Next Article in Journal
Exergy and Exergoeconomic Model of a Ground-Based CAES Plant for Peak-Load Energy Production
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrate Formation/Dissociation in (Natural Gas + Water + Diesel Oil) Emulsion Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Recycling of Waste Engine Oils Using a New Washing Agent

1
Faculty of Engineering and Surveying, National Centre for Engineering in Agriculture, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba 4350, QLD, Australia
2
Faculty of Engineering and Science, University of Koya, Koya KOY45 AB64, Iraq
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2013, 6(2), 1023-1049; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en6021023
Submission received: 3 December 2012 / Revised: 21 January 2013 / Accepted: 6 February 2013 / Published: 19 February 2013

Abstract

:
This paper addresses recycling of waste engine oils treated using acetic acid. A recycling process was developed which eventually led to comparable results with some of the conventional methods. This gives the recycled oil the potential to be reused in cars’ engines after adding the required additives. The advantage of using the acetic acid is that it does not react or only reacts slightly with base oils. The recycling process takes place at room temperature. It has been shown that base oils and oils’ additives are slightly affected by the acetic acid. Upon adding 0.8 vol% of acetic acid to the used oil, two layers were separated, a transparent dark red colored oil and a black dark sludge at the bottom of the container. The base oils resulting from other recycling methods were compared to the results of this paper. The comparison showed that the recycled oil produced by acetic acid treatment is comparable to those recycled by the other conventional methods.

1. Introduction

Waste engine oil is a high pollutant material that requires responsible management. Waste engine oil may cause damage to the environment when dumped into the ground or into water streams including sewers. This may result in groundwater and soil contamination [1]. Recycling of such contaminated materials will be beneficial in reducing engine oil costs. In addition, it will have a significant positive impact on the environment [2,3,4]. The conventional methods of recycling of waste engine oil either requires a high cost technology such as vacuum distillation or the use of toxic materials such as sulfuric acid. These methods also produce contaminating by-products which have highly sulfur levels, especially in the Kurdistan region/Iraq. Lubricant oils have been used primarily for reducing friction between moving parts of various machinery or equipment, minimize material wear, improve the efficiency of equipment /machinery and for fuel and energy savings. Access to lubricants is essential to any modern society and not only does lubrication reduce friction and wear by interposition of a thin liquid film between moving surfaces, but it also removes heat, keeps equipment clean, and prevents corrosion. One of its important applications includes gasoline and diesel engine oils [5]. Waste lubricating oil refers to the engine oil, transmission oil, hydraulic and cutting oils after use. It is also refers to the degradation of the fresh lubricating components that become contaminated by metals, ash, carbon residue, water, varnish, gums, and other contaminating materials, in addition to asphaltic compounds which result from the bearing surface of the engines [6]. These oils must be changed and removed from the automobile after a few thousand kilometers of driving because of stress from serious deterioration in service. The amount of lubricating oils that is collected annually in Europe and USA is very large, approximately 1.7 to 3.5 million tons. This large amount of waste engine oils has a significant impact on both economical and environmental aspects. They cost millions of dollars to manufacture and represent a high pollutant material when disposed of. If discharged into the land, water or even burnt as a low grade fuel, this may cause serious pollution problems because they release harmful metals and other pollutants into the environment [7].
A recommended solution for this issue is the recovery of the lubricating oil from the waste oil. Recycling processes using nontoxic and cost effective materials can be an optimum solution. Acid-clay has been used as a recycling method for used engine oil for a long time. This method has many disadvantages; it also produces large quantity of pollutants, is unable to treat modern multigrade oils and it is difficult to remove asphaltic impurities [8]. Solvent extraction has replaced acid treatment as the method of choice for improving the oxidative stability and viscosity/temperature characteristics of base oils. The solvent selectively dissolves the undesired aromatic components (the extract), leaving the desirable saturated components, especially alkanes, as a separate phase (the raffinate) [9]. In one study [10] a mixture of methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) and 2-propanol was used as an extracting material for recycling used engine oils. Although the oil resulting from this process is comparable to that produced by the acid-clay method, its cost is high. Expensive solvents and vacuum distillation are required to carry out this method [11,12]. Recently [13] propane was used as a solvent. Propane is capable of dissolving paraffinic or waxy material and intermediately dissolved oxygenated material. Asphaltenes which contain heavy condensed aromatic compounds and particulate matter are insoluble in the liquid propane. These properties make propane ideal for recycling the used engine oil, but there are many other issues that have to be considered. Propane is hazardous and flammable therefore this process is regarded as a hazardous process. Also, the extraction involves solvent losses, and highly skilled operating maintenance. In addition, extraction occurs at pressures higher than 10 atm and requires high pressure sealing systems which makes solvent extraction plants expensive to construct, operate and the method also produces remarkable amounts of hazardous by-products [14].
Membrane technology is another method for regeneration of used lubricating oils. In this method three types of polymer hollow fiber membranes [polyethersulphone (PES), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), and polyacrylonitrile (PAN)] were used for recycling the used engine oils. The process is carried out at 40 °C and 0.1 MPa pressure. The process is a continuous operation as it removes metal particles and dusts from used engine oil and improves the recovered oils liquidity and flash point. Despite the above mentioned advantages, the expensive membranes may get damaged and fouled by large particles [15].
Vacuum distillation and hydrogenation are two other methods that can be used for recycling used engine oil [16]. The Kinetics Technology International (KTI) process is a combination of vacuum distillation and hydrofinishing. This method removes most of the contaminants from the waste oil. The process starts with atmospheric distillation to eliminate water and light hydrocarbons. This is then followed by vacuum distillation at a temperature of 250 °C. The final stage is hydrogenation of the products to eliminate the sulphur, nitrogen and oxygenated compounds. This stage is also used to improve the color and odor of the oil. The product can be of quality standard (Gp.I) with a yield of approximately 82% and minimized polluting by-products. The disadvantage of this method is the high investment cost [17,18].
In this research glacial acetic acid was used for recycling used engine oils. The method provides a lower cost process in comparison with the conventional methods due to the low cost of the acid and the moderate conditions of the process. The recycled oil obtained by this method has been shown to have potential for reuse as an engine lubricant.

2. Experimental Apparatus and Procedure

2.1. Experiment

For the purpose of this study a series of experiments have been carried out for two kinds of collected oils. The oils were collected from car oil change shops and from personal cars after 3000 to 3500 km in use. The type of base oil used in this study is Ravenol (VSi SAE 5W-40), manufactured in Werther, Germany. In order to confirm the ability of glacial acetic acid to separate the base oil from the contaminated substances many random experiments were carried out. The first experiment was carried out with the oils collected from the shops. The oil was heated to a temperature of over 250 °C for one hour, for the purpose of evaporating the water and the volatile substances in the used oil. This is to mimic the procedure used by the acid-clay method. The oil was then cooled to room temperature (16 °C, winter) and then equal amounts of this oil (10 mL) were added to a number of beakers. Different quantities of glacial acetic acid were then added to the used oils in the beakers. The amounts of the acid added were 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, and 2 mL to each 10 mL sample. These samples then mixed at 600 rpm for half hour and heated on a hot plate stirrer (LabTech, ES35A-Pro) to a temperature of 25 °C. The beakers were open to the atmosphere. Then the oils resulting from the stirring and heating were centrifuged (Sigma, 2-6E, Sigma Laborzentrifugen GmbH, Osterode am Harz, Germany) immediately for a quarter hour at a speed of 3000 rpm. No separation was observed after this process, besides the absence of change in the treated used oil color. This may be due to the heating which may result in evaporation of acetic acid. This may also be due to the low period of interaction between the acid with the used oil. The second set of experiments were done by increasing the mixing time to half an hour and later to one hour, followed immediately by centrifugation. For the second and third times no separation occurred and the absence of and color changes in the treated used oil was noted.
The third experiment was undertaken using covered beakers and the mixing process was performed for one hour at room temperature. The mixture was then left at room temperature for 24 hours before being placed in the centrifuge. Two layers were separated, a clear reddish lubricant oil layer and sludge at the bottom of the test tube. The lube oil separated from the sludge easily because the sludge was concentrated at the end of the test tubes. Both the lube oil and the sludge were weighed. In order to measure the weight of the sludge, the test tube was heated and then the sludge was removed from the tube using pieces of cotton. The cotton has been weighed in advance and the cotton with the sludge was dried in an oven (Memmert, UF110, Schwabach, Germany) at 50 °C for 24 hours. After drying, the weight of the sludge was confirmed to be 0.2 to 0.4 gm/10 gm sample of the used oil. The balance used in weighing is from Denver Instrument (Denver, S/SI-603, Denver, CO, USA).
The results indicated that the amount of sludge increased as the amount of acid added to the samples increased, up to a certain limit. Up to the 1.0 mL acid added/10 mL used oil the sludge collected was black in color, rigid and compacted in a small area in the bottom of the test tube after the centrifugation process. The sludge changed significantly after increasing the acid volume above 1.0 mL/10 mL used oil. The sludge became more like an emulsion and yellow in color, and it also occupied a quarter of the test tube. The experiments done with the first kind of the lubricant oil (the oil collected from the shops) were repeated for the second kind, personal cars lubricant oils of the Ravenol brand (VSi SAE 5W-40) collected after being in use for 3000 to 3500 km. The treatment procedure performed was similar to that applied for the oil collected from the shops. The experiments carried out using the used oil from personal cars gave better results regarding the clarity compared to the treated used oil collected from the oil-change shops. It worth noting that the oil-change shops in Koya city collect used oil from both compression ignition (CI) and spark ignition (SI) engines crankcases.

2.2. Experimental Procedures

Used cars lubricant oils have been collected from car oil-change shops in Koya city/Erbil-Iraq and personal cars after being in use for 3000 to 3500 km. These oils were collected in containers of 20 L each and then after mixing well by hand shaking for 15 min they were subdivided into smaller containers of 5 liters.
The recycling process started with removing the contamination from the used engine oil. Glacial acetic acid was mixed with the used engine oil using a ratio of 0.8 mL acetic acid to 10 mL used engine oil. This was followed by stirring in a closed container at room conditions (room temperature and pressure) for one hour. The mixture was left for 24 hours at room conditions and then underwent centrifugation for one hour to separate the base oil from the contaminants. The separated base oil was then mixed with kaolinite at a ratio of 1 mL oil to 4 g kaolinite. The kaolinite was added to remove the dark color and the smell which result from oxidation of some components in the oil. This was achieved by heating to a temperature slightly higher than 250 °C, followed by centrifugation for 30 min. This process produced a yellow clear base oil and an amount of sludge very close to the initial weight of the kaolinite used plus 5 wt%. The sludge measurement followed the same procedure in Section 2.1. Figure 1 below illustrates the schematic diagram of the test rig used in carrying out the experiments.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the test rig.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the test rig.
Energies 06 01023 g001
The second step in the recycling process was measuring the chemical and the physical properties of the resulting materials by performing oil analysis (OA). The materials that have undergone analysis are: the base engine oil produced by the acetic acid-clay method, base oil produced by local companies in Kurdistan region using the sulfuric acid-clay method, base oil resulting from vacuum distillation-clay treatment, base oils (Ravenol, VSi SAE 5W-40), used engine oil and the by-product (sludge).
Oil analyses (OA) is the laboratory analysis of the engine oils’ physical and chemical properties, suspended contaminants and wear debris. Oil analysis is performed during routine preventive maintenance to provide meaningful and accurate information on lubricant and machine condition. By tracking oil analysis sample results over the life of a particular machine, trends can be established which can help eliminate costly repairs. Oil analysis can be divided into three categories:
Analysis of oil physical and chemical properties including tests such as: Flash Points by Cleveland Open Cup Tester ASTM D 92 [19], Pour Point ASTM D 97 [20], Viscosity Index ASTM D 2270 [21], Water and Sediment ASTM D 4007 [22], Rams bottom Carbon Residue ASTM D 524 [23], Total acid number (TAN) ASTM D 664 [24], Total Base Number (TBN) ASTM D 4739 [25], Refractive Index ASTM D 1218 [26], and Density (Specific Gravity) ASTM D 1298 [27].
Analysis of metallic contained by atomic absorption spectrometer (AAS).
Analysis of oxidative components by a Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Thermo Mattson Nicolet 300-FTIR). The carbonyl groups have absorption peaks in the range of 1700 to 1750 cm−1.
The metallic content analysis was performed by atomic absorption spectrometry using a fast sequential atomic absorption spectrometer (Varian, AA280 FS). Before the analysis the used engine oil sample was heated to 60 °C and stirred to ensure homogeneity of the sample, it was then mixed with 10 volumes of kerosene [28]. Sets of organometallic standards of metal (Zn, Cd, Cu, Fe, Ca, Pb, Sn, Mg and Mn) 4-cyclohexylbutyric acid salts were prepared and metal concentrations were determined by introducing the test solutions of engine oil samples into the flame of the atomic absorption spectrophotometer and recording the responses. Metal concentrations were determined from the calibration curve that was obtained from standard solutions. Standard solutions for all metals in engine oil samples were prepared according to Varian Techtron Pty LTD and ASTM D 4628-2 [29,30].
The specification of the apparatus used to carry out the experiments and the oil analysis are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Specifications of the apparatus used in the experiments.
Table 1. Specifications of the apparatus used in the experiments.
ApparatusTypeModelSpecifications
ScaleDenverS/SI-603Scale range: 0–600 g, readability: 0.001 g and accuracy: 0.002 g
OvenMemmertUF110Forced air circulation, resolution of display for set point values 0.1 °C up to 99.9 °C, 0.5 °C from 100 °C to 300 °C, dimension (w × h × d): 560 × 480 × 400 mm
Hot plateLabTechES35A-ProSpeed range: 0–1500 rpm, heating rate 6 K/min, heating temp. Range: ambient to 340 °C, dimension: 280 × 160 × 85 mm, display: analog scale.
CentrifugeSigma2-6Speed pre-selection up to 4000 rpm, low speed operation from 100 rpm, stainless steel bowl
Atomic Absorber spectrometer (AAS)Varian AA280 FSFlame AA instrument, PC-controlled, double-beam Atomic Absorption spectrometer with Fast Sequential operation.
Fourier transform Infrared spectrometer (FT-IR)Thermo ScientificThermo Mattson Nicolet 300-FTIRFTIR machine equally handles solids and liquids

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Physical and Chemical Properties

3.1.1. Flash Point

The flash point of an engine oil is the lowest temperature to which the oil must be heated under specified conditions to give off sufficient vapor to form a mixture with air that can be ignited spontaneously by a specified flame. The flash point of engine oil is an indication of the oil’s contamination. A substantially low flash point of an engine oil is a reliable indicator that the oil has become contaminated with volatile products such as gasoline. In the presence of 3.5% fuel or greater in used engine oils the flash point will potentially reduce to below 55 °C. The flash point is also an aid in establishing the identity of a particular petroleum product. The flash point increases with increasing molecular mass of the oil. Oxidation would result in formation of volatile components which leads to decrease the flash point. [31]. Table 2 shows flash point values of different samples. The flash point of the base oil (Ravenol, VSi SAE 5W-40) is 232 °C because it is contains many different additives which contribute to improving its flash point. In contrast, the flash point of the measured used engine oil is 158 °C. This decrease in flash point is a result of contamination with fuel and oxidation products [31]. On one hand, the table clearly shows that the flash point of the base oil is highly affected by adding sulfuric acid (185 °C, row 9). On the other hand it is slightly affected by adding acetic acid (210 °C, row 10) which indicates the destructive and complex effect of sulfuric acid even on the virgin oil. The flash point of the base oil produced using acetic acid treatment combined with vacuum distillation (220 °C, row 4) is giving comparable results to that produced by professional companies using sulfuric acid (222 °C, row 2) and the marketed base oil (232 °C, row 1). The comparable results between the flash points of the two recycling methods are clearly showing the ability of glacial acetic acid to restore the used engine oil.
Table 2. Analysis of results of physical and chemical properties of different oil samples.
Table 2. Analysis of results of physical and chemical properties of different oil samples.
NoSamplesFlash point °CPour point °CKinematic viscosity@ (40 °C)Kinematic viscosity@ (100 °C)Viscosity indexRefractive indexSpecific gravity
1Base engine oil (Ravenol, VSi SAE 5W-40)232−13195.6218100.271.48860.8818
2Marketed engine oil Recycled from used engine oil by professional recycling companies using acid (H2SO4) clay method and evaporation after adding the required additives222−10169.51697.071.48690.8828
3Used engine oil (being in use for 2000–3000 km)158−5136.613.589.111.47630.9261
4Oil resulting from recycling the used engine oil by acetic acid (adding CH3COOH + mixing + clay treatment + centrifugation) + vacuum distillation220−9.861.57.889.001.48330.8697
5Oil resulting from recycling the used engine oil by acetic acid (adding CH3COOH + mixing + clay treatment + centrifugation)190−980.258.582.471.48120.8768
6Oil resulting from recycling the used engine oil by sulfuric acid (adding H2SO4 + mixing + clay treatment + centrifugation)200−972.5984.451.48220.8707
7Oil resulting from pretreatment of the used engine oil by acetic acid (adding CH3COOH + mixing + centrifugation)165−8130.51391.841.48120.8838
8Oil resulting from pretreatment of the used engine oil by sulfuric acid (adding H2SO4 + mixing + centrifugation)180−71201295.221.47850.8707
9Oil resulting from mixing the base engine oil with acetic acid (adding CH3COOH + mixing)210−11.8182.715.689.181.48650.8717
10Oil resulting from mixing the base engine oil with sulfuric acid (adding H2SO4 + mixing)185−9.5175.67.889.301.47860.8707

3.1.2. Pour Point

The pour point of an engine oil is the lowest temperature at which the oil will remain in a flowing state. Most engine base oils contain waxes and paraffins that solidify at cold temperatures. Engine oils with high wax and paraffin content will have a higher pour point. Pour point is highly affected by an oil’s viscosity, and engine oils with high viscosity are characterized by having high pour points. The pour point of an engine oil is an important variable, especially when starting the engine in cold weather. The oil must have the ability to flow into the oil pump and then be pumped to the various part of the engine, even at low temperatures [32]. Table 2 shows the pour point values of different samples. Acids are added to the base oil to examine their effect on the oil’s composition. The pour point of the base oil was not notably affected by the addition of acetic acid. There was a small change in the pour point of around 1.2 °C, but this value rose to 3.5 °C when sulfuric acid was added. It is also obvious that recycling the used oil with acetic acid combined with a vacuum distillation gave remarkable results (−9.8 °C) and it is very comparable to the oil recycled using the acid-clay method (−10 °C). The result of the acetic acid method is before adding the required additives to the oil. It is important to mention that the oil treated by acid-clay method before introducing the required additives only measures a pour point of −9 °C (row 6).

3.1.3. Kinematic Viscosities

Viscosity is a state function of temperature, pressure and density. There is an inverse relationship between viscosity and temperature, when the temperature of the engine oil decreases the viscosity increases and vice versa. Viscosity testing can indicate the presence of contamination in used engine oil. The oxidized and polymerized products dissolved and suspended in the oil may cause an increase of the oil viscosity, while decreases in the viscosity of engine oils indicate fuel contamination [33]. Oxidation of base oils during use in an engine environment produces corrosive oxidized products, deposits, and varnishes which lead to an increase in the viscosity [33]. Kinematic viscosity for different samples at two temperatures is shown in Table 2. The same viscosity test results have been predicted when acetic acid is added to the base oil at 40 and 100 °C. Kinematic viscosity at 40 °C was slightly affected by the addition of acetic acid to the base oil (182.7 cSt). The same result was predicted at 100 °C. The base oil lost only 13% of its original kinematic viscosity value. However, while the kinematic viscosity of the base oil was not greatly affected by the addition of sulfuric acid at 40 °C, it lost more than 50% of its value at 100 °C. These results show the destructive effect of sulfuric acid on the oil. It would appear that recycling the used oil with acetic acid (row 5) or sulfuric acid (row 6) is giving very comparable results at both temperatures (40 °C and 100 °C). The results of recycling with both methods reduced the kinematic viscosity of the used oil from 13.5 to 8.5 and 9 cSt, respectively. This means that the two methods are effective in removing the oxidized products, deposits, and varnishes from the used oil [33]. This may also mean removing the additives which have been added to enhance the viscosity.

3.1.4. Viscosity Index

Viscosity Index is strictly an empirical number and indicates the effect of change in temperature on viscosity. A high viscosity index indicates a small change in viscosity with temperature, which also means better protection of an engine that operates under vast temperature variations. Viscosity index improvers is among the common additives that improve the efficiency of the oil, however, engine oil with a high addition level of viscosity index improvers tends to degrade more rapidly. A high viscosity index is due to the absence of aromatic and volatile compounds. It also means good thermal stability and low temperature flow behaviors [34]. Table 2 shows very similar effects of both acids on the viscosity index when added to the base oil. The table shows that the viscosity index of the recycled used oil with acetic acid 89.00 (row 4) deviated slightly from that of the used oil 89.11 (row 3). This clearly indicates the low destructive effect acetic acid has on the viscosity index improver additives. It also seems that clay treatment contributes to a reduction in the viscosity index by approximately 10%, reduced from 91.84 (row 7) to 82.47 (row 5).

3.1.5. Refractive Index

Refractive index (RI) is the ratio of the light velocity in vacuum to the light velocity in substances at a specific temperature. The measurement of the refractive index is very simple, and requires small quantities of the samples. The refractive index can be used to provide valuable information about the composition of engine oils. Low values of refractive index indicate the presence of paraffin material while high values indicate the presence of aromatic compounds. It is also used to estimate other physical prosperities such as molecular mass [35]. Table 2 shows a base oil refractive index value of 1.4886. This is due to the presence of additives like polymers, polar organic compound, organic compounds, different metals, copolymers of olefins and hydrogenated diene styrene copolymers [35]. These components increase the molecular mass of the base oil and consequently its refractive index [35]. The results also indicate the low destructive action of the acetic acid, mixing the base oil with this acid reduces the RI by a small fraction of around 0.2%. In contrast, the addition of sulfuric acid reduces the RI by 0.7%. The same results are predicted after the recycling of the used engine oil with acetic acid and sulfuric acid.

3.1.6. Density (Specific Gravity)

Specific gravity is the ratio of the mass of volume of substance to the mass of the same volume of water and depends on two temperatures, at which the mass of the sample and the water are measured. Specific gravity is influenced by the chemical composition of the oil. An increase in the amount of aromatic compounds in the oil results in an increase in the specific gravity, while an increase in the saturated compounds results in a decrease in the specific gravity. An approximate correlation exists between the specific gravity, sulfur content, carbon residues, viscosity and nitrogen content [36]. Used engine oils specific gravity increases with the presence of increasing amounts of solids in the used engine oil. One percent of weight of solids in the sample can raise the specific gravity by 0.007 [36]. Used engine oil is contaminated with oxidized and condensed products rich in carbon. As shown in Table 2, base oil has a specific gravity of 0.8818, which is low compared to the used engine oil specific gravity of 0.9261. The high value of specific gravity of used engine oil is due to the presence of oxidation products, metals and contamination. Both acids have almost the same effect on the specific gravity when added to the base oil. The oil’s specific gravity resulted from treatment by acetic acid combined with a vacuum distillation (0.8697) which is quite good compared to the virgin oil (0.8818), however this is before the introduction of the required additives to the recycled oil.

3.2. Water and Sediments

Water is generally referred to as a chemical contamination when suspended in engine oils. Water contamination of engine oil affects the oil quality, condition and wear of engines in service. The water content in engine oil is governed by the oil composition, physicochemical properties, production technology and conditions of storage and use. Water created in engine oil is a result of: absorbing moisture directly from the air (oil is hygroscopic), condensation (humid air entering oil compartments), heat exchanger (corroded or leaky heat exchangers), combustion (fuel combustion forms water which may enter the lubricant oil through worn rings), oxidation (chemical reaction) and neutralization (when alkalinity improvers neutralize acids formed during combustion), and free water entry (during oil changes). Water can prompt a host of chemical reactions such as hydrolysis of compounds and atomic species including oil additives base stock and suspended contaminants. In combination with oxygen, heat and metal catalyst, water is known to promote the oxidation and the formation of free radicals and peroxide compounds. Water attacks additives such as oxidation inhibitors, rust inhibitor, viscosity improver and the oil's base stock forming sludge. The water and sediment content of engine oil is significant because it can cause corrosion of equipment and problems in processing [37]. As shown in Table 3, base oil has water and sediment content values of zero due to the dehydration steps involved in producing base oils. In addition, introducing additives to the oil is minimizing the ratio of water and sediment to zero or near zero. It is obvious from the table that adding sulfuric acid to the virgin oil leads to different results to those seen when adding acetic acid. Water and sediments content of the base oil after adding the sulfuric acid is 0.6 mL/25 mL sample, compared to adding acetic acid <0.01 mL/25 mL sample. This clearly states the high reactivity of sulfuric acid with the materials that form the oil, one reaction being oxidation. The sulfuric acid-clay treatment shows a water content of <0.01 mL/25 mL sample because this method involves evaporation of the oil for more than one hour which helps in reducing the water content to this level. The same result as the sulfuric acid-clay method was achieved when adding acetic acid combined with vacuum distillation.

3.3. Carbon Residue

The amount of carbonaceous residue remaining after thermal decomposition of engine oil in a limited amount of air is also called coke or carbon forming tendency. The test for carbon residue can be used at the same time to evaluate the carbonaceous depositing characteristics of engine oils used in internal combustion engines. The carbon residue value of engine oil is regarded as indicative of the amount of carbonaceous deposits engine oil would form in the combustion chamber of an engine. It is now considered to be of doubtful significance due to the presence of additives in many oils. For example, an ash-forming detergent additive can increase the carbon residue value of engine oil yet will generally reduce its tendency to form deposits [38]. The carbon residue in base oil produced from raw petroleum materials is 0.55 wt%, which is 0.27 wt% lower than that produced by the recycling of used oil by the sulfuric acid-clay method, as shown in Table 3. This may be due to the complex reactions of the oil’s components with sulfuric acid which may increase the sulfur content of the oil. A more precise relationship between carbon residue and hydrogen content, (H=C) atomic ratio, nitrogen and sulfur content have been shown to exist [38]. The recycling of the used oil by acetic acid combined with a vacuum distillation appears to provide better results. The carbon residue of this oil is slightly higher by 0.04 wt% than the base oil. As shown in the table, adding acetic acid to the base oil has increased the carbon residue by only 0.08 wt%. In contrast, adding sulfuric acid led to a greater increase in the carbon residue by 0.69 wt%. This clearly indicates the formation of components that have direct influence on the carbon residue of the oil.

3.4. Total Acid Number (TAN)

Total Acid number (TAN) is the weight (in milligrams) of potassium hydroxide required to neutralize one gram of the materials in the oil that will react with (KOH) under specific test conditions. The usual major components of such materials are organic acids, soaps of heavy metals. As engine oils are subjected to elevated temperatures, the process of oxidation occurs. Oxidation leads to the formation of organic acids in the engine oil. Total acid number (TAN) has been considered to be an important indicator for engine oil quality, specifically in terms of defining oxidation states. The presence of oxygen, in most engine oils environments, and hydrocarbons which make up the base oil lead to some reactions. This reaction may lead to the formation of carbonyl-containing products (primary oxidation products), subsequently these undergo further oxidation to produce carboxylic acids (secondary products) which results in an increase in the TAN value [39]. In addition, with time and elevated temperature, the oxidation products formed then polymerize leading to precipitation of sludge which decreases the efficiency of engine oil and causes excessive wear [39]. As shown in Table 3, the TAN of the used engine oil is measured to be 4.5 mg (KOH)/g (sample) which is much higher than the TAN of the base oils [0.02 mg (KOH)/g (sample)]. This is due to the presence of organic, inorganic, heavy metal salts, ammonia slots, resin, water and corrosive materials which result from the oxidation process that occurred at elevated temperatures in the engine [39]. The addition of sulfuric acid to the base oil has increased the TAN by 1 mg (KOH)/g (sample) compared to addition of acetic acid. It has been interpreted that the low acidity of the used oil when recycled with sulfuric acid is mostly due to the evaporation stage and clay processing rather than the acid action. The recycled oil by sulfuric acid without these two processes (row 8) is high in TAN around 2 mg (KOH)/g (sample).
Table 3. Analysis results of sediments and acidity of different samples.
Table 3. Analysis results of sediments and acidity of different samples.
No.SamplesWater and Sediment (mL)Carbon residue (Wt %)(TAN) mg KOH/g(sample)(TBN) mg KOH/g(sample)
1Base engine oil (Ravenol, VSi SAE 5W-40)Zero0.550.023.55
2Marketed engine oil. Recycled from used engine oil by professional recycling companies using acid (H2SO4) clay method and steaming after adding the required additives<0.020.820.142.8
3Used engine oil (being in use for 2000–3000 km)0.91.824.50.11
4Oil resulting from recycling the used engine oil by acetic acid (adding CH3COOH + mixing + clay treatment + centrifugation) + vacuum distillation<0.010.590.15-
5Oil resulting from recycling the used engine oil by acetic acid (adding CH3COOH + mixing + clay treatment + centrifugation)<0.010.880.56-
6Oil resulting from recycling the used engine oil by sulfuric acid (adding H2So4 + mixing + clay treatment + centrifugation)<0.010.990.7-
7Oil resulting from pretreatment of the used engine oil by acetic acid (adding CH3COOH + mixing + centrifugation)0.0131.651.8-
8Oil resulting from pretreatment of the used engine oil by sulfuric acid (adding H2SO4 + mixing + centrifugation)0.81.072-
9Oil resulting from mixing the base engine oil with acetic acid (adding CH3COOH + mixing)<0.010.621.52.5
10Oil resulting from mixing the base engine oil with sulfuric acid (adding H2SO4 + mixing)0.61.232.60.5

3.5. Total Base Number (TBN)

Internal combustion engine oils are formulated with a highly alkaline base additives package to neutralize the acidic products composition. The TBN is a measure of this package and it may be used as an indication for the engine oil’s replacement time. This is because TBN depletes with time in service. Higher oil TBN values are more effective at neutralizing acids for longer periods of time. The rate of consumption of the additives is an indication of the projected service life of the oil [40]. As shown in Table 3 adding acetic acid to the base oil causes a small decline in the alkalinity of the oil from 3.55 to 2.5 mg KOH/g (sample). In contrast, adding sulfuric acid has reduced the alkalinity of the base oil by 96%. It is also obvious that the alkalinity is a result of the additives because the used oil’s alkalinity is only 0.11 mg KOH/g (sample). TBN values for base oil (row 1) and that recycled using the sulfuric acid method (row 2) are 3.55 mg KOH/g (sample) and 2.8 mg KOH/g (sample), respectively. These values show higher TBN values than the TBN value of used engine oil [0.11 mg KOH/g (sample)]. This is due to the presence of a high alkaline additive package that was not depleted and has the ability to neutralize large quantity of acids, organic, inorganic bases including amino compounds and certain salts of heavy metals [40]. Used oil’s TBN is low due to the depletion of the additive package as a result of the high temperature and the acid effect of water and oxidant product contamination. Base oil mixed with glacial acetic acid and concentrated 98% H2SO4 have TBN values 2.5 mg KOH/g (sample) and 0.5 mg KOH/g (sample), respectively. This clearly illustrates the lower effect of acetic acid on the oil’s components.

3.6. Engine Oil’s Metallic Content

Metals are regarded as heteroatoms found in engine oil mixtures. The amounts of metals are in range of a few hundred to thousands of ppm and their amounts increase with an increase in the boiling points or decrease in the API gravity of the engine oil. Engine oils’ metallic constituents are associated with heavy compounds and they mainly appear in the residues. Base and base engine oils have very little metal content, which indicates their purity. Some metals present in virgin oils in high concentrations are in the form of various additives which improve the performance of the engine oil. Many others are introduced in to the oils after using due to depletion of various additives, engine bearings or bushings, and dilution of the engine oil with fuel containing metal additives [41]. Metals are found in used engine oil in two forms:
▪ Metal particulate contamination
Metallic particulates enter the engine oil as a consequence of the breakdown of oil-wetted surfaces due to ineffective lubrication, mechanical working, abrasion erosion and/or corrosion. Metallic particles from deteriorating component surfaces are generally hard and increase the wear rate as their concentration in the oil increases.
▪ Elemental (Metals)
Many oil constituents contain metallic elements that have been added to enhance the oil’s efficiency. In general, metals in engine oils regarded as contaminants that should be removed completely in order to produce suitable base oil for producing new virgin oil [42]. Copper (Cu) is introduced to engine oils after use from bearings, wearing and valve guides. Engine oil coolers can also be contributing to copper content along with some oil additives [43]. The recycled oil with acetic acid combined with a vacuum distillation has a copper concentration of 0.4 ppm compared to zero ppm in oil recycled by sulfuric acid as shown in Table 4. This is because sulfuric acid is more reactive with copper than acetic acid and forms a precipitate. Magnesium is normally introduced into engine oil in an additive package. Magnesium is regarded as the most common wear metals in used engine oil and is present in virgin oil in the form of magnesium phenates and magnesium salicylates that behave as antioxidants at high temperatures [44]. Table 4 shows that the concentration of magnesium (Mg) in the base oil was affected more when sulfuric acid was added compared to acetic acid. This is again is due to the reactivity of sulfuric acid with the Mg, which may lead to precipitated compounds. Chromium presence in engine oil is normally associated with piston ring wear. High levels can be caused by dirt coming through the air intake or broken rings. Chromium may indicate excessive wear of chromed parts such as rings and liners [45]. As Table 4 is showing, the amount of chromium is very low, even in the used oil because this metal is persisting only in some parts of the engine. The recycling with acetic acid combined with a vacuum distillation seems to reduce the amount of this metal from 1.5 ppm to 0.2 ppm. The same result is shown in Table 4 in regards to tin. Tin is introduced into the oil after usd from piston wear, certain shaft types, bearings or bushings and valve guides [46]. Tin must be removed completely from base oils because it regarded as a contaminant. Lead (Pb) is associated with bearing wear, fuel source (leaded gasoline), and contamination due to the use of galvanized containers [47]. Lead concentration in virgin oils is zero because it is regarded as a base oil contaminant. Used engine oil has a lead concentration of 14.6 ppm as shown in Table 4. This is due to dilution of the engine oil by leaded gasoline that has been treated with tetraethyl lead as anti-knocking and engine part wear. The recycling with acetic acid combined with a vacuum distillation is very active in removing this metal. It helped to reduce the used oil content of this metal from 14.6 to 0.4 ppm. The most common wear metal in a car's engine that is introduced into the engine oil after a period of use is iron. Iron comes from many various places in the engine such as liners, camshafts and crank shaft, pistons, gears, rings, and oil pump. Iron concentration in engine oil depends on the bearing conditions inside the engine. If a bearing fails, iron concentrations in used engine oil increases. In the engine, the wear rises at a faster rate during the starting of the engine [48]. Base oils must be free from iron completely because it participates in producing oxidation products due to different chemical reactions. It is also clear that recycling with acetic acid combined with a vacuum distillation is very efficient in completely removing the metal. Zinc is introduced to base oil in the form of additives package as anti-oxidant, corrosion inhibitor, anti-wear, detergent and extreme pressure tolerance. Zinc is introduced in to base oil as additives, such as [49]:
Zinc diethyldithiophosphate (ZDDP), which functions as an oxidation inhibitor that increases the oxidation resistance of the oil.
Zinc dithiophosphates, this is not only acts as an anti-oxidant, but also acts as a wear inhibitor and protects the engine metals against corrosion.
Zinc dialkyldithiocarbamates, this compound is mainly used as anti-oxidants but it is also has extreme pressure activity.
Zinc concentration in the base oil is 1,200 ppm, as shown in Table 4. This is added to the base oils as part of multi-functional additives for improving the oils’ performance. The used engine oil content of zinc is 1280 ppm. The increase in the zinc concentration in used engine oil results from wearing of the galvanized piping. Adding sulfuric acid to the base oil leads to the reduction in zinc content by 28% compared to 11% with acetic acid. Sulfuric acid reacts with zinc to produce precipitated compounds. Manganese (Mn) is introduced from wear of cylinder liners, valves, and shafts [50]. As shown in Table 4 only a small amount of manganese is present in the used engine oil. Recycling with acetic acid combined with vacuum distillation is very effective in complete removal of this metal. Cadmium (Cd) is introduced in the engine oil as a contaminant during use. Base oils are free from cadmium [51]. It is clear from Table 4 that cadmium only has a count of 1 ppm in the used oil and it can be completely removed by acetic acid treatment.
Table 4. Analysis results of metal content of different samples.
Table 4. Analysis results of metal content of different samples.
No.SamplesCu (ppm)Mg (ppm)Cr (ppm)Sn (ppm)Pb (ppm)Fe (ppm)Zn (ppm)Mn (ppm)Cd (ppm)
1Base engine oil (Ravenol, VSi SAE 5W-40)0720000120000
2Marketed engine oil. Recycled from used engine oil by professional recycling companies using acid (H2SO4) clay method after adding the required additives0680000105000
3Used engine oil (being in use for 2000–3000 km)4.6811.51.614.67212801.51
4Oil resulting from recycling the used engine oil by acetic acid (adding CH3COOH + mixing + clay treatment + centrifugation) + vacuum distillation0.40.80.20.20.404100
5Oil resulting from recycling the used engine oil by acetic acid (adding CH3COOH + mixing + clay treatment + centrifugation)1.63.20.70.73.23.281.60.50.4
6Oil resulting from recycling the used engine oil by sulfuric acid (adding H2So4 + mixing + clay treatment + centrifugation)0.920.40.64.51.2540.20.1
7Oil resulting from pretreatment of the used engine oil by acetic acid (adding CH3COOH + mixing + centrifugation)3.56650.80.911.2347800.80.45
8Oil resulting from pretreatment of the used engine oil by sulfuric acid (adding H2SO4 + mixing + centrifugation)2.1450.50.65.424.46130.40.2
9Oil resulting from mixing the base engine oil with acetic acid (adding CH3COOH + mixing)0650000107600
10Oil resulting from mixing the base engine oil with sulfuric acid (adding H2SO4 + mixing)057000086500
Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS) was used to measure the metals traces in the oil. The detection limits of the metals presented in Table 4 are shown in Table 5. It is obvious that the metals traces measured are far above the detection limit of the Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS) used in the analysis.
Table 5. Detection limits of the AAS.
Table 5. Detection limits of the AAS.
ElementSymbolDetection Limit (ppm)
CopperCu0.003
MagnesiumMg0.0003
ChromiumCr0.006
TinSn0.1
LeadPb0.01
IronFe0.006
ZincZn0.001
ManganeseMn0.002
CadmiumCd0.002

3.7. Sludge Analysis

A secondary oxidation phase occurs at high temperatures where the viscosity of the bulk medium increases as a result of the polycondensation of the difunctional oxygenated products formed in the primary oxidation phase such as carboxylic acids. Further polycondensation and polymerization reactions of these high molecular weight intermediates form products which are no longer soluble in the hydrocarbon. The resulting precipitate is called sludge. Under thin-film oxidation conditions, as in the case of a lubricant film on a metal surface, varnish-like deposits are formed. The polycondensation reactions lead to high molecular weight intermediates (sludge precursors) [52].
The sludge produced has been analyzed for metals content. The analysis was done for the sludge collected from three resources; sludge resulting from centrifugation of the used oil directly before carrying out any further treatment (column three), after treatment with sulfuric acid-clay and after treatment with acetic acid-clay. The sludge collected from direct centrifugation was very low in quantity due to failure of centrifugation alone to precipitate contaminant in the used oil. As shown in Table 6, the sludge resulting from acetic acid-clay treatment is richer in metals than the one treated with the sulfuric acid-clay method. This high content of metals explains the lower losses in the sludge weight (~70%) when heated to 800 °C for three hours compared to sulfuric acid-clay method (~95%). This confirms the ability of acetic acid to precipitate the metal content in the used oil by 25% more than the sulfuric acid method.
Table 6. Analysis results of the sludge.
Table 6. Analysis results of the sludge.
SamplesSludge Analysis
Sludge resulted from acid-clay method + centrifugationSludge resulted from acetic acid-clay method + centrifugationSludge resulted from used oil
Losing in ignition at 800 °C for 3 hours %94.71469.941795.448
Na0.1700.790.223
Cu0.28NilNil
Pb1.111.170.0736
AgNilNilNil
Ni0.0580.64Nil
Mg0.283.74Nil
VNilNilNil
Mo1.331.91Nil
AlNil0.44Nil
SnNilNilNil
TiNilNilNil
Ca1.312.231.28
BaNilNilNil
Cr0.8119.30.9655
SiO2Nil8.2Nil
Total99.567499.521798.0111

3.8. Color

Different categories of the engine oil were pictured to show the color changes that the oil went through during the process. As shown in Figure 2 and Table 7, the base oil (column 9) has changed color and become highly opaque (column 6) due to the vigorous reaction with sulfuric acid. In contrast, the base oil did not show any change in color when mixed with acetic acid (column 7) due to its low reactivity of acetic acid with the base oil. The acetic acid has shown a high reactivity with the contaminants in the used oil, and columns 5 and 8 show the base oil results from treatment with sulfuric acid and acetic acid, respectively. It is obvious that the base oil resulting from acetic acid treatment is brighter and has a clear yellowish color.
Figure 2. Pictures of the engine oil samples as described in Table 7.
Figure 2. Pictures of the engine oil samples as described in Table 7.
Energies 06 01023 g002
Table 7. Description of the engine oil samples in Figure 2.
Table 7. Description of the engine oil samples in Figure 2.
No.Description
1Used engine oil
2Used engine oil after centrifugation only
3Used engine oil treated with sulfuric acid after mixing for 1 hour
4Used engine oil treated with glacial acetic acid after mixing for 1 hour
5Base oil produced by using sulfuric acid
6Base oil (Ravinol type) + concentrated H2SO4 + mixing for 1 hour
7Base oil (Ravinol type) + glacial acetic acid + mixing for 1 hour
8Base oil produced by using glacial acetic acid
9Base oil (Ravinol type)
10Base oil produced by vacuum distillation and clay treatment

3.9. Engine Oil Oxidation Products Analysis

Oxidation of engine oil inside the engine is related to the availability of oxygen and in-cylinder pressure and temperature [52]. It can be divided into two types: oxidation at low and high temperatures. Oxidation of engine oil at low temperatures leads to alkylhydroperoxides ROOH, dialkylperoxides ROOR, alcohols ROH, aldehydes RCHO and ketones RR′C=O. In addition, cleavage of a dihydroperoxide leads to diketones RCO(CH2)xCOR′, ketoaldehydes RCO(CH2)xCHO, and hydroxyketones RCH(OH)–(CH2)xCOR′ [53]. At high temperatures (>120 °C) the engine oil oxidation process can be divided into a primary and a secondary oxidation phase. In the primary oxidation phase the initiation and propagation of the radical chain reaction are the same as discussed under low-temperature conditions, but selectivity is reduced and reaction rates increased. At high temperatures the cleavage of hydroperoxides plays the most important role. Carboxylic acids (RCOOH) form, which represents one of the principal products under these oxidation conditions. In a subsequent step they can react with alcohols R′OH to form esters (RCOOR′). The termination reaction proceeds through primary and secondary peroxy radicals, but at temperatures above 120 °C these peroxy radicals also interact in a non-terminating way to give primary and secondary alkoxy radicals [54]. The secondary oxidation phase happens at higher temperatures where the viscosity of the bulk medium increases as a result of the polycondensation of the difunctional oxygenated products formed in the primary oxidation phase. Further polycondensation and polymerization reactions of these high molecular weight intermediates lead to form sludge [53]. Reaction oxidation compounds in oil samples determined qualitatively by obtaining their IR spectra in a Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Thermo Mattson Nicolet 300-FTIR). A spectral band at 1700–1750 cm−1 indicated the presence of oxidation compounds, because of the fact that (C=O) bond strongly absorbs at this frequencies [55].
The IR results of the base oil as shown in Figure 3 and Table 8 showed no peaks of oxidized products which confirm its virginity. IR spectra for used engine oil show a medium peak at 1704.61 cm−1 that indicates the presence of oxidation products in the used engine oil sample, as shown in Figure 4 and Table 9.
Figure 3. Results of analysis of base oil (Ravenol, VSi SAE 5W-40).
Figure 3. Results of analysis of base oil (Ravenol, VSi SAE 5W-40).
Energies 06 01023 g003
Table 8. Results of analysis of base oil (Ravenol, VSi SAE 5W-40).
Table 8. Results of analysis of base oil (Ravenol, VSi SAE 5W-40).
Frequency cm−1Type of vibrationBondFunctional group
653.95StretchC-XAlkyl halide
721.94Bending in plain (roking)C-HAlkenes
818.13Out of plan bendingC-HAlkenes
890.19Out of plan bendingC-HAlkenes
972.81Out of plan bendingC-HAromatic
1155.34WaggingCH2-XAlkyl halide
1306.37WaggingCH2-XAlkyl halide
1377.05Out of plan bendingC-HAlkans
1464.57Bending in plain (scissoring)C-HAlkans
1515.68StretchC=CAromatic
1604.85StretchC=CAromatic
2358.98StretchC ≡ CAlkynes
2727.71StretchC ≡ CAlkynes
2934.97StretchC-HAlkans
Figure 4. Results of analysis of the used engine oil.
Figure 4. Results of analysis of the used engine oil.
Energies 06 01023 g004
Table 9. Results of analysis of the used engine oil.
Table 9. Results of analysis of the used engine oil.
Frequency cm−1Type of vibrationBondFunctional group
722.01Bending in plain (Rocking)C-HAlkans
814.47Out of plan bendingC-HAromatic
889.41Out of plan bendingC-HAromatic
1032.37StretchC-OCarboxylic acid
1155.53StretchC-OCarboxylic acid
1376.86Out of plain bendingC-HCH3
1457.84Bending in plain (Scissoring)C-HAlkan
1605.17StretchC=CAromatic
1704.61StretchC=OCarbonyl compounds
2359.55StretchO-HCarboxylic Acid
2727.6StretchH-C=O:CHAldehyd
2923.03StretchC-HAlkan
IR spectra for used engine oil showed additional peaks at 1032.37, 1155.53 and 2359.55 cm−1 which represent the primary oxydized products at high temperatures. The used oil treated by the acid-clay method still showed some oxidized components as illustrated in Figure 5 and Table 10.
Figure 5. Results of analysis of the recycled oil (after adding the additives) by acid-clay method in local companies in Kurdistan/Iraq.
Figure 5. Results of analysis of the recycled oil (after adding the additives) by acid-clay method in local companies in Kurdistan/Iraq.
Energies 06 01023 g005
Table 10. Results of analysis of the recycled oil by acid-clay method in local companies in Kurdistan/Iraq.
Table 10. Results of analysis of the recycled oil by acid-clay method in local companies in Kurdistan/Iraq.
Frequency cm−1Type of vibrationBondFunctional group
721.79In plan bending (Rocking)C-HAlkenes
814.63Out of plan bendingC-HAlkenes
889.76Out of plan bendingC-HAromatic
965.57Out of plan bendingC-HAromatic
1076.36StretchC-OCarboxylic acid
1155.41StretchC-OCarboxylic acid
1304.64RockC-HAromatic
1376.24Out of plain bendingC-HCH3
1457.43In plain bending (Scissoring)C-HAlkans
1604.83StretchC=CAromatic
2358.96StretchO-HCarboxylic acid
2727.54StretchH-C=O:C-HAldehyde
2958.42StretchC-HAlkans
There are aldehyde components at 1457.43 cm−1 and carboxylic acids at 1076.36 and 1155.41 cm−1. The only difference between the treatment by acid-clay method and vacuum distillation is the absence of aldehyde components as shown in Figure 6 and Table 11. The IR results of the base oil produced by the acetic acid-clay method are represented in Figure 7 and Table 12. This method gives the best results because it shows no aldehyde and no carboxylic acid at 2359.56 cm−1.
Figure 6. Results of analysis of the recycled oil (base oil only before adding the additives) by vacuum distillation-clay method in local companies in Kurdistan/Iraq.
Figure 6. Results of analysis of the recycled oil (base oil only before adding the additives) by vacuum distillation-clay method in local companies in Kurdistan/Iraq.
Energies 06 01023 g006
Table 11. Results of analysis of the recycled oil (base oil only before adding the additives) by vacuum distillation-clay method in local companies in Kurdistan/Iraq.
Table 11. Results of analysis of the recycled oil (base oil only before adding the additives) by vacuum distillation-clay method in local companies in Kurdistan/Iraq.
Frequency cm−1Type of vibrationBondFunctional group
721.86In plan bending (Rocking)C-HAlkan
813.79Out of plan bendingC-HAromatic
889.56Out of plan bendingC-HAromatic
965.43Out of plan bendingC-HAlkan
1032.62StretchC-OCarboxylic acid
1155.37StretchC-OCarboxylic acid
1304.69RockC-HAlkans
1376.94Out of plain bendingC-HCH3
1457.51In plain bending (Scissoring)C-HAlkans
1604.95StretchC=CAromatic
2359.56StretchO-HCarboxylic acid
2727.59StretchC-HAlkans
2922.2StretchC-HAlkans
Figure 7. Results of analysis of the recycled oil (base oil only before adding the additives) by acetic acid-vacuum distillation-clay method.
Figure 7. Results of analysis of the recycled oil (base oil only before adding the additives) by acetic acid-vacuum distillation-clay method.
Energies 06 01023 g007
Table 12. Results of analysis of the recycled oil (base oil only before adding the additives) by acetic acid-vacuum distillation-clay method.
Table 12. Results of analysis of the recycled oil (base oil only before adding the additives) by acetic acid-vacuum distillation-clay method.
Frequency cm−1Type of vibrationBondFunctional group
721.78In plan bending (Rocking)C-HAlkenes
814.64Out of plan bendingC-HAlkenes
872.05Out of plan bendingC-HAromatic
966.3Out of plan bendingC-HAromatic
1032.53StretchC-OCarboxylic acid
1155.19StretchC-OCarboxylic acid
1304.76RockC-HAromatic
1376.42Out of plain bendingC-HCH3
1458.11In plain bending (Scissoring)C-HAlkans
1604.88StretchC=CAromatic
2727.00StretchC-HAlkans
2925.02StretchC-HAlkans
There are aldehyde components at 1457.43 cm−1 and carboxylic acids at 1076.36 and 1155.41 cm−1. The only difference between the treatment by the acid-clay method and vacuum distillation is the absence of aldehyde components, as shown in Figure 6 and Table 11. The IR results of the base oil produced by the acetic acid-clay method are represented in Figure 7 and Table 12. This method gives the best results because it shows no aldehyde and no carboxylic acid at frequency 2359.56 cm−1.

4. Conclusions

This research has shown that used engine oil can be recycled by using glacial acetic acid. This method produces base oil comparable to that produced using conventional methods. Optimum conditions for recycling used engine oil using this method are room temperature and atmospheric pressure. The process for recycling is simple, as it only requires mixing at room temperature, settling, centrifugation and finally mixing with kaolinate. The base oil produced by the glacial acetic acid method is of comparable quality to that produced by the acid-clay method. Also, it has a potential to be reused in cars’ engines after adding the required additives. The glacial acetic acid has shown almost no reaction with base oils, in contrast to sulfuric acid, however it reacted vigorously with the used oil. This clearly indicates that acetic acid is not affecting the original structure of the oil. Furthermore, this is most advantageous of using acetic acid in recycling of used oil. This new process of recycling of used engine oil did not emit poisonous gases like sulfur dioxide to the atmosphere. In addition, glacial acetic acid has less of a negative impact on the processing equipment compared with sulfuric acid. Lower amount of additives may be required for the base oil recycled by acetic acid-clay method due its low reactivity with the used oil. Further research is required in order to take this process to the commercial stage. However, while many variables have been studied in this research, there are many others that need investigation such as temperature, pressure, settling time, mixing, centrifugation speed and type of adsorbent.

References

  1. Hopmans, J.J. The Problem of the Processing of Spent Oil in the Member States of EEC; Report for the European Economic Community (EEC); National Institute for Wastewater Treatment: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kajdas, C. Major pathways for used oil disposal and recycling, Part 1. Tribotest J. 2000, 7, 61–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Boughton, B.; Horvath, A. Environmental assessment of waste oil management methods. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Part 2, Carbon Blacks, Mineral Oils (Lubricant Base Oils and Derived Products) and Some Nitroarenes. In IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; IARC: Lyon, France, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  5. Francois, A. Waste Engine Oils Refining and Energy Recovery, 1st ed.; Elsevier Science and Technology Books: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; pp. 15–31. [Google Scholar]
  6. Whisman, M.L.; Reynolds, J.W.; Goetzinger, J.W.; Cotton, F.O.; Brinkman, D.W. Re-refining makes quality oils. Hydrocarb. Process. 1978, 57, 141–145. [Google Scholar]
  7. Reis, M.A.R.; Jeronimo, M.S. Waste lubricating oil re-refining by extraction-flocculation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1988, 27, 1222–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fox, M.F. Sustainability and environmental aspects of lubricants. In Handbook of Lubrication and Tribology; George, E.D., Totten, E., Eds.; Taylor and Francis: New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  9. Rincon, J.; Canizares, P.; Garcia, M.T. Regeneration of used lubricating oil by polar solvent extraction. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 43–73. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rincon, J.; Canizares, P.; Garcia, M.T. Waste oil recycling using mixtures of polar solvents. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 7854–7859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shakirullah, M.; Ahmed, I.; Saeed, M.; Khan, M.A.; Rehman, H.; Ishaq, M.; Shah, A.A. Environmentally friendly recovery and characterization of oil from used engine lubricants. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 2006, 53, 335–342. [Google Scholar]
  12. Martins, J.P. The extraction-flocculation re-refining lubricating oil process using ternary organic solvents. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1997, 36, 3854–3858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rincon, J.; Canizares, P.; Garcia, M.T.; Gracia, I. Regeneration of used lubricant oil by propane extraction. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42, 4867–4873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Quang, D.V.; Carriero, G.; Schieppati, R.; Comte, A.; Andrews, J.W. Propane purification of used lubricating oils. Hydrocarb. Process. 1974, 53, 129–131. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dang, C.S. Rerefining of used oils—A review of commercial processes. Tribotest 1997, 3, 445–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Beuther, H.; Peno, T.; County, A.; Henke, A.M.; Petreson, R.E. Hydrogenation and Distillation of Lubricating. U.S. Patent 622,312, 15 November 1956. [Google Scholar]
  17. Havemann, R. The KTI used oil re-refining process. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of Used Oil Recovery & Reuse, Houston, TX, USA, 16–18 October 1978.
  18. Puerto-Ferre, E.; Kajdas, C. Clean technology for recycling waste lubricating oils. In Proceedings of 9th International Colloquium, Ecological and Economic Aspects of Tribology, Esslingen, Germany, 14–16 January 1994.
  19. ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) International. Standard Test Method for Flash and Fire Points by Cleveland Open Cup Tester; ASTM Standard D92; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  20. ASTM International. Standard Test Method for Pour Points; ASTM Standard D97; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  21. ASTM International. Standard Practice for Calculating Viscosity Index from Kinematic Viscosity at 40 °C and 100 °C; ASTM Standard D2270; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  22. ASTM International. Standard Test Method for Water and Sediment in Crude Oil by the Centrifuge Method (Laboratory Procedure); ASTM Standard D4007; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  23. ASTM International. Standard Test Method for Ramsbottom Carbon Residue of Petroleum Products; ASTM Standard D524; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  24. ASTM International. Standard Test Method for Acid Number of Petroleum Products by Potentiometric Titration; ASTM Standard D664; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  25. ASTM International. Standard Test Method for Base Number of Petroleum Products by Potentiometric Titration; ASTM Standard D4739; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  26. ASTM International. Standard Test Method for Refractive Index and Refractive Dispersion of Hydrocarbon Liquids; ASTM Standard D1218; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  27. ASTM International. Standard Test Method for Density, Relative Density, or API Gravity of Crude Petroleum and Liquid Petroleum Products by Hydrometer Method; ASTM Standard D1298; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  28. Van Loon, J.C. Analysis of petroleum and petroleum products. In Analytical Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Selected Methods; Academic Press Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  29. Skujins, S. The Analysis of Lubricating Oil Additives; Varian Techtron Application Notes, 4/70; Varian Techtron Pty. Ltd.: Mulgrave, Australia, 1970. [Google Scholar]
  30. ASTM International. Standard Test Method for Analysis of Barium, Calcium, Magnesium, and Zinc in Unused Lubricating Oils by Atomic Absorption Spectrometry; ASTM Standard D4628-02; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lenoir, J.M. Predict flash points accurately. Hydrocarb. Process. 1975, 54, 153–158. [Google Scholar]
  32. Riazi, M.R.; Daubert, T.E. Predicting flash and pour points. Hydrocarb. Process. 1987, 66, 81–83. [Google Scholar]
  33. Diaz, R.M.; Bernardo, M.I.; Fernandez, A.M.; Folgueras, M.B. Prediction of the viscosity of lubricating oil blends at any temperature. Fuel 1996, 75, 574–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Singh, H.; Gulati, I.B. Influence of base oil refining on the performance of viscosity index improvers. Wear 1987, 118, 33–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Riazi, M.R.; Roomi, Y.A. Use of the refractive index in the estimation of thermophysical properties of hydrocarbons and petroleum mixtures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 1975–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Forsthoffer, W.E. Lube, seal and control oil system best practices. In Forsthoffer’s Best Practice Handbook for Rotating Machinery, 1st ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2011; pp. 347–468. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kishore Nadkarni, R.A. Water and Sediment in Crude Oil. In Guide to ASTM Test Methods for the Analysis of Petroleum Products and Lubricants, 2nd ed.; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kishore Nadkarni, R.A. Ramsbottom Carbon Residue. In Guide to ASTM Test Methods for the Analysis of Petroleum Products and Lubricants, 2nd ed.; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  39. Fox, M.F.; Pawlak, Z.; Picken, D.J. Acid-base determination of lubricating oils. Tribol. Int. 1991, 24, 335–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kauffman, R.E. Rapid, portable voltammetric techniques for performing antioxidant, total acid number (tan) and total base number (tan) measurements. Lubr. Eng. 1998, 54, 39–46. [Google Scholar]
  41. Abou El Naga, H.H.; Salem, A.E.M. Effect of worn metals on the oxidation of lubricating oils. Wear 1984, 96, 267–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Aucelio, R.Q.; de Souza, R.M.; de Campos, R.C.; Miekeley, N.; Da Silva, C.L.P. The determination of trace metals in lubricating oils by atomic spectrometry. Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc. 2007, 62, 952–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Alder, J.F.; West, T.S. Atomic absorption and fluorescence spectrophotometry with a carbon filament atom reservoir: Part IX—The direct determination of silver and copper in lubricating oils. Anal. Chim. Acta 1972, 58, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hopp, H.U.; Erdoel Kohle, E. Atomic absorption spectrophotometric determination of zinc, calcium, barium and magnesium in mineral oil products. Petrochem. Brennst-Chem. 1974, 27, 435–442. [Google Scholar]
  45. Kahn, H.L.; Peterson, G.E.; Manning, D.C. Determination of Iron and chromium in used lubricating oils. At. Absorpt. Newsl. 1970, 9, 79–80. [Google Scholar]
  46. Schallis, J.E.; Kahn, H.L. Determination of tin in lubricating oils with a nitrous oxide-acetylene flame. At. Absorpt. Newsl. 1968, 7, 84. [Google Scholar]
  47. Bertrand, P.A.; Bauer, R.; Fleischauer, P.D. Determination of lead in lubricating oils by isotopic dilution secondary ion mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 1980, 52, 12–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kiss, R.H.; Bartels, T.T. Improved atomic absorption techniques for measuring iron particles in lubricating oil. At. Absorpt. Newsl. 1970, 9, 78. [Google Scholar]
  49. Peterson, G.E.; Kahn, H.L. The determination of barium, calcium and zinc in additives and lubricating oils using atomic absorption spectrophotometry. At. Absorpt. Newsl. 1970, 9, 71. [Google Scholar]
  50. Lukasiewicz, R.J.; Buell, B.E. Direct determination of manganese in gasoline by atomic absorption spectrometry in the nitrous oxide-hydrogen flame. Appl. Spectrosc. 1977, 31, 541–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Robbins, W.K.; Walker, H.H. Analysis of petroleum for trace metals. Determination of trace quantities of cadmium in petroleum by atomic absorption spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 1975, 47, 1269–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yusaf, T.; Yusaf, B.F.; Elawad, M.M. Crude palm oil fuel for diesel-engines: Experimental and ANN simulation approaches. Energy 2011, 36, 4871–4878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Owrang, F.; Mattsson, H.; Olsson, J.; Pedersen, J. Investigation of oxidation of a mineral and a synthetic engine oil. Thermochim. Acta 2004, 413, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Maduako, A.U.C.; Ofunner, G.C.; Ojinnaka, C.M. The role of metals in the oxidative degradation of automotive crankcase oils. Tribol. Int. 1996, 29, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Von Fuchs, G.H.; Diamond, H. Oxidation characteristics of lubricating oils. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1942, 34, 927–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hamawand, I.; Yusaf, T.; Rafat, S. Recycling of Waste Engine Oils Using a New Washing Agent. Energies 2013, 6, 1023-1049. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en6021023

AMA Style

Hamawand I, Yusaf T, Rafat S. Recycling of Waste Engine Oils Using a New Washing Agent. Energies. 2013; 6(2):1023-1049. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en6021023

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hamawand, Ihsan, Talal Yusaf, and Sardasht Rafat. 2013. "Recycling of Waste Engine Oils Using a New Washing Agent" Energies 6, no. 2: 1023-1049. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en6021023

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop