Next Article in Journal
Comparative Analysis of Composite Mortality Prediction Scores in Intensive Care Burn Patients
Previous Article in Journal
Marine Oil Spill Detection from SAR Images Based on Attention U-Net Model Using Polarimetric and Wind Speed Information
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Amer et al. Assessing Patient Experience and Attitude: BSC-PATIENT Development, Translation, and Psychometric Evaluation—A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 7149

1
Doctoral School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, H-7621 Pécs, Hungary
2
Institute for Health Insurance, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, H-7621 Pécs, Hungary
3
Division of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An Najah National University, Nablus P.O. Box 7, Palestine
4
Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, An Najah National University, Nablus P.O. Box 7, Palestine
5
National Laboratory for Human Reproduction, University of Pécs, H-7621 Pécs, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(19), 12319; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph191912319
Submission received: 19 July 2022 / Accepted: 15 August 2022 / Published: 28 September 2022
The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [1]:

Text Correction

There was an error in the “Abstract” of the original publication. We mentioned that “The final best fit model in CFA comprised ten constructs with 34 items.”
A correction has been made to “The final best fit model in CFA comprised ten constructs with 36 items.”
There was an error in the “Conclusions” of the original publication. We mentioned that “It consists of 19 items assessing patient experience observations and 15 items assessing patient attitudes.”
A correction has been made to “It consists of 36 items; 21 items assessing patient experience observations and 15 items assessing patient attitudes.”

Error in Figure

In the original publication, there were mistakes in Figure 5 as published. The corrected Figure 5 appears below.

Error in Table

In the original publication, there was a mistake in Table A3 as published. We missed two lines of data. The corrected Table A3 appears below.

Appendix A

Table A3. Final resulted items.
Table A3. Final resulted items.
ConstructCodeNo.Question
PT EXR PCU4 Q1 This hospital distributes surveys to assess my satisfaction before discharge.
PCU3 Q2 This hospital distributes surveys to assess my needs upon arrival to the hospital, admission, or during the stay.
PLE11 Q3 This hospital follows up with me after the discharge.
PCU5 Q4 My complaints are taken seriously into consideration and solved immediately at this hospital.
PLE6 Q5 Staff trained me on infection precaution measures such as hand hygiene, cough etiquette, isolation rational, personal protective equipment, etc.
PR EXR PFI2 Q6 I pay a reasonable price for the other medical services (laboratory, radiology, etc.) at this hospital.
PFI3 Q7 I pay a reasonable price for the medications at this hospital.
PFI1 Q8 I pay a reasonable price for the medical consultation at this hospital.
BUILENV EXR PEN13 Q9 There is a sufficient number of chairs in the waiting area.
PEN12 Q10 The hospital has clean departments, corridors, rooms, bathrooms.
BUILCAP EXR PEN14 Q11 The capacity of departments at this hospital including (ER, ICU, waiting room, etc.) is sufficient enough.
PEN11 Q12 This hospital has new building infrastructure (walls, ceiling, bathrooms, etc.).
ACC EXR PEN4 Q13 The accessibility to this hospital is easy by either public transportation or my car.
PEN5 Q14 The accessibility to this hospital in an emergency is easy.
INFO EXR PLE4 Q15 Information provided to me to be used after discharge is sufficient (medication and side effects, health condition, etc.).
PLE3 Q16 Oral and written information provided to me or my family during my hospital experience is sufficient.
PLE2 Q17 Information and guidance provided at admission or the first visit are sufficient.
SERV PEN8 Q18 Female doctors are available at this hospital.
PIN12 Q19 There are a variety of departments at this hospital.
PIN18 Q20 Services at night, vacations, and weekends are available at this hospital.
PIN15 Q21 There are a variety of specialties at this hospital.
BSCP ATT SAT3 Q22 I will recommend this hospital to my family and friends.
PIN1 Q23 I believe I receive an accurate medical examination at this hospital.
PEN3 Q24 I believe this hospital offers me better treatment than the other Palestinian hospitals.
SAT1 Q25 My overall satisfaction with this hospital’s performance is high.
PEN1 Q26 I believe this hospital has a high cure rate.
SAT2 Q27 I will choose this hospital again when I need a medical consultation.
PLE1 Q28 I believe the staff at this hospital are competent, knowledgeable, updated, and skilled.
PIN16 Q29 The services provided to me at this hospital have high quality.
PIN14 Q30 I believe the medications prescribed to me at this hospital have good quality and efficacy.
COMP IMAGE PIN6 Q31 There is a probability for postoperative bacterial infection at this hospital
PIN5 Q32 There is a probability for case referral to another hospital
PIN4 Q33 There is a probability for case readmission at the same hospital
TECH IMAGE PLE9 Q34 This hospital use technology to link my prescriptions and tests with pharmacy and labs.
PLE10 Q35 This hospital use technology for saving my records.
PLE8 Q36 I believe this hospital uses the newest technology and devices for diagnosing and treating patients.
The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Amer, F.; Hammoud, S.; Onchonga, D.; Alkaiyat, A.; Nour, A.; Endrei, D.; Boncz, I. Assessing Patient Experience and Attitude: BSC-PATIENT Development, Translation, and Psychometric Evaluation—A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 7149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 5. Flow chart for BSC-PATIENT development and psychometric validation.
Figure 5. Flow chart for BSC-PATIENT development and psychometric validation.
Ijerph 19 12319 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Amer, F.; Hammoud, S.; Onchonga, D.; Alkaiyat, A.; Nour, A.; Endrei, D.; Boncz, I. Correction: Amer et al. Assessing Patient Experience and Attitude: BSC-PATIENT Development, Translation, and Psychometric Evaluation—A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 7149. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 12319. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph191912319

AMA Style

Amer F, Hammoud S, Onchonga D, Alkaiyat A, Nour A, Endrei D, Boncz I. Correction: Amer et al. Assessing Patient Experience and Attitude: BSC-PATIENT Development, Translation, and Psychometric Evaluation—A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 7149. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(19):12319. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph191912319

Chicago/Turabian Style

Amer, Faten, Sahar Hammoud, David Onchonga, Abdulsalam Alkaiyat, Abdulnaser Nour, Dóra Endrei, and Imre Boncz. 2022. "Correction: Amer et al. Assessing Patient Experience and Attitude: BSC-PATIENT Development, Translation, and Psychometric Evaluation—A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 7149" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 19: 12319. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph191912319

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop