Next Article in Journal
Improved Gain Scheduling Control and Its Application to Aero-Engine LPV Synthesis
Next Article in Special Issue
Thermal Treatment of Biomass: A Bibliometric Analysis—The Torrefaction Case
Previous Article in Journal
Energy Saving and CO2 Reduction Potential from Partial Bus Routes Reduction Model in Bangkok Urban Fringe
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Physicochemical Properties and Lignin Degradation of Thermal-Pretreated Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch

by
Intan Nazirah Mohammad
,
Clarence M. Ongkudon
and
Mailin Misson
*
Biotechnology Research Institute, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jln UMS, Kota Kinabalu 88400, Sabah, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 21 September 2020 / Revised: 27 October 2020 / Accepted: 28 October 2020 / Published: 16 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomass Pretreatment and Optimisation of Biofuel Production Processes)

Abstract

:
Oil palm empty fruit bunches (EFB) are recoverable lignocellulosic biomass serving as feedstock for biofuel production. The major hurdle in producing biofuel from biomass is the abundance of embedded recalcitrant lignin. Pretreatment is a key step to increase the accessibility of enzymes to fermentable sugars. In this study, thermal pretreatments at moderate temperatures ranging from 150 °C to 210 °C, at different durations (30–120 min) and EFB particle sizes (1–10 mm), were employed to maximize lignin degradation. Observation through a scanning electron microscope (SEM) revealed disruptions in EFB structure and the removal of silica bodies and other impurities upon thermal pretreatment. Remarkable changes on the elemental contents and functional groups occurred, as was evident from the energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analyses. The smallest EFB size yielded higher lignin degradation—about 2.3-fold and 1.2-fold higher—than the biggest and moderate tested EFB sizes, indicating a smaller particle size provides a higher surface area for bioreaction. Furthermore, applying a longer duration of treatment and a higher temperature enhanced lignin degradation by up to 58%. This study suggests that moderate thermal treatment could enhance lignin degradation by altering the physicochemical structure of EFB, which is beneficial in improving biofuel production.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The processing of oilseeds by the palm oil industry stimulates great socioeconomic impact. The success of the oil palm industry brought to the national economy about RM 67.6 billion in export earnings in 2016, which equals 6.1% of Malaysia’s total GDP [1]. As the second largest palm oil producer worldwide, Malaysia contributes about 37% of the global market [2]. The massive production of oil palm has consequently resulted in a tremendous accumulation of huge amounts of agricultural wastes, such as oil palm trunks, oil palm fronds, empty fruit bunch (EFB) and palm pressed fibers [3], by the industry. According to Roslan and Zakaria [4], only 10% of palm oil is extracted from fresh palm fruit bunches, while the remaining 90% is discarded. Burning biomass wastes may cause emissions of greenhouse gases, while dumping them into plantation sites for natural decomposition may create homes for pests [5]. As such, the conversion of biomass wastes into commercially valuable products has been of biotechnological interest.
EFB is a lignocellulose material made up of cellulose (20–50%), hemicellulose (23–36%), lignin and other derivatives (22–51%) [6]. An interesting fact is that cellulose and hemicellulose are made up of various fermentable sugars that can be converted into biofuel [7]. Different biomass substrates possess different lignocellulosic contents. According to Rambo and Schmidt [8] sugarcane baggase possess a high cellulose content, determined at 43.3%, in comparison with rice husks (31%), pine wood (36.5%) and corncob (30.2%). Meanwhile, the hemicellulose components of corncob is 1.3-fold and 1.7-fold higher than rice husks and pine wood, respectively. Lignin is an amorphous polymer imparting structural integrity to EFB cell walls. Lignin is composed of phenylpropane units comprising guaiacyl alcohol (G), syringyl alcohol (S) and p-coumaryl alcohol (H). The interunits are linked together by several covalent bonds, such as aryl–ether, aryl–aryl carbon–carbon bonds [9,10]. Besides lignin, the presence of silica bodies on the EFB surface also hinders the penetration of biochemicals into the hemicellulose and cellulose matrix. These highly complex structures and strong chemical bonds make the conversion of cellulosic materials into bioethanol challenging. The physicochemical structures of biomass hinder the hydrolysis of celluloses present in biomass due to their complexity and variability [11]. The disruption of the physicochemical structures via pretreatment could increase the rate of hydrolysis 3- to 10-fold [12]. According to Muhammad Nauman Aftab [12], the pretreatment of lignocellulose material is a vital step to facilitate the breaking of strong linkages of polymers within the plant cell wall, thus increasing their availability for enzymatic reactions, digestibility and product yield. Therefore, the pretreatment of the recalcitrant feedstocks should be employed to resolve these limitations.
In order to break the polymeric network of lignin, several methods have been employed to disrupt the lignocellulosic structure of biomass, including chemical, biological and physical pretreatments. The aim of the pretreatment strategies is to enhance the enzymes’ or acids’ accessibility to hydrolyze cellulose through the breaking of lignin structures, as well as disrupting the crystalline structure of cellulose [13]. The usage of alkaline or acid chemicals in chemical pretreatment unfortunately causes toxic accumulation and environmental damages [14,15]. Biological pretreatment offers an environment-friendly pathway by utilizing bacterial and fungal enzymes [16,17]; however, the expensive processes of enzyme production and purification have been recognized as the major hurdle for large-scale application [9]. Physical pretreatment, on the other hand, has received great attention as an efficient technology for the reduction of lignocellulose recalcitrance and component separation. In addition, this technology is environmentally friendly as it does not any hazardous chemicals. Moreover, it requires a shorter treatment duration.
In this regard, the technology could be used as a green and feasible approach, which normally involves thermal treatment, such as pyrolysis, hydrogenolysis and hydrolysis, of lignin with or without catalysts. The technical aspects and process viability should be considered so as to maximize the economic benefits and mimic actual industrial practice. While the aim is to obtain highly accessible lignocellulosic for hydrolysis and achieve a higher production of fine sugars, the pretreatment process should avoid the degradation of the desired fermentable sugars. Oil palm EFBs have been treated with various approaches, including hydrothermal treatment [3], steam or superheated steam [18,19], subcritical phenol [2], ball milling pretreatment and diluted acid hydrolysis [20], and Fenton oxidation with Fe(III), Fe(0) and Fe3O4 as a catalyst [21]. Under the effect of temperature, lignin degradation occurs due to chemical reactions, as a result of which the physical structure evolves [22]. Lignin acts as an amorphous thermoplastic polymer, which develops a rubber-like structure upon being heated beyond its glass transition temperature, which allows some structural movement [23]. Lignin would lose these thermo-plasticity properties upon harsh treatment, which causes severe degradation in its high molecular weight and three dimensional structure [11].
As such, in the present study, thermal treatment at varying conditions was investigated to enhance lignin degradation in the EFB structure. The chosen pretreatment method can be accomplished in a shorter period of time, and could alter the structural composition of EFB more effectively than the biological method. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the thermal treatment on the physicochemical structure of EFB and the degradation of the lignin structure. The treatments were conducted at different temperatures (150 °C, 170 °C, 190 °C, 210 °C), pretreatment durations (30 min, 60 min, 90 min, 120 min) and EFB sizes (1 mm, 3–4 mm, 7–10 mm). Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), scanning electron microscope (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analyses were performed to evaluate the morphological and structural changes upon pretreatment. Subsequently, the degradation of lignin via thermal treatment was determined by Klason’s lignin analysis, as described by Sluiter and Hames [24]. Lignin decomposed over a wide range of temperatures [25]. Klason’s lignin analysis is a direct method used to determine the lignin in biomass by hydrolyzing carbohydrates using concentrated acid, leaving lignin as a residue which can be determined via gravimetric measurement. This study is a promising platform for an industrially and economically feasible lignocellulosic pretreatment to enhance biofuel production.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Samples

EFB samples were obtained from Palm Oil Mill Tawau (Tawau, Sabah, Malaysia). The samples were pre-shredded and sieved to collect fibers at desired particle sizes (1 mm, 3–4 mm, 7–10 mm). The samples were then kept at room temperature until further use.

2.2. Thermal Pretreatment of EFB

Prior to the thermal treatment, EFB samples were placed on aluminum foil and oven-dried at 60 °C overnight. Approximately 3 g of the oven-dried EFB samples were treated at different temperatures (150 °C, 170 °C, 190 °C and 210 °C), durations (30, 60, 90 and 120 min) and particle sizes (1 mm, 3–4 mm, 7–10 mm). Upon completion of the treatment, the heat was stopped, and the sample was allowed to cool down at an ambient temperature. The treated samples were collected and weighed before the characterization and lignin degradation analyses. The treatment with pressure was conducted inside a reactor with pressure set at 15 psi. The reactor was initially flushed with nitrogen.

2.3. Characterization of EFB

Observations on the morphological changes were carried out using an SEM (Hitachi S-3400 N, Hitachi High-Tech Science America, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA). The changes included the removal of silica compounds and other impurities on the EFB surface. EFB samples were mounted on the sampling holder using double-side adhesive tape and coated with gold before the morphological examination. The elemental analysis of the samples was determined using an SEM–energy dispersive X-ray (SEM-EDX) (Hitachi S-3400 N, USA). Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) (Agilents Technology Cary 630, Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to conduct the characterization of functional groups. The changes were observed by comparing the treated samples with the untreated counterparts.

2.4. Determination of Lignin Degradation

The lignin content in the pretreated samples was analyzed by using Klason’s lignin analysis method [26]. Approximately 150 mg of EFB was added into 3 mL of 72% sulfuric acid (H2SO4), and incubated in a water bath at 30 °C for an hour. After incubation, 84 mL of distilled water was added and then autoclaved at 125 °C for one hour. After cooling down at room temperature, the solid sample was separated from the solution through filtration using a filter paper. In total, 5 mL of the filtrate was mixed with 3% H2SO4 before measuring the absorbance using a UV spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Canby, OR, USA) at the 205 nm wavelength. The percentage of lignin degradation was determined using Equation (1).
L i g n i n   D e g r a d a t i o n   ( % ) =   L i g n i n   ( u n t r e a t e d ) L i g n i n   ( t r e a t e d ) L i g n i n   ( u n t r e a t e d ) × 100

3. Results

3.1. Morphological External Surface

3.1.1. Physical Appearance Observation

Physical changes in biomass due to thermal treatment have been known to improve the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose by increasing the biomass pore size for enzyme penetration and decreasing its crystallinity and association with lignin [27]. Figure 1 shows the physical appearance of untreated EFB (Figure 1a,f), treated EFB at various temperatures (150 °C, 170 °C, 190 °C and 210 °C) for 90 min under an inert atmosphere (Figure 1b–e), and EFB treated under similar pretreatment conditions but in the presence of pressure (15 psi), as a comparative study (Figure 1g–j). The color and morphological changes upon thermal treatment were observed and compared with the untreated counterpart.
Observably, the samples became darker in color as the pretreatment temperature increased. A significant color change was observed when the highest pretreatment temperature (210 °C) was applied. It is important to note that smell, like ‘burnt sugar’, was generated during the treatment process. This observation was in agreement with a reported study wherein the smell was more evident at a higher temperature and longer duration of the thermal pretreatment [18]. The photochemical reaction of carbohydrate and lignin compounds in EFB might be responsible for the smell phenomenon that occurred with an increased temperature [28].
In the presence of pressure (Figure 1f–j), the impact on the color change was more remarkable. The EFB samples turned to a black color even at the lowest temperature (150 °C) and became ashes at the highest pretreatment temperature (210 °C). Aita and Kim [29] reported that the lignin structure would be modified at high temperatures and pressures by the melting, coagulation and reprecipitation of cellulose fibers. These resulted in the cellulose fibrils becoming more accessible to enzyme reactions. Although high pressures could increase the pore volume of cellulose and therefore its surface area, this study reveals that pressure could alter the EFB physical structures significantly. A reduction of total carbohydrate may occur due to the elimination of the waxy layer on the outer surface of the EFB structure [29]. Such physical changes should be kept minimal in the thermal treatment to prevent the degradation of hydrolyzable sugars. As such, pretreatment with moderate temperature and without additional pressure is preferable for an economical process, and importantly to preserve the fermentable sugars from being degraded.

3.1.2. SEM Observation

The SEM images for the untreated and thermally treated EFB samples at different temperatures are presented in Figure 2. The structures of untreated EFB (Figure 2a) were smooth and rigid. The external wall exhibited ball-like structures embedded on the EFB structure, which are possibly the silica bodies described by Isroi and Cifriadi [30]. These round-shaped spiky silica bodies attached to circular craters are spread around the EFB strands. Bahrin and Baharuddin [18] reported that the amount of silica on the EFB surface was determined to be roughly 5%. After the pretreatment process, a partial disruption on the EFB cell wall was observed (Figure 2b–e), where most of the silica bodies were removed. The removal of the external walls of EFB was attributed to lignin solubilization [20]. The impact was less significant at lower temperatures, as evidenced by the treated samples at 150 °C (Figure 2b) and 170 °C (Figure 2c), whereat some of the silica bodies were still intact on the EFB’s surface. A similar finding was also reported when superheated steam was employed at a temperature of around 140 °C [18]. The findings indicate that a greater change on the surface morphology could be observed when higher temperatures are applied (Figure 2d,e). Most impurities on the EFB surface were also removed, making the surface smoother.
As revealed by these findings, sufficient energy was required to remove the embedded silica bodies. The thermal treatment above 170 °C was found to significantly alter the EFB surface. In a previous study, the silica bodies were dislodged using other extensive treatments, such as washing, hammering and crushing [30]. Silica is known as a chemical composition barrier in the EFB structure, as its removal facilitates the formation of pores that increase the surface area for enzyme accessibility [31]. The fraction of pores has also been reported to trigger enzymatic and microbial reactions, as it was thought to be effective in the swelling of the EFB structure [19].
The effect of particle size on EFB thermal treatment was also evaluated, as depicted in Figure 3. Pretreatment using smaller particle sizes contributed to a distinct change in the EFB’s physical appearance. The silica bodies were found missing on the outer surfaces of the 1 mm and 3–4 mm treated EFB samples (Figure 3a,b), while treatment using the largest particle size of EFB showed most of the silica bodies remaining embedded, implying the EFB surface was less affected by the treatment (Figure 3c). These trends of observations are probably attributed to the surface area available for pretreatment. The smaller size of EFB provides a larger surface area to be exposed to the thermal reaction.

3.2. Chemical Compounds Analysis

Figure 4 illustrates the results of elemental analysis as a function of particle size and pretreatment temperature. The elemental compounds found after EFB treatment were compared with the untreated properties to assess the changes during treatment. The untreated EFB majorly consisted of oxygen (32.09 wt. %), followed by silicon (24.07 wt. %) and carbon (17. 27 wt. %). Other elements, including magnesium, kalium, calcium and niobium, made up about 24.07 wt. % (Figure 4). After thermal treatment, the carbon rapidly increased from 17.27 wt. % to above 60 wt. %, while oxygen content slightly reduced, from 32.09 wt. % to below 30 wt. %. The decrease in the oxygen content after thermal treatment was likely due to the decomposition of the oxygenated bonds and the release of low molecular weight by-products containing H and O [32]. The most significant effect was observed in the treatments using 190 °C and above. Silicon and other elements sharply decreased and became almost absent at this range of temperature, implying the decomposition of the compounds [33]. A decrease in calcium and magnesium was reported as the pyrolysis temperature was increased from 450 to 600 °C, using hickory wood as the feedstock [26]. Some metals were also suggested to be volatile at high temperatures [34].
The elemental composition of the treated EFB was also greatly affected by EFB particle size (Figure 4b). There were major increases in carbon after thermal pretreatment using the 1 mm and 3–4 mm EFB sizes, of about 3.45-fold and 3.72-fold, respectively. Pretreatment using the largest particle size (7–10 mm), on the other hand, demonstrated an escalation of oxygen content of about 1.6-fold, similar to its carbon increment (1.3-fold). It is important to note that while silicon and other elements of the 1 mm and 3–4 mm EFB sizes were majorly decomposed after treatment, the silicon content remained approximately 30 wt. % for the 7–10 mm sample. This result indicates that the volatile fractions removed were most likely attributed to the high surface area available for pretreatment.

3.3. Changes on Chemical Functional Groups

Fourier transformed infrared (FTIR) analysis was performed to evaluate the structural changes due to thermal treatment, as presented in Figure 5. The treated EFB demonstrated significant structural differences when compared with the untreated counterpart. A considerable number of absorption bands were found to have disappeared, while some were notably decreased. Greater changes were found on the samples pretreated using higher temperatures (Figure 5a), longer pretreatment times (Figure 5b) and smaller EFB particle sizes (Figure 5c). The peak at 1225 nm indicates the functional group for C-O from the guaiacyl ring in lignin [35], while the peak at 1445 nm indicates the stretching of (C-C) in the aromatic ring. Grube and Lin [36] also reported that both peaks are typical signals for the lignin component. The valent of C-O, C-C, and the deformation variations in the ring structures of CH2OH origin correspond to the band in the 950 to 1200 cm−1 region [18]. Meanwhile, the notable peaks at 550 nm resemble alkyl halide or halo compound C-Br stretching with strong intensity. The reduction in peak intensity indicates the alteration of the functional groups present in the EFB structure. Bahrin and Baharuddin [18] explained that the disappearance of the absorptions might be associated with the decomposition of hemicellulose components in EFB during thermal treatment. It may be concluded through these FTIR findings that certain composition changes occurred after the samples underwent pretreatment.

3.4. Effect of Thermal Treatment on Lignin Degradation

The lignin degradation profile of EFB pretreated using different temperatures (Figure 6a), durations (Figure 6b) and particle sizes (Figure 6c) was further evaluated. The lignin content was determined using Klason’s lignin analysis [24]. It is a direct method that uses concentrated acid to hydrolyze carbohydrates present in the samples, leaving only lignin as the residue, which is then analyzed via gravimetric measurement. As Figure 6a indicates, smaller EFB sizes demonstrated a higher percentage of lignin degradation. The 1 mm-sized EFB yielded lignin degradations that were about 1.2-fold and 2.2-fold higher than the pretreated samples using 3–4 mm and 7–10 mm sizes, respectively (Figure 6b). As the particle size reduced, the surface area available for pretreatment to take place on increased. In addition, a longer pretreatment time and higher temperature might be required to break down the physical structure of the larger EFB.
The findings in Figure 6b demonstrate a consistent increase in the percentage of lignin degradation with the increase in the duration of pretreatment. Extending the pretreatment time to 120 min led to the highest lignin degradation, estimated at 56%, when compared to the 16% achieved by the 30 min pretreatment. This agrees with the rule of thumb that a longer pretreatment duration provides sufficient time for a complete reaction to take place.
Figure 6c presents the effect of pretreatment temperature on lignin degradation. Thermal treatments at 150 °C and 170 °C yielded almost the same lignin degradation, of around 20–25%. Increasing the temperature yielded a significant increase in lignin degradation. By using the highest temperature (210 °C), the yield remarkably improved, reaching almost 60% lignin degradation. Heat can disrupt the structural and physicochemical properties of biomass. Other factors that could influence the disruption are the heating rate and holding time [37]. At longer pretreatment times and higher temperatures, lignin could be degraded into smaller or more soluble fragments by the vigorous breaking of hydrogen bond and thus the decreasing amount of β-O-4 linkages [38]. Nevertheless, at low temperatures, these fragments would be able to re-condense and rearrange themselves into other forms.
The thermal treatment in this study features a potential optimal method for lignin degradation in EFB structures under moderate conditions. Benchmarking the findings with previously reported studies, as shown in Table 1, the thermal treatment in this study shows a comparable or even greater lignin degradation. The pretreatment at 210 °C without the addition of chemicals or pressure resulted in the degradation of lignin at around 58%. In addition, the carbohydrate components of EFB were also probably reduced. Bahrin and Baharuddin [18] reported reductions in cellulose and hemicelluloses from 71.3% to 63.7% after EFB superheated steam treatment at 210 °C/60 min. According to Tadesse and Luque [39], the pretreatment process of lignocellulose generally consists of rupturing the complex lignin seal and loosening the crystalline structure of cellulose.
Besides the selection of treatment methods, the type of biomass may also contribute to the performance of lignin removal. For instance, grass waste may not be as recalcitrant as EFB lignocelluloses, thus yielding a higher lignin degradation (73.2%) via chemical treatment. Biological treatment using fungal strains, on the other hand, requires more days of treatment (25–42 days) than the thermal approach. Future research should be designed to assess the effectiveness of this thermal treatment in increasing the bioconversion of fermentable sugars into bioethanol from EFB. Detailed economic analysis also needs to be conducted as an important guideline for the financial feasibility of large-scale operations.

4. Conclusions

The effectiveness of the thermal pretreatment of the oil palm empty fruit bunch (EFB) for the removal of lignin was investigated in this study. The processing parameters, including EFB particle size, the duration of treatment and the temperature, were found to play vital roles in enhancing lignin degradation. Morphological observations revealed significant changes in the physicochemical structure of EFB upon thermal treatment. Characterization studies using SEM, EDX and FTIR analyses indicated the removal of silica bodies and other impurities, besides changes in elemental content and chemical functional groups. Nevertheless, applying pressure along with an elevated treatment temperature caused undesirable damages in the physical structure of EFB, and possibly the fermentable sugars. Smaller EFB particle sizes (1 mm), longer durations (120 min) and higher temperatures (210 °C) were found to be the optimal conditions for thermal treatment, yielding the highest lignin degradation, estimated at 58%. The findings of this study reveal that thermal pretreatment is promising in enhancing lignin degradation, which may be beneficial in improving enzyme accessibility during fermentation and may contribute to setting up a solid foundation for biofuel production from biomass

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.M.O., M.M.; formal analysis and investigation, I.N.M.; writing—original draft preparation, I.N.M.; writing—review and editing, M.M.; supervision, C.M.O., M.M.; project administration and funding acquisition, C.M.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The international collaborative research grant scheme GL00139 with Autodisplay Biotech GmBH, Germany: Saccharification of Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch using Autodisplay Cells.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the funding from research grant scheme (GL00139) Autodisplay Biotech GmBH, Germany.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nambiappan, B.; Ismail, A.; Hashim, N.; Ismail, N.; Shahari, D.N.; Idris, N.A.N.; Omar, N.; Salleh, K.M.; Hassan, N.A.M.; Kushairi, A. Malaysia: 100 Years of Resilient Palm Oil Economic Performance. J. Oil Palm Res. 2018, 30, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Karunakaran, V.; Abd-Talib, N.; Yong, T.-L.K. Lignin from oil palm empty fruit bunches (EFB) under subcritical phenol conditions as a precursor for carbon fiber production. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ali, M.D.M.; Tamunaidu, P.; Aslan, A.K.H.N.; Morad, N.A.; Sugiura, N.; Goto, M.; Zhang, Z. Hydrothermal pre-treatment of oil palm empty fruit bunch into fermentable sugars. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2016, 36, 012042. [Google Scholar]
  4. Roslan, R.; Zakaria, S.; Chia, C.H.; Boehm, R.; Laborie, M.-P. Physico-mechanical properties of resol phenolic adhesives derived from liquefaction of oil palm empty fruit bunch fibres, Industrial Crops and Products. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2014, 62, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Krishnan, Y.; Bong, C.P.C.; Azman, N.F.; Zakaria, Z.; Othman, N.A.; Abdullah, N.; Ho, C.S.; Lee, C.T.; Hansen, S.B.; Hara, H. Co-composting of palm empty fruit bunch and palm oil mill effluent: Microbial diversity and potential mitigation of greenhouse gas emission. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 146, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sukiran, M.A.; Abnisa, F.; Daud, W.M.A.W.; Bakar, N.A.; Loh, S.K. A review of torrefaction of oil palm solid wastes for biofuel production. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 149, 101–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Palamae, S.; Dechatiwongse, P.; Choorit, W.; Chisti, Y.; Prasertsan, P. Cellulose and hemicellulose recovery from oil palm empty fruit bunch (EFB) fibers and production of sugars from the fibers. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 155, 491–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Rambo, M.K.D.; Schmidt, F.L.; Ferreira, M.M.C. Analysis of the lignocellulosic components of biomass residues for biorefinery opportunities. Talanta 2015, 144, 696–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chauhan, P.S. Role of various bacterial enzymes in complete depolymerization of lignin: A review. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 23, 101498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Datta, R.; Kelkar, A.; Baraniya, D.; Molaei, A.; Moulick, A.; Meena, R.S.; Formanek, P. Enzymatic degradation of lignin in soil: A review. Sustainability 2017, 9, 11636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Sarip, H.; Hossain, M.S.; Azemi, M.; Allaf, K. A Review of the Thermal Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass towards Glucose Production: Autohydrolysis with DIC Technology. BioResources 2016, 11, 10625–10653. [Google Scholar]
  12. Aftab, M.N.; Iqbal, I.; Riaz, F.; Karadag, A.; Tabatabaei, M. Different pretreatment methods of lignocellulosic biomass for use in biofuel production. In Biomass for Bioenergy-Recent Trends and Future Challenges; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  13. Peng, F.; Peng, P.; Xu, F.; Sun, R.-C. Fractional purification and bioconversion of hemicelluloses. Biotechnol. Adv. 2012, 30, 879–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kang, S.; Bu, D.; Xue, L.; Wang, Q.; Jiang, M. Degradation of lignin catalyzed by nanochannels solid acids in ionic liquid. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2019, 166, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tolesa, L.D.; Gupta, B.S.; Tiwikrama, A.H.; Wu, Y.-C.; Lee, M.-J. Alkali lignin degradation with aqueous ammonium-based ionic liquid solutions. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 258, 120724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schneider, W.D.H.; Fontana, R.C.; Baudel, H.M.; Siqueira, F.G.d.; Jorge Rencoret, A.G.; Eugenio, L.I.d.; Prieto, A.; Martínez, M.J.; Martínez, Á.T.; Dillon, A.J.P.; et al. Lignin degradation and detoxification of eucalyptus wastes by on-site manufacturing fungal enzymes to enhance second-generation ethanol yield. Appl. Energy 2020, 26215, 114493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. de Gonzalo, G.; Colpa, D.I.; Habib, M.H.; Fraaije, M.W. Bacterial enzymes involved in lignin degradation. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 236, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Bahrin, E.K.; Baharuddin, A.S.; Ibrahim, M.F.; Razak, M.N.A.; Sulaiman, A.; Abd-Aziz, S.; Hassan, M.A.; Shirai, Y.; Nishida, H. Physicochemical property changes and enzymatic hydrolysis enhancement of oil palm empty fruit bunches treated with superheated steam. BioResourse 2012, 7, 1784–1801. [Google Scholar]
  19. Shamsudin, S.; Shah, U.K.M.; Zainudin, H.; Abd Aziz, S.; Kamal, S.M.M.; Shirai, Y.; Hassan, M.A. Effect of steam pretreatment on oil palm empty fruit bunch for the production of sugars. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 36, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chin, S.X.; Chia, C.H.; Zakaria, S.; Fang, Z.; Ahmad, S. Ball milling pretreatment and diluted acid hydrolysis of oil palm empty fruit bunch (EFB) fibres for the production of levulinic acid. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2015, 52, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Santanaraj, J.; Sajab, M.S.; Mohammad, A.W.; Harun, S.; Chia, C.H.; Zakaria, S.; Kaco, H. Enhanced delignification of oil palm empty fruit bunch fibers with in situ Fenton-oxidation. Bioresources 2017, 12, 5223–5235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Chruściel, J.J.; Leśniak, E. Modification of epoxy resins with functional silanes, polysiloxanes, silsesquioxanes, silica and silicates. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2015, 41, 67–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Laurichesse, S.; Avérous, L. Chemical modification of lignins: Towards biobased polymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2014, 39, 1266–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sluiter, A.; Hames, B.; Ruiz, R.; Scarlata, C.; Sluiter, J.; Templeton, D.; Crocker, D. Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass. Lab. Anal. Proced. 2012, 1617, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yang, H.; Yan, R.; Chen, H.; Lee, D.H.; Zheng, C. Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 2007, 86, 1781–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sun, Y.; Gao, B.; Yao, Y.; Fang, J.; Zhang, M.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, H.; Yang, L. Effects of feedstock type, production method, and pyrolysis temperature on biochar and hydrochar properties. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 240, 574–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cybulska, I.; Chaturvedi, T.; Thomsen, M.H. Lignocellulosic Thermochemical Pretreatment Processes; Bastidas-Oyanedel, J.R., Schmidt, J., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; p. 763. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bledzki, A.K.; Mamun, A.A.; Volk, J. Physical, chemical and surface properties of wheat husk, rye husk and soft wood and their polypropylene composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2010, 41, 480–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aita, G.A.; Kim, M. Pretreatment technologies for the conversion of lignocellulosic materials to bioethanol. In: Sustainability of the Sugar and Sugar–Ethanol Industries. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 117–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Isroi, C.A.; Panji, T.; Wibowo, N.A.; Syamsu, K. Bioplastic production from cellulose of oil palm empty fruit bunch. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2017, 65, 012011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ariffin, H.; Hassan, M.A.; Kalsom, M.S.U.; Abdullah, N.; Shirai, Y. Effect of physical, chemical and thermal pretreatments on the enzymatic hydrolysis of oil palm empty fruit bunch. J. Trop. Agric. Food Sci. 2008, 36, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  32. Suliman, W.; Harsh, J.B.; Abu-Lail, N.I.; Fortuna, A.-M.; Dallmeyer, I.; Garcia-Perez, M. Influence of feedstock source and pyrolysis temperature on biochar bulk and surface properties. Biomass Bioenergy 2016, 84, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhao, S.X.; Ta, N.; Wang, X.D. Effect of Temperature on the Structural and Physicochemical Properties of Biochar with Apple Tree Branches as Feedstock Material. Energies 2017, 10, 1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Pituello, C.; Francioso, O.; Simonetti, G. Characterization of chemical–physical, structural and morphological properties of biochars from biowastes produced at different temperatures. J. Soils Sediments 2015, 15, 792–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zulkefli, S.; Abdulmalek, E.; Rahman, M.B.A. Pretreatment of oil palm trunk in deep eutectic solvent and optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated oil palm trunk. Renew. Energy 2017, 107, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Grube, M.; Lin, J.G.; Lee, P.H.; Kokorevicha, S. Evaluation of sewage sludge-based compost by FT-IR spectroscopy. Geoderma 2006, 130, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Guizani, C.; Jeguirim, M.; Valin, S.; Limousy, L.; Salvador, S. Biomass Chars: The Effects of Pyrolysis Conditions on Their Morphology, Structure, Chemical Properties and Reactivity. Energies 2017, 10, 796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Pu, Y.; Hu, F.; Huang, F.; Davison, B.; Ragauskas, A. Assessing the molecular structure basis for biomass recalcitrance during dilute acid and hydrothermal pretreatments. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2013, 6, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Tadesse, H.; Luque, R. Advances on biomass pretreatment using ionic liquids: An overview. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 3913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yan, X.; Cheng, J.-R.; Wang, Y.-T.; Zhu, M.-J. Enhanced lignin removal and enzymolysis efficiency of grass waste by hydrogen peroxide synergized dilute alkali pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 301, 122756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bazargan, A.; Wang, Z.; Barford, J.P.; Saleem, J.; McKay, G. Optimization of the removal of lignin and silica from rice husks with alkaline peroxide. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 260, 120848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yadav, M.; Singh, A.; Balan, V.; Pareek, N.; Vivekanand, V. Biological treatment of lignocellulosic biomass by Chaetomium globosporum: Process derivation and improved biogas production. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 128, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Brahim, M.; Kantar, S.E.; Boussetta, N.; Grimi, N.; Brosse, N.; Vorobiev, E. Delignification of rapeseed straw using innovative chemo-physical pretreatments. Biomass Bioenergy 2016, 95, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yadav, M.; Paritosh, K.; Pareek, N.; Vivekanand, V. Coupled treatment of lignocellulosic agricultural residues for augmented biomethanation. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 213, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Baksi, S.; Sarkar, U.; Saha, S.; Ball, A.K.; Kuniyal, J.C.; Wentzel, A.; Birgen, C.; Preisig, H.A.; Wittgens, B.; Markussen, S. Studies on delignification and inhibitory enzyme kinetics of alkaline peroxide pre-treated pine and deodar saw dust. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 2019, 143, 107607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Procentese, A.; Johnson, E.; Orr, V.; Campanile, A.G.; Wood, J.A.; Marzocchella, A.; Rehmann, L. Deep eutectic solvent pretreatment and subsequent saccharification of corncob. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 192, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Phutela, U.G.; Sahni, N.; Sooc, S.S. Fungal degradation of paddy straw for enhancing biogas production. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 2011, 4, 660–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Physical appearance of untreated EFB (a,f) and thermally pretreated EFB at 150 °C (b,g), 170 °C (c,h), 190 °C (d,i) and 210 °C (e,j) for 90 min. The top images (be) and bottom images (fj) of samples were pretreated in the absence and presence of pressure (15 psi), respectively.
Figure 1. Physical appearance of untreated EFB (a,f) and thermally pretreated EFB at 150 °C (b,g), 170 °C (c,h), 190 °C (d,i) and 210 °C (e,j) for 90 min. The top images (be) and bottom images (fj) of samples were pretreated in the absence and presence of pressure (15 psi), respectively.
Energies 13 05966 g001
Figure 2. SEM micrograph of (a) untreated EFB and thermally treated EFB at (b) 150 °C, (c) 170 °C, (d) 190 °C and (e) 210 °C for 90 min.
Figure 2. SEM micrograph of (a) untreated EFB and thermally treated EFB at (b) 150 °C, (c) 170 °C, (d) 190 °C and (e) 210 °C for 90 min.
Energies 13 05966 g002
Figure 3. SEM micrograph of treated EFB using different particle size: (a) 1 mm, (b) 3–4 mm, (c) 7–10 mm pretreated at 190 °C for 90 min.
Figure 3. SEM micrograph of treated EFB using different particle size: (a) 1 mm, (b) 3–4 mm, (c) 7–10 mm pretreated at 190 °C for 90 min.
Energies 13 05966 g003
Figure 4. Profile of chemical elements that exist in untreated and treated EFB using different (a) pretreatment temperatures and (b) particle sizes of EFB.
Figure 4. Profile of chemical elements that exist in untreated and treated EFB using different (a) pretreatment temperatures and (b) particle sizes of EFB.
Energies 13 05966 g004
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of untreated and treated EFB using different (a) pretreatment temperatures, (b) pretreatment times and (c) particle sizes of EFB.
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of untreated and treated EFB using different (a) pretreatment temperatures, (b) pretreatment times and (c) particle sizes of EFB.
Energies 13 05966 g005
Figure 6. Profile of lignin degradation of the thermal pretreated EFB using different operating conditions. (a) Effect of EFB particle size on lignin degradation pretreated at 190 °C for 90 min. (b) Effect of time on lignin degradation pretreated at 190 °C using 1 mm EFB particle size. (c) Effect of temperature on lignin degradation pretreated for 90 min using 1 mm EFB particle size.
Figure 6. Profile of lignin degradation of the thermal pretreated EFB using different operating conditions. (a) Effect of EFB particle size on lignin degradation pretreated at 190 °C for 90 min. (b) Effect of time on lignin degradation pretreated at 190 °C using 1 mm EFB particle size. (c) Effect of temperature on lignin degradation pretreated for 90 min using 1 mm EFB particle size.
Energies 13 05966 g006
Table 1. Comparison of the improvement in lignin degradation with previous studies related to lignocellulosic treatment using various treatment methods and different types of biomass.
Table 1. Comparison of the improvement in lignin degradation with previous studies related to lignocellulosic treatment using various treatment methods and different types of biomass.
Treatment MethodOperating ConditionsBiomassLignin Degradation
(%)
Reference
Chemical treatmentNaOH pretreatment supplemented with H2O2Grass waste73.2[40]
Chemical treatment5.29% NaOH, 1% H2O2 at 20 °CRice husk59.85[41]
Physical treatmentHeating at 210 °C for 90 min at inert atmosphereOil palm EFB58This study
Biological treatmentFungal strain (Chaetomium globosporum) at 36 °C for 31 daysWheat straw45[42]
Chemo-physical treatment40 min treatment using high voltage electrical discharge treatment and NaOH (0.125–0.5 M) at 60–90 °CRapeseed straw42.3[43]
Biological treatmentFungal strain (Pleurotus ostreatus) at 28 °C for 42 daysPearl millet straw30[44]
Chemical treatment2% alkaline peroxide at 100 °CWood powders28.8 [45]
Chemical treatmentChCl:Urea (1:2) at 80 °C for 15 hCorncob27.1[46]
Biological treatmentFungal strain (Pleurotus ostreatus)at 28 °C for 42 daysWheat straw21[44]
Biological treatmentFungal strain (Coriolus versicolor)at 30 °C for 25 daysPaddy straw19[47]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mohammad, I.N.; Ongkudon, C.M.; Misson, M. Physicochemical Properties and Lignin Degradation of Thermal-Pretreated Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch. Energies 2020, 13, 5966. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en13225966

AMA Style

Mohammad IN, Ongkudon CM, Misson M. Physicochemical Properties and Lignin Degradation of Thermal-Pretreated Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch. Energies. 2020; 13(22):5966. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en13225966

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mohammad, Intan Nazirah, Clarence M. Ongkudon, and Mailin Misson. 2020. "Physicochemical Properties and Lignin Degradation of Thermal-Pretreated Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch" Energies 13, no. 22: 5966. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en13225966

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop