Next Article in Journal
Perceived Public Participation and Health Delivery in Local Government Districts in Uganda
Previous Article in Journal
Tele-Mental Health Service: Unveiling the Disparity and Impact on Healthcare Access and Expenditures during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Mississippi
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Mapping the Environmental Co-Benefits of Reducing Low-Value Care: A Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis

Collaborative Centre for Climate, Health & Sustainable Care, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M6, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21(7), 818; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph21070818
Submission received: 27 April 2024 / Revised: 7 June 2024 / Accepted: 18 June 2024 / Published: 22 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Health Care Sciences)

Abstract

Reducing low-value care (LVC) and improving healthcare’s climate readiness are critical factors for improving the sustainability of health systems. Care practices that have been deemed low or no-value generate carbon emissions, waste and pollution without improving patient or population health. There is nascent, but growing, research and evaluation to inform practice change focused on the environmental co-benefits of reducing LVC. The objective of this study was to develop foundational knowledge of this field through a scoping review and bibliometric analysis. We searched four databases, Medline, Embase, Scopus and CINAHL, and followed established scoping review and bibliometric analysis methodology to collect and analyze the data. A total of 145 publications met the inclusion criteria and were published between 2013 and July 2023, with over 80% published since 2020. Empirical studies comprised 21%, while commentary or opinions comprised 51% of publications. The majority focused on healthcare generally (27%), laboratory testing (14%), and medications (14%). Empirical publications covered a broad range of environmental issues with general and practice-specific ‘Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions’, ‘waste management’ and ‘resource use’ as most common topics. Reducing practice-specific ‘GHG emissions’ was the most commonly reported environmental outcome. The bibliometric analysis revealed nine international collaboration networks producing work on eight key healthcare areas. The nineteen ‘top’ authors were primarily from the US, Australia and Canada.
Keywords: low-value care; environmental sustainability; healthcare; co-benefits; scoping review; bibliometric analysis low-value care; environmental sustainability; healthcare; co-benefits; scoping review; bibliometric analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Parker, G.; Hunter, S.; Born, K.; Miller, F.A. Mapping the Environmental Co-Benefits of Reducing Low-Value Care: A Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21, 818. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph21070818

AMA Style

Parker G, Hunter S, Born K, Miller FA. Mapping the Environmental Co-Benefits of Reducing Low-Value Care: A Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2024; 21(7):818. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph21070818

Chicago/Turabian Style

Parker, Gillian, Sarah Hunter, Karen Born, and Fiona A. Miller. 2024. "Mapping the Environmental Co-Benefits of Reducing Low-Value Care: A Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 21, no. 7: 818. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph21070818

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop