106181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yang, T.; Jiang, X.; Zhong, Y.; Zhao, X.; Lin, S.; Li, J.; Xinming, L.; Xu, J.; Li, Z.; Zh, H. A wearable and highly sensitive graphene strain sensor for precise home-based pulse wave monitoring. ACS Sens. 2017, 2, 967–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jae, B.H.; Sung, C.G.; Keun, K.K.; Suk, P.K. A smart health monitoring chair for nonintrusive measurement of biological signals. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 2012, 16, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fan, T.; Liu, Z.; Tian, X.; Li, J.; Yang, J.; Wang, C.; Bi, H.; Qiao, F.; Wu, X.; Chu, J. Object identification with smart glove assembled by pressure sensors. IEEE Sens. Lett. 2021, 5, 5500904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tian, X.; Liu, Z.; Chu, J.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, J. Dual-mode sensor and actuator to learn human-hand tracking and grasping. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2019, 66, 5407–5410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Conti, F.; Schilling, R.; Schiavone, P.D.; Pullini, A.; Rossi, D.; Gürkaynak, F.; Muehlberghuber, M.; Gautschi, M.; Loi, I.; Haugou, G. An iot endpoint system-on-chip for secure and energy-efficient near-sensor analytics. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap. 2017, 64, 2481–2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Gao, W.; Emaminejad, S.; Nyein, H.; Challa, S.; Chen, K.; Peck, A.; Fahad, H.M.; Ota, H.; Shiraki, H.; Kiriya, D. Fully integrated wearable sensor arrays for multiplexed in situ perspiration analysis. Nature 2016, 529, 509–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Tian, X.; Liu, Z.; Guo, C.; Yang, J.; Lu, Y. Pressure sensor array with low-power near-sensor cmos chip for human gait monitoring. IEEE Sens. Lett. 2021, 5, 6000304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lyu, L.; Ye, D.; Xu, R.; Mu, G.; Shi, C. A fully-integrated 64-channel wireless neural interfacing soc achieving 110 db afe psrr and supporting 54 mb/s symbol rate, meter-range wireless data transmission. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs 2020, 67, 831–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, J.-S.; Kwon, D.-Y.; Choi, B.-D. High-accuracy, compact scanning method and circuit for resistive sensor arrays. Sensors 2016, 16, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Lyu, L.; Wang, Q.; Huang, Z.; Wu, X. An in situ digital background calibration algorithm for multi-channel r-βr ladder dacs. J. Electron. Sci. Technol. 2022, 20, 100150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ye, D.; Wang, Y.; Xiang, Y.; Lyu, L.; Min, H.; Shi, C. A wireless power and data transfer receiver achieving 75.4% effective power conversion efficiency and supporting 0.1% modulation depth for ask demodulation. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2019, 55, 1386–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lyu, L.; Ye, D.; Shi, C. A 340 nw/channel 110 db psrr neural recording analog front-end using replica-biasing lna, level-shifter assisted pga, and averaged lfp servo loop in 65nm cmos. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 2020, 14, 811–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Muller, R.; Le, H.P.; Li, W.; Ledochowitsch, P.; Gambini, S.; Bjorninen, T.; Koralek, A.; Carmena, J.M.; Maharbiz, M.M.; Alon, E. A minimally invasive 64-channel wireless μecog implant. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2015, 50, 344–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Kassiri, H.; Bagheri, A.; Soltani, N.; Abdelhalim, K.; Jafari, H.M.; Salam, M.T.; Velazquez, J.; Genov, R. Battery-less tri-band-radio neuro-monitor and responsive neurostimulator for diagnostics and treatment of neurological disorders. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2016, 51, 1274–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, Y.; Luan, S.; Williams, I.; Rapeaux, A.; Constandinou, T.G. A 64-channel versatile neural recording soc with activity-dependent data throughput. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 2017, 11, 1344–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Han, D.; Zheng, Y.; Rajkumar, R.; Dawe, G.S. A 0.45 v 100-channel neural-recording ic with sub- μw/channel consumption in 0.18 μm cmos. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 2013, 7, 735–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Katsuura, T.; Izumi, S.; Yoshimoto, M.; Kawaguchi, H.; Sekitani, T. Wearable pulse wave velocity sensor using flexible piezoelectric film array. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS), Turin, Italy, 19–21 October 2017. [Google Scholar]
  29. Willemet, M.; Chowienczyk, P.; Alastruey, J. A database of virtual healthy subjects to assess the accuracy of foot-to-foot pulse wave velocities for estimation of aortic stiffness. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2015, 309, H663–H675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kim, C.S.; Carek, A.M.; Inan, O.T.; Mukkamala, R.; Hahn, J.O. Ballistocardiogram-based approach to cuff-less blood pressure monitoring: Proof-of-concept and potential challenges. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2018, 65, 2384–2391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yao, Y.; Shin, S.; Mousavi, A.; Kim, C.-S.; Xu, L.; Mukkamala, R.; Hahn, J.-O. Unobtrusive estimation of cardiovascular parameters with limb ballistocardiography. Sensors 2019, 19, 2922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Overview of the remote health monitoring system with a flexible resistive pressure sensor array and a wireless multi-channel signal readout chip.
Figure 1. Overview of the remote health monitoring system with a flexible resistive pressure sensor array and a wireless multi-channel signal readout chip.
Sensors 22 03934 g001
Figure 2. Characteristic test of the flexible pressure sensor. (a) The typical testing system of the flexible pressure sensor. (b) Changes in the reciprocal of resistance as a function of applied pressure. (c) Variations of deformation and sensitivity of five groups of samples with increasing pressure from 50 to 600 kPa. (d) The sensor output current changes with the step pressure, indicating its fast response.
Figure 2. Characteristic test of the flexible pressure sensor. (a) The typical testing system of the flexible pressure sensor. (b) Changes in the reciprocal of resistance as a function of applied pressure. (c) Variations of deformation and sensitivity of five groups of samples with increasing pressure from 50 to 600 kPa. (d) The sensor output current changes with the step pressure, indicating its fast response.
Sensors 22 03934 g002
Figure 3. (a) Circuit diagram of the multi-channel resistance-to-voltage converter. (b) Sensitivity curves of the conventional linear and proposed nonlinear signal readout.
Figure 3. (a) Circuit diagram of the multi-channel resistance-to-voltage converter. (b) Sensitivity curves of the conventional linear and proposed nonlinear signal readout.
Sensors 22 03934 g003
Figure 4. (a) The architecture of the 64-channel wireless signal readout SoC. (b) Micrograph of the SoC fabricated in 65 nm CMOS process. (c) Key specifications of the SoC.
Figure 4. (a) The architecture of the 64-channel wireless signal readout SoC. (b) Micrograph of the SoC fabricated in 65 nm CMOS process. (c) Key specifications of the SoC.
Sensors 22 03934 g004
Figure 5. Measured performance of the custom-designed chip. (a) Power distribution in wireless mode with a total power of 2.28 mW. (b) Power distribution in wireline mode with a total power of 0.48 mW. (c) The measured transfer characteristic and input-referred noise of a typical AFE channel. (d) Comparison of the PSRR and power consumption of the signal-channel AFE.
Figure 5. Measured performance of the custom-designed chip. (a) Power distribution in wireless mode with a total power of 2.28 mW. (b) Power distribution in wireline mode with a total power of 0.48 mW. (c) The measured transfer characteristic and input-referred noise of a typical AFE channel. (d) Comparison of the PSRR and power consumption of the signal-channel AFE.
Sensors 22 03934 g005
Figure 6. Monitoring of the BCG and pulse wave signals by the proposed system. (a) Diagram of the hardware setup to acquire BCG and (b) the measured waveform. (c) Diagram of the hardware setup to acquire four-channel pulse wave and (d) the measured waveforms.
Figure 6. Monitoring of the BCG and pulse wave signals by the proposed system. (a) Diagram of the hardware setup to acquire BCG and (b) the measured waveform. (c) Diagram of the hardware setup to acquire four-channel pulse wave and (d) the measured waveforms.
Sensors 22 03934 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wangxu, H.; Lyu, L.; Bi, H.; Wu, X. Flexible Pressure Sensor Array with Multi-Channel Wireless Readout Chip. Sensors 2022, 22, 3934. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/s22103934

AMA Style

Wangxu H, Lyu L, Bi H, Wu X. Flexible Pressure Sensor Array with Multi-Channel Wireless Readout Chip. Sensors. 2022; 22(10):3934. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/s22103934

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wangxu, Haohan, Liangjian Lyu, Hengchang Bi, and Xing Wu. 2022. "Flexible Pressure Sensor Array with Multi-Channel Wireless Readout Chip" Sensors 22, no. 10: 3934. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/s22103934

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop