Next Article in Journal
A Simplified Method for Modeling of Pressure Losses and Heat Transfer in Fixed-Bed Reactors with Low Tube-to-Particle Diameter Ratio
Next Article in Special Issue
On the Use of Modern Engineering Codes for Designing a Small Wind Turbine: An Annotated Case Study
Previous Article in Journal
Increasing Efficiency of a Finned Heat Sink Using Orthogonal Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development and Validation of CFD 2D Models for the Simulation of Micro H-Darrieus Turbines Subjected to High Boundary Layer Instabilities
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Implementation and Validation of an Advanced Wind Energy Controller in Aero-Servo-Elastic Simulations Using the Lifting Line Free Vortex Wake Model

by Sebastian Perez-Becker *, David Marten, Christian Navid Nayeri and Christian Oliver Paschereit
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Reviewer 4: Anonymous
Submission received: 6 January 2021 / Revised: 27 January 2021 / Accepted: 28 January 2021 / Published: 2 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Numerical Simulation of Wind Turbines)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors implemented an advanced wind energy controller into the aeroelastic software and presented an interesting study. Overall, the work is well put together. One minor concern is that the authors should put a length scale and contour legend in Figure 8. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper presents an open-source tool for control of wind-turbine, TUBCon. The toolbox is based on standard techniques of control (namely PID controllers), and it aims at controlling pitch and torque, as well as supervisory controllers.

The tests are performed using an aeroelastic simulation code and verified against a turbine controller.

One of the main merit of the paper is to provide a rather complete explanation of the implemented controllers and tests for different turbulent wind level-sets which give the confidence the open-source tool can actually be applied in real situations. In that sense, I found the investigation rather compelling.

On a negative note, it can be improved for what concerns the presentation. In particular

  • I felt the captions are not informative enough due to the rather large notations introduced: although everything is defined in the text, for the sake of readability it would be better to have longer, self-contained captions.
  • There are some paragraphs which I felt are a bit vague or verbose (for instance in lines 133-170).

Finally, English is of good level, although I spotted some typos and some loose ends.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The paper is concerned with performance of the TUB Controller, an advanced open-source wind turbine controller capable of performing full load calculations. The manuscript is well-written with a clear presentation and figures on massive technical issues.

Could you please elaborate on the possible use of neural networks instead of PID regulators?

To summarize, I suggest to accept the paper.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 4 Report

The study describes the controller and includes a validation study using an established open-source controller. In addition, the advanced load reduction capabilities of the individual pitch control strategy are investigated. In general, it can be acceptable to publish as a journal paper. Minor revisions should be conducted before publication. Many abbreviations have been used in the manuscript, it is better to give a seperate part to describe the abbreviations.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop