Next Article in Journal
Prevalence and Impact of the Relative Age Effect on Competition Performance in Swimming: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Integration Experiences of Former Afghan Refugees in Australia: What Challenges Still Remain after Becoming Citizens?
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Impact of Mobility Restriction Strategies in the Control of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Modelling the Relation between COVID-19 Health and Community Mobility Data

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(19), 10560; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph181910560
by Adil Al Wahaibi *, Amal Al Maani, Fatma Alyaquobi, Abdullah Al Manji, Khalid Al Harthy, Bader Al Rawahi, Abdullah Alqayoudhi, Sulien Al Khalili, Amina Al-Jardani and Seif Al-Abri
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(19), 10560; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph181910560
Submission received: 23 September 2021 / Revised: 29 September 2021 / Accepted: 5 October 2021 / Published: 8 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Infectious Disease Epidemiology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear

The version received present improvements related to the older version. So, I believe that now the quality is suitable for publication. But there still some observations:


Second paragraph: "many studies and data analysing..." But the authors cited only two references. Please add more citations.


In Conclusion must be reviewed again.

Author Response

Second paragraph: "many studies and data analysing..." But the authors cited only two references. Please add more citations.

Thank you for the response, a third reference is added now. 

In Conclusion must be reviewed again.

Thank you, the conclusion is re-written and made more concise now. 

 

All the changes are now added to the main manuscript with track changes and yellow highlight.

This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.


Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear,

I evaluated again the paper. In general, the paper still unsuitable to IJERPH. The strong modifications were made on Introduction. But the other sections must be improve again.

 

Reviewer 2 Report

The changes made improved the understanding of the article. I only suggest a deepening of the conclusions.

Reviewer 3 Report

Overall the article met the journal requirements.

Back to TopTop