Next Article in Journal
Acoustoelectric Effect for Rayleigh Wave in ZnO Produced by an Inhomogeneous In-Depth Electrical Conductivity Profile
Previous Article in Journal
Fast Detection of Missing Thin Propagating Cracks during Deep-Learning-Based Concrete Crack/Non-Crack Classification
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Anomalous Nernst Effect in Flexible Co-Based Amorphous Ribbons

by
Marcio A. Correa
1,2,*,
Armando Ferreira
2,3,
Arthur L. R. Souza
1,
João. M. Dantas Neto
1,
Felipe Bohn
1,
Filipe Vaz
2,3 and
Galina V. Kurlyandskaya
4,5
1
Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59078-900, RN, Brazil
2
Centro de Física das Universidades do Minho e do Porto (CF-UM-UP), Universidade do Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
3
LaPMET—Laboratório de Física para Materiais e Tecnologias Emergentes, Universidade do Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
4
Department of Magnetism and Magnetic Nanomaterials, Ural Federal University, 620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia
5
Department of Electricity and Electronics, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, 48940 Leioa, Biscay, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 12 December 2022 / Revised: 9 January 2023 / Accepted: 23 January 2023 / Published: 27 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Sensor Materials)

Abstract

:
Fe 3 Co 67 Cr 3 Si 15 B 12 ribbons with a high degree of flexibility and excellent corrosion stability were produced by rapid quenching technique. Their structural, magnetic, and thermomagnetic (Anomalous Nernst Effect) properties were studied both in an as-quenched (NR) state and after stress annealing during 1 h at the temperature of 350 °C and a specific load of 230 MPa (AR). X-ray diffraction was used to verify the structural characteristics of our ribbons. Static magnetic properties were explored by inductive technique and vibrating sample magnetometry. The thermomagnetic curves investigated through the Anomalous Nernst Effect are consistent with the obtained magnetization results, presenting a linear response in the thermomagnetic signal, an interesting feature for sensor applications. Additionally, Anomalous Nernst Effect coefficient S A N E values of 2.66 μ V/K and 1.93 μ V/K were estimated for the as-quenched and annealed ribbons, respectively. The interplay of the low magnetostrictive properties, soft magnetic behavior, linearity of the thermomagnetic response, and flexibility of these ribbons place them as promising systems to probe curved surfaces and propose multifunctional devices, including magnetic field-specialized sensors.

1. Introduction

Green processes and advanced energy saving technologies are crucial requests nowadays [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Among them, physical and electrophysical techniques employing no or a small amount of water/organic solvents have become very important [7,8]. In this scenario, the development of highly efficient sensors with reduced energy consumption levels becomes essential for the future [9,10,11,12]. For instance, one of the tendencies is the miniaturization of sensor devices, allowing to save both energy and the amount of employed materials [13,14]. Although a wide range of physical and chemical phenomena has been explored for sensor applications in recent years, special attention was paid to the materials which can demonstrate the ability to be employed in multifunctional devices, as well as materials having stable properties with respect to special environmental conditions. For instance, the change in the electrical resistance of nanostructures has a great appeal for temperature, gas, and humidity sensors [15,16,17,18]. Furthermore, changes in electrical voltage can be used for magnetic and electrical field sensors [19,20,21,22], including magnetic field sensors working in principle on the magnetoimpedance effect (GMI) [23,24,25,26,27] and being one of the most efficient types of the sensors for obtaining the high sensitivity for room temperature applications.
Another key point to mention with respect to the active research directions is the significant increase in demand for multifunctional sensors with flexible properties [26,27]. Within this context, the sensors in which the measurements of distinct physical/chemical properties with flexible sensitive elements allow the miniaturization of the devices and the production of sensors adjustable to curved surfaces. The last feature is very important for many biomedical applications (including sports medicine) where an adjustable body or particular shape design is highly desired.
The thermomagnetic effects arise as an exciting alternative to developing multifunctional flexible sensors. Phenomena such as Anomalous Nernst (ANE) [28,29,30,31] and Longitudinal Spin-Seebeck (LSSE) effects [32,33,34,35] can be easily accessed through a slight thermal gradient ( T ) applied to a ferromagnetic material. Usually, thermomagnetic effects are studied in ferromagnetic nanostructures (thin films) grown onto rigid substrates [35,36]. The geometry of these materials permits the adjustment of the ferromagnetic properties during the film deposition up to the desired, making possible the tuning of the thermomagnetic response. However, the employment of a flexible element, in turn, provides a path for modifications of the magnetic properties, especially in the case of magnetic materials having high magnetostriction coefficient [30]. A possible alternative to address this challenge is the use of flexible materials without substrates, such as amorphous ribbons or even ribbon-based composites [37,38]. For instance, previously, a number of studies were devoted to the design of GMI composites consisting of rapidly quenched magnetic ribbons, with thin-film coverings deposited by sputtering deposition [39,40]. For sensor applications, flexible properties related to the change of shape are requested together with soft magnetic properties. In this case, the most magnetically soft ribbons having nanocrystalline structures become not appropriate due to their poor mechanical properties and very limited flexibility [41,42].
Surprisingly, the number of studies of thermomagnetic effects as ANE in amorphous ribbons is scarce [43,44]. The main reason for the reduced interest relies on the difficulties of obtaining ferromagnetic ribbons with magnetic properties favorable for thermomagnetic applications. In this case, properties such as high magnetic permeability ( μ ), high saturation magnetization ( M s ), low coercive field ( H c ), and low magnetostriction properties can hardly be reached simultaneously. Nonetheless, in a recent study, Kurlyandskaya and co-workers [45] have brought to light a ferromagnetic system with remarkable potential. Specifically, the authors have produced Co-based ferromagnetic flexible ribbons with soft magnetic properties and very small negative magnetostriction constant, and high corrosion stability. These features allow reaching ribbon with interesting linearity in the magnetization dependence concern to the external applied magnetic field at the low field interval. These ribbons demonstrated excellent potential for high-frequency sensor applications, explored by using magnetoimpedance effect [45]. From now, new studies about the potential application for thermomagnetic voltage generation can improve the applicability of the alloy. The interplay of these properties is an excellent starting point for ANE studies and, consequently, the development of multifunctional flexible sensor applications.
It is worth mentioning that Fe 3 Co 67 Cr 3 Si 15 B 12 amorphous ribbons are well-studied materials with a number of interesting properties [46], showing the possibility of modification of the effective magnetic anisotropy by heat treatments, in certain conditions appearance the second-order magnetic anisotropy, and characterized by excellent corrosion stability requested in biological applications [47]. Moreover, Chromium (Cr) doping results in complex changes in the physical properties of the ribbon. Cr addition allows verifying an increase in corrosion stability, which leads to a better quality of the free side of the ribbon in comparison with the composition without Cr doping. Magnetically, the ribbon presents a very stable response in the induced magnetic anisotropy induction, which is most important for the technological applications requiring an external magnetic field of a few Oersted (Oe) [45].
In this work, the structural, magnetic, and thermomagnetic properties, specifically the Anomalous Nernst Effect, were studied in the amorphous CoFeCrSiB rapidly quenched ribbons, with very small negative magnetostriction constant, both in as-quenched state and after stress annealing during 1 h at the temperature of 350 °C and a specific load of 230 MPa.

