Next Article in Journal
Concepts, Beliefs, and Traditional Treatment for Childhood Seizures in a Quilombola Community in Northeastern Brazil: Analysis by the Discourse of the Collective Speech
Previous Article in Journal
Pollution Source Apportionment and Water Quality Risk Evaluation of a Drinking Water Reservoir during Flood Seasons
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 18
Issue 4
10.3390/ijerph18041874
Review Report
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Pathways from Type A Personality to Physical and Mental Health Amid COVID-19: A Multiple-Group Path Model of Frontline Anti-Epidemic Medical Staff and Ordinary People

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(4), 1874; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18041874
by Peng Wang 1, Rong Wang 1, Mei Tian 2,*, Yu Sun 1, Jiexin Ma 1, Yitong Tu 1 and Yun Yan 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(4), 1874; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18041874
Submission received: 21 January 2021 / Revised: 9 February 2021 / Accepted: 10 February 2021 / Published: 15 February 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Here are my minor concerns:

1- In some cases, the paper uses a causal language. Make sure this is nor suggesting any causation. 

2- More data are needed on alternative models.

3- More date are needed on validity and reliability and factor structure of the measures used in this study.

4- Instead of bullet points, write the aims as a paragraph.

5- More details are needed on selection of final SEM models.

 

Other than these comments, I like the paper. 

Author Response

Thank you for reminding us of this question, please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The topic is current. Please look at these remarks:

1. In Materials and Methods (lines 138-140) "According to the questionnaire response rate... ordinary people (n = 325)". How were these answers collected? Moreover, if these answers were collected by phone or in person, the role of telemedicine in this historic pandemic period needs to be discussed. Add these 2 papers:        Montemurro N. Will COVID-19 change neurosurgical clinical practice? Br J Neurosurg. 2020 Jun 1:1-2. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2020.1773399.            Ateriya N, Saraf A, Meshram VP, Setia P. Telemedicine and virtual consultation: The Indian perspective. Natl Med J India. 2018 Jul-Aug;31(4):215-218. doi: 10.4103/0970-258X.258220.

 

2.  In Results section (lines 215-218): merge subparagraphs 3.1 and 3.2, please removed "3.1 Independent Samples T-Test and Correlation Analysis", leave "3.1 Path Analysis for Ordinary People and Frontline Anti-epidemic Medical Personnel Samples"

 

3. "4.5. Limitations and prospects" paragraph (lines 408-418) must be improved. Remove point 1 (lines 408-409), this is not a limitation, you can put this sentence in the discussion section.

 

4.  In Discussion section (lines 283-286) more neurological symptoms (just 2-3 lines) and covid-19 must be discussed.

Author Response

Thank you for reminding us of this question, please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Good.

Back to TopTop