Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Heparin and Other Exogenous Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) in Reducing IL-1β-Induced Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine IL-8 and IL-6 mRNA Expression and the Potential Role for Reducing Inflammation
Previous Article in Journal
Dose Prediction and Pharmacokinetic Simulation of XZP-5610, a Small Molecule for NASH Therapy, Using Allometric Scaling and Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models
Previous Article in Special Issue
N-Derivatives of (Z)-Methyl 3-(4-Oxo-2-thioxothiazolidin-5-ylidene)methyl)-1H-indole-2-carboxylates as Antimicrobial Agents—In Silico and In Vitro Evaluation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Novel Antibacterial Agents 2022

by
Fiorella Meneghetti
* and
Daniela Barlocco
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Milan, Via L. Mangiagalli 25, 20133 Milan, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(3), 370; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ph17030370
Submission received: 2 February 2024 / Accepted: 11 March 2024 / Published: 13 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Antibacterial Agents 2022)
This Special Issue contains 16 original articles, 3 reviews, and 1 communication. The authors of these papers focused on the topic of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria and addressed several targets either by natural or synthetic compounds as well as novel techniques.
In particular, in the field of natural compounds, Abdulrahman S. Bazaid et al. identified, by GC-MS analysis, 2,4-dihydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furan-3-one and 1-methylcyclopropanemethanol as the major phytoconstituents of Sumra honey [1] and suggested that this source be used as a promising potential therapeutic tool against infections caused by MDR bacteria and fungi [2]. In addition, they proposed Sumra honey as a good candidate to inhibit bacterial cellular communication in strains of P. aeruginosa and C. violaceum [1].
Zenon Węglarz et al. studied the chemical profile of the species cultivated in the temperate climate of Central Europe of Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G. Don., one of the most important medicinal plants originating from the Mediterranean region of Europe [3]. Both herbs and inflorescences were analyzed. Neryl acetate, accompanied by α-pinene in the herb (10.42%), and nerol in inflorescences (15.73%), were the most important components. When tested for their antioxidant properties, both methanolic extract and essential oil obtained from the herb indicated a higher potential than those originating from the inflorescences. By contrast, the antimicrobial activity of the essential oil from inflorescences was higher than that of the herb essential oil. Gram-positive bacteria were more sensitive to both essential oils in comparison with Gram-negative bacteria [4].
The antibacterial activity of a <10 kDa peptide-rich extract obtained through the autolysis of yeast biomass under mild thermal treatment with self-proteolysis by endogenous peptidases was reported [5]. Maria Fernanda da Silva Santos et al., by in silico analysis using four independent algorithms, identified fifty-eight AMP candidate sequences which possibly contribute to the bacterial inactivation; then, they recommended S. cerevisiae-biomass peptides as promising adjuvants to treat infectious diseases that are poorly sensitive to conventional antibiotics, as previously proposed [6].
Tafenoquine and a derivative of chondrofoline [7,8] were tested for their antileishmanial activity against L. tropica (HTD7) by Sayyed Ibrahim Shah et al. In vitro tests (intra-THP-1 amastigote activity) showed that 10-hydroxy chondrofoline was more potent than tafenoquine (LD50 43.80 µM and 53.57 µM, respectively, after 48 h of incubation).
Varsha Srivastava et al. evaluated the antimycobacterial activity of the extracts of S. xanthocarpum Schrad. & Wendl., authenticated according to the Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India, against M. avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP) infection [9]. The best inhibition was shown by the hydro-alcoholic extract.
Tuberculosis was the topic of two other articles, which addressed different mycobacterial enzymes.
The enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase InhA of M. tuberculosis is a recognized druggable target [10]. Fawzia Faleh Albelwi et al., based on data from the literature, synthesized a series of 1,2,3-triazole linked to different acetamide groups as inhibitors of InhA. In vitro tests proved that the compounds were able to completely inhibit InhA at a concentration of 10 µM, being better inhibitors than Rifampicin.
Matteo Mori et al., based on their previous results, tested a series of analogues of the 5-(3-cyanophenyl)furan-2-carboxylic acid, the most potent salicylate synthase MbtI inhibitor identified to date [11,12]. Structure–activity relationships evidenced the importance of the side chain linked to the phenyl moiety to improve the in vitro antimycobacterial activity. They also set up a fluorescence-based screening test, using MPI-2 murine cells, which potentially accelerates the identification of new anti-TB drugs.
In recent years, the repurposing of well-known drugs has been proposed as a promising and less-demanding approach in antibiotic research.
On these premises, Tsung-Ying Yang et al. published two papers, investigating the immunomodulator ammonium trichloro(dioxoethylene-O,O′)tellurate (AS101) [13] as an antimicrobial agent.
In the first article, the compound was evaluated against carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) [14]. Values of MIC below 50% cytotoxicity were recorded (0.5 to 32 µg/mL and ~150 µg/mL, respectively). The compound displayed better effects than colistin in the carbapenemase-producing A. baumannii mouse sepsis model. The accumulation of ROS and disruption of the cell membrane were indicated as antibacterial mechanisms.
Positive results for AS101 were also reported in the second paper, when the compound was tested against colistin- and carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP).
The hybridization of known scaffolds has also provided good results in the identification of new potential drugs [15]. This approach was followed by Riham M. Bokhtia, who synthesized 31 linezolid conjugates and tested them against different strains of bacteria. The most promising agent showed MIC 4.5 µM against S. aureus and 2.25 µM against B. subtilis. Based on their results, the group developed a robust QSAR (R2 = 0.926, 0.935; R2cvOO = 0.898, 0.915; R2cvMO = 0.903, 0.916 for the S. aureus and B. subtilis models, respectively) and 3D pharmacophore models.
Several novel synthetic moieties were reported by different groups.
Anthi Petrou et al., following a previous approach, tested seventeen (Z)-methyl 3-(4-oxo-2-thioxothiazolidin-5-ylidene)methyl)-1H-indole-2-carboxylate derivatives against eight Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [16]. Their activity was found to be higher than that of ampicillin and streptomycin by 10–50-fold. They also displayed significant antifungal activity, with T. viride being the most sensitive, while A. fumigatus was the most resistant one.
Kevin Schindler et al. presented the results of the computationally evaluated binding affinity of a series of rhenium di- and tricarbonyl diamine complexes against the published structurally characterized membrane-bound S. aureus proteins [17]. Two possible major targets were proposed, namely lipoteichoic acids flippase (LtaA) and lipoprotein signal peptidase II (LspA).
Beatriz Suay-García et al. selected two quinolones by applying to a library of 1000 quinolones [18,19] their prediction model of activity against E. coli, and they tested them for their antibacterial properties together with a series of zwitterionic quinolonates by a microdilution method. The two quinolones showed the best broad-spectrum activity, though all the compounds were provided with antibacterial properties.
Bacteria resistance was also the topic of three different reviews.
Luigi Principe et al. devoted their attention to the combination of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (Bls/BLIs) and considered the following associations of drugs: aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/enmetazobactam, cefepime/taniborbactam, cefepime/zidebactam, cefiderocol, ceftaroline/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/ nacubactam, and meropenem/vaborbactam [20].
Anika Rütten et al. reported on recent data in the literature concerning bioactivity-based screening methods, focusing on the most relevant assays for the identification of antibiotic activity [21], and mechanisms of action investigations. Successful examples were also reported.
Sekar Madhu et al. focused on recent developments in electrochemical sensing techniques used to assess latent antibiotic resistances of pathogenic bacteria. They highlighted the prevalence of biorecognition probes and tailor-made nanomaterials in electrochemical antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) [22].
Nanomaterials were also investigated by two other groups.
Maider Ugalde-Arbizu et al. synthesized hybrid nanosystems based on mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) [23] functionalized with a nicotinic ligand and silver chloride nanoparticles, both phenytoin sodium (Ph)-loaded and unloaded. Their antibacterial activity was evaluated against three different strains of P. aeruginosa. The Ph-loaded materials promoted a quasi-complete inhibition of bacterial growth.
Noura Hazime et al. synthesized, and tested against E. coli, 184 novel formulations, based on colistin loaded on alginate nanoparticles (Alg Nps) [24], either in the absence or presence of small molecules such as components of essential oils, polyamines, and lactic acid. The formulations, whose safety towards eukaryotic HT-29 cells was established in vitro, are thought to permeabilize the bacterial membrane and cause the leakage of intracellular proteins [25].
Frida Svanberg Frisinger et al. investigated the prototype drug (MAC13243), which interferes with the Gram-negative outer membrane protein LolA on the fecal microbiota. The compound exhibited the concentration-dependent killing of coliforms in two fecal suspensions of healthy donors after 8 h, thus assuring a low risk of inducing dysbiosis.
Finally, a communication by Marius Seethaler et al. proposed a simple one-pot synthesis of fluorinated benzothiophene–indole hybrids as a promising strategy for the search of novel antimicrobial agents [26]. Compounds were evaluated against various S. aureus and MRSA strains. Bacterial pyruvate kinase was found to be their molecular target.

Author Contributions

The authors contributed equally to the writing and proof-reading of this Editorial. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Bazaid, A.S.; Aldarhami, A.; Patel, M.; Adnan, M.; Hamdi, A.; Snoussi, M.; Qanash, H.; Imam, M.; Monjed, M.K.; Khateb, A.M. The Antimicrobial Effects of Saudi Sumra Honey against Drug Resistant Pathogens: Phytochemical Analysis, Antibiofilm, Anti-Quorum Sensing, and Antioxidant Activities. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 1212.
  • Santos, M.F.D.S.; Freitas, C.S.; Verissimo da Costa, G.C.; Pereira, P.R.; Paschoalin, V.M.F. Identification of Antibacterial Peptide Candidates Encrypted in Stress-Related and Metabolic Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 163. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ph15020163.
  • Shah, S.I.; Nasir, F.; Malik, N.S.; Alamzeb, M.; Abbas, M.; Rehman, I.U.; Khuda, F.; Shah, Y.; Goh, K.W.; Zeb, A.; Ming, L.C. Efficacy Evaluation of 10-Hydroxy Chondrofoline and Tafenoquine against Leishmania tropica (HTD7). Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 1005. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ph15081005.
  • Srivastava, V.; Navabharath, M.; Gupta, S.; Singh, S.V.; Ahmad, S. Exploration of Solanum xanthocarpum Schrad. & Wendl. Against Mycobacterium avium Subspecies paratuberculosis and Assessment of Its Immunomodulatory and Anti-Inflammatory Potential. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 1367. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ph15111367.
  • Albelwi, F.F.; Abdu Mansour, H.M.; Elshatanofy, M.M.; El Kilany, Y.; Kandeel, K.; Elwakil, B.H.; Hagar, M.; Aouad, M.R.; El Ashry, E.S.H.; Rezki, N.; et al. Design, Synthesis and Molecular Docking of Novel Acetophenone-1,2,3-Triazoles Containing Compounds as Potent Enoyl-Acyl Carrier Protein Reductase (InhA) Inhibitors. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 799. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ph15070799.
  • Mori, M.; Stelitano, G.; Griego, A.; Chiarelli, L.R.; Cazzaniga, G.; Gelain, A.; Pini, E.; Camera, M.; Canzano, P.; Fumagalli, A.; et al. Synthesis and Assessment of the In Vitro and Ex Vivo Activity of Salicylate Synthase (Mbti) Inhibitors as New Candidates for the Treatment of Mycobacterial Infections. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 992. https://10.3390/ph15080992.
  • Bokhtia, R.M.; Girgis, A.S.; Ibrahim, T.S.; Rasslan, F.; Nossier, E.S.; Barghash, R.F.; Sakhuja, R.; Abdel-Aal, E.H.; Panda, S.S.; Al-Mahmoudy, A.M.M. Synthesis, Antibacterial Evaluation, and Computational Studies of a Diverse Set of Linezolid Conjugates. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 191. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ph15020191.
  • Yang, T.Y.; Tseng, S.P.; Dlamini, H.N.; Lu, P.L.; Lin, L.; Wang, L.C.; Hung, W.C. In Vitro and In Vivo Activity of AS101 against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 823. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ph14080823.
  • Petrou, A.; Geronikaki, A.; Kartsev, V.; Kousaxidis, A.; Papadimitriou-Tsantarliotou, A.; Kostic, M.; Ivanov, M.; Sokovic, M.; Nicolaou, I.; Vizirianakis, I.S. N-Derivatives of (Z)-Methyl 3-(4-Oxo-2-thioxothiazolidin-5-ylidene)methyl)-1H-indole-2-carboxylates as Antimicrobial Agents-In Silico and In Vitro Evaluation. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 131. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ph16010131.
  • Suay-García, B.; Bueso-Bordils, J.I.; Antón-Fos, G.; Pérez-Gracia, M.T.; Falcó, A.; Alemán-López, P. Synthesis of Quinolones and Zwitterionic Quinolonate Derivatives with Broad-Spectrum Antibiotic Activity. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 818. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ph15070818.
  • Principe, L.; Lupia, T.; Andriani, L.; Campanile, F.; Carcione, D.; Corcione, S.; De Rosa, F.G.; Luzzati, R.; Stroffolini, G.; Steyde, M.; et al. Microbiological, Clinical, and PK/PD Features of the New Anti-Gram-Negative Antibiotics: β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitors in Combination and Cefiderocol—An All-Inclusive Guide for Clinicians. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 463. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ph15040463.
  • Rütten, A.; Kirchner, T.; Musiol-Kroll, E.M. Overview on Strategies and Assays for Antibiotic Discovery. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 1302. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ph15101302.
  • Madhu, S.; Ramasamy, S.; Choi, J. Recent Developments in Electrochemical Sensors for the Detection of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 1488. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ph15121488.
  • Ugalde-Arbizu, M.; Aguilera-Correa, J.J.; Mediero, A.; Esteban, J.; Páez, P.L.; San Sebastian, E.; Gómez-Ruiz, S. Hybrid Nanosystems Based on Nicotinate-Functionalized Mesoporous Silica and Silver Chloride Nanoparticles Loaded with Phenytoin for Preventing Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Development. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 884. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ph15070884.
  • Hazime, N.; Belguesmia, Y.; Kempf, I.; Barras, A.; Drider, D.; Boukherroub, R. Enhancing Colistin Activity against Colistin-Resistant Escherichia coli through Combination with Alginate Nanoparticles and Small Molecules. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 682. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ph15060682.
  • Svanberg Frisinger, F.; Pirolo, M.; Ng DYK, Mao X, Nielsen DS, Guardabassi L. Impact of the Gram-Negative-Selective Inhibitor MAC13243 on In Vitro Simulated Gut Microbiota. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 731. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15060731.
  • Seethaler, M.; Hertlein, T.; Hopke, E.; Köhling, P.; Ohlsen, K.; Lalk, M.; Hilgeroth, A. Novel Effective Fluorinated Benzothiophene-Indole Hybrid Antibacterials against S. aureus and MRSA Strains. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 1138. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ph15091138.

References

  1. Aldarhami, A.; Bazaid, A.S.; Qanash, H.; Ahmad, I.; Alshammari, F.H.; Alshammari, A.M.; Alshammari, A.H.; Aljanfawe, F.M.; Aldamiri, B.; Aldawood, E.; et al. Effects of Repeated in-vitro Exposure to Saudi Honey on Bacterial Resistance to Antibiotics and Biofilm Formation. Infect. Drug Resist. 2023, 16, 4273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bazaid, A.S.; Aldarhami, A.; Gattan, H.; Aljuhani, B. Saudi Honey: A Promising Therapeutic Agent for Treating Wound Infections. Cureus 2021, 13, e18882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wijayadi, L.J.; Kelvin, K. Effectiveness of Helichrysum italicum Essential Oil on Wound Healing. J. Food. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 10, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Węglarz, Z.; Kosakowska, O.; Pióro-Jabrucka, E.; Przybył, J.L.; Gniewosz, M.; Kraśniewska, K.; Szyndel, M.S.; Costa, R.; Bączek, K.B. Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activity of Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G. Don. from Central Europe. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Agbebi, E.A.; Alabi, O.S.; Nkrumah, A.O.; Ogbole, O.O. Evaluation of the antibacterial and antifungal potentials of peptide-rich extracts from selected Nigerian plants. Eur. J. Integr. Med. 2022, 54, 102163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pereira, P.R.; Freitas, C.S.; Paschoalin, V.M.F. Saccharomyces cerevisiae biomass as a source of next-generation food preservatives: Evaluating potential proteins as a source of antimicrobial peptides. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 4450–4479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Baldas, J.; Bick, I.R.C.; Porter, Q.N.; Vernengo, M.J. Structure and stereochemistry of the alkaloid chondrofoline. J. Chem. Soc. D 1971, 132–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chu, C.S.; Hwang, J. Tafenoquine: A toxicity overview. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 2021, 20, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Boorgula, G.D.; Jakkula, L.U.M.R.; Gumbo, T.; Jung, B.; Srivastava, S. Comparison of Rifamycins for Efficacy Against Mycobacterium avium Complex and Resistance Emergence in the Hollow Fiber Model System. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 645264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Prasad, M.S.; Bhole, R.P.; Khedekar, P.B.; Chikhale, R.V. Mycobacterium enoyl acyl carrier protein reductase (InhA): A key target for antitubercular drug discovery. Bioorganic Chem. 2021, 115, 105242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mori, M.; Stelitano, G.; Gelain, A.; Pini, E.; Chiarelli, L.R.; Sammartino, J.C.; Poli, G.; Tuccinardi, T.; Beretta, G.; Porta, A.; et al. Shedding X-ray Light on the Role of Magnesium in the Activity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Salicylate Synthase (MbtI) for Drug Design. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 7066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chiarelli, L.R.; Mori, M.; Barlocco, D.; Beretta, G.; Gelain, A.; Pini, E.; Porcino, M.; Mori, G.; Stelitano, G.; Costantino, L.; et al. Discovery and development of novel salicylate synthase (MbtI) furanic inhibitors as antitubercular agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 155, 754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Vázquez-Tato, M.P.; Mena-Menéndez, A.; Feás, X.; Seijas, J.A. Novel Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of the Immunomodulator Organotellurium Compound Ammonium Trichloro(dioxoethylene-O,O′)tellurate (AS101). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 3287–3298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kim, Y.J.; Kim, S.I.; Kim, Y.R.; Hong, K.W.; Wie, S.H.; Park, Y.J.; Jeong, H.; Kang, M.W. Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Diversity of resistant mechanisms and risk factors for infection. Epidemiol. Infect. 2012, 140, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Shaveta; Mishra, S.; Singh, P. Hybrid molecules: The privileged scaffolds for various pharmaceu-ticals. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 124, 500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Stingaci, E.; Zveaghinteva, M.; Pogrebnoi, S.; Lupascu, L.; Valica, V.; Uncu, L.; Smetanscaia, A.; Drumea, M.; Petrou, A.; Ana Ciric, A.; et al. New vinyl-1,2,4-triazole derivatives as antimicrobial agents: Synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular docking studies. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2020, 30, 127368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Schindler, K.; Zobi, F. Anticancer and Antibiotic Rhenium Tri- and Dicarbonyl Complexes: Current Re-search and Future Perspectives. Molecules 2022, 27, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Suay-García, B.; Alemán-López, P.; Bueso-Bordils, J.I.; Falcó, A.; Pérez-Gracia, M.T.; Antón-Fos, G.M. Topological index Nclass as a factor determining the antibacterial activity of quinolones against Escherichia coli. Future Med. Chem. 2019, 11, 2255–2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bueso-Bordils, J.I.; Pérez-Gracia, M.T.; Suay-García, B.; Duart, M.J.; Algarra, R.V.M.; Zamora, L.L.; Anton-Fos, G.M.; Lopez, P.A.A. Topological pattern for the search of new active drugs against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 138, 807–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tehrani, K.H.M.E.; Martin, N.I. β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations: An update. Med. Chem. Commun. 2018, 9, 1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fu, Y.; Luo, J.; Qin, J.; Yang, M. Screening techniques for the identification of bioactive compounds in natural products. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2019, 168, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kim, D.; Yoo, S. Electrochemical Sensors for Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing: Strategies and Applica-tions. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Castillo, R.R.; Lozano, D.; González, B.; Manzano, M.; Izquierdo-Barba, I.; Vallet-Regí, M. Advances in mesoporous silica nanoparticles for targeted stimuli-responsive drug delivery: An update. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2019, 16, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Drider, D.; Boukherroub, R.; Le Devendecn, L.; Belguesmia, Y.; Hazime, N.; Mourand, G.; Paboeuf, F.; Kempf, I. Impact of colistin and colistin-loaded on alginate nanoparticles on pigs infected with a colistin-resistant enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli strain. Vet. Microbiol. 2022, 266, 109359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Choi, U.; Chang-Ro, L. Antimicrobial Agents That Inhibit the Outer Membrane Assembly Machines of Gram-Negative Bacteria. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 15, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Seethaler, M.; Hertlein, T.; Wecklein, B.; Ymeraj, A.; Ohlsen, K.; Lalk, M.; Hilgeroth, A. Novel Small-molecule Antibacterials against Gram-positive Pathogens of Staphylococcus and Enterococcus Species. Antibiotics 2019, 8, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meneghetti, F.; Barlocco, D. Novel Antibacterial Agents 2022. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 370. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ph17030370

AMA Style

Meneghetti F, Barlocco D. Novel Antibacterial Agents 2022. Pharmaceuticals. 2024; 17(3):370. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ph17030370

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meneghetti, Fiorella, and Daniela Barlocco. 2024. "Novel Antibacterial Agents 2022" Pharmaceuticals 17, no. 3: 370. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ph17030370

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop