Next Article in Journal
COVID-19 Isolation in Healthy Population in Israel: Challenges in Daily Life, Mental Health, Resilience, and Quality of Life
Next Article in Special Issue
The First Polish Isolate of a Novel Species Pectobacterium aquaticum Originates from a Pomeranian Lake
Previous Article in Journal
Temporal and Spatial Variation of Radon Concentrations in Environmental Water from Okinawa Island, Southwestern Part of Japan
Previous Article in Special Issue
ARDEP, a Rapid Degenerate Primer Design Pipeline Based on k-mers for Amplicon Microbiome Studies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 18
Issue 3
10.3390/ijerph18030997
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genomic and Physiological Investigation of Heavy Metal Resistance from Plant Endophytic Methylobacterium radiotolerans MAMP 4754, Isolated from Combretum erythrophyllum

by
Mampolelo M. Photolo
1,
Lungile Sitole
1,
Vuyo Mavumengwana
2 and
Matsobane G. Tlou
3,*
1
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Auckland Park Campus, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2092, South Africa
2
DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, South African Medical Research Council Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tygerberg Campus, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town 7505, South Africa
3
Department of Biochemistry, School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, Mafikeng Campus, North-West University, Mafikeng 2790, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(3), 997; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18030997
Submission received: 16 December 2020 / Revised: 6 January 2021 / Accepted: 11 January 2021 / Published: 23 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Environmental Microbiology)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Combretum erythrophyllum is an indigenous southern African tree species, a metal hyperaccumulator that has been used as a phytoextraction option for tailing dams in Johannesburg, South Africa. In hyperaccumulators, metal detoxification has also been linked or attributed to the activities of endophytes, and, in this regard, metal detoxification can be considered a form of endophytic behavior. Therefore, we report herein on the identification of proteins that confer heavy metal resistance, the in vitro characterization of heavy metal resistance, and the production of plant growth-promoting (PGP) volatiles by Methylobacterium radiotolerans MAMP 4754. Multigenome comparative analyses of M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754 against eight other endophytic strains led to the identification of zinc, copper, and nickel resistance proteins in the genome of this endophyte. The maximum tolerance concentration (MTC) of this strain towards these metals was also investigated. The metal-exposed cells were analyzed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The ethyl acetate and chloroform extracts (1:1 v/v) of heavy metal untreated M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754 were also screened for the production of PGP compounds by Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectroscopy (GC/MS). The MTC was recorded at 15 mM, 4 mM, and 12 mM for zinc, copper, and nickel, respectively. The TEM analysis showed the accumulation of metals in the intracellular environment of M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754, while the GC/MS analysis revealed several plant growth-promoting compounds, including alcohols, phthalate esters, alkenes, ketones, sulfide derivatives, phenols, and thiazoles. Our findings suggest that the genetic makeup of M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754 encodes heavy metal resistant proteins that indicate hyperaccumulator-specific endophytic behavior and the potential for application in bioremediation. The production of plant growth-promoting volatiles in pure culture by M. raditotolerans MAMP 4754 is a characteristic feature for plant growth-promoting bacteria.

1. Introduction

Heavy metals are nondegradable, inorganic contaminants that are extremely toxic to many different living organisms [1]. Copper, zinc, iron, manganese, nickel, and cobalt are essential elements, which can be toxic in large amounts, whereas cadmium, mercury, lead, and silver are nonessential and extremely toxic elements [2,3,4,5]. The most common heavy metals, which are contributors to soil toxicity, are cadmium, nickel, lead, copper, manganese, and zinc [1,6]. The major environmental causes of heavy metal emissions include mining, agricultural pesticides, pharmaceuticals, sewage sludge, and industrial activities [7,8,9]. Conventional methods such as chemical precipitation, ion exchange, or reverse osmosis for the elimination of heavy metals from contaminated soils are costly and pose a variety of challenges, including high reagent requirements and the production of toxic sludge [10,11,12]. On the contrary, environmental remediation processes, such as phytoremediation, provide low-cost benefits, lower reagent requirements, and decreased production of disposable sludge [13,14].
Phytoremediation is the utilization of plants in the accumulation, degradation, or removal of contaminants, such as heavy metals, from the environment [15,16]. Plants with these remarkable metal remediating abilities are known as hyperaccumulator plants [17], and examples of such plants include Combretum erythrophyllum, a native southern African tree found in rivers and wetlands. This plant species has been used in the management of seepage from AngloGold Ashanti Ltd. (Johannesburg, South Africa) gold mine tailings [18] and, therefore, is generally considered a suitable candidate for the control of seepage and in situ stabilization of heavy metals [19]. Phytoremediation of soil contaminated with heavy metals can be achieved by various mechanisms, which include phytoextraction, phytovolatization, phytostabilzation, rhizodegradation, phytohydraulics, and phytodegradation [8,13,20,21,22,23,24]. Plant growth-promoting endophytes have been documented to play a significant role in the phytoremediation of heavy-metal-contaminated soil [25,26,27,28,29]. The partnership between endophytes and host plants enables adjustments in the physiology and metabolism of the plant [30,31]. Plant growth-promoting endophytes are able to detoxify pollutants and relieve planta stress through metabolic pathways, which are encoded by genes involved in nitrogen fixation, phytohormone synthesis, and degradation of contaminants. Examples of the enzymes/proteins involved include cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, hydrolases, polyphenol peroxidases, heavy metal ATPases, metallothioneins, and transporter proteins [32,33,34,35,36]. Furthermore, increasing evidence suggests that endophytes produce phytohormones, which also play an important role in accelerating heavy metal detoxification in plants [37,38]; as well as producing phosphatases, which are known as plant growth promotion traits [39].
The strain of interest in this study, Methylobacterium radiotolerans 4754, is an endophytic isolate from C. erythrophyllum that was isolated and identified as previously reported in [40]. Therefore, we hypothesize that this strain possesses heavy metal tolerance properties that are complementary to life inside the hyperaccumulator host plant and also produces secondary metabolites/volatiles that play a role in plant growth promotion, a characteristic feature for beneficial endophytic behavior.
Plant growth-promoting traits for endophytes can be identified by the presence (in the genomes) of genes that are implicated in the enhancement of nutrient absorption/availability, amelioration of oxidative and abiotic stresses, and catabolism of aromatic compounds [41]. Furthermore, for hyperaccumulator-inhabiting endophytes, the presence of genes/proteins for heavy metal resistance can be considered to indicate a specialized role played by the endophyte within the host plant. The latter is supported by the reported isolation from hyperaccumulator plants of metal-resistant bacterial isolates capable of detoxification and translocation of several heavy metals, including cadmium, nickel, copper, zinc, and mercury [42].
In this study, the reciprocal smallest distance (RSD) algorithm-based comparative multigenome analysis of M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754 versus selected Proteobacteria species (endophytic and rhizospheric) was employed for the investigation of genes/proteins possibly implicated in plant-beneficial behavior. We also report on the heavy metal detoxification properties and the production by this strain of organic compounds that are involved in plant growth promotion.

2. Method and Materials

2.1. Comparative Genome Analysis

Comparative genome analysis was done as per the methods described in [43]. Genome coding sequences were compared using the RSD algorithm with the most stringent blast E-value (1 × 10−20) and divergence thresholds (0.2) [44]. RSD makes use of reciprocal best blast hits (RBHs), global sequence alignment, and the highest probability estimation of evolutionary distance in the identification of orthologs between two genomes or two input files [44]. The complete genomes of endophytic and nonendophytic plant growth-promoting Proteobacteria were used (Table 1), and gene products putatively responsible for endophytic behavior were predicted. First, a nonendophytic (Methylobacterium nodulans ORS 2060) and an endophytic bacterium of the same genus (Methylobacterium mesophilicum SR 1.6/6) were compared. Orthologs were identified in both genomes, and the genes unique to the nonendophyte were subtracted from the genome of the endophytic bacterium M. mesophilicum SR 1.6/6. These orthologs were also subtracted from M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754, leaving behind genes putatively responsible for endophytic behavior. Furthermore, the common putative endophytic genes were compared to the genomes of eight different endophytic bacteria (Table 1), using the RSD algorithm in order to ensure their presence in several endophytic bacteria and their confirmation as candidates for endophytic behavior.

2.2. Growth Profile of M. Radiotolerans MAMP 4754

The bacterium, M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754, was initially cultured on Luria broth (LB) agar, incubated at 28 °C overnight, and a single colony was selected and inoculated into 10 mL of LB broth (preinoculum). The exponential phase preinoculum (10 mL) was used to inoculate LB medium (1000 mL) in a shake flask, and the growth was monitored at regular intervals by measuring the optical density at 600 nm in a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu spectrophotometer UV-1800; Shimadzu Corporation. Analytical & Measuring Instruments Division, Kyoto, Japan).

2.3. Determination of Maximum Tolerance Concentration (MTC)

The maximum tolerance concentration (MTC) for M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754 was determined for the heavy metals zinc, nickel, and copper (ZnCl2.6H2O, NiCl2.6H2O, and CuSO4.5H2O). The heavy metal stocks were prepared in deionized water, sterilized by a filter membrane with a pore size of 22 µm, and stored at 4 °C until used. Each heavy metal solution was added to Luria broth (LB) at varying final concentrations ranging from 1 mM to 15 mM for zinc, nickel, and copper. Bacterial growth was determined spectrophotometrically at OD600nm [57].

2.4. Transmission Electron Microscopy

In order to investigate the fate of the heavy metals in the cell, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed on the metal-treated and untreated cells. Briefly, the pellets were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) followed by their resuspension in 1 mL of fixative solution (2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2% formaldehyde), and kept at 4 °C for 6 h. Post fixation, the samples were centrifuged, and the pellets were washed with PBS five times. Finally, the pellets were resuspended in 1 mL of sodium phosphate buffer and analyzed by TEM. Studies were performed at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV using a Jeol JEM-2100F Field Emission Microscope instrument equipped with an LaB6 source. The TEM samples were prepared by dropping 10 µL of the resuspended pellets on a 200-mesh size copper grid coated with a lacy carbon film. The images were verified using a digital charge-coupled device camera.

2.5. Gas Chromatography HighResolution Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Analysis

In order to investigate the production of plant growth-promoting volatiles from M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754, an extraction was performed from the cell culture as previously described by [40]. The extract was studied for metabolites/volatiles using gas chromatography high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-HRTOFMS (LECO Corporation St. Joseph, MI, United States)), operating in high resolution, equipped with a Gerstel MPS multipurpose autosampler (Gerstel Inc., Mülheim, Germany). For the analysis, the samples were run in a 30 m × 0.25 mm capillary column with a film thickness of 0.25 µm. The carrier gas was helium, and it was maintained at a column flow rate of 1 mL/min. A 1 µL sample of the extract was injected and the column temperature was maintained at 75 °C, followed by temperature programming at 10 °C/min to 235 °C for 2 min, and finally to 300 °C at a rate of 40 °C/min for 3 min (scan range: 45–500 m/z). The mass spectrometer and transfer line were held at 250 °C. Peak picking, peak and retention time alignment, as well as detection and matching were done on ChromaTOF-HRT® software (LECO Corporation, St. Joseph, MI, United States). A signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio of 100 was used and the similarity/probability match was >70%, before a name was assigned to a compound using Mainlib, NIST, and the Feihn metabolomics database through comparison of the mass spectra data, the molecular formula, as well as the retention time.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Comparative Multigenome Analysis, MTC, and TEM Analysis

The use of comparative multigenome analysis is valuable in understanding the genetic and metabolic diversity of related microbes involved in different types of interactions with plants as well as with animals [58]. It also gives insight into various genomes from different bacteria encoding similar functions. Thus, the comparison of genes encoded by the endophytic Methylobacterium strain to the genomes of a rhizospheric strain of the same genus aids in the identification of genes specifically involved in endophytic behavior within the endophytic strain. Upon RSD-based analysis with eight plant growth-promoting endophytes of phylum Proteobacteria genes/gene products that play a role in the transport, secretion, and delivery system, we identified plant polymer degradation, transcriptional regulation, redox potential maintenance, and detoxification functions.
Interestingly, from the comparative analysis, proteins that confer resistance to zinc, copper, and nickel (heavy metals) (Table 2) stood out in the genome of M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754, possibly indicating involvement in endophytic behavior and/or a specialized role for the bacteria in the hyperaccumulator host plant. A probable explanation for the presence of these proteins is that the bacterium protects the plant from heavy-metal-induced stress and/or augment the process of metal detoxification by the host plant. Heavy metal stress can induce the production of ethylene and an excess of ethylene can inhibit plant development [59]. In this study, copper resistance gene A (Table 2), reportedly the main genetic element for copper resistance in Gram-negative bacteria [60,61], was also identified from the genome of M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754. Furthermore, TonB-dependent, transporter-related genes were also identified in the analysis (Table 2). These are outer membrane proteins that are frequently found binding and transporting nickel and iron chelates and, thus, play a vital role in bacterial metal transport [62,63]. Additionally, the nickel-responsive transcriptional regulator protein (NikR) (also identified in the comparative analysis) has been reported to regulate the expression of the nickel transporter system [64]. The presence of these genes in M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754, and their ion metal transport function, suggests their involvement in the heavy metal tolerance, and further supports the isolates’ potential in microbe-assisted phytoremediation and bioremediation, as previously suggested [65]. This is especially supported by the fact that Enterobacter cloacae subsp. cloacae ENHKU01, Enterobacter sp 638, Klebsiella pneumoniae 342, Pseudomonas putida W619, and Serratia proteamaculans 568 (isolated from hyperaccumulator plants Capsicum annuum, maize plants, and Populus trichocarpa × deltoides) were also found to possess heavy metal detoxification properties [66,67]. Furthermore, plant growth promotion enzymes such as glutathione S-transferase and glutathione-dependent dehydrogenase were also identified in M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754 and the other endophytes selected for the genome comparison. These enzymes are reported to play a role in the alleviation of oxidative stress caused by abiotic factors such as salinity and heavy metal toxicity, for example [68]. The identification of these enzymes, including the proteins for metal detoxification, indicates that M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754 is directly involved in processes of growth promotion in the host plant.
Various heavy metal concentrations for copper, nickel, and zinc were prepared and the maximum tolerance concentration for each metal was determined and is presented in Table 3. M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754 was able to tolerate heavy metal concentrations as high as 4.0, 12.0, and 15.0 mM for copper, nickel, and zinc, respectively. The level of copper, nickel, and zinc tolerance of M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754 is significant in comparison with what is reported for other Methylobacterium strains [10,69]. This suggests, therefore, the potential to utilize M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754 in heavy metal bioremediation processes and indicates an adaptation to life inside the hyperaccumulator plant host, C. erythrophyllum. Furthermore, the presence of copper-, nickel-, and zinc-detoxifying proteins is in support of the notion that endophytes and their plant hosts transfer beneficial attributes to each other through the process of horizontal gene transfer [70,71,72].
In order to investigate the fate of the treated metals, M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754 cells (heavy metal treated and untreated) were viewed under TEM. The transmission electron micrographs show metal accumulation in both the cell wall and the cytoplasmic membrane (Figure 1B–D). Furthermore, cells exposed to high concentrations of zinc showed thickening of the exterior membrane, which alludes to the mechanism of extracellular biosorption of the heavy metal on the cell surface. The localization of the heavy metal aggregates inside the cell suggests that the mediation of metal toxicity is due to the presence of metal-binding, as well as efflux, mechanisms.
As previously discussed by [73], the high resistance of M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754 to heavy metal stress is possibly due to an efficient ion efflux and metal complexation and reduction, and thus self-repair capabilities. It may therefore be inferred that metal allocation within bacterial cells is determined by the mechanism of tolerance for each micro-organism [74]. For example, when intracellular sequestration is the method of heavy metal detoxification, the complexation of metal ions occurs in the bacterial cell cytoplasm [75]; extracellular sequestration on the other hand, results in the accumulation of metal ions within the periplasm or the complexation of these heavy metals into less toxic insoluble compounds [75].

3.2. M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754 Plant Growth-Promoting Volatiles

For the determination of compounds implicated in plant growth promotion, gas chromatography high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-HRTOFMS) was performed as described in [40]. Several soil micro-organisms have been directed to promote plant root development based on the capacity of bacterial 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase to hydrolyze and lower the quantity of ACC, an ethylene precursor, in plants [76,77]. They also stimulate plant growth promotion by releasing volatile organic compounds, including esters, aliphatic aldehydes, alcohols, ketones, organic acids, hydrocarbons, and ethers [78,79]. In this study, several volatile organic compounds known to have an influence in plant growth promotion were identified to be produced by M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754. These identified bioactive volatile organic compounds have different functional groups, such as acids, ketones, alcohols, sulphides, alkenes, thiazoles, phthalic esters, and phenols (Table 4).
The widely known phenolic defense hormone, salicylic acid, was one of the acids identified in the GC-HRTOFMS analysis. This hormone is known to play a role in several physiological processes in plants, including local and systemic resistance [92]. Furthermore, salicylic acid improves photosynthetic disruption, growth inhibition, abnormal absorption of nutrients, and oxidative disruption that is triggered by heavy metal stress [93,94]. Dimethyl disulphide, which is known to be produced by several plant growth-promoting strains, was also identified. This compound was previously stated to act as a source of sulfur, which contributed to nutrition in tobacco seedlings [89], while [83] indicated its ability to raise biomass in Arabidopsis thaliana (2013).
Benzothiazole of the thiazole family was also identified in the GC-HRTOFMS analysis of M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754. The compound was previously obtained from various Pseudomonas spp., and showed potential for the inhibition of the formation of scleroids caused by the pathogenic fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, and increased salt-tolerance levels in soybeans [88,89]. The indole compound, dibutyl phthalate, plus the phenolic compounds (also identified in this study) were previously reported as a requirement for microbial associations within the host plant roots [95]. Eicosene was also identified, and it plays a role in antimicrobial and antifungal activity [87,96]. These results correlate with literature as Methylobacterium spp. have been stipulated to have the ability to inhibit plant pathogens, which in turn enhances plant growth promotion [97].

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, comparative genome analysis is useful in understanding the genetic diversity of similar or related micro-organisms, and different types of plant interactions including endophyte-assisted phytoremediation. The genome comparison analysis of M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754 to other plant growth-promoting endophytes identified proteins such as nickel-responsive transcriptional regulator protein NikR, cobalt–zinc–cadmium resistance protein CzcA, and copper resistance A, which support its role in heavy metal detoxification, a process that can be considered plant promoting for the hyperaccumulator host plant. The maximum tolerance concentrations of 4 mM, 15 mM, and 12 mM for copper, zinc, and nickel, respectively, are significantly high in comparison with other Methylobacterium strains, and this indicates the potential for the application of this strain in bioremedial processes. The study also showed that M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754 produces plant growth-promoting compounds. The presence of these volatiles suggests that the isolate can be exploited for the discovery of novel products for plant growth, biocontrol, and therapeutics.

Author Contributions

The following represents the individual author substantial contributions: conceptualization, M.M.P., M.G.T. and L.S.; methodology, M.M.P., M.G.T. and L.S.; validation, M.G.T. and L.S.; formal analysis, M.M.P.; investigation, M.M.P.; resources, L.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M.P.; writing—review and editing, M.G.T. and L.S.; visualization, M.M.P., M.G.T. and L.S.; supervision, M.G.T., V.M. and L.S.; project administration, M.G.T. and L.S.; funding acquisition, M.G.T. and L.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the University of Johannesburg, National Research Foundation (NRF, grant nos. TTK14052968076 and TTK150713125714), and LGC ownership trust bursary.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The bacterial endophyte reported herein (M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754) has been deposited in Genbank with accession number MF133459.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the University of Johannesburg, National Research Foundation (NRF, grant nos. TTK14052968076 and TTK150713125714), and LGC ownership trust bursary, for providing them with financial support. Mampolelo Mirriam Photolo received an Innovation Doctoral Scholarship from the NRF (grant no. SFH13082430507).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Daisley, B.A.; Monachese, M.; Trinder, M.; Bisanz, J.E.; Chmiel, J.A.; Burton, J.P.; Reid, G. Immobilization of Cadmium and Lead by Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 Mitigates Apical-to-basolateral Heavy Metal Translocation in a Caco-2 Model of the Intestinal Epithelium. Gut Microbes 2019, 10, 321–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Gadd, G.M. Heavy Metal Accumulation by Bacteria and other Microorganisms. Experientia 1990, 46, 834–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Williams, L.E.; Pittman, J.K.; Hall, J. Emerging Mechanisms for Heavy Metal Transport in Plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2000, 1465, 104–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fan, T.; Liu, Y.; Feng, B.; Zeng, G.; Yang, C.; Zhou, M.; Zhou, H.; Tan, Z.; Wang, X. Biosorption of Cadmium (II), Zinc (II) and Lead (II) by Penicillium simplicissimum: Isotherms, Kinetics and Thermodynamics. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 160, 655–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mazej, Z.; Al Sayegh-Petkovšek, S.; Pokorny, B. Heavy Metal Concentrations in Food Chain of Lake Velenjsko Jezero, Slovenia: An Artificial Lake from Mining. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2010, 58, 998–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Buchauer, M.J. Contamination of Soil and Vegetation near a Zinc Smelter by Zinc, Cadmium, Copper, and Lead. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1973, 7, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alloway, B.J. Heavy Metals in Soils; John Willey and Sons Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  8. Raskin, I.; Kumar, P.N.; Dushenkov, S.; Salt, D.E. Bioconcentration of Heavy Metals by Plants. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1994, 5, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shen, Z.G.; Li, X.D.; Wang, C.C.; Chen, H.M.; Chua, H. Lead Phytoextraction from Contaminated Soil with High-biomass Plant Species. J. Environ. Qual. 2002, 31, 1893–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Alboghobeish, H.; Tahmourespour, A.; Doudi, M. The Study of Nickel Resistant Bacteria (NiRB) Isolated from Wastewaters Polluted with Different Industrial Sources. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2014, 12, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Keramati, P.; Hoodaji, M.; Tahmourespour, A. Multi-Metal Resistance Study of Bacteria Highly Resistant to Mercury Isolated from Dental Clinic Effluent. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2011, 5, 831–837. [Google Scholar]
  12. De Silóniz, M.I.; Balsalobre, L.; Alba, C.; Valderrama, M.J.; Peinado, J.M. Feasibility of Copper Uptake by the Yeast Pichia guilliermondii Isolated from Sewage Sludge. Res. Microbiol. 2002, 153, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Raskin, I.; Ensley, B.D. Phytoremediation of Toxic Metals; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jadia, C.D.; Fulekar, M.H. Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals: Recent Techniques. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 8, 921–928. [Google Scholar]
  15. Prasad, M.N.V. Phytoremediation of Metals and Radionuclides in the Environment: The Case for Natural Hyperaccumulators, Metal Transporters, Soil-amending Chelators and Transgenic Plants. In Heavy Metal Stress in Plants; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2004; pp. 345–391. [Google Scholar]
  16. Dickinson, N.M.; Baker, A.J.; Doronila, A.; Laidlaw, S.; Reeves, R.D. Phytoremediation of Inorganics: Realism and Synergies. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2009, 11, 97–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Cho-Ruk, K.; Kurukote, J.; Supprung, P.; Vetayasuporn, S. Perennial Plants in the Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils. Biotechnology 2006, 5, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  18. Regnier, T.C.; Kouekam, C.R.; Leonard, C.M.; Mokgalaka, N.S.; Weiersbye, I.M. Chemical Analysis and Potential use of the Tree Combretum erythrophyllum Grown on Gold and Uranium Mine Tailings Seepage. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Mine Closure, Perth, Australia, 9–11 September 2009; pp. 539–547. [Google Scholar]
  19. Weiersbye, I.M.; Cukrowska, E.M. Elemental Concentrations in Wild Plants and Crops on the Witwatersrand Basin Gold Fields: Recommendations for Safe Land-Uses; AngloGold Ashanti Report; Witwatersrand University: Johannesburg, South Africa, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  20. Muthusaravanan, S.; Sivarajasekar, N.; Vivek, J.S.; Paramasivan, T.; Naushad, M.; Prakashmaran, J.; Gayathri, V.; Al-Duaij, O.K. Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals: Mechanisms, Methods and Enhancements. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2018, 16, 1339–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kamal, M.; Ghaly, A.E.; Mahmoud, N.; Cote, R. Phytoaccumulation of Heavy Metals by Aquatic Plants. Environ. Int. 2004, 29, 1029–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Berti, W.R.; Cunningham, S.D. Phytostabilization of Metals; John Willey and Sons Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  23. Newman, L.A.; Reynolds, C.M. Phytodegradation of Organic Compounds. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2004, 15, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zayed, A.M.; Pilon-Smits, E.; deSouza, E.M.; Lin, Z.-Q.; Terry, N. Remediation of Selenium-Polluted Soils and Waters by Phytovolatilization. In Phytoremediation of Contaminated Soil and Water; Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2000; pp. 61–83. [Google Scholar]
  25. Guo, H.; Luo, S.; Chen, L.; Xiao, X.; Xi, Q.; Wei, W.; Zeng, G.; Liu, C.; Wan, Y.; Chen, J.; et al. Bioremediation of Heavy Metals by Growing Hyperaccumulaor Endophytic Bacterium Bacillus sp. L14. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 8599–8605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Syranidou, E.; Christofilopoulos, S.; Gkavrou, G.; Thijs, S.; Weyens, N.; Vangronsveld, J.; Kalogerakis, N. Exploitation of Endophytic Bacteria to Enhance the Phytoremediation Potential of the Wetland Helophyte Juncus acutus. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Stępniewska, Z.; Kuźniar, A. Endophytic Microorganisms—Promising Applications in Bioremediation of Greenhouse Gases. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 9589–9596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Doty, S.L.; Freeman, J.L.; Cohu, C.M.; Burken, J.G.; Firrincieli, A.; Simon, A.; Khan, Z.; Isebrands, J.G.; Lukas, J.; Blaylock, M.J. Enhanced Degradation of TCE on a Superfund Site using Endophyte-assisted Poplar Tree Phytoremediation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 10050–10058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Motesharezadeh, B.; Alikhani, H.A.; Zariee, M.; Azimi, S. Investigating the Effects of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria and Glomus Mosseae on Cadmium Phytoremediation by Eucalyptus camaldulensis L. Pollution 2017, 3, 575–588. [Google Scholar]
  30. Tripathi, V.; Edrisi, S.A.; Chen, B.; Gupta, V.K.; Vilu, R.; Gathergood, N.; Abhilash, P.C. Biotechnological Advances for Restoring Degraded Land for Sustainable Development. Trends Biotechnol. 2017, 35, 847–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Afzal, S.; Begum, N.; Zhao, H.; Fang, Z.; Lou, L.; Cai, Q. Influence of Endophytic Root Bacteria on the Growth, Cadmium Tolerance and Uptake of Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 123, 498–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kotrba, P.; Najmanova, J.; Macek, T.; Ruml, T.; Mackova, M. Genetically Modified Plants in Phytoremediation of Heavy Metal and Metalloid Soil and Sediment Pollution. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27, 799–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yu, Q.; Powles, S. Metabolism-Based Herbicide Resistance and Cross-resistance in Crop Weeds: A Threat to Herbicide Sustainability and Global Crop Production. Plant Physiol. 2014, 166, 1106–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Santoyo, G.; Moreno-Hagelsieb, G.; del Carmen Orozco-Mosqueda, M.; Glick, B.R. Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterial Endophytes. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 183, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Schwitzguébel, J.P. Phytoremediation of Soils Contaminated by Organic Compounds: Hype, Hope and Facts. J. Soils Sediments 2017, 17, 1492–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Etesami, H. Bacterial Mediated Alleviation of Heavy Metal Stress and Decreased Accumulation of Metals in Plant Tissues: Mechanisms and Future Prospects. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 147, 175–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Babu, A.G.; Kim, J.D.; Oh, B.T. Enhancement of Heavy Metal Phytoremediation by Alnus Firma with Endophytic Bacillus thuringiensis GDB-1. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 250, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pál, M.; Janda, T.; Szalai, G. Interactions between Plant Hormones and Thiol-related Heavy Metal Chelators. Plant Growth Regul. 2018, 85, 173–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Tsavkelova, E.A.; Cherdyntseva, T.A.; Botina, S.G.; Netrusov, A.I. Bacteria Associated with Orchid Roots and Microbial Production of Auxin. Microbiol. Res. 2007, 162, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Photolo, M.M.; Mavumengwana, V.; Sitole, L.; Tlou, M.G. Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Properties of a Bacterial Endophyte, Methylobacterium radiotolerans MAMP 4754, Isolated from Combretum erythrophyllum Seeds. Int. J. Microbiol. 2020, 2020, 9483670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Asaf, S.; Khan, A.L.; Khan, M.A.; Al-Harrasi, A.; Lee, I.-J. Complete Genome Sequencing and Analysis of Endophytic Sphingomonas sp. LK11 and its Potential in Plant Growth. 3 Biotech 2018, 8, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Ma, Y.; Oliveira, R.S.; Nai, F.; Rajkumar, M.; Luo, Y.; Rocha, I.; Freitas, H. The Hyperaccumulator Sedum plumbizincicola Harbors Metal-Resistant Endophytic Bacteria that Improve its Phytoextraction Capacity in Multi-Metal Contaminated Soil. J. Environ. Manag. 2015, 156, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Ali, S.; Duan, J.; Charles, T.C.; Glick, B.R. A Bioinformatics Approach to the Determination of Genes Involved in Endophytic Behavior in Burkholderia spp. J. Theor. Biol. 2014, 343, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wall, D.P.; DeLuca, T. Ortholog Detection using the Reciprocal Smallest Distance Algorithm. In Comparative Genomics; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2007; pp. 95–110. [Google Scholar]
  45. Jourand, P.; Giraud, E.; Bena, G.; Sy, A.; Willems, A.; Gillis, M.; Dreyfus, B.; de Lajudie, P. Methylobacterium nodulans sp. nov., for a Group of Aerobic, Facultatively Methylotrophic, Legume Root-Nodule-Forming and Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2004, 54, 2269–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Almeida, D.M.; Dini-Andreote, F.; Neves, A.A.C.; Ramos, R.T.J.; Andreote, F.D.; Carneiro, A.R.; de Souza Lima, A.O.; de Sá, P.H.C.G.; Barbosa, M.S.R.; Araújo, W.L.; et al. Draft Genome Sequence of Methylobacterium Mesophilicum Strain SR1. 6/6, Isolated from Citrus Sinensis. Genome Announc. 2013, 1, e00356-13. [Google Scholar]
  47. Photolo, M.M.; Mavumengwana, V.; Serepa-Dlamini, M.H.; Tlou, M.G. Draft Genome Sequence of Methylobacterium radiotolerans Strain MAMP 4754, a Bacterial Endophyte Isolated from Combretum erythrophyllum in South Africa. Genome Announc. 2017, 5, e00976-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Copeland, A.; Lucas, S.; Lapidus, A.; Glavina Del Rio, T.; Dalin, E.; Tice, H.; Bruce, D.; Goodwin, L.; Pitluck, S.; Chertkov, O.; et al. Complete Sequence of Chromosome of Methylobacterium sp.; US DOE Joint Genome Institute: Walnut Creek, CA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  49. Wisniewski-Dyé, F.; Borziak, K.; Khalsa-Moyers, G.; Alexandre, G.; Sukharnikov, L.O.; Wuichet, K.; Hurst, G.B.; McDonald, W.H.; Robertson, J.S.; Barbe, V.; et al. Azospirillum Genomes Reveal Transition of Bacteria from Aquatic to Terrestrial Environments. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7, e1002430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Weilharter, A.; Mitter, B.; Shin, M.V.; Chain, P.S.; Nowak, J.; Sessitsch, A. Complete Genome Sequence of the Plant Growth-Promoting Endophyte Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJN. J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 3383–3384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Liu, W.Y.; Chung, K.M.K.; Wong, C.F.; Jiang, J.W.; Hui, R.K.H.; Leung, F.C.C. Complete Genome Sequence of the Endophytic Enterobacter cloacae subsp. cloacae strain ENHKU01. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194, 5965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Taghavi, S.; van der Lelie, D.; Hoffman, A.; Zhang, Y.B.; Walla, M.D.; Vangronsveld, J.; Newman, L.; Monchy, S. Genome Sequence of the Plant Growth-Promoting Endophytic Bacterium Enterobacter sp. 638. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6, e1000943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Fouts, D.E.; Tyler, H.L.; DeBoy, R.T.; Daugherty, S.; Ren, Q.; Badger, J.H.; Durkin, A.S.; Huot, H.; Shrivastava, S.; Kothari, S.; et al. Complete Genome Sequence of the N2-fixing Broad Host Range Endophyte Klebsiella pneumoniae 342 and Virulence Predictions Verified in Mice. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4, e1000141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Taghavi, S.; Garafola, C.; Monchy, S.; Newman, L.; Hoffman, A.; Weyens, N.; Barac, T.; Vangronsveld, J.; van der Lelie, D. Genome Survey and Characterization of Endophytic Bacteria Exhibiting a Beneficial Effect on Growth and Development of Poplar Trees. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 748–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Bai, Y.; Souleimanov, A.; Smith, D.L. An Inducible Activator Produced by a Serratia proteamaculans Strain and Its Soybean Growth-promoting Activity Under Greenhouse Conditions. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 1495–1502. [Google Scholar]
  56. Grkovic, S.; Glare, T.R.; Jackson, T.A.; Corbett, G.E. Genes Essential for Amber Disease in Grass Grubs Are Located on the Large Plasmid Found in Serratia entomophila and Serratia proteamaculans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 2218–2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Vashishth, A.; Khanna, S. Toxic Heavy Metals Tolerance in Bacterial Isolates Based on their Inducible Mechanism. Int. J. Novel Res. Life Sci. 2015, 2, 34–41. [Google Scholar]
  58. Kaul, S.; Sharma, T.; Dhar, K.M. “Omics” Tools for Better Understanding the Plant—Endophyte Interactions. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Jackson, M.B. Ethylene in root growth and development. In The Plant Hormone Ethylene; Mattoo, A.K., Suttle, J.C., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1991; pp. 159–181. [Google Scholar]
  60. Rensing, C.; Grass, G. Escherichia Coli Mechanisms of Copper Homeostasis in a Changing Environment. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 27, 197–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Lejon, D.P.H.; Nowak, V.; Bouko, S.; Pascault, N.; Mougel, C.; Martins, J.M.F.; Ranjard, L. Genetic Structure and Diversity of Copper Resistant Bacterial Communities According to Soil Types, Organic Status and Copper Contamination. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2007, 61, 424–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Noinaj, N.; Guillier, M.; Barnard, T.J.; Buchanan, S.K. TonB-Dependent Transporters: Regulation, Structure, and Function. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 64, 43–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Theriault, G.; Nkongolo, K.K. Evidence of Prokaryote like Protein Associated with Nickel Resistance in Higher Plants: Horizontal Transfer of TonB-Dependent Receptor/Protein in Betula Genus or de Novo Mechanisms? Heredity 2017, 118, 358–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Chivers, P.T.; Sauer, R.T. Regulation of High Affinity Nickel Uptake in Bacteria Ni2+-Dependent Interaction of NikR with Wild-type and Mutant Operator Sites. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 19735–19741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Khan, A.L.; Ullah, I.; Hussain, J.; Kang, S.M.; Al-Harrasi, A.; Al-Rawahi, A.; Lee, I.J. Regulations of Essential Amino Acids and Proteomics of Bacterial Endophytes Sphingomonas sp. L k11 During Cadmium Uptake. Environ. Toxicol. 2016, 31, 887–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Marrugo-Negrete, J.; Marrugo-Madrid, S.; Pinedo-Hernández, J.; Durango-Hernández, J.; Díez, S. Screening of Native Plant Species for Phytoremediation Potential at a Hg-contaminated Mining Site. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 542, 809–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Guerra, F.; Gainza, F.; Pérez, R.; Zamudio, F. Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals Using Poplars (Populus spp.): A Glimpse of the Plant Responses to Copper, Cadmium and Zinc Stress. In Handbook of Phytoremediation; Nova Science: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 387–413. [Google Scholar]
  68. Kang, S.M.; Khan, A.L.; Waqas, M.; You, Y.H.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, J.G.; Hamayun, M.; Lee, I.J. Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Reduce Adverse Effects of Salinity and Osmotic Stress by Regulating Phytohormones and Antioxidants in Cucumis sativus. J. Plant Interact. 2014, 9, 673–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Dourado, M.N.; Ferreira, A.; Araújo, W.L.; Azevedo, J.L.; Lacava, P.T. The Diversity of Endophytic Methylotrophic Bacteria in an Oil-contaminated and an Oil-free Mangrove Ecosystem and their Tolerance to Heavy Metals. Biotechnol. Res. Int. 2012, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Wickell, D.A.; Li, F.W. On the Evolutionary Significance of Horizontal Gene Transfers in Plants. N. Phytol. 2019, 225, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Schaack, S.; Gilbert, C.; Feschotte, C. Promiscuous DNA: Horizontal Transfer of Transposable Elements and Why It Matters for Eukaryotic Evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25, 537–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Rosewich, U.L.; Kistler, H.C. Role of Horizontal Gene Transfer in the Evolution of Fungi. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 2000, 38, 325–363. [Google Scholar]
  73. Wang, X.; Chen, M.; Xiao, J.; Hao, L.; Crowley, D.E.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, J.; Huang, N.; Huo, M.; Wu, J. Genome Sequence Analysis of the Naphthenic Acid Degrading and Metal Resistant Bacterium Cupriavidus gilardii CR3. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0132881. [Google Scholar]
  74. Vicentin, R.P.; Santos, J.V.D.; Labory, C.R.G.; Costa, A.M.D.; Moreira, F.M.D.S.; Alves, E. Tolerance to and Accumulation of Cadmium, Copper, and Zinc by Cupriavidus necator. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 2018, 42, e0170080. [Google Scholar]
  75. Igiri, B.E.; Okoduwa, S.I.; Idoko, G.O.; Akabuogu, E.P.; Adeyi, A.O.; Ejiogu, I.K. Toxicity and Bioremediation of Heavy Metals Contaminated Ecosystem from Tannery Wastewater: A Review. J. Toxicol. 2018, 2018, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  76. Hall, J.A.; Peirson, D.; Ghosh, S.; Glick, B. Root Elongation in Various Agronomic Crops by the Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR12–2. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 1996, 44, 37–42. [Google Scholar]
  77. Glick, B.R.; Penrose, D.M.; Li, J. A Model for the Lowering of Plant Ethylene Concentrations by Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria. J. Theor. Biol. 1998, 190, 63–68. [Google Scholar]
  78. Kai, M.; Haustein, M.; Molina, F.; Petri, A.; Scholz, B.; Piechulla, B. Bacterial Volatiles and Their Action Potential. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 81, 1001–1012. [Google Scholar]
  79. Vaishnav, A.; Varma, A.; Tuteja, N.; Choudhary, D.K. PGPR-Mediated Amelioration of Crops Under Salt Stress. In Plant-Microbe Interaction: An Approach to Sustainable Agriculture; Springer: Singapore, 2017; pp. 205–226. [Google Scholar]
  80. Wei, Y.; Liu, G.; Chang, Y.; He, C.; Shi, H. Heat Shock Transcription Factor 3 Regulates Plant Immune Response Through Modulation of Salicylic Acid Accumulation and Signalling in Cassava. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018, 19, 2209–2220. [Google Scholar]
  81. Sharifi, R.; Ryu, C.M. Are bacterial volatile compounds poisonous odors to a fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea, alarm signals to Arabidopsis seedlings for eliciting induced resistance, or both? Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 196. [Google Scholar]
  82. Gutiérrez-Luna, F.M.; López-Bucio, J.; Altamirano-Hernández, J.; Valencia-Cantero, E.; De La Cruz, H.R.; Macías-Rodríguez, L. Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Modulate Root-system Architecture in Arabidopsis thaliana through Volatile Organic Compound Emission. Symbiosis 2010, 51, 75–83. [Google Scholar]
  83. Groenhagen, U.; Baumgartner, R.; Bailly, A.; Gardiner, A.; Eberl, L.; Schulz, S.; Weisskopf, L. Production of Bioactive Volatiles by Different Burkholderia ambifaria strains. J. Chem. Ecol. 2013, 39, 892–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Singh, S.K.; Strobel, G.A.; Knighton, B.; Geary, B.; Sears, J.; Ezra, D. An Endophytic Phomopsis sp. Possessing Bioactivity and Fuel Potential with its Volatile Organic Compounds. Microb. Ecol. 2011, 61, 729–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Dolatabad, H.K.; Goltapeh, E.M.; Safari, M.; Golafaie, T.P. Potential Effect of Piriformospora indica on Plant Growth and Essential Oil Yield in Mentha piperita. Plant. Pathol. Quar. 2017, 7, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Leff, J.W.; Fierer, N. Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Emissions from Soil and Litter Samples. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2008, 40, 1629–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Shah, S.; Shrestha, R.; Maharjan, S.; Selosse, M.A.; Pant, B. Isolation and Characterization of Plant Growth-promoting Endophytic Fungi from the Roots of Dendrobium moniliforme. Plants 2019, 8, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Fernando, W.D.; Ramarathnam, R.; Krishnamoorthy, A.S.; Savchuk, S.C. Identification and Use of Potential Bacterial Organic Antifungal Volatiles in Biocontrol. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2005, 37, 955–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Vaishnav, A.; Kumari, S.; Jain, S.; Varma, A.; Tuteja, N.; Choudhary, D.K. PGPR-Mediated Expression of Salt Tolerance Gene in Soybean Through Volatiles Under Sodium Nitroprusside. J. Basic Microbiol. 2016, 56, 1274–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Meldau, D.G.; Meldau, S.; Hoang, L.H.; Underberg, S.; Wünsche, H.; Baldwin, I.T. Dimethyl Disulfide Produced by the Naturally Associated Bacterium Bacillus sp. B55 Promotes Nicotiana attenuata Growth by Enhancing Sulfur Nutrition. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 2731–2747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Siddiquee, S.; Cheong, B.E.; Taslima, K.; Kausar, H.; Hasan, M.M. Separation and Identification of Volatile Compounds from Liquid Cultures of Trichoderma harzianum by GC-MS Using Three Different Capillary Columns. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2012, 50, 358–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Zhang, X.; Li, C.; Nan, Z. Effects of Cadmium Stress on Growth and Anti-Oxidative Systems in Achnatherum inebrians Symbiotic with Neotyphodium gansuense. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 175, 703–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Popova, L.P.; Maslenkova, L.T.; Yordanova, R.Y.; Ivanova, A.P.; Krantev, A.P.; Szalai, G.; Janda, T. Exogenous Treatment with Salicylic Acid Attenuates Cadmium Toxicity in Pea Seedlings. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2009, 47, 224–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Wani, S.H.; Kumar, V.; Shriram, V.; Sah, S.K. Phytohormones and Their Metabolic Engineering for Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants. Crop J. 2016, 4, 162–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Peters, N.K.; Verma, D.P.S. Phenolic Compounds as Regulators of Gene Expression in Plant-Microbe Interactions. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 1990, 3, 4–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Baltruschat, H.; Fodor, J.; Harrach, B.D.; Niemczyk, E.; Barna, B.; Gullner, G.; Janeczko, A.; Kogel, K.H.; Schäfer, P.; Schwarczinger, I.; et al. Salt Tolerance of Barley Induced by the Root Endophyte Piriformospora indica is Associated with a Strong Increase in Antioxidants. N. Phytol. 2008, 180, 501–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Poorniammal, R.; Sundaram, S.P.; Kumutha, K. In Vitro Biocontrol Activity of Methylobacterium extorquens against Fungal Pathogens. Int. J. Plant Prot. 2009, 2, 59–62. [Google Scholar]
Ijerph 18 00997 g001 550
Figure 1. Transmission electron micrographs of M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754 after 2 days of inoculation. (A): Untreated cell; (B): Nickel-treated cells (12 mM); (C): Copper-treated cells (4 mM); (D): Zinc-treated cells (15 mM). The arrows indicate metal accumulation/aggregation within the cell.
Figure 1. Transmission electron micrographs of M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754 after 2 days of inoculation. (A): Untreated cell; (B): Nickel-treated cells (12 mM); (C): Copper-treated cells (4 mM); (D): Zinc-treated cells (15 mM). The arrows indicate metal accumulation/aggregation within the cell.
Ijerph 18 00997 g001
Table
Table 1. Bacteria used in this study, including Genbank accession number and the nature of their interaction with plants.
Table 1. Bacteria used in this study, including Genbank accession number and the nature of their interaction with plants.
BacteriumAccession NumberBiological NatureReferences
Methylobacterium nodulans ORS 2060NC_011894.1Non-endophytic[45]
Methylobacterium mesophilicum SR 1.6/6NZ_ANPA01000003.1Endophyte[46]
Methylobacterium radiotolerans MAMP 4754NKQS00000000Endophytic[47]
Methylobacterium radiotolerans JCM 2831CP001001.1Endophytic[48]
Azospirillum lipoferum 4BNC_016622Endophytic[49]
Paraburkholderia phytofirmans PsJNCP001053Endophytic[50]
Enterobacter cloacae subsp. cloacae ENHKU01CP003737Endophytic[51]
Enterobacter sp 638NC_009436Endophytic[52]
Klebsiella pneumoniae 342NC_011283Endophytic[53]
Pseudomonas putida W619CP000949.1Endophytic[54]
Serratia proteamaculans 568NC_009832Endophytic[55,56]
Table
Table 2. Summary of proteins putatively responsible for heavy metal resistance of copper, nickel, zinc, and siderophore production in Methylobacterium radiotolerans MAMP 4754.
Table 2. Summary of proteins putatively responsible for heavy metal resistance of copper, nickel, zinc, and siderophore production in Methylobacterium radiotolerans MAMP 4754.
Protein_idsProtein NamesALECESKPBPMRPPSP
WP_043378427.1Metallophosphoesterase11110010
WP_059409106.1Heavy metal translocating P-type ATPase11111011
WP_043388287.1Divalent metal cation transporter01111010
WP_059409724.1Siderophore-iron reductase FhuF01110110
WP_012321357.1Glutathione S-transferase11111111
WP_024827434.1Glutathione-dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenase11111111
WP_050735140.1Metal/formaldehyde-sensitive transcriptional repressor01110110
WP_059409487.1CusA/CzcA family heavy metal efflux RND transporter01110111
WP_059408797.1Amidohydrolase/deacetylase family metallohydrolase01110110
WP_053621161.1NRAMP family metal ion transporter01110110
WP_059409485.1Heavy metal RND transporter01110110
WP_059408529.1Metallophore periplasmic binding protein01110110
WP_012321311.1Zinc-dependent hydrolase11111111
WP_029358139.1Zinc-binding dehydrogenase11110111
WP_058608166.1Zinc ribbon domain-containing protein01110110
WP_012329798.1Nickel ABC transporter permease subunit NikA01110111
WP_012329795.1Nickel-responsive transcriptional regulator NikR01110110
WP_059408014.1Nickel/cobalt efflux protein RcnA01110110
WP_059408010.1Nickel resistance protein01110010
WP_059408014.1Nickel efflux protein RcnA01110110
WP_059408075.1Copper chaperone01110110
WP_059408113.1Copper resistance protein A01110110
WP_059407953.1Crp/Fnr family transcriptional regulator11110010
WP_059408521.1TonB-dependent siderophore receptor11111111
WP_012319993.1Multidrug efflux RND transporter permease subunit11111111
WP_059409802.1Efflux RND transporter periplasmic adaptor subunit11111111
WP_029360904.1Arsenical efflux pump membrane protein ArsB01111111
WP_059408180.1Hydrophobe/amphiphile efflux-1 family RND transporter01111101
WP_012318331.1MATE efflux family protein01111100
WP_012321398.1Fluoride efflux transporter CrcB01111100
The numbers “1” and “0” in columns 3–10 represent the presence or absence of particular genes in the studied genome, respectively. The reciprocal smallest distance (RSD) algorithm was utilized with the blast E-value (1 E-20) and divergence thresholds (0.2). Strains key: AL is Azospirillum lipoferum 4B, EC is Enterobacter cloacae subsp. cloacae ENHKU01, ES is Enterobacter sp 638, KP is Klebsiella pneumoniae 342, BP is Paraburkholderia phytofirmans PsJN, MR is Methylobacterium radiotolerans JCM 2831, PP is Pseudomonas putida W619, and SP is Serratia proteamaculans 568.
Table
Table 3. Maximum tolerable concentration shown by M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754 against heavy metals.
Table 3. Maximum tolerable concentration shown by M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754 against heavy metals.
HM Concentrations (mM)12345678910111213141516171819
MTC of Nickel++++++++++++-------
MTC of Copper++++---------------
MTC of Zinc+++++++++++++++----
A “+” sign in columns 2–20 indicates the presence of bacterial growth and “-” indicates the absence of bacterial growth.
Table
Table 4. Gas chromatography high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-HRTOFMS) analysis of the crude extract of M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754, showing microbial compounds reported for their ability to promote plant growth.
Table 4. Gas chromatography high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-HRTOFMS) analysis of the crude extract of M. radiotolerans MAMP 4754, showing microbial compounds reported for their ability to promote plant growth.
R.T (min:sec)Molecule NameMFFunctional GroupReferences
14:43Salicylic acidC7H6O3Acid[80]
03:332-Butanone, 3-ethoxy-3-methyl-C6H12O2Ketone[81]
17:032-Acetoxy-5-hydroxyacetophenoneC10H10O4Ketone[82,83]
16:432-Propanone, 1,1,1-trifluoroC3H3F3OKetone[84]
04:263-Pentanol, 3-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2,2,4,4-tetramethyl-C13H28OAlcohol[81]
24:59Dibutyl phthalateC16H22O4Phthalic esters[85]
04:00Propanoic acid, ethyl esterC5H10O2Ester[86]
20:42Phenol, 2,5-bis (1,1-dimethylethyl)C14H22OPhenol[86]
25:113-EicoseneC20H40Alkene[87]
16:26BenzothiazoleC7H5NSThiazole[88,89]
04:30Dimethyl, disulfideC2H6S2Disulfide[90]
23:023,5-di-tert-Butyl-4-hydroxybenzaldehydeC15H22O2Aldehyde[91]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Photolo, M.M.; Sitole, L.; Mavumengwana, V.; Tlou, M.G. Genomic and Physiological Investigation of Heavy Metal Resistance from Plant Endophytic Methylobacterium radiotolerans MAMP 4754, Isolated from Combretum erythrophyllum. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 997. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18030997

AMA Style

Photolo MM, Sitole L, Mavumengwana V, Tlou MG. Genomic and Physiological Investigation of Heavy Metal Resistance from Plant Endophytic Methylobacterium radiotolerans MAMP 4754, Isolated from Combretum erythrophyllum. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(3):997. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18030997

Chicago/Turabian Style

Photolo, Mampolelo M., Lungile Sitole, Vuyo Mavumengwana, and Matsobane G. Tlou. 2021. "Genomic and Physiological Investigation of Heavy Metal Resistance from Plant Endophytic Methylobacterium radiotolerans MAMP 4754, Isolated from Combretum erythrophyllum" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 3: 997. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18030997

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop