Next Article in Journal
Retrospective Study on the Clinical Superiority of the Vacuum-Assisted Closure System with a Silicon-Based Dressing over the Conventional Tie-over Bolster Technique in Skin Graft Fixation
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Spectrographic Analysis of the Newborns’ Cry in the Presence of Tight Intrapartum Nuchal Cord vs. Normal Using the Neonat App. Preliminary Results
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Single-Center Study of Lymphoepithelioma-Like Carcinoma of Uterine Cervix over a 10-Year Period

by Angel Yordanov 1,*, Martin Karamanliev 2, Milena Karcheva 3, Assia Konsoulova 4, Mariela Vasileva-Slaveva 5,6,7 and Strahil Strashilov 8
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 27 October 2019 / Revised: 2 December 2019 / Accepted: 5 December 2019 / Published: 9 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Obstetrics and Gynecology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors present a retrospective study concerning to LELC. Once these tumors are rare, I believe that the manuscript merits are the patient number and time expended to that analyses and follow up (3,3% out of 630 women - period since 2007 until 2016). Moreover, the manuscript brings information for clinical and researchers that could complement these tumors literature scarce. 

I suggest that author insert the viral data (HPV and/or EBV) of the patients in the results section. 

Author Response

Thank you for the review. We were performed IHC for both viruses and the results are inserted in the result section.

 

Reviewer 2 Report

This manuscript has interesting results, but needs minor revisions before it can be accepted for publication. 

1. Please add tumor size in Table 1.

2. Since LELC is rare subtype of uterine cancer and this study includes relatively larger number of cases, assessment of viral status (EBV and HPV) in this study will be valuable to characterize this rare entity in Caucasian patients.

3. In materials, please describe selection of stage I patients in this retrospective study and its reason

Author Response

Thank you for the review.

We added tumor size in table 1. We examined the viral status in these patients by IHC and we added them in the result section. We described and explained why only patients in clinical stage I were included in this research.

Back to TopTop