2. Materials and Methods

Fe 3 Co 67 Cr 3 Si 15 B 12 ribbons were produced by rapid quenching technique onto Cu rotating weal in air conditions [45,48]. The ribbons were obtained as large batches of the order of 10 m. Their dimensions were width of ≈ 0.8 mm and thickness of t R 0.24 μ m. The lengths varied for different experimental studies, being 35 mm for inductive hysteresis loop measurements, 5 mm for vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM), and 12 mm for ANE measurements. It is important to point out that the ribbon length used for VSM and ANE measurements must be similar once the ANE curves mimic the magnetization one for a given field alignment. Ribbons demonstrated excellent flexibility and can be curved in accordance with the shape of different surfaces, as depicted in Figure 1a,b. The alloy has a Curie temperature close to 170 °C, a crystallization temperature of 570 °C, a saturation magnetization of M s = 365 G, and a very low negative value of saturation magnetostriction constant, λ s 10 7 . The structural, magnetic, and thermomagnetic properties were studied both in an as-quenched (NR) state and after stress annealing for 1 h at the temperature of 350 °C and a specific load of 230 MPa (AR). The structural features of the ribbons were obtained through X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies by using a Rigaku diffractometer model MiniFlex (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan), operating with Cu-k α radiation in θ 2 θ configuration.
Inductive magnetic hysteresis loops were measured using a homemade conventional inductive system. Angular dependence of the magnetic properties was investigated via magnetization curves measured using a VSM LakeShore Model 7404 (VSM, Lake Shore 7404, Westerville, OH, USA). Depending on the particular application, the size of the ribbon element can vary significantly from a few mm to tens of cm [49,50]. The samples with variations in length differ from each other due to a change in the demagnetizing factor, affecting the value of the estimated value of effective magnetic anisotropy. For observation of the magnetic domain structure, magneto-optical Kerr (MOKE) microscopy (Evico, Dresden, Germany) was used. Although the quasi-static magnetic behavior of the ribbons has already been discussed in published articles [49,50], it is essential to ensure that the same properties were obtained. Therefore, these characterizations were done once the thermomagnetic and the magnetic properties are connected to each other.
For the Anomalous Nernst Effect measurements, we employed a homemade system, as depicted in Figure 1c. In this setup, the ribbon was connected to a glass substrate through silver paint to make easier the electrical contacts during the measurements, as well as to isolate electrically the ribbon from the heat sink, which was a metallic block in our case. To improve the thermal stability of our system, a high thermal conductive graze is used between the ribbon and the substrate. Although interface effects can be present in our heterostructure (ribbon + substrate), the thicknesses of the ribbons allow us to ensure that the ANE signal is mainly from the bulk signal of the samples. A micro-Peltier module was responsible for the T applied perpendicular to the ribbon plane. The temperature difference between the top of the ribbon and the bottom of the glass substrate ( Δ T) was measured by using micro-thermocouples. The temperature control is done through currents in the micro-Peltier module. Although a rigorous experimental procedure is performed to ensure similar Δ T values for distinct samples, small differences can still be observed. The external magnetic field was oriented in the plane of the sample for distinct φ H orientations with respect to the electrical contact direction. The alignment shown in Figure 1c is defined as φ H in a similar way taken for the magnetization curves. In particular, we define the angular direction φ H = 0 ° for H transverse to the main axis of the ribbon, while we assume φ H = 90 ° for H along the main axis of the sample. The measurements were carried out by varying the current in the Peltier module, which allowed us to control Δ T . The thermomagnetic signal, i.e., the induced voltage, was measured using a high-resolution multimeter Keithley 2700 series.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural and Magnetic Characterization

Figure 2 depicts the XRD results for the NR and AR ribbons. From the analysis of the results, the amorphous character of both samples becomes clear. This feature is confirmed by the broad and low-intensity peak located at 2 θ 45 ° , which is associated with Co-based alloys. The other broad peak having higher intensity is related to the amorphous glass substrate. It is important to point out that, even with the annealing performed in the AR ribbon, the amorphous structure remains unchanged for this material. During the stress annealing, three experimental parameters come into play: the temperature, the stress intensity, and the time. In our case, the temperature of 350 °C and low values of stress were considered, ensuring the soft magnetic behavior and linear shape of the magnetization curves at a low field regime.
The very soft magnetic properties are interesting features for flexible sensor applications once the ribbon can be used to cover curved surfaces and be submitted to a small thermal gradient. Our structural findings are in accordance with that one observed in the literature for similar ribbons [45].
Figure 3a,b shows the inductive magnetic hysteresis loops, obtained by standard inductive technique, for the external magnetic field applied along the long axis of the ribbon. For the NR ribbon, although the shape of the magnetization curves can be described as an S-loop, there is a long interval in the small magnetic fields for which the linear dependence of M ( H ) is well fitted. The AR ribbon, in turn, has negligible coercivity and a clear linear dependence of magnetization on the applied magnetic field up to the anisotropy field of the ribbon. Here we can definitely observe the difference in magnetic behavior for NR and AR ribbons. The results for the NR one suggest an effective magnetic anisotropy having a major longitudinal component, while the ones for the AR ribbon undoubtedly indicate a transverse effective magnetic anisotropy. In this case, the induced anisotropy and the shape anisotropy are competing with each other. As aforementioned, the ribbons of such composition have very small negative saturation magnetostriction constant, λ s 10 7 , and, therefore, they can be used for stress annealing and formation of the transverse induced magnetic anisotropy [45].
The surface magnetic domains confirm our interpretation and are in agreement with the results of magnetic measurements and previous results reported in the literature. These measurements were done for a near zero external magnetic field, i.e., with the samples in the remanent state. Specifically, Figure 3c discloses tilted domains, primarily orientated along the main axis of the ribbon. Figure 3d shows typical zig-zag surface domains, a result of the stress annealing of Co-based ribbons, leading to a transverse magnetic anisotropy, which can be connected to the Fe–Fe or Cr–Cr pair ordering [51,52,53] as well as the non-uniform distribution of the internal stress. As a result, the induced anisotropy axis is oriented along the width of the ribbon [47,54]. It is known that the in-plane component of the magnetization should be oriented perpendicular to the direction of the applied stress [47]. After stress annealing, the domains are generally bounded by 180° domains walls complicated by a zig-zag sub-structure: the alternating of the tilted domain boundaries is due to an additional out-of-plane anisotropy, which leads to the structure of the observed domain at low field presented in Figure 3d.
Regarding the magnetization process, given the field is along the main axis in the inductive experiment, although some domain wall motion is expected for the NR ribbon, for both, the changes of magnetization are especially connected with coherent rotations of the magnetization of the domains with little, if any, hysteresis, a fact assigned by the very soft magnetic properties of the samples.
Figure 4 shows the angular magnetization curves measured by VSM, once these properties are an interesting feature for the ANE characterization. It is worth remarking that we define φ H = 0 ° as the orientation when the external magnetic field is perpendicular to the main axis of the ribbon, as we can see in Figure 4a. The external magnetic field is always oriented in the plane of the ribbon, in a sense, φ H = 90 ° takes place when H is parallel to the main axis of the sample.
Figure 4b shows the magnetization curves for the NR ribbon. Strong dependence of the magnetization curves is observed as the φ H increases. Considering the dimensions of the ribbon, the results may be interpreted in terms of strong shape anisotropy. For φ H = 0 ° a magnetization behavior with a tiny coercive field, H c 2 Oe, and saturation field H s of around 220 Oe is observed. However, the most remarkable feature is related to the linearity of the curves at low magnetic fields, ± 80 Oe, for the measurements performed at φ H = 0 ° . Similar behavior was verified for the AR ribbon, as we can see in Figure 4c. Again, the shape anisotropy dominates in such a way that makes the magnetic properties of the NR and AR ribbons to be very similar, with a tiny increase in the coercive field, H c 8 Oe. The shape anisotropy commands the magnetization curves for distinct φ H values. For the curves measured for φ H = 0 ° the linearity of the magnetization is reproduced. To compare the NR and AR ribbons, Figure 4d shows the magnetization curves for φ H = 0 ° . From this figure, it is evident the very same behavior for the two ribbons. Inset depicts the very low coercive field of our ribbons. The comparison of the remarkable difference between the magnetic behavior of short and long ribbons presented in Figure 3 and Figure 4 can be understood by the contribution of the demagnetizing fields of the short samples.
In both cases of NR and AR ribbons, the samples present soft magnetic behavior, with magnetization curves having very small H c , irrespectively of φ H measured curves. This latter feature can also be interpreted as a feature of the small influence of the magnetostrictive properties of the Co-based alloy on the magnetic ones.
The transition from the longitudinal to transverse effective anisotropy (depicted in Figure 3), as well as the dependence of such evolution with the dimensions of the ribbons (Figure 3 and Figure 4) are issues that deserve further studies. Anyway, the magnetic properties of this alloy present an interesting behavior for low magnetic field sensor applications. It is important to point out that these properties can be reproduced in other magnetic phenomena. Therefore, from now, we show the thermomagnetic response, measured using ANE.

3.2. Anomalous Nernst Effect

The Anomalous Nernst Effect is the generation of an electrical field E when a ferromagnetic material with magnetization M is submitted to a thermal gradient T . The induced electrical field is described through the relation [28]
E A N E = S A N E ( M ^ × T ) ,
with M ^ being the unit vector associated with the orientation of M . Here, S A N E is related with the ANE coefficient λ A N E by
λ A N E = S A N E μ ° M s ,
where μ ° is the vacuum magnetic permeability, and M s is the saturation magnetization of the studied material. Experimentally, we are able to measure an ANE voltage V A N E through contacts put on top of the sample, distant L one each other. Such voltage is given by
V A N E = 0 L E A N E · d l .
Hence, from Equations (1) and (3), one can notice it is possible to handle the V A N E by changing the magnetic state of the ribbon, i.e., M . Moreover, the V A N E signal is strongly dependent on the angular measurements between the generated E A N E , magnetization M , and the direction of the electric contacts L . This feature can be explored to produce directional magnetic sensor devices since changes in the M intensity and direction can produce distinct thermomagnetic V A N E responses.
Considering the flexible state of the ribbons, as well as the absence of effects devoted to magnetostriction, ANE measurements can be interesting to employ amorphous ribbons to generate electric signals in systems that require curved sensory covers.
Figure 5 shows the angular dependence of the ANE curves for AR ribbon measured at Δ T = 18.5 K. As expected, the increase in φ H leads to a decrease in the ANE signal. This feature is connected to the rotation of the E with respect to L (voltage detection direction defined by the contacts). For φ H = 90 ° , we observe the absence of ANE response. As we can observe in the inset, the reduction of V m a x with φ H does not present a linear behavior. Instead of it, from Equations (1) and (3), we notice the dependence is well described by a cosine function, as confirmed. It is important to point out that the ANE response for the NR ribbon presents similar results, which corroborate with the correct assembly of the experimental apparatus.
Figure 6 shows the ANE response for the NR ribbon. The measurements were performed as a function of the external magnetic field for distinct Δ T values at φ H = 0 ° . In particular, Δ T = 0 K indicates that the temperatures on top of the ribbons and bottom of the glass substrate are the same. Moreover, in our experiment, we heat the top of the ribbon while the bottom of the glass substrate is in thermal contact with a heat sink. For this field’s configuration, the electrical field E is along the detection direction L defined by the electrical contacts. Consequently, for Δ T 0 K, the shape of thermomagnetic curves mirrors the magnetization one, while for Δ T = 0 K, we observe the absence of ANE voltage. The increase in Δ T leads to a linear increase in the maximum value reached by the thermomagnetic curves, named here as V m a x . Taking V m a x as a function of Δ T , it is possible to estimate S A N E . Experimentally, the S A N E value can be calculated through [55,56]
S A N E = V m a x t R L Δ T R ,
where Δ T R is the temperature difference in the ribbon, which is related to Δ T through
Δ T R = t R K s t s K R Δ T ,
in which K s and K R are the thermal conductivity of the substrate (glass) and of the ribbon, respectively, and t s and t R are the thickness of the substrate and ribbon.
Figure 6b presents V m a x as a function of Δ T for the NR ribbon. First, it is possible to confirm the linear behavior of the experimental results, a feature expected for the ANE effect. Second, considering K s = 1.15 W/mK and t s = 0.15 mm for the substrate, and K R = 133.79 W/mK and t R = 0.24 μ m for the ribbon, from Equations (4) and (5) we achieve S A N E = 2.66 μ V/K for the NR ribbon. This value demonstrates how efficient the conversion of thermal gradient on electrical voltage V A N E for this system.
Figure 7, in turn, shows the ANE response for the AR ribbon. In Figure 7a, the curves were obtained as a function of the external magnetic field, with φ H = 0 ° , for distinct Δ T values. Again, the alignment between the M , E , and L allow us to mirror the shape of the magnetization curves in the ANE response. For Δ T = 0 K, we observe the absence of the thermomagnetic voltage, as expected [see Equation (1)]. The increase in Δ T discloses a raise of V m a x , without modifications in the shape of the curves.
The most striking finding resides in the linearity of the ANE curve at low field values found for the AR ribbon as well. This feature is a consequence of the low magnetostrictive properties of the alloy. As observed, after the annealing, the magnetization properties and the ANE response do not change considerably. Despite it, after the annealing, the main modification is associated with the electrical conductivity of the ribbon, which causes changes in the V m a x values.
From the slope of V m a x as a function of the Δ T , depicted in Figure 7b, the S A N E can be estimated using the Equations (4) and (5). Taking into account the same values previously mentioned, here we estimated S A N E = 1.93 μ V/K. This value is smaller than that of one observer for the NR ribbon, a feature associated with the modification in the electrical resistivity of the ribbon after the annealing. The reached S A N E for our flexible Co-based ribbons are compared with similar systems produced in thin films deposited onto rigid substrates [57,58].
As discussed before, the ANE has a great appeal for green energy generation. The exploit of such effect in flexible magnetic systems shows interesting applicability for ribbons. In our case, in addition to the ANE signal, the ribbons present a very interesting linearity at a low magnetic field range, which can be explored as magnetic field sensors. Within this context, Figure 8a depicts representative ANE response for NR ribbon as a function of the magnetic field measured with Δ T = 22 K. Taking a linear fit between ± 80 Oe (red line), it is possible to calculate the ANE sensitivity (Sens.). For the NR ribbon, we obtain Sens N R = 0.33 μ V/Oe. Considering a similar procedure for the AR ribbon, Figure 8b shows the result measured at Δ T = 18.5 K, for which we achieve Sens A R = 0.22 μ V/Oe. It is important to point out that the ANE sensitivity is strongly dependent on the measured Δ T . However, experimentally, this parameter is easily controlled Peltier modulus.
The observed difference between Sens N R and Sens A R values still requires additional studies opening the possibilities of future research. For example, the existing techniques of structural investigation of nanocrystalline materials with stress-induced magnetic anisotropy anisotropic stress distribution were observed, indicating an important role of anisotropic stress distribution in the stress-induced magnetic anisotropy formation [59]. In the present study, we are dealing with amorphous materials, and direct referencing might not be very appropriate. However, one can suppose that the difference between Sens N R and Sens A R observed for NR and AR ribbons may have a contribution related to the difference of the stress distribution in the elements with different pre-history and, therefore, providing distinct types of thermal conductivity in different directions. In this regard, new types of thermoelectric composites consisting of rapidly quenched magnetic ribbons capped by thin films deposited by sputtering might be of special interest to study in the future. One of the other important points for thermomagnetic applications could be thermal stability in the field of the temperatures under consideration. Usually, amorphous ribbons in the initial state have a higher level of internal stress and a higher relaxation response in the course of heating. This means that stress-annealed ribbons with lower Sens A R coefficient may have preferable functional characteristics.

4. Conclusions

The structural, quasi-static magnetic properties and thermomagnetic behavior of as-quenched and stress-annealed CoFeCrSiB rapidly quenched amorphous ribbons were studied. The magnetic properties correspond to soft magnetic behavior, with high magnetic permeability and remarkable linearity of magnetization dependence on the value of the applied magnetic field in the low field range. The ANE measurements, carried out in a wide range of magnetic fields and temperature gradients, reflect the magnetic results, presenting a linear response in the thermomagnetic signal, an interesting feature for sensor applications. Irrespective of the studied system (as quenched or annealed sample), the ANE response presents a strong dependence on the magnetic field intensity and direction, which make suitable the use of this system as a magnetic sensor. From the ANE results, we reached S A N E ( N R ) = 2.66 μ V/K and S A N E ( A R ) = 1.93 μ V/K, for the NR and AR ribbons, respectively. Calculated sensitivities of Sens N R = 0.33 μ V/Oe and Sens A R = 0.22 μ V/Oe reach promising application values of the ANE coefficient and thermomagnetic sensitivity for all studied cases. At last, it is worth mentioning that the studied flexible Co-based ribbon can be explored to probe curved surfaces and be used to generate green energy from the heat dissipation of surfaces.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A.C. and G.V.K.; software, M.A.C., G.V.K., F.B., F.V. and A.F.; validation, M.A.C., G.V.K., F.B., F.V. and A.F.; formal analysis, M.A.C., G.V.K., F.B., F.V., A.F., A.L.R.S. and J.M.D.N.; investigation, M.A.C., G.V.K., F.B., F.V., A.F., A.L.R.S. and J.M.D.N.; resources, M.A.C., G.V.K., F.B., F.V. and A.F.; data curation, M.A.C. and A.L.R.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A.C., G.V.K., F.B., F.V. and A.F.; writing—review and editing, M.A.C. and G.V.K.; supervision, G.V.K. and M.A.C.; project administration, M.A.C., G.V.K., F.B., F.V. and A.F.; funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

M.A.C. thanks CAPES (8887.573100/2020-00) and CNPq. A.F. thanks the FCT (CTTI-31/18-C.F. (2) junior researcher contract). G.V.K was supported in the frame of the Priority-2030 Program of Ural Federal University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Brazilian agencies CNPq and CAPES for the financial support. From the Portugal side, the authors thank the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) for the strategic funding UIDB/FIS / 04650 / 2020 . Armando Ferreira thanks the FCT for the contract under the Stimulus of Scientific Employment (CTTI-31/18-CF (2) junior researcher contract). G.V. thanks Priority-2030 Program of Ural Federal University. We thank Iñaki Orue, V.A. Lukshina, and A.A. Pasynkova for their special support. Selected measurements were made at SGIKER services of UPV/EHU.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Seh, A.Q.; Gupta, D.C. Exploration of highly correlated Co-based quaternary Heusler alloys for spintronics and thermoelectric applications. Int. J. Energy Res. 2019, 43, 8864–8877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sofi, S.A.; Gupta, D.C. Systematic study of ferromagnetic phase stability of Co-based Heusler materials with high figure of merit: Hunt for spintronics and thermoelectric applicability. AIP Adv. 2020, 10, 105330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kung, P.Y.; Pan, F.; Su, Y.H. Spintronic hydrogen evolution induced by surface plasmon of silver nanoparticles loaded on Fe- and Co-doped ZnO nanorods. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 24863–24873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, Q.; Sun, Y.; Xu, W.; Zhu, D. Organic Thermoelectric Materials: Emerging Green Energy Materials Converting Heat to Electricity Directly and Efficiently. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 6829–6851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, H.; Chi, D. Synthesis of Iron Sulfide and Iron Oxide Nanocrystal Thin Films for Green Energy Applications. Procedia Eng. 2016, 141, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Shah, J.; Gupta, R.; Kotnala, R.K. Colossal Humidoresistance Inducement in Magnesium Ferrite Thin Film Led to Green Energy Device Invention: Hydroelectric Cell; Spinger: Singapore, 2020; pp. 389–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Buznikov, N.; Safronov, A.; Orue, I.; Golubeva, E.; Lepalovskij, V.; Svalov, A.; Chlenova, A.; Kurlyandskaya, G. Modelling of magnetoimpedance response of thin film sensitive element in the presence of ferrogel: Next step toward development of biosensor for in-tissue embedded magnetic nanoparticles detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 117, 366–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Serikov, V.V.; Kleinerman, N.M.; Volkova, E.G.; Lukshina, V.A.; Potapov, A.P.; Svalov, A.V. Structure and magnetic properties of nanocrystalline FeCuNbSiB alloys after a thermomechanical treatment. Phys. Met. Metallogr. 2006, 102, 268–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, G.; Li, C.; Cheng, F.; Chen, J. ZnFe2O4 tubes: Synthesis and application to gas sensors with high sensitivity and low-energy consumption. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2007, 120, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wolf, S.A.; Awschalom, D.D.; Buhrman, R.A.; Daughton, J.M.; von Molnar, S.; Roukes, M.L.; Chtchelkanova, A.Y.; Treger, D.M. Spintronics: A Spin-Based Electronics Vision for the Future. Science 2001, 294, 1488–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lu, J.W.; Chen, E.; Kabir, M.; Stan, M.R.; Wolf, S.A. Spintronics technology: Past, present and future. Int. Mater. Rev. 2016, 61, 456–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Felser, C.; Fecher, G.H. Spintronics: From Materials to Devices; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dufay, B.; Saez, S.; Dolabdjian, C.P.; Yelon, A.; Menard, D. Characterization of an Optimized Off-Diagonal GMI-Based Magnetometer. IEEE Sens. J. 2013, 13, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Fernandez, E.; Garcia-Arribas, A.; Barandiaran, J.M.; Svalov, A.V.; Kurlyandskaya, G.V.; Dolabdjian, C.P. Equivalent Magnetic Noise of Micro-Patterned Multilayer Thin Films Based GMI Microsensor. IEEE Sens. J. 2015, 15, 6707–6714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Efeoğlu, H.; Turut, A. A highly stable temperature sensor based on Au/Cu/n-Si Schottky barrier diodes dependent on the inner metal thickness. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2022, 55, 185303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yu, C.; Wang, Z.; Yu, H.; Jiang, H. A stretchable temperature sensor based on elastically buckled thin film devices on elastomeric substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 141912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Yan, W.; Li, H.; Liu, J.; Guo, J. EPMA and XRD study on nickel metal thin film for temperature sensor. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2007, 136, 212–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sarma, S.; Lee, J.H. Developing Efficient Thin Film Temperature Sensors Utilizing Layered Carbon Nanotube Films. Sensors 2018, 18, 3182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Liu, X.; Lam, K.H.; Zhu, K.; Zheng, C.; Li, X.; Du, Y.; Liu, C.; Pong, P.W.T. Overview of Spintronic Sensors With Internet of Things for Smart Living. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2019, 55, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Díaz-Michelena, M. Small Magnetic Sensors for Space Applications. Sensors 2009, 9, 2271–2288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Koh, I.; Josephson, L. Magnetic Nanoparticle Sensors. Sensors 2009, 9, 8130–8145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Popovic, R.; Randjelovic, Z.; Manic, D. Integrated Hall-effect magnetic sensors. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2001, 91, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Makhotkin, V.; Shurukhin, B.; Lopatin, V.; Marchukov, P.; Levin, Y. Magnetic field sensors based on amorphous ribbons. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 1991, 27, 759–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Beach, R.S.; Berkowitz, A.E. Sensitive field- and frequency-dependent impedance spectra of amorphous FeCoSiB wire and ribbon (invited). J. Appl. Phys. 1994, 76, 6209–6213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Semirov, A.V.; Bukreev, D.A.; Moiseev, A.A.; Derevyanko, M.S.; Kudryavtsev, V.O. Relationship Between the Temperature Changes of the Magnetostriction Constant and the Impedance of Amorphous Elastically Deformed Soft Magnetic Cobalt-Based Ribbons. Russ. Phys. J. 2013, 55, 977–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fernández, E.; Svalov, A.V.; García-Arribas, A.; Feuchtwanger, J.; Barandiaran, J.M.; Kurlyandskaya, G.V. High Performance Magnetoimpedance in FeNi/Ti Nanostructured Multilayers with Opened Magnetic Flux. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2012, 12, 7496–7500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Melzer, M.; Kaltenbrunner, M.; Makarov, D.; Karnaushenko, D.; Karnaushenko, D.; Sekitani, T.; Someya, T.; Schmidt, O.G. Imperceptible magnetoelectronics. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Chuang, T.C.; Su, P.L.; Wu, P.H.; Huang, S.Y. Enhancement of the anomalous Nernst effect in ferromagnetic thin films. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 96, 174406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Asaba, T.; Ivanov, V.; Thomas, S.M.; Savrasov, S.Y.; Thompson, J.D.; Bauer, E.D.; Ronning, F. Colossal anomalous Nernst effect in a correlated noncentrosymmetric kagome ferromagnet. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Melo, A.S.; de Oliveira, A.B.; Chesman, C.; Pace, R.D.D.; Bohn, F.; Correa, M.A. Anomalous Nernst effect in stressed magnetostrictive film grown onto flexible substrate. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 15338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Chen, T.; Minami, S.; Sakai, A.; Wang, Y.; Feng, Z.; Nomoto, T.; Hirayama, M.; Ishii, R.; Koretsune, T.; Arita, R.; et al. Large anomalous Nernst effect and nodal plane in an iron-based kagome ferromagnet. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Uchida, K.; Ishida, M.; Kikkawa, T.; Kirihara, A.; Murakami, T.; Saitoh, E. Longitudinal spin Seebeck effect: From fundamentals to applications. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2014, 26, 343202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Uchida, K.; Takahashi, S.; Harii, K.; Ieda, J.; Koshibae, W.; Ando, K.; Maekawa, S.; Saitoh, E. Observation of the spin Seebeck effect. Nature 2008, 455, 778–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Adachi, H.; Uchida, K.; Saitoh, E.; Maekawa, S. Theory of the spin Seebeck effect. Rep. Prog. Physics. Phys. Soc. (Great Britain) 2013, 76, 036501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Tian, D.; Li, Y.; Qu, D.; Jin, X.; Chien, C.L. Separation of spin Seebeck effect and anomalous Nernst effect in Co/Cu/YIG. App. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 212407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Uchida, K.; Xiao, J.; Adachi, H.; Ohe, J.; Takahashi, S.; Ieda, J.; Ota, T.; Kajiwara, Y.; Umezawa, H.; Kawai, H.; et al. Spin Seebeck insulator. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 894–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Svalov, A.; Andreev, S.; Arkhipov, A.; Kudyukov, E.; Neznakhin, D.; Larrañaga, A.; Kurlyandskaya, G. Magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of Gd melt-spun ribbons. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1389, 012100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Parsons, R.; Ono, K.; Li, Z.; Kishimoto, H.; Shoji, T.; Kato, A.; Hill, M.; Suzuki, K. Prediction of density in amorphous and nanocrystalline soft magnetic alloys: A data mining approach. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 859, 157845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Volchkov, S.O.; Pasynkova, A.A.; Derevyanko, M.S.; Bukreev, D.A.; Kozlov, N.V.; Svalov, A.V.; Semirov, A.V. Magnetoimpedance of CoFeCrSiB Ribbon-Based Sensitive Element with FeNi Covering: Experiment and Modeling. Sensors 2021, 21, 6728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cerdeira, M.A.; Kurlyandskaya, G.V.; Fernandez, A.; Tejedor, M.; Garcia-Miquel, H. Giant Magnetoimpedance Effect in Surface Modified CoFeMoSiB Amorphous Ribbons. Chin. Phys. Lett. 2003, 20, 2246–2249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Yoshizawa, Y.; Oguma, S.; Yamauchi, K. New Fe-based soft magnetic alloys composed of ultrafine grain structure. J. Appl. Phys. 1988, 64, 6044–6046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dmitrieva, N.V.; Lukshina, V.A.; Noskova, N.I.; Potapov, A.P. Magnetic anisotropy induced by stress annealing, its thermal stability, and structure of the Fe5Co72Si15B8 alloy. Phys. Met. Metallogr. 2007, 104, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xing, Y.; Sun, Q.-F.; Wang, J. Nernst and Seebeck effects in a graphene nanoribbon. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80, 235411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Geishendorf, K.; Vir, P.; Shekhar, C.; Felser, C.; Facio, J.I.; van den Brink, J.; Nielsch, K.; Thomas, A.; Goennenwein, S.T.B. Signatures of the Magnetic Entropy in the Thermopower Signals in Nanoribbons of the Magnetic Weyl Semimetal Co 3 Sn 2 S 2. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 300–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kurlyandskaya, G.V.; Lezama, L.; Pasynkova, A.A.; Volchkov, S.O.; Lukshina, V.A.; Larrañaga, A.; Dmitrieva, N.V.; Timofeeva, A.V.; Orue, I. Amorphous FeCoCrSiB Ribbons with Tailored Anisotropy for the Development of Magnetic Elements for High Frequency Applications. Materials 2022, 15, 4160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Song, Y.; Jia, M.; Lin, M.; Li, X.; Lu, W. Thermal stability, magnetic properties and GMI effect of Cr-doping amorphous CoFeSiB ribbons. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 622, 500–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kurlyandskaya, G.; Vázquez, M.; Muñoz, J.; García, D.; McCord, J. Effect of induced magnetic anisotropy and domain structure features on magnetoimpedance in stress annealed Co-rich amorphous ribbons. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1999, 196–197, 259–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kurlyandskaya, G.; Dmitrieva, N.; Zayarnaya, T.; Lukshina, V.; Potapov, A. The thermomechanical treatment of an amorphous Co-based alloy with a low Curie temperature. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1996, 160, 307–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Handrich, K.; Kobe, S. Amorphe Ferro- und Ferrimagnetika; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany; Boston, MA, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  50. Yang, Z.; Lei, C.; Zhou, Y.; Sun, X.-C. Study on the giant magnetoimpedance effect in micro-patterned Co-based amorphous ribbons with single strip structure and tortuous shape. Microsyst. Technol. 2015, 21, 1995–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Néel, L. Anisotropie magnétique superficielle et surstructures d’orientation. J. Phys. Radium 1954, 15, 225–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ershov, N.V.; Chernenkov, Y.P.; Lukshina, V.A.; Smirnov, O.P.; Shishkin, D.A. Effect of Temperature of Long Annealing on the Structure and Magnetic Properties of Nanocrystalline FeSiNbCuB Alloy. Phys. Solid State 2021, 63, 978–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ershov, N.V.; Fedorov, V.I.; Chernenkov, Y.P.; Lukshina, V.A.; Shishkin, D.A. Effect of crystallization annealing under loading on the magnetic properties and the structure of a soft magnetic FeSiNbCuB alloy doped with chromium. Phys. Solid State 2017, 59, 1748–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Závěta, K.; Nielsen, O.V.; Jurek, K. A domain study of magnetization processes in a stress-annealed metallic glass ribbon for fluxgate sensors. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1992, 117, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Holanda, J.; Santos, O.A.; Cunha, R.O.; Mendes, J.B.; Rodríguez-Suárez, R.L.; Azevedo, A.; Rezende, S.M. Longitudinal spin Seebeck effect in permalloy separated from the anomalous Nernst effect: Theory and experiment. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 95, 214421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Correa, M.A.; Gamino, M.; de Melo, A.S.; Lopes, M.V.P.; Santos, J.G.S.; Souza, A.L.R.; Junior, S.A.N.F.; Ferreira, A.; Lanceros-Méndez, S.; Vaz, F.; et al. Unraveling the role of magnetic anisotropy on the thermoelectric response: A theoretical and experimental approach. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2022, 55, 025001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cox, C.D.W.; Caruana, A.J.; Cropper, M.D.; Morrison, K. Anomalous Nernst effect in Co 2 MnSi thin films. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2020, 53, 035005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sakuraba, Y.; Hyodo, K.; Sakuma, A.; Mitani, S. Giant anomalous Nernst effect in the Co2MnAl1-xSix Heusler alloy induced by Fermi level tuning and atomic ordering. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 134407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kurlyandskaya, G.; Lukshina, V.; Larrañaga, A.; Orue, I.; Zaharova, A.; Shishkin, D. Induced magnetic anisotropy features in FeCrSiBNbCu nanocrystalline alloy: Role of stress distribution proven by direct X-ray measurements. J. Alloys Compd. 2013, 566, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. General view of the Fe 3 Co 67 Cr 3 Si 15 B 12 amorphous ribbons of the 45 mm length showing the high degree of flexibility; (a) ribbon arranged in a circle (b) ribbon placed onto the cylindrical surface of 50 mm in diameter. (c) Schematic representation of the experimental setup for Anomalous Nernst Effect measurements. The ribbon was connected to a glass substrate with silver paint cured for 24 h. The Peltier module was responsible for the thermal gradient ( T ) perpendicular to the ribbon plane. Spring gold contacts were used for the thermomagnetic measurements, while an external magnetic field was generated by an electromagnet.
Figure 1. General view of the Fe 3 Co 67 Cr 3 Si 15 B 12 amorphous ribbons of the 45 mm length showing the high degree of flexibility; (a) ribbon arranged in a circle (b) ribbon placed onto the cylindrical surface of 50 mm in diameter. (c) Schematic representation of the experimental setup for Anomalous Nernst Effect measurements. The ribbon was connected to a glass substrate with silver paint cured for 24 h. The Peltier module was responsible for the thermal gradient ( T ) perpendicular to the ribbon plane. Spring gold contacts were used for the thermomagnetic measurements, while an external magnetic field was generated by an electromagnet.
Sensors 23 01420 g001
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction results for the NR and AR ribbons. The measurements were performed with the ribbons onto glass substrates without the use of silver paint.
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction results for the NR and AR ribbons. The measurements were performed with the ribbons onto glass substrates without the use of silver paint.
Sensors 23 01420 g002
Figure 3. (a) Inductive hysteresis loops of amorphous Fe 3 Co 67 Cr 3 Si 15 B 12 ribbons of 35 mm lengths in initial state NR and after stress-annealing AR for the magnetic field applied along the long axis of the ribbon. (b) Detailed view of the curves for a small magnetic field range. (c) Magnetic domains image for near zero fields for NR ribbon, in which the long axis of the ribbon is vertical. (d) Magnetic domains image for AR ribbon, in which the long axis of the ribbon is horizontal.
Figure 3. (a) Inductive hysteresis loops of amorphous Fe 3 Co 67 Cr 3 Si 15 B 12 ribbons of 35 mm lengths in initial state NR and after stress-annealing AR for the magnetic field applied along the long axis of the ribbon. (b) Detailed view of the curves for a small magnetic field range. (c) Magnetic domains image for near zero fields for NR ribbon, in which the long axis of the ribbon is vertical. (d) Magnetic domains image for AR ribbon, in which the long axis of the ribbon is horizontal.
Sensors 23 01420 g003
Figure 4. Magnetization curves for NR and AR ribbons. (a) Definition of φ H , in which φ H = 0 ° is assumed to be when the magnetic field is perpendicular to the main axis of the ribbon. (b) Normalized magnetization curves for the NR ribbon, measured at distinct φ H values. (c) Similar plots for AR ribbon. (d) NR and AR magnetization curves measured for φ H = 0 ° , showing the mirroring between the results. Inset depicts the low field curve, showing the coercive field of our ribbons.
Figure 4. Magnetization curves for NR and AR ribbons. (a) Definition of φ H , in which φ H = 0 ° is assumed to be when the magnetic field is perpendicular to the main axis of the ribbon. (b) Normalized magnetization curves for the NR ribbon, measured at distinct φ H values. (c) Similar plots for AR ribbon. (d) NR and AR magnetization curves measured for φ H = 0 ° , showing the mirroring between the results. Inset depicts the low field curve, showing the coercive field of our ribbons.
Sensors 23 01420 g004
Figure 5. Angular dependence of the V m a x as a function of H for the AR ribbon measured at Δ T = 18.5 K. The inset shows V m a x as a function of the φ H values. The red solid line is a fit of the experimental data using a cosine function.
Figure 5. Angular dependence of the V m a x as a function of H for the AR ribbon measured at Δ T = 18.5 K. The inset shows V m a x as a function of the φ H values. The red solid line is a fit of the experimental data using a cosine function.
Sensors 23 01420 g005
Figure 6. Anomalous Nernst Effect measurement for NR ribbon. (a) ANE voltage as a function of external magnetic field for distinct Δ T values. (b) V m a x as a function of Δ T for NR ribbon. From the slope of this curve, we estimated the S A N E value of our sample.
Figure 6. Anomalous Nernst Effect measurement for NR ribbon. (a) ANE voltage as a function of external magnetic field for distinct Δ T values. (b) V m a x as a function of Δ T for NR ribbon. From the slope of this curve, we estimated the S A N E value of our sample.
Sensors 23 01420 g006
Figure 7. Anomalous Nernst Effect measurement for AR ribbon. (a) ANE voltage as a function of external magnetic field for distinct Δ T values. (b) V m a x as a function of Δ T for AR ribbon.
Figure 7. Anomalous Nernst Effect measurement for AR ribbon. (a) ANE voltage as a function of external magnetic field for distinct Δ T values. (b) V m a x as a function of Δ T for AR ribbon.
Sensors 23 01420 g007
Figure 8. (a) Anomalous Nernst Effect response for the NR ribbon as a function of the magnetic field for Δ T = 22 K. The red line is the linear fit between ± 80 Oe where the thermomagnetic response presents a linear behavior. From the fitting, it is possible to calculate the ANE sensitivity of 0.33 μ V/Oe for the NR ribbon. (b) A similar plot for the AR ribbon measured at Δ T = 18.5 K, revealing a sensitivity of 0.22 μ V/Oe for the AR ribbon.
Figure 8. (a) Anomalous Nernst Effect response for the NR ribbon as a function of the magnetic field for Δ T = 22 K. The red line is the linear fit between ± 80 Oe where the thermomagnetic response presents a linear behavior. From the fitting, it is possible to calculate the ANE sensitivity of 0.33 μ V/Oe for the NR ribbon. (b) A similar plot for the AR ribbon measured at Δ T = 18.5 K, revealing a sensitivity of 0.22 μ V/Oe for the AR ribbon.
Sensors 23 01420 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Correa, M.A.; Ferreira, A.; Souza, A.L.R.; Dantas Neto, J.M.; Bohn, F.; Vaz, F.; Kurlyandskaya, G.V. Anomalous Nernst Effect in Flexible Co-Based Amorphous Ribbons. Sensors 2023, 23, 1420. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/s23031420

AMA Style

Correa MA, Ferreira A, Souza ALR, Dantas Neto JM, Bohn F, Vaz F, Kurlyandskaya GV. Anomalous Nernst Effect in Flexible Co-Based Amorphous Ribbons. Sensors. 2023; 23(3):1420. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/s23031420

Chicago/Turabian Style

Correa, Marcio A., Armando Ferreira, Arthur L. R. Souza, João. M. Dantas Neto, Felipe Bohn, Filipe Vaz, and Galina V. Kurlyandskaya. 2023. "Anomalous Nernst Effect in Flexible Co-Based Amorphous Ribbons" Sensors 23, no. 3: 1420. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/s23031420

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop