Next Article in Journal
The National Interscholastic Cycling Association (NICA) Mountain Biking Injury Surveillance System (ISS): Analysis of 66,588 Student Athlete-Years of Injury Data
Next Article in Special Issue
COVID-19 in Dental Settings: Novel Risk Assessment Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Lifestyle Habits and Health Indicators in Migrants and Native Schoolchildren in Chile
Previous Article in Special Issue
Use of Respiratory Protection Devices by Medical Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 18
Issue 11
10.3390/ijerph18115852
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association between Green Space Structure and the Prevalence of Asthma: A Case Study of Toronto †

by
Yuping Dong
1,2,
Helin Liu
1,2,* and
Tianming Zheng
1,2
1
School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
2
Center for Urban and Rural Planning Support Research, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
This paper is an extended version of our conference paper published in Proceedings of the 3rd International Electronic Conference on Environmental Research and Public Health—Public Health Issues in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic, Online, 11–25 January 2021.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(11), 5852; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18115852
Submission received: 6 April 2021 / Revised: 21 May 2021 / Accepted: 25 May 2021 / Published: 29 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Papers from the 3rd International Electronic Conference on Environmental Research and Public Health--Public Health Issues in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease that can be caused by various factors, such as asthma-related genes, lifestyle, and air pollution, and it can result in adverse impacts on asthmatics’ mental health and quality of life. Hence, asthma issues have been widely studied, mainly from demographic, socioeconomic, and genetic perspectives. Although it is becoming increasingly clear that asthma is likely influenced by green spaces, the underlying mechanisms are still unclear and inconsistent. Moreover, green space influences the prevalence of asthma concurrently in multiple ways, but most existing studies have explored only one pathway or a partial pathway, rather than the multi-pathways. Compared to greenness (measured by Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, tree density, etc.), green space structure—which has the potential to impact the concentration of air pollution and microbial diversity—is still less investigated in studies on the influence of green space on asthma. Given this research gap, this research took Toronto, Canada, as a case study to explore the two pathways between green space structure and the prevalence of asthma based on controlling the related covariates. Using regression analysis, it was found that green space structure can protect those aged 0–19 years from a high risk of developing asthma, and this direct protective effect can be enhanced by high tree diversity. For adults, green space structure does not influence the prevalence of asthma unless moderated by tree diversity (a measurement of the richness and diversity of trees). However, this impact was not found in adult females. Moreover, the hypothesis that green space structure influences the prevalence of asthma by reducing air pollution was not confirmed in this study, which can be attributed to a variety of causes.

1. Introduction

Asthma is a major chronic lung disease characterized by airway inflammation and usually leads to bronchoconstriction and increases mucus production in the airway [1]. The highest prevalence is in children, and most deaths occur in older adults [2]. It has been reported that more than 339 million people have developed asthma, with approximately 417,918 people dying from asthma and approximately 24.8 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) attributed to asthma globally in 2016 [2]. Continuous airway inflammation from childhood asthma has a profound influence on adulthood respiratory health and lung function [3], associated, for example, with a higher risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in adulthood [4]. Additionally, asthma can exert multiple adverse impacts on patients, such as increasing anxiety, decreasing self-confidence, and reducing outdoor/physical activities [5]. Therefore, the potential factors that can directly/indirectly lead to asthma have been widely examined, such as genes, ethnicity, family history, maternal lifestyle and diet, age, gender, and income [1,6].
Notwithstanding the complex and genetic characteristics of asthmatics [7], the development of gene–environment interaction theory from an epidemiologic perspective makes alleviating asthma, as well as asthma-like diseases, via the surrounding environment possible [8]. Air pollution has been found to have a negative influence on the asthma-related outcomes of children and adults [9]. For example, higher exposure to nitrogen dioxide (NO2) early in life produces a long-term influence on asthma development across approximately 20 years [10]. Similarly, long-term exposure to particulate matter (PM) early in life is likely to increase the risk of subsequent asthma throughout childhood by up to 12 years [11]. The underlying mechanism between air pollution and asthma may be partly explained by oxidative stress [9]. The inhaled polluted air in the airways can help to generate reactive oxygen species and thus can lead to airway hyperreactivity, epithelial cell inflammation, and lung impairment. In addition to the indirect method of inflammation induction, pollution deposition can also directly influence the airway epithelia by producing free reactive oxygen species, which diffuse from the airway surface [12]. Moreover, oxidative stress has been found to correlate with the lower corticosteroid responsiveness of asthmatics [13]. Based on this, exposure to air pollution increases the risk of asthmatics’ failure to deal with inhaled allergens.
There is abundant evidence that has proven that green space plays a significant role in reducing air pollutants, such as PM, NO2, and ozone (O3) [14,15]. On the one hand, vegetation can absorb gaseous pollutants via its leaf stomata or branch lenticel, and then the absorbed gases are transformed into non-toxic substances through redox reaction to be excreted by roots or stored in inner organs [16]. On the other hand, vegetation can intercept airborne particles and retain them on its surface, and the retained particles are taken away by rain or fallen leaves and twigs [15,17]. Hence, reducing air pollution is usually regarded as an important pathway by which green spaces relieve asthma, as well as asthma-related symptoms [18,19]. Notably, the characteristics of green spaces, especially type, structure, and quantity, create significant differences in their mitigation effects [15,20]. For example, air pollution is negatively correlated with the percentage of tree cover areas and positively with mixing layer heights [15]. Moreover, according to the biodiversity hypothesis, interacting with the natural environment has the potential to improve immunoregulatory circuits and to decrease inflammatory disorders [21]. The microbiota in such a biodiverse environment can promote the diversity of human commensal microbiota, such as the plentifulness of Gammaproteobacteria on the skin, which in turn influences human immunologic tolerance [22]. In other words, besides the mediation effect of air pollution, green spaces can also directly make a difference in the outcomes of asthmatics due to their biodiverse components [19].
Given the research status talked above, the characteristics of green spaces, such as greenness, accessibility, and green types, are commonly used to measure the green space exposure of the asthmatics [23,24,25]. Additionally, the most commonly applied indicators to measure greenness are the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and tree cover/density [19,26]. It is intriguing that the conclusions on the impact of green spaces on asthma are not consistent or even contrary [27]. For example, some studies have found that greenness negatively correlates with the prevalence of asthma and its related symptoms, whereas others have failed to find a significant correlation between them [28,29,30]. Some have even generated adverse conclusions by using other indicators to describe green spaces [31,32]. This can be partially explained by green spaces having a dual and opposing influence on asthma. Not only can they generate benefits by improving air quality and influencing microbial agents, but they can also cause detrimental effects by producing allergenic pollen and reacting with air pollutants [32,33]. Rather than exploring the multi-pathways between green spaces and asthma (concurrently focusing on the direct and indirect mechanisms between them), most relevant studies have explored only one pathway or partial pathway, such as the association between green spaces and asthma mediated by air quality or green spaces together with air quality [9,19,34]. Considering the possible counteracting effects of different pathways between green spaces and asthma, it is necessary to conduct a more comprehensive analysis to understand the simultaneous multi-pathways between them.
Furthermore, greenness, measured by tree density, has been proven to negatively correlate with asthma in some studies [35], but it does not necessarily mean that such a relationship still exists when other types and proportions of vegetation are taken into account. This is because different green space structures can play different roles in influencing air quality and microbiota. For instance, trees have a better reduction effect on air pollution than shrubs and grass [36], and, compared to the structure of shrubs plus grass, trees together with shrubs or grass have a relatively higher average PM reduction rate (including PM1, PM2.5, and PM10) [37]. In other words, green space structures consisting of different vegetation types (trees–shrubs–grass, trees–grass, trees only, shrubs–grass, etc.) may have different abilities to influence air pollution. Even if the components are the same, such as trees plus shrubs, the effect of green spaces on air pollution in terms of both extent and direction might vary when the ratio of the tree and shrub areas is different. It has been proven that when the tree area is almost equal to the shrub area, the space is more enclosed, and if the shrub area is greater than the tree area, then the space is relatively open [38]. This can subsequently influence the spread of air pollution.
Moreover, the structure of vegetation components can influence microbial diversity [39,40]. First, shrubs and grass can directly impact the soil microclimate, nutrient availability, and pH value through the litter and root exudates [41,42]. Additionally, trees can influence the microorganisms through both the litter and secretion to enter the soil, and the nutrient cascade. In detail, trees can not only reduce the growth, productivity, and diversity of understory vegetation through allelopathy and competition for light, water, and nutrition to indirectly impact the understory vegetation entering the soil [43]; they also directly influence other soil organisms that can have an influence on the soil microorganisms by the nutrient cascade effect [44]. Furthermore, shrubs, grass, and trees can jointly make a difference in microbial diversity by the soil microenvironment, as well as the litter and secretion entering the soil [45]. Thus, the structure of vegetation components can change the prevalence of asthma as a result of changing the microbial condition on a human’s skin and nasal cavity [46]. In sum, green space structures can influence air pollution and microbial diversity, but with different results due to the variation in green types and the proportions of vegetation components, which, as a result, leads to the differences in its influence on the prevalence of asthma. Hence, a better knowledge of the relationship between green space structures and asthma, as well as the potential pathways between them, can help urban planners and policy-makers to reduce the risk and severity of asthma by devising planning schemes and intervention mechanisms.
Considering the reasoning above, this research took Toronto as a case study to explore three questions: (1) Does green space structure have a direct relationship with the prevalence of asthma? (2) Does green space structure influence the prevalence of asthma by reducing air pollution? (3) Is the influence of green space structure on the prevalence of asthma adjusted by related moderators? To this end, the rest of this paper is organized as follows: Section 2 introduces the research materials and analysis methods; the analysis results are presented in Section 3; in Section 4, the underlying causes for the analysis results are discussed, and the paper is ended with conclusions in Section 5.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Research Area

The research case, i.e., Toronto, is the capital of Ontario province, located on the northwest shore of Lake Ontario in Canada. Plenty of vegetation, various types of green spaces, and the abundant vegetation species in Toronto [47] make the consideration of diverse vegetation structures possible for this research. It covers approximately 630 km2 of land, with over 8000 hectares designated as parks (concerning the types of woodlots, destination parks, parkettes, etc.) (Figure 1), and comprises nearly 10 million trees (including approximately 600,000 street trees and 3.5 million park trees) [48]. Moreover, Toronto has a large number of ethnic minorities, and more than half of the population (approximately 51.5%) are the visible minorities, which is higher than the average proportion in Ontario (29.3%) [49]. This means that the generated findings (with statistical significance) in this study will likely suit a wide spectrum of ethnicities and will potentially be a reference for concerned ethnicities in other places or countries. Asthma, as the third most common chronic disease in Canada, has received wide research and attention [50]. Compared to Ontario (15.4 per 100 people in 2016), which has the highest prevalence of asthma in Canada [51], Toronto has a slightly lower prevalence of asthma (14.8 per 100 people in 2016) [52]. In total, there are more than 700 facilities reported to release 25 priority chemicals; volatile organic compounds (VOCs), nitrogen oxide (NOx), and PM2.5, which are the top three air pollutants, accounted for 75.13%, 19.96%, and 3.9% of the total priority substances released into the air in 2016, respectively [53].

2.2. Research Design

In light of the research questions, two potential influencing pathways were explored in this study (Figure 2). In detail, the direct pathway refers to the influence of green space structure per se on the prevalence of asthma, while the indirect pathway points to the mediators’ impact on the relationship between green space structure and the prevalence of asthma. In particular, the former is based on the biodiversity hypothesis, and it supposes that green space structure plays a role in the prevalence of asthma via its micro-components (diverse microbiota). The latter is formulated by the hypothesis that green space structure affects the prevalence of asthma mediated by a reduction in air pollution. Moreover, the related moderator was also taken into account in the analysis model with controlling covariates. In general, this study was conducted at the population level, and the neighborhood was treated as the research unit. The values of all the variables were standardized before analysis using SPSS 20 v. PROCESS 3.4 (Andrew F. Hayes, Ohio State University, USA) (downloaded from http://processmacro.org/download.html (accessed on 10 August 2019)).

2.3. Variables Measurement

2.3.1. Dependent Variables

Previous studies have reported that the triggers of child and teenage asthma and adult asthma are probably different, and the gender proportions of asthmatics at different ages can also cause differences [1]. In other words, even if the surrounding environment is the same, it still can generate different influences on the prevalence of asthma among different age and gender groups. Considering this, we classified asthmatics (including all ages and genders) into different groups by their age and gender (Table 1 and Appendix A Table A1) and analyzed them separately (Figure 2). This contributed to a better understanding of how the selected impact factors play different roles among the various asthmatic groups.

2.3.2. Independent Variable

The green space structure is measured by the ratio of vegetation components in this study. The data of the vegetation types (trees, shrubs, and grass) were derived from multispectral satellite imagery with the assistance of light detection and ranging (LiDAR) information and classified automatically by following certain classification model logic (for the detailed analysis methodology, please refer to the 2018 Land Cover Documentation released by Toronto Parks, Forestry and Recreation [54]). We combined the shrub class with the grass class to form the shrub–grass class to reduce the classification bias. In other words, the vegetation components of trees and shrub–grass were distinguished in this study, and based on this, the indicator of the ratio of trees to shrubs–grass was calculated to measure green space structure (Table 1). Notably, the original data of the trees, shrubs, and grass were not presented by the unit of the neighborhood. Using ArcGIS 10.3, they were extracted from the Toronto land cover dataset first according to the class codes, and the tool of Intersect was applied to connect their geographic locations with neighborhood shapes (transformation of projection coordinates was performed during this process). Then, the areas of trees, shrubs, and grass at the neighborhood level were, respectively, summarized in Excel 2007. After this, the ratio of trees to shrubs–grass in each research unit could be calculated (Appendix A Table A1).

2.3.3. Mediator Variables

Inhaled substances and particles that may provoke allergic reactions or irritate the airways are regarded as the strongest risk factors for developing asthma [2], and many of them, such as NO2, SO2, VOCs, and O3, as well as PM, also have adverse impacts on potential asthmatics [9]. Hence, considering the ecological benefits of green space structure in improving air quality, we took the comprehensive indicator of total pollutants released into the air (including 25 priority chemicals) as one of the possible mediators between green space structure and asthma (Table 1 and Appendix A Table A1). Additionally, ultrafine particles (UFPs) have been reported to cause serious detriments to public respiratory health for a relatively long time through directly permeating cell membranes and inducing severe epithelial damage and alveolar macrophage chemotaxis [55,56]. Therefore, the indicator of UFPs was considered as another possible mediator (Table 1). The data of UFPs were derived from Sabaliauskas et al. [57], and we obtained the authors’ permission. It is important to note that although UFPs were measured in 2008 and were inconsistent with the year of asthma and green spaces measured (Appendix A Table A1), such inconsistency can still be accepted. As the average change rate of total pollutants released into the air in Toronto from 2012 to 2018 was 2% (negative value, calculation based on the Toronto Annual ChemTRAC Reports [58]), this means that air quality did not change significantly during this period. UPFs, as a component of air pollutants, likely experience a similar change trend.

2.3.4. Moderator Variable

Tree species play a crucial role in improving air quality due to their morphological characteristics [15]. For example, compared to bushy coniferous species, broad-leaf trees have a higher ability to capture PM [17]. Similarly, compared to leathery- and smooth-leaf trees, those with hairy and rough leaves are more successful in reducing particle concentrations [17]. In other words, tree species can influence the indirect pathway between green space structures and asthma through altering the reduction effect of green space structure on air pollution. Additionally, vegetation diversity/richness has been found to potentially enhance the reduction effect on PM by improving the greenness quantity of the leaf area [59]. For the same structure of vegetation components, the richer the vegetation species are, the better their ability to reduce PM [37]. Moreover, various vegetation species have the potential to generate different levels of pollen allergenicity [60] and microbial communities [61,62], which probably influences the direct mechanism of green space structures on the prevalence of asthma via microbial diversity. Considering that this study analyzed by the unit of the neighborhood, it was impossible to determine all of the vegetation species (including trees, shrubs, and grass/herbs) in each neighborhood to calculate the vegetation diversity/richness. Hence, the indicator of (street) tree diversity was applied to partially reflect the diversity/richness of the vegetation in the study area (Table 1). Similar to the trees, shrubs, and grass, the original data of tree species needed to be attached to the neighborhood shapes first. Thus, the process methods were the same as those mentioned above, but transformation of the projection coordinates was not necessary during this process. It is worth noting that while tree species are plentiful, they vary by neighborhood, and some of them exist in several neighborhoods. Therefore, categorizing tree species on a more general level (genus) is necessary before matching them to neighborhood units, which can facilitate the calculation of tree diversity. For the detailed calculation method, please refer to Appendix A Table A1.

2.3.5. Covariates

Asthma is a complex chronic disease, which can be triggered by multiple factors, including asthma-related genes, indoor and outdoor allergens, tobacco smoke, chemical irritants, and pollen [2]. Since this research was conducted at the population level, individual-level factors were not taken into consideration. Regarding existing findings and data accessibility, factors such as greenness (measured by the percentage of green space), income (measured by average total income), number of family members (measured by average household size), and ethnic group (measured by the percentage of total visible minorities) that possibly influence the prevalence of asthma were selected as the covariates [1,6,63] (Table 1). Therein, the indicators of sibling numbers, family size, etc., were applied to measure the influence of sibship size on asthma or wheezing in previous research, since they are considered as a potential protective factor for allergy-related issues (some research defined this phenomenon as the “sibling effect”) [64]. Different from children-targeted studies, our research additionally included adults. Compared to the number of siblings, family size might be a more appropriate indicator. Therefore, we took the obtained data of household size as a confounder that potentially influences the prevalence of asthma to be controlled. Notably, all of the covariates were calculated at the neighborhood level (Appendix A Table A1).

3. Results

As described in Table 2, the prevalence of asthma varied across age and gender. Compared to adults, children had a higher risk of developing asthma. For people aged 0–19 years, male asthmatics accounted for the majority, while for those aged 20 years and above, there were more female than male asthmatics. Such characteristics of the prevalence of asthma are consistent with existing findings [1]. The mean ratio of trees to shrubs–grass indicates that most neighborhoods were able to provide canopy space for outdoor activities [65]. From the maximum and minimum values of UFPs and pollutants released into the air (PRA), we can infer that significant differences in air pollution exist among the neighborhoods. However, tree diversity did not vary significantly. The relatively high value of percentage of green space (POGS) indicates that the whole population had potential for high green space exposure. Moreover, the rather high mean percentage of total visible minorities (PTVM) reflects that most neighborhoods had highly diverse ethnic groups. To intuitively present the independent, dependent, mediator, and moderator variables, their spatial distributions at the neighborhood level are depicted in Appendix A Figure A1, Figure A3, Figure A3, Figure A4, Figure A5, Figure A6, Figure A7, Figure A8, Figure A9, Figure A10, Figure A11, Figure A12 and Figure A13.
As the partial influencing pathway (Figure 2), the correlations between green space structure and air pollution, as well as the probable moderator (tree diversity), were analyzed first. As shown in Table 3, the ratio of trees to shrubs–grass (RTSG) was negatively related to UFPs and had no significant association with the PRA. On the contrary, the relationship between the POGS and the PRA was negative, but the POGS had no significant association with UFPs. Moreover, tree diversity (TD) did not play a role in influencing UFPs or the PRA (neither coefficient of TD was statistically significant), and could not adjust the relationship between the RTSG and UFPs or the PRA (neither coefficient of the interaction between the RTSG and TD (Int_1) was statistically significant). Intriguingly, total income (TI) had a positive impact on UFPs but did not influence the PRA.
The overall analysis results are outlined in Table 4. In general, the RTSG had a significantly negative relationship with asthmatics aged 0–19 years, no matter if they were female or male, while it had no impact on adult asthmatics. Unexpectedly, neither UFPs nor the PRA were found to correlate with the prevalence of asthma. Interestingly, although TD did not directly influence the prevalence of asthma, it could make a difference by adjusting the relationship between the RTSG and asthma. In other words, moderated by TD, the influence of the RTSG on asthma could be statistically significant. However, Int_1 was statistically significant only in adult male asthmatics. Except for the POGS, the other three selected covariates played a role in the prevalence of asthma. In particular, household size (HS) and the PTVM influenced all asthmatic groups with statistical significance, while TI was only significant in the adult female asthmatics.
UFPs and the PRA did not correlate with the prevalence of asthma in this study, which indicates the RTSG did not affect asthma mediated by UFPs or the PRA. However, the RTSG had the potential to directly influence asthma (Table 4). Detailed conditional effects analysis contributed to a better understanding of how the RTSG, as well as TD, influences the prevalence of asthma at different threshold intervals. As discussed above, the RSTG did not statistically correlate with adult asthmatics, but when moderated by TD (value in the 84th percentile), it had a significant protective influence on asthmatics (Table 5). However, the moderation effect of TD on the RSTG only functioned significantly for adult male asthmatics. Moreover, despite the Int_1 coefficient not being statistically significant in asthmatics aged 0–19 years, this does not mean that TD cannot adjust its association with the RSTG. As depicted in Table 5, compared to the conditional effect of the RSTG on asthmatics aged 0–19 years, with TD being in the 50th percentile, it was significantly higher when TD was in the 84th percentile. In other words, from the whole perspective, TD did not moderate the relationship between the RSTG and the prevalence of asthmatics aged 0–19 years, but there was a significant moderation effect when TD reached a certain threshold interval (84th percentile in this study). Collectively, the RSTG can play a direct role in developing asthma for those aged 0–19 years. Additionally, it could also influence the prevalence of adult male asthma when moderated by TD. However, the moderation effect of TD on the RSTG only existed in the 84th percentile in this study. It is noteworthy that the RSTG did not influence adult female asthma; even when moderated by relatively high TD, the influence of the RSTG was still not significant.

4. Discussion

In general, the hypothesis of the direct pathway, as illustrated in Figure 2, was confirmed in this study, but only in asthmatics aged 0–19 years. For adult male asthmatics, only when the RSTG was moderated by the 84th percentile TD were they influenced by the RSTG. In other words, the ratio of trees to shrubs–grass has the potential to directly reduce the prevalence of asthma for residents aged 0–19 years, whether it is moderated by tree diversity or not. However, it did not exert a reduction effect on the prevalence of asthma for people aged 20 years and above until moderated by the relatively high tree diversity. However, this protective influence did not exist in adult female asthmatics. This might be due to the difference in green space use for different groups. As discussed above, the direct pathway between the ratio of trees to shrubs–grass and asthma is based on the hypothesis of biodiversity, which implies that actual green space use is the precondition for green spaces to influence asthma prevalence via diverse microbiota. Specifically, only when people are physically exposed to green spaces is it possible for the micro-composition of green spaces to improve the microbiota on human skin [46]. For children, adolescents, and adults, the esthetic attributes of green spaces, such as the richness and diversity of the vegetation, are important factors that influence the duration and frequency of their green space use [66]. Nevertheless, women are less likely to use green spaces if they are perceived as being unsafe [67], while men are not easily influenced by unsafe perceptions [68]. Additionally, the frequency of males’ usage of green spaces increases with their age, up until 80 years old, whereas this phenomenon does not exist in women [69]. Given this, whether or not the ratio of trees to shrubs–grass directly exerts an influence on asthma seems to partially depend on whether people use green spaces or not.
Besides, asthma is a complex chronic respiratory disease. Besides the factors that we focused on at the population level in this study, there are many other individual-level factors that impact the prevalence of asthma, such as genes and lifestyle [1]. In contrast to atopy and family asthma history as the major triggers for childhood asthma, adult asthma mainly correlates with the female gender, smoking habits, and low socioeconomic status [70]. In other words, even if the ratio of trees to shrubs–grass can play a protective role in the process of developing asthma, these individual adverse factors might offset such effects. Moreover, the protective roles of biodiversity, which are performed by increasing human microbiota, may be more effective for children and adolescent asthmatics, since they are susceptible to allergic atopy, and diverse microbials obtained from green spaces have the potential to improve their immunoregulatory capacity, which possibly protects them from developing chronic inflammatory diseases [71]. As a result, the ratio of trees to shrubs–grass has a decreasing effect on the prevalence of asthma in those aged 0–19 years and such an influence can be enhanced by tree diversity. However, it makes no difference in the prevalence of adult asthma on the whole and needs extra adjustment/enhancement of the moderator (tree diversity) to make the influence on adult male asthma significant.
Unexpectedly, we did not find a statistically significant relationship between UFPs or the PRA and the prevalence of asthma. In other words, the hypothesis of the indirect influencing pathway was not confirmed in this study. Several possibilities can explain such results. First of all, unlike previous studies analyzing certain single pollutants’ influences on asthma, this study used the PRA, a comprehensive indicator. This indicator refers not only to the pollutants that have been reported to positively correlate with asthma (NO2, PM2.5, etc.), but also contains other substances that possibly have no significant relationship with asthma (chloroform, dichloromethane, etc.). In other words, neighborhoods with high total amounts of priority substances released into the air do not necessarily have high concentrations of NO2, PM2.5, etc., which may be the cause of the nonsignificant relationship between the PRA and asthma. Second, the value of UFPs used in this study was probably lower than the value that it should be in reality. Existing studies suggest that the UFPs concentration has a negative correlation with ambient temperature and it is relatively higher in winter months [72,73]. However, the UFPs data applied in this study were measured in the summer, when the temperature was 25–32 °C [57]. Therefore, compared to the actual UFPs exposure, the measured UFPs concentration had probably not yet reached the threshold to influence asthma. Finally, the time inconsistency between the air pollution data, especially the UFPs and asthma data, may also be important. Although the annual change rate of total pollutants released into the air was small, it was still different from that in the year when the data of asthma were collected. Thus, the time bias of these variables might partially explain the uncorrelated relationship between air pollution and the prevalence of asthma.
The analysis also found that PTVM has a negative relationship with asthma prevalence, which resonates with the existing conclusions [74,75]. On the one hand, previous studies have shown that the duration of residence of immigrants in developed countries is positively associated with asthma prevalence, as well as asthma-related outcomes [76,77], and compared with the native-born people, immigrants, as well as their children, have lower asthma morbidity [78]. This might be due to early life exposure in their home countries that can continuously protect them [74]. On the other hand, it has also been found that the prevalence of asthma differs between ethnic groups [79,80]. For example, Hispanic individuals have a lower risk of developing asthma than non-Hispanic White and Black individuals [81]. Chaldean and Arab individuals have a lower prevalence of asthma than non-Middle Eastern white and African American individuals [82]. A great deal of evidence has suggested that genetic variation and gene–environment interactions are moderately accountable for the ethnic discrepancy in asthma morbidity and prevalence [83,84]. As discussed above, the negative association between PTVM and asthma prevalence possibly results from the relatively short residence time and low asthma-related genes of visible minorities in Toronto compared with non-minorities. Household size was found to be positively related to the prevalence of asthma, which aligns with the conclusions from Weitzman et al. [85] using the same indicators, but contrasts the findings obtained by using the indicator of sibling numbers [86]. This discrepancy might be due to the different measurements of sibship size and targeted groups.
Household income was negatively related to the prevalence of adult asthma, especially female asthma, but had no evident influence on asthmatics aged 0–19 years. These findings can be partially explained by three aspects. First, as discussed above, the RTSG or the RTSG combined with TD can negatively influence the prevalence of total asthmatics aged 0–19 years and male asthmatics aged 20+ years, whereas this suppression effect of green space did not affect female asthmatics aged 20+ years. In other words, regarding the low-income group, the adverse influence of low income on total asthmatics aged 0–19 years and male asthmatics aged 20+ years can be alleviated or offset by the benefits of green spaces, but not for female asthmatics aged 20+ years. As a comparison, income seems to be more significant for female asthmatics aged 20+ years, and with the increase in household income, the impacts of the lower economic status are mitigated. Second, a series of studies have found that, compared to male asthmatics, female asthmatics tend to spend more on medication and become hospitalized, even with a similar asthma severity as male asthmatics [87,88] as they have a more sensitive perception of asthma and are more likely to report more severe asthma-related symptoms [89]. As a result, the preference of taking healthcare use-related actions probably results in income level becoming more significant for female asthmatics than male asthmatics. Correspondingly, high income can exert a negative influence on the prevalence of asthma in females. It is equally important that asthma prevalence is also possibly influenced by smoking and stress [1,70,90]. As has been revealed, chronic stress is positively correlated with interleukin production and eosinophil counts, which implicates the inflammatory process in asthma, while higher family savings contribute to reducing interleukin production and eosinophil counts [91]. Moreover, stress can promote tobacco use [92], and, compared with males, females are more likely to smoke when managing stress [93]. However, household income is negatively related to nicotine dependence and chronic stress, and it can moderate the positive relationship between stress and smoking [92]. Therefore, household income possibly influences adult asthmatics through tobacco use and chronic stress, and higher income can provide alleviation for adult asthmatics (especially for female asthmatics).
Greenness, measured by the percentage of green space, is not associated with asthma, as revealed, which is in line with some existing studies. For example, Dadvand et al. found that greenness, measured by the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), is not associated with the prevalence of asthma, while living close to parks causes a significant difference in the prevalence of current asthma [30]. Nevertheless, there are other different conclusions. Zeng et al. found that NDVI negatively correlates with the prevalence of asthma and wheezing [28]. Contrarily, Andrusaityte et al. reported that greenness is positively related to the risk of asthma [24]. The inconsistencies among different studies on the relationship between greenness and asthma may be due to the differences in measurements, locations, and scales of greenness. For instance, Dadvand et al. (Spain) measured greenness within the buffer area of respondents’ geocoded addresses, while Zeng et al. focused on the greenness surrounding schools, and Andrusaityte et al. (Lithuania) used the mean NDVI within the buffer areas of participants’ homes. In this study, however, instead of concentrating on the surrounding greenness of certain land use types, greenness was calculated at the neighborhood level and measured by the percentage of green space (total vegetation).
It is important to note the potential limitations in this study. First, the vegetation types of trees, shrubs, and grass were classified automatically with the assistance of LiDAR information, which might have resulted in slight differences from the vegetation structure in reality. Although shrubs and grass were treated as one category in this study, classification bias probably still influenced the analysis results. Moreover, the time inconsistencies (data were generated in different years) among the data of air pollution, green spaces, and asthma may have also cause differences in the analysis results. For instance, the reason that a mediation effect of air pollution on the relationship between the ratio of trees to shrubs–grass and the prevalence of asthma was not found in this study might be partially attributed to this. Additionally, the analysis presented in this study was based at the population level, so many asthma-related impact factors at the individual level were not considered. The co-effects of these positive and adverse factors can jointly exert their influence upon the development of asthma. Thus, without accounting for individual-based impact factors, the conclusions generated in this study may have overemphasized or overlooked the effects of the selected factors upon asthma prevalence. Finally, some studies have suggested that the geographic context is also important. Studies conducted in different locations might generate different or even contrary conclusions on the same issues [25]. Therefore, the limitations of this research, as explained above, need to be kept in mind when applying the conclusions to other research contexts or practices.

5. Conclusions

This study mainly explored the two pathways between green space structure (measured by the ratio of trees to shrubs–grass) and the prevalence of asthma (categorized into nine detailed indicators by gender and age) based on controlling the related covariates at the population level. In particular, the direct pathway is based on the biodiversity hypothesis, and the indirect pathway is related to the green structure influencing the prevalence of asthma by reducing air pollution. According to the analysis, the direct pathway was statistically significant for those aged 0–19 years, while the indirect pathway was not well justified. Furthermore, green space structure can play a protective role for male asthmatics aged 20 years and above when moderated by a higher tree diversity, whereas this effect did not exist in female asthmatics aged 20 years and above, even when moderated by higher tree diversity. Additionally, green space structure can generate a protective effect for asthmatics aged 0–19 years, whether female or male, and such a protective influence can be enhanced by a higher tree diversity.

Author Contributions

Y.D. and H.L. jointly conceptualized the study and analytical design, conducted the analyses, interpreted the results, and wrote and reviewed the manuscript drafts; Y.D. and T.Z. collected the data and preprocessed them. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Ministry of Education (grant number 19GBQY083) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number D1218006).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank the University of Toronto researchers (Kelly Sabaliauskas and Greg Evans) for providing the data on ultrafine particles applied in this study. Additionally, thanks are given to the anonymous reviewers for providing many insightful comments and suggestions that have greatly enhanced the quality of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table
Table A1. Variables and requisite data.
Table A1. Variables and requisite data.
VariablesDescriptionDataCalculation
CategoryIndicatorsRequisite DataSourceTime
Dependent variablesPTA_allNumbers of asthmatics per 100 people (including male, female, and both sexes) at all ages, 0–19 years, and 20+ yearsPrevalence of asthmaNumber (/100) of total, male, and female asthmatics at all ages at the neighborhood levelOntario Community Health Profiles Partnership2016–2017N/A
PMA_all
PFA_all
PTA_0–19Number (/100) of total, male, and female asthmatics aged 0–19 years at the neighborhood level
PMA_0–19
PFA_0–19
PTA_20+Total asthmatics, female and male asthmatics, total population, and females and males at neighborhood level (aged 20+ years)Total asthmatics ∗ 100/total population (aged 20+)
PMA_20+Male asthmatics ∗ 100/total males (aged 20+)
PFA_20+Female asthmatics ∗ 100/total females (aged 20+)
Mediator variablesUFPsUltrafine particles with diameters mainly between 8 and 300 nm; the majority of measuring sites concern railroads, expressways, arterial road, etc.Air pollutionMean particle number concentrations (cm–3) at the neighborhood levelSabaliauskas et al. (2015)2008N/A
PRATotal pollutants released into the air, total amount of priority substances released into the air, a comprehensive indicator, including different pollutant chemicals, such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs), NOx, and PM2.5Pollutants released into the air (kg) at the neighborhood levelToronto Social Development, Finance and Administration2012N/A
Independent variableRTSGRatio of tree areas to shrub and grass areas, an indicator of the vertical component characteristic of vegetationGreen space structureTree areas and shrub areas at the neighborhood levelToronto Parks, Forestry and Recreation2018Tree areas/(shrub areas + grass areas)
Moderator variablesTDTree diversity, a measurement of the richness and diversity of street treesBiodiversityStreet tree species at the neighborhood level2017
CovariatesPOGSPercentage of green space (total vegetated areas) at the neighborhood level, reflection of the quantity of total vegetationGreennessTree, shrub, grass, and neighborhood areas2018(tree areas + shrub areas + grass areas)/neighborhood areas
TITotal income, the sum of certain incomes of the statistical unit for the population aged 15 years and over in private householdsEconomicsTotal income (average amount) at the neighborhood levelToronto Social Development, Finance and Administration2016N/A
HSHousehold size, the number of persons in a private household, a characteristic of dwellingThe average number of persons in a household at the neighborhood level2016N/A
PTVMPercentage of total visible minorities, indirect reflection of genetic diversity; Employment Equity Act defines visible minorities as “persons, other than Aboriginal peoples, who are non-Caucasian in race or non-white in color”DemographicsTotal visible minorities and neighborhood populations2016Total visible minority number/neighborhood population
Note: (1) N/A means calculation is not required and detailed values of corresponding indicators have been offered. (2) In the “Calculation” column, all slashes, except for that in “N/A,” mean “divided by”. (3) The letters in the formula of tree diversity represent, respectively, that n is the total tree species and Pi means the percentage of species i among the total trees at the neighborhood level.
Ijerph 18 05852 g0a1 550
Figure A1. Distribution of the prevalence of female asthmatics at all ages (PFA_all).
Figure A1. Distribution of the prevalence of female asthmatics at all ages (PFA_all).
Ijerph 18 05852 g0a1
Ijerph 18 05852 g0a2 550
Figure A2. Distribution of the prevalence of male asthmatics at all ages (PMA_all).
Figure A2. Distribution of the prevalence of male asthmatics at all ages (PMA_all).
Ijerph 18 05852 g0a2
Ijerph 18 05852 g0a3 550
Figure A3. Distribution of the prevalence of total asthmatics at all ages (PTA_all).
Figure A3. Distribution of the prevalence of total asthmatics at all ages (PTA_all).
Ijerph 18 05852 g0a3
Ijerph 18 05852 g0a4 550
Figure A4. Distribution of the prevalence of female asthmatics aged 0–19 years (PFA_0–19).
Figure A4. Distribution of the prevalence of female asthmatics aged 0–19 years (PFA_0–19).
Ijerph 18 05852 g0a4
Ijerph 18 05852 g0a5 550
Figure A5. Distribution of the prevalence of male asthmatics aged 0–19 years (PMA_0–19).
Figure A5. Distribution of the prevalence of male asthmatics aged 0–19 years (PMA_0–19).
Ijerph 18 05852 g0a5
Ijerph 18 05852 g0a6 550
Figure A6. Distribution of the prevalence of total asthmatics aged 0–19 years (PTA_0–19).
Figure A6. Distribution of the prevalence of total asthmatics aged 0–19 years (PTA_0–19).
Ijerph 18 05852 g0a6
Ijerph 18 05852 g0a7 550
Figure A7. Distribution of the prevalence of female asthmatics aged 20 years and above (PFA_20+).
Figure A7. Distribution of the prevalence of female asthmatics aged 20 years and above (PFA_20+).
Ijerph 18 05852 g0a7
Ijerph 18 05852 g0a8 550
Figure A8. Distribution of the prevalence of male asthmatics aged 20 years and above (PMA_20+).
Figure A8. Distribution of the prevalence of male asthmatics aged 20 years and above (PMA_20+).
Ijerph 18 05852 g0a8
Ijerph 18 05852 g0a9 550
Figure A9. Distribution of the prevalence of total asthmatics aged 20 years and above (PTA_20+).
Figure A9. Distribution of the prevalence of total asthmatics aged 20 years and above (PTA_20+).
Ijerph 18 05852 g0a9
Ijerph 18 05852 g0a10 550
Figure A10. Distribution of the ratio of trees to shrubs–grass (RTSG).
Figure A10. Distribution of the ratio of trees to shrubs–grass (RTSG).
Ijerph 18 05852 g0a10
Ijerph 18 05852 g0a11 550
Figure A11. Distribution of tree diversity (TD).
Figure A11. Distribution of tree diversity (TD).
Ijerph 18 05852 g0a11
Ijerph 18 05852 g0a12 550
Figure A12. Distribution of ultrafine particles (UFPs).
Figure A12. Distribution of ultrafine particles (UFPs).
Ijerph 18 05852 g0a12
Ijerph 18 05852 g0a13 550
Figure A13. Distribution of pollutants released into the air (PRA).
Figure A13. Distribution of pollutants released into the air (PRA).
Ijerph 18 05852 g0a13

References

  1. Trivedi, M.; Denton, E. Asthma in children and adults—What are the differences and what can they tell us about asthma. Front. Pediatrics 2019, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. World Health Organisation. Asthma. 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/asthma (accessed on 1 December 2020).
  3. To, M.; Tsuzuki, R.; Katsube, O.; Yamawaki, S.; Soeda, S.; Kono, Y.; Honda, N.; Kano, I.; Haruki, K.; To, Y. Persistent asthma from childhood to adulthood presents a distinct phenotype of adult asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2020, 8, 1921–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hayden, L.P.; Cho, M.H.; Raby, B.A.; Beaty, T.H.; Silverman, E.K.; Hersh, C.P. Childhood asthma is associated with COPD and known asthma variants in COPDGene: A genome-wide association study. Respir. Res. 2018, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Asthma Canada. A Snapshot of Asthma in Canada: 2019 Annual Asthma Survey Report. 2019. Available online: https://asthma.ca/what-we-do/research/asthma-canada-research/ (accessed on 1 December 2020).
  6. Aarab, R.; Vijverberg, S.J.H.; Prins, M.; Snijder, M.B.; van Ree, R.; Fokkens, W.J.; Zwinderman, A.H.; Bel, E.H.D.; van der Zee, A.H.M. Prevalence of and factors associated with adult-onset asthma in different ethnic groups: The HELIUS study. Respir. Med. 2019, 150, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ober, C.; Yao, T.C. The genetics of asthma and allergic disease: A 21st century perspective. Immunol. Rev. 2011, 242, 10–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Murrison, L.B.; Brandt, E.B.; Myers, J.B.; Hershey, G.K.K. Environmental exposures and mechanisms in allergy and asthma development. J. Clin. Investig. 2019, 129, 1504–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Tiotiu, A.I.; Novakova, P.; Nedeva, D.; Chong-Neto, H.J.; Novakova, S.; Steiropoulos, P.; Kowal, K. Impact of air pollution on asthma outcomes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gehring, U.; Wijga, A.H.; Koppelman, G.H.; Vonk, J.M.; Smit, H.A.; Brunekreef, B. Air pollution and the development of asthma from birth until young adulthood. Eur. Respir. J. 2020, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bowatte, G.; Lodge, C.; Lowe, A.J.; Erbas, B.; Perret, J.; Abramson, M.J.; Matheson, M.; Dharmage, S.C. The influence of childhood traffic-related air pollution exposure on asthma, allergy and sensitization: A systematic review and a meta-analysis of birth cohort studies. Allergy 2015, 70, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Guarnieri, M.; Balmes, J.R. Outdoor air pollution and asthma. Lancet 2014, 383, 1581–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Heijink, I.; van Oosterhout, A.; Kliphuis, N.; Jonker, M.; Hoffmann, R.; Telenga, E.; Klooster, K.; Slebos, D.J.; ten Hacken, N.; Postma, D.; et al. Oxidant-induced corticosteroid unresponsiveness in human bronchial epithelial cells. Thorax 2014, 69, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Nowak, D.J.; Civerolo, K.L.; Rao, S.T.; Sistla, G.; Luley, C.J.; Crane, D.E. A modeling study of the impact of urban trees on ozone. Atmos. Environ. 2000, 34, 1610–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nowak, D.J.; Crane, D.E.; Stevens, J.C. Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban For. Urban Green. 2006, 4, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, Y.S.; Fang, J.H. Forest and air pollution. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 26, 61–64. [Google Scholar]
  17. Beckett, K.P.; Freer-Smith, P.; Taylor, G. Effective tree species for local air-quality management. J. Arboric. 2000, 26, 12–19. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee, J.Y.; Lamichhane, D.K.; Lee, M.; Ye, S.; Kwon, J.H.; Park, M.S.; Kim, H.C.; Leem, J.H.; Hong, Y.C.; Kim, Y.; et al. Preventive effect of residential green space on infantile atopic dermatitis associated with prenatal air pollution exposure. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Rufo, J.C.; Paciencia, I.; Ribeiro, A.I. Green environments and allergic diseases in children: A scoping review. Curr. Epidemiol. Rep. 2019, 6, 442–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xing, Y.; Brimblecombe, P. Trees and parks as “the lungs of cities”. Urban For. Urban Green. 2020, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. von Hertzen, L.; Hanski, I.; Haahtela, T. Natural immunity: Biodiversity loss and inflammatory diseases are two global megatrends that might be related. EMBO Rep. 2011, 12, 1089–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hanski, I.; von Hertzen, L.; Fyhrquist, N.; Koskinen, K.; Torppa, K.; Laatikainen, T.; Karisola, P.; Auvinen, P.; Paulin, L.; Makela, M.J.; et al. Environmental biodiversity, human microbiota, and allergy are interrelated. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 8334–8339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Fuertes, E.; Markevych, I.; von Berg, A.; Bauer, C.P.; Berdel, D.; Koletzko, S.; Sugiri, D.; Heinrich, J. Greenness and allergies: Evidence of differential associations in two areas in Germany. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2014, 68, 787–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Andrusaityte, S.; Grazuleviciene, R.; Kudzyte, J.; Bernotiene, A.; Dedele, A.; Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J. Associations between neighbourhood greenness and asthma in preschool children in Kaunas, Lithuania: A case–control study. BMJ OPEN 2016, 6, e010341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Dzhambov, A.M.; Lercher, P.; Rudisser, J.; Browning, M.H.E.M.; Markevych, I. Allergic symptoms in association with naturalness, greenness, and greyness: A cross-sectional study in schoolchildren in the Alps. Environ. Res. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ferrante, G.; Asta, F.; Cilluffo, G.; De Sario, M.; Michelozzi, P.; La Grutta, S. The effect of residential urban greenness on allergic respiratory diseases in youth: A narrative review. World Allergy Organ. J. 2020, 13, 100096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Squillacioti, G.; Bellisario, V.; Levra, S.; Piccioni, P.; Bono, R. Greenness availability and respiratory health in a population of urbanised children in north-western Italy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Zeng, X.W.; Lowe, A.J.; Lodge, C.J.; Heinrich, J.; Roponen, M.; Jalava, P.; Guo, Y.M.; Hu, L.W.; Yang, B.Y.; Dharmage, S.C.; et al. Greenness surrounding schools is associated with lower risk of asthma in schoolchildren. Environ. Int. 2020, 143, 105967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Alcock, I.; White, M.; Cherrie, M.; Wheeler, B.; Taylor, J.; McInnes, R.; Kampe, E.O.I.; Vardoulakis, S.; Sarran, C.; Soyiri, I.; et al. Land cover and air pollution are associated with asthma hospitalisations: A cross sectional study. Environ. Int. 2017, 109, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dadvand, P.; Villanueva, C.M.; Font-Ribera, L.; Martinez, D.; Basagana, X.; Belmonte, J.; Vrijheid, M.; Grazuleviciene, R.; Kogevinas, M.; Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J. Risks and benefits of green spaces for children: A cross-sectional study of associations with sedentary behaviour, obesity, asthma, and allergy. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 1329–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lovasi, G.S.; O’Neil-Dunne, J.P.; Lu, J.W.T.; Sheehan, D.; Perzanowski, M.S.; MacFaden, S.W.; King, K.L.; Matte, T.; Miller, R.L.; Hoepner, L.A.; et al. Urban tree canopy and asthma, wheeze, rhinitis, and allergic sensitization to tree pollen in a New York City birth cohort. Environ. Health Perspect. 2013, 121, 494–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. DellaValle, C.T.; Triche, E.W.; Leaderer, B.P.; Bell, M.L. Effects of ambient pollen concentrations on frequency and severity of asthma symptoms among asthmatic children. Epidemiology 2012, 23, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Ghiani, A.; Aina, R.; Asero, R.; Bellotto, E.; Citterio, S. Ragweed pollen collected along high-traffic roads shows a higher allergenicity than pollen sampled in vegetated areas. Allergy 2012, 67, 887–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Eisenman, T.S.; Churkina, G.; Jariwala, S.P.; Kumar, P.; Lovasi, G.S.; Pataki, D.E.; Weinberger, K.R.; Whitlow, T.H. Urban trees, air quality, and asthma: An interdisciplinary review. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2019, 187, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lovasi, G.S.; Quinn, J.W.; Neckerman, K.M.; Perzanowski, M.S.; Rundle, A. Children living in areas with more street trees have lower prevalence of asthma. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2008, 62, 647–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Liu, Y.; Wang, X.L.; Han, H.Z.; Jiang, Y.H.; Li, S.H.; Zhang, N.; Chen, C. Air PM10 concentration of urban green space and its relationship with environmental factors. J. South. Agric. 2015, 45, 1469–1473. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sun, X.D.; Li, H.M.; Liu, X.; Xu, M. Subduction ability of different green space structure on atmospheric particulate matter. Environ. Chem. 2017, 36, 289–295. [Google Scholar]
  38. Qiu, L.; Liu, F.; Zhang, X.; Gao, T. Reducing effect of air particulate matter concentration by green spaces with different vegetation structure in city park. Res. Environ. Sci. 2018, 31, 1685–1694. [Google Scholar]
  39. Jae-Eun, K.; Sonoko, W.; Luchman, H.; Nobukazu, N. Urban green spaces and soil microbial diversity in Jakarta, Indonesia. Hikobia 2006, 14, 459–468. [Google Scholar]
  40. Waymouth, V.; Miller, R.E.; Ede, F.; Bissett, A.; Aponte, C. Variation in soil microbial communities: Elucidating relationships with vegetation and soil properties, and testing sampling effectiveness. Plant Ecol. 2020, 221, 837–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhao, J.; Wan, S.Z.; Li, Z.A.; Shao, Y.H.; Xu, G.L.; Liu, Z.F.; Zhou, L.X.; Fu, S. Dicranopteris-dominated understory as major driver of intensive forest ecosystem in humid subtropical and tropical region. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2012, 49, 78–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, K.; Bao, W.K.; Yang, B.; Hu, B. The effects of understory vegetation on soil microbial community composition and structure. Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. 2017, 23, 1178–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mitchell, R.J.; Keith, A.M.; Potts, J.M.; Ross, J.; Reid, E.; Dawson, L.A. Overstory and understory vegetation interact to alter soil community composition and activity. Plant Soil 2012, 352, 65–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Shao, Y.H.; Bao, W.K.; Chen, D.M.; Eisenhauer, N.; Zhang, W.X.; Pang, X.Y.; Xu, G.L.; Fu, S.L. Using structural equation modeling to test established theory and develop novel hypotheses for the structuring forces in soil food webs. Pedobiologia 2015, 58, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yin, K.; Zhang, L.; Chen, D.M.; Tian, Y.C.; Zhang, F.F.; Wen, M.P.; Yuan, C. Understory herb layer exerts strong controls on soil microbial communities in subtropical plantations. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Selway, C.A.; Mills, J.G.; Weinstein, P.; Skelly, C.; Yadav, S.; Lowe, A.; Breed, M.F.; Weyrich, L.S. Transfer of environmental microbes to the skin and respiratory tract of humans after urban green space exposure. Environ. Int. 2020, 145, 106084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Toronto Parks, Forestry and Recreation. Sustaining & Expanding the Urban Forest: Toronto’s Strategic Forest Management Plan. 2013. Available online: https://www.toronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/8e0e-Strategic-Forest-Management-Plan-2012_22.pdf (accessed on 27 February 2021).
  48. Toronto at a Glance. Available online: https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/data-research-maps/toronto-at-a-glance/ (accessed on 1 December 2020).
  49. Ontario Community Health Profiles Partnership. Scio-Demographic, Census Canada (Visible Minority). 2016. Available online: http://www.ontariohealthprofiles.ca/dataTablesON.php?varTab=HPDtbl&select1=105 (accessed on 1 December 2020).
  50. Asthma Canada. Understanding Asthma. Available online: https://asthma.ca/get-help/understanding-asthma/ (accessed on 1 December 2020).
  51. Government of Canada. Asthma in Canada. Available online: https://health-infobase.canada.ca/datalab/asthma-blog.html (accessed on 1 December 2020).
  52. Ontario Community Health Profiles Partnership. Adult Health and Disease (Asthma). 2016. Available online: http://www.ontariohealthprofiles.ca/dataTablesON.php?varTab=HPDtbl&select1=7 (accessed on 1 December 2020).
  53. Toronto Public Health. 7th Annual ChemTRAC Report-2016 Reporting Year. 2018. Available online: https://www.toronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/8e73-ChTR-2016-highlights_report-FINAL180509MB_SI_sg_-Final.pdf (accessed on 1 December 2020).
  54. Toronto Parks, Forestry & Recreation. 2018 Land Cover Documentation. 2020. Available online: https://open.toronto.ca/dataset/forest-and-land-cover/ (accessed on 1 December 2020).
  55. Wu, J.Z.; Ge, D.D.; Zhou, L.F.; Hou, L.Y.; Zhou, Y.; Li, Q.Y. Effects of particulate matter on allergic respiratory diseases. Chronic Dis. Transl. Med. 2018, 4, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Mills, N.L.; Amin, N.; Robinson, S.D.; Anand, A.; Davies, J.; Patel, D.; de la Fuente, J.M.; Cassee, F.R.; Boon, N.A.; MacNee, W.; et al. Do inhaled carbon nanoparticles translocate directly into the circulation in humans? Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006, 173, 426–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Sabaliauskas, K.; Jeong, C.H.; Yao, X.H.; Reali, C.; Sun, T.; Evans, G.J. Development of a land-use regression model for ultrafine particles in Toronto, Canada. Atmos. Environ. 2015, 110, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Toronto Public Health. Tracking and Reducing Chemicals in Toronto: Annual ChemTRAC Reports 2012–2018. Available online: https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/data-research-maps/research-reports/public-health-significant-reports/chemtrac-reports-archive/ (accessed on 1 December 2020).
  59. Ding, Y.; Li, G.C.; Lu, X.; Gao, M. Spatial heterogeneity and air pollution removal by green space in greater pearl river delta. Prog. Geogr. 2011, 30, 1415–1421. [Google Scholar]
  60. Lai, Y.; Kontokosta, C.E. The impact of urban street tree species on air quality and respiratory illness: A spatial analysis of large-scale, high-resolution urban data. Health Place 2019, 56, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Zeng, J.Y.; Vuong, T.M.D.; Zhang, B.W.; Chen, Y.Z.; Zhang, G.C.; Bi, B. An investigation into whether effect of tree species on soil microbial community is related with deciduous property or leaf shape. Catena 2020, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Carey, C.J.; Glassman, S.I.; Bruns, T.D.; Aronson, E.L.; Hart, S.C. Soil microbial communities associated with giant sequoia: How does the world’s largest tree affect some of the world’s smallest organisms? Ecol. Evol. 2020, 10, 6593–6609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Idani, E.; Raji, H.; Maraghi, E.; Aghababaeian, H.; Madadizadeh, F.; Maryam, D. Risk factors associated with asthma among adults in Khuzestan, southwest Iran. Clin. Epidemiol. Glob. Health 2020, 8, 350–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Karmaus, W.; Botezan, C. Does a higher number of siblings protect against the development of allergy and asthma? A review. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2002, 56, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Zhang, X.W.; Li, Z.D.; Wang, J.L.; Zhao, C.L.; Liu, Y. Analysis of the ratio of arbor to shrub of several types of green space in Beijing. J. Beijing For. Univ. 2010, 32, 183–188. [Google Scholar]
  66. McCormack, G.R.; Rock, M.; Toohey, A.M.; Hignell, D. Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: A review of qualitative research. Health Place 2010, 16, 712–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ho, C.H.; Sasidharan, V.; Elmendorf, W.; Willits, F.K.; Graefe, A.; Godbey, G. Gender and ethnic variations in urban park preferences, visitation, and perceived benefits. J. Leis. Res. 2005, 37, 281–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Foster, C.; Hillsdon, M.; Thorogood, M. Environmental perceptions and walking in English adults. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2004, 58, 924–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Schipperijn, J.; Ekholm, O.; Stigsdotter, U.K.; Toftager, M.; Bentsen, P.; Kamper-Jorgensen, F.; Randrup, T.B. Factors influencing the use of green space: Results from a Danish national representative survey. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2010, 95, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Tan, D.J.; Walters, E.H.; Perret, J.L.; Burgess, J.A.; Johns, D.P.; Lowe, A.J.; Lodge, C.J.; Rezvan, P.H.; Simpson, J.A.; Morrison, S.; et al. Clinical and functional differences between early-onset and late-onset adult asthma: A population-based tasmanian longitudinal health study. Thorax 2016, 71, 981–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Rook, G.A. Regulation of the immune system by biodiversity from the natural environment: An ecosystem service essential to health. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 18360–18367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Wang, Y.G.; Zhu, Y.F.; Salinas, R.; Ramirez, D.; Karnae, S.; John, K. Roadside Measurements of Ultrafine Particles at a Busy Urban Intersection. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2008, 58, 1449–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wichmann, H.E.; Spix, C.; Tuch, T.; Wolke, G.; Peters, A.; Heinrich, J.; Kreyling, W.G.; Heyder, J. Daily mortality and fine and ultrafine particles in Erfurt, Germany part I: Role of particle number and particle mass. Res. Rep. Health Eff. Inst. 2000, 98, 5–86, discussion 87–94. [Google Scholar]
  74. Whitrow, M.J.; Harding, S. Asthma in Black African, Black Caribbean and South Asian adolescents in the MRC DASH study: A cross sectional analysis. BMC Pediatrics 2010, 10, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Vang, Z.M.; Sigouin, J.; Flenon, A.; Gagnon, A. Are immigrants healthier than native-born Canadians? A systematic review of the healthy immigrant effect in Canada. Ethn. Health 2017, 22, 209–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Powell, C.V.E.; Nolan, T.M.; Carlin, J.B.; Bennett, C.M.; Johnson, P.D.R. Respiratory symptoms and duration of residence in immigrant teenagers living in Melbourne, Australia. Arch. Dis. Child. 1999, 81, 159–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Kuehni, C.E.; Strippoli, M.P.F.; Low, N.; Silverman, M. Asthma in young south Asian women living in the United Kingdom: The importance of early life. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2007, 37, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Subramanian, S.V.; Jun, H.J.; Kawachi, I.; Wright, R.J. Contribution of race/ethnicity and country of orion to variations in lifetime reported asthma: Evidence for a nativity advantage. Am. J. Public Health 2009, 99, 690–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Forno, E.; Celedon, J.C. Asthma and ethnic minorities: Socioeconomic status and beyond. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009, 9, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Torgerson, D.G.; Ampleford, E.J.; Chiu, G.Y.; Gauderman, W.J.; Gignoux, C.R.; Graves, P.E.; Himes, B.E.; Levin, A.M.; Mathias, R.A.; Hancock, D.B.; et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies of asthma in ethnically diverse North American populations. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43, 887–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Moorman, J.E.; Rudd, R.A.; Johnson, C.A.; King, M.; Minor, P.; Bailey, C.; Scalia, M.R.; Akinbami, L.J. National surveillance for asthma—United States, 1980–2004. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2007, 56, pp. 1–54.
  82. Jamil, H.; Raymond, D.; Fakhouri, M.; Templin, T.; Khoury, R.; Fakhouri, H.; Arnetz, B.B. Self-reported asthma in Chaldeans, Arabs, and African Americans: Factors associated with asthma. J. Immigr. Minority Health 2011, 13, 568–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Nguyen, E.A.; Burchard, E.G. Asthma research for all of the United States. Pediatric Allergy Immunol. Pulmonol. 2012, 25, 128–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Reibman, J.; Liu, M.L. Genetics and asthma disease susceptibility in the US latino population. Mt. Sinai J. Med. 2010, 77, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Weitzman, M.; Gortmaker, S.; Sobol, A. Racial, social, and environmental risks for childhood asthma. Am. J. Dis. Child. 1990, 144, 1189–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ball, T.M.; Castro-Rodriguez, J.A.; Griffith, K.A.; Holberg, C.J.; Martinez, F.D.; Wright, A.L. Siblings, day-care attendance, and the risk of asthma and wheezing during childhood. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000, 343, 538–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Serra-Batlles, J.; Plaza, V.; Morejon, E.; Comella, A.; Brugues, J. Costs of asthma according to the degree of severity. Eur. Respir. J. 1998, 12, 1322–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Zein, J.G.; Erzurum, S.C. Asthma is Different in Women. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2015, 15, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Paivinen, M.K.; Keskinen, K.L.; Tikkanen, H.O. Swimming and asthma: Differences between women and men. J. Allergy 2013, 2013, 520913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Yonas, M.A.; Lange, N.E.; Celedon, J.C. Psychosocial stress and asthma morbidity. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2012, 12, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Chen, E.; Hanson, M.D.; Paterson, L.Q.; Griffin, M.J.; Walker, H.A.; Miller, G.E. Socioeconomic status and inflammatory processes in childhood asthma: The role of psychological stress. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2006, 117, 1014–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Hobkirk, A.L.; Krebs, N.M.; Muscat, J.E. Income as a moderator of psychological stress and nicotine dependence among adult smokers. Addict. Behav. 2018, 84, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Syed, I.U. Clearing the smoke screen: Smoking, alcohol consumption, and stress management techniques among cana-dian long-term care workers. Int. J. Environ. Public Health 2020, 17, 6027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijerph 18 05852 g001 550
Figure 1. Study area (source: Toronto Open Data).
Figure 1. Study area (source: Toronto Open Data).
Ijerph 18 05852 g001
Ijerph 18 05852 g002 550
Figure 2. Research framework.
Figure 2. Research framework.
Ijerph 18 05852 g002
Table
Table 1. The description of variables.
Table 1. The description of variables.
VariablesDescription
CategoryIndicatorsAbbreviations
Dependent variablesPrevalence of total asthmatics at all agesPTA_allNumbers of asthmatics per 100 people (including male, female, and both sexes) at all ages, 0–19 years, and 20+ yearsPrevalence of asthma
Prevalence of male asthmatics at all agesPMA_all
Prevalence of female asthmatics at all agesPFA_all
Prevalence of total asthmatics aged 0–19 yearsPTA_0–19
Prevalence of male asthmatics aged 0–19 yearsPMA_0–19
Prevalence of female asthmatics aged 0–19 yearsPFA_0–19
Prevalence of total asthmatics aged 20 years and abovePTA_20+
Prevalence of male asthmatics aged 20 years and abovePMA_20+
Prevalence of female asthmatics aged 20 years and abovePFA_20+
Independent variableRatio of trees to shrubs–grassRTSGRatio of tree areas to shrub and grass areas, an indicator of the vertical component characteristic of vegetationGreen space structure
Mediator variablesUltrafine particlesUFPsUltrafine particles with diameters mainly between 8 and 300 nm, the majority of measuring sites concern railroads, expressways, arterial road, etc.Air pollution
Pollutants released into the airPRATotal pollutants released into the air, total amount of priority substances released into the air, a comprehensive indicator, including different pollutant chemicals, such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs), NOx, and PM2.5
Moderator variable(street) Tree diversityTDTree diversity, a measurement of the richness and diversity of street treesBiodiversity
CovariatesPercentage of green spacePOGSPercentage of green space at the neighborhood level, reflection of the quantity of total vegetationGreenness
(average) Total incomeTITotal income, the sum of certain incomes of the statistical unit for the population aged 15 years and over in private households (at the neighborhood level)Economics
(average) Household sizeHSHousehold size, the number of persons in a private household, a characteristic of dwelling (at the neighborhood level)
Percentage of total visible minoritiesPTVMPPercentage of total visible minorities, indirect reflection of genetic diversity; Employment Equity Act defines visible minorities as “persons, other than Aboriginal peoples, who are non-Caucasian in race or non-white in color”Demographics
Table
Table 2. Descriptive statistics (before standardization).
Table 2. Descriptive statistics (before standardization).
Variables (Units)NMinimumMaximumMeanStd. Deviation
YPTA_all (/100 people)1408.0019.4014.382.24
PMA_all (/100 people)1408.0019.4014.272.20
PFA_all (/100 people)1408.0020.0014.502.35
PTA_0–19 (/100 people)1406.5028.6017.533.61
PMA_0–19 (/100 people)1407.1030.9020.184.07
PFA_0–19 (/100 people)1405.9026.1014.743.27
PTA_20+ (/100 people)1407.4018.2013.512.00
PMA_20+ (/100 people)1407.1016.2012.531.73
PFA_20+ (/100 people)1407.7020.1014.412.34
XRTSG (N/A)1400.5910.543.161.97
MUFPs (cm−3)1404077354,47543,447.2543,762.34
PRA (kg)14001,585,69058,944.02184,007.30
WTD (N/A)1402.212.992.660.18
CPOGS (N/A)1400.120.670.370.12
TI ($)14025,989308,01055,248.4938,738.60
HS (persons/household)1401.503.402.490.40
PTVM (N/A)1400.120.950.460.22
Valid N140
Note: (1) Y, X, M, W, and C represent the dependent, independent, mediator, moderator, and covariate variables, respectively. (2) “Valid N: 140” means that there were a total of 140 samples (research units) in this study, and all of the samples were considered in the analysis (no one was omitted). (3) “N/A” means indicators are dimensionless.
Table
Table 3. Coefficients of variables (outcome variable: Mediators).
Table 3. Coefficients of variables (outcome variable: Mediators).
Coefficients Variables
XWIC
RTSGTDInt_1POGSTIHSPTVM
UFPs−0.31 **−0.040.100.070.23 *0.200.17
PRA−0.100.05−0.01−0.32 **0.160.220.11
Note: (1) I represents the interaction of the moderator (W) and independent (X) variables, and Int_1 refers to the interaction between the RTSG and TD. (2) C includes the variables of POGS, TI, HS, and PTVM. (3) * p ≤ 0.05 and ** p ≤ 0.01.
Table
Table 4. Coefficients of variables (outcome variable: Prevalence of asthma).
Table 4. Coefficients of variables (outcome variable: Prevalence of asthma).
Coefficients Variables
XMWIC
RTSGUFPsPRATDInt_1POGSTIHSPTVM
At all agesBoth sexes−0.190.020.010.07−0.19 *0.12−0.23 *0.46 ***−0.53 ***
Male−0.190.030.020.08−0.18 *0.10−0.110.56 ***−0.48 ***
Female−0.170.010.010.07−0.180.13−0.33 **0.35 ***−0.54 ***
At 0–19 yearsBoth sexes−0.27 **0.010.020.09−0.070.12−0.060.53 ***−0.27 **
Male−0.25 *0.000.050.10−0.030.14−0.050.54 ***−0.29 **
Female−0.28 *0.02−0.020.06−0.120.09−0.080.49 ***−0.24 *
At 20+ yearsBoth sexes−0.130.030.000.06−0.20 *0.10−0.30 **0.36 ***−0.63 ***
Male−0.150.07−0.010.05−0.21 *0.03−0.150.43 ***−0.63 ***
Female−0.11−0.010.020.06−0.190.14−0.39 ***0.29 **−0.60 ***
Note: (1) Int_1 means the interaction between the RTSG and TD. (2) C includes the variables of POGS, TI, HS, and PTVM. (3) * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001. (4) Level of confidence for all confidence intervals in the output: 95.0000. (5) The dependent variables PTA_all, PMA_all, PFA_all, PTA_0–19, PMA_0–19, PFA_0–19, PTA_20+, PMA_20+, and PFA_20+ were taken into the analysis model one by one.
Table
Table 5. Conditional direct effect(s) of the RSTG on the prevalence of asthma.
Table 5. Conditional direct effect(s) of the RSTG on the prevalence of asthma.
TD PercentilesEffects
At All AgesAt 0–19 YearsAt 20+ Years
Both sexesMaleFemaleBoth SexesMaleFemaleBoth SexesMaleFemale
16th0.020.010.03−0.19−0.21−0.140.100.090.10
50th−0.19−0.20−0.17−0.27‒0.25‒0.28−0.13−0.15−0.11
84th−0.39−0.39−0.37−0.35–0.29–0.41−0.35−0.38−0.31
Note: (1) Conditional direct effect(s) of the RSTG on the prevalence of asthma: CRSTG + CInt_1 * TD, where CRSTG is the coefficient of the RSTG, CInt_1 is the coefficient of Int_1, and TD is the tree diversity. (2) Bold values represent p ≤ 0.05. (3) Level of confidence for all confidence intervals in the output: 95.0000. (4) TD values in conditional tables are the 16th, 50th, and 84th percentiles. (5) The dependent variables of PTA_all, PMA_all, PFA_all, PTA_0–19, PMA_0–19, PFA_0–19, PTA_20+, PMA_20+, and PFA_20+ were taken into the analysis model one by one.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dong, Y.; Liu, H.; Zheng, T. Association between Green Space Structure and the Prevalence of Asthma: A Case Study of Toronto. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5852. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18115852

AMA Style

Dong Y, Liu H, Zheng T. Association between Green Space Structure and the Prevalence of Asthma: A Case Study of Toronto. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(11):5852. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18115852

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dong, Yuping, Helin Liu, and Tianming Zheng. 2021. "Association between Green Space Structure and the Prevalence of Asthma: A Case Study of Toronto" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 11: 5852. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18115852

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop