Next Article in Journal
Effects of COVID-19 Infection during Pregnancy and Neonatal Prognosis: What Is the Evidence?
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison between Communicated and Calculated Exposure Estimates Obtained through Three Modeling Tools
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Longitudinal Study of Metabolic Biomarkers among Conventional and Organic Farmers in Thailand

by
Pornpimol Kongtip
1,2,*,
Noppanun Nankongnab
1,2,
Nichcha Kallayanatham
1,2,
Ritthirong Pundee
3,
Jutharak Yimsabai
4 and
Susan Woskie
5
1
Department of Occupational Health and Safety, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, 420/1 Rajvidhi Road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
2
Center of Excellence on Environmental Health and Toxicology, EHT, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
3
Mahidol University, Nakhonsawan Campus, Nakhonsawan 60130, Thailand
4
Department of Medical Technology and Clinical Pathology, Buddhachinaraj Phitsanulok, 90 Sithamma traipidok Road, Muang, Phitsanulok 65000, Thailand
5
Department of Public Health, University of Massachusetts Lowell, One University Ave, Lowell, MA 01854-2867, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(11), 4178; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17114178
Submission received: 9 May 2020 / Revised: 5 June 2020 / Accepted: 9 June 2020 / Published: 11 June 2020

Abstract

:
The aim of this longitudinal study is to assess how pesticide use may impact metabolic biomarkers by collecting and comparing data from conventional (n = 13) and organic farmers (n = 225) every eight months for four rounds. Farmers were interviewed about family health history, food consumption behaviors, self-reported health problems, agricultural activities, and history of pesticide use. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure and body mass index (BMI) were measured. Blood samples were collected for total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), blood glucose, and triglycerides. A linear mixed model with random intercepts for subjects was used to compare the metabolic biomarkers between conventional and organic farmers and to examine the impact of the number of pesticide spray days for all four rounds after controlling for covariates. The conventional farmers reported using insecticides, herbicides, and fungicides. The marginal means for chemical farmers were significantly higher than organic farmers for total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, glucose, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, BMI, and waist circumference. Increasing the number of days of spraying either insecticides or fungicides was associated with an increase in HDL, LDL, and cholesterol levels. Increasing the number of herbicide spray days was associated with an increase in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and a decrease in BMI. These findings suggest that pesticide-using conventional farmers may be at higher risk of metabolic disease in the future.

1. Introduction

Pesticides are important for agricultural production; however, the widespread use of pesticides may be putting humans at risk for adverse health effects [1]. In Thailand, 131,308 tons of pesticides were imported in 2019, including 88,846 tons of herbicides, 16,897 tons of insecticides, 19,334 tons of fungicides, and 6231 tons of other pesticides [2]. In Thailand, acute poisoning remains a risk factor for pesticide use. We had 4001 pesticide-poisoning cases and 520 deaths during the period of October 2018 to June 2019 [2,3]. However, little work has been done to investigate the potential for chronic health effects from pesticide use by farmers in Thailand.
The organic farming sector in Thailand is in early development. The main organic agricultural products are rice, vegetables, and fruits; the area under organic farming is slowly increasing from 0.2% of the total agricultural area in Thailand in 2011 [4]. Farmers adopt organic farming based on knowledge of organic farming systems, market costs and dynamics, and the environmental benefits to the farm [5]. In addition, the health benefits to the farmers of reduced pesticide exposure and to consumers of reduced pesticide contamination in the food supply also play a role in the conversion of farms to organic agriculture [6]. Previously, we have reported results from a cross-sectional study of conventional and organic farmers, where we found that conventional pesticide-using farmers had a significantly higher risk of abnormal metabolic and cardiovascular health outcomes and biomarkers, compared to organic farmers [7]. This study follows that cohort for three years, with four rounds of data collection, to assess whether the cross-sectional finding results remain consistent over time.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population and Data Collection

To collect different groups of conventional as well as organic farmers, we recruited farmers from three provinces in Thailand. For conventional farmers using pesticides, we recruited rice and vegetable farmers in two subdistricts, Bueng Phra Subdistrict and Wat Phrik Subdistrict, Muang in Phitsanulok province, located in the lower north of Thailand. Sugarcane and rice farmers in Khao Thong Subdistrict, Phayuha Khiri District in Nakorn Sawan province, are located in the upper central area in Thailand. For conventional farmers, one farmer who sprayed pesticides was selected in each household. Organic farmers were recruited from five subdistricts: Sang Ming subdistrict, Loeng Nok Tha district, Kammaet and Na So subdistricts, Kut Chum district, and Bak Ruea subdistrict, Maha Chana Chai district in the Yasothorn province, in northeast Thailand. They had to use certified organic farming practices for all of their crops, including rice, vegetables, and fruits. One farmer was selected from each household.
The studied subjects were male or female farmers over 18 years old who were free of a current diagnosis of diabetes, high blood pressure, and thyroid or heart disease. Health-promoting hospitals/primary care units (HPH/PCUs) in the areas, community leaders, public health volunteers, and the hired site officer worked together to help recruit farmers. The site officer visited each home during the recruitment to conduct interviews during the two months before physical health examinations in each round. Physical examinations and blood collection occurred at the local HPH/PCU. The subjects received a small remuneration for participation in this study, and a study doctor explained the results of their individual health checkup. At recruitment, we enrolled 243 conventional farmers and 235 organic farmers.
The questionnaires comprised screening questions, demographics, health behaviors, family health history, food consumption behaviors, home location and home pesticide use, self-reported health problems, agricultural activities, and history of pesticide use. The Department of Mental Health stress questionnaire (Department of Mental Health, Thai Ministry of Public Health) [8] was used and covered sleeping problems, reduced concentration, irritability, boredom, and lack of interest in meeting people, with a scale of 0 for no problem to 3 as always having problems. In the morning (7–9 a.m.), during the physical exam, data on weight, height, waist circumference, body composition (Tanita model DC-360, Amsterdam, Netherland), blood pressure (taken twice, 10 min apart and averaged), and blood samples were collected. The farmers were told to abstain from food for at least 8 h before the blood collection. Sera extracted from blood samples in nonheparinized vacutainer tubes were stored at −20 °C until analysis. Serum glucose, triglycerides (TGs), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) were measured by an AU5800 apparatus (Beckmann Coulter, Atlanta, GA, USA) at Buddhachinaraj Hospital, the regional medical center in the Phitsanulok province, using standard clinical laboratory methods. The blood sample collection and physical health examination were collected over four rounds, 8 months apart. The first round was November to December 2016, 8 months after recruitment. The second round was in July 2017, the third round in April to May 2018, and the fourth round in January to February 2019.
All subjects gave their informed consent for inclusion before they participated in the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Human Research, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University (MUPH 2015-146).

2.2. Statistical Analyses

All statistical analyses were done by SPSS for Windows, version 23 (IBM Thailand Co., Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand). When comparing conventional and organic farmers, contingency tables, chi-square, Fisher’s exact test, and independent t-tests were employed. To account for the repeated measures on each subject, a linear mixed model with random intercepts for subjects was used to estimate the marginal means for each of the metabolic biomarkers for the organic and conventional farmers, after controlling for baseline age, gender, smoking, alcohol and pesticide use at home [7]. We also used a linear mixed model with random intercepts for subjects to look at the change in biomarker levels with an increasing number of self-reported days of spraying in the previous 8 months, for each type of pesticide, after controlling for the same covariates and the round of data collection.

3. Results

When the first physical health checkups were conducted, 8 months after recruitment, the cohort had declined from 243 to 213 conventional farmers and from 235 to 225 organic farmers, with response rates of 87.7% and 95.7%, respectively. In the second, third, and fourth rounds, collected about 8 months apart, the loss of follow-up was 4.57%, 4.78%, and 4.77%, respectively.

3.1. Characteristics of Subjects and Metabolic Biomarkers

The average age and education of organic farmers were significantly higher than those of conventional farmers (Table 1).
The conventional farmers comprised a higher percentage of male farmers, while the organic farmers had a similar male to female ratio. The organic farmers held second jobs more frequently than the conventional farmers and worked more hours per week in their agricultural work as well as their second job. The conventional farmers were significantly more likely to be smokers, drinkers, and use insecticides at home in the past year.

3.2. Metabolic Biomarkers for Organic versus Conventional Farmers

The marginal means estimated from repeated measures linear mixed models showed that conventional farmers had significantly higher total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, blood glucose, triglycerides, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, BMI and waist circumference than organic farmers, accounting for all 4 rounds of data collection (Table 2).

3.3. Pesticide Spraying Days of Conventional Farmers

Organic farmers did not report spraying chemical pesticides. The conventional farmers self-reported the number of days of spraying by crop season, which was used to calculate the number of days of spraying insecticides, herbicides, and fungicides in the previous 8 months before the biomarker collection. The pesticide-spraying days (median and Interquartile Range, IQR) are presented in Table 3 for each round.
The mean number of spray days was highest for Round 1 for insecticides and fungicides, and highest in Round 2 for insecticides. The lowest mean number of spray days was in Round 4 for insecticides and fungicides. It should be noted that the median spray days for fungicides for all rounds was zero so that the mean was highly influenced by a few high values, while a median of 4 spray days was reported for insecticides for all rounds and for all but Round 2 (8) for herbicides.

3.4. Change of Metabolic Biomarkers per 10 Days of Pesticide Sprayed

The change in metabolic biomarkers per an increase in 10 days of pesticide spraying is presented in Table 4. An increase in days of insecticide spraying was significantly associated with increased HDL and LDL, and a borderline significant increase in total cholesterol. An increase in herbicide spraying was significantly associated with an increase in HDL and systolic and diastolic blood pressure, but a decrease in BMI. An increase in fungicide-spraying days was significantly associated with an increase in total cholesterol, HDL, and LDL.

4. Discussion

The characteristics of the farmers enrolled in this study showed that conventional farmers were significantly more likely to be smokers and drinkers and use pesticides at home, and have lower education compared to organic farmers. Chouichom (2010) [5] reported that longer-term farm experience (higher age) and higher education were supporting factors in the choice to transfer to an organic farming system [9]. Training in organic farming emphasizes a better quality of life and organic farmers tend to have lower rates of smoking and drinking. In addition, the conventional farmers in this study were more likely to be male, whereas the organic farmers were equally divided between males and females. In Thailand, alcohol consumption and smoking are more likely to occur with males than females [10,11].
In our previous cross-sectional study, we found that conventional farmers who currently use pesticides had a significantly higher risk of abnormal metabolic and cardiovascular health biomarkers, including clinically abnormal levels of triglycerides, total cholesterol, LDL, waist circumference, % body fat, and BMI, as compared to organic farmers, after controlling for a variety of demographic and behavioral risk factors [7]. In this longitudinal study, the conventional and organic farmers were followed-up for three years, with four rounds of physical health outcomes and questionnaires. We compared actual levels of the biomarkers between organic and chemical farmers (not the proportion of clinically abnormal results). However, we found complementary results for BMI, cholesterol, HDL, and LDL, where conventional farmers had statistically significantly higher levels of these measures. Unlike our previous study, we did not find triglycerides or % body fat were significantly higher in conventional farmers.
With regard to organic versus conventional farmers, our findings are similar for lipids and glucose but different for triglycerides from those of animal studies, where after exposure to malathion, rats were found to have significantly higher serum total cholesterol, and other liver enzymes and significantly lower triglycerides and very low-density lipoprotein levels compared to controls [12]. In this longitudinal study, there were no significant differences in triglyceride levels between organic and conventional farmers, although lipids were significantly higher. Likewise, in rats, chlorpyrifos has been observed to induce significant increase in total cholesterol, but a significant decrease in triglyceride levels [13]. However, rats exposed to monocrotophos had significantly decreased plasma triglyceride levels in an earlier phase (50–60% of control), followed by hypertriglyceridemia in a later phase (15–30% above control) [14].
We did find that blood glucose and systolic and diastolic blood pressure were significantly higher in conventional farmers, and this aligns with the findings of animal studies that show hyperglycemia following exposure to organophosphates and other pesticides [13,15,16]. Exposure to organophosphates, organochlorines, and carbamates during the first trimester of pregnancy was found to increase the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) [17]. In rats exposed to acephate orally, blood glucose increased in 2 h, with a significant increase in liver glycogen content 6 h after exposure [18]. Repeated exposure to very high doses of dimethoate and diazinon were also shown to cause a significant increase in blood glucose [19,20]. It was reported that malathion induces hyperglycemia mainly through altering glucose metabolism in the liver and skeletal muscles. Malathion also activates islets muscarinic receptors, resulting in hyperinsulinemia, overproduction of glutamate/glutathione by glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), and overproduction of glucose via increased glycogenolysis in response to malathion-induced oxidative stress [21]. In humans, exposure to insecticides is linked to an increased risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes [22,23,24]. Pesticides may induce metabolic disorders, such as diabetes and obesity, by disturbing energy absorption in the intestine, energy storage in the liver, and by affecting fat tissue, skeletal muscle, the pancreas, and immune cells [25].
The conventional farmers in this study were sugarcane, rice, and vegetable farmers. Most reported spraying several types of pesticides, including herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides. In the first 8 months, the herbicides reported included glyphosate, paraquat, 2,4-D sodium salt, diuron, amethrin, acetochlor, and propanil. The insecticides used included chlorpyrifos, methyl parathion, carbofuran, carbosulfan, cypermethrin, abamectin, and profenofos. The fungicides used included azoxystrobin, difenoconazole, propiconazole, propineb, carbendazim, isoprothiolane, and mancozeb [7]. The median of insecticide-spraying days was the same for 4 rounds, but due to the skewed distribution of spray days, the average number of spraying days declined from Round 1 to Round 4. The number of days herbicides were sprayed was highest in the second round. Compared to the other pesticides, the use of fungicides was the lowest, with the median days sprayed equal to zero for all rounds, although due to the skewed distribution of spray days, the average number of spray days was lowest in Round 4. There are many reports of problems with pesticide use in developing countries related to overuse and misuse, lack of training in hazards and proper pesticide use, inappropriate pesticides being used due to manufacturer-to-retailer subsidies, and inadequate regulation and enforcement [26,27].
More frequent application of insecticides and fungicides resulted in significantly higher total cholesterol, HDL, and LDL for the conventional farmers compared to the organic farmers (borderline with total cholesterol and insecticides). Aminov et al. 2013 [28] reported that in residents of Anniston, Alabama, organochlorine pesticide concentrations were associated with an increase in total serum lipids, and total cholesterol and triglycerides. In developing countries, higher socioeconomic status has been associated with higher levels of serum lipids [29,30]. However, in the current study, the education level of organic farmers was significantly higher than those of conventional farmers, but the organic farmers had significantly lower serum lipids, including total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and BMI than the conventional farmers. Self-reported income adequacy was not significantly different between the two groups. For nutrition, the organic farmers reported consuming significantly more sweet fruits, snacks, and desserts than the conventional farmers, but the consumption of other types of food, such as meat with high fat and deep-fried food, was not significantly different between the two groups [7].
Du et al. (2013) [31] concluded that organophosphates at low doses cause liver dysfunction, which affects the tricarboxylic acid cycle and the lipid metabolism of rats. The liver is the primary detoxification organ of xenobiotic pesticides in the body, with p450-mediated enzymatic catalysis eventually inhibited due to pesticide-induced liver damage and cell death [25]. Chlorpyrifos and deltamethrin cause liver damage [32]. Consequently, the pesticides and exogenous toxins travel from the liver to other fat-rich tissues, such as adipose tissue, causing more severe negative effects on energy metabolism and other body functions. Exposure to β-HCH reduced β-oxidation and increased fatty acid synthesis in the livers of mice [33]. Some pesticides can accumulate in the adipose tissue, causing obesogenic effects. Exposure to chlorpyrifos [34] and imidacloprid [35,36] increased the epididymal fat weight in mice fed a high-fat diet. Exposure to permethrin [37], diazinon [38], deltamethrin [39], chlorantraniliprole [40], and fipronil [41] were found to induce lipid accumulation by regulating the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) pathway in mice. Male zebrafish exposed to the fungicide tebuconazole for 7 days showed increases in glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, and lactate levels over those in the control fish [42]. Pesticide-induced changes in blood lipid levels are associated with several metabolic disorders, which, in turn, lead to fibrosis, atherosclerosis, and cardiac disease [43]. In humans with chronic pesticide use, serum cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL levels were increased significantly among those with decreased cholinesterase levels compared to persons with normal cholinesterase levels [44].
We also found that the increasing use of herbicides resulted in significant increases in HDL and systolic and diastolic blood pressure and decreased BMI. Among US Vietnam veterans tasked with aerial spraying of herbicides during the war, herbicide-spray history was significantly associated with self-reported physician-diagnosed hypertension [45]. Similarly, Yi et al. (2013) [46] found a statistically significant association of hypertension and self-reported Agent Orange exposure (2,4,5-T and 2,4-D herbicides contaminated with dioxin). It is unclear whether exposure was an initiating or synergistic factor in the development of hypertension. Dioxins are believed to initiate blood pressure changes through the endothelial aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), but this mechanism has been proved only in an animal model [47]. Samsuddin et al. (2015) [48] reported that chronic mixed pesticide exposure among workers involved in mosquito control was possibly associated with depression of diazoxonase and an increase in oxidized low-density lipoproteino (x-LDL), brachial and aortic diastolic BP, systolic BP, and heart rate.
Pesticides may be acting as endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), which are known to interfere with hormonal action and impair hormone functions in the regulation of development and the maintenance of homeostasis and physiological processes, including adipogenesis and energy balance [49,50]. We report that conventional farmers had significantly higher BMI and waist circumference than organic farmers but did not find a significant association between the number of spray days and BMI, except for with herbicides, where the association was negative (lower BMI with increasing use). Perinatal exposure to EDCs and other environmental pollutants has been proposed as a contributing factor to childhood overweight and obesity [51,52]. Lind et al. (2013) [53] demonstrated that long term weight gain was observed in older subjects with higher serum levels of summed organochlorine pesticides and higher levels of low-chlorinated PCBs relative to those with lower serum levels of these compounds. The development of metabolic syndrome was associated with exposure to organochlorine pesticides in Anniston, Alabama, residents without diabetes [54,55]. Berg et al. (2019) [56] reported that occupational exposure to pesticides (organophosphate and carbamates insecticides) may play a role in the development of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). They report that people with other cardiovascular confounders such as obesity, hypertension, and stroke were more likely to have exacerbations of their health conditions when exposed to agrochemicals over a period of time.
Limitations of our study include potential misclassification of pesticide use, which was retrospectively collected from farmers by questionnaire (covering the previous growing seasons). Repeated measures of pesticide biomarker levels could improve the exposure assessment if taken frequently throughout the study period. This longitudinal study covered four rounds of data collection, eight months apart. Some biomarkers like body fat percent may change more slowly, and the development of metabolic syndrome or other outcomes of metabolic disorders like stroke, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease are likely to require a longer follow-up period. Although we controlled for some factors like age, gender, smoking, and alcohol use in our analyses, there may be other unidentified confounders that could explain the differences in metabolic biomarkers between organic and conventional farmers [7].

5. Conclusions

In this longitudinal study, conventional farmers using pesticides had significantly higher total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, blood glucose, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, BMI, and waist circumference than those of organic farmers. Increasing the number of days spraying pesticides (insecticides, herbicides, or fungicides) in the previous eight months was associated with increases in lipid levels. Increasing days of herbicide-spraying was associated with changes in blood pressure and decreases in BMI.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.K. and S.W.; methodology, N.N., N.K., and R.P.; sample collection and validation, N.N., N.K, J.Y., and R.P.; sample analysis, J.Y.; investigation, P.K.; data curation, N.N. and N.K.; writing—original draft preparation, P.K.; writing—review and editing, S.W.; supervision, S.W.; project administration, N.K.; funding acquisition, P.K. and S.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded and supported by the NIH Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences, and the NIH under Award Number U01 TW010091 and U2RTW010088.

Acknowledgments

The authors are most grateful to all the participants of this study. We would like to thank the health-promoting hospital staff in all areas for their assistance in subject recruitment and data collection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Huang, X.; Zhang, C.; Hu, R.; Li, Y.; Yin, Y.; Chen, Z.; Cai, J.; Cui, F. Association between occupational exposures to pesticides with heterogeneous chemical structures and farmer health in China. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Office of Agricultural Economics, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives. Pesticides Imported Year 2015–2019. Available online: http://www.oae.go.th/view/1/%E0%B8%9B%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%88%E0%B8%88%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%A2%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%9C%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%95/TH-TH# (accessed on 5 May 2020).
  3. National Health Security Office. Available online: https://www.nhso.go.th/FrontEnd/NewsInformationDetail.aspx?newsid=MjM5OQ== (accessed on 5 May 2020).
  4. Win, H.E. Organic Agriculture in Thailand. 2017. Available online: http://ap.fftc.agnet.org/ap_db.php?id=734 (accessed on 5 May 2020).
  5. Chouichom, S.; Yamao, M. Comparing opinions and attitudes of organic and non-organic farmers towards organic rice farming system in north-eastern Thailand. J. Org. Syst. 2010, 5, 25–35. [Google Scholar]
  6. Beyond Pesticides. Health Benefits of Organic Agriculture. Available online: https://www.beyondpesticides.org/programs/organic-agriculture/why-organic/health-benefits (accessed on 5 May 2020).
  7. Kongtip, P.; Nankongnab, N.; Tipayamongkholgul, N.; Bunngamchairat, A.; Yimsabai, J.; Pataitiemthong, A.; Woskie, S. A cross-sectional investigation of cardiovascular and metabolic biomarkers among conventional and organic farmers in Thailand. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Department of Mental Health, Thai Ministry of Public Health. Stress Evaluation. Available online: https://www.dmh.go.th/test/download/view.asp?id=18 (accessed on 6 May 2020).
  9. Kings, D.; Ilbery, B. Organic and Conventional Farmers’ Attitudes towards Agricultural Sustainability. Available online: https://www.intechopen.com/books/organic-farming-and-food-production/organic-and-conventional-farmers-attitudes-towards-agricultural-sustainability (accessed on 6 May 2020).
  10. Aungkulanon, S.; Pitayarangsarit, S.; Bundhamcharoen, K.; Akaleephan, C.; Chongsuvivatwong, V.; Phoncharoen, R.; Tangcharoensathien, V. Smoking prevalence and attributable deaths in Thailand: Predicting outcomes of different tobacco control interventions. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Wakabayashi, M.; McKetin, R.; Banwell, C.; Yiengprugsawan, V.; Kelly, M.; Seubsman, S.; Iso, H.; Sleigh, A.; Thai Cohort Study Team. Alcohol consumption patterns in Thailand and their relationship with non-communicable disease. BMC Public Health 2015, 15, 1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Kalender, S.; Uzun, F.G.; Durak, D.; Demir, F.; Kalender, Y. Malathion induced hepatotoxicty in rats: The effects of vitamins C and E. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010, 48, 633–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Elsharkawy, E.E.; Yahia, D.; El-Nisr, N.A. Sub-chronic exposure to chlorpyrifos induces hematological, metabolic disorders and oxidative stress in rat: Attenuation by glutathione. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2013, 35, 218–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nagaraju, R.; Joshi, A.K.; Rajini, P.S. Organophosphorus insecticide, monocrotophos, possesses the propensity to induce insulin resistance in rats on chronic exposure. J. Diabetes 2015, 7, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Amanvermez, R.; Baydin, A.; Yardan, T.; Başol, N.; Günay, M. Emerging laboratory abnormalities in suicidal patients with acute organophosphate poisoning. J. Biochem. 2010, 35, 29–34. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
  16. Everett, C.J.; Matheson, E.M. Biomarkers of pesticide exposure and diabetes in the 1999–2004. National health and nutrition examination survey. Environ. Int. 2010, 36, 398–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Saldana, T.M.; Basso, O.; Hoppin, J.A.; Baird, D.D.; Knott, C.; Blair, A.; Alavanja, M.C.R.; Sandler, D.P. Pesticide exposure and self-reported gestational diabetes mellitus in the Agricultural Health Study. Diabetes Care 2007, 30, 529–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Joshi, A.K.; Rajini, P.S. Reversible hyperglycemia in rats following acute exposure to acephate, an organophosphorus insecticide: Role of gluconeogenesis. Toxicology 2009, 257, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kamath, V.; Rajini, P.S. Altered glucose homeostasis and oxidative impairment in pancreas of rats subjected to dimethoate intoxication. Toxicology 2007, 231, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ueyama, J.; Kamijima, M.; Asai, K.; Mochizuki, A.; Wang, D.; Kondo, T.; Suzuki, T.; Takagi, K.; Takagi, K.; Kanazawa, H.; et al. Effect of the organophosphorus pesticide diazinon on glucose tolerance in type2 diabetic rats. Toxicol. Lett. 2008, 182, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Panahi, P.; Vosough-Ghanbari, S.; Pournourmohammadi, S.; Ostad, S.N.; Nikfar, S.; Minaie, B.; Abdollahi, M. Stimulatory effects of malathion on the key enzymes activities of insulin secretion in langerhans islets, glutamate dehydrogenase and glucokinase. Toxicol. Mech. Methods 2006, 16, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Xiao, X.; Clark, J.M.; Park, Y. Potential contribution of insecticide exposure and development of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Food. Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 105, 456–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Czajk, M.; Matysiak-Kucharek, M.; Jodłowska-Jędrych, B.; Sawicki, K.; Fal, B.; Drop, B.; Kruszewski, M.; Kapka-Skrzypczak, L. Organophosphorus pesticides can influence the development of obesity and type 2 diabetes with concomitant metabolic changes. Environ. Res. 2019, 178, 108685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lakshm, J.; Mukhopadhay, K.; Ramaswamy, P.; Mahadevan, S.A. Systematic Review on Organophosphate Pesticide and Type II Diabetes Mellitus. Curr. Diabetes Rev. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. He, B.; Ni, Y.; Jin, Y.; Fu, Z. Pesticides-induced energy metabolic disorders. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 729, 139033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zadjali, S.A.; Morse, S.; Chenoweth, J.; Deadman, M. Factors determining pesticide use practices by farmers in the Sultanate of Oman. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 476–477, 505–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Ecobichon, D.J. Pesticide use in developing countries. Toxicology 2001, 160, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Aminov, Z.; Haase, R.F.; Pavuk, M.; Carpenter, D.O. Anniston Environmental Health Research Consortium. Analysis of the effects of exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and chlorinated pesticides on serum lipid levels in residents of Anniston, Alabama. Environ. Health 2013, 12, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Heiss, G.; Haskell, W.; Mowery, R.; Criqui, M.H.; Brockway, M.; Tyroler, H.A. Plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and socioeconomic status. The Lipid Research Clinics Program Prevalence Study. Circulation 1980, 62, 108–115. [Google Scholar]
  30. Shohaimi, S.; Boekholdt, M.S.; Luben, R.; Wareham, N.J.; Khaw, K.T. Distribution of lipid parameters according to different socio-economic indicators the EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study. BMC Public Health 2014, 1, 782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Du, L.; Wang, H.; Xu, W.; Zeng, Y.; Hou, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Sun, C. Application of ultraperformance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry-based metabonomic techniques to analyze the joint toxic action of long-term low-level exposure to a mixture of organophosphate pesticides on rat urine profile. Toxicol. Sci. 2013, 134, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Tuzmen, N.; Candan, N.; Kaya, E.; Demiryas, N. Biochemical effects of chlorpyrifos and deltamethrin on altered antioxidative defense mechanisms and lipid peroxidation in rat liver. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2008, 26, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, Q.; Shao, W.; Zhang, C.; Xu, C.; Wang, Q.; Liu, H.; Sun, H.; Jiang, Z.; Gu, A. Organochloride pesticides modulated gut microbiota and influenced bile acid metabolism in mice. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 226, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liang, Y.; Zhan, J.; Liu, D.; Luo, M.; Han, J.; Liu, X.; Chang, L.; Zheng, C.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, P. Organophosphorus pesticide chlorpyrifos intake promotes obesity and insulin resistance through impacting gut and gut microbiota. Microbiome 2019, 7, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Sun, Q.; Xiao, X.; Kim, Y.; Kim, D.; Yoon, K.S.; Clark, J.M.; Park, Y. Imidacloprid promotes high fat diet-induced adiposity and insulin resistance in male C57BL/6J mice. J Agric. Food Chem 2016, 64, 9293–9306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sun, Q.; Qi, W.; Xiao, X.; Yang, S.-H.; Kim, D.; Yoon, K.S.; Clark, J.M.; Park, Y. Imidacloprid promotes high fat diet-induced adiposity in female C57BL/6J mice and enhances adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 adipocytes via the AMPKα-mediated pathway. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 6572–6581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Xiao, X.; Kim, Y.; Kim, D.; Yoon, K.S.; Clark, J.M.; Park, Y. Permethrin alters glucose metabolism in conjunction with high fat diet by potentiating insulin resistance and decreases voluntary activities in female C57BL/6J mice. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 108, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Smith, A.; Yu, X.; Yin, L. Diazinon exposure activated transcriptional factors CCAATenhancer-binding proteins α (C/EBPα) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) and induced adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. Pestic. Biochem. Phys. 2018, 150, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Shen, P.; Hsieh, T.H.; Yue, Y.; Sun, Q.; Clark, J.M.; Park, Y. Deltamethrin increases the fat accumulation in 3T3-L1 adipocytes and Caenorhabditis elegans. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 101, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yuan, L.; Lin, J.; Peng, Y.; Gao, R.; Sun, Q. Chlorantraniliprole induces adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 adipocytes via the AMPKalpha pathway but not the ER stress pathway. Food Chem. 2020, 311, 125953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Sun, Q.; Qi, W.; Yang, J.J.; Yoon, K.S.; Clark, J.M.; Park, Y. Fipronil promotes adipogenesis via AMPKα-mediated pathway in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2016, 92, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Sancho, E.; Villarroel, M.J.; Ferna’ndez, C.; Andreu, E.; Ferrando, M.D. Short-term exposure to sublethal tebuconazole induces physiological impairment in male zebrafish (Danio rerio). Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 2010, 73, 370–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Budoff, M. Triglycerides and triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in the causal pathway of cardiovascular disease. Am. J. Cardiol. 2016, 118, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Pothu, U.K.; Thammisetty, A.K.; Nelakuditi, L.K. Evaluation of cholinesterase and lipid profile levels in chronic pesticide exposed persons. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2019, 8, 2073–2078. [Google Scholar]
  45. Cypel, Y.; Kress, A.M.; Eber, S.M.; Schneiderman, A.I.; Davey, V.J. Herbicide Exposure, Vietnam Service, and Hypertension Risk in Army Chemical Corps Veterans. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2016, 58, 1127–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Yi, S.W.; Ohrr, H.; Hong, J.S.; Yi, J.J. Agent Orange exposure and prevalence of self-reported diseases in Korean Vietnam veterans. J. Prev. Med. Public Health 2013, 46, 213–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Trivedi, S.; Arora, R.R. Association of Dioxin and Dioxin-like Congeners with Hypertension. Fed. Pract. 2018, 35, 20–26. [Google Scholar]
  48. Samsuddin, N.; Rampal, K.G.; Ismail, N.H.; Abdullah, N.Z.; Nasreen, H.E. Pesticides Exposure and Cardiovascular Hemodynamic Parameters Among Male Workers Involved in Mosquito Control in East Coast of Malaysia. Am. J. Hypertens. 2016, 29, 226–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gore, A.C.; Chappell, V.A.; Fenton, S.E.; Flaws, J.A.; Nadal, A.; Prins, G.S.; Toppari, J.; Zoeller, R.T. Edc-2: The endocrine society’s second scientific statement on endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Endocr. Rev. 2015, 36, E1–E150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zoeller, R.T.; Brown, T.; Doan, L.L.; Gore, A.C.; Skakkebaek, N.E.; Soto, A.M.; Woodruff, T.J.; Vom Saal, F.S. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and public health protection: A statement of principles from the endocrine society. Endocrinology 2012, 153, 4097–4110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Grun, F.; Blumberg, B. Environmental obesogens: Organotins and endocrine disruption via nuclear receptor signaling. Endocrinology 2006, 147, S50–S55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. La Merrill, M.; Birnbaum, L.S. Childhood obesity and environmental chemicals. Mt. Sinaij. Med. 2011, 78, 22–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Lind, P.M.; Lee, D.H.; Jacobs, D.R.; Salihovic, S.; van Bavel, G.; Wolff, M.S.; Lind, L. Circulating levels of persistent organic pollutants are related to retrospective assessment of life-time weight change. Chemosphere 2013, 90, 998–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Rosenbaum, P.F.; Silverstone, A.E.; Weinstock, R.S.; Pavuk, M. Metabolic syndrome and pesticide exposure in the Anniston community health survey. Organohalog. Compd. 2010, 72, 780–782. [Google Scholar]
  55. Rosenbaum, P.F.; Weinstock, R.S.; Silverstone, A.E.; Sjödin, A.; Pavuk, M. Metabolic syndrome is associated with exposure to organochlorine pesticides in Anniston, AL, United States. Environ. Int. 2017, 108, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Berg, Z.K.; Rodriguez, B.; Davis, J.; Katz, A.R.; Cooney, R.V.; Masaki, K. Association Between Occupational Exposure to Pesticides and Cardiovascular Disease Incidence: The Kuakini Honolulu Heart Program. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2019, 8, e012569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Characteristic and risk factors of conventional farmers (n = 213) and organic farmers (n = 225).
Table 1. Characteristic and risk factors of conventional farmers (n = 213) and organic farmers (n = 225).
VariablesConventional Farmers n (%)Organic Farmers n (%)p-Value
Age
Min–max18–6928–79
Mean (SD)50.22 (11.1)53.20 (10.3)0.005 §
Sex
Male158 (74.2)115 (51.1)<0.001 †
Female55 (25.8)110 (48.9)
Educational level
Below elementary 14 (6.6)4 (1.8)0.035 †
Elementary122 (57.3)125 (55.6)
High school72 (33.8)85 (37.8)
Bachelor or higher5 (2.3)11 (4.9)
Marital status
Single21 (10.1)13 (6)0.032 †
Married179 (86.1)185 (84.9)
Widowed/divorced8 (3.8)20 (9.2)
Agricultural work time (h/week)
Mean (SD)26.9 (13.8)28.8 (17.2)0.011 §
Have Second Job
Yes49 (23)128 (56.9)<0.001 †
No164 (77)97 (43.1)
Second job work time (h/week)
Mean (SD)24.9 (13.6)26.6 (17.8)0.048 §
Alcohol intake
Current drinker136 (63.8)91 (41)<0.001 †
Non drinker77 (36.2)131 (59)
Expense adequacy
Enough for saving39 (18.3)50 (22.2)0.618 †
Just enough100 (46.9)94 (41.8)
In debt73 (34.3)79 (35.1)
Smoking
Current smoker59 (26.9)36 (16.1)0.006 †
Non smoker155 (73.1)188 (83.9)
Any stress symptom in past 2–4 weeks
Yes113 (53.3)100 (45.0)0.085 †
No99 (46.7)122 (55.0)
Insecticide use in home in the past year
Yes191 (89.7)33 (14.7)<0.001 †
No22 (10.3)191 (85.3)
† = chi-square, § = independence t-test.
Table 2. Estimated marginal means for 4 rounds of measurement of organic and chemical farmers.
Table 2. Estimated marginal means for 4 rounds of measurement of organic and chemical farmers.
ParameterConventional Farmer
Mean (95%CI)
Organic Farmer
Mean (95%CI)
p-Value from Model F-Test
Total Cholesterol (mg/dL)217.9 (211.2–224.6)193.0 (186.6–199.3)<0.001
LDL (mg/dL)132.1 (126.9–137.3)117.8 (112.7–122.2)<0.001
HDL (mg/dL)56.5 (54.6–58.3)45.8 (44.1–47.6)<0.001
Blood glucose (mg/dL)109.9 (106.7–113.0)104.1 (101.1–107.1)0.009
Triglyceride (mg/dL)157.2 (142.3–172.1)147.6 (133.5–161.7)0.356
Systolic BP (mmHg)134.5 (131.9–136.6)129.3 (127.1–131.5)0.002
Diastolic BP (mmHg)80.7 (79.3–82.1)76.8 (75.4–78.1)<0.001
BMI (kg/m2)24.3 (23.7–24.9)23.3 (22.8–23.8)0.010
Body fat (%)28.0 (27.0–29.1)27.5 (26.4–28.5)0.469
Waist circumference (cm)83.6 (82.1–85.1)80.7 (79.2–82.1)0.004
Marginal mean estimated from repeated measures linear mixed model with random intercepts for subjects and fixed effects for organic vs. conventional farmer, along with covariates for age at baseline, gender, smoking use, alcohol use, pesticide use at home.
Table 3. Self-reported pesticide exposure (days of spraying) for each round (8 months) among conventional farmers.
Table 3. Self-reported pesticide exposure (days of spraying) for each round (8 months) among conventional farmers.
Days of Spraying Pesticide Round 1
Mean (IQR)
n = 213
Round 2
Mean (IQR)
n = 199
Round 3
Mean (IQR)
n = 185
Round 4
Mean (IQR)
n = 178
Insecticide14 (4–24)11 (2–24)11 (2–8)7 (0–4)
Herbicide7 (4–8)9 (4–14)7 (4–12)8 (2–12)
Fungicide9 (0–8)7 (0–8)8 (0–8)3 (0–2)
IQR: Interquartile Range.
Table 4. Change in metabolic biomarkers per 10 days of pesticide sprayed (β × 10) in the previous 8 months from a linear mixed model with random intercepts for subjects and fixed effects for days of a type of pesticide sprayed (insecticide or herbicide or fungicide), along with covariates including baseline age, gender, smoking, alcohol and pesticide use at home, and testing round.
Table 4. Change in metabolic biomarkers per 10 days of pesticide sprayed (β × 10) in the previous 8 months from a linear mixed model with random intercepts for subjects and fixed effects for days of a type of pesticide sprayed (insecticide or herbicide or fungicide), along with covariates including baseline age, gender, smoking, alcohol and pesticide use at home, and testing round.
Metabolic BiomarkerInsecticide Spray Daysp-ValueHerbicide Spray Daysp-ValueFungicide Spray Daysp-Value
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)1.78 (−0.01, 3.56)0.0521.76 (−1.2, 4.71)0.2432.15 (0.07, 4.24)0.043
HDL (mg/dL)0.96 (0.42, 1.49)<0.0011.42 (0.53, 2.32)0.0021.25 (0.63, 1.87)<0.001
LDL (mg/dL)1.56 (0.16, 2.96)0.0281.11 (−1.20, 0.34)0.3451.75 (0.12, 3.38)0.035
Glucose (mg/dL)0.29 (−0.51, 1.08)0.482−0.60 (−1.88, 0.68)0.3580.13 (−0.79, 1.05)0.782
Triglyceride (mg/dL)−2.80 (−7.47, 1.87)0.239−3.22 (−10.92, 4.49)0.413−2.57 (−8.02, 2.87)0.354
Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)0.19 (−0.39, 0.78)0.5191.14 (0.19, 2.09)0.0180.16 (−0.52, 0.83)0.649
Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)−0.01 (−0.35, 0.32)0.9370.58 (0.04, 1.13)0.0370.16 (−0.23, 0.55)0.412
BMI (kg/m2)−0.03 (−0.10, 0.04)0.453−0.14 (−0.26, −0.03)0.015−0.03 (−0.12, 0.05)0.444
Body fat (%)0.11 (−0.17, 0.4)0.449−0.25 (−0.72, 0.22)0.3000.10 (−0.24, 0.43)0.573
Waist Circumference (cm)0.20 (−0.10, 0.49)0.171−0.02 (−0.48, 0.45)0.9460.14 (−0.19, 0.48)0.402

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kongtip, P.; Nankongnab, N.; Kallayanatham, N.; Pundee, R.; Yimsabai, J.; Woskie, S. Longitudinal Study of Metabolic Biomarkers among Conventional and Organic Farmers in Thailand. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4178. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17114178

AMA Style

Kongtip P, Nankongnab N, Kallayanatham N, Pundee R, Yimsabai J, Woskie S. Longitudinal Study of Metabolic Biomarkers among Conventional and Organic Farmers in Thailand. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(11):4178. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17114178

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kongtip, Pornpimol, Noppanun Nankongnab, Nichcha Kallayanatham, Ritthirong Pundee, Jutharak Yimsabai, and Susan Woskie. 2020. "Longitudinal Study of Metabolic Biomarkers among Conventional and Organic Farmers in Thailand" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 11: 4178. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17114178

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop