Next Article in Journal
Hygrothermal Risk in Museum Buildings Located in Moderate Climate
Next Article in Special Issue
Comprehensive Spray Characteristics of Water in Port Fuel Injection Injector
Previous Article in Journal
Thermal Energy Storage for Grid Applications: Current Status and Emerging Trends
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of the Bore to Stroke Ratio on Combustion, Gaseous and Particulate Emissions in a Small Port Fuel Injection Engine Fueled with Ethanol Blended Gasoline
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biomass and Lipid Production Potential of an Indian Marine Algal Isolate Tetraselmis striata BBRR1

by
Annakkili Baskara Boopathy
1,2,3,
Thanasekaran Jayakumar
3,
Senthil Chinnasamy
4,
Muthu Ganesan Rajaram
1,
Natarajan Mohan
1,
Subramani Nagaraj
1,
Ramasamy Rengasamy
1,
Manjunath Manubolu
5,
Joen-Rong Sheu
3,6,* and
Chao-Chien Chang
6,7,8,*
1
Centre for Advanced Studies in Botany, University of Madras, Guindy Campus, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600025, India
2
Department of Biochemistry, Caussanel College of Arts and Science, Muthupettai, Ramanathapuram, Tamil Nadu 623523, India
3
Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
4
Biotechnology Division, Aban Infrastructure Private Limited, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600008, India
5
Department of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43212, USA
6
Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
7
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 24205, Taiwan
8
Department of Cardiovascular Center, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei 10630, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 17 December 2019 / Revised: 6 January 2020 / Accepted: 7 January 2020 / Published: 10 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental and Energy Assessment of Alternative Fuels)

Abstract

:
Four different strains of marine algae viz. Tetraselmis tetrathele, Tetraselmis striata, Tetraselmis chuii, and Tetraselmis gracilis were isolated from the saltpans in Kovelong, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. The systematic position of Tetraselmis striata BBRR1 was confirmed through molecular identification. Under laboratory conditions, T. striata Butcher BBRR1 grown in f/2-medium recorded highest biomass concentration of 0.58 ± 0.021 g L−1, volumetric productivity of 0.025 ± 0.004 g L−1 d−1, 19 ± 2.3% proteins, 17 ± 1.5% carbohydrates, and 15 ± 2.4% lipids. Volumetric biomass productivity of 0.063 ± 0.08 g L−1 d−1, specific growth rate of 0.45 day−1 and lipid content of 19.42 ± 0.98% were recorded for the alga T. striata Butcher BBRR1 cultivated in 10-m2 open raceway ponds using Modified CFTRI ABRR1 medium. The fatty acid profile of T. striata Butcher BBRR1 showed the presence of 33.14% palmitic acid, 22.64% 11-octadecenoic acid, and 21.94% heptadecanoic acid. This study confirms the feasibility of cultivating the marine alga T. striata in open raceway ponds to produce biomass, which can be used for the production of biofuels.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Fossil-based energy is one of the most needed factors for development and economic growth. The use of fossil fuel sources for transport and energy applications is increasing day by day, which has a negative impact on the environment. Developing countries like India and China are heavily dependent on fossil fuels for their growth, and India imports 87% of its total petroleum crude requirement from oil-producing countries. In order to ensure energy security, majority of the countries are now looking for alternative sources of renewable liquid transportation fuels. First-generation biofuels derived from food crops are not sustainable. Second-generation biofuels such as 2G ethanol require vast amounts of biomass sources as feedstock. Recently, microalgae have gained importance as they can provide a sustainable source of biomass to produce biofuels. Biomass productivity and photosynthetic efficiency of microalgae are much higher than that of terrestrial crops, and microalgae are also rich sources of lipids, proteins, carbohydrates, pigments, and other value-added bioactive compounds [1,2]. Microalgae are capable of accumulating substantial amounts of triglycerides up to 50% of dry cell weight. Microalgae can also grow in saline, brackish, and poor-quality wastewaters [3]. Microalgae are considered as potential sources of feedstock for biofuels as they only need non-arable land, poor-quality waters including seawater, brackish water, and waste water, and CO2 from flue gas for their growth [4].
Advanced and promising methodologies are continuously improving microalgae cultivation to overcome problems in biomass production for various applications [5]. Microalgae can be cultivated on non-arable and unproductive lands using seawater [6]. Many strains of microalgae are exceedingly rich in oil, which is a major source for biodiesel production [7]. Microalgae are traditionally considered as good source of fatty acids [3], which are suitable for biofuel production [8]. The fatty acid profiles of microalgae have been well established [9,10]. The aim of this study was to cultivate the alga Tetraselmis striata isolated from saltpans in an open raceway pond and evaluate its growth performance in terms of biomass and lipids.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation of Algal Strains

Water samples were collected from saltpans of Kovelong (12.7870° N, 80.2504° E), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. Water samples were enriched with f/2-nutrient medium to promote the growth of algal cells. Enriched water samples were then subjected to serial dilution and plated on f/2-agar medium [11]. Single colonies of different isolates were picked up using a micropipette. The isolates were then inoculated in the f/2-growth medium. To 950 mL of filtered natural seawater, the following ingredients were added, and the final volume of 1 L was made with filtered seawater. The growth medium was autoclaved at 121 °C at 15 psi for 20 min. The composition (in mg L−1) of f/2-growth medium was as follows: NaNO3-75, NaH2PO4·H2O-5, Fe-EDTA-5, CuSO4·5H2O-0.0098, ZnSO4·7H2O-0.022, CoCl2·6H2O-0.010, MnCl2·4H2O-0.180, Na2MoO4·2H2O-0.006, and pH 7.9 [12]. The culture medium after inoculation was incubated at 24 ± 1 °C in a growth chamber controlled thermostatically and illuminated using cool fluorescent lamps at a photon flux density of 30 µE m−2 s−1 under 12/12 light/dark cycle.

2.2. Laboratory Screening Studies

A known quantity (30 mL) of seed culture of four different isolates of Tetraselmis spp. (Tetraselmis tetrathele, Tetraselmis striata, Tetraselmis chuii, and Tetraselmis gracilis) was inoculated in 500 mL Erlenmeyer flasks with 270 mL of sterile f/2-medium. Lab studies were conducted for a duration of 21 d, and for every 3 d interval, the growth parameters such as cell numbers, biomass [13], different pigment levels viz. chlorophyll a and b, carotenoids [14], total carbohydrates [15], proteins [16], and lipids [17] were recorded. Media optimization studies for the selected algal isolate were conducted using different strengths of f/2-medium [i.e., full strength (f/2-medium), 2 times the concentration of f/2 (f-medium), 5 times the concentration of f/2 (5f-medium), and 10 times the concentration of f/2 (10f-medium)]. A low-cost medium was also developed by optimising the nutrient concentration in the Modified CFTRI medium (mg L−1) with the following composition: Urea-250, Single super phosphate-20, FeCl3-4, MgSO4-150, NaHCO3-150, Sea water-1L, and pH 8.0.

2.3. Molecular Characterisation

The Dye De-oxy Terminator Cycle Sequencing PCR kit obtained from GENEI, Bangalore, India, was used to isolate the genomic DNA samples of T. striata from the lyophilized algal biomass. To eliminate RNA contamination, the extract was digested for 30 min with 10 µg of RNase-A at 37 °C. DNA concentration was determined by a spectrophotometer measuring its absorbance at 260 nm. The isolate of T. striata was subjected for molecular identification in order to ascertain its systematic position. The genomic DNA of the culture was isolated according to Richards et al. [18]. In the present study, the forward primer 5′-GTAACCCGTTGAACCCCATT-3′ and reverse primer 5′-CCATCCAATCGGTAGTAGCG-3′ were used as recommended by Liu et al. [19]. The 18S rRNA gene region of T. striata was isolated and subjected to the amplification of primers at GENEI, Bangalore, India. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using a PCR program was performed in an ABI thermal cycler (ABI) with initial denaturing at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, annealing at 58° for 55 s, extension at 72 °C for 50 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were separated through agarose gel electrophoresis. The purified PCR products were separated using 1.4% agarose gels and stained with 0.5 µg mL−1 ethidium bromide. The gel was viewed and captured using the Vilber Loumart Gel Documentation system. Sequences were determined by the chain termination method with the use of Dye De-oxy Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Perkin Elmer Applied Bio-system, Wokingham, UK) with AV1377 automated DNA sequencer.

2.4. Acclimatisation of T. striata Butcher BBRR1 for Outdoor Cultivation

The laboratory grown isolate of T. striata BBRR1 was scaled-up to 1 and 2 L in conical flasks and further scaled up for 2 weeks to 10 L in transparent 30 L carboys for acclimatization under outdoor conditions. The seed culture of 15 L was inoculated in 135 L f/2-medium in a 1.0-m2 mini open raceway pond (150 L capacity) coated with fibre-reinforced plastic (FRP) material (length 2.2 m; width 0.50 m; depth 0.26 m) and incubated for 2 weeks. The growth medium before inoculation was sterilised by adding 50 ppm of sodium hypochlorite to remove contaminants. After 12 h treatment, sodium thiosulphate (2.85 mg per 1 mg of chlorine) was added to the growth medium to neutralise the residual chlorine. The raceway pond was agitated with a paddle wheel system at 10 rpm. The culture was mixed with the paddle wheel system during daytime only. During the experiment, the evaporated water was compensated with chlorine-treated bore well water (after neutralising residual chlorine with sodium thiosulphate) and the ponds were protected on top from dust with a transparent polythene sheet. Adaptation of the algal culture to outdoor conditions was continued for 2 weeks, and the culture without contamination after 2 weeks of exposure was used as inoculum for mass culture trials. Vit K3 (5 ppm) was added to the growth medium in the open raceway pond to prevent cyanobacterial contamination.

2.5. Mass Culture of T. striata BBRR1 in 10-m2 Open Raceway Pond

The experiment was conducted in two numbers of 10-m2 FRP-coated concrete raceway ponds of 2000 L capacity (length 7 m; width 1.5 m; depth 0.26 m) each. The order in which the inoculum raised was as follows: 15 L of optimally grown T. striata BBRR1 culture in the lab with 0.06 g L−1 of biomass concentration was inoculated into two numbers of 1-m2 raceway ponds each containing 135 L of f-medium and grown for 10 d. The composition of f medium (in mg L−1) was as follows: NaNO3-150, NaH2PO4·H2O-10, Fe-EDTA-10; CuSO4·5H2O-0.0196, ZnSO4·7H2O-0.044, CoCl2·6H2O-0.020, MnCl2·4H2O-0.360, Na2MoO4·2H2O-0.012 and pH 7.9. Then the culture (150 L) was inoculated to 10-m2 raceway ponds containing (a) 1350 L of f-medium as control and (b) Modified CFTRI ABRR1 medium as treatment. The composition of Modified CFTRI ABRR1 medium (mg L−1) was as follows: Urea-50, Single super phosphate-40, FeCl3-10, MgSO4-250, NaHCO3-500, Sea water-1 L and pH 8.5. The culture height in the pond was maintained at 15 cm level with the total volume of 1500 L. The algal culture was mixed using paddle wheels during the daytime to control settling of algal cells and to improve dissolved CO2 levels. This experiment was conducted in batch mode for a period of 21 d. The culture purity was monitored on a daily basis, and other parameters such as pH, biomass, pigments, lipids, proteins, and carbohydrates were analysed at every 3 d interval. Daily temperature and light intensity were also measured.

2.6. Biomass Harvest of T. striata BBRR1

Biomass of T. striata BBRR1 was harvested by switching off the paddle wheel for a period of 12 h. The biomass settled at the bottom through auto flocculation was collected after the medium was drained off. To remove the excess salts from the algal biomass, it was washed with acidified water 3 times. The washed algal cells were dried for 3 h in the sunlight, followed by oven drying for 8 h at 60 °C.

2.7. Estimation of Biomass and Other Growth Parameters

Twenty-five millilitres of algal culture was taken and washed thrice with 25 mL of isotonic solution containing 0.65 M ammonium formate [13] in order to remove excess salts. Pre-weighed Whatman GF/C glass microfiber filters (1.2 µm) were used to obtain the biomass after filtration in the moisture analyser (Mettler Toledo HR83). Then, the filter along with the biomass was placed in the moisture analyser, and its final dry weight was recorded after drying at 100 °C for 8 min. Dry weight was calculated after subtracting the filter weight, and the dry weight measured was expressed as g L−1. Following equations were used for the calculation of the growth parameters given below where µ (day−1) is the specific growth rate, N1 and N2 are the biomass at time 1, i.e., t1 and time 2, i.e., t2, respectively.
µ (day−1) = ln (N2/N1)/(t2 − t1)
Divisions per day = µ/ln2
Generation time (days) = 1/Div. day−1

2.8. Extraction of Algal Oil and Analysis of Fatty Acids

A known quantity of dried algal biomass (10 g) was treated using hexane at a ratio of 1:5 (w/v), and the algal oil was extracted using a Soxhlet apparatus. The solvent extraction process was continued for 8 h. After the extraction, the solvent containing the algal oil was filtered through Whatman GF/C filter paper. The solvent was recovered using a rotary evaporator at the respective boiling temperature. Algal oil obtained after solvent removal was quantified, and the yield was expressed on the basis of ash-free dry biomass.

2.9. Acid Transesterification

Ten grams of total lipid extracted from the alga was combined with 0.6 mL g−1 of sulphuric acid and a mixture of 4 mL g−1 each of chloroform and methanol (2:1), hexane, and petroleum ether. The reaction mixture was kept in a water bath for 40 min at 90 °C and was mixed intermittently. Then it was cooled at room temperature followed by the addition of 2 mL g−1 of distilled water. This solution was mixed for 45 s. After phase separation, the solvent layer containing biodiesel fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) was collected and transferred to a pre-weighed glass vial. The solvent was then evaporated using liquid N2, and the amount of biodiesel obtained was quantified gravimetrically. FAME was analysed by GC-MS [Agilent 6890 gas chromatograph, 15 m Alltech EC-5 column (250 μ I.D., 0.25 μ film thickness)]. A JEOL GCmate II bench top double-focusing magnetic sector mass spectrometer operating in electron ionization (EI) mode with TSS-20001 software was used for all the analyses. Identification of FAME was made by matching their recorded spectra with the databank mass spectra of NIST library V 11 provided by the instrument software.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Throughout the study period, triplicates were maintained for each experiment. The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis of the data was done using Origin Pro. V 8.0 for Windows.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Isolation of Tetraselmis Spp.

In the present attempt, from the water samples collected from the saltpans (salinity: 60 ppt) in Kovelong, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, four different isolates were obtained. Based on the colony morphology, colour, and cell size, these isolates were identified as quadriflagellate algae belonging to the genus Tetraselmis. The isolates include Tetraselmis chuii, T. gracilis, T. striata, and T. tetrathele (Figure 1a,b) [12]. Tetraselmis is a euryhaline microalga and commonly present in saltpans and marine environments [20,21]. T. chuii Butcher is a green four-flagellated alga having an ovoid body shape with a distinct curve (cell length: 12–14 µm, width: 9–10 µm). T. gracilis (Kylin) Butcher cells are ellipsoid and slightly compressed. The cells showed four anterior lobes, large pyrenoids, sub-basal with U-shaped starch shield, and median eyespot in red-orange colour. The length and width of the cells observed were 8–12 μm and 6–9 μm, respectively. T. striata Butcher cells showed longitudinal rows of granules and a posterior eyespot with cell length and width of 10–21 μm and 8–17 μm, respectively. T. tetrathele (G.S.West) Butcher cells appeared compressed, with deep and wide four-lobed apical furrows. The cell length and width were 10–16 μm and 8–12 μm, respectively. The cells appeared bright green when grown in f/2-agar medium under 30 µE m−2 s−1 light intensity and 12/12 light/dark cycle at 24 ± 1 °C. f/2-medium was reported to be the best growth medium for marine and brackish water strains of algae [13].

3.2. Screening Studies—Dry Biomass and Total Lipids in Tetraselmis spp.

The four different species of Tetraselmis isolated were screened for their growth performance under laboratory conditions. This study revealed that the isolate of T. striata showed the maximum biomass concentration, lipid content and volumetric biomass productivity of 0.58 ± 0.021 g L−1, 151 ± 3 mg L−1, and 0.025 ± 0.004 g L−1 d−1, respectively (Figure 2a,b; Table 1). Huerlimann et al. [22] reported a maximum biomass concentration of 0.35 g L−1 for T. gracilis, which was 8% less than the test alga, T. striata. Arkronrat et al. [23] reported a specific growth rate of 0.16 day−1 in Tetraselmis spp., which was 36% less than the specific growth rate of 0.25 day−1 recorded by the test alga T. striata used in this study. In the present study, the isolate of T. striata Butcher had the highest lipid content compared to the other three isolates. T. striata recorded a maximum lipid content of 33.60% and lipid productivity of 7.21 mg L−1 d−1 (Table 1). Huerlimann et al. [22] reported a lipid productivity of 18.6 mg L−1 d−1 for Tetraselmis spp., which was 2.6 times more than the lipid productivity recorded by the isolate T. striata used in this study.
Age, morphology, and quality of the culture could vary depending on the chemical composition of the growth media and growth conditions [24]. The variation observed in the lipid productivity of the Tetraselmis strain used in this study when compared to the values reported in the literature, could be attributed to the above factors. As the isolate T. striata BBRR1 outperformed all other isolates in terms of biomass and lipid productivity, further studies were conducted to assess this isolate for its growth performance in different strengths of f/2-medium as mentioned below: full strength (f/2-medium), 2 times the concentration of f/2 (f-medium), 5 times the concentration of f/2 (5f-medium), and 10 times the concentration of f/2 (10f-medium). Among these, f-medium outperformed all other media for the growth of T. straiata in terms of biomass productivity and specific growth rate, in lab studies (Table 2). However, as the cost of this medium was high, a low-cost medium (Modified CFTRI ABRR1) was developed by optimising the concentrations of nutrients present in the Modified CFTRI medium to improve the growth of algae. Though the biomass productivity was less, the Modified CFTRI ABRR1 medium recorded a 58% increase in the specific growth rate and a 60% increase in lipid productivity when compared to Modified CFTRI medium under laboratory conditions (Table 3). The costs of f/2, f, Modified CFTRI and Modified CFTRI ABRR1 media were US$1.1, 2.2, 0.4, and 0.6 per L, respectively. The cost of Modified CFTRI ABRR1 medium was 45% cheaper than f/2-medium and 73% cheaper than f-medium.
The morphological parameters may not be enough to identify the strains at species level. Hence, molecular tools like PCR are needed for confirming the systematic position of the algal isolates. In the present study, the 18S region of the ribosomal RNA gene was isolated and amplified with the specific primers. The obtained sequence was compared with the existing sequences in the NCBI database by the BLAST algorithm homology (sequence identity). This sequence was found to have 99% similarity with T. striata JQ315813 KMMCC 1157 strain in the database. Based on the classical taxonomy as well as molecular taxonomy, the test alga was identified and confirmed as T. striata Butcher BBRR1 (Figure 3). The sequence was submitted to the GenBank, NCBI, and the accession number (KP317837) was obtained.

3.3. Growth Performance of T. striata BBRR1 in 10-m2 Open Raceway Ponds

A trial was conducted to compare the growth performance T. striata BBRR1 in f-medium (control) and Modified CFTRI ABRR1 medium (treatment) cultivated in 10-m2 open raceway ponds. The alga recorded volumetric chlorophyll a productivities of 0.394 mg L−1 d−1 and 0.335 mg L−1 d−1 in the treatment and control, respectively on day 15 (Figure 4a). Volumetric productivity of chl a in the treatment recorded an 18% increase when compared to the control. The alga grown in the treatment showed an 8.4% increase in volumetric productivity of chl b over control on day 18 (Figure 4b). Volumetric productivity of carotenoids recorded a 5% increase for the treatment over control on day 18 (Figure 4c).
The observations in the present study clearly indicated that the cells continued their growth that resulted in the net increase of biomass up to day 15 in both control and treatment. In the treatment, the initial biomass of 0.12 ± 0.01 g L−1 increased up to a maximum of 0.95 ± 0.06 g L−1 on the 15th day, which was 28% higher than that of the control (Figure 5). T. Striata BBRR1 cultivated in the open raceway pond using Modified CFTRI ABRR1 medium (treatment) recorded 47, 15, 15, and 16% increases in the specific growth rate, volumetric biomass productivity, areal biomass productivity, and lipid productivity over control (f-medium), respectively (Table 4).
The alga grown in Modified CFTRI ABRR1 medium under laboratory conditions recorded 54% and 46% increases in specific growth rate and 45% and 19% increases in volumetric biomass productivity when compared to the alga grown in f/2 and f-medium, respectively (Table 4). The isolate T. striata BBRR1 used in this study recorded an areal biomass productivity of 9.45 g m−2 d−1 in Modified CFTRI ABRR1 medium and 8.25 g m−2 d−1 in f-medium. Fon-Sing and Borowitzka [25] reported an average biomass productivity of 8.3 g m−2 d−1 for Tetraselmis spp. Used in their study.
The lipid content of the alga varied from 16.5% to 25%, and the average lipid content in all the treatments was 19.8% (Table 4). Tetraselmis and Nannochloropsis spp. showed high lipid productivity in the experiments conducted by Rodolfi et al. [10], and they reported that these two species of marine algal strains were potential feedstocks for biomass and lipid production.
Nutrient management could change biochemical constituents of algae (Hsieh and Wu [26]). During the study period, the lipid content in T. striata BBRR1 increased due to growth-limiting factors like nitrogen and phosphorus. Pernet et al. [27], Li et al. [28], and Arumugam et al. [29] also reported that the biomass and lipid content of microalgae were affected by cultivation conditions and nutrient composition of growth medium. The culture in the open raceway pond was periodically monitored under microscope, and at the end of the study, the algal biomass in the pond was harvested and dried. The comparative analysis of biomass indicated 27, 24, and 47% increases in lipids, carbohydrates, and proteins obtained from the outdoor study when compared to the biomass obtained from the lab studies. Regan [30] observed that the total content of lipids varied from 1–85% of the dry weight in algae, with values higher than 40% being typically reached under nutrient limitation conditions.
The fatty acid composition of hexane-extracted FAMEs was analysed by GC-MS in the present study. The isolate T. striata BBRR1 recorded the presence of 33.14% of palmitic acid, followed by 22.64% 11-octadecenoic acid, 21.94% heptadecanoic acid, 5.94% palmitoleicacid, and 3.14% pentadecanoic acid (Table 5). Similarly, Sharminet al. [9] found significant amounts of myristic acid (C 14:0), palmitic acid (C 16:0), stearic acid (C 18:0), and palmitoleic acid (C 16:1) in the marine microalga Skeletonema costatum isolated from the Bangladesh coast, and they suggested that this algae can be used as biodiesel feedstock.
The areal biomass productivity of T. striata BBRR1 cultivated using Modified CFTRI ABRR1 medium in the 10-m2 open raceway pond was 9.45 g m−2 d−1. Based on this areal productivity observed in T. striata BBRR1, it can be concluded that this alga has the potential to produce about 31 dry tons of algal biomass ha−1 year−1 and can capture and fix 62 tons of CO2 ha−1 year−1. Cultivation of algae for biomass production is gaining importance day by day as this biomass can be used for the production of biofuels. However, production cost of algal biomass needs to be reduced below $150 per dry ton to make the biofuel production technology from algae economically viable. Currently, the production cost of algal biomass is much higher when compared to that of the biomass resources obtained from terrestrial crops. Marine algae have the potential to produce low-cost feedstock for the production of biofuels in the future. However, more research is required to improve the biomass and lipid productivity of algae in order to reduce the cost of production of biomass and algae biofuels.

4. Conclusions

This study envisaged researching the feasibility and sustainability of marine microalgae as biofuel feedstock to meet the energy crisis in the future. In the present attempt, four different marine algal species of Tetraselmis viz. T. chuii Butcher, T. gracilis (Kylin) Butcher, T. striata Butcher, and T. tetrathele (G.S.West) Bucher were isolated and screened for their growth performance. Among these isolates, T. striata recorded the maximum biomass productivity under lab conditions. This strain was further tested in 10-m2 open race way pond for biomass and lipid productivity using a low-cost medium under outdoor conditions. This study was the first attempt to cultivate the strain of T. striata BBRR1in an open outdoor raceway pond for biomass and biofuel applications.

Author Contributions

A.B.B., M.G.R., and R.R. conceived the project and designed the experiments. N.M., S.C., and S.N. assisted in writing the paper. T.J., M.M., and R.R. wrote the paper. J.-R.S. and C.-C.C. contributed clarifications and guidance on the manuscript. All authors were involved in editing the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (MOST 104-2622-B-038-003, MOST 104-2320-B-038-045-MY2, MOST 106-2320-B-038-012, MOST 107-2320-B-038-035-MY2) and Taipei Medical University (DP2-108-21121-01-N-02-03) and the APC was funded by MOST.

Acknowledgments

The authors A.B.B. and M.G.R. are thankful to the Biotechnology Division of Aban Group, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, for permitting us to use their algae pilot plant facility to conduct our research and providing financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Miao, X.; Wu, Q. High yield bio-oil production from fast pyrolysis by metabolic controlling of Chlorella protothecoides. J. Biotechnol. 2004, 110, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Raja, A.; Vipin, C.; Aiyappan, A. Biological importance of marine algae an overview. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2013, 2, 222–227. [Google Scholar]
  3. Borowitzka, M.A. High-value products from microalgae—Their development and commercialisation. J. Appl. Phycol. 2013, 25, 743–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nigam, P.S.; Singh, A. Production of liquid biofuels from renewable resources. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2011, 37, 52–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Moheimani, N.R.; Mark, P.; McHenry, K.; de Boer, K.; Parisa, B. Biomass and Biofuels from Microalgae: Advances in Engineering and Biology; Springer: Cham, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  6. Florentinus, A.; Hamelinck, C.; Lint, S.D.; Iersel, S.V. Worldwide Potential of Aquatic Biomass; Ecofys: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chisti, Y. Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol. Adv. 2007, 25, 294–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sharmin, T.; Hasan, M.; Md, C.; Aftabuddin, S.; Rahman, M.A.; Khan, M. Growth, Fatty Acid, and Lipid Composition of Marine Microalgae Skeletonemacostatum Available in Bangladesh Coast: Consideration as Biodiesel Feedstock. J. Mar. Biol. 2016, 8, 33–51. [Google Scholar]
  9. Griffiths, M.J.; Harrison, S.T. Lipid productivity as a key characteristic for choosing algal species for biodiesel production. J. Appl. Phycol. 2009, 21, 493–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rodolfi, L.; ChiniZittelli, G.; Bassi, N.; Padovani, G.; Biondi, N.; Bonini, G.; Tredici, M.R. Microalgae for oil: Strain selection, induction of lipid synthesis and outdoor mass cultivation in a low-cost photobioreactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 102, 100–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Iyengar, M.O.P.; Desikachary, T.V. Volvocales; Indian Council of Agricultural Research: New Delhi, India, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  12. Guillard, R.R.L.; Ryther, J.H. Studies of marine planktonic diatoms. I. Cyclotella nanaHustedt and DetonulaconfervaceaCleve. Can. J. Microbiol. 1962, 8, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Moheimani, N.R. The Culture of Coccolithophore Algae for Carbon Dioxide Bioremediation. Ph.D. Thesis, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lichtenthaler, H.K. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic membranes. Method Enzymol. 1987, 148, 350–382. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dubois, M.; Gilles, K.A.; Hamilton, J.K.; Rebers, P.A.; Smith, F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 1956, 28, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lowry, O.H.; Rosebrough, N.S.; Farrand, A.L.; Randall, R.J. Protein measurement with folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, 193, 263–275. [Google Scholar]
  17. Folch, J.; Lees, M.; Sloane, S.G.H. Asimplemethodfortheisolationand purificationof thetotallipids fromanimaltissues. J. Biol. Chem. 1957, 226, 49–57. [Google Scholar]
  18. Richards, E.; Reichardt, M.; Rogers, S. Preparation of genomic DNA from plant tissue. Curr. Prot. Mol. Biol. 1994, 27, 2–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, K.H.; Yeh, Y.L.; Shen, W.C. Fast preparation of fungal DNA for PCR screening. J. Microbiol. Meth. 2011, 85, 170–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kawabata, Y.; Nakahara, H.; Katayama, Y.; Ishida, N. The phytoplankton of some saline lakes in Central Asia. Int. J. Salt Lake Res. 1997, 6, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. López-González, P.J.; Guerrero, F.; Carmen, C.M. Seasonal fluctuations in the plankton community in a hypersaline temporary lake (Honda, southern Spain). Inter. J. Salt Lake Res. 1998, 6, 353–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Huerlimann, R.; De Nys, R.; Heimann, K. Growth, lipid content, productivity, and fatty acid composition of tropical microalgae for scale-up production. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010, 107, 245–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Arkronrat, W.; Deemark, P.; Oniam, V. Growth performance and proximate composition of mixed cultures of marine microalgae (Nannochloropsis sp. and Tetraselmis sp.) with monocultures. Songklanakarin. J. Sci. Technol. 2016, 38, 326–345. [Google Scholar]
  24. Metzger, P.; Largeau, C. Botryococcusbraunii: A rich source for hydrocarbons and related ether lipids. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 66, 486–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fon-Sing, S.; Borowitzka, M.A. Isolation and screening of euryhaline Tetraselmis spp. Suitable for large-scale outdoor culture in hypersaline media for biofuels. J. Appl. Phycol. 2015, 28, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hsieh, C.H.; Wu, W.T. Cultivation of microalgae for oil production with a cultivation strategy of urea limitation. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 3921–3926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Pernet, F.; Tremblay, R.; Demers, E.; Roussy, M. Variation of lipid class and fatty acid composition of Chaetocerosmuelleri and Isochrysis sp. grown in a semicontinuous system. Aquaculture 2003, 221, 393–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, Q.; Du, W.; Liu, D. Perspectives of microbial oils for biodiesel production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 80, 749–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Arumugam, M.; Agarwal, A.; Arya, M.C.; Zakwan, A. Influence of nitrogen sources on biomass productivity of microalgae Scenedesmusbijugatus. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 131, 246–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Regan, D.L. Other micro-algae. In Micro-Algal Biotechnology; Borowitzka, M.A., Borowitzka, L.J., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1988; pp. 135–150. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Colonies of Tetraselmis spp. On f/2-agar medium on the 20th day. (b) T. tetrathele (A), T. striata (B), T. chuii (C), and T. gracilis (D) after 18 d of growth.
Figure 1. (a) Colonies of Tetraselmis spp. On f/2-agar medium on the 20th day. (b) T. tetrathele (A), T. striata (B), T. chuii (C), and T. gracilis (D) after 18 d of growth.
Energies 13 00341 g001
Figure 2. (a) Dry biomass and (b) total lipids of Tetraselmis spp. At different intervals.
Figure 2. (a) Dry biomass and (b) total lipids of Tetraselmis spp. At different intervals.
Energies 13 00341 g002
Figure 3. PCR amplification of 18S rRNA gene of T. striata. Lane 1. DNA ladder (kB); Lane 2. PCR amplified product of T. striata.
Figure 3. PCR amplification of 18S rRNA gene of T. striata. Lane 1. DNA ladder (kB); Lane 2. PCR amplified product of T. striata.
Energies 13 00341 g003
Figure 4. (a) Chlorophyll a, (b) chlorophyll b, and (c) total carotenoids of T. striata BBRR1 in Modified CFTRI ABRR1 medium at different intervals in 10-m2 open raceway pond.
Figure 4. (a) Chlorophyll a, (b) chlorophyll b, and (c) total carotenoids of T. striata BBRR1 in Modified CFTRI ABRR1 medium at different intervals in 10-m2 open raceway pond.
Energies 13 00341 g004
Figure 5. Dry biomass production by T. striata BBRR1 in f-medium and Modified CFTRI ABRR1 medium at different time intervals in 10-m2 open raceway ponds.
Figure 5. Dry biomass production by T. striata BBRR1 in f-medium and Modified CFTRI ABRR1 medium at different time intervals in 10-m2 open raceway ponds.
Energies 13 00341 g005
Table 1. Biomass, lipid productivity, lipid content and CO2 utilisation of different Tetraselmis spp.
Table 1. Biomass, lipid productivity, lipid content and CO2 utilisation of different Tetraselmis spp.
StrainsVolumetric Biomass Productivity (g L−1 d−1)Lipid Productivity (mg L−1 d−1)Lipid Content (%)CO2 Fixed (g L−1 d−1)
T. chuii0.023 ± 0.0035.33 ± 0.00531.46 ± 1.240.042 ± 0.012
T. gracilis0.024 ± 0.0045.12 ± 0.00427.88 ± 1.120.042 ± 0.013
T. striata0.025 ± 0.0047.21 ± 0.00533.60 ± 1.250.046 ± 0.025
T. tetrathele0.021 ± 0.0055.22 ± 0.00428.48 ± 1.050.038 ± 0.017
Data represent mean ± standard Error (SE) of three replicates.
Table 2. Growth performance of T. striata in different strengths of f/2-medium.
Table 2. Growth performance of T. striata in different strengths of f/2-medium.
Growth MediaVolumetric Biomass Productivity (g L−1d−1)Specific Growth Rate (Day−1)Div. d−1Gen’ t (d)
f/2 (1×)0.022 ± 0.0050.39 ± 0.070.56 ± 0.041.79 ± 0.08
f (2×)0.027 ± 0.0040.41 ± 0.060.59 ± 0.031.69 ± 0.05
5f (5×)0.019 ± 0.0060.16 ± 0.030.24 ± 0.074.25 ± 0.03
10f (10×)0.003 ± 0.0030.16 ± 0.040.23 ± 0.054.31 ± 0.05
Data represent mean ± standard Error (SE) of three replicates.
Table 3. Growth performance of T. striata in low-cost algal growth media.
Table 3. Growth performance of T. striata in low-cost algal growth media.
Growth MediumVolumetric Biomass Productivity (g L1 d1)Specific Growth Rate (day–1)Div. d1Gen’ t (d)Lipid Productivity (mg L1 d1)
[A] Modified CFTRI0.81 ± 0.040.38 ± 0.060.55 ± 0.031.81 ± 0.078.41 ± 0.013
[B] Modified CFTRI ABRR10.71 ± 0.080.60 ± 0.080.86 ± 0.051.16 ± 0.0513.44 ± 0.015
Data represent mean ± standard Error (SE) of three replicates.
Table 4. Growth performance of T. striata BBRR1 cultivated under lab and outdoor conditions in different media.
Table 4. Growth performance of T. striata BBRR1 cultivated under lab and outdoor conditions in different media.
S.NoCulture ConditionsSpecific Growth Rate (Day–1)Div. d1Gen’ t (d)Volumetric Biomass Productivity (g L1 d1)Areal Biomass Productivity (g m2 d1)Lipid Content (%)
1f/2-medium under in-vitro study0.39 ± 0.070.56 ± 0.041.79 ± 0.080.022 ± 0.02-25.07 ± 0.24
2f-medium under in-vitro study0.41 ± 0.060.59 ± 0.031.68 ± 0.080.027 ± 0.05-19.42 ± 0.80
3Modified CFTRI ABRR1 medium under in-vitro study0.60 ± 0.080.86 ± 0.051.16 ± 0.050.032 ± 0.04-18.76 ± 1.30
410-m2 open race way pond f-medium0.24 ± 0.060.35 ± 0.032.88 ± 0.040.055 ± 0.058.25 ± 0.0616.50 ± 1.42
510-m2 open race way Modified CFTRI ABRR1medium0.45 ± 0.070.64 ± 0.051.55 ± 0.070.063 ± 0.089.45 ± 0.0919.42 ± 0.98
Data represent mean ± standard Error (SE) of three replicates.
Table 5. Lipid profile of T. striata BBRR1 grown in the open raceway pond.
Table 5. Lipid profile of T. striata BBRR1 grown in the open raceway pond.
Fatty AcidsWt. (%)
7-Octadecene1.49
Methyltetradecanoate2.63
Pentadecanoic acid, methyl ester3.14
Palmitoleic acid, methyl ester5.94
Palmitic acid, methyl ester33.14
Hexadecanoic acid, 14-methyl-, methyl ester2.82
11-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester22.64
Heptadecanoic acid, 16-methyl-, methyl ester21.94
Cyclopropane octanoic acid 2-hexyl-methyl ester1.64

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Boopathy, A.B.; Jayakumar, T.; Chinnasamy, S.; Rajaram, M.G.; Mohan, N.; Nagaraj, S.; Rengasamy, R.; Manubolu, M.; Sheu, J.-R.; Chang, C.-C. Biomass and Lipid Production Potential of an Indian Marine Algal Isolate Tetraselmis striata BBRR1. Energies 2020, 13, 341. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en13020341

AMA Style

Boopathy AB, Jayakumar T, Chinnasamy S, Rajaram MG, Mohan N, Nagaraj S, Rengasamy R, Manubolu M, Sheu J-R, Chang C-C. Biomass and Lipid Production Potential of an Indian Marine Algal Isolate Tetraselmis striata BBRR1. Energies. 2020; 13(2):341. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en13020341

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boopathy, Annakkili Baskara, Thanasekaran Jayakumar, Senthil Chinnasamy, Muthu Ganesan Rajaram, Natarajan Mohan, Subramani Nagaraj, Ramasamy Rengasamy, Manjunath Manubolu, Joen-Rong Sheu, and Chao-Chien Chang. 2020. "Biomass and Lipid Production Potential of an Indian Marine Algal Isolate Tetraselmis striata BBRR1" Energies 13, no. 2: 341. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en13020341

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop