Next Article in Journal
Marine Invertebrates: A Promissory Still Unexplored Source of Inhibitors of Biomedically Relevant Metallo Aminopeptidases Belonging to the M1 and M17 Families
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Intestinal Barrier on Alleviating an Increase in Blood Pressure by Sodium Alginate Intake in 2-Kidney, 1-Clip Renovascular Hypertensive Rats
Previous Article in Journal
Marine Aspergillus: A Treasure Trove of Antimicrobial Compounds
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Marine Drugs
Volume 21
Issue 5
10.3390/md21050278
marinedrugs-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Phytochemical Screening, Pigment Content, In Vitro Antioxidant, Antibacterial Potential and GC-MS Metabolite Profiling of Green Seaweed Caulerpa racemosa

by
Sivagaami Palaniyappan
1,
Arun Sridhar
2,
Zulhisyam Abdul Kari
3,4,
Guillermo Téllez-Isaías
5 and
Thirumurugan Ramasamy
1,*
1
Laboratory of Aquabiotics/Nanoscience, Department of Animal Science, School of Life Sciences, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli 620024, Tamil Nadu, India
2
Immunology-Vaccinology, Department of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals & Health (FARAH), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium
3
Department of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agro-Based Industry, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Jeli Campus, Jeli 17600, Malaysia
4
Advanced Livestock and Aquaculture Research Group, Faculty of Agro-Based Industry, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Jeli Campus, Jeli 17600, Malaysia
5
Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2023, 21(5), 278; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/md21050278
Submission received: 30 March 2023 / Revised: 22 April 2023 / Accepted: 25 April 2023 / Published: 28 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Seaweed Bioactive Metabolites: Health Benefits and Potential Applications 2nd Edition)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Exploration of seaweeds to unravel their bioactive metabolites from the perspective of wider applications gained substantial importance. The present study was performed to investigate the total phenolic, flavonoid, tannin content, antioxidant activity and antibacterial potential of various solvent extracts of green seaweed Caulerpa racemosa. The methanolic extract showed higher phenolic (11.99 ± 0.48 mg gallic acid equivalents/g), tannin (18.59 ± 0.54 mg tannic acid equivalents/g) and flavonoid (33.17 ± 0.76 mg quercetin equivalents/g) content than other extracts. Antioxidant activity was determined by using 2,2-diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) assay with different concentrations of C. racemosa extracts. The methanolic extract showed higher scavenging potential in both the DPPH and ABTS activity with the inhibition value of 54.21 ± 1.39% and 76.62 ± 1.08%, respectively. Bioactive profiling was also identified by using Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) techniques. These studies revealed the presence of valuable bioactive compounds in C. racemosa extracts and these compounds might be responsible for antimicrobial, antioxidant, anticancer and anti-mutagenic properties. Major compounds identified in GC-MS were 3,7,11,15-Tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-ol, 3-hexadecene and Phthalic acid. In terms of antibacterial activity, C. racemosa has promising antibacterial potential against aquatic pathogens Aeromonas hydrophila, Aeromonas veronii and Aeromonas salmonicida. Further evaluation studies focusing aquatic related aspects would reveal the novel bioproperties and applications of C. racemosa.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The marine environment is rich in biodiversity with numerous potentials and contains bioactive compounds of unique structural and physical properties that are inimitable to the natural molecules derived from terrestrial sources [1]. Macroalgae collectively known as seaweed are an integral part of the marine ecosystem. Seaweeds are considered as non- flowering, photosynthetic plant-like organisms which play a vital role as (i) primary producers in the marine niche; (ii) food sources for herbivorous organisms and (iii) habitats for many microorganisms [2]. Seaweed consumption as food or medicine was already recorded since ancient times and now, it became a popular ingredient in the preparation of food and beverages [3]. In Western countries, macroalgae became prevalent foods latterly due to the presence of many beneficial properties. Every year, 20 million tons of seaweed were harvested and half of them were intended for human consumption [4,5]. In addition, compounds and metabolites present in seaweeds are in high demand with extensive applications in cosmetics and pharmaceutical industries [6]. Seaweeds contain high-quality proteins, dietary fibers, polysaccharides, macro and micronutrients, vitamins, minerals, fatty acids and phytochemical constituents/bioactive compounds which possess a wide spectrum of activities [7,8,9]. The seaweed shows extensive species diversity distribution and abundance. Depending on species, season, temperature and geographic locations, the biochemical contents may vary, and these factors influence their minerals and elements. Furthermore, seaweeds are the only source of compounds such as agar, algin and carrageenan, which are used as gelling and stabilizing agents [10]. Seaweeds provide cobalamin (vitamin B12) which is not synthesized or acquired by higher plants [11]. Seaweeds are also used as a productive source of biomass for its simple depolymerization ability owing to the absence of hard lignocellulose [9].
Depending on pigments, seaweeds are classified into three groups, such as red (Rhodophyceae), brown (Phaeophyceae) and green algae (Chlorophyceae) [12]. Each macroalgae has unique biological properties with a wide range of applications. Macroalgae were utilized in various fields based on their characteristics features and chemical compositions. Altogether, these macroalgae provide many socio-economic values. In recent years, macroalgae garnered huge interest due to their potential use in feed, pharmaceutics and an increased application in health-promoting functional foods. Proportionately, the aquaculture farming of green seaweeds was expanded over the last decade for commercialization [13]. Green algae of the genus Caulerpa, family Caulerpaceae, are distributed worldwide in shallow water subtropical and tropical marine habitats and they are contemplated as better alternative food with therapeutic properties [14]. The species Caulerpa racemosa commonly referred to as “sea grapes” is one of the dominant edible marine green seaweeds on the Indian coastline and a good source of magnesium, iron and calcium. It is consumed in raw or cooked forms across the Indo-pacific regions [15]. It displays invasive behavior and has the tendency to propagate clonally by fragmentation and become a major feeding habit of demersal species [16]. The C. racemosa contains phytoconstituents (ceramides, sesquiterpenes etc), amino acids (alanine, phenylalanine, glutamic acid, glycine, serine, isoleucine, lysine, aspartic acid, leucine and valine) and peptides [17]. C. racemosa is known for its polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), secondary metabolites which are responsible for its antibacterial, anticancer, antinociceptive, antimutagenic, anti-inflammatory and cytotoxic properties. The antioxidant capacity of C. racemosa highlights its potential utilization as nutraceuticals. C. racemosa was shown to have anti-aging and anti-obesity properties by altering glucose and lipid profiles [18]. Recent evidence suggested that C. racemosa could be used as a functional food with beneficial applications in human health [19].
In particular, specific bisindole alkaloid compounds such as caulerpin, caulersin and caulerpenyne are rich in C. racemosa. They exert a wide array of bioactivities and are highly desirable in multi-industrial applications [20]. Racemosin A & B and caulerprenylols A & B isolated from C. racemosa exhibited neuroprotective and antifungal activity, respectively [21]. The extracts of C. racemosa inhibit the growth of bacterial pathogens which cause infections in humans, plants and animals. It was reported that the bacteria associated with C. racemosa have the capacity to inactivate the pathogens causing disease in Gracillaria verrucosa species. Thus, co-culturing of C. racemosa and G. verrucosa may benefit to meet out the demand of Gracillaria species for export by reducing the disease occurrence [2]. The polysaccharides of C. racemosa have immunomodulatory or immunostimulatory effects that contribute in a great manner for the pharmaceutical industries to treat different types of diseases [22]. Moreover, the supplementation of C. racemosa to the Vibrio parahaemolyticus infected white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) can increase the survival rate by increasing the macrophage activity with the help of sulfate polysaccharides [23]. Although much research endeavors were studied in C. racemosa, there are still some gaps to fill the existing knowledge concerning its bioactive constituents. In order to investigate the medicinal properties of C. racemosa, it is necessary to study the active biomolecules and its interactions [19]. Therefore, the present investigation was carried out to study the metabolites of different solvent extracts of C. racemosa through GC-MS profiling and in vitro studies that will provide important biomolecules insights and exploit its further potential in the aspects of human and animal health.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Pigments Determination

Pigments are used to absorb the light for photosynthesis in seaweeds. They can act as an antioxidant by removing free radicals and preventing oxidative damage [24,25]. Chlorophyll and carotenoids (carotenes and xanthophylls) are the major pigments present in green seaweeds [26]. In this study, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, chlorophyll c1+c2, total chlorophyll and carotenoids were evaluated and results are manifested in Figure 1. Chlorophyll c is a pigment-protein light-harvesting complex which allow light to penetrate underwater habitats due to its spectroscopic properties and structures [27]. Verma et al. [28] reported that Caulerpa vervelansis possess higher chlorophyll a pigment. These pigments in seaweeds contain various health benefits.
Provitamin-A carotenoid, and β-carotene are a significant source of vitamins. Xanthophyll pigments efficiently absorb the blue light and impede the formation of reactive oxygen species in the photoreceptors that helps to defend from light-induced oxidative damage in the retinal pigment epithelial cells [29,30]. These macroalgae pigments show diverse activities such as antioxidant activity, neuroprotective effects and cardiovascular protection [31].

2.2. Biochemical Constituents Analysis

The proximate composition of C. racemosa (CR) powder is presented in Table 1. Proximate composition analysis is very crucial for the assessment of nutritional value of macronutrients and could be used to formulate feed. Dried powder of C. racemosa contained 7.04% of moisture, 12.64% of crude protein, 2.85% of crude fibre, 1.8% of ether extract, 48.41% of total ash and 2089 Kcal/kg of gross energy. Our results were in line with Hao et al. [32] in C. racemosa var peltata. Regal et al. [33] evaluated the proximate composition of seaweed Asparagopsis taxiformis and reported the similar level of ash content (47.3 to 48.7%).

2.3. Preliminary Phytochemical Analysis

Seaweeds contain unique phytochemicals that are associated with a plenty of biological activities and they are believed to hold various health benefits [34]. The phytochemicals include tannins, flavonoids, saponins, phytosterol, terpenoids, phenol, phenolic flavonoids, alkaloids and steroids of various extracts of C. racemosa were screened and depicted in Table 2. All the phytochemicals screened in this study were present in polar solvent (methanol and ethanol) extracts. Terpenoids, steroids, phytosterols, tannins and flavonoids were present in ethyl acetate extract. Acetone extract showed the absence of saponins and alkaloids. Petroleum ether extract exhibited the presence of tannins. Terpenoids and tannins were present in the hexane extract of C. racemosa.
According to Nagaraj and Osborne. [10], the methanolic extract of C. racemosa demonstrated the presence of saponins, alkaloids and terpenoids. These secondary metabolites have numerous therapeutic benefits and are used tremendously in the drug and pharmaceutical industry. Tannin and saponins are the excellent anti-microbial agents, while flavonoids and polyphenols are antioxidant agents. Flavonoids are water-soluble antioxidants that can scavenge free radicals. Flavonoids in human diet may prevent menopausal symptoms and reduce cancers [35,36]. Alkaloids were nitrogenous compound that contains anti-inflammatory, anti-fungal and antibacterial activities [37]. The macroalgae genus Caulerpa contains a high amount of indolic alkaloid compound caulerpin, which was reported to possess anti-inflammatory activity. Caulerpin was reported in various species of Caulerpa genus of green seaweeds such as C. racemosa, C. lentillifera, C. peltata, C. paspaloides, C. cupressoides, C. sertularioides, C. prolifera and C. mexicana [38].

2.4. FT-IR Analysis

Based on the wavelength and intensity of the absorption bands of different molecular groups, FT-IR spectroscopy can reveal the presence of chemical components. This method is extensively used in food authentication and efficient in capturing the entire composition of chemical compounds [39,40]. Functional groups were detected by the infrared radiation ranges from 4000 to 500 cm−1 (Figure 2). Based on the FT-IR results obtained in this study, methanolic and ethanolic extracts of CR showed the absorption band at 3325 cm−1 (OH stretch alcohol). All extracts of CR showed a strong peak between 2972.73 and 2943.8 cm−1 (NH stretch amine salt).
C=O stretch indicated the presence of aliphatic ketones in ethyl acetate, acetone, hexane and petroleum ether extract of C. racemosa at the band range of 1710.55, 1736.58, 1763.58 and 1763.85 cm−1, respectively. The OH bend represented the carboxylic group at the peak of 1449.24 cm−1 in ethyl acetate extract and 1425.14 cm−1 in acetone extract. The peaks were observed around 1242.9 to 1221.68 cm−1 in hexane, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate and acetone extract of C. racemosa, indicating the presence of alkyl ether. A strong peak at 1021.12 cm−1 (C-O) in the methanol extract of CR indicated the presence of ether [41]. In the ethanol extract of CR, the medium peak at 879.38 cm−1 represented the C-S bend [42]. Halo compounds were observed at the peak range of 609.39 cm−1 in ethyl acetate extract of CR. The FT-IR results revealed the presence of various bioactive molecules in the extracts of C. racemosa. These compounds are responsible for its anti-bacterial, antioxidant and other medicinal properties.

2.5. GC-MS Analysis

The GC-MS chromatogram and detected compounds of C. racemosa extracts are given in Figure 3 and Table 3. In total, 74 compounds were identified from various extracts of C. racemosa. The highest number of compounds were detected in the methanol extract (29 compounds) and the lowest number of compounds were detected in hexane (7 compounds) extract of C. racemosa. In the present study, all the CR extracts contained bioactive compounds that exhibit antimicrobial, antioxidant, anticancer and anti-mutagenic properties.
The major metabolite identified was carboxylic acid and it is an important antioxidant [43]. 3-hexadecene shows numerous medicinal properties to cure cancer, inflammatory diseases and diabetes [44]. Phthalic acid has antibacterial and antioxidant properties. Phthalic acid inhibits the oxidation by stabilizing the phenoxyl radicals [45]. Methyl glycolate is a potential antioxidant reported by Shah et al. [20]. Tetrazole has antimicrobial property [46]. 8,11,14-docosatrienoic acid methyl ester is one of the (n-6 fatty acids) polyunsaturated fatty acids [47,48]. 3,7,11,15-Tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-ol displays antimicrobial activity [49]. The GC–MS results from the various extracts of CR confirmed that they all possessed numerous beneficial compounds.

2.6. Total Phenolic Content

In higher plants, phenolic compounds in the secondary metabolite forms are prevalent bioactive compounds [50]. In recent years, bioactive polyphenols received importance due to their protection efficiency against oxidative stress, which is responsible for many diseases including aging, cancer and congestive heart failure [51]. In seaweeds, phenolic compound production may differ based on varying environmental factors such as salinity, herbivory pressure, nutrients, UV radiation, etc. [52,53]. Results are shown in Figure 4A. In this study, the highest phenolic content was estimated in methanol extract of C. racemosa (11.99 ± 0.48 mg GAE/g) followed by ethanol (9.70 ± 0.45 mg GAE/g), acetone (9.40 ± 0.42 mg GAE/g), ethyl acetate (9.40 ± 0.38 mg GAE/g), hexane (8.48 ± 1.23 mg GAE/g) and petroleum ether (7.73 ± 0.38 mg GAE/g).
Phenols are natural antioxidants, which produce OH functional groups in seaweed that inhibit oxidative stress by donating hydrogen to stabilize and prevent free radical generation. It lowers the disease risk and promotes health [20]. Vega et al. [53] reported that 2.26% of total phenol was evaluated in C. racemosa. According to Akbary et al. [54] polar solvent extract of brown seaweed Stoechospermum marginatum exhibited higher phenolic content than other solvents used. Marinho et al. [55] reported that higher phenolic content was obtained in the methanol extract than ethyl acetate extract. Rodríguez-Bernaldo de Quirós et al. [56] evaluated the phenolic compounds of brown seaweed Sargassum pallidum extracts using various solvents, such as 30% ethanol, 30% methanol and 70% acetone, and reported higher phenolic content in 70% acetone extract.

2.7. Total Tannin Content

Tannins are the kind of water-soluble polyphenols present in terrestrial plants and marine algae. They play a crucial role in vascular plants’ defense mechanism [57]. The results of tannin content in the current study are given in Figure 4B. The levels of tannin content were higher in the ethanol extract of CR (21 ± 1.21 mg TAE/g) followed by methanol (18.59 ± 0.54 mg TAE/g), acetone (11.95 ± 1.99 mg TAE/g), ethyl acetate (11.87 ± 0.023 mg TAE/g), hexane (8.77 ± 0.89 mg TAE/g) and petroleum ether (7.49 ± 0.35 mg TAE/g). Bharath et al. [58] reported that the ethanol extract of Turbinaria ornata (28.01 ± 0.20 mg TAE) showed higher tannin content. Consumption of tannins-containing beverages may encourage, as it is believed, to cure or prevent plenty of diseases [59]. The highest tannin content was recorded in green seaweed C. duthieae by Rengasamy et al. [60]. Tannin has a potential anti-inflammatory activity [61]. Tannins are also used to treat burns as it forms a protective covering by precipitating proteins of exposed tissues [62]. It is an essential compound in antimicrobial activity owing to its inactivation of membrane-bound enzyme, cell envelope transport and microbial cell adhesions [58]. Higher and lower tannin content was reported in the 70% acetone soxhlet extract of C. peltata and C. latum, respectively [57].

2.8. Total Flavonoid Content

Secondary metabolites, such as flavonoids, are strong antioxidants and crucial dietary supplements for humans. In Caulerpa spp., luteolin, apigenin, quercetin, cyanidin, malvidin, myricetin, kaempferol and quercetagetin flavonoids were detected. These metabolites demonstrated a variety of biological functions such as immune-modulation, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and anticancer [63]. CR methanol extract of this study exhibited higher flavonoid content (33.17 ± 0.76 µg QE/g) than other solvents and lower content of flavonoid was revealed by non-polar solvent petroleum ether (23.64 ± 0.66 µg QE/g). The levels of total flavonoid contents of various CR extracts were given in Figure 4C. Sobuj et al. [64] also obtained higher flavonoid content in methanol seaweed extract of Padina tetrastromatica (41.77 ± 1.59 mg of Q/g) and Gracilaria tenuistipitata (36.17 ± 2.38 mg of Q/g). Furthermore, the present study findings are hand in hand with the results reported by Marinho et al. [55] in which the methanol extract of Saccharina latissima seaweed showed higher activity than ethyl acetate. Yap et al. [65] also reported higher total flavonoid content in the aqueous extract of C. racemosa and C. lentillifera. According to the report of Suraiya et al. [9] fermented seaweed Squatina japonica showed higher flavonoid content than unfermented seaweed S. japonica.

2.9. Antioxidant Activity

The phenolic acids and flavonoids have electron donating capacity and prevent cells from reactive oxygen species either by inhibiting or reducing free radicals. The antioxidant activity is determined by the free radical scavenging capacity or inhibition of oxidation by different biological mechanisms [19].

2.9.1. DPPH Activity

DPPH assay is a simple and prominent method to evaluate free radical scavenging ability. The hydrogen-donating capacity of extracts was thought to be responsible for the DPPH radical scavenging activity. The antioxidant compound reacts with radical DPPH that reduces to DPPH-H, which could be observed by reduction in absorbance values [66]. Figure 5 shows the result of DPPH activity of various extracts of C. racemosa. It was found that the CR extracts exhibited DPPH scavenging effect in a concentration dependent manner.
In this study, all the CR extracts showed significantly lower activity than the standard in all the different concentrations. The CR extracts showed higher activity at 100 µg/mL in which the methanol extract showed activity at 54.21 ± 1.39% followed by ethanol 47.59 ± 1.78%, acetone 46.23 ± 0.46%, ethyl acetate 44.04 ± 2.01%, petroleum ether 38.79 ± 0.77% and hexane 31.86 ± 3.32%. The lowest IC50 value was observed in the methanol extract of CR (86.33 µg/mL) and highest IC50 value was obtained in the hexane extract (173.21 µg/mL) (Table 4). In our study, the total phenolic content was also higher in the methanol extract of CR, which serves as evidence of the value of phenolic compounds as antioxidants. Similar results were proclaimed by Fonseca et al. [67] in Atlantic brown seaweed species Zonaria tournefortii and Cystoseira abies-marina. Tanna et al. [63] reported that the methanol extract of C. racemosa var. macrophysa showed 60% of DPPH scavenging activity.

2.9.2. ABTS Activity

The decolorization of bluish-green ABTS due to polyphenolic compounds present in algal extracts was measured at 734 nm to determine the ABTS activity [68]. Similar to DPPH activity, ABTS also performed in a dose-dependent manner. The results of ABTS scavenging activity were represented in Figure 6. Highest ABTS activity was recorded in the C. racemosa methanol extract (76.62 ± 1.08%) followed by ethanol (68.44 ± 3.23%), acetone (66.16 ± 2.96%), ethyl acetate (64.92 ± 2.82%), petroleum ether (57.98 ± 2.69%) and hexane (54.94 ± 5.65%). Lowest IC50 value was expressed in methanol extract (54.51 µg/mL) and the highest IC50 was observed in hexane extract (76.28 µg/mL) (Table 4). According to Maheswari and Salamun. [68] the highest ABTS radical scavenging activity (96.95 ± 0.41%) was observed in C. verticillata than standard ascorbic acid (90.99 ± 0.30%). Mani et al. [69] evaluated the antioxidant potential of various species of tropical green seaweeds, in which C. antennia showed higher ABTS activity (IC50 0.93 mg/mL). Subcritical water extraction of U. lactuca displayed a higher ABTS activity than C. racemosa [70].

2.10. Antibacterial Activity

Aquatic bacterial pathogens can cause severe economic loss in the aquaculture industry. Aeromonas is a major bacterium that causes septicaemia and ulcer in Indian major carps and other fish species. Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are also identified as fish pathogens. P. aeruginosa cause red skin infection in Oreochromis mossambicus [71]. Divya et al. [72] stated that P. aeruginosa cause friable liver, gill necrosis, abdominal distension, splenomegaly and hemorrhagic septicemia in Indian major carp Labeo rohita. Kukułowicz et al. [73] and Sivaraman et al. [74] isolated S. aureus from edible fish. It affects Oreochromis niloticus and causes severe mortality with pathological alterations [75]. K. pneumoniae can also cause severe mortality in Indian major carps through causing hemorrhagic infection. The present study divulged the antibacterial potential of different extracts of C. racemosa against all tested aquatic bacterial pathogens. The CR methanol extract showed better activity than other extracts against all tested organisms, especially Aeromonas veronii. Significant variations were observed depending on solvent and pathogens when compared with control (streptomycin). The present study’s results are represented in Table 5. A higher inhibition zone was observed in methanol (27 ± 0.71 mm) and ethanol (25 ± 0.35 mm) extract of C. racemosa (200 µg/mL) against A. veronii. Petroleum ether extract (200 µg/mL) showed the lowest inhibition zone against K. pneumoniae (11 ± 1.41 mm). These results were similar to those obtained in the analysis of antibacterial activity of C. racemosa against S. aureus [9]. Several studies were conducted on antibacterial activity of C. racemosa extracts which exhibited better inhibition activity against most of the pathogenic organisms [76]. Belkacemi et al. [77] stated that methanol and hexane extract of C. racemosa showed inhibition zone at 10 mm and 9.33 mm, respectively, against P. aeruginosa. In our present study, preliminary phytochemical analysis revealed the presence of secondary metabolites such as saponins, tannins, terpenoids, etc.; these metabolites may inhibit the growth of the bacterial pathogens. Our study also disclosed the higher tannin and phenolic content in methanol extract, the same extract showed better antibacterial activity against all tested organisms. Tannin plays a major role in antimicrobial activity by inactivating membrane-bound enzymes, transport proteins and cell-to-cell adhesions [58]. Fatty acid derivatives were also identified in the GC-MS analysis, which may contribute to the antimicrobial activity of solvent extracts [78]. Talreja et al. [79] investigated the antibacterial potential of Ulva lactuca, and methanolic extract showed strong activity against S. aureus.

2.11. MIC Determination

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is the lowest concentration of an agent that prevents microbial growth [80]. The MIC of CR extracts was determined by the Resazurin-based 96-well plate dilution method [81]. The MIC of each CR extract was determined visually by the color change in the 96-well plate. Positive control streptomycin showed MIC at 25 µg/mL against A. hydrophila, A. veronii and A. salmonicida; 50 and 100 µg/mL of MIC were determined against Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae, respectively. The results are shown in Table 5. Methanol, ethanol and acetone extracts of C. racemosa exhibited similar MIC values (100 µg/mL) against all the tested Aeromonas strains. Hexane and petroleum ether extract showed the MIC value at 400 µg/mL against P. aeruginosa, S. aureus and K. pneumoniae. Antibacterial compounds present in various extracts of seaweed might interdict the growth of bacterial pathogens via diverse mechanisms such as inhibition of DNA, RNA and protein synthesis, interference with cell-wall synthesis, lysis of the bacterial membrane and inhibition of metabolic pathways. Antibacterial properties of bioactive compounds significantly influenced the interactions with hydrophobic structures of bacterial strains [82,83,84]. The antibacterial activity of seaweed was due to the presence of fatty acids (Hexadecanoic, 9-octadecenoic, Tetradecanoic and Tetracosenoic acid) [79,80,85,86]. The same result was reported by Raj et al. [87] in which the 500 µg/mL was the minimum inhibitory concentration of Caulerpa chemnitzia hexane extract against S. aureus, and K. pneumoniae.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Collection of Seaweed Caulerpa racemosa

Seaweed samples were collected from coastal area of Sambai, Ramanadhapuram (9°31′15.3″ N 78°56′08.1″ E) (Figure 7), Tamil Nadu, India. The seaweed was identified by Botanical Survey of India, Southern Regional Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University Campus, Coimbatore, India, as Caulerpa racemosa var. Chemnitzia. The collected seaweed was washed thoroughly with running faucet water to eliminate surface contaminants. Then, distilled water was used to clean the seaweed, which was then shade dried and cut into small pieces before being ground into fine powder. The powder was stored at −20 °C for further use.

3.2. Pigments Determination

An amount of 1 g of crude Caulerpa racemosa (CR) powder was homogenized with 10 mL of acetone using a mortar and pestle. The homogenized extract was transferred into the vials then covered with aluminium foil to prevent light penetration and stored at 4 °C for 24 h [88]. Next day, the absorbance was measured spectrometrically (Shimadzu-160A, Japan) at 663, 645, 452.5, 630, 664, 470, 631, 581, 664, 615, 652 and 562 nm.
Chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, chlorophyll c1+c2, total chlorophyll and carotenoid contents were calculated by using the following formulae according to Arnon’s [89], Dexbury and Yentch [90] and Jensen and Jensen [91]:
Chlorophyll a (mg/g) = 12.7 (A663) – 2.69 (A645)
Chlorophyll b (mg/g) = 22.9 (A645) – 4.68 (A663)
Total chlorophyll (mg/g) = 20.2 (A645) + 8.02 (A663)
Carotenoids (mg/g) = 4.2 × (A452.5) – (0.0264 × chl. a) + (0.426 × chl. b)
Chlorophyll c1+c2 (mg/g) = (24.36 × A630) – (3.73 × A664)

3.3. Biochemical Constituents Analysis

The proximate composition includes moisture, crude protein, crude fibre, ether extract, total ash and gross energy of CR powder was estimated by using standard AOAC [92] methods.

3.4. Preparation of Caulerpa racemosa Solvent Extracts

Based on the polarity, six solvents such as methanol, ethanol (polar), ethyl acetate, acetone (mid polar), petroleum ether and hexane (non-polar) were selected for extraction. Extracts were prepared by maceration method, briefly dissolving 10 g of C. racemosa powder in 100 mL of solvent (1:10 W/V) [93]. Extracts were kept in a shaker for 24 h at room temperature. Then, the extracts were filtered by Whatman No. 1 filter paper. The filtrate was concentrated with the help of a rotary vacuum evaporator at 40 °C. Desiccated samples were stored at −20 °C until further analysis. For the GC-MS analysis, Soxhlet extraction method was adopted, and the samples were stored at −20 °C until use.

3.5. Preliminary Phytochemical Analysis

The prepared CR extracts were investigated to determine the presence of saponins, steroids, terpenoids, phytosterols, flavonoids, tannins, phenol, phenolic flavonoids and alkaloids according to the methods of Sadasivam [94]. The positive results of these tests were considered by observing precipitate formation or any colour change.

3.5.1. Saponins

About 2 mL of distilled water was mixed with 1 mL of CR extracts. The mixture was mixed well for few seconds and allowed to stand for 5 to 10 min. The presence of saponins was determined by foam formation [94].

3.5.2. Terpenoids

Each 1 mL of CR extracts was added to the equal volume of concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO4). Terpenoids were detected by the appearance of reddish-brown colour [94].

3.5.3. Steroids

An amount of 0.25 mL of concentrated sulphuric acid (H2SO4) was added to 0.5 mL of CR extracts along with 1 mL of chloroform. The upper layer turns to yellow, and the lower layer turns to green, fluorescent colour. These colour changes confirm the presence of steroids [94].

3.5.4. Phytosterols

An amount of 1 mL of chloroform was added to the equal volume of CR extracts followed by few drops of H2SO4. This mixture was allowed to stand for few minutes. Presence of golden yellow tint indicates the presence of phytosterol [94].

3.5.5. Tannins

An amount of 1 mL of freshly prepared 5% ferric chloride (FeCl3) was added to 1 mL of CR extracts. The dark green or greenish black colour formation indicates the presence of tannin [94].

3.5.6. Flavonoids

Few drops of 10% sodium hydroxide (NaOH) were added to 1 mL of CR extracts. The presence of flavonoids was indicated by a brown precipitate [94].

3.5.7. Phenol

The phenol was detected by adding few drops of alcoholic FeCl3 solution to the 2 mL of CR extract. Formation of bluish colour suggests the presence of phenols [94].

3.5.8. Phenolic Flavonoids

Few drops of freshly prepared 10% lead acetate were added to 1 mL of CR extracts. Brown precipitation indicates the presence of phenolic flavonoids [94].

3.5.9. Alkaloids

A total of 1 mL of Mayer’s reagent was added to 1 mL of CR extracts. The existence of alkaloids was confirmed by the formation of a white precipitate [94].

3.6. FT-IR Detection

The functional groups present in the different solvent extracts of CR were analyzed by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) by adopting potassium bromide (KBr) pellet method in the spectral range of 4000–500 cm−1.

3.7. GC-MS Analysis

Shimadzu (QP2020) instrument integrated with a mass spectrometer was used to perform gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis for different solvent extracts of CR. In brief, 100 µL of the filtrate was suspended in 900 µL of respective solvents (ethanol, methanol, acetone, ethyl acetate, hexane and petroleum ether). To eliminate the impurities, the mixture was filtered by a syringe filter (0.25 μM). Then, the filtered samples were injected into Shimadzu (QP2020) GC-MS instrument equipped with 30 m long SH-Rxi-5Sil-MS capillary column (0.25 µm film thickness and 0.25 mm inner diameter) by auto injector in 1:10 split ratio. The inlet temperature program was at 50 °C initially and it was increased gradually (6 °C /min) up to 280 °C. Injector temperature was maintained at 250 °C, pressure at 68.1 kpa and helium was used as a carrier gas with 1.2 mL/min flow rate (linear velocity of 39.7 cm/s). The ionization energy of 70 eV was used to perform ionization in an electron impact mode at 200 °C. The results obtained for CR extracts were compared with the standard mass spectra (NIST 2005 MS collection) libraries. The relative percentage of each compound was determined by calculating the average peak area to total area ratio.

3.8. Total Phenolic Content

Folin–Ciocalteu method was used to detect the total phenolic content as described by Salar et al. [95] with slight modifications. The CR extracts of 0.1 mL were added to 0.5 mL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent. The mixture was kept at 37 °C and incubated for a period of 5 min. Then, 1.5 mL of 7.5% sodium carbonate was added to it and the total volume was made up to 10 mL using distilled water. The absorbance was recorded at 765 nm against blank using Synergy HT Multimode Reader (Bio Tek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). The amount of total phenolic content was calculated using standard gallic acid calibration curve. The results were expressed as mg gallic acid equivalents per gram (mg GAE/g).

3.9. Total Tannin Content

Total tannin content of different solvent extracts of CR was determined by the method of Amorim et al. [96]. Briefly, 0.1 mL of CR extract was diluted with 7.5 mL of distilled water. Then, 0.5 mL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent was added followed by 1 mL of 35% sodium carbonate. The mixture was mixed well and kept at 25 °C for 30 min. The absorbance was measured at 725 nm. Tannic acid was used as standard, and the results were expressed as mg tannic acid equivalents per gram (mg TAE/g) using the calibration curve of tannic acid.

3.10. Total Flavonoid Content

Aluminium chloride (AlCl3) colorimetric assay of Lamaison and Carnart [97] was adopted to determine the total flavonoid content of CR solvent extracts. In brief, 0.2 mL of CR extracts were added to a test tube containing 4.8 mL of distilled water. Then, 0.3 mL of 5% sodium nitrite (NaNO2) was added and mixed well using a vortex mixer. After 5 min, 0.3 mL of 10% AlCl3 ∙6H2O was added, followed by the addition of 2 mL of 1M NaOH and the total volume was made up to 10 mL with distilled water. The absorbance was measured at 414 nm. Quercetin was used as standard, and the total flavonoid content was expressed as mg quercetin equivalents per gram (mg QE/g) using the calibration curve of quercetin.

3.11. In Vitro Antioxidant Activity

3.11.1. DPPH Radical-Scavenging Activity

DPPH (2, 2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazile) activity was estimated according to the method of Brand-Williams et al. [98]. The reaction was performed in a 96-well microtiter plate containing 100 µL of different concentrations (20 to 100 µg/mL) of CR extracts. Then, 100 µL of 2mM DPPH solution was added to each well. The reaction mixture was incubated at room temperature in dark conditions for 30 min. The coloration from violet to yellow indicates free radical scavenging activity by the compounds present in the CR extracts. The change in absorbance was read at 517 nm using HT Multimode Reader (Bio Tek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). Vitamin C (Ascorbic acid) was used as standard. The following formula Equation (1) was used to calculate the percentage of CR extracts’ radical scavenging ability,
%   o f   D P P H   s c a v e n g i n g = A b − A s A b × 100
where Ab—absorbance value of blank and As—absorbance value of sample.

3.11.2. ABTS Radical Scavenging Activity

ABTS [2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid)] radical scavenging activity was determined by cation decolorization assay with slight modifications in Arumugam et al. [99] to analyze the antioxidant potential of various solvent extracts of CR. The ABTS stock solution was prepared by mixing equal volumes of 7 mM ABTS and 140 mM of potassium persulfate solution and allowed them to react in dark conditions at 25 °C for 12–16 h before use. The working solution was prepared by diluting the stock using 50% ethanol to obtain an absorbance of 0.7 ± 0.02 at 734 nm using HT Multimode Reader (Bio Tek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). Subsequently, 200 µL of ABTS solution was added to 100 µL of various concentrations of CR extracts in a 96-well microtiter plate. The mixture was incubated in a dark condition for 10 min and then, the absorbance was read at 734 nm. Ascorbic acid was used as standard. The percentage of inhibition was calculated using Equation (1).

3.12. Anti-Bacterial Activity

The antibacterial potential of various solvent extracts of CR was studied against aquatic Gram-negative pathogens such as Aeromonas hydrophila, Aeromonas salmonicida, Aeromonas veronii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Gram-positive pathogen Staphylococcus aureus, by agar well diffusion method according to Logaranjan et al. [100] with slight modifications. Briefly, the bacteria were pre-cultured overnight at 37 °C. The culture strain was adjusted to obtain a final concentration of 1 × 108 cells/mL using 0.5 McFarland standards and inoculated in triplicates on Muller-Hinton agar plates using a sterile cotton swab. Then, a well was created using corkborer in the inoculated plates. The sample extracts were resuspended in Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) with a concentration of 1 mg/mL to reduce the evaporation rate. Different concentrations (50, 100, 150 and 200 µg/mL) of CR extracts were added to the wells. DMSO and streptomycin (1 mg/mL) were used as a negative and positive control, respectively. Then, the plates were incubated at 37 °C overnight. Finally, the antibacterial activity was determined by measuring the zone of inhibition (mm) formed around the wells.

3.13. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Determination

Resazurin-based 96 well microtiter plate method of Chakansin et al. [101] was adopted to determine the MIC of various extracts of CR with slight modifications. In brief, 100 µL of nutrient broth was added to the sterile 96-well microtiter plate. First row of the plate acted as negative control (nutrient broth). Second row of the plate acted as positive control (streptomycin). Serial dilutions were made from third row of the plate containing 100 µL of CR extracts which was resuspended in DMSO. Finally, 50 µL of bacterial suspension was added to all the wells resulting in a final concentration of 1 × 107 CFU/mL. To avoid dehydration, the plate was loosely wrapped with aluminium foil, and it was incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. After incubation, 20 µL of resazurin indicator solution was added to all the wells. Then, the plate was incubated again for 2–4 h at 37 °C. The results were examined visually. The colour change from purple to pink indicates the reduction in resazurin by bacteria. The experiment was performed in triplicates and the lowest concentration that prevented the colour change was considered as the MIC value.

3.14. Statistical Analyses

Experiments were performed in triplicates and the results were presented as mean ± standard deviation. The data were analyzed by applying two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test using GraphPad Prism version 8 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The data are presented in the form of descriptive statistics through tables and graphs. *, **, ***, and **** indicate p-values of, respectively, ≤0.05, ≤0.01, ≤0.001 and ≤0.0001.

4. Conclusions

In this study, our results demonstrated that the various solvent extracts of C. racemosa exhibited significant in vitro properties. Among all the extracts evaluated, the methanol extract showed better results than other solvent extracts both in antioxidant and antibacterial activities. The levels of tannin and flavonoid content in the methanol extract might be responsible for its increased biological activities. The GC-MS analysis revealed the presence of pentadecane, 1-heptadecene, tridecanoic acid, methyl ester, 2-aminophenol and hexadecamethyl compounds in the solvent extracts of C. racemosa endowed with potential antioxidant and antibacterial properties, which are responsible for the wider production of novel drugs that could be facilitated to treat or prevent infectious diseases for humans and animals. In futuristic strategies, the marine seaweed would be utilized as a sustainable novel natural drug development approach for therapeutics, nutraceutical and pharmaceutical large-scale industrial applications. However, extensive investigations should be warranted to exploit the action mechanisms of the C. racemosa extracts and its bioactive compounds and evaluate the effects in biological systems in vivo using experimental animal models.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and design, T.R. and S.P.; methodology and acquisition of data, S.P.; data analysis, S.P. and A.S.; resources, writing—review and editing, A.S., Z.A.K. and G.T.-I.; writing—original draft preparation, S.P.; supervision, TR.; validation, T.R., A.S., Z.A.K. and G.T.-I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Research was supported in part by funds provided by USDA-NIFA Sus-tainable Agriculture Systems, Grant No. 2019-69012-29905. Title of Project: Empowering US Broiler Production for Transformation and Sustainability USDA-NIFA (Sustainable Agriculture Systems): No. 2019-69012-29905.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Acknowledgments

The first author Sivagaami Palaniyappan is grateful to “RUSA, 2.0-Biological Sciences, Bharathidasan University” for providing Project Fellowship (Ref. No. 02BDU/RUSA 2.0/TRP/BS/Date:22/04/2021). The authors (TR, SP) are thankful to UGC-SAP-DRS-II (F.3–9/2013[SAP-II], Department of Science and Technology-Fund for Improvement of Science and Technology Infrastructure (DST-FIST) Level-I (stage-II) (Ref. No. SR/FST/LSI-647/2015(C) Date.11.08.2016) and the Department of Science and Technology Promotion of University Re-search and Scientific Excellence (DST PURSE Phase—II) (Ref. No. SR/PURSE PHASE 2/16(G) /& 16© Date. 21.02.2017) of the Department of Animal Science, Bharathidasan University for the in-strumentation facility.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mahendran, S.; Sankaralingam, S.; Muthuramalinga Sethu, S.; Kathiresan, D.; Muthumani, M.; Kousalya, L.; Palpperumal, S.; Harinathan, B. Evaluation of Antioxidant and Cytotoxicity Activities of Polyphenol Extracted from Brown Seaweed Sargassum Tenerrimum Biomass. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2022, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zainuddin, E.N.; Anshary, H.; Huyyirnah, H.; Hiola, R.; Baxa, D.V. Antibacterial Activity of Caulerpa racemosa against Pathogenic Bacteria Promoting “Ice-Ice” Disease in the Red Alga Gracilaria Verrucosa. J. Appl. Phycol. 2019, 31, 3201–3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ganesan, A.R.; Tiwari, U.; Rajauria, G. Seaweed Nutraceuticals and Their Therapeutic Role in Disease Prevention. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2019, 8, 252–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Buschmann, A.H.; Camus, C.; Infante, J.; Neori, A.; Israel, Á.; Hernández-González, M.C.; Pereda, S.V.; Gomez-Pinchetti, J.L.; Golberg, A.; Tadmor-Shalev, N.; et al. Seaweed Production: Overview of the Global State of Exploitation, Farming and Emerging Research Activity. Eur. J. Phycol. 2017, 52, 391–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Martelli, F.; Cirlini, M.; Lazzi, C.; Neviani, E.; Bernini, V. Edible Seaweeds and Spirulina Extracts for Food Application: In Vitro and In Situ Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity towards Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria. Foods 2020, 9, 1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Choudhary, B.; Chauhan, O.P.; Mishra, A. Edible Seaweeds: A Potential Novel Source of Bioactive Metabolites and Nutraceuticals with Human Health Benefits. Front. Mar. Sci. 2021, 8, 740054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Collins, K.G.; Fitzgerald, G.F.; Stanton, C.; Ross, R.P. Looking Beyond the Terrestrial: The Potential of Seaweed Derived Bioactives to Treat Non-Communicable Diseases. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Amoriello, T.; Mellara, F.; Amoriello, M.; Ceccarelli, D.; Ciccoritti, R. Powdered Seaweeds as a Valuable Ingredient for Functional Breads. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2021, 247, 2431–2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Suraiya, S.; Lee, J.M.; Cho, H.J.; Jang, W.J.; Kim, D.G.; Kim, Y.O.; Kong, I.S. Monascus spp. fermented brown seaweeds extracts enhance bio-functional activities. Food Biosci. 2018, 21, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nagaraj, S.R.; Osborne, J.W. Bioactive Compounds from Caulerpa racemosa as a Potent Larvicidal and Antibacterial Agent. Front. Biol. 2014, 9, 300–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Peñalver, R.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Ros, G.; Amarowicz, R.; Pateiro, M.; Nieto, G. Seaweeds as a functional ingredient for a healthy diet. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hamid, S.S.; Wakayama, M.; Ichihara, K.; Sakurai, K.; Ashino, Y.; Kadowaki, R.; Soga, T.; Tomita, M. Metabolome Profiling of Various Seaweed Species Discriminates between Brown, Red, and Green Algae. Planta 2019, 249, 1921–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Moreira, A.; Cruz, S.; Marques, R.; Cartaxana, P. The Underexplored Potential of Green Macroalgae in Aquaculture. Rev. Aquac. 2022, 14, 5–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rushdi, M.I.; Abdel-Rahman, I.A.M.; Attia, E.Z.; Abdelraheem, W.M.; Saber, H.; Madkour, H.A.; Amin, E.; Hassan, H.M.; Abdelmohsen, U.R. A Review on the Diversity, Chemical and Pharmacological Potential of the Green Algae Genus Caulerpa. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2020, 132, 226–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kumar, A.; Krishnamoorthy, E.; Devi, H.M.; Uchoi, D.; Tejpal, C.S.; Ninan, G.; Zynudheen, A.A. Influence of Sea Grapes (Caulerpa racemosa) Supplementation on Physical, Functional, and Anti-Oxidant Properties of Semi-Sweet Biscuits. J. Appl. Phycol. 2018, 30, 1393–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Varela-Álvarez, E.; Gómez Garreta, A.; Rull Lluch, J.; Salvador Soler, N.; Serrao, E.A.; Siguán, M.A.R. Mediterranean Species of Caulerpa Are Polyploid with Smaller Genomes in the Invasive Ones. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e47728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Edison, T.N.J.I.; Atchudan, R.; Kamal, C.; Lee, Y.R. Caulerpa racemosa: A Marine Green Alga for Eco-Friendly Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Its Catalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2016, 39, 1401–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nurkolis, F.; Taslim, N.A.; Subali, D.; Kurniawan, R.; Hardinsyah, H.; Gunawan, W.B.; Kusuma, R.J.; Yusuf, V.M.; Pramono, A.; Kang, S.; et al. Dietary Supplementation of Caulerpa racemosa Ameliorates Cardiometabolic Syndrome via Regulation of PRMT-1/DDAH/ADMA Pathway and Gut Microbiome in Mice. Nutrients 2023, 15, 909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Qudus, B.; Aroyehun, A.; Abdul Razak, S.; Palaniveloo, K.; Nagappan, T.; Suraiza Nabila Rahmah, N.; Wee Jin, G.; Chellappan, D.K.; Chellian, J.; Kunnath, A.P. Bioprospecting Cultivated Tropical Green Algae, Caulerpa racemosa (Forsskal) J. Agardh: A Perspective on Nutritional Properties, Antioxidative Capacity and Anti-Diabetic Potential. Foods 2020, 9, 1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shah, S.A.A.; ul Hassan, S.S.; Bungau, S.; Si, Y.; Xu, H.; Rahman, M.H.; Behl, T.; Gitea, D.; Pavel, F.-M.; Corb Aron, R.A.; et al. Chemically Diverse and Biologically Active Secondary Metabolites from Marine Phylum Chlorophyta. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, D.-Q.; Mao, S.-C.; Zhang, H.-Y.; Yu, X.-Q.; Feng, M.-T.; Wang, B.; Feng, L.-H.; Guo, Y.-W. Racemosins A and B, Two Novel Bisindole Alkaloids from the Green Alga Caulerpa racemosa. Fitoterapia 2013, 91, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hao, H.; Han, Y.; Yang, L.; Hu, L.; Duan, X.; Yang, X.; Huang, R. Structural Characterization and Immunostimulatory Activity of a Novel Polysaccharide from Green Alga Caulerpa racemosa Var Peltata. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 134, 891–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pratiwi, A.F.; Satyantini, W.H.; Mahasri, G.; Sulmartiwi, L.; Mukti, A.T. Sudarno The Administration of Caulerpa racemosa Extract on Total Bacteria and Survival Rates of White Shrimp (Litopenaeus Vannamei) after Infected by Vibrio Parahaemolyticus. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 679, 012068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ferdous, U.T.; Yusof, Z.N.B. Medicinal Prospects of Antioxidants From Algal Sources in Cancer Therapy. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 593116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nazarudin, M.F.; Yasin, I.S.M.; Mazli, N.A.I.N.; Saadi, A.R.; Azizee, M.H.S.; Nooraini, M.A.; Saad, N.; Ferdous, U.T.; Fakhrulddin, I.M. Preliminary Screening of Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Potential of Green Seaweed, Halimeda Opuntia (Linnaeus) Lamouroux. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 29, 2698–2705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kumar, M.D.; Kavitha, S.; Tyagi, V.K.; Rajkumar, M.; Bhatia, S.K.; Kumar, G.; Banu, J.R. Macroalgae-Derived Biohydrogen Production: Biorefinery and Circular Bioeconomy. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2022, 12, 769–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Myśliwa-Kurdziel, B.; Latowski, D.; Strzałka, K. Chapter Three—Chlorophylls c—Occurrence, Synthesis, Properties, Photosynthetic and Evolutionary Significance. In Advances in Botanical Research; Grimm, B., Ed.; Metabolism, Structure and Function of Plant Tetrapyrroles: Introduction, Microbial and Eukaryotic Chlorophyll Synthesis and Catabolism; Academic Press: London, UK, 2019; Volume 90, pp. 91–119. [Google Scholar]
  28. Verma, P.; Kumar, M.; Mishra, G.; Sahoo, D. Multivariate Analysis of Fatty Acid and Biochemical Constitutes of Seaweeds to Characterize Their Potential as Bioresource for Biofuel and Fine Chemicals. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 226, 132–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Arunkumar, R.; Gorusupudi, A.; Bernstein, P.S. The Macular Carotenoids: A Biochemical Overview. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2020, 1865, 158617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bhat, I.; Haripriya, G.; Jogi, N.; Mamatha, B.S. Carotenoid Composition of Locally Found Seaweeds of Dakshina Kannada District in India. Algal Res. 2021, 53, 102154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cikoš, A.-M.; Šubarić, D.; Roje, M.; Babić, J.; Jerković, I.; Jokić, S. Recent Advances on Macroalgal Pigments and Their Biological Activities (2016–2021). Algal Res. 2022, 65, 102748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hao, H.; Fu, M.; Yan, R.; He, B.; Li, M.; Liu, Q.; Cai, Y.; Zhang, X.; Huang, R. Chemical Composition and Immunostimulatory Properties of Green Alga Caulerpa racemosa Var Peltata. Food Agric. Immunol. 2019, 30, 937–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Regal, A.L.; Alves, V.; Gomes, R.; Matos, J.; Bandarra, N.M.; Afonso, C.; Cardoso, C. Drying Process, Storage Conditions, and Time Alter the Biochemical Composition and Bioactivity of the Anti-Greenhouse Seaweed Asparagopsis Taxiformis. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2020, 246, 781–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mayer, A.M.S.; Hamann, M.T. Marine Pharmacology in 1999: Compounds with Antibacterial, Anticoagulant, Antifungal, Anthelmintic, Anti-Inflammatory, Antiplatelet, Antiprotozoal and Antiviral Activities Affecting the Cardiovascular, Endocrine, Immune and Nervous Systems, and Other Miscellaneous Mechanisms of Action. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2002, 132, 315–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jeeva, S.; Antonisamy, J.M.; Domettila, C.; Anantham, B.; Mahesh, M. Preliminary Phytochemical Studies on Some Selected Seaweeds from Gulf of Mannar, India. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2012, 2, S30–S33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ruela de Sousa, R.R.; Queiroz, K.C.S.; Souza, A.C.S.; Gurgueira, S.A.; Augusto, A.C.; Miranda, M.A.; Peppelenbosch, M.P.; Ferreira, C.V.; Aoyama, H. Phosphoprotein Levels, MAPK Activities and NFκB Expression Are Affected by Fisetin. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2007, 22, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Desgagné-Penix, I. Biosynthesis of Alkaloids in Amaryllidaceae Plants: A Review. Phytochem. Rev. 2021, 20, 409–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Abbott, D.W.; Aasen, I.M.; Beauchemin, K.A.; Grondahl, F.; Gruninger, R.; Hayes, M.; Huws, S.; Kenny, D.A.; Krizsan, S.J.; Kirwan, S.F.; et al. Seaweed and Seaweed Bioactives for Mitigation of Enteric Methane: Challenges and Opportunities. Animals 2020, 10, 2432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Long, H.; Gu, X.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, C.; Xia, X.; Zhou, N.; Liu, X.; Zhao, M. Effects of Bottom Sediment on the Accumulation of Nutrients in the Edible Green Seaweed Caulerpa Lentillifera (Sea Grapes). J. Appl. Phycol. 2020, 32, 705–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rodriguez-Saona, L.E.; Allendorf, M.E. Use of FTIR for Rapid Authentication and Detection of Adulteration of Food. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 2, 467–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mariselvam, R.; Ranjitsingh, A.J.A.; Usha Raja Nanthini, A.; Kalirajan, K.; Padmalatha, C.; Mosae Selvakumar, P. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from the Extract of the Inflorescence of Cocos Nucifera (Family: Arecaceae) for Enhanced Antibacterial Activity. Spectrochim. Acta. A. Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2014, 129, 537–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yang, K.; Wang, G.; Chen, X.; Wang, X.; Liu, F. Treatment of Wastewater Containing Cu2+ Using a Novel Macromolecular Heavy Metal Chelating Flocculant Xanthated Chitosan. Colloids Surf. Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2018, 558, 384–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gyawali, R.; Ibrahim, S.A. Impact of Plant Derivatives on the Growth of Foodborne Pathogens and the Functionality of Probiotics. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 95, 29–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Patil, D.-S.; Dubal, K.; Dongare, M.; Kale, M. Investigation of Chemical Composition from Dryopteris Chochleata (D. Don) C. CHR. (Dryopteridaceae). Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2015, 8, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  45. Arulkumar, A.; Rosemary, T.; Paramasivam, S.; Rajendran, R.B. Phytochemical Composition, in Vitro Antioxidant, Antibacterial Potential and GC-MS Analysis of Red Seaweeds (Gracilaria corticata and Gracilaria edulis) from Palk Bay, India. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 15, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rostom, S.A.F.; Ashour, H.M.A.; Razik, H.A.A.E.; Fattah, A.E.F.H.A.E.; El-Din, N.N. Azole Antimicrobial Pharmacophore-Based Tetrazoles: Synthesis and Biological Evaluation as Potential Antimicrobial and Anticonvulsant Agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 2410–2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hashem, N.M.; Soltan, Y.A.; El-Desoky, N.I.; Morsy, A.S.; Sallam, S.M.A. Effects of Moringa Oleifera Extracts and Monensin on Performance of Growing Rabbits. Livest. Sci. 2019, 228, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Laparra, J.M.; Sanz, Y. Interactions of Gut Microbiota with Functional Food Components and Nutraceuticals. Pharmacol. Res. 2010, 61, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yu, J.; Lei, J.; Yu, H.; Cai, X.; Zou, G. Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activity of the Essential Oil of Scutellaria Barbata. Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 881–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kumaran, A.; Joel Karunakaran, R. In Vitro Antioxidant Activities of Methanol Extracts of Five Phyllanthus Species from India. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 40, 344–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ye, H.; Zhou, C.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, X.; Liu, J.; Hu, Q.; Zeng, X. Antioxidant Activities in Vitro of Ethanol Extract from Brown Seaweed Sargassum Pallidum. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2009, 230, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shpigel, M.; Shauli, L.; Odintsov, V.; Ben-Ezra, D.; Neori, A.; Guttman, L. The Sea Urchin, Paracentrotus lividus, in an Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) System with Fish (Sparus aurata) and Seaweed (Ulva lactuca): Nitrogen Partitioning and Proportional Configurations. Aquaculture 2018, 490, 260–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Vega, J.; Álvarez-Gómez, F.; Güenaga, L.; Figueroa, F.L.; Gómez-Pinchetti, J.L. Antioxidant Activity of Extracts from Marine Macroalgae, Wild-Collected and Cultivated, in an Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture System. Aquaculture 2020, 522, 735088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Akbary, P.; Aminikhoei, Z.; Hobbi, M.; Samadi Kuchaksaraei, B.; Rezaei Tavabe, K. Antioxidant Properties and Total Phenolic Contents of Extracts from Three Macroalgae Collected from Chabahar Coasts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. B Biol. Sci. 2021, 91, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Marinho, G.S.; Sørensen, A.-D.M.; Safafar, H.; Pedersen, A.H.; Holdt, S.L. Antioxidant Content and Activity of the Seaweed Saccharina Latissima: A Seasonal Perspective. J. Appl. Phycol. 2019, 31, 1343–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rodríguez-Bernaldo de Quirós, A.; Frecha-Ferreiro, S.; Vidal-Pérez, A.M.; López-Hernández, J. Antioxidant Compounds in Edible Brown Seaweeds. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2010, 231, 495–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Petchidurai, G.; Nagoth, J.A.; John, M.S.; Sahayaraj, K.; Murugesan, N.; Pucciarelli, S. Standardization and Quantification of Total Tannins, Condensed Tannin and Soluble Phlorotannins Extracted from Thirty-Two Drifted Coastal Macroalgae Using High Performance Liquid Chromatography. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2019, 7, 100273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bharath, B.; Pavithra, A.N.; Divya, A.; Perinbam, K. Chemical Composition of Ethanolic Extracts from Some Seaweed Species of the South Indian Coastal Zone, Their Antibacterial and Membrane-Stabilizing Activity. Russ. J. Mar. Biol. 2020, 46, 370–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Usman, R.B.; Adamu, M.; Isyaku, I.M.; Bala, H.A. Quantitative and Qualitative Phytochemicals and Proximate Analysis of Aloe Vera (Aloe Barbadensis Miller). Int. J. Adv. Acad. Res. Sci. Technol. Eng. 2020, 6, 16. [Google Scholar]
  60. Rengasamy, K.R.R.; Amoo, S.O.; Aremu, A.O.; Stirk, W.A.; Gruz, J.; Šubrtová, M.; Doležal, K.; Van Staden, J. Phenolic Profiles, Antioxidant Capacity, and Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitory Activity of Eight South African Seaweeds. J. Appl. Phycol. 2015, 27, 1599–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Eahamban, K.; Antonisamy, J.M. Preliminary Phytochemical, UV-VIS, HPLC and Anti-Bacterial Studies on Gracilaria corticata J. Ag. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2012, 2, S568–S574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kolodziej, H.; Kiderlen, A.F. Antileishmanial Activity and Immune Modulatory Effects of Tannins and Related Compounds on Leishmania Parasitised RAW 264.7 Cells. Phytochemistry 2005, 66, 2056–2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Tanna, B.; Choudhary, B.; Mishra, A. Metabolite Profiling, Antioxidant, Scavenging and Anti-Proliferative Activities of Selected Tropical Green Seaweeds Reveal the Nutraceutical Potential of Caulerpa Spp. Algal Res. 2018, 36, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sobuj, M.K.A.; Islam, M.A.; Islam, M.S.; Islam, M.M.; Mahmud, Y.; Rafiquzzaman, S.M. Effect of Solvents on Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Padina Tetrastromatica and Gracilaria Tenuistipitata Seaweeds Collected from Bangladesh. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 19082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Yap, W.-F.; Tay, V.; Tan, S.-H.; Yow, Y.-Y.; Chew, J. Decoding Antioxidant and Antibacterial Potentials of Malaysian Green Seaweeds: Caulerpa racemosa and Caulerpa lentillifera. Antibiotics 2019, 8, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Lulan, T.Y.; Fatmawati, S.; Santoso, M.; Ersam, T. Antioxidant Capacity of Some Selected Medicinal Plants in East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia: The Potential of Sterculia Quadrifida R.Br. Free Radic. Antioxid. 2018, 8, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Fonseca, I.; Guarda, I.; Mourato, M.; Martins, L.L.; Gomes, R.; Matos, J.; Gomes-Bispo, A.; Bandarra, N.M.; Cardoso, C.; Afonso, C. Undervalued Atlantic Brown Seaweed Species (Cystoseira Abies-Marina and Zonaria Tournefortii): Influence of Treatment on Their Nutritional and Bioactive Potential and Bioaccessibility. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2021, 247, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Maheswari, A.; Salamun, D.E. In Vitro Correlation Studies of Antidiabetic, Antioxidant Activity and HPLC-ESI-MS/MS Analysis of Marine Seaweeds from Gulf of Mannar. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2022, 56, 102682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mani, A.E.; Chakraborty, K.; Pananghat, V. Comparative Phytochemical and Pharmacological Properties of Commonly Available Tropical Green Seaweeds. J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol. 2021, 30, 988–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pangestuti, R.; Haq, M.; Rahmadi, P.; Chun, B.-S. Nutritional Value and Biofunctionalities of Two Edible Green Seaweeds (Ulva lactuca and Caulerpa racemosa) from Indonesia by Subcritical Water Hydrolysis. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Thomas, J.; Thanigaivel, S.; Vijayakumar, S.; Acharya, K.; Shinge, D.; Seelan, T.S.J.; Mukherjee, A.; Chandrasekaran, N. Pathogenecity of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in Oreochromis Mossambicus and Treatment Using Lime Oil Nanoemulsion. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2014, 116, 372–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Divya, D.; Beulah, G.; Govinda Rao, K.; Sravya, M.V.N.; Simhachalam, G.; Sai Krishna, M.; Sampath Kumar, N.S. Bioactivity of Excoecaria Agallocha Leaf Extract against Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infection in Labeo Rohita. J. Appl. Aquac. 2022, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kukułowicz, A.; Steinka, I.; Siwek, A. Presence of Antibiotic-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus in Fish and Seafood Originating from Points of Sale in the Tri-City Area (Poland). J. Food Prot. 2021, 84, 1911–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Sivaraman, G.K.; Muneeb, K.H.; Sudha, S.; Shome, B.; Cole, J.; Holmes, M. Prevalence of Virulent and Biofilm Forming ST88-IV-T2526 Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Clones Circulating in Local Retail Fish Markets in Assam, India. Food Control 2021, 127, 108098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Montaser, M.M.; El-sharnouby, M.E.; EL-Noubi, G.; El-Shaer, H.M.; Khalil, A.A.; Hassanin, M.; Amer, S.A.; El-Araby, D.A. Boswellia Serrata Resin Extract in Diets of Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis Niloticus: Effects on the Growth, Health, Immune Response, and Disease Resistance to Staphylococcus Aureus. Animals 2021, 11, 446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Jebasingh, S.E.J.; Rosemary, S.; Elaiyaraja, S.; Sivaraman, K.; Lakshmikandan, M.; Murugan, A.; Raja, P. Potential Antibacterial Activity of Selected Green and Red Seaweeds. J. Pharm. Biomed. Sci. 2011, 5, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  77. Belkacemi, L.; Belalia, M.; Djendara, A.C.; Bouhadda, Y. Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities and Identification of Bioactive Compounds of Various Extracts of Caulerpa racemosa from Algerian Coast. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2020, 10, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Darmasiwi, S.; Aramsirirujiwet, Y.; Kimkong, I. Biological Activities and Chemical Profile of Hericium Erinaceus Mycelium Cultivated on Mixed Red and White Jasmine Rice. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 42, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Talreja, S.C. Evaluation of Methanolic Extract of Seaweed Ulva lactuca against Resistant Pathogenic Fungal and Microbial Strains. Indian J. Res. 2017, 6, 312–316. [Google Scholar]
  80. Wiegand, I.; Hilpert, K.; Hancock, R.E.W. Agar and Broth Dilution Methods to Determine the Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of Antimicrobial Substances. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. McNicholl, B.P.; McGrath, J.W.; Quinn, J.P. Development and Application of a Resazurin-Based Biomass Activity Test for Activated Sludge Plant Management. Water Res. 2007, 41, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Riahi, L.; Elferchichi, M.; Ghazghazi, H.; Jebali, J.; Ziadi, S.; Aouadhi, C.; Chograni, H.; Zaouali, Y.; Zoghlami, N.; Mliki, A. Phytochemistry, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of the essential oils of Mentha rotundifolia L. in Tunisia. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013, 49, 883–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Álvarez-Martínez, F.J.; Barrajón-Catalán, E.; Herranz-López, M.; Micol, V. Antibacterial plant compounds, extracts and essential oils: An updated review on their effects and putative mechanisms of action. Phytomedicine 2021, 90, 153626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Nefzi, K.; Ben Jemaa, M.; Baraket, M.; Dakhlaoui, S.; Msaada, K.; Nasr, Z. In Vitro Antioxidant, Antibacterial and Mechanisms of Action of Ethanolic Extracts of Five Tunisian Plants against Bacteria. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 5038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Thanigaivel, S.; Chandrasekaran, N.; Mukherjee, A. John Thomas Seaweeds as an Alternative Therapeutic Source for Aquatic Disease Management. Aquaculture 2016, 464, 529–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Yuan, Y.V.; Bone, D.E.; Carrington, M.F. Antioxidant Activity of Dulse (Palmaria palmata) Extract Evaluated in Vitro. Food Chem. 2005, 91, 485–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Raj, G.A.; Chandrasekaran, M.; Krishnamoorthy, S.; Venkatesalu, V. Antibacterial Activity of Diff Erent Solvent Extracts of Caulerpa Chemnitzia (Esper) J.V. Lamououx, from Mandapam, Gulf of Mannar Southeast Coast, Tamil Nadu, India. J. Med. Herbs Ethnomed. 2015, 1, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sudhakar, M.P.; Ananthalakshmi, J.S.; Nair, B.B. Extraction, Purification and Study on Antioxidant Properties of Fucoxanthin from Brown Seaweeds. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2013, 5, 169–175. [Google Scholar]
  89. Arnon, D.I. Copper Enzymes in Isolated Chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase In Beta Vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 1949, 24, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Dexbury, A.C.; Yentch, C.S. Plankton Pigment Monograph. J. Mater. Res. 1956, 15, 93–101. [Google Scholar]
  91. Jensen, A.R.N.E. Quantitative Paper Chromatography of Carotenoids. Acta Chem. Scand. 1959, 13, 1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. AOAC Official Methods of Analysis, 17th ed.; The Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2000.
  93. Kumar, S.; Yadav, M.; Yadav, A.; Yadav, J.P. Impact of Spatial and Climatic Conditions on Phytochemical Diversity and in Vitro Antioxidant Activity of Indian Aloe Vera (L.) Burm.f. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2017, 111, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Sadasivam, S. Biochemical Methods; New Age International: New Delhi, India, 1996; ISBN 978-81-224-0976-5. [Google Scholar]
  95. Salar, R.K.; Certik, M.; Brezova, V. Modulation of Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Activity of Maize by Solid State Fermentation with Thamnidium Elegans CCF 1456. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2012, 17, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Amorim, E.L.C.; Nascimento, J.E.; Monteiro, J.M. A Simple and Accurate Procedure for the Determination of Tannin and Flavonoid Levels and Some Applications in Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology. Funct. Ecosyst. Communities 2008, 2, 88–94. [Google Scholar]
  97. Lamaison, J.L.; Carnart, A. Teneurs En Principaux Falvonoïdes Des Fleurs et Des Feuilles de Crataegus Monogyna Jacq. et de Crataegus Laevigata (Poiret) DC. En Fonction de La Période de Végétation. Plantes Médicinales Et Phytothérapie 1990, 25, 12–16. [Google Scholar]
  98. Brand-Williams, W.; Cuvelier, M.E.; Berset, C. Use of a Free Radical Method to Evaluate Antioxidant Activity. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 1995, 28, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Arumugam, M.; Manikandan, D.B.; Sridhar, A.; Palaniyappan, S.; Jayaraman, S.; Ramasamy, T. GC–MS Based Metabolomics Strategy for Cost-Effective Valorization of Agricultural Waste: Groundnut Shell Extracts and Their Biological Inhibitory Potential. Waste Biomass Valorization 2022, 13, 4179–4209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Logaranjan, K.; Raiza, A.J.; Gopinath, S.C.B.; Chen, Y.; Pandian, K. Shape- and Size-Controlled Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Aloe Vera Plant Extract and Their Antimicrobial Activity. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Chakansin, C.; Yostaworakul, J.; Warin, C.; Kulthong, K.; Boonrungsiman, S. Resazurin Rapid Screening for Antibacterial Activities of Organic and Inorganic Nanoparticles: Potential, Limitations and Precautions. Anal. Biochem. 2022, 637, 114449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Marinedrugs 21 00278 g001 550
Figure 1. Pigments content of collected green seaweed Caulerpa racemosa.
Figure 1. Pigments content of collected green seaweed Caulerpa racemosa.
Marinedrugs 21 00278 g001
Marinedrugs 21 00278 g002 550
Figure 2. FT-IR spectrum of various extracts of Caulerpa racemosa.
Figure 2. FT-IR spectrum of various extracts of Caulerpa racemosa.
Marinedrugs 21 00278 g002
Marinedrugs 21 00278 g003 550
Figure 3. GC-MS chromatogram of various extracts of Caulerpa racemosa.
Figure 3. GC-MS chromatogram of various extracts of Caulerpa racemosa.
Marinedrugs 21 00278 g003
Marinedrugs 21 00278 g004 550
Figure 4. Quantitative analysis of (A) total phenolic content, (B) total tannin content and (C) total flavonoid content of Caulerpa racemosa extracts.
Figure 4. Quantitative analysis of (A) total phenolic content, (B) total tannin content and (C) total flavonoid content of Caulerpa racemosa extracts.
Marinedrugs 21 00278 g004
Marinedrugs 21 00278 g005 550
Figure 5. DPPH radical scavenging activity of various extracts of Caulerpa racemosa. Bars represent the mean ± standard deviation. Asterisks denote the significant difference between the Caulerpa racemosa extracts and the standard (Vitamin C).
Figure 5. DPPH radical scavenging activity of various extracts of Caulerpa racemosa. Bars represent the mean ± standard deviation. Asterisks denote the significant difference between the Caulerpa racemosa extracts and the standard (Vitamin C).
Marinedrugs 21 00278 g005
Marinedrugs 21 00278 g006 550
Figure 6. ABTS radical scavenging activity of various extracts of Caulerpa racemosa. Bars represent the mean ± standard deviation. Asterisk denotes the significant difference between the Caulerpa racemosa extracts and the standard (Vitamin C).
Figure 6. ABTS radical scavenging activity of various extracts of Caulerpa racemosa. Bars represent the mean ± standard deviation. Asterisk denotes the significant difference between the Caulerpa racemosa extracts and the standard (Vitamin C).
Marinedrugs 21 00278 g006
Marinedrugs 21 00278 g007 550
Figure 7. Sample (Caulerpa racemosa) collection site mapping.
Figure 7. Sample (Caulerpa racemosa) collection site mapping.
Marinedrugs 21 00278 g007
Table
Table 1. Biochemical constituents’ analysis of Caulerpa racemosa.
Table 1. Biochemical constituents’ analysis of Caulerpa racemosa.
Biochemical ConstituentsCaulerpa racemosa
Moisture7.04%
Crude protein12.64%
Crude fibre2.85%
Ether extract1.80%
Total ash48.41%
Nitrogen free extract27.26%
Gross energy2089 Kcal/kg
Table
Table 2. Preliminary phytochemical analysis of various extracts of Caulerpa racemosa. “+”—indicates presence of phytochemicals. “–”—indicates the absence of phytochemicals.
Table 2. Preliminary phytochemical analysis of various extracts of Caulerpa racemosa. “+”—indicates presence of phytochemicals. “–”—indicates the absence of phytochemicals.
S. NoTestMethanolEthanolAcetoneEthyl AcetatePetroleum EtherHexane
1.Saponins++––––
2.Terpenoids ++++–+
3.Steroids++++––
4.Phytosterol++++––
5.Tannins++++++
6.Flavonoids++++––
7.Phenol +++–––
8.Phenolic flavonoids +++–––
9.Alkaloids++––––
Table
Table 3. GC–MS analysis of various extracts of Caulerpa racemosa.
Table 3. GC–MS analysis of various extracts of Caulerpa racemosa.
ExtractCompound NameMolecular FormulaMolecular WeightArea %
MethanolOxalic acid, allyl ethyl esterC8H10O41700.11
3-Butynoic acidC4H4O2840.03
3-HexadeceneC16H32224.420.8
Phthalic acidC8H6O4166.140.23
DodecaneC12H26170.332.16
3-Octadecene, (E)-C18H36252.53.3
PentadecaneC15H32212.4112.99
Heptadecane, 7-methyl- C18H38254.50.48
Carbonic acid, decyl vinyl esterC13H24O228.330.15
1-HeptadeceneC17H34238.532.37
1-Decene, 3,3,4-trimethyl-C13H26160.210.27
PentadecaneC15H32212.422.72
NeophytadieneC20H38278.50.60
2-Tridecenal, (E)-C13H24O196.330.39
9-HeptadecanoneC17H34O254.51.11
TetradecaneC14H30198.390.28
9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)- methyl esterC19H36O2296.50.22
Tridecanoic acid, methyl esterC14H28O2228.378.53
1,1-Diisobutoxy-butaneC12H26O2202.330.36
Nonane, 3,7-dimethyl-C11H24156.310.18
1-Dodecene, 2-ethyl-C12H24168.320.29
8,11,14-Eicosatrienoic acid, methyl ester,C21H36O2320.50.60
11,14-Eicosadienoic acid, methyl esterC21H38O2322.50.43
7-Hexadecenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z)-C17H32O2268.40.24
Tetracosanoic acid, methyl esterC25H50O2382.70.26
1-NonadeceneC19H38266.50.80
2-Aminophenol, 2TBDMS derivativeC18H35NOSi2337.647612.77
HeneicosaneC21H44296.576.37
Octasiloxane, 1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7,9,9,11,11 13,13,15,15- Hexadecamethyl(Alpha reductase inhibitor, 5-HT inhibitor)C16H50O7Si857827.47
Ethanol3-HexadeceneC16H32224.421.92
Acetic acid 13.57
2-(Benzyloxy)ethanamineC9H13NO15113.27
PropiolactoneC3H4O2724.98
N-(4-Tolylsulfonyl)azetidin-3-oneC10H11NO3S22510.38
1H-TetrazoleCH2N4702.87
N-Methylene-2-phenylethanamineC9H11N1331.43
ButanenitrileC4H7N69.112.90
Hexadecane C16H342261.17
NeophytadieneC20H382785.63
3,7,11,15-Tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-olC20H40O296.511.06
Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl esterC18H36O22842.10
AcetonePropanoic acidC3H6O274.086.15
2-Pentanone, 4-hydroxy-4-methylC18H20O2116.1625.88
Acetic acid, hydroxy-, methyl ester (methyl glycolate)C3H6O390.080.90
(3S,4S)-3,4-Bis(methoxymethoxy)pyrrolidineC8H17NO41910.34
Oxalic acid, diallyl esterC8H10O4170.161.28
ButanenitrileC4H7N69.111.84
HeptadecaneC17H36240.4717.57
3,7,11,15-Tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-olC20H40O296.55.78
Ethyl acetate1H-TetrazoleCH2N4708.20
PropiolactoneC3H4O2724.42
2-Butanol, 4-chloro-3-methyl-C5H11ClO122.594.08
Hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitroso-1,3,5-triazineC3H6N6O31747.45
2-Butanone, 3-hydroxyC4H8O88.113.19
2-BenzyloxyethylamineC19H13NO27110.05
Propanoic acidC3H6O274.087.76
1-TrideceneC13H261826.96
1-HeptadeceneC17H34238.55.45
Petroleum etherPropiolic acid C3H2O270.050.87
2-Pentanone, 5-hydroxy- C5H10O210219.53
1H-TetrazoleCH2N4705.87
2-TetradecanolC14H30O2141.06
Tricosane C23H483241.27
Hexanoic acidC6H12O2116.153.25
Isopropyl myristateC17H34O2270.454.16
Pentadecanoic acid, methyl esterC17H34O22703.58
Hexanedioic acid, bis(2-ethylhexyl) esterC22H42O4370.62.35
HexaneCyclopentane, 1-acetyl-1,2-epoxyC7H10O212654.36
N,N′,N″-Trinitro-1,3,5-triazacycloheptaneC4H8N6O6366.89
1H-TetrazoleCH2N4706.66
PropiolactoneC3H4O2722.12
ButanenitrileC4H7N690.64
TricosaneC23H483241.77
PentadecaneC15H322123.50
Table
Table 4. IC50 values of Caulerpa racemosa extracts of DPPH & ABTS radical scavenging activity.
Table 4. IC50 values of Caulerpa racemosa extracts of DPPH & ABTS radical scavenging activity.
Extracts of Caulerpa racemosaDPPH Assay (µg/mL)ABTS Assay (µg/mL)
Vitamin C (standard)36.7932.06
Methanol 86.3354.51
Ethanol 104.4675.10
Acetone 102.5273.64
Ethyl acetate 111.5974.41
Petroleum ether 124.4169.92
Hexane 173.2176.28
Table
Table 5. Antibacterial activity and MIC of the various extracts of Caulerpa racemosa against tested microorganisms.
Table 5. Antibacterial activity and MIC of the various extracts of Caulerpa racemosa against tested microorganisms.
Zone of Inhibition (mm)
ExtractBacterial StrainControl (Streptomycin)50µg/mL100 µg/mL150 µg/mL200 µg/mLMIC µg/mL
MethanolAeromonas hydrophila25.5 ± 2.12-15.5 ± 0.72 **17.5 ± 2.12 **21.5 ± 2.12 *100
Aeromonas veronii29 ± 1.41-20 ± 2.82 *24 ± 2.83 *27 ± 0.71 *100
Aeromonas salmonicida26.5 ± 0.70-16 ± 1.41 **17.5 ± 2.12 **23.5 ± 0.71 *100
Pseudomonas aeruginosa29 ± 1.41-11.5 ± 2.12 **14 ± 0.70 **19.5 ± 2.12 *200
Staphylococcus aureus26.5 ± 0.70-12.25 ± 1.06 **15 ± 1.41 **17.5 ± 0.71 **200
Klebsiella pneumoniae26 ± 2.83-12 ± 1.41 **14 ± 1.41 **17.75 ± 1.06 **200
EthanolAeromonas hydrophila30 ± 2.83-12.5 ± 0.71 **16 ± 1.41 **19.5 ± 0.71 *100
Aeromonas veronii29.5 ± 2.12-16.5 ± 2.12 **19 ± 2.83 *25 ± 0.35 *100
Aeromonas salmonicida32.75 ± 0.35-14.5 ± 2.12 **17.5 ± 0.71 **21.25 ± 0.35 *100
Pseudomonas aeruginosa24.5 ± 0.71-12 ± 1.41 **14 ± 1.41 **16.5 ± 0.71 **200
Staphylococcus aureus24.5 ± 0.71-10.75 ± 0.35 **11.5 ± 0.71 **13.5 ± 0.71 **200
Klebsiella pneumoniae29.5 ± 0.71--11.25 ± 1.06 **13.5 ± 2.12 **200
AcetoneAeromonas hydrophila28.5 ± 2.12-11 ± 1.14 **13.5 ± 0.71 **16 ± 1.41 **100
Aeromonas veronii31 ± 1.41-14.5 ± 2.12 **18 ± 2.83 **21.5 ± 0.71 *100
Aeromonas salmonicida27.5 ± 2.12-15.5 ± 0.71 **16 ± 1.41 **18 ± 1.41 **100
Pseudomonas aeruginosa29 ± 1.41--10.5 ± 0.71 **11.5 ± 0.71 **200
Staphylococcus aureus25.5 ± 2.12-10.5 ± 0.71 **11.5 ± 0.71 **11.75 ± 1.06 **200
Klebsiella pneumoniae28.5 ± 0.71--10.5 ± 0.71 **13.5 ± 0.71 **200
Ethyl acetateAeromonas hydrophila29 ± 0.71-11 ± 1.41 **12 ± 2.82 **15.5 ± 0.71 **200
Aeromonas veronii30.5 ± 0.71-12 ± 2.83 **15.5 ± 2.12 **20 ± 1.41 *100
Aeromonas salmonicida29.5 ± 2.12-12.5 ± 0.71 **13.5 ± 2.12 **15.5 ± 0.71 **100
Pseudomonas aeruginosa29 ± 1.14---10.5 ± 0.71 **200
Staphylococcus aureus27.25 ± 0.35-11 ± 0.35 **11 ± 0.35 **11.5 ± 0.71 **200
Klebsiella pneumoniae26 ± 2.83--11.5 ± 0.71 **11 ± 1.41 **400
Petroleum etherAeromonas hydrophila26.5 ± 0.71---12 ± 1.41 **400
Aeromonas veronii28.5 ± 0.71-11.5 ± 2.12 **11.5 ± 0.71 **14.25 ± 1.06 **200
Aeromonas salmonicida26.5 ± 0.71-11.5 ± 0.71 **10.75 ± 1.06 **11.5 ± 0.71 **200
Pseudomonas aeruginosa29.5 ± 2.12--11 ± 0.71 **12 ± 1.41 **400
Staphylococcus aureus28.5 ± 2.12--10.5 ± 0.71 **12.5 ± 0.71 **400
Klebsiella pneumoniae27 ± 1.41---11.5 ± 2.12 **400
HexaneAeromonas hydrophila27.5 ± 0.71--10.5 ± 0.71 **12 ± 1.41 **400
Aeromonas veronii30 ± 0.71-10.5 ± 0.71 **13.5 ± 0.71 **16 ± 1.41 **200
Aeromonas salmonicida32 ± 1.41-10.5 ± 0.71 **10.5 ± 0.71 **12 ± 1.41 **400
Pseudomonas aeruginosa29 ± 1.41---13.5 ± 0.70 **400
Staphylococcus aureus26 ± 1.41--11 ± 1.14 **12 ± 2.82 **400
Klebsiella pneumoniae27.5 ± 0.71---12.5 ± 2.12 **200
Each result represents the mean±standard deviation (n = 3), and asterisks indicate significant differences between the control and different concentrations of Caulerpa racemosa extracts. “-” indicates no activity.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Palaniyappan, S.; Sridhar, A.; Kari, Z.A.; Téllez-Isaías, G.; Ramasamy, T. Evaluation of Phytochemical Screening, Pigment Content, In Vitro Antioxidant, Antibacterial Potential and GC-MS Metabolite Profiling of Green Seaweed Caulerpa racemosa. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 278. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/md21050278

AMA Style

Palaniyappan S, Sridhar A, Kari ZA, Téllez-Isaías G, Ramasamy T. Evaluation of Phytochemical Screening, Pigment Content, In Vitro Antioxidant, Antibacterial Potential and GC-MS Metabolite Profiling of Green Seaweed Caulerpa racemosa. Marine Drugs. 2023; 21(5):278. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/md21050278

Chicago/Turabian Style

Palaniyappan, Sivagaami, Arun Sridhar, Zulhisyam Abdul Kari, Guillermo Téllez-Isaías, and Thirumurugan Ramasamy. 2023. "Evaluation of Phytochemical Screening, Pigment Content, In Vitro Antioxidant, Antibacterial Potential and GC-MS Metabolite Profiling of Green Seaweed Caulerpa racemosa" Marine Drugs 21, no. 5: 278. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/md21050278

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop