Next Article in Journal
Long-Term Residential Environment Exposure and Subjective Wellbeing in Later Life in Guangzhou, China: Moderated by Residential Mobility History
Next Article in Special Issue
Breastfeeding and Maternal Perceptions of Infant Sleep, Settle and Cry Patterns in the First 9 Months
Previous Article in Journal
Health Risk Assessment during In Situ Remediation of Cr(VI)-Contaminated Groundwater by Permeable Reactive Barriers: A Field-Scale Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Frequent Smartphone Use on Sleep Problems in Children under 7 Years of Age in Korea: A 4-Year Longitudinal Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sleep Respiratory Disturbances in Girls with Rett Syndrome

1
NeuroDiderot-INSERM, Université de Paris, 75019 Paris, France
2
Department of Sleep-Wake Disorders and Chronobiology, Hospital Gelderse Vallei Ede, Governor Kremers Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6716 RP Gelderland, The Netherlands
3
Governor Kremers Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(20), 13082; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph192013082
Submission received: 3 September 2022 / Revised: 8 October 2022 / Accepted: 10 October 2022 / Published: 12 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Sleep in Children)

Abstract

:
Individuals with Rett Syndrome (RTT), a rare neurodevelopmental disorder, present disordered breathing during wakefulness. Whilst findings on breathing during sleep are contradictory, the relation between sleep breathing and their clinical features, genetic characteristics, age, and sleep phase is rarely investigated, which is the objective of this study. Overnight polysomnography (PSG) was performed. Sleep macrostructure parameters were compared between the RTT subjects with and without sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). The association between the apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) with age at PSG was tested. Particularly for RTT subjects with SDB, the respiratory indexes in REM and NREM sleep were compared. Stratified analyses per clinical characteristics, genetic characteristics, and clinical features’ severity were performed. Non-parametric statistics were applied. A sample of 11 female RTT subjects, aged 8.69 ± 5.29 years with ten confirmed with MECP2 mutations, were studied. The average AHI was 3.94 ± 1.19/h TST, of which eight (72.73%) had obstructive sleep apnea, i.e., six in 1/h TST ≤ AHI ≤ 5/h TST, and two in AHI > 5/h TST. The mean SpO2% was 81.00 ± 35.15%. The AHI was not significantly correlated with their age at PSG (rs = −0.15, p = 0.67). Sleep macrostructure in SDB-absent and SDB-present groups was not different. Respiratory indexes in those with obstructive sleep apnea showed no difference between REM and NREM sleep nor any of the strata. In our clinical sample, more than half of the RTT subjects with MECP2 mutations had obstructive sleep apnea in both NREM and REM sleep which was unrelated to their clinical features. Our results also indicated hypoxemia throughout nocturnal sleep in RTT. To conclude, our results suggest that disordered breathing during sleep is prevalently present in RTT as an independent clinical feature.

1. Introduction

Rett Syndrome (RTT, OMIM 312750) is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder with an incidence rate of 1/10,000 in girls [1]. Genetically, RTT is strongly associated with the X-linked dominant methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2) gene [2], being confirmed in more than 90% of the RTT cases [3]. MECP2 is a critical component regulating the DNA methylation and transcription of many other genes and is, therefore, expressed widely across the body systems. Thus, MECP2 malfunction would cause diverse and complex consequences. In terms of symptomatology, RTT is characterized by stealthy onset in early infancy [4] and rapid developmental deterioration at approximately 6–18 months postnatal age [5]. A spectrum of cardinal clinical manifestations, including loss of acquired purposeful hand skills and spoken language and the presence of gait abnormalities and stereotypical hand movements [1], is generally seen in RTT. In addition to the essential clinical features, other features present in RTT are epilepsy, problematic sleeping, breathing dysfunction, and scoliosis. Upon presence and absence of these clinical features, individuals with RTT are diagnosed and classified into classic phenotype and atypical variants including three distinctive variants: Preserved speech variant (PSV), Congenital variant (CV), and Early seizure variant (ESV) [1].
The breathing disturbances of these patients are a predominant clinical abnormality during their wake state and are known to be potentially life-threatening [6]. More specifically, various breathing forms including apneustic breathing, episodic hyperventilation, air swallowing, forceful breathing, and breath-holding spells terminated by Valsalva maneuvers, have been vividly described [7,8,9,10]. Their daytime respiratory phenotypes were further classified into forceful, feeble, and apneustic [11], yet breathing disturbances are thought to vary between day and night [12]. Early studies reported roughly normal breathing patterns during sleep [13,14]. However, both obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and central sleep apnea were reported in more recent RTT polysomnographic (PSG) studies [15,16,17]. Several sleep studies [15,16,17,18,19,20] reported that the apnea–hypopnea index (AHI), a key index to define sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), is in the abnormal range, thus suggestive of SDB in RTT. We further found in an aggregated sample from case (series) studies in the PSG literature [21], that 71.7% of RTT cases had an abnormal AHI, and approximately half of those with SDB were in the severe range (i.e., AHI >5/h TST). Additionally, we confirmed severe nocturnal hypoxemia with apneic events in RTT cases in our meta-analysis of PSG data [22].
In a typically developing (TD) population, the prevalence of SDB is estimated to vary widely from 0.7% to 13.0% [23]. Moreover, in the pediatric TD population, abnormal sleep breathing was found to be dominant [24,25,26] in rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Findings of abnormal sleep breathing in specific sleep stages in RTT remain scant, such that only one study revealed a subtle decrease in oxygen saturation during REM sleep [13]. Furthermore, and firstly, in RTT animal studies, sleep apnea was found to be more frequent in non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep than in REM sleep in cyclin-dependent kinase-like 5 (i.e., Cdkl5 associates to ESV variant) mutant mouse models [27]. Secondly, sleep macrostructure in RTT was found to be characterized by a poor REM-on switch resulting in abnormal sleep cycling [21]. Thirdly, previous studies [13,28] comparing sleep macrostructure in RTT with primary snoring girls showed no significant differences in sleep stage proportions. Altogether, this questions the issue of sleep breathing and its potential role in the sleep macrostructure of RTT.
In addition, we found the salient tendency of sleep macrostructure perturbations varying along with several cardinal clinical features, particularly regarding hand functioning in our previous study (under revision), yet the association between sleep breathing abnormalities and these clinical features has been unexplored previously.
Therefore, in the present study, we performed overnight PSG recordings in RTT girls with MECP2 mutations to characterize sleep breathing abnormalities in RTT, to examine the hypotheses that (1) sleep breathing abnormalities in the individuals with RTT are present since early childhood, (2) sleep macrostructure between RTT girls with and without SDB is different, (3) the sleep breathing disturbances differ during REM and NREM sleep, and (4) the severity of SDB may aggravate with the cardinal clinical features’ severity in RTT. Consequently, we aimed to delineate the characteristics of sleep breathing abnormalities and their association with other core clinical and genetic features in individuals with RTT, especially regarding individuals with MECP2 mutations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. RTT Participants and Sleep Recording

RTT subjects confirmed by diagnostic criteria [1] and genetic tests were invited for sleep recording and assessment of clinical features’ severity from 2013 to 2016, following the institutional guidelines and the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from parents for use of their anonymized data, given that the study was approved by the IRB (IRB 2022-3158). RTT subjects with other central nervous system complications would be excluded.
PSG recording was performed and scored according to the AASM 2007 guideline [29]. Standard sleep macrostructure parameters are reported in this study; they are total sleep time (i.e., TST, the time from sleep onset to the end of the final sleep epoch minus wake after sleep onset), sleep onset latency (i.e., SOL, time from lights-off to sleep onset), wake after sleep onset (i.e., WASO, the proportion of time spent awake during the time in bed, expressed as a percentage), and proportional parameters including sleep efficiency (i.e., SEI, the ratio between TST and time from lights-off in the evening to lights-on in the next morning, expressed as a percentage), stage N (i.e., the amount of time in NREM stages per TST, expressed as a percentage, being stage N1, stage N2, and stage N3), and stage R (i.e., the amount of time in REM sleep per TST, expressed as a percentage).
For sleep breathing, respiratory-event-related parameters were scored per hour of TST, NREM sleep, and REM sleep, respectively, including AHI (i.e., normal value: ≤1/h TST, with >5/h TST further defined as severe SDB), apnea index, and hypopnea index. O2-saturation-related parameters were calculated only for TST, including mean SpO2%, nadir SpO2% (i.e., normal value: >90%), and oxygen desaturation index (i.e., ODI, drop 3% or 4% below baseline O2 levels).

2.2. Experimental Design and According to RTT Group Stratification

The data of AHI in all RTT participants were used to analyze the association between sleep breathing abnormalities and age. Next, RTT subjects were divided into subgroups of those with and without SDB (i.e., AHI > 1/h TST as presenting SDB), for comparing their sleep macrostructure.
Then, to investigate the sleep breathing abnormalities in REM and NREM sleep, we compared the key sleep breathing parameters of the SDB-present subgroup.
Lastly, to analyze the differences in sleep breathing abnormalities upon other RTT core clinical and genetic characteristics, we also stratified only the SDB-present subjects per clinical characteristics, genetic characteristics, and severity levels of clinical features. In clinical characteristics, phenotype (e.g., FF: forme frust variant and PSV: preserved speech variant), stage (e.g., I: Early-Onset Stagnation Period, II: Rapid Developmental Regression Period, III: Pseudo-Stationary Stage, and IV: Late Motor Deterioration, including IVA and IVB), and breathing phenotype (i.e., feeble, forceful, and other) were present. For the genetic characteristics, mutation domain (e.g., Methyl-CpG-Binding Domain (MBD), Transcription Repression Domain (TRD), and C-Terminal Segment (CTS)) and mutation type (e.g., nonsense mutation (ns) and missense mutation (ms)) were present. For the severity levels of clinical features, a three-level category (i.e., mild, moderate, and severe) was present in five clinical features of hand function, sitting, walking, speech, and scoliosis, and a two-level category (i.e., present and absent) was applied to epilepsy.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive results (mean ± standard deviation) are reported per presence of SDB, in REM and NREM sleep as well as per stratification of genetic characteristics or clinical features. Spearman’s correlation analysis was applied to examine the correlation between AHI and chronological age at PSG. Cohen’s d was applied for calculating the standardized mean differences, facilitating the clinical interpretation of the data (small: d < 0.2; 0.2 > medium < 0.5, and >0.5 large). Mann–Whitney U test was performed to compare the sleep macrostructure parameters between SDB-absent and SDB-present groups. Sign tests were used to compare the apneic indexes between stage NREM and stage REM in the SDB group. Kruskal–Wallis H test was used to compare sleep macrostructure parameters in different strata. Statistical analyses were performed in Statistica version 13 (TIBCO Software Inc. (2018), Palo Alto, CA, USA). A p-value was set at 0.05 as statistical significance.

3. Results

3.1. Sample Description

The 11 RTT subjects (aged 8.69 ± 5.29 years) were primarily classic phenotype (i.e., n = 7), with one PSV variant and one FF variant. Six were in stage III or stage IV. For the genetic mutations, all 11 subjects but one were known to have MECP2 mutations. Regarding specific nucleotide changes, two were of 502C > T and one RTT subject was in each of the following: c. 808C, gross rear, 806delG, 816C > T, 897C > T, c.880C > T, 880C > T, and 951_968 delinsAG. Regarding the mutation type and mutation domain, there were two subjects of ‘ms’ and seven of ‘ns’, four in MBD, four in TRD, and one in CTS.
The average AHI of the 11 RTT subjects was 3.94 ± 1.19/h TST, of which 27.3% had AHI < 1/h TST, 54.5% in 1/h TST ≤ AHI ≤ 5/h TST, and 18.2% in AHI > 5/h TST. We found no significant correlation between their AHI and age at PSG (rs = −0.15, p = 0.67).

3.2. Sleep Macrostructure upon the Presence of SDB

Based on the AHI > 1/h TST, eight (72.73%) RTT subjects had sleep apnea. Sleep macrostructure of SDB-absent (n = 3) and SDB-present (n = 8) groups is shown in Table 1. Cohen’s d of sleep macrostructure parameters between SDB-absent and SDB-present subgroups were mostly large, and we found no significant difference in their sleep macrostructure parameters.

3.3. Sleep-Disordered Breathing in the REM and NREM Sleep

The results of sleep respiratory parameters in those with SDB (n = 8) were tabulated and are shown in Table 2 for TST, REM, and NREM sleep, respectively. The oxygen-saturation-related indexes were available only for TST (n = 7); the mean SpO2% was 81.00 ± 35.15%, nadir SpO2% was 85.43 ± 6.88%, and ODI was 20.40 ± 31.33/h TST. Whereas the standardized mean differences of apneic indexes between REM and NREM sleep were of medium size, the sign test showed no significant difference (presented in Table 2).

3.4. Sleep-Disordered Breathing upon the Genetic Characteristics and Clinical Features’ Severity

We found no significant difference in the comparison of sleep respiratory indexes among the strata per genetic and clinical phenotypic characteristics nor severity levels of clinical features, as shown in Table 3. The standardized mean difference is summarized in Supplementary Table S1. Given the Cohen’s d values, several clinical differences are noticeable. Upon genetic characteristics, per mutation type, the individuals with ms mutation type may have more apneic events but higher saturation, which is the opposite for individuals with the ns mutation type. Nadir SpO2 (%) in individuals with a mutation in the TRD domain was the lowest. Upon the clinical items’ severity, individuals without epilepsy and sitting abnormalities showed clinically more apneic events. Individuals with motor issues such as non-functional hand use, walking with support, or unable to walk demonstrated saturation problems.

4. Discussion

This is the first study in a homogeneous RTT group with MECP2 mutations to analyze SDB in relation to their clinical and genetic characteristics. We found in our sample that more than half of the girls with MECP2 mutations presented sleep apnea. Further, sleep macrostructure appeared to be unaffected by the presence of sleep apnea. Although the severity of the apneic events tended to be greater in REM sleep than in NREM sleep, there was no significant mean difference between the sleep phases. Our analysis also revealed that SBD was constant irrespective of RTT clinical phenotypes, such as disease stages, genetic characteristics, and the severity of their cardinal features. Therefore, our results suggest that disordered breathing during sleep is prevalently present in RTT as an independent clinical feature. Within the realm of a sample with only MECP2 mutations, our findings are insufficient to explain its mechanism, yet the genetic mutation might be the mainstream regulator of the sleep-breathing pathophysiology.

4.1. Sleep Breathing in RTT

Although their breathing during sleep seems to show fewer abnormalities compared with their disturbed breathing during wakefulness, we confirmed SDB in the majority of our RTT sample cases. Previously, one study reported comparable sleep breathing to healthy subjects in RTT [14], whilst another early study concluded roughly normal breathing during sleep compared with primary snoring subjects [13]. The latter study noted only subtle decreases in oxygen saturation during REM sleep in their RTT sample, which may demonstrate the increased upper airway resistance during sleep in RTT comparable to primary snoring [30]. More recent studies have reported sleep breathing abnormalities in their RTT samples such as central sleep apnea and hypoxemia [15,17]. Overall, a prevalence rate of SDB (i.e., by AHI >1/h TST) in RTT of greater than 70% was described. Upon reviewing the sample characteristics across these studies, we have to note that in the early study by Glaze et al. [14], RTT subjects were diagnosed only by fulfilling the clinical RTT features, and the recent studies mostly confirmed RTT with genetic mutations, as in our study. Furthermore, our RTT sample involves only girls with MECP2 mutations. Thus, possibly upon a confirmed genetic mutation, and hence a shared pathological basis, the potential bias due to the sample characteristics as seen in other studies might be less confounding in ours.
In terms of the pathophysiological mechanism behind the sleep-breathing abnormalities in RTT, firstly, only a few animal studies focused on genetic mutations such as Mecp2 [31] and Cdkl5 [27,32]. Mouse models of both genetic mutations presented apnea during sleep. That is, more sleep apneas with increasing age in Mecp2 mutant mice [31] and more frequently during NREM sleep in Cdkl5 mutant ones [27] have been reported. In our study, including only girls with MECP2 mutations, we found a high prevalence of SDB. However, our female sample with MECP2 mutations did not show a significant correlation with their chronological age, which might be due to the phenotypic variances caused by differences from sex-determining genes and genetic alterations. That is, in the animal model the type was Mecp2-null (i.e., Mecp2-/y), and in human subjects, nucleotide changes were mutant fragment(s) in the MECP2 gene.
Secondly, the control of coordinated ventilation involves the integration of chemoreceptor input, motor input, as well as behavioral input. During sleep, predominantly chemoreception is involved, whereas in the waking state, it is the behavioral regulation. Given that disturbed breathing during sleep was present in our sample with MECP2 mutation, and also reported in previous studies [15,16,21], such a finding may imply that the intermitted breathing regulation is elicited by hypercapnia or metabolic acidosis. Further, such chemical feedback circuits may be passivated due to decreased sensitivity of chemoreceptors under long-term hypoxemia [33]. More studies suggested that abnormal sleep breathing in RTT is associated with poor ventilatory control given the brainstem dysfunction [11,34], yet the specific pathophysiological pathways behind SDB in RTT are still uncertain.
Thirdly, SDB is primarily attributed to a narrowing upper airway during sleep, which is usually associated with the following possible causes: (1) a (temporary) inability of the upper airway dilating muscles to withstand the negative forces generated within the upper airway during inspiration, (2) abnormal craniofacial anatomy, soft tissue accumulation in the oropharynx, and (3) increasing collapsing forces of airway for rostral fluid [35]. In RTT the weakened throat anatomy presenting as dysphagia, e.g., feeding difficulties, oral apraxia, and dyskinetic tongue movements [36], is acknowledged. However, we found no significant difference in sleep breathing parameters upon a history of adeno(tonsil)ectomy surgery (A&T) in an aggregated literature RTT sample [21].

4.2. Sleep Macrostructure upon the Presence of SDB in RTT

We could not confirm our hypothesis that sleep macrostructure between RTT girls with and without SDB is different, since in this study the sleep macrostructure in girls with RTT did not differ upon the presence of SDB. However, based on Cohen’s d—although all are large effect sizes—particularly SEI (hence higher WASO) and Stage N3 were lower in individuals suffering from SDB. Firstly, it is known that an abnormal AHI indicates the presence of airway obstruction during sleep, which is usually terminated by brief (micro-) arousals, causing sleep fragmentation [37]. Additionally, in RTT subjects [38,39,40] night waking is prevalent and in RTT animal sleep studies [41] fragmented sleep was summarized. Yet, in our study, the arousal index was similar across groups, irrespective of the presence of SDB. We have to note here, however, that in infants and younger children, the majority of respiratory events are found not to be terminated with spontaneous arousals, irrespective of quiet (or NREM) and active (REM) sleep [42]. Secondly, for other possible sleep macrostructure perturbations related to abnormal sleep breathing, in the studies comparing sleep stage distribution between children with OSA and healthy ones, researchers reported increased stage N1 and decreased stage N3 in the OSA group [43], whilst others reported non-significant differences [44,45]. In this study, for an RTT sample, we found similar stage proportions irrespective of the presence of SDB: yet, clinically, a poorer quality of sleep might be suspected (Cohen’s d findings). Furthermore, in our previous review of aggregated literature on RTT cases and comparing their sleep with TD children, we found decreased stage N1 and increased stage N3 in RTT cases with MECP2 mutations. In fact, the sample also included those with AHI > 1/h TST [21]. In other words, the sleep stage distribution changes in individuals with RTT did not mimic the sleep macrostructure findings as reported in OSA samples. None of our subjects demonstrated central sleep apnea. In children with idiopathic central sleep apnea (ICSA), significantly higher stage N2 and lower stage N3 [46] have been reported, which was also not found in our sample. Consequently, not the disordered breathing during sleep but potentially the genetic mutations override the perturbations in the sleep macrostructure of individuals with RTT.

4.3. Sleep Breathing Abnormalities and Sleep Phases in RTT

In TD children, SDB was found to be predominately present in REM sleep [26,47,48], and in adults, it occurred more frequently during deeper sleep stages whilst being more severe in REM sleep [49,50]. For children with OSA, one study reported that the obstructive events occur throughout REM (55%) and NREM (45%) phases but without a difference in desaturation episodes in REM and NREM sleep [44]. This again confirms the susceptibility of REM sleep toward apneic events. Contrary, we found that the apneic indexes were not different between REM and NREM sleep in RTT subjects with SDB, but clinically they showed a tendency to be frequent in REM sleep (Cohen’s d). We, thus, could not confirm our hypothesis regarding the sleep phase differences in sleep breathing abnormalities for a homogeneous RTT sample. It could be that there is a negative publication bias because thus far only one study explored the issue of sleep phases. Namely, Marcus et al. [13] reported a subtle decreased oxygen saturation during REM when comparing RTT cases with primary snoring subjects [13]. Additionally, we have to note that REM sleep is proven to be attenuated in RTT [20,21]. Linking to the potential regulation pathways [51] during sleep, such even distribution of sleep apneic events may indicate an impaired breathing generation in RTT. In Mecp2-null male mice (during wakefulness), a deficiency in noradrenergic and serotonergic modulation of the medullary respiratory network was suspected to be related to their worsening of breathing abnormalities with age [52]. However, such pathways have not yet been specified for the sleep phase.

4.4. Sleep Breathing Abnormalities and Characteristics in RTT Subjects

The stratification analysis in our study indicated that SDB in the RTT sample with MECP2 mutations did not vary with the clinical characteristics: again, we could not confirm our hypothesis. Contrary to our previous findings on sleep macrostructure (under revision), the presence of sleep apnea events seems not to be affected by the severity of psychomotor dysfunctioning. Our negative findings could be explained in several ways. On the one hand, we only included RTT subjects with MECP2 mutations, potentially sharing common fundamental pathologic molecular pathways as well as clinical features. On the other hand, as mentioned, ventilatory regulation differs significantly between sleep and wakefulness. With sleep onset, behavioral-related inputting signals terminate, such that the voluntary drive to both the respiratory pump muscles and the upper airway dilating muscles is lost. Further, the usual ventilatory responses to hypoxemic and hypercapnic levels also decrease, especially during REM sleep [51]. Such a physiological basis is important for the pathogenesis of upper airway obstruction during sleep. Additionally, the metabolic responses to fluctuations in oxygen and carbon dioxide saturation dominate the respiratory impulse during sleep. Regarding the clinical features within our analysis (e.g., breathing type), brainstem dysfunction may also provide influence, but per a different downstream mechanism. Lastly, and contrary to others, we did not use a healthy or snoring comparison group but, rather, RTT subjects.
Thus, on the basis of the RTT strata results, integrating that MECP2 was found to be required for an appropriate post-inspiratory response rate from acute hypoxia [33,53] during wakefulness but not directly damage the basic respiratory rhythm generation [52], we may conclude that despite the acknowledged brainstem impairments, the baseline sympathetic tone is preserved in RTT [7]. That is, though breathing rhythm and the response to episodes of hypoxia, hypercapnia, and obstructive apnea might be affected by MECP2 mutations, their respiratory system is still able to centrally generate a normal respiratory rhythm during sleep independently.
Clinically, based on Cohen’s d, individuals with TRD of MECP2 showed lower nadir saturation compared with individuals with MBD of MECP2, which warrants further investigation. In addition, individuals with motor issues such as non-functional hand use, walking with support, or being unable to walk demonstrated saturation problems.
Regarding the potential neurotransmitters, disturbed monoaminergic modulation including noradrenaline (NA) and serotonin (5-HT), which are involved in both sleep-wake cycles [54] and breathing regulation [55], have been related to the sleep-breathing abnormalities in RTT [56]. However, only reported in Mecp2-null mice, the brain levels of NA and 5-HT are normal at birth and then decline from 14 postnatal days (i.e., represents approximately 2 years of age in humans [57]) onwards [58].

4.5. Limitations

Constraints exist in this study. That is, only girls with MECP2 mutations were involved in this study; thus, discussion on and generalizability to CDKL5 and Forkhead box G1 (FOXG1) sleep breathing is not possible. The unequal sample size may lead to a loss of statistical power by imbalanced variances between samples, yet non-parametric tests were applied. Small samples are inherent to research on rare disorders. An aggregated analysis of cases from the literature suggested 71.7% of the cases demonstrated SDB; therefore, our sample with 8 out of 11(72.7%) consequently had sufficient power.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we found that a portion of the RTT subjects with MECP2 mutations presented apneic events in both NREM and REM sleep, with hypoxemia throughout the nocturnal phase, which was unrelated to their clinical features.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/ijerph192013082/s1, Table S1: Cohen’s d of RTT strata.

Author Contributions

K.S. conceptualized and designed the study, managed data collection, analyzed data, and critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content; X.Z. cooperated in the data analysis and wrote the initial draft; M.S. and L.C. approved the final draft. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was performed in accordance with institutional guidelines and the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from parents for use of their anonymized data (IRB 2022-3158).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The financial support (NO. 201806180064) provided by China Scholarship Council (CSC) is acknowledged. Karen Spruyt is a member of the transdiagnostic workgroup of the ERN Ithaca. Data were collected during K.S.’ employment at the Maastricht University Medical Center–GKC and School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University. We thank Stichting Terre–Rett syndroom fonds and N.R.S.V., as well as Roest Bas (Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei, KNF) and Eric Smeets and Harry W. Steinbusch.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

References

  1. Neul, J.L.; Kaufmann, W.E.; Glaze, D.G.; Christodoulou, J.; Clarke, A.J.; Bahi-Buisson, N.; Leonard, H.; Bailey, M.E.; Schanen, N.C.; Zappella, M.; et al. Rett syndrome: Revised diagnostic criteria and nomenclature. Ann. Neurol. 2010, 68, 944–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Amir, R.E.; Van den Veyver, I.B.; Wan, M.; Tran, C.Q.; Francke, U.; Zoghbi, H.Y. Rett syndrome is caused by mutations in X-linked MECP2, encoding methyl-CpG-binding protein 2. Nat. Genet. 1999, 23, 185–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Krishnaraj, R.; Ho, G.; Christodoulou, J. RettBASE: Rett syndrome database update. Hum. Mutat. 2017, 38, 922–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cosentino, L.; Vigli, D.; Franchi, F.; Laviola, G.; De Filippis, B. Rett syndrome before regression: A time window of overlooked opportunities for diagnosis and intervention. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2019, 107, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hagberg, B.; Hanefeld, F.; Percy, A.; Skjeldal, O. An update on clinically applicable diagnostic criteria in Rett syndrome. Comments to Rett Syndrome Clinical Criteria Consensus Panel Satellite to European Paediatric Neurology Society Meeting, Baden Baden, Germany, 11 September 2001. Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol. 2002, 6, 293–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ramirez, J.M.; Karlen-Amarante, M.; Wang, J.J.; Bush, N.E.; Carroll, M.S.; Weese-Mayer, D.E.; Huff, A. The Pathophysiology of Rett Syndrome With a Focus on Breathing Dysfunctions. Physiology 2020, 35, 375–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Julu, P.O.; Kerr, A.M.; Apartopoulos, F.; Al-Rawas, S.; Engerstrom, I.W.; Engerstrom, L.; Jamal, G.A.; Hansen, S. Characterisation of breathing and associated central autonomic dysfunction in the Rett disorder. Arch. Dis. Child. 2001, 85, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Julu, P.O.; Engerström, I.W.; Hansen, S.; Apartopoulos, F.; Engerström, B.; Pini, G.; Delamont, R.S.; Smeets, E.E. Cardiorespiratory challenges in Rett’s syndrome. Lancet 2008, 371, 1981–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ramirez, J.-M.; Ward, C.S.; Neul, J.L. Breathing challenges in Rett Syndrome: Lessons learned from humans and animal models. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2013, 189, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Tarquinio, D.C.; Hou, W.; Neul, J.L.; Berkmen, G.K.; Drummond, J.; Aronoff, E.; Harris, J.; Lane, J.B.; Kaufmann, W.E.; Motil, K.J.; et al. The course of awake breathing disturbances across the lifespan in Rett syndrome. Brain Dev. 2018, 40, 515–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Julu, P.O.; Witt Engerström, I. Assessment of the maturity-related brainstem functions reveals the heterogeneous phenotypes and facilitates clinical management of Rett syndrome. Brain Dev. 2005, 27 (Suppl. 1), S43–S53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rohdin, M.; Fernell, E.; Eriksson, M.; Albåge, M.; Lagercrantz, H.; Katz-Salamon, M. Disturbances in cardiorespiratory function during day and night in Rett syndrome. Pediatr. Neurol. 2007, 37, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Marcus, C.L.; Carroll, J.L.; McColley, S.A.; Loughlin, G.M.; Curtis, S.; Pyzik, P.; Naidu, S. Polysomnographic characteristics of patients with Rett syndrome. J. Pediatr. 1994, 125, 218–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Glaze, D.G.; Frost, J.D., Jr.; Zoghbi, H.Y.; Percy, A.K. Rett’s syndrome: Characterization of respiratory patterns and sleep. Ann. Neurol. 1987, 21, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sarber, K.M.; Howard, J.J.M.; Dye, T.J.; Pascoe, J.E.; Simakajornboon, N. Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Pediatric Patients With Rett Syndrome. J. Clin. Sleep Med. 2019, 15, 1451–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hagebeuk, E.E.; Bijlmer, R.P.; Koelman, J.H.; Poll-The, B.T. Respiratory disturbances in rett syndrome: Don’t forget to evaluate upper airway obstruction. J. Child Neurol. 2012, 27, 888–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bassett, E.; Heinle, R.; Johnston, D. Sleep Apnea in Patients With Rett Syndrome: Roles for Polysomnography and Adenotonsillectomy. J. Child Neurol. 2016, 31, 1633–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hagebeuk, E.E.; van den Bossche, R.A.; de Weerd, A.W. Respiratory and sleep disorders in female children with atypical Rett syndrome caused by mutations in the CDKL5 gene. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2012, 55, 480–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Amaddeo, A.; De Sanctis, L.; Arroyo, J.O.; Khirani, S.; Bahi-Buisson, N.; Fauroux, B. Polysomnographic findings in Rett syndrome. Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol. 2019, 23, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Carotenuto, M.; Esposito, M.; D’Aniello, A.; Rippa, C.D.; Precenzano, F.; Pascotto, A.; Bravaccio, C.; Elia, M. Polysomnographic findings in Rett syndrome: A case-control study. Sleep Breath 2013, 17, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, X.Y.; Spruyt, K. Literature Cases Summarized Based on Their Polysomnographic Findings in Rett Syndrome. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 3422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, X.Y.; Spruyt, K. A meta-review of standard polysomnography parameters in Rett Syndrome. Front. Neurol. 2022, 13, 963626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bixler, E.O.; Vgontzas, A.N.; Lin, H.-M.; Liao, D.; Calhoun, S.; Vela-Bueno, A.; Fedok, F.; Vlasic, V.; Graff, G. Sleep Disordered Breathing in Children in a General Population Sample: Prevalence and Risk Factors. Sleep 2009, 32, 731–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Marcus, C.L. Sleep-disordered breathing in children. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2001, 164, 16–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Verginis, N.; Jolley, D.; Horne, R.S.; Davey, M.J.; Nixon, G.M. Sleep state distribution of obstructive events in children: Is obstructive sleep apnoea really a rapid eye movement sleep-related condition? J. Sleep Res. 2009, 18, 411–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Spruyt, K.; Gozal, D. REM and NREM sleep-state distribution of respiratory events in habitually snoring school-aged community children. Sleep Med. 2012, 13, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Lo Martire, V.; Alvente, S.; Bastianini, S.; Berteotti, C.; Silvani, A.; Valli, A.; Viggiano, R.; Ciani, E.; Zoccoli, G. CDKL5 deficiency entails sleep apneas in mice. J. Sleep Res. 2017, 26, 495–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Ammanuel, S.; Chan, W.C.; Adler, D.A.; Lakshamanan, B.M.; Gupta, S.S.; Ewen, J.B.; Johnston, M.V.; Marcus, C.L.; Naidu, S.; Kadam, S.D. Heightened Delta Power during Slow-Wave-Sleep in Patients with Rett Syndrome Associated with Poor Sleep Efficiency. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0138113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Iber, C.; Ancoli-Israel, S.; Chesson, A.L.; Quan, S.F. The AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events: Rules, Terminology and Technical Specifications; American Academy of Sleep Medicine: Westchester, IL, USA, 2007; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  30. Baker-Smith, C.M.; Isaiah, A.; Melendres, M.C.; Mahgerefteh, J.; Lasso-Pirot, A.; Mayo, S.; Gooding, H.; Zachariah, J. Sleep-Disordered Breathing and Cardiovascular Disease in Children and Adolescents: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2021, 10, e022427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ren, J.; Ding, X.; Funk, G.D.; Greer, J.J. Anxiety-Related Mechanisms of Respiratory Dysfunction in a Mouse Model of Rett Syndrome. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 17230–17240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fuchs, C.; Gennaccaro, L.; Trazzi, S.; Bastianini, S.; Bettini, S.; Lo Martire, V.; Ren, E.; Medici, G.; Zoccoli, G.; Rimondini, R.; et al. Heterozygous CDKL5 Knockout Female Mice Are a Valuable Animal Model for CDKL5 Disorder. Neural Plast. 2018, 2018, 9726950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Ward, C.S.; Huang, T.-W.; Herrera, J.A.; Samaco, R.C.; McGraw, C.M.; Parra, D.E.; Arvide, E.M.; Ito-Ishida, A.; Meng, X.; Ure, K.; et al. Loss of MeCP2 Function Across Several Neuronal Populations Impairs Breathing Response to Acute Hypoxia. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 593554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Weese-Mayer, D.E.; Lieske, S.P.; Boothby, C.M.; Kenny, A.S.; Bennett, H.L.; Ramirez, J.M. Autonomic dysregulation in young girls with Rett Syndrome during nighttime in-home recordings. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2008, 43, 1045–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. McNicholas, W.T.; Pevernagie, D. Obstructive sleep apnea: Transition from pathophysiology to an integrative disease model. J. Sleep Res. 2022, 31, e13616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mezzedimi, C.; Livi, W.; De Felice, C.; Cocca, S. Dysphagia in Rett Syndrome: A Descriptive Study. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2017, 126, 640–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ralls, F.; Cutchen, L. A contemporary review of obstructive sleep apnea. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2019, 25, 578–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Boban, S.; Wong, K.; Epstein, A.; Anderson, B.; Murphy, N.; Downs, J.; Leonard, H. Determinants of sleep disturbances in Rett syndrome: Novel findings in relation to genotype. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2016, 170, 2292–2300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wong, K.; Leonard, H.; Jacoby, P.; Ellaway, C.; Downs, J. The trajectories of sleep disturbances in Rett syndrome. J. Sleep Res. 2015, 24, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Young, D.; Nagarajan, L.; de Klerk, N.; Jacoby, P.; Ellaway, C.; Leonard, H. Sleep problems in Rett syndrome. Brain Dev. 2007, 29, 609–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zhang, X.; Lin, J.S.; Spruyt, K. Sleep problems in Rett syndrome animal models: A systematic review. J. Neurosci. Res. 2021, 99, 529–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. McNamara, F.; Issa, F.G.; Sullivan, C.E. Arousal pattern following central and obstructive breathing abnormalities in infants and children. J. Appl. Physiol. 1996, 81, 2651–2657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Durdik, P.; Sujanska, A.; Suroviakova, S.; Evangelisti, M.; Banovcin, P.; Villa, M.P. Sleep Architecture in Children With Common Phenotype of Obstructive Sleep Apnea. J. Clin. Sleep Med. 2018, 14, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Goh, D.Y.; Galster, P.; Marcus, C.L. Sleep architecture and respiratory disturbances in children with obstructive sleep apnea. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2000, 162, 682–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Marcus, C.L.; Carroll, J.L.; Koerner, C.B.; Hamer, A.; Lutz, J.; Loughlin, G.M. Determinants of growth in children with the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. J. Pediatr. 1994, 125, 556–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gurbani, N.; Verhulst, S.L.; Tan, C.; Simakajornboon, N. Sleep Complaints and Sleep Architecture in Children With Idiopathic Central Sleep Apnea. J. Clin. Sleep Med. 2017, 13, 777–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Arens, R.; Muzumdar, H. Sleep, sleep disordered breathing, and nocturnal hypoventilation in children with neuromuscular diseases. Paediatr. Respir. Rev. 2010, 11, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kanathur, N.; Halbower, A.C. Sleep disordered breathing in children. In Berman’s Pediatric Decision Making, 5th ed.; Bajaj, L., Hambidge, S.J., Kerby, G., Nyquist, A.-C., Eds.; Mosby: Saint Louis, MO, USA, 2011; pp. 760–762. [Google Scholar]
  49. Ratnavadivel, R.; Chau, N.; Stadler, D.; Yeo, A.; McEvoy, R.D.; Catcheside, P.G. Marked reduction in obstructive sleep apnea severity in slow wave sleep. J. Clin. Sleep Med. 2009, 5, 519–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Siddiqui, F.; Walters, A.S.; Goldstein, D.; Lahey, M.; Desai, H. Half of patients with obstructive sleep apnea have a higher NREM AHI than REM AHI. Sleep Med. 2006, 7, 281–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Malik, V.; Smith, D.; Lee-Chiong, T. Respiratory Physiology During Sleep. Sleep Med. Clin. 2012, 7, 497–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Viemari, J.C.; Roux, J.C.; Tryba, A.K.; Saywell, V.; Burnet, H.; Peña, F.; Zanella, S.; Bévengut, M.; Barthelemy-Requin, M.; Herzing, L.B.; et al. Mecp2 deficiency disrupts norepinephrine and respiratory systems in mice. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25, 11521–11530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Stettner, G.M.; Huppke, P.; Brendel, C.; Richter, D.W.; Gärtner, J.; Dutschmann, M. Breathing dysfunctions associated with impaired control of postinspiratory activity in Mecp2-/y knockout mice. J. Physiol. 2007, 579, 863–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Saper, C.B.; Fuller, P.M. Wake-sleep circuitry: An overview. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2017, 44, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Richter, D.W.; Manzke, T.; Wilken, B.; Ponimaskin, E. Serotonin receptors: Guardians of stable breathing. Trends Mol. Med. 2003, 9, 542–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Katz, D.M.; Dutschmann, M.; Ramirez, J.M.; Hilaire, G. Breathing disorders in Rett syndrome: Progressive neurochemical dysfunction in the respiratory network after birth. Respir Physiol. Neurobiol. 2009, 168, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Sengupta, P. The Laboratory Rat: Relating Its Age With Human’s. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2013, 4, 624–630. [Google Scholar]
  58. Ide, S.; Itoh, M.; Goto, Y. Defect in normal developmental increase of the brain biogenic amine concentrations in the mecp2-null mouse. Neurosci. Lett. 2005, 386, 14–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Sleep macrostructure of RTT girls with and without sleep-disordered breathing.
Table 1. Sleep macrostructure of RTT girls with and without sleep-disordered breathing.
ParametersSDB-Absent RTT (n = 3)SDB-Present RTT (n = 8)The Standardized Mean Difference between SDB-Absent and SDB-PresentMann–Whitney Test between SDB-Absent and SDB-Present
Mean ± SDMean ± SDCohen’s dUp-Value
TST (min)614.67 ± 80.12529.75 ± 105.290.854.000.13
SEI (%)92.20 ± 2.5177.29 ± 12.651.332.000.05
SOL (min)20.10 ± 9.9020.33 ± 15.47−0.0212.000.92
WASO (%)7.80 ± 2.5122.71 ± 12.65−1.332.000.05
Stage N1 (%)4.53 ± 3.478.29 ± 6.19−0.668.000.47
Stage N2 (%)27.03 ± 6.9536.55 ± 12.12−0.855.000.18
Stage N3 (%)50.30 ± 5.2842.36 ± 9.530.916.000.26
Stage R (%)18.13 ± 4.0412.79 ± 8.280.718.000.47
Arousal index *27.307.78 ± 3.59---
*: Only one RTT subject of the SDB-absent group and five in the SDB-present group showed arousals. RTT: Rett Syndrome; SD: standard deviation; SDB: sleep-disordered breathing; SEI: sleep efficiency; SOL: sleep onset latency; Stage N: the amount of time in non-rapid eye movement sleep stages per TST, expressed as a percentage, including stage N1, stage N2, and stage N3; Stage R: the amount of time in rapid eye movement sleep per TST, expressed as a percentage; TST: total sleep time; and WASO: wake after sleep onset.
Table 2. The comparison between REM and NREM sleep of the sleep respiratory indexes in RTT subjects (n = 8) with sleep-disordered breathing.
Table 2. The comparison between REM and NREM sleep of the sleep respiratory indexes in RTT subjects (n = 8) with sleep-disordered breathing.
ParametersTSTREM SleepNREM SleepThe Standardized Mean Difference between REM and NREM SleepSign Test between REM and NREM Sleep
nMean ± SDnMean ± SDnMean ± SDCohen’s dZ-Valuep-Value
AHI85.31 ± 4.0086.83 ± 5.0884.93 ± 4.15−0.4101
Apnea index73.27 ± 3.5664.52 ± 3.5473.04 ± 3.71−0.411.220.22
Hypopnea index82.43 ± 1.8173.90 ± 4.3582.26 ± 1.76−0.540.950.34
Respiratory-related MA41.35 ± 0.9711.0041.50 ± 1.12-1.500.13
AHI: apnea–hypopnea index; MA: micro arousal; NREM: non-rapid eye movement sleep; REM: rapid eye movement; TST: total sleep time; and SD: standard deviation.
Table 3. Difference of sleep respiratory parameters in RTT clinical and genetic stratifications in the SDB-present RTT subjects (n = 8).
Table 3. Difference of sleep respiratory parameters in RTT clinical and genetic stratifications in the SDB-present RTT subjects (n = 8).
RTT Group [n]StratumAHI
Mean ± SD [n]
Apnea Index
Mean ± SD [n]
Hypopnea Index
Mean ± SD [n]
ODI
Mean ± SD [n]
Mean SpO2 (%)
Mean ± SD [n]
Nadir SpO2 (%)
Mean ± SD [n]
SDB-present [8]SDB-present5.31 ± 4.00 [8]3.27 ± 3.56 [7]2.43 ± 1.81 [7]20.40 ±31.33 [7]81.00 ± 35.15 [7]85.43 ± 6.88 [7]
Stratification per Genetic characteristic
Mutation typems7.70 ± 7.35 [2]6.00 ± 6.93 [2]1.70 ± 0.42 [2]8.00 ± 7.35 [2]97.50 ± 0.71 [2]90.00 ± 1.41 [2]
ns4.18 ± 2.15 [4]2.73 ± 1.27 [3]2.10 ± 1.00 [4]26.88 ± 42.26 [4]71.50 ± 46.48 [4]86.00 ± 6.00[4]
Missing5.20 ± 5.23 [2]1.35 ± 1.34 [2]3.80 ± 3.82 [2]19.30 [1]86.00 [1]74.00 [1]
K–W test within groupH [n] df = 1, p-value1.38 [6], 0.240 [5], 1.000.21 [6], 0.640 [6], 1.000.86 [6], 0.350.24 [6], 0.62
Mutation domainCTS1.10 [1][0]1.10 [1]3.70 [1]95.00 [1]91.00 [1]
MBD6.57 ± 5.56 [3]4.67 ± 5.42 [3]1.90 ± 0.46 [3]6.17 ± 6.09 [3]98.00 [3]90.33 ± 1.15 [3]
TRD5.65 ± 0.21 [2]3.10 ± 1.56 [2]2.50 ± 1.27 [2]50.65 ± 55.65 [2]46.00 ± 62.23 [2]81.00 ± 2.83 [2]
Missing5.20 ± 5.23 [2]1.35 ± 1.34 [2]3.80 ± 3.82 [2]19.30 [1]86.00 [1]74.00 [1]
K–W test within groupH [n] df = 2, p-value2.38 [6], 0.300 [5], 1.002.38 [6], 0.301.95 [6], 0.384.29 [6], 0.123.98 [6], 0.14
Stratification perClinical characteristic
RTT phenotypeCR5.40 ± 2.35 [5]2.32 ± 1.14 [5]3.04 ± 2.09 [5]25.18 ± 36.89 [5]75.00 ± 41.17 [5]83.60 ± 7.47 [5]
FF1.10 [1][0]1.10 [1]3.70 [1]95.00 [1]91.00 [1]
PSV12.90 [1]10.90 [1]2.00 [1]13.20 [1]97.00 [1]89.00 [1]
Missing1.50 [1]0.40 [1]1.10 [1][0][0][0]
K–W test within groupH [n] df = 2, p-value3.86 [7], 0.150 [6], 1.002.31 [7], 0.310.43 [7], 0.810.26 [7], 0.881.11 [7], 0.57
RTT stageII8.90 [1]2.30 [1]6.50 [1]19.30 [1]86.00 [1]74.00 [1]
III3.40 ± 1.27 [2]1.55 ± 0.64 [2]1.85 ± 0.64 [2]2.65 ± 0.21 [2]98.50 ± 0.71 [2]91.00 ± 0.00 [2]
III-IVA5.50 [1]2.00 [1]3.40 [1]11.30 [1]2.00 [1]83.00 [1]
IVB5.80 [1]4.20 [1]1.60 [1]90.00 [1]90.00 [1]79.00 [1]
Missing5.17 ± 6.70 [3]5.65 ± 7.42 [2]1.40 ± 0.52 [3]8.45 ± 6.71 [2]96.00 ± 1.41 [2]90.00 ± 1.41 [2]
K–W test within groupH [n] df = 3, p-value3.80 [5], 0.283.53 [5], 0.323.20 [5], 0.363.80 [5], 0.283.80 [5], 0.284.00 [5], 0.26
Breathing typeForceful3.17 ± 2.08 [3]1.67 ± 0.80 [3]1.97 ± 1.25 [3]7.05 ± 6.01 [2]50.00 ± 67.88 [2]87.00 ± 5.66 [2]
Feeble5.80 [1]4.20 [1]1.60 [1]90.00 [1]90.00 [1]79.00 [1]
Other4.30 [1]2.00 [1]2.30 [1]2.50 [1]99.00 [1]91.00 [1]
Missing7.63 ± 6.00 [3]6.60 ± 6.08 [2]3.20 ± 2.89 [3]12.07 ± 7.86 [3]92.67 ± 5.86 [3]84.67 ± 9.29 [3]
K–W test within groupH [n] df = 2, p-value2.13 [5], 0.342.67 [5], 0.260.53 [5], 0.772.70 [4], 0.261.80 [4], 0.412.25 [4], 0.32
Stratification perClinical severity item
EpilepsyNot have8.10 ± 5.25 [3]4.77 ± 5.35 [3]3.30 ± 2.88 [3]11.77 ± 8.34 [3]93.67 ± 6.66 [3]84.67 ± 9.29 [3]
Have4.18 ± 2.15 [4]2.73 ± 1.27[3]2.10 ± 1.00 [4]26.88 ± 42.26 [4]71.50 ± 46.48 [4]86.00 ± 6.00 [4]
Missing1.50 [1]0.40 [1]1.10 [1][0][0][0]
K–W test within groupH [n] df = 1, p-value1.13 [7], 0.290.05 [6], 0.820.13 [7], 0.720.13 [7], 0.720.13 [7], 0.720.13 [7], 0.71
Hand functionNo hand functional abnormality7.00 ± 8.34 [2]10.90 [1]1.55 ± 0.64 [2]8.45 ± 6.72 [2]96.00 ± 1.41 [2]90.00 ± 1.41 [2]
Reduced/poor hand use4.30 [1]2.00 [1]2.30 [1]2.50 [1]99.00 [1]91.00 [1]
Non-functional hand use5.68 ± 2.62 [4]2.40 ± 1.30 [4]3.23 ± 2.36 [4]30.85 ± 40.00 [4]69.00 ± 44.94 [4]81.75 ± 7.18 [4]
Missing1.50 [1]0.40 [1]1.10 [1][0][0][0]
K–W test within groupH [n] df = 2, p-value0.27 [7], 0.872.30 [6], 0.321.39 [7], 0.502.41 [7], 0.302.89 [7], 0.242.31 [7], 0.32
SittingNo sitting abnormality6.50 ± 5.96 [3]6.45 ± 6.29 [2]2.17 ± 1.16 [3]9.40 ± 5.03 [3]64.67 ± 54.28 [3]87.67 ± 4.16 [3]
Sitting with support4.30 [1]2.00 [1]2.30 [1]2.50 [1]99.00 [1]91.00 [1]
Unable5.73 ± 3.20 [3]2.53 ± 1.56 [3]3.17 ± 2.89 [3]37.37 ± 46.32 [3]91.33 ± 6.11 [3]81.33 ± 8.74 [3]
Missing1.50 [1]0.40 [1]1.10 [1][0][0][0]
K–W test within groupH [n] df = 2, p-value0.29 [7], 0.870.65 [6], 0.720.29 [7], 0.872.57 [7], 0.282.29 [7], 0.321.69 [7], 0.43
WalkingNo walking abnormality7.00 ± 8.34 [2]10.90 [1]1.55 ± 0.64 [2]8.45 ± 6.72 [2]96.00 ± 1.41 [2]90.00 ± 1.41 [2]
Walking with support4.90 ± 0.85 [2]2.00 ± 0.00 [2]2.85 ± 0.78 [2]6.90 ± 6.22 [2]50.50 ± 68.59 [2]87.00 ± 5.66 [2]
Unable5.73 ± 3.20 [3]2.53 ± 1.56 [3]3.17 ± 2.89 [3]37.37 ± 46.32 [3]91.33 ± 6.11 [3]81.33 ± 8.74 [3]
Missing1.50 [1]0.40 [1]1.10 [1][0][0][0]
K–W test within groupH [n] df = 2, p-value0.18 [7], 0.912.45 [6], 0.291.93 [7], 0.381.61 [7], 0.450.18 [7], 0.911.27 [7], 0.53
Spoken languageNo spoken abnormality1.10 [1][0]1.10 [1]3.70 [1]95.00 [1]91.00 [1]
Use some real words with meaning12.90 [1]10.90 [1]2.00 [1]13.20 [1]97.00 [1]89.00 [1]
Use no real words with meaning5.40 ± 2.35 [5]2.32 ± 1.14 [5]3.04 ± 2.09 [5]25.18 ± 36.89 [5]75.00 ± 41.17 [5]83.60 ± 7.47 [5]
Missing1.50 [1]0.40 [1]1.10 [1][0][0][0]
K–W test within groupH [n] df = 1, p-value3.86 [7], 0.150 [6], 1.002.31 [7], 0.310.43 [7], 0.810.26 [7], 0.881.11 [7], 0.57
ScoliosisHad no deviation6.58 ± 5.26 [4]4.77 ± 5.35 [3]2.98 ± 2.37 [4]9.75 ± 7.92 [4]94.00 ± 5.48 [4]86.25 ± 8.22 [4]
Mild scoliosis4.30 [1]1.80 [1]2.3 [1]2.5 [1]99.00 [1]91.00 [1]
Severe scoliosis5.65 ± 0.21 [2]3.10 ± 1.56 [2]2.50 ± 1.27 [2]50.65 ± 55.65 [2]46.00 ± 62.23 [2]81.00 ± 2.23 [2]
Missing1.50 [1]0.40 [1]1.10 [1][0][0][0]
K–W test within groupH [n] df = 1, p-value0.32 [7], 0.850.35 [6], 0.840.54 [7], 0.772.89 [7], 0.243.70 [7], 0.162.02 [7], 0.36
AHI: apnea–hypopnea index; CR: classic RTT phenotype; CTS: C-Terminal Segment; FF: forme frust variant; H: Kruskal–Wallis test; II: Rapid Developmental Regression Period; III: Pseudo-Stationary Stage; IV: Late Motor Deterioration; MBD: Methyl-CpG-Binding Domain; ms: missense mutation; ns: nonsense mutation; ODI: oxygen desaturation index; PSV: preserved speech variant; RTT: Rett Syndrome; SD: standard deviation; SDB: sleep-disordered breathing; and TRD: Transcription Repression Domain.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Smits, M.; Curfs, L.; Spruyt, K. Sleep Respiratory Disturbances in Girls with Rett Syndrome. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 13082. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph192013082

AMA Style

Zhang X, Smits M, Curfs L, Spruyt K. Sleep Respiratory Disturbances in Girls with Rett Syndrome. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(20):13082. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph192013082

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xinyan, Marcel Smits, Leopold Curfs, and Karen Spruyt. 2022. "Sleep Respiratory Disturbances in Girls with Rett Syndrome" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 20: 13082. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph192013082

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop