Next Article in Journal
Disparities in Healthcare Services and Spatial Assessments of Mobile Health Clinics in the Border Regions of Thailand
Next Article in Special Issue
Differential Bioaccumulation Patterns of α, β-Hexachlorobenzene and Dicofol in Adipose Tissue from the GraMo Cohort (Southern Spain)
Previous Article in Journal
Association between Weight Loss and Food Form in Older Individuals Residing in Long-Term Care Facilities: 1-Year Multicenter Longitudinal Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mercury Levels in Feathers of Penguins from the Antarctic Peninsula Area: Geographical and Inter-Specific Differences
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pharmaceutical Products and Pesticides Toxicity Associated with Microplastics (Polyvinyl Chloride) in Artemia salina

by
María Gemma Albendín
1,
Vanessa Aranda
1,
María Dolores Coello
2,*,
Carmen González-Gómez
1,
Rocío Rodríguez-Barroso
2,
José María Quiroga
2 and
Juana María Arellano
1
1
Toxicology Laboratory, University Institute of Marine Research (INMAR), International Campus of Excellence of the Sea (CEI MAR), Faculty of Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of Cádiz, 11510 Cádiz, Spain
2
Environmental Technologies Department, University Institute of Marine Research (INMAR), International Campus of Excellence of the Sea (CEI MAR), Faculty of Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of Cádiz, 11510 Cádiz, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(20), 10773; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph182010773
Submission received: 13 August 2021 / Revised: 6 October 2021 / Accepted: 7 October 2021 / Published: 14 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Threads in Environmental Toxicology)

Abstract

:
Pharmaceutical products, as well as insecticides and antimicrobials, have been extensively studied, but knowledge of their effects—especially those caused by their mixtures with microplastics—on aquatic organisms remains limited. However, it should be borne in mind that the state of knowledge on acute and chronic effects in aquatic organisms for pharmaceuticals and pesticides is not similar. In response, this investigation analyzed the presence of microplastics (polyvinyl chloride) and their impacts on the toxicity of chlorpyrifos (an insecticide) and triclosan (an antibacterial) when they coincide in the environment, alongside the two most consumed drugs of their type (hypolipemic and anticonvulsant, respectively), namely simvastatin and carbamazepine, in Artemia salina. LC50 and cholinesterase enzyme activity were calculated to determine the possible neurotoxicity associated with emergent contaminants in the treatments. The LC50 values obtained were 0.006 mg/dm3 for chlorpyrifos, 0.012 mg/dm3 for chlorpyrifos associated with microplastics, 4.979 mg/dm3 for triclosan, 4.957 mg/dm3 for triclosan associated with microplastics, 9.35 mg/dm3 for simvastatin, 10.29 mg/dm3 for simvastatin associated with microplastics, 43.25 mg/dm3 for carbamazepine and 46.50 mg/dm3 for carbamazepine associated with microplastics in acute exposure. These results indicate that the presence of microplastics in the medium reduces toxicity, considering the LC50 values. However, exposure to chlorpyrifos and carbamazepine, both alone and associated with microplastics, showed a decline in cholinesterase activity, confirming their neurotoxic effect. Nevertheless, no significant differences were observed with the biomarker cholinesterase between the toxicant and the toxicant with microplastics.

1. Introduction

Currently, aquatic systems, in some cases, show a significant deterioration. Human intervention is one of the sources of water pollution; domestic, industrial and agricultural activities use and produce large quantities of substances such as insecticides, antibacterials, plastics, drugs, etc. This complex mixture of substances with plastics could be responsible for environmental pollution, since aquatic/sediment/soil organisms could be especially exposed [1,2,3]. Plastic waste in the environment is an increasing problem that has generated a lot attention from both researchers and the general public. This debris fragments in the environment into smaller particles, such as microplastics (MP; <5 mm), whose presence has been detected until in the Atlantic gyre [4].
The presence of pharmaceuticals and their metabolites in groundwater, lakes, rivers, oceans and so forth has been confirmed by authors such as Liu et al. (2011) [5], Biel-Maeso et al. (2018) [6], Barbosa et al. (2019) [7] and Primrose et al. (2019) [8]. High concentrations of simvastatin and carbamazepine have been observed in the aquatic environment due to the progressive increase in their consumption in recent decades. Simvastatin is the most consumed hypolipemic drug in Spain, having increased by 670% since 2000 [9]. Similarly, carbamazepine is the most widely used anticonvulsant, with an increase in consumption of 41.52% since 2008 [10].
The high consumption of simvastatin and carbamazepine and their subsequent discharge into urban wastewater through human excretion, drug residues that are not properly disposed of and waste generated during their manufacture cause large quantities of drugs and their metabolites to reach wastewater stations (WWTPs) [11]. These toxic substances are not completely eliminated during treatment processes. Due to their high cost, most WWTPs do not have purification systems capable of totally eliminating pharmaceutical compounds. Instead, the effluent is typically dumped, and high concentrations of these products are maintained in aquatic ecosystems, where they can have toxic impacts on organisms [11]. Neuparth et al. (2014) [12] have shown that exposure to simvastatin disrupts the reproduction and growth of the amphipod crustacean Gammarus locusta in vivo. In vitro research has also indicated that this compound and its metabolite cause liver cytotoxicity in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), metabolic inhibition and loss of cell membrane integrity [13]. Carbamazepine has been found to produce harmful effects in organisms, such as moult and growth inhibition in the crustacean Eriocheir sinensis [14]; malformations during embryonic development in Mytilus galloprovincialis [15]; and neurotoxic effects, such as alterations in mobility and behavior, in Danio rerio embryos [16].
Today, a wide range of pesticides are used in agriculture and horticulture and play a key role in global food production. The main factors driving the increase in pesticide use are related to population growth, necessitating the intensified exploitation of agricultural land [17].
Chlorpyrifos (CPF) is an organophosphate that is used to control foliage and insect and arthropod pests in the soil in a variety of foods [18]. In 2019, the European Food Safety Authority confirmed a human health concern due to the possible genotoxicity and neurotoxicity of CPF. Previously, CPF had been banned in Hawaii and California [19], and it is no longer authorized for use in plant protection products in the EU from 2020. CPF is a typical insecticide that is difficult to dissolve in water (1.4 mg/dm3 at 25 °C). It can be transported from groundwater by leaching and travel in surface water via runoff and erosion [20,21]. Low concentrations of CPF in the aquatic environment cause adverse effects, such as histopathological and behavioral changes, oxidative stress, neurological damage and genotoxicity in algae, fish, crustaceans and shellfish [19].
In the group of antibacterials, triclosan (TCS) is found in the composition of many products used in our daily lives, such as soaps, shampoos, detergents, deodorants, household items, additives in packaging and textiles. TCS has antibacterial and fungicidal properties and is released into the sewage network, eventually reaching sewage treatment plants that empty into rivers and seas. TCS represents a major source of pollution [22] because exposure leads to toxicity in aquatic organisms [23]. The routes of entry of TCS in humans are through skin contact, mucous membranes and the gastrointestinal tract, because this compound is rapidly metabolized and excreted through urine. It has a low probability of generating toxic effects, whether genotoxic, teratogenic, mutagenic or carcinogenic. However, TCS has structural similarities to thyroid hormones and androgenic and estrogenic disruptors [24]. Its mechanism of action as an antibacterial is based on disrupting the membrane through blocking lipid synthesis. It inhibits the transport protein enoyl-acylreductase, which participates in the biosynthesis of fatty acids necessary for the formation of cell membranes and in the reproduction of bacteria [25].
Microplastics (MPs) constitute another emerging contaminant that has been gaining relevance in recent years. Due to their low cost and versatility, plastics are increasingly in demand, having replaced conventional materials (paper, glass, wood and metal). In 2018, the production of plastics worldwide reached 360 million tons, including 62 million tons in Europe. The amount of plastics generated in the world has been growing exponentially for decades, from 348 to 359 million tons during the period 2017/2018 [26].
Some plastic products have a useful life of less than one year, while others have a durability of more than 50 years, but one thing that all of them have in common is that, when their useful life is over, they become waste. The disposal of many of these plastic wastes is not properly managed, so they end up contaminating aquatic ecosystems [27]. Although there are many types of marine debris (e.g., paper, glass and metal), plastics represent 82% of this waste [28]. This plastic garbage can be classified according to its size into macroplastics and microplastics, the latter representing the majority of the total garbage released into the marine environment. As is also the case with pharmaceutical substances, MPs originated by human activity in the form of textile fibers, remains of cosmetics and industrial processes end up in the sewage system and reach the marine environment through the effluents of WWTPs, where they are not completely eliminated [29,30,31].
They can also act as vectors for the transportation of other pollutants, because they have additives in their composition that can be released into the environment during the fragmentation process and they have the ability to adsorb other chemical pollutants on their surfaces, including heavy metals [32], hydrophobic organic pollutants and pharmaceutical compounds [33]. From this capacity of MPs to act as vectors for other contaminants derives the importance of investigating the interaction between MPs, pharmaceutical compounds and pesticides, as these contaminants are increasingly present in aquatic ecosystems. Authors such as Rainieri et al. (2018) [34] and Webb et al. (2020) [35] have shown that the presence of MPs in the environment affects the toxicity of other pollutants.
Cholinesterase (ChE) activity inhibition is one of the biomarkers of exposure, which is widely used and recognized as a biomarker to organophosphate compounds, such as CPF [36], as well as to pharmaceutical substances. In crustaceans, Thi et al. (2009) [37] showed that the cholinesterase activity present in adult Penaeus monodon was inhibited by the action of antibiotics. Albendín et al. (2021) [38] and Soto-Mancera et al. (2020) [39] determined a decreased level of cholinesterase activity exposed to organophosphate compounds in seabream. Nunes et al. (2016) [40] found that the anxiolytic diazepam inhibited the cholinesterase activity present in Artemia parthenogenetica. Similarly, Yu et al. (2018) [41] determined that MPs significantly reduced cholinesterase activity in Eriocheir sinensis.
Relative to fish and molluscs, the use of Artemia salina in toxicity tests has many advantages. These crustaceans have a shorter life cycle, provide available populations all year and offer both a standardized method of cultivation from dried cysts and easy handling. Therefore, Artemia salina has been successfully used in toxicological tests for decades [42,43,44].
For the above reasons, in this study, the impacts of the toxicity of MPs (polyvinyl chloride), pharmaceutical substances (simvastatin and carbamazepine) and pesticides (chlorpyrifos and triclosan) on Artemia salina were evaluated, in order to determine whether MPs in combination with drugs or pesticides increase the adverse effects on this organism. To measure possible adverse effects, toxicity tests were performed by determining the LC50, as well as the ChE, activity.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Acetylthiocholine iodide (AcSCh) (Sigma-Aldrich, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), 5,5′-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) (Merck, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), acetone (Scharlab, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), 5H-dibenzo[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide (carbamazepine (CAS 298-46-4) (Sigma-Aldrich, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany),(1S,3R,7S,8S,8aR)-8-{2-[(2R,4R)-4-Hydroxy-6-oxotetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-yl]ethyl}-3,7-dimethyl-1,2,3,7,8,8a-hexahydro-1-naphthalenyl 2,2-dimethylbutanoate (simvastatin CAS 79902-63-9, Sigma-Aldrich), 5-Chloro-2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) phenol (triclosan (CAS 3380-34-5, Sigma-Aldrich) and O, O-dietil O-3,5,6-tricloro-2-piridil fosforotionato (chlorpyrifos) (CAS 2921-88-2, Sigma-Aldrich) were used. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) and the BioRad Protein Assay were supplied by BioRad (Madrid, Spain). Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) (CAS 9002-86-2, Aldrich. The data for the compound are listed in PubChem: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/6338. (accessed on 13 September 2021), MP < 5 mm), potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) (CAS 7778-50-9, Panreac, AppliChem. ITW Reagents, Barcelona, Spain), di-sodium hydrogen phosphate anhydrous (CAS 7558-79-4, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and sodium dihydrogen phosphate monohydrate (CAS 10049-21-5, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were used.

2.2. Organisms and Sample Preparation

Artemia salina (aged 4 weeks) were obtained from the Marine Culture Laboratory (registration number ES110280000312) at the Marine and Environmental Sciences Faculty (University of Cádiz). The organisms were treated in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the European Union Council (Council Directive 86/609/EEC) and the Bioethical Committee of the University of Cádiz (Spain). Specimens were anaesthetized by immersion in ice.
The tests yielded the following results: pH = 7.49–7.63, dissolved oxygen = 75.4–98.3%, conductivity = 48.20–49.37 mS/cm and temperature = 20.55–21.22 °C. There were no significant variations in the parameters of the aquariums. Acclimation to laboratory conditions prior to the tests: After 28 days of decapsulation of the A. salina, the organism was kept for 48 h under the same conditions as during the laboratory tests but fed ad libitum.

2.3. Exposure Experiments

2.3.1. MP Intake Bioassay

A. salina specimens were exposed to nominal concentrations of 0.26, 0.69 and 1.6 mg/dm3 of polyvinyl chloride in seawater, in 25 mL flasks, with each containing 10 adults. These concentrations were selected based on the results obtained by other authors [45,46]. Three replicates of each concentration, as well as a control concentration, were used. The tests were conducted according to the guidelines of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) chemical test guideline 202 [47], testing the dead/immobilization of A. salina. To reach the stable microplastic concentrations, a stock suspension of microplastics was added, previously stirred. MP concentrations were not quantified. After the 48-h test period, a visual analysis of the digestive system of the organisms exposed to the MP was observed under an optical microscope to check whether the specimens had ingested MP.

2.3.2. Pesticides, Pharmaceutical Products, MPs and Reference Toxicity Test

Potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) was used as a reference test. The concentrations used were 80, 40, 20, 10, 5, 2.5 and 1.25 mg/dm3, as well as a seawater control. Glass flasks of 25 cm3 were used. There were 3 replicates for each treatment and 10 organisms in each flask. The exposure duration was 48 h at 21 °C and 16 h of light/8 h of darkness. A. salina were not fed. At the end of the test, the surviving individuals were counted; if they did not show any movement, they were considered dead. The concentrations of simvastatin and carbamazepine were 12.03, 10.03, 8.35, 6.96, 5.80 and 52.08 mg/dm3; and 43.40, 36.17, 30.14 and 25.16 mg/dm3 in seawater, respectively. Following these tests, the concentrations of triclosan and chlorpyrifos were 12, 6, 3, 1.5, 0.75 and 0.0312 mg/dm3; and 0.0156, 0.0078, 0.0039 and 0.00195 mg/dm3, respectively.
The nominal MP concentration 0.26 mg/dm3 was chosen based on a bibliographic review [45] and was considered environmentally relevant. Acetone was used as the solvent due to the hydrophobic nature of chemical compounds. A control with seawater and another with acetone were used in all the tests. Eight semi-static toxicity tests with three replicates were undertaken: simvastatin, simvastatin–MP, carbamazepine, carbamazepine–MP, TCS, TCS–MP, CPF and CPF–MP. Ten specimens of Artemia salina (aged 4 weeks) of approximately 8 mm of size were included in each flask. The solvent concentration in the acetone control and chemical component-only exposures was <0.001% v/v. In the MP tests, the polyvinyl chloride stock suspension (0.26 mg/dm3) was added.
Surviving and dead/immobilized organisms were counted. Surviving A. salina specimens were preserved frozen at –80 °C, until the time of analysis. In addition, before conservation, living organisms from the tests with MPs were observed under an optical microscope to check whether they had ingested the MPs.

2.3.3. Sample Preparations

After euthanasia by ice, the samples were stored at –80 °C until processing. The surviving A. salina from each concentration were rapidly thawed and homogenized cold at the rate of 100 μL of phosphate buffer (0.1 M pH 7.4), using an Ultraturrax homogenizer and centrifuged at 9000 g for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatants of each sample were then collected.

2.4. Enzymatic Assays

ChE activity was measured according to the Ellman et al. (1961) [48] method, adapted for use with a microplate reader as previously described by Albendín et al. (2017) [49]. Briefly, 50 µL of sample was mixed with a mixture containing 30 cm3 of 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 1 cm3 of DTNB 0.01 M (0.27 mM: final well concentration) and 0.2 cm3 of ASCh 0.2 M (1.07 mM: final well concentration). The change in optical density over time was recorded at 415 nm for 3 min.
The protein content of the samples was measured using Bradford’s (1976) [50] method, adapted to microplates using bovine serum albumin as the standard. All enzyme and protein determinations were prepared in triplicate at 25 °C. ChE activities were expressed as nmol hydrolyzed substrate/min/mg of protein. The specific activities are reported below as the mean ± SD.

2.5. Data and Statistical Analysis

The mortality data were treated with the program of the Environmental Agency of the United States (EPA-USA), probit method. The values of CL50 for all the chemical compounds individually and associated with the MPs were studied.
Cholinesterase activity data were statistically analysed using the IBM SPSS Statistics (IBM, Madrid, Spain) for Windows Version 23 program. Assumptions regarding the data’s normality and homogeneity of variance were tested by using the Shapiro–Wilk test and Levene’s test, respectively. When the assumption of normality was not satisfied, the Kruskal–Wallis test was used to determine whether there was any significant difference and the Tukey or the Mann–Whitney U test was used to determine between which groups there was a significant difference. Statistical differences between groups were accepted for p-values lower than 0.05.
When the assumption of normality was followed, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed to assess the differences of AChE activity among the different chemical compounds, followed by Dunnet’s post hoc comparison test.

3. Results

3.1. Toxicity Reference Test

The LC50 value of K2Cr2O7 during the 24-h duration of the test was 11.80 mg/dm3. The values obtained for the lower and upper confidence limits, both of 95%, were 8.75 and 16.07 mg/m3, respectively.
The database of the State Agency for the Protection of the Environment (EPA) has established that the LC50 value for this toxic substance in acute toxicity tests on invertebrates should be in the range of 0.067–59.90 mg/dm3. When the value obtained for K2Cr2O7 was found, i.e., LC50 of 11.80 mg/dm3, which is within this range, it was determined that the quality of the A. salina population was optimal for carrying out subsequent tests with the substances.

3.2. Toxicity Test: Pharmaceuticals, Pesticides and MPs

In Figure 1, the samples of MPs and digestive tract of A. salina in the control group are observed. Artemia salina ingested MPs during the 48 h exposure experiments at all the concentrations exposed (0.26, 0.69 and 1.5 mg/dm3; Figure 2), as particles were detected in the digestive tract. These nominal concentrations were used to check whether the MPs indeed accumulated in A. salina. In the subsequent tests, the lowest concentration was used, so it can be considered ecologically relevant [51].
The organisms that had ingested MPs were counted. No mortality was recorded in any of the concentrations or in the seawater control during the test. The number of A. salina with MPs increased with concentration (Table 1). In the lowest concentration used, 16.6% of individuals had ingested MPs.
MPs were found in the digestive tract of the surviving A. salina of the simvastatin and MP test; these were detected in 58 of the 127 specimens exposed to MPs that survived. In the carbamazepine and MP test, these were found in 71 of the 130 that survived. Meanwhile, in the CPF + MP and TCS + MP test, these were not observed.
The mortalities recorded in tests where organisms were exposed to different increasing concentrations of simvastatin, simvastatin–MP, carbamazepine, carbamazepine–MP, TCS, TCS–MP, CPF and CPF–MP, as shown in Figure 3.
The toxicity acute test showed lower mortality in organisms exposed to simvastatin and MP together compared to simvastatin alone. At the lowest concentrations (5.80 and 6.96 mg/dm3), the mortality difference was slightly smaller in this test, becoming more marked in the concentration of 8.35 mg/dm3. At the highest concentrations (10.03 and 12.03 mg/dm3), the difference in mortality between the two assays was greatest, being 10% in both concentrations. In the visual controls that were carried out during both tests, no alteration was observed, neither in the physiology nor in the behavior of the organisms. The same mortality rates (10% and 16.66%, respectively) occurred in A. salina exposed to concentrations of 25.16 and 30.14 mg/dm3 in the tests with carbamazepine only and carbamazepine associated with MPs. The greatest mortality difference (10%) between the treatments occurred in the concentration of 52.08 mg/dm3 of carbamazepine.
The organisms did not manifest changes in physiology, even though they did in their behavior. A. salina survivors at concentrations of 30.14 and 36.17 mg/dm3 in both assays exhibited slow mobility with respect to the control, including alternating periods of immobility with periods of fast swimming movements with respect to the control. At the highest concentrations of 43.40 and 52.08 mg/dm3 (carbamazepine and carbamazepine + MP), A. salina did not show mobility and only reacted when mechanically stimulated with a glass rod.
Comparing the CPF treatments with and without MP, at the lowest concentrations (0.00195 and 0.0039 mg/dm3), we see that the percentage of mortality was lower in the chlorpyrifos test versus chlorpyrifos and associated MP, but at higher concentrations (0.0078 and 0.0156 mg/dm3), the pattern changed, mortality being lower for chlorpyrifos and MP. At the concentration of 0.0312 mg/dm3, there was 100% mortality in both tests.
The mortality at 0.75 and 1.5 mg/dm3 did not differ in the triclosan test with and without MP. At a concentration of 12 mg/dm3, there was 100% mortality in both tests. In general, at the highest concentrations, mortality was slightly lower in tests where the toxicant was associated with MP, but they were not statistically different.
According to the OECD guide [47], the mortality of controls cannot exceed 10% in order for the test to be considered valid. Given that none of the four tests performed in this study exceeded this percentage, they could be regarded as such.
The LC50 values and 95% confidence intervals for A. salina exposed to the different substances are presented in Table 2.

3.3. Enzymatic Assay

The results regarding cholinesterase activity in simvastatin, carbamazepine and both in association with MP are shown in Figure 4.
In the test with carbamazepine, statistically significant differences were obtained between the seawater and acetone controls at concentrations of 36.17, 43.30 and 52.08 mg/dm3; between the concentration of 25.16 mg/dm3 and the concentrations of 36.17, 43.30 and 52.08 mg/dm3; between the concentration of 30.14 mg/dm3 and the concentrations of 36.17, 43.30 and 52.08 mg/dm3; between the concentration of 36.17 mg/dm3 and that of 52.08 mg/dm3; and between the concentration of 43.30 mg/dm3 and that of 52.08 mg/dm3.
In the tests with carbamazepine + MP, an increase in the inhibition of cholinesterase activity was observed versus only with carbamazepine treatments. After statistical analysis of the data, statistically significant differences were obtained between the controls for seawater, acetone and all concentrations of MP-associated carbamazepine that were used in the test. MPs showed significant differences with concentrations of 25.16, 30.14, 36.17, 43.40 and 52.08 mg/dm3. These differences were also determined between the concentration of 36.17 mg/dm3 and those of 25.16 and 30.14 mg/dm3, between the concentration of 43.30 mg/dm3 and those 25.16 and 30.14 mg/dm3 and between the concentration of 52.08 mg/dm3 and 25.16 and 30.14 mg/dm3.
In addition, the results obtained between the same concentrations of both assays were compared (simvastatin and MP associated with simvastatin), revealing no statistically significant differences.
The results of cholinesterase activity in CPF, TCS and either in association with MP are shown in Figure 5.
The concentration value of 0.008 mg/dm3 CPF was considered abnormally high (possibly due to biological variability), so this result is disregarded in the Discussion section below.
Statistically significant differences in CPF + MP treatments were observed between the MP and the controls, between the concentrations of 0.004 mg/dm3 and the 0.008 mg/dm3 + MP, between 0.002 mg/dm3 and 0.004 mg/dm3 and 0.008 mg/dm3 + MP concentration, and between 0.002 mg/dm3 + MP and 0.008 mg/dm3 + MP.
No differences were observed between equal concentrations of 0.002 and 0.004 mg/dm3 CPF with and without MP.

4. Discussion

Pesticides, pharmaceuticals and MPs are environmental contaminants whose hazardous potential (especially in the case of the latter) have been ignored until relatively recently. Nevertheless, they can have direct effects on organisms, as well as act as vectors of other pollutants, potentially modifying their toxicity and bioavailability [32,33]. In this study, we observed the variability of responses between different pollutants with and without MP in the crustacean A. salina.
Among the values obtained for LC50, simvastatin was found to be most toxic (LC50 of 9.348 mg/dm3), followed by the combination of simvastatin and MP (LC50 of 10.294 mg/dm3), carbamazepine (LC50 of 43.225 mg/dm3) and, finally, simvastatin with MP (LC50 of 46.503 mg/dm3). The presence of MPs in the treatments containing them showed a slight increase in LC50.
The LC50 of simvastatin has been determined in different crustaceans. Dahl et al. (2006) [52] observed a 96-h LC50 of 810 µg/dm3 for Novanapis spinipes; however, Key et al. (2008) [53] observed a 96-h LC50 of 1.18 mg/dm3 for larvae of Palaemonetes pugio and more than 10 mg/dm3 for adult specimens of the same species, a value that was very similar to that obtained for A. salina (9.348 mg/dm3). In fish, Ribeiro et al. (2015) [54] studied the effects of simvastatin on zebrafish (Danio rerio), establishing an LC50 of 5 mg/dm3 for zebrafish embryos. Another study carried out by Key et al. (2009) [55] determined an LC50 of 2.68 mg/ dm3 for Fundulus heteroclitus.
In A. salina, statistically significant differences were not recorded between the measures of cholinesterase activity in the control groups and the groups exposed to the different concentrations of simvastatin and simvastatin associated with MP tests. Similar results were observed by Key et al. (2009) [55] regarding simvastatin exposure for 96 h in Fundulus heteroclitus, although reduced cholinesterase activity declined slightly, if not significantly. In crustaceans, the test carried out by Key et al. (2008) [53] showed an LC50 of simvastatin in the range of 0.001 to 10 mg/dm3, which did not cause alterations in the acetylcholinesterase activity of larvae and adults of the shrimp Palaemonetes pugio. Considering that simvastatin is a commonly used and highly prescribed drug whose discharge into the aquatic environment has increased in recent years, it is reasonable to expect that its presence in the environment tends to increase and consequently enhance the risk of undesirable effects on the most sensitive species. For this reason and given this study’s results, it is advisable to continue investigating the sublethal effects that this drug can cause, carrying out trials with other taxa and with organisms at different stages of development, using different biomarkers to assess the possible effects produced and increasing the time of exposure to the drug through chronic toxicity tests.
In the case of carbamazepine, the 48-h LC50 for Artemia salina was 43.225 mg/dm3. In other crustaceans, such as Daphnia magna, Kim et al. (2007) [56] estimated a 96-h LC50 of 76.3 mg/dm3. A very similar concentration was obtained by Ferrari et al. (2004) [57]: a 48-h LC50 of 77.7 mg/dm3 in the same organism. These concentrations differ from those obtained in this work; hence, A. salina seems to be a more sensitive organism to carbamazepine than Daphnia magna. For the association of carbamazepine with MP, an LC50 of 46.503 mg/dm3 was obtained, which was higher (by 3.303 mg/dm3) than carbamazepine alone. A similar pattern was obtained with simvastatin. Besides, we observed that toxicity decreased in the combination of pharmaceuticals and MP. However, Brandts et al. (2018) [58] determined that exposure to carbamazepine associated with nanoplastics (polystyrene) induced a significant negative regulation in genetic expression in Mytilus galloprovincialis compared to exposure to carbamazepine only. In addition, studies carried out by Gambardella et al. (2017) [59] showed that exposure to MP (polystyrene) caused neurotoxic effects in nauplii of Artemia franciscana and Amphibalanus Amphitrite. Moreover, the ChE activity in carbamazepine and carbamazepina + MP exposed to A. salina was significantly inhibited in our study. Similar results have been obtained by other authors with different species of invertebrate organisms. For instance, Siebel et al. (2010) [60] observed via an in vitro test that carbamazepine inhibited acetylcholinesterase activity in the brain of zebrafish (Danio rerio). In crustaceans, Nkoom et al. (2019) [61] reported a significant decrease in acetylcholinesterase activity in Daphnia magna specimens exposed to concentrations of 5 and 100 µg/L, as well as an ability to bioconcentrate in the aqueous medium under laboratory conditions. The ChE activity recorded in this test (carbamazepine + microplastic) was slightly lower than that obtained in the isolated carbamazepine test, but no statistically significant differences were obtained using the same concentrations in the two tests.
On the other hand, the smaller LC50 values from lowest to highest were: CPF, CPF + MP and finally TCS + MP and TCS, which were similar. The value of 48-h LC50 for TCS (4.979 mg/dm3) obtained in this study was higher than associated values in the literature, probably related to the age of the crustaceans. For instance, Xu et al. (2015) [62] reported a 24-h LC50 of 0.171 mg/dm3 in a TCS toxicity test on A. salina (nauplium). Iannacone et al. (2016) [63] studied antimicrobial toxicity in Artemia franciscana (nauplii phase II), yielding a 48-h LC50 of 0.72 mg/dm3. Perron et al. (2012) [23] investigated the effect of TCS on the invertebrates Ampelisca abdita and Americamysis bahia, reporting 48-h LC50 values of 0.0913 and 0.0956 mg/dm3, respectively. Regarding the effect of TCS in zebrafish (Danio rerio), Oliveira et al. (2009) [64] reported 96-h LC50 values of 0.42 mg/dm3 for embryos/larvae and 0.34 mg/dm3 for adults. These authors also examined variations in the values of biomarkers, including cholinesterase activity. They did not observe decreased enzymatic levels, similar to our study, where significant differences were not seen between the various concentrations tested and the control.
Sybeg et al. (2017) [65] tested with Acartia tonsa (adult) exposure to TCS alone and polyethylene (500 MP/cm3), yielding a 48-h LC50 of 0.1579 mg/dm3 for TCS and 0.1096 mg/dm3 for TCS + MP. With these data, the authors concluded that the mixture of TCS + MP was more toxic than TCS alone. These data disagree with our results, where no difference was observed between the LC50 of the TCS and TCS + MP.
Regarding A. salina, the 48-h LC50 values of 0.006 mg/dm3 and 0.012 mg/dm3 for CPF and CPF + MP, respectively, are in the range of those found by other authors in adults and juveniles. For instance, Osuna et al. (1997) [66] evaluated the toxicity to CPF in Penaeus sp. (juveniles), observing a 48-h LC50 of 0.00207 mg/dm3. Galindo et al. (1996) previously indicated a 48-h LC50 of 0.0048 mg/dm3 in a test with the crustacean Penaeus vannamei (juveniles) exposed to CPF.
Varó et al. (1998) [67] exposed to CPF on nauplii of different species of the genus Artemia sp. and observed differences in sensitivity to the toxic substance, indicating that the most sensitive species was Artemia salina (24-h LC50 from 0.95 to 5.12 mg/dm3). They also described differences that were not only based on the species tested (A. salina, A. persimilis, A. franciscana and A. parthenogenetica), but also between strains of the same species. Accordingly, these authors exposed to CPF in Artemia parthenogenetica, adult fish Gambusia affinis and Aphanius iberus and observed increased resistance to CPF in the genus Artemia compared to the two fish species (48-h LC50 for G. affinis of 0.5 mg/dm3 and 48-h LC50 for A. iberus of 0.0386 mg/dm3). In addition, the genus Artemia showed different sensitivity to the toxic substance according to the degree of development or intraspecific variability (nauplii 24-h LC50: juveniles, 3.9 ± 0.9 mg/dm3; adults, 0.08 ± 0.01 mg/dm3).
Baek et al. (2015) [68] evaluated the effect of CPF, among other biocides, on A. salina (nauplium), yielding a 24-h LC50 of 2.032 (0.416–6.891 mg/dm3), within the range of Varó et al.’s (1998) [67] findings. In the same study, acetylcholinesterase activity was studied, comparing newborn nauplii with 48-h nauplii. The former was found to exhibit a greater decrease in cholinesterase activity than the 48-h nauplii, following exposure to CPF for 24 h, rendering this a very useful marker for predicting signs of contamination by this toxic substance in the environment. The data from these studies indicate that there are differences in sensitivity, not only among species, but also depending on the stage of development. Adults and juveniles seem to be more sensitive than nauplii, so the choice of biomarker and developmental stage is of great importance in experiments to ensure a higher safety range. In our study, the LC50 data regarding A. salina were more in line with the values provided by these authors working with adults and juveniles.
The association of CPF with MP was not reflected in an increase in toxicity with CPF, as the LC50 value was higher. This toxicity-reducing effect has been mentioned by other authors [18], who have indicated that CPF adsorption to MP can reduce toxicity’s effect on algal growth (Isochrysis galbana).
On the other hand, we observed a significant decrease in cholinesterase activity by the CPF + MP test, just as Oliveira et al. (2013) [69] and Luís et al. (2015) [45] found that acetylcholinesterase activity in samples of Pomatoschistus microps exposed to MP (polyethylene) to a 96-h test was lower than in a control. However, in the TCS + MP test, no significant differences were found, as has also been described by other researchers working with aquatic organisms [64,70].
Organophosphate substances (CPFs) are known as prototype inhibitors of this enzyme. In fact, the specific activity of cholinesterase in A. salina decreases as concentrations of CPF increase [67]. Nevertheless, in this work, no statistically significant differences in cholinesterase activity were observed between equal concentrations of CPF with and without MP.
The results obtained indicate that the presence of MP in the medium reduces the toxicity, considering the LC50 values that may be related to the low MP intake detected in our preliminary test, since the concentration used (0.26 mg/dm3) was lower. This concentration was related to the concentration of MPs observed in the environmental. However, inhibition of cholinesterase activity of A. salina exposed with CPF, simvastatin and CPF + MP, simvastatin + MP in a concentration-dependent ratio showed a synergistic effect of MP+ other contaminants, probably due to their possible role as vehicles of exposure. Eder et al. (2021) [71] reviewed studies showing that the toxicity of pharmaceuticals and other particles and chemicals increased when exposure was combined with MP. Among the adverse effects, they distinguished the same biomarker studied in our work, the inhibition of cholinesterase activity. The synergistic effect could be determined by the sorption behavior of organic contaminants to MP that, according to Wang et al. (2020) [72], are partitioning, surface sorption and pore filling, as well as by the properties of the MP, organic contaminants and aquatic conditions. Thus, the interaction of MPs with contaminants can result in aggregation, reduced bioavailability and alteration in the toxicity to the organism [73].

5. Conclusions

In this study, the adverse effects of pharmaceutical compounds with associated MPs and pesticides with associated MPs were studied. Regarding 48-h LC50 in A. salina, the MPs did not potentiate the adverse effects of pollutants when they were co-exposed; however, cholinesterase activity decreased more if the pollutant (drug or pesticide) was in contact with the MP than without them, indicating a cellular effect.
The concentration of MP exposed to A. salina was used by other authors for ecologically relevant studies, but the preliminary studies in this work with MP ingestion by organisms showed that, if the concentration of MP increased, the number of A. salina that incorporated MPs also increased, and this could suggest, that if the MP concentration increases in the environment, toxicity in the organism can also increase.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.M.Q., J.M.A. and M.D.C.; methodology, V.A., C.G.-G. and M.G.A.; formal analysis, J.M.A., R.R.-B. and M.G.A.; investigation, J.M.A. and M.G.A.; data curation, J.M.A. and R.R.-B.; writing—original draft preparation, J.M.A. and V.A.; writing—review and editing, J.M.A. and M.D.C.; supervision, M.D.C. and J.M.A.; project administration, J.M.A.; funding acquisition, J.M.Q. and M.D.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministerio de Ciencia, Investigación y Universidades (REF.: RTI2018-096771-B-100).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Laboratory of Marine Culture at University of Cádiz for providing the experimental fish used in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Barboza, L.; Vieira, L.; Branco, V.; Figueiredo, N.; Carvalho, F.; Carvalho, C.; Guilhermino, L. Microplastics cause neurotoxicity, oxidative damage and energy-related changes and interact with the bioaccumulation of mercury in the European seabass, Dicentrarchus labrax (Linnaeus, 1758). Aquat. Toxicol. 2018, 195, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fonte, E.; Ferreira, P.; Guilhermino, L. Temperature rise and microplastics interact with the toxicity of the antibiotic cefalexin to juveniles of the common goby (Pomatoschistus microps): Post-exposure predatory behaviour, acetylcholinesterase activity and lipid peroxidation. Aquat. Toxicol. 2016, 180, 173–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wardrop, P.; Shimeta, J.; Nugegoda, D.; Morrison, P.D.; Miranda, A.; Tang, M.; Clarke, B.O. Chemical pollutants sorbed to ingested microbeads from personal care products accumulate in fish. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 4037–4044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ter Halle, A.; Jeanneau, L.; Martignac, M.; Jardé, E.; Pedrono, B.; Brach, L.; Gigault, J. Nanoplastic in the north atlantic subtropical gyre. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 13689–13697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, Z.; Ojego, J.; Pruden, A.; Knowlton, K.F. Occurrence, fate and removal of synthetic oral contraceptives (SOCs) in the natural environment: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409, 5149–5161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Biel-Maeso, M.; Baena-Nogueras, R.M.; Corada-Fernández, C.; Lara-Martín, P.A. Science of the Total Environment Occurrence, distribution and environmental risk of pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs) in coastal and ocean waters from the Gulf of Cadiz (SW Spain). Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 612, 649–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Barbosa, T.; Luiz Riveiro de Paiva, A.; Bezerra, M.M.M.; Carla, D.; Da Silva Pereira, J.J. Analysis of the presence of anti-inflammatories drugs in surface water: A case study in Beberibe river–PE Brazil. Chemosphere 2019, 222, 961–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Primrose, N.; Naicker, D.; Ncube, S.; Chimuka, L. Determination of naproxen, diclofenac and ibuprofen in Umgeni estuary and seawater: A case of northern Durban in KwaZulu–Natal Province of South Africa. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2019, 29, 100675. [Google Scholar]
  9. AEMPS. Agencia Española de Medicamentes y Productos Sanitarios. Utilización de Medicamentos Hipolipemiantes en España Durante el Periodo 2000–2012. Informe de Utilización de Medicamentos U/HLP/V1/17012014. 2014. Available online: https://www.aemps.gob.es/?s=HIPOLIPEMIANTES (accessed on 13 May 2021).
  10. AEMPS. Agencia Española de Medicamentes y Productos Sanitarios. Utilización de Medicamentos Antiepilépticos en España Durante el Periodo 2008–2016. Informe de Utilización de Medicamentos U/EPIL/V1/11/09/2017. 2017. Available online: https://www.aemps.gob.es/?s=antiepilepticos (accessed on 13 May 2021).
  11. Hernando, M.; Heath, E.; Petrovic, M.; Barcelo, D. Trace-level determination of pharmaceutical residues by LC-MS/MS in natural and treated waters. A pilot-Survey Study. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2006, 385, 985–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Neuparth, T.; Martins, C.; Santos, C.B.D.L.; Costa, M.H.; Martins, I.; Costa, P.M.; Santos, M.M. Hypocholesterolaemic pharmaceutical simvastatin disrupts reproduction and population growth of the amphipod Gammarus locusta at the ng/L range. Aquat. Toxicol. 2014, 155, 337–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ellesat, K.S.; Tollefsen, K.; Åsberg, A.; Thomas, K.V.; Hylland, K. Cytotoxicity of atorvastatin and simvastatin on primary rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) hepatocytes. Toxicol. In Vitro 2020, 24, 1610–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chen, H.; Gu, X.; Zeng, Q.; Mao, Z.; Liang, X.; Martyniuk, C.J. Carbamazepine disrupts molting hormone signaling and inhibits molting and growth of Eriocheir sinensis at environmentally relevant concentrations. Aquat. Toxicol. 2019, 208, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Franzellitti, S.; Canesi, L.; Rajapaksha, M.A.; Whathsala, H.G.R.; Fabri, E. Microplastic exposure and effects in aquatic organisms: A physiological perspective Environ. Toxicol. Pharm. 2019, 68, 37–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Weichert, F.G.; Floeter, C.; Meza, A.S.; Kammann, U. Assessing the ecotoxicity of potentially neurotoxic substances-Evaluation of a behavioural parameter in the embryogenesis of Danio rerio. Chemosphere 2017, 186, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. De Souza, R.M.; Seibert, D.; Quesada, H.B.; Basetti, F.J.; Fagundes-Klen, M.R.; Bergamasco, R. Occurrence, impacts and general aspects of pesticides in surface water: A review. Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 2020, 135, 22–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Garrido, S.; Linares, M.; Campillo, A.J.; Albentosa, M. Effect of microplastics on the toxicity of chlorpyrifos to the microalgae Isochrysis galbana, clone T-ISO. Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 2019, 173, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, X.; Duan, W. Ecotoxicity of chlorpyrifos to aquatic organisms: A review. Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 2020, 200, 110731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Albers, J.W.; Berent, S.; Garabrant, D.H.; Giordani, B.; Schweitzer, S.J.; Garrison, R.P.; Richardson, R.J. The effects of occupational exposure to chlorpyrifos on the neurologic examination of central nervous system function: A prospective cohort study. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2004, 46, 367–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Racke, K.D. Environmental fate of chlorpyrifos. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1993, 131, 1–154. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. McAvoy, D.C.; Schatowitz, B.; Jacob, M.; Hauk, A.; Eckhoff, W.S. Measurement of triclosan in wastewater treatment systems. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2002, 21, 1323–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Perron, M.M.; Ho, K.T.; Cantwell, M.G.; Burgess, R.M.; Pelleterier, M.C. Effects of triclosan on marine benthic and epibenthic organisms. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2012, 31, 1861–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ishibashi, H.; Matsumura, N.; Hirano, M.; Matsuoka, M.; Shiratsuchi, H.; Ishibashi, Y.; Takao, Y.; Arizono, K. Effects oftriclosan on the early life stages and reproduction of medaka Oryzias latipes and induction of hepatic vitellogenin. Aquat. Toxicol. 2007, 67, 167–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Levy, C.W.; Roujeinikova, A.; Sedelnikova, S.; Baker, P.J.; Stuitje, A.R.; Slabas, A.R.; Rice, D.W.; Raffertu, K.-B. Molecular basis of triclosan activity. Nature 1999, 398, 383–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Plastics Europe. An Analysis of European Plastics Production, Demand and Waste Data. Plastics-the Facts. 2019. Available online: https://www.plasticseurope.org/es/resources/publications/1804-plastics-facts-2019 (accessed on 13 May 2021).
  27. Lestari, P.; Trihadiningrum, Y. The impact of improper solid waste management to plastic pollution in Indonesian coast and marine environment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 149, 110505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Deudero, S.; Alomar, C. Mediterranean marine biodiversity under threat: Reviewing influence of marine litter on species. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2015, 98, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Magni, S.; Binelli, A.; Pittura, L.; Giacomo, C.; Della, C.; Carla, C.; Regoli, F. The fate of microplastics in an Italian Wastewater Treatment Plant. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 652, 602–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Franco, A.A.; Arellano, J.M.; Albendín, G.; Rodríguez-Barroso, R.; Zahedi, S.; Quiroga, J.M.; Coello, M.D. Mapping microplastics in Cadiz (Spain): Occurrence of microplastics inmunicipal and industrial wastewaters. J. Water Process Eng. 2020, 38, 101596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Franco, A.A.; Arellano, J.M.; Albendín, G.; Rodríguez-Barroso, R.; Quiroga, J.M.; Coello, M.D. Microplastic pollution in wastewater treatment plants in the city of Cádiz: Abundance, removal efficiency and presence in receiving water body. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 776, 145795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yuan, W.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, J. Toxicological effects of microplastics and heavy metals on the Daphnia magna. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 746, 141254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Li, J.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, H. Adsorption of antibiotics on microplastics. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 237, 460–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rainieri, S.; Conlledo, N.; Larsen, B.K.; Granby, K.; Barranco, A. Combined effects of microplastics and chemical contaminants on the organ toxicity of zebra fish (Danio rerio). Environ. Res. 2018, 162, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Webb, S.; Gawa, S.; Marsdenb, I.D.; McRae, N.K. Biomarker responses in New Zealand green-lipped mussels Perna canaliculus exposed to microplastics and triclosan. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 201, 110871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Choi, J.Y.; Yu, J.; Yang, D.B.; Ra, K.; Kin, K.T.; Hong, G.H.; Shin, K.H. Acetylthiocholine (ATC)-Cleaving cholinesterase (ChE) activity as a potential biomarker of pesticide exposure in the Manila clam, Ruditapes philippinarum, of Korea. Mar. Environ. Res. 2011, 71, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Thi, H.; Silvestre, F.; Scippo, M.; Thome, J.; Thanh, N.; Kestemont, P. Acetylcholinesterase activity as a biomarker of exposure to antibiotics and pesticides in the black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2009, 72, 1463–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Albendín, M.G.; Mánuel-Vez, M.P.; Arellano, J.M. In vivo cholinesterase sensitivity of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) exposed to organophosphate compounds: Influence of biological factors. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 121, 107176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Soto-Mancera, F.; Arellano, J.M.; Albendín, M.G. Carboxylesterase in Sparus aurata: Characterisation and sensitivity to organophosphorus pesticides and pharmaceutical products. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 109, 105603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nunes, B.; Carvalho, F.; Guilhermino, L. Effects of widely used pharmaceuticals and a detergent on oxidative stress biomarkers of the crustacean Artemia parthenogenetica. Chemosphere 2006, 62, 581–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Yu, P.; Liu, Z.; Wu, D.; Chen, M.; Lv, W.; Zhao, Y. Accumulation of polystyrene microplastics in juvenile Eriocheir sinensis and oxidative stress effects in the liver. Aquat. Toxicol. 2018, 200, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Migliore, L.; Civitareale, C.; Brambilla, G.; Di Delupis, D.G. Toxicity of several important agricultural to Artemia. Water Res. 1997, 31, 1801–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Libralato, G.; Prato, E.; Migliore, L.; Cicero, A.M.; Manfra, L. A review of toxicity testing protocols and endpoints with Artemia spp. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 69, 35–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Wang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, M.; Mu, J.; Ding, G.; Mao, Z.; Cao, Y.; Jin, F.; Cong, Y.; Wang, L.; et al. Effects of ingested polystyrene microplastics on brine shrimp, Artemia parthenogenetica. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 244, 715–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Luís, L.G.; Ferreira, P.; Fontea, E.; Oliveira, M.; Guilhermino, L. Does the presence of microplastics influence the acute toxicity of chromium (VI) to early juveniles of the common goby (Pomatoschistus microps)? A study with juveniles from two wild estuarine populations. Aquat. Toxicol. 2015, 164, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Barboza, L.G.A.; Vieiro, L.R.; Gilhermino, L. Single and combined effects of microplastics and mercury on juveniles of the European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax): Changes in behavioural responses and reduction of swimming velocity and resistance time. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 236, 1014–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. OECD. Daphnia sp., Acute Immobilisation. Guideline for testing of chemicals, 202. 2004. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/env/ehs/testing/Full%20list%20of%20Test%20Guidelines%20in%20English%20September%20%202014.pdf (accessed on 13 May 2021).
  48. Ellman, G.L.; Courtney, K.D.; Andres, V.; Featherstone, R.M. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem. Pharma 1961, 7, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Albendín, G.; Arellano, J.M.; Mánuel-Vez, M.P.; Sarasquete, C.; Arufe, M.I. Characterization and in vitro sensitivity of cholinesterases of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) to organophosphate pesticides. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 43, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bradford, M.M. A Rapid and Sensitive Method for the Quantitation Microgram Quantities of Protein Utilizing the Principle of Protein-Dye Binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 254, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Goldstein, M.C.; Rosenberg, M.; Cheng, L. Increased oceanic microplastic debris enhances oviposition in an endemic pelagic insect. Biol. Lett. 2021, 8, 817–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Dahl, U.; Gorokhova, E.; Breitholtz, M. Application of growth-related sublethal endpoints in ecotoxicological assessments using a harpacticoid copepod. Aquat. Toxicol. 2006, 77, 433–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Key, P.B.; Hoguet, J.; Reed, L.A.; Chung, K.W.; Fulton, M.H. Effects of the Statin Antihyperlipidemic Agent Simvastatin on Grass Shrimp, Palaemonetes pugio. Environ. Toxicol. 2008, 23, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ribeiro, S.; Torres, T.; Martins, R.; Santos, M.M. Toxicity screening of diclofenac, propranolol, sertraline and simvastatin using Danio rerio and Paracentrotus lividus embryo bioassays. Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 2015, 114, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Key, P.B.; Hoguet, J.; Chung, K.W.; Venturella, J.J.; Pennington, P.L.; Fulton, M.H. Lethal and sublethal effects of simvastatin, irgarol, and PBDE-47 on the estuarine fish, Fundulus heteroclitus. J. Environ. Sci. Health 2009, 1234, 379–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kim, Y.; Choi, K.; Jung, J.; Park, S.; Kim, P.G.; Park, J. Aquatic toxicity of acetaminophen, carbamazepine, cimetidine, diltiazem and six major sulfonamides, and their potential ecological risks in Korea. Environ. Int. 2007, 33, 370–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ferrari, B.; Mons, R.; Vollat, B.; Fraysse, B.; Paxéus, N.; Lo Giudice, R.; Pollio, A.; Garric, J. Environmental risk assessment of six human pharmaceuticals: Are the current environmental risk assessment procedures sufficient for the protection of the aquatic environment? Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2004, 23, 1344–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Brandts, I.; Teles, M.; Gonçalves, A.P.; Barreto, A.; Franco-Martinez, L.; Tvarijonaviciute, A.; Martins, M.A.; Soares, A.M.V.M.; Tort, L.; Oliveira, M. Effects of nanoplastics on Mytilus galloprovincialis after individual and combined exposure with carbamazepine. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 643, 775–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gambardella, C.; Morgana, S.; Ferrando, S.; Bramini, M.; Piazza, V.; Costa, E.; Garaventa, F.; Faimali, M. Effects of polystyrene microbeads in marine planktonic crustaceans. Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 2017, 145, 250–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Siebel, A.M.; Rico, E.P.; Capiotti, K.M.; Piato, A.L.; Cusinato, C.T.; Franco, T.M.A.; Bogo, M.R.; Bonan, C.D. Toxicology in Vitro In vitro effects of antiepileptic drugs on acetylcholinesterase and ectonucleotidase activities in zebrafish (Danio rerio) brain. Toxicol. In Vitro 2010, 24, 1279–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nkoom, M.; Lu, G.; Liu, J.; Yang, H.; Dong, H. Bioconcentration of the antiepileptic drug carbamazepine and its physiological and biochemical effects on Daphnia magna. Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 2019, 172, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Xu, X.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, D.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, X.; Xu, H.; Mei, Y. Toxic Assessment of Triclosan and Triclocarban on Artemia salina. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2015, 95, 728–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Iannacone, J.J.; Alvariño, L.; Valle Riestra, V.; Ymaña, B.; Argota, G.; Fimia, F.; Carhuapoma, M.; Castañeda, L. Toxicidad de agentes antiparasitarios, antimicrobianos e insecticidas sobre larvas del camarón salino Artemia franciscana (Crustacea: Artemiidae). Rev. Toxicol. 2016, 33, 1–38. [Google Scholar]
  64. Oliveira, R.; Domingues, I.; Grisolia, C.K.; Soares, A.M. Effects of triclosan on zebrafish early-life stages and adults. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2009, 16, 679–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Syberg, K.; Nielsen, A.; Khan, F.R.; Banta, G.T.; Palmqvist, A.; Jepsen, P.M. Microplastic potentiates triclosan toxicity to the marine copepod Acartia tonsa. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 2017, 80, 23–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Osuna, I.; López, D.; Galindo, J.G.; Riva, M.C. Evaluación ecológica del metilparatión, metilazinfós, clorpirifos, diazinón y metamidofos, en camarones del género Penaueus sp. Bol. Intexter 1997, 111, 65–71. [Google Scholar]
  67. Varó, I.; Serrano, R.; Navarro, J.C.; Lopez, F.J.; Amat, F. Acute lethal toxicity of the organophosphorus pesticide Chlorpyrifos to different species and strains of Artemia. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1998, 61, 778–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Baek, I.; Choi, H.J.; Rhee, J.S. Inhibitory effects of biocides on hatching and acetylcholinesterase activity in the brine shrimp Artemia salina. Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci. 2015, 7, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Oliveira, M.; Ribeiro, A.; Hylland, K.; Guilhermino, L. Single and combined effects of microplastic and pyrene on juveniles (0+ group) of the common goby Pomatoschistus microps. Ecol. Indic. 2013, 34, 641–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Albendín, G.; Cabrera-Pozo, I.; Coello, D.; Rodríguez-Barroso, R.; Quiroga, J.M.; Arellano, J.M. Effects of triclosan and its mixed with microplastics on acetylcholinesterase present on head of Solea senegalensis. In XIX Seminario Ibérico de Química Marina; Cobelo, A., Nieto, O., Viñas, L., Álvarez-Salgado, X.A., Eds.; Universidade de Vigo: Vigo, Spain, 2018; pp. 97–98. [Google Scholar]
  71. Eder, M.L.; Oliva-Teles, L.; Pinto, R.; Carvalho, A.P.C.; Almeida, C.M.; Hornek-Gausterer, R.; Guimaraes, L. Microplastics as a vehicle of exposure to chemical contamination in freshwater systems: Current research status and way forward. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 417, 125980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Wang, F.; Zhang, M.; Sha, W.; Wang, Y.; Hao, H.; Dou, Y.; Li, Y. Rewiew: Sorption behaviour and mechanisms of organic contaminants to nano and microplastics. Molecules 2020, 25, 1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Bhagat, J.; Nishimura, N.; Shimada, Y. Toxicological interactions of microplastics/nanoplastics and environmental contaminants: Current knowledge and future perspectives. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 405, 123913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. MPs and Artemia salina: (a) MPs used in the tests, (b) Artemia salina control without MPs after 48 h and (c) Artemia salina mouth control without MPs after 48 h. Scale bar (ac): 200 µm.
Figure 1. MPs and Artemia salina: (a) MPs used in the tests, (b) Artemia salina control without MPs after 48 h and (c) Artemia salina mouth control without MPs after 48 h. Scale bar (ac): 200 µm.
Ijerph 18 10773 g001
Figure 2. Artemia salina after 48 h of exposure to different MP concentrations: (a) 26 mg/dm3 of MPs, (b) 0.69 mg/dm3 of MPs and (c) 1.5 mg/dm3 of MPs. Scale bar (ac): 200 µm.
Figure 2. Artemia salina after 48 h of exposure to different MP concentrations: (a) 26 mg/dm3 of MPs, (b) 0.69 mg/dm3 of MPs and (c) 1.5 mg/dm3 of MPs. Scale bar (ac): 200 µm.
Ijerph 18 10773 g002
Figure 3. Mortality rate of A. salina after 48 h of exposure to different contaminant concentrations (mg/dm3): (a) simvastatin and simvastatin + MP; (b) carbamazepine and carbamazepine + MP; (c) CPF and CPF + MP; and (d) TCS and TCS + MP. Mean values are represented. SW C: Seawater Control; AC C: Acetone Control.
Figure 3. Mortality rate of A. salina after 48 h of exposure to different contaminant concentrations (mg/dm3): (a) simvastatin and simvastatin + MP; (b) carbamazepine and carbamazepine + MP; (c) CPF and CPF + MP; and (d) TCS and TCS + MP. Mean values are represented. SW C: Seawater Control; AC C: Acetone Control.
Ijerph 18 10773 g003
Figure 4. ChE activity of A. salina after 48 h of exposure to different contaminant concentrations: (a) simvastatin, (b) simvastatin + MP, (c) carbamazepine and (d) carbamazepine + MP. Error bars represent standard deviations. * Significantly different between controls and other treatments (p > 0.05).
Figure 4. ChE activity of A. salina after 48 h of exposure to different contaminant concentrations: (a) simvastatin, (b) simvastatin + MP, (c) carbamazepine and (d) carbamazepine + MP. Error bars represent standard deviations. * Significantly different between controls and other treatments (p > 0.05).
Ijerph 18 10773 g004
Figure 5. ChE activity of A. salina after 48 h of exposure to different contaminant concentrations: (a) CPF, (b) CPF + MP, (c) TCS and (d) TCS + MP. Error bars represent standard deviations. * Significantly different between controls and other treatments (p > 0.05).
Figure 5. ChE activity of A. salina after 48 h of exposure to different contaminant concentrations: (a) CPF, (b) CPF + MP, (c) TCS and (d) TCS + MP. Error bars represent standard deviations. * Significantly different between controls and other treatments (p > 0.05).
Ijerph 18 10773 g005
Table 1. Quantification of MPs in the digestive tract of Artemia salina. Number of organisms in which MP was detected (MP)/number of organisms in which MP was not detected (No MP).
Table 1. Quantification of MPs in the digestive tract of Artemia salina. Number of organisms in which MP was detected (MP)/number of organisms in which MP was not detected (No MP).
Sample ReplicationTotal
MPMP/No MPMP/No MPMPs/No MPMPs/No MP
0.26 mg/dm32/82/81/95/30
0.69 mg/dm34/65/52/811/30
1.5 mg/dm33/77/39/119/30
Table 2. Forty-eight-hour LC50 values and confidence intervals for adult A. salina exposed to different toxicants (simvastatin, simvastatin + MP, carbamazepine, carbamazepine + MP, CPF, CPF + MP, TCS and TCS + MP).
Table 2. Forty-eight-hour LC50 values and confidence intervals for adult A. salina exposed to different toxicants (simvastatin, simvastatin + MP, carbamazepine, carbamazepine + MP, CPF, CPF + MP, TCS and TCS + MP).
Emergent ContaminantsLC50 (mg/dm3)95% Limits
Simvastatin9.358.58–10.43
Simvastatin + MP10.299.34–12.02
Carbamazepine43.2539.59–49.04
Carbamazepine + MP46.5041.95–55.72
CPF0.006 0.002–0.009
CPF + MP0.012 0.001–0.018
TCS4.979 2.096–6.0872
TCS + MP4.957 2.431–7.093
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Albendín, M.G.; Aranda, V.; Coello, M.D.; González-Gómez, C.; Rodríguez-Barroso, R.; Quiroga, J.M.; Arellano, J.M. Pharmaceutical Products and Pesticides Toxicity Associated with Microplastics (Polyvinyl Chloride) in Artemia salina. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 10773. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph182010773

AMA Style

Albendín MG, Aranda V, Coello MD, González-Gómez C, Rodríguez-Barroso R, Quiroga JM, Arellano JM. Pharmaceutical Products and Pesticides Toxicity Associated with Microplastics (Polyvinyl Chloride) in Artemia salina. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(20):10773. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph182010773

Chicago/Turabian Style

Albendín, María Gemma, Vanessa Aranda, María Dolores Coello, Carmen González-Gómez, Rocío Rodríguez-Barroso, José María Quiroga, and Juana María Arellano. 2021. "Pharmaceutical Products and Pesticides Toxicity Associated with Microplastics (Polyvinyl Chloride) in Artemia salina" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 20: 10773. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph182010773

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop