Next Article in Journal
Active Participation of Buildings in the Energy Networks: Dynamic/Operational Models and Control Challenges
Previous Article in Journal
Selection of Appropriate Dispatch Strategies for Effective Planning and Operation of a Microgrid
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biopolymers in Aerobic Granular Sludge—Their Role in Wastewater Treatment and Possibilities of Re-Use in Line with Circular Economy

by
Agnieszka Cydzik-Kwiatkowska
Department of Environmental Biotechnology, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Sloneczna 45g, 10-687 Olsztyn, Poland
Submission received: 8 October 2021 / Revised: 27 October 2021 / Accepted: 29 October 2021 / Published: 2 November 2021

Abstract

:
Aerobic granular sludge (AGS) technology for wastewater treatment ensures better quality effluent and higher process sustainability than wastewater treatment systems based on activated sludge. One of the reasons for the better operational results of AGS systems is the high content of extracellular polymers (EPS) in the granule structures. EPS produced during granulation have a very complex composition with a predo minance of polysaccharides and proteins, and one of the main components, alginate, may have a wide variety of practical applications. This review summarizes up-to-date information on the composition of EPS in AGS, the manner in which their production and composition are affected by the operational parameters of wastewater treatment, and the effects of EPS in biomass on wastewater treatment and sludge management. Additionally, the possibility of polymer recovery from AGS is presented together with information regarding potential applications based on the newest findings. Re-use of AGS-derived polymers will increase the sustainability of wastewater treatment processes by making them more economical and reducing the amount of sludge that requires management.

1. Introduction

One of the challenges in modern wastewater treatment is to make the processes sustainable by increasing the economic recovery and reducing the amount of sludge that needs further management.
Aerobic granular sludge (AGS) technology has been extensively studied and is used in wastewater treatment plants to remove biodegradable organic matter and to overcome difficulties with conventional activated sludge systems. It has been successfully implemented in over 40 full-scale plants in locations around the world [1,2]. AGS technology, in which biomass has a form of compact and dense granules, offers advantages over conventional activated sludge such as a high settling capacity, more effective sludge-effluent separation, higher biomass retention, tolerance to high organic loads and toxicity, the possibility of simultaneously removing nutrients, and adsorption of heavy metals. AGS technology allows wastewater treatment plants to be operated with 30% less energy input and with significantly lower investment costs [3].
To cultivate granular sludge, the operational parameters must be properly selected to stimulate bacterial aggregation, which results mainly from secretion of self-produced extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), which form a matrix that encapsulates and protects the bacteria. EPS not only contributes to the formation and preservation of biofilm architecture, but also protects bacterial cells against desiccation, antibiotics and host immune defenses. The content of EPS is related to the size of the granules in the biomass. In AGS, granules with a diameter of 0.5–1 mm had the highest content of stable EPS while the smallest granules had the highest content of bound EPS [4]. EPS can be excreted by microorganisms, released during cell lysis and also adsorbed as organic matter from wastewater. Recovery of biopolymers from excess AGS provides a valuable source of biomaterial.
This review summarizes up-to-date information on the composition of EPS in AGS, the manner in which their production and composition are affected by the operational parameters of wastewater treatment, and the effects of EPS in biomass on wastewater treatment and sludge management. Additionally, the possibility of polymer recovery from AGS is presented together with information regarding potential applications based on the newest findings.

2. Composition of Polymers in Biomass

The composition of EPS in biomass varies depending on the microbial composition of the biofilm and the environmental conditions [5]. In EPS, polysaccharides (PS) and proteins (PN) predominate, but EPS may also contain other macro-molecules, such as nucleic acids, lipids, and humic substances [6,7]. Wang et al. [8] proposed that large amounts of PS and PN conjugate in the EPS matrix, with PS as the skeleton, deciding the granular stability by affecting hydrophobicity interactions and hydrogen bonds, which are two important parameters of gel properties. The chemical structure of EPS varies considerably, not only between different bacterial species but even with the same species. Generally, macromolecular compounds predominate in EPS although the distribution of molecular weights may vary considerably, from <3 kDa to >235 kDa [9]. The formation of EPS PN with a high molecular mass (≥116 kDa) was stimulated by the presence of Ca2+ in the reactors [10]. The presence of Ca2+ significantly reduced the electrostatic repulsion between EPS and enabled a dense EPS matrix to be formed [11]. PN are usually more abundant in biomass than PS, and PN/PS ratios of 1–8 have been reported [4,12,13]. In AGS from a full-scale wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) treating urban wastewater, PN and humic substances were the main EPS components (329–494 and 259−316 mg/g VSS of AGS, respectively), while PS and DNA represented minor EPS fractions [14]. EPS can contain hetero- or homopolymers, simple linear sugars, or sugars with branched side chains. These molecules can be dimers and trimers, can be composed of thousands of saccharides arranged in long repeatable units, or can be knitted together forming fibers [15]. Jahn et al. [16] reported that the tryptophan content in EPS isolated from AGS was almost twice as high compared to EPS extracted from activated sludge. Tyrosine- and tryptophan-like substances were identified in EPS in high amounts after cell exposure to toxic compounds such as nonylphenol or nitrobenzene [17,18].
Regarding PS, two crucial constituents, alginate-like exopolysaccharide (ALE) and granulan, have been identified as the functional gel-forming constituents of AGS. Granulan is a complex heteropolysaccharide [19]. ALE is a mixture of both neutral and uronic polysaccharides [20]. ALE is an important constituent of biopolymers extracted from both floccular and granular sludge. In AGS, an increase in the ALE content was a signal of granule maturation [21]. In a study on sludge granulation, the ALE content in biomass increased from 32 mg/g VSS in the sludge to 100 mg/g VSS in mature AGS [12]. Another study found ALE only in mature granules [22].
Recent studies have revealed that, in EPS, complex glycoconjugates are also present such as glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). GAGs are linear heteropolysaccharides and were identified not only in the EPS matrix but also in the spaces between the cells inside the microcolonies. Felz et al. [7] speculated that, in granules, GAGs-like polymers are involved in attracting cations, forming hydrogels, binding proteins, and signaling in biological processes. Moreover, sialic acids were found in EPS from seawater-adapted AGS. These compounds were located in the outer layer of the EPS matrix, functioning as a shield that protected the underlying sugars from degradation [23]. Glycosylated amyloid-like proteins have been extracted from granules with a predominance of ammonium-oxidizing bacteria [24].
The role of EPS for biomass formation is related with the presence of multivalent cations that bind to it [25,26]. Those ions support bacterial adhesion by neutralizing negative charges on cell surfaces [27] and also act as a bridging agents in the EPS matrix. In the presence of multivalent cations, the granule matrix is predominantly composed of large and complex proteins. Ca2+ has been shown to have a considerable regulatory influence on production of EPS during aerobic granulation [10]. Via addition of divalent cations into saline wastewater with a low organic load, halotolerant AGS with an average diameter of 910 ± 10 μm was cultivated. The positive correlation between the concentration of divalent cations in wastewater and particle size indicated that Ca2+ played an important role in granulation [28]. The presence of multivalent ions speeds up AGS formation. Wang [29] observed that addition of Fe2+ (3–5 mg/L) to the reactor caused granules with an average size higher than 0.35 mm to be cultivated within seven days, and that addition of iron ions did not negatively affect removal of COD and ammonium from wastewater. However, the presence of ions in the AGS structure affects the biodegradability of AGS. Wang et al. [30] observed that the EPS from the outer granule layer, in which multivalent ions were mostly present, was not biodegradable, which was in contrast to EPS found in the inner layers. Also, Leenen [31] showed that the Ba-Ca-EPS complex was not biodegradable.
Quorum sensing (QS) is an important mechanism involved in aerobic granulation. QS regulation systems support biofilm development via production of hydrophobic gel-forming EPS, which increases the aggregation and stability of granules [32]. During granulation, an increase in the concentration of acyl-homoserine lactones (AHL) was observed [33]. Granulation can also be affected by the amount of cyclic diguanylate (c-di-GMP) in bacterial cells, which is commonly used by bacteria to regulate the production of exopolysaccharides. A decrease in the intracellular concentration of c-di-GMP after addition of Mn2+ ions decreased the concentration of EPS, resulting in granule disintegration and wash out from the reactors of PS producers belonging to Acinetobacter sp., Bdellovibrio sp., Thauera sp., and Paracoccus sp. [34]. Metabolomics analysis combined with microbiological analyses were used to explore granulation mechanisms and the EPS structure; these analyses showed that the amino acid biosynthesis pathway was stimulated by a low COD/N ratio, which increased the hydrophobicity of EPS. The operation of an AGS reactor also affected the QS in biomass. Partially denitrified granular sludge had stronger AHLs-based QS than denitrified granular sludge [35].
In the literature, EPS in biomass are most often classified as bound and soluble EPS (Sol-EPS). Among bound EPS, loosely-bound (LB-EPS) and tightly-bound EPS (TB-EPS) are distinguished. In a laboratory-scale study of sludge from a meat utilization plant, the TB-EPS contained nearly two times more PNs than sugars, while the LB-EPS contained more sugars than PNs [36]. The concept of “structural EPS” has been proposed and discussed in the literature [24,37]. The characteristics of this structural EPS, which was extracted from both aerobic and anaerobic AGS, and investigation of the behavior of the hydrogel that was formed, indicated that the structural EPS was a part of the TB-EPS in the AGS. A study by Zhang et al. [38] indicated that tyrosine, tryptophan, and aromatic protein-like substances present in TB-EPS played critical roles in the granulation process, as reflected by their strong correlation with particle size variation.
A study focused on targeting potential EPS producers in municipal wastewater sludge showed that, out of the EPS-producing bacterial strains that were isolated, eleven were Bacillus sp., three were Serratia sp., two were Pseudomonas sp., two were Enterobacter sp., two were Yersinia sp., two were Microbacterium sp., and one strain was from each of the genera Pantoea, Photorhabdus, and Pectobacterium. The concentration of slime and capsular EPS produced by those strains ranged from 5.0 to 36.4 g/L [39]. Nohua et al. [40] conducted similar research and isolated eight EPS-producing bacterial strains from sludge from municipal WWTP including Chryseobacterium gregarium, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Stenotrophomonas acidaminiphila, Brevibacillus parabrevis, Cloacibacteruim normanense, Pseudomonas veronii, Acinetobacter soli, and Acinetobacter parvus. EPS production by the different strains varied greatly, and Cloacibacterium normannese produced the largest amounts of EPS (11.8 ± 1.2 g/L). The authors attributed the differences in EPS production to the genetic organization of the gene cluster involved in the EPS biosynthesis in the individual strains, and the differences in gene structure, regulatory elements, and sugar precursor biosynthesis. With regard to AGS, significant changes in the microbial structure were associated with granulation [41]. Cydzik-Kwiatkowska [42] reported that Thauera sp. and other Rhodcyclales-related bacteria, such as Xanthomonadaceae, Sphigmonadales, and Rhizobiales, mainly contributed to the production of EPS in mature AGS in a full-scale municipal wastewater treatment system. In a glycerol-driven partial-denitrification reactor, Saccharibacteria were enriched to over 60% and were believed to be responsible for granulation [38]. Observations of Paulo et al. [43] during the treatment of fish canning wastewater with variable levels of organic, nutrients, and salts showed that most of the bacteria in the AGS core microbiome were EPS producers (e.g., Thauera and Paracoccus) and their abundance increased at higher OLR loadings. A high microbial diversity of those producers ensured preservation of bacterial groups responsible for nutrients’ removal.
Alginate (ALE) is one the most important components of EPS. This polymer has a high molecular weight and is composed of linear polysaccharides comprising β-D-mannuronic acid (M-block) and α-L-guluronic acid (G-block) blocks linked by 1–4 glycosidic bonds. The presence of G-blocks favors formation of gels in the presence of multivalent cations and affects such gel properties as swelling, stiffness, and porosity [44]. G blocks support interchain ion binding and formation of hydrogels; the multivalent cation creates interchain linkages by connecting two neighboring G-blocks or G-blocks in a second ALE chain. In contrast, MM and MG blocks in the ALE chain support chain elasticity and connect GG blocks, supporting gelation [45]. Schambeck et al. [21] observed that the hydrogel properties of ALE depended on the type of bioaggregate that was used. ALE extracted from AGS was more elastic and had stronger gelling properties than ALE isolated from flocs because the latter had a higher content of GG blocks.
Azotobacter vinelandii is a well-recognized bacteria that can produce ALE under environmental stress conditions. For example, during nitrogen starvation, A. vinelandii forms a dormant cyst and deposits a protective extracellular material composed primarily of ALE. The composition of ALE produced by Azotobacter sp. depends on the activity of a set of extracellularly produced and Ca2+-dependent mannuronan C-5-epimerases. Each of these introduces a specific pattern and ratio of M and G residues [46]. Another bacteria capable of efficient ALE synthesis is Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Comparison of the properties of ALE produced by these two genera indicates that P. aeruginosa strains can secrete large amounts of ALE and form thick biofilms that lack GG-blocks [47], whereas Azotobacter sp. produce stiff ALE containing many GG-blocks, which is closely associated with the cell [48].
The quantity of EPS excreted by AGS (including ALE) is higher than that excreted by conventional activated sludge. Extractable ALE can comprise up to 25% of AGS [37]; extraction of ALE can, therefore, decrease the solids content of AGS and contribute to sludge management [49]. In a study by Cydzik-Kwiatkowska et al. [50], the content of ALE was about 184 mg/L of excess activated sludge, whereas the amount of ALE in granular sludge was over three times higher. The amount of ALE per g unit of biomass was over two-fold higher in AGS (86.0  ±  11.2 mg/g MLSS) than in activated sludge (49.0  ±  9.0 mg/g MLSS).

3. Methods of EPS Isolation

To draw conclusions about the role of the EPS matrix in the formation and action of biofilms, including AGS, credible methods of EPS extraction and characterization must be applied. Isolating, identifying, and characterizing biofilm EPS faces a number of obstacles, due to the complexity of the biofilm matrix and the need for EPS purification procedures. During EPS isolation from cell surfaces, the isolate may be contaminated as a result of cell lysis [51]. Isolation of EPS from culture supernatants does not solve the problem because the extracted polymers may have different properties than their cell-associated counterparts. Removal of contaminants from the isolated EPS can be accomplished using chemical precipitation of contaminants, enzymatic digestion, precipitation of EPS, or chromatographic techniques [51]. High yields of gel-forming EPS can be extracted using the sodium carbonate method [52], but it is almost impossible to extract all components of EPS with a single procedure, so different isolation methods are often combined. Adav and Lee [53] compared several physical and chemical extraction methods and observed that the highest yield of EPS was obtained if ultrasound-formamide-NaOH treatment was applied. Felz et al. [37] extracted EPS using centrifugation, sonication, extraction in EDTA, formamide-sodium hydroxide extraction (NaOH), formaldehyde-NaOH extraction, and high-temperature sodium carbonate extraction (Na2CO3). Only EPS extracted from aerobic granules with Na2CO3 formed a drop-like shape during ALE gelation in a 2.5% (w/v) aqueous solution of CaCl2 and formed stable hydrogel beads. Wang et al. [54] stress the role of EPS extraction methods on the secondary structure of extracellular proteins. They tested ten EPS extraction methods and concluded that the treatment of 0.5% Tween-20 for 4 h preserved the protein secondary structure, ensured a high EPS yield (44.4 ± 1.4 mg/g VSS), and limited the lysis of cells’ anammox granules.
AGS may have diameters exceeding 1 mm, which limits the surface area for extraction. Therefore, sometimes, EPS isolation can be preceded by mechanical treatment. McSwain et al. [55] applied homogenization to support the release of EPS from the internal parts of granules and observed that the PN content in EPS increased from about 20 g/L in a non-homogenized sample to over 70 g/L in a homogenized sample. The first minute of homogenization is the most important because, during this time, EPS is released as a result of breaking down large particles and destruction of the three-dimensional EPS matrix [56]. It was also shown that homogenization intensity matters: the highest yields of EPS were obtained at the highest homogenization intensity applied [57].
For extraction of ALE-like exopolysaccharides from AGS in lab-scale reactors, Lin et al. [58] used a protocol used for ALE extraction from seaweed, which was based on the alkaline lysis method. In this method, sodium carbonate is added to the biomass to increase the pH, to solubilize exopolysaccharides/EPS. The mixture is homogenized and incubated at a high temperature. The centrifuged supernatant is adjusted to a low pH (2.2 to 2.0) to precipitate alginic acid. The collected alginic acid is dissolved in a NaOH or potassium hydroxide solution and finally precipitated in alcohol media (ethanol or isopropanol).
Figure 1 shows ALE extracted from AGS taken from the aeration tanks of full-scale WWTP in Poland. This WWTP operates at a low organic load (OLR) and now uses AGS technology to treat wastewater corresponding to a population equivalent of 15,000. Th wastewater flow is about 3200 m3/day and about 30–40% of the influent is wastewater from the dairy industry. The OLR of the WWTP is 0.77 m3/(m3∙day) [59]. The sodium carbonate method was modified and optimized, and the average content of ALE in the AGS was 10% [57]. The extracted ALE had the same dark brown color as granular sludge. The ALE demonstrated the unique property of gelation with divalent cations over a wide range of temperatures and pH values, and ALE beads were successfully obtained (Figure 1). The excellent gelling ability of ALE indicates that it is important in the formation and structural stability of AGS.
Currently, it is stressed in the literature that, to better understand the role of EPS in biofilm formation, research should focus more on in-depth analysis of particular EPS components, not just the overall amount of EPS in biomass. Therefore, analytical methods like Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy, high-pressure liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, or nuclear magnetic resonance are now commonly used for studying the material that comprises biofilm EPS [20]. Felz et al. [7] used isotope dilution mass spectrometry to study amino acids in EPS from AGS. Although a total of 14 amino acids were identified, including glycine, alanine, leucine, isoleucine, etc., the authors indicated that total amino acids comprised merely 1.5% of the structural EPS by weight. High throughput identification of EPS composition can also be achieved with quantitative proteomics. A study by Chen et al. [26] used this technique to indicate that, in anammox biofilm, the extracellular PN are mainly associated with the binding of multivalent cations.

4. Effect of Operational Parameters on Polymer Production and the Effect of Polymer Content on Wastewater Treatment and Sludge Management

EPS production and composition in the biomass in a wastewater treatment system depend on the substrate type and operational conditions, such as dissolved oxygen (DO), shear forces, OLR, hydraulic retention time (HRT), sludge retention time, growth stage, solution chemistry (ionic strength, pH, concentration of divalent cation) and the presence of toxic substances such as drugs and heavy metals [4,60].
The OLR is one of the most important of the parameters that affect the production and composition of EPS in AGS. Higher OLRs in the early granulation period promote an increase in EPS production and affect granule stability, which is related to the PN/PS ratio [61]. Kang and Yuan [62] cultivated granules at an OLR of 2.7 kg COD/(m3·day), then gradually reduced the OLR to 1.4 kg COD/(m3·day). At the lower OLR, the EPS content was about 150 mg/g VSS and the PN/PS ratio was about 25. Further lowering the OLR to 0.8 kg COD/(m3·day) decreased both the EPS content in biomass and the PN/PS ratio in EPS, which resulted in granule break-up. After acclimatization of the sludge to the lower OLR, the authors observed re-granulation, and both EPS production and the PN/PS ratio increased. The increase in EPS production was stimulated by a longer period of hunger in the reactor cycle, as the impact of all OLRs was tested at the same HRT. Similarly, Rusanowska et al. [4] reported that the highest EPS content occurred in the granules operated at the lowest OLR. The OLR also affects the distribution of EPS in AGS. Xu et al. [63] cultivated AGS using synthetic wastewater and increased the OLR over time by reducing the HRT. Those authors observed that, with an increased OLR, the LB-EPS content in the sludge increased, while the TB-EPS content remained almost unchanged. In a study on the treatment of landfill leachate in MBR reactors, an increase in OLR, resulting from raising the share of leachate in the influent from 75% to 100%, stimulated the production of PNs and Sol-EPS [64].
The ALE content in the biomass was positively correlated with the concentration of organics, especially volatile fatty acids, in wastewater [12]. AGS fed with acetate and propionate yielded significantly more ALE (up to 261 ± 33 mg VSALE/g VSsludge) than sludge fed with wastewater containing no volatile fatty acids [21]. In reactors fed with wastewater containing volatile fatty acids in form of acetate and propionate, uronic sugars predominated among polysaccharides found in the ALE extracts.
Changes in COD/N ratios result in considerable variations in the functional groups and composition of EPS. In a study by Shi and Liu [65], two reactors were fed with wastewater with COD/N ratios of 100:5 and 100:10. At the lower COD/N ratio, granulation was faster and granules were stable. The characteristics of the EPS indicated that a larger content of polysaccharides, a greater content of β-sheets in the proteins, and reduced mineral surface adhesion and viscoelasticity benefited aerobic sludge granulation and granule maintenance. Decreasing the COD/N ratio from six to three during treatment of synthetic mariculture wastewater in a sequencing batch biofilm reactor decreased the PN and PS contents in LB-EPS and TB-EPS [66]. Decreasing the COD/N ratio from two to zero during the treatment of high-strength ammonia wastewater did not significantly affect the EPS contents in nitrifying sludge; however, the PS content was significantly larger than that of PN when the COD/N ratio was increased from two to ten. Tryptophan-containing PN predominated in the EPS, and humic-acid-like substances were abundant at both extremely low and high COD/N ratios [67].
EPS production is also associated with wastewater salinity [68,69]. At a high salinity (>20 mg NaCl/L), 90% of the EPS consisted of TB-EPS and the PN/PS ratio was high [69]. A sudden increase in salinity in the reactor and uncontrolled sludge retention time increased the content of LB-EPS [70,71], thus deteriorating the quality of the EPS matrix. In contrast, a lower SRT and gradual increases in salinity promoted formation of sludge with good physical properties and a stable PN/PS ratio. High salinity may affect the content of ALE in the biomass. For instance, in AGS fed with synthetic saline wastewater, ALE comprised only about 5% of VSS [72,73]. Treatment of low-strength organic saline wastewater by granular sludge can be supported by addition of Ca2+, which accumulates in the halophilic biomass. Halophilic bacteria belonging to the family Flavobacteriaceae that predominated in the biomass secreted a lot of EPS that was mostly composed of proteins (about 70%) [28].
EPS secretion by biomass is affected by both DO concentration and aeration regimes in biological reactors. Liu et al. [74] observed that high DO leads to longer famine periods in batch reactors, and more EPS, especially PS, is consumed, decreasing the overall EPS content in the biomass. Kinyua et al. [75] reported that EPS production was stimulated by decreasing the length of the aeration period in the reactor cycle, which was associated with the release of Sol- and LB-EPS from TB-EPS. Zhang et. al. [76] have shown that, in reactors with air recirculation, the production of ALE was higher in a reactor with DO over 8 mg/L than in reactors with DO at 5.13–6.52 or 3.48–4.53 mg/L. In the study of Wang et al. [77], moving bed biofilm reactors were operated with continuous aeration or intermittent aeration (20 min on/15 min off). In the reactor with continuous aeration, the greater microbial activity resulted in a larger sludge discharge and a higher biofilm detachment rate than in the one with intermittent aeration. In the reactor with intermittent aeration, the larger number of dead cells resulted in a higher ratio of humic substances to PS in EPS than in the reactor with continuous aeration.
During filamentous bulking, which is one of the most problematic phenomena in wastewater treatment, EPS may deteriorate sludge floc stability and structure. During sludge bulking, EPS content and the content of PN in EPS gradually decreased, and simultaneously, an increase in PS was observed. The number of PN associated with synthesis of hydrophobic amino acids decreased and the number associated with synthesis of hydrophilic amino acids increased [78].
Production of EPS can be impacted by the presence of pollutants, including micropollutants, in wastewater. It was reported that polystyrene nanoplastics inhibited the total production of EPS and PNs after 12 h exposure [79]. The presence of polystyrene nanoplastics at a concentration of 100 mg/L caused cellular oxidative stress and cell membrane damage. Accumulation of polypropylene microplastics in the range of 0.14 to 0.30 g/L in a membrane bioreactor did not affect the efficiency of removal of COD and ammonium but inhibited the growth of microorganisms, enhanced the secretion of EPS, and reduced microbial richness and diversity [80]. On the other hand, it was observed that nanoplastics released into an aquatic environment interacted with EPS. EPS biomolecules robustly encapsulated nanoplastics to develop an eco-corona layer. This layer altered both the physicochemical properties of nanoplastics and also their bioreactivity, fate, and ecological impacts [81].
The presence of EPS and the fact that microorganisms grow in the form of a biofilm affect treatment efficiency. A high content of EPS in AGS protects microbial communities from stressful conditions. The presence of large amounts of EPS increased the bioavailability of anthracene, acenaphthene, fluorene, naphthalene, and a mixture of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, as well as their biodegradation by Klebsiella pneumoniae [82]. Oliveira et al. [83] observed that increased production of EPS contributed to the robustness of AGS during a long-term exposure to 2-fluorophenol in saline wastewater. The EPS concentration in AGS decreased just after addition of 2-fluorophenol but then gradually recovered. The moderate salinity and presence of 2-fluorophenol in wastewater had a more detrimental effect on nutrients’ removal than on production of EPS. Similarly, exposition of Dictyosphaerium sp. to nonylphenol caused overproduction of PS in Sol-EPS and of PNs in bound EPS, which reduced the toxicity of the pollutant. Tyrosine- and tryptophan-like substances were the main functional components in the PNs in EPS from nonylphenol-exposed cells [17].
EPS are critical for the resistance of biofilms to heavy metals and to the migration and transformation of heavy metals. In Sol-EPS, TB-EPS, cell walls, and membranes in Pseudomonas putida biofilms, 60–67% of the copper was located in the extracellular fraction of the biofilms, mostly in TB-EPS, while only 17.2–21.2% of copper was found in the intracellular fraction. The copper was primarily bound by carboxyl-, hydrosulfide-, and phosphate-like ligands within the EPS matrix, intracellular fraction, and cell walls and membranes, respectively [84].
EPS in AGS serve as the first barrier that prevents the direct contact of antibiotics with the cells, thus increasing the stability of the AGS. In experiments with tetracycline, the antibiotic interacted with PNs and humic acids in AGS-EPS by forming complexes via hydrogen bonds and van der Waals forces, which trapped the antibiotics. Nonetheless, concentrations of tetracycline that are too high may destabilize AGS due to the limited interaction sites that are available in the AGS-EPS [85]. The presence of antibiotics generally stimulates EPS production. In a sequencing batch reactor operated under norfloxacin stress, the PN and PS contents in LB-EPS and TB-EPS increased as the norfloxacin concentration in the wastewater increased [86]. Ciprofloxacin present in wastewater was mostly bound by tryptophan-like and tyrosine-like proteins in EPS, but addition of Ca2+ into EPS and ciprofloxacin binding systems caused release of ciprofloxacin from the sludge as a result of cation competition for CO groups in amide I [87]. EPS-associated antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) are a source of extracellular ARGs, and they may play an important role in horizontal gene transfer in WWTPs. In activated sludge sampled from four WWTPs, typical ARGs (sulI, sulII, blaTEM-1, tetO, tetA, tetQ, tetW) and class I integron (intI1) were quantified in EPS-associated, intracellular, and cell-free DNA. The absolute abundances of EPS-associated ARGs were 0.2–4.6 orders of magnitude higher than the abundances of corresponding ARGs in the cell-free DNA [88].
The reduced biodegradability of AGS in comparison to that of activated sludge, resulting from the high EPS content of the AGS, severely affects the management of excess sludge. It was shown that the biochemical methane potential of AGS from laboratory and full-scale municipal wastewater treatment systems was lower than that of waste activated sludge [89]. EPS in AGS possess anion-repelling and cation-binding properties [90]. This impacts downstream processing of waste sludge because ions that are preferentially transported by EPS are also more toxic for methanogenic cells, which may inhibit biogas production. Some minerals, such as magnetite, are known to improve the anaerobic digestion of organic wastes. The latest findings indicate that interspecies electron transfer promoted by magnetite was a result of magnetite-stimulated secretion of EPS containing redox-active organic functional groups [91].
The dewaterability of waste sludge strongly depends on EPS content and composition. Decomposition of sludge EPS during a five-day denitrification process triggered by nitrate supply released the bound water and improved the filterability of the sludge [92]. Application of an ultrasound-activated persulfate oxidation efficiently degraded the gel-like EPS matrix and attacked cells. As a result, the moisture that was trapped in cells and EPS was released [93]. A mechanism for improving dewaterability of AGS by Fe(II) activated peroxydisulfate conditioning was proposed by Ding et al. [94]. SO4/OH radicals destroyed the structure of EPS and cells, and the bound water was released from the AGS. The Fe(III) that was generated decreased the electrostatic repulsion and facilitated the re-flocculation of sludge. Regarding EPS composition, it was reported that PNs were the primary component in the AGS, and that changes in PNs in TB-EPS during conditioning and granulation were associated with changes in sludge dewaterability [94]. It was observed that sludge dewaterability was related to the composition of the amino acids in EPS. The presence of glycine, serine, and threonine in EPS resulted in highly repulsive hydrophilic interactions, which reduced sludge dewaterability. In sludge that contained these amino acids, hydrophilic CO and C–OH functional groups were found to be more prevalent [95]. The dewatering performance of sludge can be increased by bioleaching. As shown by Li [96], the application of different DO concentrations decreased the content of PN in TB-EPS, thus improving sludge dewatering. Increased DO favored the growth of the genera Acidithiobacillus, Metallibacterium, Alicyclobacillus, Acidibacter, Acidocella, and Luteococcus, which played important roles in EPS biodegradation.

5. Possibilities for Utilizing Granule-Derived Polymers

WWTPs produce a constant stream of excess sludge, and recovery of resources from this stream may significantly reduce the generation of waste, energy consumption, and greenhouse gases’ emissions. WWTPs converted into facilities for recovery of resources will constitute a net source of valuable bioproducts, such as biopolymers, cellulose, phosphorus, or biogas [97]. Recovery of polymers from waste AGS would improve the economics of sewage treatment plants, especially taking into account the increasing number of WWTPs operated with AGS technology [98]. Moreover, even if activated sludge has a lower polymer content than AGS [21], recovery of biopolymers from activated sludge can still be beneficial, due to the popularity of these systems. Recovery of polymers may also improve sludge management. The cost of sewage sludge management accounts for about 50% of wastewater treatment cost [99]. Extraction of polymers from excess AGS reduces the amount of sludge that must be disposed of by 20–35% [100]. Removal of ALE prior anaerobic digestion can also act as a pre-treatment method to increase the rate of biodegradation of sludge [101]. Information on the possibility of reusing polymers obtained from waste sludge for different applications is presented in Figure 2.

5.1. Coatings, Agricultural Agents, Flame-Retardants

Polymers extracted from AGS appear in fibrous, gel, liquid, or foam forms. Polymer fibers can be used for the production of absorbing gels, tissues, or can be used as a gluing agent during fertilizer pellets’ production. The liquid form can be used to thicken inks or improve paper quality, while the foam form of polymers is used to produce fire-resistant boards [102]. AGS-extracted biodegradable PS can be easily drawn into a homogeneous and flexible film that enhances the water resistance of the paper. As reported by Lin et al. [103], application of 5% (w/v) water solution of PS-based biomaterial provides the same water-resistant property to paper as the commercially used alkenyl succinic anhydride. AGS-derived polymers are used as a coating for concrete, which limits concrete from drying out during curing and prevents tearing.
Biopolymers derived from excessive AGS can be used in the agricultural sector as a coating for seeds, ensuring young plants can develop faster and are less vulnerable to diseases [100]. Moreover, they may be used to improve water retention in semi-arid areas. Go et al. [104] indicated that biopolymers isolated from excess sludge can be applied as corrosion inhibitors. EPS adsorbed on the metal surface act like a protective barrier to isolate the metal from a corrosive environment. The main advantage of such an approach is that EPS-derived corrosion inhibitors are biodegradable and free from heavy metal.
There is a potential to use EPS for the development of bio-inspired high-performance flame-retardant materials. EPS extracted from activated sludge and AGS were tested as bio-based flame retardant materials. Biopolymers were used to coat flax fabric and its flammability was evaluated. Both types of EPS enabled the fabrics to achieve the self-extinguishment due to an effective formation of char, however, only samples coated with AGS-extracted EPS met the requirements for the aircraft interior [105]. EPS can also be used to decrease the flammability of synthetic polymers. Incorporation of EPS recovered from excess AGS into poly (vinyl alcohol) reduced the rate of heat release and CO emission of EPS/poly (vinyl alcohol) [106].

5.2. Sorption, Ion Exchange, Immobilization

Wastewater-produced EPS can be an attractive biosorbent for heavy metal removal and recovery. EPS isolated from the strain Parapedobacter sp. ISTM3 was used to remove heavy metals (Zn2+, Cu2+, Pb2+, Cr6+, Fe2+, and Cd2+). EPS showed the highest removal efficiency and metal adsorption capability for Cr6+, and the Langmuir model was found to best fit Cr6+ adsorption by EPS, with a maximum adsorption capacity of 33.783 mg/g [107]. EPS extracted from nitrogen-limited glycerol/ethanol-rich wastewater were used to recover Pb2+ and Cu2+ from aqueous solutions. Flow-through tests carried out in in columns packed with polyethyleneimine-coated silica gel, to which EPS were irreversibly attached, showed that immobilized EPS excellently adsorbed Cu2+ and Pb2+. Desorption with 0.1M HCl ensured average recoveries 86% and 90% for Cu2+ and Pb2+, respectively. For Cu2+, five adsorption-desorption cycles were conducted with no reduction in the amount of adsorbed metal at the breakthrough point. The major mechanism responsible for ion removal by EPS was ion exchange [108].
EPS can be used to reduce such metal ions as Ag(I) or Au(III) to corresponding metal nanoparticles (MNPs). Experiments with EPS from Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 showed that EPS with a low molecular weight (<3 kDa) was the major reducing agent but the fraction itself could not convert a high concentration (>25 mg/L) of Au(III) to stable AuNPs. On the other hand, EPS with high molecular weights (>50 kDa) acted as coating reagents, increasing the stability of the AuNPs with sizes of 20–50 nm, but were characterized by a low Au(III)-reducing activity [109]. EPS extracts can also be successfully used to immobilize oxyanions. In the study of Wang [110], ClO4 oxyanions were trapped in 20 min by freely dissolved EPS extracted from Bacillus subtilis, but chemical reduction of ClO4 was not observed in 48 h.
The ion exchange properties of EPS were also investigated by Sudmalis et al. [90]. EPS were entangled with an inert binder (poly (vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene)) and a membrane was formed. This membrane was used in an electrodialysis cell. For a mixture of NaCl and KCl salts, the EPS membrane acted as a cation exchange membrane (CEM) with a current efficiency of ~80%. The membrane was characterized by a higher selectivity for transport of K+ compared to Na+ (separation factor SK+/Na+ of 1.3). These properties were compared to a membrane from a model EPS (ALE) and a commercial CEM. The ALE membrane had a similar current efficiency (~80%), but a higher SK+/Na+ of 1.9. The commercial CEM did not show selectivity towards Na+ or K+. The selectivity of EPS and ALE towards K+ transport can be applied for ion separation from water streams.
EPS recovered from AGS may also be used as a natural carrier to immobilize a specific microbial strain important for pollutant degradation. For example, Rhodococcus sp. FP1, able to degrade 2-fluorophenol, was immobilized in EPS and introduced to an AGS reactor fed with saline wastewater containing 2-fluorophenol. Nutrient removal was impaired by 2-fluorophenol load, but bioaugmentation improved the phosphate and ammonium removal efficiencies. Moreover, bioaugmentation resulted in horizontal gene transfer because many bacterial strains isolated from granules were able to degrade 2-fluorophenol [83].

5.3. Re-Use in WWTP

EPS isolated from waste sludge can be re-used directly in WWTP. Hu et al. [111] investigated the potential of EPS as natural redox mediators improving methanogenesis. Artificial redox mediators improve the electron transfer efficiency during sludge methanogenesis but they are expensive and often poorly biodegradable. Addition of 0.50 g EPS/L during methanogenesis increased the methane yield due to increased activity of acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens, shortened the duration of the lag phase, and enhanced the sludge dewaterability. After EPS addition, the charge transfer resistance decreased and the efficiency of extracellular electron transfer was enhanced. EPS can also be used for preservation of granules to support the rapid start-up of reactors and improve the treatment stability. Zhang et al. [112] observed that EPS isolated from anammox sludge added to anammox granules stored at 4 °C enabled highly specific anammox activity and nitrogen removal efficiency to be preserved. Cunha et al. [113] indicated the potential of the microalgal-based EPS to replace hazardous synthetic flocculants used in wastewater treatment and to remove nano- and microplastic from wastewater.

5.4. ALE

Most commonly, ALE is derived from such genera of seaweed as Laminaria, Macrocystis, and Ascophyllum. This ALE is commonly used to thicken food products, for production of medicines, immobilization of biocatalysts such as enzymes, or as a gelling agent in cosmetics [98,114]. Since the price of seaweed-derived ALE is high, the recovery of ALE from waste sludge is an attractive option. AGS contains up to 10–20% of ALE; therefore, ALE is now recognized as one of the most promising bioproducts that can be recovered from WWTP [115,116]. In a field test on ALE recovery from waste AGS, it was demonstrated that 18 kg of ALE was produced from 80 kg of AGS [102]. In the Netherlands, it is planned that by 2030 about 85 ktons of ALE will be recovered from 10 different WWTP, generating 170 million euros [117].
The ALE extracted from AGS can form beads that can be used as sorbing agents. In the study of Ladnorg et al. [118], ALE, which accounted for about 58% of the total EPS, was used for sorption of methylene blue. The removal efficiency of dye increased with increasing initial concentrations of ALE, and the pseudo-first order model best described the kinetic behavior of the adsorption process. Increasing the temperature of the adsorption process to 35 °C increased the removal efficiency to 69%; however, at higher temperatures, the removal efficiency decreased significantly. Similar research was conducted for sorption of cadmium from an aqueous solution. The use of AGS-extracted ALE ensured that the sorption efficiency was close to 90%, which was only slightly lower that the efficiency observed for a commercial ALE (data not published). Knowledge of the composition and hydrogel properties of ALE is necessary to develop ALE applications in the industry, for instance, in the chemical fields or as a rheology conditioner/emulsion stabilizer [13].

6. Conclusions

Biopolymer recovery from excess AGS provides a valuable source of biomaterial, increases the sustainability of wastewater treatment and reduces the amount of sludge that requires management. Challenges that must be faced include optimization of extraction methods to obtain biopolymers with well-defined characteristics, and operation of reactors in such a way that both the treatment efficiency and polymer content in excess sludge are high. The latest ideas for the use of biopolymers that are presented in this review article open a huge field for the development of new technologies based on waste-extracted EPS.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bates, B. Aerobic Granular Sludge Technology. Available online: https://www.scribd.com/document/426381925/Ohio-Biosolids-Nereda-Seminar-2017 (accessed on 10 October 2021).
  2. Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, A.; Podlasek, M.; Nosek, D.; Jaskulska, B. Treatment efficiency and characteristics of biomass in a full-scale wastewater treatment plant with aerobic granular sludge. J. Ecol. Eng. 2018, 19, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Inocencio, P.; Coelho, F.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M.; Giesen, A. The future of sewage treatment: Nereda technology exceeds high expectation. Water 2013, 21, 28–29. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rusanowska, P.; Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, A.; Świątczak, P.; Wojnowska-Baryła, I. Changes in extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) content and composition in aerobic granule size-fractions during reactor cycles at different organic loads. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 272, 188–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Flemming, H.-C.; Wingender, J. The biofilm matrix. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 623–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Seviour, T.; Pijuan, M.; Nicholson, T.; Keller, J.; Yuan, Z. Understanding the properties of aerobic sludge granules as hydrogels. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 102, 1483–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Felz, S.; Neu, T.R.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M.; Lin, Y. Aerobic granular sludge contains hyaluronic acid-like and sulfated glycosaminoglycans-like polymers. Water Res. 2020, 169, 115291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, S.; Huang, X.; Liu, L.; Yan, P.; Chen, Y.; Fang, F.; Guo, J. Insight into the role of exopolysaccharide in determining the structural stability of aerobic granular sludge. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 298, 113521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhu, L.; Zhou, J.; Lv, M.; Yu, H.; Zhao, H.; Xu, X. Specific component comparison of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in flocs and granular sludge using EEM and SDS-PAGE. Chemosphere 2015, 121, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kończak, B.; Miksch, K. Influence of calcium, magnesium and iron ions on the molecular mass of exoproteins during biogranulation. Chem. Process Eng. 2020, 41, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, Z.; Li, H.; Zhao, L.; Liu, X.; Wan, C. Understanding the role of cations and hydrogen bonds on the stability of aerobic granules from the perspective of the aggregation and adhesion behavior of extracellular polymeric substances. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 95, 148659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yang, Y.C.; Liu, X.; Wan, C.; Sun, S.; Lee, D.J. Accelerated aerobic granulation using alternating feed loadings: ALE-like exopolysaccharides. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 171, 360–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lotti, T.; Carretti, E.; Berti, D.; Montis, C.; Del Buffa, S.; Lubello, C.; Feng, C.; Malpei, F. Hydrogels formed by anammox extracellular polymeric substances: Structural and mechanical insights. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 11633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Oliveira, A.S.; Amorim, C.L.; Ramos, M.A.; Mesquita, D.P.; Inocêncio, P.; Ferreira, E.C.; van Loosdrecht, M.; Castro, P.M.L. Variability in the composition of extracellular polymeric substances from a full-scale aerobic granular sludge reactor treating urban wastewater. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cescutti, P.; Foschiatti, M.; Furlanis, L.; Lagatolla, C.; Rizzo, R. Isolation and characterisation of the biological repeating unit of cepacian, the exopolysaccharide produced by bacteria of the Burkholderiacepacia complex. Carbohydr. Res. 2010, 345, 1455–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jahn, L.; Saracevic, E.; Svardal, K.; Krampe, J. Anaerobic biodegradation and dewaterability of aerobic granular sludge. J. Chem. Technol. 2019, 94, 2908–2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Cheng, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Jin, Z.; Hui, C.; Xu, L.; Zhou, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Du, L.; Jiang, H. Enhanced excretion of extracellular polymeric substances associated with nonylphenol tolerance in Dictyosphaerium sp. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 395, 122644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lu, X.; Xu, W.; Liu, C.; Zhao, Q.; Ye, Z. Insight into the role of extracellular polymeric substances in denitrifying biofilms under nitrobenzene exposure. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 222, 112539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Seviour, T.; Yuan, Z.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M.; Lin, Y. Aerobic sludge granulation: A tale of two polysaccharides? Water Res. 2012, 46, 4803–4813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Felz, S.; Vermeulen, P.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M.; Lin, Y.M. Chemical characterization methods for the analysis of structural extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). Water Res. 2019, 157, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schambeck, C.M.; Girbal-Neuhauser, E.; Böni, L.; Fischer, P.; Bessière, Y.; Paul, E.; da Costa, R.H.R.; Derlon, N. Chemical and physical properties of alginate-like exopolymers of aerobic granules and flocs produced from different wastewaters. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 312, 123632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Huang, J.L.; Wang, H.H.; Alam, F.; Cui, Y.W. Granulation of halophilic sludge inoculated with estuarine sediments for saline wastewater treatment. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 682, 532–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. De Graaff, D.R.; Felz, S.; Neu, T.R.; Pronk, M.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M.; Lin, Y. Sialic acids in the extracellular polymeric substances of seawater-adapted aerobic granular sludge. Water Res. 2019, 155, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lin, Y.; Reino, C.; Carrera, J.; Pérez, J.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. Glycosylated amyloid-like proteins in the structural extracellular polymers of aerobic granular sludge enriched with ammonium-oxidizing bacteria. Microbiologyopen 2018, 7, e00616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kończak, B.; Karcz, J.; Miksch, K. Influence of Calcium, Magnesium, and Iron Ions on Aerobic Granulation. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2014, 174, 2910–2918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Chen, C.; Ming, J.; Yoza, B.A.; Liang, J.; Li, Q.X.; Guo, H.; Liu, Z.; Deng, J.; Wang, Q. Characterization of aerobic granular sludge used for the treatment of petroleum wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 271, 353–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Liu, L.; Gao, D.W.; Zhang, M.; Fu, Y. Comparison of Ca2+ and Mg2+ enhancing aerobic granulation in SBR. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 181, 382–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Cui, Y.-W.; Huang, J.-L.; Alam, F. Fast granulation of halophilic activated sludge treating low-strength organic saline wastewater via addition of divalent cations. Chemosphere 2021, 264, 128396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, K.; Zhang, X.; Song, W.; Song, T.; Li, J. Study on rapid formation of aerobic granular sludge promoted by addition of Fe2+. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2009, 2021, 012047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, Z.W.; Liu, Y.; Tay, J.H. Biodegradability of extracellular polymeric substances produced by aerobic granules. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 74, 462–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Leenen, E.J.T.M. Nitrification by Artificially Immobilized Cells: Model and Practical System. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, Y.-C.; Zhu, J.-R. Role of N-acyl homoserine lactone (AHL)-based quorum sensing (QS) in aerobic sludge granulation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 7623–7632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lv, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhong, C.; Li, Y.; Hao, W.; Zhu, J. The effect of quorum sensing and extracellular proteins on the microbial attachment of aerobic granular activated sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 152, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wan, C.; Zhang, P.; Lee, D.-J.; Yang, X.; Liu, X.; Sun, S.; Pan, X. Disintegration of aerobic granules: Role of second messenger cyclic di-GMP. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 146, 330–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ma, C.; Zeng, W.; Meng, Q.; Wang, C.; Peng, Y. Identification of partial denitrification granulation enhanced by low C/N ratio in the aspect of metabolomics and quorum sensing. Chemosphere 2022, 286, 131895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Basuvaraj, M.; Fein, J.; Liss, N. Protein and polysaccharide content of tightly and loosely bound extracellular polymeric substances and the development of a granular activated sludge floc. Water Res. 2015, 82, 104–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Felz, S.; Al-Zuhnairy, S.; Aarstas, O.A.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M.; Lin, Y.M. Extraction of structural polymeric substances from aerobic granular sludge. J. Vis. Exp. 2016, 115, e54534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Zhang, T.; Cao, J.; Zhu, Q.; Fu, B.; Yang, E.; Fang, F.; Feng, Q.; Luo, J. Revealing the characteristics and formation mechanisms of partial denitrification granular sludge for efficient nitrite accumulation driven by glycerol. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 428, 131195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Subramanian, S.B.; Yan, S.; Tyagi, R.D.; Surampalli, R.Y. Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) producing bacterial strains of municipal wastewater sludge: Isolation, molecular identification, EPS characterization and performance for sludge settling and dewatering. Water Res. 2010, 44, 2253–2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nouha, K.; Yan, S.; Tyadi, R.D.; Surampalli, R.Y. EPS producting microorganisms from municipal wastewater activated sludge. J. Pet. Environ. Biotechnol. 2015, 7, 1000255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Tan, C.H.; Koh, K.S.; Xie, C.; Tay, M.; Zhou, Y.; Williams, R.; Ng, W.J.; Rice, S.A.; Kjelleberg, S. The role of quorum sensing signalling in EPS production and the assembly of a sludge community into aerobic granules. ISME J. 2014, 8, 1186–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, A. Bacterial structure of aerobic granules is determined by aeration mode and nitrogen load in the reactor cycle. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 181, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Paulo, A.M.S.; Amorim, C.L.; Costa, J.; Mesquita, D.P.; Ferreira, E.C.; Castro, P.M.L. Long-term stability of a non-adapted aerobic granular sludge process treating fish canning wastewater associated to EPS producers in the core microbiome. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 756, 144007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Donati, I.; Paoletti, S. Material properties of ALEs. In ALEs: Biology and Applications; Rehm, B.H.A., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  45. Hay, I.D.; Rehman, Z.U.; Moradali, M.F.; Wang, Y.; Rehm, B.H.A. Microbial alginate production, modification and its applications. Microb. Biotechnol. 2013, 6, 637–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Ertesvåg, H.; Valla, S.; Skjåk-Bræk, G. Enzymatic ALE Modification. In ALEs: Biology and Applications; Rehm, B.H.A., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  47. Hay, I.D.; Gatland, K.; Campisano, A.; Jordens, J.Z.; Rehm, B.H. Impact of ALE overproduction on attachment and biofilm architecture of a super mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 6022–6025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Sabra, W.; Zeng, A.P. Microbial production of ALEs physiology and process aspects In ALEs: Biology and Applications; Rehm, B.H.A., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 153–173. [Google Scholar]
  49. Giesen, A.; van Loosdrecht, M.; de Bruin, B.; van der Roest, H.; Pronk, M. Full-scale experiences with aerobic granular biomass technology for treatment of urban and industrial wastewater. In Proceedings of the International Water Week, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 4–8 November 2013. [Google Scholar]
  50. Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, A.; Nosek, D.; Wojnowska-Baryła, I.; Mikulski, A. Efficient dewatering of polymer-rich aerobic granular sludge with cationic polymer containing hydrocarbons. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 9, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Bales, P.M.; Renke, E.M.; May, S.L.; Shen, Y.; Nelson, D.C. Purification and characterization of biofilm-associated EPS exopolysaccharides from ESKAPE organisms and other pathogens. PLoS ONE 2008, 8, 67950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Frølund, B.; Palmgren, R.; Keiding, K.; Nielsen, P.H. Extraction of extracellular polymers from activated sludge using a cation exchange resin. Water Res. 1996, 30(8), 1749–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Adav, S.S.; Lee, D.J. Extraction of extracellular polymeric substances from aerobic granule with compact interior structure. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 154, 1120–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wang, W.; Yan, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhu, Y.; Ma, J.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, Y. Comparison and optimization of extraction methods of extracellular polymeric substances in anammox granules: From maintaining protein secondary structure perspective. Chemosphere 2020, 259, 127539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. McSwain, B.S.; Irvine, R.L.; Hausner, M.; Wilderer, P.A. Composition and distribution of extracellular polymeric substances in aerobic flocs and granular sludge. Appl. Environ. Biotechnol. 2005, 71, 1051–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Su, W.; Tang, B.; Fu, F.; Huang, S.; Zhao, S.; Bin, L.; Ding, J.; Chen, C. A new insight into resource recovery of excess sewage sludge: Feasibility of extracting mixed amino acids as an environment-friendly corrosion inhibitor for industrial pickling. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 279, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, A.; Nosek, D.; Gusiatin, Z.M.; Zielińska, M.; Bernat, K.; Kulikowska, D.; Wojnowska-Baryła, I. Optimization of extraction parameters of alginate from aerobic granular sludge. In Proceedings of the 6th International Environmental Best Practices Conference, Olsztyn, Poland, 22–26 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
  58. Lin, Y.M.; Wang, L.; Chi, Z.M.; Liu, X.Y. Bacterial ALE role in aerobic granular bio-particles formation and settle ability improvement. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2008, 43, 1642–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Świątczak, P.; Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, A. Performance and microbial characteristics of biomass in a full-scale aerobic granular sludge wastewater treatment plant. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2018, 25, 1655–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Sheng, G.P.; Yu, H.Q.; Li, X.Y. Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of microbial aggregates in biological wastewater treatment systems: A review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2010, 28, 882–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, Z.; Qiu, J.; Xiang, R.; Yu, H.; Xu, X.; Zhu, L. Organic load rate (OLR) regulation for enhancement of aerobic sludge granulation: Role of key microorganism and their function. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 653, 630–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kang, A.J.; Yuan, Q. Long-term stability and nutrient removal efficiency of aerobic granules at low organic loads. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 234, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Xu, H.; Liu, Y.; Li, F.; Yang, B.; Wang, M.; Ma, C.; Tian, Q.; Song, X.; Sand, W. Granulation process in an expanded granular sludge blanked (EGSB) reactor for domestic sewage treatment: Impact of extracellular polymeric substances compositions and evolution of microbial population. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 269, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Remmas, N.; Melidis, P.; Zerva, I.; Kristoffersen, J.B.; Nikolaki, S.; Tsiamis, G.; Ntougias, S. Dominance of candidate Saccharibacteria in a membrane bioreactors treating medium age landfill leachte: Effects of organic load on microbial communities hydrolytic potential and extracellular polymeric substances. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 248, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Shi, Y.; Liu, Y. Evolution of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in aerobic sludge granulation: Composition, adherence and viscoelastic properties. Chemosphere 2021, 262, 128033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Song, C.; Zhao, C.; Wang, Q.; Lu, S.; She, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Jin, C.; Guo, L.; Li, K.; Gao, M. Impact of carbon/nitrogen ratio on the performance and microbial community of sequencing batch biofilm reactor treating synthetic mariculture wastewater. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 298, 113528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Wang, X.; Yang, L.; Ren, X.; Cui, S.; Guo, L.; Zhang, Z. Impacts of influent COD/N ratio on floc physicochemical characteristics and microbial community of nitrifying sludge under high-strength ammonia conditions. J. Water Process Eng. 2021, 41, 102002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Decho, A.W.; Gutierrez, T. Microbial extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) in ocean systems. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Corsino, S.F.; Capodici, M.; Pippo, D.F.; Tandoi, V.; Torregrossa, M. Comparison between kinetics of autochthons marine bacteria in activated sludge and granular sludge systems at different salinity and SRTs. Water Res. 2019, 148, 425–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Ismail, S.B.; de La Parra, C.J.; Temmink, H.; van Lier, J.B. Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors operated under high salinity conditions. Water Res. 2010, 44, 1909–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Corsino, S.F.; Capodici, M.; Torregrossa, M.; Viviani, G. Physical properties and extracellular polymeric substances pattern of aerobic granular sludge treating hypersaline wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 229, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Li, X.; Luo, J.; Guo, G.; Mackey, H.R.; Hao, T.; Chen, G. Seawater-based wastewater accelerates development of aerobic granular sludge: A laboratory proof-of-concept. Water Res. 2017, 115, 210–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Meng, F.; Liu, D.; Pan, Y.; Xi, L.; Yang, D.; Huang, W. Enhanced amount and quality of alginate-like exopolysaccharides in aerobic granular sludge for the treatment of salty wastewater. BioResources 2019, 14, 139–165. [Google Scholar]
  74. Liu, X.; Sun, S.P.; Ma, B.Y.; Zhang, C.; Wan, C.L.; Lee, D.J. Understanding of aerobic granulation enhanced by starvation in the perspective of quorum sensing. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 3747–3755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kinyua, M.N.; Elliott, M.; Wett, B.; Murthy, S.; Chandran, K.; Bott, C.B. The role extracellular polymeric substances on carbon capture in a high rate activated sludge A-stage system. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 322, 428–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhang, Z.; Ji, Y.; Cao, R.; Yu, Z.; Xu, X.; Zhu, L. A novel mode of air recycling favored stable operation of the aerobic granular sludge process via calcium accumulation. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 371, 600–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wang, J.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, W.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y. The connection between aeration regimes and EPS composition in nitritation biofilm. Chemosphere 2021, 265, 129141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Li, W.-M.; Liao, X.-W.; Guo, J.-S.; Zhang, Y.-X.; Chen, Y.-P.; Fang, F.; Yan, P. New insights into filamentous sludge bulking: The potential role of extracellular polymeric substances in sludge bulking in the activated sludge process. Chemosphere 2020, 248, 126012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Qian, J.; He, X.; Wang, P.; Xu, B.; Li, K.; Lu, B.; Jin, W.; Tang, S. Effects of polystyrene nanoplastics on extracellular polymeric substance composition of activated sludge: The role of surface functional groups. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 279, 116904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wang, Q.Y.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Hu, W.; Lin, L.; Wu, Z. Effects of microplastics accumulation on performance of membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment. Chemosphere 2022, 287, 131968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Junaid, M.; Wang, J. Interaction of nanoplastics with extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in the aquatic environment: A special reference to eco-corona formation and associated impacts. Water Res. 2021, 201, 117319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Premnath, N.; Mohanrasu, K.; Rao, R.G.R.; Dinesh, G.H.; Prakash, G.S.; Pugazhendhi, A.; Jeyakanthan, J.; Govarthanan, M.; Kumar, P.; Arun, A. Effect of C/N substrates for enhanced extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) production and Poly Cyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) degradation. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 275, 116035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Oliveira, A.S.; Amorim, C.L.; Mesquita, D.P.; Ferreira, E.C.; van Loosdrecht, M.; Castro, P.M.L. Increased extracellular polymeric substances production contributes for the robustness of aerobic granular sludge during long-term intermittent exposure to 2-fluorophenol in saline wastewater. J. Water Process. Eng. 2021, 40, 101977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Lin, H.; Wang, C.; Zhao, H.; Chen, G.; Chen, X. A subcellular level study of copper speciation reveals the synergistic mechanism of microbial cells and EPS involved in copper binding in bacterial biofilms. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 263, 114485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Li, Z.; Wan, C.; Liu, X.; Wang, L.; Lee, D.-J. Understanding of the mechanism of extracellular polymeric substances of aerobic granular sludge against tetracycline from the perspective of fluorescence properties. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 756, 144054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Li, S.; Ma, B.; She, Z.; Guo, L.; Zhao, Y.; Jin, C.; Gao, M. Effect of norfloxacin on performance, microbial enzymatic activity and microbial community of a sequencing batch reactor. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2020, 18, 100726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Yu, J.; Gao, D.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, X.; Cheng, J.; Jin, L.; Lyu, Y.; Du, Z.; Guo, M. Multiple roles of Ca2+ in the interaction of ciprofloxacin with activated sludge: Spectroscopic investigations of extracellular polymeric substances. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 751, 142246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wang, L.; Yuan, L.; Li, Z.-H.; Zhang, X.; Sheng, G.-P. Quantifying the occurrence and transformation potential of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS)-associated antibiotic resistance genes in activated sludge. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 408, 124428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Bernat, K.; Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, A.; Wojnowska-Baryła, I.; Karczewska, M. Physicochemical properties and biogas productivity of aerobic granular sludge and activated sludge. Biochem. Eng. J. 2017, 117, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sudmalis, D.; Mubita, T.M.; Gagliano, M.C.; Dinis, E.; Zeeman, G.; Rijnaarts, H.H.M.; Temmink, H. Cation exchange membrane behaviour of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in salt adapted granular sludge. Water Res. 2020, 178, 115855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Yu, Q.; Yang, Y.; Wang, M.; Zhu, Y.; Sun, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Z. Enhancing anaerobic digestion of kitchen wastes via combining ethanol-type fermentation with magnetite: Potential for stimulating secretion of extracellular polymeric substances. Waste Manag. 2021, 127, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Huang, Q.; Shen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xiao, J.; Yuan, H.; Lou, Z.; Zhu, N. Synergy between denitrification and calcium bridging improves dewaterability of waste activated sludge. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 242, 118438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Bian, C.; Ge, D.; Wang, G.; Dong, Y.; Li, W.; Zhu, N.; Yuan, H. Enhancement of waste activated sludge dewaterability by ultrasound-activated persulfate oxidation: Operation condition, sludge properties, and mechanisms. Chemosphere 2021, 262, 128385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ding, W.; Jin, W.; Zhou, X.; Yang, Q.; Chen, C.; Wang, Q. Role of extracellular polymeric substances in anaerobic granular sludge: Assessing dewaterability during Fe(II)-peroxydisulfate conditioning and granulation processes. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 286, 124968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Xiao, K.; Li, N.; Yang, C.; Zhu, Y.; Yu, Z.; Yu, W.; Liang, S.; Hou, H.; Liu, B.; Hu, J.; et al. Deciphering the impacts of composition of extracellular polymeric substances on sludge dewaterability: An often overlooked role of amino acids. Chemosphere 2021, 284, 131297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Li, Y.B.; Song, J.L.; Yao, Q.J.; Chen, Z.X.; Wei, Y.; Li, H.L.; Wang, M.X.; Wang, B.J.; Zhou, J.M. Effects of dissolved oxygen on the sludge dewaterability and extracellular polymeric substances distribution by bioleaching. Chemosphere 2021, 281, 130906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Van der Hoek, J.P.; De Fooij, H.; Struker, A. Wastewater as a resource: Strategies to recover resources from Amsterdam’s wastewater. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2016, 113, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Van der Roest, H.; van Loosdrecht, M.; Langkamp, E.J.; Uijterlinde, C. Recovery and reuse of Bio-ALE from granular Nereda sludge. Water 2015, 21, 48. [Google Scholar]
  99. Kroiss, H. What is the potential for utilizing the resources in sludge? Water Sci. Technol. 2004, 49, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. ROYAL HASKONINGDHV. 2019. Available online: https://www.royalhaskoningdhv.com/en-gb/news-room/news/launching-new-sustainable-raw-material-kaumera/10149 (accessed on 10 October 2021).
  101. Hogendoorn, A. Enhanced Digestion and Bio-ALE-Like Exopolysaccharides Extraction from Nereda Sludge. Master’s Thesis, University of Delft, Delft, The Netherlands, 2013. Available online: https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:b1c86da0-3786-4fd7-b2c6-1cf0d3da8865?collection=education (accessed on 29 August 2021).
  102. ROYAL HASKONINGDHV. 2017. Available online: https://www.royalhaskoningdhv.com/en-gb/news-room/news/new-raw-material-from-nereda-wastewater/6794 (accessed on 30 November 2017).
  103. Lin, Y.M.; Nierop, K.G.J.; Girbal-Neuhauser, E.; Adriaanse, M.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. Sustainable polysaccharide-based biomaterial recovered from waste aerobic granular sludge as a surface coating material. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2015, 4, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Go, L.C.; Holmes, W.; Depan, D.; Hernandez, R. Evaluation of extracellular polymeric substances extracted from waste activated sludge as a renewable corrosion inhibitor. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Kim, N.K.; Mao, N.; Lin, R.; Bhattacharyya, D.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M.; Lin, Y. Flame retardant property of flax fabrics coated by extracellular polymeric substances recovered from both activated sludge and aerobic granular sludge. Water Res. 2020, 170, 115344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Kim, N.K.; Lin, R.; Bhattacharyya, D.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M.; Lin, Y. Insight on how biopolymers recovered from aerobic granular wastewater sludge can reduce the flammability of synthetic polymers. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 805, 150434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Tyagi, B.; Gupta, B.; Thakur, I.S. Biosorption of Cr (VI) from aqueous solution by extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) produced by Parapedobacter sp. ISTM3 strain isolated from Mawsmai cave, Meghalaya, India. Environ. Res. 2020, 191, 110064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ajao, V.; Nam, K.; Chatzopoulos, P.; Spruijt, E.; Bruning, H.; Rijnaarts, H.; Temmink, H. Regeneration and reuse of microbial extracellular polymers immobilised on a bed column for heavy metal recovery. Water Res. 2020, 171, 115472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Dong, B.; Liu, G.; Zhou, J.; Cai, L.; Wang, J.; Jin, R. Roles of molecular weight-fractionated extracellular polymeric substance in transformation of Au(III) to Au nanoparticles in aqueous environments. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 728, 138889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Wang, Q.; Chen, K.; Huang, S.; Zhu, X.; Kang, F. Spontaneous assembly of microbial extracellular polymeric substances into microcapsules involved in trapping and immobilizing degradation-resistant oxoanions. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 758, 143651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Hu, A.; Cheng, X.; Wang, C.; Kang, L.; Chen, P.; He, Q.; Zhang, G.; Ye, J.; Zhou, S. Extracellular polymeric substances trigger an increase in redox mediators for enhanced sludge methanogenesis. Environ. Res. 2020, 191, 110197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Zhang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Bai, Y.-H.; Xia, W.-J.; Ni, S.-K.; Wu, Q.-Y.; Fan, N.-S.; Huang, B.-C.; Jin, R.-C. Exogenous extracellular polymeric substances as protective agents for the preservation of anammox granules. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 747, 141464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Cunha, C.; Silva, L.; Paulo, J.; Faria, M.; Nogueira, N.; Cordeiro, N. Microalgal-based biopolymer for nano- and microplastic removal: A possible biosolution for wastewater treatment. Environ. Poll. 2020, 263, 114385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Dragett, K.I.; Taylor, C. Chemical, physical and biological properties of ALEs and their biomedical implications. Food Hydrocoll. 2011, 25, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Lin, Y.M.; Sharma, P.K.; van Loosedrecht, M.C.M. The chemical and mechanical differences between ALE-like exopolysaccharides isolated form aerobic flocculent sludge and aerobic granular sludge. Water Res. 2013, 47, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Pronk, M.; Neu, T.R.; van Loosedrecht, M.C.M.; Lin, Y.M. The acid souble extracellular polymeric substance of aerobic granular sludge dominated by Defluvuiicoccus sp. Water Res. 2017, 122, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Van Leeuwen, K.; De Vries, E.; Koop, S.; Roest, K. The Energy & Raw Materials Factory: Role and Potential Contribution to the Circular Economy of the Netherlands. Environ. Manag. 2018, 61, 786–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Ladnorg, S.; Libardi, N., Jr.; Dall’Agnol, P.; Domingos, D.G.; Magnus, B.S.; Wichern, M.; Gehring, T.; de Costa, R.H.R. ALE-like exopolysaccharide extracted from aerobic granular sludge as biosorbent for methylene blue: Termodynamic, kinetics and isotherm studies. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 103081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. ALE extracted from AGS from a full-scale WWTP.
Figure 1. ALE extracted from AGS from a full-scale WWTP.
Energies 14 07219 g001
Figure 2. Possibility of reusing polymers extracted from waste sludge from a WWTP.
Figure 2. Possibility of reusing polymers extracted from waste sludge from a WWTP.
Energies 14 07219 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, A. Biopolymers in Aerobic Granular Sludge—Their Role in Wastewater Treatment and Possibilities of Re-Use in Line with Circular Economy. Energies 2021, 14, 7219. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en14217219

AMA Style

Cydzik-Kwiatkowska A. Biopolymers in Aerobic Granular Sludge—Their Role in Wastewater Treatment and Possibilities of Re-Use in Line with Circular Economy. Energies. 2021; 14(21):7219. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en14217219

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, Agnieszka. 2021. "Biopolymers in Aerobic Granular Sludge—Their Role in Wastewater Treatment and Possibilities of Re-Use in Line with Circular Economy" Energies 14, no. 21: 7219. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en14217219

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop